Edgar Filing: TF FINANCIAL CORP

(in thousands)

Options Exercised

Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised

Cash receipts from options exercised

form10q.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the period ended June 30, 2011

- or -

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 0-24168

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Pennsylvania		74-2705050
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
or Organization)

3 Penns Trail, Newtown, Pennsylvania		18940
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 579-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES xNO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 Exchange Act). YES o NO x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: August 12, 2011

Class	Outstanding
$.10 par value common stock	2,824,034 shares

CONTENTS

PART I-CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.		Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited	3

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27

Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	37

Item 4.		Controls and Procedures	38

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.		Legal Proceedings	39

Item 1A.		Risk Factors	39

Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	39

Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities	39

Item 4.		[Removed and Reserved]	39

Item 5.		Other Information	39

Item 6.		Exhibits	39

Signatures			40

Exhibits

31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.	Certification pursuant of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The following Exhibits are being furnished as part of this report:

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

TF Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,786		$	7,437
Investment securities		127,587			127,490
Loans receivable, net		499,263			501,528
Loans receivable held for sale		—			130
Federal Home Loan Bank stock—at cost		8,484			9,401
Accrued interest receivable		2,775			2,738
Premises and equipment, net		6,797			6,797
Goodwill		4,324			4,324
Bank-owned life insurance		18,189			17,868
Other assets		15,356			14,044
TOTAL ASSETS	$	691,561		$	691,757

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits	$	552,104		$	550,135
Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank		55,345			61,987
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		2,425			2,166
Accrued interest payable		2,232			1,784
Other liabilities		4,035			2,269
Total liabilities		616,141			618,341

Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, none issued		—			—
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 5,290,000 shares issued and, 2,822,449 shares outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, net of shares in treasury of 2,467,551.		529			529
Additional paid-in capital		54,057			53,964
Unearned ESOP shares		(1,156	)		(1,217	)
Treasury stock-at cost		(51,220	)		(51,220	)
Retained earnings		71,801			70,749
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,409			611
Total stockholders’ equity		75,420			73,416
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	691,561		$	691,757

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended June 30,					For the six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	6,695		$	7,150	$		13,279	$	14,452
Investment securities
Fully taxable	874			1,065		1,770			2,140
Exempt from federal taxes	362			306		717			603
Interest-bearing deposits and other	1			1		1			2

TOTAL INTEREST INCOME	7,932			8,522		15,767			17,197

Interest expense
Deposits	1,438			1,841		2,898			3,836
Borrowings	505			793		1,064			1,641

TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE	1,943			2,634		3,962			5,477

NET INTEREST INCOME	5,989			5,888		11,805			11,720

Provision for loan losses	1,450			600		2,350			1,561

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	4,539			5,288		9,455			10,159

Non-interest income
Service fees, charges and other operating income	479			363		944			892
Bank-owned life insurance	164			167		321			339
Gain on sale of investments	210			7		210			7
Gain on sale of loans	50			52		167			112
Loss (gain) on sale of foreclosed real estate	(11		)	8		—			(137		)

TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME	892			597		1,642			1,213

Non-interest expense
Employee compensation and benefits	2,622			2,667		5,368			5,367
Occupancy and equipment	736			723		1,554			1,482
Professional fees	324			256		802			484
Marketing and advertising	102			120		169			240
FDIC insurance premiums	151			259		384			453
Other operating	675			566		1,309			1,157

TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE	4,610			4,591		9,586			9,183

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES	821			1,294		1,511			2,189

Income taxes	122			327		194			505

NET INCOME	$	699		$	967	$		1,317	$	1,684

Earnings per share—basic	$	0.26		$	0.36	$	0.49		$	0.63
Earnings per share—diluted	$	0.26		$	0.36	$	0.49		$	0.63
Dividends paid per share	$	0.05		$	0.19	$	0.10		$	0.38

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010
	(in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	1,317		$	1,684
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Amortization and impairment adjustment of mortgage loan servicing rights		78			200
Premiums and discounts on investment securities, net		59			39
Premiums and discounts on mortgage-backed securities, net		127			19
Deferred loan origination costs, net		24			135
Provision for loan losses		2,350			1,561
Depreciation of premises and equipment		436			421
Increase in value of bank-owned life insurance		(321	)		(339	)
Stock based compensation		154			151
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale		8,632			11,518
Origination of loans held for sale		(8,409	)		(11,314	)
(Gain) loss on sale of:
Investments		(210	)		(7	)
Loans held for sale		(167	)		(112	)
Foreclosed real estate		—			137
(Increase) decrease in:
Accrued interest receivable		(37	)		(116	)
Other assets		473			495
Increase (decrease) in:
Accrued interest payable		448			(240	)
Other liabilities		1,377			(1,326	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		6,331			2,906

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Loan originations		(50,143	)		(33,311	)
Loan principal payments		47,642			40,900
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate		639			799
Principal repayments on mortgage-baked securities held to maturity		361			220
Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities available for sale		14,327			13,610
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale		3,534			60
Purchase of investment securities available for sale		(4,112	)		(8,507	)
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available for sale		(14,550	)		(13,995	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(436	)		(1,240	)
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		917			—
Proceeds from sale of mortgage backed securities available for sale		1,518			—
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(303	)		(1,464	)

Table of Contents

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010
	(in thousands)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in customer deposits		1,969			6,674
Proceeds of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		6,573			12,884
Repayment of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		(13,215	)		(13,196	)
Net increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		259			182
Exercise of stock options		—			177
Tax benefit arising from stock compensation		—			17
Common stock dividends paid		(265	)		(1,016	)
NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(4,679	)		5,722

NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		1,349			7,164

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		7,437			12,801

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	8,786		$	19,965

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for:
Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	3,514		$	5,717
Income taxes	$	300		$	382
Non-cash transactions:
Capitalization of mortgage servicing rights	$	74		$	92
Transfers from loans to foreclosed real estate	$	2,392		$	1,088
Securities available for sale purchased not settled	$	1,234		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010 and for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited) include the accounts of TF Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries Third Federal Bank (the “Bank”), TF Investments Corporation and Penns Trail Development Corporation. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet but does not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The Company’s business is conducted principally through the Bank. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all of the disclosures or footnotes required by US GAAP. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

NOTE 3 - CONTINGENCIES

The Company, from time to time, is a party to routine litigation that arises in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of this litigation, if any, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 4 - OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income is the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Total comprehensive income was $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The components of other comprehensive income are as follows for the three months ended:

	June 30, 2011
	Before tax amount			Tax (expense)			Net of tax amount
	(in thousands)
Unrealized gains on securities
Unrealized holding gains arising during period	$	956		$	(325	)	$	631
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income		(210	)		71			(139	)
Pension plan benefit adjustment related to actuarial losses		29			(10	)		19
Other comprehensive income, net	$	775		$	(264	)	$	511

	June 30, 2010
	Before tax amount			Tax (expense)			Net of tax amount
	(in thousands)
Unrealized gains on securities
Unrealized holding gains arising during period	$	337		$	(117	)	$	220
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income		(7	)		2			(5	)
Pension plan benefit adjustment related to prior service costs and actuarial losses		42			(14	)		28
Other comprehensive income, net	$	372		$	(129	)	$	243

