UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

 

Commission File Number 1-12815

 

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.

Incorporated in The Netherlands IRS Identification Number: not applicable

 

Oostduinlaan 75
2596 JJ The Hague
The Netherlands
31-70-3732010

 

(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

none

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES  þ  NO o               

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES o  NO þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ  NO o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES þ  NO o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)
YES o  NO þ

 

Aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates, based on a New York Stock Exchange closing price of $18.81 as of June 30, 2010 was $1,860,865,306.

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of February 1, 2011 was 99,435,863.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

 

 

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

Founded in 1889, Chicago Bridge & Iron N.V. (“CB&I” or “the Company”) is one of the world’s leading integrated engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) service providers and major process technology licensors, delivering comprehensive solutions to customers primarily in the energy and natural resource industries. Our stock currently trades on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “CBI.” With more than a century of experience and approximately 13,000 employees worldwide, we capitalize on our global expertise and local knowledge to safely and reliably deliver projects virtually anywhere. During 2010, we executed over 700 projects in more than 70 countries.

 

Segment Financial Information

 

CB&I is comprised of three business sectors: CB&I Steel Plate Structures, CB&I Lummus, and Lummus Technology. Through these business sectors, we offer services both independently and on an integrated basis:

 

CB&I Steel Plate Structures.  CB&I Steel Plate Structures provides engineering, procurement, fabrication and construction services for the petroleum, water and nuclear industries. Projects include above ground storage tanks, elevated storage tanks, Liquefied Natural Gas (“LNG”) tanks, pressure vessels, and other specialty structures, such as nuclear containment vessels. Customers for these structures include international, national and regional energy companies, such as ADNOC, British Gas (“BG”), Chevron, CNOOC, ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan, Qatar Petroleum, Saudi Aramco, Shell and Woodside, as well as nuclear technology companies such as Westinghouse.

 

CB&I Lummus.  CB&I Lummus provides engineering, procurement, fabrication and construction services for upstream and downstream energy infrastructure facilities. Projects include LNG liquefaction and regasification terminals, refinery units, petrochemical complexes and a wide range of other energy-related projects. Customers for these facilities are international, national and regional energy companies, such as BG, British Petroleum, Chevron, CNOOC, ConocoPhillips, Ecopetrol, ExxonMobil, Gazprom, Hunt Oil, Nexen, Occidental, Sabic, Shell and Woodside.

 

Lummus Technology.  Lummus Technology provides licenses, products and services globally to companies in gas processing, oil refining and petrochemicals/plastics. Our customer base includes integrated oil companies, national oil companies and world-wide chemical producers, such as Chevron, Chevron Phillips, Pemex, Reliance, Rosneft, Sabic, Saudi Aramco, Shell and Valero. The Asia-Pacific region is a very important component of our business. The customers in this region may be somewhat less well known, but are equally important, such as Essar, Formosa Plastics, Pertamina, PetroChina, PTT, Sinopec and various emerging private Chinese companies.

 

Segment financial information by business sector can be found under “Results of Operations” within “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 14 within “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

 

Recent Acquisitions

 

Through December 31, 2010, we held a 50% equity investment in Catalytic Distillation Technologies (“CD Tech”), which provides license/basic engineering and catalyst supply for catalytic distillation applications, including gasoline desulphurization and alkylation processes. This investment was accounted for by the equity method and was reflected in the operating results of Lummus Technology. On December 31, 2010, we acquired Chemical Research and Licensing (“CR&L”) from CRI/Criterion, a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell plc., for approximately $38.4 million, net of cash acquired. The acquisition of CR&L included a research and development and catalyst manufacturing facility, and enabled us to assume the remaining 50% equity interest in CD Tech. The future results of operations of CD Tech will be consolidated and will continue to reside within Lummus Technology.

 

On November 16, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Lummus Global (“Lummus”) from Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. for a purchase price of approximately $820.9 million, net of cash acquired and including transaction costs. Lummus has been fully integrated into CB&I Lummus and Lummus Technology.

Competitive Strengths

 

Our core competencies, which we believe are significant competitive strengths, include:

 

Strong Health, Safety and Environmental (“HSE”) Performance.  Because of our long and outstanding safety record, we are sometimes invited to bid on projects for which other competitors do not qualify. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the national Lost Workday Case Incidence Rate for construction companies similar to CB&I was 1.4 per 100 full-time employees for 2009 (the latest reported year), while our rate for 2010 was only 0.02 per 100 employees. Our excellent HSE performance also translates directly to lower cost, timely completion of projects, and reduced risk to our employees, subcontractors and customers.

 

Worldwide Record of Excellence.  We have an established record as a leader in the international engineering and construction industry by providing consistently superior project performance for over 120 years.

 

Global Execution Capabilities.  With a global network of approximately 80 sales and operations offices, established supplier relationships and available workforces, we have the ability to rapidly mobilize people, materials and equipment to execute projects in locations ranging from highly industrialized countries to some of the world’s most remote regions. Additionally, due primarily to our long-standing presence in numerous markets around the world, we have a prominent position as a local contractor in global energy and industrial markets.

 

Modular Fabrication.  We are one of the few EPC and process technology contractors with in-house fabrication facilities, which allow us to offer customers the option of modular construction, when feasible. In contrast to traditional onsite “stick built” construction, modular construction enables modules to be built within a tightly monitored shop environment and allows us to better control quality, minimize weather delays and expedite schedules. Once completed, the modules are shipped to and assembled at the project site.

 

Licensed Technologies.  We offer a broad, state-of-the-art portfolio of gas processing, refining and petrochemical technologies. Being able to provide licensed technologies sets CB&I apart from our competitors and presents opportunities for increased profitability. Combining technology with EPC capabilities strengthens CB&I’s presence throughout the project life cycle, allowing us to capture additional market share in the important higher margin growth markets.

 

Recognized Expertise.  Our in-house engineering team includes internationally recognized experts in oil and gas processes and facilities, modular design and fabrication, cryogenic storage and processing, and bulk liquid storage and systems. Several of our senior engineers are long-standing members of committees that have helped develop worldwide standards for storage structures and process vessels for the petroleum industry, including the American Petroleum Institute and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

 

Strong Focus on Project Risk Management.  We are experienced in managing the risk associated with bidding and executing complex projects. Our position as an integrated EPC service provider allows us to execute global projects on a competitively bid and negotiated basis. We offer our customers a range of contracting options, including fixed-price, cost reimbursable and hybrid approaches.

 

Management Team with Extensive Engineering and Construction Industry Experience.  Members of our senior leadership team have an average of approximately 25 years of experience in the engineering and construction industry.

 

Growth Strategy

 

On an opportunistic and strategic basis, we may pursue additional growth through selective acquisitions of businesses or assets that will expand or complement our current portfolio of services and meet our stringent acquisition criteria.

 

Competition

 

We operate in a competitive environment. Technology performance, price, timeliness of completion, quality, safety record and reputation are the principal competitive factors within our industry. There are numerous regional, national and global competitors that offer similar services to those offered by each of our business sectors.

Marketing and Customers

 

Through our global network of sales offices, we contract directly with hundreds of customers in the energy and natural resources industries. We rely primarily on direct contact between our technically qualified sales and engineering staff and our customers’ engineering and contracting departments. Dedicated sales employees are located in offices throughout the world.

 

Our significant customers, with many of which we have had longstanding relationships, are primarily in the hydrocarbon industry and include major petroleum and petrochemical companies (see the “Segment Financial Information” section above for a listing of our significant customers).

 

We are not dependent upon any single customer on an ongoing basis and do not believe that the loss of any single customer would have a material adverse effect on our business. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, we had no customers that accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2008, revenue from Peru LNG within CB&I Lummus totaled approximately $598.2 million or 10% of our total 2008 revenue.

 

Backlog/New Awards

 

We had a backlog of work to be completed on contracts totaling approximately $6.9 billion as of December 31, 2010, compared with $7.2 billion as of December 31, 2009. Due to the timing of awards and the long-term nature of some of our projects, approximately 48% of our backlog is anticipated to be completed beyond 2011. New awards were approximately $3.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with $6.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our new awards by business sector were as follows:

 

 

Types of Contracts

 

Our contracts are awarded on a competitive bid and negotiated basis. We offer our customers a range of contracting options, including fixed-price, cost reimbursable and hybrid approaches. Each contract is designed to optimize the balance between risk and reward.

 

Raw Materials and Suppliers

 

The principal raw materials that we use are metal plate, structural steel, pipe, fittings, catalysts, proprietary equipment and selected engineered equipment such as pressure vessels, exchangers, pumps, valves, compressors, motors and electrical and instrumentation components. Most of these materials are available from numerous suppliers worldwide, with some furnished under negotiated supply agreements. We anticipate being able to obtain these materials for the foreseeable future; however, the price, availability and schedule validities offered by our suppliers may vary significantly from year to year due to various factors, including supplier consolidations, supplier raw material shortages and costs, surcharges, supplier capacity, customer demand, market conditions, and any duties and tariffs imposed on the materials.

 

We make planned use of subcontractors where it assists us in meeting customer requirements with regard to schedule, cost or technical expertise. These subcontractors may range from small local entities to companies with global capabilities, some of which may be utilized on a repetitive or preferred basis. To the extent necessary, we anticipate being able to locate and contract with qualified subcontractors in all global areas where we do business.

