e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34594
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
27-0676603 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
875 Third Avenue |
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
10022 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(zip code) |
(212) 725-7550
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer and accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of
May 12, 2010 there were 42,899,474 outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock and
4,221,096 of Restricted Class A Common Stock at a par value of $0.01 per share; 12,798,118
outstanding shares of Class B-1 Common Stock at a par value of $0.01; 5,561,630 outstanding shares
of Class B-2 Common Stock at a par value of $0.01; 5,561,630 outstanding shares of Class B-3 Common
Stock at a par value of $0.01; and 5,399,778 outstanding shares of Class B-4 Common Stock at a par
value of $0.01.
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
For the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
Nine months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
803,963 |
|
|
$ |
416,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,637,922 |
|
|
$ |
1,279,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of providing services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
537,706 |
|
|
|
260,384 |
|
|
|
1,062,251 |
|
|
|
787,751 |
|
Professional and subcontracted services |
|
|
52,139 |
|
|
|
30,939 |
|
|
|
102,004 |
|
|
|
91,947 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
35,735 |
|
|
|
17,787 |
|
|
|
73,402 |
|
|
|
54,529 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
69,999 |
|
|
|
38,563 |
|
|
|
141,454 |
|
|
|
131,258 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
32,834 |
|
|
|
17,531 |
|
|
|
69,019 |
|
|
|
55,265 |
|
Transaction and integration expenses |
|
|
24,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752,818 |
|
|
|
365,204 |
|
|
|
1,497,827 |
|
|
|
1,120,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
51,145 |
|
|
|
51,790 |
|
|
|
140,095 |
|
|
|
158,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/Income from affiliates |
|
|
(1,049 |
) |
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
6,398 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,273 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
|
|
(2,181 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
49,696 |
|
|
|
56,653 |
|
|
|
140,868 |
|
|
|
168,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
40,329 |
|
|
|
15,927 |
|
|
|
77,792 |
|
|
|
52,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
9,367 |
|
|
|
40,726 |
|
|
|
63,076 |
|
|
|
115,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income attributable to controlling interests |
|
$ |
8,815 |
|
|
$ |
40,591 |
|
|
$ |
62,468 |
|
|
$ |
115,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income Basic |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
2.70 |
|
Net income Diluted |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
2.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares of common stock, basic (000) |
|
|
76,414 |
|
|
|
42,609 |
|
|
|
53,777 |
|
|
|
42,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares of common stock, diluted (000) |
|
|
76,416 |
|
|
|
42,773 |
|
|
|
53,920 |
|
|
|
42,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
condensed consolidated financial statements
1
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars, Except Share Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
474,950 |
|
|
$ |
209,832 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
124,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from clients: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billed, net of allowances of $10,182 and $4,452 |
|
|
411,126 |
|
|
|
190,991 |
|
Unbilled, at estimated net realizable value |
|
|
257,091 |
|
|
|
111,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
668,217 |
|
|
|
302,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
202,063 |
|
|
|
53,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,469,403 |
|
|
|
565,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
237,599 |
|
|
|
174,857 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
162,352 |
|
|
|
111,912 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,804,128 |
|
|
|
542,754 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
708,555 |
|
|
|
186,233 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
156,645 |
|
|
|
44,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,538,682 |
|
|
$ |
1,626,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred income |
|
$ |
396,456 |
|
|
$ |
281,946 |
|
Reinsurance payables |
|
|
153,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable |
|
|
200,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
143,470 |
|
|
|
51,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
894,002 |
|
|
|
333,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued retirement benefits |
|
|
908,154 |
|
|
|
292,555 |
|
Professional liability claims reserve |
|
|
341,323 |
|
|
|
43,229 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
153,636 |
|
|
|
102,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
2,312,115 |
|
|
|
771,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock $.01 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000,000 shares authorized;
47,051,134 and 0 issued and
47,051,134 and 0 outstanding |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
99,000,000 shares authorized;
0 and 43,813,451 issued and
0 and 42,657,431 outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
438 |
|
Class B Common Stock $.01 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,500,000 shares authorized;
29,374,775 and 0 issued and
29,374,775 and 0 outstanding |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,750,520 |
|
|
|
452,938 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost - 0 and 1,156,020 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,299 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
659,007 |
|
|
|
608,634 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(195,291 |
) |
|
|
(145,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
2,215,000 |
|
|
|
853,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
11,567 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
2,226,567 |
|
|
|
854,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Total Equity |
|
$ |
4,538,682 |
|
|
$ |
1,626,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
condensed consolidated financial statements
2
TOWERS
WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows (used in)/from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
63,076 |
|
|
|
115,734 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful receivables from clients |
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
4,113 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
49,683 |
|
|
|
44,597 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
19,336 |
|
|
|
10,668 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
63,364 |
|
|
|
7,446 |
|
Equity from affiliates |
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
(6,171 |
) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
27,016 |
|
|
|
2,901 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(3,117 |
) |
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(net of business acquisitions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from clients |
|
|
(53,004 |
) |
|
|
34,847 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(46,470 |
) |
|
|
(7,348 |
) |
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
(14,627 |
) |
|
|
3,603 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred income |
|
|
(311,237 |
) |
|
|
(47,020 |
) |
Reinsurance payables |
|
|
37,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued retirement benefits |
|
|
(6,313 |
) |
|
|
(40,789 |
) |
Professional liability claims reserves |
|
|
14,870 |
|
|
|
(8,073 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(4,858 |
) |
|
|
(14,060 |
) |
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(32,698 |
) |
|
|
(14,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows (used in)/from operating activities: |
|
|
(189,568 |
) |
|
|
83,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows
from/(used in) investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for business acquisitions |
|
|
(200,025 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
Cash acquired from business acquisitions |
|
|
721,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed assets |
|
|
(11,479 |
) |
|
|
(29,772 |
) |
Capitalized software costs |
|
|
(15,638 |
) |
|
|
(14,503 |
) |
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
(17,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Redemption of held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,007 |
) |
Contingent proceeds from divestitures |
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows
from/(used in) investing activities: |
|
|
485,736 |
|
|
|
(43,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under Credit Facility |
|
|
15,368 |
|
|
|
40,223 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(9,562 |
) |
|
|
(9,586 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(34,922 |
) |
|
|
(77,443 |
) |
Issuances of common stock and excess tax benefit |
|
|
4,447 |
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows
used in financing activities: |
|
|
(24,669 |
) |
|
|
(41,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
|
|
(6,381 |
) |
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
265,118 |
|
|
|
(6,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
209,832 |
|
|
|
124,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
474,950 |
|
|
$ |
118,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
|
$ |
2,091 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
48,823 |
|
|
$ |
46,889 |
|
See accompanying notes to the
condensed consolidated financial statements
3
TOWERS
WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars, Except Share Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(number of shares, |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Stock, |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in thousands) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
at Cost |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
42,657 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
$ |
452,938 |
|
|
$ |
(63,299 |
) |
|
$ |
608,634 |
|
|
$ |
(145,073 |
) |
|
$ |
853,638 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,468 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,218 |
) |
|
|
(50,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,250 |
|
Class A common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,095 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,922 |
) |
Issuances of common stock and excess tax benefit |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
21,104 |
|
|
|
17,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,750 |
|
Retirement of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(80,565 |
) |
|
|
80,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for consideration of Merger: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of class A restricted shares |
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
53,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,659 |
|
Issuance of class B1-B4 shares |
|
|
29,375 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
1,303,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,303,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
76,426 |
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
1,750,520 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
659,007 |
|
|
$ |
(195,291 |
) |
|
$ |
2,215,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
condensed consolidated financial statements
4
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular amounts are in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Organization and Basis of Presentation.
On January 1, 2010, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended by Amendment No. 1
(the Merger Agreement), Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. (Watson Wyatt) and Towers, Perrin, Forster
& Crosby, Inc. (Towers Perrin) combined their businesses through two simultaneous mergers (the
Merger) and became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Jupiter Saturn Holding Company, which
subsequently changed its name to Towers Watson & Co. (Towers Watson, the Company or we).
Since the consummation of the Merger, Towers Perrin changed its name to Towers Watson Pennsylvania
Inc.; and Watson Wyatt changed its name to Towers Watson Delaware Holdings Inc. However, for ease
of reference, we continue to use the legacy Towers Perrin and Watson Wyatt names throughout this
Report.
Although the business combination of Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin was a merger of equals,
generally accepted accounting principles require that one of the combining entities be identified
as the acquirer by reviewing facts and circumstances as of the acquisition date. Watson Wyatt was
determined to be the accounting acquirer. This conclusion is primarily supported by the facts that
Watson Wyatt shareholders owned approximately 56 percent of all Towers Watson common stock after
the redemption of Towers Watson Class R common stock and that Watson Wyatts Chief Executive
Officer became the Chief Executive Officer of Towers Watson. Watson Wyatt is the
accounting predecessor in the Merger and as such, the historical results of Watson Wyatt through
December 31, 2009 have become those of the new registrant, Towers Watson. Towers Watsons condensed
consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010
include the results of Towers Perrins operations beginning January 1, 2010.
The accompanying unaudited quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements of Towers Watson &
Co. and our subsidiaries (collectively referred to as we, Towers Watson or the Company) are
presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission
(SEC) for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management,
these condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed
consolidated financial statements and results for the interim periods. All intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read together with the Watson Wyatt audited consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009, which is filed under the historical registrant Watson Wyatt (now found under the filings of
Towers Watson Delaware Holdings Inc.) with the SEC and Towers Watsons Registration Statement on
Form S-4/A (Registration No. 333-161705) filed with the SEC, and declared effective on November 9,
2009. Both of such reports may be accessed via EDGAR on the SECs web site at www.sec.gov. Balance
sheet data as of June 30, 2009 was derived from Watson Wyatts audited financial statements.
Our fiscal year 2010 began July 1, 2009 and ends June 30, 2010.
5
The results of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 are not indicative of the
results that can be expected for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, especially in light
of the Merger. The results reflect certain estimates and assumptions made by management including
those estimates used in calculating Merger consideration and fair value of tangible and
intangibles, net assets of Towers Perrin as of January 1, 2010, estimated bonuses and anticipated
tax liabilities that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements
and related notes.
Note 2 Merger with Towers Perrin.
Consideration Exchanged
The consummation of the Merger resulted in the following:
|
|
|
Each share of Watson Wyatt Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Merger was converted into the right to receive one (1)
share of Towers Watson Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Class A Common
Stock.). In addition, outstanding deferred rights to receive Watson Wyatt Class A common
stock were converted into the right to receive an equal number of shares of Towers Watson
Class A common stock, and outstanding options to purchase Watson Wyatt Class A common stock
were assumed by Towers Watson and converted on a one-for-one basis into fully-vested
options to purchase shares of Towers Watson Class A common stock with the same exercise
price as the underlying Watson Wyatt options. |
|
|
|
|
Each share of Towers Perrin common stock, par value $0.50 per share issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Merger was converted into the right to receive
545.627600377 fully-paid and nonassessable shares of Towers Watson common stock, which
ratio was determined at the time of the Merger in accordance with the Merger Agreement.
Shares of Towers Watson common stock issued to Towers Perrin shareholders (other than
209,013 shares issued to Towers Perrin shareholders located in certain countries (as detailed
below) and other than shares issued to Towers Perrin shareholders who elected to receive a
portion of their Merger Consideration as shares of Towers Watsons Class R common stock,
par value $0.01 per share) have been divided among four series of non-transferable Towers
Watson common stock, Classes B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-4, each with a par value of $0.01 per
share. Outstanding shares of Towers Watson Class B common stock generally will
automatically convert on a one-for-one basis into shares of freely transferable shares of
Towers Watson Class A common stock on the following timetable: |
|
|
|
|
Class B-1 common stock- January 1, 2011
Class B-2 common stock- January 1, 2012
Class B-3 common stock- January 1, 2013
Class B-4 common stock- January 1, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the Merger Agreement, to provide immediate liquidity to certain
Towers Perrin shareholders located in countries where the Merger consideration may be
subject to current tax, such Towers Perrin shareholders received a portion of their merger
consideration in the form of unrestricted shares of Towers Watson Class A Common Stock
instead of shares of Towers Watson Class B Common Stock. |
|
|
|
|
Certain Towers Perrin shareholders who met defined age and service criteria elected to
terminate their employment no later than January 31, 2010 (except as extended by Towers
Watsons executive committee) and receive a portion of their Merger consideration in shares
of Towers Watson Class R Common Stock, which subsequently were automatically redeemed for
equal amounts of cash and subordinated one-year promissory notes (such election, a Class R
Election). The amount of cash and principal amount of Towers Watson notes issued in
exchange for each share of Towers Watson Class R Common Stock was determined based on the
Exchange Ratio and the average closing price per share of Watson Wyatt Common Stock for the
10 trading days ending on December 28, 2009, the second trading day immediately prior to
the closing of the Merger, which was $46.79. Class R Elections were prorated so that the
amount of cash and notes payable on the automatic conversion of the shares of Towers Watson
Class R common stock would not exceed $400
|
6
|
|
|
million, which amount was agreed to by Towers Perrin and Watson Wyatt prior to the closing of
the Merger. Towers Perrin shareholders who made valid Class R Elections received shares of
Towers Watson Class B-1 common stock in exchange for their shares of Towers Perrin common
stock that were not exchanged for shares of Towers Watson Class R common stock due to
proration or because the Towers Perrin shareholder elected to receive less than 100 percent
of his or her Merger consideration in the form of Towers Watson Class R common stock. As
noted above, shares of Towers Watson Class B-1 common stock generally will automatically
convert into freely tradable shares of Towers Watson Class A Common Stock on January 1, 2011. |
|
|
|
Prior to the Merger, Towers Perrin issued awards of restricted stock units to certain
Towers Perrin employees, which were exchanged in the Merger for shares of Towers Watson
Class A common stock, generally subject to a three-year contractual vesting schedule and
other restrictions (Restricted Towers Watson Class A Common Stock). At the time of the
Merger, the restricted stock units were converted using the Merger Agreement exchange ratio
(545.627600377) into Towers Watson Restricted Class A common stock. The restriction on the
underlying shares lapses over the service period for the employees, which is from grant
date in October 2009 to January 1, 2011 through 2013, annually. The Towers Watson
Restricted Class A common stock is held by an administrator or in a trust and the dividends
accrue and the shares are voted in blocks according to provisions in the Merger Agreement. |
In summary, as a result of closing of the Merger, all outstanding Towers Perrin and Watson Wyatt
common stock, restricted stock units and derivative securities were converted into the right to
receive the following forms of consideration:
|
|
|
46,911,275 shares of Towers Watson Class A Common Stock (less a number of shares
that were withheld for tax purposes in respect of Watson Wyatt deferred
stock units and deferred shares), including 4,248,984 shares of Restricted Towers Watson
Class A Common Stock; |
|
|
|
|
29,483,008 shares of Towers Watson Class B Common Stock, including: |
|
|
|
|
12,798,118 shares of Class B-1 Common Stock; |
|
|
|
|
5,561,630 shares of Class B-2 Common Stock; |
|
|
|
|
5,561,630 shares of Class B-3 Common Stock; and |
|
|
|
|
5,561,630 shares of Class B-4 Common Stock; |
|
|
|
|
8,548,835 shares of Towers Watson Class R Common Stock, which subsequently were
redeemed automatically in exchange for the right to receive: |
|
|
|
|
$200 million in cash (subject to applicable tax withholding and gross-up
adjustments); and |
|
|
|
|
Towers Watson Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $200 million. |
In addition, on January 1, 2010, Towers Watson issued shares of Class F stock, no par value, pro
rata to all holders of Towers Perrin common stock, which shares represent only the contingent right
to receive, three years after the Merger, a pro rata portion of a number of shares of Towers Watson
Class A common stock equal to the number of shares of Restricted Towers Watson Class A common stock
forfeited by former Towers Perrin employees plus a number of shares of Towers Watson Class A common
stock with a value equivalent to the amount of dividends attributed to such forfeited shares.
The Towers Watson common stock and Towers Watson Notes issued in conjunction with the Merger were
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Towers Watsons Registration
Statement on Form S-4/A (Registration No. 333-161705) filed with the SEC, and declared effective on
November 9, 2009. The Class A Common Stock is listed on The New York Stock Exchange, LLC and The
NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC under the ticker symbol TW, and began trading on January 4, 2010.
7
For a more complete description of the Merger Agreement and Amendment No.1 to the Merger Agreement,
please see the registration statement on Form S-4/A filed by Towers Watson with the SEC
(Registration No. 333-161705) and declared effective on November 9, 2009.
Fair Value of Consideration
The business combination has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting as
prescribed in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805, Business Combinations, (Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R). The total consideration of $1,757,379,000 is comprised
of $200 million of cash and $200 million of notes payable to Class R shareholders and of stock
consideration for the following: Class A shares for certain foreign shareholders of $9,932,000,
Restricted Class B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-4 shares of $1,303,718,000 and Restricted Class A shares of
$43,729,000.
The consideration given in the form of cash and notes payable was measured in the amount of cash
paid and notes payable issued. According to ASC 805 the fair value of the securities traded in the
market the day before the merger is consummated is used to determine the fair value of the equity
consideration. As accounting predecessor, Watson Wyatts closing share price on the NYSE on
December 31, 2009 of $47.52 was used to determine the fair value of equity consideration. The
equity consideration for the Class A shares to certain foreign shareholders of $9,932,000 is valued
at $47.52 multiplied by 209,013, the shares issued. The estimated fair value of the restricted
Class B1-B4 shares of $1,303,718,000 was calculated at $47.52 multiplied by 29,483,008, the shares
issued and using a discount to approximate the fair value of the one, two, three and four-year
period of restriction lapse until the shares are converted into freely-tradable Towers Watson Class
A common stock. The estimated fair value of the Restricted Class A shares of $43,729,000 includes
(i) the vested portion of the Towers Perrin restricted stock units which was earned by employees
related to the service condition from grant date in October 2009 until the Merger date January 1,
2010 valued at $47.52 per share and (ii) 10 percent of the unvested portion of the Towers Perrin
restricted stock units which is the estimate of forfeitures that will result from employees not
fulfilling the service condition during the three year vesting post-Merger which will be
proportionately distributed to Class F shareholders, the Towers Perrin shareholders as of the
Merger date.
PCIC
As of December 31, 2009, Towers Perrin and Watson Wyatt each owned a 36.4 percent equity investment
in Professional Consultants Insurance Company (PCIC). PCIC is a captive insurance company that
provides professional liability insurance on a claims-made basis. Watson Wyatt applied the equity
method of accounting for its investment in PCIC through December 31, 2009. Towers Watsons
financial statements as of and for the nine month period ended March 31, 2010, included herein,
reflect Watson Wyatts equity method of accounting for PCIC for the six month period ended December
31, 2009 which resulted in a recording a loss from affiliates of $113 thousand.
As a result of the Merger, Towers Watson has a majority ownership interest in PCIC and consequently
retained a majority of the economic risks and rewards of PCIC. As a result, Towers Watson now
consolidates PCICs financial position and results of operations in its consolidated financial
statements beginning January 1, 2010. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Fair value of net assets acquired and intangibles
According to ASC805, the assets acquired and liabilities of Towers Perrin assumed by Towers Watson
were recorded at their respective fair values as of the combination date, January 1, 2010. The
valuation was performed by a third-party valuation specialist who assisted management in the
determination of estimated fair value including significant estimates and assumptions. Management
also evaluated the methodology and valuation models to determine the estimated useful lives and
amortization method.
8
Customer relationships
Customer relationship intangible was identified separate from goodwill based on determination of
the length, strength and contractual nature of the relationship that Towers Perrin shared with its
clients. This customer relationship information was analyzed via the application of the
multi-period excess earnings method, an income approach. Several assumptions used in the income
approach are revenue growth, retention rate, operating expenses, charge for contributory assets and
trade name and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the cash flows. The
customer relationship, valued at $140.8 million, is amortized on an accelerated amortization basis
over the estimated useful life of 12 years.
Trademarks and trade names
The Towers Perrin trade name was identified separate from goodwill based on evaluation of the
importance of the Towers Perrin trade name to the Towers Perrin business through understanding the
brand recognition in the market, importance of the trade name to the customer, and the amount of
revenue associated with the trade name. In developing the estimated fair value, the trade name was
valued utilizing the relief from royalty method, an income approach. Significant assumptions used
in the relief from royalty method were revenue growth, royalty rate, and discount rate used to
calculate the present value of cash flows. The Towers Perrin trade name, valued at $275.5 million,
has an estimated indefinite lived asset and is not amortized but tested annually for impairment or
if factors exist to indicate impairment.
Developed technology
Developed technology identified separately from goodwill consists of intellectual property such as
proprietary software used internally for revenue producing activities or by clients. Developed
technology can provide significant advantages to the owner in terms of product differentiation,
cost advantages and other competitive advantages. Three external-use technologies of Towers
Perrin: Moses, EVALUE and the Global Compensation technology are offered for sale or subscription
and have associated revenue streams. In addition, twenty-two internally developed technology
applications were identified as primary applications used in Towers Perrins business but did not
have associated revenue streams. The external-use technologies, for which revenue sources were
directly identified, were valued by applying the multi-period excess earnings method, an income
approach. The internal-use technologies were valued by applying the cost to replicate method, a
cost approach. Significant assumptions used in the multi-period excess earnings method were revenue
growth, decay rate, cost of revenue, operating expenses, charge for use of contributory assets and
trade name and discount rate used to calculate the present value of the cash flows. The
external-use technology, valued at $58.2 million, is amortized on an accelerated basis over a
weighted-average useful life of 3.6 years. Significant assumptions used in the cost to replicate
method were cost to replace including the number and skill level of man hours and cost per hour
based on fully burdened salary of staff; profit margin if the work were performed by a third-party;
and obsolescence factor. The internal-use technology, valued at $67.2 million, is amortized on a
straight-line basis over the weighted-average estimated useful life of 4.2 years.
Favorable and unfavorable lease contracts
Assets and liabilities for favorable and unfavorable lease contracts were identified separately
from goodwill related for 39 of Towers Perrins material real estate leases agreements. The assets
and liabilities were valued by comparing cash obligations for each material lease agreement to the
estimated market rent at the time of the transaction. The resulting favorable or unfavorable
positions are recorded gross as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. Significant
assumptions used in the valuation were market rent, annual escalation percentages based on current
inflation rates and a discount rate used to calculate the present value of the cash flows. Both
the assets for favorable lease agreements, valued at $12.1 million, and the liabilities for
unfavorable lease agreements, valued at $28.1 million, are amortized on a straight-line basis over
the life of the respective lease to occupancy costs. The weighted-average estimated useful life
for the leases is 7.1 years.
9
As of the date of the filing of this quarterly report, the initial accounting for this business
combination is not yet complete. Although the Company does not anticipate any significant
adjustments, to the extent that the estimates used need to be refined, the Company will do so upon
making that determination but not later than one year from the business combination date.
The table below sets forth a preliminary estimate of the Merger consideration transferred to Towers
Perrin shareholders and the preliminary estimate of tangible and intangible net assets received in
the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
Calculation of Consideration Transferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
Notes payable issued to Towers Perrin shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towers Perrin shares converted to Towers Watson shares |
|
|
42,489,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Class R shares |
|
|
(8,548,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less 10% of consideration in RSUs |
|
|
(4,248,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Towers Watson stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,692,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Closing price of Watson Wyatt stock, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average discount for restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate fair value of the Towers Watson common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313,650 |
|
Fair value of RSUs assumed in the Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,757,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Tangible and Intangible Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
982,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
553,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(674,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(823,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,291,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated tangible and intangible net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,757,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations have been provided to
present illustrative combined unaudited statements of operations for the nine months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, giving effect to the business combination as if it had been completed on July 1,
2009 and July 1, 2008, respectively. The unaudited historical combined statement of operations for
the three month period ended March 31, 2010 reflects the actual financial results of the combined
Company. All other periods reflect the pro forma historical financial results from Watson Wyatt and
Towers Perrin. The unaudited pro forma combined financial information shows the impact of the
business combination on Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrins historical results of operations. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operation are presented for illustrative
purposes only and are not indicative of the results of operations that might have occurred had the
business combination actually taken place as of the dates specified, or that may be expected to
occur in the future. We do not assume any benefits from any cost savings or synergies expected to
result from the Merger, except for any cost savings or synergies actually realized by the Company
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010.
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma, as adjusted, |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,431,008 |
|
|
$ |
2,484,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of providing services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
1,667,884 |
|
|
|
1,711,391 |
|
Professional and subcontracted services |
|
|
181,908 |
|
|
|
229,936 |
|
Occupancy, communications and other |
|
|
111,013 |
|
|
|
108,725 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
188,954 |
|
|
|
255,634 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
99,534 |
|
|
|
102,537 |
|
Transaction and integration expenses |
|
|
49,697 |
|
|
|
49,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,298,990 |
|
|
|
2,457,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
132,018 |
|
|
|
26,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from affiliates |
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
(10,326 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
7,231 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(7,957 |
) |
|
|
(10,252 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
8,885 |
|
|
|
17,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
135,411 |
|
|
|
30,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
60,898 |
|
|
|
25,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
74,513 |
|
|
|
4,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to controlling interests |
|
$ |
74,464 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income Basic |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income Diluted |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock,
basic (000) |
|
|
76,422 |
|
|
|
76,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock,
diluted (000) |
|
|
76,565 |
|
|
|
76,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3 Segment Information.
Towers Watson has three reportable operating segments or practice areas:
(1) Benefits Group
(2) Risk and Financial Services Group
(3) Talent and Rewards Consulting Group
11
Towers Watsons chief operating decision maker is the chief executive officer. It was determined
that Towers Watson operational data used by the chief operating decision maker is that of the new
segments. Management bases strategic goals and decisions on these segments and the data presented
below is more useful to assess the adequacy of strategic decisions, the method of achieving these
strategies and related financial results. Historically Watson Wyatt had five reportable
segments which have been retrospectively adjusted to the new post-Merger segments. The Benefits and
Technology and Administrative Solutions segments were combined and reclassified into the Benefits
Group. The Investment Consulting and Insurance & Financial Services segments were combined and
reclassified into the Risk and Financial Services Group while the Human Capital Group became the
Talent and Rewards Consulting Group.
Management evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on net
operating income on a pre-bonus, pre-tax basis.
The table below presents specified information about reported segments as of and for the three
months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk and Financial |
|
|
Talent and Rewards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits Group |
|
|
Services Group |
|
|
Consulting Group |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue (net of
reimbursable
expenses) |
|
$ |
469,927 |
|
|
$ |
191,064 |
|
|
$ |
122,641 |
|
|
$ |
783,632 |
|
Net operating income |
|
|
151,185 |
|
|
|
53,792 |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
208,532 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
421,198 |
|
|
|
143,457 |
|
|
|
109,439 |
|
|
|
674,094 |
|
The table below presents specified information about reported segments as of and for the three
months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk and Financial |
|
|
Talent and Rewards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits Group |
|
|
Services Group |
|
|
Consulting Group |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue (net of
reimbursable
expenses) |
|
$ |
285,841 |
|
|
$ |
71,037 |
|
|
$ |
46,968 |
|
|
$ |
403,846 |
|
Net operating income |
|
|
90,238 |
|
|
|
19,727 |
|
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
108,478 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
251,617 |
|
|
|
51,197 |
|
|
|
39,425 |
|
|
|
342,239 |
|
The table below presents specified information about reported segments as of and for the nine
months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk and Financial |
|
|
Talent and Rewards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits Group |
|
|
Services Group |
|
|
Consulting Group |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue (net of
reimbursable
expenses) |
|
$ |
1,029,836 |
|
|
$ |
331,314 |
|
|
$ |
230,042 |
|
|
$ |
1,591,192 |
|
Net operating income |
|
|
318,105 |
|
|
|
84,548 |
|
|
|
18,291 |
|
|
|
420,944 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
421,198 |
|
|
|
143,457 |
|
|
|
109,439 |
|
|
|
674,094 |
|
The table below presents specified information about reported segments as of and for the nine
months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk and Financial |
|
|
Talent and Rewards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits Group |
|
|
Services Group |
|
|
Consulting Group |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue (net of
reimbursable
expenses) |
|
$ |
848,734 |
|
|
$ |
213,443 |
|
|
$ |
175,629 |
|
|
$ |
1,237,806 |
|
Net operating income |
|
|
251,315 |
|
|
|
51,417 |
|
|
|
20,637 |
|
|
|
323,369 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
251,617 |
|
|
|
51,197 |
|
|
|
39,425 |
|
|
|
342,239 |
|
Information about interest income and tax expense is not presented as a segment expense
because such items are not considered a responsibility of the segments operating management.
12
Reconciliations of the information reported by segment to the historical consolidated amounts
follow for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended, March 31 |
|
|
Nine Months Ended, March 31 |
|
Revenue: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
783,632 |
|
|
$ |
403,846 |
|
|
$ |
1,591,192 |
|
|
$ |
1,237,806 |
|
Reimbursable
expenses and other |
|
|
20,331 |
|
|
|
13,148 |
|
|
|
46,730 |
|
|
|
41,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
803,963 |
|
|
$ |
416,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,637,922 |
|
|
$ |
1,279,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net
operating income |
|
$ |
208,532 |
|
|
$ |
108,478 |
|
|
$ |
420,994 |
|
|
$ |
323,369 |
|
Differences in
allocation methods (1) |
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
|
|
(1,920 |
) |
|
|
4,444 |
|
|
|
(1,014 |
) |
Amortization of
intangible assets |
|
|
(12,492 |
) |
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
(19,336 |
) |
|
|
(10,668 |
) |
Transaction and
integration expenses |
|
|
(24,405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
restricted A shares |
|
|
(24,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Discretionary
compensation |
|
|
(90,556 |
) |
|
|
(45,779 |
) |
|
|
(185,384 |
) |
|
|
(144,452 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(6,270 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
(6,085 |
) |
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income
taxes |
|
$ |
49,696 |
|
|
$ |
56,653 |
|
|
$ |
140,868 |
|
|
$ |
168,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment
receivables billed
and unbilled (2) |
|
$ |
674,094 |
|
|
$ |
342,239 |
|
|
$ |
674,094 |
|
|
$ |
342,239 |
|
Valuation
differences and
other |
|
|
(5,877 |
) |
|
|
(15,443 |
) |
|
|
(5,877 |
) |
|
|
(15,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total billed and
unbilled receivables |
|
|
668,217 |
|
|
|
326,796 |
|
|
|
668,217 |
|
|
|
326,796 |
|
Assets not reported
by segment |
|
|
3,870,465 |
|
|
|
1,126,783 |
|
|
|
3,870,465 |
|
|
|
1,126,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,538,682 |
|
|
$ |
1,453,579 |
|
|
$ |
4,538,682 |
|
|
$ |
1,453,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain expenses including general and administrative, pension, and medical costs are allocated
to our segments as management believes these costs are largely uncontrollable to the segment. To
the extent the basis for allocation differs from expectation, a reconciling item will be created
between internally allocated expenses and the actual expense that we report for U.S. GAAP purposes. |
|
(2) |
|
Total segment receivables, which reflects the receivable balances used by management to make
business decisions, are included for management reporting purposes net of deferred revenue. |
13
Note 4 Share-based Compensation.
In connection with the Merger, Towers Watson assumed
the amended and restated Watson Wyatt 2001
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Watson Wyatt 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and created the
Towers Watson & Co. 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan. Towers Watson
did not assume the Watson Wyatt 2001 Deferred
Stock Unit Plan for Selected Employees or the Watson Wyatt Amended Compensation Plan for Outside Directors.
Towers Watson & Co. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Towers Watson assumed the amended and restated Watson Wyatt 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
Stock Purchase Plan) which enables employees to purchase shares of Towers Watson stock at a 5
percent discount. The Stock Purchase Plan is a non-compensatory plan under generally accepted
accounting principles of stock-based compensation. As a result, no compensation expense is
recognized in conjunction with this plan. Watson Wyatt originally registered 750,000 shares of its
Class A common stock on December 19, 2001 and an additional 1,500,000 shares of its Class A common
stock on December 16, 2003, of which 196,424 shares remained available for issuance immediately
prior to the Merger at which time 4,500,000 additional shares were added. Towers Watson filed a
Form S-8 Registration Statement in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 registering the 4,696,424
shares available for issuance under the Stock Purchase Plan.
Towers Watson & Co. 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan
In January 2010, Towers Watson filed a Form S-8 Registration Statement to register 12,500,000
shares of Towers Watson Class A common stock that may be issued pursuant to the Towers Watson & Co.
2009 Long Term Incentive Plan (the 2009 Plan) and 125,648 shares of Class A common stock that may
be issued upon exercise of the unvested stock options previously granted under the Watson Wyatt
2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Watson Wyatt 2000 Long-term Incentive Plan was assumed by Towers
Watson and the registered shares for the Watson Wyatt 2000 Long-term Incentive Plan are limited to
exercise of awards which were outstanding at the time of the Merger. The assumed options were
exercisable for shares of Towers Watson Class A Common Stock based on the exchange ratio of one
share of Watson Wyatt Class A common stock underlying the options for one share of Towers Watson
Class A Common Stock. The 2009 Plan was approved by Watson Wyatt shareholders on December 18, 2009.
During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, 108,933 fully-vested stock options were
granted under the 2009 Plan with an exercise price equal to the grant date fair value of Towers
Watson Class A common stock of $45.88. As a result the Company recorded $1.3 million of stock-based
compensation in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. During the three and nine months ended March 31,
2010, 0 and 125,648 stock options, respectively, were granted under the Watson Wyatt 2000 Long-term
Incentive Plan with an exercise price equal to the grant date market price of Watson Wyatts common
stock of $42.47. All outstanding Watson Wyatt stock options became fully vested at the time of the
Merger with the exercise price as of the original grant date. As a result, $1.1 million of the
unamortized grant date fair value of the options was expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
There were no grants of stock options during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009.
The weighted-average fair value of the stock option grants was calculated using the Black-Scholes
formula and are included in the valuation assumptions table below. In addition, a post-vesting
discount was calculated using 1.4 percent, the risk-free interest rate of a three-year bond,
compounded over three-years. The post-vesting discount was used to estimate fair value as there is
a transfer restriction for three years of the stock options underlying shares once vested.
Compensation expense is recorded over a three-year graded vesting term as if one third of the
options granted to a participant are granted over one year, one third over two years and the
remaining one third over three years.
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Stock option grants: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Expected lives in years |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
11.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares granted |
|
|
108,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
Former Watson Wyatt Plans and Change of Control Provisions
Amended Compensation Plan for Outside Directors
Under this Plan, outside Watson Wyatt Directors were initially paid in shares of Watson Wyatts
common stock, or in a combination of cash and shares, quarterly, at the completed quarter-end share
price (which approximates fair value), for services provided during the preceding quarter.
Restricted Stock Units
The Watson Wyatt 2001 Deferred Stock Unit Plan for Selected Employees was intended to provide
selected associates with additional incentives by permitting Watson Wyatt to grant them an equity
interest in the form of restricted stock units, in lieu of a portion of their annual fiscal year
end bonus. Shares under this plan are awarded during the first quarter of each fiscal year. During
the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, 219,751 shares of common stock were awarded at an average
market price of $44.08 for a total fair value of $9.7 million. During the first quarter of fiscal
year 2009, 295,775 shares of common stock were awarded at an average market price of $54.24 for a
total fair value of $16.0 million.
Deferred Stock Units
Under the Watson Wyatt 2001 Deferred Stock Unit Plan for Selected Employees there were Performance
Share Bonus Incentive Programs (SBI) which consisted of grants of deferred stock units based on
either salary or on the value of the cash portion of the eligible participants fiscal year-end
bonus target and a multiplier, which was then converted into a target number of deferred stock
units based upon Watson Wyatts stock price as of the quarter end prior to grant. Participants
vested between zero and 170 percent of the target number of deferred stock units or between zero
and 100 percent based on the extent to which financial and strategic performance metrics were
achieved over three fiscal year periods. The financial and strategic performance metrics were
established at the beginning of each performance period. For the performance periods covering
fiscal years 2007 through 2009, 2008 through 2010, and 2009 through 2011, the vesting criteria are
based upon growth specific metrics such as earnings per share, net operating income and revenue.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, 94,906 shares vested, of which 66,065 were deferred
and 28,841 were awarded at a market price of $44.07 to certain senior executive officers under the
SBI 2007 plan, which represented vesting at 135 percent of the target number of deferred stock
units. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, 164,457 shares vested, of which, 120,396 were
deferred and 44,061 were awarded at a market price of $56.83 to certain senior executive officers
under the SBI 2006 plan, which represented vesting at 170 percent of the target number of deferred
stock units.
Historically, Watson Wyatts management periodically reviewed conditions that would affect the
vesting of performance-based awards and adjusts compensation expense, if necessary, based on
achievement of financial performance metrics set by the Compensation Committee of Watson Wyatt. The
SBI 2008 and 2009 plan documents stated that the Compensation Committee had the discretion to
accelerate the vesting of awards under the SBI Program in connection with a change in control.
Based on available plan performance information, the Compensation
15
Committee concluded that (i) no payout would be made under the SBI 2008 plan upon the date of the
Merger, and (ii) it would settle the SBI 2009 plan at 100 percent of target to take into account
that the performance period would only be halfway completed as of the closing date of the Merger.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, Watson Wyatts management evaluated the performance
metrics of the SBI 2008 for Select Associates, and based on an update to the forecast for the
remaining performance period, the accrual of compensation expense recorded was $3.0 million in the
three months ended December 31, 2009. Approximately $3.4 million of compensation expense was
recorded relative to the SBI plans during the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 as a result of
change of control provisions. In addition, 142,081 of fully vested deferred restricted stock units
from the fiscal year 2005 through 2007 plans were distributed subsequent to the Merger as the 2001
Deferred Stock Unit Plan for Selected Employees was not assumed by Towers Watson.
Note 5 Retirement Benefits.
Defined Benefit Plans
Towers Watson sponsors both qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans and other
post-employment benefit or OPEB plans in North America and Europe. These funded and unfunded
plans represent 90 percent of total Towers Watsons pension obligations and as a result are
disclosed herein. Towers Watson also sponsors funded and unfunded defined benefit pension plans in
certain other countries as well, representing the remaining 10 percent of the liability.
Under the legacy Watson Wyatt plans in North America, benefits are based on the number of years of
service and the associates compensation during the five highest paid consecutive years of service.
The non-qualified plan, included only in North America, provides for pension benefits that would be
covered under the qualified plan but are limited by the Internal Revenue Code. The non-qualified
plan has no assets and therefore is an unfunded arrangement. Beginning January 2008, Watson Wyatt
made changes to the plan in the U.K. related to years of service used in calculating benefits for
associates. Benefits earned prior to January 2008 are based on the number of years of service and
the associates compensation during the three years before leaving the plan and benefits earned
after January 2008 are based on the number of years of service and the associates average
compensation during the associates term of service since that date. The plan liabilities in
Germany were a result of Watson Wyatts acquisition of Heissmann GmbH in 2007. A significant
percentage of the liabilities represent the grandfathered pension benefit for employees hired prior
to a July 1991 plan amendment. The pension plan for those hired after July 1991 is a defined
contribution type arrangement. In the Netherlands, the pension benefit is a percentage of service
and average salary over the working life of the employee, where salary includes allowances and
bonuses up to a set maximum salary and is offset by the current social security benefit.
The benefit liability is reflected on the balance sheet. The measurement date for each of the
plans is June 30.
The legacy Towers Perrin pension plans in the U.S. accrue benefits under a cash-balance formula for
employees hired or rehired after 2002 and for all employees for service after 2007. For employees
hired prior to 2003 and active as of January 2003, benefits prior to 2008 are based on a
combination of a cash balance formula, for the period after 2002, and a final average pay formula
based on years of plan service and the highest five consecutive years of plan compensation prior to
2008. Under the cash balance formula benefits are based on a percentage of each year of the
employees plan compensation. The Canadian Retirement Plan provides a choice of a defined benefit
approach or a defined contribution approach. The non-qualified plans in North America provide for
pension benefits that would be covered under the qualified plan in the respective country but are
limited by statutory maximums. The non-qualified plans have no assets and therefore are unfunded
arrangements. The U.K. Plan provides predominantly lump sum benefits. Benefit accruals under the
U.K. Plan ceased on March 31, 2008. The plans in Germany mostly provide benefits under a
cash balance benefit formula. Benefits under the Netherlands plan accrue on a final pay basis on
earnings up to a maximum amount each year. The benefit assets and liabilities are reflected on the
balance sheet. The measurement date for each of the plans has historically been December
31, but will be changed to June 30 as a result of the Merger.
16
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost for Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The following tables set forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Companys
defined benefit pension plan for North America and Europe for the three and nine month periods
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost |
|
$ |
13,107 |
|
|
$ |
3,217 |
|
|
$ |
5,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
35,787 |
|
|
|
10,037 |
|
|
|
12,118 |
|
|
|
3,593 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(35,146 |
) |
|
|
(8,659 |
) |
|
|
(12,397 |
) |
|
|
(3,258 |
) |
Amortization of Net Loss/(Gain) |
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Amortization of Prior Service
(Credit)/Cost |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost |
|
$ |
17,106 |
|
|
$ |
5,276 |
|
|
$ |
6,993 |
|
|
$ |
1,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost |
|
$ |
25,009 |
|
|
$ |
7,044 |
|
|
$ |
18,884 |
|
|
$ |
5,930 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
60,604 |
|
|
|
21,708 |
|
|
|
36,489 |
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(58,282 |
) |
|
|
(18,836 |
) |
|
|
(38,045 |
) |
|
|
(16,318 |
) |
Amortization of Net Loss/(Gain) |
|
|
11,080 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
6,622 |
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
Amortization of Prior Service Cost |
|
|
(1,218 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(1,705 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost |
|
$ |
37,193 |
|
|
$ |
11,960 |
|
|
$ |
22,245 |
|
|
$ |
6,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fiscal year 2010 net periodic benefit cost is based, in part, on the following rate assumptions
as of June 30, 2009 for the North America and Europe plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
Europe |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
|
6.06 |
% |
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
|
|
8.10 |
% |
|
|
6.51 |
% |
Rate of increase in compensation levels |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
4.90 |
% |
Employer Contributions
The Company made $32.4 million in contributions to the North American plans during the first nine
months of fiscal year 2010 and anticipates making $1.6 million in contributions over the remainder
of the fiscal year. The Company made $15.7 million in contributions to Europe plans during the
first nine months of fiscal year 2010 and anticipates making $4.3 million in contributions over the
remainder of the fiscal year.
17
Defined Contribution Plans
Under the Watson Wyatt legacy plan, we sponsor a savings plan that provides benefits to
substantially all U.S. associates. The Company matches employee contributions at a rate of 50% of
the first 6% up to $60,000 of associates eligible compensation. The Company will also make an
annual profit sharing contribution to the plan in an amount that is dependent upon the Companys
financial performance during the fiscal year. The Watson Wyatt U.K. pension plan has a money
purchase section to which the Company makes core contributions plus additional contributions
matching those of the participating employees up to a maximum rate. Contribution rates are
dependent upon the age of the participant and on whether or not they arise from salary sacrifice
arrangements through which an individual has taken a reduction in salary and the Company has paid
an equivalent amount as pension contributions. Core contributions amount to 2-6% of pensionable
salary with additional matching contributions of a further 2-6%.
The Towers Perrin legacy plans consist of sponsoring savings plans in 21 countries that provide
benefits to substantially all employees within those countries. Certain of these plans provide for
a Company match to employee contributions at various rates. In the U.S., the company provides a
matching contribution of 100% of the first 5% of employee contributions. The Company makes
contributions of 10% of pay to the legacy Towers Perrin UK plan.
Health Care Benefits
In the legacy Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin U.S. plans, we sponsor a contributory health care plan
that provides hospitalization, medical and dental benefits to substantially all U.S. associates. We
accrue a liability for estimated incurred but unreported claims based on projected use of the plan
as well as prior plan history.
Postretirement Benefits
Under both the Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin plans, we provide certain health care and life
insurance benefits for retired associates. The principal plans cover associates in the U.S. and
Canada who have met certain eligibility requirements. Our principal post-retirement benefit plans
are primarily unfunded. We accrue a liability for these benefits.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost for Other Postretirement Plans
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Companys
healthcare and post-retirement plans for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
1,995 |
|
|
$ |
930 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
3,721 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
5,034 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net gain |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
(700 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
4,670 |
|
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
5,743 |
|
|
$ |
1,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
The fiscal year 2010 net periodic benefit cost for the healthcare and post retirement plans is
based, in part, on the following rate assumptions as of June 30, 2009 for the North America plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
Discount rate |
|
|
6.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels |
|
|
4.09 |
% |
Note 6 Goodwill and Intangible Assets.
The components of goodwill and intangible assets are outlined below for the nine months ended March
31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Risk and Financial |
|
|
Talent and Rewards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group |
|
|
Services Group |
|
|
Consulting Group |
|
|
All Other Segments |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
394,954 |
|
|
$ |
115,942 |
|
|
$ |
30,644 |
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
542,754 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
|
785,978 |
|
|
|
226,126 |
|
|
|
279,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,291,380 |
|
Translation adjustment |
|
|
(20,528 |
) |
|
|
(8,286 |
) |
|
|
(1,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,160,404 |
|
|
$ |
333,782 |
|
|
$ |
308,728 |
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,804,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects changes in the net carrying amount of the components of
intangible assets for the nine months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark & |
|
|
Customer related |
|
|
developed |
|
|
Non-compete |
|
|
Favorable lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
trade name |
|
|
intangible |
|
|
technology |
|
|
agreements |
|
|
agreements |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
100,511 |
|
|
$ |
78,843 |
|
|
$ |
6,757 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
186,233 |
|
Intangible assets acquired during the period |
|
|
275,500 |
|
|
|
140,800 |
|
|
|
125,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,144 |
|
|
|
553,844 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,019 |
) |
|
|
(8,194 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,336 |
) |
Rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
Translation adjustment |
|
|
(7,758 |
) |
|
|
(4,048 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
368,253 |
|
|
$ |
204,576 |
|
|
$ |
123,811 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,915 |
|
|
$ |
708,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
The intangible unfavorable lease liability recorded as a result of acquisition accounting as
of January 1, 2010 was $(28.1) million with an offset to rent expense of $810 thousand for an
ending balance of $(27.3) million as of March 31, 2010. The following table reflects the rent
offset resulting from the amortization of the net lease intangible assets and liabilities for the
remainder of fiscal year 2010 and subsequent fiscal years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ending June 30, |
|
Amount |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
(376 |
) |
2011 |
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
2012 |
|
|
(2,786 |
) |
2013 |
|
|
(2,134 |
) |
2014 |
|
|
(1,873 |
) |
Thereafter |
|
|
(6,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(15,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects the carrying value of intangible assets as of March 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Accumulated Amortization |
|
Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark and trade name |
|
$ |
368,655 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
$ |
100,913 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
Customer related intangibles |
|
|
245,774 |
|
|
|
41,198 |
|
|
|
108,821 |
|
|
|
29,978 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
148,773 |
|
|
|
24,962 |
|
|
|
23,525 |
|
|
|
16,768 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
Favorable lease agreements |
|
|
12,144 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
776,624 |
|
|
$ |
68,069 |
|
|
$ |
234,532 |
|
|
$ |
48,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A component of the change in the gross carrying amount of intangible assets reflects
translation adjustments between June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2010. These intangible assets are
denominated in the currencies of our subsidiaries outside the United States, and are translated
into our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar, based on exchange rates at the balance sheet date.
The weighted average remaining life of amortizable intangible assets at March 31, 2010 was 8.9
years. Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 and subsequent fiscal
years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ending June 30, |
|
Amount |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
12,193 |
|
2011 |
|
|
47,908 |
|
2012 |
|
|
47,874 |
|
2013 |
|
|
44,359 |
|
2014 |
|
|
37,964 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
138,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
328,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
20
Note 7 Short-term investments
Short-term investments are comprised of the following as of March 31, 2010. There were no short
term investments as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
121,586 |
|
|
$ |
2,587 |
|
|
$ |
124,173 |
|
Note 8 Earnings Per Share.
The Company adopted guidance under ASC 260, Earnings per Share, relating to the two-class method
of presenting EPS. This guidance addresses whether awards granted in share-based transactions are
participating securities prior to vesting and therefore need to be included in the earning
allocation in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. ASC 260-10-45-60 requires
nonvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend
equivalents to be treated as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. The
Companys participating securities include nonvested restricted stock.
The
adoption had no impact on previously reported basic or diluted EPS.
The components of
basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
8,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Income allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
8,325 |
|
|
|
72,165 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
40,591 |
|
|
|
42,609 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
8,325 |
|
|
|
72,167 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
40,591 |
|
|
|
42,773 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
62,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
115,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Income allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders |
|
|
60,822 |
|
|
|
52,361 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
115,302 |
|
|
|
42,705 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
60,822 |
|
|
|
52,504 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
115,302 |
|
|
|
42,869 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Stock options of 109 thousand were outstanding as of March 31, 2010, but were not included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.
Note 9 Comprehensive (Loss)/Income.
Comprehensive (loss)/income includes net income and changes in the cumulative translation
adjustment gain or loss. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, comprehensive loss totaled
$36.8 million compared with comprehensive income of $22.2 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, comprehensive income totaled $12.3 million
compared with comprehensive loss of $96.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009.
Note 10 Restricted Shares.
In conjunction with the Merger, shares of Towers Watson common stock issued to Towers Perrin
shareholders have been divided among four series of non-transferable Towers Watson common stock,
Classes B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-4, each with a par value of $0.01 per share. Outstanding shares of
Towers Watson Class B common stock generally will automatically convert on a one-for-one basis into
shares of freely transferable shares of Towers Watson Class A common stock on the following
timetable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Class |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Conversion Date |
B-1
|
|
|
12,798,118 |
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
B-2
|
|
|
5,561,630 |
|
|
January 1, 2012 |
B-3
|
|
|
5,561,630 |
|
|
January 1, 2013 |
B-4
|
|
|
5,453,397 |
|
|
January 1, 2014 |
The Towers Perrin restricted stock unit (RSU) holders received 10 percent of the total
consideration issued to Towers Perrin shareholders in conjunction with the Merger. The RSUs were
converted into 4,248,984 Towers Watson Restricted Class A shares, of which an estimated 10%, or
42,489 shares, are expected to be forfeited by current employee Restricted Class A shareholders who
are subject to a service condition. The service condition is fulfilled from grant date through
each of the three annual periods from January 1, 2010 until December 31, 2012. The restriction
lapses annually on January 1 and the Restricted Class A shares are exchanged for freely tradable
Class A common stock. Forfeited shares will be distributed to Towers Perrin shareholders as of
December 31, 2009 in proportion to their ownership in Towers Perrin on that date. Shareholders of
Restricted Class A shares have voting rights and receive dividends upon annual vesting of the
shares. Dividends on forfeited shares are distributed with the associated shares on January 1,
2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Class |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Conversion Date |
A
|
|
|
1,416,328 |
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
A
|
|
|
1,416,328 |
|
|
January 1, 2012 |
A
|
|
|
1,416,328 |
|
|
January 1, 2013 |
Note 11 Derivative Financial Instruments.
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To manage
this exposure, the Company enters into various derivative transactions. These instruments have the
effect of reducing the Companys exposure to unfavorable changes in foreign currency rates. The
Company does not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes.
22
Derivative transactions are governed by a set of policies and procedures established by the Company
covering areas such as authorization, counterparty exposure and hedging practices. The Company also
evaluates new and existing transactions and agreements to determine if they require derivative
accounting treatment. Positions are monitored using fair market value and sensitivity analyses.
Certain derivatives also give rise to credit risks from the possible non-performance by
counterparties. The credit risk is generally limited to the fair value of those contracts that are
favorable to the Company. The Company has established strict counterparty credit guidelines and
enters into transactions only with financial institutions with securities of investment grade or
better. The Company monitors counterparty exposures and reviews any downgrade in credit rating. To
mitigate pre-settlement risk, minimum credit standards become more stringent as the duration of the
derivative financial instrument increases. To minimize the concentration of credit risk, the
Company enters into derivative transactions with a portfolio of financial institutions. Based on
these factors, the Company considers the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.
Accounting Policy for Derivatives
All derivative instruments are recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at fair
value. Derivative instruments with a positive fair value are reported in other current assets and
derivative instruments with a negative fair value are reported in other current liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are
recognized immediately in general and administrative expenses, unless the derivative is designated
as a hedge and qualifies for hedge accounting.
There are three hedging relationships where a derivative (hedging instrument) may qualify for hedge
accounting: (1) a hedge of the change in fair value of a recognized asset or liability or firm
commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of the variability in cash flows from forecasted
transactions (cash flow hedge), and (3) a hedge of the variability caused by changes in foreign
currency exchange rates (foreign currency hedge). Under hedge accounting, recognition of derivative
gains and losses can be matched in the same period with that of the hedged exposure and thereby
minimize earnings volatility. If the derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting, the Company
considers the transaction to be an economic hedge and changes in the fair value of the derivative
asset or liability are recognized immediately in general and administrative expenses. At March 31,
2010, the Company had entered into foreign currency cash flow hedges and economic hedges.
In order for a derivative to qualify for hedge accounting, the derivative must be formally
designated as a fair value, cash flow, or a foreign currency hedge by documenting the relationship
between the derivative and the hedged item. Additionally, the hedge relationship must be expected
to be highly effective at offsetting changes in either the fair value or cash flows of the hedged
item at both inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis. The Company assesses the ongoing
effectiveness of its hedges and measures and records hedge ineffectiveness, if any, at the end of
each quarter.
For a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in fair value of a hedging instrument is
recognized in other comprehensive income, as a component of shareholders investment, and
subsequently reclassified to general and administrative expenses. The ineffective portion of a cash
flow hedge is recognized immediately in general and administrative expenses.
The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when (1) the derivative expires or is sold,
terminated, or exercised, (2) it determines that the hedging transaction is no longer highly
effective, (3) a hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring in the time
period described in the hedge documentation, (4) the hedged item matures or is sold, or (5)
management elects to discontinue hedge accounting voluntarily.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because the derivative no longer qualifies as a cash flow
hedge, the Company will continue to carry the derivative in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet at its fair value, recognize subsequent changes in the fair value of the derivative in
current-period general and administrative expenses, and continue to defer the derivative gain or
loss in other comprehensive income or loss until the hedged forecasted transaction affects
expenses. If the hedged forecasted transaction is not likely to occur in the time period described
in the hedge documentation or within a two month period of time thereafter, the deferred derivative
gain or loss is reclassified immediately to general and administrative expenses.
23
The Companys reinsurance intermediary subsidiary in the U.K. receives revenues in currencies
(primarily in U.S. dollars) that differ from its functional currency. As a result, the foreign
subsidiarys functional currency revenue will fluctuate as the currency exchange rates change. To
reduce this variability, the Company uses foreign exchange forward contracts and over-the-counter
options to hedge the foreign exchange risk of the forecasted collections. The Company has
designated these derivatives as cash flow hedges of its forecasted foreign currency denominated
collections. At March 31, 2010, the longest outstanding maturity was twenty-one months. As of March
31, 2010 a net $2.5 million pretax loss has been deferred in other comprehensive loss, $2.2 million
of which is expected to be reclassified to general and administrative expenses in the next twelve
months. Deferred gains or losses will be reclassified from other comprehensive loss to general and
administrative expenses when the hedged revenue is recognized. During the three months ended March
31, 2010, the Company recognized no material gains or losses due to hedge ineffectiveness within
general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The
Company also uses derivative financial contracts, principally foreign exchange forward contracts to
hedge non-functional currency obligations. Primarily, these exposures arise from intercompany
lending between entities with different functional currencies.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had cash flow hedges with a notional value of $175.9 million, $59.5
million to hedge revenue cash flows and $116.4 million to hedge short term intercompany loans. The Company
determines the fair value of its foreign currency derivatives based on quoted prices received from
the counterparty for each contract which the Company evaluates using pricing models whose inputs
are observable. The net fair value of derivatives held as of March 31, 2010 was $(1.8) million. See
note 11 for further information regarding the determination of fair value.
The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments held at March 31, 2010 and their location in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset derivatives |
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
|
|
Balance sheet location |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Balance sheet location |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forwards |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
(3,951 |
) |
Foreign exchange options |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
92 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
(4,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forwards |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange options |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
The effect of derivative instruments that are designated as hedging instruments on the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations and the consolidated statement of changes in
stockholders equity for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of loss |
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized in |
|
(ineffective |
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Location of loss |
|
Loss |
|
|
income (ineffective |
|
portion and |
|
|
|
recognized |
|
|
reclassified |
|
reclassified |
|
|
portion and amount |
|
amount |
|
|
|
in OCI |
|
|
from OCI into |
|
from OCI into |
|
|
excluded from |
|
excluded from |
|
Derivatives designated as |
|
(effective |
|
|
income (effective |
|
income (effective |
|
|
effectiveness |
|
effectiveness |
|
hedging instruments: |
|
portion) |
|
|
portion) |
|
portion) |
|
|
testing) |
|
testing) |
|
|
Foreign
exchange forwards |
|
$ |
(3,150 |
) |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
(835 |
) |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
Foreign
exchange options |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(3,323 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(835 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 the Company had $118.8 million of notional value of derivatives, as economic
hedges primarily to hedge intercompany loans that do not receive hedge accounting treatment. The
effect of derivatives which have not been designated as hedging instruments on the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of gain (loss) |
|
|
Gain (loss) |
|
Derivatives not designated |
|
recognized |
|
|
recognized |
|
as hedging instruments: |
|
in income |
|
|
in income |
|
|
Foreign
exchange forwards |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
2,236 |
|
Foreign exchange options |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12- Fair Value Measurements
The Company has categorized its financial instruments into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The
fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities (Level 1) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). In some
cases, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall into different levels of the fair value
hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within
which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Financial assets recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on
the inputs in the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1- Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for
identical assets or liabilities in an active market.
25
Level 2-Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on the following:
|
a) |
|
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
|
b) |
|
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets; |
|
|
c) |
|
Pricing models whose inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset
or liability; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data through correlation or other means for substantially the full asset or
liability. |
Level 3-Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices, or valuation techniques
that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value
measurement. These inputs reflect managements own assumptions about the assumptions a market
participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The following presents the Companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of March 31, 2010. There were no assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis at |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
8,363 |
(a) |
|
$ |
115,810 |
(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
124,173 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,401 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
7,558 |
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,558 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,156 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,156 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Available for sale consisting of commercial paper and corporate securities. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign exchange options. |
|
(c) |
|
Primarily available for sale securities. |
The
Company recorded a gain of $2,146 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, under general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to the
changes in the fair value of its financial instruments for foreign exchange forward contracts and
foreign exchange options accounted for as foreign currency hedges which are still held at March 31,
2010. There was no gain or loss recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
for available for sale securities still held at March 31, 2010.
To determine the fair value of the Companys foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign
exchange options, the Company receives a quoted value from the counterparty for each contract. The
quoted price received by the Company is a Level 2 valuation based on observable quotes in the
marketplace for the underlying currency. The Company uses these underlying values to estimate
amounts that would be paid or received to terminate the contracts at the reporting date based on
current market prices for the underlying currency.
The available for sale securities are valued using quoted market prices as of the end of the
trading day. The Company monitors the value of the investments for other-than-temporary impairment
on a quarterly basis.
26
Note 13- Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
The commitment and contingencies described below are currently in effect and could require Towers
Watson, or its predecessor companies, Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin, to make payments to third
parties under certain circumstances. In addition to commitments and contingencies specifically
described below, Towers Watson and its historical predecessor companies, Watson Wyatt and Towers
Perrin, have historically provided guarantees on an infrequent basis to third parties in the
ordinary course of business.
Subordinated Notes due January 2011: On December 30, 2009, in connection with the Merger and the
Class R Elections as described in Note 2, Towers Watson entered into an Indenture (the Indenture)
with Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (the Trustee), for the issuance of Towers Watson Notes in
the aggregate principal amount of $200 million. The Towers Watson Notes were issued on January 6,
2010, bearing interest from January 4, 2010 at a fixed per-annum rate of 2.0 percent, and will
mature on January 1, 2011. The Indenture contains limited operating covenants, and obligations
under the Towers Watson Notes are subordinated to the Companys obligations under the Senior Credit
Facility (as defined below) on the terms set forth in the Indenture.
Towers Watson Senior Credit Facility: On January 1, 2010, in connection with the Merger, Towers
Watson and certain subsidiaries entered into a three-year, $500 million revolving credit facility
with a syndicate of banks (the Senior Credit Facility). Borrowings under the Senior Credit
Facility will bear interest at a spread to either LIBOR or the Prime Rate. We are charged a
quarterly commitment fee, currently 0.5 percent of the Senior Credit Facility, which varies with
our financial leverage and is paid on the unused portion of the Senior Credit Facility. Obligations
under the Senior Credit Facility are guaranteed by Towers Watson and all of its domestic
subsidiaries (other than PCIC) and are secured by a pledge of 65 percent of the voting stock and
100 percent of the non-voting stock of Towers Perrin Luxembourg Holdings S.A.R.L.
The Senior Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties and affirmative and
negative covenants. The Senior Credit Facility requires Towers Watson to maintain certain financial
covenants that include a minimum Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio and a maximum Consolidated
Leverage Ratio (which terms in each case are defined in the Senior Credit Facility). In addition,
the Senior Credit Facility contains restrictions on the ability of Towers Watson and its
subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends; make
distributions; create liens on assets; make investments, loans or advances; make acquisitions;
dispose of property; engage in sale-leaseback transactions; engage in mergers or consolidations,
liquidations and dissolutions; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and make changes in
lines of businesses.
As of March 31, 2010, Towers Watson had $15.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Senior
Credit Facility.
Letters of Credit under the Senior Credit Facility: As of March 31, 2010, Towers Watson had standby
letters of credit totaling $21.2 million to guarantee payment to a beneficiary in the event that it
fails to meet its financial obligations to the beneficiary. Additionally, Towers Watson had $0.8
million of standby letters of credit covering various other existing or potential business
obligations. The aforementioned letters of credit are issued under the Senior Credit Facility, and
therefore reduce the amount that can be borrowed under the Senior Credit Facility by the
outstanding amount of these standby letters of credit.
Additional Borrowings, Letters of Credit and Guarantees not part of the Senior Credit Facility:
Towers Perrin Foster and Crosby, Ltda. (Brazil) has a bilateral credit facility with a major bank
totaling Brazilian Real (BRL) 6.5 million (U.S. $3.6 million). As of March 31, 2010, a total of BRL
5.0 million ($2.8 million) was outstanding under this facility.
Towers
Watson has also provided a $5.0 million Australian
dollar-denominated letter of credit (U.S.
$4.6 million) to an Australian governmental agency as required by the local regulations. The
estimated fair market value of these letters of credit is immaterial because they have never been
used, and the Company believes that the likelihood of future usage is remote.
27
Towers Watson also has $2.5 million of letters of guarantee from major banks in support of office
leases and performance under existing or prospective contracts.
Indemnification Agreements: Towers Watson has various agreements that provide that it may be
obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain matters. Generally, these
indemnification clauses are included in contracts arising in the normal course of business and in
connection with the purchase and sale of certain businesses. Although it is not possible to predict
the maximum potential amount of future payments under these indemnification agreements due to the
conditional nature of Towers Watsons obligations and the unique facts of each particular
agreement, Towers Watson does not believe that any potential liability that might arise from such
indemnity provisions is probable or material. There are no provisions for recourse to third
parties, nor are any assets held by any third parties that any guarantor can liquidate to recover
amounts paid under such indemnities.
Legal Proceedings: From time to time, Towers Watson and its subsidiaries, including Watson Wyatt
and Towers Perrin, are parties to various lawsuits, arbitrations or mediations that arise in the
ordinary course of business. The matters reported on below involve the most significant pending or
potential claims against Towers Watson and its subsidiaries. We also have received subpoenas and
requests for information in connection with government investigations.
Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin each carried substantial professional liability insurance with a
self-insured retention of $1 million per occurrence, which provides coverage for professional
liability claims including the cost of defending such claims. These policies remained in force
subsequent to the Merger. We reserve for contingent liabilities based on ASC 450, Contingencies
when it is determined that a liability, inclusive of defense costs, is probable and reasonably
estimable. The contingent liabilities recorded are primarily developed actuarially. Litigation is
subject to many factors which are difficult to predict so there can be no assurance that in the
event of a material unfavorable result in one or more of all pending claims, we will not incur
material costs. Our professional liability insurance coverage beyond our self-insured retention was
written by PCIC, an affiliated captive insurance company, with reinsurance and excess insurance
attaching at $26 million provided by various unaffiliated commercial insurance carriers.
Post-Merger, Towers Watson has a 72.86 percent ownership interest in PCIC and as a result, PCICs
results will be consolidated in Towers Watsons operating results. Although the PCIC insurance
policies will continue to cover professional liability claims above a $1 million per occurrence
self-insured retention, the consolidation of PCIC will effectively result in self-insurance for the
first $25 million of aggregate loss for each of Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin above the $1 million
per occurrence self-insured retention. As a result of consolidating PCICs results of operations in
the Companys consolidated financial statements, the impact of PCICs reserve development also may
result in fluctuations in Towers Watsons earnings. PCIC will cease issuing insurance policies
effective July 1, 2010 and will at that time enter into a run-off mode of operation.
ExxonMobil Superannuation Plan (Australia)
In March 2007, the Trustees of the ExxonMobil (Australia) Superannuation Plan commenced a legal
proceeding in the Supreme Court of Victoria against Towers Perrin; the plan sponsors, Esso
(Australia) and ExxonMobil (Australia), commenced a similar legal proceeding against Towers Perrin
in April 2007 (collectively the 2007 actions). On May 15, 2009, as the time was expiring to add
any additional contributing parties, Towers Perrin filed third-party claims against Watson Wyatt,
the successor actuary and Plan administrator.
The complaints in the 2007 actions allege that while performing administrative and actuarial
services for the Superannuation Plan during the period from mid-1990 to 1995, Towers Perrin failed
to detect drafting errors made by previous plan advisors including attorneys, when they prepared
certain amendments to the Superannuation Plan Deed. These amendments were adopted before Towers
Perrin commenced its engagement. Watson Wyatt succeeded Towers Perrin as the plan administrator
and plan actuary in 1996 and continues to serve in those capacities. The previous plan advisors
are also named as defendants in the 2007 actions.
28
Plaintiffs allege that the faulty drafting resulted in the grant of additional, but unintended and
unauthorized benefits, to certain Superannuation Plan participants. Plaintiffs further allege that
because Towers Perrin failed to detect the drafting error, benefits were not properly administered
and the plan was not properly funded. Towers Perrin administered and valued the plan benefits
consistent with what the plan sponsors contend was intended. Watson Wyatt continued to administer
and value the benefits in the same manner when it succeeded Towers Perrin in 1996.
The most recent estimate of the value of the allegedly unintended benefits is AU$538 million.
The Trustee and plan sponsors have been engaged since 2001 in a separate legal proceeding (the
rectification action) that seeks an interpretation of the relevant portions of the plan Deed and,
if necessary, modification to conform those portions to reflect the manner in which the benefits
were intended to be, and were, administered during both the Towers Perrin and Watson Wyatt
engagements.
The April 2010 trial date previously set for the rectification action has been adjourned in
light of ongoing settlement efforts among the parties to that action.
Former Towers Perrin shareholder litigation
On December 9, 2009, Watson Wyatt was informed by Towers Perrin of a settlement demand from the
plaintiffs in a putative class action lawsuit filed by certain former shareholders of Towers Perrin
(the Dugan Action). Although the complaint in the Dugan Action does not contain a quantification
of the damages sought, plaintiffs settlement demand, which was orally communicated to Towers
Perrin on December 8, 2009 and in writing on December 9, 2009, sought a payment of $800 million to
settle the action on behalf of the proposed class. Plaintiffs requested that Towers Perrin
communicate the settlement demand to Watson Wyatt.
The Dugan Action previously was reported in Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form
S-4/A (File No. 333-161705) filed on November 9, 2009 by the Jupiter Saturn Holding Company (the
Registration Statement). As reported in the Registration Statement, the complaint was filed on
November 5, 2009 against Towers Perrin, members of its board of directors, and certain members of
senior management in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Plaintiffs in this action are former members of the Towers Perrins senior management, who left
Towers Perrin at various times between 1995 and 2000. The Dugan plaintiffs seek to represent a
class of former Towers Perrin shareholders who separated from service on or after January 1, 1971,
and who also meet certain other specified criteria.
On December 17, 2009, four other former Towers Perrin shareholders, all of whom voluntarily left
Towers Perrin in May or June 2005 and all of whom are excluded from the proposed class in the Dugan
Action, commenced a separate legal proceeding (the Allen
Action) in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging the same claims in substantially the same
form as those alleged in the Dugan Action. These plaintiffs are proceeding in their individual
capacities and do not seek to represent a proposed class.
On January 15, 2010, another former Towers Perrin shareholder who separated from service with
Towers Perrin in March 2005 when Towers Perrin and EDS launched a joint venture that led to the
creation of a corporate entity known as ExcellerateHRO (eHRO), commenced a separate legal
proceeding (the Pao Action) in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania also alleging the same claims in substantially the same form as those alleged in the
Dugan Action. Towers Perrin contributed its Towers Perrin Administrative Solutions (TPAS)
business to eHRO and formerly was a minority shareholder (15 percent) of eHRO. Pao seeks to
represent a class of former Towers Perrin shareholders who separated from service in connection
with Towers Perrins contribution to eHRO of its TPAS business and who are excluded from the
proposed class in the Dugan Action. Towers Watson is also a defendant in the Pao Action.
29
Pursuant to the Towers Perrin Bylaws in effect at the time of their separations, the Towers Perrin
shares held by each of these plaintiffs were redeemed by Towers Perrin at book value at the time
these individuals separated from employment. The complaints allege variously that there either
was a promise that Towers Perrin would remain privately owned in perpetuity (Dugan Action) or that
in the event of a change to public ownership plaintiffs would receive compensation (Allen and Pao
Actions). Plaintiffs allege that by agreeing to sell their shares back to Towers Perrin at book
value upon retirement, they and other members of the putative classes relied upon these alleged
promises, which they claim were breached as a result of the consummation of the merger between
Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin. The complaints assert claims for breach of contract, breach of
express trust, breach of fiduciary duty, promissory estoppel, quasi-contract/unjust enrichment, and
constructive trust, and seek equitable relief including an accounting, disgorgement, rescission
and/or restitution, and the imposition of a constructive trust. On January 20, 2010, the court
consolidated the three actions for all purposes.
On February 22, 2010, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaints in their entireties. The
motion is not yet fully briefed and remains pending.
Towers Watson believes the claims in these lawsuits are without merit and intends to defend against
them vigorously. However, the cost of defending against the claims could be substantial and the
outcome of these legal proceedings is inherently uncertain and could be unfavorable to Towers
Watson.
Note 14 Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
Adopted
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued its final Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS
No. 168 made the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) the single source of
U.S. GAAP used by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements, except for
rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws, which are
sources of authoritative accounting guidance for SEC registrants. The Codification is meant to
simplify user access to all authoritative accounting guidance by reorganizing U.S. GAAP
pronouncements into roughly 90 accounting topics within a consistent structure; its purpose is not
to create new accounting and reporting guidance. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards and was effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009.
Following SFAS No. 168, the Board will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB
Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead, it will issue Accounting
Standards Updates.
ASC 805, Business Combinations which is a revision of accounting provisions that changes the
application of the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects. Acquisition costs will
generally be expensed as incurred; noncontrolling interests will be valued at fair value at the
acquisition date; restructuring costs associated with a business combination will generally be
expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; contingent consideration will be recognized at its
fair value on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be
recognized in earnings until settled, and changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and
income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. ASC
350-30-35-1, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets amends the factors that should
be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of
recognized intangible assets under ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. ASC
805-20-25-18A, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination
That Arise from Contingencies which amends and clarifies the accounting for acquired contingencies
and is effective upon the adoption of ASC 805, Business Combinations. We adopted these provisions
on July 1, 2009.
30
ASC 810, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No.
51 requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the
consolidated financial statements and separate from the parents equity. The amount of net income
attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income. It also
amends certain consolidation procedures for consistency with the requirements of ASC 805, Business
Combinations. The provisions also include expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests
of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. We adopted these provisions on July 1, 2009. As a
result, Watson Wyatts non-controlling interest of $1.0 million as of June 30, 2009, which was
previously included in other non-current liabilities, was reclassified to non-controlling interest
in total equity.
ASC 815-10-50, SFAS 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 gives financial statement users better information about the
reporting entitys hedges by providing for qualitative disclosures about the objectives and
strategies for using derivatives, quantitative data about the fair value of and gains and losses on
derivative contracts, and details of credit-risk-related contingent features in their hedged
positions. We adopted these provisions on January 1, 2009.
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The Company adopted these provisions for financial assets and liabilities on July 1,
2008 and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities on July 1, 2009. These adoptions did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations
Not yet adopted
ASC 715-10-50, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets provides guidance
on the objectives an employer should consider when providing detailed disclosures about assets of a
defined benefit pension plan or other postretirement plan. These disclosure objectives include
investment policies and strategies, categories of plan assets, significant concentrations of risk
and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets. These
provisions are effective for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. The Company is currently
evaluating the effects these provisions may have on its financial statements.
ASC 810 Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (R) which amends the evaluation criteria to
identify the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity provided by FASB Interpretation
46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities-An Interpretation of ARB No. 51. Additionally,
the provisions require ongoing assessment of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of
the variable interest entity. We will adopt these provisions on July 1, 2010. The Company is
currently evaluating the effects these provisions may have on its financial statements.
Note 15 Income Taxes.
At March 31, 2010, Towers Watsons gross liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax
positions was $37.5 million. This liability can be reduced by $3.6 million of offsetting deferred
tax benefits associated with foreign tax credits and the federal tax benefit of state income taxes.
The net difference of $33.9 million, if recognized, would have a favorable impact on the Companys
effective tax rate. The gross tax liability for uncertain tax
positions increase is mainly due to the inclusion of legacy Towers
Perrins liability of $26.7 million.
Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in income tax expense. At
March 31, 2010, Towers Watson had accrued interest of $3.0 million and penalties of $0.07 million,
totaling $3.07 million.
The Company believes it is reasonably possible that there will be a $0.9 million decrease in the
gross tax liability for uncertain tax positions within the next 12 months based upon potential
settlements and the expiration of statutes of limitations in various tax jurisdictions.
31
The Company and its subsidiaries conduct business globally and are subject to income tax in the US
and in many states and foreign jurisdictions. Towers Watson is currently under examination in
several tax jurisdictions. A summary of the tax years that remain subject to examination in Towers
Watsons major tax jurisdictions are:
|
|
|
|
|
Open Tax Years |
|
|
(fiscal year ending) |
|
United States Federal
|
|
2005 and forward |
United States Various States
|
|
1998 and forward |
Canada Federal
|
|
2003 and forward |
Germany
|
|
2003 and forward |
The Netherlands
|
|
2008 and forward |
United Kingdom
|
|
2007 and forward |
32
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Executive Overview
The Merger
On January 1, 2010, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended by Amendment No. 1
(the Merger Agreement), Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. (Watson Wyatt) and Towers, Perrin, Forster
& Crosby, Inc. (Towers Perrin) combined their businesses through two simultaneous mergers (the
Merger) and became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Jupiter Saturn Holding Company, which
subsequently changed its name to Towers Watson & Co. (Towers Watson, the Company or we).
Since the consummation of the Merger, Towers Perrin changed its name to Towers Watson Pennsylvania
Inc.; and Watson Wyatt changed its name to Towers Watson Delaware Holdings Inc. However, for ease
of reference, we continue to use the legacy Towers Perrin and Watson Wyatt names throughout this
discussion.
Although the business combination of Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin was a merger of equals,
generally accepted accounting principles require that one of the combining entities be identified
as the acquirer by reviewing facts and circumstances as of the acquisition date. Watson Wyatt was
determined to be the accounting acquirer. This conclusion is primarily supported by the facts that
Watson Wyatt shareholders owned approximately 56 percent of all Towers Watson common stock after
the redemption of Towers Watson Class R common stock and that Watson Wyatts chief executive
officer became the chief executive officer of Towers Watson. Watson Wyatt is the accounting
predecessor in the Merger; as such, the historical results of Watson Wyatt have become those of the
new registrant, Towers Watson, and are presented in this filing. Towers Watsons condensed
consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010,
include the results of Towers Perrins operations beginning January 1, 2010.
General
Towers Watsons history, which is primarily that of our predecessor companies since the Merger
occurred on January 1, 2010, is summarized below.
Watson Wyatt traces its roots back to the actuarial firm R. Watson & Sons, founded in 1878 in the
U.K. In 1946, The Wyatt Company was established as an actuarial consulting firm in the U.S. Over
the next few decades, the U.S.-based firm branched out into such other services as health care and
compensation consulting and broadened its global reach, establishing offices throughout Canada,
Europe, Latin America and Asia. In 1995, the two firms formed a global alliance and began operating
as Watson Wyatt Worldwide. In 2000, the U.S.-based arm of the alliance completed a successful
initial public offering and began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WW. In
August 2005, the two firms formally combined into one.
Towers Perrins predecessor firm, Henry W. Brown & Co., was founded in 1871. Towers, Perrin,
Forster & Crosby, Inc., was incorporated in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on February 13, 1934. The
firm opened for business with 26 employees and initially operated a Reinsurance Division and Life
Division. The firm eventually began to specialize in pensions and other employee benefit plans.
Over the decades, the firm grew, diversified, globalized and was renamed Towers Perrin in 1987.
At Towers Watson, we bring together professionals from around the world experts in their areas
of specialty to deliver the perspectives that give organizations a clear path forward. We do
this by working with clients to develop solutions in the areas of employee benefits, risk and
capital management, and talent and rewards.
We help our clients enhance business performance by improving their ability to attract, retain and
motivate qualified employees. We focus on delivering consulting services that help organizations
anticipate, identify and capitalize on emerging opportunities in human capital management. We also
provide independent financial advice regarding all aspects of life assurance and general insurance,
as well as investment advice to help our clients develop disciplined and efficient strategies to
meet their investment goals.
33
As leading economies worldwide become more service-oriented, human resources and financial
management have become increasingly important to companies and other organizations. The heightened
competition for skilled employees, unprecedented changes in workforce demographics, regulatory
changes related to compensation and retiree benefits, and rising employee-related costs have
increased the importance of effective human capital management. Insurance and investment decisions
have become increasingly complex and important in the face of changing economies and dynamic
financial markets. Towers Watson helps its clients address these issues by combining expertise in
human capital and financial management with consulting and technology solutions, to improve the
design and implementation of various human resources and financial programs, including
compensation, retirement, health care, and insurance and investment plans.
The human resources consulting industry, although highly fragmented, is highly competitive. It is
composed of major human capital consulting firms, specialty firms, consulting arms of accounting
firms and information technology consulting firms.
In the short term, Towers Watsons revenue will be driven by many factors, including the general
state of the global economy and the resulting level of discretionary spending, the continuing
regulatory compliance requirements of its clients, changes in investment markets, the ability of
our consultants to attract new clients or provide additional services to existing clients, the
impact of new regulations in the legal and accounting fields and the impact of our ongoing cost
saving initiatives. In the long term, we expect that our financial results will depend in large
part upon how well we succeed in deepening our existing client relationships through thought
leadership and a focus on developing cross-practice solutions, actively pursuing new clients in our
target markets, cross selling and making strategic acquisitions. We believe that the highly
fragmented industry in which we operate offers us tremendous growth opportunities, because we
provide a unique business combination of benefits and human capital consulting, as well as risk and
capital management and strategic technology solutions.
Overview of Towers Watson
Towers Watson is a global consulting firm focusing on providing human capital and financial
consulting services. Towers Watson provides services in three principal practice areas: Benefits,
Risk & Financial Services and Talent and Rewards operating from 171 offices in 36 countries
throughout North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Latin America. Towers Watson employed
approximately 12,935 and 7,700 associates as of March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, in
the following practice areas (with all information for June 30, 2009 including Watson Wyatt
associates only):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
4,255 |
|
Risk and Financial Services |
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
Talent and Rewards |
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
Other |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Business Services (incl. Corporate and field support) |
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
|
Total associates |
|
|
12,935 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
|
34
Principal Services
Benefits Segment. The Benefits segment is our largest and most established segment with
approximately 6,150 associates. This segment has grown through business combinations as well as
strong organic growth. It helps clients create and manage cost-effective benefits programs that
help them attract, retain and motivate a talented workforce.
The lines of business within the Benefits Segment are:
|
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
|
|
Health and Group Benefits |
|
|
|
|
Technology and Administration Solutions |
|
|
|
|
International Consulting Group |
The Benefits segment accounted for 65 percent of Towers Watsons total revenue for the first nine
months of fiscal 2010. Approximately 45 percent of the Benefits segments revenue originates from
outside of the United States and is thus subject to translation exposure resulting from foreign
exchange rate fluctuations.
Retirement
Our retirement consulting supports organizations worldwide in designing, managing, administering
and communicating all types of retirement plans.
We are one of the worlds leading advisors on retirement plans, providing actuarial and consulting
services for large defined benefit and defined contribution plans, including design, funding and
risk management strategies. We also help our clients assess the effects of changing workforce
demographics on their retirement plans, cash flow requirements, and retiree benefit adequacy and
security.
Our consultants are the named actuaries and provide actuarial services to many of the worlds
largest retirement plan sponsors. Towers Watson provides actuarial services to more of the top 300
pension funds worldwide than any other consulting firm. In the United States, we provide actuarial
services to three of the four largest corporate-sponsored defined benefit plans (based on total
pension plan assets), and in the United Kingdom, we are advisor to almost half of the 100 largest
corporate pension funds. Additionally, we have market-leading positions in Canada, Germany and the
Netherlands.
We offer clients a full range of integrated and innovative retirement consulting services to meet
the needs of all types of employers including those that continue to offer defined benefit plans
and those that are reexamining their retirement benefits strategies. For those clients who want to
outsource some or all of their pension plan management, we offer integrated solutions that combine
investment consulting, pension administration, core actuarial services and communication
assistance.
Our retirement consulting services include:
|
|
|
Retirement strategy and plan design |
|
|
|
|
Actuarial services and related support |
|
|
|
|
Retirement financial management |
|
|
|
|
Settlement solutions |
|
|
|
|
Compliance and governance strategies |
|
|
|
|
Risk management |
|
|
|
|
Defined contribution solutions |
|
|
|
|
Pension plan administration and outsourcing |
|
|
|
|
Investment services |
Our retirement consulting services are supported by a strong focus on research and advocacy for
sound public policy. We specialize in the development and support of hybrid pension designs like
cash balance plans in the United States, which are widely seen as the future of the defined benefit
system.
35
Much of our recent consulting with clients relates to managing risk and cost volatility, various
regulatory changes (global accounting reform and U.S. and European pension funding legislation),
and a broad-based desire on the part of many employers to revisit their retirement design approach.
We use unique data and analyses to provide perspective on the overall environment and to help our
clients with their design decisions. We have tracked the retirement designs of the largest U.S.
public companies over many years, providing clients with data to better understand the true
magnitude of the movement from defined benefit to defined contribution designs.
To further enhance our retirement consulting services, we dedicate significant resources to
technology systems and tools to ensure the consistency and efficiency of service delivery in all
our offices worldwide. We also maintain extensive proprietary databases that enable our clients to
track and benchmark benefit plan provisions. Our tools and technology solutions include:
|
|
|
OnePlace/ClientConnect Web portals that help our clients with the day-to-day
management and governance of their plans and links easily with our global tools, research
and data |
|
|
|
|
FAS Tool/RFM Benchmarking Database Interactive tools that allows the immediate
comparison of income statement and balance sheet information and assumptions related to
pension, stock option and retiree medical plans for large, publicly traded U.S. companies |
|
|
|
|
Employee Benefit Information Center/COMPARISON Comprehensive sources of comparative
benefit practices for premier companies, including BenVal which determines benefit values
for each company by using consistent actuarial methods and assumptions, along with a common
employee population. |
|
|
|
|
Forecaster A web-enabled tool that allows pension plan sponsors to quickly and easily
model a variety of financial and business situations and to project retirement plan
contributions, funded status and expense |
|
|
|
|
Liability Watch Enables our European clients to keep daily track of their funding
position |
|
|
|
|
Cost and Risk Management Channel A web-enabled tool that provides daily monitoring of
funded status and the impact of changes in capital markets on contributions and cost. It is
a global tool, covering all major defined benefit countries. |
|
|
|
|
DesignIT A modeling tool for our European clients that provides comparisons between a
selection of alternative pension designs |
Retirement, the largest part of the Benefits business, typically lags reduction in discretionary
spending compared to the other segments, mainly due to the recurring nature of its client
relationships. Tower Watsons corporate client retention rate within its target market has remained
very high. Revenue for the retirement practice is seasonal, with the second and third quarters of
each fiscal year being the busier periods. Major revenue growth drivers in this practice include
changes in regulations, economic uncertainty, leverage from other practices, increased global
demand and increased market share.
Health and Group Benefits
We provide plan management consulting across the full spectrum of health and group benefits
programs, including health, dental, disability, life and other coverage. We also advise clients on
issues specific to their interests and needs, including the impact of health care reform
legislation on their plan strategy and related plan changes, and the implementation and monitoring
of disease management and general care management programs. Clients seek our evidence-based,
practical solutions to improve employee health, satisfaction and productivity while minimizing
costs. We work closely with our clients matching their resources and capabilities with our
methodologies, technology, and total compensation and benefits perspective.
Globally, many health care systems are strained by shrinking resources and increasing demand due to
population aging and changes in employees health status. Our health and group benefits consulting
services help clients provide health and welfare benefits to attract and retain qualified workers
and enhance the health and productivity of their workforce.
36
In the United States, the enactment of health care reform legislation has prompted employers to
reevaluate their health plan strategies in light of expanded coverage requirements and new tax
considerations. Also, given continued above-inflation increases in health care costs, employers are
seeking new and proven solutions for managing plan costs and engaging members. An increasing number
of employers are adopting consumer-oriented health care approaches that encourage employees and
retirees to participate more actively in health care buying decisions. These models put workers in
charge of spending their own health care dollars and provide them with appropriate incentives,
tools and information to make wiser health purchasing decisions.
Towers Watson has one of the strongest networks in the health and group benefits consulting
business. We manage numerous collective purchasing initiatives (e.g., pharmacy, retiree health)
that enable employers to achieve greater value from third-party service providers than they can
realize on their own. We lead the flexible benefits markets in the United Kingdom, China and
Canada.
Our approach to health and group benefits consulting emphasizes health and productivity, pharmacy,
provider quality, effective communication, and data and metrics. Our global services include:
|
|
|
Program strategy, design and pricing |
|
|
|
|
Health condition management consulting |
|
|
|
|
Pharmacy benefit management consulting |
|
|
|
|
Workforce well-being evaluation |
|
|
|
|
Wellness and health promotion consulting |
|
|
|
|
Performance measurement and monitoring |
|
|
|
|
Development of funding strategies |
|
|
|
|
Forecasting, budgeting and reserve setting |
|
|
|
|
Vendor evaluation, selection and management |
|
|
|
|
Claims audits |
|
|
|
|
Pre- and post-implementation audits |
International Consulting Group
To help multinational companies face the challenges of operating in the global marketplace, Towers
Watson provides expertise in dealing with international human capital and related finance issues
for corporate headquarters and their overseas subsidiaries.
Through our global specialists and in cooperation with our local offices worldwide, we help
multinational companies on a range of issues, including:
|
|
|
Accounting consolidation for employee benefit plans globally |
|
|
|
|
Global oversight and governance procedures |
|
|
|
|
Global actuarial services |
|
|
|
|
Financial, cost and risk-control solutions for employee benefit plans globally |
|
|
|
|
Cross-border mergers, acquisitions and divestitures |
|
|
|
|
Multinational pooling and captive solutions |
|
|
|
|
Global health care solutions and wellness strategies |
|
|
|
|
Expansion into new territories |
|
|
|
|
Country HR legislative updates |
|
|
|
|
Advice on internationally mobile employees |
We offer several tools and research resources to help deliver these services, including:
|
|
BenTrack The online tool used by the worlds largest multinationals, including four of the
Fortune 10, to help govern global benefits and compensation programs |
|
|
|
Global Benefits Benchmarking Database This tool consolidates various Towers Watson
employee benefit surveys onto a single platform to give users access to benefit data and
resources across borders and industry sectors. |
37
|
|
Global Survey of Accounting Assumptions for Defined Benefit Plans an annual survey of the
accounting assumptions applied by major corporations for their defined benefit plans around
the world |
Technology and Administration Solutions (Benefits Outsourcing)
Towers Watsons Technology and Administration Solutions line of business provides benefits
outsourcing services to hundreds of clients across multiple industries. Our world-class solutions
are supported by our fully integrated technology system, BenefitConnect, and our dedicated,
on-shore service center. Supporting more than five million participants, we provide:
|
|
|
Pension and retirement plan administration |
|
|
|
|
Health and welfare administration |
|
|
|
|
Benefits service center support |
|
|
|
|
Integrated, transparent, state-of-the-art technology for administration, employee
self-service and workflow management whether you choose to outsource or co-source |
Towers Watson has a 30-year track record of success in benefits outsourcing. With three distinct
delivery models full outsourcing, co-sourcing and system-only support we offer a full range of
solutions to help meet the needs of employers of all types.
In the United States, Towers Watson is a top-tier benefits outsourcing provider and a market leader
for co-sourced defined benefit (DB) administration for organizations with 10,000 or more employees.
For retirement administration, BenefitConnect includes case management and administration tools to
assist plan sponsors in managing the entire life cycle of pension administration, from new hire to
retirement, and employee self-service tools that enhance employees understanding of their
retirement benefits future value. For health and welfare administration, BenefitConnect is a
customizable, web-based application that combines self-service employee tools with administrative
and call-center components to facilitate the administration and management of health and welfare
benefits.
In the United Kingdom, we are a leader in retirement administration outsourcing services to the
private sector, using highly automated processes and modern transactional web technology to enable
members to access their records and improve their understanding of their benefits. Our technology
also provides trustees and human resources with timely management information and the means to
monitor activity levels and reduce administration costs.
In markets outside the U.S. with more complex defined contribution (DC) arrangements, we have
deployed sophisticated DC technology, processes and controls. Our DC administration model in
Germany and the United Kingdom leverages web technology and provides clients with back office
reconciliation and investment manager interaction expertise, while offering the option to flex
the front-office operations to be as comprehensive as required. Participants can access static and
transactional data allowing them to be self-sufficient in managing their portfolios.
In Europe, we were named the best global pension plan administration service provider and benefits
administration provider of the year. Globally, we deliver high-quality solutions that has led to
one of the highest benefits outsourcing client retention rates in the industry.
38
Talent and Rewards Segment. The Talent and Rewards segment accounted for 15 percent of
Towers Watsons total revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2010. Few of the segments
projects have a recurring element. Approximately 45 percent of the segments revenue originates
from outside of the United States and is thus subject to translation exposure resulting from
foreign exchange rate fluctuations. As a result, this segment is most sensitive to changes in
discretionary spending due to cyclical economic fluctuations. Revenue for Talent and Rewards
consulting has minimal seasonality, with a small degree of heightened activity in the second half
of the year during the annual compensation, benefits and survey cycles. Major revenue growth
drivers in this group include demand for workforce productivity improvements and labor cost
reductions, focus on high performance culture, globalization of the workforce, changes in
regulations and benefits programs, mergers and acquisitions activity, and the demand for universal
metrics related to workforce engagement.
Our Talent & Rewards segment focuses in three principal areas:
|
|
|
Executive Compensation |
|
|
|
|
Rewards, Talent and Communication |
|
|
|
|
Data, Surveys and Technology |
Executive Compensation
We advise our clients management and boards of directors on executive pay programs, including base
pay, annual bonus, long-term incentives, perquisites and other benefits. This work includes helping
clients understand market practices relative to levels of compensation as well as the design of
incentive programs. We also provide clients with executive pay related transactional support
associated with various transactions such as mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, executive
transitions and business restructuring.
We have a global network of executive pay practitioners that allows us to provide comprehensive
solutions to our clients. We maintain a number of proprietary databases that our consultants access
in their work that provide us with competitive advantage.
Rewards, Talent and Communication
From this line of business, we provide our broad array of capabilities in designing and
implementing the programs and processes that touch employees, managers and leaders day to day and
influence their behavior, level of engagement and performance. Our solutions cut across the
employment lifecycle, from attracting and deploying talent to managing and rewarding employees
performance to developing their skills and providing relevant career paths to help retain and
engage them over time.
Our expertise in organizational communication and change management underlies and supports our work
in these areas. We help clients identify and align their employee value proposition, employment
deal and desired culture with their business strategy, and create supporting management and
communication processes to help drive their success over time.
Our primary practice areas include:
|
|
|
Talent Management. We help organizations develop integrated programs and processes to
identify leadership and workforce needs, engage and develop leaders and employees, and
align their behavior and decision making with the critical drivers of business performance.
Within this practice, our HR function effectiveness service line helps clients determine
and implement the right HR structure, service delivery model and staff to meet the needs of
both the organization and employees efficiently and effectively. |
|
|
|
|
Rewards. We provide the strategy, design and execution support for pay and other reward
programs to help clients optimize their reward spend and ensure their programs drive the
behaviors and performance required to meet key business goals. Within this practice, our
sales effectiveness and rewards service line focuses on sales force productivity and
incentives to drive profitable growth. |
39
|
|
|
Communication and Change Management. We offer deep expertise in change management,
organizational effectiveness and communication to drive employee engagement and help align
behavior with business results. |
Data, Surveys and Technology
This line of business combines data, analytics and software to enable more effective management of
people and programs. It brings together our complete array of capabilities in employee surveys,
global databases, and talent and rewards technology. It is the natural complement to our Rewards,
Talent and Communication business, providing the real-world information and intelligence required
to develop the insights that lead to appropriate solutions and, ultimately, results for our clients
around the world.
The business includes our global compensation databases, employee survey practices, human capital
metrics and analytics, web-based and personalized communications, and software applications related
to talent management and rewards. It combines the practices that can readily generate recurring
revenue, leveraging data, technology and a pool of staff resources that can be flexibly deployed.
We have data and tools that our competitors cannot easily match. Our compensation databases cover
almost 100 countries across six continents to support global clients wherever they do business. Our
employee surveys offer clients access to the worlds largest normative database of employee
perceptions to help them build and sustain employee engagement and understand cultural nuances that
define high performance. Our human capital metrics database provides benchmarks on key workforce
measures and analyzes how they link to and drive business performance. And our personalized web
tools help employees understand and make smart decisions about their reward programs.
These offerings work individually or in concert to provide clients with actionable intelligence
about their workforce, forming a powerful suite of insights to inform talent and rewards strategy,
program design and delivery.
Risk and Financial Services Segment The Risk and Financial Services (RFS) segment accounted
for 20 percent of Towers Watsons total revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
Approximately 65 percent of RFSs revenue originates from outside of the United States and is thus
subject to translation exposure resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations. The segment has
a strong base of recurring revenue, driven by long-term client relationships in reinsurance
intermediary services, retainer investment consulting relationships, consulting services on
financial reporting, and actuarial opinions on property/casualty loss reserves. Some of these
relationships have been in place for more than 20 years. A portion of the revenue is related to
project work, which is more heavily dependent on the overall level of discretionary spending by
clients. This work is favorably influenced by strong client relationships, particularly related to
mergers and acquisitions consulting.
Major revenue growth drivers include changes in regulations, the level of mergers and acquisitions
activity in the insurance industry, growth in pension and other asset pools, and reinsurance
retention and pricing trends.
The RFS segment has three lines of business:
|
|
|
Reinsurance and Insurance Brokerage (Brokerage) |
|
|
|
|
Risk Consulting and Software (RCS) and |
|
|
|
|
Investment Consulting and Solutions (Investment) |
The segment is united by an approach to client issues that focuses on risk, capital and value
management. We help companies around the world improve business performance by effectively
integrating risk management with their overall financial management framework.
We are well-positioned to serve this need. Our professionals have decades of experience in
insurance, reinsurance, investment and actuarial issues. We excel at creating practical, tailored
solutions for our clients. We back our work with rigorous quantitative analysis and globally
recognized thought leadership, research and technology.
40
We work with a variety of client executives: chief financial officers and treasurers, chief risk
officers and senior actuaries, insurance and reinsurance buyers, and pension plan sponsors and
trustees. Two of our lines of business, Reinsurance and Insurance Brokerage and Risk Consulting and
Software, have a particular focus on the insurance industry, while Investment focuses on pension
plans. However, all three of our businesses also apply their expertise to serve broader markets.
We can often add significant value to our clients by bringing a wider range of Towers Watson
products and services to bear in addressing the issues they face. Our RiskCapital Solutions
reflects this approach, combining RCS solutions with Brokerage to support insurance executives more
holistically with strategic risk management and risk transfer support. Investment often works with
colleagues in our Benefits segment on retirement financial management issues. In the future, we
will look for more opportunities to combine our services to respond in innovative ways to client
needs.
We have also developed a range of financial modeling software products. Our products bring together
innovative actuarial thinking with software expertise to provide comprehensive solutions to measure
value, manage risk and monitor capital adequacy. Our software solutions support a variety of
activities, ranging from asset-liability modeling and product development to economic capital
aggregation and allocation. These are used internally for consulting projects and licensed to
clients around the world.
We offer the following integrated services for our clients:
|
|
|
We provide actuarial, risk management and strategic consulting to the insurance industry
to both life/health and property/casualty insurance companies. We offer innovative
consulting services that help insurers manage risk and capital, improve business
performance and create competitive advantage. M&A consulting is a particular strength.
Towers Watson has extensive experience working with many of the worlds leading insurers on
complex merger, acquisition, sale and restructuring transactions. |
|
|
|
|
We leverage our knowledge of the insurance industry to provide risk management
consulting to the corporate market, and we have special expertise in areas such as captives
and professional liability. Towers Watsons risk specialists help companies address the
risks that affect their ability to achieve strategic goals and add shareholder value. |
|
|
|
|
We offer reinsurance and insurance brokerage services that are complemented by capital
markets risk financing solutions. We combine creative risk transfer solutions with
full-service insurance consulting and financial modeling software. |
|
|
|
|
We provide a wide range of investment consulting services and solutions, including
pension plan de-risking services. As a leading investment consultant, we help
organizations manage investment complexity, establish risk tolerance and improve
governance. |
|
|
|
|
We also offer financial modeling software and implementation consulting. Towers Watsons
actuarial know-how, industry knowledge and software expertise help clients measure value,
manage risk and monitor capital adequacy. |
Reinsurance and Insurance Brokerage (Brokerage)
We are the worlds fourth-largest reinsurance broker. We cover all major lines of business and
maintain trading relationships with more than 200 reinsurers and Lloyds underwriters.
Our Brokerage business provides risk transfer solutions by serving as an intermediary between
our clients and the insurance, reinsurance and capital markets. The bulk of our business is
providing global reinsurance intermediary services and consulting expertise. We help our clients
with reinsurance strategy and program review, claims management and program administration,
catastrophe exposure management, contract negotiation and placement, and market security issues.
41
Through our consultative approach, industry-leading analytical capabilities and tools, and
brokering expertise, we are able to help clients make informed decisions about risk and capital
management and execute comprehensive solutions that achieve broad coverage at competitive prices.
Clients further benefit from our capital market broker/dealer capabilities. Our integrated approach
to risk management helps our clients allocate, use and protect the capital they need to achieve
financial objectives.
While most of our clients are insurance companies, our Brokerage business also places insurance
programs for corporate clients.
We have offices in North America and Europe to serve clients in all the major insurance markets.
Our London office places reinsurance for Lloyds Syndicates and European insurers. In addition, it
acts as a correspondent broker, placing insurance and reinsurance for North American companies into
Lloyds of London. Together with Risk Consulting and Software, we have an on-the-ground presence in
Bermuda to access this important market.
Investment Consulting and Solutions (Investment)
Our Investment business helps our clients manage investment complexity, establish their risk
tolerance and improve governance. We combine innovative thinking with capable execution to help
balance risk and return.
We are a market leader in investment consulting and solutions. Our business is focused on creating
financial value for institutional investors through independent, best-in-class investment advice.
We provide coordinated investment strategy advice based on expertise in risk assessment,
strategic asset allocation and investment manager selection to some of the worlds largest
pension funds and institutional investors. We advise more than 1,000 pension funds and
institutional investors with assets in excess of $1 trillion, and we lead in creating innovative
pension risk management solutions.
We have one of the industrys largest investment strategy teams, with disciplines that include
investment banking, asset management and actuarial science. We also have more than 100 investment
manager research professionals covering all asset classes from mainstream equities and fixed income
to alternative investments, including hedge funds and private equity. With this deep specialist
expertise, we provide practical, independent advice tailored to meet the needs of our clients.
We also provide retirement risk solutions, including strategies that offer financial predictability
and stability around defined benefit pension plans. For those looking to exit plan sponsorship
altogether, we offer settlement solutions.
While Investment clients primarily include defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans,
we see significant growth potential in other areas, including insurance company asset management.
Risk Consulting and Software (RCS)
RCS is the largest line of business within Risk and Financial Services. RCS is primarily focused on
the insurance industry but increasingly serves as a risk specialist across a variety of industries.
We are also a leading provider of financial modeling software to the insurance industry. Our
clients include most of the leading global insurers as well as some of the largest financial
services companies and other corporations. We have more actuaries serving the insurance industry
than any other professional services firm.
Our consultants use deep analytical skills to solve practical business problems, applying the
latest techniques and software solutions to help clients improve business performance and create
competitive advantage in areas related to financial and regulatory reporting, enterprise risk
management, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate restructuring, and product and market
strategies.
42
Through our predecessor companies, we pioneered the use of enterprise risk management to help
insurers identify and avoid potential major losses, enhance risk-adjusted returns and meet
strategic objectives. Our consultants work with clients to identify, measure and manage key risks
that span the enterprise as well as risks that affect a particular line of business.
Our software solutions support insurance companies and other businesses that require sophisticated
and auditable financial modeling processes as they confront volatile markets and regulatory changes
driven by Solvency II, Principle-Based Approaches and Sarbanes-Oxley. Our software solutions
underpin a variety of activities, ranging from asset-liability modeling and product development to
economic capital aggregation and allocation.
Financial Statement Overview
Towers Watsons fiscal year end is June 30. The financial statements contained in this quarterly
report reflect Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the end of the third quarter of fiscal
year 2010 (March 31, 2010) and as of the end of fiscal year 2009 (June 30, 2009), Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine month periods ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 and a Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the
nine month period ended March 31, 2010.
Towers Watson derives the majority of its revenue from fees for consulting services, which
generally are billed based on time and materials or on a fixed-fee basis. Clients are typically
invoiced on a monthly basis with revenue generally recognized as services are performed. No single
client accounted for more than one percent of consolidated revenue for any of the most recent three
fiscal years.
Shown below are Towers Watsons top five markets based on percentage of consolidated revenue as
follows. The three months ended March 31, 2010 includes Towers Watson geographic regions while the
fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include only historical Watson Wyatt geographic regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Fiscal Year |
Geographic Region |
|
3/31/10 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
United States |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
United Kingdom |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Canada |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Germany |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Netherlands |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
In delivering consulting services, Towers Watsons principal direct expenses relate to compensation
of personnel. Salaries and employee benefits are comprised of wages paid to associates, related
taxes, severance, benefit expenses such as pension, medical and insurance costs, and fiscal
year-end incentive bonuses.
Professional and subcontracted services represent fees paid to external service providers for
employment, marketing and other services. For the most recent three fiscal years, approximately 50
to 60 percent of the professional and subcontracted services for Watson Wyatt were directly
incurred on behalf of clients and were reimbursed by them, with such reimbursements being included
in revenue. For the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 for Towers Watson, approximately 40 percent
of professional and subcontracted services represent these reimbursable services.
43
Occupancy, communications and other expenses represent expenses for rent, utilities, supplies and
telephone to operate office locations as well as non-client-reimbursed travel by associates,
publications and professional development. This line item also includes miscellaneous expenses,
including gains and losses on foreign currency transactions.
General and administrative expenses include the operational costs, professional fees and insurance
paid by corporate management, general counsel, marketing, human resources, finance, research and
technology support.
Depreciation and amortization includes the depreciation of fixed assets and amortization of
intangible assets and internally developed software.
Transaction and integration expenses include all fees and charges associated with the Merger.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Our estimates, judgments and assumptions are
continually evaluated based on available information and experience. Because of the use of
estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those
estimates. The areas that we believe are critical accounting policies include revenue recognition,
valuation of billed and unbilled receivables from clients, discretionary compensation, income
taxes, pension assumptions, incurred but not reported claims, and goodwill and intangible assets.
The critical accounting policies discussed below involve making difficult, subjective or complex
accounting estimates that could have a material effect on the financial condition and results of
operations. These critical accounting policies require us to make assumptions about matters that
are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate or assumption. Different estimates that we could
have used, or changes in estimates that are reasonably likely to occur, may have a material impact
on our financial statements and results of operations.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue includes fees primarily generated from consulting services provided. We recognize revenue
from these consulting engagements when hours are worked, either on a time-and-materials basis or on
a fixed-fee basis, depending on the terms and conditions defined at the inception of an engagement
with a client. We have engagement letters with our clients that specify the terms and conditions
upon which the engagements are based. These terms and conditions can only be changed upon
agreement by both parties. Individual consultants billing rates are principally based on a
multiple of salary and compensation costs.
Revenue for fixed-fee arrangements, which span multiple months, is based upon the percentage of
completion method. The Company typically has three types of fixed-fee arrangements: annual
recurring projects, projects of a short duration, and non-recurring system projects. Annual
recurring projects and the projects of short duration are typically straightforward and highly
predictable in nature. As a result, the project manager and financial staff are able to identify,
as the project status is reviewed and bills are prepared monthly, the occasions when cost overruns
could lead to the recording of a loss accrual.
We have non-recurring system projects that are longer in duration and subject to more changes in
scope as the project progresses than projects undertaken in other segments. We evaluate at least
quarterly, and more often as needed, project managers estimates-to-complete to assure that the
projects current status is accounted for properly. The Technology and Administration Solutions
Group contracts generally provide that if the client terminates a contract, the Company is entitled
to payment for services performed through termination.
44
Revenue recognition for fixed-fee engagements is affected by a number of factors that change the
estimated amount of work required to complete the project such as changes in scope, the staffing on
the engagement and/or the level of client participation. The periodic engagement evaluations
require us to make judgments and estimates regarding the overall profitability and stage of project
completion that, in turn, affect how we recognize revenue. The Company recognizes a loss on an
engagement when estimated revenue to be received for that engagement is less than the total
estimated direct and indirect costs associated with the engagement. Losses are recognized in the
period in which the loss becomes probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. The
Company has experienced certain costs in excess of estimates from time to time. Management
believes that it is rare, however, for these excess costs to result in overall project losses.
The Company has developed various software programs and technologies that we provide to clients in
connection with consulting services. In most instances, such software is hosted and maintained by
the Company and ownership of the technology and rights to the related code remain with the Company.
Software developed to be utilized in providing services to a client, but for which the client does
not have the contractual right to take possession, is capitalized in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles of capitalized software. Revenue associated with the related
contract, together with amortization of the related capitalized software, is recognized over the
service period. As a result, we do not recognize revenue during the implementation phase of an
engagement.
In connection with the Merger, we acquired the reinsurance intermediary business of Towers Perrin.
In our capacity as a reinsurance intermediary, we collect premiums from reinsureds and, after
deducting our brokerage commissions, we remit the premiums to the respective reinsurance
underwriters on behalf of reinsureds. In general, compensation for reinsurance intermediary
services is earned on a commission basis. Commissions are calculated as a percentage of a
reinsurance premium as stipulated in the reinsurance contracts with the Companys clients and
reinsurers. The Company recognizes intermediary services revenue on the later of the inception date
or billing date of the contract. In addition, the Company holds cash needed to settle amounts due
reinsurers or reinsureds, net of any commissions due the Company, pending remittance to the
ultimate recipient. The Company is permitted to invest these funds in high quality liquid
instruments.
Revenue recognized in excess of billings is recorded as unbilled accounts receivable. Cash
collections and invoices generated in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue
until the revenue recognition criteria are met. Client reimbursable expenses, including those
relating to travel, other out-of-pocket expenses and any third-party costs, are included in
revenue, and an equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses are included in professional and
subcontracted services as a cost of revenue.
Valuation of Billed and Unbilled Receivables from Clients
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts to reflect estimated losses resulting from the
clients failure to pay for the services after the services have been rendered, including
allowances when customer disputes may exist. The related provision is recorded as a reduction to
revenue. Our allowance policy is based on the aging of the billed and unbilled client receivables
and has been developed based on the write-off history. Facts and circumstances such as the average
length of time the receivables are past due, general market conditions, current economic trends and
our clients ability to pay may cause fluctuations in our valuation of billed and unbilled
receivables.
Discretionary Compensation
Our compensation program includes a discretionary bonus that is determined by management and has
historically been paid once per fiscal year in the form of cash and/or deferred stock units after
its annual operating results are finalized. As a result of the Merger, interim bonuses were paid
in March 2010 relative to the six-month period ended December 31, 2009 and then will be paid in
September 2010 relative to the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, after which time bonuses will
be paid annually each September.
An estimated annual bonus amount is initially developed at the beginning of each fiscal year in
conjunction with our budgeting process. Quarterly, estimated annual operating performance is
reviewed by the Company and the discretionary annual bonus amount is then adjusted, if necessary,
by management to reflect changes in the forecast of pre-bonus profitability for the year.
45
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, which prescribes
the use of the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax asset or liability account balances
are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect. Valuation
allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely
than not that a portion or all of a given deferred tax asset will not be realized. In accordance
with ASC 740, income tax expense includes (i) deferred tax expense, which generally represents the
net change in the deferred tax asset or liability balance during the year plus any change in
valuation allowances and (ii) current tax expense, which represents the amount of tax currently
payable to or receivable from a taxing authority plus amounts accrued for expected tax
contingencies (including both tax and interest). ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold of
more-likely-than-not, and a measurement attribute for all tax positions taken or expected to be
taken on a tax return, in order for those positions to be recognized in the financial statements.
The Company continually reviews tax laws, regulations and related guidance in order to properly
record any uncertain tax liabilities. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and
circumstances, such as the outcome of tax audits. The provision for income taxes includes the
impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate.
Pension Assumptions
Towers Watson sponsors both qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans and other
post-employment benefit or OPEB plans in North America and in the Europe. These plans represent
90 percent of total Towers Watsons pension obligations and as a result are disclosed herein.
Towers Watson also sponsors funded and unfunded defined benefit pension plans in certain other
countries as well, representing the remaining 10 percent of the liability.
Under the legacy Watson Wyatt plans in North America, benefits are based on the number of years of
service and the associates compensation during the five highest paid consecutive years of service.
The non-qualified plan, included only in North America, provides for pension benefits that would be
covered under the qualified plan but are limited by the Internal Revenue Code. The non-qualified
plan has no assets and therefore is an unfunded arrangement. Beginning January 2008, Watson Wyatt
made changes to the plan in the U.K. related to years of service used in calculating benefits for
associates. Benefits earned prior to January 2008 are based on the number of years of service and
the associates compensation during the three years before leaving the plan and benefits earned
after January 2008 are based on the number of years of service and the associates average
compensation during the associates term of service since that date. The plan liabilities in
Germany were a result of Watson Wyatts acquisition of Heissmann GmbH in 2007. A significant
percentage of the liabilities represent the grandfathered pension benefit for employees hired prior
to a July 1991 plan amendment. The pension plan for those hired after July 1991 is a defined
contribution type arrangement. In the Netherlands, the pension benefit is a percentage of service
and average salary over the working life of the employee, where salary includes allowances and
bonuses up to a set maximum salary and is offset by the current social security benefit.
The benefit liability is reflected on the balance sheet. The measurement date for each of the
plans is June 30.
The legacy Towers Perrin pension plans in the U.S. accrue benefits under a cash-balance formula for
employees hired or rehired after 2002 and for all employees for service after 2007. For employees
hired prior to 2003 and active as of January 2003, benefits prior to 2008 are based on a
combination of a cash balance formula, for the period after 2002, and a final average pay formula
based on years of plan service and the highest five consecutive years of plan compensation prior to
2008. Under the cash balance formula benefits are based on a percentage of each year of the
employees plan compensation. The Canadian Retirement Plan provides a choice of a defined benefit
approach or a defined contribution approach. The non-qualified plans in North America provide for
pension benefits that would be covered under the qualified plan in the respective country but are
limited by statutory maximums. The non-qualified plans have no assets and therefore are unfunded
arrangements. The U.K. Plan provides predominantly lump sum benefits. Benefit accruals under the
U.K. Plan ceased on March 31, 2008. The plans in Germany mostly provide benefits under a
cash balance benefit formula. Benefits under the Netherlands plan accrue on a final pay basis on
earnings up to a maximum amount each year. The benefit assets and liabilities are reflected on the
balance sheet. The measurement date for each of the plans has historically been December
31, but will be changed to June 30 as a result of the Merger.
46
The determination of Towers Watsons obligations and annual expense under the plans is based on a
number of assumptions that, given the longevity of the plans, are long-term in focus. A change in
one or a combination of these assumptions could have a material impact on Towers Watsons pension
benefit obligation and related expense. For this reason, management employs a long-term view so
that assumptions do not change frequently in response to short-term volatility in the economy. Any
difference between actual and assumed results is amortized into Towers Watsons pension expense
over the average remaining service period of participating employees. Towers Watson considers
several factors prior to the start of each fiscal year when determining the appropriate annual
assumptions, including economic forecasts, relevant benchmarks, historical trends, portfolio
composition and peer comparisons.
North American Plans
The following assumptions were used in the valuations of Towers Watsons North American plans and
represent the weighted-average of rates for all U.S. and Canadian plans at June 30, 2009 and 2008.
The assumptions as of June 30, 2009 have been adjusted by the inclusion of the legacy Towers Perrin
plans in the weighted-average calculation using assumptions as of January 1, 2010, the acquisition
date. The assumptions as of June 30, 2008 represent only the legacy Watson Wyatt plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
|
6.91 |
% |
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
|
|
8.10 |
% |
|
|
8.61 |
% |
Rate of increase in compensation levels |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
4.08 |
% |
The discount rate and other assumptions are the weighted-average assumptions from each of the
respective North American plans. The 6.46 percent discount rate assumption used at the end of
fiscal year 2009 represents a 45 basis point decrease over the rate used at fiscal year 2008.
Towers Watsons discount rate assumptions were determined by matching expected future pension
benefit payments with current AA corporate bond yields from the respective countries for the same
periods. In the U.S., specific bonds were selected to match plan cash flows. In Canada, yields
were taken from a corporate bond yield curve.
The expected rate of return represents the weighted-average assumptions from each of the respective
North American funded plans. The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption decreased
to 8.10 percent per annum as of June 30, 2009 (for fiscal year 2010 expense) from 8.61 percent per
annum as of June 30, 2008 (for fiscal year 2009 expense). Selection of the return assumption at
8.10 percent per annum was supported by an analysis performed by Towers Watson of the
weighted-average yield expected to be achieved with the anticipated makeup of investments.
The following information illustrates the sensitivity to a change in certain assumptions for the
North American pension plans for fiscal year 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on Fiscal 2010 |
Change in Assumption |
|
Pre-Tax Pension Expense |
25 basis point decrease in discount rate |
|
+$3.3 million |
25 basis point increase in discount rate |
|
-$3.2 million |
25 basis point decrease in expected return on assets |
|
+$2.8 million |
25 basis point increase in expected return on assets |
|
-$2.8 million |
47
The above sensitivities reflect the impact of changing one assumption at a time. Economic factors
and conditions often affect multiple assumptions simultaneously and the effects of changes in key
assumptions are not necessarily linear.
European Plans
The following assumptions were used in the valuations of Towers Watsons European plans and
represent the weighted-average of rates for the U.K., Germany and Netherlands plans at June 30,
2009 and 2008. The assumptions as of June 30, 2009 have been adjusted by the inclusion of the
legacy Towers Perrin plans in the weighted-average calculation using assumptions as of January 1,
2010, the acquisition date. The assumptions as of June 30, 2008 represent only the legacy Watson
Wyatt plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions as of June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.06 |
% |
|
|
6.47 |
% |
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
|
|
6.51 |
% |
|
|
6.74 |
% |
Rate of increase in compensation levels |
|
|
4.90 |
% |
|
|
5.36 |
% |
The 6.06 percent discount rate assumption used at the end of fiscal year 2009 represents a 41 basis
point decrease over the rate used at fiscal year 2008. The discount rate is set having regard to
yields on European AA corporate bonds at the measurement date and this increase reflects the change
in yields between these dates.
The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption decreased to 6.51 percent per annum as
of June 30, 2009 from 6.74 percent per annum as of June 30, 2008. The rate of return was supported
by an analysis performed by Towers Watson for the plan of the weighted-average return expected to
be realized based on the anticipated makeup of investments.
The following information illustrates the sensitivity to a change in certain assumptions for the
Europe pension plans for fiscal year 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on Fiscal 2010 |
Change in Assumption |
|
Pre-Tax Pension Expense |
25 basis point decrease in discount rate |
|
+$2.5 million |
25 basis point increase in discount rate |
|
-$2.2 million |
25 basis point decrease in expected return on assets |
|
+$1.2 million |
25 basis point increase in expected return on assets |
|
-$1.2 million |
The amounts above applicable to the legacy Towers Perrin plans show the effect on expense for the 6
month period from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010. The sensitivities reflect the effect of
assumption changes occurring after purchase accounting has been applied. The differences in the
discount rate and compensation level assumption used for the North American and European plans
above can be attributed to the differing interest rate environments associated with the currencies
and economies to which the plans are subject. The differences in the expected return on assets are
primarily driven by the respective asset allocation in each plan, coupled with the return
expectations for assets in the respective currencies.
48
Incurred But Not Reported Claims
Towers Watson uses actuarial assumptions to estimate and record a liability for incurred but not
reported (IBNR) professional liability claims. Our estimated IBNR liability is based on long-term
trends and averages, and considers a number of factors, including changes in claim reporting
patterns, claim settlement patterns, judicial decisions, and legislation and economic decisions,
but excludes the effect of claims data for large cases due to the insufficiency of actual
experience with such cases. Our estimated IBNR liability will fluctuate if claims experience
changes over time.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In applying the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, amounts assigned to
identifiable assets and liabilities acquired were based on estimated fair values as of the date of
the acquisitions, with the remainder recorded as goodwill. Intangible assets are initially valued
at fair market value using generally accepted valuation methods appropriate for the type of
intangible asset. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of June 30, and whenever indicators
of impairment exist. The evaluation is a two-step process whereby the fair value of the reporting
unit is compared with its carrying amount, including goodwill. As the fair value of our reporting
units exceeds their carrying value, we do not perform step two to determine the impairment loss. In
the event that a reporting units carrying value exceeded its fair value, we would determine the
implied fair value of goodwill and recognize an impairment loss for the excess of carrying value
over implied fair value. Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated
useful lives and are reviewed for impairment if indicators of impairment arise. Intangible assets
with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually as of June 30. The fair value of the
intangible assets are compared with their carrying value and an impairment loss would be recognized
for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. In the three and nine months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we have not recorded any impairment losses of goodwill or
intangibles.
Results of Operations
Watson Wyatt is the accounting predecessor in the Merger; as such, the historical results of Watson
Wyatt have become those of the new registrant, Towers Watson, and are presented in this filing as
historical results. The condensed consolidated statement of operations of Towers Watson for the
three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 includes the result of Towers Perrins operations
beginning January 1, 2010. The result of operations for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 includes
only the financial results of Watson Wyatt.
In addition to analysis of results of operations as reported, the Company has prepared pro forma
results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 as if the
Merger had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented and analysis of the pro forma results
of operations by line item. The pro forma analysis is prepared and presented to aid in explaining
the results of operations of the merged Towers Watson.
As a result of the merger, Towers Watson aligned and grouped general and administrative accounts
using a natural account methodology. The accounting predecessor, Watson Wyatt, allocated certain
support service charges to general and administrative expenses from specific offices, teams and
accounts. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
have been retrospectively realigned to new general and administrative expense methodology.
49
The table below sets forth Towers Watsons Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, as
reported, data as a percentage of revenue for the periods indicated:
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(as reported and as a percent of revenue)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
Nine months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of providing services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
Professional and subcontracted services |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Transaction and integration expenses |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/Income from affiliates |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the
Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009
Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $804 million, an increase of $387 million, or
93%, compared to $417 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase was
primarily a result of the Merger and combination of Towers Perrins and Watson Wyatts operations
as of January 1, 2010. Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $9 million, a
decrease of $32 million, or 78%, compared to $41 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The decrease was primarily due to transaction and integration expenses of $24 million incurred in
the quarter.
In addition, salaries and employee benefits was 67% of revenue for the three months ended March 31,
2010, an increase of 5% from 62% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009. This
increase is the result of stock-based compensation of $27 million recorded in the third quarter of
fiscal 2010, which consisted of $24 million related to the vesting of Restricted A shares issued in
the Merger and $3 million related to recording the unamortized fair value of Watson Wyatt stock
options and deferred stock units outstanding at the time of the Merger that vested upon change of control. The remaining
increase is the result of higher salaries and employee benefits as a percentage of revenue for
Towers Perrin. There were no other significant increases (greater than 1%) comparing the income
statement line items as a percent of revenue period over period for the three months ended March
31, 2010 from 2009.
Revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was $1.6 billion, an increase of $358 million, or
28%, compared to $1.3 billion for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The increase was
primarily a result of the Merger and combination of Towers Perrins and Watson Wyatts operations
as of January 1, 2010. Net income for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was $62 million, a
decrease of $53 million, or 46%, compared to $115 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009.
The decrease was primarily due to transaction and integration expenses of $50 million incurred in
the first three quarters of fiscal 2010.
In addition, salaries and employee benefits was 65% of revenue for the nine months ended March 31,
2010, an increase of 3% from 62% of revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. This
increase is the result of stock-based compensation of $27 million recorded in the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 which consisted of $24 million related to the vesting of Restricted A shares issued in
the Merger and $3 million related to recording the unamortized fair value of Watson Wyatt stock
options and deferred stock units outstanding at the time of the Merger that vested upon change of control. The remaining
increase is the result of higher salaries and employee benefits as a percentage of revenue for
Towers Perrin. There were no other significant increases (greater than 1%) comparing the income
statement line items as a percent of revenue period over period for the nine months ended March 31,
2010 from 2009.
Provision for income taxes for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $77.8 million,
compared to $52.4 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. The effective tax rate was
55.2 percent for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 and
31.1 percent for the first nine
months of fiscal year 2009.
The provision for income taxes for the three and nine months ended
March 31, 2010 also includes a deferred tax charge of $10.6 million due to the enactment of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act and U.S. Health Care and Education Reconciliation
Act of 2010 during March 2010, which effectively makes government subsidies received for Medicare-equivalent
prescription drug coverage taxable. Guidance on accounting for income taxes requires that the
tax effects of changes in laws be reflected in financial statements in the period in which the
legislation is enacted regardless of the effective date. Deferred tax assets had previously been
recorded based on the liability for other postretirement benefits without regard to the tax-free
subsidy. As a result of the change, deferred tax assets were reduced to reflect the expected future
income tax on the subsidy. Beginning in 2013, a cash tax cost will be incurred when the
subsidies received increase taxable income.
In addition, the Company has established valuation allowance reserves in the amount of
$10.2 million on certain German deferred tax assets and US foreign tax credits in relation to the
Merger. Towers Watson records a tax benefit on foreign net operating loss carryovers and foreign
deferred expenses only if it is more likely than not that a benefit will be realized.
Towers Watson has not provided U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative earnings of foreign subsidiaries
that have been reinvested indefinitely, with the exception of its Canadian subsidiary. The Company
will continue to provide deferred taxes on Canadian earnings for the foreseeable future.
51
Adjusted earnings per share.
Towers Watsons management uses adjusted diluted earnings per share, a non-generally accepted
accounting principles measure, to evaluate its performance, and separately evaluates its
performance of the transaction and integration activities and unusual events such as the loss of
the Medicare Part D subsidy. Management determined that this information is useful to investors in
evaluating its results of operations and providing a baseline for evaluation of current and future
operating performance.
Net income attributable to controlling interests.
Net income attributable to controlling interests for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $8.8
million inclusive of the amortization of deal related intangible assets, deductible and
non-deductible transaction and integration expenses, stock-based compensation related to Restricted
Class A shares and severance (recorded in salaries and employee benefits), loss of the Medicare
Part D subsidy and the tax related items of limitations on officer compensation and the negative
impact of German tax law changes on certain German deferred tax assets in relation to the Merger,
compared to net income attributable to controlling interests of $40.6 million for the third quarter
of fiscal year 2009.
Earnings per share.
Diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $0.12, compared to $0.95
for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Diluted earnings per share exclusive of the amortization of intangible assets, deductible and
non-deductible transaction and integration expenses, stock-based compensation related to Restricted
Class A shares and severance (recorded in salaries and employee benefits), loss of the Medicare
Part D subsidy and the tax related items of limitations on officer compensation and the negative
impact of German tax law changes on certain German deferred tax assets in relation to the Merger
(adjusted diluted earnings per share), resulted in adjusted diluted earnings per share, a
non-generally accepted accounting principle measure, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 of
$0.92.
A reconciliation of net income, as reported under generally accepted accounting principles, to
adjusted net income, and of diluted earnings per share as reported under generally accepted
accounting principles to adjusted diluted earnings per share is as follows:
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests, As Reported |
|
$ |
8,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted for expenses as a result of the Merger (1): |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
8,495 |
|
Transaction and integration expenses |
|
|
14,030 |
|
Restricted Class A Shares |
|
|
15,434 |
|
Severance |
|
|
3,129 |
|
Other tax-related items |
|
|
9,604 |
|
|
Loss of Medicare Part D subsidy |
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests |
|
$ |
70,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Shares of Common Stock Diluted (000) |
|
|
76,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Diluted, As Reported |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted for expenses as a result of the Merger: |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
0.11 |
|
Transaction and integration expenses |
|
|
0.18 |
|
Restricted Class A Shares |
|
|
0.20 |
|
Severance |
|
|
0.04 |
|
Other tax-related items |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
Loss of Medicare Part D subsidy |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Earnings Per Share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The expenses that are adjusted as a result of the Merger for the three months ended March
31, 2010 are net of tax. In calculating the net of tax amounts, the effective tax rate for
amortization of intangible assets is 32.0%, transaction and integration expenses is 26.0%,
Restricted Class A shares is 35.8% and severance is 42.7%. In addition, the decrease of expense
of $9.6 million resulting from the loss of Medicare Part D subsidy and of $11.2 million of tax
related items are items included in the condensed consolidated statement of operations provision
for income taxes. |
Pro Forma Analysis.
The following unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations have been provided to present
illustrative combined unaudited statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, giving effect to the business combination as if it had been completed on
July 1, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The unaudited historical combined statement of operations for
the three month period ended March 31, 2010 reflects the actual financial results of the combined
Company. All other periods reflect the pro forma historical financial results from Watson Wyatt and
Towers Perrin. The unaudited pro forma combined financial information, which is a non-generally
accepted accounting principles measure, shows the impact of the business combination on Watson
Wyatt and Towers Perrins historical results of operations. The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statement of operation are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not indicative
of the results of operations that might have occurred had the business combination actually taken
place as of the dates specified, or that may be expected to occur in the future. We do not assume
any benefits from any cost savings or synergies expected to result from the Merger, except for any
cost savings or synergies actually realized by the Company for the three-month period ended March
31, 2010.
53
Pro forma adjustments consist of the following:
|
A. |
|
Reflects the elimination of premium revenue from Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin as
recorded by PCIC, as well as related professional liability insurance expense recorded by
Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin. |
|
|
B. |
|
Reflects the 27.14% non-controlling interest in PCIC. |
|
|
C. |
|
Reflects the elimination of Watson Wyatts and Towers Perrins earnings from PCIC as
previously recorded under the equity method. |
|
|
D. |
|
Reflects interest income forgone as a result of the cash consideration of $200 million
paid to Towers Perrin Class R participants, which is assumed to be paid on July 1, 2008 or
2009 in conjunction with the redemption of Towers Watson Class R shares. |
|
|
E. |
|
Reflects interest accrued on $200 million principal amount of Towers Watson Notes
issued to Towers Perrin Class R participants. Interest on the Towers Watson Notes will
accrue at a fixed rate per annum, compounded annually at 2 percent. |
|
|
F. |
|
Transaction and integration expenses related to the Merger are included in the period
as if the transaction occurred at the beginning of the period presented. |
|
|
G. |
|
Reflects cash payment and capitalized prepayment of estimated bank fees associated with
a Towers Watson Senior Credit facility and of amortization of those fees. |
|
|
H. |
|
Record reversal of Towers Perrins asset retirement obligation to approximate fair
value. |
|
|
I. |
|
Record reversal of amortization on Towers Perrin former intangible assets. Formerly
acquired and developed intangible assets of Towers Perrin were included in the Towers
Watson valuation of intangibles at the time of the Merger and the new intangibles fair
value was recorded in the beginning balance sheet. |
|
|
J. |
|
Reflects the adjustment to rent expense related to the beginning balance sheet fair
value of leases. |
|
|
K. |
|
Record reduction of revenue related to deferred revenue fair value adjustment as of the
beginning balance sheet. |
|
|
L. |
|
Reflects the stock-based compensation recorded related to the unamortized fair value of
the stock options assumed by Towers Watson formerly under the Watson Wyatt 2000 Long-term
Incentive Plan that were subject to change of control provisions. |
|
|
M. |
|
Reflects the stock-based compensation recorded relative to the Restricted Class A shares issued at the time of the Merger subject to a service condition for which the
restriction lapses annually over three years. |
|
|
N. |
|
Reflects amortization of intangible assets related to the Merger on an accelerated
basis over the assets estimated useful life. Customer-related intangible assets are
amortized over a twelve year estimated life and developed technology assets are generally
amortized over a four year weighted average estimated life. The trademark intangible asset
has an estimated indefinite life and thus is not amortized. |
|
|
O. |
|
Reflects the provision for taxes adjustments as a result of the Merger and other
acquisition accounting adjustments. |
54
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
Pro Forma As |
|
|
|
Towers Watson |
|
|
Watson Wyatt |
|
|
Towers Perrin |
|
|
PCIC |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
803,963 |
|
|
$ |
416,994 |
|
|
$ |
385,266 |
|
|
$ |
9,968 |
|
|
$ |
(12,720 |
) A, K |
|
$ |
799,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of providing services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
537,706 |
|
|
|
260,384 |
|
|
|
276,980 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
29,883 |
L, M |
|
|
567,290 |
|
Professional and subcontracted services |
|
|
52,139 |
|
|
|
30,939 |
|
|
|
38,099 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,335 |
|
Occupancy, communications and other |
|
|
35,735 |
|
|
|
17,787 |
|
|
|
17,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,102 |
J |
|
|
35,954 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
69,999 |
|
|
|
38,563 |
|
|
|
41,207 |
|
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
(7,136 |
) A, H |
|
|
76,445 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
32,834 |
|
|
|
17,531 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,416 |
I, N |
|
|
33,037 |
|
Transaction and integration expenses |
|
|
24,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,405 |
F |
|
|
24,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752,818 |
|
|
|
365,204 |
|
|
|
382,441 |
|
|
|
4,151 |
|
|
|
54,670 |
|
|
|
806,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
51,145 |
|
|
|
51,790 |
|
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
5,817 |
|
|
|
(67,390 |
) |
|
|
(6,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from affiliates |
|
|
(1,049 |
) |
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,392 |
) C |
|
|
389 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) D |
|
|
2,123 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,273 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
(862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,723 |
) E,G |
|
|
(3,138 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
49,696 |
|
|
|
56,653 |
|
|
|
8,154 |
|
|
|
6,866 |
|
|
|
(74,731 |
) |
|
|
(3,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
40,329 |
|
|
|
15,927 |
|
|
|
7,913 |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
(25,323 |
) O |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
9,367 |
|
|
|
40,726 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
4,305 |
|
|
|
(49,408 |
) |
|
|
(4,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168 |
B |
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to controlling interests |
|
|
8,815 |
|
|
$ |
40,591 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
4,305 |
|
|
$ |
(50,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income Basic |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income Diluted |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock, basic (000) |
|
|
76,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock, diluted (000) |
|
|
76,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
Towers Watson |
|
|
Watson Wyatt |
|
|
Towers Perrin |
|
|
PCIC |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Adjusted |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
803,963 |
|
|
$ |
833,959 |
|
|
$ |
798,131 |
|
|
$ |
12,750 |
|
|
$ |
(17,795 |
) |
A, K |
$ |
2,431,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of providing services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
537,706 |
|
|
|
524,546 |
|
|
|
558,855 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
46,670 |
|
M |
|
1,667,884 |
|
Professional and subcontracted services |
|
|
52,139 |
|
|
|
49,865 |
|
|
|
79,421 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,908 |
|
Occupancy, communications and other |
|
|
35,735 |
|
|
|
37,668 |
|
|
|
35,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
J |
|
111,013 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
69,999 |
|
|
|
71,454 |
|
|
|
40,351 |
|
|
|
16,924 |
|
|
|
(9,774 |
) |
A, H |
|
188,954 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
32,834 |
|
|
|
36,185 |
|
|
|
19,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,508 |
|
I, N |
|
99,534 |
|
Transaction and integration expenses |
|
|
24,405 |
|
|
|
25,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752,818 |
|
|
|
745,010 |
|
|
|
733,040 |
|
|
|
17,514 |
|
|
|
50,608 |
|
|
|
2,298,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
51,145 |
|
|
|
88,949 |
|
|
|
65,091 |
|
|
|
(4,764 |
) |
|
|
(68,403 |
) |
|
|
132,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from affiliates |
|
|
(1,049 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
C |
|
(1,024 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
D |
|
3,489 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,273 |
) |
|
|
(1,053 |
) |
|
|
(1,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,095 |
) |
E, G |
|
(7,957 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
49,696 |
|
|
|
91,171 |
|
|
|
69,202 |
|
|
|
(3,247 |
) |
|
|
(71,411 |
) |
|
|
135,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
40,329 |
|
|
|
37,463 |
|
|
|
9,779 |
|
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(25,386 |
) |
O |
|
60,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
9,367 |
|
|
|
53,708 |
|
|
|
59,423 |
|
|
|
(1,960 |
) |
|
|
(46,025 |
) |
|
|
74,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
B |
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to controlling interests |
|
$ |
8,815 |
|
|
$ |
53,652 |
|
|
$ |
59,423 |
|
|
$ |
(1,960 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,466 |
) |
|
$ |
74,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income Basic |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income Diluted |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares of common stock, basic (000) |
|
|
76,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares of common stock, diluted (000) |
|
|
76,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
Watson Wyatt |
|
|
Towers Perrin |
|
|
PCIC |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
As Adjusted |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,279,509 |
|
|
$ |
1,212,905 |
|
|
$ |
29,905 |
|
|
$ |
(38,159 |
) |
A, K |
|
$ |
2,484,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of providing services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
787,751 |
|
|
|
847,003 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
76,553 |
|
L, M |
|
|
1,711,391 |
|
Professional and subcontracted
services |
|
|
91,947 |
|
|
|
137,148 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,936 |
|
Occupancy, communications and other |
|
|
54,529 |
|
|
|
50,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
J |
|
|
108,725 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
131,258 |
|
|
|
135,032 |
|
|
|
10,751 |
|
|
|
(21,407 |
) |
A, H |
|
|
255,634 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
55,265 |
|
|
|
29,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,924 |
|
I, N |
|
|
102,537 |
|
Transaction and integration expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,697 |
|
F |
|
|
49,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,120,750 |
|
|
|
1,199,421 |
|
|
|
11,676 |
|
|
|
126,073 |
|
|
|
|
2,457,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
158,759 |
|
|
|
13,484 |
|
|
|
18,229 |
|
|
|
(164,232 |
) |
|
|
|
26,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from affiliates |
|
|
6,398 |
|
|
|
(6,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,182 |
) |
C |
|
|
(10,326 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
4,485 |
|
|
|
3,974 |
|
|
|
(2,875 |
) |
D |
|
|
7,231 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,181 |
) |
|
|
(2,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,225 |
) |
E, G |
|
|
(10,252 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
13,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
168,089 |
|
|
|
22,435 |
|
|
|
22,203 |
|
|
|
(182,514 |
) |
|
|
|
30,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
52,355 |
|
|
|
36,257 |
|
|
|
7,764 |
|
|
|
(70,734 |
) |
O |
|
|
25,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
115,734 |
|
|
|
(13,822 |
) |
|
|
14,439 |
|
|
|
(111,780 |
) |
|
|
|
4,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
432 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
3,919 |
|
B |
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to controlling interests |
|
$ |
115,302 |
|
|
$ |
(13,822 |
) |
|
$ |
14,439 |
|
|
$ |
(115,699 |
) |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income Basic |
|
$ |
2.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income Diluted |
|
$ |
2.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares of common stock, basic (000) |
|
|
42,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares of common stock, diluted (000) |
|
|
42,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
Pro Forma Financial Information for the Three and Nine Months Ended
March 31, 2010 Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009
Towers Watson pro forma revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $804.0 million,
an increase of $4.5 million, or less than one percent, from $799.5 million in the third quarter of
fiscal year 2009.
The average exchange rate used to translate the revenue earned in British pounds sterling increased
to 1.5643 for the third quarter ended March 31, 2010 from 1.4437 for the third quarter ended March
31, 2009, and the average exchange rate used to translate the revenue earned in Euros increased to
1.3830 for the third quarter ended March 31, 2010 from 1.3184 for the third quarter ended March 31,
2009. Constant currency, a non-generally accepted accounting principle method, is calculated by
translating prior year revenue at the current year average exchange rate and is provided to aid in
the understanding of analysis without the impact of foreign currency.
The fluctuations in the segment revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, as compared to
the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, are as follows:
|
|
|
Benefits revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $469.9 million, a $6.5
million, or 1 percent, increase compared to pro forma revenue for the third quarter of
fiscal year 2009. On a pro forma, constant currency basis revenue decreased 2 percent due
to declines in Retirement and in Technology and Administration Solutions which were
partially offset by an increase in Health and Group Benefits. Retirement performed as
expected in the current economic cycle. Technology and Administration Solutions had lower
revenue in the quarter due to a larger deferral of revenue to subsequent quarters due to
new project implementations in the United States compared to the third quarter of fiscal
year 2009. In March, Congress enacted comprehensive health care reform legislation which is
complex and contains numerous provisions which take effect between 2010 and 2014. The
Health and Group Benefits group is positioned to assist clients in evaluating the new
legislation and to optimize performance of their health benefit plans. |
|
|
|
|
Risk and Financial Services revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $191.1
million, a $1.7 million, or 1 percent, decrease compare to pro forma revenue for the third
quarter of fiscal year 2009. Risk and Financial Services pro forma, constant currency
revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 decreased 5 percent compared to the third
quarter of fiscal year 2009. The revenue decrease in Risk Consulting and Software was
partially offset by pro forma, constant currency increases of 8.3 percent in Investment
Consulting and 4.7 percent in Brokerage. Risk Consulting and Software due to decreases in
project activity decreases in all geographic regions. Investment Consulting increases are
supported by increases in implemented consulting activities and in strategy projects.
Brokerage business is experiencing growth from new clients and strong renewal rates. The
Risk and Financial Services segment pairs its reinsurance brokerage services with strong
analytic capabilities and creates opportunities for clients seeking a more comprehensive
approach to risk and capital management. |
|
|
|
|
Talent and Rewards Group revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $122.6
million. Talent and Rewards Group pro forma, constant currency revenue for the third
quarter of fiscal year 2010 decreased 2.2 percent compared to the third quarter of fiscal
year 2009. Rewards, Talent and Communication decreased due to less project activity in all
regions. Data, Surveys and Technology increased due to data services increases in North
America. Excluding the legacy Towers Perrin ERP business, which was sold in April 2009, pro
forma, constant currency revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 decreased 4
percent. |
Towers Watson pro forma revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was $2.4 billion, a
decrease of $53.2 million, or 2 percent, from $2.5 billion in the nine months ended March 31, 2009.
58
The average exchange rate used to translate the revenue earned in British pounds sterling decreased
to 1.6086 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 from 1.6479 for the nine months ended March 31,
2009, and the average exchange rate used to translate the revenue earned in Euros increased to
1.4231 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 from 1.3821 for the nine months ended March 31,
2009. Constant currency is calculated by translating prior year revenue at the current year
average exchange rate.
The increases in the segment revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the
nine months ended March 31, 2009 are as follows.
|
|
|
Benefits revenue was $1.4 billion for the first three quarters of fiscal year 2010.
Benefits pro forma, constant currency revenue increased $16.0 million, or 1 percent,
compared to the first three quarters of fiscal year 2009. On a pro forma, constant
currency basis revenue increased due to an increase in Health and Group Benefits. |
|
|
|
|
Risk and Financial Services revenue was $413.3 million for first three quarters of
fiscal year 2010. Risk and Financial Services pro forma, constant currency revenue for the
third quarter of fiscal year 2010 decreased 5 percent compared to the first three quarters
of fiscal year 2009. The revenue decrease in Risk Consulting and Software was partially
offset by pro forma, constant currency, increases in Investment Consulting and Brokerage. |
|
|
|
|
Talent and Rewards Group revenue was $557.3 million for the first three quarters of fiscal year
2010. Talent and Rewards Group pro forma, constant currency, revenue for the third quarter
of fiscal year 2010 decreased 12 percent compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2009. |
Salaries and Employee Benefits.
Salaries and employee benefit expenses for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 were $537.7
million compared to $567.3 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of $29.6
million or 5.2 percent. On a constant currency basis, salaries and employee benefits decreased approximately 8.0 percent. The decrease,
inclusive of currency, was principally due to a decrease in base salary expense resulting from a 2
percent reduction in headcount, and a decrease in discretionary compensation expense, partially
offset by increases in pension and vacation expenses. As a percentage of revenue, salaries and
employee benefits decreased to 66.9 percent from 71.0 percent.
Salaries and employee benefit expenses for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 were $1.67
billion compared to $1.71 billion for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of
$43.5 million or 2.5 percent. On a constant currency basis, salaries and employee benefits
decreased approximately 3.9 percent. The decrease, inclusive of currency, was principally due to a
decrease in base salary expense and other employee benefits expense resulting from an 8 percent
reduction in headcount, partially offset by an increase in discretionary compensation and pension
expenses. As a percentage of revenue, salaries and employee benefits
decreased to 68.6 percent
from 68.9 percent.
Professional and Subcontracted Services.
Professional and subcontracted services expenses for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 were
$52.1 million compared to $69.3 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of
$17.2 million or 24.8 percent. On a constant currency basis, professional and subcontracted
services decreased approximately 30.5 percent. The decrease, inclusive of currency, was mainly due
to a decreased use of external service providers as well as a decrease in reimbursable expenses
incurred on behalf of clients, which is primarily attributable to the current economic environment.
As a percentage of revenue, professional and subcontracted services decreased to 6.5 percent from
8.7 percent.
59
Professional and subcontracted services used in consulting operations for the first nine months of
fiscal year 2010 were $181.9 million, compared to $229.9 million for the first nine months of
fiscal year 2009, a decrease of $48 million or 20.9 percent. On a constant currency basis,
professional and subcontracted services decreased approximately 30.4 percent. The decrease,
inclusive of currency, was principally due to a decrease in external service providers and
reimbursable expenses incurred on behalf of clients, which is primarily attributable to the current
economic environment. As a percentage of revenue, professional and subcontracted services
decreased to 7.5 percent from 9.3 percent.
Occupancy.
Occupancy expense for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $35.7 million compared to $35.9
million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of $0.2 million or 0.6 percent. On a
constant currency basis, occupancy decreased approximately 1.1 percent. As a percentage of
revenue, occupancy expense decreased to 4.4 percent from 4.5 percent.
Occupancy expense for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $111.0 million compared to
$108.7 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, an increase of $2.3 million or 2.1
percent. On a constant currency basis, occupancy expense increased approximately 2.6 percent. The
increase, inclusive of currency, was the result of entering into new leases during the third
quarter of fiscal year 2009. As a percentage of revenue, occupancy expense increased to 4.6
percent from 4.4 percent.
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and administrative expenses for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 were $70.0 million,
compared to $76.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of $6.4 million or
8.4 percent. On a constant currency basis, general and administrative expenses decreased
approximately 18.9 percent. The decrease, inclusive of currency, was mainly due to decreases in
travel expense, promotion expense, repairs and maintenance expense, and recognized foreign exchange
gains primarily related to derivatives hedging our U.S. dollar exposure related to our U.K.
reinsurance business. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses decreased to
8.7 percent from 9.6 percent.
General and administrative expenses for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 were $189.0
million, compared to $255.6 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of
$66.7 million or 26.1 percent. On a constant currency basis, general and administrative expenses
decreased approximately 29.7 percent. The decrease, inclusive of currency, was mainly due to
decreases in professional liability expense as a result of a reduction in reserves for specific
claims, travel expense, recognized foreign exchange gains primarily related to derivatives hedging
our U.S. dollar exposure related to our U.K. reinsurance business, promotion expense, and
professional development expense. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses
decreased to 7.8 percent from 10.3 percent.
Depreciation and Amortization.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $32.8 million,
compared to $33.0 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of $0.2 million or
0.6 percent. On a constant currency basis, depreciation and amortization expense decreased
approximately 3.4 percent. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization expenses
remained at 4.1 percent for both periods.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $99.5
million, compared to $102.5 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of
$3.0 million or 2.9 percent. On a constant currency basis, depreciation and amortization expense
decreased approximately 6.8 percent. The decrease, inclusive of currency, was principally due to a
decrease in depreciation of fixed assets, partially offset by an increase in depreciation of
internally developed software. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization expenses
were consistently 4.1 percent for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
60
Transaction and Integration Expenses.
Transaction and integration expenses incurred related to the Merger were $24.4 million and $49.7
million for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Transaction and integration expenses principally consist of investment banker fees, regulatory
filing expenses, integration consultants, as well as legal, accounting, marketing, and IT
integration expenses. As a percentage of revenue, transaction and
integration expenses were 3
percent for the third quarter and 2 percent for the nine months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009.
(Loss) Income From Affiliates.
Loss from affiliates for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $1.0 million compared to income
of $0.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of $1.4 million.
Affiliate loss for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $1.0 million compared to a loss of
$10.3 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, an improvement of $9.3 million.
Affiliate loss during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 included the loss associated with the
sale of an investment by Towers Perrin in June 2009. Affiliate loss during the nine months ended
March 31, 2010 includes our share of Dubais losses as well as an asset write down of an equity
affiliate.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $2.3 million, compared to $3.1
million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009. Interest expense for the first nine months of
fiscal year 2010 was $8.0 million, compared to $10.3 million for the first nine months of fiscal
year 2009. The decrease in both periods was principally due to the downward fluctuation in Libor
rates.
Interest Income.
Interest income for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $1.2 million, compared to $2.1
million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009. Interest income for the first nine months of
fiscal year 2010 was $3.5 million, compared to $7.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal
year 2009. The decrease is mainly due to a lower average cash balance in the current period
compared to the prior period, combined with lower short-term interest rates in the United States
and Europe.
Other Non-Operating Income.
Other non-operating income for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $0.7 million, compared to
$4.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009. Other non-operating income for the first
nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $8.9 million, compared to $17.3 million for the first nine
months of fiscal year 2009. The decrease in both periods was principally due to contingent
payments received in fiscal year 2009 from an investment that was sold in June 2009, in addition to
other contingent payments received.
The unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations and pro forma analysis above have been
provided to present illustrative combined unaudited statements of operations for the three and nine
month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, giving effect to the business combination as if it had
been completed on July 1, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This presentation was for illustrative
purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that might have occurred had the
business combination actually taken place as of the dates specified, or that may be expected to
occur in the future. The following sections of this quarterly report are on actual results of the
business and do not contain pro forma information.
61
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Towers Watsons cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2010
totaled $475.0 million, compared to
$209.8 million at June 30, 2009. The increase in cash from June 30, 2009 to March 31, 2010 was
principally attributable to the $628.3 million in cash balances acquired from recording Towers
Perrins cash assets in connection with the Merger less consideration payments of $200.0 million as
a result of the Merger and payments during fiscal year 2010 of $496.1 million of discretionary
compensation. The discretionary compensation payout consists of
Watson Wyatts bonus related to both the fiscal year ended June
30, 2009 and the six month period ended December 31, 2009, as well as
Towers Perrins bonus for calender year 2009. Towers Watson also paid $48.8 million in corporate taxes, $11.5
million in capital expenditures and $9.6 million in dividends during the first nine months of
fiscal year 2010. These outflows of cash were funded by cash balances acquired from Towers Perrin.
As more
fully discussed in a Schedule TO, expected to be filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission by the Company on the date hereof,
or shortly hereafter, the Company intends to repurchase up to $200 million of shares of Class B-1
Common Stock, in exchange for Company notes due in March 2012.
Consistent with the Companys liquidity position, management considers various alternative
strategic uses of cash reserves including acquisitions, dividends and stock buybacks, or any
combination of these options. The Company believes that it has sufficient resources to fund
operations beyond the next twelve months.
The non-U.S. operations are substantially self-sufficient for their working capital needs. As of
March 31, 2010, $229.0 million of Towers Watsons total cash balance of $475.0 million was held
outside of the United States, which it has the ability to utilize, if necessary. There are no
significant repatriation restrictions other than local or U.S. taxes associated with repatriation.
Included in cash balances, is $229.9 of cash consisting of $76.8 million of cash from the
consolidated balance sheet of PCIC which is available for payment of professional liability claims
reserves and $153.1 million of cash from the consolidated balance sheet of Towers Perrin which is
available for payment of reinsurance premiums on behalf of reinsurance clients.
Under the terms of the business combination between Watson Wyatt and Watson Wyatt LLP, we are
required under certain circumstances to place funds into an insurance trust designed to satisfy
potential litigation settlement related to the former partners. If the assets of the trust are not
used by 2017, they will be returned to the Company. As of March 31, 2010, we maintained $5.2
million of restricted cash related to this obligation. This restricted cash balance was included in
Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheet.
Assets and liabilities associated with non-U.S. entities have been translated into U.S. dollars as
of March 31, 2010, at appreciated U.S. dollar rates compared to historical periods. As a result,
cash flows derived from changes in the consolidated balance sheets include the impact of the change
in foreign exchange translation rates.
Cash Flows (Used in)/From Operating Activities.
Cash flows used in operating activities for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $189.6
million, compared to cash flows from operating activities of $83.9 million for the first nine
months of fiscal year 2009. The difference is primarily attributable to lower net income
attributable to controlling interests, an increase in billed and unbilled receivables and the
payment of twelve months of bonuses to former associates of Towers Perrins and six months of
bonuses to former associates of Watson Wyatt.
The allowance for doubtful accounts increased $5.7 million from June 30, 2009 to March 31, 2010,
primarily related to the Merger. The number of days of accounts receivable increased to 71 at March
31, 2010 compared to 62 at June 30, 2009.
62
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities.
Cash flows from investing activities for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $485.7
million, compared to $43.3 million of cash flows used in investing activities for the first nine
months of fiscal year 2009. The difference can be primarily attributed to Towers Perrins and
PCICs cash balances acquired in the Merger less cash consideration paid in connection with the
Merger of $200.0 million.
Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities.
Cash flows used in financing activities for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $24.7
million, compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $41.9 million for the first nine
months of fiscal year 2009. This change is primarily attributable to the repurchase of $34.9
million of Towers Watsons common stock in the first nine months of fiscal year 2010, compared to
$77.4 million of repurchases of common stock during the same period in fiscal year 2009, partially
offset by borrowings under the credit facility of $15.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal
year 2010 compared to borrowings of $40.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal year 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining payments due by fiscal year as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
Cash Obligations (in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Lease Commitments |
|
$ |
640,350 |
|
|
|
36,764 |
|
|
|
278,866 |
|
|
|
158,401 |
|
|
|
166,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
640,350 |
|
|
|
36,764 |
|
|
|
278,866 |
|
|
|
158,401 |
|
|
|
166,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases: We lease office space, furniture, cars and selected computer equipment
under operating lease agreements with terms typically ranging from one to ten years. The Company
has determined that there is not a large concentration of leases that will expire in any one fiscal
year. Consequently, management anticipates that any increase in future rent expense on leases will
be mainly market driven. As a result of the Merger, the exercise of determining the fair value of
the operating lease obligations of Towers Perrin resulted in revaluing the lease obligations based
on current market rates.
Pension Contributions. Remaining contributions to Towers Watsons various pension plans for fiscal
year 2010 are projected to be approximately $5.9 million.
Subordinated Notes due January 2011: On December 30, 2009, in connection with the Merger and the
Class R Elections, Towers Watson entered into the Indenture with the Trustee, for the issuance of
Towers Watson Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $200 million. The Towers Watson Notes were
issued on January 6, 2010, bearing interest from January 4, 2010 at a fixed per-annum rate of 2.0
percent, and will mature on January 1, 2011. The Indenture contains limited operating covenants,
and obligations under the Towers Watson Notes are subordinated to the Companys obligations under
the Senior Credit Facility (as defined below) on the terms set forth in the Indenture.
Towers Watson Senior Credit Facility: On January 1, 2010, in connection with the Merger, Towers
Watson and certain subsidiaries entered into a three-year, $500 million revolving credit facility
with a syndicate of banks (the Senior Credit Facility). Borrowings under the Senior Credit
Facility will bear interest at a spread to either LIBOR or the Prime Rate. We are charged a
quarterly commitment fee, currently 0.5 percent of the Senior Credit Facility, which varies with
our financial leverage and is paid on the unused portion of the Senior Credit Facility. Obligations
under the Senior Credit Facility are guaranteed by Towers Watson and all of its domestic
subsidiaries (other than PCIC) and are secured by a pledge of 65 percent of the voting stock and
100 percent of the non-voting stock of Towers Perrin Luxembourg Holdings S.A.R.L.
63
The Senior Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties and affirmative and
negative covenants. The Senior Credit Facility requires Towers Watson to maintain certain financial
covenants that include a minimum Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio and a maximum Consolidated
Leverage Ratio (which terms in each case are defined in the Senior Credit Facility). In addition,
the Senior Credit Facility contains restrictions on the ability of Towers Watson and its
subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends; make
distributions; create liens on assets; make investments, loans or advances; make acquisitions;
dispose of property; engage in sale-leaseback transactions; engage in mergers or consolidations,
liquidations and dissolutions; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and make changes in
lines of businesses.
As of March 31, 2010, Towers Watson had $15.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Senior
Credit Facility.
Letters of Credit under the Senior Credit Facility: As of March 31, 2010, Towers Watson had standby
letters of credit totaling $21.2 million to guarantee payment to a beneficiary in the event that it
fails to meet its financial obligations to the beneficiary. Additionally, Towers Watson had $0.8
million of standby letters of credit covering various other existing or potential business
obligations. The aforementioned letters of credit are issued under the Senior Credit Facility, and
therefore reduce the amount that can be borrowed under the Senior Credit Facility by the
outstanding amount of these standby letters of credit.
Additional Borrowings, Letters of Credit and Guarantees not part of the Senior Credit Facility:
Towers Perrin Foster and Crosby, Ltda. (Brazil) has a bilateral credit facility with a major bank
totaling Brazilian Real (BRL) 6.5 million (U.S. $3.6 million). As of March 31, 2010, a total of BRL 5.0
million ($2.8 million) was outstanding under this facility.
Towers
Watson has also provided a $5.0 million Australian
dollar-denominated letter of credit (U.S.
$4.6 million) to an Australian governmental agency as required by the local regulations. The
estimated fair market value of these letters of credit is immaterial because they have never been
used, and the Company believes that the likelihood of future usage is remote.
Towers Watson also has $2.5 million of letters of guarantee from major banks in support of office
leases and performance under existing or prospective contracts.
Risk Management
As a part of our overall risk management program, we carry customary commercial insurance policies,
including commercial general liability and claims-made professional liability insurance. Our
professional liability insurance includes a self-insured retention of $1 million per occurrence,
and covers professional liability claims of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the cost of
defending such claims. Prior to the merger, Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin each carried
substantial professional liability insurance with a self-insured retention of $1 million per claim,
which policies remain in force subsequent to the Merger through June 30, 2010. We reserve for
contingent liabilities based on ASC 450, Contingencies when it is determined that a liability,
inclusive of defense costs, is probable and reasonably estimable. The contingent liabilities
recorded are primarily developed actuarially. Litigation is subject to many factors which are
difficult to predict so there can be no assurance that in the event of a material unfavorable
result in one or more of all pending claims, we will not incur material costs.
Our professional liability insurance coverage, beyond our self-insured retention has been written
by PCIC, an affiliated captive insurance company owned by Watson Wyatt, Towers Perrin and a
non-affiliated company, with $25 million of reinsurance attaching at $26 million provided by
various other commercial insurance carriers. In addition, both legacy companies carried excess
insurance above $51 million. Since losses for each member firm that are incurred by PCIC below $26
million per claim and in the aggregate are not covered by reinsurance, but are retained by PCIC,
pre-Merger reserve adjustments and actual outcomes of specific claims of any PCIC member firm
carried through into Watson Wyatts financial results as income or loss from affiliates through its
36.43 percent ownership of PCIC.
64
Towers Watsons ownership interest in PCIC is 72.86 percent post-Merger, as a result, PCICs
results of operations are consolidated into Towers Watsons results of operations. Although the
PCIC insurance policies for fiscal year 2010 will continue to cover professional liability claims
above a $1 million per claim self-insured retention (SIR), the consolidation of PCIC will
effectively net PCICs premium income against Towers Watsons premium expense for the first $25
million in loss above the SIR for each legacy company. Accordingly, the impact of PCICs reserve
development may result in fluctuations in Towers Watsons earnings.
PCIC will cease issuing insurance policies effective July 1, 2010 and will at that time enter into
a run-off mode of operation. The Company has established a new wholly-owned captive insurance
company, Stone Mountain Insurance Company (Stone Mountain), through which it will obtain
similarly structured insurance effective July 1, 2010.
In formulating its premium structure, PCIC estimates the amount it expects to pay for losses (and
loss expenses) for the member firms as a whole and then allocates that amount to the member firms
based on the individual members expected losses. PCIC bases premium calculations, which are
determined annually based on experience through March of each year, on relative risk of the various
lines of business performed by each of the owner companies, past claim experience of each owner
company, growth of each of those companies, industry risk profiles in general and the overall
insurance markets.
Our agreements with PCIC could require additional payments to PCIC if development of claims
significantly exceeds prior expectations. If these circumstances were to occur, the Company would
record a liability at the time it becomes probable and reasonably estimable.
The Company provides for the self-insured retention where specific estimated losses and loss
expenses for known claims are considered probable and reasonably estimable. Although the Company
maintains professional liability insurance coverage, this insurance does not cover claims made
after expiration of our current insurance contracts. Generally accepted accounting principles
require that we record a liability for incurred but not reported (IBNR) professional liability
claims if they are probable and reasonably estimable, and for which we have not yet contracted for
insurance coverage. The Company uses actuarial assumptions to estimate and record its IBNR
liability and as of March 31, 2010, Towers Watson had a $145.5 million IBNR liability balance.
As stated above, commencing July 1, 2010, Towers Watson will obtain primary insurance for errors
and omissions professional liability risks from Stone Mountain. Stone Mountain will provide the
Company with $50 million of coverage per claim and in the aggregate on a claims-made basis. Stone
Mountain intends to secure reinsurance for coverage provided $25 million in excess of the $25
million retained layer. Stone Mountain intends to issue a policy of insurance substantially similar
to the policy issued by PCIC.
Insurance market conditions for our industry and the Company have varied in recent years, but the
long-term trend has been increasing premium cost. Although the market for insurance is presently
robust, trends toward higher self-insured retentions, constraints on aggregate excess coverage for
this class of professional liability risk and financial difficulties which have, over the past two
years, been faced by several longstanding E&O carriers are anticipated to recur periodically, and
to be reflected in our future annual insurance renewals. As a result, we will continue to assess
our ability to secure future insurance coverage and we cannot assure that such coverage will
continue to be available indefinitely in the event of specific adverse claims experience, adverse
loss trends, market capacity constraints or other factors.
In light of increasing litigation worldwide, including litigation against professionals, the
Company has a policy that all client relationships be documented by engagement letters containing
specific risk mitigation clauses that were not included in all historical client agreements.
Certain contractual provisions designed to mitigate risk may not be legally enforceable in
litigation involving breaches of fiduciary duty or certain other alleged errors or omissions, or in
certain jurisdictions. We may incur significant legal expenses in defending against litigation.
With the exception of our reinsurance business, nearly 100 percent of the Companys U.S. and U.K.
corporate clients have signed engagement letters including some if not all of our preferred risk
mitigation clauses, and processes to maintain that protocol in the United States and the United
Kingdom and complete it elsewhere are underway.
65
Disclaimer Regarding Forward-looking Statements
This filing contains a number of forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, but not limited to the following: Note 5 -
Retirement Benefits; Note 6 Goodwill and Intangible Assets; Note 10 Restricted Shares; Note 13
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities; Note 15 Income Taxes; the Executive Overview; Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates; the discussion of our capital expenditures; Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements and Contractual Obligations; Liquidity and Capital Resources; Risk Management; and
Part II, Item 1 Legal Proceedings. You can identify these statements and other forward-looking
statements in this filing by words such as may, will, expect, anticipate, believe,
estimate, plan, intend, continue, or similar words, expressions or the negative of such
terms or other comparable terminology. You should read these statements carefully because they
contain projections of our future results of operations or financial condition, or state other
forward-looking information. A number of risks and uncertainties exist which could cause actual
results to differ materially from the results reflected in these forward-looking statements.
Such factors include but are not limited to:
|
|
the Towers Perrin and Watson Wyatt businesses will not be integrated successfully; |
|
|
|
anticipated cost savings and any other synergies from the merger of Towers Perrin
and Watson Wyatt may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; |
|
|
|
our ability to reduce our effective tax rate through the restructuring of certain
foreign operations of Towers Perrin; |
|
|
|
our ability to make acquisitions, on which our growth depends; |
|
|
|
our ability to integrate acquired businesses into our own business, processes and
systems, and achieve the anticipated results; |
|
|
|
foreign currency exchange and interest rate fluctuations; |
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions, including a significant or prolonged
economic downturn, that adversely affect us or our clients; |
|
|
|
our continued ability to recruit and retain qualified associates; |
|
|
|
the success of our marketing, client development and sales programs after our
acquisitions; |
|
|
|
our ability to maintain client relationships and to attract new clients after our
acquisitions; |
|
|
|
declines in demand for our services; |
|
|
|
recently implemented SEC rules concerning disclosure on compensation consultant
fees, and the potential impact of losses of clients and associates; |
|
|
|
outcomes of pending or future litigation and the availability and capacity of
professional liability insurance to fund the outcome of pending cases or future judgments or
settlements; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain professional liability insurance; |
|
|
|
a significant decrease in the demand for the consulting, actuarial and other
services we offer as a result of changing economic conditions or other factors; |
|
|
|
actions by competitors, including public accounting and consulting firms,
technology consulting firms, insurance consulting firms and Internet/intranet development
firms; |
|
|
|
our ability to achieve cost reductions after acquisitions; |
|
|
|
exposure to liabilities that have not been expressly assumed in our acquisition
transactions; |
|
|
|
the ability to conduct a successful tender offer for Class B-1 common stock in
exchange for unsecured subordinated notes, and to otherwise successfully address issues
surrounding the number of Company shares that will become freely tradable on January 1, 2011; |
|
|
|
the level of capital resources required for future acquisitions and business
opportunities; |
|
|
|
regulatory developments abroad and domestically that impact our business practice; |
|
|
|
legislative and technological developments that may affect the demand for or costs
of our services; |
and other factors identified under Risk Factors in Towers Watsons Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on December 23, 2009; as updated in
Towers Watsons Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, filed with
the SEC on February 8, 2010; and as discussed under Risk Factors in Watson Wyatts 2009 Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on August 14, 2009. These statements are based on
assumptions that may not come true. All forward-looking disclosure is speculative by its nature.
The Company undertakes no obligation to update any of the forward-looking information included in
this report, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed expectations or
otherwise.
66
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. |
Towers Watson is exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of business. These risks include
interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange and translation risk.
Interest Rate Risk
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time
maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective, we maintain our
portfolio in mainly short term securities that are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value.
Foreign Currency Risk
International net revenue result from transactions by our foreign operations and are typically
denominated in the local currency of each country. These operations also incur most of their
expenses in the local currency. Accordingly, our foreign operations use the local currency as their
functional currency and our primary international operations use the British Pound, Canadian dollar
and the Euro. Our international operations are subject to risks typical of international
operations, including, but not limited to, differing economic conditions, changes in political
climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate
volatility. Accordingly, our future results could be adversely impacted by changes in these or
other factors.
Translation Exposure
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may adversely impact our consolidated financial position as well
as our consolidated results of operations and may adversely impact our financial position as the
assets and liabilities of our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars in preparing our
condensed consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, foreign exchange rate fluctuations may
adversely impact our condensed consolidated results of operations as exchange rate fluctuations on
transactions denominated in currencies other than our functional currencies result in gains and
losses that are reflected in our condensed consolidated statement of income. Certain of Towers
Perrins foreign brokerage subsidiaries, primarily in the U.K., receive revenue in currencies
(primarily in U.S. dollars) that differ from their functional currencies. To reduce this
variability, Towers Perrin uses foreign exchange forward contracts and over-the-counter options to
hedge the foreign exchange risk of the forecasted collections for up to a maximum of two years in
the future.
The foreign currency and translation exposure risks have been heightened as a result of the recent
large fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
We consolidate our international subsidiaries by converting them into U.S. dollars in accordance
with generally acceptable accounting principles of foreign currency translation. The results of
operations and our financial position will fluctuate when there is a change in foreign currency
exchange rates.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including the chief executive officer, or CEO, and chief financial officer, or CFO, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that
evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of March 31, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting in the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
67
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures
will necessarily prevent all error and all fraud. However, management does expect that the control
system provides reasonable assurance that its objectives will be met. A control system, no matter
how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the control systems
objectives will be met. In addition, the design of such internal controls must take into account
the costs of designing and maintaining such a control system. Certain inherent limitations exist
in control systems to make absolute assurances difficult, including the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty, that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake, and
that individuals can circumvent controls. The design of any control system is based in part upon
existing business conditions and risk assessments. There can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls
may become inadequate because of changes in business conditions or deterioration in the degree of
compliance with policies or procedures. As a result, they may require change or revision. Because
of the inherent limitations in a control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and
may not be detected. Nevertheless, the disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide
reasonable assurance of achieving their stated objectives, and the CEO and CFO have concluded that
the disclosure controls and procedures are effective at a reasonable assurance level.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. |
From time to time, we are a party to various lawsuits, arbitrations or mediations that arise in the
ordinary course of business. The disclosure called for by Part II, Item 1, regarding our legal
proceedings is incorporated by reference herein from Note 11 Commitments and Contingent
Liabilities, of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Except as described below, there are no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed
in Watson Wyatts 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-16159), filed on August 14, 2009;
and in Towers Watsons Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (File
No. 333-161705), filed on December 23, 2009 as updated in Towers Watsons Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on February 8, 2010. We urge you to
read all of the risk factors contained in such reports.
|
|
|
Effective in February 2010, the SEC implemented new rules with respect to
issuer disclosures on compensation consultants. Among other requirements, the rules require
disclosure of fees paid to compensation consultants as well as a description of any
additional services provided to the issuer by the compensation consultant and its
affiliates and the aggregate fees paid for such services. Due in part to this regulation,
some clients of Towers Watson have decided to terminate their relationships with the
Company (either with respect to compensation consulting services or with respect to other
consulting services) to avoid perceived or potential conflicts of interest. Additional
clients of Towers Watson may decide to terminate their relationships with Towers Watson,
and as a result, Towers Watsons business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially adversely impacted. |
68
|
|
|
In addition, due in part to such regulation, some Towers Watson consultants have terminated
their relationships with the Company, and some have indicated that they intend to compete
with Towers Watson. Such talent migration, and any future such talent migration, could have a
material adverse effect on Towers Watsons business. |
|
|
|
As previously described in Towers Watsons Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended December 31, 2009, a putative class action lawsuit was filed by certain
former shareholders of Towers Perrin against Towers Perrin and certain of its officers and
directors (the Dugan Action). Since that time, two additional lawsuits have been filed
against the same defendants one by four former shareholders who are proceeding in their
individual capacities (the Allen Action) and one by a former shareholder who seeks to
represent a proposed class of an alleged 50 additional former shareholders who are not
included in the proposed class in the Dugan Action (the Pao Action). Plaintiffs in these
additional lawsuits allege the same claims in substantially the same form as those in the
Dugan Action. Towers Watson believes that all of the foregoing claims are without merit and
intends to vigorously defend the actions. However, Towers Watson could incur significant
costs defending against these claims. The outcome of these legal proceedings is inherently
uncertain and could be unfavorable to Towers Watson. |
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Towers Watson will periodically repurchase shares of common stock, one purpose of which is to
offset potential dilution from shares issued in connection with its benefit plans. During the third
quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to
750,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock. No shares had been repurchased as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
REMOVED AND RESERVED. |
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION. |
None.
69
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc., Towers, Perrin,
Forster & Crosby, Inc., Jupiter Saturn Holding Company, Jupiter Saturn Delaware Inc.
and Jupiter Saturn Pennsylvania Inc., dated as of June 26, 2009. (1) |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger among Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc.,
Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc., Jupiter Saturn Holding Company, Jupiter
Saturn Delaware Inc. and Jupiter Saturn Pennsylvania Inc., dated as of October 19,
2009. (1) |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Towers Watson & Co. (2) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Towers Watson & Co. (3) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated as of December 30, 2009, by and between Towers Watson & Co. and
Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee, and form of Towers Watson Notes. (4) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of January 1, 2010, among Towers Watson & Co. and certain
subsidiaries, as borrowers, each lender from time to time party thereto and Bank of
America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer. (5) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Towers Watson & Co. 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan. (6) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Form of Transaction Based Compensation Agreement between Towers, Perrin, Forster &
Crosby, Inc. (now known as Towers Watson Pennsylvania Inc.) and certain executives.
(7) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Plan. (8) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Form of Award pursuant to the Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc. Restricted Stock
Unit Plan. (9) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of Transaction Award pursuant to the Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc.
Restricted Stock Unit Plan. (10) |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement with directors and executive officers. (11) |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Trust Deed and Rules of the Watson Wyatt Share Incentive Plan 2005 (U.K). (12) |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Watson Wyatt Share Incentive Plan 2005 Deed of Amendment (U.K.). (12) |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Share Purchase Plan 2005 (Spain). (12) |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Trust Deed and Rules of the Watson Wyatt Ireland Share Participation Scheme. (12) |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Watson Wyatt Amended and Restated Senior Officer Deferred Compensation Plan. (13) |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Watson Wyatt Amended Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
(14) |
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Towers Watson & Co. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, John J. Haley, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Roger F. Millay, pursuant
to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, John J. Haley, and Chief
Financial Officer, Roger F. Millay, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Risk Factors section on Form 10-Q filed by the Registrant on December 23, 2009. (15) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants joint proxy
statement/prospectus included in the Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (File No.
333-161705) filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission and declared
effective on November 9, 2009, as supplemented by the prospectus supplement filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(3) on December 14, 2009 (collectively, the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus). |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-A filed by the Registrant on January
4, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on January
4, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on January
4, 2010. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annex G to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference from Watson Wyatt Worldwide Inc., Form 10-K filed on September 1,
2006. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 10-Q filed by the Registrant on
December 23, 2009. |
71
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Towers Watson & Co.
(Registrant)
|
|
/s/ John J. Haley |
|
May 17, 2010 |
Name: |
John J. Haley |
|
Date |
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Roger F. Millay |
|
May 17, 2010 |
Name: |
Roger F. Millay |
|
Date |
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter L. Childs |
|
May 17, 2010 |
Name: |
Peter L. Childs |
|
Date |
Title: |
Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
72