UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

Commission file number: 001-32891

 

Hanesbrands Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

(336) 519-8080
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

As of August 3, 2009, there were 94,739,884 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Trademarks, Trade Names and Service Marks

 

We own or have rights to use the trademarks, service marks and trade names that we use in conjunction with the operation of our business. Some of the more important trademarks that we own or have rights to use that appear in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include the Hanes, Champion, C9 by Champion, Playtex, Bali, L’eggs, Just My Size, barely there, Wonderbra, Stedman, Outer Banks, Zorba, Rinbros and Duofold marks, which may be registered in the United States and other jurisdictions. We do not own any trademark, trade name or service mark of any other company appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts, and can generally be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “continue” or similar expressions. In particular, information appearing under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” includes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements inherently involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in these statements.

 

Where, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of our management and expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. More information on factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated is included from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009, particularly under the caption “Risk Factors.”

 

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009, particularly under the caption “Risk Factors.” We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

 

We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You can inspect, read and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain information regarding the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a Web site at www.sec.gov that makes available reports, proxy statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

 

We make available free of charge at www.hanesbrands.com (in the “Investors” section) copies of materials we file with, or furnish to, the SEC. By referring to our Web site, www.hanesbrands.com, we do not incorporate our Web site or its contents into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

 

 

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

HANESBRANDS INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)

 

 

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

HANESBRANDS INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

 

 

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

 

These statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and, in accordance with those rules and regulations, do not include all information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate for a fair statement of the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of Hanesbrands Inc., a Maryland corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Hanesbrands”). In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows for the interim periods presented herein. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results may vary from these estimates. The Company has also evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through August 6, 2009, the day the financial statements were issued.

 

These condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full year.

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 became effective for the Company’s financial assets and liabilities on December 30, 2007. The FASB approved a one-year deferral of the adoption of SFAS 157 as it relates to non-financial assets and liabilities with the issuance in February 2008 of FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, as a result of which implementation by the Company was required on January 4, 2009. The partial adoption of SFAS 157 in the first quarter ended March 29, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities and the first quarter ended April 4, 2009 for non-financial assets and liabilities had no material impact on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company, but resulted in certain additional disclosures reflected in Note 9.

 

Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”). The objective of SFAS 160 is to improve the relevance, comparability and transparency of the financial information that a company provides in its consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 requires a company to clearly identify and present ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the company in the consolidated financial statements within the equity section but separate from the company’s equity. It also requires that the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income; that changes in ownership interest be accounted for similarly, as equity transactions; and when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, that any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary and the gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary be measured at fair value. The Company adopted SFAS 160 in the first quarter ended April 4, 2009. The adoption of

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

SFAS 160 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

 

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 expands the disclosure requirements of FASB Statement No. 133 about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. The Company adopted SFAS 161 in the first quarter ended April 4, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows but resulted in certain additional disclosures reflected in Note 8.

 

Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 107-1 and Accounting Principal Board Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP 107-1”). FSP 107-1 amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. This statement also amends Accounting Principal Board Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in all interim financial statements. FSP 107-1 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Since FSP 107-1 only requires additional disclosures, the adoption of the statement had no material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows but resulted in certain additional disclosures reflected in Note 9.

 

Subsequent Events

 

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 provides guidance on the Company’s assessment and disclosure of subsequent events, and clarifies that the Company must evaluate, as of each reporting period, events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued for both interim and annual financial reporting periods. SFAS 165 is effective prospectively for the Company’s interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the SFAS 165 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows but resulted in certain additional disclosures reflected in Note 1.

 

Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets

 

In December 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (“FSP 132(R)-1”). FSP 132(R)-1 expands the disclosure requirements of FASB Statement No. 132(R) to include more detailed disclosures about an employers’ plan assets, including employers’ investment strategies, major categories of plan assets, concentrations of risk within plan assets, and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, similar to the disclosure requirements of SFAS 157. FSP 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Since FSP 132(R)-1 only requires additional disclosures, adoption of the statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets

 

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (“SFAS 166”). SFAS 166 amends the derecognition guidance and the accounting and disclosures required by

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS 166 is effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of the Company’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company is evaluating the impact of adoption of this statement on the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

 

Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)

 

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS 167”). SFAS 167 amends the consolidation guidance that applies to variable interest entities. SFAS 167 is effective for the Company’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company is evaluating the impact of adoption of this statement on the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

 

The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162

 

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.