Environmental Matters

 

Our operations are subject to extensive and changing U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations, as well as the laws of other nations, that establish health and environmental quality standards. These standards, among others, relate to air and water pollutants and the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. We are exposed to potential liability for personal injury or property damage caused by any release, spill, exposure or other accident involving such pollutants, substances or wastes.

 

In connection with the historical operation of our facilities, substances which currently are or might be considered hazardous were used or disposed of at some sites that will or may require us to make expenditures for remediation. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify parties from whom we have purchased or to whom we have sold facilities for certain environmental liabilities arising from acts occurring before the dates those facilities were transferred.

 

We believe that we are currently in compliance, in all material respects, with all environmental laws and regulations. We do not currently believe that any environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations, financial position or cash flow. We do not anticipate that we will incur material capital expenditures for environmental controls or for the investigation or remediation of environmental conditions during 2011 or 2012.

 

Patents

 

We have numerous active patents and patent applications throughout the world, the majority of which are associated with technologies licensed by Lummus Technology. However, no individual patent is so essential that its loss would materially affect our business.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2010, we employed 12,600 persons worldwide, comprised of 6,600 salaried employees and 6,000 hourly and craft employees. The number of hourly and craft employees varies in relation to the number and size of projects we have in process at any particular time. The percentage of our employees represented by unions generally ranges between 5 and 10 percent. We have agreements, which generally extend up to three years, with various unions representing groups of employees at project sites in the United States (“U.S.”), Canada, Australia and various other countries. We enjoy good relations with our unions and have not experienced a significant work stoppage in any of our facilities in more than 10 years.

 

Additionally, to preserve our project management and technological expertise as core competencies, we recruit and develop, and maintain ongoing training programs for engineers and field supervision personnel.

 

Available Information

 

We make available our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, free of charge through our internet website at www.cbi.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

 

The public may read and copy any materials we file with or furnish to the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website that contains our filings and other information regarding issuers who file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

 

Any of the following risks (which are not the only risks we face) could have material adverse effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flow:

 

Risk Factors Relating to Our Business

 

Our Business is Dependent upon Major Construction Projects, the Unpredictable Timing of Which May Result in Significant Fluctuations in our Cash Flows and Earnings due to Timing Between the Award of the Project and Payment Under the Contract.

 

Our cash flow and earnings are dependent upon major construction projects in cyclical industries, including the hydrocarbon refining, natural gas and water industries. The timing of or failure to obtain projects, delays in awards of projects, cancellations of projects or delays in completion of projects could result in significant periodic fluctuations in our cash flows. Moreover, construction projects for which our services are contracted may require significant expenditures by us prior to receipt of relevant payments by a customer and such expenditures could reduce our cash flows and necessitate increased borrowings under our credit facilities.

 

We Could Lose Money if We Fail to Execute Within Our Cost Estimates on Fixed-Price, Lump-Sum Contracts.

 

A portion of our revenue is derived from fixed-price, lump-sum contracts. Under these contracts, we perform our services and execute our projects at a fixed price and, as a result, benefit from cost savings, but may be unable to recover any cost overruns. If we do not execute the contract within our cost estimates, we may incur losses or the project may be less profitable than we expected. The revenue, cost and gross profit realized on such contracts can vary, sometimes substantially, from the original projections due to changes in a variety of factors, including but not limited to:

 

 

These risks are exacerbated if the duration of the project is long-term because there is an increased risk that the circumstances upon which we based our original bid will change in a manner that increases costs. In addition, we sometimes bear the risk of delays caused by unexpected conditions or events.

Our Revenue and Earnings May Be Adversely Affected by a Reduced Level of Activity in the Hydrocarbon Industry.

 

In recent years, demand from the worldwide hydrocarbon industry has been the largest generator of our revenue. Numerous factors influence capital expenditure decisions in the hydrocarbon industry, including the following:

 

 

These factors are beyond our control. Reduced activity in the hydrocarbon industry could result in a reduction of major projects available in the industry, which may result in a reduction of our revenue and earnings and possible under-utilization of our assets.

 

Intense Competition in the EPC and Process Technology Industries Could Reduce Our Market Share and Earnings.

 

The EPC and process technology markets are highly competitive markets in which a large number of multinational companies compete, and these markets require substantial resources and capital investment in equipment, technology and skilled personnel. Competition also places downward pressure on our contract prices and margins. Intense competition is expected to continue in these markets, presenting us with significant challenges in our ability to maintain strong growth rates and acceptable margins. If we are unable to meet these competitive challenges, we could lose market share to our competitors and experience an overall reduction in our earnings.

 

Volatility in the Equity and Credit Markets Could Adversely Impact Us due to Factors Affecting the Availability of Funding for Our Customers, Availability of our Lending Facilities and Non-Compliance with Financial and Restrictive Lending Covenants.

 

Some of our customers, suppliers and subcontractors have traditionally accessed commercial financing and capital markets to fund their operations, and the availability of funding from those sources could be adversely impacted by a volatile equity or credit market. The availability of lending facilities and our ability to remain in compliance with our financial and restrictive lending facility covenants could also be impacted by circumstances or conditions beyond our control, including but not limited to, the delay or cancellation of projects, changes in currency exchange or interest rates, performance of pension plan assets, or changes in actuarial assumptions. Further, we could be impacted if our customers experience a material change in their ability to pay us or if the banks associated with our lending facilities were to cease or reduce operations.

 

Our Use of the Percentage-of-Completion Method of Accounting Could Result in a Reduction or Reversal of Previously Recorded Revenue and Profit.

 

We follow the guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Revenue Recognition Topic 605-35 for accounting policies relating to our use of the percentage-of-completion (“POC”) method, estimating costs and revenue recognition, including the recognition of profit incentives, unapproved change orders and claims, and combining and segmenting contracts. Our contract revenue is primarily recognized using the POC method, based on the percentage that actual costs-to-date bear to

total estimated costs to complete each contract. We utilize this cost-to-cost approach, the most widely recognized method used for POC accounting, as we believe this method is less subjective than relying on assessments of physical progress. Under the cost-to-cost approach, the use of estimated cost to complete each contract is a significant variable in the process of determining recognized revenue and is a significant factor in the accounting for contracts. The cumulative impact of revisions in total cost estimates during the progress of work is reflected in the period in which these changes become known, including, to the extent required, the reversal of profit recognized in prior periods. Due to the various estimates inherent in our contract accounting, actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

We Could be Exposed to Credit Risk from a Customer’s Financial Difficulties.

 

Our billed and unbilled revenue is generated from clients around the world, the majority of which are in the natural gas, petroleum and petrochemical industries. Most contracts require payments as the projects progress or, in certain cases, advance payments. We may be exposed to potential credit risk if our customers should encounter financial difficulties.

 

Any Prospective Acquisitions that We Undertake Could Be Difficult to Integrate, Disrupt Our Business, Dilute Shareholder Value and Harm Our Operating Results.

 

We may continue to pursue growth through the opportunistic and strategic acquisition of companies or assets that will enable us to broaden the types of projects we execute and technologies we provide and to expand into new markets. Our opportunity to grow through prospective acquisitions may be limited if we cannot identify suitable companies or assets, reach agreement on potential strategic acquisitions on acceptable terms or for other reasons. Our future acquisitions may be subject to a variety of risks, including the following:

 

 

Realization of one or more of these risks could have an adverse impact on our operations. Moreover, to the extent an acquisition transaction financed by non-equity consideration results in additional goodwill, it will reduce our tangible net worth, which might have an adverse effect on our credit and bonding capacity.

 

Our New Awards and Liquidity May Be Adversely Affected by Bonding and Letter of Credit Capacity.

 

A portion of our new awards requires the support of bid and performance surety bonds or letters of credit, as well as advance payment and retention bonds, which can enhance our cash flows. Our primary use of surety bonds is to support water and wastewater treatment and standard tank projects in the U.S., while letters of credit are generally used to support other projects. A restriction, reduction, or termination of our surety bond agreements could limit our ability to bid on new project opportunities, thereby limiting our new awards, or increase our letter of credit utilization in lieu of bonds, thereby reducing availability under our credit facilities. A restriction, reduction or termination of our letter of credit facilities could also limit our ability to bid on new project opportunities or could significantly change the timing of project cash flows, resulting in increased borrowing needs.

Our Projects Expose Us to Potential Professional Liability, Product Liability, Warranty or Other Claims.

 

We engineer and construct (and our structures typically are installed in) large industrial facilities in which system failure can be disastrous. We may also be subject to claims resulting from the subsequent operations of facilities we have installed. In addition, our operations are subject to the usual hazards inherent in providing engineering and construction services, such as the risk of accidents, fires and explosions. These hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, business interruptions, property damage, and pollution and environmental damage. We may be subject to claims as a result of these hazards.

 

Although we generally do not accept liability for consequential damages in our contracts, any catastrophic occurrence in excess of insurance limits at project sites where our structures are installed or on projects for which services are performed could result in significant professional liability, product liability, warranty or other claims against us. These liabilities could exceed our current insurance coverage and the fees we derive from those structures and services. These claims could also make it difficult for us to obtain adequate insurance coverage in the future at a reasonable cost. Clients or subcontractors that have agreed to indemnify us against such losses may refuse or be unable to pay us. A partially or completely uninsured claim, if successful and of significant magnitude, could result in substantial losses and reduce cash available for our operations.

