e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
May 1, 2009
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission File
Number: 0-17017
Dell Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
74-2487834
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
One Dell
Way
Round Rock, Texas 78682
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(512) 338-4400
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No
þ
As of the close of business on May 29, 2009,
1,953,985,884 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per
share, were outstanding.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
9,691
|
|
|
$
|
8,352
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
4,731
|
|
Financing receivables, net
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
|
|
3,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
19,910
|
|
|
|
20,151
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
2,277
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
Long-term financing receivables, net
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,742
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
Purchased intangible assets, net
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
26,189
|
|
|
$
|
26,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
7,844
|
|
|
|
8,309
|
|
Accrued and other
|
|
|
3,513
|
|
|
|
3,788
|
|
Short-term deferred enhanced services revenue
|
|
|
2,683
|
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
14,141
|
|
|
|
14,859
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
Long-term deferred enhanced services revenue
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
21,959
|
|
|
|
22,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock and capital in excess of $.01 par value;
shares authorized: 5,000; issued and outstanding: none
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and capital in excess of $.01 par value;
shares authorized: 7,000; shares issued: 3,345 and 3,338,
respectively; shares outstanding: 1,951 and 1,944, respectively
|
|
|
11,224
|
|
|
|
11,189
|
|
Treasury stock at cost: 919 shares
|
|
|
(27,904
|
)
|
|
|
(27,904
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
20,967
|
|
|
|
20,677
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
4,230
|
|
|
|
4,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
26,189
|
|
|
$
|
26,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
10,232
|
|
|
$
|
13,956
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
|
12,342
|
|
|
|
16,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
8,786
|
|
|
|
11,847
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
10,174
|
|
|
|
13,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Research, development, and engineering
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
In-process research and development charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Other
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Financing receivables
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
Deferred enhanced services revenue
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
141
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash from operating activities
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
Maturities and sales
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash received
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash from investing activities
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,031
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock under employee plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Issuance of commercial paper, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
Repayments of debt
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash from financing activities
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
7,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,691
|
|
|
$
|
8,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 1
|
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
|
Basis of Presentation The accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Dell Inc.
(Dell) should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) in Dells Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009. The
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). In
the opinion of management, the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments of a
normal recurring nature considered necessary to fairly state the
financial position of Dell and its consolidated subsidiaries at
May 1, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for the three months ended May 1, 2009, and
May 2, 2008.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in Dells Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes.
Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The
results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended
May 1, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected for the full year.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting
Pronouncements In December 2007, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 141(R), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R) requires
that the acquisition method of accounting be applied to a
broader set of business combinations and establishes principles
and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in
its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree, and the goodwill acquired. Dell adopted
SFAS 141(R) in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. The
adoption of SFAS 141(R) did not have any impact on
Dells Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2),
which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
Dell adopted the provisions of
FSP 157-2
related to non-financial assets and liabilities effective in the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010. The adoption of the provisions of
SFAS 157 related to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities did not have a material impact on Dells
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 3 of
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires that the
noncontrolling interest in the equity of a subsidiary be
accounted for and reported as equity, provides revised guidance
on the treatment of net income and losses attributable to the
noncontrolling interest and changes in ownership interests in a
subsidiary, and requires additional disclosures that identify
and distinguish between the interests of the controlling and
noncontrolling owners. Dell adopted SFAS 160 in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not
have any impact on Dells Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(SFAS 161), which requires additional
disclosures about the objectives of derivative instruments and
hedging activities, the method of accounting for such
instruments under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations,
and a tabular disclosure of the effects of such instruments and
related hedged items on Dells Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. SFAS 161 does not change the
accounting treatment for derivative instruments. Dell adopted
SFAS 161 in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. See
Note 3 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
4
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements In April 2009, the FASB
issued
FSP 157-4
Determining Fair Value When Volume and Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Indentifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(SFAS 157-4),
which provides additional guidance on measuring the fair value
of financial instruments when markets become inactive and quoted
prices may reflect distressed transactions. The provisions of
FSP 157-4
are effective for Dell beginning in the second quarter of Fiscal
2010. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the
adoption of
FSP 157-4
but does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on
Dells Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS No. 107-1
and APB
No. 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1).
FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
require disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for annual and interim reporting periods of publicly
traded companies. FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
is effective in reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009, and is required to be adopted by Dell beginning in the
second quarter of Fiscal 2010. Management does not expect the
adoption of this FSP to have any impact on Dells Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS No. 115-2
and
FAS No. 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than Temporary
Investments (FSP
FAS 115-2
and
124-2).
FSP
FAS 115-2
and 124-2
amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt
securities. Under FSP
FAS 115-2
and 124-2,
the pre-existing intent and ability trigger was
modified such that an other-than-temporary impairment is now
triggered when there is intent to sell the security, it is more
likely than not that the security will be required to be sold
before recovery in value, or the security is not expected to
recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Credit
related losses on debt securities will be considered an
other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings, and any
other losses due to a decline in fair value relative to the
amortized cost deemed not to be other-than-temporary will be
recorded in other comprehensive income. FSP
FAS 115-2
and 124-2 is
effective in reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009,
and is required to be adopted by Dell beginning in the second
quarter of Fiscal 2010. Management is currently evaluating the
impact of the adoption of FSP
FAS 115-2
and 124-2
but does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on
Dells Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS 165), which
provides guidance to establish general standards of accounting
for and disclosures of events that occur after balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available
to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or fiscal
periods ending after June 15, 2009, and is required to be
adopted by Dell beginning in the second quarter of Fiscal 2010.
Management is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of
SFAS 165 but does not expect the adoption to have a
material impact on Dells Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Out of Period Adjustments In the first
quarter of Fiscal 2009, Dell recorded adjustments related to net
revenue, cost of net revenue, operating expenses, and investment
and other income that in the aggregate increased income before
income taxes by approximately $110 million. The two largest
of these corrections include a reversal of the provision for
Fiscal 2008 employee bonuses and foreign exchange rate
errors. These errors increased income before income taxes by
$46 million and $42 million, respectively. Because
these errors, both individually and in the aggregate, were not
material to any of the prior years financial statements,
including Fiscal 2009 financial statements, Dell recorded the
correction of these errors in the first quarter of Fiscal 2009
financial statements.
Reclassifications Dell expects its
enhanced services revenue to exceed 10% of total net revenue in
Fiscal 2010. Enhanced services revenue includes infrastructure
consulting, deployment of enterprise products and computer
systems in customers environments, asset recovery and
recycling, computer-related training, IT support, client and
enterprise support, and managed service solutions. To maintain
comparability among the periods presented, Dell has revised the
Fiscal 2009 presentation of the components of net revenue and
cost of net revenue presented in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income in order to disclose net revenue and cost
of net revenue for services as required by the SEC
Regulation S-X
article 210.5-03
Income Statements. In conjunction with separating
enhanced services revenue and related cost, Dell elected to
classify revenue and cost of net revenue related to
5
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
standalone software sold with post contract customer support
(PCS) in the same line item as enhanced services in
our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Services
revenue and cost of services revenue captions on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income include Dells enhanced
services and software from Dells software and peripherals
product category. This software revenue and related costs
include software license fees and related PCS that is sold
separately from computer systems through our software and
peripherals product category. Dell recognizes software revenue
and related costs in accordance with the requirements of AICPA
Statement of Position
No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition. Dell has not established
vendor specific objective evidence to support a separation of
the software license and PCS elements; therefore, software
license revenue and related costs are included in services
revenue and cost of revenue and are generally recognized over
the term of the arrangement. The revision had no impact to total
net revenue and total cost of net revenue.
Dell has revised the presentation of certain prior period
amounts reported within cash flow from operations presented in
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The
revision had no impact to the total change in cash from
operating activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production materials
|
|
$
|
444
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
Fair
Value Measurements
On February 2, 2008, Dell adopted the effective portions of
SFAS 157 for all financial assets and liabilities and
non-financial assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value
on a recurring basis. On January 31, 2009, Dell adopted
FSP 157-2
for all non-financial assets and liabilities accounted for at
fair value on a non-recurring basis. SFAS 157 defines fair
value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair
value, Dell uses various methods including market, income, and
cost approaches. Dell utilizes valuation techniques that
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of
unobservable inputs. The adoption of
FSP 157-2
did not have a material effect on the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010.
As a basis for categorizing these inputs, SFAS 157
establishes the following hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs
used to measure fair value from market based assumptions to
entity specific assumptions:
|
|
|
Level 1: Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted prices
included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets
and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical
or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
Level 3: Inputs reflect managements best estimate of
what market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable
in the market and significant to the instruments valuation.
|
6
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The following tables present the hierarchy for Dells
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Investments - available for sale securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
954
|
|
Investments - trading securities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Retained interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on recurring basis
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1,136
|
|
|
$
|
532
|
|
|
$
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value on recurring basis
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Investments - available for sale securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,135
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
1,162
|
|
Investments - trading securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Retained interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on recurring basis
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1,835
|
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
2,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value on recurring basis
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The following section describes the valuation methodologies Dell
uses to measure financial instruments at fair value:
Investments Available for Sale The
majority of Dells investment portfolio consists of various
fixed income securities such as U.S. government and
agencies, U.S. and international corporate, and state and
municipal bonds. This portfolio of investments, as of
May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009, is valued based on
model driven valuations, whereby all significant inputs are
observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable
market data for substantially the full term of the asset. Dell
utilizes a pricing service to obtain fair value pricing for the
majority of the investment portfolio. Pricing for securities is
based on proprietary models, and inputs are documented in
accordance with the SFAS 157 hierarchy. Dell conducts
reviews on a quarterly basis to verify pricing, assess
liquidity, and determine if significant inputs have changed that
would impact the SFAS 157 hierarchy disclosure. The
Level 3 position represents a convertible debt security
that Dell was unable to corroborate with observable market data.
The investment is valued at cost plus accrued interest as this
is managements best estimate of fair value.
Investments Trading Securities The
majority of Dells trading portfolio consists of various
mutual funds and equity securities. The Level 1 securities
are valued using quoted prices for identical assets in active
markets. The Level 2 securities include various mutual
funds that are not exchange traded and valued at their net asset
value, which can be market corroborated.
Retained Interest in Securitized
Receivables The fair value of the retained
interest is determined using a discounted cash flow model.
Significant assumptions to the model include pool credit losses,
payment rates, and discount rates. These assumptions are
supported by both historical experience and anticipated trends
relative to the particular receivable pool. Retained interest in
securitized receivables is included in financing receivables,
current and long-term, on the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Financial Position. See Note 4 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
about retained interest.
Derivative Instruments Dells
derivative financial instruments consist of foreign currency
forward and purchased option contracts. The portfolio is valued
using internal models based on market observable inputs,
including forward and spot prices for currencies and implied
volatilities. Credit risk is also factored into the fair value
calculation of our derivative instrument portfolio. Credit risk
is quantified through the use of credit default swap spreads
based on a composite of Dells counterparties, which
represents the cost of protection in the event the counterparty
or Dell were to default on the obligation.
The following tables show a reconciliation of the beginning and
ending balances for fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs for the three months ended May 1, 2009,
and May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
for Sale
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at January 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains included in
earnings(a)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Issuances and settlements
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The unrealized gains on investments
available for sale represent accrued interest.
|
8
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
for Sale
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at February 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
Net unrealized losses included in earnings
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Issuances and settlements
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 2, 2008
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains or (losses) on retained interest and the
convertible debt security are reported in income.
Financial Items Measured at Fair Value on a
Nonrecurring Basis Certain assets and
liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
and therefore are not included in the above recurring fair value
table. The balances are not material relative to Dells
balance sheet, and there were no material non-recurring
adjustments to earnings to disclose under the provisions of
SFAS 157 for the three months ended May 1, 2009, and
May 2, 2008.
Non-financial Items Measured at Fair Value on a
Nonrecurring Basis Non-financial assets
such as goodwill; intangible assets; and property, plant, and
equipment are measured at fair value when there is an indicator
of impairment and recorded at fair value only when impairment is
recognized. Dell performed impairment analyses in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010. Based on the results of the impairment
tests, Dell determined no impairment of goodwill; intangible
assets; or property, plant, and equipment existed as of
May 1, 2009.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
Foreign
Currency Instruments
As part of its risk management strategy, Dell uses derivative
instruments, primarily forward contracts and purchased options,
to hedge certain foreign currency exposures. Dells
objective is to offset gains and losses resulting from these
exposures with gains and losses on the derivative contracts used
to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of earnings and
protecting fair values of assets and liabilities. Dell applies
hedge accounting based upon the criteria established by
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative instruments
and Hedging Activities, (SFAS 133), whereby
Dell designates its derivatives as fair value hedges or cash
flow hedges. Dell estimates the fair values of derivatives based
on quoted market prices or pricing models using current market
rates and records all derivatives in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position at fair value.
