AGCO CORPORATION
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended June 30, 2007
of
AGCO CORPORATION
A Delaware Corporation
IRS Employer Identification No. 58-1960019
SEC File Number 1-12930
4205 River Green Parkway
Duluth, GA 30096
(770) 813-9200
AGCO Corporation (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
As of July 31, 2007, AGCO Corporation had 91,551,809 shares of common stock outstanding.
AGCO Corporation is a large accelerated filer.
AGCO Corporation is a well-known seasoned issuer and is not a shell company.
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited and in millions, except shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
229.8 |
|
|
$ |
401.1 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
727.7 |
|
|
|
677.1 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,248.5 |
|
|
|
1,064.9 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
128.2 |
|
|
|
129.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,361.8 |
|
|
|
2,309.0 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
663.4 |
|
|
|
643.9 |
|
Investment in affiliates |
|
|
200.7 |
|
|
|
191.6 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
108.0 |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
205.0 |
|
|
|
207.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
617.8 |
|
|
|
592.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,234.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,114.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
Convertible senior subordinated notes |
|
|
201.3 |
|
|
|
201.3 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
722.9 |
|
|
|
706.9 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
646.6 |
|
|
|
629.7 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
79.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,629.7 |
|
|
|
1,623.6 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
477.2 |
|
|
|
577.4 |
|
Pensions and postretirement health care benefits |
|
|
270.4 |
|
|
|
268.1 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
133.6 |
|
|
|
114.9 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,556.9 |
|
|
|
2,620.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding in 2007 and 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized,
91,551,809 and 91,177,903 shares issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
919.7 |
|
|
|
908.9 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
862.4 |
|
|
|
774.1 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(105.4 |
) |
|
|
(190.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,677.6 |
|
|
|
1,493.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,234.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,114.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited and in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,711.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,450.5 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
1,414.4 |
|
|
|
1,199.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
297.0 |
|
|
|
251.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
144.4 |
|
|
|
132.5 |
|
Engineering expenses |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Restructuring and other infrequent expenses |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
82.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
93.6 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
95.9 |
|
|
|
91.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited and in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,044.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,620.3 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
2,527.6 |
|
|
|
2,162.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
516.4 |
|
|
|
457.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
|
259.1 |
|
Engineering expenses |
|
|
69.7 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
Restructuring and other infrequent expenses |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
156.2 |
|
|
|
126.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
123.9 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
|
$ |
58.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
90.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
91.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited and in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
|
$ |
58.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
53.7 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
Deferred debt issuance cost amortization |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliates, net of cash received |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
23.0 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
(153.1 |
) |
|
|
(154.4 |
) |
Other current and noncurrent assets |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Other current and noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(115.4 |
) |
|
|
(68.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(48.9 |
) |
|
|
(47.8 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(48.4 |
) |
|
|
(49.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of debt obligations, net |
|
|
(110.3 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(103.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(171.3 |
) |
|
|
(54.0 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
401.1 |
|
|
|
220.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
229.8 |
|
|
$ |
166.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements of AGCO Corporation and its subsidiaries (the
Company or AGCO) included herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the opinion of management, the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a
normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position, results of
operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements
and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006. Certain reclassifications of previously reported financial information were made to
conform to the current presentation. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the results for the year.
Stock Compensation Plans
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. During the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded approximately $1.7 million and $3.6 million,
respectively, of stock compensation expense in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. During the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded approximately $1.9 million and $3.2
million, respectively, of stock compensation expense in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. The stock
compensation expense was recorded as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Incentive Plans
In 2006, the Company obtained stockholder approval for the 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (the
2006 Plan) under which up to 5,000,000 shares of AGCO common stock may be issued. The 2006 Plan
allows the Company, under the direction of the Board of Directors Compensation Committee, to make
grants of performance shares, stock appreciation rights, stock options and stock awards to
employees, officers and non-employee directors of the Company. The Companys Board of Directors
approved the grants of awards during 2006 effective under the employee and director stock incentive
plans described below.
Employee Plans
The 2006 Plan encompasses two stock incentive plans to Company executives and key managers.
The primary long-term incentive plan is a performance share plan that provides for awards of shares
of common stock based on achieving financial targets, such as targets for earnings per share and
return on invested capital, as determined by the Companys Board of Directors. The stock awards
are earned over a performance period, and the number of shares earned is determined based on the
cumulative or average results for the period, depending on the measurement. Performance periods
are consecutive and overlapping three-year cycles and performance targets are set at the beginning
of each cycle. In order to transition to the 2006 Plan, the Company established award targets in
2006 for both a one-year and two-year performance period in addition to the normal three-year
period. The plan provides for participants to earn from 33% to 200% of the target awards
depending on the actual performance achieved, with no shares earned if performance is below
the established minimum
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
target. Awards earned under the performance share plan will be paid in
shares of common stock at the end of each performance period. The compensation expense associated
with these awards is being amortized ratably over the vesting or performance period based on the
Companys projected assessment of the level of performance that will be achieved and earned. No
compensation expense was recorded associated with the Companys one-year performance period
transition plan during 2006, as no shares were earned as of December 31, 2006. During the first
quarter of 2007, the Company granted 507,500 awards under the 2006 Plan for the three-year
performance period commencing in 2007 and ending in 2009. Compensation expense recorded with
respect to these awards was based upon the stock price as of the grant date. During the second
quarter of 2007, the Company reversed approximately $0.7 million of previously recorded
compensation expense and ceased recording additional stock compensation expense associated with its
two-year performance period transition plan, as it is no longer probable that the target
performance levels will be earned. The weighted average grant-date fair value of performance
awards granted under the 2006 Plan during the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $37.38.
Performance award transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2007 were as follows and are
presented as if the Company were to achieve its target levels of performance under the plan:
|
|
|
|
|
Shares awarded but not earned at January 1 |
|
|
642,083 |
|
Shares awarded |
|
|
507,500 |
|
Shares forfeited or unearned |
|
|
(149,083 |
) |
Shares earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares awarded but not earned at June 30 |
|
|
1,000,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007, the total compensation cost related to unearned performance awards
not yet recognized, assuming minimum thresholds of performance are achieved, was approximately $7.7
million, and the weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized is
approximately two years.
In addition to the performance share plan, certain executives and key managers are eligible to
receive grants of stock settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs) or incentive stock options
depending on the participants country of employment. The SSARs provide a participant with the
right to receive the aggregate appreciation in stock price over the market price of the Companys
common stock at the date of grant, payable in shares of the Companys common stock. The
participant may exercise his or her SSAR at any time after the grant is vested but no later than
seven years after the date of grant. The SSARs vest ratably over a four-year period from the date
of grant. SSAR award grants made to certain executives and key managers under the 2006 Plan are
made with the base price equal to the price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
During the first quarter of 2007, the Company granted 224,500 SSAR awards. During the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded stock compensation expense of approximately
$0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The compensation expense associated with these awards
is being amortized ratably over the vesting period. The Company estimated the fair value of the
grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average grant-date fair value of
SSARs granted under the 2006 Plan and the weighted average assumptions under the Black-Scholes
option model were as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSARs weighted average grant date fair
value |
|
$ |
13.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average assumptions under
Black-Scholes option model: |
|
|
|
|
Expected life of awards (years) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
41.4 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
SSAR transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
SSARs outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
221,750 |
|
SSARs granted |
|
|
224,500 |
|
SSARs exercised |
|
|
(26,062 |
) |
SSARs canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
SSARs outstanding at June 30 |
|
|
413,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSAR price ranges per share: |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
$ |
37.38 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
23.80 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
23.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average SSAR exercise prices per share: |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
$ |
37.38 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
23.80 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
23.80 |
|
Outstanding at June 30 |
|
|
31.23 |
|
At June 30, 2007, the weighted average remaining contractual life of SSARs outstanding
was approximately six years and there were 24,625 SSARs currently exercisable with an exercise
price of $23.80 and an aggregate intrinsic value of $0.5 million. As of June 30, 2007, the total
compensation cost related to unvested SSARs not yet recognized was approximately $3.8 million and
the weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized is approximately three
years.
The following table sets forth the exercise price range, number of shares, weighted average
exercise price, and remaining contractual lives by groups of similar price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSARs Outstanding |
|
SSARs Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Exercisable |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
as of |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
Exercise |
|
June 30, |
|
Exercise |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Number of Shares |
|
(Years) |
|
Price |
|
2007 |
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
$23.80 $26.00
|
|
|
188,688 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
23.90 |
|
|
|
24,625 |
|
|
$ |
23.80 |
|
$37.38
|
|
|
224,500 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
37.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of SSARs exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2007
was $0.5 million and the total fair value of shares vested during the same period was $0.4 million.
