Form 10-Q/A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
(Amendment No. 1)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 27, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 001-32514
DIAMONDROCK HOSPITALITY COMPANY
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
20-1180098 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 800, Bethesda, Maryland
|
|
20817 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(240) 744-1150
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The registrant had 107,972,100 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock outstanding as of
May 5, 2009.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
We are filing this Amendment No.1 (this Amendment) to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 27, 2009 (the Original Form 10-Q), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, on May 5, 2009:
|
|
to amend the certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to the Original
10-Q, which inadvertently omitted certain introductory language of
paragraph 4 of Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, and |
|
|
|
to file as exhibit 10.3 to this Amendment, the Agreement of Limited
Partnership of DiamondRock Hospitality Limited Partnership, dated as
of June 4, 2004 (originally filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File no. 333-123065)) and as
exhibit 10.4 to this Amendment, the Companys Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2007 (originally filed as
an exhibit to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on March 9, 2007), each in its entirety, including all schedules
and exhibits thereto. |
This Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Original Form 10-Q, which continues to speak
as of the date that the Original Form 10-Q was filed. Except as specifically noted above, this
Amendment does not modify or update any disclosures in the Original Form 10-Q. Accordingly, this
Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Original Form 10-Q or modify or
update any disclosures that may have been affected by subsequent events.
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item I. Financial Statements
DIAMONDROCK HOSPITALITY COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of March 27, 2009 and December 31, 2008
(in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost |
|
$ |
2,151,416 |
|
|
$ |
2,146,616 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(245,145 |
) |
|
|
(226,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,906,271 |
|
|
|
1,920,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
28,534 |
|
|
|
30,060 |
|
Due from hotel managers |
|
|
56,562 |
|
|
|
61,062 |
|
Favorable lease assets, net |
|
|
40,444 |
|
|
|
40,619 |
|
Prepaid and other assets |
|
|
31,756 |
|
|
|
33,414 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
14,283 |
|
|
|
13,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,080,992 |
|
|
$ |
2,102,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage debt |
|
$ |
820,352 |
|
|
$ |
821,353 |
|
Senior unsecured credit facility |
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
872,352 |
|
|
|
878,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income related to key money, net |
|
|
20,197 |
|
|
|
20,328 |
|
Unfavorable contract liabilities, net |
|
|
84,007 |
|
|
|
84,403 |
|
Due to hotel managers |
|
|
34,410 |
|
|
|
35,196 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
56,720 |
|
|
|
66,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
195,334 |
|
|
|
206,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000
shares authorized; no shares issued and
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares
authorized; 90,147,100 and 90,050,264 shares
issued and outstanding at March 27, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,101,588 |
|
|
|
1,100,541 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(89,183 |
) |
|
|
(83,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,013,306 |
|
|
|
1,017,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,080,992 |
|
|
$ |
2,102,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 1 -
DIAMONDROCK HOSPITALITY COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Fiscal Quarters Ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 21, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms |
|
$ |
75,116 |
|
|
$ |
85,927 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
36,890 |
|
|
|
40,081 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,538 |
|
|
|
6,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
118,544 |
|
|
|
132,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms |
|
|
19,982 |
|
|
|
21,160 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
26,581 |
|
|
|
28,928 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
4,965 |
|
Other hotel expenses |
|
|
46,024 |
|
|
|
46,453 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
18,717 |
|
|
|
16,687 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
3,769 |
|
|
|
2,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
118,400 |
|
|
|
121,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
11,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expenses (Income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(438 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
11,498 |
|
|
|
10,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
|
11,415 |
|
|
|
10,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income before income taxes |
|
|
(11,271 |
) |
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
5,978 |
|
|
|
3,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(5,293 |
) |
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 2 -
DIAMONDROCK HOSPITALITY COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Fiscal Quarters Ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 21, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(5,293 |
) |
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate depreciation |
|
|
18,717 |
|
|
|
16,687 |
|
Corporate asset depreciation as corporate expenses |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Non-cash ground rent |
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
Non-cash financing costs as interest |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
Amortization of debt premium and unfavorable contract liabilities |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
Amortization of deferred income |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
Due to/from hotel managers |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(8,886 |
) |
|
|
(8,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
13,843 |
|
|
|
19,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel capital expenditures |
|
|
(7,293 |
) |
|
|
(21,542 |
) |
Receipt of deferred key money |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(3,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(7,150 |
) |
|
|
(20,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of credit facility |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Draws on credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Scheduled mortgage debt principal payments |
|
|
(1,002 |
) |
|
|
(680 |
) |
Repurchase of shares |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(22,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
(9,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
(10,699 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
13,830 |
|
|
|
29,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
14,283 |
|
|
$ |
19,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
11,987 |
|
|
$ |
11,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid dividends |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 3 -
DIAMONDROCK HOSPITALITY COMPANY
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Organization
DiamondRock Hospitality Company (the Company) is a lodging-focused real estate company that
owns, as of May 5, 2009, 20 premium hotels and resorts. We are committed to maximizing stockholder
value through investing in premium full-service hotels and, to a lesser extent, premium urban
limited-service hotels located throughout the United States. Our hotels are concentrated in key
gateway cities and in destination resort locations and are all operated under a brand owned by one
of the top three national brand companies (Marriott International, Inc. (Marriott), Starwood
Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. (Starwood) or Hilton Hotels Corporation (Hilton)).
We are owners, as opposed to operators, of hotels. As an owner, we receive all of the
operating profits or losses generated by our hotels, after paying the hotel managers a fee based on
the revenues and profitability of the hotels and reimbursing all of their direct and indirect
operating costs.
As of March 27, 2009, the Company owned 20 hotels, comprising 9,586 rooms, located in the
following markets: Atlanta, Georgia (3); Austin, Texas; Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois
(2); Fort Worth, Texas; Lexington, Kentucky; Los Angeles, California (2); New York, New York (2);
Northern California; Oak Brook, Illinois; Orlando, Florida; Salt Lake City, Utah; Washington D.C.;
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands; and Vail, Colorado.
We conduct our business through a traditional umbrella partnership REIT, or UPREIT, in which
our hotel properties are owned by our operating partnership, DiamondRock Hospitality Limited
Partnership, or subsidiaries of our operating partnership. We are the sole general partner of the
operating partnership and currently own, either directly or indirectly, all of the limited
partnership units of the operating partnership.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
We have condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or
GAAP, in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. We believe the
disclosures made are adequate to prevent the information presented from being misleading. However,
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended December
31, 2008, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 27, 2009.
In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect
all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position as of March 27, 2009, and the
results of our operations and cash flows for the fiscal quarters ended March 27, 2009 and March 21,
2008. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year performance because of the
impact of seasonal and short-term variations.
Our financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Reporting Periods
The results we report in our condensed consolidated statements of operations are based on
results of our hotels reported to us by our hotel managers. Our hotel managers use different
reporting periods. Marriott, the manager of most of our properties, uses a fiscal year ending on
the Friday closest to December 31 and reports twelve weeks of operations for each of the first
three quarters and sixteen or seventeen weeks for the fourth quarter of the year for its domestic
managed hotels. In contrast, Marriott, for its non-domestic hotels (including Frenchmans Reef),
Vail Resorts, manager of the Vail Marriott, Noble Management Group, LLC, manager of the Westin
Atlanta North at Perimeter, Hilton Hotels Corporation, manager of the Conrad Chicago, and Westin
Hotel Management, L.P, manager of the Westin Boston Waterfront Hotel report results on a monthly
basis. Additionally, as a REIT, we are required by U.S. federal tax laws to report results on a
calendar year basis. As a result, we have adopted the reporting periods used by Marriott for its
domestic hotels, except that the fiscal year always ends on December 31 to comply with REIT rules.
The first three fiscal quarters end on the same day as Marriotts fiscal quarters but the fourth
quarter ends on December 31 and the full year results, as reported in the statement of operations,
always include the same number of days as the calendar year.
- 4 -
Two consequences of the reporting cycle we have adopted are: (1) quarterly start dates will
usually differ between years, except for the first quarter which always commences on January 1, and
(2) the first and fourth quarters of operations and year-to-date operations may not include the
same number of days as reflected in prior years.