 

We May Experience Increased Costs and Decreased Cash Flows Due to Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations, Liability for Contamination of the Environment or Related Personal Injuries.

 

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations, including those concerning emissions into the air; discharge into waterways; generation, storage, handling, treatment and disposal of waste materials; and health and safety.

 

Our business often involves working around and with volatile, toxic and hazardous substances and other highly regulated pollutants, substances, or wastes, the improper characterization, handling or disposal of which could constitute violations of U.S. federal, state or local laws and regulations and laws of other nations, and result in criminal and civil liabilities. Environmental laws and regulations generally impose limitations and standards for certain pollutants or waste materials and require us to obtain permits and comply with various other requirements. Governmental authorities may seek to impose fines and penalties on us, or revoke or deny issuance or renewal of operating permits for failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations. We are also exposed to potential liability for personal injury or property damage caused by any release, spill, exposure or other accident involving such pollutants, substances or wastes. We may incur liabilities that may not be covered by insurance policies, or, if covered, the dollar amount of such liabilities may exceed our policy limits or fall within applicable deductible or retention limits. A partially or completely uninsured claim, if successful and of significant magnitude, could cause us to suffer a significant loss and reduce cash available for our operations.

 

The environmental health and safety laws and regulations to which we are subject are constantly changing, and it is impossible to predict the impact of such laws and regulations on us in the future. We cannot ensure that our operations will continue to comply with future laws and regulations or that these laws and regulations will not cause us to incur significant costs or adopt more costly methods of operation.

 

In connection with the historical operation of our facilities, substances which currently are or might be considered hazardous were used or disposed of at some sites that will or may require us to make expenditures for remediation. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify parties from whom we have purchased or to whom we have sold facilities for certain environmental liabilities arising from acts occurring before the dates those facilities were transferred.

 

We Are and Will Continue to Be Involved in Litigation That Could Negatively Impact Our Earnings and Liquidity.

 

We have been and may from time to time be named as a defendant in legal actions claiming damages in connection with engineering and construction projects, technology licenses and other matters. These are typically claims that arise in the normal course of business, including employment-related claims and contractual disputes or claims for personal injury or property damage which occur in connection with services performed relating to project

or construction sites. Contractual disputes normally involve claims relating to the timely completion of projects, performance of equipment or technologies, design or other engineering services or project construction services provided by us. While management does not currently believe that any of our pending contractual, employment-related personal injury or property damage claims and disputes will have a material effect on our future results of operations, financial position or cash flow, there can be no assurance that this will be the case.

 

We May Not Be Able to Fully Realize the Revenue Value Reported in Our Backlog.

 

As of December 31, 2010, we had a backlog of work to be completed on contracts totaling approximately $6.9 billion. Backlog develops as a result of new awards, which represent the revenue value of new project commitments received by us during a given period. Backlog consists of projects which have either (i) not yet been started or (ii) are in progress but are not yet complete. In the latter case, the revenue value reported in backlog is the remaining value associated with work that has not yet been completed. The revenue projected in our backlog may not be realized, or if realized, may not result in earnings as a result of poor contract performance.

 

In addition, from time to time, projects are cancelled that appeared to have a high certainty of going forward at the time they were recorded as new awards. In the event of a project cancellation, we typically have no contractual right to the total revenue reflected in our backlog. In addition, although we may be reimbursed for certain costs, we may be unable to recover all direct costs incurred and may incur additional unrecoverable costs due to the resulting under-utilization of our assets.

 

Political and Economic Conditions, Including War or Conflict, in Non-U.S. Countries in Which We Operate, Could Adversely Affect Us.

 

A significant number of our projects are performed or located outside the U.S., including projects in developing countries with political and legal systems that are significantly different from those found in the U.S. We expect non-U.S. sales and operations to continue to contribute materially to our earnings for the foreseeable future. Non-U.S. contracts and operations expose us to risks inherent in doing business outside the U.S., including the following:

 

 

Political instability risks may arise from time to time on a country-by-country basis where we happen to have a large active project. We do not currently believe we have material risks attributable to political instability.

 

We Are Exposed to Possible Losses from Foreign Currency Exchange Rates.

 

We are exposed to market risk associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates arises from receivables, payables, and firm and forecasted commitments associated with foreign transactions, as well as intercompany loans used to finance non-U.S. subsidiaries. We may incur losses from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations if we are unable to convert foreign currency in a timely fashion. We seek to minimize the risks from these foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations primarily through a combination of contracting methodology and, when deemed appropriate, the use of foreign currency exchange rate derivatives. In circumstances where we utilize derivatives, our results of operations might be negatively impacted if the underlying transactions occur at different times, in different amounts than originally anticipated, or if the counterparties to our contracts fail to perform. We do not hold, issue, or use financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Our Goodwill and Other Finite-Lived Intangible Assets Could be Impaired and Result in a Charge to Earnings.

 

We have accounted for our acquisitions using the “purchase” method of accounting. Under the purchase method we have recorded, at fair value, assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and have recorded as goodwill, the difference between the cost of the acquisitions and the sum of the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired, less liabilities assumed. Finite-lived intangible assets have been segregated from goodwill and recorded at fair value, based upon expected future recovery of the underlying assets.

 

At December 31, 2010, our goodwill balance was $938.9 million, attributable to the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired as part of previous acquisitions. Our goodwill by business sector was $48.5 million for CB&I Steel Plate Structures, $454.2 million for CB&I Lummus and $436.1 million for Lummus Technology. Goodwill is not amortized to earnings, but instead is reviewed for impairment at least annually via a two-phase process, absent any indicators of impairment. The first phase screens for impairment, while the second phase, if necessary, measures impairment. We have elected to perform our annual analysis of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year based upon balances as of the beginning of that year’s fourth quarter. Impairment testing of goodwill is accomplished by comparing an estimate of discounted future cash flows to the net book value of each applicable reporting unit. Upon completion of our 2010 impairment test for goodwill, no impairment charge was necessary, as the fair value of each reporting unit sufficiently exceeded its net book value. At December 31, 2010, our finite-lived intangible assets totaled $215.4 million. Finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed by management for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, and are amortized over their anticipated useful lives, absent any indicators of impairment. In the future, if our remaining goodwill or other intangible assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment would result in a charge to earnings in the year of the impairment with a resulting decrease in our net worth.

 

If We Are Unable to Attract, Retain and Motivate Key Personnel, Our Business Could Be Adversely Affected.

 

Our future success depends upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled personnel in various areas, including engineering, project management, procurement, project controls, finance and senior management. If we do not succeed in retaining and motivating our current employees and attracting new high quality employees, our business could be adversely affected.

 

Uncertainty in Enforcing U.S. Judgments Against Netherlands Corporations, Directors and Others Could Create Difficulties for Holders of Our Securities in Enforcing Any Judgments Obtained Against Us.

 

We are a Netherlands company and a significant portion of our assets are located outside of the U.S. In addition, certain members of our management and supervisory boards are residents of countries other than the U.S. As a result, effecting service of process on such persons may be difficult, and judgments of U.S. courts, including judgments against us or members of our management or supervisory boards predicated on the civil liability provisions of the federal or state securities laws of the U.S., may be difficult to enforce.

 

Risk Factors Related to Our Common Stock

 

If We Fail to Meet Expectations of Securities Analysts or Investors due to Fluctuations in Our Revenue or Operating Results, Our Stock Price Could Decline Significantly.

 

Our revenue and operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, including the timing of or failure to obtain projects, delays in awards of projects, cancellations of projects, delays in the completion of projects and the timing of approvals of change orders from, or recoveries of claims against, our customers. It is likely that in some future quarters our operating results may fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors. In this event, the trading price of our common stock could decline significantly.

Certain Provisions of Our Articles of Association and Netherlands Law May Have Possible Anti-Takeover Effects.

 

Our Articles of Association and the applicable law of The Netherlands contain provisions that may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects. Among other things, these provisions provide for a staggered board of Supervisory Directors, a binding nomination process and supermajority shareholder voting requirements for certain significant transactions. Such provisions may delay, defer or prevent takeover attempts that shareholders might consider in their best interests. In addition, certain U.S. tax laws, including those relating to possible classification as a “controlled foreign corporation” (described below), may discourage third parties from accumulating significant blocks of our common shares.

 

We Have a Risk of Being Classified as a Controlled Foreign Corporation and Certain Shareholders Who Do Not Beneficially Own Shares May Lose the Benefit of Withholding Tax Reduction or Exemption Under Dutch Legislation.

 

As a company incorporated in The Netherlands, we would be classified as a “controlled foreign corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes if any U.S. person acquires 10% or more of our common shares (including ownership through the attribution rules of Section 958 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), each such person, a “U.S. 10% Shareholder”) and the sum of the percentage ownership by all U.S. 10% Shareholders exceeds 50% (by voting power or value) of our common shares. We do not believe we are currently a controlled foreign corporation; however, we may be determined to be a controlled foreign corporation in the future. In the event that such a determination is made, all U.S. 10% Shareholders would be subject to taxation under Subpart F of the Code. The ultimate consequences of this determination are fact-specific to each U.S. 10% Shareholder, but could include possible taxation of such U.S. 10% Shareholder on a pro rata portion of our income, even in the absence of any distribution of such income.