The Company did not realize a tax benefit from the exercise of these SSARs. There were 388,563
SSARs that were not vested as of June 30, 2007. The total intrinsic value of outstanding SSARs as
of June 30, 2007 was approximately $5.0 million.
Director Restricted Stock Grants
The 2006 Plan provides $25,000 in annual restricted stock grants to all non-employee directors
effective on the first day of each calendar year. The shares are restricted as to transferability
for a period of three years, but are not subject to forfeiture. In the event a director departs
from the Board of Directors, the non-transferability period would expire immediately. The plan
allows for the director to have the option of forfeiting a portion of the shares awarded in lieu of
a cash payment contributed to the participants tax withholding to satisfy the participants
statutory minimum federal, state and employment taxes which would be payable at the time of grant.
The January 1, 2006 grant equated to 11,550 shares of common stock, of which 8,832 shares of common
stock were issued, after shares were withheld for withholding taxes. The Company recorded stock
compensation expense of approximately $0.3 million during the second quarter of 2006 associated
with these grants. The January 1, 2007 grant equated to 8,080 shares of common stock, of which
6,346 shares of common stock were issued, after shares were withheld for withholding taxes. The
Company recorded stock compensation expense of approximately $0.3 million during the first quarter
of 2007 associated with these grants.
As of June 30, 2007, of the 5,000,000 shares reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan,
2,544,571 shares
7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
were available for grant, assuming the maximum number of shares are earned related
to the performance award grants discussed above.
Stock Option Plan
The Companys Option Plan provides for the granting of nonqualified and incentive stock
options to officers, employees, directors and others. The stock option exercise price is
determined by the Companys Board of Directors except in the case of an incentive stock option for
which the purchase price shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value at the date of grant.
Each recipient of stock options is entitled to immediately exercise up to 20% of the options
issued to such person, and the remaining 80% of such options vest ratably over a four-year period
and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant.
There were no grants under the Companys Option Plan during the six months ended June 30,
2007. The Company does not intend to make any grants under the Option Plan in the future. Stock
option transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
511,170 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(357,910 |
) |
Options canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(10,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at June 30 |
|
|
142,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options available for grant at June 30 |
|
|
1,930,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option price ranges per share: |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
$ |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
8.50-31.25 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
15.12-31.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average option exercise prices per share: |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
$ |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
20.66 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
16.97 |
|
Outstanding at June 30 |
|
|
14.10 |
|
At June 30, 2007, the outstanding options had a weighted average remaining contractual
life of approximately four years and there were 140,300 options currently exercisable with option
prices ranging from $9.10 to $22.31 with a weighted average exercise price of $14.00 and an
aggregate intrinsic value of $4.1 million. The total intrinsic value of outstanding options as of
June 30, 2007 was approximately $4.2 million.
The following table sets forth the exercise price range, number of shares, weighted average
exercise price, and remaining contractual lives by groups of similar price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Exercisable |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
as of |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
Exercise |
|
June 30, |
|
Exercise |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Number of Shares |
|
(Years) |
|
Price |
|
2007 |
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
$9.10 $11.88
|
|
|
69,500 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
11.12 |
|
|
|
69,500 |
|
|
$ |
11.12 |
|
$15.12 $22.31
|
|
|
72,800 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
16.93 |
|
|
|
70,800 |
|
|
$ |
16.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2007
was $6.2 million and the total fair value of shares vested during the same period was less than
$0.1 million. There were 2,000 stock options that were not vested as of June 30, 2007. Cash
received from stock option exercises was approximately $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
Company did not realize a tax benefit from the exercise of these options.
8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
Former Non-employee Director Stock Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan
In December 2005, the Companys Board of Directors elected to terminate the Companys
Long-Term Incentive Plan and its Non-employee Director Incentive Plan, and the outstanding awards
under those plans were cancelled. Awards cancelled prior to December 31, 2005 did not result in
any compensation expense under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. However, awards cancelled after January 1, 2006 were
subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, and, therefore, the Company recorded approximately $1.3
million of stock compensation expense during the first quarter of 2006 associated with those
cancellations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value
and to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of financial
statements to understand more easily the effect on earnings of a companys choice to use fair
value. It also requires companies to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for
which a company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. The Company is
required to adopt SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008 and is currently evaluating the impact, if any,
of SFAS No. 159 on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to guidance regarding
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing
the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations for its
2008 fiscal year.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position AUG AIR-1 Accounting for Planned Major
Maintenance Activities (FSP AUG AIR-1). FSP AUG AIR-1 amends the guidance on the accounting for
planned major maintenance activities; specifically it precludes the use of the previously
acceptable accrue in advance method. FSP AUG AIR-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations, as the Company does not employ
the accrue in advance method.
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No.
06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements (EITF 06-4), which requires the application of the
provisions of SFAS No. 106 Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
(SFAS No. 106), to endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements. SFAS No. 106 would
require the Company to recognize a liability for the discounted future benefit obligation that the
Company will have to pay upon the death of the underlying insured employee. An endorsement-type
arrangement generally exists when the Company owns and controls all incidents of ownership of the
underlying policies. EITF 06-4 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The
Company may have certain insurance policies subject to the provisions of this new pronouncement,
but does not believe the adoption of EITF 06-4 will have a material impact on its consolidated
results of operations or financial position during its 2008 fiscal year.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, and disclosure. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated results of operations or financial position. See Note 8 where the adoption
of FIN 48 is discussed.
9
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS No. 156). SFAS No. 156 requires an entity to
recognize a servicing asset or liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a
financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in specified situations. Such servicing
assets or liabilities would be initially measured at fair value, if practicable, and subsequently
measured at amortized value or fair value based upon an election of the reporting entity. SFAS No.
156 also specifies certain financial statement presentations and disclosures in connection with
servicing assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
September 15, 2006 and may be adopted earlier but only if the adoption is in the first quarter of
the fiscal year. The adoption of SFAS No. 156 did not have a material effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position.
In March 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-3, How Taxes Collected from
Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement
(that is, Gross versus Net Presentation) (EITF 06-3), which allows companies to adopt a policy
of presenting taxes in the income statement on either a gross or net basis. Taxes within the scope
of EITF 06-3 would include taxes that are imposed on a revenue transaction between a seller and a
customer; for example, sales taxes, use taxes, value-added taxes, and some types of excise taxes.
EITF 06-3 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006.
The adoption of EITF 06-3 did not impact the method for recording and reporting these taxes in the
Companys consolidated results of operations or financial position, as the Companys policy is to
exclude all such taxes from net sales and present such taxes in the consolidated statements of
operations on a net basis.
2. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER INFREQUENT EXPENSES
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company announced the closure of its Valtra sales
office located in France. The closure will result in the termination of approximately 13
employees. The Company recorded severance costs of approximately $0.2 million associated with the
closure during the second quarter of 2007. None of the severance costs had been paid as of June
30, 2007 and none of the employees had been terminated. The severance costs and related
terminations are expected to be paid and completed during 2008.
During the third quarter of 2006, the Company announced the closure of two sales offices
located in Germany, including a Valtra sales office. The closures will result in the termination
of approximately 13 employees. The Company recorded severance costs of approximately $0.5 million
associated with the closures during 2006. During the second quarter of 2007, the Company recorded
and paid employee relocation costs associated with the rationalizations of approximately $0.1
million. Approximately $0.2 million of the severance costs accrued had been paid as of June 30,
2007 and four of the employees had been terminated. The $0.3 million of severance costs accrued at
June 30, 2007 are expected to be paid during 2007.