 

 

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) was computed by dividing net income by the number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the quarters and six months ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008. Diluted EPS was calculated to give effect to all potentially dilutive shares of common stock using the treasury stock method. The reconciliation of basic to diluted weighted average shares for the quarters and six months ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008 is as follows:

 

 

Options to purchase 5,943 and 140 shares of common stock were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive for the quarters ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively. Options to purchase 5,943 and 1,480 shares of common stock and 48 and 0 restricted stock units were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive for the six months ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008, respectively.

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

 

 

Since becoming an independent company, the Company has undertaken a variety of restructuring efforts in connection with its consolidation and globalization strategy designed to improve operating efficiencies and lower costs. As a result of this strategy, the Company expects to incur approximately $250,000 in restructuring and related charges over the three year period following the spin off from Sara Lee Corporation (“Sara Lee”) on September 5, 2006, of which approximately half is expected to be noncash. As of July 4, 2009, the Company has recognized approximately $247,000 and announced approximately $241,000 in restructuring and related charges related to this strategy since September 5, 2006. Of the amounts recognized, approximately $94,000 relates to employee termination and other benefits, approximately $87,000 relates to accelerated depreciation of buildings and equipment for facilities that have been or will be closed, approximately $24,000 relates to noncancelable lease and other contractual obligations, approximately $22,000 relates to write-offs of stranded raw materials and work in process inventory determined not to be salvageable or cost-effective to relocate, approximately $11,000 relates to impairments of fixed assets and approximately $9,000 relates to other exit costs such as equipment moving costs. Accelerated depreciation related to the Company’s manufacturing facilities and distribution centers that have been or will be closed is reflected in the “Cost of sales” and “Selling, general and administrative expenses” lines of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The write-offs of stranded raw materials and work in process inventory are reflected in the “Cost of sales” line of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

The reported results for the quarters and six months ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008 reflect amounts recognized for restructuring actions, including the impact of certain actions that were completed for amounts more favorable than previously estimated. The impact of restructuring efforts on income before income tax expense is summarized as follows:

 

 

The following table illustrates where the costs associated with these actions are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

Components of the restructuring actions are as follows:

 

 

Rollforward of accrued restructuring is as follows:

 

 

The accrual balance as of July 4, 2009 is comprised of $19,293 in current accrued liabilities and $4,473 in other noncurrent liabilities. The $19,293 in current accrued liabilities consists of $13,707 for employee termination and other benefits and $5,586 for noncancelable lease and other contractual obligations. The $4,473 in other noncurrent liabilities primarily consists of noncancelable lease and other contractual obligations.

 

Adjustments to previous estimates resulted from actual costs to settle obligations being lower than expected. The adjustments were reflected in the “Restructuring” line of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

Year Ended January 2, 2010 Actions

 

During the six months ended July 4, 2009, the Company approved actions to close three manufacturing facilities and two distribution centers in the Dominican Republic, the United States, Honduras and Canada, and eliminate an aggregate of approximately 2,800 positions in those countries and El Salvador. The production capacity represented by the manufacturing facilities has been relocated to lower cost locations in Asia, Central America and the Caribbean Basin. The distribution capacity has been relocated to the Company’s West Coast distribution center in California in order to expand capacity for goods the Company sources from Asia. In addition, approximately 300 management and administrative positions were eliminated, with the majority of these positions based in the United States. The Company recorded charges of $10,589 and $19,244 in the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009, respectively, related to these actions. In the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009, the Company recognized $9,978 and $16,242, respectively, for employee termination and other benefits recognized in accordance with benefit plans previously communicated to the affected employee group, $6 and $1,368, respectively, for noncancelable lease and other contractual obligations related to the closure of certain manufacturing facilities, $15 and $858, respectively, for write-offs of stranded

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

raw materials and work in process inventory determined not to be salvageable or cost-effective to relocate related to the closure of certain manufacturing facilities, $448 and $577, respectively, for other exit costs and $142 and $199, respectively, for accelerated depreciation of buildings and equipment. These charges are reflected in the “Restructuring,” “Cost of sales” and “Selling, general and administrative expenses” lines of the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. All actions are expected to be completed within a 12-month period.