 

Under the double taxation convention in effect between The Netherlands and the U.S. (the “Treaty”), dividends paid by us to certain U.S. corporate shareholders owning at least 10% of our voting power are generally eligible for a reduction of the 15% Netherlands withholding tax to 5%, unless the common shares held by such residents are attributable to a business or part of a business that is, in whole or in part, carried on through a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in The Netherlands. Dividends received by exempt pension organizations and exempt organizations, as defined in the Treaty, are completely exempt from the withholding tax. A holder of common shares other than an individual will not be eligible for the benefits of the Treaty if such holder of common shares does not satisfy one or more of the tests set forth in the limitation on benefits provisions of Article 26 of the Treaty. According to an anti-dividend stripping provision, no exemption from, reduction of, or refund of, Netherlands withholding tax will be granted if the ultimate recipient of a dividend paid by CB&I N.V. is not considered to be the beneficial owner of such dividend. The ability of a holder of common shares to take a credit against its U.S. taxable income for Netherlands withholding tax may be limited.

 

Our Sale or Issuance of Additional Common Shares Could Dilute Your Share Ownership.

 

Part of our business strategy is to expand into new markets and enhance our position in existing markets throughout the world through the strategic and opportunistic acquisition of complementary businesses. In order to successfully complete targeted acquisitions or fund our other activities, we may issue additional equity securities that could dilute our earnings per share and your share ownership.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This annual report on Form 10-K, including all documents incorporated by reference, contains forward-looking statements regarding CB&I and represents our expectations and beliefs concerning future events. These forward-looking statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements included herein or incorporated herein by reference include or may include, but are not limited to, (and you should read carefully) any statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or use or contain words, terms, phrases, or expressions such as “achieve,” “forecast,” “plan,” “propose,” “strategy,” “envision,” “hope,” “will,” “continue,” “potential,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “predict,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “might,” or similar words, terms, phrases, or expressions or the negative of any of these terms. Any statements in this Form 10-K that are not based upon historical fact are forward-looking statements and represent our best judgment as to what may occur in the future.

 

In addition to the material risks listed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” above that may cause business conditions or our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements, the following are some, but not all, of the factors that might cause business conditions or our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements, or contribute to such differences: our ability to realize cost savings from our expected performance of contracts, whether as a result of improper estimates, performance, or otherwise; uncertain timing and funding of new contract awards, as well as project cancellations; cost overruns on fixed price or similar contracts, whether as a result of improper estimates, performance, or otherwise; risks associated with labor productivity; risks associated with POC accounting; our ability to settle or negotiate unapproved change orders and claims; changes in the costs or availability of, or delivery schedule for, equipment, components, materials, labor or subcontractors; adverse impacts from weather affecting our performance and timeliness of completion, which could lead to increased costs and affect the quality, costs or availability of, or delivery schedule for, equipment, components, materials, labor or subcontractors; operating risks, which could lead to increased costs and affect the quality, costs or availability of, or delivery schedule for, equipment, components, materials, labor or subcontractors; increased competition; fluctuating revenue resulting from a number of factors, including a decline in energy prices and the cyclical nature of the individual markets in which our customers operate; delayed or lower than expected activity in the hydrocarbon industry, demand from which is the largest component of our revenue; lower than expected growth in our primary end markets, including but not limited to LNG and energy processes; risks inherent in acquisitions and our ability to complete or obtain financing for proposed acquisitions; our ability to integrate and successfully operate and manage acquired businesses and the risks associated with those businesses; the non-competitiveness or unavailability of, or lack of demand or loss of legal protection for, our intellectual property rights; failure to keep pace with technological changes; failure of our patents or licensed technologies to perform as expected or to remain competitive, current, in demand, profitable or enforceable; adverse outcomes of pending claims or litigation or the possibility of new claims or litigation, and the potential effect of such claims or litigation on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow; lack of necessary liquidity to provide bid, performance, advance payment and retention bonds, guarantees, or letters of credit securing our obligations under our bids and contracts or to finance expenditures prior to the receipt of payment for the performance of contracts; proposed and actual revisions to U.S. and non-U.S. tax laws, and interpretation of said laws, Dutch tax treaties with foreign countries and U.S. tax treaties with non-U.S. countries (including, but not limited to The Netherlands), which would seek to increase income taxes payable; political and economic conditions including, but not limited to, war, conflict or civil or economic unrest in countries in which we operate; compliance with applicable laws and regulations in any one or more of the countries in which we operate including, without limitation, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and those concerning the environment, export controls and sanctions program; our inability to properly manage or hedge currency or similar risks; and a downturn, disruption, or stagnation in the economy in general.

 

Although we believe the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future performance or results. You should not unduly rely on any forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement is made and applies only as of the date of the particular statement, and we are not obligated to update, withdraw, or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,

future events or otherwise. You should consider these risks when reading any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements attributed or attributable to us or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph entitled “Forward-Looking Statements”.

 

 

None.

 

 

We own or lease properties in U.S. and Non-U.S. locations to conduct our business. We believe these facilities are adequate to meet our current and near-term requirements. The following list summarizes our principal properties by the business sector for which they are primarily utilized: CB&I Steel Plate Structures (“SPS”), CB&I Lummus (“CBIL”), Lummus Technology (“LT”), and Corporate (“Corp”).

 

 

 

 

We also own or lease a number of smaller administrative and field construction offices, warehouses and equipment maintenance centers strategically located throughout the world.

 

 

We have been and may from time to time be named as a defendant in legal actions claiming damages in connection with engineering and construction projects, technology licenses and other matters. These are typically claims that arise in the normal course of business, including employment-related claims and contractual disputes or claims for personal injury or property damage which occur in connection with services performed relating to project or construction sites. Contractual disputes normally involve claims relating to the timely completion of projects, performance of equipment or technologies, design or other engineering services or project construction services provided by us. Management does not currently believe that any of our pending contractual, employment-related personal injury or property damage claims and disputes will have a material effect on our future results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

 

Asbestos Litigation — We are a defendant in lawsuits wherein plaintiffs allege exposure to asbestos due to work we may have performed at various locations. We have never been a manufacturer, distributor or supplier of asbestos products. Through December 31, 2010, we have been named a defendant in lawsuits alleging exposure to asbestos involving approximately 5,000 plaintiffs and, of those claims, approximately 1,400 claims were pending and 3,600 have been closed through dismissals or settlements. Through December 31, 2010, the claims alleging exposure to asbestos that have been resolved have been dismissed or settled for an average settlement amount of approximately one thousand dollars per claim. We review each case on its own merits and make accruals based upon the probability of loss and our estimates of the amount of liability and related expenses, if any. We do not currently believe that any unresolved asserted claims will have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations, financial position or cash flow, and, at December 31, 2010, we had accrued approximately $1.6 million for liability and related expenses. With respect to unasserted asbestos claims, we cannot identify a population of potential claimants with sufficient certainty to determine the probability of a loss and to make a reasonable estimate of liability, if any. While we continue to pursue recovery for recognized and unrecognized contingent losses through insurance, indemnification arrangements or other sources, we are unable to quantify the amount, if any, that we may expect to recover because of the variability in coverage amounts, limitations and deductibles, or the viability of carriers, with respect to our insurance policies for the years in question.

 

Environmental Matters — Our operations are subject to extensive and changing U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations, as well as the laws of other nations, that establish health and environmental quality standards. These standards, among others, relate to air and water pollutants and the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. We are exposed to potential liability for personal injury or property damage caused by any release, spill, exposure or other accident involving such pollutants, substances or wastes.

 

In connection with the historical operation of our facilities, substances which currently are or might be considered hazardous were used or disposed of at some sites that will or may require us to make expenditures for remediation. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify parties from whom we have purchased or to whom we have sold facilities for certain environmental liabilities arising from acts occurring before the dates those facilities were transferred.

 

We believe that we are currently in compliance, in all material respects, with all environmental laws and regulations. We do not currently believe that any environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations, financial position or cash flow. We do not anticipate that we will incur material capital expenditures for environmental controls or for the investigation or remediation of environmental conditions during 2011 or 2012.

 

 

 

Our common stock is traded on the NYSE. As of February 1, 2011, we had approximately 56,000 shareholders, based upon the number of record holders at that date. The following table presents the range of common stock prices on the NYSE and the cash dividends paid per share of common stock by quarter for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

 

 

Dividends were suspended beginning in the first quarter of 2009; however, in February 2011 our Supervisory Board approved quarterly cash dividends of $0.05 per share effective for the first quarter of 2011. Cash dividends are dependent upon our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, availability of surplus and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

 

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2010, relating to our equity compensation plans pursuant to which grants of options or other rights to acquire our common shares may be granted from time to time:

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

 

On August 18, 2009, we entered into a Sales Agency Agreement with Calyon Securities (USA) Inc. (“Calyon”), pursuant to which we may issue and sell from time to time, through Calyon as our sales agent, up to 10.0 million shares of our common stock (the “Shares”). The Shares are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-160852), which became effective upon filing with the SEC on July 29, 2009. During 2010, no Shares were sold under the Sales Agency Agreement.

 

We derived the following summary financial and operating data, as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2006 through 2010, from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements (“Financial Statements”), except for “Other Data.” You should read this information together with Item 7 and Item 8.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is provided to assist readers in understanding our financial performance during the periods presented and significant trends that may impact our future performance. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and the related notes thereto.