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company announced that it was changing its distribution
arrangements for its Valtra and Fendt products in Scandinavia by entering into a distribution
agreement with a third-party distributor to distribute Valtra and Fendt equipment in Sweden and
Valtra equipment in Norway and Denmark. As a result of this agreement and the decision to close
other Valtra European sales offices, the Company initiated the restructuring and closure of its
Valtra sales offices located in the United Kingdom, Spain, Denmark and Norway, resulting in the
termination of approximately 24 employees. The Danish and Norwegian sales offices were transferred
to the third-party Scandinavian equipment distributor in October 2005, which included the transfer
of certain employees, assets and lease and supplier contracts. The Company recorded severance
costs, asset write-downs and other facility closure costs of approximately $0.4 million, $0.1
million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to these closures during 2005. During the fourth quarter
of 2005, the Company completed the sale of property, plant and equipment associated with the sales
offices in the United Kingdom and Norway and recorded a gain of approximately $0.2 million, which
was reflected within Restructuring and other infrequent expenses within the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company recorded an
additional $0.1 million of severance costs related to these closures. As of December 31, 2006, all
of the employees had been terminated and all severance and other facility closure costs had been
paid.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company initiated the restructuring of certain
administrative functions within its Finnish tractor manufacturing operations, resulting in the
termination of approximately 58
10
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
employees. During 2004, the Company recorded severance costs of approximately $1.4 million
associated with this rationalization. During 2005, the Company paid approximately $0.8 million of
severance costs. As of March 31, 2006, all of the 58 employees had been terminated. The $0.6
million of severance payments accrued at June 30, 2007 are expected to be paid through 2009.
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Changes in the carrying amount of acquired intangible assets during the six months ended June
30, 2007 are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Customer |
|
|
Patents and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames |
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross carrying amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
89.6 |
|
|
$ |
50.1 |
|
|
$ |
172.6 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
95.6 |
|
|
$ |
51.3 |
|
|
$ |
179.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Customer |
|
|
Patents and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames |
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Total |
|
Accumulated amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
|
$ |
56.8 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
|
$ |
26.5 |
|
|
$ |
67.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
Tradenames |
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
92.1 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
93.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2007 are
summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
South |
|
|
Europe/Africa/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
America |
|
|
Middle East |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Balance as of December 31,
2006 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
146.4 |
|
|
$ |
442.6 |
|
|
$ |
592.1 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
162.2 |
|
|
$ |
452.5 |
|
|
$ |
617.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, establishes a method of testing
goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis or on an
interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of a
reporting unit below its carrying value. The Companys annual assessments involve determining an
estimate of the fair value of the Companys reporting units in order to evaluate whether an
impairment of the current carrying amount of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets
exists. Fair values are derived based on an evaluation of past and expected future performance of
the Companys reporting units. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an
operating segment (e.g., a component). A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if
the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and the
Companys executive management team regularly reviews the operating results of that component. In
addition, the Company combines and aggregates two or more components of an operating segment as a
single reporting unit if the components have similar economic characteristics. The Companys
reportable segments reported under the guidance of SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, are not
11
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
its reporting units, with the exception of its Asia/Pacific geographical segment.
The Company utilized a combination of valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow
approach and a market multiple approach, when making its annual and interim assessments. As stated
above, goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and more often if indications of
impairment exist. The Company conducts its annual impairment analyses as of October 1 each fiscal
year.
The Company amortizes certain acquired intangible assets primarily on a straight-line basis
over their estimated useful lives, which range from three to 30 years.
4. INDEBTEDNESS
Indebtedness consisted of the following at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
111.4 |
|
67/8% Senior subordinated notes due 2014 |
|
|
270.8 |
|
|
|
264.0 |
|
13/4% Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2033 |
|
|
201.3 |
|
|
|
201.3 |
|
11/4% Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2036 |
|
|
201.3 |
|
|
|
201.3 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680.1 |
|
|
|
785.0 |
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
13/4% Convertible senior subordinated
notes due 2033 |
|
|
(201.3 |
) |
|
|
(201.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness, less current portion |
|
$ |
477.2 |
|
|
$ |
577.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. INVENTORIES
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method.
Market is net realizable value for finished goods and repair and replacement parts. For work in
process, production parts and raw materials, market is replacement cost. Cash flows related to the
sale of inventories are reported within Cash flows from operating activities within the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Inventories at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
564.2 |
|
|
$ |
468.7 |
|
Repair and replacement parts |
|
|
347.0 |
|
|
|
331.9 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
86.9 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
250.4 |
|
|
|
204.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
1,248.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,064.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
6. PRODUCT WARRANTY
The warranty reserve activity for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 consisted of
the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
141.2 |
|
|
$ |
124.7 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period |
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
147.3 |
|
|
$ |
128.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The warranty reserve activity for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 consisted
of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
136.9 |
|
|
$ |
122.8 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period |
|
|
(58.2 |
) |
|
|
(57.0 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
147.3 |
|
|
$ |
128.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys agricultural equipment products are generally warranted against defects in
material and workmanship for a period of one to four years. The Company accrues for future
warranty costs at the time of sale based on historical warranty experience.
7. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
The computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share are presented
in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed
by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each
period. Diluted earnings per common share assumes exercise of outstanding stock options and
vesting of restricted stock when the effects of such assumptions are dilutive.
The Companys $201.3 million aggregate principal amount of 13/4% convertible senior subordinated
notes and its $201.3 million aggregate principal amount of 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes
provide for (i) the settlement upon conversion in cash up to the principal amount of the converted
notes with any excess conversion value settled in shares of the Companys common stock, and (ii)
the conversion rate to be increased under certain circumstances if the new notes are converted in
connection with certain change of control transactions. Dilution of weighted shares outstanding
will depend on the Companys stock price for the excess conversion value using the treasury stock
method. A reconciliation of net income and weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes
of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 is as follows:
13
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
|
$ |
58.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
number of common
shares outstanding |
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
90.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
|
$ |
58.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
number of common
shares outstanding |
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
90.6 |
|
Dilutive stock options
and restricted stock
awards |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Weighted average
assumed conversion of
contingently
convertible senior
subordinated notes |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
number of common and
common equivalent
shares outstanding for
purposes of computing
diluted earnings per
share |
|
|
95.9 |
|
|
|
91.6 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
91.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were SSARs to purchase 0.2 million shares for both the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007 that were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they
had an antidulitve impact. There were SSARs and options to purchase 0.3 million and 0.5 million
shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, that were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share because the SSAR and option exercise prices
were higher than the average market price of the Companys common stock during the
related period.
8. INCOME TAXES
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the
implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no material adjustment with respect to liabilities
for unrecognized income tax benefits. As of the adoption date of January 1, 2007, the Company had
$12.9 million of unrecognized income tax benefits, all of which would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. As of June
30, 2007, the Company had approximately $2.8 million of current accrued taxes related to uncertain
income tax positions connected with ongoing income tax audits in various jurisdictions that it
expects to settle or pay in the next 12 months.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions in
income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, the Company had approximately $0.8 million of accrued
interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions.
The tax years 2001 through 2006 remain open to examination by taxing authorities in the United
States and other certain foreign taxing jurisdictions, primarily the
United Kingdom, France, Germany, Finland and Brazil.
9. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company applies the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities as amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and
Certain Hedging Activities An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. All derivatives are
recognized on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. On the date the derivative contract
is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as either (1) a fair value hedge of a
recognized liability, (2) a cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction, (3) a hedge of a net
investment in a foreign operation, or (4) a non-designated derivative instrument.
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items,
as well as the risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions.
The Company formally assesses, both at the hedges inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the
derivatives that are used in
14
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flow of
hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is no longer highly effective as a hedge,
hedge accounting is discontinued on a prospective basis.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company has significant manufacturing operations in the United States, France, Germany,
Finland, Brazil and Denmark, and it purchases a portion of its tractors, combines and components
from third-party foreign suppliers, primarily in various European countries and in Japan. The
Company also sells products in over 140 countries throughout the world. The Companys most
significant transactional foreign currency exposures are the Euro, Brazilian Real and the Canadian
dollar in relation to the United States dollar.
The Company attempts to manage its transactional foreign exchange exposure by hedging foreign
currency cash flow forecasts and commitments arising from the settlement of receivables and
payables and from future purchases and sales. Where naturally offsetting currency positions do not
occur, the Company hedges certain, but not all, of its exposures through the use of foreign
currency forward and option contracts. The Companys hedging policy prohibits foreign currency
forward contracts for speculative trading purposes.
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to economically hedge receivables and
payables on the Company and its subsidiaries balance sheets that are denominated in foreign
currencies other than the functional currency. These forward contracts are classified as
non-designated derivative instruments. Gains and losses on such contracts are historically
substantially offset by losses and gains on the remeasurement of the underlying asset or liability
being hedged. Changes in the fair value of non-designated derivative contracts are reported in
current earnings.
