Edgar Filing: TF FINANCIAL CORP

file10q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the period ended June 30, 2013

- or -

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 0-24168

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Pennsylvania		74-2705050
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
or Organization)

3 Penns Trail, Newtown, Pennsylvania		18940
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 579-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES xNO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 Exchange Act). YES  NO x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: August 14, 2013

Class	Outstanding
$.10 par value common stock	3,150,439 shares

CONTENTS

PART I-CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.		Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	33

Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	42

Item 4.		Controls and Procedures	42

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.		Legal Proceedings	43

Item 1A.		Risk Factors	43

Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	43

Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities	43

Item 4.		Mine Safety Disclosures	43

Item 5.		Other Information	43

Item 6.		Exhibits	43

Signatures			44

Exhibits

31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.	Certification pursuant of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The following Exhibits are being furnished as part of this report:

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART I-CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	At
	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	44,958		$	31,137
Investment securities
Available for sale		97,142			102,284
Held to maturity (fair value of $1,906 and $2,271 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)		1,677			1,965
Loans receivable, net		523,039			526,720
Loans receivable, held for sale		1,509			706
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock — at cost		3,846			5,431
Accrued interest receivable		2,422			2,460
Premises and equipment, net		6,546			6,108
Goodwill		4,324			4,324
Bank owned life insurance		18,140			19,109
Other assets		11,178			11,592
TOTAL ASSETS	$	714,781		$	711,836

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits	$	571,412		$	560,315
Advances from the FHLB		52,534			60,656
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		3,295			2,880
Accrued interest payable		888			817
Other liabilities		3,199			4,223
Total liabilities		631,328			628,891
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, none issued		—			—
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 5,290,000 shares issued, 2,842,095 and 2,838,493 shares outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, net of shares in treasury of 2,447,905 and 2,451,507, respectively.		529			529
Additional paid-in capital		54,581			54,328
Unearned ESOP shares		(908	)		(970	)
Treasury stock — at cost		(50,821	)		(50,896	)
Retained earnings		81,733			78,984
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(1,661	)		970
Total stockholders’ equity		83,453			82,945
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	714,781		$	711,836

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	5,963	$	6,231	$	12,029	$	12,428
Investment securities
Fully taxable		355		667		724		1,296
Exempt from federal taxes		412		430		830		865
Interest-bearing deposits and other		14		—		18		2
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME		6,744		7,328		13,601		14,591
Interest expense
Deposits		712		926		1,443		1,992
Borrowings		226		351		474		756
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE		938		1,277		1,917		2,748
NET INTEREST INCOME		5,806		6,051		11,684		11,843
Provision for loan losses		400		500		839		1,000
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		5,406		5,551		10,845		10,843
Noninterest income
Service fees, charges and other operating income		650		373		1,177		857
Bank owned life insurance		137		152		280		304
Bank owned life insurance death benefit proceeds		934		—		934		—
Gain on sale of loans		226		214		531		538
Gain on disposition of premises and equipment		—		—		420		277
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME		1,947		739		3,342		1,976
Noninterest expense
Compensation and benefits		2,842		2,697		5,659		5,571
Occupancy and equipment		709		672		1,406		1,382
Federal deposit insurance premiums		132		150		242		301
Merger-related costs		295		—		615		—
Professional fees		230		174		518		525
Marketing and advertising		132		106		171		191
Foreclosed real estate expense		235		340		459		627
Other operating		557		510		1,092		1,108
TOTAL NONINTEREST EXPENSE		5,132		4,649		10,162		9,705
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		2,221		1,641		4,025		3,114
Income tax expense		421		392		1,002		710
NET INCOME	$	1,800	$	1,249	$	3,023	$	2,404
Earnings per share—basic	$	0.66	$	0.46	$	1.10	$	0.88
Earnings per share—diluted	$	0.66	$	0.46	$	1.10	$	0.88
Dividends paid per share	$	0.05	$	0.05	$	0.10	$	0.10
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		2,743		2,724		2,741		2,721
Diluted		2,743		2,728		2,741		2,725

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(in thousands)

Net income	$	1,800		$	1,249		$	3,023		$	2,404
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Investment securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains		(2,845	)		429			(4,118	)		326
Tax effect		967			(146	)		1,400			(111	)
Net of tax amount		(1,878	)		283			(2,718	)		215
Pension plan benefit adjustment:
Related to actuarial losses and prior service cost		66			71			132			143
Tax effect		(22	)		(24	)		(45	)		(49	)
Net of tax amount		44			47			87			94
Total other comprehensive (loss) income		(1,834	)		330			(2,631	)		309
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(34	)	$	1,579		$	392		$	2,713

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	3,023		$	2,404
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization and impairment adjustment of mortgage loan servicing rights		(77	)		188
Premiums and discounts on investment securities, net		144			119
Premiums and discounts on mortgage-backed securities, net		208			146
Deferred loan origination costs, net		105			145
Provision for loan losses		839			1,000
Depreciation of premises and equipment		334			396
Increase in value of bank owned life insurance		(280	)		(304	)
Income from life insurance death benefit		(934	)		—
Stock-based compensation		380			246
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale		21,088			26,047
Origination of loans held for sale		(21,580	)		(26,836	)
Loss on foreclosed real estate		375			425
Gain on sale of:
Loans held for sale		(531	)		(538	)
Disposition of premises and equipment		—			(277	)
Disposition of real-estate		(420	)		—
Decrease (increase) in:
Accrued interest receivable		38			21
Other assets		(93	)		260
Increase in:
Accrued interest payable		71			46
Other liabilities		157			242
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		2,847			3,730

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Loan originations		(56,636	)		(66,089	)
Loan principal payments		59,116			44,945
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate		987			6,570
Proceeds from disposition of premises and equipment		417			356
Proceeds from maturities of investment securites available for sale		2,545			3,420
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance		2,183			—
Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity		294			237
Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities available for sale		10,889			13,420
Purchase of investment securities available for sale		(10,902	)		(4,260	)
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available for sale		(1,867	)		(13,520	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(767	)		(311	)
Redemption of FHLB stock		1,585			747
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		7,844			(14,485	)

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		11,097			(4,248	)
Net (decrease) increase in short-term FHLB borrowings		(8,122	)		7,440
Proceeds of long-term FHLB borrowings		—			8,197
Repayment of long-term FHLB borrowings		—			(11,461	)
Net increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		415			531
Exercise of stock options		13			7
Tax benefit arising from exercise of stock options		1			(1	)
Common stock dividends paid		(274	)		(271	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		3,130			194
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		13,821			(10,561	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		31,137			14,928
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	44,958		$	4,367
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for:
Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	1,846		$	2,702
Income taxes	$	575		$	375
Noncash transactions:
Capitalization of mortgage servicing rights	$	220		$	267
Transfers from loans to foreclosed real estate	$	257		$	1,889

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 — PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012 and for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited) include the accounts of TF Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries: 3rd Fed Bank (the “Bank”) and Penns Trail Development Corporation. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet but does not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The Company’s business is conducted principally through the Bank. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

NOTE 2 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all of the disclosures or footnotes required by US GAAP. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

NOTE 3 — RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this update require an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under US GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under US GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under US GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company has provided the necessary disclosures in Note 6 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income.

In February 2013, FASB issued ASU 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. The objective of the amendments in this update is to provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in US GAAP. Examples of obligations within the scope of this update include debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. US GAAP does not include specific guidance on accounting for such obligations with joint and several liability, which has resulted in diversity in practice. Some entities record the entire amount under the joint and several liability arrangement on the basis of the concept of a liability and the guidance that must be met to extinguish a liability. Other entities record less than the total amount of the obligation, such as an amount allocated, an amount corresponding to the proceeds received, or the portion of the amount the entity agreed to pay among its co-obligors, on the basis of the guidance for contingent liabilities. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

NOTE 4 — CONTINGENCIES

The Company, from time to time, is a party to routine litigation that arises in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of this litigation, if any, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

NOTE 5 — EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following tables illustrate the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data):

	For the three months ended June 30, 2013
	Income (numerator)		Weighted average shares (denominator)		Per share Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	1,800		2,743,427	$	0.66
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants		—		—		—

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	1,800		2,743,427	$	0.66

	For the six months ended June 30, 2013
	Income (numerator)		Weighted average shares (denominator)		Per share Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	3,023		2,740,915	$	1.10
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants		—		—		—

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	3,023		2,740,915	$	1.10

There were 30,388 options to purchase shares of common stock at a price range of $25.71 to $32.51 per share which were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

Table of Contents

	For the three months ended June 30, 2012
	Income (numerator)		Weighted average shares (denominator)		Per share Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	1,249		2,723,683	$	0.46
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants		—		4,324		—

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	1,249		2,728,007	$	0.46

	For the six months ended June 30, 2012
	Income (numerator)		Weighted average shares (denominator)		Per share Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	2,404		2,721,261	$	0.88
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants		—		3,945		—

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	2,404		2,725,206	$	0.88

There were 44,132 options to purchase shares of common stock at a price range of $25.71 to $32.51 per share which were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

Table of Contents

NOTE 6 — ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

The activity in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

	Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income (1), (2)
	Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale			Defined benefit pension plan			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at March 31, 2013	$	2,965		$	(2,792	)	$	173
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		(1,878	)		—			(1,878	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—			44			44
Period change		(1,878	)		44			(1,834	)
Balance at June 30, 2013	$	1,087		$	(2,748	)	$	(1,661	)


Balance at March 31, 2012	$	3,581		$	(2,856	)	$	725
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		283			—			283
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—			47			47
Period change		283			47			330
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	3,864		$	(2,809	)	$	1,055

(1	)	All amounts are net of tax. Related income tax expense or benefit is calculated using a Federal income tax rate of 34%.
(2	)	Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

	Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income For the three months ended June 30, (2)						Affected line item in the consolidated statements of net income
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Defined benefit pension plan (1)
Amortization of net actuarial loss	$	66		$	71		Compensation and benefits
Related income tax expense		(22	)		(24	)	Income tax expense
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive income for the period	$	44		$	47		Net income

(1	)	Included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 11 – Employee Benefit Plans for additional detail.
(2	)	Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

The activity in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

	Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income (1), (2)
	Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale			Defined benefit pension plan			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	3,805		$	(2,835	)	$	970
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		(2,718	)		—			(2,718	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—			87			87
Period change		(2,718	)		87			(2,631	)
Balance at June 30, 2013	$	1,087		$	(2,748	)	$	(1,661	)


Balance at December 31, 2011	$	3,649		$	(2,903	)	$	746
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		215			—			215
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—			94			94
Period change		215			94			309
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	3,864		$	(2,809	)	$	1,055

(1	)	All amounts are net of tax. Related income tax expense or benefit is calculated using a Federal income tax rate of 34%.
(2	)	Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

	Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income For the six months ended June 30, (2)						Affected line item in the consolidated statements of net income
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Defined benefit pension plan (1)
Amortization of net actuarial loss	$	132		$	143		Compensation and benefits
Related income tax expense		(45	)		(49	)	Income tax expense
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive income for the period	$	87		$	94		Net income

(1	)	Included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 11 – Employee Benefit Plans for additional detail.
(2	)	Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

Table of Contents

NOTE 7 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of the Company’s investment securities are summarized as follows:

	At June 30, 2013
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	7,000	$	—	$	(284	)	$	6,716
State and political subdivisions		56,467		1,986		(555	)		57,898
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		32,028		570		(70	)		32,528
Total investment securities available for sale		95,495		2,556		(909	)		97,142

Held to maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		1,677		229		—			1,906
Total investment securities	$	97,172	$	2,785	$	(909	)	$	99,048


	At December 31, 2012
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale
State and political subdivisions	$	55,254	$	4,360	$	(4	)	$	59,610
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		41,265		1,409		—			42,674
Total investment securities available for sale		96,519		5,769		(4	)		102,284

Held to maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		1,965		306		—			2,271
Total investment securities	$	98,484	$	6,075	$	(4	)	$	104,555

There were no sales of investment securities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.

Table of Contents

The amortized cost and fair value of investment and mortgage-backed securities, by contractual maturity, are shown below.

	At June 30, 2013
	Available for sale				Held to maturity
	Amortized cost		Fair value		Amortized cost		Fair value
	(in thousands)
Investment securities
Due in one year or less	$	1,652	$	1,698	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years		10,940		11,380		—		—
Due after five years through ten years		29,275		29,441		—		—
Due after ten years		21,600		22,095		—		—
		63,467		64,614		—		—

Mortgage-backed securities		32,028		32,528		1,677		1,906
Total investment and mortgage-backed securities	$	95,495	$	97,142	$	1,677	$	1,906

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2013:

			Less than					12 months
	Number		12 months					or longer				Total
	of		Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Securities		Value		Loss			Value		Loss		Value		Loss
	(dollars in thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agencies		2	$	6,716	$	(284	)	$	—	$	—	$	6,716	$	(284	)
State and political subdivisions		14		12,644		(555	)		—		—		12,644		(555	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi- governmental agencies		4		8,814		(70	)		—		—		8,814		(70	)
Total temporarily impaired securities		20	$	28,174	$	(909	)	$	—	$	—	$	28,174	$	(909	)

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2012:

			Less than					12 months
	Number		12 months					or longer				Total
	of		Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Securities		Value		Loss			Value		Loss		Value		Loss
	(dollars in thousands)
State and political subdivisions		1	$	617	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—	$	617	$	(4	)
Total temporarily impaired securities		1	$	617	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—	$	617	$	(4	)

On a quarterly basis, temporarily impaired securities are evaluated to determine whether such impairment is an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). The Company has performed this evaluation and has determined that the unrealized losses at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, are not considered other-than-temporary but are the result of changes in interest rates, and are therefore reflected in other comprehensive (loss) income.

Table of Contents

NOTE 8 — LOANS RECEIVABLE

Loans receivable are summarized as follows:

	At
	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(in thousands)
Held for investment:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	327,088		$	323,665

Commercial
Real estate-commercial		107,439			104,766
Real estate-residential		20,604			21,570
Real estate-multi-family		16,485			19,118
Construction loans		10,350			16,288
Commercial and industrial loans		5,191			4,646
Total commercial loans		160,069			166,388

Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		39,429			40,143
Other consumer		1,657			1,835
Total consumer loans		41,086			41,978

Total loans		528,243			532,031
Net deferred loan origination costs and unamortized premiums		1,712			1,611
Less allowance for loan losses		(6,916	)		(6,922	)
Total loans receivable	$	523,039		$	526,720

Held for sale:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,509		$	706

Table of Contents

The following tables present by credit quality indicators the composition of the commercial loan portfolio:

	At June 30, 2013
			Special
	Pass		mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(in thousands)
Real estate-commercial	$	94,251	$	4,132	$	9,056	$	—	$	107,439
Real estate-residential		19,177		371		1,056		—		20,604
Real estate-multi-family		13,141		—		3,344		—		16,485
Construction loans		3,855		3,551		2,944		—		10,350
Commercial and industrial loans		5,107		75		9		—		5,191
Total	$	135,531	$	8,129	$	16,409	$	—	$	160,069

	At December 31, 2012
			Special
	Pass		mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(in thousands)
Real estate-commercial	$	91,446	$	4,192	$	9,128	$	—	$	104,766
Real estate-residential		19,244		1,018		1,308		—		21,570
Real estate-multi-family		15,751		—		3,367		—		19,118
Construction loans		7,397		4,097		4,794		—		16,288
Commercial and industrial loans		4,565		81		—		—		4,646
Total	$	138,403	$	9,388	$	18,597	$	—	$	166,388

In order to assess and monitor the credit risk associated with commercial loans, the Company employs a risk rating methodology whereby each commercial loan is initially assigned a risk grade. At least annually, all risk ratings are reviewed in light of information received such as tax returns, rent rolls, cash flow statements, appraisals, and any other information which may affect the then current risk rating, which is adjusted upward or downward as needed. At the end of each quarter the risk ratings are summarized and become a component of the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses. The Company’s risk rating definitions mirror those promulgated by banking regulators and are as follows:

Pass: A good quality loan characterized by satisfactory liquidity; reasonable debt capacity and coverage; acceptable management in all critical positions and normal operating results for its peer group. The Company has grades 1 through 6 within the Pass category which reflect the increasing amount of attention paid to the individual loan because of, among other things, trends in debt service coverage, management weaknesses, or collateral values.

Special mention: A loan that has potential weaknesses that deserves management’s close attention. Although the loan is currently protected, if left uncorrected, potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the loan’s repayment prospects or in the borrower’s future credit position. Potential weaknesses include: weakening financial condition; an unrealistic repayment program; inadequate sources of funds; lack of adequate collateral; credit information; or documentation. There is currently the capacity to meet interest and principal payments, but further adverse business, financial, or economic conditions may impair the borrower’s capacity or willingness to pay interest and repay principal.

Substandard: A loan that is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged. Although no loss of principal or interest is presently apparent, there is the distinct possibility that a partial loss of interest and/or principal will be sustained if the deficiencies are not corrected. There is a current identifiable vulnerability to default

and the dependence upon favorable business, financial, or economic conditions to meet timely payment of interest and repayment of principal.

Doubtful: A loan which has all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard asset with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable

Table of Contents

and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonable specific pending factors which may work to strengthen the asset, classification as an estimated loss is deferred until a more exact status is determined. Pending factors include: proposed merger, acquisition, liquidation, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and refinancing plans.

Loss: Loans which are considered uncollectible and have been charged off. The Company has charged-off all loans classified as loss.

Loans classified as special mention, substandard or doubtful are evaluated for potential impairment. All impaired loans are placed on nonaccrual status and are classified as substandard or doubtful.

The following tables present by credit quality indicator the composition of the residential mortgage and consumer loan portfolios:

	At June 30, 2013
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential mortgages	$	325,157	$	1,931	$	327,088
Home equity and second mortgage		39,286		143		39,429
Other consumer		1,655		2		1,657
Total	$	366,098	$	2,076	$	368,174

	At December 31, 2012
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential mortgages	$	321,400	$	2,265	$	323,665
Home equity and second mortgage		40,000		143		40,143
Other consumer		1,827		8		1,835
Total	$	363,227	$	2,416	$	365,643

In order to assess and monitor the credit risk associated with residential mortgage loans and consumer loans which include second mortgage loans and home equity secured lines of credit, the Company relies upon the payment status of the loan. Residential mortgage and other consumer loans 90 days or more past due are placed on nonaccrual status, classified as nonperforming, and evaluated for impairment.

Table of Contents

The following table presents by class nonperforming loans including impaired loans and loan balances 90 days or more past due for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued:

	At
	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,931	$	2,265
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		552		1,098
Real estate-residential		392		51
Construction loans		2,944		4,794
Commercial and industrial loans		9		—
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		143		143
Other consumer		2		8
Total nonperforming loans	$	5,973	$	8,359
Total loans past due 90 days as to interest or principal and accruing interest	$	—	$	—

Table of Contents

The following tables present by class loans individually evaluated for impairment:

	At June 30, 2013
	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
	(in thousands)
With an allowance recorded:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,781	$	1,781	$	190	$	2,010	$	—
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		—		—		—		182		—
Construction loans		2,944		3,142		2,000		2,944		—
		4,725		4,923		2,190		5,136		—
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		552		552		—		552		—
Real estate-residential		392		392		—		181		—
		944		944		—		733		—
Total	$	5,669	$	5,867	$	2,190	$	5,869	$	—

	At December 31, 2012
	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
	(in thousands)
With an allowance recorded:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	2,137	$	2,214	$	218	$	2,061	$	—
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		546		1,497		296		697		—
Real estate-residential		51		51		4		298		—
Construction loans		4,737		5,137		1,029		3,604		—
Commercial and industrial loans		—		—		—		2		—
		7,471		8,899		1,547		6,662		—
With no allowance recorded:
Residential
Residential mortgages		—		—		—		698		—
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		552		552		—		1,012		—
Real estate-residential		—		—		—		216		—
Construction loans		57		116		—		1,932		—
		609		668		—		3,858		—
Total	$	8,080	$	9,567	$	1,547	$	10,520	$	—

Table of Contents

The following tables present by class the contractual aging of delinquent loans:

		At June 30, 2013
		Current		30-59 Days past due		60-89 Days past due		Loans past due 90 days or more		Total past due		Total loans		Recorded investment over 90 days and accruing interest
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages		$	324,232	$	406	$	587	$	1,863	$	2,856	$	327,088	$	—
Commercial
Real estate-commercial			106,654		—		233		552		785		107,439		—
Real estate-residential			20,183		—		29		392		421		20,604		—
Real estate-multi-family			16,485		—		—		—		—		16,485		—
Construction loans			7,406		—		—		2,944		2,944		10,350		—
Commercial and industrial loans			5,182		—		—		9		9		5,191		—
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage			39,114		166		6		143		315		39,429		—
Other consumer			1,655		—		—		2		2		1,657		—
Total		$	520,911	$	572	$	855	$	5,905	$	7,332	$	528,243	$	—

	At December 31, 2012
	Current		30-59 Days past due		60-89 Days past due		Loans past due 90 days or more		Total past due		Total loans		Recorded investment over 90 days and accruing interest
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	319,982	$	1,161	$	329	$	2,193	$	3,683	$	323,665	$	—
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		102,868		800		—		1,098		1,898		104,766		—
Real estate-residential		21,488		31		—		51		82		21,570		—
Real estate-multi-family		19,118		—		—		—		—		19,118		—
Construction loans		11,494		—		—		4,794		4,794		16,288		—
Commercial and industrial loans		4,646		—		—		—		—		4,646		—
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		39,842		34		124		143		301		40,143		—
Other consumer		1,824		—		3		8		11		1,835		—
Total	$	521,262	$	2,026	$	456	$	8,287	$	10,769	$	532,031	$	—

Table of Contents

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 is summarized as follows:

	Balance April 1, 2013		Provision			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Balance June 30, 2013
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,800	$	77		$	(109	)	$	12	$	1,780
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		1,311		(74	)		—			—		1,237
Real estate-residential		601		(241	)		—			—		360
Real estate-multi-family		237		(65	)		—			—		172
Construction loans		1,894		484			(39	)		3		2,342
Commercial and industrial loans		125		(55	)		—			1		71
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		211		(1	)		—			—		210
Other consumer		11		27			(16	)		2		24
Unallocated		472		248			—			—		720
Total	$	6,662	$	400		$	(164	)	$	18	$	6,916

	Balance January 1, 2013		Provision			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Balance June 30, 2013
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,849	$	126		$	(207	)	$	12	$	1,780
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		1,754		(82	)		(435	)		—		1,237
Real estate-residential		608		(189	)		(59	)		—		360
Real estate-multi-family		245		(73	)		—			—		172
Construction loans		1,697		781			(150	)		14		2,342
Commercial and industrial loans		119		(52	)		—			4		71
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		251		(34	)		(15	)		8		210
Other consumer		11		30			(19	)		2		24
Unallocated		388		332			—			—		720
Total	$	6,922	$	839		$	(885	)	$	40	$	6,916

Table of Contents

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 is summarized as follows:

	Balance April 1, 2012		Provision			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Balance June 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,953	$	(159	)	$	(177	)	$	3	$	1,620
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		1,834		370			(291	)		—		1,913
Real estate-residential		654		462			(417	)		—		699
Real estate-multi-family		350		(66	)		—			—		284
Construction loans		1,171		83			(252	)		—		1,002
Commercial and industrial loans		46		244			(156	)		3		137
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		309		(23	)		(21	)		—		265
Other consumer		8		14			(12	)		2		12
Unallocated		656		(425	)		—			—		231
Total	$	6,981	$	500		$	(1,326	)	$	8	$	6,163

	Balance January 1, 2012		Provision			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Balance June 30, 2012
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	2,194	$	(8	)	$	(576	)	$	10	$	1,620
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		2,819		8			(914	)		—		1,913
Real estate-residential		464		652			(417	)		—		699
Real estate-multi-family		358		(74	)		—			—		284
Construction loans		1,260		602			(860	)		—		1,002
Commercial and industrial loans		138		147			(156	)		8		137
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		448		(162	)		(21	)		—		265
Other consumer		22		1			(14	)		3		12
Unallocated		397		(166	)		—			—		231
Total	$	8,100	$	1,000		$	(2,958	)	$	21	$	6,163

Despite the above allocation, the allowance for credit losses is general in nature and is available to absorb losses from any portfolio segment.

Loans receivable include certain loans that have been modified as Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. The objective for granting the concessions is to maximize the recovery of the investment in the loan and may include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness

Table of Contents

of interest or principal, forbearance or other actions. TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructuring and typically return to performing status after considering the borrower’s positive repayment performance for a reasonable period of time, usually six months.

Loans modified in a TDR are evaluated individually for impairment based on the present value of expected cash flows or the fair value of the underlying collateral less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, impairment is recognized through an increase by an additional provision to the allowance for loan losses. In periods subsequent to modification, TDRs are evaluated for possible additional impairment.

The following tables present by class loans classified as TDRs for the period indicated:

	For the three months ended June 30, 2012						For the six months ended June 30, 2012
	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Residential	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Residential mortgage		—	$	—	$	—		1	$	852	$	813
Total		—	$	—	$	—		1	$	852	$	813

There were no new loans classified as TDRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

During the first quarter of 2012, a TDR totaling $167,000 which had been previously identified as in default of its modified terms was repaid and a $40,000 loss was charged to the allowance for loan losses.

Table of Contents

The following tables present by class the ending balance of the allowance for loan losses and ending loan balance based on impairment method as of June 30, 2013:

	Evaluated for impairment
Allowance	Individually		Collectively		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	190	$	1,590	$	1,780
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		—		1,237		1,237
Real estate-residential		—		360		360
Real estate-multi-family		—		172		172
Construction loans		2,000		342		2,342
Commercial and industrial loans		—		71		71
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		—		210		210
Other consumer		—		24		24
Unallocated		—		720		720
Total	$	2,190	$	4,726	$	6,916

	Evaluated for impairment
Loan balance	Individually		Collectively		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,781	$	325,307	$	327,088
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		552		106,887		107,439
Real estate-residential		392		20,212		20,604
Real estate-multi-family		—		16,485		16,485
Construction loans		2,944		7,406		10,350
Commercial and industrial loans		—		5,191		5,191
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		—		39,429		39,429
Other consumer		—		1,657		1,657
Total	$	5,669	$	522,574	$	528,243

Table of Contents

The following tables present by class the ending balance of the allowance for loan losses and ending loan balance based on impairment method as of December 31, 2012:

	Evaluated for impairment
Allowance	Individually		Collectively		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	218	$	1,631	$	1,849
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		296		1,458		1,754
Real estate-residential		4		604		608
Real estate-multi-family		—		245		245
Construction loans		1,029		668		1,697
Commercial and industrial loans		—		119		119
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		—		251		251
Other consumer		—		11		11
Unallocated		—		388		388
Total	$	1,547	$	5,375	$	6,922

	Evaluated for impairment
Loan balance	Individually		Collectively		Total
	(in thousands)
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	2,137	$	321,528	$	323,665
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		1,098		103,668		104,766
Real estate-residential		51		21,519		21,570
Real estate-multi-family		—		19,118		19,118
Construction loans		4,794		11,494		16,288
Commercial and industrial loans		—		4,646		4,646
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		—		40,143		40,143
Other consumer		—		1,835		1,835
Total	$	8,080	$	523,951	$	532,031

Table of Contents

NOTE 9 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following tables present information about the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement hierarchy has been established for inputs in valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Determination of the appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement for the instrument or security.

The fair value hierarchy levels are summarized below:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 inputs are inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable and contain assumptions of the party assessing the fair value of the asset or liability.

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by fair value hierarchy level are summarized below:

							Balance as of
	Fair value hierarchy levels						June 30,
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		2013
	(in thousands)
Assets
Investment securities available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	—	$	6,716	$	—	$	6,716
State and political subdivisions		—		57,898		—		57,898
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		—		32,528		—		32,528
Total investment securities available for sale	$	—	$	97,142	$	—	$	97,142

Loans receivable, held for sale	$	—	$	1,509	$	—	$	1,509

							Balance as of
	Fair value hierarchy levels						December 31,
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			2012
	(in thousands)
Assets
Investment securities available for sale
State and political subdivisions	$	—	$	59,610	$	—	$	59,610
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		—		42,674		—		42,674
Total investment securities available for sale	$	—	$	102,284	$	—	$	102,284

Loans receivable, held for sale	$	—	$	706	$	—	$	706

Table of Contents

Investment securities available for sale and mortgage-backed securities available for sale are valued primarily by a third party pricing agent. U.S. Government and federal agency securities are primarily priced through a multi-dimensional relational model, a Level 2 hierarchy, which incorporates dealer quotes and other market information including, defined sector breakdown, benchmark yields, base spread, yield to maturity and corporate actions. State and political subdivision securities are valued within the Level 2 hierarchy using inputs with a series of matrices that reflect benchmark yields, ratings updates, and spread adjustments. Mortgage-backed securities include Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) and Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) certificates which are valued under a Level 2 hierarchy using a matrix correlation to benchmark yields, spread analysis, and prepayment speeds.

Values for loans held for sale utilize active pricing quotes which exist in the secondary market and are therefore deemed a Level 2 hierarchy.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis segregated by fair value hierarchy level at June 30, 2013 are summarized below:

							Balance as of
	Fair value hierarchy levels						June 30,
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		2013
	(in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	1,698	$	1,698
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		—		—		6,177		6,177
Mortgage servicing rights		—		1,323		—		1,323

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which the Bank has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value at June 30, 2013:

		Fair value		Valuation	Unobservable	Range of
Description		estimate		technique	Input	inputs
	(in thousands)

Impaired loans		$	1,698	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Discount rate to reflect current market conditions and ultimate recoverability		5%-15	%
Real estate acquired through foreclosure			6,177	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Discount rate to reflect current market conditions and liquidation expenses		5%-20	%

)

Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.

Table of Contents

The fair value of impaired loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include level 3 inputs which are not identifiable. Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses are presented as a percent of the appraised value.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis segregated by fair value hierarchy level at December 31, 2012 are summarized below:

							Balance as of
	Fair value hierarchy levels						December 31,
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		2012
	(in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	6,533	$	6,533
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		—		—		7,282		7,282
Mortgage servicing rights		—		956		—		956

		Fair value		Valuation	Unobservable	Range of
Description		estimate		technique	Input	inputs
	(in thousands)

Impaired loans		$	6,533	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Discount rate to reflect current market conditions and ultimate recoverability		5%-15	%
Real estate acquired through foreclosure			7,282	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Discount rate to reflect current market conditions and liquidation expenses		5%-20	%

)

Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.

The Company retains a qualified valuation service to calculate the amortized cost and to determine the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights. The valuation service utilizes discounted cash flow analyses adjusted for prepayment speeds, market discount rates and conditions existing in the secondary servicing market. Hence, the fair value of mortgage servicing rights is deemed a Level 2 hierarchy. The amortized cost basis of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights was $1.3 million and $1.1 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The fair value of the mortgage servicing rights was $1,254,000 and $843,000 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and was included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

In addition to financial instruments recorded at fair value in the Company’s financial statements, disclosure of the estimated fair value of all of an entity’s assets and liabilities considered to be financial instruments is also required. For the Bank, as for most financial institutions, the majority of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments. However, many such instruments lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intent to hold its financial instruments to maturity or available for sale and to not engage in trading or significant sales activities. For fair value disclosure purposes, the Company substantially utilized the established fair value measurement hierarchy.

Changes in the assumptions or methodologies used to estimate fair values may materially affect the estimated amounts. In addition, there may not be reasonable comparability between entities due to the wide range of permitted assumptions and methodologies in the absence of active markets. This lack of uniformity gives rise to a high degree of subjectivity in estimating financial instrument fair values.

Table of Contents

Fair values have been estimated using data which management considered the best available, as generally provided by estimation methodologies deemed suitable for the pertinent category of financial instrument. The recorded carrying amounts and fair values segregated by fair value hierarchy level at June 30, 2013 are summarized below:

	Carrying		Fair		Fair value hierarchy levels
	value		value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	44,958	$	44,958	$	44,958	$	—	$	—
Investment securities		64,614		64,614		—		64,614		—
Mortgage-backed securities		34,205		34,434		—		34,434		—
Loans receivable		524,548		523,005		—		1,509		521,496

Liabilities
Deposits with stated maturities	$	165,331	$	167,950	$	—	$	—	$	167,950
Deposits with no stated maturities		406,081		406,081		406,081		—		—
Borrowings with stated maturities		52,534		51,340		—		—		51,340

The recorded carrying amounts and fair values segregated by fair value hierarchy level at December 31, 2012 are summarized below:

	Carrying		Fair		Fair value hierarchy levels
	value		value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	31,137	$	31,137	$	31,137	$	—	$	—
Investment securities		59,610		59,610		—		59,610		—
Mortgage-backed securities		44,639		44,945		—		44,945		—
Loans receivable		527,426		539,665		—		706		538,959

Liabilities
Deposits with stated maturities	$	171,417	$	175,025	$	—	$	—	$	175,025
Deposits with no stated maturities		388,898		388,898		388,898		—		—
Borrowings with stated maturities		60,656		60,939		—		—		60,939

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents equals the carrying amount. The fair value of investment and mortgage-backed securities is described and presented under fair value measurement guidelines as discussed earlier.

The fair value of loans receivable has been estimated using the present value of cash flows, discounted at the approximate current market rates, and giving consideration to estimated prepayment risk but not adjusted for credit risk. Loans receivable also includes loans receivable held for sale.

The fair value of deposits and borrowings with stated maturities has been estimated using the present value of cash flows, discounted at rates approximating current market rates for similar liabilities. Fair value of deposits and borrowings with floating interest rates is generally presumed to approximate the recorded carrying amounts.

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturities is generally presumed to approximate the carrying amount (the amount payable on demand). The fair value of deposits with floating interest rates is generally presumed to approximate the recorded carrying amounts.

The Bank’s remaining assets and liabilities are not considered financial instruments. No disclosure of the relationship value of the Bank’s depositors or customers is required.

Table of Contents

NOTE 10 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has stock benefit plans that allow the Company to grant options and restricted stock to employees and directors. The awards, which have a term of up to 10 years when issued, vest over a two to five year period. The exercise price of each award equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. The fair value of each option grant during the first half of 2013 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

Weighted average assumptions
Dividend yield		0.83	%
Expected volatility		17.24	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.67	%
Fair value of options granted during the period	$	3.13
Expected lives in years		5

There were no stock options granted during the three or six months ended June 30, 2012.

At June 30, 2013, there was $506,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested awards under the Company’s stock option plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 12.4 months. Option activity under the Company’s stock option plan as of June 30, 2013 was as follows:

	At June 30, 2013
	Number of shares			Weighted average exercise price per share		Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)		Aggregate intrinsic value ($000)
Outstanding at January 1, 2013		89,279		$	24.08
Options granted		200,000			24.21
Options exercised		(672	)		19.67
Options forfeited		(2,499	)		28.25
Options expired		(14,279	)		24.26
Outstanding at June 30, 2013		271,829		$	24.14		3.07	$	458
Options exercisable at June 30, 2013		64,126		$	24.45		1.64	$	176

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the second quarter and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options).

The aggregate intrinsic value and cash receipts of options exercised are as follows:

	At June 30,
	2013		2012
	(in thousands)
Options Exercised
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised	$	3	$	6
Cash receipts from options exercised		13		7

Table of Contents

The Company issues stock of the Company as payment for director fees as permitted by the 2011 Director Stock Compensation Plan. The cost associated with these grants is included as a component of stock-based compensation. The following tables provide information regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation expense:

	For the three months ended June 30,
	2013		2012
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation expense
Director fees	$	36	$	37
Stock option expense		84		7
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") expense		82		80
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	202	$	124

The Bank reports ESOP expense in an amount equal to the fair value of shares released from the ESOP to employees less dividends received on the allocated shares in the plan used for debt service. Dividends on allocated shares used to reduce ESOP expense totaled $9,000 and $8,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options resulted in a tax benefit of $26,000 and $2,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation expense
Director fees	$	70	$	74
Stock grant expense		—		—
Stock option expense		143		14
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") expense		163		142
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	376	$	230

The Bank reports ESOP expense in an amount equal to the fair value of shares released from the ESOP to employees less dividends received on the allocated shares in the plan used for debt service. Dividends on allocated shares used to reduce ESOP expense totaled $17,000 and $16,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options resulted in a tax benefit of $44,000 and $5,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Table of Contents

NOTE 11 — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Net periodic defined benefit pension cost included the following:

	For the three months ended June 30,
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	206		$	184
Interest cost		89			90
Expected return on plan assets		(182	)		(161	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		66			71
Net periodic benefit cost	$	179		$	184

	For the six months ended June 30,
		2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	411		$	368
Interest cost		177			180
Expected return on plan assets		(363	)		(322	)
Amortization of prior service cost		1			1
Recognized net actuarial loss		131			142
Net periodic benefit cost	$	357		$	369

There were no employer contributions for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Employer contributions of $653,000 were made during the second quarter of 2013.

NOTE 12— MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

On July 2, 2013, the Company acquired Roebling Financial Corp, Inc. (“Roebling”), the parent company of Roebling Bank, for approximately $14.5 million in stock and cash (the “Merger”).

As a result of the Merger, Roebling has merged with and into the Company and Roebling Bank has merged with and into the Bank. Each outstanding share of Roebling common stock was converted into the right to receive $8.60 per share or 0.364 shares of the Company’s common stock, at the election of Roebling shareholders, subject to proration. The aggregate cash consideration paid in the Merger was 50% of the total merger consideration (including any cash paid in connection with the Roebling options and any shares held by the employee stock ownership plan and not allocated to participant accounts). Cash was paid in lieu of fractional shares at a value based on the average closing sale price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty trading days immediately prior to the closing date.

The Merger is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. As a result, the shares of Roebling exchanged for the Company’s shares will be transferred on a tax-free basis.

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

The Company may from time to time make written or oral “forward-looking statements”, including statements contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the exhibits hereto), in its reports to stockholders and in other communications by the Company, which are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of the Company’s plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions that are subject to change based on various important factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s control). The following factors, among others, could cause the Company’s financial performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of the Company and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors’ products and services; the willingness of users to substitute competitors’ products and services for the Company’s products and services; the success of the Company in gaining regulatory approval of its products and services, when required; the impact of changes in financial services’ laws and regulations (including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance); technological changes, acquisitions; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; failure to realize the anticipated benefits as a result of our acquisition of Roebling and Roebling Bank; and the success of the Company at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

The Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.

Financial Condition

The Company’s total assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $714.8 million and $711.8 million, respectively, representing an increase of $3.0 million during the six-month period. Largely as a result of the repayment of loans receivable and investment securities, cash and cash equivalents increased by $13.8 million during the first six months of 2013. Loans receivable, net decreased by $3.7 million during the first six months of 2013. Principal repayments of $59.1 million on loans were partially offset by originations of consumer and single-family residential mortgage loans totaling $39.9 million and originations of commercial loans totaling $16.7 million. The Company increased the allowance for loan losses by $839,000 and transferred $257,000 from loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure. Loans receivable held for sale increased $803,000 as originations of loans for sale in the secondary market totaled $21.6 million and proceeds from loan sales totaled $21.1 million. Investment securities decreased by $5.4 million due to principal repayments and maturities totaling $13.8 million, a decrease in the fair value of available for sale securities of $4.1 million and net premium amortization of $352,000, all of which were offset by security purchases of $12.8 million.

Total liabilities increased by $2.4 million during the first six months of 2013. Deposit balances increased $11.1 million during the period with checking, money market and savings accounts increasing by $17.2 million. Retail certificates of deposit (“CDs”) decreased $6.1 million during the first six months of 2013. Advances from the FHLB decreased by $8.1 million, the result of scheduled amortization and maturities.

Total consolidated stockholders’ equity of the Company was $83.5 million or 11.9% of total assets at June 30, 2013. At June 30, 2013, there were approximately 102,000 shares available for repurchase under the previously announced share repurchase plan.

Table of Contents

Asset Quality

Nonperforming assets include real estate owned, which is carried at estimated fair value less costs to sell and nonperforming loans. Nonperforming loans include loan balances 90 days or more past due and impaired loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued. The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s nonperforming assets:

Nonperforming Assets	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012			June 30, 2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loans receivable, net:
Residential
Residential mortgages	$	1,931		$	2,265		$	3,731
Commercial
Real estate-commercial		552			1,098			1,425
Real estate-residential		392			51			840
Construction loans		2,944			4,794			6,154
Commercial and industrial loans		9			—			—
Consumer
Home equity and second mortgage		143			143			416
Other consumer		2			8			—
Total nonperforming loans		5,973			8,359			12,566
Real estate owned		6,177			7,282			6,625
Total nonperforming assets	$	12,150		$	15,641		$	19,191
Total loans 90 days or more past due as to interest or principal and accruing interest	$	—		$	—		$	—
Ratio of nonperforming loans to gross loans		1.30	%		1.56	%		2.42	%
Ratio of nonperforming loans to total assets		0.84	%		1.17	%		1.83	%
Ratio of total nonperforming assets to total assets		1.70	%		2.20	%		2.80	%

Nonperforming construction loans include a participation in a commercial construction project with a principal balance due of $3.1 million. The Bank has recorded a partial charge-off of $198,000 from the allowance for loan losses equal to the difference between the recorded investment and a recent appraisal. Additionally, $2,000,000 of the allowance for loan losses has been allocated to this loan for a potential shortfall related to the disposition of the loan.

Foreclosed property at June 30, 2013 consisted of twenty-one parcels of real estate with a combined carrying value of $6.2 million. During the first six months of 2013, the Bank foreclosed on three mortgage loans secured by residential property valued at $257,000 which resulted in a charge to the allowance of $147,000. Also, the Bank sold two properties acquired through foreclosure with an aggregate book value of $982,000. All foreclosed properties are listed or are in the process of being listed with real estate agents for sale in a timely manner. Foreclosed real estate is included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Bank provides valuation allowances for estimated losses from uncollectible loans. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and reduced by net charge-offs. On a quarterly basis, the Company prepares an allowance for loan losses (ALLL) analysis. In the analysis, the loan portfolio is segmented into groups of homogeneous loans that share similar risk characteristics: commercial loans secured by nonresidential or non-owner occupied residential real estate, construction, commercial and industrial loans, single-family residential and consumer which is predominately real estate secured by junior liens and home equity lines of credit. Each segment is assigned reserve factors based on quantitative and qualitative measurements. In addition, the Bank

Table of Contents

reviews its internally classified loans, its loans classified for regulatory purposes, delinquent loans, and other relevant information in order to isolate loans for further scrutiny as potentially impaired loans.

Quantitative factors include an actual expected loss factor based on historical loss experience over a relevant look-back period. Quantitative factors also include the Bank’s actual risk ratings for the commercial loan segments as determined in accordance with loan review and loan grading policies and procedures, and additional factors as determined by management to be representative of additional risk due to the loan’s geographic location, type, and other attributes. These quantitative factors are adjusted if necessary, up or down, based on actual experience and an evaluation of the qualitative factors.

Qualitative factors are based upon: (1) changes in lending policies and procedures, including but not limited to changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses; (2) changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio, including the condition of various market segments; (3) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans; (4) changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; (5) changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans; (6) changes in the quality of the loan review system; (7) changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; (8) the existence and effect of any concentration of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations; and (9) the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the existing loan portfolio.

Potentially impaired loans selected for individual evaluation are reviewed in accordance with US GAAP which governs the accounting for impaired assets, as well as regulatory guidance regarding treatment of troubled, collateral-dependent loans. Each potentially impaired loan is evaluated using all available information such as recent appraisals, whether the loan is currently on accrual or nonaccrual status, discounted cash flow analyses, guarantor financial strength, the value of additional collateral, and the loan’s and borrower’s past performance to determine whether in management’s best judgment it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all contractual interest and principal in accordance with the loan’s terms. Loans deemed not to be impaired are assigned a reserve factor based upon the segment from which they were selected.

Loans deemed impaired are evaluated to determine the estimated fair value of the collateral, and a portion of the ALLL will be allocated to the deficiency. Troubled collateral-dependent real estate secured loans are valued using the appraised value of the collateral, and a portion of the ALLL will be allocated to these loans based on the difference between the loan amount and the appraised value. If such amounts are judged by management to be permanent, they will be charged-off. In addition, if foreclosure is

probable, a portion of the ALLL will be allocated to the estimated additional costs to acquire and the estimated costs to sell. Upon completion of the foreclosure process, these amounts will be charged-off.

The ALLL needed as a result of the foregoing evaluation is compared with the unadjusted amount, and an adjustment is made by means of a provision to the allowance for loan losses. Recognizing the inherently imprecise nature of the loss estimates and the large number of assumptions needed in order to perform the analysis, the required reserve may be less than the actual level of reserves at the end of any evaluation period, and thus there may be an unallocated portion of the ALLL. Management adjusts the unallocated portion to an amount which management considers reasonable under the circumstances.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012

Net Income. The Company recorded net income of $1.8 million, or $0.66 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to net income of $1.2 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Average Balance Sheet

The following table sets forth information (dollars in thousands) relating to the Company’s average balance sheet and reflects the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the periods indicated. Yields and costs are computed by dividing income or expense by the average daily balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the three-month periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013								2012
	Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost			Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable(1)	$	524,728	$	5,963			4.56	%	$	501,757	$	6,231			4.99	%
Mortgage-backed securities		37,523		246			2.63	%		61,580		564			3.68	%
Investment securities(2)		68,211		713			4.19	%		68,181		731			4.31	%
Other interest-earning assets(3)		39,111		14			1.14	%		3,074		—			—	%*
Total interest-earning assets		669,573		6,936			4.15	%		634,592		7,526			4.77	%
Noninterest-earning assets		45,938								48,329
Total assets	$	715,511							$	682,921
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	570,271	$	712			0.50	%	$	550,040	$	926			0.68	%
Borrowings from the FHLB		53,303		226			1.70	%		46,785		351			3.02	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		623,574		938			0.60	%		596,825		1,277			0.86	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities		7,508								6,486
Total liabilities		631,082								603,311
Stockholders’ equity		84,429								79,610
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	715,511							$	682,921
Net interest income—tax equivalent basis				5,998								6,249
Interest rate spread(4)—tax equivalent basis							3.55	%							3.91	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5)—tax equivalent basis							3.59	%							3.96	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities							106.33	%							106.33	%
Less: tax-equivalent interest adjustments				(192	)							(198	)
Net interest income			$	5,806							$	6,051
Interest rate spread(4)							3.44	%							3.78	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5)							3.48	%							3.84	%

(1	)	Nonperforming loans have been included in the appropriate average loan balance category, but interest on nonperforming loans has not been included for purposes of determining interest income.
(2	)	Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $192,000 and $198,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.
(3	)	Includes interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
(4	)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5	)	Net yield on interest-earning assets represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
*		Is less than $500 for period indicated.

Table of Contents

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the change in interest income and interest expense (dollars in thousands) attributed to (i) changes in volume (changes in the weighted average balance of the total interest earning asset and interest-bearing liability portfolios multiplied by the prior year rate), and (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior year volume). Changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately based on the absolute value of changes due to volume and changes due to rate.

	For the three months ended June 30,
	2013 vs 2012 Increase (decrease) due to
	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Loans receivable, net	$	1,414		$	(1,682	)	$	(268	)
Mortgage-backed securities		(184	)		(134	)		(318	)
Investment securities (1)		2			(20	)		(18	)
Other interest-earning assets		—			14			14
Total interest-earning assets		1,232			(1,822	)		(590	)
Interest expense:
Deposits		214			(428	)		(214	)
Borrowings from the FHLB		268			(393	)		(125	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities		482			(821	)		(339	)
Net change in net interest income	$	750		$	(1,001	)	$	(251	)

)

Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $192,000 and $198,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.

Total Interest Income. Total interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, decreased by $590,000, or 7.8%, to $6.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared with the second quarter of 2012. Interest income from loans receivable decreased by $268,000, the result of a decrease in the average yield on loans of 43 basis points netted against the effect of a $23.0 million increase in the average balance of loans outstanding. The decrease in the yield was caused by the combined effects of a large number of higher rate loans being prepaid, and new loans added to the portfolio with lower yields than the existing portfolio loans that had matured or refinanced. Interest income from mortgage-backed securities was lower in the quarter ended June 30, 2013 in comparison to the same period in 2012 mainly because the yield associated with principal repayments and sales which occurred during the intervening period was higher than the yield on the remaining mortgage-backed securities.

Total Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $339,000 to $938,000 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with the same period in 2012. The average interest rate paid on the Bank’s deposits was 18 basis points lower in 2013 due to the maturity of certificates of deposit with higher interest rates than current market rates offered on the products into which the maturing CDs were renewed or reinvested, and a favorable change in the deposit mix and pricing. Interest expense associated with borrowings from the FHLB decreased $125,000 between the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter of 2012. During the intervening period, the Bank increased its average outstanding borrowings by $6.5 million, which included an increase in long-term advances with rates lower than the maturing advances, which resulted in a decrease in the cost of borrowed funds of 132 basis points.

Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income was $1.9 million for the second quarter of 2013 compared with $739,000 for the same period in 2012. Income from the benefits paid on the bank owned life insurance policies was $934,000 during the second quarter of 2013 due to the death of two insured individuals. Fair value adjustments to mortgage servicing rights increased loan servicing income by $271,000 from the second quarter of 2012 to the same quarter of 2013.

Noninterest Expense. Total noninterest expense increased by $483,000 to $5.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. Merger-related costs attributable to the announced acquisition of Roebling totaled $295,000 during the second quarter of 2013. Employee compensation increased by $145,000 in 2013, mainly the result of stock option expense for option grants in 2013. Foreclosed real estate expense decreased $105,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 mainly due to a decrease in the holding costs of real estate acquired through foreclosure that resulted from the disposition of such properties during the intervening period

Income Tax Expense. The Company’s effective tax rate was 19.0% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared to 23.9% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. These effective tax rates are lower than the Company’s marginal tax rate of 34% largely due to the tax-exempt income associated with the Company’s investments in tax-exempt municipal bonds and bank owned life insurance offset by merger-related costs treated as nondeductible.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012

Net Income. The Company recorded net income of $3.0 million, or $1.10 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to net income of $2.4 million, or $0.88 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Average Balance Sheet

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013								2012
	Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost			Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable(1)	$	525,000	$	12,029			4.62	%	$	497,576	$	12,428			5.02	%
Mortgage-backed securities		39,744		519			2.63	%		61,776		1,103			3.59	%
Investment securities(2)		66,680		1,421			4.30	%		67,608		1,455			4.33	%
Other interest-earning assets(3)		34,022		18			0.11	%		8,347		2			0.05	%
Total interest-earning assets		665,446		13,987			4.24	%		635,307		14,988			4.74	%
Noninterest-earning assets		46,252								49,443
Total assets	$	711,698							$	684,750
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	565,536	$	1,443			0.51	%	$	552,282	$	1,992			0.73	%
Borrowings from the FHLB		54,701		474			1.75	%		47,086		756			3.23	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		620,237		1,917			0.62	%		599,368		2,748			0.92	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities		7,363								6,504
Total liabilities		627,600								605,872
Stockholders’ equity		84,098								78,878
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	711,698							$	684,750
Net interest income—tax equivalent basis				12,070								12,240
Interest rate spread(4)—tax equivalent basis							3.62	%							3.82	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5)—tax equivalent basis							3.66	%							3.87	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities							107.29	%							106.00	%
Less: tax-equivalent interest adjustments				(386	)							(397	)
Net interest income			$	11,684							$	11,843
Interest rate spread(4)							3.50	%							3.70	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5)							3.54	%							3.75	%

(1	)	Nonperforming loans have been included in the appropriate average loan balance category, but interest on nonperforming loans has not been included for purposes of determining interest income.
(2	)	Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $386,000 and $397,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.
(3	)	Includes interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
(4	)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5	)	Net yield on interest-earning assets represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the change in interest income and interest expense (dollars in thousands) attributed to (i) changes in volume (changes in the weighted average balance of the total interest earning asset and interest bearing liability portfolios multiplied by the prior year rate), and (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior year volume). Changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately based on the absolute value of changes due to volume and changes due to rate.

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2013 vs 2012 Increase (decrease) due to
	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Loans receivable, net	$	1,441		$	(1,840	)	$	(399	)
Mortgage-backed securities		(335	)		(249	)		(584	)
Investment securities (1)		(26	)		(8	)		(34	)
Other interest-earning assets		11			5			16
Total interest-earning assets		1,091			(2,092	)		(1,001	)
Interest expense:
Deposits		135			(684	)		(549	)
Borrowings from the FHLB		289			(571	)		(282	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities		424			(1,255	)		(831	)
Net change in net interest income	$	667		$	(837	)	$	(170	)

)

Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $386,000 and $397,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.

Total Interest Income. Total interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, decreased by $1.0 million, or 6.7%, to $14.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the same period of 2012. Interest income from loans receivable decreased by $399,000, the result of a decrease in the average yield on loans of 40 basis points netted against the effect of a $27.4 million increase in the average balance of loans outstanding. The decrease in the yield was caused by the combined effects of a large number of higher rate loans being prepaid, and new loans added to the portfolio with a lower yield than the existing portfolio loans that had matured or refinanced. Interest income from mortgage-backed securities was lower in the 2013 quarter in comparison to the same period of 2012 mainly because the yield associated with principal repayments and sales which occurred during the intervening period was higher than the yield on the remaining mortgage-backed securities.

Total Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $831,000 to $1.9 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with the same period in 2012. The average interest rate paid on the Bank’s deposits was 22 basis points lower in 2013 due to the maturity of certificates of deposit with higher interest rates than current market rates offered on the products into which the maturing CDs were renewed or reinvested, and a favorable change in the deposit mix and pricing. Interest expense associated with borrowings from the FHLB decreased $282,000 between the first half of 2013 compared to the same period of 2012. During the intervening period, the Bank increased its average outstanding borrowings by $7.6 million, which included an increase in long-term advances with rates lower than the maturing advances, which resulted in a decrease in the cost of borrowed funds of 148 basis points.

Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income was $3.3 million for the first six months of 2013 compared with $2.0 million for the same period in 2012. Income from the benefits paid on the bank owned life insurance policies was $934,000 during the second quarter of 2013 due to the death of two insured individuals. Gain on disposition of premises and equipment included $417,000 related to an eminent domain matter affecting a parcel of Company property, a $153,000 increase over the amount recorded in 2012 related to the same matter, which is now finalized. Fair value adjustments to mortgage servicing rights increased loan servicing income by $265,000 between the first six months of 2012 and the same period of 2013.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense. Total noninterest expense increased by $681,000 to $10.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. Merger-related costs attributable to the acquisition of Roebling totaled $615,000 during the first half of 2013. Employee compensation increased by $88,000 in 2013, mainly the result of a $131,000 increase in stock option expense for option grants in 2013. Offsetting this increase was a decline in the employee group health insurance premiums. Foreclosed real estate expense decreased $168,000 in 2013 over the same period in 2012 mainly due to a decrease in the holding costs of real estate acquired through foreclosure that resulted from the disposition of such properties during the intervening period.

Income Tax Expense. The Company’s effective tax rate was 24.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 22.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

These effective tax rates are lower than the Company’s marginal tax rate of 34% largely due to the tax-exempt income associated with the Company’s investments in tax-exempt municipal bonds and bank owned life insurance offset by merger-related costs treated as nondeductible.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

The Bank’s liquidity is a measure of its ability to fund loans, and pay withdrawals of deposits, and other cash outflows in an efficient, cost-effective manner. The Bank’s short-term sources of liquidity include maturities, repayment and sales of assets, excess cash and cash equivalents, new deposits, brokered deposits, other borrowings, and new borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank. There has been no material adverse change during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 in the ability of the Bank and its subsidiaries to fund their operations.

At June 30, 2013, the Bank had commitments outstanding under letters of credit of $930,000, commitments to originate loans of $21.5 million, and commitments to fund undisbursed balances of closed loans and unused lines of credit of $45.2 million. At June 30, 2013, the Bank had $5.2 million in outstanding commitments to sell loans. There has been no material change during the six months ended June 30, 2013 in any of the Bank’s other contractual obligations or commitments to make future payments.

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are dividends from the Bank, principal and interest payments received from a loan made to the Bank’s ESOP, and tax benefits arising from the use of the Company’s tax deductions by other members of its consolidated group pursuant to a tax sharing agreement. The Company is dependent upon these sources and cash on hand which totaled approximately $2.1 million at June 30, 2013 in order to fund its operations and pay the dividend to its shareholders. There has been no material adverse change in the ability of the Company to fund its operations during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013. On July 1, 2013, the Company received a $6 million dividend from the Bank, used in addition to cash on hand to fund the cash portion of the purchase of Roebling as described in Note 12.

Capital Requirements

The Bank was in compliance with all of its capital requirements as of June 30, 2013.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Certain critical accounting policies of the Company require the use of significant judgment and accounting estimates in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related data of the Company. These accounting estimates require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made. Management believes that the most critical accounting policy requiring the use of accounting estimates and judgment is the determination of the allowance for loan losses. If the financial position of a significant number of debtors or the value of the collateral securing the loans should deteriorate more than the Company has estimated, the present allowance for loan losses may be insufficient and additional provisions for loan losses may be required. The allowance for loan losses was approximately $6.9 million at June 30, 2013.

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files and submits pursuant to the rules and forms of the SEC is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

During the quarter under report, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

	Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries are involved in any pending legal proceedings, other than routine legal matters occurring in the ordinary course of business that in the aggregate involve amounts which are believed by management to be immaterial to the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

	As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

	None.

ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

	Not applicable.

ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

	None.

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS

	(a)	Exhibits
		31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
		31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
		32.	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

		101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
		101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
		101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
		101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
		101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
		101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:	August 14, 2013	/s/ Kent C. Lufkin
		Kent C. Lufkin
		President and CEO
		(Principal Executive Officer)


Date:	August 14, 2013	/s/ Dennis R. Stewart
		Dennis R. Stewart
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)