Table of Contents

Total comprehensive income was $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The components of other comprehensive income are as follows for the six months ended:

	June 30, 2011
	Before tax amount			Tax (expense)			Net of tax amount
	(in thousands)
Unrealized gains on securities
Unrealized holding gains arising during period	$	1,360		$	(462	)	$	898
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income		(210	)		71			(139	)
Pension plan benefit adjustment related to prior service costs and actuarial losses		58			(19	)		39
Other comprehensive income, net	$	1,208		$	(410	)	$	798

	June 30, 2010
	Before tax amount			Tax (expense)			Net of tax amount
	(in thousands)
Unrealized gains on securities
Unrealized holding gains arising during period	$	594		$	(205	)	$	389
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income		(7	)		2			(5	)
Pension plan benefit adjustment related to actuarial losses		75			(25	)		50
Other comprehensive income, net	$	662		$	(228	)	$	434

NOTE 5—EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following tables illustrate the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three months ended June 30, 2011
	Income (numerator)		Weighted average shares (denominator)	Per share Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	699	2,704,922	$	0.26
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants	—		1,013	—

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	699	2,705,935	$	0.26

	Six months ended June 30, 2011
	Income (numerator)		Weighted average shares (denominator)	Per share Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	1,317	2,703,358	$	0.49
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants	—		613	—

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	1,317	2,703,971	$	0.49

There were 66,507 options to purchase shares of common stock at a price range of $24.12 to $32.51 per share which were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

	Three months ended June 30, 2010
	Income (numerator)		Weighted average shares (denominator)	Per share Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	967	2,680,364	$	0.36
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants	—		—	—

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	967	2,680,364	$	0.36

Table of Contents

	Six months ended June 30, 2010
	Income (numerator)		Weighted average shares (denominator)	Per share Amount
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders	$	1,684	2,674,851	$	0.63
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options and grants	—		—	—

Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common stockholders plus effect of dilutive securities	$	1,684	2,674,851	$	0.63

There were 258,442 options to purchase shares of common stock at a price range of $19.67 to $32.51 per share which were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

Table of Contents

NOTE 6—INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of the Company’s investment securities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2011
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	8,989	$	32	$	—		$	9,021
State and political subdivisions		48,413		2,649		(16	)		51,046
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		52,837		1,546		(25	)		54,358
Residential mortgage-backed securities privately issued		10,123		238		(8	)		10,353
Total investment securities available for sale		120,362		4,465		(49	)		124,778

Held to maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		2,809		350		—			3,159
Total investment securities	$	123,171	$	4,815	$	(49	)	$	127,937

	December 31, 2010
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	6,000	$	59	$	—		$	6,059
Corporate debt securities		3,340		223		—			3,563
State and political subdivisions		47,348		1,120		(260	)		48,208
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		50,942		1,950		(6	)		52,886
Residential mortgage-backed securities, privately issued		13,425		224		(44	)		13,605
Total investment securities available for sale		121,055		3,576		(310	)		124,321

Held to maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		3,169		341		—			3,510
Total investment securities	$	124,224	$	3,917	$	(310	)	$	127,831

Gross realized gains were $210,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. These gains resulted from proceeds from the sale of investment and mortgage-backed securities of $5.1 million. Gross realized gains were $7,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. These gains resulted from proceeds from the sale of investment equity securities of $60,000.

Table of Contents

The amortized cost and fair value of investment and mortgage-backed securities, by contractual maturity, are shown below.

	June 30, 2011
	Available for sale				Held to maturity
	Amortized cost		Fair value		Amortized cost		Fair value
	(in thousands)
Investment securities
Due in one year or less	$	1,285	$	1,297	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years		11,722		12,081		—		—
Due after five years through 10 years		27,512		28,986		—		—
Due after ten years		16,883		17,703		—		—
		57,402		60,067		—		—

Mortgage-backed securities		62,960		64,711		2,809		3,159
Total investment and mortgage-backed securities	$	120,362	$	124,778	$	2,809	$	3,159

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011:

	Number		Less than 12 months					12 months or longer				Total
Description of Securities	of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair value		Unrealized Loss
	(in thousands)
State and political subdivisions		2	$	709	$	(16	)	$	—	$	—	$	709	$	(16	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		5		6,916		(25	)		—		—		6,916		(25	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities privately issued		1		3,872		(8	)		—		—		3,872		(8	)

Total temporarily impaired securities		8	$	11,497	$	(49	)	$	—	$	—	$	11,497	$	(49	)

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2010:

	Number		Less than 12 months					12 months or longer				Total
Description of Securities	of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair value		Unrealized Loss
	(in thousands)
State and political subdivisions		17	$	14,210	$	(260	)	$	—	$	—	$	14,210	$	(260	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		1		3,027		(6	)		—		—		3,027		(6	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities privately issued		3		7,048		(44	)		—		—		7,048		(44	)
Total temporarily impaired securities		21	$	24,285	$	(310	)	$	—	$	—	$	24,285	$	(310	)

On a quarterly basis, temporarily impaired securities are evaluated to determine whether such impairment is other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). The Company has performed this evaluation and has determined that the unrealized losses at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, are not considered other-than-temporary but are the result of changes in interest rates, and are therefore reflected in other comprehensive income.

Table of Contents

NOTE 7—LOANS RECEIVABLE

Loans receivable are summarized as follows:


	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Held for investment:
First mortgage loans
Secured by one-to four-family residences	$	270,221		$	269,077
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		145,918			137,307
Construction loans		17,824			18,799
Total first mortgage loans		433,963			425,183

Other loans
Commercial-business, real estate secured		18,948			26,603
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		5,001			5,575
Home equity and second mortgage		47,470			49,430
Other consumer		2,116			2,407
Total other loans		73,535			84,015

Total loans		507,498			509,198
Net deferred loan origination costs and unamortized premiums		873			658
Less allowance for loan losses		(9,108	)		(8,328	)
Total loans receivable	$	499,263		$	501,528

Held for sale:
First mortgage loans
Secured by one-to four-family residences	$	—		$	130

Table of Contents

The following table presents the composition of the commercial loan portfolio by credit quality indicators:

Commercial credit exposure-credit risk profile by internally assigned grade
June 30, 2011

		Pass		Special mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
		(in thousands)
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties	$	123,238	$	16,028	$	6,652	$	—	$	145,918
Construction loans		3,034		5,474		9,316		—		17,824
Commercial-business, real estate secured		8,188		530		10,230		—		18,948
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		4,848		—		153		—		5,001
Total	$	139,308	$	22,032	$	26,351	$	—	$	187,691

Commercial credit exposure-credit risk profile by internally assigned grade
December 31, 2010

		Pass		Special mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
		(in thousands)
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties	$	108,484	$	19,299	$	9,524	$	—	$	137,307
Construction loans		3,482		6,269		9,048		—		18,799
Commercial-business, real estate secured		15,778		1,007		9,818		—		26,603
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		5,531		—		—		44		5,575
Total	$	133,275	$	26,575	$	28,390	$	44	$	188,284

In order to assess and monitor the credit risk associated with commercial loans, the Company employs a risk rating methodology whereby each commercial loan is initially assigned a risk grade. At least annually, all risk ratings are reviewed in light of information received such as tax returns, rent rolls, cash flow statements, appraisals, and any other information which may affect the then current risk rating, which is adjusted upward or downward as needed. At the end of each quarter the risk ratings are summarized and become a component of the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses. The Company’s risk rating definitions mirror those promulgated by banking regulators and are as follows:

Pass: Good quality loan characterized by satisfactory liquidity; reasonable debt capacity and coverage; acceptable management in all critical positions and normal operating results for its peer group. The Company has grades 1 through 6 within the Pass category which reflect the increasing amount of attention paid to the individual loan because of, among other things, trends in debt service coverage, management weaknesses, or collateral values.