During 2006 and 2007, the Company designated certain foreign currency option contracts as cash
flow hedges of expected future sales. The effective portion of the fair value gains or losses on
these cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income, with the cumulative gain or loss
subsequently reclassified into net sales during the same period as the sales are recognized. These
amounts offset the effect of the changes in foreign exchange rates on the related sale
transactions. The amount of the gain recorded in other comprehensive loss that was reclassified to
net sales during the year ended December 31, 2006 was approximately $4.0 million on an after-tax
basis. The amount of the gain recorded to other comprehensive loss related to the outstanding cash
flow hedges as of June 30, 2007 was approximately $0.1 million. The outstanding contracts range in
maturity from July of 2007 through April of 2008.
The following table summarizes activity in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to
derivatives held by the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2007 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before-Tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
After-Tax |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Amount |
|
Accumulated derivative net gains as of December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Net changes in fair value of derivatives |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Net gains reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss into income |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated derivative net gains as of June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys senior management establishes the Companys foreign currency and interest
rate risk management policies. These policies are reviewed periodically by the Audit Committee of
the Companys Board of Directors. These policies allow for the use of derivative instruments to
hedge exposures to movements in foreign currency and interest rates. The Companys policies
prohibit the use of derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
15
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
10. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Total comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
|
$ |
58.2 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives held by affiliates |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
124.3 |
|
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
|
$ |
173.2 |
|
|
$ |
140.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECURITIZATION
At June 30, 2007, the Company had accounts receivable securitization facilities in the United
States, Canada and Europe totaling approximately $485.4 million. Under the securitization
facilities, wholesale accounts receivable are sold on a revolving basis to commercial paper
conduits either through a wholly-owned special purpose U.S. subsidiary or a qualifying special
purpose entity (QSPE) in the United Kingdom. The Company accounts for its securitization
facilities and its wholly-owned special purpose U.S. subsidiary in accordance with SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a
Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125 (SFAS No. 140), and FIN No. 46R, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities An Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46R). Due to the fact that
the receivables sold to the commercial paper conduits are an insignificant portion of the conduits total asset portfolios
and such receivables are not siloed, consolidation is not appropriate under FIN 46R, as the Company
does not absorb a majority of losses under such transactions. In Europe, the commercial paper
conduit that purchases a majority of the receivables is deemed to be the majority beneficial
interest holder of the QSPE, and thus consolidation by the Company is not appropriate under FIN
46R, as the Company does not absorb a majority of losses under such transactions. In addition,
these facilities are accounted for as off-balance sheet transactions in accordance with SFAS No.
140.
Outstanding funding under these facilities totaled approximately $435.4 million at June 30,
2007 and $429.6 million at December 31, 2006. The funded balance has the effect of reducing
accounts receivable and short-term liabilities by the same amount. Losses on sales of receivables
primarily from securitization facilities included in other expense, net were $10.2 million and $7.3
million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $16.8 million and
$13.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively . The losses
are determined by calculating the estimated present value of receivables sold compared to their
carrying amount. The present value is based on historical collection experience and a discount
rate representing the spread over LIBOR as prescribed under the terms of the agreements.
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company completed an agreement to permit transferring,
on an ongoing basis, the majority of its wholesale interest-bearing receivables in North America to
AGCO Finance LLC and AGCO Finance Canada, Ltd., its U.S. and Canadian retail finance joint
ventures. The Company has a 49% ownership interest in these joint ventures. The transfer of the
receivables is without recourse to the Company, and the Company continues to service the
receivables. As of June 30, 2007, the balance of interest-bearing receivables transferred to AGCO
Finance LLC and AGCO Finance Canada, Ltd. under this agreement was approximately $99.0 million
compared to approximately $124.1 million as of December 31, 2006.
12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees, principally in the
United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Finland, Norway, France, Australia and Argentina. The
Company also provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for certain
employees, principally in the United States, as well as a supplemental executive retirement plan,
which is an unfunded plan that provides Company executives with retirement income for a period of
ten years after retirement.
16
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
Net pension and postretirement cost for the plans for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006 are set forth below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Pension
benefits |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial
loss and prior service cost |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension cost |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
benefits |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement cost |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension and postretirement cost for the plans for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 are set forth below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Pension
benefits |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial
loss and prior service cost |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension cost |
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
benefits |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement cost |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, approximately $16.5 million of contributions
had been made to the Companys defined benefit pension plans. The Company currently estimates its
minimum contributions for 2007 to its defined benefit pension plans will aggregate approximately
$28.9 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company made approximately $1.0
million of contributions to its U.S.-based postretirement health care and life insurance benefit
plans. The Company currently estimates that it will make approximately $2.2 million of
contributions to its U.S.-based postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans during
2007.
13. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company has four reportable segments: North America; South America; Europe/Africa/Middle
East; and Asia/Pacific. Each regional segment distributes a full range of agricultural equipment
and related replacement parts. The Company evaluates segment performance primarily based on income
from operations. Sales for each regional segment are based on the location of the third-party
customer. The Companys selling, general and administrative expenses and engineering expenses are
charged to each segment based on the region and division where the expenses are incurred. As a
result, the components of income from operations for one segment may not be comparable to another
segment. Segment results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and assets as
of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are as follows (in millions):
17
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
North |
|
South |
|
Europe/Africa/ |
|
Asia/ |
|
|
June 30, |
|
America |
|
America |
|
Middle East |
|
Pacific |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
342.1 |
|
|
$ |
257.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,073.1 |
|
|
$ |
38.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,711.4 |
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
129.6 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
343.2 |
|
|
$ |
160.6 |
|
|
$ |
911.0 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,450.5 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
101.1 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
North |
|
South |
|
Europe/Africa/ |
|
Asia/ |
|
|
June 30, |
|
America |
|
America |
|
Middle East |
|
Pacific |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
668.9 |
|
|
$ |
447.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,853.2 |
|
|
$ |
74.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,044.0 |
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
159.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
192.2 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
664.0 |
|
|
$ |
301.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,586.2 |
|
|
$ |
68.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,620.3 |
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
137.6 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
161.9 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
635.4 |
|
|
$ |
442.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,474.3 |
|
|
$ |
82.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,634.4 |
|
As of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
678.4 |
|
|
|
342.2 |
|
|
|
1,283.7 |
|
|
|
79.5 |
|
|
|
2,383.8 |
|
A reconciliation from the segment information to the consolidated balances for income
from operations and total assets is set forth below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Segment income from operations |
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
$ |
101.1 |
|
|
$ |
192.2 |
|
|
$ |
161.9 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Restructuring and other infrequent
income (expenses) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income from operations |
|
$ |
110.6 |
|
|
$ |
82.6 |
|
|
$ |
156.2 |
|
|
$ |
126.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Segment assets |
|
$ |
2,634.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,383.8 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
229.8 |
|
|
|
401.1 |
|
Receivables from affiliates |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
200.7 |
|
|
|
191.6 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
135.6 |
|
|
|
142.3 |
|
Other current and noncurrent assets |
|
|
206.0 |
|
|
|
193.6 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
205.0 |
|
|
|
207.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
617.8 |
|
|
|
592.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
$ |
4,234.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,114.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As a result of Brazilian tax legislative changes impacting value added taxes (VAT), the
Company has recorded a reserve of approximately $18.0 million and $20.0 million against its
outstanding balance of Brazilian VAT taxes receivable as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively, due to the uncertainty of the Companys ability to collect the amounts outstanding.
The Company is a party to various legal claims and actions incidental to its business. The
Company believes that none of these claims or actions, either individually or in the aggregate, is
material to its business or financial condition.
As disclosed in Item 3 of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, in
February 2006, the Company received a subpoena from the SEC in connection with a non-public,
fact-finding inquiry entitled In the Matter of Certain Participants in the Oil for Food Program.
This subpoena requested documents concerning transactions in Iraq under the United Nations Oil for
Food Program by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. Subsequently the Company was
contacted by the Department of Justice (the DOJ) regarding the same transactions, although no
subpoena or other formal process has been initiated by the DOJ. Similar inquiries have been
initiated by the Danish and French governments regarding two of the Companys subsidiaries. The
inquiries arose from sales of approximately $58.0 million in farm equipment to the Iraq ministry of
agriculture between 2000 and 2002. The SECs staff has asserted that certain aspects of those
transactions were not properly recorded in the Companys books and records. The Company is
cooperating fully in these inquiries. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these inquiries
or their impact, if any, on the Company, although if the outcomes were adverse the Company could be
required to pay fines and make other payments as well as take appropriate remedial actions.