 

CB&I is an integrated EPC provider and major process technology licensor. Founded in 1889, CB&I provides conceptual design, technology, engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction and commissioning services to customers in the energy and natural resource industries.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

CB&I’s reporting segments are comprised of our three business sectors: CB&I Steel Plate Structures, CB&I Lummus and Lummus Technology. Our new awards, revenue and income from operations by reporting segment are as follows:

 

 

Current Market Conditions  — We continue to have a broad diversity within the entire energy project spectrum, with more than 75% of our 2010 revenue coming from outside the U.S. Our revenue mix will continue to evolve consistent with changes in our backlog mix, as well as shifts in future global energy demand. We currently

anticipate that investment in steel plate structures and energy processes projects will remain strong in many parts of the world. LNG investment also continues, with liquefaction projects increasing in comparison to regasification projects in certain geographies. With respect to Lummus Technology, we continue to see a resurgence in petrochemical activity in developing countries and, while refining activity remains slow, we are experiencing improving conditions.

 

2010 Versus 2009

 

Consolidated Results

 

New Awards/Backlog — During 2010, new awards, representing the value of new project commitments received during a given period, were $3.4 billion, compared with $6.1 billion during 2009. These commitments are included in backlog until work is performed and revenue is recognized, or until cancellation. The decrease in new awards over the comparable prior-year period was primarily a result of two significant awards during 2009 for CB&I Lummus; a refinery in Colombia (in excess of $1.4 billion) and a gas plant in Papua New Guinea (in excess of $1.0 billion). Our 2010 new awards were distributed among our business sectors as follows: CB&I Steel Plate Structures — $1.3 billion (39%), CB&I Lummus — $1.6 billion (49%) and Lummus Technology — $422.5 million (12%). Our 2009 awards were distributed as follows: CB&I Steel Plate Structures — $2.2 billion (36%), CB&I Lummus — $3.6 billion (59%) and Lummus Technology — $311.6 million (5%). See Segment Results below for further discussion.

 

Backlog at December 31, 2010 was approximately $6.9 billion, compared with $7.2 billion at December 31, 2009, as revenue exceeded new awards during the 2010 period. As of December 31, 2010, more than 80% of our backlog was for work outside the U.S.

 

Revenue — Revenue for 2010 was $3.6 billion, representing a $914.2 million decrease (20%) from 2009. Revenue decreased $208.1 million (13%) for CB&I Steel Plate Structures, $638.0 million (25%) for CB&I Lummus and $68.1 million (19%) for Lummus Technology. Our 2010 revenue was distributed among our business sectors as follows: CB&I Steel Plate Structures — $1.4 billion (40%), CB&I Lummus — $1.9 billion (52%) and Lummus Technology — $295.3 million (8%). Our 2009 revenue was distributed as follows: CB&I Steel Plate Structures — $1.7 billion (36%), CB&I Lummus — $2.5 billion (56%) and Lummus Technology — $363.4 million (8%). The lower revenue for 2010 was primarily due to the wind down of several projects for CB&I Lummus and CB&I Steel Plate Structures, which was only partially offset by activity on our large awards from the back half of 2009 as they are still in their early stages. Revenue from these large 2009 awards will increase in 2011 as construction activities increase. See Segment Results below for further discussion.

 

Gross Profit — Gross profit was $492.1 million (13.5% of revenue) for 2010 compared with $522.7 million (11.5% of revenue) for 2009. The increase in gross profit percentage, as compared to the comparable prior year period, primarily resulted from the prior year including a $77.0 million charge for the South Hook project in the U.K., partly offset by a favorable project claim resolution of approximately $20.0 million. The South Hook project has been completed since the first quarter of 2010.

 

Excluding the net impact of this 2009 charge, our 2010 gross profit as a percentage of revenue was higher than 2009, primarily due to a better project mix for CB&I Steel Plate Structures and Lummus Technology in the current year, project claim resolutions/incentives in each of our sectors and generally lower pre-contract costs, partly offset by the impact of lower revenue volume and cost increases on a project in the U.S. for CB&I Lummus.

 

Selling and Administrative Expenses — Selling and administrative expenses for 2010 were $185.2 million (5.1% of revenue), compared with $204.9 million (4.5% of revenue) for 2009. The absolute dollar decrease as compared to 2009 was primarily attributable to reductions in our global and business sector administrative support costs.

 

Other Operating (Income) Expense — Other operating income for 2010 was $0.6 million versus expense of $15.3 million for 2009. The prior year included severance costs in all of our business sectors, costs associated with the reorganization of our business sectors and costs associated with the closure of certain fabrication facilities. The reorganization and closure costs were related to CB&I Lummus and CB&I Steel Plate Structures. The prior year also included a gain on the sale of a non-controlling equity investment held by CB&I Lummus, which partially offset the previously noted severance, reorganization and facility closure costs. See Segment Results below for further discussion.

Equity Earnings — Equity earnings totaled $19.5 million for 2010, compared to $35.1 million for 2009. The decrease was due to lower technology licensing and catalyst sales in joint venture investments of Lummus Technology, attributable to a slowdown in refining activity.

 

Income from Operations — Income from operations for 2010 was $303.3 million (8.3% of revenue) versus $314.2 million (6.9% of revenue) during 2009. The decrease in absolute value and increase as a percentage of revenue were due to the reasons noted above. See Segment Results below for further discussion.

 

Interest Expense and Interest Income — Interest expense was $16.7 million during 2010, compared with $21.4 million during 2009. The current year benefited from the impact of lower debt balances, offset partially by $2.6 million of interest expense related to the timing of tax payments resulting from our periodic U.S. income tax compliance reviews and incremental costs during the second half of 2010 associated with the amendment and extension of our $1.1 billion revolving credit facility. Interest income was $5.0 million during 2010, compared with $1.8 million for 2009. The increase over 2009 was due to higher average cash balances and higher rates of return.

 

Income Tax Expense — Income tax expense for 2010 was $80.0 million (27.4% of pre-tax income), compared with $114.9 million (39.0% of pre-tax income). The rate decreased compared to 2009 primarily because we did not recognize an income tax benefit during 2009 for losses incurred in the U.K., primarily for the South Hook project. The current year rate also decreased relative to 2009 due to our U.S. versus non-U.S. pre-tax income mix.

 

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for 2010 was $7.0 million compared with $5.5 million for 2009. The change compared with 2009 was commensurate with the level of applicable operating income.

 

Segment Results

 

CB&I Steel Plate Structures

 

New Awards/Backlog — During 2010, new awards were $1.3 billion, compared with $2.2 billion in the comparable prior-year period. Significant new awards during 2010 included LNG storage tanks in Asia Pacific (in excess of $190.0 million), three storage tank awards in the Middle East (totaling approximately $170.0 million) and LNG work in Australia. Significant new awards during 2009 included LNG and condensate storage tanks in Australia (approximately $550.0 million), low temperature/cryogenic and ambient storage tanks in the Middle East (approximately $530.0 million), a crude oil terminal expansion project in Panama (approximately $100.0 million) and an LNG expansion project in the U.S. (approximately $100.0 million).

 

Revenue — Revenue was $1.4 billion during 2010, representing a decrease of $208.1 million (13%), compared with 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the wind down of two large tank projects in Australia and reduced oil sands related work in Canada, partly offset by a greater volume of petroleum storage tank work in Central America and revenue from our large third quarter 2009 storage tank awards in the Middle East and Australia. We anticipate higher sector revenue from these 2009 awards in 2011 as construction activities continue to increase.

 

Income from Operations — Income from operations for 2010 was $134.4 million (9.3% of revenue), versus $147.2 million (8.9% of revenue) during 2009. The prior year was negatively impacted by approximately $5.9 million of severance, reorganization and facility closure costs. The current year did not experience such costs and benefited from a better project mix, a claim settlement in the U.S., and lower pre-contract costs, partly offset by the impact of lower revenue volume.

 

CB&I Lummus

 

New Awards/Backlog — During 2010, new awards were $1.6 billion, compared with $3.6 billion in 2009. Significant new awards during 2010 included incremental releases for an oil sands project in Canada (approximately $340.0 million), a gas processing plant in the U.S. (approximately $280.0 million), engineering services for a floating production, storage and offloading facility in Europe (approximately $50.0 million), a gas processing plant in Peru (approximately $45.0 million), development services for an LNG integrated project in Russia, and scope increases on our existing projects, particularly in Papua New Guinea and Colombia. Awards

during 2009 included a refinery in Colombia (in excess of $1.4 billion) and a gas plant in Papua New Guinea (in excess of $1.0 billion).

 

Revenue — Revenue was $1.9 billion during 2010, representing a decrease of $638.0 million (25%), compared with 2009. Our 2010 results were impacted by a lower volume of LNG work in South America and Europe and less refinery work in the U.S. and Europe, partly offset by a higher volume of oil sands related work in Canada and revenue from our large fourth quarter 2009 refinery and gas plant awards in Colombia and Papua New Guinea, respectively. We anticipate higher sector revenue from these 2009 awards in 2011 as construction activities continue to increase.