 

Year Ended January 3, 2009 Actions

 

During the six months ended July 4, 2009, the Company recognized additional charges, as well as credits for certain actions which were completed for amounts more favorable than previously estimated, associated with facility closures announced in the year ended January 3, 2009, resulting in a decrease of $820 and $13,875 to income before income tax expense for the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009, respectively. In the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009, the Company recognized credits of $686 and charges of $7,257, respectively, for noncancelable lease and other contractual obligations associated with plant closures announced in the year ended January 3, 2009, charges of $1,362 and $4,229, respectively, for other exit costs and charges of $144 and $2,389, respectively, for write-offs of stranded raw materials and work in process inventory determined not to be salvageable or cost-effective to relocate related to the closure of certain manufacturing facilities. These charges are reflected in the “Restructuring” and “Cost of sales” lines of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

 

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

 

 

The changes in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts and allowance for chargebacks and other deductions for the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009 are as follows:

 

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

Charges to the allowance for doubtful accounts are reflected in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line and charges to the allowance for customer chargebacks and other customer deductions are primarily reflected as a reduction in the “Net sales” line of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Deductions and write-offs, which do not increase or decrease income, represent write-offs of previously reserved accounts receivables and allowed customer chargebacks and deductions against gross accounts receivable.

 

 

The Company had the following debt at July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009:

 

 

As of July 4, 2009, the Company had $60,000 outstanding under the Senior Secured Credit Facility’s $500,000 Revolving Loan Facility and $25,351 of standby and trade letters of credit issued and outstanding under this facility.

 

Availability of funding under the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility depends primarily upon the eligible outstanding receivables balance. The total amount of receivables used as collateral for the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility was $424,252 and $331,470 at July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009, respectively, and is reported on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in “Trade accounts receivable less allowances.”

 

On March 10, 2009, the Company entered into a Third Amendment (the “Third Amendment”) to the Senior Secured Credit Facility dated as of September 5, 2006. Pursuant to the Third Amendment, the ratio of debt to EBITDA (earnings before income taxes, depreciation expense and amortization) for the preceding four quarters, or leverage ratio, was increased from 3.75 to 1 in the first quarter of 2009 to 4.25 to 1, from 3.5 to 1 in the second quarter of 2009 to 4.2 to 1, from 3.25 to 1 in the third quarter of 2009 to 3.95 to 1, and from 3.0 to 1 in the fourth quarter of 2009 to 3.6 to 1. After 2009, the leverage ratio will decrease from 3.6 to 1 until it reaches 3.0 to 1 in the third quarter of 2011. In addition, pursuant to the Third Amendment, the ratio of EBITDA for the preceding four quarters to consolidated interest expense for such period, or interest coverage ratio, was decreased from 3.0 to 1 in the second and third quarters of 2009 to 2.5 to 1 and from 3.25 to 1 in the fourth quarter of 2009 to 2.5 to 1. After 2009, the interest coverage ratio will increase from 2.5 to 1 until it reaches 3.25 to 1 in the third quarter of 2011.

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

At the Company’s option, borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility may be maintained from time to time as (a) “Base Rate” loans, which bear interest at the higher of (i) 1/2 of 1% in excess of the federal funds rate and (ii) the rate published in the Wall Street Journal as the “prime rate” (or equivalent), in each case in effect from time to time, plus the applicable margin in effect from time to time, or (b) LIBOR-based loans, which bear interest at the “LIBO Rate” (as defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facility and adjusted for maximum reserves), for the respective interest period plus the applicable margin in effect from time to time. Pursuant to the Third Amendment, the applicable margins for the Senior Secured Credit Facility were increased by 300 basis points.

 

The Third Amendment also provides for certain other amendments to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, including increasing the percentage of “Excess Cash Flow” as calculated pursuant to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, which is used to determine whether, and the extent to which, the Company is required in certain circumstances to make certain mandatory prepayments. The Company paid $20,570 in debt amendment fees in connection with entering into the Third Amendment of which $16,792 will be amortized over the term of the Senior Secured Credit Facility.

 