While the reporting calendar we adopted is more closely aligned with the reporting calendar
used by the manager of most of our properties, one final consequence of the calendar is we are
unable to report any results for Frenchmans Reef, Vail Marriott, Westin Atlanta North at
Perimeter, Conrad Chicago, or Westin Boston Waterfront Hotel for the month of operations that ends
after its fiscal quarter-end because neither Westin Hotel Management, L.P., Hilton Hotels
Corporation, Noble Management Group, LLC, Vail Resorts nor Marriott make mid-month results
available to us. As a result, our quarterly results of operations include results from Frenchmans
Reef, the Vail Marriott, the Westin Atlanta North at Perimeter, the Conrad Chicago, and the Westin
Boston Waterfront Hotel as follows: first quarter (January, February), second quarter (March to
May), third quarter (June to August) and fourth quarter (September to December). While this does
not affect full-year results, it does affect the reporting of quarterly results.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from operations of the hotels are recognized when the services are provided. Revenues
consist of room sales, golf sales, food and beverage sales, and other hotel department revenues,
such as telephone and gift shop sales.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net (loss) income, adjusted for
dividends on unvested stock grants, by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net (loss) income,
adjusted for dividends on unvested stock grants, by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the period plus other potentially dilutive securities such as stock grants or
shares issuable in the event of conversion of operating partnership units. No adjustment is made
for shares that are anti-dilutive during a period.
We implemented the provisions of FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities, which
resulted in no significant impact on current or prior period earnings (loss) per share.
Stock-based Compensation
We account for stock-based employee compensation using the fair value based method of
accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123R),
Share-Based Payment. We record the cost of awards with service conditions based on the grant-date
fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is
required to provide service in exchange for the award. No compensation cost is recognized for
equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. No awards with
performance-based or market-based conditions have been issued.
Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Intangible assets and liabilities are recorded on non-market contracts assumed as part of the
acquisition of certain hotels. We review the terms of agreements assumed in conjunction with the
purchase of a hotel to determine if the terms are favorable or unfavorable compared to an estimated
market agreement at the acquisition date. Favorable lease assets or unfavorable contract
liabilities are recorded at the acquisition date and amortized using the straight-line method over
the term of the agreement. We do not amortize intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, but
review these assets for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that the asset may be
impaired.
Straight-Line Rent
We record rent expense on leases that provide for minimum rental payments that increase in
pre-established amounts over the remaining term of the lease on a straight-line basis as required
by U.S. GAAP.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of
credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. We maintain cash and cash equivalents
with various high credit-quality financial
institutions. We perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these
financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure with any one institution.
- 5 -
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Risks and Uncertainties
The state of the overall economy can significantly impact hotel operational performance and
thus, impact our financial position. Should any of our hotels experience a significant decline in
operational performance, it may affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and
service debt or meet other financial obligations.
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment as of March 27, 2009 (unaudited) and December 31, 2008 consists of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
219,590 |
|
|
$ |
219,590 |
|
Land improvements |
|
|
7,994 |
|
|
|
7,994 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
1,661,710 |
|
|
|
1,658,227 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
260,360 |
|
|
|
259,154 |
|
CIP and corporate office equipment |
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,151,416 |
|
|
|
2,146,616 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(245,145 |
) |
|
|
(226,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,906,271 |
|
|
$ |
1,920,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 27, 2009 we did not have any accrued capital expenditures. As of December 31,
2008, we had accrued capital expenditures of $2.6 million.
4. Capital Stock
Common Shares
We are authorized to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share.
Each outstanding share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to
a vote of stockholders. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends out of assets
legally available for the payment of dividends when authorized by our board of directors.
On April 17, 2009, we completed a follow-on public offering of our common stock. We sold
17,825,000 shares of common stock, including the underwriters overallotment of 2,325,000 shares,
at an offering price of $4.85 per share. The net proceeds to us, after deduction of offering
costs, were approximately $82.1 million.
Preferred Shares
We are authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per
share. Our board of directors is required to set for each class or series of preferred stock the
terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to
dividends or other distributions, qualifications, and terms or conditions of redemption. As of
March 27, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
- 6 -
Operating Partnership Units
Holders of operating partnership units have certain redemption rights, which enable them to
cause our operating partnership to redeem their units in exchange for cash per unit equal to the
market price of our common stock, at the time of redemption, or, at our option for shares of our
common stock on a one-for-one basis. The number of shares issuable upon
exercise of the redemption rights will be adjusted upon the occurrence of stock splits,
mergers, consolidations or similar pro-rata share transactions, which otherwise would have the
effect of diluting the ownership interests of the limited partners or our stockholders. As of
March 27, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were no operating partnership units held by
unaffiliated third parties.
5. Stock Incentive Plans
As of March 27, 2009, we have issued or committed to issue 3,194,151 shares of our common
stock under our 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, including 1,978,595 shares of
unvested restricted common stock and a commitment to issue 466,819 units of deferred common stock.
Restricted Stock Awards
As of March 27, 2009, our officers and employees have been awarded 3,066,967 shares of
restricted common stock, including those shares which have since vested. Shares issued to our
officers and employees vest over a three-year period from the date of the grant based on continued
employment. We measure compensation expense for the restricted stock awards based upon the fair
market value of our common stock at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period and is included in corporate expenses in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
A summary of our restricted stock awards from January 1, 2009 to March 27, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unvested balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
605,809 |
|
|
$ |
13.02 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,515,955 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(135,985 |
) |
|
|
15.29 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7,184 |
) |
|
|
14.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested balance at March 27, 2009 |
|
|
1,978,595 |
|
|
$ |
5.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining share awards are expected to vest as follows: 62,748 shares during 2009, 631,082
shares during 2010, 779,448 shares during 2011 and 505,317 during 2012. As of March 27, 2009, the
unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards was $8.7 million and the
weighted-average period over which the unrecognized compensation expense will be recorded is
approximately 28 months. For the fiscal quarters ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008, we
recorded $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to restricted
stock awards.
Deferred Stock Awards
At the time of our initial public offering, we made a commitment to issue 382,500 shares of
deferred stock units to our senior executive officers. These deferred stock units are fully vested
and represent the promise to issue a number of shares of our common stock to each senior executive
officer upon the earlier of (i) a change of control or (ii) five years after the date of grant,
which was the initial public offering completion date (the Deferral Period). However, if an
executives service with the Company is terminated for cause prior to the expiration of the
Deferral Period, all deferred stock unit awards will be forfeited. The executive officers are
restricted from transferring these shares until the fifth anniversary of the initial public
offering completion date. As of March 27, 2009, we have a commitment to issue 466,819 shares under
this plan. The share commitment increased from 382,500 to 466,819 since our initial public
offering because current dividends are not paid out but instead are effectively reinvested in
additional deferred stock units based on the closing price of our common stock on the dividend
payment date.
Stock Appreciation Rights and Dividend Equivalent Rights
In 2008, we awarded our executive officers stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs)
and dividend equivalent rights (DERs). The SARs/DERs vest over three years based on continued
employment and may be exercised, in whole or in part, at any time after the instrument vests and
before the tenth anniversary of issuance. Upon exercise, the holder of a SAR is entitled to receive
a number of common shares equal to the positive difference, if any, between the closing price of
our common stock on the exercise date and the strike price. The strike price is equal to the
closing price of our common stock on the SAR grant date. We simultaneously issued one DER for each
SAR. The DER entitles the holder to the value of dividends issued on one share of common stock. No
dividends are paid on a DER prior to vesting, but upon vesting, the holder of each DER will receive
a lump sum equal to the cumulative dividends paid per share of common stock from the
grant date through the vesting date. The DER terminates eight years from the grant date. We
measure compensation expense of the SAR/DER awards based upon the fair market value of these awards
at the grant date. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period and is included in corporate expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements
of operations.
- 7 -
As of March 27, 2009, we have awarded 300,225 SARs/DERs to our executive officers with an
aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $2.0 million. For the fiscal quarters ended March
27, 2009 and March 21, 2008, we recorded approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively,
of compensation expense related to the SARs/DERs. A summary of our SARs/DERs as of March 27, 2009
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
SARs/DERs |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
300,225 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 27, 2009 |
|
|
300,225 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-third of the SAR/DER awards vested in 2009 and the remainder are expected to vest as
follows: one-third in 2010 and one-third in 2011. As of March 27, 2009, the unrecognized
compensation cost related to the SAR/DER awards was $1.3 million and the weighted-average period
over which the unrecognized compensation expense will be recorded is approximately 23 months.
6. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net (loss) income available to
common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings
(loss) per share is calculated by dividing net (loss) income available to common stockholders, that
has been adjusted for dilutive securities, by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding including dilutive securities. For the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009, no effect
is shown for the potentially dilutive effect of our restricted stock and SARs, as the impact is
anti-dilutive in periods when we incur a net loss.
The following is a reconciliation of the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 21, 2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) per Share Calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(5,293 |
) |
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
Less: dividends on unvested restricted common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income after dividends on unvested
restricted common stock |
|
$ |
(5,293 |
) |
|
$ |
5,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
90,551,505 |
|
|
|
95,173,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share Calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(5,293 |
) |
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
Less: dividends on unvested restricted common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income after dividends on unvested
restricted common stock |
|
$ |
(5,293 |
) |
|
$ |
5,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
90,551,505 |
|
|
|
95,173,458 |
|
Unvested restricted common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,795 |
|
Unvested SARs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
90,551,505 |
|
|
|
95,288,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 8 -
7. Debt
We have incurred limited recourse, property specific mortgage debt in conjunction with certain
of our hotels. In the event of default, the lender may only foreclose on the pledged assets;
however, in the event of fraud, misapplication of funds and other customary recourse provisions,
the lender may seek payment from us. As of March 27, 2009, 12 of our 20 hotel properties were
secured by mortgage debt. Our mortgage debt contains certain property specific covenants and
restrictions, including minimum debt service coverage ratios that trigger cash management
provisions as well as restrictions on incurring additional debt without lender consent. As of
March 27, 2009, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of our mortgage debt.
The following table sets forth information regarding the Companys debt as of March 27, 2009
(unaudited), in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Courtyard Manhattan / Midtown East |
|
$ |
40,968 |
|
|
|
5.195 |
% |
Marriott Salt Lake City Downtown |
|
|
34,108 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
% |
Courtyard Manhattan / Fifth Avenue |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
% |
Marriott Griffin Gate Resort |
|
|
28,247 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
% |
Renaissance Worthington |
|
|
57,400 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
% |
Frenchmans Reef & Morning Star Marriott |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beach Resort |
|
|
62,029 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
% |
Marriott Los Angeles Airport |
|
|
82,600 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
Orlando Airport Marriott |
|
|
59,000 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
% |
Chicago Marriott Downtown Magnificent Mile |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
5.975 |
% |
Renaissance Austin |
|
|
83,000 |
|
|
|
5.507 |
% |
Renaissance Waverly |
|
|
97,000 |
|
|
|
5.503 |
% |
Bethesda Marriott Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 0.95 (1.45% as of |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
March 27, 2009) |
|
Total mortgage debt |
|
|
820,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 0.95 (1.46% as of |
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
March 27, 2009) |
Total debt |
|
$ |
872,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Interest Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
We are party to a four-year, $200.0 million unsecured credit facility (the Facility)
expiring in February 2011. We may extend the maturity date of the Facility for an additional year
upon the payment of applicable fees and the satisfaction of certain other customary conditions. As
of March 27, 2009, we had a $52 million outstanding balance on the Facility. On April 17, 2009, we
repaid the $52 million outstanding on the Facility.
Interest is paid on the periodic advances under the Facility at varying rates, based upon
either LIBOR or the alternate base rate, plus an agreed upon additional margin amount. The interest
rate depends upon our level of outstanding indebtedness in relation to the value of our assets from
time to time, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio |
|
|
|
60% or Greater |
|
|
55% to 60% |
|
|
50% to 55% |
|
|
Less Than 50% |
|
Alternate base rate margin |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
LIBOR margin |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
The Facility contains various corporate financial covenants. A summary of the most restrictive
covenants is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual at |
|
|
|
Covenant |
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
Maximum leverage ratio(1) |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
42.8 |
% |
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio(2) |
|
|
1.6 |
x |
|
|
2.7 |
x |
Minimum tangible net worth(3) |
|
$738.4 million |
|
|
$1.3 billion |
|
Unhedged floating rate debt as a percentage of total indebtedness |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Maximum leverage ratio is determined by dividing the total debt outstanding
by the net asset value of our corporate assets and hotels. Hotel level net
asset values are calculated based on the application of a contractual
capitalization rate (which range from 7.5% to 8.0%) to the trailing twelve
month hotel net operating income. |
|
(2) |
|
Minimum fixed charge ratio is calculated based on the trailing four quarters. |
|
(3) |
|
Tangible net worth is defined as the gross book value of our real estate
assets and other corporate assets less our total debt and all other corporate
liabilities. |
- 9 -
The Facility requires that we maintain a specific pool of unencumbered borrowing base
properties. The unencumbered borrowing base assets are subject to the following limitations and
covenants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
|
Covenant |
|
|
2009 |
|
Minimum implied debt service ratio |
|
|
1.5 |
x |
|
|
13.01 |
% |
Maximum unencumbered leverage ratio |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Minimum number of unencumbered borrowing base properties |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Minimum unencumbered borrowing base value |
|
$150 million |
|
|
$658.9 million |
|
Percentage of total asset value owned by borrowers or guarantors |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
In addition to the interest payable on amounts outstanding under the Facility, we are required
to pay an amount equal to 0.20% of the unused portion of the Facility if the unused portion of the
Facility is greater than 50% and 0.125% if the unused portion of the Facility is less than 50%. We
incurred interest and unused credit facility fees on the Facility of $0.3 million and $0.2 million
for the fiscal quarters ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008, respectively.
8. Dividends
We have paid quarterly cash dividends to common stockholders at the discretion of our board of
directors. We intend to issue our next dividend to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2009.
The 2009 dividend is intended to be an amount equal to 100% of our 2009 taxable income. Depending
on our 2009 liquidity needs, we may elect to pay a portion of our 2009 dividend in shares of our
common stock, as permitted by the Internal Revenue Services Revenue Procedure 2009-15.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are not involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material
litigation threatened against us. We are involved in routine litigation arising out of the
ordinary course of business, all of which is expected to be covered by insurance and none of which
is expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Income Taxes
We had no accruals for tax uncertainties as of March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008. As of March
27, 2009, all of our federal income tax returns and state tax returns for the jurisdictions in
which our hotels are located remain subject to examination by the respective jurisdiction tax
authorities.
- 10 -
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995 and includes this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions.
These forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of the words believe,
expect, intend, anticipate, estimate, project or similar expressions, whether in the
negative or affirmative. Forward-looking statements are based on managements current expectations
and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance. Factors that may cause actual
results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to, the risk
factors discussed herein and other factors discussed from time to time in our periodic filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Companys
expectations will be realized. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, the
Company disclaims any obligations or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to
any forward-looking statement contained in this report to reflect events, circumstances or changes
in expectations after the date of this report.
Overview
We are a lodging-focused real estate company that owns, as of May 5, 2009, 20 premium hotels
and resorts that contain approximately 9,600 guestrooms. We are committed to maximizing stockholder
value through investing in premium full-service hotels and, to a lesser extent, premium urban
limited-service hotels located throughout the United States. Our hotels are concentrated in key
gateway cities and in destination resort locations and are all operated under a brand owned by one
of the top three national brand companies Marriott, Starwood or Hilton.
We are owners, as opposed to operators, of hotels. As an owner, we receive all of the
operating profits or losses generated by our hotels, after we pay the hotel managers a fee based on
the revenues and profitability of the hotels and reimburse all of their direct and indirect
operating costs.
As an owner, we create value by acquiring the right hotels with the right brands in the right
markets, prudently financing our hotels, thoughtfully re-investing capital in our hotels,
implementing profitable operating strategies, approving the annual operating and capital budgets
for our hotels, closely monitoring the performance of our hotels, and deciding if and when to sell
our hotels. In addition, we are committed to enhancing the value of our operating platform by being
open and transparent in our communications with investors, monitoring our corporate overhead and
following corporate governance best practice.
We differentiate ourselves from our competitors because of our adherence to three basic
principles:
|
|
|
high-quality urban- and resort-focused branded real estate; |
|
|
|
conservative capital structure; and |
|
|
|
thoughtful asset management. |
High-Quality Urban- and Resort-Focused Branded Real Estate
We own 20 premium hotels and resorts in North America. These hotels and resorts are primarily
categorized as upper upscale as defined by Smith Travel Research and are generally located in high
barrier to entry markets with multiple demand generators.
Our properties are concentrated in five key gateway cities (New York City, Los Angeles,
Chicago, Boston and Atlanta) and in destination resort locations (such as the U.S. Virgin Islands
and Vail, Colorado). We believe that gateway cities and destination resorts will achieve higher
long-term growth because they are attractive business and leisure destinations. We also believe
that these locations are better insulated from new supply due to relatively high barriers to entry
and expensive construction costs.
We believe that the higher quality lodging assets create more dynamic cash flow growth and
superior long-term capital appreciation.
- 11 -
In addition, a core tenet of our strategy is to leverage national hotel brands. We strongly
believe in the value of powerful national brands because we believe that they are able to produce
incremental revenue and profits compared to similar unbranded hotels. In particular, we believe
that branded hotels outperform unbranded hotels in an economic
downturn. Dominant national hotel brands typically have very strong reservation and reward
systems and sales organizations, and all of our hotels are operated under a brand owned by one of
the top three national brand companies (Marriott, Starwood or Hilton) and all but two of our hotels
are managed by the brand company directly. Generally, we are interested in owning only those hotels
that are operated under a nationally recognized brand or acquiring hotels that can be converted
into a nationally branded hotel.
Capital Structure
Since our formation in 2004, we have been consistently committed to a flexible capital
structure with prudent leverage levels. During 2004 though early 2007, we took advantage of the low
interest rate environment by fixing our interest rates for an extended period of time. Moreover,
during the recent peak in the commercial real estate market, we maintained low financial leverage
by funding the majority of our acquisitions through the issuance of equity. This strategy allowed
us to maintain a balance sheet with a moderate amount of debt. During the peak years, we believed,
and present events have confirmed, that it would be inappropriate to increase the inherent risk of
a highly cyclical business through a highly levered capital structure.
We believe the current economic environment has confirmed the merits of our financing
strategy. We believe that we maintain a reasonable amount of fixed interest rate mortgage debt with
limited near-term maturities. As of March 27, 2009, we had $872.4 million of debt outstanding,
which consisted of $52.0 million outstanding on our senior unsecured credit facility and
$820.4 million of mortgage debt. We currently have eight hotels, with an aggregate historic cost of
$790 million, which are unencumbered by mortgage debt. As of March 27, 2009, our debt had a
weighted-average interest rate of 5.37% and a weighted-average maturity date of 6.1 years. In
addition, as of March 27, 2009, 93.5% of our debt was fixed rate.
We prefer a relatively simple but efficient capital structure. We have not invested in joint
ventures and have not issued any operating partnership units or preferred stock. We endeavor to
structure our hotel acquisitions so that they will not overly complicate our capital structure;
however, we will consider a more complex transaction if we believe that the projected returns to
our stockholders will significantly exceed the returns that would otherwise be available.
During the current recession, our corporate goals and objectives are focused on preserving and
enhancing our liquidity. We have taken a number of steps to achieve these goals, as follows:
|
|
|
We completed a follow-on public offering of our common stock on April 17, 2009. We sold
17,825,000 shares of common stock, including the underwriters overallotment of 2,325,000
shares, at an offering price of $4.85 per share. The net proceeds to us, after deduction of
offering costs, were approximately $82.1 million. We continue to evaluate our liquidity
needs and financing alternatives, and may choose to sell additional shares of common stock
in the future. |
|
|
|
We repaid the $52 million outstanding on our senior unsecured credit facility on April
17, 2009 with a portion of the proceeds from our follow-on offering. |
|
|
|
We chose to not pay a 2008 fourth quarter dividend and we intend to pay our next dividend
to our stockholders of record as of December 31, 2009. We expect the 2009 dividend will be
in an amount equal to 100% of our 2009 taxable income. |
|
|
|
Depending on our 2009 liquidity needs, we may elect to pay a portion of our 2009 dividend
in shares of our common stock, as permitted by the Internal Revenue Services Revenue
Procedure 2009-15. |
|
|
|
We have significantly curtailed capital spending for 2009 and expect to fund
approximately $10 million in capital expenditures in 2009, compared to an average of
$35 million per year of owner-funded capital expenditures during 2006, 2007 and 2008. |
|
|
|
As previously announced, we continue to evaluate the process regarding the sale of one or
more of our hotels. To date we have not received any bids that we consider attractive
compared to our internal valuation. |
We have only two near-term mortgage debt maturities totaling $68 million. The debt maturities
include $40.2 million coming due on the Courtyard Manhattan/Midtown East on December 11, 2009 and
$27.7 million coming due on the Griffin Gate Marriott in January 2010. We have agreed on terms
with a lender to provide up to $43 million of mortgage debt with a term of five years on the
Courtyard Manhattan/Midtown East and have locked our interest rate at 8.81%. The terms of the loan
are still subject to approval of the lenders credit committee. We cannot provide assurance that
this lender will fund the mortgage debt or that the terms of the loan will be satisfactory to us,
as we have not yet agreed on definitive documentation nor has the lender completed its due
diligence. We are currently assessing the best alternatives to refinance
the Griffin Gate Marriott mortgage debt. Our most likely alternatives include repaying the
mortgage debt with corporate cash or refinancing the mortgage debt with a new mortgage lender.
- 12 -
Thoughtful Asset Management
We believe that we are able to create significant value in our portfolio by utilizing our
managements extensive experience and our innovative asset management strategies. Our senior
management team has an established broad network of hotel industry contacts and relationships,
including relationships with hotel owners, financiers, operators, project managers and contractors
and other key industry participants.
In the current economic environment, we believe that our extensive lodging experience, our
network of industry relationships and our asset management strategies uniquely position us to
minimize the impact of declining revenues on our hotels. In particular, we are focused on
controlling our property-level and corporate expenses, as well as working closely with our managers
to optimize the mix of business at our hotels in order to maximize potential revenue. Our
property-level cost containment includes the implementation of aggressive contingency plans at each
of our hotels. The contingency plans include controlling labor expenses, eliminating hotel staff
positions, adjusting food and beverage outlet hours of operation and not filling open positions. In
addition, our strategy to significantly renovate nearly all of the hotels in our portfolio from
2006 to 2008 resulted in the flexibility to significantly curtail our planned capital expenditures
for 2009 and 2010.
We use our broad network to maximize the value of our hotels. Under the regulations governing
REITs, we are required to engage a hotel manager that is an eligible independent contractor through
one of our subsidiaries to manage each of our hotels pursuant to a management agreement. Our
philosophy is to negotiate management agreements that give us the right to exert significant
influence over the management of our properties, annual budgets and all capital expenditures, and
then to use those rights to continually monitor and improve the performance of our properties. We
cooperatively partner with the managers of our hotels in an attempt to increase operating results
and long-term asset values at our hotels. In addition to working directly with the personnel at our
hotels, our senior management team also has long-standing professional relationships with our hotel
managers senior executives, and we work directly with these senior executives to improve the
performance of our portfolio.
We believe we can create significant value in our portfolio through innovative asset
management strategies such as rebranding, renovating and repositioning. We are committed to
regularly evaluating our portfolio to determine if we can employ these value-added strategies at
our hotels. From 2006 to 2008 we completed a significant amount of capital reinvestment in our
hotels completing projects that ranged from room renovations, to a total renovation and
repositioning of the hotel, to the addition of new meeting space, spa or restaurant repositioning.
In connection with our renovations and repositionings, our senior management team and our asset
managers are individually committed to completing these renovations on time, on budget and with
minimum disruption to our hotels. As we have significantly renovated nearly all of the hotels in
our portfolio, we have chosen to substantially reduce capital expenditures beginning in 2009.
Key Indicators of Financial Condition and Operating Performance
We use a variety of operating and other information to evaluate the financial condition and
operating performance of our business. These key indicators include financial information that is
prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as other financial information that is not prepared in
accordance with GAAP. In addition, we use other information that may not be financial in nature,
including statistical information and comparative data. We use this information to measure the
performance of individual hotels, groups of hotels and/or our business as a whole. We periodically
compare historical information to our internal budgets as well as industry-wide information. These
key indicators include:
|
|
|
Occupancy percentage; |
|
|
|
|
Average Daily Rate (or ADR); |
|
|
|
|
Revenue per Available Room (or RevPAR); |
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (or EBITDA); and |
|
|
|
|
Funds From Operations (or FFO). |
Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR are commonly used measures within the hotel industry to evaluate
operating performance. RevPAR, which is calculated as the product of ADR and occupancy percentage,
is an important statistic for monitoring operating performance at the individual hotel level and
across our business as a whole. We evaluate individual hotel RevPAR performance on an absolute
basis with comparisons to budget and prior periods, as well as on a company-wide and regional
basis. ADR and RevPAR include only room revenue. Room revenue comprised approximately 63% of our
total revenues for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009, and is dictated by demand, as measured
by occupancy percentage, pricing, as measured by ADR, and our available supply of hotel rooms.
Our ADR, occupancy percentage and RevPAR performance may be impacted by macroeconomic factors
such as regional and local employment growth, personal income and corporate earnings, office
vacancy rates and business relocation
decisions, airport and other business and leisure travel, new hotel construction and the
pricing strategies of competitors. In addition, our ADR, occupancy percentage and RevPAR
performance is dependent on the continued success of Marriott and its brands as well as the Westin
and Conrad brands.
- 13 -
We also use EBITDA and FFO as measures of the financial performance of our business. See
Non-GAAP Financial Matters.
Outlook
The United States is currently in the midst of a recession and the operating environment
continues to be very challenging. The decline in GDP, employment, corporate profits, consumer
spending and business investment has and will continue to negatively impact overall lodging demand.
We believe that consumer and commercial spending and lodging demand will continue to decline in
2009. We do not anticipate an improvement in lodging demand until the current economic trends
reverse course, particularly the expected continued weakness in the global economy and the lack of
liquidity in the credit markets.
We believe that the economic slowdown will continue to significantly affect both the group and
transient elements of our business. Based on reservation activity for 2009, we expect that group
demand will continue to decline as companies continue to reduce travel expenditures, which will
lead to increased cancellations, diminished booking activity and reduced attendance at group events
resulting in lower banquet and food and beverage and other revenues. Similarly, the continued
reduction in corporate travel budgets will affect the transient business traveler. The general
economic trends discussed above make it difficult to predict our future operating results. However,
we expect to experience further declines in hotel revenues and profits at our properties.
Our Hotels
The following table sets forth certain operating information for each of our hotels for the
fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from 2008 |
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Rooms |
|
|
(%) |
|
|
ADR($) |
|
|
RevPAR($) |
|
|
RevPAR |
|
Chicago Marriott |
|
Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
% |
|
$ |
152.01 |
|
|
$ |
88.29 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Los Angeles Airport Marriott |
|
Los Angeles, California |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
115.90 |
|
|
|
92.38 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
Westin Boston Waterfront Hotel (1) |
|
Boston, Massachusetts |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
160.95 |
|
|
|
77.70 |
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
Renaissance Waverly Hotel |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
143.51 |
|
|
|
86.90 |
|
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
Salt Lake City Marriott Downtown |
|
Salt Lake City, Utah |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
138.98 |
|
|
|
81.04 |
|
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
Renaissance Worthington |
|
Fort Worth, Texas |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
164.57 |
|
|
|
118.72 |
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
Frenchmans Reef & Morning Star
Marriott Beach Resort (1) |
|
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
282.01 |
|
|
|
234.19 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
Renaissance Austin Hotel |
|
Austin, Texas |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
156.69 |
|
|
|
98.51 |
|
|
|
(16.6 |
) |
Torrance Marriott South Bay |
|
Los Angeles County, California |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
119.59 |
|
|
|
74.88 |
|
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
Orlando Airport Marriott |
|
Orlando, Florida |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
120.58 |
|
|
|
98.66 |
|
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
Marriott Griffin Gate Resort |
|
Lexington, Kentucky |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
108.41 |
|
|
|
53.12 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
Oak Brook Hills Marriott Resort |
|
Oak Brook, Illinois |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
118.38 |
|
|
|
37.17 |
|
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
Westin Atlanta North at Perimeter (1) |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
109.94 |
|
|
|
72.90 |
|
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
Vail Marriott Mountain Resort & Spa
(1) |
|
Vail, Colorado |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
|
|
|
287.44 |
|
|
|
229.51 |
|
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
Marriott Atlanta Alpharetta |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
136.01 |
|
|
|
77.88 |
|
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
Courtyard Manhattan/Midtown East |
|
New York, New York |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
79.1 |
|
|
|
200.59 |
|
|
|
158.76 |
|
|
|
(28.9 |
) |
Conrad Chicago (1) |
|
Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
156.42 |
|
|
|
87.77 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
Bethesda Marriott Suites |
|
Bethesda, Maryland |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
196.94 |
|
|
|
111.24 |
|
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
Courtyard Manhattan/Fifth Avenue |
|
New York, New York |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
202.23 |
|
|
|
177.22 |
|
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
The Lodge at Sonoma, a Renaissance
Resort & Spa |
|
Sonoma, California |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
159.39 |
|
|
|
63.94 |
|
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE |
|
|
|
|
9,586 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
$ |
155.00 |
|
|
$ |
98.80 |
|
|
|
(16.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Frenchmans Reef & Morning Star Marriott Beach Resort, Vail Marriott Mountain
Resort & Spa, Westin Atlanta North at Perimeter, Conrad Chicago and the Westin Boston
Waterfront Hotel report operations on a calendar month and year basis. The fiscal quarter
ended March 27, 2009 includes the operations for the period from January 1, 2009 to
February 28, 2009 for these five hotels. |
- 14 -
Results of Operations
As of March 27, 2009, we owned 20 hotels. Our total assets were $2.1 billion as of March 27,
2009. Total liabilities were $1.1 billion as of March 27, 2009, including $872.4 million of debt.
Stockholders equity was approximately $1.0 billion as of March 27, 2009.
Comparison of the Fiscal Quarter Ended March 27, 2009 to the Fiscal Quarter Ended March 21, 2008
Our net loss for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009 was $5.3 million compared to net
income of $5.2 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 21, 2008.
Revenue. Revenue consists primarily of the room, food and beverage and other operating
revenues from our hotels. Revenues for the fiscal quarters ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008,
respectively, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 21, 2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Rooms |
|
$ |
75,116 |
|
|
$ |
85,927 |
|
|
|
(12.6 |
)% |
Food and beverage |
|
|
36,890 |
|
|
|
40,081 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
6,538 |
|
|
|
6,855 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
118,544 |
|
|
$ |
132,863 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual hotel revenues for the fiscal quarters ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008,
respectively, consist of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 21, 2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Marriott |
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
Los Angeles Airport Marriott |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
Frenchmans Reef & Morning Star Marriott Beach Resort (1) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
(10.7 |
)% |
Renaissance Worthington |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(10.5 |
)% |
Renaissance Austin Hotel |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
Renaissance Waverly Hotel |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
)% |
Westin Boston Waterfront Hotel (1) |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
(21.3 |
)% |
Orlando Airport Marriott |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(12.0 |
)% |
Vail Marriott Mountain Resort & Spa (1) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
(27.4 |
)% |
Salt Lake City Marriott Downtown |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
)% |
Torrance Marriott South Bay |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
(20.7 |
)% |
Courtyard Manhattan/Midtown East |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
(25.0 |
)% |
Marriott Griffin Gate Resort |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
Bethesda Marriott Suites |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
Marriott Atlanta Alpharetta |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
)% |
Oak Brook Hills Marriott Resort |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
Courtyard Manhattan/Fifth Avenue |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(14.7 |
)% |
Westin Atlanta North at Perimeter (1) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(32.4 |
)% |
The Lodge at Sonoma, a Renaissance Resort & Spa |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(26.7 |
)% |
Conrad Chicago (1) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(15.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118.5 |
|
|
$ |
132.9 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Frenchmans Reef & Morning Star Marriott Beach Resort, Vail Marriott Mountain
Resort & Spa, Westin Atlanta North at Perimeter, Conrad Chicago and the Westin Boston
Waterfront Hotel report operations on a calendar month and year basis. The fiscal quarters
ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008 include the operations for the period from January
1, 2009 to February 28, 2009 and January 1, 2008 to February 29, 2008, respectively, for
these five hotels. |
- 15 -
Our total revenues declined $14.4 million or 10.8%, from $132.9 million for the fiscal quarter
ended March 21, 2008 to $118.5 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009, reflecting the
continued weakness in the lodging fundamentals. The decline reflects a 16.5 percent decline in
RevPAR as a result of a 10.4 percent decrease in ADR and a 4.8 percentage point decrease in
occupancy. The comparison of the first quarter of 2009 to the first quarter of 2008 is positively
impacted by disruption from the renovation of the Chicago Marriott, which was ongoing during the
first quarter of 2008. Excluding the Chicago Marriott from our 2009 and 2008 first fiscal quarters
would increase our RevPAR contraction by approximately
2.4 percentage points. In addition, the first quarter 2009 results of operations for our
Marriott-managed hotels include five additional days as compared to the first quarter of 2008.
The majority of our customers fall into three broad categories: business transient, group and
leisure and other business. In the first quarter of 2009, business transient room revenue,
which represented approximately 28% of our total room revenue, decreased approximately 28% from the
first quarter of 2008 as discretionary business travel has declined in response to the current
economic recession. Group revenue, which represented approximately 36% of our total room revenue,
decreased approximately 9% from the first quarter of 2008 due to groups increasingly renegotiating rates and an overall decline in demand.
Revenue from leisure
and other business, which represented 36% of our total room revenue, decreased approximately 11%
from the first quarter of 2008 as overall consumer spending has declined in response to the current
economic recession.
Food and beverage revenues decreased 8.0% from 2008, reflecting a decline in both banquet and
outlet revenues. Other revenues, which primarily represent spa, golf, parking and attrition and
cancellation fees, decreased 4.6% from 2008.
The following are the key hotel operating statistics for our hotels for the fiscal quarters
ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 21, 2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Occupancy % |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
68.5 |
% |
|
(4.8) percentage points |
|
ADR |
|
$ |
155.00 |
|
|
$ |
172.91 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
)% |
RevPAR |
|
$ |
98.80 |
|
|
$ |
118.37 |
|
|
|
(16.5 |
)% |
Hotel operating expenses. Hotel operating expenses consist primarily of operating expenses
of our hotels, including non-cash ground rent expense. The operating expenses for the fiscal
quarters ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008, respectively, consist of the following (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 21, 2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Rooms departmental expenses |
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
|
$ |
21.2 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
Food and beverage departmental expenses |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
)% |
Other hotel expenses |
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
Base management fees |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
)% |
Incentive management fees |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(85.7 |
)% |
Property taxes |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
Ground rentContractual |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
)% |
Ground rentNon-cash |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
$ |
95.9 |
|
|
$ |
101.5 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our hotel operating expenses decreased $5.6 million or 5.5%, from $101.5 million for the
fiscal quarter ended March 21, 2008 to $95.9 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009.
Due to the decreased occupancy levels at our hotels, we have worked with our hotel managers to
lower operating expenses. As a result of these cost-containment measures, and an overall decline
in occupancy, we have reduced the rooms, food and beverage and other hotel departmental expenses.
The primary driver for the decrease in these operating expenses is an overall decline in wages and
benefits. We expect the decreases in the rooms, food and beverage, and other hotel departmental
expenses to continue in 2009.
Management fees are calculated as a percentage of total revenues, as well as the level of
operating profit at certain hotels. Therefore, the decline in base management fees is due to the
overall decline in revenues at our hotels. We pay incentive management fees only at certain of our
hotels based on operating profits. The decrease in incentive management fees of approximately $1.2
million is due to the decline in operating profits at those hotels.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is recorded on our hotel
buildings over 40 years for the periods subsequent to acquisition. Depreciable lives of hotel
furniture, fixtures and equipment are estimated as the time period between the acquisition date and
the date that the hotel furniture, fixtures and equipment will be replaced. Our depreciation and
amortization expense increased $2.0 million from $16.7 million for the fiscal quarter ended March
21, 2008 to $18.7 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009. This increase is primarily
the result of having additional assets in service as of March 27, 2009, resulting in higher
depreciation expense.
- 16 -
Corporate expenses. Our corporate expenses increased from $3.0 million for the fiscal
quarter ended March 21, 2008 to $3.8 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009, due
primarily to an increase in stock-based compensation expense. Corporate expenses principally
consist of employee-related costs, including base payroll, bonus and restricted stock. Corporate
expenses also include corporate operating costs, professional fees and directors fees.
Interest expense. Our interest expense increased $0.8 million from $10.7 million for the
fiscal quarter ended March 21, 2008 to $11.5 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009.
The increase in interest expense is primarily attributable to the first fiscal quarter of 2009
having five additional days of interest expense compared to the first fiscal quarter of 2008 as
well as higher capitalized interest recorded in the first quarter of 2008. The 2009 interest
expense was comprised of mortgage debt ($11.0 million), amortization of deferred financing costs
($0.2 million) and interest and unused facility fees on our credit facility ($0.3 million). The
2008 interest expense is comprised of mortgage debt ($10.3 million), amortization of deferred
financing costs ($0.2 million) and interest and unused facility fees on our credit facility ($0.2
million).
As of March 27, 2009, we had property-specific mortgage debt outstanding on twelve of our
hotels. On all but one of the hotels, we have fixed-rate secured debt, which bears interest at
rates ranging from 5.11% to 6.48% per year. Amounts drawn under the credit facility bear interest
at a variable rate that fluctuates based on the level of outstanding indebtedness in relation to
the value of our assets from time to time. The weighted-average interest rate as of March 27, 2009
on our draws under the credit facility was 1.46% as compared to 3.99% as of March 21, 2008. The
Company had $52.0 million drawn on the credit facility as of March 27, 2009. Our weighted-average
interest rate on all debt as of March 27, 2009 was 5.4%.
Interest income. Interest income decreased $0.3 million from $0.4 million for the fiscal
quarter ended March 21, 2008 to $0.1 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009 due to
lower interest rates in 2009.
Income taxes. We recorded an income tax benefit for income taxes from continuing operations
of $6.0 million and $3.7 million for the fiscal quarters ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008,
respectively. The first quarter 2009 income tax benefit was incurred on the $15.7 million pre-tax
loss of our taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009, together
with foreign income tax expense of $0.2 million related to the taxable REIT subsidiary that owns
the Frenchmans Reef & Morning Star Marriott Beach Resort. The first quarter 2008 income tax
benefit was incurred on the $10.5 million pre-tax loss of our TRS for the fiscal quarter ended
March 21, 2008, together with foreign income tax expense of $0.4 million related to the taxable
REIT subsidiary that owns the Frenchmans Reef & Morning Star Marriott Beach Resort.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The current recession and related financial crisis has resulted in deleveraging attempts
throughout the global financial system. As banks and other financial intermediaries reduce their
leverage and incur losses on their existing portfolio of loans, the amount of capital that they are
able to lend has materially decreased. As a result, it is a very difficult borrowing environment
for all borrowers, even those that have strong balance sheets. While we have low leverage and a
significant number of high quality unencumbered assets, we are uncertain if we could currently
obtain new debt, or refinance existing debt, on reasonable terms in the current market.
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to fund future
distributions to our stockholders to maintain our REIT status as well as to pay for operating
expenses and other expenditures directly associated with our hotels, including capital expenditures
as well as payments of interest and principal. We currently expect that our operating cash flows
will be sufficient to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash
provided by operations, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under our
credit facility.
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for the costs
of acquiring additional hotels, renovations, expansions and other capital expenditures that need to
be made periodically to our hotels, scheduled debt payments and making distributions to our
stockholders. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through various sources of
capital, cash provided by operations and borrowings, as well as through our issuances of additional
equity or debt securities. Our ability to incur additional debt is dependent upon a number of
factors, including the current state of the overall credit markets, our degree of leverage, the
value of our unencumbered assets and borrowing restrictions imposed by existing lenders.
- 17 -
Our Financing Strategy
Since our formation in 2004, we have been consistently committed to a flexible capital
structure with prudent leverage levels. During 2004 though early 2007, we took advantage of the low
interest rate environment by fixing our interest rates for an extended period of time. Moreover,
during the recent peak in the commercial real estate market, we maintained low financial leverage
by funding the majority of our acquisitions through the issuance of equity. This strategy allowed
us to maintain a balance sheet with a moderate amount of debt. During the peak years, we believed,
and present events have confirmed, that it would be inappropriate to increase the inherent risk of
a highly cyclical business through a highly levered capital structure.
We believe the current economic environment has confirmed the merits of our financing
strategy. We believe that we maintain a reasonable amount of fixed interest rate mortgage debt with
limited near-term maturities. As of March 27, 2009, we had $872.4 million of debt outstanding,
which consisted of $52.0 million outstanding on our senior unsecured credit facility and
$820.4 million of mortgage debt. We currently have eight hotels, with an aggregate historic cost of
$790 million, which are unencumbered by mortgage debt. As of March 27, 2009, our debt had a
weighted-average interest rate of 5.37% and a weighted-average maturity date of 6.1 years. In
addition, as of March 27, 2009, 93.5% of our debt was fixed rate.
We prefer a relatively simple but efficient capital structure. We have not invested in joint
ventures and have not issued any operating partnership units or preferred stock. We endeavor to
structure our hotel acquisitions so that they will not overly complicate our capital structure;
however, we will consider a more complex transaction if we believe that the projected returns to
our stockholders will significantly exceed the returns that would otherwise be available.
During the current recession, our corporate goals and objectives are focused on preserving and
enhancing our liquidity. We have taken a number of steps to achieve these goals, as follows:
|
|
|
We completed a follow-on public offering of our common stock in April 2009. We sold
17,825,000 shares of common stock, including the underwriters overallotment of 2,325,000
shares, at an offering price of $4.85 per share. The net proceeds to us, after deduction of
offering costs, were approximately $82.1 million. We continue to evaluate our liquidity
needs and financing alternatives, and may choose to sell additional shares of common stock
in the future. |
|
|
|
|
We repaid the $52 million outstanding on our senior unsecured credit facility on April
17, 2009 with a portion of the proceeds from our follow-on offering. |
|
|
|
|
We chose to not pay a 2008 fourth quarter dividend and we intend to pay our next dividend
to our stockholders of record as of December 31, 2009. We expect the 2009 dividend will be
in an amount equal to 100% of our 2009 taxable income. |
|
|
|
|
Depending on our 2009 liquidity needs, we may elect to pay a portion of our 2009 dividend
in shares of our common stock, as permitted by the Internal Revenue Services Revenue
Procedure 2009-15. |
|
|
|
|
We have significantly curtailed capital spending for 2009 and expect to fund
approximately $10 million in capital expenditures in 2009, compared to an average of
$35 million per year of owner-funded capital expenditures during 2006, 2007 and 2008. |
|
|
|
|
As previously announced, we continue to evaluate the process regarding the sale of one or
more of our hotels. To date we have not received any bids that we consider attractive
compared to our internal valuation. |
We have only two near-term mortgage debt maturities totaling $68 million. The debt maturities
include $40.2 million coming due on the Courtyard Manhattan/Midtown East on December 11, 2009 and
$27.7 million coming due on the Griffin Gate Marriott in January 2010. We have agreed on terms
with a lender to provide up to $43 million of mortgage debt with a term of five years on the
Courtyard Manhattan/Midtown East and have locked our interest rate at 8.81%. The terms of the loan
are still subject to the approval of the lenders credit committee. We cannot provide assurance
that this lender will fund the mortgage debt or that the terms of the loan will be satisfactory to
us, as we have not yet agreed on definitive documentation nor has the lender completed its due
diligence. We are currently assessing the best alternatives to refinance the Griffin Gate Marriott
mortgage debt. Our most likely alternatives include repaying the mortgage debt with corporate cash
or refinancing the mortgage debt with a new mortgage lender.
- 18 -
Credit Facility
We are party to a four-year, $200.0 million unsecured credit facility (the Facility)
expiring in February 2011. We may extend the maturity date of the Facility for an additional year
upon the payment of applicable fees and the satisfaction of certain other customary conditions. On
April 17, 2009, we repaid the outstanding balance of $52.0 million under the Facility with a
portion of the proceeds from our follow-on public offering of common stock.
Interest is paid on the periodic advances under the Facility at varying rates, based upon
either LIBOR or the alternate base rate, plus an agreed upon additional margin amount. The interest
rate depends upon our level of outstanding indebtedness in relation to the value of our assets from
time to time, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio |
|
|
|
60% or |
|
|
55% to |
|
|
50% to |
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
Greater |
|
|
60% |
|
|
55% |
|
|
50% |
|
Alternate base rate margin |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
LIBOR margin |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
Our Facility contains various corporate financial covenants. A summary of the most restrictive
covenants is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
|
Covenant |
|
|
2009 |
|
Maximum leverage ratio(1) |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
42.8 |
% |
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio(2) |
|
|
1.6 |
x |
|
|
2.7 |
x |
Minimum tangible net worth(3) |
|
$738.4 million |
|
|
$1.3 billion |
|
Unhedged floating rate debt as a percentage of total indebtedness |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Maximum leverage ratio is determined by dividing the total debt outstanding
by the net asset value of our corporate assets and hotels. Hotel level net
asset values are calculated based on the application of a contractual
capitalization rate (which range from 7.5% to 8.0%) to the trailing twelve
month hotel net operating income. |
|
(2) |
|
Minimum fixed charge ratio is calculated based on the trailing four quarters. |
|
(3) |
|
Tangible net worth is defined as the gross book value of our real estate
assets and other corporate assets less our total debt and all other corporate
liabilities. |
- 19 -
Our Facility requires that we maintain a specific pool of unencumbered borrowing base
properties. The unencumbered borrowing base assets are subject to the following limitations and
covenants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
|
Covenant |
|
|
2009 |
|
Minimum implied debt service ratio |
|
|
1.5 |
x |
|
|
13.01 |
x |
Maximum unencumbered leverage ratio |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Minimum number of unencumbered borrowing base properties |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Minimum unencumbered borrowing base value |
|
$150 million |
|
|
$658.9 million |
|
Percentage of total asset value owned by borrowers or guarantors |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
If we were to default under any of the above covenants, we would be obligated to repay all
amounts outstanding under our Facility and our Facility would terminate. Our ability to comply with
two most restrictive financial covenants, the maximum leverage ratio and the fixed charge coverage
ratio, depend primarily on our EBITDA. The following table shows the impact of various hypothetical
scenarios on those two covenants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA Change from 2008 |
|
|
|
Covenant |
|
|
-10% |
|
|
-20% |
|
|
-30% |
|
|
-40% |
|
Maximum leverage ratio |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio |
|
|
1.6 |
x |
|
|
2.6 |
x |
|
|
2.3 |
x |
|
|
2.0 |
x |
|
|
1.7 |
x |
In addition to the interest payable on amounts outstanding under the Facility, we are required
to pay an amount equal to 0.20% of the unused portion of the Facility if the unused portion of the
Facility is greater than 50% and 0.125% if the unused portion of the Facility is less than 50%. We
incurred interest and unused credit facility fees on the Facility of $0.3 million and $0.2 million
for the fiscal quarters ended March 27, 2009 and March 21, 2008, respectively. As of March 27,
2009, we had $52.0 million outstanding on the Facility with a capacity to borrow an additional
$148.0 million.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash are revenues from operations, borrowing under mortgage debt,
draws on the Facility and the proceeds from our equity offerings. Our principal uses of cash are
debt service, asset acquisitions, capital expenditures, operating costs, corporate expenses and
dividends.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Our cash provided by operating activities was $13.8
million for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009, which is the result of our $5.3 million net
loss adjusted for the impact of several non-cash charges, including $18.7 million of depreciation,
$1.8 million of non-cash straight line ground rent, $0.2 million of amortization of deferred
financing costs, and $1.2 million of stock compensation, offset by $0.4 million of amortization of
unfavorable agreements, $0.1 million of amortization of deferred income and unfavorable working
capital changes of $2.3 million.
Our cash provided by operating activities was $19.6 million for the fiscal quarter ended March
21, 2008, which is the result of our $5.2 million net income adjusted for the impact of several
non-cash charges, including $16.7 million of depreciation, $1.8 million of non-cash straight line
ground rent, $0.2 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, and $0.7 million of stock
compensation, offset by $0.4 million of amortization of unfavorable agreements, $0.1 million of
amortization of deferred income and unfavorable working capital changes of $4.4 million.
Cash Used In Investing Activities. Our cash used in investing activities was $7.2 million
for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009. During the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009, we
incurred capital expenditures at our hotels of $7.3 million and an increase in restricted cash of
$0.1 million.
Our cash used in investing activities was $20.5 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 21,
2008. During the fiscal quarter ended March 21, 2008, we incurred capital expenditures at our
hotels of $21.5 million and a decrease in restricted cash of $4.0 million, which was offset by the
receipt of $5.0 million of key money related to the Chicago Marriott Downtown.
Cash Provided by Financing Activities. Our cash used in financing activities was
$6.2 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2009 consisted of $1.0 million of scheduled
debt principal payments and $0.2 million of share repurchases and $5.0 million in repayments of our
credit facility.
- 20 -
Our cash used in financing activities was $9.8 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 21,
2008 consisted of $0.7 million of scheduled debt principal payments, $0.3 million of share
repurchases, and $22.8 million of dividend payments offset by $14.0 million in draws under our
credit facility.
Dividend Policy
We intend to distribute to our stockholders dividends equal to our REIT taxable income so as
to avoid paying corporate income tax and excise tax on our earnings (other than the earnings of our
TRS and TRS lessees, which are all subject to tax at regular corporate rates) and to qualify for
the tax benefits afforded to REITs under the Code. In order to qualify as a REIT under the Code, we
generally must make distributions to our stockholders each year in an amount equal to at least:
|
|
|
90% of our REIT taxable income determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction,
plus |
|
|
|
|
90% of the excess of our net income from foreclosure property over the tax imposed on
such income by the Code, minus |
|
|
|
|
any excess non-cash income. |
We have paid quarterly cash dividends to common stockholders at the discretion of our board of
directors. We chose not to pay a 2008 fourth quarter dividend and we intend to issue our next
dividend to our stockholders of record as of December 31, 2009. We expect the 2009 dividend will be
an amount equal to 100% of our 2009 taxable income. Depending on our 2009 liquidity needs, we may
elect to pay a portion of our 2009 dividend in shares of our common stock, as permitted by the
Internal Revenue Services Revenue Procedure 2009-15.
Capital Expenditures
The management and franchise agreements for each of our hotels provide for the establishment
of separate property improvement funds to cover, among other things, the cost of replacing and
repairing furniture and fixtures at our hotels. Contributions to the property improvement fund are
calculated as a percentage of hotel revenues. In addition, we may be required to pay for the cost
of certain additional improvements that are not permitted to be funded from the property
improvement fund under the applicable management or franchise agreement. As of March 27, 2009, we
have set aside $27.1 million for capital projects in property improvement funds. Funds held in
property improvement funds for one hotel are typically not permitted to be applied to any other
property.
DiamondRock has made extensive capital investments in its hotels during 2006 to 2008 and now
nearly all of its hotels are fully-renovated. As a result, the Company has significantly curtailed
capital spending for 2009. In 2009, the Company plans to commence or complete approximately $35
million of capital improvements at its hotels, approximately $10.0 million of which will be funded
from corporate cash. The Company spent approximately $7.3 million on capital improvements at its
hotels during the first fiscal quarter, including the completion of a significant guestroom
renovation at the Salt Lake City Marriott, almost all of which was funded by the hotels escrow
funds.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current
or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to
investors.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use the following two non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to investors
as key measures of our operating performance: (1) EBITDA and (2) FFO. These measures should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA represents net (loss) income excluding: (1) interest expense; (2) provision for income
taxes, including income taxes applicable to sale of assets; and (3) depreciation and amortization.
We believe EBITDA is useful to an investor in evaluating our operating performance because it helps
investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the
impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and our asset base (primarily
depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. In addition, covenants included in our
indebtedness use EBITDA
as a measure of financial compliance. We also use EBITDA as one measure in determining the
value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions.
- 21 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 21, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(5,293 |
) |
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
11,498 |
|
|
|
10,695 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(5,978 |
) |
|
|
(3,723 |
) |
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
18,717 |
|
|
|
16,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
18,944 |
|
|
$ |
28,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Trusts, which defines FFO as net (loss) income (determined in accordance with
GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization. We
believe that the presentation of FFO provides useful information to investors regarding our
operating performance because it is a measure of our operations without regard to specified
non-cash items, such as real estate depreciation and amortization and gain or loss on sale of
assets. We also use FFO as one measure in assessing our results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, 2009 |
|
|
March 21, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(5,293 |
) |
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
18,717 |
|
|
|
16,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO |
|
$ |
13,424 |
|
|
$ |
21,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the DiamondRock Hospitality
Company and all consolidated subsidiaries. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
While we do not believe the reported amounts would be materially different, application of these
policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties
and, as a result, actual results could differ materially from these estimates. We evaluate our
estimates and judgments, including those related to the impairment of long-lived assets, on an
ongoing basis. We base our estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies are
disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The following represent certain
critical accounting policies that require us to exercise our business judgment or make significant
estimates:
Investment in Hotels. Acquired hotels, land improvements, building and furniture, fixtures
and equipment and identifiable intangible assets are initially recorded at fair value in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations. Additions to
property and equipment, including current buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and
equipment are recorded at cost. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line
method over an estimated useful life of 15 to 40 years for buildings and land improvements and one
to ten years for furniture and equipment. Identifiable intangible assets are typically related to
contracts, including ground lease agreements and hotel management agreements, which are recorded at
fair value. Above-market and below-market contract values are based on the present value of the
difference between contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the contracts acquired and our
estimate of the fair market contract rates for corresponding contracts. Contracts acquired that are
at market do not have significant value. We typically enter into a new hotel management agreement
based on market terms at the time of acquisition. Intangible assets are amortized using the
straight-line method over the remaining non-cancelable term of the related agreements. In making
estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we may utilize a number of
sources that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of a property and
other market data. Management also considers information obtained about each property as a result
of its pre-acquisition due diligence in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible
assets acquired.
- 22 -
We review our investments in hotels for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the investments in hotels may not be recoverable. Events or
circumstances that may cause us to perform a
review include, but are not limited to, adverse changes in the demand for lodging at our
properties due to declining national or local economic conditions and/or new hotel construction in
markets where our hotels are located. When such conditions exist, management performs an analysis
to determine if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from operations and the proceeds from
the ultimate disposition of an investment in a hotel exceed the hotels carrying value. If the
estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an
adjustment to reduce the carrying value to the estimated fair market value is recorded and an
impairment loss recognized.
Revenue Recognition. Hotel revenues, including room, golf, food and beverage, and other
hotel revenues, are recognized as the related services are provided.
Stock-based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation using
the fair value based method of accounting described in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment. The Company records the cost of awards
with service conditions based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized
over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.
No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the
requisite service. No awards with performance-based or market-based conditions have been issued.
Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a
change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the new rate is enacted.
We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and,
as such, are not subject to federal income tax, provided we distribute all of our taxable income
annually to our stockholders and comply with certain other requirements. In addition to paying
federal and state income tax on any retained income, we are subject to taxes on built-in-gains on
sales of certain assets. Additionally, our taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to federal, state
and foreign income tax.
Inflation
Operators of hotels, in general, possess the ability to adjust room rates daily to reflect the
effects of inflation. However, competitive pressures may limit the ability of our management
companies to raise room rates.
Seasonality
The operations of hotels historically have been seasonal depending on location, and
accordingly, we expect some seasonality in our business. Historically, we have experienced
approximately two-thirds of our annual income in the second and fourth fiscal quarters.
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
There are no new unimplemented accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material
impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 3. Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market
sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business strategies, the primary market risk to which we
are currently exposed, and, to which we expect to be exposed in the future, is interest rate risk.
The face amount of our outstanding debt at March 27, 2009 was approximately $872.4 million, of
which $57.0 million or 6.5% was variable rate debt. As of March 27, 2009, the fair value of the
$815.4 million of fixed-rate debt was approximately $703.5 million. If market rates of interest
were to increase by 1.0%, or approximately 100 basis points, the decrease in the fair value of our
fixed-rate debt would be $33.1 million. On the other hand, if market rates of interest were to
decrease by one percentage point, or approximately 100 basis points, the increase in the fair value
of our fixed-rate debt would be $35.5 million.
- 23 -
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), as required
by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, and has concluded that as
of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
were effective to give reasonable assurances that information we disclose in reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the
Exchange Act during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
- 24 -
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are not involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material
litigation threatened against us other than routine litigation arising out of the ordinary course
of business or which is expected to be covered by insurance and none of which is expected to have a
material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors described in Item 1A of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-Q:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.1 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Articles of
Incorporation of DiamondRock Hospitality Company (incorporated by
reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-11
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (File no.
333-123065)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.2 |
|
|
Amendment to the Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the
Articles of Incorporation of DiamondRock Hospitality Company
(incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 9, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2.1 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of DiamondRock Hospitality
Company (incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (File no. 333-123065)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2.2 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of
DiamondRock Hospitality Company (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Form of Certificate for Common Stock for DiamondRock Hospitality
Company (incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (File no. 333-123065)). |
- 25 -
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Right (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Form of Dividend Equivalent Right (incorporated by reference to
the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Agreement
of Limited Partnership of DiamondRock Hospitality Limited
Partnership, dated as of June 4, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2007 by and among DiamondRock
Hospitality Limited Partnership, DiamondRock Hospitality Company, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Agent, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and as Book
Manager, each of Bank of America, N.A., Calyon New York Branch and The Royal Bank Of Scotland
PLC, as a Syndication Agent, and Citicorp North America, Inc., as
Documentation Agent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. |
- 26 -
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 7, 2009
|
|
|
|
DiamondRock Hospitality Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sean M. Mahoney
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael D. Schecter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean M. Mahoney
|
|
|
|
Michael D. Schecter |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
- 27 -
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Right (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 6, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Form of Dividend Equivalent Right (incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 6, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Agreement of Limited Partnership of DiamondRock Hospitality Limited Partnership, dated as of
June 4, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2007 by and among DiamondRock
Hospitality Limited Partnership, DiamondRock Hospitality Company, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Agent, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and as Book
Manager, each of Bank of America, N.A., Calyon New York Branch and The Royal Bank Of Scotland
PLC, as a Syndication Agent, and Citicorp North America, Inc., as
Documentation Agent. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. |
- 28 -