19
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
GENERAL
Our operations are subject to the cyclical nature of the agricultural industry. Sales of our
equipment have been and are expected to continue to be affected by changes in net cash farm income,
farm land values, weather conditions, demand for agricultural commodities, commodity prices and
general economic conditions. We record sales when we sell equipment and replacement parts to our
independent dealers, distributors or other customers. To the extent possible, we attempt to sell
products to our dealers and distributors on a level basis throughout the year to reduce the effect
of seasonal demands on manufacturing operations and to minimize our investment in inventory.
Retail sales by dealers to farmers are highly seasonal and are a function of the timing of the
planting and harvesting seasons. As a result, our net sales have historically been the lowest in
the first quarter and have increased in subsequent quarters.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended June 30, 2007, we generated net income of $63.8 million, or $0.67
per share, compared to net income of $40.9 million, or $0.45 per share, for the same period in
2006. For the first six months of 2007, we generated net income of $88.3 million, or $0.93 per
share, compared to net income of $58.2 million, or $0.64 per share, for the same period in 2006.
Net sales during the second quarter and first six months of 2007 were $1,711.4 million and
$3,044.0 million, respectively, which were approximately 18% and 16% higher than the second quarter
and first six months of 2006, respectively, primarily due to sales growth in South America and
Europe as well as the impact of currency translation.
Second quarter income from operations was $110.6 million in 2007 compared to $82.6 million in
the second quarter of 2006. Income from operations was $156.2 million for the first six months of
2007 compared to $126.5 million for the same period in 2006. The increase in income from
operations was primarily due to the increase in net sales, as well as the result of improved
operating margins.
Income from operations increased in our Europe/Africa/Middle East region in the second quarter
and first six months of 2007 primarily due to improved sales, currency translation and cost
reduction initiatives. In the South America region, income from operations increased in the second
quarter and first six months of 2007 due to increased sales volumes resulting from stronger market
conditions, primarily in the major market of Brazil. The higher sales volumes combined with ongoing
process improvements resulted in improved operating margins in the region for the second quarter
and first six months of 2007 compared to 2006. Income from operations in North America was lower
in the second quarter and first six months of 2007 primarily due to negative currency impacts on
products sourced from Brazil and Europe, as well as higher engineering expenses. Income from
operations in our Asia/Pacific region was lower in the second quarter and first six months of 2007
where drought conditions in Australia have impacted demand for higher margin products such as
combines and high horsepower tractors.
Retail Sales
In North America, industry unit retail sales of tractors for the first six months of 2007
increased approximately 1% compared to the first six months of 2006 resulting from increases in the
utility and high horsepower tractor segments largely offset by a decrease in the compact tractor
segment. Industry unit retail sales of combines for the first six months of 2007 were
approximately 6% higher than the prior year period. Higher commodity prices and improving farmer
sentiment in North America contributed to continued improvement in retail demand in the first six
months of 2007. Our unit retail sales of tractors and combines were lower in the first six months
of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
20
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
(Continued)
In Europe, industry unit retail sales of tractors for the first six months of 2007 increased
approximately 3% compared to the prior year period. Retail demand improved in Central and Eastern
Europe, the United Kingdom, Scandinavia and France, but declined in Germany, Italy and Spain.
Industry retail sales are benefiting from higher farm income in 2006 and continued strong growth in
Eastern and Central Europe. Our unit retail sales were also higher in the first six months of 2007
compared to the same period in 2006.
South American industry unit retail sales of tractors in the first six months of 2007
increased approximately 35% over the prior year period. Industry unit retail sales of combines for
the first six months of 2007 were approximately 44% higher than the prior year period. Retail
sales of tractors and combines in the major market of Brazil increased approximately 43% and 98%,
respectively, during the first six months of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. The sugar
cane sector remains strong in Brazil and improved commodity prices have resulted in increased
industry demand. Our South American unit retail sales of tractors and combines were also higher in
the first six months of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
Outside of North America, Europe and South America, net sales for the first six months of 2007
were relatively flat compared to the prior year period due to higher sales in Africa and Asia,
offset by lower sales in Australia and the Middle East.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Net sales for the second quarter of 2007 were $1,711.4 million compared to $1,450.5 million
for the same period in 2006. Net sales for the first six months of 2007 were $3,044.0 million
compared to $2,620.3 million for the prior year period. For the first six months of 2007, net
sales increased in all four of AGCOs geographical segments, with a significant percentage increase
in South America, where improved market conditions in Brazil led to higher sales. Foreign currency
translation positively impacted net sales by approximately $98.3 million, or 6.8%, in the second
quarter of 2007 and by $173.9 million, or 6.6%, in the first six months of 2007. The following
table sets forth, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the impact to net
sales of currency translation by geographical segment (in millions, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change due to currency |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
translation |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
342.1 |
|
|
$ |
343.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
South America |
|
|
257.8 |
|
|
|
160.6 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Europe/Africa/Middle
East |
|
|
1,073.1 |
|
|
|
911.0 |
|
|
|
162.1 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,711.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,450.5 |
|
|
$ |
260.9 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
$ |
98.3 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change due to currency |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
translation |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
668.9 |
|
|
$ |
664.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
South America |
|
|
447.1 |
|
|
|
301.8 |
|
|
|
145.3 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
% |
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
Europe/Africa/Middle
East |
|
|
1,853.2 |
|
|
|
1,586.2 |
|
|
|
267.0 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,044.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,620.3 |
|
|
$ |
423.7 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
$ |
173.9 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Continued)
Regionally, net sales in North America decreased during the second quarter of 2007 and
increased slightly during the first six months of 2007. Retail inventory reduction efforts in
North America continued to lower our dealer shipments during the second quarter of 2007. In the
Europe/Africa/Middle East region, net sales increased in the second quarter and first six months of
2007 primarily due to sales growth in Eastern Europe, France and Finland. Net sales in South
America increased significantly during the second quarter and first six months of 2007 primarily as
a result of stronger market conditions in the region, predominantly in Brazil. In the
Asia/Pacific region, net sales decreased slightly in the second quarter of 2007 and were relatively
flat in the first six months of 2007 compared to the same periods in 2006 due to sales growth in
Asia, partially offset by weaker market conditions and lower sales in Australia due to continued
drought conditions. We estimate that consolidated price increases during the second quarter and the
first six months of 2007 contributed approximately 2% to the increase in sales in both periods.
Consolidated net sales of tractors and combines, which comprised approximately 72% and 70% of our
net sales in the second quarter and first six months of 2007, respectively, increased approximately
21% and 19% in the second quarter and first six months of 2007, respectively, compared to the same
periods in 2006. Unit sales of tractors and combines increased approximately 9% during both the
second quarter and first six months of 2007 compared to the same periods in 2006. The difference
between the unit sales increase and the increase in net sales was primarily the result of foreign
currency translation, pricing and sales mix changes.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage relationship to net
sales of certain items in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in millions, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
297.0 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
$ |
251.3 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
144.4 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
132.5 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
Engineering expenses |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Restructuring and other infrequent expenses |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
110.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
$ |
82.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net sales(1) |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
516.4 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
$ |
457.6 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
259.1 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
Engineering expenses |
|
|
69.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Restructuring and other infrequent expenses |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
156.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
$ |
126.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rounding may impact summation of percentages. |
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased slightly during the second quarter of
2007 and decreased during the first six months of 2007 compared to the prior year, primarily due to
sales and brand mix as well as currency impacts. Lower margins in North America were primarily a
result of negative currency impacts on products sourced from Brazil and Europe. In addition, our
year-to-date margins were impacted by a weaker sales mix in our Europe/Africa/Middle East region
during the first quarter of 2007, as a result of the phasing and controlled roll-out of a new high
horsepower tractor series as well as a result of supplier constraints experienced at our German manufacturing
facility. During the second quarter of 2007, production at our German manufacturing facility
returned to more normal levels, resulting in an improved sales mix and margins in the
22
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Continued)
region. The supplier constraints that limited our production and sales in the first
quarter improved in the second quarter but remain a concern for the balance of 2007. We are
working with our existing suppliers to prepare them for projected demand levels and we are also
qualifying new suppliers to mitigate future supply constraints. If additional supplier constraints
occur, they could negatively impact our future results. We recorded approximately $0.1 million of
stock compensation expense, within cost of goods sold, during the first six months of 2007, as is
more fully explained in Note 1 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased
during the second quarter and first six months of 2007 compared to the prior year primarily due to
higher sales and spending control initiatives. We recorded approximately $1.7 million and $3.5
million of stock compensation expense, within SG&A, during the second quarter and first six months
of 2007, as is more fully explained in Note 1 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Engineering expenses increased during the second quarter and first six months of 2007 compared to
the prior year, as a result of continued spending to fund product improvements and cost reduction
projects.
