UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-7278
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Kevin J. McCarthy
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (312) 917-7700
Date of fiscal year end: February 28
Date of reporting period: August 31, 2011
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. ss. 3507.
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
LIFE IS COMPLEX.
Nuveen makes things e-simple.
It only takes a minute to sign up for e-Reports. Once enrolled, you’ll receive an e-mail as soon as your Nuveen Fund information is ready. No more waiting for delivery by regular mail. Just click on the link within the e-mail to see the report and save it on your computer if you wish.
Free e-Reports right to your e-mail!
www.investordelivery.com
If you receive your Nuveen Fund dividends and statements from your financial advisor or brokerage account.
OR
www.nuveen.com/accountaccess
If you receive your Nuveen Fund dividends and statements directly from Nuveen.
Table of Contents
|
Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders
|
4
|
|
Portfolio Managers’ Comments
|
5
|
|
Common Share Dividend and Share Price Information
|
12
|
|
Performance Overviews
|
14
|
|
Portfolios of Investments
|
19
|
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
|
41
|
|
Statement of Operations
|
42
|
|
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
|
43
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows
|
46
|
|
Financial Highlights
|
48
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
57
|
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement Approval Process
|
70
|
|
Reinvest Automatically, Easily and Conveniently
|
78
|
|
Glossary of Terms Used in this Report
|
80
|
|
Other Useful Information
|
83
|
Chairman’s
Letter to Shareholders
Dear Shareholders,
The global economy continues to be weighed down by an unusual combination of pressures facing the larger developed economies. Japanese leaders continue to work through the economic aftereffects of the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Political leaders in Europe and the U.S. have resolved some of the near term fiscal problems, but the financial markets are not convinced that these leaders are able to address more complex longer term fiscal issues. Despite improved earnings and capital increases, the largest banks in these countries continue to be vulnerable to deteriorating mortgage portfolios and sovereign credit exposure, adding another source of uncertainty to the global financial system.
In the U.S., recent economic statistics indicate that the economic recovery may be losing momentum. Consumption, which represents about 70% of the gross domestic product, faces an array of challenges from seemingly intractable declines in housing values, increased energy costs and limited growth in the job market. The failure of Congress and the administration to agree on the debt ceiling increase on a timely basis and the deep divisions between the political parties over fashioning a balanced program to address growing fiscal imbalances that led to the recent S&P ratings downgrade add considerable uncertainty to the domestic economic picture.
On a more positive note, corporate earnings continue to hold up well and the municipal bond market is recovering from recent weakness as states and municipalities implement various programs to reduce their budgetary deficits. In addition, the Federal Reserve System has made it clear that it stands ready to take additional steps should the economic recovery falter. However, there are concerns that the Fed is approaching the limits of its resources to intervene in the economy.
These perplexing times highlight the importance of professional investment management. Your Nuveen investment team is working hard to develop an appropriate response to increased risk, and they continue to seek out opportunities created by stressful markets using proven investment disciplines designed to help your Fund achieve its investment objectives. On your behalf, we monitor their activities to assure that they maintain their investment disciplines.
As always, I encourage you to contact your financial consultant if you have any questions about your investment in a Nuveen Fund. On behalf of the other members of your Fund Board, we look forward to continuing to earn your trust in the months and years ahead.
Sincerely,
Robert P. Bremner
Chairman of the Board
October 21, 2011
4 Nuveen Investments
Portfolio Managers’ Comments
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. (NAZ)
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (NFZ)
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (NKR)
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (NXE)
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (NTX)
Portfolio managers Michael Hamilton and Daniel Close review key investment strategies and the six-month performance of these five Nuveen Funds. Michael, who has 22 years of investment experience, assumed portfolio management responsibility for the Arizona Funds in January 2011. An eleven-year veteran of Nuveen, Dan has managed NTX since 2007.
What key strategies were used to manage the Arizona and Texas Funds during the six-month reporting period ended August 31, 2011?
During this reporting period, municipal bond prices generally rallied as yields declined across the municipal curve. The relative decline in yields was attributable in part to the continued depressed level of municipal bond issuance. Tax-exempt volume, which had been limited in 2010 by issuers’ extensive use of taxable Build America Bonds (BABs), continued to drift lower in 2011. Even though BABs were no longer an option for issuers (the BAB program expired at the end of 2010), some borrowers had accelerated issuance into 2010 in order to take advantage of the program’s favorable terms before its termination, fulfilling their capital program borrowing needs well into 2012. This reduced the need for many borrowers to come to market with new issues during this period. For the six months ended August 31, 2011, national municipal issuance was down 34% compared with the same period in 2010, while municipal issuance in Arizona and Texas declined 60% and 27%, respectively.
Despite the constrained issuance on tax-exempt municipal bonds and relatively lower yields, we continued to take a bottom-up approach to discovering undervalued sectors and individual credits with the potential to perform well over the long term. During this period, NTX found value in water and sewer bonds, local general and limited tax obligation credits and Texas appropriations bonds. The Texas Fund also purchased gas prepayment bonds, which are used by municipal utilities to prepay for gas supplies to be delivered over a long period of time. In the Arizona Funds, our focus was on buying bonds with wider credit spreads where we believed we were being compensated for perceived risk. This included some AA rated, insured school district credits that offered higher yields due to the fact that this segment was out of favor with the market. For the most part, all of these Funds focused on purchasing longer bonds in order to take advantage of more attractive yields at the longer end of the municipal yield curve.
Cash for new purchases during this period was generated largely by the proceeds from bond calls and maturing bonds, which we worked to redeploy to keep the Funds fully invested. In addition, the Arizona Funds sold pre-refunded bonds and credits with shorter call dates to generate additional cash for funding new purchases. This was particularly true in NKR, where we worked to reduce the Fund’s overweighting in bonds with shorter maturities.
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements. Discussions of specific investments are for illustration only and are not intended as recommendations of individual investments. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are those of the portfolio managers as of the date of this report. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and the views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. The Funds disclaim any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein.
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by a national rating agency.
Nuveen Investments 5
As of August 31, 2011, all five of these Funds continued to use inverse floating rate securities. We employ inverse floaters as a form of leverage for a variety of reasons, including duration management, income enhancement and total return enhancement.
How did the Funds perform?
Individual results for these Nuveen Arizona and Texas Funds, as well as relevant index and peer group information, are presented in the accompanying table.
|
Average Annual Total Returns on Common Share Net Asset Value*
|
||||
|
For periods ended 8/31/11
|
||||
|
6-Month
|
1-Year
|
5-Year
|
10-Year
|
|
|
Arizona Funds
|
||||
|
NAZ
|
8.30%
|
2.35%
|
4.47%
|
4.87%
|
|
NFZ
|
9.58%
|
2.61%
|
4.06%
|
5.41%
|
|
NKR
|
7.60%
|
3.18%
|
4.53%
|
N/A
|
|
NXE
|
8.27%
|
3.72%
|
4.69%
|
N/A
|
|
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Arizona Municipal Bond Index**
|
6.15%
|
2.52%
|
4.82%
|
4.96%
|
|
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) National Municipal Bond Index**
|
6.56%
|
2.62%
|
4.60%
|
4.93%
|
|
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Classification Average**
|
8.63%
|
1.97%
|
4.44%
|
5.43%
|
|
Texas Fund
|
||||
|
NTX
|
8.04%
|
2.48%
|
5.00%
|
5.48%
|
|
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Texas Municipal Bond Index**
|
6.40%
|
2.78%
|
4.95%
|
5.17%
|
|
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) National Municipal Bond Index**
|
6.56%
|
2.62%
|
4.60%
|
4.93%
|
|
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Classification Average**
|
8.63%
|
1.97%
|
4.44%
|
5.43%
|
For the six months ended August 31, 2011, the cumulative returns on common share net asset value (NAV) for all four Arizona Funds exceeded the return for the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Arizona Municipal Bond Index and NTX outperformed the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Texas Municipal Bond Index. All of the Funds also outperformed the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) National Municipal Bond Index. For the six-month period, NFZ exceeded the return for the Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Classification Average, while the remaining four Funds trailed the Lipper classification. Shareholders should note that the performance of the Lipper Other States classification represents the overall average of returns for funds from ten different states with a wide variety of municipal market conditions, which may make direct comparisons less meaningful.
Key management factors that influenced the Funds’ returns during this period included duration and yield curve positioning, credit exposure and sector allocation. In addition, the use of leverage was an important positive factor during this period. The impact of leverage is discussed in more detail later in this report.