Cash
Flow Hedges
Dell uses a combination of forward contracts and purchased
options designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the
foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in its forecasted
transactions denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. The risk of loss associated with purchased
options is limited to premium amounts paid for the option
contracts. The risk of loss associated with forward contracts is
equal to the exchange rate differential from the time the
contract is entered into until the time it is settled. Both of
these contracts typically expire in 12 months or less. For
derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash
flow hedges, Dell records the effective portion of the gain or
loss on the derivative instrument in accumulated other
comprehensive income (OCI) (loss) as a separate
component of stockholders equity and reclassifies these
amounts into earnings in the period during which the hedged
transaction is recognized in earnings. Dell reports the
effective portion of cash flow hedges in the same financial
statement line item within earnings as the changes in value of
the hedged item.
9
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
For foreign currency forward contracts and purchased options
designated as cash flow hedges, Dell assesses hedge
effectiveness both at the onset of the hedge as well as at the
end of each fiscal quarter throughout the life of the
derivative. Dell measures hedge ineffectiveness by comparing the
cumulative change in the fair value of the hedge contract with
the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedged item, both
of which are based on forward rates. Dell recognizes any
ineffective portion of the hedge, as well as amounts not
included in the assessment of effectiveness, currently in
earnings as a component of investment and other income
(expenses), net. Hedge ineffectiveness for cash flow hedges was
not material for the three months ended May 1, 2009. During
the three months ended May 1, 2009, Dell did not
discontinue any cash flow hedges that had a material impact on
Dells results of operations as substantially all
forecasted foreign currency transactions were realized in
Dells actual results.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the foreign
exchange contracts on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position for the three months ended May 1, 2009,
as well as the amount of hedge ineffectiveness on cash flow
hedges recorded in earnings for the respective period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) recognized
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Accumulated
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Derivatives in
|
|
OCI, Net of Tax,
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
SFAS 133 Cash Flow
|
|
on Derivatives
|
|
|
into Income
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
Income on Derivative
|
|
Hedging Relationships
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion)
|
|
(Ineffective Portion)
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
Investment and other
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
$
|
(124)
|
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(124)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Foreign Currency Derivative Instruments
Dell uses forward contracts to hedge monetary assets and
liabilities, primarily receivables and payables, denominated in
a foreign currency. The change in the fair value of these
instruments represents a natural hedge as their gains and losses
offset the changes in the underlying fair value of the monetary
assets and liabilities due to movements in currency exchange
rates. These contracts generally expire in three months or less.
These contracts are considered economic hedges and are not
designated as hedges under SFAS 133, and therefore, the
change in the instruments fair value is recognized
currently in earnings as a component of investment and other
income (expense), net. For the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, the
gain on the contracts that was recognized in Financing and Other
Income was $46 million.
Derivative
Instruments Additional Information
The gross notional value of foreign currency derivative
financial instruments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
$
|
5,692
|
|
Other derivatives
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from derivative instruments are presented in the same
category on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash flows
as the cash flows from the intended hedged items or the economic
hedges.
10
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
While Dell has derivative contracts in more than 20 currencies,
the majority of the gross notional values are denominated in the
Euro, British Pound, Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollar, and
Australian Dollar.
Dell accounts for derivatives under FASB Interpretation
No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain
Contracts, which allows for net presentation of its
derivative instruments in a statement of financial position due
to right of setoff by counterparty under master netting
arrangements. As a result, there are contracts in an asset
position recorded in the other current liabilities, and vice
versa. As required by SFAS 161, the fair value of the
derivative instruments presented on a gross basis is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Current
|
|
|
Other Current
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
521
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under
SFAS 133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives at Fair value
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dell has reviewed the existence and nature of
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative trading
agreements with its counterparties. Certain agreements contain
clauses whereby upon a change of control and if Dells
credit ratings were to fall below investment grade,
counterparties would have the right to terminate those
derivative contracts where Dell is in a net liability position.
As of May 1, 2009, there has been no such triggering event.
Debt
Commercial
Paper
Dell has a $1.5 billion commercial paper program with a
supporting $1.5 billion senior unsecured revolving credit
facility that allows Dell to obtain favorable short-term
borrowing rates. On April 3, 2009, Dell entered into a
replacement
364-day
$500 million credit facility, which expires on
April 2, 2010. Additionally, Dell has a five-year
$1.0 billion credit facility that will expire on
June 1, 2011. There were no events of default as of
May 1, 2009.
At May 1, 2009, there was $100 million outstanding
under the commercial paper program and no outstanding advances
under the related revolving credit facilities. The
weighted-average interest rate on these outstanding short- term
borrowings was 0.20%. At January 30, 2009, there was
$100 million outstanding under the commercial paper program
and no outstanding advances under the related revolving credit
facilities. Dell uses the proceeds of the program for short-term
liquidity needs.
11
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
India
Credit Facilities
At May 1, 2009, there were no outstanding advances from
Citibank India, and at January 30, 2009, outstanding
advances from Citibank India totaled $12 million and are
included in short-term debt on Dells Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. There have been
no events of default.
Long-Term
Debt
The following table summarizes our long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$600 million issued on April 17, 2008 at 4.70% due
April 2013 (2013 Notes) with interest payable April
15 and October 15
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
$500 million issued on April 1, 2009 at 5.625% due
April 2014 (2014 Notes) with interest payable April
15 and October 15
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
$500 million issued on April 17, 2008 at 5.65% due
April 2018 (2018 Notes) with interest payable April
15 and October 15
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
$400 million issued on April 17, 2008 at 6.50% due
April 2038 (2038 Notes) with interest payable April
15 and October 15
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Senior Debenture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$300 million issued on April 1998 at 7.10% due April 2028
with interest payable April 15 and October 15 (includes the
impact of interest rate swap termination)
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,396
|
|
|
$
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2014 Notes were issued during the first quarter of Fiscal
2010, under an automatic shelf registration statement that was
filed in November 2008. The net proceeds from the offering of
the 2014 Notes were approximately $497 million after
payment of expenses of the offering. The estimated fair value of
all the Notes in aggregate was approximately $2.0 billion
at May 1, 2009, compared to a carrying value of
$2.0 billion at that date. All Notes are unsecured
obligations and rank equally with our existing and future
unsecured senior indebtedness. The Notes effectively rank junior
to all indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade
payables, of Dells subsidiaries. The 2014 Notes were
issued pursuant to an Indenture dated April 1, 2009,
between Dell and a trustee, with terms and conditions
substantially the same as those governing the 2013 Notes, 2018
Notes, and 2038 Notes.
The principal amount of the Senior Debenture was
$300 million at May 1, 2009. The estimated fair value
of the long-term debt was approximately $301 million at
May 1, 2009, compared to a carrying value of
$398 million at that date as it includes termination of the
interest rate swap agreements in the fourth quarter of Fiscal
2009.
As of May 1, 2009, there were no events of default for the
Notes and the Senior Debenture.
NOTE 4 FINANCIAL
SERVICES
Dell
Financial Services L.L.C.
Dell offers or arranges various financing options and services
for its business and consumer customers in the U.S. through
Dell Financial Services L.L.C. (DFS), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Dell. DFSs key activities include the
origination, collection, and servicing of customer receivables
related to the purchase of Dell products.
12
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Dell utilizes DFS to facilitate financing for customers who
elect to finance products sold by Dell. New financing
originations, which represent the amounts of financing provided
to customers for equipment and related software and services
through DFS, were $0.9 billion, and $1.1 billion,
during the three months ended May 1, 2009, and May 2,
2008, respectively.
CIT Group Inc. (CIT), formerly a joint venture
partner of DFS, continues to have the right to purchase a
percentage of new customer receivables facilitated by DFS until
the end of Fiscal 2010. CITs contractual funding right on
a cumulative annual basis was up to 35% in Fiscal 2009 and is up
to 25% in Fiscal 2010. For the three months ended May 1,
2009, CITs funding percentage was approximately 31% as
agreed to by CIT and Dell. DFS services the receivables
purchased by CIT. However, Dells obligation related to the
performance of the DFS originated receivables purchased by CIT
is limited to the cash funded credit reserves established at the
time of funding.
Financing
Receivables
The following table summarizes the components of Dells
financing receivables, net of the allowance for financing
receivables losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Financing receivables, net:
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Customer receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loans, gross
|
|
$
|
931
|
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
Fixed-term leases and loans, gross
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables, gross
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
Customer receivables allowance
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables, net
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
Residual interests
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
Retained interest and other
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,220
|
|
|
$
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
|
$
|
1,712
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,220
|
|
|
$
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the gross customer receivables balance at May 1, 2009,
and January 30, 2009, $33 million and
$45 million, respectively, represent balances which are due
from CIT in connection with specified promotional programs.
Customer Receivables The composition
and credit quality of customer receivables vary from investment
grade commercial customers to subprime consumers. Dells
estimate of subprime customer receivables was approximately 21%
and 20% of the gross customer receivable balance at May 1,
2009, and January 30, 2009, respectively.
As of May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009, customer
financing receivables 60 days or more delinquent were
$60 million and $58 million, respectively. These
amounts represent 3.7% and 3.4% of the ending gross customer
financing receivables balances for the respective periods.
Net principal charge-offs for the three months ended May 1,
2009, and May 2, 2008, were $30 million and
$18 million, respectively. These amounts when annualized
represent 7.2% and 4.7% of the average gross outstanding
customer financing receivable balance (including accrued
interest) for the respective three month periods.
13
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The following is a description of the components of customer
receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loans offered under private label credit financing
programs underwritten by CIT Bank provide qualified customers
with a revolving credit line for the purchase of products and
services offered by Dell. Revolving loans bear interest at a
variable annual percentage rate that is tied to the prime rate.
Based on historical payment patterns, revolving loan
transactions are typically repaid on average within
12 months. Revolving loans are included in short-term
financing receivables in the table above. From time to time,
account holders may have the opportunity to finance their Dell
purchases with special programs during which, if the outstanding
balance is paid in full by a specific date, no interest is
charged. These special programs generally range from 3 to
12 months. At May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009,
$274 million and $352 million, respectively, were
receivable under these special programs.
|
|
|
|
Dell enters into sales-type lease arrangements with customers
who desire lease financing. Leases with business customers have
fixed terms of two to five years. Future maturities of minimum
lease payments at May 1, 2009, for future fiscal years are
as follows: 2010 - $185 million; 2011
$166 million; 2012 $82 million;
2013 $14 million; and 2014
$1 million. Fixed-term loans are also offered to qualified
small businesses, large commercial accounts, governmental
organizations, and educational entities.
|
Residual Interest Dell retains a
residual interest in the leased equipment. The amount of the
residual interest is established at the inception of the lease
based upon estimates of the value of the equipment at the end of
the lease term using historical studies, industry data, and
future
value-at-risk
demand valuation methods. On a quarterly basis, Dell assesses
the carrying amount of its recorded residual values for
impairment. Anticipated declines in specific future residual
values that are considered to be other-than-temporary are
recorded in current earnings.
Retained Interest Retained interest
represents the residual beneficial interest Dell retains in
certain pools of securitized financing receivables. Retained
interest is stated at the present value of the estimated net
beneficial cash flows after payment of all senior interests.
Dell values the retained interest at the time of each receivable
transfer and at the end of each reporting period. The fair value
of the retained interest is determined using a discounted cash
flow model with various key assumptions, including payment
rates, credit losses, discount rates, and the remaining life of
the receivables sold. These assumptions are supported by both
Dells historical experience and anticipated trends
relative to the particular receivable pool. The weighted average
assumptions for retained interest can be affected by many
factors, including asset type (revolving versus fixed),
repayment terms, and the credit quality of assets being
securitized.
The following table summarizes the activity in retained interest
balances for the three months ended May 1, 2009, and
May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Retained interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interest at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Distributions from conduits
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
Net accretion
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Change in fair value for the period
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interest at end of period
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The table below summarizes the key assumptions used to measure
the fair value of the retained interest at time of transfer
within the quarter and at the balance sheet date, May 1,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Key Assumptions
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
Credit
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
Losses
|
|
Rates
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
(lifetime)
|
|
(annualized)
|
|
(months)
|
|
Time of transfer valuation of retained interest
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
|
Valuation of retained interest
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
|
The impact of adverse changes to the key valuation assumptions
to the fair value of retained interest at May 1, 2009, is
shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Adverse Change of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected prepayment speed: 10%
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Expected prepayment speed: 20%
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected credit losses: 10%
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
Expected credit losses: 20%
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate: 10%
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Discount rate: 20%
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
The analyses above utilized 10% and 20% adverse variation in
assumptions to assess the sensitivities in the fair value of the
retained interest. However, these changes generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship between a change in one
assumption to the resulting change in fair value may not be
linear. For the above sensitivity analyses, each key assumption
was isolated and evaluated separately. Each assumption was
adjusted by 10% and 20% while holding the other key assumptions
constant. Assumptions may be interrelated, and changes to one
assumption may impact others and the resulting fair value of the
retained interest. For example, increases in market interest
rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit
losses. The effect of multiple assumption changes were not
considered in the analyses.
Asset
Securitization
During the first three months of Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009,
Dell transferred $233 million and $421 million,
respectively, of fixed-term leases and loans and revolving loans
to unconsolidated qualifying special purpose entities. The
qualifying special purpose entities are bankruptcy remote legal
entities with assets and liabilities separate from those of
Dell. The purpose of the qualifying special purpose entities is
to facilitate the funding of financing receivables in the
capital markets. The qualifying special purpose entities have
entered into financing arrangements with three multi-seller
conduits that, in turn, issue asset-backed debt securities in
the capital markets. Two of the three conduits fund fixed-term
leases and loans, and one conduit funds revolving loans. The
principal balance of the securitized receivables at May 1,
2009, and January 30, 2009, was $1.3 billion and
$1.4 billion, respectively.
15
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Dell services securitized contracts and earns a servicing fee.
Dells securitization transactions generally do not result
in servicing assets and liabilities as the contractual fees are
adequate compensation in relation to the associated servicing
cost.
The revolving securitization agreement continues under scheduled
amortization. During this scheduled amortization period, all
principal collections will be used to pay down the outstanding
debt amount related to the securitized assets. The right to
receive cash collections is delayed until the debt is fully
paid. During the scheduled amortization, no transfers of new
revolving loans will occur. Additional purchases made on
existing securitized revolving loans (repeat purchases) will
continue to be transferred to the qualified special purpose
entity and will increase the retained interest in securitized
assets on the balance sheet.
Once the amount of the beneficial interest in the revolving
credit conduit owned by third parties falls below 10%, Dell will
be required to recognize the fair value of the assets and
liabilities relating to the revolving securitization transaction
on the balance sheet. The overall impact to the balance sheet
will be an increase in accrued and other current liabilities,
representing the unpaid portion of the outstanding debt, which
is immaterial. As of May 1, 2009, the principal balance of
the revolving securitized receivables was $616 million, and
the balance of the debt associated with those assets was
$184 million.
Dells securitization programs contain standard structural
features related to the performance of the securitized
receivables. These structural features include defined credit
losses, delinquencies, average credit scores, and excess
collections above or below specified levels. In the event one or
more of these features are met and Dell is unable to restructure
the program, no further funding of receivables will be permitted
and the timing of expected retained interest cash flows will be
delayed, which would impact the valuation of the retained
interest. For the revolving transaction currently under
scheduled amortization, performance features have been suspended.
As of May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009, securitized
financing receivables 60 days or more delinquent were
$60 million and $63 million, respectively. These
amounts represent 4.7% and 4.6% of the ending securitized
financing receivables balances for the respective periods.
Net principal charge-offs for the three months ended May 1,
2009, and May 2, 2008, were $36 million and
$28 million, respectively. These amounts when annualized
represent 10.6% and 8.7% of the average outstanding securitized
financing receivable balance for the respective three month
periods.
16
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 5
|
GOODWILL
AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Goodwill
Goodwill allocated to Dells business segments as of
May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009, and changes in the
carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
Public
|
|
|
Medium Business
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at January 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
679
|
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
1,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles are tested annually
during the second fiscal quarter and whenever events or
circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. If the
carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value, estimated
based on discounted cash flow analyses, an impairment charge
would be recorded. In the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, Dell
evaluated goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles for
potential triggering events that could indicate impairment in
connection with the new alignment of its business segments.
Based on the results of the impairment tests, Dell determined
that no impairment of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible
assets existed at May 1, 2009. The goodwill adjustments are
primarily the result of contingent purchase price considerations
related to prior acquisitions and the effects of foreign
currency fluctuations.
17
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 6
|
WARRANTY
LIABILITY AND RELATED DEFERRED ENHANCED SERVICES
REVENUE
|
Revenue from extended warranty and service contracts including
support agreements, for which Dell is obligated to perform, is
recorded as deferred enhanced services revenue and subsequently
recognized over the term of the contract or when the service is
completed and the costs associated with these contracts is
recognized as incurred. Deferred software related revenue is
included in accrued and other current and other non-current
liabilities on Dells Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position. Dell records warranty liabilities at the
time of sale for the estimated costs that may be incurred under
its limited warranty. Changes in Dells deferred enhanced
services revenue for extended warranties and its warranty
liability for standard warranties, which are included in accrued
and other current and other non-current liabilities on
Dells Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position, are presented in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008(b)
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred enhanced services revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred enhanced services revenue at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
5,649
|
|
|
$
|
5,260
|
|
Revenue deferred for new extended warranty and services
contracts sold
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
Revenue recognized
|
|
|
(772
|
)
|
|
|
(780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred enhanced services revenue at end of period
|
|
$
|
5,637
|
|
|
$
|
5,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
2,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,518
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
|
|
2,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred enhanced services revenue at end of period
|
|
$
|
5,637
|
|
|
$
|
5,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Warranty liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
Costs accrued for new warranty contracts and changes in
estimates for pre-existing
warranties(a)
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Services obligations honored
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Changes in cost estimates related
to pre-existing warranties are aggregated with accruals for new
warranty contracts. Dells warranty liability process does
not differentiate between estimates made for pre-existing
warranties and new warranty obligations.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Fiscal 2009 amounts have been
revised to include foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
in revenue deferred for new extended warranty and service
contracts sold and costs accrued for new warranty contracts and
changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties to conform to
the current period presentation.
|
18
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 7
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Severance Costs and Facility Closures
In Fiscal 2008, Dell announced a comprehensive review of costs
that is currently ongoing. Since this announcement and through
the end of the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, Dell reduced its
headcount and closed certain Dell facilities. Results of
operations for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 include net
pre-tax charges of $185 million for these actions, which is
comprised of $175 million related to headcount reduction
and a net $10 million related to facilities actions,
including accelerated depreciation. In the first quarter of
Fiscal 2009, costs related to severance and facility closures
were $106 million. As of May 1, 2009, and
January 30, 2009, the accrual related to these cost
reductions and efficiency actions was $183 million and
$98 million, respectively, which is included in accrued and
other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position.
Restricted Cash Pursuant to an
agreement between Dell and CIT, Dell is required to maintain
escrow cash accounts that are held as recourse reserves for
credit losses, performance fee deposits related to Dells
private label credit card, and deferred servicing revenue.
Restricted cash in the amount of $197 million and
$213 million is included in other current assets at
May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009, respectively.
Legal Matters Dell is involved in
various claims, suits, investigations, and legal proceedings. As
required by SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, Dell accrues a liability when it believes
that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and
that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. Dell
reviews these accruals at least quarterly and adjusts them to
reflect ongoing negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of
legal counsel, and other relevant information. However,
litigation is inherently unpredictable; therefore, Dell could
incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims that could
adversely affect its operating results or cash flows in a
particular period.
The following is a discussion of Dells significant legal
matters.
|
|
|
Investigations and Related Litigation In
August 2005, the SEC initiated an inquiry into certain of
Dells accounting and financial reporting matters and
requested that Dell provide certain documents. The SEC expanded
that inquiry in June 2006 and entered a formal order of
investigation in October 2006. The SECs requests for
information were joined by a similar request from the United
States Attorney for the Southern District of New York
(SDNY), who subpoenaed documents related to
Dells financial reporting from and after Fiscal 2002. In
August 2006, because of potential issues identified in the
course of responding to the SECs requests for information,
Dells Audit Committee, on the recommendation of management
and in consultation with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Dells
independent registered public accounting firm, initiated an
independent investigation, which was completed in the third
quarter of Fiscal 2008. Although the Audit Committee
investigation has been completed, the investigations being
conducted by the SEC and the SDNY are ongoing. Dell continues to
cooperate with the SEC and the SDNY.
|
Dell and several of its current and former directors and
officers were named as parties to the following securities,
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA), and shareholder derivative lawsuits all
arising out of the same events and facts.
|
|
|
|
|
Four putative securities class actions filed between
September 13, 2006, and January 31, 2007, in the
Western District of Texas, Austin Division, against Dell and
certain of its current and former officers were consolidated as
In re Dell Securities Litigation, and a lead plaintiff
was appointed by the court. The lead plaintiff asserted claims
under sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 based on alleged false and misleading
disclosures or omissions regarding Dells financial
statements, governmental investigations, internal controls,
known battery problems and business model, and based on
insiders sales of Dell securities. This action also
included Dells independent registered public accounting
firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as a defendant. On
October 6, 2008, the court dismissed all of the
plaintiffs claims with prejudice and without leave to
amend. On November 3, 2008, the plaintiff appealed the
dismissal of Dell and the officer defendants to the Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals.
|
19
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Four other putative class actions filed between
September 25, 2006, and October 5, 2006, in the
Western District, Austin Division, by purported participants in
the Dell 401(k) Plan were consolidated as In re Dell ERISA
Litigation, and lead plaintiffs were appointed by the court.
The lead plaintiffs asserted claims under ERISA based on
allegations that Dell and certain current and former directors
and officers imprudently invested and managed participants
funds and failed to disclose information regarding its stock
held in the 401(k) Plan. On June 23, 2008, the court
granted the defendants motion to dismiss as to the
plaintiffs claims under ERISA based on allegations of
imprudence, but the court denied the motion to dismiss as to the
claims under ERISA based on allegations of a failure to
accurately disclose information. On October 29, 2008, the
court dismissed all of the individual plaintiffs claims
with prejudice.
|
|
|
|
In addition, seven shareholder derivative lawsuits filed between
September 29, 2006, and January 22, 2007, in three
separate jurisdictions were consolidated as In re Dell
Derivative Litigation into three actions. One of those
consolidated actions was pending in the Western District of
Texas, Austin Division, but was dismissed without prejudice by
an order filed October 9, 2007. The second consolidated
shareholder derivative action was pending in Delaware Chancery
Court. On October 16, 2008, the Delaware court granted the
parties stipulation to dismiss all of the plaintiffs
claims in the Delaware lawsuit without prejudice. The third
consolidated shareholder derivative action is pending in state
district court in Williamson County, Texas. These shareholder
derivative lawsuits named various current and former officers
and directors as defendants and Dell as a nominal defendant, and
asserted various claims derivatively on behalf of Dell under
state law, including breaches of fiduciary duties.
|
The Board of Directors received a shareholder demand letter,
dated November 12, 2008, asserting allegations similar to
those made in the securities and shareholder derivative lawsuits
against various current and former officers and directors and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and requesting that the Board of
Directors investigate and assert claims relating to those
allegations on behalf of Dell. The Board of Directors is
considering and will address the demand.
|
|
|
Copyright Levies Proceedings against the
IT industry in Germany seek to impose levies on equipment such
as personal computers and multifunction devices that facilitate
making private copies of copyrighted materials. The total levies
due, if imposed, would be based on the number of products sold
and the per-product amounts of the levies, which vary. Dell,
along with other companies and various industry associations,
are opposing these levies and instead are advocating
compensation to rights holders through digital rights management
systems.
|
On December 29, 2005, Zentralstelle Für private
Überspielungrechte (ZPÜ), a joint
association of various German collection societies, instituted
arbitration proceedings against Dells German subsidiary
before the Arbitration Body in Munich. ZPÜ claims a levy of
18.4 per PC that Dell sold in Germany from January 1,
2002, through December 31, 2005. On July 31, 2007, the
Arbitration Body recommended a levy of 15 on each PC sold
during that period for audio and visual copying capabilities.
Dell and ZPÜ rejected the recommendation, and on
February 21, 2008, ZPÜ filed a lawsuit in the German
Regional Court in Munich. Dell plans to continue to defend this
claim vigorously and does not expect the outcome to have a
material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of
operations.
Dell has various other claims, suits, investigations, and legal
proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course
of its business, including matters involving stockholder,
consumer, antitrust, tax, intellectual property, and other
issues on a global basis. Dell does not expect that the outcome
in any of these other legal proceedings, individually or
collectively, will have a material adverse effect on its
financial condition or results of operations.
20
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 8
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
|
The following table summarizes comprehensive income for the
three months ended May 1, 2009, and May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
Change related to foreign currency hedging instruments, net
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Change related to marketable securities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dells effective income tax rate was 29.6% for the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010, as compared to 23.5% for the same
quarter in the prior year. The increase in the effective rate in
the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 as compared to the effective
rate in the first quarter of Fiscal 2009 is primarily due to
increased profitability mix in higher tax rate jurisdictions and
the accrual of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions. The Fiscal 2009 effective tax rate reflects decreases
in uncertain tax positions resulting from the effective
settlement of an examination in a foreign jurisdiction and
reevaluation of certain tax incentives, partially offset by the
accrual of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions. The differences between the estimated effective
income tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%
principally result from Dells geographical distribution of
taxable income and differences between the book and tax
treatment of certain items. The income tax rate for Fiscal 2010
will be impacted by the actual mix of jurisdictions in which
income is generated.
Dell is currently under income tax audits in various
jurisdictions, including the United States. The tax periods open
to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which Dell
is subject include fiscal years 1997 through 2009. As a result
of these audits, Dell maintains ongoing discussions and
negotiations relating to tax matters with the taxing authorities
in these various jurisdictions. Dells U.S. Federal
income tax returns for fiscal years 2004 through 2006 are under
examination, and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
has issued a Revenue Agents Report proposing certain
assessments primarily related to transfer pricing matters, which
Dell has protested in accordance with IRS administrative
procedures. Dell anticipates this audit will take several years
to resolve and believes that it has provided adequate reserves
related to the matters under audit. However, should Dell
experience an unfavorable outcome in this matter, it could have
a material impact on its results of operations, financial
position, or cash flows. Although the timing of income tax audit
resolutions and negotiations with taxing authorities are highly
uncertain, Dell does not anticipate a significant change to the
total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits within the next
12 months.
Dell takes certain non-income tax positions in the jurisdictions
in which it operates and has received certain non-income tax
assessments from various jurisdictions. Dell is also involved in
related non-income tax litigation matters in various
jurisdictions. Dell believes its positions are supportable, a
liability is not probable, and that it will ultimately prevail.
However, significant judgment is required in determining the
ultimate outcome of these matters. In the normal course of
business, Dells positions and conclusions related to its
non-income taxes could be
21
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
challenged and assessments may be made. To the extent new
information is obtained and Dells views on its positions,
probable outcomes of assessments, or litigation change, changes
in estimates to Dells accrued liabilities would be
recorded in the period in which such determination is made.
|
|
NOTE 10
|
EARNINGS
PER COMMON SHARE
|
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted-average effect
of all common shares issued and outstanding and is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted-average shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common
shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the
number of common shares that would be issued assuming exercise
or conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares
outstanding. Dell excludes equity instruments from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share if the effect of
including such instruments is antidilutive. Accordingly, certain
stock-based incentive awards have been excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share totaling
247 million shares and 275 million shares for the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009, respectively.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three months ended
May 1, 2009, and May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
2,036
|
|
Effect of dilutive options, restricted stock units, restricted
stock, and other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
|
$
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, Dell completed its
reorganization from Dells geographic commercial segments
(Americas Commercial; Europe, Middle East, and Africa
Commercial; and Asia Pacific-Japan Commercial) to global
business units (Large Enterprise, Public, and Small and Medium
Business), reflecting the impact of globalization on Dells
customer base. Dells four global business segments are
Large Enterprise, Public, Small and Medium Business
(SMB), and its existing Consumer segment. Large
Enterprise includes sales of IT infrastructure and service
solutions to large global and national corporate customers.
Public includes sales to educational institutions, governments,
health care organizations, and law enforcement agencies, among
others. SMB includes sales of complete IT solutions to small and
medium businesses. Consumer includes sales for individual
consumers and retailers around the world.
22
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
During the reorganization, Dell identified revenue activities
that were managed and reported within Dells commercial
business, but which had characteristics more consistent with
Dells consumer business. As a result, these activities
were realigned into Dells Consumer segment during the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010. Prior period amounts have been
reclassified from Dells commercial segments to Dells
Consumer segment to conform to the current period presentation.
The business segments disclosed in the accompanying Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements are based on this organizational
structure and information reviewed by Dells management to
evaluate the business segment results. Dells measure of
segment operating income for management reporting purposes
excludes severance and facility closure expenses, broad based
long-term incentives, acquisition-related charges such as
in-process research and development, and amortization of
intangibles.
The following table presents net revenue by Dells
reportable global segments as well as a reconciliation of
consolidated segment operating income to Dells
consolidated operating income for the three months ended
May 1, 2009, and May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
$
|
3,400
|
|
|
$
|
4,921
|
|
Public
|
|
|
3,171
|
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
3,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
12,342
|
|
|
$
|
16,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
Public
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated segment operating income
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
Severance and facility closure expense
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broad based long-term
incentives(a)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income
|
|
$
|
414
|
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Broad based long-term incentives
include stock based compensation of $67 million and
$50 million for the three months ended May 1, 2009,
and May 2, 2008, respectively.
|
23
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
SPECIAL NOTE: This section,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, contains
forward-looking statements based on our current expectations.
Actual results in future periods may differ materially from
those expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements
because of a number of risks and uncertainties. For a discussion
of risk factors affecting our business and prospects, see
Part I Item 1A Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009.
All percentage amounts and ratios were calculated using
the underlying data in thousands. Unless otherwise noted, all
references to industry share and total industry growth data are
for personal computers (including desktops, notebooks, and x86
servers), and are based on preliminary information provided by
IDC Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker, May 18, 2009. Share
data is for the calendar quarter and all our growth rates are on
a fiscal year-over-year basis. Unless otherwise noted, all
references to time periods refer to our fiscal periods.
OVERVIEW
Our
Company
We are a leading technology solutions provider in the IT
industry. We are the number two supplier of computer systems in
the United States, and the number two supplier worldwide. We
offer a broad range of products, including mobility products,
desktop PCs, software and peripherals, servers and networking,
and storage products. Our enhanced services offerings include
infrastructure consulting, deployment of enterprise products and
computer systems in customers environments, asset recovery
and recycling, computer-related training, IT support, client and
enterprise support, and managed service solutions. We also offer
various financing alternatives, asset management services, and
other customer financial services for business and consumer
customers.
We were founded on the core principle of a direct customer
business model, which creates direct relationships with our
customers. These relationships allow us to be on the forefront
of changing user requirements and needs while competing as one
of the industry leaders in selling the most relevant technology,
at the best value, to our customers. We continue to simplify
technology and enhance product design and features to meet our
customers needs and preferences.
Our direct customer business model includes a highly efficient
global supply chain, which allows low inventory levels and the
efficient use of and return on capital. We have manufacturing
locations around the world and relationships with third-party
original equipment manufacturers. This structure allows us to
optimize our global supply chain to best serve our global
customer base. To maintain our competitiveness, we continuously
strive to improve our products, services, technology,
manufacturing, and logistics.
We are continuing to invest in initiatives that will align our
new and existing products around customers needs in order
to drive long-term sustainable growth, profitability, and
operating cash flow. We have expanded our business model to
include new distribution partners, such as retail, system
integrators, value-added resellers, and distributors, which
allow us to reach even more end-users around the world. We are
investing resources in emerging countries with an emphasis on
Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC), where we
expect significant growth to occur over the next several years.
We are also creating customized products and services to meet
the preferences and requirements of our diversified global
customer base.
As part of our overall growth strategy, we have completed
strategic acquisitions to augment select areas of our business
with more products, services, and technology. We expect to
continue to grow our business organically, and inorganically
through alliances and through strategic acquisitions.
Customer needs are increasingly being defined by how they use
technology rather than where they use it, which is why we have
transitioned from a global business that is run regionally to
businesses that are globally organized. During the first quarter
of Fiscal 2010, we completed our reorganization from our
geographic commercial segments [Americas Commercial; Europe,
Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) Commercial; and Asia
Pacific-Japan (APJ) Commercial], to global business
units [Large Enterprise, Public, and Small and Medium Business
(SMB)],
24
reflecting the impact of globalization on our customer base. To
simplify reporting, we aligned certain countries that represent
a small percentage of our total revenue with a single global
segment, based mainly on the countries customer base. This
realignment creates a clear customer focus, which allows us to
serve customers with faster innovation and greater
responsiveness, thus allowing us to capitalize on competitive
advantages, while strengthening execution and synergies. We
began managing and reporting in our new business segment
structure in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. Our four global
business segments are:
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise Our customers
include large global and national corporate businesses. We
believe that a single large-enterprise unit will give us an even
greater knowledge of our customers and thus further our
advantage in delivering globally consistent and cost-effective
solutions and services to the worlds largest IT users. We
intend to improve our global leadership and relationships with
these customers. Our execution in this space will be
increasingly focused on data center solutions, disruptive
innovation, customer segment specialization, and the value chain
of design to value, price to value, market to value, and sell to
value.
|
|
|
|
Public Our Public customers, which
include educational institutions, government, health care, and
law enforcement agencies, operate in communities and their
missions are aligned with their constituents needs. Our
customers measure their success against a common goal of
improving lives, and they require that their partners, vendors,
and suppliers understand their goals and execute to their
mission statements as well. We intend to further our
understanding of our Public customers goals and missions
and extend our leadership in answering their urgent IT
challenges. To better meet our customers goals, we are
focusing on simplifying IT, providing faster deployment of IT
applications, expanding our enterprise and services offerings,
helping customers understand economic stimulus packages through
our Economic Stimulus Learning Center, and strengthening our
partner relations to build best of breed integrated solutions.
|
|
|
|
Small and Medium Business Our SMB
segment is focused on providing small and medium businesses with
the simplest and most complete standards-based IT solutions and
services, customized for their needs. Our SMB organization will
accelerate the creation and delivery of specific solutions and
technology to small and medium-sized businesses worldwide in an
effort to help our customers improve and grow their businesses.
For example, our ProManage-Managed Services solution is a
Web-based service that proactively monitors and manages IT
networks to prevent system issues. We also extended our channel
program (PartnerDirect) to provide additional certification
paths and purchase options to our partners.
|
|
|
|
Consumer Our consumer business sells
to customers through our on-line store at www.dell.com, over the
phone, and through our retail partners. The globalization of our
business has improved our global sales execution and coverage
through better customer alignment, targeted sales force
investments in rapidly growing countries, and improved marketing
tools. We are also designing new, innovative products with
faster development cycles and competitive features including the
new Studio line of notebooks, allowing consumers greater
personalization. Finally, we will continue to expand and
transform our retail business in order to reach more consumers.
|
25
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Consolidated
Operations
The following table summarizes the results of our operations for
the three months ended May 1, 2009, and May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
10,232
|
|
|
|
82.9
|
%
|
|
|
(27)%
|
|
|
$
|
13,956
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
%
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1)%
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
12,342
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
(23)%
|
|
|
$
|
16,077
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
(27)%
|
|
|
$
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
(15)%
|
|
|
$
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
414
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
(54)%
|
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
(63)%
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(61)%
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Share Position We shipped
9.1 million units in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010.
According to IDC, in the first quarter of calendar year 2009, we
maintained our second place position in the worldwide computer
systems market with a share position of 13.9%, which is
consistent with our share position of 13.9% for the fourth
quarter of calendar 2008. However, we lost 1.6 percentage
points of share since the first quarter of calendar 2008 due to
our commercial businesss slower unit growth as we pursued
profitable growth opportunities in a slow global IT demand
environment.
The challenging economic conditions that began in the second
half of Fiscal 2009 continued to be prevalent in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010. As a result, we experienced a decline in
global IT end-user demand. Consistent with the second half of
Fiscal 2009, we focused on balancing liquidity, profitability,
and growth by selecting areas that provided profitable growth
opportunities. We also took actions to reduce operating
expenses, optimize product costs, and improve working capital
management, and we will continue these actions throughout Fiscal
2010. We will also selectively invest in strategic growth
opportunities.
Product Revenue Product revenue and
unit shipments decreased year-over-year by 27% and 17%,
respectively, for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. Our product
revenue performance is primarily attributed to a decrease in
customer demand as a result of the challenging economic
environment and a reduction in average selling prices.
Services Revenue, including software
related Services revenue remained relatively
flat year-over-year with a 1% decrease in the first quarter of
Fiscal 2010. Our services revenue performance is primarily
attributed to an 8% year-over-year decrease in enhanced services
revenue, offset by a 12% increase in software related revenue.
Overall, our average selling price (total revenue per unit sold)
during the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 decreased 8%
year-over-year. Average selling prices were adversely impacted
by a change in revenue mix between our commercial and consumer
business. Selling prices in our commercial business are
typically higher than our consumer business selling prices, and
during the quarter our consumer unit shipments grew 12% while
our commercial unit shipments declined 27% year-over-year.
Average selling prices were also affected by our increased
presence in consumer retail, which typically has lower average
selling prices than our consumer on-line and phone direct
business. Average selling prices in our Consumer segment
declined 25% year-over-year for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010
compared to a 3% increase in selling prices for our commercial
business. Within Consumer, average selling prices were also
adversely impacted by a shift in product mix from higher priced
computer systems to lower priced offerings and by a competitive
pricing environment. Our market strategy has been to concentrate
on solution sales to drive a more profitable mix of products and
services, while pricing our products to remain competitive in
the
26
marketplace. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we
continued to see competitive pressure, particularly for lower
priced desktops and notebooks, as we targeted a broader range of
products and price bands. We expect this competitive pricing
environment will continue for the foreseeable future.
Revenue outside the U.S. represented approximately 48% of
net revenue for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. Outside the
U.S., we experienced a 26% year-over-year revenue decline for
the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 as compared to a 20% decline in
revenue for the U.S. At a consolidated level, BRIC revenue
declined 21% during the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 as compared
to the same period in the prior year; however, BRIC revenue in
our Consumer segment increased 17% year-over-year. We will
continue to tailor solutions to meet specific regional needs,
enhance relationships to provide customer choice and
flexibility, and expand into these and other emerging countries
that represent the vast majority of the worlds population.
From a worldwide product perspective, the continuing decline in
desktop unit sales and prices and competitive pricing pressure
in mobility contributed heavily to our first quarter of Fiscal
2010 performance.
We manage our business on a U.S. Dollar basis, and as a
result of our comprehensive hedging program, foreign currency
fluctuations did not have a significant impact on our
consolidated results of operations.
Operating Income In the first quarter
of Fiscal 2010, operating income decreased 54% year-over-year to
$414 million. The decline was driven by a decrease in
end-user demand, overall competitive pricing pressures, and a
shift in product mix that resulted in lower average selling
prices. Operating expenses decreased 15% year-over-year;
however, operating expenses as a percentage of revenue increased
to 14.2% for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 from 12.9% for the
first quarter of Fiscal 2009. We continued to aggressively
manage our operating cost structure as we realigned our
business. In the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we took
organizational actions to reduce costs, and accordingly, we
recorded severance and facility closure expenses of
$185 million.
Net Income In the first quarter of
Fiscal 2010, net income decreased 63% year-over-year to
$290 million. Net income was impacted by a 54%
year-over-year decline in operating income, a 101% decline in
investment and other income (expense), and an increase in our
effective tax rate to 29.6% from 23.5%.
Revenues
by Segment
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we completed our
previously communicated reorganization from our geographic
commercial segments (Americas Commercial, EMEA Commercial, and
APJ Commercial), to global business units (Large Enterprise,
Public, and Small and Medium Business), reflecting the impact of
globalization on our customer base. Our four global business
segments are Large Enterprise, Public, Small and Medium
Business, and our existing Consumer segment.
During the reorganization to global business units, we
identified revenue activities that were managed and reported
within our commercial business, but which had characteristics
more consistent with our Consumer business. As a result, these
activities were realigned into our Consumer segment during the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010. Prior period amounts have been
reclassified from our commercial segments to our Consumer
segment to conform to the current period presentation.
27
The following table summarizes our revenue by reportable global
segments for the three months ended May 1, 2009, and
May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
$
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
(31)%
|
|
|
$
|
4,921
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Public
|
|
|
3,171
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
(11)%
|
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
(30)%
|
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
(16)%
|
|
|
|
3,331
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
12,342
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(23)%
|
|
|
$
|
16,077
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise Large
Enterprises revenue decreased 31% year-over-year due to a
unit shipment decline of 36% for the first quarter of Fiscal
2010, partially offset by a 7% increase in average selling
prices. The increase in average selling prices was driven by
higher mix of software and services revenues, which improved
overall product mix. Large Enterprises weak performance
can be directly attributed to the current global economy. As a
result of the current economic slowdown, many of our customers
have either delayed or canceled IT projects. Large Enterprise
experienced significant year-over-year declines in revenue
across all product lines during the first quarter of Fiscal
2010. Revenue from desktop PCs and mobility products
declined 39% and 37%, respectively, year-over-year for the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010; servers and networking, storage, and
software and peripherals revenue decreased 29%, 26%, and 26%,
respectively; and enhanced services revenue declined 9%. Revenue
decreased significantly across all countries due to current
global economic conditions and competitive pressures.
|
|
|
Public Public experienced an 11%
year-over-year decline in revenue due to a unit shipment decline
of 14%, which was partially offset by a 3% increase in average
selling prices. Our average selling prices improved as we
strategically protected profitability by foregoing certain sales
opportunities particularly in the North America and
EMEA regions. Publics revenue declined across all product
categories except for software and peripherals, whose revenue
grew 4% year-over for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. Product
revenue decline was led by desktop PCs, which decreased
24% year-over-year. From a country perspective, revenue declined
across most countries.
|
|
|
Small and Medium Business During
the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, SMB experienced a 30%
year-over-year decline in revenue and unit shipments. For the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010, SMB experienced a double digit
revenue decline across all product lines, led by a 38% and 31%
decline in desktop PC and mobility revenue, respectively.
Consistent with our other segments performance, the
contraction of the global economy in the first quarter of Fiscal
2010 as compared to the first quarter of Fiscal 2009 is a
significant contributor to SMBs year-over-year revenue and
unit shipments decline. Geographically, IT demand was the
strongest in Asia and softer in the Americas and EMEA. From a
country perspective, revenue declined across all countries
except for India, which had year-over-year revenue growth of 56%.
|
|
|
Consumer Consumer revenue declined 16%
year-over-year on unit growth of 12% for the first quarter of
Fiscal 2010. However, even though unit shipments grew, our
Consumer revenue decreased mainly due to our growth in retail,
which tends to have lower selling prices, coupled with a shift
in product mix and competitive pricing pressures. As a result,
our average selling prices declined 25% year-over-year in the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010. In addition, Consumers
desktop PC revenue declined 34% for the first quarter of Fiscal
2010 as compared to the first quarter of Fiscal 2009 on a unit
shipment decline of 20% during the same time period, and even
though mobility shipments increased 32% year-over-year, average
selling prices for mobility products declined 28% during the
same time period, which also negatively impacted overall
Consumer revenue. The continued shift in consumer preference
from desktops to notebooks has contributed to our mobility unit
growth. The reduction in mobility average selling prices can be
mainly attributed to our expansion into retail coupled
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
with a demand shift to less expensive notebooks from higher
priced notebooks. Software and peripheral revenue also declined
21% year-over-year during the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. At a
country level, Brazil and India grew revenue year-over-year at a
rate of 33% and 60%, respectively.
|
We sell desktop and notebook computers, printers, ink, and toner
through retail partners. Our goal is to have strategic
relationships with a number of major retailers in our larger
geographic regions. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we
continued to expand our global retail presence, and we now reach
over 30,000 retail locations worldwide.
Revenue
by Product and Services Categories
We design, develop, manufacture, market, sell, and support a
wide range of products that in many cases are customized to
individual customer requirements. Our product categories include
mobility products, desktop PCs, software and peripherals,
servers and networking products, and storage products. In
addition, we offer a range of services.
In the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we performed an analysis of
our enhanced services revenue and determined that certain items
previously classified as enhanced services revenue were more
appropriately categorized within product revenue. Also, certain
items previously categorized as mobility, desktop PC, and
servers and networking revenue were more appropriately
reclassified to storage revenue. Fiscal 2009 balances reflect
the revised revenue classifications. The net change in
classification of prior period amounts resulted in a decrease of
$55 million to mobility, an increase of $81 million to
desktop PCs, an increase of $65 million to servers and
networking, a decrease of $104 million to enhanced
services, and an increase of $13 million to storage in the
first quarter of Fiscal 2009.
The following table summarizes our net revenue by product and
service categories for the three months ended May 1, 2009,
and May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobility
|
|
$
|
3,875
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
(20)%
|
|
|
$
|
4,849
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Desktop PCs
|
|
|
3,163
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
(34)%
|
|
|
|
4,781
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Software and peripherals
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
(18)%
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Servers and networking
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(25)%
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Enhanced services
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(8)%
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Storage
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
(17)%
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
12,342
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(23)%
|
|
|
$
|
16,077
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobility During the first quarter
of Fiscal 2010, revenue from mobility products (which includes
notebook computers and mobile workstations) declined 20% on a
unit decline of 5% compared to the first quarter of Fiscal 2009.
According to IDC, our unit shipments declined for the first
quarter of calendar 2009 by 8%, compared to the industrys
growth rate of 6%. The mobility shipment decline was most
pronounced in our Large Enterprise and SMB segments, which
experienced year-over-year declines of 38% and 31%,
respectively, mainly due to a softer demand environment.
Partially offsetting the Large Enterprise and SMB unit decreases
was 32% unit growth in Consumer mobility products. The
average selling prices of our mobility products at a
consolidated level dropped 16% year-over-year due to the
continued expansion into retail by our Consumer segment coupled
with a mix shift within Consumer mobility products and weaker
demand in certain areas of our Public business. Average selling
prices for mobility products declined 28% in Consumer as opposed
to only a 1% reduction in our commercial segments (Large
Enterprise, Public, and SMB).
|
Our new product lines range from the lightest ultra-portable in
our history to the most powerful mobile workstation. We believe
the on-going trend to mobility products will continue, and we
are therefore focused on
29
expanding our product platforms to cover broader price bands and
functionalities. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we
launched mobility products such as the Inspiron Mini 10 and our
new ultra-thin consumer notebook, the Adamo. We also launched
our Latitude XT2 convertible tablet, which is the first
multi-touch capable product that allows customers to use the
entire screen.
|
|
|
Desktop PCs During the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010, revenue from desktop PCs (which includes
desktop computer systems and workstations) decreased 34%
year-over-year on a unit decline of 26%. In the marketplace, we
are continuing to see rising end-user demand for mobility
products, which contributes to further slowing demand for
desktop PCs as mobility growth is expected to continue to
outpace desktop growth. The decline in desktop PC revenue was
also due to the on-going competitive pricing pressure for lower
priced desktops and a softening in global IT end-user demand.
Consequently, our average selling price for desktops decreased
11% year-over-year during the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 as we
continued to align our prices and product offerings with the
marketplace. For the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, desktop
revenue decreased across all segments. Our Consumer, Large
Enterprise, SMB, and Public segments experienced year-over-year
revenue declines of 34%, 39%, 38%, and 24%, respectively. During
the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we introduced three new models
of our
Vostrotm
desktop systems, which are designed to meet the productivity
requirements of small and medium businesses, and we also
introduced three new Dell Precision tower workstations. Other
desktop launches during the quarter included our new Inspiron
slim and mini towers, our
all-in-one
Studio One 19, and our XPS 435 designed for elite performance.
|
|
|
Software and Peripherals Revenue
from sales of software and peripherals (S&P)
consists of Dell-branded printers, monitors (not sold with
systems), projectors, and a multitude of competitively priced
third-party peripherals including plasma and LCD televisions,
standalone software sales and related support services, and
other products. This revenue declined 18% year-over-year for the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010, driven by displays, imaging
products, and electronics, which experienced revenue declines of
36%, 30%, and 27%, respectively. We continued to see strength in
software licensing with 12% growth; contributing to this growth
was our acquisition of ASAP Software (ASAP) in the
fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008. With ASAP, we now offer products
from over 2,000 software publishers. We continue to believe that
software licensing is a revenue growth opportunity as customers
continue to seek out consolidated software sources. At a segment
level, Large Enterprise, SMB, and Consumer experienced
year-over-year revenue decreases of 26%, 28%, and 21%,
respectively, for Fiscal 2010; whereas, Publics S&P
revenue grew 4%.
|
Software revenue from our S&P line of business, which
includes software license fees and related post contract
customer support (PCS), is included in services
revenue on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Software and related support services revenue represents 41% and
37% of services revenue for the first quarters of Fiscal 2010
and Fiscal 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
Servers and Networking During the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010, revenue from sales of servers and
networking products decreased 25% year-over-year on a unit
shipment decrease of 28%. The decline in our server and
networking revenue is due to demand challenges across all
segments and regions. Our average selling price for servers and
networking products increased 4% year-over-year during the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010. According to IDC, for the first quarter
of calendar 2009, we continue to rank number one in the United
States with a 36% share in server units shipped; worldwide, we
were second with a 26% share. Throughout the first quarter of
Fiscal 2010, we continued the rollout of our new
11th generation PowerEdge servers as a part of our mission
to help companies of all sizes simplify their IT environments.
These servers provide optimal virtualization, system management,
and usability.
|
|
|
Enhanced Services Enhanced
services offerings include infrastructure consulting, deployment
of enterprise products and computer systems in customers
environments, asset recovery and recycling, computer-related
training, IT support, client and enterprise support, and managed
service solutions. Enhanced services revenue decreased 8%
year-over-year for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 to
$1.2 billion mainly due to a lack of demand for our
business solution services in a slow global economy. For the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010, enhanced services revenue for each
of our segments declined as compared to the first quarter of
Fiscal 2009 with Large Enterprise experiencing the largest
reduction from an absolute dollar perspective. Revenue declined
9% for Large Enterprise, 11% for SMB, 14% for Consumer, and 1%
for Public. Our deferred enhanced service revenue
|
30
|
|
|
balance increased 4% year-over-year to $5.6 billion at
May 1, 2009, primarily due to an increase in up-sell
service offerings. While our deferred enhanced services revenue
balance grew slightly, our enhanced services demand and revenue
growth has declined driven by lower unit sales. We continue to
view enhanced services as a strategic growth opportunity and
will continue to invest in our offerings and resources focused
on increasing our solution sales.
|
|
|
|
Storage Revenue from sales of
storage products decreased 17% year-over-year for the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010. Large Enterprise, Public, and SMB all
contributed to the decrease in storage revenue with
year-over-year revenue declines of 26%, 3%, and 11%,
respectively, for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. EqualLogic
performed strongly with year over year growth of 71%, and during
the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we launched our new Dell
EqualLogic PS6000 series of storage arrays with increased
performance and advanced virtualization capabilities.
|
Gross
Margin
The following table presents information regarding our gross
margin for the three months ended May 1, 2009, and
May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
(31)%
|
|
$
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
|
(16)%
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin
|
|
$
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
(27)%
|
|
$
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products During the first quarter of
Fiscal 2010, our products gross margin decreased in absolute
dollars by $663 million compared to same period in the
prior year with a corresponding decrease in gross margin
percentage to 14.1% from 15.1%. The decline in gross margin is
attributable to soft demand and lower average selling prices.
Average selling prices were impacted by our further expansion
into retail through an increased number of worldwide retail
locations, a shift in product revenue mix from our commercial
segments to our Consumer segment, and competitive pricing
pressures. As a result of our Fiscal 2009 cost improvement
initiatives, we launched a number of new cost optimized products
during the second half of Fiscal 2009 that have positively
impacted our gross margin during the first quarter of Fiscal
2010, and we will continue these cost optimization efforts
throughout Fiscal 2010. We continue to make progress against our
ongoing cost improvement initiatives, and approximately 30% of
our production volume is now going through contract
manufacturers.
Services, including software related
Our services (including software related) gross margin rate is
driven by our extended warranty sales, partially offset by lower
margin categories such as software, consulting, and managed
services. Our extended warranty services are more profitable
because we sell our extended warranty offerings directly to
customers instead of selling through a distribution channel. We
also have a service support structure that allows us to
favorably manage our fixed costs.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, our services gross
margin decreased in absolute dollars by $134 million
compared to same period in the prior year with a corresponding
decrease in gross margin percentage to 34.2% from 40.4%. Our
solution services and software support offerings faced
competitive margin pressures in the current economic
environment. A mix shift toward lower margin software products
further reduced our overall services gross margin rate.
We continue to actively review all aspects of our facilities,
logistics, supply chain, and manufacturing footprints. This
review is focused on identifying efficiencies and cost reduction
opportunities while maintaining a strong customer experience. In
the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, the cost of these actions and
other severance and business
31
realignment reductions was $185 million, of which
approximately $65 million affected gross margin. Headcount
related actions accounted for $55 million of the
$65 million. In the first quarter of Fiscal 2009, the cost
of these actions and other severance and business realignment
reductions was $106 million, of which approximately
$24 million affected gross margin. We may realign or close
additional facilities depending on a number of factors,
including end-user demand, capabilities, and our migration to a
more variable cost manufacturing model.
We continue to evaluate and optimize our global manufacturing
and distribution network, including our relationships with
original design manufacturers, to better meet customer needs and
reduce product cycle times. Our goal is to introduce the latest
relevant technology and to deliver the best value to our
customers worldwide. As we continue to evolve our inventory and
manufacturing business model to capitalize on component cost
declines, we continuously negotiate with our suppliers in a
variety of areas including availability of supply, quality, and
cost. These real-time continuous supplier negotiations support
our business model, which is able to respond quickly to changing
market conditions due to our direct customer model and real-time
manufacturing. Because of the fluid nature of these ongoing
negotiations, the timing and amount of supplier discounts and
rebates vary from time to time. These discounts and rebates are
allocated to the segments based on a variety of factors
including strategic initiatives to drive certain programs.
In general, gross margin and margins on individual products and
services will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of
factors, including continued industry wide global pricing
pressures, increased competition, compressed product life
cycles, potential increases in the cost and availability of raw
materials, and outside manufacturing services. We will continue
to adjust our pricing strategy with the goals of being in a
competitive price position while maximizing margin expansion
through the sale of cost optimized products and services, where
appropriate.
Operating
Expenses
The following table summarizes our operating expenses for the
three months ended May 1, 2009, and May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
$
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
(16)%
|
|
$
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
Research, development, and engineering
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
(7)%
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
(100)%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
(15)%
|
|
$
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, selling, general, and
administrative (SG&A) expenses were 13.1% of
revenue as compared to 11.9% in the first quarter of Fiscal
2009. However, SG&A expenses decreased 16% to
$1.6 billion compared to $1.9 billion in the prior
year. The decrease in SG&A expenses is primarily due to a
reduction in compensation related expenses of approximately
$140 million driven by a decrease in headcount, especially
in higher cost locations. Compensation expenses in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2009 were favorably impacted by a
$38 million reversal of the Fiscal 2008 bonus accrual. With
the increase in retail volumes, our advertising expenses
decreased $61 million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010
compared to the same period in Fiscal 2009. In connection with
the cost reduction measures undertaken company-wide, there were
also decreases in most other categories of expenses, including
outside services, travel, maintenance, and financing fees.
Partially offsetting these declines were a $38 million
increase in severance costs and a $27 million increase in
bad debt expense in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 when
compared to the first quarter of the prior year.
32
Research, Development, and Engineering
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, research, development,
and engineering (RD&E) expenses remained
approximately 1% of revenue and decreased $11 million
year-over-year. The decrease was primarily driven by lower
employee related costs due to a slight reduction in headcount.
In-Process Research and Development
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), we recognized
in-process research and development (IPR&D)
charges in connection with acquisitions accounted for as
business combinations.
Operating
Income
Operating income decreased 54% year-over-year to
$414 million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 from
$899 million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2009. The
decrease in operating income is primarily attributable to a
decline in gross margin dollars of 27%. Gross margin percentage
declined to 17.6% in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 from 18.4%
in the first quarter of Fiscal 2009. A 15% reduction in
operating expenses favorably impacted operating income; however,
operating expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 14.2%
in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 as compared to 12.9% for the
same period in the prior year.
Severance and facility closure expenses, broad based long-term
incentive expenses, in-process research and development, and
amortization of purchased intangible assets costs are not
allocated to the reporting segments. These costs totaled
$300 million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 and
$182 million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2009.
Large Enterprise For the first quarter
of Fiscal 2010, operating income percentage decreased
210 basis points year-over-year from 7.8% to 5.7%.
Operating income deteriorated as revenue and costs of revenue
decreased year-over-year by 31% and 30%, respectively, due to
lower demand, which was driven by current market conditions.
Additionally, operating expenses as a percentage of revenue
increased 130 basis points year-over-year in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010 even though operating expense dollars
decreased 23% during the same time period.
Public For the first quarter of Fiscal
2010, operating income percentage increased approximately
150 basis points from the same period last year, and
operating income dollars increased 6% even though revenue
declined 11%. Operating income dollars and percentage were
positively impacted by a 3% increase in average selling prices.
Additionally, cost of revenue decreased 13% year-over-year as we
were able to improve our product cost structure. The increase in
average selling prices coupled with the reduction in costs aided
in the increase in gross margin percentage from 18.7% in the
first quarter of Fiscal 2009 to 20.0% in the first quarter of
Fiscal 2010. Also, favorably impacting operating income was an
18% year-over-year decrease in operating expenses as we
continued to realize the benefits from our cost-improvement
initiatives that began in Fiscal 2009.
Small and Medium Business Operating
income percentage remained relatively flat at 7.7% for the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010. However, operating income dollars
decreased 30% year-over-year as revenue and unit shipments both
decreased 30% mainly due to the existing challenging end-user
demand environment. Favorably impacting operating income was an
increase in gross margin percentage from 19.7% in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2009 to 20.5% in the first quarter of Fiscal
2010 as cost of revenue decreased 31% year-over-year due to the
combination of lower unit shipments and an improvement in
product pricing controls. We were also able to reduce operating
expenses by 25% during first three months of Fiscal 2010 as
compared to the same time period of Fiscal 2009 mainly due to
savings from headcount reductions and business realignment
efforts taken during Fiscal 2009 and tighter spending controls
around our sales and marketing expenses.
Consumer For the first quarter of
Fiscal 2010, Consumer experienced essentially break-even
operating results. Consumers operating performance was
mainly due to lower average selling prices, which is
attributable to our growth in retail, a shift in product mix to
lower priced products, and competitive pricing pressures. Even
though our year-over-year unit shipment increased 12% for the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010, it was not enough to offset a
year-over-year decline in average selling prices of 25%. The
decrease in average selling prices led to a 16% reduction in
revenue and a reduction in gross margin percentage from 16.2% to
14.0%. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, operating
expenses as a percentage of revenue increased 50 basis
points year-over-year to 14.0% even though operating expense
dollars decreased 13% during the same time period.
33
Investment
and Other Income (Expense), net
The table below provides a detailed presentation of investment
and other income (expense), net for the three months ended
May 1, 2009, and May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Investment and other income (expense), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income, primarily interest
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
Gains on investments, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The year-over-year decrease in investment income for the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010 is primarily due to decreased yields on a
higher short-term investment mix. Interest expense has increased
year-over-year due to the issuance of $1.5 billion of debt
in the first quarter of Fiscal 2009 and $500 million of
debt in the first quarter Fiscal 2010. During the first quarter
of Fiscal 2010, we recognized a $9 million increase in the
fair market value of our investments related to our deferred
compensation plan compared to an $8 million decrease during
first quarter Fiscal 2009. Fair market value adjustments related
to the deferred compensation plan are included in Other in the
table above.
The year-over-year decrease in foreign exchange for the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010, as compared to the same period in the
prior year, is primarily due to gains realized on our hedge
program and a correction of errors during the first quarter
Fiscal 2009. A more stable rate environment coupled with an
effective hedge program allowed us to mitigate our foreign
exchange risk during the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. In the
first quarter of Fiscal 2009, $42 million of the gain
related to the correction of errors in the remeasurement of
certain local currency balances to the functional currency
related to prior periods. A deferred revenue liability was
incorrectly remeasured over time, based on changes in currency
exchange rates, instead of remaining at historical exchange
rates. There was also a tax liability incorrectly held at a
historical rate, instead of being remeasured over time based on
changes in currency exchange rates.
Income
Taxes
We reported an effective income tax rate of approximately 29.6%
for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, as compared to 23.5% for
the same quarter in the prior year. The increase in our
effective rate is primarily due to an increased mix of profits
in higher tax rate jurisdictions and the accrual of interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions. Additionally, our
Fiscal 2009 effective tax rate reflects decreases in uncertain
tax positions resulting from the effective settlement of an
examination in a foreign jurisdiction and the reevaluation of
certain tax incentives, partially offset by the accrual of
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. Our
foreign earnings are generally taxed at lower rates than in the
United States. The differences between our effective tax rate
and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% principally
result from our geographical distribution of taxable income and
permanent differences between the book and tax treatment of
certain items.
We are currently under income tax audits in various
jurisdictions, including the United States. The tax periods open
to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are
subject include fiscal years 1997 through 2009. As a result of
these audits, we maintain ongoing discussions and negotiations
relating to tax matters with the taxing authorities in these
various jurisdictions. Our U.S. Federal income tax returns
for fiscal years 2004 through 2006 are under examination, and
the IRS has issued a Revenue Agents Report proposing
certain assessments primarily related to transfer pricing
matters, which we have protested in accordance with IRS
administrative procedures. We anticipate this audit will take
several years to resolve and continue to believe that we have
provided adequate reserves related to the matters under audit.
However, should we experience an unfavorable outcome in this
matter, it
34
could have a material impact on our financial statements.
Although the timing of income tax audit resolution and
negotiations with taxing authorities are highly uncertain, we do
not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of
unrecognized income tax benefits within the next 12 months.
We take certain non-income tax positions in the jurisdictions in
which we operate and have received certain non-income tax
assessments from various jurisdictions. We are also involved in
related non-income tax litigation matters in various
jurisdictions. We believe our positions are supportable, a
liability is not probable, and that we will ultimately prevail.
However, significant judgment is required in determining the
ultimate outcome of these matters. In the normal course of
business, our positions and conclusions related to our
non-income taxes could be challenged and assessments may be
made. To the extent new information is obtained and our views on
our positions, probable outcomes of assessments, or litigation
changes, changes in estimates to our accrued liabilities would
be recorded in the period in which such determination is made.
ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
We sell products and services directly to customers and through
a variety of sales channels, including retail distribution. At
May 1, 2009, our gross accounts receivable balance was
$4.4 billion, a 9% decrease from our balance at
January 30, 2009. This decrease in accounts receivable was
mainly due to lower sales in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 as
compared to the same period in prior year. We maintain an
allowance for doubtful accounts to cover receivables that may be
deemed uncollectible. The allowance for losses is based on
specific identifiable customer accounts that are deemed at risk
and general historical bad debt experience. As of May 1,
2009, and January 30, 2009, the allowance for doubtful
accounts was $120 million and $112 million,
respectively. The increase is the result of a detailed analysis
of our accounts receivable aging and specific customer account
balances. Based on our assessment, we believe that we are
adequately reserved for expected credit losses. We monitor the
aging of our accounts receivable and are continuing to take
actions in Fiscal 2010 to reduce our exposure to credit losses.
FINANCING
RECEIVABLES
At May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009, our net
financing receivables balance was $2.2 billion for both
periods. Gross revolving loan receivables decreased
$32 million from our balance at January 30, 2009, due
to a reduction in the amount of promotional receivables. From
time to time, we offer certain customers the opportunity to
finance their Dell purchases with special programs during which,
if the outstanding balance is paid in full, no interest is
charged. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we continued
to reduce our promotional offerings. Promotional receivables
were $274 million and $352 million, at May 1,
2009, and January 30, 2009, respectively.
This decrease in promotional receivables was partially offset by
an increase in non-promotional receivables, due to a decreased
reliance on securitization as a means of funding revolving
receivables. No off-balance sheet transfers of new revolving
loans occurred during the three months ended May 1, 2009.
This resulted in an increase in non-promotional receivables on
our balance sheet as of May 1, 2009.
Gross fixed term leases and loans decreased $53 million
from our balance at January 30, 2009, primarily due to the
sale of approximately $60 million of fixed term leases
during the period. This sale resulted in an immaterial impact to
the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the three
months ended May 1, 2009. We intend to periodically sell
customer receivables outside of our securitization structures in
the future.
Retained interest increased $108 million from our balance
at January 30, 2009, due to a modification to one of our
securitization agreements, resulting in a scheduled amortization
of the transaction. During the scheduled amortization period,
additional purchases made on existing securitized revolving
loans are transferred to the qualified special purpose entity,
which increased our retained interest balance. See Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements for additional information.
We expect growth in financing receivables throughout Fiscal 2010
as CIT Group Inc. (CIT) funding rights decrease and
we reduce our reliance on securitization as a means of funding
revolving receivables. For the three months ended May 1,
2009, CITs funding percentage was approximately 31% as
agreed to by CIT and Dell. CITs funding percentage is
expected to decline below the contractual funding percentage of
25% over the remainder of
35
Fiscal 2010. To manage growth in financing receivables, we will
continue to balance the use of our own working capital and other
sources of liquidity. The key decision factors in the funding
decision are the cost of funds, required credit enhancements for
receivables sold to the conduits, and the ability to access the
capital markets. See Note 4 of Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I
Item 1 Financial
Statements for additional information about our financing
receivables and our promotional programs.
We maintain an allowance to cover financing receivable credit
losses. Consistent with trends in the financial services
industry, for the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009,
we experienced year-over-year increased financing receivable
credit losses. Net principal charge-offs at May 1, 2009,
and May 2, 2008, were $30 million and
$18 million, respectively. These amounts when annualized
represent 7.2% and 4.7% of the average gross outstanding
customer financing receivable balance (including accrued
interest) for the respective three month periods. We have taken
underwriting actions to limit our exposure to losses, including
reducing our credit approval rate. We continue to assess our
portfolio risk and take additional underwriting actions as we
deem necessary. Our estimate of subprime customer receivables
was approximately 21% and 20% of the gross customer receivable
balance at May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009,
respectively.
The allowance for losses is determined based on various factors,
including historical and anticipated experience, past due
receivables, receivable type, and customer risk profile.
Substantial changes in the economic environment or any of the
factors mentioned above could change the expectation of
anticipated credit losses. As of May 1, 2009, and
January 30, 2009, the allowance for financing receivable
losses was $154 million and $149 million,
respectively. A 10% change in this allowance would not be
material to our consolidated results. Based on our assessment of
the customer financing receivables and the associated risks, we
believe that we are adequately reserved. See Note 4 of
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Part I Item 1
Financial Statements for additional
information about our financing receivables and our promotional
programs.
Currently, revolving loans are offered under private label
credit financing programs underwritten by CIT Bank. We expect to
secure a new banking partner in Fiscal 2010 to replace the
existing CIT Bank arrangement with no material adverse impact to
our ability to offer or arrange financing for our customers.
The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure
Act of 2009 was signed into U.S. law on May 22, 2009,
and will impose new restrictions on credit card companies in the
areas of marketing, servicing, and pricing of consumer credit
accounts. Some provisions of the law are effective in
90 days, with the most substantive provisions effective in
February 2010. We are currently evaluating this new legislation
but do not expect that it will substantially change how consumer
credit is offered to our customers or how their accounts will be
serviced. Commercial credit is unaffected by the change in law.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Asset
Securitization
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we continued to
transfer certain customer financing receivables to
unconsolidated qualifying special purpose entities. The
qualifying special purpose entities are bankruptcy remote legal
entities with assets and liabilities separate from ours. The
purpose of the qualifying special purpose entities is to
facilitate the funding of customer receivables in the capital
markets. Our qualifying special purpose entities have entered
into financing arrangements with three multi-seller conduits
that, in turn, issue asset-backed debt securities in the capital
markets. Two of the three conduits fund fixed-term leases and
loans, and one conduit funds revolving loans. During the first
three months of Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009, we transferred
$233 million and $421 million, respectively, of
customer receivables to qualifying special purpose entities. The
principal balance of the securitized receivables at May 1,
2009, and January 30, 2009, was $1.3 billion and
$1.4 billion, respectively.
Certain transfers are accounted for as a sale in accordance with
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities, (SFAS 140). Upon the sale of
the customer receivables to qualifying special purpose entities
we recognize a gain on the sale and retain an interest in the
assets sold. We provide credit enhancement to the securitization
in the form of over-collateralization. Receivables transferred
to the qualified special purpose entities exceed the level of
debt issued. We retain the right to receive collections for
assets securitized exceeding the amount required to pay
interest, principal, and other fees and
36
expenses (referred to as retained interest). Retained interest
is included in Financing Receivables on the balance sheet. At
May 1, 2009, and January 30, 2009, our retained
interest in securitized receivables was $504 million and
$396 million, respectively. Our risk of loss related to
securitized receivables is limited to the amount of our retained
interest.
Our retained interest in the securitizations is determined by
calculating the present value of excess cash flows over the
expected duration of the transactions. In estimating the value
of the retained interest, we make a variety of financial
assumptions, including pool credit losses, payment rates, and
discount rates. These assumptions are supported by both our
historical experience and anticipated trends relative to the
particular receivable pool. The weighted average assumptions for
valuing retained interest can be affected by many factors,
including the type of assets (revolving versus fixed), repayment
terms, and the credit quality of assets being securitized. We
review our investments in retained interest periodically for
impairment, based on estimated fair values. All gains and losses
are recognized in income immediately. Retained interest balances
and assumptions are disclosed in Note 4 of Notes to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part I Item 1 Financial
Statements.
We service securitized contracts and earn a servicing fee. Our
securitization transactions generally do not result in servicing
assets and liabilities as the contractual fees are adequate
compensation in relation to the associated servicing cost.
The revolving securitization agreement continues under scheduled
amortization. During this scheduled amortization period no new
debt will be issued and all principal collections will be used
to pay down the outstanding debt amount related to the
securitized assets. Our right to receive cash collections is
delayed until the debt is fully paid off. During the scheduled
amortization period, no transfers of new revolving loans will
occur. Additional purchases made on existing securitized
revolving loans (repeat purchases) will continue to be
transferred to the qualified special purpose entity, which will
increase our retained interest on the balance sheet.
We expect the securitization transaction related to revolving
receivables to terminate completely in Fiscal 2010. We will be
required to recognize the fair value of the assets and
liabilities relating to the revolving securitization transaction
on our balance sheet once the amount of beneficial interest in
the revolving credit conduit owned by third parties falls below
10%. The overall impact to our balance sheet will be an increase
in accrued and other current liabilities, representing the
unpaid portion of the outstanding debt, which is expected to be
immaterial. As of May 1, 2009, the principal balance of the
revolving securitized receivables was $616 million, and the
balance of the debt associated with those assets was
$184 million. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we
successfully renewed one of our two fixed-term lease and loan
securitization programs. We expect to renew the other fixed-term
facility in Fiscal 2010. As we negotiate the annual renewals,
management will continue to assess the costs and benefits of
using securitization to fund our receivables. We expect to be
able to continue to offer or arrange financing for our
customers, despite our reduced reliance on securitization as a
means of funding receivables.
All of our securitization programs contain standard structural
features related to the performance of the securitized
receivables. These structural features include defined credit
losses, delinquencies, average credit scores, and excess
collections above or below specified levels. In the event one or
more of these features are met and we are unable to restructure
the program, no further funding of receivables will be
permitted, and the timing of expected retained interest cash
flows will be delayed, which would impact the valuation of our
retained interest. Should these events occur, we do not expect a
material adverse affect on the valuation of the retained
interest.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
Current
Market Conditions
We continue to experience volatility in the financial markets
due to global economic conditions. As a result, during the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010, we actively monitored the financial
health of our supplier base, carefully managed customer credit,
diversified financial partner exposure, and monitored the risk
concentration of our cash and cash equivalents balance. We
maintained a conservative investment portfolio with shorter
duration and high quality assets and monitored the effectiveness
of our foreign currency hedging program. We remain focused on
maintaining spending controls across the company. We will
monitor and manage these activities depending on current and
expected market developments.
37
We monitor credit risk associated with our financial
counterparties using various market credit risk indicators such
as reviews and actions taken by rating agencies and changes in
credit default swap levels. We perform periodic evaluations of
our positions with these counterparties and may limit the
agreements or contracts entered into with any one counterparty
in accordance with our policies. We do not anticipate
non-performance by our counterparties. We believe that no
significant concentration of credit risk for investments exists.
The impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of
any credit adjustments related to these counterparties has been
immaterial.
Liquidity
Our cash balances are held in numerous locations throughout the
world, including substantial amounts held outside of the U.S.;
however, the majority of our cash and investments that are
located outside of the U.S. are denominated in the
U.S. dollar. Most of the amounts held outside of the
U.S. could be repatriated to the U.S., but under current
law, would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, less
applicable foreign tax credits. In some countries, repatriation
of certain foreign balances is restricted by local laws. We have
provided for the U.S. federal tax liability on these
amounts for financial statement purposes, except for foreign
earnings that are considered permanently reinvested outside of
the U.S. Repatriation could result in additional
U.S. federal income tax expense. We utilize a variety of
tax planning and financing strategies with the objective of
having our worldwide cash available in the locations in which it
is needed.
We have an active working capital management team that monitors
the efficiency of our balance sheet by evaluating liquidity
under various macroeconomic and competitive scenarios. These
scenarios quantify risks to the financial statements and provide
a basis for actions necessary to ensure adequate liquidity.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, we continued to monitor
and prioritize capital expenditures and other discretionary
spending. The shift to third party manufacturers and the
associated closure of several of our manufacturing and other
facilities has reduced the amount of capital required for our
business. Additionally, we have not been active with our share
repurchase program since the third quarter of Fiscal 2009. Our
commercial paper program remains at $1.5 billion, and we
continue to be active in the commercial paper market by issuing
short-term borrowings. On April 3, 2009, we entered into a
replacement
364-day
$500 million credit facility, which will expire on
April 2, 2010. We continue to hold a five-year
$1.0 billion credit facility that will expire June 1,
2011.
We intend to establish the appropriate debt levels to maintain
an efficient capital structure taking into account our cash flow
expectations, the overall cost of capital, cash requirements for
operations, and discretionary spending items such as
share repurchases, funding customer receivables, and
acquisitions. Accordingly, in April 2009, we issued
$500 million of notes, maturing in 2014, under a shelf
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) in November 2008. We do not believe
that the overall credit concerns in the markets will impede our
ability to access the capital markets in the future because of
the overall strength of our financial position.
We ended the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 with
$10.7 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and investments,
compared to $9.8 billion at the end of the first quarter of
Fiscal 2009. Since May 2, 2008, we have spent
$1.8 billion on share repurchases offset primarily by our
$500 million debt issuance and $2.5 billion in cash
flow from operations. We use cash generated by operations as our
primary source of liquidity and believe that internally
generated cash flows are sufficient to support business
operations. Over the past year, we have utilized external
capital sources to supplement our domestic liquidity to fund a
number of strategic initiatives. We ended the first quarter of
Fiscal 2010 with a negative cash conversion cycle of
28 days, which is a three day improvement from the fourth
quarter of Fiscal 2009 and a contraction of two days from the
first quarter of Fiscal 2009. Over the past twelve months, the
slowdown in revenue growth when combined with a negative cash
conversion cycle has resulted in a decrease in cash flow from
operations. However, over the past quarter, with controlled
spending and management of working capital, we were able to
improve our cash generation from operating activities.
Generally, as our growth stabilizes, our cash generation from
operating activities will improve. For further discussion of the
results of our cash conversion cycle, see Key
Performance Metrics below.
38
The following table summarizes the results of our Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended
May 1, 2009, and May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Net change in cash from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
761
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,339
|
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities Cash from
operating activities was $761 million during the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010, compared to $143 million during
first quarter Fiscal 2009. In the first quarter of Fiscal 2010,
operating cash flows resulted from net income and to favorable
changes in our cash conversion cycle, timing of settlement of
favorable foreign exchange contracts, and other working capital
efficiencies. Cash from operations during the first quarter of
Fiscal 2009 of $143 million was primarily from net income
offset by a deterioration in our days in accounts payable as a
result of a shift away from suppliers with extended payment
terms and the timing of purchases from and payments to suppliers
during the first quarter of Fiscal 2009.
Key Performance Metrics Our direct
business model allows us to maintain an efficient cash
conversion cycle, which compares favorably with that of others
in our industry.
The following table presents the components of our cash
conversion cycle at May 1, 2009, January 30, 2009, and
May 2, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Days of sales
outstanding(a)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Days of supply in
inventory(b)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Days in accounts
payable(c)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion cycle
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Days of sales outstanding
(DSO) calculates the average collection period of
our accounts receivable. DSO is based on the ending net trade
receivables and the most recent quarterly total net revenue for
each period. DSO also includes the effect of product costs
related to customer shipments not yet recognized as revenue that
are classified in other current assets. DSO is calculated by
adding accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts, and customer shipments in transit and dividing that
sum by average net revenue per day for the current quarter
(90 days). At May 1, 2009, January 30, 2009, and
May 2, 2008, DSO and days of customer shipments not yet
recognized were 31 and 3 days; 31 and 4 days; and 33
and 3 days.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Days of supply in inventory
(DSI) measures the average number of days from
procurement to sale of our product. DSI is based on ending
inventory and most recent quarterly total cost of sales for each
period. DSI is calculated by dividing inventory by average cost
of goods sold per day for the current quarter (90 days).
|
|
(c)
|
|
Days in accounts payable
(DPO) calculates the average number of days our
payables remain outstanding before payment. DPO is based on
ending accounts payable and most recent quarterly total cost of
sales for each period. DPO is calculated by dividing accounts
payable by average cost of goods sold per day for the current
quarter (90 days).
|
Our cash conversion cycle improved three days at May 1,
2009, from January 30, 2009, driven by a one day
improvement in DSO and two day improvement in DPO. The
improvement in DSO from January 30, 2009, is attributable
to operational improvements slightly offset by timing of when
revenue was earned throughout the quarter. The improvement in
DPO from January 30, 2009, is attributable to timing of
purchases from and payments to suppliers during the first
quarter Fiscal 2010 as compared to the fourth quarter of Fiscal
2009.
39
Our cash conversion cycle contracted by two days at May 1,
2009, from May 2, 2008, driven by a six day decrease in DPO
offset by a two day improvement in DSO and a two day improvement
in DSI. The decrease in DPO from May 2, 2008, is
attributable to a reduction in inventory levels, procurement
throughput declines as a result of declining demand, and a
decrease in non-production supplier payables as we continued to
control our operating expense spending and our timing of
purchases from and payments to suppliers during the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010 as compared to the first quarter of
Fiscal 2009. The improvement in DSO from May 2, 2008, is
attributable to operational improvements and timing of revenue.
The improvement in DSI from May 2, 2008, is attributable to
a decrease in the amount of strategic material purchases.
We defer the cost of revenue associated with customer shipments
not yet recognized as revenue until they are delivered. These
deferred costs are included in our reported DSO because we
believe it presents a more accurate presentation of our DSO and
cash conversion cycle. These deferred costs are recorded in
other current assets in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position and totaled $409 million,
$556 million, and $484 million at May 1, 2009,
January 30, 2009, and May 2, 2008, respectively.
Investing Activities Cash provided by
investing activities for the three months ended May 1,
2009, was $131 million, compared to $30 million cash
used by investing activities during the same period last year.
Cash generated or used in investing activities principally
consists of the net of sales and maturities and purchases of
investments; net capital expenditures for property, plant, and
equipment; and cash used to fund strategic acquisitions, which
was approximately $3 million during the first quarter of
Fiscal 2010 compared to $170 million during the first
quarter of Fiscal 2009. In light of continued capital market and
interest rate volatility, we further increased liquidity and
maintained the overall interest rate profile of the investment
portfolio to shorter duration securities. In the first quarter
of Fiscal 2010 as compared to the first quarter of Fiscal 2009,
higher cash flow from operating activities combined with shorter
duration securities resulted in an increase in the volume of
investment transactions.
Financing Activities Cash provided by
financing activities during the three months ended May 1,
2009, was $485 million as compared to $387 million
during the same period last year. Financing activities typically
consist of debt issuance proceeds, the issuance of common stock
under employee stock plans, offset with the repurchase of our
common stock. The year-over-year increase in cash provided by
financing activities is due primarily to the reduction of our
share repurchase program and proceeds from the issuance of
long-term debt offset by our repayment of long-term debt. During
the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, no significant number of
shares was repurchased compared to approximately 52 million
shares at an aggregate cost of $1.0 billion repurchased in
the first quarter of Fiscal 2009. We issued and sold long-term
notes of $500 million during the first quarter of Fiscal
2010 and $1.5 billion during the first quarter of Fiscal
2009. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2009, we also paid the
principal of $200 million notes that matured in April 2008.
We also have a commercial paper program that allows us to issue
short-term unsecured notes in an aggregate amount not to exceed
$1.5 billion. We use the proceeds for general corporate
purposes. At May 1, 2009, there was $100 million
outstanding under the commercial paper program and no advances
under the supporting credit facility. See Note 3 of Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part I Item 1 Financial
Statements for further discussion on our long-term debt
and commercial paper program.
Capital
Commitments
Share Repurchase Program We have a
share repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase shares
of common stock in order to increase shareholder value and
manage dilution resulting from shares issued under our equity
compensation plans. However, we do not currently have a policy
that requires the repurchase of common stock to offset
share-based compensation arrangements. For more information
regarding shares repurchases, see Part II
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds.
Capital Expenditures During the three
months ended May 1, 2009, we spent $80 million on
property, plant, and equipment primarily on our global expansion
efforts and infrastructure investments in order to support
future growth. Product demand, product mix, and the increased
use of contract manufacturers, as well as ongoing investments in
operating and information technology infrastructure, influence
the level and prioritization of our capital expenditures.
Capital expenditures for Fiscal 2010, related to our continued
expansion worldwide, are
40
currently expected to reach approximately $400 million.
These expenditures are expected to be funded from our cash flows
from operating activities.
Restricted Cash Pursuant to an
agreement between Dell and CIT, we are required to maintain
escrow cash accounts that are held as recourse reserves for
credit losses, performance fee deposits related to our private
label credit card, and deferred servicing revenue. Restricted
cash in the amount of $197 million and $213 million is
included in other current assets at May 1, 2009, and
January 30, 2009, respectively.
Debt
The following table summarizes our long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$600 million issued on April 17, 2008 at 4.70% due
April 2013 (2013 Notes) with interest payable April
15 and October 15
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
$500 million issued on April 1, 2009 at 5.625% due
April 2014 (2014 Notes) with interest payable April
15 and October 15
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
$500 million issued on April 17, 2008 at 5.65% due
April 2018 (2018 Notes) with interest payable April
15 and October 15
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
$400 million issued on April 17, 2008 at 6.50% due
April 2038 (2038 Notes) with interest payable April
15 and October 15
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Senior Debenture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$300 million issued on April 1998 at 7.10% due April 2028
with interest payable April 15 and October 15 (includes the
impact of interest rate swap termination)
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,396
|
|
|
$
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2014 Notes were issued during the first quarter of Fiscal
2010, under an automatic shelf registration statement that was
filed in November 2008. The net proceeds from the offering of
the 2014 Notes were approximately $497 million after
payment of expenses of the offering. All Notes are unsecured
obligations and rank equally with our existing and future
unsecured senior indebtedness. The Notes effectively rank junior
to all indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade
payables, of our subsidiaries.
RECENTLY
ISSUED AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part I
Item 1
Financial Statements for a
description of recently issued accounting pronouncements,
including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects
on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS 141(R). SFAS 141(R)
requires that the acquisition method of accounting be applied to
a broader set of business combinations and establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in
the acquiree, and the goodwill acquired. We adopted
SFAS 141(R) in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. The
adoption of SFAS 141(R) did not have any impact on our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2),
which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
We adopted the provisions of
FSP 157-2
related to non-financial assets and liabilities effective in the
first quarter of Fiscal 2010. The adoption of the provisions of
SFAS 157 related to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
41
liabilities did not have a material impact on our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 3 of Notes to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires that the
noncontrolling interest in the equity of a subsidiary be
accounted for and reported as equity, provides revised guidance
on the treatment of net income and losses attributable to the
noncontrolling interest and changes in ownership interests in a
subsidiary, and requires additional disclosures that identify
and distinguish between the interests of the controlling and
noncontrolling owners. We adopted SFAS 160 in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2010. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not
have any impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(SFAS 161), which requires additional
disclosures about the objectives of derivative instruments and
hedging activities, the method of accounting for such
instruments under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations,
and a tabular disclosure of the effects of such instruments and
related hedged items on our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. SFAS 161 does not change the accounting
treatment for derivative instruments. We adopted SFAS 161
in the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. See Note 3 of Notes to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
For a description of our market risks, see
Part II Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Market Risk in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009. Our exposure to
market risks has not changed materially from the description in
the Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
This Report includes the certifications of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). See Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2. This Item 4
includes information concerning the controls and control
evaluations referred to in those certifications.
EVALUATION
OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the chief executive officer and the chief
financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this Report, our
management, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
May 1, 2009. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
May 1, 2009.
CHANGES
IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting during the first quarter of Fiscal 2010 that
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
42
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
The information required by this item is set forth under
Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part I
Item 1 Financial Statements, and is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
For a description of the risk factors affecting our business and
results of operations, see Part I
Item 1A
Risk Factors in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009.
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
PURCHASES
OF COMMON STOCK
Share
Repurchase Program
We have a share repurchase program that authorizes us to
purchase shares of common stock in order to increase shareholder
value and manage dilution resulting from shares issued under our
equity compensation plans. However, we do not currently have a
policy that requires the repurchase of common stock in
conjunction with share-based payment arrangements. The following
table sets forth information regarding our repurchases or
acquisitions of common stock during the first quarter of Fiscal
2010 and the remaining authorized amount for future purchases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
of Shares That
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
as Part of
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
Under the
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
Period
|
|
Repurchased(a)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Repurchases from January 31, 2009 through February 27,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,543
|
|
Repurchases from February 28, 2009 through March 27,
2009
|
|
|
4,601
|
|
|
$
|
22.37
|
|
|
|
4,601
|
|
|
$
|
4,543
|
|
Repurchases from March 28, 2009 through May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
All shares were repurchased as part
of our registered recession offer. On June 5, 2008, we
announced a registered rescission offer to eligible plan
participants, which became effective as of August 12, 2008
and provided for the repurchase of up to
i) 1,852,486 units sold pursuant to the Dell Inc.
Stock Fund through the Dell Inc. 401(k) Plan,
ii) 65,714 units sold pursuant to the Group Retirement
Savings Plan for the Employees of Dell Canada Inc. and Deferred
Profit Sharing Plan for Canadian Employees of Dell Canada Inc.
and iii) 5,841,982 unregistered shares of common stock sold
pursuant to the Dell Inc. Stock Purchase Plan. The registered
rescission offer expired on September 26, 2008.
|
(a) Exhibits See Index to
Exhibits below.
43
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DELL INC.
|
|
|
Date: June 4, 2009
|
|
/s/ THOMAS W. SWEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Sweet
Vice President, Corporate Finance and
Chief Accounting Officer
(On behalf of the registrant and as
principal accounting officer)
|
44
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed February 1,
2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of
Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 2, 2006, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Restated Bylaws, as amended and effective March 8, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Dells
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 13, 2007, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 27, 1998, between Dell
Computer Corporation and Chase Bank of Texas, National
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of
Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 28, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Officers Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the
Indenture establishing the terms of Dells
7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.4 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 28, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Form of Dells 7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of Dells
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 28, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 17, 2008, between Dell Inc.
and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(including the form of notes) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 17, 2008, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dells
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2009, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between
Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2
of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2009, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Form of 5.625% Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2009, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certifications of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, and Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Identifies Exhibit that consists of or includes a management
contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
45