We recorded restructuring and other infrequent expenses of approximately $0.3 million during
the second quarter and first six months of 2007, primarily related to severance and employee
relocation costs associated with our rationalization of our Valtra sales office located in France,
as well as our rationalization of certain parts, sales and marketing and administration functions
in Germany. During the second quarter and first six months of 2006, we recorded restructuring and
other infrequent expenses of less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, primarily
related to severance costs associated with the rationalization of certain Valtra European sales
offices located in Denmark, Norway and the United Kingdom. See Note 2 to our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of restructuring activities.
Interest expense, net was $7.5 million and $14.2 million for the second quarter and first six
months of 2007, respectively, compared to $14.3 million and $27.9 million for the comparable
periods in 2006 due to the reduction in debt levels from 2006. In December 2006, we issued $201.3
million of 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes. The net proceeds received from the issuance
of the notes, as well as available cash on hand, were used to repay a portion of our outstanding
United States dollar and Euro denominated term loans, which bear a higher variable interest rate.
In June 2007, we repaid the remaining balances of our outstanding United States dollar and Euro
denominated term loans with available cash on hand.
Other expense, net was $9.5 million and $18.1 million during the second quarter and first six
months of 2007, respectively, compared to $10.3 million and $16.8 million for the same periods in
2006. Losses on sales of receivables, primarily under our securitization facilities, were $10.2
million and $16.8 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2007, respectively,
compared to $7.3 million and $13.8 million for the same periods in 2006. The increase is primarily
due to higher interest rates in 2007 compared to 2006.
We recorded an income tax provision of $36.1 million and $48.9 million for the second quarter
and first six months of 2007, respectively, compared to $22.1 million and $34.7 million for the
comparable periods in 2006. The effective tax rate was 38.6% and 39.5% for the second quarter and
first six months of 2007, respectively, compared to 38.1% and 42.4% in the comparable prior year
periods. Our effective tax rate was negatively impacted in both periods by losses in the United
States, where we recorded no tax benefit.
RECENT PENDING JOINT VENTURE
On June 25, 2007, we announced that, subject to the approval of the competition authorities,
we have agreed to acquire 50% of Laverda S.p.A. from the Italian ARGO group for approximately 46.0
million (or approximately $62.0 million). Laverda is located in Breganze, Italy and manufactures
harvesting equipment. In addition to producing Laverda branded combines, the Breganze factory has
been manufacturing mid-range combine harvesters for AGCOs Massey Ferguson, Fendt and Challenger
brands for distribution in Europe, Africa and the Middle East since 2004. The joint venture also
includes Laverdas ownership in Fella-Werke
GMBH, a German manufacturer of grass and hay machinery, and its 50% stake in Gallignani
S.p.A., an Italian manufacturer of balers. The addition of the Fella and Gallignani product lines
enables us to provide a comprehensive harvesting offer to our customers. We intend to finance the
purchase price with available cash
23
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Continued)
on hand. The Laverda acquisition will be evaluated with respect to consolidation in our
results of operations and financial position in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our financing requirements are subject to variations due to seasonal changes in inventory and
receivable levels. Internally generated funds are supplemented when necessary from external
sources, primarily our revolving credit facility and accounts receivable securitization facilities.
Our current financing and funding sources, with balances outstanding as of June 30, 2007, are
our
200.0 million
(or approximately $270.8 million) principal amount 67/8% senior subordinated notes
due 2014, $201.3 million principal amount 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes due 2033,
$201.3 million principal amount 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes due 2036, approximately
$485.4 million of accounts receivable securitization facilities (with approximately $435.4 million
in outstanding funding as of June 30, 2007), and a $300.0 million multi-currency revolving credit
facility (with no amounts outstanding as of June 30, 2007). For a full description of all of our
outstanding notes and facilities refer to the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
On December 4, 2006, we issued $201.3 million of 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes due
2036 and received proceeds of approximately $196.4 million, after related fees and expenses. The
notes are unsecured obligations and are convertible into cash and shares of our common stock upon
satisfaction of certain conditions, as discussed below. The notes provide for (i) the settlement
upon conversion in cash up to the principal amount of the notes with any excess conversion value
settled in shares of our common stock, and (ii) the conversion rate to be increased under certain
circumstances if the notes are converted in connection with certain change of control transactions
occurring prior to December 15, 2013. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at
an effective price of $40.73 per share, subject to adjustment. Holders may convert the notes
only under the following circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter, if the closing sales price
of our common stock exceeds 120% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the 30
consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter; (2) during
the five business day period after a five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price
per note for each day of that period was less than 98% of the product of the closing sale price of
our common stock and the conversion rate; (3) if the notes have been called for redemption; or (4)
upon the occurrence of certain corporate transactions.
On June 29, 2005, we exchanged our $201.3 million of 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes
due 2033 for new notes which provide for (i) the settlement upon conversion in cash up to the
principal amount of the converted new notes with any excess conversion value settled in shares of
our common stock, and (ii) the conversion rate to be increased under certain circumstances if the
new notes are converted in connection with certain change of control transactions occurring prior
to December 10, 2010, but otherwise are substantially the same as the old notes. The notes are
unsecured obligations and are convertible into cash and shares of our common stock upon
satisfaction of certain conditions, as discussed below. The notes are convertible into shares of
our common stock at an effective price of $22.36 per share, subject to adjustment. Holders may
convert the notes only under the following circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter, if the
closing sales price of our common stock exceeds 120% of the conversion price for at least 20
trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding
fiscal quarter; (2) during the five business day period after a five consecutive trading day period
in which the trading price per note for each day of that period was less than 98% of the product of
the closing sale price of our common stock and the conversion rate; (3) if the notes have been
called for redemption; or (4) upon the occurrence of certain corporate transactions.
The 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes and the 11/4% convertible senior subordinated
notes will impact the diluted weighted average shares outstanding in future periods depending on
our stock price for the excess conversion value using the treasury stock method. On July 25, 2007,
the FASB directed its staff to prepare a proposed FASB Staff Position (FSP) that would require
the liability and equity components of
convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial
cash settlement) to be separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the issuers
nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The
24
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Continued)
proposed FSP would be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The guidance in
the proposed FSP would be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. If the FSP is approved
by the FASB, it is likely that the interest expense related to our convertible notes will increase
significantly.
As of December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2007, the closing sales price of our common stock had
exceeded 120% of the conversion price of $22.36 per share for at least 20 trading days in the 30
consecutive trading days ending December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2007, and, therefore, we classified
the 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes as a current liability. Future classification of the
notes between current and long-term debt is dependent on the closing sales price of our common
stock during future quarters. We believe it is unlikely the holders of the notes will convert the
notes under the provisions of the indenture, as typically convertible securities are not converted
prior to expiration unless called for redemption, thereby requiring us to repay the principal
portion in cash. In the event the notes were converted, we believe we could repay the notes with
available cash on hand, funds from our existing $300.0 million multi-currency revolving credit
facility, or a combination of these sources.
On January 5, 2004, we entered into a credit facility that provided for a $300.0 million
multi-currency revolving credit facility, a $300.0 million United States dollar denominated term
loan and a 120.0 million Euro denominated term loan. The maturity date of the revolving credit
facility is December 2008 and the maturity date for the term loan facility is June 2009. We were
required to make quarterly payments towards the United States dollar denominated term loan and Euro
denominated term loan of $0.75 million and 0.3 million, respectively (or an amortization of one
percent per annum until the maturity date of each term loan). On June 29, 2007, we repaid the
remaining balances of our outstanding United States dollar and Euro denominated term loans,
totaling $72.5 million and 28.6 million, respectively, with available cash on hand. As of June
30, 2007, we had no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility. As of June 30, 2007, we had
availability to borrow $291.1 million under the revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2006, we
had total borrowings of $419.4 million under the credit facility, which included $271.0 million
under the United States dollar denominated term loan facility, 108.3 million (approximately $138.5
million) under the Euro denominated term loan facility and $9.9 million outstanding under the
multi-currency revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2006, we had availability to borrow
$282.3 million under the revolving credit facility.
Under our securitization facilities, we sell accounts receivable in the United States, Canada
and Europe on a revolving basis to commercial paper conduits through a wholly-owned special purpose
U.S. subsidiary and a qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE) in the United Kingdom. The United
States and Canadian securitization facilities expire in April 2009 and the European facility
expires in October 2011, but each is subject to annual renewal. The European facility was renewed
in October 2006 and restructured so that wholesale receivables are sold through a QSPE. As of June
30, 2007, the aggregate amount of these facilities was $485.4 million. The outstanding funded
balance of $435.4 million as of June 30, 2007 has the effect of reducing accounts receivable and
short-term liabilities by the same amount. Our risk of loss under the securitization facilities is
limited to a portion of the unfunded balance of receivables sold, which is approximately 15% of the
funded amount. We maintain reserves for doubtful accounts associated with this risk. If the
facilities were terminated, we would not be required to repurchase previously sold receivables but
would be prevented from selling additional receivables to the commercial paper conduit.
These facilities allow us to sell accounts receivables through financing conduits which obtain
funding from commercial paper markets. Future funding under securitization facilities depends upon
the adequacy of receivables, a sufficient demand for the underlying commercial paper and the
maintenance of certain covenants concerning the quality of the receivables and our financial
condition. In the event commercial paper demand is not adequate, our securitization facilities
provide for liquidity backing from various financial institutions, including Coöperatieve Centrale
Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. These liquidity commitments would provide us with interim funding to
allow us to find alternative sources of working capital financing, if necessary.
In May 2005, we completed an agreement to permit transferring, on an ongoing basis, the
majority of our
wholesale interest-bearing receivables in North America to our United States and Canadian
retail finance joint ventures, AGCO Finance LLC and AGCO Finance Canada, Ltd. We have a 49%
ownership interest in these
25
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Continued)
joint ventures. The transfer of the wholesale interest-bearing receivables is without
recourse to AGCO and we will continue to service the receivables. As of June 30, 2007, the balance
of interest-bearing receivables transferred to AGCO Finance LLC and AGCO Finance Canada, Ltd. under
this agreement was approximately $99.0 million compared to approximately $124.1 million as of
December 31, 2006.
Our business is subject to substantial cyclical variations, which generally are difficult to
forecast. Our results of operations may also vary from time to time resulting from costs
associated with rationalization plans and acquisitions. As a result, we have had to request relief
from our lenders on occasion with respect to financial covenant compliance. While we do not
currently anticipate asking for any relief, it is possible that we would require relief in the
future. Based upon our historical working relationship with our lenders, we currently do not
anticipate any difficulty in obtaining that relief.
Cash flow used in operating activities was $27.1 million for the first six months of 2007
compared to $10.7 million for the first six months of 2006. The use of cash in both periods was
primarily due to seasonal increases in working capital.
Our working capital requirements are seasonal, with investments in working capital typically
building in the first half of the year and then reducing in the second half of the year. We had
$732.1 million in working capital at June 30, 2007, as compared with $685.4 million at December 31,
2006 and $954.0 million at June 30, 2006. Working capital balances as of June 30, 2007 and December
31, 2006 include the classification of the 13/4% convertible notes as current obligations. Accounts
receivable and inventories, combined, at June 30, 2007 were $234.2 million higher than at December
31, 2006 and $40.7 million higher than at June 30, 2006.
Capital expenditures for the first six months of 2007 were $48.9 million compared to $47.8
million for the first six months of 2006. We anticipate that capital expenditures for the full
year of 2007 will range from approximately $120 million to $130 million and will primarily be used
to support the development and enhancement of new and existing products.
Our debt to capitalization ratio, which is total long-term debt divided by the sum of total
long-term debt and stockholders equity, was 28.8% at June 30, 2007 compared to 34.5% at December
31, 2006.
From time to time we review and will continue to review acquisition and joint venture
opportunities, as well as changes in the capital markets. If we were to consummate a significant
acquisition or elect to take advantage of favorable opportunities in the capital markets, we may
supplement availability or revise the terms under our credit facilities or complete public or
private offerings of equity or debt securities.
We believe that available borrowings under the revolving credit facility, funding under the
accounts receivable securitization facilities, available cash and internally generated funds will
be sufficient to support our working capital, capital expenditures and debt service requirements
for the foreseeable future.
COMMITMENTS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Commitments
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. As a result
of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized no material adjustment with respect to liabilities
for unrecognized income tax benefits. As of the adoption date of January 1, 2007, we had $12.9
million of unrecognized income tax benefits. We recognize interest and penalties related to
uncertain income tax positions in income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, we had approximately
$0.8 million of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions. As of
June 30, 2007, we had approximately $2.8 million of current accrued taxes related to uncertain tax
positions connected with ongoing income tax audits in various jurisdictions that we expect to
settle or pay in the next 12 months. At this time, the settlement period for the noncurrent
portion
of our income tax liabilities cannot be determined; however it is not expected to be due
within the next 12 months. We will include our income tax liabilities in our Contractual
Obligations table in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
26
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Continued)
Guarantees
At June 30, 2007, we were obligated under certain circumstances to purchase, through the year
2010, up to $6.3 million of equipment upon expiration of certain operating leases between AGCO
Finance LLC and AGCO Finance Canada, Ltd., our retail finance joint ventures in North America, and
end users. We also maintain a remarketing agreement with these joint ventures whereby we are
obligated to repurchase repossessed inventory at market values, limited to $6.0 million in the
aggregate per calendar year. We believe that any losses, which might be incurred on the resale of
this equipment, will not materially impact our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
From time to time, we sell certain trade receivables under factoring arrangements to financial
institutions throughout the world. We evaluate the sale of such receivables pursuant to the
guidelines of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a Replacement of
FASB Statement No. 125, and have determined that these facilities should be accounted for as
off-balance sheet transactions in accordance with SFAS No. 140.
At June 30, 2007, we guaranteed indebtedness owed to third parties of approximately $93.4
million, primarily related to dealer and end-user financing of equipment. We believe the credit
risk associated with these guarantees is not material to our financial position.
Other
At June 30, 2007, we had foreign currency forward contracts to buy an aggregate of
approximately $305.5 million United States dollar equivalents and foreign currency forward
contracts to sell an aggregate of approximately $255.6 million United States dollar equivalents.
All contracts have a maturity of less than one year. See Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk Foreign Currency Risk Management for further
information.
Contingencies
As a result of Brazilian tax legislative changes impacting value added taxes (VAT), we have
recorded a reserve of approximately $18.0 million against our outstanding balance of Brazilian VAT
taxes receivable as of June 30, 2007, due to the uncertainty as to our ability to collect the
amounts outstanding.
As disclosed in Item 3 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, in February
2006, we received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) in connection
with a non-public, fact-finding inquiry entitled In the Matter of Certain Participants in the Oil
for Food Program. See Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings for further discussion of the matter.
OUTLOOK
2007 farm equipment demand is forecasted to be up from 2006 levels in most of the worlds
agricultural markets. Retail farm equipment sales in Western Europe are expected to be relatively
flat while growth is projected in Central and Eastern Europe. In South America, recovery of the
farming sector in Brazil is expected to result in a strong increase in demand for farm equipment in
2007. Higher cash receipts by North America farmers partially offset by higher input costs are
expected to result in growth in industry demand in the high horsepower tractor and combine
segments.
Our net sales for the full year of 2007 are expected to be higher than 2006, driven primarily
by stronger market conditions in South America, continued growth in Europe and currency impacts.
For the full year, we are targeting earnings improvement resulting primarily from sales growth and
lower interest costs. Results in
the second half of the year will include spending on strategic investments including increased
engineering expenses, plant restructurings, system initiatives, and new market development and
distribution expenditures. Earnings growth and focus on working capital reduction for the
remainder of the year are expected to produce strong cash flow from operations.