During this period, as yields across the municipal yield curve declined, municipal bonds with longer maturities generally outperformed the shorter maturity categories,
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares.
For additional information, see the individual Performance Overview for your Fund in this report.
* 6-month returns are cumulative; all other returns are annualized.
**Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for definitions.
6 Nuveen Investments
with credits at the longest end of the yield curve posting the strongest returns. Overall, duration and yield curve positioning was a positive contributor to the performance of NAZ, NFZ, NKR, NXE and NTX. All five of these Funds were underweighted in the shorter parts of the yield curve that produced weaker returns and had correspondingly heavier exposures to the outperforming longer segments. Of the five, NFZ was the most advantageously positioned for the market environment of this period, with the longest duration.
Holdings that generally made positive contributions to the Funds’ returns during this period included zero coupon bonds and health care, transportation and education credits. The special tax, water and sewer, and industrial development revenue sectors also outperformed the municipal market as a whole, while general obligation (GO) and other tax-supported bonds generally performed in line with the market during this period. Although NTX’s transportation holdings were positive for performance, this was offset to some degree by negative performance from the Fund’s local GO allocations. In the Arizona Funds, our holdings of limited tax obligation bonds issued for the Maricopa County Stadium District, which owns Chase Field in Phoenix, performed poorly. These bonds are backed by revenues from a car rental surcharge, which were negatively impacted by the decline in Arizona tourism and the drop in business and convention travel. Holdings of the stadium bonds detracted from the performance of NAZ and NKR, while NFZ and NXE did not own any of these bonds. Overall, the Arizona Funds’ utilities holdings were helpful for performance, with NFZ, NAZ and NXE benefiting the most.
Pre-refunded bonds, which are often backed by U.S. Treasury securities, were among the poorest performing market segments during this period. The underperformance of these bonds can be attributed primarily to their shorter effective maturities and higher credit quality. Among these five Funds, NFZ had the smallest allocation of pre-refunded bonds, which lessened the negative impact of these holdings, while an overweighting in pre-refunded bonds detracted from the performance of NTX.
Credit exposure played a smaller role in performance during these six months, as bonds rated BBB, A and AA typically outperformed those rated AAA. This outperformance was due in part to the higher yields they offered investors looking for income. In this environment, the Funds’ performance generally benefited from their allocations to lower quality credits.
IMPACT OF THE FUNDS’ LEVERAGE STRATEGIES ON PERFORMANCE
One important factor impacting the returns of all these Funds relative to the comparative indexes was the Funds’ use of leverage. The Funds use leverage because their managers believe that, over time, leveraging provides opportunities for additional
Nuveen Investments 7
income and total return for common shareholders. However, use of leverage also can expose common shareholders to additional volatility. For example, as the prices of securities held by a Fund decline, the negative impact of these valuation changes on common share net asset value and common shareholder total return is magnified by the use of leverage. Conversely, leverage may enhance common share returns during periods when the prices of securities held by a Fund generally are rising. Leverage made a positive contribution to the performance of these Funds over this reporting period.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING THE FUNDS’ REDEMPTION OF AUCTION RATE PREFERRED SHARES
Shortly after their respective inceptions, each of the Funds issued auction rate preferred shares (ARPS) to create structural leverage. As noted in past shareholder reports, the ARPS issued by many closed-end funds, including these Funds, have been hampered by a lack of liquidity since February 2008. Since that time, more ARPS have been submitted for sale in each of their regularly scheduled auctions than there have been offers to buy. In fact, offers to buy have been almost completely nonexistent since late February 2008. This means that these auctions have “failed to clear,” and that many, or all, of the ARPS shareholders who wanted to sell their shares in these auctions were unable to do so. This lack of liquidity in ARPS did not lower the credit quality of these shares, and ARPS shareholders unable to sell their shares continued to receive distributions at the “maximum rate” applicable to failed auctions, as calculated in accordance with the pre-established terms of the ARPS. In the recent market, with short term rates at multi-generational lows, those maximum rates also have been low.
One continuing implication for common shareholders from the auction failures is that each Fund’s cost of leverage likely has been incrementally higher at times than it otherwise might have been had the auctions continued to be successful. As a result, each Fund’s common share earnings likely have been incrementally lower at times than they otherwise might have been.
As noted in past shareholder reports, the Nuveen funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees authorized several methods that can be used separately or in combination to refinance a portion of the Nuveen funds’ outstanding ARPS. Some funds have utilized tender option bonds (TOBs), also known as inverse floating rate securities, for leverage purposes. The amount of TOBs that a fund may use varies according to the composition of each fund’s portfolio. Some funds have a greater ability to use TOBs than others. Some funds have issued Variable Rate Demand Preferred (VRDP) Shares or Variable MuniFund Term Preferred (VMTP) Shares, which are floating rate forms of preferred stock with a mandatory term redemption. Some funds have issued MuniFund Term Preferred (MTP) Shares, a fixed rate form of preferred stock with a mandatory redemption period of three to five years.
8 Nuveen Investments
During 2010 and 2011, certain Nuveen leveraged closed-end funds (including NXE) received a demand letter from a law firm on behalf of purported holders of common shares of each such fund, alleging that Nuveen and the funds’ officers and Board of Directors/Trustees breached their fiduciary duties related to the redemption at par of the funds’ ARPS. In response, the Board established an ad hoc Demand Committee consisting of certain of its disinterested and independent Board members to investigate the claims. The Demand Committee retained independent counsel to assist it in conducting an extensive investigation. Based upon its investigation, the Demand Committee found that it was not in the best interests of each fund or its shareholders to take the actions suggested in the demand letters, and recommended that the full Board reject the demands made in the demand letters. After reviewing the findings and recommendation of the Demand Committee, the full Board of each fund unanimously adopted the Demand Committee’s recommendation.
Subsequently, 33 of the funds that received demand letters (including NXE) were named in a consolidated complaint as nominal defendants in a putative shareholder derivative action captioned Martin Safier, et al. v. Nuveen Asset Management, et al. that was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division (the “Cook County Chancery Court”) on February 18, 2011 (the “Complaint”). The Complaint, filed on behalf of purported holders of each fund’s common shares, also name Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc. as a defendant, together with current and former Officers and interested Director/Trustees of each of the funds (together with the nominal defendants, collectively, the “Defendants”). The Complaint contains the same basic allegations contained in the demand letters. The suits seek a declaration that the Defendants have breached their fiduciary duties, an order directing the Defendants not to redeem any ARPS at their liquidation value using fund assets, indeterminate monetary damages in favor of the funds and an award of plaintiffs’ costs and disbursements in pursuing the action. The court has heard arguments on the funds’ motion to dismiss the suit and has taken the matter under advisement. Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc. believes that the Complaint is without merit, and is defending vigorously against these charges.
As of August 31, 2011, each of the Funds has redeemed all of their outstanding ARPS at liquidation value.
As of August 31, 2011, the Funds have issued and outstanding MTP Shares and VMTP Shares as shown in the accompanying tables.
|
MTP Shares
|
||||
|
MTP Shares Issued
|
Annual
|
NYSE
|
||
|
Fund
|
Series
|
at Liquidation Value
|
Interest Rate
|
Ticker
|
|
NFZ
|
2015
|
$11,100,000
|
2.05%
|
NFZ PrC
|
|
NKR
|
2015
|
$18,725,000
|
2.05%
|
NKR PrC
|
|
NXE
|
2016
|
$20,846,000
|
2.90%
|
NXE PrC
|
|
NTX
|
2015
|
$70,920,000
|
2.30%
|
NTX PrC
|
Nuveen Investments 9
|
VMTP Shares
|
||
|
VMTP
|
VMTP Shares Issued
|
|
|
Fund
|
Series
|
at Liquidation Value
|
|
NAZ
|
2014
|
$28,000,000
|
(Refer to Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies and Footnote 4 – Fund Shares for further details on MTP and VMTP Shares.)
As of October 5, 2010, after the close of this reporting period, all 84 of the Nuveen closed-end municipal funds that had issued ARPS, approximately $11.0 billion, have redeemed at liquidation value all of these shares.
For up-to-date information, please visit the Nuveen CEF Auction Rate Preferred Resource Center at: http://www.nuveen.com/arps.