 

Income from Operations — Income from operations for 2010 was $82.6 million (4.3% of revenue), versus $86.1 million (3.4% of revenue) during 2009. Our 2009 results included charges of $77.0 million on the South Hook project, which was completed in the first quarter of 2010, offset partially by a favorable project claim resolution of approximately $20.0 million. Our 2009 results were also impacted by approximately $6.8 million of severance, reorganization and facility closure costs, net of a gain on the sale of a non-controlling equity investment. Relative to the comparable 2009 period, excluding the impact of the 2009 net charges noted above, the current year experienced a lower margin project mix and cost increases on a project in the U.S., partly offset by project incentives earned on a project in Asia Pacific and lower pre-contract and selling and administrative costs.

 

Lummus Technology

 

New Awards/Backlog — During 2010, new awards were $422.5 million, compared with $311.6 million in the comparable prior year period. Significant new awards during 2010 included awards for the license and engineering design of a propane dehydrogenation unit in China, engineering and heater technology for an ethylene expansion project in the U.S. and an ethylene cracking heater award in Russia. The increase over the comparable prior year period is attributable to increased heat transfer equipment orders as well as greater opportunities in the petrochemicals markets. The award activity for 2010 has primarily been located in Asia Pacific, the Middle East, the U.S. and Russia. Significant 2009 new awards included an ethylene cracking heaters award in Taiwan (approximately $40.0 million).

 

Revenue — Revenue was $295.3 million for 2010, representing a $68.1 million decrease (19%), compared with 2009. Our 2009 period benefited from a higher heater supply backlog going into the year, while 2010 has been impacted by lower beginning of the year heater supply backlog. The decrease for 2010 was partially offset by higher licensing revenue attributable to an increase in petrochemical award activity.

 

Income from Operations — Income from operations for 2010 was $86.3 million (29.2% of revenue), versus $80.9 million (22.3% of revenue) during 2009. Our 2010 results were positively impacted by a greater ratio of higher margin licensing technology revenue compared to heat transfer revenue, a favorable project claim resolution, and lower selling and administrative costs, partly offset by lower equity earnings. We experienced lower equity earnings from joint venture investments in 2010 due to lower technology licensing and catalyst sales which are attributable to a slowdown in refining activity. Our 2009 results were also impacted by severance costs totaling $2.6 million.

 

2009 Versus 2008

 

Consolidated Results

 

New Awards/Backlog — During 2009, new awards were $6.1 billion, compared with $4.3 billion during 2008. The increase in new awards over the comparable prior-year period was primarily a result of two significant awards during 2009 for CB&I Lummus: a refinery award in Colombia (in excess of $1.4 billion) and a gas plant in Papua New Guinea (in excess of $1.0 billion). Our 2009 new awards were distributed among our business sectors as follows: CB&I Steel Plate Structures — $2.2 billion (36%), CB&I Lummus — $3.6 billion (59%) and Lummus Technology — $311.6 million (5%). Our 2008 awards were distributed as follows: CB&I Steel Plate Structures — $2.6 billion (60%), CB&I Lummus — $1.2 billion (28%) and Lummus Technology — $505.2 million (12%). See Segment Results below for further discussion.

Backlog at December 31, 2009 was approximately $7.2 billion, compared with $5.7 billion at December 31, 2008, representing a $1.5 billion increase, which is primarily a result of the significant 2009 awards noted above.

 

Revenue — Revenue for 2009 was $4.6 billion, decreasing $1.4 billion (23%) from 2008. Revenue decreased $361.6 million (18%) for CB&I Steel Plate Structures, $951.6 million (27%) for CB&I Lummus and $75.3 million (17%) for Lummus Technology. Our 2009 revenue was distributed among our business sectors as follows: CB&I Steel Plate Structures — $1.7 billion (36%), CB&I Lummus — $2.5 billion (56%) and Lummus Technology — $363.4 million (8%). Our 2008 revenue was distributed as follows: CB&I Steel Plate Structures — $2.0 billion (34%), CB&I Lummus — $3.5 billion (59%) and Lummus Technology — $438.7 million (7%). See Segment Results below for further discussion.

 

Gross Profit — Gross profit was $522.7 million (11.5% of revenue) for 2009 compared with $233.2 million (3.9% of revenue) for 2008. During 2008, CB&I Lummus recognized a $457.0 million charge associated with the South Hook and Isle of Grain II projects in the U.K. (“the U.K. Projects”). Although 2009 reflected a $77.0 million charge for the South Hook project, the year benefited from a favorable claim settlement for CB&I Lummus and a favorable project gross profit mix across all business sectors, offset partially by higher pre-contract costs and the impact of lower revenue volume.

 

Selling and Administrative Expenses — Selling and administrative expense for 2009 was $204.9 million (4.5% of revenue), compared with $215.5 million (3.6% of revenue) for 2008. The absolute dollar decrease as compared to 2008 was primarily attributable to a significant reduction in our global and business sector administrative support costs, partly offset by higher incentive program costs in 2009.

 

Other Operating Expense (Income) — Other operating expense for 2009 was $15.3 million versus income of ($0.5) million in 2008. Included in 2009 were severance costs in all business sectors, costs associated with the reorganization of our business sectors and costs associated with the closure of certain fabrication facilities. The reorganization and closure costs were related to CB&I Lummus and CB&I Steel Plate Structures. These costs were partly offset by a gain on the sale of a non-controlling equity investment held by CB&I Lummus.

 

Equity Earnings — Equity earnings totaled $35.1 million for 2009, compared to $41.1 million for 2008. The decrease was due primarily to 2008 including higher technology licensing and catalyst sales for various proprietary technologies in joint venture investments of Lummus Technology.

 

Income from Operations — Income from operations for 2009 was $314.2 million (6.9% of revenue) versus income from operations of $35.2 million (0.6% of revenue) for 2008. The increase was due to the reasons noted above. See Segment Results below for further discussion.

 

Interest Expense and Interest Income — Interest expense was $21.4 million during 2009, compared with $21.1 million during 2008. The higher 2009 expense reflects the full year impact of higher costs resulting from the amendment of our credit facilities in the second half of 2008, offset partially by a lower debt balance. Interest income was $1.8 million for 2009, compared with $8.4 million for 2008. The decrease was due to lower average cash balances and lower rates of return.

 

Income Tax Expense — Income tax expense for 2009 was $114.9 million (39.0% of pre-tax income), versus income tax expense of $37.5 million (166.3% of pre-tax income) for 2008. Our 2008 income tax rate was impacted by the aforementioned charges on the U.K. Projects, for which we did not provide an income tax benefit for their net losses in the third and fourth quarters of 2008. Our 2009 income tax rate also reflects the impact of project losses in the U.K., where we have not provided an associated income tax benefit, partially offset by the income tax benefit of previously unrecognized net operating losses utilized during the current year in other jurisdictions, primarily The Netherlands.

 

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for 2009 was $5.5 million compared with $6.2 million for 2008. The change compared with 2008 was commensurate with the level of applicable operating income.

Segment Results

 

CB&I Steel Plate Structures

 

New Awards/Backlog — During 2009, new awards were $2.2 billion, compared with $2.6 billion in the comparable prior-year period. Significant new awards during 2009 included low temperature/cryogenic and ambient storage tanks in the Middle East (approximately $530.0 million), LNG and condensate storage tanks in Australia (approximately $550.0 million), a crude oil terminal expansion project in Panama (approximately $100.0 million) and an LNG expansion project in the U.S. (approximately $100.0 million). Significant new awards during 2008 included an oil sands storage terminal and LNG peak shaving facility in Canada (approximately $400.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively), two nuclear containment vessels in the U.S. (approximately $336.0 million), an expansion project in Australia, and additional tanks at an LNG import terminal in China.

 

Revenue — Revenue was $1.7 billion during 2009, representing a decrease of $361.6 million (18%), compared with 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the timing of 2009 awards, which largely occurred during the back half of the year, reduced oil sands related work in Canada, reduced activity in the U.S. and the wind down of a large project in Australia.

 

Income from Operations — Income from operations for 2009 was $147.2 million (8.9% of revenue), versus $214.4 million (10.7% of revenue) for 2008. Our project gross profit mix was comparable between 2009 and 2008; however, our 2009 results were impacted by lower revenue volume and higher pre-contract costs. Additionally, 2009 was negatively impacted by severance, reorganization and facility closure costs totaling approximately $5.9 million.

 

CB&I Lummus

 

New Awards/Backlog — During 2009, new awards were $3.6 billion, compared with $1.2 billion in 2008. Significant new awards for 2009 included a refinery in Colombia (in excess of $1.4 billion) and a gas plant in Papua New Guinea (in excess of $1.0 billion). Additionally, during 2009 and 2008, we were awarded various energy processes awards throughout the world.

 

Revenue — Revenue was $2.5 billion during 2009, representing a decrease of $951.6 million (27%), compared with 2008. Our 2009 results were impacted by a lower volume of LNG terminal work in the U.S., Europe and South America, partially offset by higher revenue for refinery work in South America and Europe.

 

Income (Loss) from Operations — Income from operations for 2009 was $86.1 million (3.4% of revenue), versus a loss from operations of ($289.9) million (8.3% of revenue) during 2008. Included in our 2008 results was a $457.0 million charge for the U.K. Projects. Although our 2009 results included a $77.0 million charge for the South Hook project and included severance, reorganization and facility closure costs, higher pre-contract costs, and was impacted by lower revenue volume, the year benefited from a favorable project gross profit mix and a favorable claim settlement. Severance, reorganization and facility closure costs, net of a gain on the sale of a non-controlling equity investment, totaled approximately $6.8 million in 2009.