Special mention: A loan that has potential weaknesses that deserves management’s close attention. Although the loan is currently protected, if left uncorrected, potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the loan’s repayment prospects or in the borrower’s future credit position. Potential weaknesses include: weakening financial condition; an unrealistic repayment program; inadequate sources of funds; lack of adequate collateral; credit information; or documentation. There is currently the capacity to meet interest and principal payments, but further adverse business, financial, or economic conditions may impair capacity or willingness to pay interest and repay principal.

Substandard: A loan that is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged. Although no loss of principal or interest is presently apparent, there is the distinct possibility that a partial loss of interest and/or principal will be sustained if the deficiencies are not corrected. There is a current identifiable vulnerability to default and the dependence upon favorable business, financial, or economic conditions to meet timely payment of interest and repayment of principal.

Table of Contents

Doubtful: A loan which has all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard asset with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonable specific pending factors which may work to strengthen the asset, classification as an estimated loss is deferred until a more exact status is determined. Pending factors include: proposed merger, acquisition, liquidation, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and refinancing plans.

Loss: Loans which are considered uncollectible and have been charged off. The Company has charged-off all loans classified as loss.

Loans classified as special mention, substandard or doubtful are evaluated for potential impairment. All impaired loans are placed on non-accrual status and are classified as substandard or doubtful.

The following table presents the composition of the residential mortgage and consumer loan portfolios by credit quality indicators:

Mortgage and consumer credit exposure-credit risk profile by payment activity
June 30, 2011

		Performing		Non-performing	Total
		(in thousands)
Secured by one-to four-family residences	$	264,211	$	6,010	$	270,221
Home equity and second mortgage		46,841		629		47,470
Other		2,116		—		2,116
Total	$	313,168	$	6,639	$	319,807

Mortgage and consumer credit exposure-credit risk profile by payment activity
December 31, 2010

		Performing		Non-performing	Total
		(in thousands)
Secured by one-to four- family residences	$	265,459	$	3,618	$	269,077
Home equity and second mortgage		48,018		1,412		49,430
Other		2,404		3		2,407
Total	$	315,881	$	5,033	$	320,914

In order to assess and monitor the credit risk associated with one-to four-family residential loans and consumer loans which include second mortgage loans and home equity secured lines of credit, the Company relies upon the payment status of the loan. Mortgage and other consumer loans 90 days or more past due are placed on non-accrual status and evaluated for impairment on a pooled basis with the exception of loans with balances in excess of $1 million. An individual impairment analysis is performed using a recent appraisal or current sales contract for mortgage and consumer loans with balances in excess of $1 million and 90 days or more past due.

The following table presents non-performing loans including impaired loans and loan balances 90 days or more past due for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued by class at:

			June 30, 2011	December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Secured by one-to four-family residences		$	6,010	$	3,618
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties			1,214		4,993
Construction loans			5,707		4,307
Commercial-business, real estate secured			4,601		4,601
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured			147		44
Home equity and second mortgage			629		1,412
Other consumer			—		3
Total non-performing loans		$	18,308	$	18,978
Total loans past due 90 days as to interest or principal and accruing interest		$	—	$	—

Table of Contents

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class:

	June 30, 2011
		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
		(in thousands)
With an allowance recorded:
Secured by one-to four- family residences	$	1,252	$	1,252	$	207	$	417	$	—
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		—		—		—		1,455		—
Construction loans		5,707		5,707		2,519		5,100		—
Commercial-business, real estate secured		2,605		2,605		768		2,605		—
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		147		147		74		64		—

With no allowance recorded:
Secured by one-to four- family residences		3,232		3,232		—		1,077
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		910		910		—		1,894		—
Construction loans		—		—		—		280		—
Commercial-business, real estate secured		1,996		1,996		—		1,996		—
Total	$	15,849	$	15,849	$	3,568	$	14,888	$	—

	December 31, 2010
		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
		(in thousands)
With an allowance recorded:
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties	$	1,855	$	1,855	$	218	$	925	$	—
Construction loans		3,887		3,887		1,627		3,887		—
Commercial-business, real estate secured		2,605		2,605		373		1,563		—
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		44		44		44		18		—

With no allowance recorded:
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		2,830		2,830		—		3,479		—
Construction loans		420		420		—		492		—
Commercial-business, real estate secured		1,996		1,996		—		4,717		—
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		—		—		—		22		—
Total	$	13,637	$	13,637	$	2,262	$	15,103	$	—

Table of Contents

The following table presents the contractual aging of delinquent loans by class at June 30, 2011:

	Current		30-59 Days past due		60-89 Days past due		Loans past due 90 days or more		Total past due		Total loans		Recorded investment over 90 days and accruing interest
	(in thousands)
Secured by one-to four- family residences	$	264,817	$	—	$	221	$	5,183	$	5,404	$	270,221	$	—
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		144,704		—		—		1,214		1,214		145,918		—
Construction loans		13,937		—		—		3,887		3,887		17,824		—
Commercial-business, real estate secured		14,347		—		—		4,601		4,601		18,948		—
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		4,848		—		6		147		153		5,001		—
Home equity and second mortgage		46,832		—		52		586		638		47,470		—
Other		2,112		1		3		—		4		2,116		—
Total	$	491,597	$	1	$	282	$	15,618	$	15,901	$	507,498	$	—

The following table presents the contractual aging of delinquent loans by class at December 31, 2010:

	Current		30-59 days past due		60-89 days past due		Loans past due 90 days or more		Total past due		Total loans		Recorded investment over 90 days and accruing interest
	(in thousands)
Secured by one-to four-family residences	$	267,885	$	424	$	26	$	742	$	1,192	$	269,077	$	—
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		131,566		748		754		4,239		5,741		137,307		—
Construction loans		14,492		—		—		4,307		4,307		18,799
Commercial-business, real estate secured		18,877		3,125		—		4,601		7,726		26,603		—
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		5,531		—		—		44		44		5,575		—
Home equity and second mortgage		48,285		60		9		1,076		1,145		49,430
Other		2,381		13		10		3		26		2,407		—
Total	$	489,017	$	4,370	$	799	$	15,012	$	20,181	$	509,198	$	—

Table of Contents

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is summarized as follows:


		Balance January 1, 2011		Provision			Charge- offs			Recoveries		Balance June 30, 2011
		(in thousands)
Secured by one-to four- family residences	$	1,839	$	(22	)	$	(124	)	$	—	$	1,693
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		2,124		1,246			(1,186	)		—		2,184
Construction loans		2,479		410			—			1		2,890
Commercial-business, real estate secured		974		197			—			—		1,171
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		77		177			(44	)		6		216
Home equity and second mortgage		607		96			(221	)				482
Other consumer		16		8			(7	)		5		22
Unallocated		212		238			—			—		450
Total	$	8,328	$	2,350		$	(1,582	)	$	12	$	9,108