On March 16, 2009, the Company and HBI Receivables LLC (“HBI Receivables”), a wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote subsidiary of Hanesbrands, entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “First Amendment”) to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility dated as of November 27, 2007. The Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility contains the same leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio provisions as the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The First Amendment effects the same changes to the leverage ratio and the interest coverage ratio that are effected by the Third Amendment described above. Pursuant to the First Amendment, the rate that would be payable to the conduit purchasers or the committed purchasers party to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility in the event of certain defaults is increased from 1% over the prime rate to 3% over the greatest of (i) the one-month LIBO rate plus 1%, (ii) the weighted average rates on federal funds transactions plus 0.5%, or (iii) the prime rate. Also pursuant to the First Amendment, several of the factors that contribute to the overall availability of funding have been amended in a manner that would be expected to generally reduce the amount of funding that will be available under the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility. The First Amendment also provides for certain other amendments to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility, including changing the termination date for the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility from November 27, 2010 to March 15, 2010, and requiring that HBI Receivables make certain payments to a conduit purchaser, a committed purchaser, or certain entities that provide funding to or are affiliated with them, in the event that assets and liabilities of a conduit purchaser are consolidated for financial and/or regulatory accounting purposes with certain other entities. The Company paid $145 in debt amendment fees in connection with entering into the First Amendment, which will be amortized over the term of the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility, and wrote off $168 of unamortized debt issuance costs.

 

On April 13, 2009, the Company and HBI Receivables entered into Amendment No. 2 (the “Second Amendment”) to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility. Pursuant to the Second Amendment, several of the factors that contribute to the overall availability of funding have been amended in a manner that is expected to generally increase over time the amount of funding that will be available under the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility as compared to the amount that would be available pursuant to the First Amendment. The Second Amendment also provides for certain other amendments to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility, including changing the termination date for the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility from March 15, 2010 to April 12, 2010. In addition, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. replaced JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as agent under the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility, PNC Bank, N.A. replaced JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as a managing agent, and PNC Bank, N.A. and an affiliate of PNC Bank, N.A. replaced affiliates of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as a committed purchaser and a conduit purchaser, respectively. The Company paid $1,450 in debt amendment fees in connection with entering into the Second

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

Amendment, which will be amortized over the term of the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility, and wrote off $168 of unamortized debt issuance costs.

 

As of July 4, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under its credit facilities.

 

During the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009, the Company recognized charges of $168 and $4,114, respectively, in the “Other expenses” line of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, which represent certain costs related to the amendments of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility.

 

 

The Company uses financial instruments to manage its exposures to movements in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices. The use of these financial instruments modifies the Company’s exposure to these risks with the goal of reducing the risk or cost to the Company. The Company does not use derivatives for trading purposes and is not a party to leveraged derivative contracts.

 

The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value is based upon either market quotes for actively traded instruments or independent bids for nonexchange traded instruments. The Company formally documents its hedge relationships, including identifying the hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking derivatives that are designated as hedges of specific assets, liabilities, firm commitments or forecasted transactions to the hedged risk. On the date the derivative is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, net investment hedge or a mark to market hedge, and accounts for the derivative in accordance with its designation. The Company also formally assesses, both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in either the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. If it is determined that a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, or if the anticipated transaction is no longer likely to occur, the Company discontinues hedge accounting, and any deferred gains or losses are recorded in the respective measurement period. The Company currently does not have any fair value or net investment hedge instruments.

 

Each of the Company’s derivative contracts is governed by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association master agreement. If the Company were to default on or be unable to perform its responsibilities with respect to a counterparty under this agreement, the counterparty could request immediate payment on any derivative instruments in net liability positions. As of July 4, 2009, all of the counterparties to the Company’s derivative instruments in net liability positions are lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. Consistent with the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facility, derivative instruments with a counterparty that is also a lender under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are secured by the same collateral that secures the Company’s obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility.

 

The Company may be exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by individual counterparties or the entire group of counterparties to the Company’s derivative contracts. Risk of nonperformance by counterparties is mitigated by dealing with highly rated counterparties and by diversifying across counterparties.

 

Mark to Market Hedges

 

A derivative used as a hedging instrument whose change in fair value is recognized to act as an economic hedge against changes in the values of the hedged item is designated a mark to market hedge.

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

Market to Market Hedges — Intercompany Foreign Exchange Transactions

 

The Company uses foreign exchange derivative contracts to reduce the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on anticipated intercompany purchase and lending transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Foreign exchange derivative contracts are recorded as mark to market hedges when the hedged item is a recorded asset or liability that is revalued in each accounting period. Mark to market hedge derivatives relating to intercompany foreign exchange contracts are reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as cash flow from operating activities. As of July 4, 2009, the U.S. dollar equivalent of commitments to purchase and sell foreign currencies in our foreign currency mark to market hedge derivative portfolio is $58,808 and $39,758, respectively, using the exchange rate at the reporting date.

 

Cash Flow Hedges

 

A hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge. The effective portion of the change in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as a cash flow hedge is recorded in the “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” line of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. When the impact of the hedged item is recognized in the income statement, the gain or loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is reported on the same line in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as the hedged item.

 

Cash Flow Hedges — Interest Rate Derivatives

 

The Company is required under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility to hedge a portion of its floating rate debt to reduce interest rate risk caused by floating rate debt issuance. The Company has executed certain interest rate cash flow hedges in the form of swaps and caps in order to mitigate the Company’s exposure to variability in cash flows for the future interest payments on a designated portion of borrowings. Given the recent turmoil in the financial and credit markets, the Company expanded its interest rate hedging portfolio at what the Company believes to be advantageous rates that are expected to minimize the Company’s overall interest rate risk. The effective portion of interest rate hedge gains and losses deferred in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” is reclassified into earnings as the underlying debt interest payments are recognized. Interest rate cash flow hedge derivatives are reported as a component of interest expense and therefore are reported as cash flow from operating activities similar to the manner in which cash interest payments are reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

 

At July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009, the Company had outstanding interest rate hedging arrangements whereby it has capped the interest rate on $400,000 of its floating rate debt at 3.50% and has fixed the interest rate on $1,393,680 of its floating rate debt at a weighted average rate of 4.16%. Approximately 81% and 82% of the Company’s total debt outstanding at July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009, respectively, was at a fixed or capped LIBOR rate. There have been no changes in the Company’s interest rate derivative portfolio during the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009.

 

Cash Flow Hedges — Foreign Currency Derivatives

 

The Company uses forward exchange and option contracts to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated transactions, foreign currency-denominated investments, and other known foreign currency exposures. Gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset losses and gains on the hedged transaction in an effort to reduce the earnings volatility resulting from fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates. The effective portion of foreign exchange hedge gains and losses deferred in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” is reclassified into earnings as the underlying inventory is sold, using historical inventory turnover rates. The settlement of foreign exchange hedge derivative contracts related to the purchase of inventory or other hedged items are reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as cash flow from operating activities.

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

Historically, the principal currencies hedged by the Company include the Euro, Mexican peso, Canadian dollar and Japanese yen. Forward exchange contracts mature on the anticipated cash requirement date of the hedged transaction, generally within one year. As of July 4, 2009, the U.S. dollar equivalent of commitments to sell foreign currencies in the Company’s foreign currency cash flow hedge derivative portfolio was $28,113, using the exchange rate at the reporting date.

 

Cash Flow Hedges — Commodity Derivatives

 

Cotton is the primary raw material the Company uses to manufacture many of its products and is purchased at market prices. From time to time, the Company uses commodity financial instruments to hedge the price of cotton, for which there is a high correlation between the hedged item and the hedge instrument. Gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset losses and gains on the hedged transactions in an effort to reduce the earnings volatility resulting from fluctuating commodity prices. The effective portion of commodity hedge gains and losses deferred in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” is reclassified into earnings as the underlying inventory is sold, using historical inventory turnover rates. The settlement of commodity hedge derivative contracts related to the purchase of inventory is reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as cash flow from operating activities. There were no amounts outstanding under cotton futures or cotton option contracts at July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009.

 

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments

 

The fair values of derivative financial instruments recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company were as follows:

 

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

Net Derivative Gain or Loss

 

The effect of cash flow hedge derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss is as follows:

 

 

 

The Company expects to reclassify into earnings during the next 12 months a net loss from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss of approximately $3,172.

 

The changes in fair value of derivatives excluded from the Company’s effectiveness assessments and the ineffective portion of the changes in the fair value of derivatives used as cash flow hedges are reported in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company recognized losses related to ineffectiveness of hedging relationships for the quarter ended July 4, 2009 of $(150), consisting of $(143) for interest rate contracts and $(7) for foreign exchange contracts. The Company recognized gains (losses) related to ineffectiveness of hedging relationships for the quarter ended June 28, 2008 of $4, consisting of $(12) for interest rate contracts and $16 for foreign exchange contracts. The Company recognized gains (losses) related to ineffectiveness of hedging relationships for the six months ended July 4, 2009 of $144, consisting of $152 for interest rate contracts and $(8) for foreign exchange contracts. The Company recognized losses related to ineffectiveness of hedging relationships for the six months ended June 28, 2008 of $(187), consisting of $(12) for interest rate contracts and $(175) for foreign exchange contracts.

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

The effect of mark to market hedge derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income is as follows:

 

 

 

Fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value, is utilized for disclosing the fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs about which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

 

 

The Company primarily applies the market approach for commodity derivatives and the income approach for interest rate and foreign currency derivatives for recurring fair value measurements and attempts to utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The determination of fair values incorporates various factors that include not only the credit standing of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements, but also the impact of the Company’s nonperformance risk on its liabilities. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

 

As of July 4, 2009, the Company held certain financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These consisted of the Company’s derivative instruments related to interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The fair values of cotton derivatives are determined based on quoted prices in public markets and are categorized as Level 1. The fair values of interest rate and foreign exchange

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

rate derivatives are determined based on inputs that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets and are categorized as Level 2. The Company does not have any financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis categorized as Level 3, and there were no transfers in or out of Level 3 during the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009. There were no changes during the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009 to the Company’s valuation techniques used to measure asset and liability fair values on a recurring basis. As of July 4, 2009, the Company did not have any non-financial assets or liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

 

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, notes receivable and accounts payable approximated fair value as of July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009. The fair value of debt was $2,090,444 and $1,753,885 as of July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009 and had a carrying value of $2,219,930 and $2,176,547, respectively. The fair values were estimated using quoted market prices as provided in secondary markets which consider the Company’s credit risk and market related conditions. The carrying amounts of the Company’s notes payable approximated fair value as of July 4, 2009 and January 3, 2009, primarily due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

 

 

The Company’s comprehensive income is as follows:

 

 

 

The difference in the estimated annual effective income tax rates of 22% for the quarter and six months ended July 4, 2009 and 24% for the quarter and six months ended June 28, 2008 and the U.S. statutory rate of 35% is primarily attributable to unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate. The Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate reflects its strategic initiative to make substantial capital investments outside the United States in its global supply chain in 2009.

 

The Company and Sara Lee entered into a tax sharing agreement in connection with the spin off of the Company from Sara Lee on September 5, 2006. Under the tax sharing agreement, within 180 days after Sara Lee filed its final consolidated tax return for the period that included September 5, 2006, Sara Lee was required to deliver to the Company a computation of the amount of deferred taxes attributable to the Company’s United States and Canadian operations that would be included on the Company’s opening balance sheet as of September 6, 2006 (“as finally determined”) which has been done. The Company has the right to participate in the computation of the amount of deferred taxes. Under the tax sharing agreement, if substituting the amount of deferred taxes as finally determined for the amount of estimated deferred taxes that were included on that balance sheet at the time of the spin off causes a decrease in the net book value reflected on that balance sheet, then Sara Lee will be required to pay the Company the amount of such decrease. If such substitution causes an increase in the net book value reflected on that balance sheet, then the Company will be required to pay Sara Lee the amount of such increase. For purposes of this computation, the Company’s deferred taxes are the amount of deferred tax benefits (including deferred tax consequences attributable to deductible temporary differences and carryforwards) that would be recognized as assets on the Company’s balance sheet computed in accordance with GAAP, but without regard to valuation allowances, less the amount of deferred tax liabilities (including deferred tax consequences attributable to taxable temporary differences) that would be recognized as liabilities on the Company’s opening balance sheet computed in accordance with GAAP, but without regard to valuation allowances. Neither the Company nor Sara Lee will be required to make any other payments to the other with respect to deferred taxes.

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

The Company’s computation of the final amount of deferred taxes for the Company’s opening balance sheet as of September 6, 2006 is as follows:

 

 

The amount that is expected to be collected from Sara Lee based on the Company’s computation of $72,223 is included as a receivable in Deferred tax assets and other current assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 4, 2009. The Company and Sara Lee have exchanged information in connection with this matter, but Sara Lee has disagreed with the Company’s computation. In accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of the tax sharing agreement, on August 3, 2009, the Company submitted the dispute to binding arbitration. The Company does not believe that the resolution of this dispute will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

 

The Company’s operations are managed and reported in five operating segments, each of which is a reportable segment for financial reporting purposes: Innerwear, Outerwear, International, Hosiery and Other. These segments are organized principally by product category and geographic location. Management of each segment is responsible for the operations of these segments’ businesses but shares a common supply chain and media and marketing platforms.

 

The types of products and services from which each reportable segment derives its revenues are as follows:

 

 

The Company evaluates the operating performance of its segments based upon segment operating profit, which is defined as operating profit before general corporate expenses, amortization of trademarks and other identifiable intangibles and restructuring and related accelerated depreciation charges and inventory write-offs. The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with those described in Note 2 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009.

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

 

 

 

 

HANESBRANDS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)