 

The charges for the South Hook project in 2008, and to a lesser extent in 2009, reflected projected cost increases resulting from significant weather delays and poor labor productivity and subcontractor performance, which extended our schedule for completion beyond our previous estimates. Additionally, as we approached progress completion, we were unable to achieve the rate of labor reduction anticipated in our estimates; absenteeism, intermittent labor walkouts and labor strike activity were significant, and this impacted the scheduling of work and increased inefficiencies, which further impacted productivity and costs; and we transferred control of the site to the project owner in 2009, which required a more stringent permit to work process that was also controlled by the owner, resulting in delays to our work processes and increased costs. The South Hook project was essentially complete as of December 31, 2009.

 

Lummus Technology

 

New Awards/Backlog — During 2009, new awards were $311.6 million, compared with $505.2 million in the comparable prior year period. Our most significant 2009 new award was for ethylene cracking heaters in China

(approximately $40.0 million). During 2008, significant awards included heat transfer equipment for a petrochemical complex in the Middle East (approximately $140.0 million), and a licensing and engineering award for a petrochemical complex in India.

 

Revenue — Revenue was $363.4 million for 2009, representing a decrease of $75.3 million (17%), compared with 2008. Our 2009 results were impacted by a lower opening backlog entering into 2009 than 2008 and fewer 2009 licensing and heater supply awards, reflecting the uncertainty in the markets in late 2008 and early 2009.

 

Income from Operations — Income from operations for 2009 was $80.9 million (22.3% of revenue), versus $110.8 million (25.2% of revenue) for 2008. Our 2009 results were impacted by lower revenue volume, lower equity earnings due to fewer joint venture licensing awards, and severance costs totaling approximately $2.6 million, offset partially by a favorable project gross profit mix and lower research and development and selling and administrative costs.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents — At December 31, 2010, cash and cash equivalents totaled $481.7 million.

 

Operating — During 2010, cash flows from operations totaled $288.4 million, as cash generated from our earnings was partly offset by an overall increase in working capital levels. The increase in working capital was the result of a decrease in accounts payable ($112.6 million) and an increase in net contracts in progress ($37.0 million) in all three of our sectors, largely offset by a decrease in accounts receivable ($124.4 million), primarily for CB&I Lummus due to receivable collections on major projects.

 

Investing — During 2010, net cash used in investing activities totaled $58.4 million. Net cash outflows associated with acquisitions during the period totaled $42.8 million, including approximately $38.4 million (net of cash acquired) for the acquisition of CR&L and $4.4 million for various other Lummus Technology investments. Additionally, capital expenditures for 2010 totaled $24.1 million. These cash outflows were partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property and equipment during the period totaling approximately $8.5 million. For 2011, capital expenditures are anticipated to be in the range of $50.0 to $60.0 million.

 

We continue to evaluate and selectively pursue opportunities for additional expansion of our business through acquisition of complementary businesses. These acquisitions, if they arise, may involve the use of cash or may require further debt or equity financing.

 

Financing — During 2010, net cash flows used in financing activities totaled $86.3 million, primarily resulting from the purchase of $51.5 million of stock under our share repurchase program (2.7 million shares at an average price of $19.07 per share) and a fourth quarter $40.0 million installment payment on our Term Loan (see below). Additional cash used in financing activities was related to fees associated with the amendment and extension of our $1.1 billion revolving credit facility and distributions to our non-controlling interest partners, both of which are included within revolving facility costs and other. Our cash outflows were partially offset by $10.8 million of cash proceeds from the issuance of shares associated with our stock plans and $7.6 million of tax benefits associated with tax deductions in excess of recognized stock-based compensation costs.

 

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash — During 2010, our cash balance increased by $12.1 million due to the impact of changes in functional currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar on non-U.S. dollar cash balances. The unrealized gain on our cash balance resulting from this exchange rate movement is reflected in the cumulative translation component of other comprehensive income (loss). Our cash held in non-U.S. dollar currencies is used primarily for project-related and other operating expenditures in those currencies, and therefore, our exposure to realized exchange gains and losses is not anticipated to be material.

 

Letters of Credit/Bank Guarantees/Debt/Surety Bonds — Our primary internal source of liquidity is cash flow generated from operations. Capacity under a revolving credit facility is also available, if necessary, to fund operating or investing activities. We have a four-year, $1.1 billion, committed and unsecured revolving credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”), as administrative agent, and Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”), as syndication agent, which was amended effective July 23, 2010 (the “Revolving Facility”). The amendment extended the Revolving Facility’s term through July 23, 2014, and maintained the $1.1 billion of

capacity and $550.0 million borrowing sublimit under the previous facility. Additionally, the Revolving Facility maintained financial covenants similar to those of the previous facility, such as a maximum leverage ratio of 2.50, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.75 and a minimum net worth level calculated as $732.3 million at December 31, 2010. The Revolving Facility also includes customary restrictions regarding subsidiary indebtedness, sales of assets, liens, investments, type of business conducted and mergers and acquisitions, among other restrictions. No direct borrowings were outstanding under the Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2010; however, we had issued $403.9 million of letters of credit. Such letters of credit are generally issued to customers in the ordinary course of business to support advance payments and performance guarantees, in lieu of retention on our contracts, or in certain cases, are issued in support of our insurance program. As of December 31, 2010, we had $696.1 million of available capacity under the Revolving Facility.

 

In addition to the Revolving Facility, we have three committed and unsecured letter of credit and term loan agreements (the “LC Agreements”) with BofA, as administrative agent, JPMorgan, and various private placement note investors. Under the terms of the LC Agreements, either BofA or JPMorgan (the “LC Issuers”) can issue letters of credit. In the aggregate, they provide up to $275.0 million of capacity. As of December 31, 2010, no direct borrowings were outstanding under the LC Agreements, but all three tranches were fully utilized. Tranche A, a $50.0 million facility, and Tranche B, a $100.0 million facility, are both five-year facilities which expire in November 2011. Tranche C is an eight-year, $125.0 million facility expiring in November 2014. The LC Agreements have financial and restrictive covenants similar to those noted above for the Revolving Facility. In the event of our default under the LC Agreements, including our failure to reimburse a draw against an issued letter of credit, the LC Issuers could transfer their claim against us, to the extent such amount is due and payable by us under the LC Agreements, to the private placement lenders, creating a term loan that is due and payable no later than the stated maturity of the respective LC Agreement. In addition to quarterly letter of credit fees that we pay under the LC Agreements, we would be assessed an applicable rate of interest over LIBOR to the extent that a term loan is in effect.

 

Additionally, we have $80.0 million remaining on our unsecured term loan (the “Term Loan”) with JPMorgan, as administrative agent, and BofA, as syndication agent. Interest under the Term Loan is paid quarterly in arrears and, at our election, is based upon LIBOR plus an applicable floating margin. However, we have an interest rate swap that provides for an interest rate of approximately 5.57%, inclusive of the applicable floating margin. The Term Loan is scheduled to be repaid in equal installments of $40.0 million per year, with the last principal payment due in November 2012. The Term Loan has financial and restrictive covenants similar to those noted above for the Revolving Facility.

 

We also have various short-term, uncommitted revolving credit facilities (the “Uncommitted Facilities”) across several geographic regions of approximately $1.3 billion. These facilities are generally used to provide letters of credit or bank guarantees to customers to support advance payments and performance guarantees in the ordinary course of business or in lieu of retention on our contracts. At December 31, 2010, we had available capacity of $633.2 million under these facilities. In addition to providing letters of credit or bank guarantees, we also issue surety bonds in the ordinary course of business to support our contract performance.

 

As of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all of our restrictive covenants and financial covenants, with a leverage ratio of 0.34, a fixed charge coverage ratio of 5.65, and net worth of $1.1 billion. Our ability to remain in compliance with such lending facilities could be impacted by circumstances or conditions beyond our control, including but not limited to the delay or cancellation of projects, changes in currency exchange or interest rates, performance of pension plan assets, or changes in actuarial assumptions. Further, we could be impacted if our customers experience a material change in their ability to pay us or if the banks associated with our lending facilities were to cease or reduce operations.

 

For a further discussion of letters of credit and surety bonds, as well as the Term Loan, see Notes 7 and 10 to our Financial Statements.

 

Sales Agency Agreement — We have a Sales Agency Agreement with Calyon, pursuant to which we may issue and sell from time to time, with Calyon as our sales agent, up to 10.0 million shares of our common stock. During 2010, no Shares were sold under the Sales Agency Agreement.

Contractual Obligations — Our contractual obligations at December 31, 2010 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

Other — We believe that our cash on hand, funds generated by operations, amounts available under our existing Revolving Facility, LC Agreements and Uncommitted Facilities, and other external sources of liquidity, such as the issuance of debt and equity instruments, will be sufficient to finance our capital expenditures, settle our commitments and contingencies (as more fully described in Note 10 to our Financial Statements) and address our working capital needs for the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that such funding will be available, as our ability to generate cash flows from operations and our ability to access funding under our Revolving Facility, LC Agreements and Uncommitted Facilities at current prices may be impacted by a variety of business, economic, legislative, financial and other factors, which may be outside of our control. Additionally, while we currently have significant uncommitted bonding facilities, primarily to support various commercial provisions in our contracts, a termination or reduction of these bonding facilities could result in the utilization of letters of credit in lieu of performance bonds, thereby reducing our available capacity under the Revolving Facility and LC Agreements. Although we do not anticipate a reduction or termination of the bonding facilities, there can be no assurance that such facilities will be available at reasonable terms to service our ordinary course obligations.