27
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Continued)
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements
requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On
an ongoing basis, management evaluates estimates, including those related to reserves, intangible
assets, income taxes, pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, derivative financial
instruments and contingencies. Management bases these estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A description of
critical accounting policies and related judgment and estimates that affect the preparation of our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements is set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward looking, including
certain statements set forth under the headings Recent Pending Joint Venture, Liquidity and
Capital Resources and Outlook. Forward looking statements reflect assumptions, expectations,
projections, intentions or beliefs about future events. These statements, which may relate to such
matters as financing the Laverda joint venture, industry demand conditions, earnings per share, net
sales and income, cash flow from operations, spending on strategic initiatives, interest costs,
future capital expenditures, working capital needs and currency translation, are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts, and you can identify certain of these statements, but not
necessarily all, by the use of the words anticipate, assumed, indicate, estimate,
believe, predict, forecast, rely, expect, continue, grow and other words of similar
meaning. Although we believe that the expectations and assumptions reflected in these statements
are reasonable in view of the information currently available to us, there can be no assurance that
these expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements involve a number of
risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in or
implied by the forward-looking statements. The following are among the important factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
general economic and capital market conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the worldwide demand for agricultural products; |
|
|
|
|
grain stock levels and the levels of new and used field inventories; |
|
|
|
|
cost of steel and other raw materials; |
|
|
|
|
government policies and subsidies; |
|
|
|
|
weather conditions; |
|
|
|
|
interest and foreign currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
pricing and product actions taken by competitors; |
|
|
|
|
commodity prices, acreage planted and crop yields; |
|
|
|
|
farm income, land values, debt levels and access to credit; |
|
|
|
|
pervasive livestock diseases; |
28
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Continued)
|
|
|
production disruptions; |
|
|
|
|
supply and capacity constraints; |
|
|
|
|
our cost reduction and control initiatives; |
|
|
|
|
our research and development efforts; |
|
|
|
|
dealer and distributor actions; |
|
|
|
|
technological difficulties; and |
|
|
|
|
political and economic uncertainty in various areas of the world. |
Any forward-looking statement should be considered in light of such important factors.
New factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described above
emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of such factors or the
extent to which any such factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ from
those contained in any forward-looking statement. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of
the date on which such statement is made, and we disclaim any obligation to update the information
contained in such statement to reflect subsequent developments or information except as required by
law.
29
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK MANAGEMENT
We have significant manufacturing operations in France, Germany, Brazil, Finland and Denmark,
and we purchase a portion of our tractors, combines and components from third-party foreign
suppliers, primarily in various European countries and in Japan. We also sell products in over 140
countries throughout the world. The majority of our net sales outside the United States are
denominated in the currency of the customer location with the exception of sales in the Middle
East, Africa and Asia, where net sales are primarily denominated in British pounds, Euros or United
States dollars (See Segment Reporting in Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the
year ended December 31, 2006 for sales by customer location). Our most significant transactional
foreign currency exposures are the Euro, the Brazilian Real and the Canadian dollar in relation to
the United States dollar. Fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies create exposures, which
can adversely affect our results of operations.
We attempt to manage our transactional foreign exchange exposure by hedging foreign currency
cash flow forecasts and commitments arising from the settlement of receivables and payables and
from future purchases and sales. Where naturally offsetting currency positions do not occur, we
hedge certain, but not all, of our exposures through the use of foreign currency forward and option
contracts. Our hedging policy prohibits foreign currency forward contracts for speculative trading
purposes. Our translation exposure resulting from translating the financial statements of foreign
subsidiaries into United States dollars is not hedged. Our most significant translation exposures
are the Euro, the British pound and the Brazilian Real in relation to the United States dollar.
When practical, this translation impact is reduced by financing local operations with local
borrowings.
All derivatives are recognized on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. On
the date a derivative contract is entered into, we designate the derivative as either (1) a fair
value hedge of a recognized liability, (2) a cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction, (3) a
hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, or (4) a non-designated derivative instrument.
We currently engage in derivatives that are non-designated derivative instruments. Changes in fair
value of non-designated derivative contracts are reported in current earnings. During 2006 and
2007, we designated certain foreign currency option contracts as cash flow hedges of expected
future sales. The effective portion of the fair value gains or losses on these cash flow hedges
are recorded in other comprehensive income, with the cumulative gain or loss subsequently
reclassified into net sales during the same period as the sales are recognized. These amounts
offset the effect of the changes in foreign exchange rates on the related sale transactions. The
amount of the gain recorded in other comprehensive loss that was reclassified to net sales during
the year ended December 31, 2006 was approximately $4.0 million on an after-tax basis. The amount
of the gain recorded to other comprehensive loss related to the outstanding cash flow hedges as of
June 30, 2007 was approximately $0.1 million. The outstanding contracts range in maturity from July
of 2007 through April of 2008.
The following is a summary of foreign currency derivative contracts used to hedge currency
exposures. All contracts have a maturity of less than one year. The net notional amounts and fair
value gains or losses as of June 30, 2007 stated in United States dollars are as follows (in
millions, except average contract rate):
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Sell)/Buy |
|
|
Rate* |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
Australian dollar |
|
$ |
(27.8 |
) |
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
Brazilian Real |
|
|
215.3 |
|
|
|
1.96 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
British pound |
|
|
67.2 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Canadian dollar |
|
|
(42.3 |
) |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Euro dollar |
|
|
(154.3 |
) |
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Japanese yen |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
121.77 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Mexican peso |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
10.63 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
New Zealand dollar |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Norwegian krone |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Polish zloty |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
Russian ruble |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
25.78 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Swedish krona |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
7.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
South African rand |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
7.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
per United States dollar |
Because these contracts were entered into for hedging purposes, the gains and losses on the
contracts would largely be offset by gains and losses on the underlying firm commitment.
Interest Rates
We manage interest rate risk through the use of fixed rate debt and may in the future utilize
interest rate swap contracts. We have fixed rate debt from our senior subordinated notes and our
convertible senior subordinated notes. Our floating rate exposure is related to our credit
facility and our securitization facilities, which are tied to changes in United States and European
LIBOR rates. Assuming a 10% increase in interest rates, interest expense, net and the cost of our
securitization facilities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 would have increased by
approximately $1.5 million.
We had no interest rate swap contracts outstanding in the six months ended June 30, 2007.
31
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of June 30, 2007, have concluded that, as of such
date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
The Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer, does not expect that the Companys disclosure controls or the Companys internal controls
will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error
or fraud may occur and not be detected. We will conduct periodic evaluations of our internal
controls to enhance, where necessary, our procedures and controls.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation described above that occurred during the six months ended June 30,
2007 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal
control over financial reporting.
32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to various legal claims and actions incidental to our business. We believe
that none of these claims or actions, either individually or in the aggregate, is material to our
business or financial condition.
As disclosed in Item 3 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, in February
2006, we received a subpoena from the SEC in connection with a non-public, fact-finding inquiry
entitled In the Matter of Certain Participants in the Oil for Food Program. This subpoena
requested documents concerning transactions in Iraq under the United Nations Oil for Food Program
by AGCO and certain of our subsidiaries. Subsequently we were contacted by the Department of
Justice (the DOJ) regarding the same transactions, although no subpoena or other formal process
has been initiated by the DOJ. Similar inquiries have been initiated by the Danish and French
governments regarding two of our subsidiaries. The inquiries arose from sales of approximately
$58.0 million in farm equipment to the Iraq ministry of agriculture between 2000 and 2002. The
SECs staff has asserted that certain aspects of those transactions were not properly recorded in
our books and records. We are cooperating fully in these inquiries. It is not possible to predict
the outcome of these inquiries or their impact, if any, on us; although if the outcomes were
adverse we could be required to pay fines and make other payments as well as take appropriate
remedial actions.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The Companys annual meeting of stockholders was held on April 26, 2007. The following
matters were voted upon and the results of the voting were as follows:
|
(1) |
|
To elect four directors to serve as Class III directors until the annual meeting in
2010 or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The nominees, Messrs.
Booker, Gros, Johanneson and Moll, were elected to the Companys board of directors. The
results follow: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
Affirmative Votes |
|
|
Withheld Votes |
|
W. Wayne Booker |
|
|
80,686,275 |
|
|
|
862,563 |
|
Francisco R. Gros |
|
|
57,954,080 |
|
|
|
23,594,758 |
|
Gerald B. Johanneson |
|
|
80,265,288 |
|
|
|
1,283,550 |
|
Curtis E. Moll |
|
|
79,351,077 |
|
|
|
2,197,761 |
|
|
(2) |
|
To ratify the appointment of the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm for 2007. The results follow: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
|
Abstain |
|
81,392,813 |
|
|
142,105 |
|
|
|
13,920 |
|
33
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The filings referenced for |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
incorporation by reference are |
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
AGCO Corporation |
10.1
|
|
Consulting Agreement with Stephen D. Lupton
|
|
August 2, 2007, Form 8-K, |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Martin Richenhagen
|
|
Filed herewith |
31.2
|
|
Certification of Andrew H. Beck
|
|
Filed herewith |
32.0
|
|
Certification of Martin Richenhagen and Andrew H. Beck
|
|
Furnished herewith |
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGCO CORPORATION
Registrant
|
|
Date: August 9, 2007 |
/s/ Andrew H. Beck
|
|
|
Andrew H. Beck |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
35