Despite the above allocation, the allowance for credit losses is general in nature and is available to absorb losses from any portfolio segment. Changes in the allowance for credit losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:

	2010
	(in thousands)
Balance at January 1,	$	5,215
Provision charged to income		1,561
Charge-offs:
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		(16	)
Home equity and second mortgage		(14	)
Recoveries:
Other consumer		3
Balance at June 30,	$	6,749

Table of Contents

The following tables present the ending balance of the allowance for loan losses and ending loan balance by portfolio by class based on impairment method as of June 30, 2011:

		Evaluated for impairment
Allowance		Individually		Collectively		Total
		(in thousands)
Secured by one-to-four family residences	$	207	$	1,486	$	1,693
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		—		2,183		2,183
Construction loans		2,519		371		2,890
Commercial-business, real estate secured		768		403		1,171
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		74		143		217
Home equity and second mortgage		—		482		482
Other consumer		—		22		22
Unallocated		—		450		450
Total	$	3,568	$	5,540	$	9,108

		Evaluated for impairment
Loan balance		Individually		Collectively		Total
		(in thousands)
Secured by one-to-four family residences	$	4,484	$	265,737	$	270,221
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		910		145,008		145,918
Construction loans		5,707		12,117		17,824
Commercial-business, real estate secured		4,601		14,347		18,948
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		147		4,854		5,001
Home equity and second mortgage		—		47,470		47,470
Other consumer		—		2,116		2,116
Total	$	15,849	$	491,649	$	507,498

Table of Contents

The following tables present the ending balance of the allowance for loan losses and ending loan balance by portfolio by class based on impairment method as of December 31, 2010:

		Evaluated for impairment
Allowance		Individually		Collectively		Total
		(in thousands)
Secured by one-to-four family residences	$	—	$	1,839	$	1,839
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		218		1,906		2,124
Construction loans		1,627		852		2,479
Commercial-business, real estate secured		373		601		974
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		44		33		77
Home equity and second mortgage		—		607		607
Other consumer		—		16		16
Unallocated		—		212		212
Total	$	2,262	$	6,066	$	8,328

		Evaluated for impairment
Loan balance		Individually		Collectively		Total
		(in thousands)
Secured by one-to-four family residences	$	—	$	269,077	$	269,077
Secured by non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		4,685		132,622		137,307
Construction loans		4,307		14,492		18,799
Commercial-business, real estate secured		4,601		22,002		26,603
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		44		5,531		5,575
Home equity and second mortgage		—		49,430		49,430
Other consumer		—		2,407		2,407
Total	$	13,637	$	495,561	$	509,198

Table of Contents

NOTE 8- FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December31, 2010. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement hierarchy has been established for inputs in valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

The fair value hierarchy levels are summarized below:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 inputs are inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable and contain assumptions of the party assessing the fair value of the asset or liability.

Determination of the appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement for the instrument or security. Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by fair value hierarchy level are summarized below:

At June 30, 2011	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance as of June 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Assets
Investment securities available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	—	$	9,021	$	—	$	9,021
State and political subdivisions		—		51,046		—		51,046
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		—		54,358		—		54,358
Residential real estate mortgage - backed securities privately issued		—		10,353		—		10,353
Total investment securities available for sale	$	—	$	124,778	$	—	$	124,778

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2010	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance as of December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Assets
Investment securities available for sale
U.S. Government and federal agencies	$	—	$	6,059	$	—	$	6,059
Corporate debt securities		—		3,563		—		3,563
State and political subdivisions		—		48,208		—		48,208
Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by quasi-governmental agencies		—		52,886		—		52,886
Residential real estate mortgage - backed securities privately issued		—		13,605		—		13,605
Total investment securities available for sale	$	—	$	124,321	$	—	$	124,321

Forward loan sales	$	—	$	—	$	3	$	3

Investment securities available for sale and mortgage-backed securities available for sale are valued primarily by a third party pricing agent. U.S. Government and federal agency and corporate debt securities are primarily priced through a multi-dimensional relational model, a Level 2 hierarchy, which incorporates dealer quotes and other market information including, defined sector breakdown, benchmark yields, base spread, yield to maturity, and corporate actions. State and political subdivision securities are also valued within the Level 2 hierarchy using inputs with a series of matrices that reflect benchmark yields, ratings updates, and spread adjustments. Mortgage-backed securities include FHLMC, GNMA, and FNMA certificates and privately issued real estate mortgage investment conduits which are valued under a Level 2 hierarchy using a matrix correlation to benchmark yields, spread analysis, and prepayment speeds.

The fair value of forward loan sales is determined at the time the underlying loan is identified as held for sale with changes in fair value correlated to the change in secondary market loan pricing. The value is adjusted to reflect the Company’s historical loan “fallout” experience which incorporates such factors as changes in market rates, origination channels and loan purpose.

The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

	Forward loan sales
	(in thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2011	$	3
Total losses— realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings	(3		)
Included in other comprehensive income	—
Purchases, issuances, and settlements	—
Ending balance, June 30, 2011	$	—

Table of Contents

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis segregated by fair value hierarchy level are summarized below:

At June 30, 2011	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance as of June 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Assets
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	12,281	$	12,281
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		—		—		9,245		9,245
Mortgage servicing rights		—		873		—		873

At December 31, 2010	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance as of December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Assets
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	11,375	$	11,375
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		—		—		7,482		7,482
Mortgage servicing rights		—		878		—		878

Impaired loans are evaluated and valued at the time the loan is identified as impaired, at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or fair value. Real estate acquired through foreclosure is initially valued at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or fair value at foreclosure less costs to sell and subsequently adjusted for further decreases in market value, if necessary. Fair value is determined by using the value of the collateral securing the loans and is therefore classified as a Level 3 hierarchy. The value of the real estate securing impaired loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure is based on appraisals prepared by qualified independent licensed appraisers contracted by the Company to perform the assessment.

The Company initially recognizes and measures servicing assets based on the fair value of the servicing right at the time the loan is sold. The Company uses the amortized cost method for subsequent measurement of its servicing assets and evaluates the recorded value for impairment quarterly. The Company retains a qualified valuation service to calculate the amortized cost and to determine the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights. The valuation service utilizes discounted cash flow analyses adjusted for prepayment speeds, market discount rates and conditions existing in the secondary servicing market. Hence, the fair value of mortgage servicing rights is deemed a Level 2 hierarchy. The amortized cost basis of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights was $931,000 and $997,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The fair value of the mortgage servicing rights was $873,000 and $878,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively and was included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents

NOTE 9- FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

For the Bank, as for most financial institutions, the majority of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments. However, many such instruments lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intent to hold its financial instruments to maturity or available for sale and to not engage in trading or significant sales activities. For fair value disclosure purposes, the Company substantially utilized the fair value measurement criteria as explained in Note 8- Fair Value Measurements. Additionally, the Company used significant estimations and present value calculations to prepare this disclosure.

Changes in the assumptions or methodologies used to estimate fair values may materially affect the estimated amounts. In addition, there may not be reasonable comparability between institutions due to the wide range of permitted assumptions and methodologies in the absence of active markets. This lack of uniformity gives rise to a high degree of subjectivity in estimating financial instrument fair values.

Fair values have been estimated using data which management considered the best available, as generally provided by estimation methodologies deemed suitable for the pertinent category of financial instrument. The estimation methodologies, resulting fair values and recorded carrying amounts are as follows:

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents equals historical book value. The fair value of investment securities is described and presented under fair value measurement guidelines as amended.

	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,786	$	8,786	$	7,437	$	7,437
Investment securities		127,937		127,587		127,831		127,490

The fair value of the loans receivable, net has been estimated using the present value of cash flows, discounted at the approximate current market rates, and giving consideration to estimated prepayment risk but not adjusted for credit risk. Loans receivable, net also include loans receivable held for sale.

	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value
	(in thousands)
Loans receivable, net	$	520,866	$	499,263	$	518,324	$	501,658

The fair value of deposits and borrowings with stated maturities has been estimated using the present value of cash flows, discounted at rates approximating current market rates for similar liabilities. Fair value of deposits and borrowings with floating interest rates is generally presumed to approximate the recorded carrying amounts.

	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value
	(in thousands)
Liabilities
Deposits with stated maturities	$	196,605	$	194,380	$	206,791	$	204,159
Borrowings with stated maturities		56,755		55,345		63,811		61,987

The fair value of deposits and borrowings with no stated maturities is generally presumed to approximate the carrying amount (the amount payable on demand). The fair value of deposits and borrowings with floating interest rates is generally presumed to approximate the recorded carrying amount.

	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value
	(in thousands)
Deposits with no stated maturities	$	357,724	$	357,724	$	345,976	$	345,976

The Bank’s remaining assets and liabilities are not considered financial instruments. No disclosure of the relationship value of the Bank’s deposits is required.

Table of Contents

NOTE 10- SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has stock benefit plans that allow the Company to grant options and restricted stock to employees and directors. The awards, which have a term of up to 10 years when issued, vest over a three to five year period. The exercise price of each award equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. At June 30, 2011, there was $63,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested awards under the Company stock option plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 15.0 months. Option activity under the Company’s stock option plan as of June 30, 2011 was as follows:

	2011
	Number of shares	Weighted average exercise price per share		Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)	Aggregate intrinsic value ($ 000)
Outstanding at January 1, 2011	126,257	$	24.04
Options granted	—	—
Options exercised	—	—
Options forfeited	—	—
Options expired	—	—
Outstanding at June 30, 2011	126,257	$	24.04	2.80	$	101
Options exercisable at June 30, 2011	98,149	$	25.19	2.80	$	54

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the second quarter and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options).

The aggregate intrinsic value and cash receipts of options exercised are as follows:

The following tables provide information regarding the Company’s share-based compensation expense for the three months ended:

	June 30,
	2011		2010
	(in thousands)
Share-based compensation expense
Stock grant expense	$	3	$	4
Stock option expense		8		13
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") expense		56		49
Total share-based compensation expense	$	67	$	66

The Bank reports ESOP expense in an amount equal to the fair value of shares released from the ESOP to employees less dividends received on the allocated shares in the plan used for debt service. Dividends on allocated shares used to reduce ESOP expense totaled $9,000 and $11,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Share-based compensation expense related to stock options resulted in a tax benefit of $3,000 and $5,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Table of Contents

The following tables provide information regarding the Company’s share-based compensation expense for the six months ended:

	June 30,
	2011		2010
	(in thousands)
Share-based compensation expense
Stock grant expense	$	6	$	8
Stock option expense		16		26
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") expense		115		94
Total share-based compensation expense	$	137	$	128

The Bank reports ESOP expense in an amount equal to the fair value of shares released from the ESOP to employees less dividends received on the allocated shares in the plan used for debt service. Dividends on allocated shares used to reduce ESOP expense totaled $18,000 and $22,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Share-based compensation expense related to stock options resulted in a tax benefit of $5,000 and $9,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Table of Contents

NOTE 11- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Net periodic defined benefit pension cost included the following (in thousands):

	Three months ended June 30,
	2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	141		$	133
Interest cost		82			74
Expected return on plan assets		(155	)		(136	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		29			42

Net periodic benefit cost	$	97		$	113

	Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	283		$	276
Interest cost		164			148
Expected return on plan assets		(310	)		(272	)
Amortization of prior service cost		1			1
Recognized net actuarial loss		57			74

Net periodic benefit cost	$	195		$	227

There was no employer contribution for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

NOTE 12 — ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATE

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“ FASB”) issued an amendment to provide additional guidance or clarification to help creditors in determining whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments are effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In April 2011, the FASB issued an accounting update to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements (repos) and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The amendments remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments apply to all entities, both public and nonpublic. The amendments affect all entities that enter into agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and obligate the transferor to repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The guidance is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. This amendment is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”). The amendments result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. This amendment is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income”. The amendments improve the comparability, clarity, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. To increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of U.S. GAAP and IFRS, the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. All entities that report items of comprehensive income, in any period presented, will be affected by the changes. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The amendments should be applied retrospectively, and early adoption is permitted. This amendment is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements or results of operations.

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

The Company may from time to time make written or oral “forward-looking statements”, including statements contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the exhibits thereto), in its reports to stockholders and in other communications by the Company, which are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of the Company’s plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions that are subject to change based on various important factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s control). The following factors, among others, could cause the Company’s financial performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of the Company and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors’ products and services; the willingness of users to substitute competitors’ products and services for the Company’s products and services; the success of the Company in gaining regulatory approval of its products and services, when required; the impact of changes in financial services’ laws and regulations (including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance); technological changes, acquisitions; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and the success of the Company at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

The Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.

Financial Position

The Company’s total assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $691.6 million and $691.8 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $200,000 during the six-month period. Loans receivable, net decreased by $2.3 million during the first six months of 2011. Principal repayments of loans receivable totaled $47.6 million which were offset by originations of consumer and single-family residential mortgage loans totaling $24.4 million and of commercial loans totaling $25.7 million. The Company increased the allowance for loan losses by $2.4 million and transferred $2.4 million from loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure. Loans receivable held for sale decreased $130,000 as proceeds of $8.6 million from the sale of loans in the secondary market were offset by loans originated for sale of $8.4 million. Investment securities increased by $97,000 due to security purchases of $18.7 million and increases in the fair value of available for sale securities of $1.2 million that were offset by principal repayments received of $14.7 million and security sales of $5.1 million. As a result of the Company’s cash-related activities, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $1.3 million during the first six months of 2011. The increase in other assets was caused by an increase of $1.8 million in real estate acquired through foreclosure, which at June 30, 2011 totaled $9.2 million and was comprised of one parcel of unimproved raw land and approximately 40 residential properties, 35 of which were acquired as a result of a foreclosure action against a single borrower.

Total liabilities decreased by $2.1 million during the first six months of 2011. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank decreased by $6.6 million, the result of scheduled amortization and maturities of $13.2 million offset by the proceeds of long term advances of $6.6 million. Deposit balances increased $2.0 million during the period with checking, money market and savings accounts increasing by $11.8 million while retail certificates of deposit decreased $9.8 million.

Total consolidated stockholders’ equity of the Company was $75.4 million or 10.9% of total assets at June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, there were approximately 102,000 shares available for repurchase under the previously announced share repurchase plan.

Table of Contents

Asset Quality

Non-performing loans include impaired loans and loan balances 90 days or more past due for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued. The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s non performing assets:

Non-Performing Assets	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010				June 30, 2010

Mortgage secured by:
One-to four- family residences	$	6,010		$	3,618		$	1,331
Non-residential properties or non—owner occupied residential properties		1,214			4,993			4,122
Construction loans		5,707			4,307			4,241
Commercial-business, real estate secured		4,601			4,601			5,867
Commercial-business, non-real estate secured		147			44			112
Home equity and second mortgage		629			1,412			151
Other consumer		—			3			4
Total non-performing loans		18,308			18,978			15,828
Real estate owned		9,245			7,482			1,448
Total non-performing assets	$	27,553		$	26,460		$	17,276
Total loans 90 days or more past due as to interest or principal and accruing interest	$	—		$	—		$	—
Ratio of non-performing loans to gross loans		3.60	%		3.72	%		3.00	%
Ratio of non-performing loans to total assets		2.65	%		2.74	%		2.20	%
Ratio of total non-performing assets to total assets		3.98	%		3.83	%		2.40	%

Loans secured by one-to four-family residential properties include two loans with a combined balance of $2.9 million to a single borrower secured by two residential properties. The borrower has listed both properties for sale and will apply the proceeds toward the outstanding loan balance. Recent appraisals of both properties indicate a fair value in excess of the recorded investment in the loans. The Bank has initiated foreclosure proceedings on both properties. In addition, this category also includes a loan with a balance of $1.3 million for which the Bank has allocated $207,000 of the allowance for loan losses to this loan, equal to the difference between the loan balance and the fair value less estimated selling costs

Construction loans include a loan with a balance of $2.4 million, secured by a largely completed commercial office building, and the personal guarantee of the borrowers. The Bank has allocated $1.2 million of the allowance for loan losses to this loan, equal to the difference between the loan balance plus other acquisition costs and the fair value based upon a recent appraisal less estimated costs to sell. The Bank has initiated foreclosure proceedings.

Also included in construction loans is a loan with a balance of $1.5 million secured by two contiguous parcels of commercial real estate and a lien on the guarantor’s personal residence. The Bank has allocated to this loan $847,000 of the allowance for loan losses, equal to the difference between the loan balance plus other acquisition costs and the fair value based upon a recent appraisal less estimated costs to sell. The Bank has initiated foreclosure proceedings and the borrower has filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Construction loans also include a loan with a balance of $1.8 million secured by five contiguous lots approved for construction of commercial and residential buildings. The Bank allocated $0.5 million of the allowance for loan losses equal to the difference between the loan balance and a recent appraisal. The borrower is attempting to sell the properties and apply the proceeds towards the outstanding loan balance.

Commercial-business loans secured by real estate include a loan with a balance of $2.6 million secured by a parcel of vacant land approved for townhome development. The Bank has allocated $768,000 of the allowance for loan losses to the loan, equal to the difference between the loan balance plus other acquisition costs and the fair value based upon a recent appraisal less estimated costs to sell. The Bank has initiated foreclosure proceedings.

Commercial-business, real estate secured loans also include two loans, with a combined balance of $2.0 million secured by a parcel of land. The borrower is attempting to sell the property and intends to apply the sale proceeds to the outstanding loan balance. A recent appraisal of the property indicates that the appraised value less selling cost is in excess of the loan balances.

With respect to each of the remaining non-performing loans, the Bank is taking appropriate steps to resolve the individual situations.

Table of Contents

Foreclosed property at June 30, 2011 included 43 properties of real estate with a combined carrying value of $9.2 million. During the second quarter of 2011, the Bank completed foreclosure proceedings on 4 loans that were secured by 35 residential rental properties located in the greater Philadelphia area. Subsequent to foreclosure the Bank was able to gain access to the properties to ascertain physical inspection and appraisals of the properties. The recording of the fair value of these properties resulted in a charge to the allowance for loan loss provision of $1.0 million. Also during 2011, the Bank foreclosed on a home equity loan secured by a single family dwelling valued at $0.8 million which resulted in a charge to the allowance of $0.2 million. In addition, the Bank sold two single family dwellings acquired through foreclosure with a recorded value of $0.6 million which approximated the carrying value of the assets. All foreclosed properties are listed or are in the process of being listed with real estate agents for sale in a timely manner. Foreclosed real estate is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Bank provides valuation allowances for estimated losses from uncollectible loans. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and reduced by net charge-offs. On a quarterly basis, the Company prepares an allowance for loan losses (ALLL) analysis. In the analysis, the loan portfolio is segmented into groups of homogeneous loans that share similar risk characteristics: non-residential or non-owner occupied residential real estate, commercial construction, commercial business, single family residential, and consumer which is predominately real estate secured junior liens and home equity lines of credit. Each segment is assigned reserve factors based on quantitative and qualitative measurements. In addition, the Bank reviews its internally classified loans, its loans classified for regulatory purposes, delinquent loans, and other relevant information in order to isolate loans for further scrutiny as potentially impaired loans.

Quantitative factors include an actual expected loss factor based on historical loss experience over a relevant look-back period. Quantitative factors also include the Bank’s actual risk ratings for the commercial loan segments as determined in accordance with loan review and loan grading policies and procedures, and additional factors as determined by management to be representative of additional risk due to the loan’s geographic location, type, and other attributes. These quantitative factors are adjusted if necessary, up or down, based on actual experience and an evaluation of the qualitative factors.

Qualitative factors are based upon: (1) changes in lending policies and procedures, including but not limited to changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses; (2) changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio, including the condition of various market segments; (3) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans; (4) changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; (5) changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans; (6) changes in the quality of the loan review system; (7) changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; (8) the existence and effect of any concentration of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations; and (9) the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the existing loan portfolio.

Potentially impaired loans selected for individual evaluation are reviewed in accordance with US GAAP which governs the accounting for impaired assets, and consideration of regulatory guidance regarding treatment of troubled, collateral dependent loans. Each potentially impaired loan is evaluated using all available information such as recent appraisals, whether the loan is currently on accrual or non-accrual status, discounted cash flow analyses, guarantor financial strength, the value of additional collateral, and the loan’s and borrower’s past performance to determine whether in management’s best judgment it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all contractual interest and principal in accordance with the loan’s terms. Loans deemed impaired are generally assigned a reserve derived from the value of the underlying collateral. Loans deemed not to be impaired are assigned a reserve factor based upon the segment from which they were selected.

The ALLL needed as a result of the foregoing evaluations is compared with the unadjusted amount, and an adjustment is made by means of a provision charged to expense for loan losses. Recognizing the inherently imprecise nature of the loss estimates and the large number of assumptions needed in order to perform the analysis, the required reserve may be less than the actual level of reserves at the end of any evaluation period, and thus there may be an unallocated portion of the ALLL. Management adjusts the unallocated portion to an amount which management considers reasonable under the circumstances.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

Net Income. The Company recorded net income of $699,000, or $0.26 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to net income of $967,000, or $0.36 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Average Balance Sheet

The following table sets forth information (dollars in thousands) relating to the Company’s average balance sheet and reflects the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the periods indicated. Yield and cost are computed by dividing income or expense by the average daily balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the three-month periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011								2010
	Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost			Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable(1)	$	499,024	$	6,695			5.38	%	$	522,289	$	7,150			5.49	%
Mortgage-backed securities		63,940		671			4.21	%		80,735		929			4.62	%
Investment securities(2)		68,439		731			4.28	%		58,446		582			3.99	%
Other interest-earning assets(3)		4,420		1			0.09	%		13,451		1			0.03	%
Total interest-earning assets		635,823		8,098			5.11	%		674,921		8,662			5.15	%
Non interest-earning assets		50,346								42,210
Total assets	$	686,169							$	717,131
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	546,215		1,438			1.06	%	$	557,128		1,841			1.33	%
Borrowings from the FHLB		57,972		505			3.49	%		78,469		793			4.05	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		604,187		1,943			1.29	%		635,597		2,634			1.66	%
Non interest-bearing liabilities		7,039								8,373
Total liabilities		611,226								643,970
Stockholders’ equity		74,943								73,161
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	686,169							$	717,131
Net interest income—tax equivalent basis				6,155								6,028
Interest rate spread(4)-tax equivalent basis							3.82	%							3.49	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5) —tax equivalent basis							3.88	%							3.58	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities							105.24	%							106.19	%
Less: tax—equivalent interest adjustment				(166	)							(140	)
Net interest income			$	5,989							$	5,888
Interest rate spread(4)							3.71	%							3.40	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5)							3.78	%							3.50	%

(1	)	Nonaccrual loans have been included in the appropriate average loan balance category, but interest on nonaccrual loans has not been included for purposes of determining interest income.
(2	)	Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $166,000 and $140,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.
(3	)	Includes interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
(4	)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5	)	Net yield on interest-earning assets represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

Table of Contents

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the change in interest income and interest expense (in thousands) attributed to (i) changes in volume (changes in the weighted average balance of the total interest earning asset and interest bearing liability portfolios multiplied by the prior year rate), and (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior year volume). Changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately based on the absolute value of changes due to volume and changes due to rate.

	Three months ended June 30
	2011 vs 2010 Increase (decrease) due to
	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Loans receivable, net	$	(314	)	$	(141	)	$	(455	)
Mortgage-backed securities		(181	)		(77	)		(258	)
Investment securities (1)		105			44			149
Other interest-earning assets		(4	)		4			—
Total interest-earning assets		(394	)		(170	)		(564	)
Interest expense:
Deposits		(35	)		(368	)		(403	)
Borrowings from the FHLB		(188	)		(100	)		(288	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities		(223	)		(468	)		(691	)
Net change in net interest income	$	(171	)	$	298		$	127

)

Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $166,000 and $140,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.

Total Interest Income. Total interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, decreased by $564,000 or 6.5% to $8.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared with the second quarter of 2010. Interest income from loans receivable decreased by $455,000, the result of a $23.3 million decrease in the average balance of loans outstanding plus a decrease in the average yield on loans of 11 basis points. The decrease in the yield was caused by the effect of new loans added to the portfolio with a lower yield than the existing portfolio loans that matured or refinanced. Interest income from mortgage-backed securities was lower in the quarter in comparison to the same period of 2010 mainly because principal repayments and sales of $31.5 million exceeded purchases of $17.6 million during the intervening period. Additionally, the yield associated with repayments was higher than the yield on newly purchased mortgage-backed securities. Interest income from investment securities was higher as purchases of $13.4 million of investments exceeded sales of investment securities of $3.6 million during the intervening period.

Total Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $691,000 to $1.9 million during the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the corresponding quarter of 2010. The average interest rates paid on the Bank’s deposits were 27 basis points lower in 2011 due to the maturity of certificates of deposit with higher interest rates than current market rates offered on the products into which the maturing CDs were renewed or reinvested. Interest expense associated with borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank decreased $288,000 between the second quarter of 2011 and 2010. During the intervening period, the Bank reduced its average outstanding borrowings by $20.5 million including the maturity of higher rate advances, thus the cost of funds of the remaining outstanding advances was 56 basis points lower.

Table of Contents

Non-interest income. Total non-interest income was $892,000 for the second quarter of 2011 compared with $597,000 for the same period in 2010. Gain on the sale of investment securities was $203,000 higher in 2011. Service fees and other charges increased $116,000 between the quarters. Fair value adjustments to mortgage servicing rights reduced loan servicing income between the quarters by $177,000.

Non-interest expense. Total non-interest expense increased by $19,000 to $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. Professional fees increased $68,000 between the two periods due to legal costs and professional services associated with the implementation of the Company’s director’s stock compensation plan. Other operating expense increased $109,000 mainly because of increased appraisal costs associated with nonperforming loans and costs to maintain and liquidate real estate acquired through foreclosure. FDIC insurance premiums decreased by $108,000 between the two quarters due to a change in the method of premium assessment. Prior to the second quarter, premium assessment was based solely on deposit balances whereas beginning in the second quarter of 2011 under the new rules, the deposit insurance assessment base will be a bank's average total assets less its average tangible equity, with adjustments for brokered deposits and unsecured debt.

Income tax expense. The Company’s effective tax rate was 14.9% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to 25.3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. These effective tax rates are lower than the Company’s marginal tax rate of 34% largely due to the tax-exempt income associated with the Company’s investments in tax-exempt municipal bonds and bank-owned life insurance.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

Net Income. The Company recorded net income of $1.3 million, or $0.49 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to net income of $1.7 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Average Balance Sheet

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011								2010
	Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost			Average balance		Interest			Average yld/cost
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable(1)	$	500,277	$	13,279			5.37	%	$	526,032	$	14,452			5.56	%
Mortgage-backed securities		65,164		1,366			4.24	%		81,284		1,896			4.72	%
Investment securities(2)		67,742		1,450			4.33	%		55,878		1,123			4.06	%
Other interest-earning assets(3)		3,831		1			0.05	%		10,108		2			0.04	%
Total interest-earning assets		637,014		16,096			5.11	%		673,302		17,473			5.25	%
Non interest-earning assets		49,667								41,711
Total assets	$	686,681							$	715,013
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	546,136		2,898			1.07	%	$	553,214		3,836			1.40	%
Borrowings from the FHLB		59,202		1,064			3.63	%		80,491		1,641			4.12	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		605,338		3,962			1.32	%		633,705		5,477			1.75	%
Non interest-bearing liabilities		6,761								8,493
Total liabilities		612,099								642,198
Stockholders’ equity		74,582								72,815
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	686,681							$	715,013
Net interest income—tax equivalent basis				12,134								11,996
Interest rate spread(4)-tax equivalent basis							3.79	%							3.50	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5) —tax equivalent basis							3.85	%							3.60	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities							105.23	%							106.25	%
Less: tax—equivalent interest adjustment				(329	)							(276	)
Net interest income			$	11,805							$	11,720
Interest rate spread(4)							3.68	%							3.42	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets(5)							3.75	%							3.52	%

(1	)	Nonaccrual loans have been included in the appropriate average loan balance category, but interest on nonaccrual loans has not been included for purposes of determining interest income.
(2	)	Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $329,000 and $276000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.
(3	)	Includes interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
(4	)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5	)	Net yield on interest-earning assets represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

Table of Contents

Rate/Volume Analysis

	Six months ended June 30
	2011 vs 2010 Increase (decrease) due to
	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Loans receivable, net	$	(693	)	$	(480	)	$	(1,173	)
Mortgage-backed securities		(351	)		(179	)		(530	)
Investment securities (1)		250			77			327
Other interest-earning assets		(2	)		1			(1	)
Total interest-earning assets		(796	)		(581	)		(1,377	)
Interest expense:
Deposits		(48	)		(890	)		(938	)
Borrowings from the FHLB		(399	)		(178	)		(577	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities		(447	)		(1,068	)		(1,515	)
Net change in net interest income	$	(349	)	$	487		$	138

)

Tax equivalent adjustments to interest on investment securities were $329,000 and $276,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Tax equivalent interest income is based upon a marginal effective tax rate of 34%.

Total Interest Income. Total interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, decreased by $1.4 million or 7.9% to $16.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the first six months of 2010. Interest income from loans receivable decreased by $1.2 million, the result of a $25.8 million decrease in the average balance of loans outstanding plus a decrease in the average yield on loans of 19 basis points. The decrease in the yield was caused by an increase in non-performing loans between the periods which reduced interest income from loans by $113,000. Also, new loans added to the portfolio during the period have a lower yield than the existing portfolio loans that matured or refinanced. Interest income from mortgage-backed securities was lower in 2011 in comparison to the same period of 2010 mainly because principal repayments and sales of $31.5 million exceeded purchases of $17.6 million during the intervening period. Additionally, the yield associated with repayments was higher than the yield on newly purchased mortgage-backed securities. Interest income from investment securities was higher as a result of purchases of $13.4 million of higher yielding investments that exceeded sales of $3.6 during the intervening period resulting in an increase in the yield of 27 basis points.

Total Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $1.5 million to $4.0 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the same period in 2010. The average interest rates paid on the Bank’s deposits were 33 basis points lower in 2011 due to the maturity of certificates of deposit with higher interest rates than current market rates offered on the products into which the maturing CDs were renewed or reinvested. Interest expense associated with borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank decreased $577,000 between 2010 and 2011. During the intervening period, the Bank reduced its average outstanding borrowings by $21.3 million, including the maturity of higher rate advances, thus the cost of funds of the remaining outstanding advances was 49 basis points lower.

Table of Contents

Non-interest income. Total non-interest income was $1.6 million for the first six months of 2011 compared with $1.2 million for the same period in 2010. Gain on the sale of investment securities was $203,000 higher in 2011. Service fees and other charges increased $52,000 between the periods mainly because fair value adjustment to mortgage servicing rights reduced loan servicing income by $200,000 in 2010. The sale of foreclosed real estate produced a loss of $137,000 in 2010.

Non-interest expense. Total non-interest expense increased by $403,000 to $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. Professional fees increased $318,000 between the two periods as legal costs associated with non-performing loans and foreclosures increased $149,000. Additionally, legal and professional costs were incurred in connection with the Company’s reincorporation in Pennsylvania, the cost of distributing a 5% stock dividend in the first quarter of 2011 and the implementation of the director’ s stock compensation plan. Other operating expense increased $152,000 mainly because of increased appraisal costs associated with nonperforming loans and costs to maintain and liquidate real estate acquired through foreclosure. Occupancy and equipment costs increased $72,000, which was mainly the result of costs associated with a relocated and renovated branch office which occurred in the second quarter of 2010. FDIC insurance premiums decreased by $69,000 between the two periods due to change in the method of premium assessment. Prior to the second quarter of 2011, premium assessment was based solely on deposit balances whereas beginning in the second quarter of 2011 under the new rules, the deposit insurance assessment base will be a bank's average total assets less its average tangible equity, with adjustments for brokered deposits and unsecured debt. Marketing and advertising expenses decreased between the two periods as marketing-related activities were streamlined during the period.

Income tax expense. The Company’s effective tax rate was 12.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 23.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. These effective tax rates are lower than the Company’s marginal tax rate of 34% largely due to the tax-exempt income associated with the Company’s investments in tax-exempt municipal bonds and bank-owned life insurance.

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

The Bank’s liquidity is a measure of its ability to fund loans, pay withdrawals of deposits, and other cash outflows in an efficient, cost-effective manner. The Bank’ short-term sources of liquidity include maturity, repayment and sales of assets, excess cash and cash equivalents, new deposits, broker deposits, other borrowings, and new borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank. There has been no material adverse change during the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 in the ability of the Bank and its subsidiaries to fund their operations.

At June 30, 2011, the Bank had commitments outstanding under letters of credit of $0.7 million, commitments to originate loans of $21.4 million, and commitments to fund undisbursed balances of closed loans and unused lines of credit of $44.2 million. At June 30, 2011, the Bank had $3.7 million in outstanding commitments to sell loans. There has been no material change during the three months ended June 30, 2011 in any of the Bank’s other contractual obligations or commitments to make future payments.

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are dividends from the Bank, principal and interest payments received from a loan made to the Bank’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and tax benefits arising from the use of the Company’s tax deductions by other members of its consolidated group pursuant to a tax sharing agreement. The Company is dependent upon these sources and cash on hand which totaled approximately $1.3 million at June 30, 2011 in order to fund its operations and pay the dividend to its shareholders. There has been no material adverse change in the ability of the Company to fund its operations during the three-month period ended June 30, 2011.

Capital Requirements

The Bank was in compliance with all of its capital requirements as of June 30, 2011.

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Certain critical accounting policies of the Company require the use of significant judgment and accounting estimates in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related data of the Company. These accounting estimates require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made. Management believes that the most critical accounting policy requiring the use of accounting estimates and judgment is the determination of the allowance for loan losses. If the financial position of a significant amount of debtors or the value of the collateral securing the loans should deteriorate more than the Company has estimated, the present allowance for loan losses may be insufficient and additional provisions for loan losses may be required. The allowance for loan losses was approximately $9.1 million at June 30, 2011.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide the information required by this item.

Table of Contents

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files and submits pursuant to the rules and forms of the SEC is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

During the quarter under report, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

	Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries are involved in any pending legal proceedings, other than routine legal matters occurring in the ordinary course of business that in the aggregate involve amounts which are believed by management to be immaterial to the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

	As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

	None.

ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

	Not applicable.

ITEM 4.	[REMOVED AND RESERVED]

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

	None.

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS

	(a)	Exhibits
		31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
		31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
		32.	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

		101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
		101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
		101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
		101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
		101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

TF FINANCIAL CORPORATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:	August 12, 2011	/s/ Kent C. Lufkin
		Kent C. Lufkin
		President and CEO
		(Principal Executive Officer)


Date:	August 12, 2011	/s/ Dennis R. Stewart
		Dennis R. Stewart
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)