 

We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits arising in the normal course of business and we have in place appropriate insurance coverage for the type of work that we have performed. As a matter of standard policy, we review our litigation accrual quarterly and as further information is known on pending cases, increases or decreases, as appropriate, may be recorded. For a discussion of pending litigation, including lawsuits wherein plaintiffs allege exposure to asbestos due to work we may have performed, see Note 10 to our Financial Statements.

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

We use operating leases for facilities and equipment when they make economic sense, including sale-leaseback arrangements. We have no other significant off-balance sheet arrangements.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

For a discussion of new accounting standards, see the applicable section in Note 2 to our Financial Statements.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

 

The discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We continually evaluate our estimates based upon historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our management has discussed the development and selection of our critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Supervisory Board of Directors. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Financial Statements:

 

Revenue Recognition — Our contracts are awarded on a competitive bid and negotiated basis. We offer our customers a range of contracting options, including fixed-price, cost reimbursable and hybrid approaches. We follow the guidance in the FASB’s ASC Revenue Recognition Topic 605-35 for accounting policies relating to our use of the POC method, estimating costs and revenue recognition, including the recognition of profit incentives, unapproved change orders and claims, and combining and segmenting contracts. Our contract revenue is primarily recognized using the POC method, based on the percentage that actual costs-to-date bear to total estimated costs to complete each contract. We utilize this cost-to-cost approach, the most widely recognized method used for POC accounting, as we believe this method is less subjective than relying on assessments of physical progress. Under the cost-to-cost approach, the use of estimated cost to complete each contract is a significant variable in the process of determining recognized revenue and is a significant factor in the accounting for contracts. The cumulative impact of revisions in total cost estimates during the progress of work is reflected in the period in which these changes become known, including, to the extent required, the reversal of profit recognized in prior periods. Due to the various estimates inherent in our contract accounting, actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Contract revenue reflects the original contract price adjusted for approved change orders and estimated minimum recoveries of unapproved change orders and claims. We recognize revenue associated with unapproved change orders and claims to the extent that related costs have been incurred, recovery is probable and the value can be reliably estimated. For 2010 and 2009, we had no material unapproved change orders or claims recognized in revenue. For 2008, we had projects with unapproved change orders or claims of approximately $50.0 million factored into the determination of their revenue and estimated costs.

 

Losses expected to be incurred on contracts in progress are charged to earnings in the period such losses become known. Net losses recognized during 2010, 2009 and 2008 for active projects in a loss position totaled approximately $18.0 million, $90.0 million and $453.0 million, respectively.

 

Credit Extension — We extend credit to customers and other parties in the normal course of business only after a review of the potential customer’s creditworthiness. Additionally, management reviews the commercial terms of all significant contracts before entering into a contractual arrangement. We regularly review outstanding receivables and provide for estimated losses through an allowance for doubtful accounts. In evaluating the level of established reserves, management makes judgments regarding the parties’ ability to and likelihood of making required payments, economic events and other factors. As the financial condition of these parties changes, circumstances develop, or additional information becomes available, adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts may be required.

 

Financial Instruments — We utilize derivative instruments in certain circumstances to mitigate the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, as described below:

 

 

Changes in the fair value of credit risk and forward points, gains and losses associated with instruments deemed ineffective during the period and instruments that we do not designate as cash flow hedges, including those instruments used to hedge intercompany loans, are recognized within cost of revenue.

 

 

Income Taxes — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The final realization of deferred tax assets depends upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate jurisdictions. We have not provided a valuation allowance against approximately $57.8 million of our net U.K. deferred tax asset associated with net operating losses, as we believe that it is more likely than not that the recorded net deferred tax asset will be utilized from future earnings and contracting strategies. During 2010, the U.K. deferred tax asset decreased by $11.2 million.

 

We provide income tax reserves in situations where we have and have not received tax assessments. Tax reserves are provided in those instances where we consider it more likely than not that additional taxes will be due in excess of amounts reflected in income tax returns filed worldwide. As a matter of standard policy, we continually review our exposure to additional income tax obligations and as further information is known or events occur, increases or decreases, as appropriate, may be recorded.

 

Insurance — We maintain insurance coverage for various aspects of our business and operations. However, we retain a portion of anticipated losses through the use of deductibles and self-insured retentions for our exposures related to third-party liability and workers’ compensation. Management regularly reviews estimates of reported and unreported claims through analysis of historical and projected trends, in conjunction with actuaries and other consultants, and provides for losses through insurance reserves. As claims develop and additional information becomes available, adjustments to loss reserves may be required. If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. A hypothetical ten percent change in our self-insurance reserves at December 31, 2010 would have impacted our pre-tax income by approximately $2.2 million for 2010.

 

Recoverability of Goodwill and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets — Goodwill is not amortized to earnings, but instead is reviewed for impairment at least annually via a two-phase process, absent any indicators of impairment. Our goodwill impairment analysis requires us to allocate goodwill to our reporting units, compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill, and then, if necessary, record a goodwill impairment charge in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill.

 

The primary method we employ to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit is the discounted cash flow method. This methodology is based, to a large extent, on assumptions about future events, which may or may not occur as anticipated, and such deviations could have a significant impact on the estimated fair values calculated. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, estimates of future growth rates, discount rates and terminal values of reporting units. Our goodwill balance at December 31, 2010 was $938.9 million. Based upon our current strategic planning and associated goodwill impairment assessments, there are currently no indicators of impairment for any of our reporting units.

We review tangible assets and finite-lived intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If an evaluation is required, the estimated cash flows associated with the asset or asset group will be compared to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if an impairment exists. Finite-lived identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 20 years, absent any indicators of impairment. For further discussion regarding goodwill and other intangibles, see Note 4 to our Financial Statements.

 

 

Foreign Currency Risk — We are exposed to market risk associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. One form of exposure to fluctuating exchange rates relates to the effects of translating financial statements of foreign operations into our reporting currency, which are recognized as a cumulative translation adjustment in AOCI. We generally do not hedge our exposure to potential foreign currency translation adjustments.

 

We do not engage in currency speculation; however, we do utilize foreign currency derivatives on an on-going basis to mitigate certain foreign currency-related operating exposures and to hedge intercompany loans utilized to finance non-U.S. subsidiaries. We generally seek hedge accounting treatment for contracts used to hedge operating exposures and designate them as “cash flow hedges.” Therefore, gains and losses exclusive of credit risk and forward points are included in AOCI until the associated underlying operating exposure impacts our earnings. Changes in the fair value of forward points, gains and losses associated with instruments deemed ineffective during the period and instruments that we do not designate as cash flow hedges, including those instruments used to hedge intercompany loans, are recognized within cost of revenue and were not material during 2010.

 

At December 31, 2010, the outstanding notional value of our outstanding forward contracts to hedge certain foreign exchange-related operating exposures totaled $76.2 million, including foreign currency exchange rate exposure associated with the following currencies: Euro ($44.0 million), Singapore Dollar ($10.8 million), Czech Koruna ($10.5 million), Russian Ruble ($5.0 million), Colombian Peso ($3.2 million), British Pound ($1.5 million) and Thai Bhat ($1.2 million). The total net fair value of these contracts was a gain of approximately $0.7 million. The potential change in fair value for our outstanding contracts from a hypothetical ten percent change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates would have been approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2010, the outstanding notional value of our outstanding forward contracts to hedge certain intercompany loans utilized to finance non-U.S. subsidiaries totaled $24.4 million, including foreign currency exchange rate exposure associated with the Singapore Dollar ($13.9 million) and Euro ($10.5 million). The potential change in fair value for our outstanding contracts from a hypothetical ten percent change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates would have been approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Interest Rate Risk — We continue to utilize a swap arrangement to hedge against interest rate variability associated with our Term Loan. The swap arrangement has been designated as a cash flow hedge as its critical terms matched those of the Term Loan at inception and as of December 31, 2010. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the hedge are recognized through AOCI. The potential change in fair value for our interest rate swap from a hypothetical one percent change in the LIBOR rate would have been approximately $0.9 million and $2.0 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Other — The carrying value of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and notes payable approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair value of our long-term debt, based upon the current market rates for debt with similar credit risk and maturity, approximated its carrying value as interest is based upon LIBOR plus an applicable floating spread and is paid quarterly in arrears. See Note 8 to our Financial Statements for quantification of our financial instruments.

 

Table of Contents

 

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Included in our system of internal control are written policies, an organizational structure providing division of responsibilities, the selection and training of qualified personnel and a program of financial and operations reviews by our professional staff of corporate auditors.

 

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the underlying transactions, including the acquisition and disposition of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that our assets are safeguarded and transactions are executed in accordance with management’s and our directors’ authorization and are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our evaluation was based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

 

Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010. The conclusion of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer is based upon the recognition that there are inherent limitations in all systems of internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

 

 

February 22, 2011

 

The Supervisory Board and Shareholders of

Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.

 

We have audited Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and subsidiaries’ maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, listed in the Index at Item 15. Our report dated February 22, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

 

Houston, Texas

February 22, 2011

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Supervisory Board and Shareholders of

Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 22, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

 

Houston, Texas

February 22, 2011

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY