nvcsr
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-5769
Van Kampen High Income Trust II
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Edward C. Wood III
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-762-4000
Date of fiscal year end: 12/31
Date of reporting period: 12/31/09
Item 1. Report to Shareholders.
The
Trusts annual report transmitted to shareholders pursuant
to Rule 30e-1
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUTUAL FUNDS
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II (VLT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Notice information on the
back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome, Shareholder
In this report, youll learn about how your investment in
Van Kampen High Income Trust II performed during the
annual period. The portfolio management team will provide an
overview of the market conditions and discuss some of the
factors that affected investment performance during the
reporting period. In addition, this report includes the
trusts financial statements and a list of trust
investments as of December 31, 2009.
Market forecasts
provided in this report may not necessarily come to pass. There
is no assurance that the trust will achieve its investment
objective. Trusts are subject to market risk, which is the
possibility that the market values of securities owned by the
trust will decline and that the value of trust shares may
therefore be less than what you paid for them. Accordingly, you
can lose money investing in this trust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOT FDIC INSURED
|
|
|
OFFER NO BANK GUARANTEE
|
|
|
MAY LOSE VALUE
|
NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY
|
|
|
NOT A DEPOSIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
Summary as
of 12/31/2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
Income Trust II
|
Symbol:
VLT
|
Average Annual
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
Based on
|
Total
Returns
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Market
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since Inception (4/28/89)
|
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-year
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-year
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-year
|
|
|
|
65.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.40
|
|
|
|
Performance data
quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of
future results, and current performance may be lower or higher
than the figures shown. For the most recent month-end
performance figures, please visit vankampen.com or speak with
your financial advisor. Investment returns, net asset value
(NAV) and common share market price will fluctuate and trust
shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original
cost.
NAV per share is
determined by dividing the value of the trusts portfolio
securities, cash and other assets, less all liabilities and
preferred shares, by the total number of common shares
outstanding. The common share market price is the price the
market is willing to pay for shares of the trust at a given
time. Common share market price is influenced by a range of
factors, including supply and demand and market conditions.
Total return assumes an investment at the beginning of the
period, reinvestment of all distributions for the period in
accordance with the trusts dividend reinvestment plan, and
sale of all shares at the end of the period. The trusts
adviser has waived or reimbursed fees and expenses from time to
time; absent such waivers/ reimbursements the trusts
returns would have been lower. Periods of less than one year are
not annualized.
The Barclays Capital
U.S. Corporate High Yield-2% Issuer Cap Index is an
unmanaged, broadbased index that reflects the general
performance of the U.S. dollar denominated, fixed rate,
non-investment grade, taxable corporate bond market. Issuers are
capped at 2% of the index. The Index is unmanaged and its
returns do not include any sales charges or fees. Such costs
would lower performance. It is not possible to invest directly
in an index.
1
Trust Report
For the
12-month
period ended December 31, 2009
Market
Conditions
The U.S. high yield market posted record performance for
2009. The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield-2%
Issuer Cap Index (the Index) returned
58.76 percent for the year, easily beating the prior record
set in 1991. Within the Index, the average bond price increased
from $61 at the start of the year to $95 at year end, average
spreads declined from 1,794 basis points to 662 basis points,
and the yield to maturity fell from 19.4 percent to
9.2 percent.
The lowest quality bonds delivered the best performance for the
year. CCC rated issues were up over 90 percent, easily
outperforming better quality BB and B rated bonds which returned
46 percent and 45 percent, respectively. From an
industry perspective, the financials and insurance industries
provided the highest returns, while the utility and consumer
non-cyclical industries lagged.
Fundamentals stabilized over the course of the period, with
U.S. GDP growth estimates moving into positive territory as
the year progressed. Although the U.S. high yield default
rate rose from 4.7 percent to 13.2 percent, the
improving fundamental picture and greater market liquidity has
led Moodys to predict that the default rate will decline
to 3.6 percent by the end of 2010. Strong demand from
investors seeking higher yields and companies refinancing their
capital structures led to a record $150 billion in new
U.S. high yield bond issuance in the fiscal year.
Performance
Analysis
The Trusts return can be calculated based upon either the
market price or the net asset value (NAV) of its shares. NAV per
share is determined by dividing the value of the Trusts
portfolio securities, cash and other assets, less all
liabilities and preferred shares, by the total number of common
shares outstanding, while market price reflects the supply and
demand for the shares. As a result, the two returns can differ,
as they did during the reporting period. On both an NAV basis
and a market price basis, the Trust outperformed the Barclays
Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield-2% Issuer Cap Index (the
Index).
Total return for
the 12-month
period ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Capital
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
Corporate High
Yield-2%
|
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Market
Price
|
|
|
Issuer
Cap Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
83.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
58.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Performance data
quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of
future results, and current performance may be lower or higher
than the figures shown. Investment return, net asset value and
common share market price will fluctuate and Trust shares, when
sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. See
Performance Summary for additional performance information and
index definition.
2
The Trusts performance relative to the Index was primarily
attributable to the following factors:
|
|
|
The Trusts large overweight allocations to the energy
and utilities sectors were additive to performance for the
period. The energy sector benefited from heightened merger and
acquisition (M&A) activity and rising commodity prices
while the utility sector, and electric credits in particular,
also performed well. An overweight allocation to the basic
industry sector also boosted returns. Here, overweights to
the chemicals, mining and paper/packaging industries were
advantageous as M&A activity drove the chemical
industrys strong performance, mining benefited from the
commodity rally, and the paper industry rebounded strongly
during the year.
|
|
|
During the period, the Trust employed a leverage strategy
which involved borrowing money at short term rates and
reinvesting the proceeds in longer term securities, taking
advantage of the difference between short and longer term rates.
The low level of short term interest rates during the reporting
period made the Trusts borrowing activity relatively
inexpensive. At the same time, the price of longer term
securities generally rose. As a result, the Trusts use of
leverage was additive to overall returns for the period.
|
|
|
The Trusts more conservative overall positioning,
however, dampened relative performance. We continued to favor
higher quality, more liquid bonds with an emphasis on issuers
with solid asset coverage as we believe this positioning
provided an appropriate risk/return profile for our investors. A
significant underweight to the lowest quality, most risky
segment of the high yield market was the primary detractor as
these bonds provided the strongest returns for the period. An
underweight in financials, particularly the banking and
brokerage industry groups, also dampened performance as these
industries performed well.
|
Market
Outlook
Although high yield bond prices have risen and yields to
maturity have declined, given the prospect of declining default
rates and further economic improvement, we are optimistic that
we will continue to find compelling investment opportunities
within segments of the market. We anticipate that we will
continue to favor more liquid, higher quality issuers in the
near term as we believe this segment of the market provides the
best risk/return profile.
There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will
continue to perform as discussed herein or that securities in
such sectors will be held by the Trust in the future.
3
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings
Allocation as of 12/31/09 (Unaudited)
|
|
BBB/Baa
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
BB/Ba
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
B/B
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
CCC/Caa
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
of Investments by Industry Classification as of 12/31/09
(Unaudited)
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
Health Care
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Utility
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Gaming & Leisure
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Forest Products
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Information Technology
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Cable
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Metals
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Wireless Communications
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Services
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Consumer Products
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Food & Tobacco
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Food & Drug
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Housing
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Pipelines
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Aerospace & Defense
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Wireline
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Other Diversified Financial Services
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods
|
|
|
0.0
|
*
|
Highways & Railtracks
|
|
|
0.0
|
*
|
IT Consulting & Other Services
|
|
|
0.0
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Investments
|
|
|
97.8
|
|
Total Repurchase Agreements
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Amount
is less than 0.1%
|
Subject to change
daily. Provided for informational purposes only and should not
be deemed as a recommendation to buy or sell the securities
mentioned or securities in the sectors shown above. Ratings
allocation percentages are as a percentage of long-term debt
investments. Summary of investments by industry classification
percentages are as a percentage of total investments. Securities
are classified by sectors that represent broad groupings of
related industries. Rating allocations based upon ratings as
issued by Standard and Poors and Moodys, respective.
Van Kampen is a wholly owned subsidiary of a global
securities firm which is engaged in a wide range of financial
services including, for example, securities trading and
brokerage activities, investment banking, research and analysis,
financing and financial advisory services.
4
Change in
Investment Policy
Consistent with the Trusts strategy of investing in income
securities, the Trust may invest up to 20% of its total assets
in fixed and floating rate loans. Loans are typically arranged
through private negotiations between the borrower and one or
more of the lenders. Loans generally have a more senior claim in
the borrowers capital structure relative to corporate
bonds or other subordinated debt. The loans in which the Trust
invests are generally in the form of loan assignments and
participations of all or a portion of a loan from another
lender. In the case of an assignment, the Trust acquires direct
rights against the borrower on the loan, however, the
Trusts rights and obligations as the purchaser of an
assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held
by the assigning lender. In the case of a participation, the
Trust typically has the right to receive payments of principal,
interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the
lender selling the participation and only upon receipt by the
lender of the payments from the borrower. In the event of
insolvency of the lender selling the participation, the Trust
may be treated as a general creditor of the lender and may not
benefit from any setoff between the lender and the borrower.
Loans are subject to credit risk, market risk, income risk and
call risk similar to the corporate bonds in which the Trust
invests. To the extent that the loans in which the Trust invests
are medium- or lower-grade, such loans are subject to same type
of risks generally associated with such medium- and lower-grade
securities as described in more detail below. Loans may have
less credit risk than corporate bonds because loans generally
have a more senior claim in the borrowers capital
structure relative to corporate bonds or other subordinated
debt. However, loans generally do not have as broad of a
secondary market compared to corporate bonds and this may impact
the market value of such loans and the Trusts ability to
dispose of particular loans when necessary to meet the
Trusts liquidity needs or in response to a specific
economic event such as a deterioration in the creditworthiness
of the borrower. The lack of a broad secondary market for loans
may also make it more difficult for the Trust to value these
securities for purposes of valuing the Trusts portfolio
and calculating its net asset value.
Derivatives
Policy
The Trust has amended and restated its policy on derivatives to
permit it to invest in the derivative investments discussed
below.
The Trust may use derivative instruments for a variety of
purposes, including hedging, risk management, portfolio
management or to earn income. Derivatives are financial
instruments whose value is based on the value of another
underlying asset, interest rate, index or financial instrument.
A derivative instrument often has risks similar to its
underlying instrument and may have additional risks, including
imperfect correlation
5
between the value of the derivative and the underlying
instrument, risks of default by the other party to certain
transactions, magnification of losses incurred due to changes in
the market value of the securities, instruments, indices or
interest rates to which they relate, and risks that the
transactions may not be liquid. The use of derivatives involves
risks that are different from, and possibly greater than, the
risks associated with other portfolio investments. Derivatives
may involve the use of highly specialized instruments that
require investment techniques and risk analyses different from
those associated with other portfolio investments. Certain
derivative transactions may give rise to a form of leverage.
Leverage associated with derivative transactions may cause the
Trust to liquidate portfolio positions when it may not be
advantageous to do so to satisfy its obligations or to meet
earmarking or segregation requirements, pursuant to applicable
SEC rules and regulations, or may cause the Trust to be more
volatile than if the Trust had not been leveraged. Although the
Investment Adviser seeks to use derivatives to further the
Trusts investment objective, there is no assurance that
the use of derivatives will achieve this result.
Following is a description of the derivative instruments and
techniques that the Trust may use and their associated risks:
Swaps. A swap contract is an agreement between two
parties pursuant to which the parties exchange payments at
specified dates on the basis of a specified notional amount,
with the payments calculated by reference to specified
securities, indexes, reference rates, currencies or other
instruments. Most swap agreements provide that when the period
payment dates for both parties are the same, the payments are
made on a net basis (i.e., the two payment streams are netted
out, with only the net amount paid by one party to the other).
The Trusts obligations or rights under a swap contract
entered into on a net basis will generally be equal only to the
net amount to be paid or received under the agreement, based on
the relative values of the positions held by each counterparty.
Swap agreements are not entered into or traded on exchanges and
there is no central clearing or guaranty function for swaps.
Therefore, swaps are subject to credit risk or the risk of
default or non-performance by the counterparty. Swaps could
result in losses if interest rate or foreign currency exchange
rates or credit quality changes are not correctly anticipated by
the Trust or if the reference index, security or investments do
not perform as expected. The Trusts use of swaps
may include those based on the credit of an underlying security
and commonly referred to as credit default swaps.
Where the Trust is the buyer of a credit default swap contract,
it would be entitled to receive the par (or other
agreed-upon)
value of a referenced debt obligation from the counterparty to
the contract only in the event of a default by a third party on
the debt obligation. If no default occurs, the Trust would have
paid to the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the
term of the contract and received no benefit from the contract.
When the Trust is the seller of a credit default swap contract,
it receives the stream of payments but is obligated to pay upon
default of the referenced debt obligation.
6
Structured Investments. The Trust also may invest a
portion of its assets in structured notes and other types of
structured investments. A structured note is a derivative
security for which the amount of principal repayment and/or
interest payments is based on the movement of one or more
factors. These factors include, but are not limited
to, currency exchange rates, interest rates (such as the prime
lending rate or LIBOR), referenced bonds and stock indices.
Investments in structured notes involve risks including interest
rate risk, credit risk and market risk. Changes in interest
rates and movement of the factor may cause significant price
fluctuations and changes in the reference factor may cause the
interest rate on the structured note to be reduced to zero and
any further changes in the reference factor may then reduce the
principal amount payable on maturity. Other types of structured
investments include interests in entities organized and operated
for the purpose of restructuring the investment characteristics
of underlying investment interests or securities. These
investment entities may be structured as trusts or other types
of pooled investment vehicles. Holders of structured investments
bear risks of the underlying investment and are subject to
counterparty risk. Certain structured investments may be thinly
traded or have a limited trading market and may have the effect
of increasing the Trusts illiquidity to the extent that
the Trust, at a particular point in time, may be unable to find
qualified buyers for these securities.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts. In connection
with its investments in foreign securities, the Trust also may
enter into contracts with banks, brokers or dealers to purchase
or sell securities or foreign currencies at a future date
(forward contracts). A foreign currency forward
contract is a negotiated agreement between the contracting
parties to exchange a specified amount of currency at a
specified future time at a specified rate. The rate can be
higher or lower than the spot rate between the currencies that
are the subject of the contract. Forward foreign currency
exchange contracts may be used to protect against uncertainty in
the level of future foreign currency exchange rates or to gain
or modify exposure to a particular currency. In addition, the
Trust may use cross currency hedging or proxy hedging with
respect to currencies in which the Trust has or expects to have
portfolio or currency exposure. Cross currency hedges involve
the sale of one currency against the positive exposure to a
different currency and may be used for hedging purposes or to
establish an active exposure to the exchange rate between any
two currencies. Hedging the Trusts currency risks
involves the risk of mismatching the Trusts objectives
under a forward or futures contract with the value of securities
denominated in a particular currency. Furthermore, such
transactions reduce or preclude the opportunity for gain if the
value of the currency should move in the direction opposite to
the position taken. There is an additional risk to the effect
that currency contracts create exposure to currencies in which
the Trusts securities are not denominated. Unanticipated
changes in currency prices may result in poorer overall
performance for the Trust than if it had not entered into such
contracts.
7
Mortgage Derivatives. Mortgage derivatives derive
their value from the value of underlying mortgages. Mortgage
derivatives are subject to the risks of price movements in
response to changing interest rates and the level of prepayments
made by borrowers of the underlying mortgages. An unexpectedly
high rate of defaults on the mortgages held by a mortgage pool
may adversely affect the value of a mortgage backed security and
could result in losses to the Trust. The risk of such defaults
is generally higher in the case of mortgage pools that include
subprime mortgages. Subprime mortgages refer to loans made to
borrowers with weakened credit histories or with a lower
capacity to make timely payment on their mortgages.
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) are
generally multi-class or pass-through securities backed by a
mortgage loan or a pool of mortgage loans secured by commercial
property, such as industrial and warehouse properties, office
buildings, retail space and shopping malls, multifamily
properties and cooperative apartments. The commercial mortgage
loans that underlie CMBS are generally not amortizing or not
fully amortizing. That is, at their maturity date, repayment of
their remaining principal balance or balloon is due
and is repaid through the attainment of an additional loan or
sale of the property. An extension of a final payment on
commercial mortgages will increase the average life of the CMBS,
generally resulting in lower yield for discount bonds and a
higher yield for premium bonds. CMBS are subject to credit risk
and prepayment risk. Although prepayment risk is present, it is
of a lesser degree in the CMBS than in the residential mortgage
market; commercial real estate property loans often contain
provisions which substantially reduce the likelihood that such
securities will be prepaid (e.g., significant prepayment
penalties on loans and, in some cases, prohibition on principal
payments for several years following origination).
Portfolio
Management
Van Kampen High Income Trust II is managed by members
of the Advisers Taxable High Yield team. The Taxable High
Yield team consists of portfolio managers and analysts. The
current members of the team jointly and primarily responsible
for the
day-to-day
management of the Trusts portfolio are Andrew Findling, an
Executive Director of the Adviser, and Dennis M. Schaney, a
Managing Director of the Adviser.
Mr. Findling has been associated with the Adviser in an
investment management capacity since October 2008 and began
managing the Trust in October 2008. Prior to October 2008,
Mr. Findling was associated with Raven Asset Management as
Head Trader from July 2005 to September 2008 and prior to that,
he was associated with the High Yield team at BlackRock, Inc. in
various capacities including portfolio manager and trader from
2003 to 2004, assistant portfolio manager and trader from 2002
to 2003 and assistant trader from 2000 to 2002. Mr. Schaney
has been associated with
8
the Adviser in an investment management capacity since September
2008 and began managing the Trust in October 2008. Prior to
September 2008, Mr. Schaney served as Global Head of Fixed
Income at Credit Suisse Asset Management from October 2003 to
April 2007 and prior to that, he was Head of Leveraged Finance
at BlackRock, Inc. from January 1998 to October 2003. All team
members are responsible for the execution of the overall
strategy of the Trusts portfolio. The composition of the
team may change from time to time.
For More
Information About Portfolio Holdings
Each Van Kampen fund provides a complete schedule of
portfolio holdings in its semiannual and annual reports within
60 days of the end of the funds second and fourth
fiscal quarters. The semiannual reports and the annual reports
are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on
Form N-CSRS
and
Form N-CSR,
respectively. Van Kampen also delivers the semiannual and
annual reports to fund shareholders, and makes these reports
available on its public Web site, www.vankampen.com. In addition
to the semiannual and annual reports that Van Kampen
delivers to shareholders and makes available through the
Van Kampen public Web site, each fund files a complete
schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the funds
first and third fiscal quarters on
Form N-Q.
Van Kampen does not deliver the reports for the first and
third fiscal quarters to shareholders, nor are the reports
posted to the Van Kampen public Web site. You may, however,
obtain the
Form N-Q
filings (as well as the
Form N-CSR
and N-CSRS
filings) by accessing the SECs Web site,
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also review and copy them at the SECs Public
Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation
of the SECs Public Reference Room may be obtained by
calling the SEC at
(800) SEC-0330.
You can also request copies of these materials, upon payment of
a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the SECs
e-mail
address (publicinfo@sec.gov) or by writing the Public Reference
section of the SEC, Washington, DC
20549-1520.
You may obtain copies of a funds fiscal quarter filings by
contacting Van Kampen Client Relations at
(800) 341-2929.
9
Proxy Voting
Policy and Procedures and Proxy Voting Record
You may obtain a copy of the Trusts Proxy Voting Policy
and Procedures without charge, upon request, by calling toll
free
(800) 341-2929
or by visiting our Web site at www.vankampen.com. It is also
available on the Securities and Exchange Commissions Web
site at
http://www.sec.gov.
You may obtain information regarding how the Trust voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
twelve-month period ended June 30 without charge by visiting our
Web site at www.vankampen.com. This information is also
available on the Securities and Exchange Commissions Web
site at
http://www.sec.gov.
10
Investment Advisory Agreement Approval
The current investment adviser for the Fund is Van Kampen Asset
Management (the Adviser) pursuant to the investment
advisory agreement approved by the Board on May
20-21, 2009.
The Adviser is a wholly owned subsidiary of Van Kampen
Investments Inc. (Van Kampen Investments), which is
an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley. On
October 19, 2009, Morgan Stanley entered into a definitive
agreement to sell substantially all of its retail asset
management business, including Van Kampen Investments, to
Invesco Ltd., a leading independent global investment management
company (the Transaction). As a result of this
Transaction, the asset management business of Van Kampen
Investments will be combined with that of Invesco Advisers, Inc.
(Invesco), a subsidiary of Invesco Ltd.
The closing of the Transaction (currently expected to be in
mid-2010) will constitute an assignment of the
current investment advisory agreement for the Fund and,
therefore, pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
1940 Act), will result in the automatic termination
of the Funds current investment advisory agreement. The
1940 Act requires that shareholders of the Fund approve any new
investment advisory agreement for the Fund.
In connection with the Transaction, the Funds Board of
Trustees has approved a new investment advisory arrangement
between the Fund and Invesco, which arrangement includes
(i) a new advisory agreement with Invesco, which agreement
allows Invesco to enter into subadvisory agreements and delegate
any or all of its rights, duties or obligations to one or more
wholly owned affiliates of Invesco Ltd. as subadvisers and
(ii) that Invesco enter into a master subadvisory agreement
with several of Invesco Ltd.s wholly owned affiliates
(collectively, the New Advisory Agreements).
The Funds Board of Trustees is seeking shareholder
approval of the New Advisory Agreements at a special meeting of
shareholders and a proxy statement is being sent to shareholders
in advance of the special meeting. Closing of the Transaction
and shareholder approval of the New Advisory Agreements are
conditions precedent to the effectiveness of the New Advisory
Agreements. As part of the Transaction, it is also expected that
Invesco and its affiliates will provide the Fund with
administrative and client servicing services that are currently
provided by Van Kampen Investments and its affiliates.
At several in-person and telephonic meetings held in August,
September, October, November and December 2009, the Board
discussed and ultimately approved the New Advisory Agreements.
At these meetings, the Board considered information provided by
Morgan Stanley, Van Kampen Investments and Invesco regarding,
among other things: Invescos organization and personnel;
business strategy; ownership structure; financial strength;
affiliations (including other asset management affiliations);
asset management practices and capabilities; legal and
regulatory matters; and compliance matters. Emphasis during
these meetings focused on Invesco being a global investment
management leader with momentum in the U.S. retail market,
and that the combination of Invesco and Morgan Stanleys
retail asset management business, including Van Kampen
Investments, can bring additional value to the
11
Funds shareholders. The parties discussed Invescos
independence as a publicly traded entity, its strategic focus
solely on the investment management business (including
Invescos investment reputation, broad product line,
service quality, industry relationships and objective of putting
investors interests first) and its significant depth in
resources, diversification, performance and experience. The
parties discussed how the current Invesco and Van Kampen
Investments businesses compare and complement each other and the
synergies of the combined organization which management believes
will benefit the Funds shareholders. The parties discussed
aligning the Fund and other funds currently advised by the
Adviser together with other funds and products currently advised
by Invesco and its affiliates towards using a single, common
operating platform (which includes, among other things, common
investment operating platforms, common global performance
measurement and risk analysis, and common compliance policies
and procedures).
In connection with the Boards consideration of the New
Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the factors
discussed above as well as the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of the Services to be
Provided. The Board considered the roles and
responsibilities of the investment adviser (and its affiliates)
as a whole and those specific to portfolio management, support
and trading functions anticipated to be servicing the Fund. The
Trustees discussed with Invesco the resources available in
managing the Fund. The Trustees also discussed certain other
services that are to be provided by Invesco or its affiliates to
the Fund including subadvisory services, certain global
performance measurement and risk analysis, compliance,
accounting, and administrative services. The Board has
determined that the nature, extent and quality of the services
to be provided by Invesco (and its affiliates) support its
decision to approve the New Advisory Agreements.
Projected Fees and Expenses of the Fund. The Board
considered that the advisory fee rate for the Fund would remain
the same under the New Advisory Agreements as they are under the
current advisory agreement. The Board had previously determined
that such fees were acceptable under the current advisory
agreement. The Board has determined that the projected fees and
expenses of the Fund support its decision to approve the New
Advisory Agreements.
Investment Advisers Expenses in Providing the Service
and Profitability. At least annually, the Trustees
expect to review Invescos expenses in providing services
to the Fund and other funds advised by Invesco and the
profitability of Invesco. In connection with the Fund, the
Trustees discussed with Invesco its projected revenues and
expenses, including among other things, revenues for advisory
services, portfolio management-related expenses, and other
costs. The Board has determined that the analysis of
Invescos projected expenses and profitability support its
decision to approve the New Advisory Agreements.
Economies of Scale. The Board noted that economies
of scale were already reflected in the advisory fees. In future
determinations of whether to approve the continuation of the
advisory agreement, the Board will consider whether economies of
scale exist and should be passed along to shareholders.
12
Other Benefits of the Relationship. The Board
considered other benefits to Invesco and its affiliates derived
from its relationship with the Fund and other funds advised by
Invesco. These benefits include, among other things, fees for
administrative services (which is reimbursement of
Invescos cost or such reasonable compensation as may be
approved by the Board), transfer agency services provided to
other funds in the fund family, in certain cases research to be
received by Invesco or its affiliates generated from commission
dollars spent on funds portfolio trading, and in certain
cases distribution or service related fees related to sales of
other funds in the fund family. The Trustees reviewed with
Invesco each of these arrangements and the reasonableness of its
costs relative to the services performed. The Board has
determined that the other benefits received by Invesco or its
affiliates support its decision to approve the New Advisory
Agreements.
13
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Portfolio of
Investments n December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds 151.0%
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense 2.0%
|
$
|
780
|
|
|
Bombardier, Inc. (Canada) (a)
|
|
|
6.300
|
%
|
|
05/01/14
|
|
$
|
776,100
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
Hexcel Corp.
|
|
|
6.750
|
|
|
02/01/15
|
|
|
381,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,157,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cable 6.7%
|
|
785
|
|
|
Anixter, Inc.
|
|
|
10.000
|
|
|
03/15/14
|
|
|
871,350
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
Charter Communications Operating LLC (a)
|
|
|
10.875
|
|
|
09/15/14
|
|
|
883,125
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
CSC Holdings, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
8.625
|
|
|
02/15/19
|
|
|
1,632,687
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
Echostar DBS Corp.
|
|
|
6.625
|
|
|
10/01/14
|
|
|
343,825
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
NTL Cable PLC (United Kingdom)
|
|
|
8.750
|
|
|
04/15/14
|
|
|
31,125
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
NTL Cable PLC (United Kingdom)
|
|
|
9.125
|
|
|
08/15/16
|
|
|
105,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,867,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals 3.8%
|
|
605
|
|
|
Airgas, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
7.125
|
|
|
10/01/18
|
|
|
632,225
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
Innophos, Inc.
|
|
|
8.875
|
|
|
08/15/14
|
|
|
754,800
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
Westlake Chemical Corp.
|
|
|
6.625
|
|
|
01/15/16
|
|
|
801,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,188,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Products 3.6%
|
|
770
|
|
|
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
|
|
|
10.500
|
|
|
05/15/16
|
|
|
854,700
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (a)
|
|
|
11.375
|
|
|
08/01/15
|
|
|
569,700
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
7.000
|
|
|
03/01/14
|
|
|
675,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,099,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy 19.6%
|
|
905
|
|
|
Atlas Energy Operating Co., LLC
|
|
|
10.750
|
|
|
02/01/18
|
|
|
1,004,550
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Chesapeake Energy Corp.
|
|
|
9.500
|
|
|
02/15/15
|
|
|
1,653,750
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
Cimarex Energy Co.
|
|
|
7.125
|
|
|
05/01/17
|
|
|
233,450
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
Compagnie Generale de Geophysique, SA (France)
|
|
|
7.500
|
|
|
05/15/15
|
|
|
563,587
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Forest Oil Corp.
|
|
|
7.250
|
|
|
06/15/19
|
|
|
59,550
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
Forest Oil Corp.
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
|
05/01/14
|
|
|
279,813
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
Hilcorp Energy/Finance Corp. (a)
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
|
11/01/15
|
|
|
615,625
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
Key Energy Services, Inc.
|
|
|
8.375
|
|
|
12/01/14
|
|
|
433,225
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
Massey Energy Co.
|
|
|
6.875
|
|
|
12/15/13
|
|
|
1,058,956
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Mirant North America LLC
|
|
|
7.375
|
|
|
12/31/13
|
|
|
397,500
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Co.
|
|
|
6.625
|
|
|
09/01/14
|
|
|
740,950
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Co.
|
|
|
7.125
|
|
|
05/15/18
|
|
|
197,925
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
OPTI Canada, Inc. (Canada)
|
|
|
8.250
|
|
|
12/15/14
|
|
|
513,825
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
Orion Power Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
12.000
|
|
|
05/01/10
|
|
|
556,200
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
Plains Exploration & Production Co.
|
|
|
7.625
|
|
|
06/01/18
|
|
|
215,775
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
Plains Exploration & Production Co.
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
|
06/15/15
|
|
|
787,325
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
Western Refining, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
11.250
|
|
|
06/15/17
|
|
|
1,233,050
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Williams Cos, Inc.
|
|
|
7.625
|
|
|
07/15/19
|
|
|
842,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,387,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial 10.5%
|
|
765
|
|
|
CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc.
|
|
|
11.625
|
|
|
06/15/17
|
|
|
852,975
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
FireKeepers Development Authority (a)
|
|
|
13.875
|
|
|
05/01/15
|
|
|
1,242,600
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
GMAC LLC (a)
|
|
|
6.875
|
|
|
09/15/11
|
|
|
1,348,225
|
|
14
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Portfolio
of
Investments n December 31,
2009 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial (Continued)
|
$
|
1,050
|
|
|
JBS USA LLC/JBS USA Finance, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
11.625
|
%
|
|
05/01/14
|
|
$
|
1,194,375
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
LaBranche & Co., Inc.
|
|
|
11.000
|
|
|
05/15/12
|
|
|
483,125
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
LPL Holdings, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
10.750
|
|
|
12/15/15
|
|
|
979,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,100,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Drug 3.4%
|
|
355
|
|
|
Axcan Intermediate Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
12.750
|
|
|
03/01/16
|
|
|
398,487
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
M-Foods Holdings, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
9.750
|
|
|
10/01/13
|
|
|
297,469
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
Rite Aid Corp.
|
|
|
8.625
|
|
|
03/01/15
|
|
|
901,250
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
SUPERVALU, Inc.
|
|
|
7.500
|
|
|
11/15/14
|
|
|
371,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,968,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Tobacco 3.5%
|
|
465
|
|
|
Constellation Brands, Inc.
|
|
|
7.250
|
|
|
05/15/17
|
|
|
473,719
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Tyson Foods, Inc.
|
|
|
7.850
|
|
|
04/01/16
|
|
|
1,545,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,018,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest Products 7.8%
|
|
508
|
|
|
Crown Americas LLC
|
|
|
7.625
|
|
|
11/15/13
|
|
|
527,050
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
Georgia-Pacific Corp. (a)
|
|
|
7.125
|
|
|
01/15/17
|
|
|
864,875
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
|
|
|
9.500
|
|
|
08/15/13
|
|
|
518,750
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
NewPage Corp. (a)
|
|
|
11.375
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
|
1,157,100
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
P.H. Glatfelter Co.
|
|
|
7.125
|
|
|
05/01/16
|
|
|
319,600
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
Verso Paper Holdings LLC, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
11.500
|
|
|
07/01/14
|
|
|
1,154,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,542,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming & Leisure 9.1%
|
|
620
|
|
|
Ameristar Casinos, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
9.250
|
|
|
06/01/14
|
|
|
646,350
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
Harrahs Operating Escrow LLC (a)
|
|
|
11.250
|
|
|
06/01/17
|
|
|
1,776,612
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
|
|
6.375
|
|
|
02/15/15
|
|
|
765,400
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
MGM Mirage, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
10.375
|
|
|
05/15/14
|
|
|
1,427,900
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
MGM Mirage, Inc.
|
|
|
13.000
|
|
|
11/15/13
|
|
|
282,363
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
Scientific Games International, Inc.
|
|
|
9.250
|
|
|
06/15/19
|
|
|
369,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,267,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care 13.2%
|
|
625
|
|
|
Apria Healthcare Group, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
11.250
|
|
|
11/01/14
|
|
|
689,062
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Apria Healthcare Group, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
12.375
|
|
|
11/01/14
|
|
|
552,500
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
Biomet, Inc.
|
|
|
10.000
|
|
|
10/15/17
|
|
|
812,981
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
Community Health Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
8.875
|
|
|
07/15/15
|
|
|
996,000
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
FMC Finance III SA (Luxembourg)
|
|
|
6.875
|
|
|
07/15/17
|
|
|
663,337
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
HCA, Inc.
|
|
|
9.125
|
|
|
11/15/14
|
|
|
1,422,338
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
Healthsouth Corp.
|
|
|
10.750
|
|
|
06/15/16
|
|
|
497,088
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
Invacare Corp.
|
|
|
9.750
|
|
|
02/15/15
|
|
|
172,838
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
Omnicare, Inc.
|
|
|
6.875
|
|
|
12/15/15
|
|
|
694,025
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Res-Care, Inc.
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
|
10/15/13
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
Tenet Healthcare Corp. (a)
|
|
|
10.000
|
|
|
05/01/18
|
|
|
393,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,643,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Portfolio
of
Investments n December 31,
2009 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing 3.2%
|
$
|
1,090
|
|
|
Interface, Inc., Ser B
|
|
|
9.500
|
%
|
|
02/01/14
|
|
$
|
1,077,738
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
10.625
|
|
|
10/15/16
|
|
|
787,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology 7.3%
|
|
435
|
|
|
Expedia, Inc.
|
|
|
8.500
|
|
|
07/01/16
|
|
|
472,519
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
First Data Corp.
|
|
|
9.875
|
|
|
09/24/15
|
|
|
1,007,812
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
Flextronics International Ltd. (Singapore)
|
|
|
6.500
|
|
|
05/15/13
|
|
|
632,710
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
Unisys Corp. (a)
|
|
|
14.250
|
|
|
09/15/15
|
|
|
1,187,550
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
Vangent, Inc.
|
|
|
9.625
|
|
|
02/15/15
|
|
|
903,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,204,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing 6.1%
|
|
330
|
|
|
Baldor Electric Co.
|
|
|
8.625
|
|
|
02/15/17
|
|
|
339,075
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
Berry Plastics Escrow LLC (a)
|
|
|
8.250
|
|
|
11/15/15
|
|
|
1,363,500
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
Case New Holland, Inc.
|
|
|
7.125
|
|
|
03/01/14
|
|
|
1,224,000
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
RBS Global, Inc. & Rexnord Corp.
|
|
|
9.500
|
|
|
08/01/14
|
|
|
609,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,536,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals 6.1%
|
|
550
|
|
|
ArcelorMittal (Luxembourg)
|
|
|
9.850
|
|
|
06/01/19
|
|
|
712,538
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
Foundation PA Coal Co.
|
|
|
7.250
|
|
|
08/01/14
|
|
|
249,288
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Cooper & Gold, Inc.
|
|
|
8.375
|
|
|
04/01/17
|
|
|
142,545
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
Novelis, Inc. (Canada)
|
|
|
7.250
|
|
|
02/15/15
|
|
|
1,024,525
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
Teck Resources Ltd. (Canada)
|
|
|
10.250
|
|
|
05/15/16
|
|
|
1,433,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,562,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipelines 2.0%
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
El Paso Corp.
|
|
|
12.000
|
|
|
12/12/13
|
|
|
1,177,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail 6.1%
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
Brown Shoe Co., Inc.
|
|
|
8.750
|
|
|
05/01/12
|
|
|
1,069,819
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
Eye Care Centers of America
|
|
|
10.750
|
|
|
02/15/15
|
|
|
722,775
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
Oxford Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
11.375
|
|
|
07/15/15
|
|
|
939,250
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
Sally Holdings LLC/Sally Capital, Inc.
|
|
|
9.250
|
|
|
11/15/14
|
|
|
823,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,555,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services 4.5%
|
|
215
|
|
|
ARAMARK Corp.
|
|
|
8.500
|
|
|
02/01/15
|
|
|
222,525
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc.
|
|
|
10.750
|
|
|
08/01/16
|
|
|
1,461,375
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
United Rentals North America, Inc.
|
|
|
6.500
|
|
|
02/15/12
|
|
|
897,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,581,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications 10.6%
|
|
870
|
|
|
DISH DBS Corp.
|
|
|
7.000
|
|
|
10/01/13
|
|
|
899,362
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Intelsat Corp.
|
|
|
9.250
|
|
|
06/15/16
|
|
|
778,125
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Nielsen Finance LLC / Nielsen Finance Co.
|
|
|
11.625
|
|
|
02/01/14
|
|
|
1,128,750
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
Qwest Capital Funding, Inc.
|
|
|
7.250
|
|
|
02/15/11
|
|
|
974,100
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Sprint Capital Corp.
|
|
|
6.900
|
|
|
05/01/19
|
|
|
693,750
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
Wind Acquisition Finance, SA (Luxembourg) (a)
|
|
|
12.000
|
|
|
12/01/15
|
|
|
876,125
|
|
16
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Portfolio
of
Investments n December 31,
2009 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications (Continued)
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
Windstream Corp. (a)
|
|
|
7.875
|
%
|
|
11/01/17
|
|
$
|
431,738
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
Windstream Corp.
|
|
|
8.125
|
|
|
08/01/13
|
|
|
359,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,141,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation 3.5%
|
|
645
|
|
|
Commercial Barge Line Co. (a)
|
|
|
12.500
|
|
|
07/15/17
|
|
|
674,025
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
Ford Motor Credit Co.
|
|
|
7.000
|
|
|
10/01/13
|
|
|
1,339,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,013,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility 12.6%
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
AES Corp.
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
|
03/01/14
|
|
|
1,300,500
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
AES Corp. (a)
|
|
|
8.750
|
|
|
05/15/13
|
|
|
762,200
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
CMS Energy Corp.
|
|
|
6.300
|
|
|
02/01/12
|
|
|
629,023
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
Dynegy Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
|
06/01/19
|
|
|
693,637
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
Edison Mission Energy
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
|
06/15/16
|
|
|
363,375
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Intergen NV (Netherlands) (a)
|
|
|
9.000
|
|
|
06/30/17
|
|
|
838,000
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
|
8.625
|
|
|
11/14/11
|
|
|
425,250
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
|
|
7.375
|
|
|
01/15/17
|
|
|
768,825
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
RRI Energy, Inc.
|
|
|
7.875
|
|
|
06/15/17
|
|
|
725,813
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co., LLC, Ser A
|
|
|
10.250
|
|
|
11/01/15
|
|
|
774,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,280,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless Communications 4.5%
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
Nextel Communications, Inc., Ser E
|
|
|
6.875
|
|
|
10/31/13
|
|
|
1,730,625
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
XM Satellite Radio, Inc. (a)
|
|
|
11.250
|
|
|
06/15/13
|
|
|
885,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,616,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline 1.3%
|
|
815
|
|
|
Citizens Communications Co.
|
|
|
7.125
|
|
|
03/15/19
|
|
|
774,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Corporate Bonds 151.0%
|
|
|
87,550,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities 0.3%
|
|
|
|
|
DecisionOne Corp.
(5,483 Common Shares) (b) (c) (d)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Hosiery Corp. of America, Inc., Class A
(1,000 Common Shares) (b) (c) (d)
|
|
|
0
|
|
GMAC, Inc. (287 Preferred Shares) (a)
|
|
|
189,187
|
|
VS Holdings, Inc.
(20,207 Common Shares) (b) (c) (d)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equities 0.3%
|
|
|
189,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Investments 151.3%
(Cost $83,522,590)
|
|
|
87,739,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Portfolio
of
Investments n December 31,
2009 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreements 3.3%
|
|
|
|
|
Banc of America Securities ($726,356 par collateralized by
U.S. Government obligations in a pooled cash account,
interest rate of 0.01%, dated 12/31/09, to be sold on 01/04/10
at $726,357)
|
|
$
|
726,356
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. ($1,177,082 par collateralized by
U.S. Government obligations in a pooled cash account,
interest rate of 0.00%, dated 12/31/09, to be sold on 01/04/10
at $1,177,082)
|
|
|
1,177,082
|
|
State Street Bank & Trust Co. ($24,562 par
collateralized by U.S. Government obligations in a pooled
cash account, interest rate of 0.00%, dated 12/31/09, to be sold
on 01/04/10 at $24,562)
|
|
|
24,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Repurchase Agreements 3.3%
(Cost $1,928,000)
|
|
|
1,928,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments 154.6%
(Cost $85,450,590)
|
|
|
89,667,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings (48.3%)
|
|
|
(28,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares (including accrued
distributions) (7.6%)
|
|
|
(4,412,941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities 1.3%
|
|
|
741,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0%
|
|
$
|
57,996,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are
calculated as a percentage of net assets applicable to common
shares.
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
144A-Private
Placement security which is exempt from registration under
Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. This
security may only be resold in transactions exempt from
registration which are normally those transactions with
qualified institutional buyers.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Market
value is determined in accordance with procedures established in
good faith by the Board of Trustees.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Non-income
producing security.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Security
has been deemed illiquid.
|
18
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Portfolio
of
Investments n December 31,
2009 continued
Fair Value
Measurements
Various inputs are
used in determining the value of the Trusts investments.
These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed
below. (See Note 1(B) in the Notes to Financial Statements
for further information regarding fair value measurements.)
The following is a
summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2009 in
valuing the Trusts investments carried at value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Significant
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
Quoted
Prices
|
|
Observable
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
(a)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Investments in an Asset Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,550,487
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,550,487
|
|
Common and Preferred Stocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highways & Railtracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Consulting & Other Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless Communications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,187
|
|
Repurchase Agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments in an Asset Position
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
89,667,674
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
89,667,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
On
December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Trust held securities
classified as Level 3 with market values of zero.
|
The following is a
reconciliation of investments in which significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3) were used in determining value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stocks
|
|
Corporate
Bonds
|
|
Balance as of 12/31/08
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
Accrued Discounts/Premiums
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Realized Gain/Loss
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
(124,169
|
)
|
Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
124,169
|
|
Net Purchases/Sales
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Net Transfers in and/or Out of Level 3
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of 12/31/09
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation from
Investments still held as of 12/31/09
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
19
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Financial Statements
Statement
of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $85,450,590)
|
|
$
|
89,667,674
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
Interest Receivable
|
|
|
1,803,187
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
24,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
91,495,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
28,000,000
|
|
|
|
Investment Advisory Fee
|
|
|
49,496
|
|
|
|
Income DistributionsCommon Shares
|
|
|
38,431
|
|
|
|
Other Affiliates
|
|
|
36,337
|
|
|
|
Trustees Deferred Compensation and Retirement Plans
|
|
|
520,860
|
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
193,625
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
247,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
29,086,204
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares (including accrued distributions)
|
|
|
4,412,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
|
|
$
|
57,996,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Common Share ($57,996,623 divided by
3,770,265 shares outstanding*)
|
|
$
|
15.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares ($0.01 par value with an unlimited number of
shares authorized, 3,770,265 shares issued and outstanding*)
|
|
$
|
37,703
|
|
|
|
Paid in Surplus
|
|
|
112,465,691
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Appreciation
|
|
|
4,217,084
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Undistributed Net Investment Income
|
|
|
(481,092
|
)
|
|
|
Accumulated Net Realized Loss
|
|
|
(58,242,763
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
|
|
$
|
57,996,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares ($0.01 par value, authorized
100,000,000 shares, 176 issued with liquidation preference
of $25,000 per share)
|
|
$
|
4,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Including Preferred Shares
|
|
$
|
62,396,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
On
May 22, 2009, there was a
1-for-5
reverse share split for the common shares.
|
20
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Financial
Statements continued
Statement
of Operations
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
7,906,111
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
17,898
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
99,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income
|
|
|
8,023,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Advisory Fee
|
|
|
568,387
|
|
|
|
Professional Fees
|
|
|
160,389
|
|
|
|
Trustees Fees and Related Expenses
|
|
|
102,369
|
|
|
|
Credit Line
|
|
|
82,290
|
|
|
|
Reports to Shareholders
|
|
|
51,073
|
|
|
|
Accounting and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
50,493
|
|
|
|
Preferred Share Maintenance
|
|
|
49,016
|
|
|
|
Transfer Agent Fees
|
|
|
44,264
|
|
|
|
Registration Fees
|
|
|
23,436
|
|
|
|
Custody
|
|
|
12,591
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
10,768
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
1,170,371
|
|
|
|
Investment Advisory Fee Reduction
|
|
|
40,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Expenses
|
|
|
1,129,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
$
|
6,893,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain/Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Loss
|
|
$
|
(6,969,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the Period
|
|
|
(21,313,045
|
)
|
|
|
End of the Period
|
|
|
4,217,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Appreciation During the Period
|
|
|
25,530,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain
|
|
$
|
18,561,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Preferred Shareholders
|
|
$
|
(1,574,640
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares from
Operations
|
|
$
|
23,880,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Financial
Statements continued
Statements
of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The
|
|
For The
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
From Investment Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
$
|
6,893,712
|
|
|
$
|
9,200,549
|
|
Net Realized Loss
|
|
|
(6,969,064
|
)
|
|
|
(19,821,399
|
)
|
Net Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation During the Period
|
|
|
25,530,129
|
|
|
|
(17,421,145
|
)
|
Distributions to Preferred Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
(1,574,640
|
)
|
|
|
(3,820,943
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares from Operations
|
|
|
23,880,137
|
|
|
|
(31,862,938
|
)
|
Distributions to Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
(5,297,230
|
)
|
|
|
(5,721,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares from
Investment Activities
|
|
|
18,582,907
|
|
|
|
(37,584,332
|
)
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the Period
|
|
|
39,413,716
|
|
|
|
76,998,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the Period (Including accumulated undistributed net
investment income of $(481,092) and $(871,416), respectively)
|
|
$
|
57,996,623
|
|
|
$
|
39,413,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Financial
Highlights
The
following schedule presents financial highlights for one common
share of the Trust outstanding throughout the periods
indicated.
All
share amounts, net asset values and common share market prices
have been adjusted as a result of the
1-for-5
reverse common share split on May 22, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of the Period
|
|
$
|
10.45
|
|
|
$
|
20.40
|
|
|
$
|
21.45
|
|
|
$
|
21.40
|
|
|
$
|
23.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
1.83
|
(a)
|
|
|
2.45
|
(a)
|
|
|
2.55
|
(a)
|
|
|
2.45
|
(a)
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/Loss
|
|
|
4.93
|
|
|
|
(9.90
|
)
|
|
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(2.25
|
)
|
Common Share Equivalent of Distributions Paid to Preferred
Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
|
(0.85
|
)
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total from Investment Operations
|
|
|
6.34
|
|
|
|
(8.45
|
)
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Distributions Paid to Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
(1.41
|
)
|
|
|
(1.50
|
)
|
|
|
(1.65
|
)
|
|
|
(1.80
|
)
|
|
|
(2.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, End of the Period
|
|
$
|
15.38
|
|
|
$
|
10.45
|
|
|
$
|
20.40
|
|
|
$
|
21.45
|
|
|
$
|
21.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Market Price at End of the Period
|
|
$
|
14.48
|
|
|
$
|
8.90
|
|
|
$
|
18.15
|
|
|
$
|
20.10
|
|
|
$
|
20.70
|
|
Total Return* (b)
|
|
|
83.40%
|
|
|
|
45.03%
|
|
|
|
1.71%
|
|
|
|
6.02%
|
|
|
|
11.46%
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares at End of the Period (In
millions)
|
|
$
|
58.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.4
|
|
|
$
|
77.0
|
|
|
$
|
81.1
|
|
|
$
|
80.8
|
|
Ratio of Net Expenses to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common
Shares* (c)
|
|
|
2.31%
|
|
|
|
1.94%
|
|
|
|
1.84%
|
|
|
|
2.00%
|
|
|
|
2.43%
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets Applicable
to Common Shares* (c)
|
|
|
14.13%
|
|
|
|
14.65%
|
|
|
|
12.06%
|
|
|
|
11.69%
|
|
|
|
11.89%
|
|
Portfolio Turnover
|
|
|
58%
|
|
|
|
46%
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
|
48%
|
|
|
|
62%
|
|
* If certain expenses had not been voluntarily
assumed by Van Kampen, total return would have been lower
and the ratios would have been as follows:
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common
Shares (c)
|
|
|
2.40%
|
|
|
|
2.04%
|
|
|
|
1.93%
|
|
|
|
2.05%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets Applicable
to Common Shares (c)
|
|
|
14.04%
|
|
|
|
14.55%
|
|
|
|
11.97%
|
|
|
|
11.64%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Supplemental Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets Applicable
to Common Shares* (d)
|
|
|
10.90%
|
|
|
|
8.56%
|
|
|
|
7.61%
|
|
|
|
7.70%
|
|
|
|
9.24%
|
|
Senior Indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Preferred Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Asset Coverage Per Preferred Share (e)
|
|
$
|
354,600
|
|
|
$
|
55,444
|
|
|
$
|
54,487
|
|
|
$
|
56,040
|
|
|
$
|
55,933
|
|
Involuntary Liquidating Preference Per Preferred Share
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Average Market Value Per Preferred Share
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Total Borrowing Outstanding (In thousands)
|
|
$
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Asset Coverage Per $1,000 Unit of Borrowings (f)
|
|
$
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Based
on average shares outstanding.
|
(b)
|
|
Total
return assumes an investment at the common share market price at
the beginning of the period indicated, reinvestment of all
distributions for the period in accordance with the Trusts
dividend reinvestment plan, and sale of all shares at the
closing common share market price at the end of the period
indicated.
|
(c)
|
|
Ratios
do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred
shareholders.
|
(d)
|
|
Ratios
reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred
shareholders.
|
(e)
|
|
Calculated
by subtracting the Trusts total liabilities (not including
the preferred shares) from the Trusts total assets and
dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
|
(f)
|
|
Calculated
by subtracting the Trusts total liabilities (not including
the preferred shares and the borrowings) from the Trusts
total assets and dividing by the total number of senior
indebtedness units, where one unit equals $1,000 of senior
indebtedness.
|
N/A = Not
Applicable
23
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009
1. Significant
Accounting Policies
Van Kampen High Income Trust II (the
Trust) is registered as a diversified, closed-end
management investment company under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Trusts
investment objective is to provide high current income, while
seeking to preserve shareholders capital through
investment in a professionally managed diversified portfolio of
income producing, fixed income securities. The Trust commenced
investment operations on April 28, 1989. On May 22,
2009, there was a
1-for-5
reverse share split for the common shares.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies
consistently followed by the Trust in the preparation of its
financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(ASC) as the single source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized by the FASB in the preparation of
financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The ASC supersedes
existing non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. The ASC did not change GAAP but rather organized it
into a hierarchy where all guidance within the ASC carries an
equal level of authority. The ASC became effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The Trust appropriately updated
relevant GAAP references to reflect the new ASC.
A. Security Valuation Investments are
valued by an independent pricing service using the mean of the
last reported bid and asked prices. For those securities where
quotations or prices are not readily available, valuations are
obtained from yield data relating to instruments or securities
with similar characteristics in accordance with procedures
established in good faith by the Board of Trustees. Factors
considered in making this determination may include, but are not
limited to, information obtained by contacting the issuer,
analysts, or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded
securities), analysis of the issuers financial statements
or other available documents and, if necessary, available
information concerning other securities in similar
circumstances. Futures contracts are valued at the settlement
price established each day on the exchange on which they are
traded. Short-term securities with remaining maturities of
60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which
approximates fair value.
B. Fair Value Measurements FASB ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820)
(formerly known as FAS 157), defines fair value as the
price that the Trust would receive to sell an investment or pay
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction with an
independent buyer in the principal market, or in the absence of
a principal market the most advantageous market for the
investment or liability. ASC 820 establishes a three-tier
hierarchy to distinguish between (1) inputs that reflect
the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from
sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs)
and (2) inputs that reflect the reporting entitys own
assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use
in pricing an asset or liability developed based on the best
information available in the
24
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes
to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009 continued
circumstances (unobservable inputs)
and to establish classification of fair value measurements for
disclosure purposes. Various inputs are used in determining the
value of the Trusts investments. The inputs are summarized
in the three broad levels listed below.
|
|
Level 1
|
quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
|
Level 2
|
other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for
similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit
risk, etc.)
|
Level 3
|
significant unobservable inputs (including the Trusts own
assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
|
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing
in those securities.
C. Security Transactions Security
transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains
and losses are determined on an identified cost basis. The Trust
may purchase and sell securities on a when-issued or
delayed delivery basis with settlement to occur at a
later date. The value of the security so purchased is subject to
market fluctuations during this period. The Trust will segregate
assets with the custodian having an aggregate value at least
equal to the amount of the when-issued or delayed delivery
purchase commitments until after payment is made. At
December 31, 2009, the Trust had no when-issued or delayed
delivery purchase commitments.
The Trust may invest in repurchase agreements, which are
short-term investments in which the Trust acquires ownership of
a debt security and the seller agrees to repurchase the security
at a future time and specified price. The Trust may invest
independently in repurchase agreements, or transfer uninvested
cash balances into a pooled cash account along with other
investment companies advised by Van Kampen Asset Management
(the Adviser) or its affiliates, the daily aggregate
of which is invested in repurchase agreements. Repurchase
agreements are fully collateralized by the underlying debt
security. The Trust will make payment for such securities only
upon physical delivery or evidence of book entry transfer to the
account of the custodian bank. The seller is required to
maintain the value of the underlying security at not less than
the repurchase proceeds due the Trust.
D. Investment Income Interest income is
recorded on an accrual basis. Bond discount is accreted and
premium is amortized over the expected life of each applicable
security. Other income is comprised primarily of consent fees.
Consent fees are earned as compensation for agreeing to changes
in the terms of debt instruments.
E. Federal Income Taxes It is the
Trusts policy to comply with the requirements of
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially
all of its taxable income to its shareholders. Therefore, no
provision for federal income taxes is required. Management has
concluded there are no significant uncertain tax positions that
would require recognition in the financial statements. If
applicable, the Trust recognizes interest accrued related to
unrecognized tax benefits in Interest Expense and
penalties in Other expenses on the Statement of
Operations. The Trust files tax returns with the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service and various states.
Generally, each of the tax years in the four year period ended
December 31, 2009, remains subject to examination by taxing
authorities.
25
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes
to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009 continued
The Trust intends to utilize provisions of the federal income
tax laws which allow it to carry a realized capital loss forward
for eight years following the year of the loss and offset these
losses against any future realized capital gains. At
December 31, 2009, the Trust had an accumulated capital
loss carryforward for tax purposes of $58,175,283 which will
expire according to the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
$
|
17,027,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
6,782,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
875,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
565,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
4,400,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
47,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
9,476,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
18,999,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Due to a merger with another regulated investment company, a
portion of the capital loss carryforward referred to above may
be limited under Internal Revenue Code Section 382.
At December 31, 2009, the cost and related gross unrealized
appreciation and depreciation were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of investments for tax purposes
|
|
$
|
85,650,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross tax unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
7,316,167
|
|
|
|
Gross tax unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(3,298,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tax unrealized appreciation on investments
|
|
$
|
4,017,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Distribution of Income and Gains The
Trust declares and pays monthly dividends from net investment
income to common shareholders. Net realized gains, if any, are
distributed at least annually on a pro rata basis to common and
preferred shareholders. Distributions from net realized gains
for book purposes may include short-term capital gains and a
portion of futures gains, which are included in ordinary income
for tax purposes.
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Distributions paid from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income
|
|
$
|
6,897,501
|
|
|
$
|
9,651,700
|
|
Permanent differences, primarily due to a capital loss
carryforward in the amount of $17,412,110 expiring in the
current year and consent fee income received from tender offers,
resulted in the following reclassification among the
Trusts components of net assets at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Undistributed
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Investment
Income
|
|
Net Realized
Loss
|
|
Paid in
Surplus
|
|
$
|
368,482
|
|
|
$
|
17,043,628
|
|
|
$
|
(17,412,110
|
)
|
26
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes
to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009 continued
As of December 31, 2009, the components of distributable
earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed ordinary income
|
|
$
|
171,784
|
|
Net realized gains or losses may differ for financial reporting
and tax purposes primarily as a result of the deferral of losses
relating to wash sale transactions.
G. Foreign Currency Translation Assets
and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated
into U.S. dollars at the mean of the quoted bid and asked
prices of such currencies against the U.S. dollar.
Purchases and sales of portfolio securities are translated at
the rate of exchange prevailing when such securities were
acquired or sold. Income and expenses are translated at rates
prevailing when accrued. Unrealized gains and losses on
investments resulting from changes in exchange rates and the
unrealized gains or losses on translations of other assets or
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are included in
foreign currency translation on the Statement of Operations.
Realized gains and losses on investments resulting from changes
in exchange rates and the realized gains or losses on
translations of other assets or liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies are included in foreign currency transactions
on the Statement of Operations.
H. Reporting Subsequent
Events Management has evaluated the impact of any
subsequent events through February 19, 2010, the date the
financial statement were effectively issued. Management has
determined that other than the event described in Note 11,
there are no material events or transactions that would affect
the Trusts financial statements or require disclosure in
the Trusts financial statements through this date.
2. Investment
Advisory Agreement and Other Transactions with
Affiliates
Under the terms of the Trusts Investment Advisory
Agreement, the Adviser will provide investment advice and
facilities to the Trust for an annual fee payable monthly of
0.70% of the average daily net assets. The advisory fee is
calculated on net assets including current preferred shares and
debt leverage of $28,000,000. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, the Adviser waived approximately $40,600
of its advisory fees or other expenses. This represents 0.05% of
the average daily net assets including preferred shares and debt
leverage of $28,000,000. This waiver is voluntary and can be
discontinued at any time.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Trust recognized
expenses of approximately $74,300 representing legal services
provided by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
of which a trustee of the Trust is a partner of such firm and he
and his law firm provide legal services as legal counsel to the
Trust.
Under separate Legal Services, Accounting Services and Chief
Compliance Officer (CCO) Employment agreements, the Adviser
provides accounting and legal services and the CCO provides
compliance services to the Trust. The costs of these services
are allocated to each trust. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, the Trust recognized expenses of
approximately $44,000 representing Van Kampen Investments
Inc.s or its affiliates (collectively
Van Kampen) cost of providing accounting and
legal services to the Trust, as well as the salary, benefits and
related costs of the CCO and related support staff paid by
Van Kampen. Services provided pursuant to the Legal
Services agreement are reported as part of Professional
Fees on the Statement of Operations. Services provided
pursuant to the Accounting
27
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes
to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009 continued
Services and CCO Employment
agreement are reported as part of Accounting and
Administrative Expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are also officers and
directors of Van Kampen. The Trust does not compensate its
officers or trustees who are also officers of Van Kampen.
The Trust provides deferred compensation and retirement plans
for its trustees who are not officers of Van Kampen. Under
the deferred compensation plan, trustees may elect to defer all
or a portion of their compensation to a later date. Benefits
under the retirement plan are payable upon retirement for a
ten-year period and are based upon each trustees years of
service to the Trust. The maximum annual benefit per trustee
under the plan is $2,500.
3. Capital
Transactions
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
transactions in common shares were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
Beginning Shares
|
|
|
18,851,327
|
|
|
|
18,851,327
|
|
1-for-5
Reverse Common Share Split
|
|
|
(15,081,062
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Shares
|
|
|
3,770,265
|
|
|
|
18,851,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Investment
Transactions
During the period, the cost of purchases and proceeds from sales
of investments, excluding short-term investments and
U.S. Government securities, were $45,882,021 and
$45,858,210, respectively. The cost of purchases and proceeds
from sales of long-term U.S. Government securities,
including paydowns on mortgage-backed securities, for the period
were $0 and $1,756, respectively.
5. Derivative
Financial Instruments
A derivative financial instrument in very general terms refers
to a security whose value is derived from the value
of an underlying asset, reference rate or index.
The Trust may use derivative instruments for a variety of
reasons, such as to attempt to protect the Trust against
possible changes in the market value of its portfolio, to manage
the portfolios effective yield, maturity and duration, or
generate potential gain. All of the Trusts portfolio
holdings, including derivative instruments, are marked to market
each day with the change in value reflected in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation. Upon disposition, a realized gain or
loss is generally recognized.
The Trust adopted FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging
(ASC 815) (formerly known as FAS 161), effective
January 1, 2009. ASC 815 is intended to improve financial
reporting about derivative instruments by requiring enhanced
disclosures to enable investors to better understand how and why
the Trust uses derivative instruments, how these derivative
instruments are accounted for and their effects on the
Trusts financial position and results of operations.
The Trust is subject to credit risk in the normal course of
pursuing its investment objectives. The Trust may enter into
credit default swaps to manage its exposure to the market or
certain sectors of the market, to reduce its risk exposure to
defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers, or to create
exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not
28
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes
to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009 continued
otherwise exposed. A credit default
swap is an agreement between two parties to exchange the credit
risk of an issuer or index of issuers. A buyer of a credit
default swap is said to buy protection by paying periodic fees
in return for a contingent payment from the seller if the issuer
has a credit event such as bankruptcy, a failure to pay
outstanding obligations or deteriorating credit while the swap
is outstanding. A seller of a credit default swap is said to
sell protection and thus collects the periodic fees and profits
if the credit of the issuer remains stable or improves while the
swap is outstanding. The seller in a credit default swap
contract would be required to pay an
agreed-upon
amount, to the buyer in the event of an adverse credit event of
the issuer. This
agreed-upon
amount approximates the notional amount of the swap and is
estimated to be the maximum potential future payment that the
seller could be required to make under the credit default swap
contract. In the event of an adverse credit event, the seller
generally does not have any contractual remedies against the
issuer or any other third party. However, if a physical
settlement is elected, the seller would receive the defaulted
credit and, as a result, become a creditor of the issuer.
The current credit rating of each individual issuer serves as an
indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk
of the credit derivative. Alternatively, for credit default
swaps on an index of credits, the quoted market prices and
current values serve as an indicator of the current status of
the payment/performance risk of the credit derivative.
Generally, lower credit ratings and increasing market values, in
absolute terms, represent a deterioration of the credit and a
greater likelihood of an adverse credit event of the issuer.
The Trust accrues for the periodic fees on credit default swaps
on a daily basis with the net amount accrued recorded within
unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swap contracts. Upon
cash settlement of the periodic fees, the net amount is recorded
as realized gain/loss on swap contracts on the Statement of
Operations. Net unrealized gains are recorded as an asset or net
unrealized losses are reported as a liability on the Statement
of Assets and Liabilities. The change in value of the swap
contracts is reported as unrealized gains or losses on the
Statement of Operations. Payments received or made upon entering
into a credit default swap contract, if any, are recorded as
realized gain or loss on the Statement of Operations upon
termination or maturity of the swap. Credit default swaps may
involve greater risks than if a Trust had invested in the issuer
directly. The Trusts maximum risk or loss from
counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the
protection buyer, is the fair value of the contract. This risk
is mitigated by having a master netting arrangement between the
Trust and the counterparty and by the posting of collateral by
the counterparty to the Trust to cover the Trusts exposure
to the counterparty.
The Trust may sell credit default swaps which expose it to risk
of loss from credit risk related events specified in the
contract. Although contract-specific, credit events are
generally defined as bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring,
obligation acceleration, obligation default, or
repudiation/moratorium. At December 31, 2009, the Trust did
not hold credit default swaps.
The Trust is subject to interest rate risk exposure in the
normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the
Trust holds fixed rate bonds, the value of these bonds may
decrease if interest rates rise. To help hedge against this risk
and to maintain its ability to generate income at prevailing
market rates, the Trust may enter into interest rate swap
contracts. Interest rate swaps are contractual agreements to
exchange interest payments calculated on a predetermined
notional principal amount. Interest rate swaps generally involve
one party paying a fixed interest rate and the other party
paying a variable rate. The Trust will usually enter into
interest rate swaps on a net basis, i.e, the two payments are
netted out in a
29
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes
to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009 continued
cash settlement on the payment date
or dates specified in the instrument, with the Trust receiving
or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two
payments. The Trust accrues the net amount with respect to each
interest rate swap on a daily basis. This net amount is recorded
within unrealized appreciation/depreciation on swap contracts.
Upon cash settlement of the payments, the net amount is recorded
as realized gain/loss on swap contracts on the Statement of
Operations. The risks of interest rate swaps include changes in
market conditions that will affect the value of the contract or
the cash flows and the possible inability of the counterparty to
fulfill its obligation under the agreement. The Trusts
maximum risk of loss from counterparty credit risk is the
discounted net value of the cash flows to be received from/paid
to the counterparty of the contracts remaining life, to
the extent that the amount is positive. This risk is mitigated
by having a master netting arrangement between the Trust and the
counterparty and by posting of collateral by the counterparty to
the Trust to cover the Trusts exposure to the counterparty.
Swap agreements are not entered into or traded on exchanges and
there is no central clearing or guaranty function for swaps.
Therefore, swaps are subject to the risk of default or
non-performance by the counterparty. If there is a default by
the counterparty to a swap agreement, the Trust will have
contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the
transaction. Counterparties are required to pledge collateral
daily (based on the valuation of each swap) on behalf of the
Trust with a value approximately equal to the amount of any
unrealized gain. Reciprocally, when the Trust has an unrealized
loss on a swap contract, the Trust has instructed the custodian
to pledge cash or liquid securities as collateral with a value
approximately equal to the amount of the unrealized loss.
Collateral pledges are monitored and subsequently adjusted if
and when the swap valuations fluctuate. Cash collateral has been
offset against open swap contracts under the provisions of FASB
ASC 210-20, Offsetting (formerly known as FASB
Interpretation No. 39) and are included within Swap
Contracts on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. For
cash collateral received, the Trust pays a monthly fee to the
counterparty based on the effective rate for Federal Funds. This
fee, when paid, is included within realized loss on swap
contracts on the Statement of Operations.
There were no transactions in swap contracts during the year
ended December 31, 2009.
6. Mortgage
Backed Securities
The Trust may invest in various types of Mortgage Backed
Securities. A Mortgage Backed Security (MBS) is a pass-through
security created by pooling mortgages and selling participations
in the principal and interest payments received from borrowers.
Most of these securities are guaranteed by federally sponsored
agenciesGovernment National Mortgage Association (GNMA),
Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or Federal Home
Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC). GNMA is a wholly owned
corporate instrumentality of the United States whose securities
and guarantees are backed by the full faith and credit of the
United States. FNMA, a federally chartered and privately owned
corporation, and FHLMC, a federal corporation, are
instrumentalities of the United States. Securities of FNMA and
FHLMC include those issued in principal only or interest only
components. On September 7, 2008, FNMA and FHLMC were
placed into conservatorship by their new regulator, the Federal
Housing Finance Agency. Simultaneously, the U.S. Treasury made a
commitment of indefinite duration to maintain the positive net
worth of both entities. No assurance can be given that the
initiatives discussed above with respect to the debt and
mortgage-backed securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC will be
successful. A Collateralized Mortgage Obligation (CMO) is a bond
which is collateralized by a pool of MBSs.
30
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes
to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009 continued
These securities derive their value from or represent interests
in a pool of mortgages, or mortgage securities. Mortgage
securities are subject to prepayment riskthe risk that, as
mortgage interest rates fall, borrowers will refinance and
prepay principal. A trust holding mortgage
securities that are experiencing prepayments will have to
reinvest these payments at lower prevailing interest rates. On
the other hand, when interest rates rise, borrowers are less
likely to refinance resulting in lower prepayments. This can
effectively extend the maturity of a trusts mortgage
securities resulting in greater price volatility. It can be
difficult to measure precisely the remaining life of a mortgage
security or the average life of a portfolio of such securities.
To the extent a trust invests in mortgage securities offered by
non-governmental issuers, such as commercial banks, savings and
loan institutions, private mortgage insurance companies,
mortgage bankers and other secondary market issuers, the Trust
may be subject to additional risks. Timely payment of interest
and principal of non-governmental issuers are supported by
various forms of private insurance or guarantees, including
individual loan, title, pool and hazard insurance purchased by
the issuer. There can be no assurance that the private insurers
can meet their obligations under the policies.
An unexpectedly high rate of defaults on the mortgages held by a
mortgage pool may adversely affect the value of a mortgage
backed security and could result in losses to a trust. The risk
of such defaults is generally higher in the case of mortgage
pools that include subprime mortgages. Subprime mortgages refer
to loans made to borrowers with weakened credit histories or
with a lower capacity to make timely payment on their mortgages.
7. Preferred
Shares
The Trust has outstanding 176 Auction Preferred Shares (APS).
Series A contains 75 shares and Series B contains
101 shares. Dividends are cumulative and the dividend rate
on each series is generally reset every 28 days through an
auction process. Beginning on February 20, 2008 and
continuing through December 31, 2009, all series of
preferred shares of the Trust were not successfully remarketed.
As a result, the dividend rates of these preferred shares were
reset to the maximum applicable rate on APS. If the preferred
shares are unable to be remarketed on a remarketing date, the
Trust would be required to pay the maximum applicable rate on
APS to holders of such shares for successive dividend periods
until such time when the shares are successfully remarketed. The
maximum rate on APS is equal to 150% of the applicable
commercial paper rate on the date. The average rate in effect on
December 31, 2009 was 6.526%. During the year ended
December 31, 2009, the rates ranged from 3.975% to 6.923%.
Historically, the Trust paid annual fees equivalent to 0.25% of
the preferred share liquidation value for the remarketing
efforts associated with the preferred auction. Effective
March 19, 2009, the Trust decreased this amount to 0.15%
due to auction failures. In the future, if auctions no longer
fail, the Trust may return to an annual fee payment of 0.25% of
the preferred share liquidation value. These fees are included
as a component of Preferred Share Maintenance
expense on the Statement of Operations.
The APS are redeemable at the option of the Trust in whole or in
part at the liquidation value of $25,000 per share plus
accumulated and unpaid dividends. The Trust is subject to
certain asset coverage tests and the APS are subject to
mandatory redemption if the tests are not met.
31
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes
to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009 continued
For the year ended December 31, 2009, transactions in
preferred shares were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
$
|
13,775,000
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
$
|
18,625,000
|
|
|
|
Amount Retired
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
(11,900,000
|
)
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
|
|
(16,100,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
2,525,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Borrowings
The Trust entered into a $30 million annual revolving
credit agreement on October 2, 2009 in order to redeem and
retire its preferred shares. This revolving credit agreement is
secured by the assets of the Trust. In connection with this
agreement, for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Trust
incurred fees of approximately $82,300, as disclosed on the
Statement of Operations. For the period October 8, 2009,
the day the Trust first borrowed under the credit agreement, to
December 31, 2009, the average daily balance of borrowings
under the credit agreement was $23,541,304 with a weighted
average interest rate of 0.18%.
9. Indemnifications
The Trust enters into contracts that contain a variety of
indemnifications. The Trusts maximum exposure under these
arrangements is unknown. However, the Trust has not had prior
claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the
risk of loss to be remote.
10. Significant
Event
On October 19, 2009, Morgan Stanley, the parent company of
Van Kampen Investments Inc., announced that it has reached
a definitive agreement to sell substantially all of its retail
asset management business to Invesco Ltd. (the
Transaction). The Transaction includes a sale of the
part of the asset management business that advises funds,
including the Van Kampen family of funds. The Transaction
is subject to certain approvals and other conditions, and is
currently expected to close in mid-2010.
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the closing of the
Transaction will cause the Trusts current investment
advisory agreement with Van Kampen Asset Management, a
subsidiary of Van Kampen Investments Inc., to terminate. In
connection with the Transaction, the Trusts Board of
Trustees (the Board) has approved a new investment
advisory agreement (which includes a master subadvisory
agreement) with Invesco Advisers, Inc., a subsidiary of Invesco
Ltd. The new advisory agreement for the Trust (the
Agreement) is subject to shareholder approval. The
Agreement will be presented to shareholders of the Trust at a
special meeting of shareholders.
11. Subsequent
Event
On January 8, 2010, the Trust announced the at par
redemption of its preferred shares. The announced redemption
totals $4.4 million and constitutes the total remaining
outstanding preferred shares issued by the Trust.
With respect to this redemption, the Depository
Trust Company (DTC), the securities holder of record,
will allocate the series redemptions among each participant
broker-dealer account according to the amount of shares held.
Each participant broker-dealer, as nominee
32
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Notes
to Financial
Statements n December 31,
2009 continued
for underlying beneficial owners
(street name shareholders), in turn will allocate redeemed
shares among its underlying beneficial owners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Series
|
|
Redeemed
|
|
Amount
Redeemed
|
|
Redemption
Date
|
|
A
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
|
January 19, 2010
|
|
B
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
2,525,000
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
4,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Accounting
Pronouncement
On January 21, 2010, the FASB issued an Accounting
Standards Update, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements, which provides guidance on how investment
assets and liabilities are to be valued and disclosed.
Specifically, the amendment requires reporting entities to
disclose i) the input and valuation techniques used to measure
fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value
measurements, for Level 2 or Level 3 positions ii)
transfers between all levels (including Level 1 and
Level 2) will be required to be disclosed on a gross basis
(i.e. transfers out must be disclosed separately from transfers
in) as well as the reason(s) for the transfer and
iii) purchases, sales, issuances and settlements must be
shown on a gross basis in the Level 3 rollforward rather
than as one net number. The effective date of the amendment is
for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,
2009. However, the requirement to provide the Level 3
activity for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a
gross basis will be effective for interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2010. At this time, management
is evaluating the implications of the amendment to ASC 820
and the impact it will have on financial statement disclosures.
33
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Van Kampen
High Income Trust II:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and
liabilities of Van Kampen High Income Trust II (the
Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as
of December 31, 2009, and the related statement of
operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in
net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended,
and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the
period then ended. These financial statements and financial
highlights are the responsibility of the Trusts
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial highlights based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The
Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trusts
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of
December 31, 2009, by correspondence with the Trusts
custodian. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial
highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Van Kampen High Income
Trust II as of December 31, 2009, the results of its
operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net
assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and
the financial highlights for each of the five years in the
period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 19, 2010
34
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) offers you a prompt
and simple way to reinvest your dividends and capital gains
distributions (Distributions) into additional shares of
Van Kampen High Income Trust II (the Trust). Under the
Plan, the money you earn from a Distribution will be reinvested
automatically in more shares of the Trust, allowing you to
potentially increase your investment over time. All shareholders
in the Trust are automatically enrolled in the Plan when shares
are purchased.
Plan
benefits
Add to
your account
You may increase your shares in the Trust easily and
automatically with the Plan.
Low
transaction costs
Transaction costs are low because the new shares are bought in
blocks and the brokerage commission is shared among all
participants.
Convenience
You will receive a detailed account statement from Computershare
Trust Company , N.A., (the Agent) which administers the
Plan. The statement shows your total Distributions, dates of
investment, shares acquired, and price per share, as well as the
total number of shares in your reinvestment account. You can
also access your account at vankampen.com.
Safekeeping
The Agent will hold the shares it has acquired for you in
safekeeping.
How to
participate in the Plan
If you own shares in your own name, you can participate directly
in the Plan. If your shares are held in street
namein the name of your brokerage firm, bank, or
other financial institutionyou must instruct that entity
to participate on your behalf. If they are unable to participate
on your behalf, you may request that they reregister your shares
in your own name so that you may enroll in the Plan.
If you choose to participate in the Plan, whenever the Trust
declares a Distribution, it will be invested in additional
shares of your Trust that are purchased on the open market.
How to
enroll
To enroll in the Plan, please read the Terms and Conditions in
the Plan brochure. You can obtain a copy of the Plan Brochure
and enroll in the Plan by
35
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
Dividend
Reinvestment
Plan continued
visiting vankampen.com, calling toll-free
(800) 341-2929
or notifying us in writing at Van Kampen Closed End Funds,
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.,
P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI
02940-3011.
Please include the Trust name and account number and ensure that
all shareholders listed on the account sign these written
instructions. Your participation in the Plan will begin with the
next Distribution payable after the Agent receives your
authorization, as long as they receive it before the
record date, which is generally ten business days
before the dividend is paid. If your authorization arrives after
such record date, your participation in the Plan will begin with
the following distribution.
Costs of the
plan
There is no direct charge to you for reinvesting Distributions
because the Plans fees are paid by the Fund. However, when
applicable, you will pay your portion of any brokerage
commissions incurred when the new shares are purchased on the
open market. These brokerage commissions are typically less than
the standard brokerage charges for individual transactions,
because shares are purchased for all participants in blocks,
resulting in lower commissions for each individual participant.
Any brokerage commissions or service fees are averaged into the
purchase price.
Tax
implications
The automatic reinvestment of dividends and capital gains
distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be
due on Distributions. You will receive tax information annually
to help you prepare your federal and state income tax returns.
Van Kampen does not offer tax advice. The tax
information contained herein is general and is not exhaustive by
nature. It was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot
be used by any taxpayer, for avoiding penalties that may be
imposed on the taxpayer under U.S. federal tax laws.
Federal and state tax laws are complex and constantly changing.
Shareholders should always consult a legal or tax advisor for
information concerning their individual situation.
How to withdraw
from the Plan
To withdraw from the Plan please visit vankampen.com or call
(800) 341-2929
or notify us in writing at the address below.
Van Kampen Closed-End Funds
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI
02940-3011
36
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
Dividend
Reinvestment
Plan continued
All shareholders listed on the account must sign any written
withdrawal instructions. If you withdraw, you have three options
with regard to the shares held in your account:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
If you opt to continue to hold your non-certificated whole
shares (Investment Plan Book Shares), they will be held by the
Agent electronically as Direct Registration Book-Shares
(Book-Entry) and fractional shares will be sold at the then
current market price. Proceeds will be sent via check to your
address of record after deducting applicable fees and brokerage
commissions.
|
|
2.
|
If you opt to sell your shares through the Agent, we will sell
all full and fractional shares and send the proceeds via check
to your address of record after deducting brokerage commissions
and a $2.50 service fee.
|
|
3.
|
You may sell your shares through your financial advisor through
the Direct Registration Systems (DRS). DRS is a
service within the securities industry that allows Trust shares
to be held in your name in electronic format. You retain full
ownership of your shares, without having to hold a stock
certificate.
|
The Trust and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. may
amend or terminate the Plan. Participants will receive written
notice at least 30 days before the effective date of any
amendment. In the case of termination, Participants will receive
written notice at least 30 days before the record date for
the payment of any dividend or capital gains distribution by the
Trust. In the case of amendment or termination necessary or
appropriate to comply with applicable law or the rules and
policies of the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other
regulatory authority, such written notice will not be
required.
To obtain a
complete copy of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, please call our
Client Relations department at
800-341-2929
or visit vankampen.com.
37
Van Kampen
High Income Trust II
Board of Trustees, Officers and Important Addresses
|
|
|
Board
of Trustees
David C. Arch
Jerry D. Choate
Rod Dammeyer
Linda Hutton Heagy
R. Craig Kennedy
Howard J Kerr
Jack E. Nelson
Hugo F. Sonnenschein
Wayne W. Whalen* Chairman
Suzanne H. Woolsey
Officers
Edward C. Wood III
President and Principal Executive Officer
Kevin Klingert
Vice President
Stefanie V. Chang Yu
Vice President and Secretary
John L. Sullivan
Chief Compliance Officer
Stuart N. Schuldt
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
Investment
Adviser
Van Kampen Asset Management
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10036
Custodian
State Street Bank
and Trust Company
One Lincoln Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02111
Transfer
Agent
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
c/o Computershare Investor Services
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3078
Legal
Counsel
Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP
155 North Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Independent
Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
111 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606-4301
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Interested
persons of the Trust, as defined in the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended.
|
38
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
Results of Shareholder Votes
The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of the Trust was held on
July 17, 2009, where shareholders voted on the election of
trustees.
With regard to the election of the following trustees by the
common shareholders of the Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of
Shares
|
|
|
In
Favor
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
Rod Dammeyer
|
|
|
2,940,682
|
|
|
|
316,602
|
|
Wayne W. Whalen
|
|
|
2,938,386
|
|
|
|
318,898
|
|
With regard to the election of the following trustees by the
preferred shareholders of the Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of
Shares
|
|
|
In
Favor
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
Linda Hutton Heagy
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
The other trustees of the Trust whose terms did not expire in
2009 are David C. Arch, Jerry D. Choate, R. Craig
Kennedy, Howard J Kerr, Jack E. Nelson, Hugo F.
Sonnenschein and Suzanne H. Woolsey.
39
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
The business and affairs of the Trust are managed under the
direction of the Trusts Board of Trustees and the
Trusts officers appointed by the Board of Trustees. The
tables below list the trustees and executive officers of the
Trust and their principal occupations during the last five
years, other directorships held by trustees and their
affiliations, if any, with Van Kampen Investments, the
Adviser, the Distributor, Van Kampen Advisors Inc.,
Van Kampen Exchange Corp. and Investor Services. The term
Fund Complex includes each of the investment
companies advised by the Adviser as of the date of this Annual
Report. Trustees serve until reaching their retirement age or
until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Officers
are annually elected by the trustees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Trustees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Trust
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
David C. Arch (64)
Blistex Inc.
1800 Swift Drive
Oak Brook, IL 60523
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1989
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blistex Inc., a consumer
health care products manufacturer.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Member of the Heartland Alliance Advisory Board, a
nonprofit organization serving human needs based in Chicago.
Board member of the Illinois Manufacturers Association.
Member of the Board of Visitors, Institute for the Humanities,
University of Michigan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
|
Trustees and
Officers
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Trust
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Jerry D. Choate (71)
33971 Selva Road
Suite 130
Dana Point, CA 92629
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
Prior to January 1999, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of the Allstate Corporation (Allstate) and Allstate
Insurance Company. Prior to January 1995, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Allstate. Prior to August 1994,
various management positions at Allstate.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of Amgen Inc., a biotechnological company, and
Valero Energy Corporation, an independent refining company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rod Dammeyer (69)
CAC, LLC
4370 La Jolla Village Drive
Suite 685
San Diego, CA 92122-1249
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1989
|
|
President of CAC, LLC, a private company offering capital
investment and management advisory services.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of Quidel Corporation and Stericycle, Inc.
Prior to May 2008, Trustee of The Scripps Research
Institute. Prior to February 2008, Director of Ventana Medical
Systems, Inc. Prior to April 2007, Director of GATX Corporation.
Prior to April 2004, Director of TheraSense, Inc. Prior to
January 2004, Director of TeleTech Holdings Inc. and Arris
Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
|
Trustees and
Officers
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Trust
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Linda Hutton Heagy (61)
4939 South Greenwood
Chicago, IL 60615
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
Prior to February 2008, Managing Partner of Heidrick &
Struggles, an international executive search firm. Prior to
1997, Partner of Ray & Berndtson, Inc., an executive
recruiting firm. Prior to 1995, Executive Vice President of ABN
AMRO, N.A., a bank holding company. Prior to 1990, Executive
Vice President of The Exchange National Bank.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Trustee on the University of Chicago Medical Center
Board, Vice Chair of the Board of the YMCA of Metropolitan
Chicago and a member of the Womens Board of the University
of Chicago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Craig Kennedy (58)
1744 R Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
Director and President of the German Marshall Fund of the United
States, an independent U.S. foundation created to deepen
understanding, promote collaboration and stimulate exchanges of
practical experience between Americans and Europeans. Formerly,
advisor to the Dennis Trading Group Inc., a managed futures and
option company that invests money for individuals and
institutions. Prior to 1992, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Director and member of the Investment Committee of the
Joyce Foundation, a private foundation.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of First Solar, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howard J Kerr (74)
14 Huron Trace
Galena, IL 61036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1992
|
|
Prior to 1998, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Pocklington Corporation, Inc., an investment holding company.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of the Lake Forest Bank & Trust.
Director of the Marrow Foundation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
|
Trustees and
Officers
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Trust
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Jack E. Nelson (74)
423 Country Club Drive
Winter Park, FL 32789
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
President of Nelson Investment Planning Services, Inc., a
financial planning company and registered investment adviser in
the State of Florida. President of Nelson Ivest Brokerage
Services Inc., a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (FINRA), Securities Investors Protection
Corp. and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. President
of Nelson Sales and Services Corporation, a marketing and
services company to support affiliated companies.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo F. Sonnenschein (69)
1126 E. 59th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1994
|
|
President Emeritus and Honorary Trustee of the University of
Chicago and the Adam Smith Distinguished Service Professor in
the Department of Economics at the University of Chicago. Prior
to July 2000, President of the University of Chicago.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Trustee of the University of Rochester and a member of
its investment committee. Member of the National Academy of
Sciences, the American Philosophical Society and a fellow of the
American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
|
Trustees and
Officers
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Trust
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Suzanne H. Woolsey, Ph.D. (68)
815 Cumberstone Road
Harwood, MD 20776
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
Chief Communications Officer of the National Academy of
Sciences/National Research Council, an independent, federally
chartered policy institution, from 2001 to November 2003 and
Chief Operating Officer from 1993 to 2001. Prior to 1993,
Executive Director of the Commission on Behavioral and Social
Sciences and Education at the National Academy of
Sciences/National Research Council. From 1980 through 1989,
Partner of Coopers & Lybrand.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Trustee of Changing World Technologies, Inc., an energy
manufacturing company, since July 2008. Director of Fluor Corp.,
an engineering, procurement and construction organization, since
January 2004. Director of Intelligent Medical Devices, Inc., a
symptom based diagnostic tool for physicians and clinical labs.
Director of the Institute for Defense Analyses, a federally
funded research and development center, Director of the German
Marshall Fund of the United States, Director of the Rocky
Mountain Institute and Trustee of California Institute of
Technology and the Colorado College.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
|
Trustees and
Officers
Information continued
|
Interested
Trustee*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Interested
Trustee
|
|
Trust
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Wayne W. Whalen* (70)
155 North Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1989
|
|
Partner in the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, legal counsel to funds in the Fund Complex.
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library
Foundation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
indicated above, prior to February 2008, Ms. Heagy was an
employee of Heidrick and Struggles, an international executive
search firm (Heidrick). Heidrick has been (and may
continue to be) engaged by Morgan Stanley from time to time to
perform executive searches. Such searches have been done by
professionals at Heidrick without any involvement by
Ms. Heagy. Ethical wall procedures exist to ensure that
Ms. Heagy will not have any involvement with any searches
performed by Heidrick for Morgan Stanley. Ms. Heagy does
not receive any compensation, directly or indirectly, for
searches performed by Heidrick for Morgan Stanley.
|
|
*
|
|
Mr.
Whalen is an interested person (within the meaning
of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of certain funds in
the Fund Complex by reason of he and his firm currently
providing legal services as legal counsel to such funds in the
Fund Complex.
|
45
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
Trustees
and Officers
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
Name, Age and
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
Address of
Officer
|
|
Trust
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
Edward C. Wood III (54)
1 Parkview Plaza - Suite 100
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
|
|
President and
Principal Executive
Officer
|
|
Officer
since 2008
|
|
President and Principal Executive Officer of funds in the Fund
Complex since November 2008. Managing Director of Van Kampen
Investments Inc., the Adviser, the Distributor, Van Kampen
Advisors Inc. and Van Kampen Exchange Corp. since December 2003.
Chief Administrative Officer of the Adviser, Van Kampen Advisors
Inc. and Van Kampen Exchange Corp. since December 2002. Chief
Operating Officer of the Distributor since December 2002.
Director of Van Kampen Advisors Inc., the Distributor and Van
Kampen Exchange Corp. since March 2004. Director of the Adviser
since August 2008. Director of Van Kampen Investments Inc. and
Van Kampen Investor Services Inc. since June 2008. Previously,
Director of the Adviser and Van Kampen Investments Inc. from
March 2004 to January 2005 and Chief Administrative Officer of
Van Kampen Investments Inc. from 2002 to 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Klingert (47)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Officer
since 2008
|
|
Vice President of funds in the Fund Complex since May 2008.
Head, Chief Operating Officer and acting Chief Investment
Officer of the Global Fixed Income Group of Morgan Stanley
Investment Management Inc. and Morgan Stanley Investment
Advisors Inc. since April 2008. Head of Global Liquidity
Portfolio Management and co-Head of Liquidity Credit Research of
Morgan Stanley Investment Management since December 2007.
Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.
and Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc. from December 2007
to March 2008. Previously, Managing Director on the Management
Committee and head of Municipal Portfolio Management and
Liquidity at BlackRock from October 1991 to January 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stefanie V. Chang Yu (43)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Vice President
and Secretary
|
|
Officer
since 2003
|
|
Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.
Vice President and Secretary of funds in the Fund Complex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John L. Sullivan (54)
1 Parkview Plaza - Suite 100
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
|
|
Chief Compliance
Officer
|
|
Officer
since 1998
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer of funds in the Fund Complex since
August 2004. Prior to August 2004, Director and Managing
Director of Van Kampen Investments, the Adviser,
Van Kampen Advisors Inc. and certain other subsidiaries of
Van Kampen Investments, Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of funds in the Fund Complex and head of
Fund Accounting for Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.
Prior to December 2002, Executive Director of Van Kampen
Investments, the Adviser and Van Kampen Advisors Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
|
Trustees and
Officers
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
Name, Age and
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
Address of
Officer
|
|
Trust
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
Stuart N. Schuldt (48)
1 Parkview Plaza - Suite 100
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
|
|
Officer
since 2007
|
|
Executive Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.
since June 2007. Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of funds
in the Fund Complex since June 2007. Prior to June 2007, Senior
Vice President of Northern Trust Company, Treasurer and
Principal Financial Officer for Northern Trust U.S. mutual fund
complex.
|
In accordance with Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock
Exchange Listed Company Manual, the Trusts Chief Executive
Officer has certified to the New York Stock Exchange that, as of
July 28, 2009, he was not aware of any violation by the
Trust of NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
The certifications by the Trusts principal executive
officer and principal financial officer required by
Rule 30a-2 under the 1940 Act were filed with the
Trusts report to the SEC on Form N-CSR and are
available on the Securities and Exchange Commissions web
site at http://www.sec.gov.
47
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
An Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S.
Privacy Policy
We are required by
federal law to provide you with a copy of our privacy policy
(Policy) annually.
This Policy applies
to current and former individual clients of certain
Van Kampen closed-end funds and related companies.
This Policy is not
applicable to partnerships, corporations, trusts or other
non-individual clients or account holders, nor is this Policy
applicable to individuals who are either beneficiaries of a
trust for which we serve as trustee or participants in an
employee benefit plan administered or advised by us. This Policy
is, however, applicable to individuals who select us to be a
custodian of securities or assets in individual retirement
accounts, 401(k) accounts, 529 Educational Savings
Accounts, accounts subject to the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act,
or similar accounts. We may amend this Policy at any time, and
will inform you of any changes to this Policy as required by
law.
We Respect Your
Privacy
We appreciate that
you have provided us with your personal financial information
and understand your concerns about safeguarding such
information. We strive to maintain the privacy of such
information while we help you achieve your financial objectives.
This Policy describes what nonpublic personal information we
collect about you, how we collect it, when we may share it with
others, and how others may use it. It discusses the steps you
may take to limit our sharing of information about you with
affiliated Van Kampen companies (affiliated
companies). It also discloses how you may limit our
affiliates use of shared information for marketing
purposes. Throughout this Policy, we refer to the nonpublic
information that personally identifies you or your accounts as
personal information.
1. What
Personal Information Do We Collect About
You?
To better serve you
and manage our business, it is important that we collect and
maintain accurate information about you. We obtain this
information from applications and other forms you submit to us,
from your dealings with us, from consumer reporting agencies,
from our websites and from third parties and other sources. For
example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
We collect
information such as your name, address,
e-mail
address, telephone/fax numbers, assets, income and investment
objectives through application forms you submit to us.
|
|
(continued
on next page)
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
An Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S. Privacy Policy continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may obtain
information about account balances, your use of account(s) and
the types of products and services you prefer to receive from us
through your dealings and transactions with us and other sources.
|
|
|
|
|
We may obtain
information about your creditworthiness and credit history from
consumer reporting agencies.
|
|
|
|
|
We may collect
background information from and through third-party vendors to
verify representations you have made and to comply with various
regulatory requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
If you interact with
us through our public and private Web sites, we may collect
information that you provide directly through online
communications (such as an
e-mail
address). We may also collect information about your Internet
service provider, your domain name, your computers
operating system and Web browser, your use of our Web sites and
your product and service preferences, through the use of
cookies. Cookies recognize your computer
each time you return to one of our sites, and help to improve
our sites content and personalize your experience on our
sites by, for example, suggesting offerings that may interest
you. Please consult the Terms of Use of these sites for more
details on our use of cookies.
|
|
2. When Do
We Disclose Personal Information We Collect About
You?
To provide you with
the products and services you request, to better serve you, to
manage our business and as otherwise required or permitted by
law, we may disclose personal information we collect about you
to other affiliated companies and to nonaffiliated third
parties.
a. Information
We Disclose to Our Affiliated
Companies. In
order to manage your account(s) effectively, including servicing
and processing your transactions, to let you know about products
and services offered by us and affiliated companies, to manage
our business, and as otherwise required or permitted by law, we
may disclose personal information about you to other affiliated
companies. Offers for products and services from affiliated
companies are developed under conditions designed to safeguard
your personal information.
b. Information
We Disclose to Third
Parties. We
do not disclose personal information that we collect about you
to nonaffiliated third parties except to enable them to provide
marketing services on our behalf, to perform joint marketing
agreements with other financial institutions, and as otherwise
required or permitted by law. For example, some instances where
we may disclose information about you to third
(continued
on next page)
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
An Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S. Privacy Policy continued
parties include: for
servicing and processing transactions, to offer our own products
and services, to protect against fraud, for institutional risk
control, to respond to judicial process or to perform services
on our behalf. When we share personal information with a
nonaffiliated third party, they are required to limit their use
of personal information about you to the particular purpose for
which it was shared and they are not allowed to share personal
information about you with others except to fulfill that limited
purpose or as may be required by law.
3. How Do We
Protect The Security and Confidentiality Of Personal Information
We Collect About
You?
We maintain
physical, electronic and procedural security measures to help
safeguard the personal information we collect about you. We have
internal policies governing the proper handling of client
information. Third parties that provide support or marketing
services on our behalf may also receive personal information
about you, and we require them to adhere to confidentiality
standards with respect to such information.
4. How Can
You Limit Our Sharing Of Certain Personal Information About You
With Our Affiliated Companies For Eligibility
Determination?
We respect your
privacy and offer you choices as to whether we share with our
affiliated companies personal information that was collected to
determine your eligibility for products and services such as
credit reports and other information that you have provided to
us or that we may obtain from third parties (eligibility
information). Please note that, even if you direct us not
to share certain eligibility information with our affiliated
companies, we may still share your personal information,
including eligibility information, with those companies under
circumstances that are permitted under applicable law, such as
to process transactions or to service your account. We may also
share certain other types of personal information with
affiliated companiessuch as your name, address, telephone
number,
e-mail
address and account number(s), and information about your
transactions and experiences with us.
5. How Can
You Limit the Use of Certain Personal Information About You by
our Affiliated Companies for
Marketing?
You may limit our
affiliated companies from using certain personal information
about you that we may share with them for marketing their
products or services to you. This information includes our
transactions and other experiences with you such as your
(continued
on next page)
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
An Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S. Privacy Policy continued
assets and account
history. Please note that, even if you choose to limit our
affiliated companies from using certain personal information
about you that we may share with them for marketing their
products and services to you, we may still share such personal
information about you with them, including our transactions and
experiences with you, for other purposes as permitted under
applicable law.
6. How Can
You Send Us an Opt-Out
Instruction?
If you wish to limit
our sharing of certain personal information about you with our
affiliated companies for eligibility purposes and
for our affiliated companies use in marketing products and
services to you as described in this notice, you may do so by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calling us at
(800) 341-2929
Monday-Friday between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. (EST)
|
|
|
|
|
Writing to us at the
following address:
Van Kampen Closed-End Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
|
|
If you choose to
write to us, your written request should include: your name,
address, telephone number and account number(s) to which the
opt-out applies and should not be sent with any other
correspondence. In order to process your request, we require
that the request be provided by you directly and not through a
third party. Once you have informed us about your privacy
preferences, your opt-out preference will remain in effect with
respect to this Policy (as it may be amended) until you notify
us otherwise. If you are a joint account owner, we will accept
instructions from any one of you and apply those instructions to
the entire account. Please allow approximately 30 days from
our receipt of your opt-out for your instructions to become
effective.
Please understand
that if you opt-out, you and any joint account holders may not
receive certain Van Kampen or our affiliated
companies products and services that could help you manage
your financial resources and achieve your investment objectives.
If you have more
than one account with us or our affiliates, you may receive
multiple privacy policies from us, and would need to follow the
directions stated in each particular policy for each account you
have with us.
(continued
on back)
Van
Kampen High Income Trust II
An Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S. Privacy Policy continued
SPECIAL NOTICE TO
RESIDENTS OF
VERMONT
This section
supplements our Policy with respect to our individual clients
who have a Vermont address and supersedes anything to the
contrary in the above Policy with respect to those clients
only.
The State of Vermont
requires financial institutions to obtain your consent prior to
sharing personal information that they collect about you with
affiliated companies and nonaffiliated third parties other than
in certain limited circumstances. Except as permitted by law, we
will not share personal information we collect about you with
nonaffiliated third parties or other affiliated companies unless
you provide us with your written consent to share such
information (opt-in).
If you wish to
receive offers for investment products and services offered by
or through other affiliated companies, please notify us in
writing at the following address:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van Kampen
Closed-End Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
|
|
Your authorization
should include: your name, address, telephone number and account
number(s) to which the opt-in applies and should not be sent
with any other correspondence. In order to process your
authorization, we require that the authorization be provided by
you directly and not through a third-party.
522
Fifth Avenue
New
York, New York 10036
www.vankampen.com
Copyright
©2010
Van Kampen Funds Inc.
All
rights reserved. Member FINRA/SIPC
902,
911, 104
VLTANN
02/10
IU10-00578P-Y12/09
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
(a) |
|
The Trust has adopted a code of ethics (the Code of Ethics) that applies to its principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or
persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the
Trust or a third party. |
|
(b) |
|
No information need be disclosed pursuant to this paragraph. |
|
(c) |
|
Due to personnel changes at the Adviser, the general counsels designee set forth in Exhibit
C was amended in April 2009. Both editions of Exhibit C are attached. |
|
(d) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
(e) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
(f) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Trusts Code of Ethics is attached hereto as Exhibit 12(1). |
|
|
(2) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Not applicable. |
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Trusts Board of Trustees has determined that it has three audit committee financial experts
serving on its audit committee, each of whom are independent Trustees : Rod Dammeyer, Jerry
Choate and R. Craig Kennedy. Under applicable securities laws, a person who is determined to be an
audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an expert for any purpose, including without
limitation for the purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as a result of being
designated or identified as an audit committee financial expert. The designation or identification
of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties,
obligations, or liabilities that are greater than the duties, obligations, and liabilities imposed
on such person as a member of the audit committee and Board of Trustees in the absence of such
designation or identification.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a)(b)(c)(d) and (g). Based on fees billed for the periods shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Registrant |
|
Covered Entities(1) |
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
51,745 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Audit Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
$ |
830 |
(4) |
|
$ |
215,000 |
(2) |
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
2,750 |
(3) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Total Non-Audit Fees |
|
$ |
3,580 |
|
|
$ |
215,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
55,325 |
|
|
$ |
215,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Registrant |
|
Covered Entities(1) |
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
51,745 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Audit Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
$ |
830 |
(4) |
|
$ |
244,200 |
(2) |
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
1,650 |
(3) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Total Non-Audit Fees |
|
$ |
2,480 |
|
|
$ |
244,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
54,225 |
|
|
$ |
244,200 |
|
|
|
|
N/A- Not applicable, as not required by Item 4. |
|
(1) |
|
Covered Entities include the Adviser (excluding sub-advisors) and
any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser
that provides ongoing services to the Registrant. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-Related Fees represent assurance and related services provided
that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the financial
statements of the Covered Entities and funds advised by the Adviser or its
affiliates, specifically attestation services provided in connection with a SAS
70 Report. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax Fees represent tax advice and compliance services provided in
connection with the review of the Registrants tax. |
|
(4) |
|
Audit-Related Fees represent agreed upon procedures provided that are
reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the financial statements
of the Registrant. |
(e)(1) The audit committees pre-approval policies and procedures are as follows:
JOINT AUDIT COMMITTEE
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
PRE-APPROVAL POLICY AND PROCEDURES
OF THE
VAN KAMPEN FUNDS
AS ADOPTED JULY 23, 2003 AND AMENDED MAY 26, 20041
1. STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES
The Audit Committee of the Board is required to review and, in its sole discretion,
pre-approve all Covered Services to be provided by the Independent Auditors to the Fund and Covered
Entities in order to assure that services performed by the Independent Auditors do not impair the
auditors independence from the Fund.2
The SEC has issued rules specifying the types of services that an independent auditor may not
provide to its audit client, as well as the audit committees administration of the engagement of
the independent auditor. The SECs rules establish two different approaches to pre-approving
services, which the SEC considers to be equally valid. Proposed services either: may be
pre-approved without consideration of specific case-by-case services by the Audit Committee
(general pre-approval); or require the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee
(specific pre-approval). The Audit Committee believes that the combination of these two
approaches in this Policy will result in an effective and efficient procedure to pre-approve
services performed by the Independent Auditors. As set forth in this Policy, unless a type of
service has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit
Committee (or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval authority has been
delegated) if it is to be provided by the Independent Auditors. Any proposed services exceeding
pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit
Committee.
For both types of pre-approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are
consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will also consider
whether the Independent Auditors are best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient
services, for reasons such as its familiarity with the Funds business, people, culture, accounting
systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance the Funds ability
to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole,
and no one factor should necessarily be determinative.
The Audit Committee is also mindful of the relationship between fees for audit and non-audit
services in deciding whether to pre-approve any such services and may determine for each fiscal
year, the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for Audit, Audit-related and Tax
services for the Fund (including any Audit-related or Tax service fees for Covered Entities that
were subject to pre-approval), and the total amount of fees for certain permissible non-audit
services classified as All Other services for the Fund (including any such services for Covered
Entities subject to pre-approval).
The appendices to this Policy describe the Audit, Audit-related, Tax and All Other services
that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of any general pre-approval is
12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee considers and provides a
different period and states otherwise. The Audit Committee will annually review and pre-approve the
services that may be provided by the Independent Auditors without obtaining specific pre-approval
|
|
|
1 |
|
This Joint Audit Committee Audit and
Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures (the Policy),
amended as of the date above, supercedes and replaces all prior versions that
may have been amended from time to time. |
|
2 |
|
Terms used in this Policy and not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meanings as defined in the Joint Audit
Committee Charter. |
from the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will add to or subtract from the list of general
pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations.
The purpose of this Policy is to set forth the policy and procedures by which the Audit
Committee intends to fulfill its responsibilities. It does not delegate the Audit Committees
responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the Independent Auditors to management.
The Funds Independent Auditors have reviewed this Policy and believes that implementation of
the Policy will not adversely affect the Independent Auditors independence.
2. Delegation
As provided in the Act and the SECs rules, the Audit Committee may delegate either type of
pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is
delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit
Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
3. Audit Services
The annual Audit services engagement terms and fees are subject to the specific pre-approval
of the Audit Committee. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit and other
procedures required to be performed by the Independent Auditors to be able to form an opinion on
the Funds financial statements. These other procedures include information systems and procedural
reviews and testing performed in order to understand and place reliance on the systems of internal
control, and consultations relating to the audit. The Audit Committee will monitor the Audit
services engagement as necessary, but no less than on a quarterly basis, and will also approve, if
necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, Fund
structure or other items.
In addition to the annual Audit services engagement approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit
Committee may grant general pre-approval to other Audit services, which are those services that
only the Independent Auditors reasonably can provide. Other Audit services may include statutory
audits and services associated with SEC registration statements (on Forms N-1A, N-2, N-3, N-4,
etc.), periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in
connection with securities offerings.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the Audit services in Appendix B.1. All other Audit
services not listed in Appendix B.1 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or by
any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
4. Audit-related Services
Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the
performance of the audit or review of the Funds financial statements or, to the extent they are
Covered Services, the Covered Entities financial statements, or that are traditionally performed
by the Independent Auditors. Because the Audit Committee believes that the provision of
Audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor and is consistent with the
SECs rules on auditor independence, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to
Audit-related services. Audit-related services include, among others, accounting consultations
related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as Audit
services; assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting
guidance from rulemaking authorities; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to
accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or
regulatory reporting matters; and assistance with internal control reporting requirements under
Forms N-SAR and/or N-CSR.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the Audit-related services in Appendix B.2. All other
Audit-related services not listed in Appendix B.2 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit
Committee (or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
5. Tax Services
The Audit Committee believes that the Independent Auditors can provide Tax services to the
Fund and, to the extent they are Covered Services, the Covered Entities, such as tax compliance,
tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditors independence, and the SEC has stated
that the Independent Auditors may provide such services. Hence, the Audit Committee believes it may
grant general pre-approval to those Tax services that have historically been provided by the
Independent Auditors, that the Audit Committee has reviewed and believes would not impair the
independence of the Independent Auditors, and that are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor
independence. The Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the Independent Auditors in
connection with a transaction initially recommended by the Independent Auditors, the sole business
purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the
Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee will consult with Director of
Tax or outside counsel to determine that the tax planning and reporting positions are consistent
with this policy.
Pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the Tax Services in
Appendix B.3. All Tax services involving large and complex transactions not listed in Appendix B.3
must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or by any member of the Audit Committee
to which pre-approval has been delegated), including tax services proposed to be provided by the
Independent Auditors to any executive officer or trustee/director/managing general partner of the
Fund, in his or her individual capacity, where such services are paid for by the Fund (generally
applicable only to internally managed investment companies).
6. All Other Services
The Audit Committee believes, based on the SECs rules prohibiting the Independent Auditors
from providing specific non-audit services, that other types of non-audit services are permitted.
Accordingly, the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre-approval to those permissible
non-audit services classified as All Other services that it believes are routine and recurring
services, would not impair the independence of the auditor and are consistent with the SECs rules
on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the All Other services in Appendix B.4. Permissible All
Other services not listed in Appendix B.4 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee
(or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
A list of the SECs prohibited non-audit services is attached to this policy as Appendix B.5.
The SECs rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of
these services and the applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.
7. Pre-Approval Fee Levels or Budgeted Amounts
Pre-approval fee levels or budgeted amounts for all services to be provided by the Independent
Auditors will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding
these levels or amounts will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee is mindful of the overall relationship of fees for audit and non-audit services in
determining whether to pre-approve any such services. For each fiscal year, the Audit Committee may
determine the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for Audit, Audit-related, and Tax
services for the Fund (including any Audit-related or Tax services fees for Covered Entities
subject to pre-approval), and the total amount of fees for certain permissible non-audit services
classified as All Other services for the Fund (including any such services for Covered Entities
subject to pre-approval).
8. Procedures
All requests or applications for services to be provided by the Independent Auditors that do
not require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Funds Chief
Financial Officer and must include a detailed description of the services to be rendered. The
Funds Chief Financial Officer will determine whether such services are included within the list of
services that have received the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee
will be informed on a timely basis of any such services rendered by the Independent Auditors.
Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee
will be submitted to the Audit Committee by both the Independent Auditors and the Funds Chief
Financial Officer, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request or
application is consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has designated the Funds Chief Financial Officer to monitor the
performance of all services provided by the Independent Auditors and to determine whether such
services are in compliance with this Policy. The Funds Chief Financial Officer will report to the
Audit Committee on a periodic basis on the results of its monitoring. A sample report is included
as Appendix B.7. Both the Funds Chief Financial Officer and management will immediately report to
the chairman of the Audit Committee any breach of this Policy that comes to the attention of the
Funds Chief Financial Officer or any member of management.
9. Additional Requirements
The Audit Committee has determined to take additional measures on an annual basis to meet its
responsibility to oversee the work of the Independent Auditors and to assure the auditors
independence from the Fund, such as reviewing a formal written statement from the Independent
Auditors delineating all relationships between the Independent Auditors and the Fund, consistent
with Independence Standards Board No. 1, and discussing with the Independent Auditors its methods
and procedures for ensuring independence.
10. Covered Entities
Covered Entities include the Funds investment adviser(s) and any entity controlling,
controlled by or under common control with the Funds investment adviser(s) that provides ongoing
services to the Fund(s). Beginning with non-audit service contracts entered into on or after May 6,
2003, the Funds audit committee must pre-approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund
but also to the Covered Entities if the engagements relate directly to the operations and financial
reporting of the Fund. This list of Covered Entities would include:
|
|
|
Van Kampen Investments Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Van Kampen Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
Van Kampen Advisors Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Van Kampen Funds Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Van Kampen Investor Services Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley Trust Company |
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Company |
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley Asset & Investment Trust Management Company Ltd. |
(e)(2) Beginning with non-audit service contracts entered into on or after May 6, 2003, the audit
committee also is required to pre-approve services to Covered Entities to the extent that the
services
are determined to have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the Registrant.
100% of such services were pre-approved by the audit committee pursuant to the Audit Committees
pre-approval policies and procedures (included herein).
(f) Not applicable.
(g) See table above.
(h) The audit committee of the Board of Trustees has considered whether the provision of
services other than audit services performed by the auditors to the Registrant and Covered Entities
is compatible with maintaining the auditors independence in performing audit services.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
(a) The Trust has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act whose members are: Craig Kennedy, Jerry Choate and Rod
Dammeyer.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
(a) Please refer to Item #1.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies.
The Trusts and its investment advisors Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures are as follows:
MORGAN STANLEY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES
I. POLICY STATEMENT
Introduction Morgan Stanley Investment Managements (MSIM) policy and procedures for
voting proxies (Policy) with respect to securities held in the accounts of clients applies to
those MSIM entities that provide discretionary investment management services and for which an MSIM
entity has authority to vote proxies. This Policy is reviewed and updated as necessary to address
new and evolving proxy voting issues and standards.
The MSIM entities covered by this Policy currently include the following: Morgan Stanley Investment
Advisors Inc., Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP, Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., Morgan Stanley
Investment Management Limited, Morgan Stanley Investment Management Company, Morgan Stanley Asset &
Investment Trust Management Co., Limited, Morgan Stanley Investment Management Private Limited, Van
Kampen Asset Management, and Van Kampen Advisors Inc. (each an MSIM Affiliate and collectively
referred to as the MSIM Affiliates or as we below).
Each MSIM Affiliate will use its best efforts to vote proxies as part of its authority to manage,
acquire and dispose of account assets. With respect to the MSIM registered management investment
companies (Van Kampen, Institutional and Advisor Fundscollectively referred to herein as the
MSIM Funds), each MSIM Affiliate will vote proxies under this Policy pursuant to authority
granted under its applicable investment advisory agreement or, in the absence of such authority, as
authorized by the Board of Directors/Trustees of the MSIM Funds. An MSIM Affiliate will not vote
proxies if the named fiduciary for an ERISA account has reserved the authority for itself, or in
the case of an account not governed by ERISA, the investment management or investment advisory
agreement does not authorize the MSIM Affiliate to vote proxies. MSIM Affiliates will vote proxies
in a prudent and diligent manner and in the best interests of clients, including beneficiaries of
and participants in a clients benefit plan(s) for which the MSIM Affiliates manage assets,
consistent with the objective of maximizing long-term investment returns (Client Proxy Standard).
In certain situations, a client or its fiduciary may provide an MSIM Affiliate with a proxy voting
policy. In these situations, the MSIM Affiliate will comply with the clients policy.
Proxy Research Services RiskMetrics Group ISS Governance Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis
(together with other proxy research providers as we may retain from time to time, the Research
Providers) are independent advisers that specialize in providing a variety of fiduciary-level
proxy-related services to institutional investment managers, plan sponsors, custodians,
consultants, and other institutional investors. The services provided include in-depth research,
global issuer analysis, and voting recommendations. While we may review and utilize the
recommendations of the Research Providers in making proxy voting decisions, we are in no way
obligated to follow such recommendations. In addition to research, ISS provides vote execution,
reporting, and recordkeeping.
Voting Proxies for Certain Non-U.S. Companies Voting proxies of companies located in some
jurisdictions, particularly emerging markets, may involve several problems that can restrict or
prevent the ability to vote such proxies or entail significant costs. These problems include, but
are not limited to: (i) proxy statements and ballots being written in a language other than
English; (ii) untimely and/or inadequate notice of shareholder meetings; (iii) restrictions on the
ability of holders outside the issuers jurisdiction of organization to exercise votes; (iv)
requirements to vote proxies in person; (v) the imposition of restrictions on the sale of the
securities for a period of time in proximity to the shareholder meeting; and (vi) requirements to
provide local agents with power of attorney to facilitate our voting instructions. As a result, we
vote clients non-U.S. proxies on a best efforts basis only, after weighing the costs and benefits
of voting such proxies, consistent with the Client Proxy Standard. ISS has been retained to
provide assistance in connection with voting non-U.S. proxies.
II. GENERAL PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES
To promote consistency in voting proxies on behalf of its clients, we follow this Policy (subject
to any exception set forth herein), including the guidelines set forth below. These guidelines
address a broad range of issues, and provide general voting parameters on proposals that arise most
frequently. However, details of specific proposals vary, and those details affect particular
voting decisions, as do factors specific to a given company. Pursuant to the procedures set forth
herein, we may vote in a manner that is not in accordance with the following general guidelines,
provided the vote is approved by the Proxy Review Committee (see Section III for description) and
is consistent with the Client Proxy Standard. Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP will follow the procedures
as described in Appendix A.
We endeavor to integrate governance and proxy voting policy with investment goals and to follow the
Client Proxy Standard for each client. At times, this may result in split votes, for example when
different clients have varying economic interests in the outcome of a particular voting matter
(such as a case in which varied ownership interests in two companies involved in a merger result in
different stakes in the outcome). We also may split votes at times based on differing views of
portfolio managers, but such a split vote must be approved by the Proxy Review Committee.
We may abstain on matters for which disclosure is inadequate.
A. Routine Matters. We generally support routine management proposals. The following are examples
of routine management proposals:
|
|
|
Approval of financial statements and auditor reports. |
|
|
|
|
General updating/corrective amendments to the charter, articles of association or
bylaws. |
|
|
|
|
Most proposals related to the conduct of the annual meeting, with the following
exceptions. We generally oppose proposals that relate to the transaction of such other
business which may come before the meeting, and open-ended requests for adjournment.
However, where management specifically states the reason for requesting an adjournment and
the requested |
|
|
|
adjournment would facilitate passage of a proposal that would otherwise be supported under
this Policy (i.e. an uncontested corporate transaction), the adjournment request will be
supported. |
We generally support shareholder proposals advocating confidential voting procedures and
independent tabulation of voting results.
B. Board of Directors
|
1. |
|
Election of directors: In the absence of a proxy contest, we generally support
the boards nominees for director except as follows: |
|
a. |
|
We consider withholding support from or voting against interested
directors if the companys board does not meet market standards for director
independence, or if otherwise we believe board independence is insufficient. We
refer to prevalent market standards as promulgated by a stock exchange or other
authority within a given market (e.g., New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq rules for
most U.S. companies, and The Combined Code on Corporate Governance in the United
Kingdom). Thus, for an NYSE company with no controlling shareholder, we would
expect that at a minimum a majority of directors should be independent as defined
by NYSE. Where we view market standards as inadequate, we may withhold votes based
on stronger independence standards. Market standards notwithstanding, we generally
do not view long board tenure alone as a basis to classify a director as
non-independent, although lack of board turnover and fresh perspective can be a
negative factor in voting on directors. |
|
i. |
|
At a company with a shareholder or group that
controls the company by virtue of a majority economic interest in the
company, we have a reduced expectation for board independence, although
we believe the presence of independent directors can be helpful,
particularly in staffing the audit committee, and at times we may
withhold support from or vote against a nominee on the view the board or
its committees are not sufficiently independent. |
|
|
ii. |
|
We consider withholding support from or voting
against a nominee if he or she is affiliated with a major shareholder
that has representation on a board disproportionate to its economic
interest. |
|
b. |
|
Depending on market standards, we consider withholding support from or
voting against a nominee who is interested and who is standing for election as a
member of the companys compensation, nominating or audit committee. |
|
|
c. |
|
We consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee if we
believe a direct conflict exists between the interests of the nominee and the
public shareholders, including failure to meet fiduciary standards of care and/or
loyalty. We may oppose directors where we conclude that actions of directors are
unlawful, unethical or negligent. We consider opposing individual board members or
an entire slate if we believe the board is entrenched and/or dealing inadequately
with performance problems, and/or acting with insufficient independence between the
board and management. |
|
|
d. |
|
We consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee
standing for election if the board has not taken action to implement generally
accepted governance practices for which there is a bright line test. For
example, in the context of the U.S. market, failure to eliminate a dead hand or
slow hand poison pills would be seen as a basis for opposing one or more incumbent
nominees. |
|
e. |
|
In markets that encourage designated audit committee financial experts,
we consider voting against members of an audit committee if no members are
designated as such. |
|
|
f. |
|
We consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee who
has failed to attend at least 75% of board meetings within a given year without a
reasonable excuse. |
|
|
g. |
|
We consider withholding support from or voting against a nominee who
serves on the board of directors of more than six companies (excluding investment
companies). We also consider voting against a director who otherwise appears to
have too many commitments to serve adequately on the board of the company. |
|
2. |
|
Board independence: We generally support U.S. shareholder proposals requiring
that a certain percentage (up to
662/3%) of the companys board members be independent
directors, and promoting all-independent audit, compensation and nominating/governance
committees. |
|
|
3. |
|
Board diversity: We consider on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals
urging diversity of board membership with respect to social, religious or ethnic group. |
|
|
4. |
|
Majority voting: We generally support proposals requesting or requiring
majority voting policies in election of directors, so long as there is a carve-out for
plurality voting in the case of contested elections. |
|
|
5. |
|
Proxy access: We consider on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals to
provide procedures for inclusion of shareholder nominees in company proxy statements. |
|
|
6. |
|
Proposals to elect all directors annually: We generally support proposals to
elect all directors annually at public companies (to declassify the Board of Directors)
where such action is supported by the board, and otherwise consider the issue on a
case-by-case basis based in part on overall takeover defenses at a company. |
|
|
7. |
|
Cumulative voting: We generally support proposals to eliminate cumulative
voting in the U.S. market context. (Cumulative voting provides that shareholders may
concentrate their votes for one or a handful of candidates, a system that can enable a
minority bloc to place representation on a board). U.S. proposals to establish cumulative
voting in the election of directors generally will not be supported. |
|
|
8. |
|
Separation of Chairman and CEO positions: We vote on shareholder proposals to
separate the Chairman and CEO positions and/or to appoint a non-executive Chairman based in
part on prevailing practice in particular markets, since the context for such a practice
varies. In many non-U.S. markets, we view separation of the roles as a market standard
practice, and support division of the roles in that context. |
|
|
9. |
|
Director retirement age and term limits: Proposals recommending set director
retirement ages or director term limits are voted on a case-by-case basis. |
|
|
10. |
|
Proposals to limit directors liability and/or broaden indemnification of
directors. Generally, we will support such proposals provided that the officers and
directors are eligible for indemnification and liability protection if they have acted in
good faith on company business and were found innocent of any civil or criminal charges for
duties performed on behalf of the company. |
C. Corporate transactions and proxy fights. We examine proposals relating to mergers, acquisitions
and other special corporate transactions (i.e., takeovers, spin-offs, sales of assets,
reorganizations, restructurings and recapitalizations) on a case-by-case basis. However, proposals
for mergers or other significant transactions that are friendly and approved by the Research
Providers generally will be supported and in those instances will not need to be reviewed by the
Proxy Review
Committee, where there is no portfolio manager objection and where there is no material conflict of
interest. We also analyze proxy contests on a case-by-case basis.
D. Changes in capital structure.
|
1. |
|
We generally support the following: |
|
|
|
Management and shareholder proposals aimed at eliminating unequal voting rights,
assuming fair economic treatment of classes of shares we hold. |
|
|
|
|
Management proposals to increase the authorization of existing classes of common
stock (or securities convertible into common stock) if: (i) a clear business
purpose is stated that we can support and the number of shares requested is
reasonable in relation to the purpose for which authorization is requested; and/or
(ii) the authorization does not exceed 100% of shares currently authorized and at
least 30% of the total new authorization will be outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
Management proposals to create a new class of preferred stock or for issuances
of preferred stock up to 50% of issued capital, unless we have concerns about use
of the authority for anti-takeover purposes. |
|
|
|
|
Management proposals to authorize share repurchase plans, except in some cases
in which we believe there are insufficient protections against use of an
authorization for anti-takeover purposes. |
|
|
|
|
Management proposals to reduce the number of authorized shares of common or
preferred stock, or to eliminate classes of preferred stock. |
|
|
|
|
Management proposals to effect stock splits. |
|
|
|
|
Management proposals to effect reverse stock splits if management
proportionately reduces the authorized share amount set forth in the corporate
charter. Reverse stock splits that do not adjust proportionately to the authorized
share amount generally will be approved if the resulting increase in authorized
shares coincides with the proxy guidelines set forth above for common stock
increases. |
|
|
|
|
Management proposals for higher dividend payouts. |
|
2. |
|
We generally oppose the following (notwithstanding management support): |
|
|
|
Proposals to add classes of stock that would substantially dilute the voting
interests of existing shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
Proposals to increase the authorized or issued number of shares of existing
classes of stock that are unreasonably dilutive, particularly if there are no
preemptive rights for existing shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
Proposals that authorize share issuance at a discount to market rates, except
where authority for such issuance is de minimis, or if there is a special situation
that we believe justifies such authorization (as may be the case, for example, at a
company under severe stress and risk of bankruptcy). |
|
|
|
|
Proposals relating to changes in capitalization by 100% or more. |
We consider on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals to increase dividend payout ratios, in
light of market practice and perceived market weaknesses, as well as individual company payout
history and current circumstances. For example, currently we perceive low payouts to shareholders
as a
concern at some Japanese companies, but may deem a low payout ratio as appropriate for a growth
company making good use of its cash, notwithstanding the broader market concern.
E. Takeover Defenses and Shareholder Rights
|
1. |
|
Shareholder rights plans: We generally support proposals to require
shareholder approval or ratification of shareholder rights plans (poison pills). In voting
on rights plans or similar takeover defenses, we consider on a case-by-case basis whether
the company has demonstrated a need for the defense in the context of promoting long-term
share value; whether provisions of the defense are in line with generally accepted
governance principles; and the specific context if the proposal is made in the midst of a
takeover bid or contest for control. |
|
|
2. |
|
Supermajority voting requirements: We generally oppose requirements for
supermajority votes to amend the charter or bylaws, unless the provisions protect minority
shareholders where there is a large shareholder. In line with this view, in the absence of
a large shareholder we support reasonable shareholder proposals to limit such supermajority
voting requirements. |
|
|
3. |
|
Shareholder rights to call meetings: We consider proposals to enhance
shareholder rights to call meetings on a case-by-case basis. |
|
|
4. |
|
Reincorporation: We consider management and shareholder proposals to
reincorporate to a different jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis. We oppose such
proposals if we believe the main purpose is to take advantage of laws or judicial
precedents that reduce shareholder rights. |
|
|
5. |
|
Anti-greenmail provisions: Proposals relating to the adoption of anti-greenmail
provisions will be supported, provided that the proposal: (i) defines greenmail; (ii)
prohibits buyback offers to large block holders (holders of at least 1% of the outstanding
shares and in certain cases, a greater amount, as determined by the Proxy Review Committee)
not made to all shareholders or not approved by disinterested shareholders; and (iii)
contains no anti-takeover measures or other provisions restricting the rights of
shareholders. |
|
|
6. |
|
Bundled proposals: We may consider opposing or abstaining on proposals if
disparate issues are bundled and presented for a single vote. |
F. Auditors. We generally support management proposals for selection or ratification of
independent auditors. However, we may consider opposing such proposals with reference to incumbent
audit firms if the company has suffered from serious accounting irregularities and we believe
rotation of the audit firm is appropriate, or if fees paid to the auditor for non-audit-related
services are excessive. Generally, to determine if non-audit fees are excessive, a 50% test will
be applied (i.e., non-audit-related fees should be less than 50% of the total fees paid to the
auditor). We generally vote against proposals to indemnify auditors.
G. Executive and Director Remuneration.
|
1. |
|
We generally support the following proposals: |
|
|
|
Proposals for employee equity compensation plans and other employee ownership
plans, provided that our research does not indicate that approval of the plan would
be against shareholder interest. Such approval may be against shareholder interest
if it authorizes excessive dilution and shareholder cost, particularly in the
context of high usage (run rate) of equity compensation in the recent past; or if
there are objectionable plan design and provisions. |
|
|
|
Proposals relating to fees to outside directors, provided the amounts are not
excessive relative to other companies in the country or industry, and provided that
the structure is appropriate within the market context. While stock-based
compensation to outside directors is positive if moderate and appropriately
structured, we are wary of significant stock option awards or other
performance-based awards for outside directors, as well as provisions that could
result in significant forfeiture of value on a directors decision to resign from a
board (such forfeiture can undercut director independence). |
|
|
|
|
Proposals for employee stock purchase plans that permit discounts up to 15%, but
only for grants that are part of a broad-based employee plan, including all
non-executive employees. |
|
|
|
|
Proposals for the establishment of employee retirement and severance plans,
provided that our research does not indicate that approval of the plan would be
against shareholder interest. |
|
2. |
|
Shareholder proposals requiring shareholder approval of all severance
agreements will not be supported, but proposals that require shareholder approval for
agreements in excess of three times the annual compensation (salary and bonus)
generally will be supported. We generally oppose shareholder proposals that would
establish arbitrary caps on pay. We consider on a case-by-case basis shareholder
proposals that seek to limit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERPs), but
support such proposals where we consider SERPs to be excessive. |
|
|
3. |
|
Shareholder proposals advocating stronger and/or particular pay-for-performance
models will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of the merits of
the individual proposal within the context of the particular company and its labor
markets, and the companys current and past practices. While we generally support
emphasis on long-term components of senior executive pay and strong linkage of pay to
performance, we consider whether a proposal may be overly prescriptive, and the impact
of the proposal, if implemented as written, on recruitment and retention. |
|
|
4. |
|
We consider shareholder proposals for U.K.-style advisory votes on pay on a
case-by-case basis. |
|
|
5. |
|
We generally support proposals advocating reasonable senior executive and
director stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements for shares gained in
option exercises. |
|
|
6. |
|
Management proposals effectively to re-price stock options are considered on a
case-by-case basis. Considerations include the companys reasons and justifications
for a re-pricing, the companys competitive position, whether senior executives and
outside directors are excluded, potential cost to shareholders, whether the re-pricing
or share exchange is on a value-for-value basis, and whether vesting requirements are
extended. |
H. Social, Political and Environmental Issues. We consider proposals relating to social, political
and environmental issues on a case-by-case basis to determine whether they will have a financial
impact on shareholder value. However, we generally vote against proposals requesting reports that
are duplicative, related to matters not material to the business, or that would impose unnecessary
or excessive costs. We may abstain from voting on proposals that do not have a readily
determinable financial impact on shareholder value. We generally oppose proposals requiring
adherence to workplace standards that are not required or customary in market(s) to which the
proposals relate.
I. Fund of Funds. Certain Funds advised by an MSIM Affiliate invest only in other MSIM Funds. If
an underlying fund has a shareholder meeting, in order to avoid any potential conflict of interest,
such proposals will be voted in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders of the
underlying fund, unless otherwise determined by the Proxy Review Committee.
III. ADMINISTRATION OF POLICY
The MSIM Proxy Review Committee (the Committee) has overall responsibility for creating and
implementing the Policy, working with an MSIM staff group (the Corporate Governance Team). The
Committee, which is appointed by MSIMs Chief Investment Officer of Global Equities (CIO),
consists of senior investment professionals who represent the different investment disciplines and
geographic locations of the firm. Because proxy voting is an investment responsibility and impacts
shareholder value, and because of their knowledge of companies and markets, portfolio managers and
other members of investment staff play a key role in proxy voting, although the Committee has final
authority over proxy votes.
The Committee Chairperson is the head of the Corporate Governance Team, and is responsible for
identifying issues that require Committee deliberation or ratification. The Corporate Governance
Team, working with advice of investment teams and the Committee, is responsible for voting on
routine items and on matters that can be addressed in line with these Policy guidelines. The
Corporate Governance Team has responsibility for voting case-by-case where guidelines and precedent
provide adequate guidance, and to refer other case-by-case decisions to the Proxy Review Committee.
The Committee will periodically review and have the authority to amend, as necessary, the Policy
and establish and direct voting positions consistent with the Client Proxy Standard.
A. Committee Procedures
The Committee will meet at least monthly to (among other matters) address any outstanding issues
relating to the Policy or its implementation. The Corporate Governance Team will timely communicate
to ISS MSIMs Policy (and any amendments and/or any additional guidelines or procedures the
Committee may adopt).
The Committee will meet on an ad hoc basis to (among other matters): (1) authorize split voting
(i.e., allowing certain shares of the same issuer that are the subject of the same proxy
solicitation and held by one or more MSIM portfolios to be voted differently than other shares)
and/or override voting (i.e., voting all MSIM portfolio shares in a manner contrary to the
Policy); (2) review and approve upcoming votes, as appropriate, for matters for which specific
direction has been provided in this Policy; and (3) determine how to vote matters for which
specific direction has not been provided in this Policy.
Members of the Committee may take into account Research Providers recommendations and research as
well as any other relevant information they may request or receive, including portfolio manager
and/or analyst research, as applicable. Generally, proxies related to securities held in accounts
that are managed pursuant to quantitative, index or index-like strategies (Index Strategies) will
be voted in the same manner as those held in actively managed accounts, unless economic interests
of the accounts differ. Because accounts managed using Index Strategies are passively managed
accounts, research from portfolio managers and/or analysts related to securities held in these
accounts may not be available. If the affected securities are held only in accounts that are
managed pursuant to Index Strategies, and the proxy relates to a matter that is not described in
this Policy, the Committee will consider all available information from the Research Providers, and
to the extent that the holdings are significant, from the portfolio managers and/or analysts.
B. Material Conflicts of Interest
In addition to the procedures discussed above, if the Committee determines that an issue raises a
material conflict of interest, the Committee will request a special committee to review, and
recommend a course of action with respect to, the conflict(s) in question (Special Committee).
The Special Committee shall be comprised of the Chairperson of the Proxy Review Committee, the
Chief Compliance Officer or his/her designee, a senior portfolio manager (if practicable, one who
is a member of the Proxy Review Committee) designated by the Proxy Review Committee, and MSIMs
relevant Chief Investment Officer or his/her designee, and any other persons deemed necessary by
the Chairperson. The Special Committee may request the assistance of MSIMs General Counsel or
his/her designee who will have sole discretion to cast a vote. In addition to the research
provided by Research Providers, the Special Committee may request analysis from MSIM Affiliate
investment professionals and outside sources to the extent it deems appropriate.
C. Identification of Material Conflicts of Interest
A potential material conflict of interest could exist in the following situations, among others:
|
1. |
|
The issuer soliciting the vote is a client of MSIM or an affiliate of MSIM and the vote
is on a material matter affecting the issuer. |
|
|
2. |
|
The proxy relates to Morgan Stanley common stock or any other security issued by Morgan
Stanley or its affiliates except if echo voting is used, as with MSIM Funds, as described
herein. |
|
|
3. |
|
Morgan Stanley has a material pecuniary interest in the matter submitted for a vote
(e.g., acting as a financial advisor to a party to a merger or acquisition for which Morgan
Stanley will be paid a success fee if completed). |
If the Chairperson of the Committee determines that an issue raises a potential material conflict
of interest, depending on the facts and circumstances, the Chairperson will address the issue as
follows:
|
1. |
|
If the matter relates to a topic that is discussed in this Policy, the proposal will be
voted as per the Policy. |
|
|
2. |
|
If the matter is not discussed in this Policy or the Policy indicates that the issue is
to be decided case-by-case, the proposal will be voted in a manner consistent with the
Research Providers, provided that all the Research Providers have the same recommendation,
no portfolio manager objects to that vote, and the vote is consistent with MSIMs Client
Proxy Standard. |
|
|
3. |
|
If the Research Providers recommendations differ, the Chairperson will refer the
matter to the Committee to vote on the proposal. If the Committee determines that an issue
raises a material conflict of interest, the Committee will request a Special Committee to
review and recommend a course of action, as described above. Notwithstanding the above,
the Chairperson of the Committee may request a Special Committee to review a matter at any
time as he/she deems necessary to resolve a conflict. |
D. Proxy Voting Reporting
The Committee and the Special Committee, or their designee(s), will document in writing all of
their decisions and actions, which documentation will be maintained by the Committee and the
Special Committee, or their designee(s), for a period of at least 6 years. To the extent these
decisions relate to a security held by an MSIM Fund, the Committee and Special Committee, or their
designee(s), will report their decisions to each applicable Board of Trustees/Directors of those
Funds at each Boards next regularly scheduled Board meeting. The report will contain information
concerning decisions made by the Committee and Special Committee during the most recently ended
calendar quarter immediately preceding the Board meeting.
The Corporate Governance Team will timely communicate to applicable portfolio managers and to ISS,
decisions of the Committee and Special Committee so that, among other things, ISS will vote proxies
consistent with their decisions.
MSIM will promptly provide a copy of this Policy to any client requesting it. MSIM will also, upon
client request, promptly provide a report indicating how each proxy was voted with respect to
securities held in that clients account.
MSIMs Legal Department is responsible for filing an annual Form N-PX on behalf of each MSIM Fund
for which such filing is required, indicating how all proxies were voted with respect to such
Funds holdings.
APPENDIX A
The following procedures apply to accounts managed by Morgan Stanley AIP GP LP (AIP).
Generally, AIP will follow the guidelines set forth in Section II of MSIMs Proxy Voting Policy and
Procedures. To the extent that such guidelines do not provide specific direction, or AIP
determines that consistent with the Client Proxy Standard, the guidelines should not be followed,
the Proxy Review Committee has delegated the voting authority to vote securities held by accounts
managed by AIP to the Liquid Markets investment team and the Private Markets investment team of
AIP. A summary of decisions made by the investment teams will be made available to the Proxy
Review Committee for its information at the next scheduled meeting of the Proxy Review Committee.
In certain cases, AIP may determine to abstain from determining (or recommending) how a proxy
should be voted (and therefore abstain from voting such proxy or recommending how such proxy should
be voted), such as where the expected cost of giving due consideration to the proxy does not
justify the potential benefits to the affected account(s) that might result from adopting or
rejecting (as the case may be) the measure in question.
Waiver of Voting Rights
For regulatory reasons, AIP may either 1) invest in a class of securities of an underlying fund
(the Fund) that does not provide for voting rights; or 2) waive 100% of its voting rights with
respect to the following:
|
1. |
|
Any rights with respect to the removal or replacement of a director, general partner,
managing member or other person acting in a similar capacity for or on behalf of the Fund
(each individually a Designated Person, and collectively, the Designated Persons),
which may include, but are not limited to, voting on the election or removal of a
Designated Person in the event of such Designated Persons death, disability, insolvency,
bankruptcy, incapacity, or other event requiring a vote of interest holders of the Fund to
remove or replace a Designated Person; and |
|
|
2. |
|
Any rights in connection with a determination to renew, dissolve, liquidate, or
otherwise terminate or continue the Fund, which may include, but are not limited to, voting
on the renewal, dissolution, liquidation, termination or continuance of the Fund upon the
occurrence of an event described in the Funds organizational documents; provided,
however, that, if the Funds organizational documents require the consent of the
Funds general partner or manager, as the case may be, for any such termination or
continuation of the Fund to be effective, then AIP may exercise its voting rights with
respect to such matter. |
APPENDIX B
The following procedures apply to the portion of the Van Kampen Dynamic Credit Opportunities Fund
(VK Fund) sub advised by Avenue Europe International Management, L.P. (Avenue). (The portion
of the VK Fund managed solely by Van Kampen Asset Management will continue to be subject to MSIMs
Policy.)
|
1. |
|
Generally: With respect to Avenues portion of the VK Fund, the Board of
Trustees of the VK Fund will retain sole authority and responsibility for proxy voting.
The Advisers involvement in the voting process of Avenues portion of the VK Fund is a
purely administrative function, and serves to execute and deliver the proxy voting
decisions made by the VK Fund Board in connection with the Avenue portion of the VK Fund,
which may, from time to time, include related administrative tasks such as receiving
proxies, following up on missing proxies, and collecting data related to proxies. As such,
the Adviser shall not be deemed to have voting power or shared voting power with Avenue
with respect to Avenues portion of the Fund. |
|
|
2. |
|
Voting Guidelines: All proxies, with respect to Avenues portion of the VK
Fund, will be considered by the VK Fund Board or such subcommittee as the VK Fund Board may
designate from time to time for determination and voting approval. The VK Board or its
subcommittee will timely communicate to MSIMs Corporate Governance Group its proxy voting
decisions, so that among other things the votes will be effected consistent with the VK
Boards authority. |
|
|
3. |
|
Administration: The VK Board or its subcommittee will meet on an adhoc basis
as may be required from time to time to review proxies that require its review and
determination. The VK Board or its subcommittee will document in writing all of its
decisions and actions which will be maintained by the VK Fund, or its designee(s), for a
period of at least 6 years. If a subcommittee is designated, a summary of decisions made
by such subcommittee will be made available to the full VK Board for its information at its
next scheduled respective meetings. |
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
FUND MANAGEMENT
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. The Fund is managed by members of the Advisers Taxable High
Yield team. The Taxable High Yield team consists of portfolio managers and analysts. The current
members of the team jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds
portfolio are Andrew Findling, an Executive Director of the Adviser, and Dennis M. Schaney, a
Managing Director of the Adviser. Mr. Findling has been associated with the Adviser in an investment
management capacity since October 2008 and began managing the Fund in October 2008. Prior to
October 2008, Mr. Findling was associated with Raven Asset Management as Head Trader from July
2005 to September 2008 and prior to that, he was associated with the High Yield team at BlackRock,
Inc. in various capacities including portfolio manager and trader from 2003 to 2004, assistant portfolio
manager and trader from 2002 to 2003 and assistant trader from 2000 to 2002. Mr. Schaney has been
associated with the Adviser in an investment management capacity since September 2008 and began
managing the Fund in October 2008. Prior to September 2008, Mr. Schaney served as Global Head of
Fixed Income at Credit Suisse Asset Management from October 2003 to April 2007 and prior to that,
he was Head of Leveraged Finance at BlackRock, Inc. from January 1998 to October 2003. All team
members are responsible for the execution of the overall strategy of the Funds portfolio. The
composition of the team may change from time to time.
OTHER ACCOUNTS MANAGED BY THE PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
As of December 31, 2009:
Mr. Schaney managed nine registered investment companies with a total of approximately $1.1 billion in
assets; three pooled investment vehicles other than registered investment companies with a total of
approximately $180.8 million in assets; and five other accounts with a total of approximately $244.6
million in assets. Of these other accounts, one account with a total of approximately $202.4 million in
assets, had performance based fees.
Mr. Findling managed six registered investment companies with a total of approximately $923.1 million in
assets; three pooled investment vehicles other than registered investment companies with a total of
approximately $180.8 million in assets; and three other accounts with a total of approximately $76.3
million in assets.
Because the portfolio managers manages assets for other investment companies, pooled investment
vehicles, and/or other accounts (including institutional clients, pension plans and certain high net worth
individuals), there may be an incentive to favor one client over another resulting in conflicts of interest. For
instance, the Adviser may receive fees from certain accounts that are higher than the fee it receives from
the Fund, or it may receive a performance-based fee on certain accounts. In those instances, the portfolio
manager may have an incentive to favor the higher and/or performance-based fee accounts over the Fund.
In addition, a conflict of interest could exist to the extent the Adviser has proprietary investments in certain
accounts, where portfolio managers have personal investments in certain accounts or when certain accounts
are investment options in the Advisers employee benefits and/or deferred compensation plans. The
portfolio manager may have an incentive to favor these accounts over others. If the Adviser manages
accounts that engage in short sales of securities of the type in which the Fund invests, the Adviser could be
seen as harming the performance of the Fund for the benefit of the accounts engaged in short sales if the
short sales cause the market value of the securities to fall. The Adviser has adopted trade allocation and
other policies and procedures that it believes are reasonably designed to address these and other conflicts of
interest.
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS COMPENSATION STRUCTURE
Portfolio managers receive a combination of base compensation and discretionary compensation,
comprised of a cash bonus and several deferred compensation programs described below. The methodology
used to determine portfolio manager compensation is applied across all accounts managed by the portfolio
manager.
BASE SALARY COMPENSATION. Generally, portfolio managers receive base salary compensation based on the level of their position with the Adviser.
DISCRETIONARY COMPENSATION. In addition to base compensation, portfolio managers may receive discretionary compensation.
Discretionary compensation can include:
- Cash Bonus;
- Morgan Stanleys Long-Term Incentive Compensation Program awards a mandatory program that
defers a portion of discretionary year-end compensation into restricted stock units or other awards based on
Morgan Stanley common stock that are subject to vesting and other conditions;
- Investment Management Alignment Plan (IMAP) awards a mandatory program that defers a portion of
discretionary year-end compensation and notionally invests it in designated funds advised by the Adviser or
its affiliates. The award is subject to vesting and other conditions. Portfolio managers must notionally
invest a minimum of 25% to a maximum of 100% of their IMAP deferral account into a combination of the
designated open-end funds they manage that are included in the IMAP Fund menu. For 2008 awards, a
clawback provision was implemented that could be triggered if the individual engages in conduct
detrimental to the Advisor or its affiliates. F0r 2009 awards, the provision was further strengthened to
allow the Firm to clawback compensation if the Firm realizes losses on certain trading positions,
investments or holdings.
- Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plans voluntary programs that permit certain employees to elect to
defer a portion of their discretionary year-end compensation or notionally invest the deferred amount across
a range of designated investment funds, including funds advised by the Adviser or its affiliates.
Several factors determine discretionary compensation, which can vary by portfolio management team and
circumstances. In order of relative importance, these factors include:
- Investment performance. A portfolio managers compensation is linked to the pre-tax investment
performance of the funds/accounts managed by the portfolio manager. Investment performance is
calculated for one-, three- ,five- and ten-year periods measured against an appropriate securities market
index (or indices) for the funds/accounts managed by the portfolio manager. Other funds/accounts
managed by the same portfolio manager may be measured against this same index and same rankings or
ratings, if appropriate, or against other indices and other rankings or ratings that are deemed more
appropriate given the size and/or style of such funds/accounts as set forth in such funds/accounts
disclosure materials and guidelines. The assets managed by the portfolio manager in funds, pooled
investment vehicles and other accounts are described in Other Accounts Managed by the Portfolio
Manager above. Generally, the greatest weight is placed on the three- and five-year periods.
- Revenues generated by the investment companies, pooled investment vehicles and other accounts managed by the portfolio manager.
- Contribution to the business objectives of the Adviser.
- The dollar amount of assets managed by the portfolio manager.
- Market compensation survey research by independent third parties.
- Other qualitative factors, such as contributions to client objectives.
- Performance of Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., and the overall
performance of the investment team(s) of which the portfolio manager is a member.
SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio managers did not own any shares of the Fund.
Item 9. Purchase of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated
Purchasers.
Not Applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not Applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Trusts principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the
Trusts disclosure controls and procedures are sufficient to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Trust in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, based upon
such officers evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the
filing date of the report.
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(1) The Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers is attached hereto.
(2)(a) A certification for the Principal Executive Officer of the registrant is attached hereto as
part of EX-99.CERT.
(2)(b) A certification for the Principal Financial Officer of the registrant is attached hereto as
part of EX-99.CERT.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act
of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) Van Kampen High Income Trust II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Edward C. Wood III
Edward C. Wood III
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
Date:
|
|
February 18, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment
Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Edward C. Wood III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Edward C. Wood III |
|
|
Title:
|
|
Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
Date:
|
|
February 18, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Stuart N. Schuldt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Stuart N. Schuldt |
|
|
Title:
|
|
Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
Date:
|
|
February 18, 2010 |
|
|