Regulatory Matters
During May 2011, Nuveen Securities, LLC, known as Nuveen Investments, LLC, prior to April 30, 2011, entered into a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) with respect to certain allegations regarding Nuveen-sponsored closed-end fund ARPS marketing brochures. As part of this settlement, Nuveen Securities, LLC neither admitted to nor denied FINRA’s allegations. Nuveen Securities, LLC is the broker-dealer subsidiary of Nuveen Investments.
The settlement with FINRA concludes an investigation that followed the widespread failure of auctions for ARPS and other auction rate securities, which generally began in mid-February 2008. In the settlement, FINRA alleged that certain marketing materials provided by Nuveen Securities, LLC were false and misleading. Nuveen Securities, LLC agreed to a censure and the payment of a $3 million fine.
RISK CONSIDERATIONS
Fund shares are not guaranteed or endorsed by any bank or other insured depository institution, and are not federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Fund common shares are subject to a variety of risks, including:
Investment Risk. The possible loss of the entire principal amount that you invest.
Price Risk. Shares of closed-end investment companies like these Funds frequently trade at a discount to their NAV. Your common shares at any point in time may be worth less than your original investment, even after taking into account the reinvestment of Fund dividends and distributions.
10 Nuveen Investments
Leverage Risk. Each Fund’s use of leverage creates the possibility of higher volatility for the Fund’s per share NAV, market price, distributions and returns. There is no assurance that a Fund’s leveraging strategy will be successful.
Tax Risk. The tax treatment of Fund distributions may be affected by new IRS interpretations of the Internal Revenue Code and future changes in tax laws and regulations.
Issuer Credit Risk. This is the risk that a security in a Fund’s portfolio will fail to make dividend or interest payments when due.
Interest Rate Risk. Fixed-income securities such as bonds, preferred, convertible and other debt securities will decline in value if market interest rates rise.
Reinvestment Risk. If market interest rates decline, income earned from a Fund’s portfolio may be reinvested at rates below that of the original bond that generated the income.
Call Risk or Prepayment Risk. Issuers may exercise their option to prepay principal earlier than scheduled, forcing a Fund to reinvest in lower-yielding securities.
Nuveen Investments 11
Common Share Dividend and Share Price Information
The monthly dividends of all five Funds in this report remained stable throughout the six-month reporting period ended August 31, 2011.
All of the Funds in this report seek to pay stable dividends at rates that reflect each Fund’s past results and projected future performance. During certain periods, each Fund may pay dividends at a rate that may be more or less than the amount of net investment income actually earned by the Fund during the period. If a Fund has cumulatively earned more than it has paid in dividends, it holds the excess in reserve as undistributed net investment income (UNII) as part of the Fund’s NAV. Conversely, if a Fund has cumulatively paid dividends in excess of its earnings, the excess constitutes negative UNII that is likewise reflected in the Fund’s NAV. Each Fund will, over time, pay all of its net investment income as dividends to shareholders. As of August 31, 2011, all of the Funds in this report had a positive UNII balance, based upon our best estimate, for tax purposes and a positive UNII balance for financial reporting purposes.
COMMON SHARE REPURCHASES AND SHARE PRICE INFORMATION
As of August 31, 2011, and since the inception of the Funds’ repurchase programs, NFZ, NKR and NXE have cumulatively repurchased and retired their outstanding common shares as shown in the accompanying table. Since the inception of the Funds’ repurchase program, NAZ and NTX have not repurchased any of their outstanding common shares.
|
Common Shares
|
% of Outstanding
|
||||||
|
Fund
|
Repurchased and Retired
|
Common Shares
|
|||||
|
NAZ
|
— | — | |||||
|
NFZ
|
2,500 | 0.2 | % | ||||
|
NKR
|
800 | 0.0 | %* | ||||
|
NXE
|
1,600 | 0.1 | % | ||||
|
NTX
|
— | — | |||||
|
* Rounds to less than 0.1%.
|
|||||||
During the six-month reporting period, NFZ, NKR and NXE did not repurchase any of their outstanding common shares.
12 Nuveen Investments
As of August 31, 2011, the Funds’ common share prices were trading at (+)premiums or (-)discounts to their common share NAVs as shown in the accompanying table.
|
8/31/11
|
Six-Month Average
|
|
|
Fund
|
(+)Premium/(-)Discount
|
(+)Premium/(-)Discount
|
|
NAZ
|
(-)7.02%
|
(-) 8.17%
|
|
NFZ
|
(-)8.32%
|
(-)8.63%
|
|
NKR
|
(-)8.25%
|
(-)9.83%
|
|
NXE
|
(-)8.96%
|
(-)10.33%
|
|
NTX
|
(+)7.77%
|
(+)4.64%
|
Nuveen Investments 13
|
NAZ
|
Nuveen Arizona
|
|
|
Premium Income
|
||
|
Performance
|
Municipal Fund, Inc.
|
|
|
OVERVIEW
|
||
|
as of August 31, 2011
|
Credit Quality (as a % of total investments)2,3
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||
|
Common Share Price
|
$12.98
|
|
|
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$13.96
|
|
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
-7.02%
|
|
|
Market Yield
|
5.78%
|
|
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
8.41%
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$62,427
|
|
|
Leverage
|
||
|
Structural Leverage
|
30.96%
|
|
|
Effective Leverage
|
32.56%
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return
|
||
|
(Inception 11/19/92)
|
||
|
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|
|
6-Month (Cumulative)
|
8.50%
|
8.30%
|
|
1-Year
|
0.38%
|
2.35%
|
|
5-Year
|
4.17%
|
4.47%
|
|
10-Year
|
2.97%
|
4.87%
|
|
Portfolio Composition3
|
||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
25.7%
|
|
|
Utilities
|
17.4%
|
|
|
Health Care
|
15.9%
|
|
|
Water and Sewer
|
14.9%
|
|
|
Education and Civic Organizations
|
11.5%
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/General
|
8.3%
|
|
|
U.S. Guaranteed
|
5.5%
|
|
|
Other
|
0.8%
|
|
|
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 31.3%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by a national rating agency.
|
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
14 Nuveen Investments
|
NFZ
|
Nuveen Arizona
Dividend Advantage
|
|
Performance
|
Municipal Fund
|
|
OVERVIEW
|
|
|
as of August 31, 2011
|
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||
|
Common Share Price
|
$13.01
|
|
|
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$14.19
|
|
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
-8.32%
|
|
|
Market Yield
|
5.95%
|
|
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
8.66%
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$21,974
|
|
|
Leverage
|
||
|
Structural Leverage
|
33.56%
|
|
|
Effective Leverage
|
36.77%
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return
|
||
|
(Inception 1/30/01)
|
||
|
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|
|
6-Month (Cumulative)
|
10.46%
|
9.58%
|
|
1-Year
|
-0.05%
|
2.61%
|
|
5-Year
|
1.28%
|
4.06%
|
|
10-Year
|
3.81%
|
5.41%
|
|
Portfolio Composition3
|
||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
31.4%
|
|
|
Utilities
|
20.4%
|
|
|
Health Care
|
14.1%
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/General
|
12.9%
|
|
|
Water and Sewer
|
9.2%
|
|
|
Education and Civic Organizations
|
8.2%
|
|
|
Other
|
3.8%
|
|
|
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 31.3%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by a national rating agency.
|
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
Nuveen Investments 15
|
NKR
|
Nuveen Arizona
|
|
|
Dividend Advantage
|
||
|
Performance
|
Municipal Fund 2
|
|
|
OVERVIEW
|
||
|
as of August 31, 2011
|
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||
|
Common Share Price
|
$13.35
|
|
|
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$14.55
|
|
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
-8.25%
|
|
|
Market Yield
|
6.02%
|
|
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
8.76%
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$35,500
|
|
|
Leverage
|
||
|
Structural Leverage
|
34.53%
|
|
|
Effective Leverage
|
36.12%
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return
|
||
|
(Inception 3/25/02)
|
||
|
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|
|
6-Month (Cumulative)
|
8.75%
|
7.60%
|
|
1-Year
|
0.47%
|
3.18%
|
|
5-Year
|
2.48%
|
4.53%
|
|
Since Inception
|
4.62%
|
5.93%
|
|
Portfolio Composition3
|
||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
32.4%
|
|
|
Health Care
|
21.0%
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/General
|
20.2%
|
|
|
Water and Sewer
|
9.0%
|
|
|
Education and Civic Organizations
|
6.9%
|
|
|
Utilities
|
5.6%
|
|
|
Other
|
4.9%
|
|
|
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 31.3%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by a national rating agency.
|
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
16 Nuveen Investments
|
NXE
|
Nuveen Arizona
Dividend Advantage
|
|
Performance
|
Municipal Fund 3
|
|
OVERVIEW
|
|
|
as of August 31, 2011
|
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||
|
Common Share Price
|
$12.91
|
|
|
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$14.18
|
|
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
-8.96%
|
|
|
Market Yield
|
5.86%
|
|
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
8.53%
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$43,474
|
|
|
Leverage
|
||
|
Structural Leverage
|
32.41%
|
|
|
Effective Leverage
|
34.77%
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return
|
||
|
(Inception 9/25/02)
|
||
|
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|
|
6-Month (Cumulative)
|
8.68%
|
8.27%
|
|
1-Year
|
1.10%
|
3.72%
|
|
5-Year
|
4.29%
|
4.69%
|
|
Since Inception
|
3.85%
|
5.21%
|
|
Portfolio Composition3
|
||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
25.9%
|
|
|
Health Care
|
23.2%
|
|
|
Education and Civic Organizations
|
12.9%
|
|
|
Utilities
|
11.1%
|
|
|
Water and Sewer
|
10.9%
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/General
|
7.6%
|
|
|
Other
|
8.4%
|
|
|
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 31.3%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by a national rating agency.
|
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
Nuveen Investments 17
|
NTX
|
Nuveen Texas
|
|
|
Quality Income
|
||
|
Performance
|
Municipal Fund
|
|
|
OVERVIEW
|
||
|
as of August 31, 2011
|
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||
|
Common Share Price
|
$15.96
|
|
|
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$14.81
|
|
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
7.77%
|
|
|
Market Yield
|
5.38%
|
|
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
7.47%
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
$141,765
|
|
|
Leverage
|
||
|
Structural Leverage
|
33.35%
|
|
|
Effective Leverage
|
34.56%
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return
|
||
|
(Inception 10/17/91)
|
||
|
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
|
|
6-Month (Cumulative)
|
8.15%
|
8.04%
|
|
1-Year
|
1.11%
|
2.48%
|
|
5-Year
|
7.26%
|
5.00%
|
|
10-Year
|
6.71%
|
5.48%
|
|
Portfolio Composition4
|
||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/General
|
28.5%
|
|
|
Utilities
|
11.1%
|
|
|
U.S. Guaranteed
|
10.9%
|
|
|
Water and Sewer
|
10.4%
|
|
|
Health Care
|
9.4%
|
|
|
Transportation
|
8.1%
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
7.6%
|
|
|
Education and Civic Organizations
|
6.7%
|
|
|
Other
|
7.3%
|
|
|
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to invest- ments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by a national rating agency.
|
|
3
|
The Fund paid shareholders capital gains and net ordinary income distributions in December 2010 of $0.0067 per share.
|
|
4
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
18 Nuveen Investments
|
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc.
|
|||||
|
NAZ
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
||||
|
August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|||||
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Consumer Staples – 1.1% (0.8% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 750
|
Puerto Rico, The Children’s Trust Fund, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds,
|
5/12 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
$ 699,480
|
|
|
Series 2002, 5.375%, 5/15/33
|
|||||
|
Education and Civic Organizations – 16.1% (11.5% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
2,500
|
Arizona Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B, Auction
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,924,925
|
|
|
Rate Securities, 0.508%, 11/01/41 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (4)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Arizona State University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 7/01/25 – FGIC Insured
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,030,590
|
|
|
Arizona State University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005:
|
|||||
|
1,455
|
5.000%, 7/01/20 – AMBAC Insured
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
1,550,885
|
|
|
750
|
5.000%, 7/01/21 – AMBAC Insured
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
793,583
|
|
|
755
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University,
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
A–
|
760,549
|
|
|
Refunding Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/15/31
|
|||||
|
1,600
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University,
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,563,424
|
|
|
Refunding Series 2010, 5.125%, 5/15/40
|
|||||
|
200
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Paradise
|
6/19 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
174,250
|
|
|
Education Center Project, Series 2010, 6.100%, 6/01/45
|
|||||
|
1,500
|
Tempe Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Lease Revenue Bonds, Arizona State University
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,404,885
|
|
|
Foundation Project, Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/34 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
825
|
Yavapai County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds,
|
3/21 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
852,143
|
|
|
Arizona Agribusiness and Equine Center Charter School, Series 2011, 7.875%, 3/01/42
|
|||||
|
10,585
|
Total Education and Civic Organizations
|
10,055,234
|
|||
|
Health Care – 22.3% (15.9% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,430
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,474,416
|
|
|
2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/25
|
|||||
|
885
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
616,518
|
|
|
2007B, 1.059%, 1/02/37
|
|||||
|
3,470
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,572,434
|
|
|
2008D, 5.500%, 1/01/38
|
|||||
|
675
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
579,926
|
|
|
Network, Series 2005B, 5.000%, 12/01/37
|
|||||
|
1,110
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
932,256
|
|
|
Network, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/42
|
|||||
|
2,150
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Health Facility Revenue Bonds,
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
A
|
2,216,693
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2004A, 5.375%, 7/01/23
|
|||||
|
2,900
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Health Facility Revenue Bonds,
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
A
|
2,917,139
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 7/01/32
|
|||||
|
210
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mayo Clinic
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
AA
|
210,097
|
|
|
Hospital, Series 1998, 5.250%, 11/15/37
|
|||||
|
515
|
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control Facilities
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
520,114
|
|
|
Financing Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Hospital de la Concepcion, Series 2000A,
|
|||||
|
6.375%, 11/15/15
|
|||||
|
Show Low Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Navapache Regional
|
|||||
|
Medical Center, Series 2005:
|
|||||
|
525
|
5.000%, 12/01/25 – RAAI Insured
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
497,963
|
|
|
435
|
5.000%, 12/01/30 – RAAI Insured
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
398,221
|
|
|
14,305
|
Total Health Care
|
13,935,777
|
Nuveen Investments 19
|
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
|
|
NAZ
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/General – 11.7% (8.3% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 1,265
|
Gila County Unified School District 10 Payson, Arizona, School Improvement Bonds, Project
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
$ 1,385,453
|
|
|
2006, Series 2008B, 5.750%, 7/01/28
|
|||||
|
1,200
|
Maricopa County Unified School District 95 Queen Creek, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
1,267,764
|
|
|
Series 2008, 5.000%, 7/01/27 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
515
|
Pima County Continental Elementary School District 39, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
559,388
|
|
|
Series 2011A, 2.000%, 7/01/30 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
3,530
|
Pinal County Unified School District 1, Florence, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
A
|
3,762,027
|
|
|
2008C, 5.250%, 7/01/28
|
|||||
|
330
|
Puerto Rico, General Obligation and Public Improvement Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.375%, 7/01/28
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
329,987
|
|
|
6,840
|
Total Tax Obligation/General
|
7,304,619
|
|||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited – 36.2% (25.7% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
327
|
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, Special Assessment
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
330,103
|
|
|
Lien Bonds, Series 2001A, 7.875%, 7/01/25
|
|||||
|
3,000
|
Glendale Western Loop 101 Public Facilities Corporation, Arizona, Third Lien Excise Tax
|
1/14 at 100.00
|
AA
|
3,105,090
|
|
|
Revenue Bonds, Series 2008B, 6.250%, 7/01/38
|
|||||
|
1,280
|
Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue Bonds, Series 2006-1, 5.000%,
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,353,139
|
|
|
8/01/22 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
740
|
Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%,
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
776,682
|
|
|
8/01/23 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
1,125
|
Marana Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Municipal Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series
|
1/12 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,127,891
|
|
|
2008B, 5.125%, 7/01/28
|
|||||
|
575
|
Marana Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/28 –
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
AA
|
586,621
|
|
|
AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
1,426
|
Marana, Arizona, Tangerine Farms Road Improvement District Revenue Bonds, Series 2006,
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
A2
|
1,443,297
|
|
|
4.600%, 1/01/26
|
|||||
|
3,400
|
Maricopa County Stadium District, Arizona, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%,
|
6/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
3,151,732
|
|
|
6/01/18 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
3,400
|
Mesa, Arizona, Street and Highway User Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/24 –
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
3,575,066
|
|
|
AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
1,140
|
Pinetop Fire District of Navajo County, Arizona, Certificates of Participation, Series 2008,
|
6/16 at 102.00
|
A3
|
1,170,689
|
|
|
7.750%, 6/15/29
|
|||||
|
265
|
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Guaranteed Government Facilities Revenue Refunding
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
265,003
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2002D, 5.125%, 7/01/24
|
|||||
|
1,610
|
San Luis Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Municipal Facilities Excise Tax Revenue
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,665,448
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/25 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Scottsdale Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
1,202,220
|
|
|
2006, 5.000%, 7/01/24
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
Scottsdale Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Water & Sewer
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
2,129,860
|
|
|
Improvements Project, Series 2010, 5.000%, 7/01/36
|
|||||
|
645
|
Vistancia Community Facilities District, Arizona, Restricted General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A1
|
681,294
|
|
|
2005, 5.750%, 7/15/24
|
|||||
|
21,933
|
Total Tax Obligation/Limited
|
22,564,135
|
|||
|
U.S. Guaranteed – 7.8% (5.5% of Total Investments) (5)
|
|||||
|
1,250
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds,
|
No Opt. Call
|
N/R (5)
|
1,503,575
|
|
|
Samaritan Health Services, Series 1990A, 7.000%, 12/01/16 – NPFG Insured (ETM)
|
|||||
|
385
|
Maricopa County, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Sun Health Corporation, Series 2005, 5.000%,
|
4/15 at 100.00
|
N/R (5)
|
444,590
|
|
|
4/01/16 (Pre-refunded 4/01/15)
|
|||||
|
1,200
|
Prescott Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Municipal Facilities Revenue Bonds,
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
AA– (5)
|
1,275,072
|
|
|
Series 2003, 5.000%, 1/01/27 (Pre-refunded 1/01/13) – FGIC Insured
|
20 Nuveen Investments
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. Guaranteed (5) (continued)
|
|||||
|
$ 735
|
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Guaranteed Government Facilities Revenue Refunding
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
Baa1 (5)
|
$ 763,827
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2002D, 5.125%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12)
|
|||||
|
530
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
Aa1 (5)
|
563,523
|
|
|
Revenue Bonds, Series 2002B, 5.000%, 1/01/22 (Pre-refunded 1/01/13)
|
|||||
|
310
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System
|
1/12 at 101.00
|
N/R (5)
|
318,252
|
|
|
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 1/01/27 (Pre-refunded 1/01/12)
|
|||||
|
4,410
|
Total U.S. Guaranteed
|
4,868,839
|
|||
|
Utilities – 24.4% (17.4% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Arizona Power Authority, Special Obligation Power Resource Revenue Refunding Crossover Bonds,
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
1,171,590
|
|
|
Hoover Project, Series 2001, 5.250%, 10/01/15
|
|||||
|
1,600
|
Maricopa County Pollution Control Corporation, Arizona, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
A1
|
1,648,464
|
|
|
Bonds, Southern California Edison Company, Series 2000A, 5.000%, 6/01/35
|
|||||
|
1,340
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Tucson Electric Power
|
1/15 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,357,849
|
|
|
Company, Refunding Series 2008, 5.750%, 9/01/29
|
|||||
|
2,170
|
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2005RR, 5.000%, 7/01/27 –
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A3
|
2,172,474
|
|
|
SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
|||||
|
715
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
840,096
|
|
|
Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 09-9W, 17.121%, 1/01/38 (IF) (6)
|
|||||
|
660
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System
|
1/12 at 101.00
|
Aa1
|
675,048
|
|
|
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 1/01/27
|
|||||
|
Salt Verde Financial Corporation, Arizona, Senior Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Energy Inc
|
|||||
|
Prepay Contract Obligations, Series 2007:
|
|||||
|
4,500
|
5.500%, 12/01/29
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
4,331,066
|
|
|
3,500
|
5.000%, 12/01/37
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
3,024,560
|
|
|
15,485
|
Total Utilities
|
15,221,147
|
|||
|
Water and Sewer – 21.0% (14.9% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,005
|
Cottonwood, Arizona, Senior Lien Water System Revenue Bonds, Municipal Property Corporation,
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,016,829
|
|
|
Series 2004, 5.000%, 7/01/24 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
|||||
|
3,500
|
Glendale, Arizona, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Lien, Series 2003, 5.000%,
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
AA
|
3,660,860
|
|
|
7/01/28 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
1,425
|
Goodyear, Arizona, Water and Sewer Revenue Obligations, Series 2010, 5.625%, 7/01/39
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,456,208
|
|
|
600
|
Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
616,518
|
|
|
2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Wastewater System Revenue Bonds,
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,079,390
|
|
|
Series 2004, 5.000%, 7/01/24 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
1,500
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Water System Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,535,775
|
|
|
2002, 5.000%, 7/01/26 – FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
1,250
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Water System Revenue Refunding
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
1,563,938
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2001, 5.500%, 7/01/21 – FGIC Insured
|
Nuveen Investments 21
|
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
|
|
NAZ
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Water and Sewer (continued)
|
|||||
|
Surprise Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
|
|||||
|
$ 600
|
4.700%, 4/01/22
|
4/14 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
$ 605,220
|
|
|
810
|
4.900%, 4/01/32
|
4/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
751,275
|
|
|
905
|
Yuma County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Exempt Revenue Bonds, Far West Water &
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
809,007
|
|
|
Sewer Inc. Refunding, Series 2007A, 6.375%, 12/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
12,595
|
Total Water and Sewer
|
13,095,020
|
|||
|
$ 86,903
|
Total Investments (cost $83,837,864) – 140.6%
|
87,744,251
|
|||
|
Variable MuniFund Term Preferred shares, at Liquidation Value – (44.9)% (7)
|
(28,000,000)
|
||||
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 4.3%
|
2,682,407
|
||||
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100%
|
$ 62,426,658
|
|
(1)
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Investment valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by, or at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in inverse floating rate transactions.
|
|
| (7) | Variable MuniFund Term Preferred shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 31.9%. | |
|
N/R
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
(ETM)
|
Escrowed to maturity.
|
|
|
(IF)
|
Inverse floating rate investment.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
22 Nuveen Investments
|
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund
|
|||||
|
NFZ
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
||||
|
August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|||||
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Education and Civic Organizations – 12.1% (8.2% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 280
|
Arizona Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B, Auction
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
A
|
$ 215,592
|
|
|
Rate Securities, 0.508%, 11/01/41 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (4)
|
|||||
|
275
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University,
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
A–
|
277,021
|
|
|
Refunding Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/15/31
|
|||||
|
500
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University,
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
488,570
|
|
|
Refunding Series 2010, 5.125%, 5/15/40
|
|||||
|
220
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Educational Revenue Bonds, Valley
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
204,239
|
|
|
Academy Charter School Project, Series 2008, 6.500%, 7/01/38
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control Facilities
|
2/12 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
920,810
|
|
|
Financing Authority, Higher Education Revenue Bonds, Ana G. Mendez University System,
|
|||||
|
Series 1999, 5.375%, 2/01/29
|
|||||
|
300
|
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control Facilities
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
300,159
|
|
|
Financing Authority, Higher Education Revenue Bonds, University of the Sacred Heart,
|
|||||
|
Series 2001, 5.250%, 9/01/21
|
|||||
|
305
|
Tucson Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Arizona
|
9/14 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
257,902
|
|
|
Agribusiness and Equine Center Charter School, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/34
|
|||||
|
2,880
|
Total Education and Civic Organizations
|
2,664,293
|
|||
|
Health Care – 21.0% (14.1% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
565
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
582,549
|
|
|
2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/25
|
|||||
|
325
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
226,405
|
|
|
2007B, 1.059%, 1/02/37
|
|||||
|
720
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
741,254
|
|
|
2008D, 5.500%, 1/01/38
|
|||||
|
10
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Adventist
|
3/13 at 100.00
|
A
|
10,004
|
|
|
Health System/West, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 3/01/28
|
|||||
|
250
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
214,788
|
|
|
Network, Series 2005B, 5.000%, 12/01/37
|
|||||
|
415
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
348,546
|
|
|
Network, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/42
|
|||||
|
750
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Health Facility Revenue Bonds,
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
A
|
773,265
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2004A, 5.375%, 7/01/23
|
|||||
|
1,025
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Health Facility Revenue Bonds,
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,031,058
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 7/01/32
|
|||||
|
Show Low Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Navapache Regional
|
|||||
|
Medical Center, Series 2005:
|
|||||
|
200
|
5.000%, 12/01/25 – RAAI Insured
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
189,700
|
|
|
150
|
5.000%, 12/01/30 – RAAI Insured
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
137,318
|
|
|
350
|
University Medical Center Corporation, Tucson, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Series 2011,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
351,253
|
|
|
6.000%, 7/01/39
|
|||||
|
4,760
|
Total Health Care
|
4,606,140
|
|||
|
Housing/Multifamily – 3.6% (2.4% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds,
|
10/11 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
785,510
|
|
|
Whispering Palms Apartments, Series 1999A, 5.900%, 7/01/29 – NPFG Insured
|
Nuveen Investments 23
|
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (continued)
|
|
|
NFZ
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/General – 19.1% (12.9% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 1,000
|
Maricopa County Unified School District 11, Peoria, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Second
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
$ 1,115,630
|
|
|
Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/20 – FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
180
|
Pima County Continental Elementary School District 39, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
195,514
|
|
|
Series 2011A, 2.000%, 7/01/30 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
1,310
|
Scottsdale, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Preserve Acquisition Series 1999,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,441,865
|
|
|
5.000%, 7/01/32
|
|||||
|
1,340
|
Yuma & La Paz Counties Community College District, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
1,447,790
|
|
|
2006, 5.000%, 7/01/21 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
3,830
|
Total Tax Obligation/General
|
4,200,799
|
|||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited – 46.5% (31.4% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,220
|
Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority, Tax Revenue Bonds, Multipurpose Stadium Facility
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
A1
|
1,131,526
|
|
|
Project, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 7/01/31 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
85
|
Centerra Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
69,706
|
|
|
2005, 5.500%, 7/15/29
|
|||||
|
205
|
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special Assessment Bonds,
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
177,421
|
|
|
Montecito Assessment District, Series 2007, 5.700%, 7/01/27
|
|||||
|
127
|
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, Special Assessment
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
128,205
|
|
|
Lien Bonds, Series 2001A, 7.875%, 7/01/25
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue Bonds, Series 2006-1, 5.000%,
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,057,140
|
|
|
8/01/22 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
275
|
Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%,
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
288,632
|
|
|
8/01/23 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
1,180
|
Marana Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 –
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,247,661
|
|
|
AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
498
|
Marana, Arizona, Tangerine Farms Road Improvement District Revenue Bonds, Series 2006,
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
A2
|
504,041
|
|
|
4.600%, 1/01/26
|
|||||
|
150
|
Marley Park Community Facilities District, City of Surprise, Arizona, Limited Tax General
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
129,986
|
|
|
Obligation Bonds, Series 2008 (Bank Qualified), 6.100%, 7/15/32
|
|||||
|
255
|
Merrill Ranch Community Facilities District 1, Florence, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
254,312
|
|
|
Series 2008A, 7.400%, 7/15/33
|
|||||
|
330
|
Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
261,307
|
|
|
2006, 5.300%, 7/15/31
|
|||||
|
225
|
Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, Limited Tax General Obligation
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
187,837
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2007, 5.800%, 7/15/32
|
|||||
|
100
|
Parkway Community Facilities District 1, Prescott Valley, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
79,704
|
|
|
Series 2006, 5.350%, 7/15/31
|
|||||
|
900
|
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Government Bonds, Capitol Mall LLC II,
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
A1
|
918,396
|
|
|
Series 2001, 5.250%, 9/15/16 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
680
|
Pinal County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Correctional Facilities Contract
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB–
|
681,108
|
|
|
Revenue Bonds, Florence West Prison LLC, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 10/01/18 – ACA Insured
|
|||||
|
600
|
San Luis Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Municipal Facilities Excise Tax Revenue
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A+
|
620,664
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/25 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Scottsdale Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
1,202,220
|
|
|
2006, 5.000%, 7/01/24
|
24 Nuveen Investments
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued)
|
|||||
|
$ 350
|
Tartesso West Community Facility District, Buckeye, Arizona, Limited Tax General Obligation
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
$ 295,894
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2007, 5.900%, 7/15/32
|
|||||
|
500
|
Vistancia Community Facilities District, Arizona, Restricted General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A1
|
528,135
|
|
|
2005, 5.750%, 7/15/24
|
|||||
|
340
|
Watson Road Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
279,776
|
|
|
2005, 6.000%, 7/01/30
|
|||||
|
225
|
Westpark Community Facilities District, Buckeye, Arizona, General Obligation Tax Increment
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
176,994
|
|
|
Bonds Series 2006, 5.250%, 7/15/31
|
|||||
|
10,245
|
Total Tax Obligation/Limited
|
10,220,665
|
|||
|
U.S. Guaranteed – 2.0% (1.4% of Total Investments) (5)
|
|||||
|
240
|
Maricopa County Union High School District 210 Phoenix, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
AA (5)
|
287,254
|
|
|
Series 2006C, 5.000%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/16) – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
140
|
Maricopa County, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Sun Health Corporation, Series 2005, 5.000%,
|
4/15 at 100.00
|
N/R (5)
|
161,669
|
|
|
4/01/16 (Pre-refunded 4/01/15)
|
|||||
|
380
|
Total U.S. Guaranteed
|
448,923
|
|||
|
Utilities – 30.2% (20.4% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,500
|
Arizona Power Authority, Special Obligation Power Resource Revenue Refunding Crossover Bonds,
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
1,807,931
|
|
|
Hoover Project, Series 2001, 5.250%, 10/01/17
|
|||||
|
600
|
Maricopa County Pollution Control Corporation, Arizona, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
A1
|
618,174
|
|
|
Bonds, Southern California Edison Company, Series 2000A, 5.000%, 6/01/35
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Mesa, Arizona, Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.250%, 7/01/17 –
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa2
|
1,187,770
|
|
|
FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
665
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Tucson Electric Power
|
1/15 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
673,858
|
|
|
Company, Refunding Series 2008, 5.750%, 9/01/29
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2005RR, 5.000%, 7/01/26 –
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A3
|
1,003,910
|
|
|
SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
|||||
|
560
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
657,978
|
|
|
Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 09-9W, 17.121%, 1/01/38 (IF) (6)
|
|||||
|
660
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System
|
1/12 at 101.00
|
Aa1
|
676,104
|
|
|
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.250%, 1/01/18
|
|||||
|
5,985
|
Total Utilities
|
6,625,725
|
|||
|
Water and Sewer – 13.7% (9.2% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
475
|
Goodyear, Arizona, Water and Sewer Revenue Obligations, Series 2010, 5.625%, 7/01/39
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
485,403
|
|
|
225
|
Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
231,194
|
|
|
2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
1,500
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Water System Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,535,775
|
|
|
2002, 5.000%, 7/01/26 – FGIC Insured
|
Nuveen Investments 25
|
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (continued)
|
|
|
NFZ
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Water and Sewer (continued)
|
|||||
|
Surprise Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
|
|||||
|
$ 225
|
4.700%, 4/01/22
|
4/14 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
$ 226,958
|
|
|
260
|
4.900%, 4/01/32
|
4/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
241,150
|
|
|
325
|
Yuma County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Exempt Revenue Bonds, Far West Water &
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
290,527
|
|
|
Sewer Inc. Refunding, Series 2007A, 6.375%, 12/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
3,010
|
Total Water and Sewer
|
3,011,007
|
|||
|
$ 32,090
|
Total Investments (cost $31,983,575) – 148.2%
|
32,563,062
|
|||
|
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (50.5)% (7)
|
(11,100,000)
|
||||
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 2.3%
|
511,206
|
||||
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100%
|
$ 21,974,268
|
|
(1)
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Investment valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by, or at the discretion of, the Board of Trustees. For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in inverse floating rate transactions.
|
|
|
(7)
|
MuniFund Term Preferred shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 34.1%.
|
|
|
N/R
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
(IF)
|
Inverse floating rate investment.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
26 Nuveen Investments
|
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2
|
|||||
|
NKR
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
||||
|
August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|||||
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Education and Civic Organizations – 10.4% (6.9% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 1,130
|
Arizona Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B, Auction
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
A
|
$ 870,066
|
|
|
Rate Securities, 0.508%, 11/01/41 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (4)
|
|||||
|
450
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University,
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
A–
|
453,308
|
|
|
Refunding Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/15/31
|
|||||
|
775
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University,
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
757,284
|
|
|
Refunding Series 2010, 5.125%, 5/15/40
|
|||||
|
485
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Noah
|
12/14 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
469,858
|
|
|
Webster Basic Schools Inc., Series 2004, 6.000%, 12/15/24
|
|||||
|
365
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Educational Revenue Bonds, Valley
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
338,851
|
|
|
Academy Charter School Project, Series 2008, 6.500%, 7/01/38
|
|||||
|
290
|
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control Facilities
|
2/12 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
290,073
|
|
|
Financing Authority, Higher Education Revenue Bonds, Ana G. Mendez University System,
|
|||||
|
Series 1999, 5.375%, 2/01/19
|
|||||
|
480
|
Tucson Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Arizona
|
9/14 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
405,878
|
|
|
Agribusiness and Equine Center Charter School, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/34
|
|||||
|
University of Arizona, Certificates of Participation, Series 2002A:
|
|||||
|
65
|
5.500%, 6/01/18 – AMBAC Insured
|
6/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
67,047
|
|
|
40
|
5.125%, 6/01/22 – AMBAC Insured
|
6/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
40,951
|
|
|
4,080
|
Total Education and Civic Organizations
|
3,693,316
|
|||
|
Health Care – 31.6% (21.0% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
845
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
871,246
|
|
|
2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/25
|
|||||
|
520
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
362,248
|
|
|
2007B, 1.059%, 1/02/37
|
|||||
|
1,150
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,183,948
|
|
|
2008D, 5.500%, 1/01/38
|
|||||
|
600
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Blood Systems Inc., Series 2004,
|
4/14 at 100.00
|
A
|
620,904
|
|
|
5.000%, 4/01/20
|
|||||
|
400
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
343,660
|
|
|
Network, Series 2005B, 5.000%, 12/01/37
|
|||||
|
655
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
550,115
|
|
|
Network, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/42
|
|||||
|
1,375
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Health Facility Revenue Bonds,
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,417,652
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2004A, 5.375%, 7/01/23
|
|||||
|
1,650
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Health Facility Revenue Bonds,
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,659,751
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 7/01/32
|
|||||
|
500
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mayo Clinic
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
AA
|
500,230
|
|
|
Hospital, Series 1998, 5.250%, 11/15/37
|
|||||
|
1,120
|
Scottsdale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Scottsdale
|
9/20 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,116,125
|
|
|
Healthcare, Series 2006C. Re-offering, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – AGC Insured
|
|||||
|
Show Low Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Navapache Regional
|
|||||
|
Medical Center, Series 2005:
|
|||||
|
315
|
5.000%, 12/01/25 – RAAI Insured
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
298,778
|
|
|
260
|
5.000%, 12/01/30 – RAAI Insured
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
238,017
|
|
|
1,050
|
University Medical Center Corporation, Tucson, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Series 2011,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,053,759
|
|
|
6.000%, 7/01/39
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Yavapai County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Yavapai
|
8/13 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
1,001,730
|
|
|
Regional Medical Center, Series 2003A, 6.000%, 8/01/33
|
|||||
|
11,440
|
Total Health Care
|
11,218,163
|
Nuveen Investments 27
|
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (continued)
|
|
|
NKR
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Housing/Multifamily – 0.7% (0.5% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 245
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, GNMA Collateralized Multifamily
|
10/11 at 105.00
|
AAA
|
$ 257,512
|
|
|
Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds, Pine Ridge, Cambridge Court, Cove on 44th and Fountain
|
|||||
|
Place Apartments, Series 2001A-1, 6.000%, 10/20/31
|
|||||
|
Tax Obligation/General – 30.5% (20.2% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Maricopa County Elementary School District 83 Cartwright, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,058,650
|
|
|
School Improvement, Project 2010, Series 2011A, 5.375%, 7/01/30 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Maricopa County School District 6, Arizona, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Washington
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA+
|
1,191,060
|
|
|
Elementary School, Series 2002A, 5.375%, 7/01/16 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
775
|
Maricopa County School District 79 Litchfield Elementary, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
898,954
|
|
|
Series 2011, 5.000%, 7/01/23
|
|||||
|
1,165
|
Maricopa County Unified School District 69, Paradise Valley, Arizona, General Obligation
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa2
|
1,302,435
|
|
|
Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.250%, 7/01/14 – FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
1,405
|
Mesa, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%, 7/01/15 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
1,641,657
|
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona, Various Purpose General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002B:
|
|||||
|
985
|
5.000%, 7/01/22
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,015,299
|
|
|
290
|
5.000%, 7/01/27
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
299,413
|
|
|
310
|
Pima County Continental Elementary School District 39, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
336,719
|
|
|
Series 2011A, 2.000%, 7/01/30 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
500
|
Pima County Unified School District 08 Flowing Wells, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
530,140
|
|
|
Series 2011B, 5.375%, 7/01/29
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Pima County Unified School District 6, Marana, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, School
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,052,720
|
|
|
Improvement Project 2010 Series 2011A, 5.000%, 7/01/25
|
|||||
|
1,360
|
Scottsdale, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Preserve Acquisition Series 1999,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,489,879
|
|
|
5.000%, 7/01/33
|
|||||
|
9,790
|
Total Tax Obligation/General
|
10,816,926
|
|||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited – 48.9% (32.4% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
Arizona State, Certificates of Participation, Series 2002A:
|
|||||
|
750
|
5.000%, 11/01/17 – NPFG Insured
|
5/12 at 100.00
|
A+
|
760,298
|
|
|
1,000
|
5.000%, 11/01/18 – NPFG Insured
|
5/12 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,012,470
|
|
|
500
|
5.000%, 11/01/20 – NPFG Insured
|
5/12 at 100.00
|
A+
|
504,935
|
|
|
120
|
Centerra Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
98,408
|
|
|
2005, 5.500%, 7/15/29
|
|||||
|
337
|
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special Assessment Bonds,
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
281,378
|
|
|
Montecito Assessment District, Series 2007, 5.800%, 7/01/32
|
|||||
|
200
|
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, Special Assessment
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
201,898
|
|
|
Lien Bonds, Series 2001A, 7.875%, 7/01/25
|
|||||
|
990
|
Marana Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Municipal Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series
|
1/12 at 100.00
|
AA
|
992,544
|
|
|
2008B, 5.125%, 7/01/28
|
|||||
|
834
|
Marana, Arizona, Tangerine Farms Road Improvement District Revenue Bonds, Series 2006,
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
A2
|
844,116
|
|
|
4.600%, 1/01/26
|
|||||
|
Maricopa County Stadium District, Arizona, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002:
|
|||||
|
840
|
5.375%, 6/01/18 – AMBAC Insured
|
6/12 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
778,663
|
|
|
2,645
|
5.375%, 6/01/19 – AMBAC Insured
|
6/12 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
2,494,498
|
|
|
240
|
Marley Park Community Facilities District, City of Surprise, Arizona, Limited Tax General
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
207,977
|
|
|
Obligation Bonds, Series 2008 (Bank Qualified), 6.100%, 7/15/32
|
|||||
|
415
|
Merrill Ranch Community Facilities District 1, Florence, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
413,880
|
|
|
Series 2008A, 7.400%, 7/15/33
|
|||||
|
530
|
Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
419,675
|
|
|
2006, 5.300%, 7/15/31
|
|||||
|
350
|
Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, Limited Tax General Obligation
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
292,191
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2007, 5.800%, 7/15/32
|
28 Nuveen Investments
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued)
|
|||||
|
$ 140
|
Parkway Community Facilities District 1, Prescott Valley, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
$ 111,586
|
|
|
Series 2006, 5.350%, 7/15/31
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Government Bonds, Capitol Mall LLC II,
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
A1
|
1,020,440
|
|
|
Series 2001, 5.250%, 9/15/16 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
1,070
|
Pinal County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Correctional Facilities Contract
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB–
|
1,071,744
|
|
|
Revenue Bonds, Florence West Prison LLC, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 10/01/18 – ACA Insured
|
|||||
|
270
|
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Guaranteed Government Facilities Revenue Refunding
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
270,003
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2002D, 5.125%, 7/01/24
|
|||||
|
250
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, First Subordinate Series
|
2/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
252,178
|
|
|
2010A, 5.375%, 8/01/39
|
|||||
|
960
|
San Luis Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Municipal Facilities Excise Tax Revenue
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A+
|
993,062
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/25 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Scottsdale Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
1,202,220
|
|
|
2006, 5.000%, 7/01/24
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Scottsdale Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Water & Sewer
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
1,064,930
|
|
|
Improvements Project, Series 2010, 5.000%, 7/01/36
|
|||||
|
555
|
Tartesso West Community Facility District, Buckeye, Arizona, Limited Tax General Obligation
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
469,203
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2007, 5.900%, 7/15/32
|
|||||
|
750
|
Vistancia Community Facilities District, Arizona, Restricted General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A1
|
792,203
|
|
|
2005, 5.750%, 7/15/24
|
|||||
|
637
|
Watson Road Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
524,168
|
|
|
2005, 6.000%, 7/01/30
|
|||||
|
350
|
Westpark Community Facilities District, Buckeye, Arizona, General Obligation Tax Increment
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
275,324
|
|
|
Bonds Series 2006, 5.250%, 7/15/31
|
|||||
|
17,733
|
Total Tax Obligation/Limited
|
17,349,992
|
|||
|
Transportation – 2.8% (1.9% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien Airport Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,005,350
|
|
|
2002B, 5.250%, 7/01/27 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
U.S. Guaranteed – 3.7% (2.5% of Total Investments) (5)
|
|||||
|
100
|
Maricopa County Unified School District 89, Dysart, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
AA+ (5)
|
113,452
|
|
|
2004B, 5.250%, 7/01/20 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14) – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
375
|
Maricopa County Union High School District 210 Phoenix, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
AA (5)
|
448,834
|
|
|
Series 2006C, 5.000%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/16) – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
730
|
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Guaranteed Government Facilities Revenue Refunding
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
Baa1 (5)
|
758,631
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2002D, 5.125%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12)
|
|||||
|
1,205
|
Total U.S. Guaranteed
|
1,320,917
|
|||
|
Utilities – 8.5% (5.6% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
900
|
Maricopa County Pollution Control Corporation, Arizona, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
A1
|
927,261
|
|
|
Bonds, Southern California Edison Company, Series 2000A, 5.000%, 6/01/35
|
|||||
|
665
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Tucson Electric Power
|
1/15 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
673,858
|
|
|
Company, Refunding Series 2008, 5.750%, 9/01/29
|
|||||
|
450
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
528,732
|
|
|
Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 09-9W, 17.121%, 1/01/38 (IF) (6)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Salt Verde Financial Corporation, Arizona, Senior Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Energy Inc
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
864,160
|
|
|
Prepay Contract Obligations, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/37
|
|||||
|
3,015
|
Total Utilities
|
2,994,011
|
Nuveen Investments 29
|
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (continued)
|
|
|
NKR
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Water and Sewer – 13.5% (9.0% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 500
|
City of Goodyear, Arizona Subordinate Lien Water and Sewer Revenue Obligations, Series 2011,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
$ 524,145
|
|
|
5.500%, 7/01/41
|
|||||
|
500
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Water System Improvement Revenue
|
12/11 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
500,110
|
|
|
Bonds, Chaparral City Water Company, Series 1997A, 5.400%, 12/01/22 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
260
|
Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
267,158
|
|
|
2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Water System Revenue Refunding
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
1,251,820
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2001, 5.500%, 7/01/22 – FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
Surprise Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
|
|||||
|
350
|
4.700%, 4/01/22
|
4/14 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
353,045
|
|
|
410
|
4.900%, 4/01/32
|
4/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
380,275
|
|
|
1,000
|
Tucson, Arizona, Water System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.500%, 7/01/18 –
|
7/12 at 102.00
|
Aa2
|
1,056,550
|
|
|
FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
525
|
Yuma County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Exempt Revenue Bonds, Far West Water &
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
469,313
|
|
|
Sewer Inc. Refunding, Series 2007A, 6.375%, 12/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
4,545
|
Total Water and Sewer
|
4,802,416
|
|||
|
$ 53,053
|
Total Investments (cost $52,462,074) – 150.6%
|
53,458,603
|
|||
|
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (52.7)% (7)
|
(18,725,000)
|
||||
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 2.1%
|
766,674
|
||||
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100%
|
$ 35,500,277
|
|
(1)
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Investment valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by, or at the discretion of, the Board of Trustees. For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in inverse floating rate transactions.
|
|
|
(7)
|
MuniFund Term Preferred shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 35.0%.
|
|
|
N/R
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
(IF)
|
Inverse floating rate investment.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
30 Nuveen Investments
|
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3
|
|||||
|
NXE
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
||||
|
August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|||||
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Consumer Staples – 1.0% (0.7% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 470
|
Puerto Rico, The Children’s Trust Fund, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds,
|
5/12 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
$ 438,341
|
|
|
Series 2002, 5.375%, 5/15/33
|
|||||
|
Education and Civic Organizations – 18.1% (12.9% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
690
|
Arizona Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B, Auction
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
A
|
531,279
|
|
|
Rate Securities, 0.508%, 11/01/41 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (4)
|
|||||
|
1,250
|
Arizona State University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/20 – AMBAC Insured
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
1,332,375
|
|
|
1,130
|
Energy Management Services LLC, Arizona State University, Energy Conservation Revenue Bonds,
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,164,555
|
|
|
Main Campus Project, Series 2002, 5.250%, 7/01/18 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
520
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University,
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
A–
|
523,822
|
|
|
Refunding Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/15/31
|
|||||
|
900
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University,
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
879,426
|
|
|
Refunding Series 2010, 5.125%, 5/15/40
|
|||||
|
560
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Noah
|
12/14 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
542,517
|
|
|
Webster Basic Schools Inc., Series 2004, 6.000%, 12/15/24
|
|||||
|
415
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Educational Revenue Bonds, Valley
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
385,269
|
|
|
Academy Charter School Project, Series 2008, 6.500%, 7/01/38
|
|||||
|
565
|
Tucson Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Arizona
|
9/14 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
477,753
|
|
|
Agribusiness and Equine Center Charter School, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/34
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
University of Arizona, Certificates of Participation, Series 2002B, 5.125%, 6/01/20 –
|
6/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,057,400
|
|
|
AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
8,030
|
Total Education and Civic Organizations
|
7,894,396
|
|||
|
Health Care – 32.6% (23.2% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,015
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,046,526
|
|
|
2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/25
|
|||||
|
620
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
431,911
|
|
|
2007B, 1.059%, 1/02/37
|
|||||
|
2,390
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,460,550
|
|
|
2008D, 5.500%, 1/01/38
|
|||||
|
625
|
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Blood Systems Inc., Series 2004,
|
4/14 at 100.00
|
A
|
646,775
|
|
|
5.000%, 4/01/20
|
|||||
|
475
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
408,096
|
|
|
Network, Series 2005B, 5.000%, 12/01/37
|
|||||
|
785
|
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
659,298
|
|
|
Network, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/42
|
|||||
|
1,825
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Health Facility Revenue Bonds,
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,881,612
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2004A, 5.375%, 7/01/23
|
|||||
|
1,985
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Health Facility Revenue Bonds,
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,996,731
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 7/01/32
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mayo Clinic
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
AA
|
2,000,920
|
|
|
Hospital, Series 1998, 5.250%, 11/15/37
|
|||||
|
Show Low Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Navapache Regional
|
|||||
|
Medical Center, Series 2005:
|
|||||
|
375
|
5.000%, 12/01/25 – RAAI Insured
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
355,688
|
|
|
315
|
5.000%, 12/01/30 – RAAI Insured
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
288,367
|
|
|
1,000
|
University Medical Center Corporation, Tucson, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Series 2011,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,003,580
|
|
|
6.000%, 7/01/39
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Yavapai County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Yavapai
|
8/13 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
1,001,730
|
|
|
Regional Medical Center, Series 2003A, 6.000%, 8/01/33
|
|||||
|
14,410
|
Total Health Care
|
14,181,784
|
Nuveen Investments 31
|
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (continued)
|
|
|
NXE
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/General – 10.7% (7.6% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 365
|
Pima County Continental Elementary School District 39, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
$ 396,459
|
|
|
Series 2011A, 2.000%, 7/01/30 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
500
|
Pima County Unified School District 08 Flowing Wells, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
530,140
|
|
|
Series 2011B, 5.375%, 7/01/29
|
|||||
|
750
|
Pima County Unified School District 6, Marana, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, School
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
789,540
|
|
|
Improvement Project 2010 Series 2011A, 5.000%, 7/01/25
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Pinal County Unified School District 1, Florence, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,065,730
|
|
|
2008C, 5.250%, 7/01/28
|
|||||
|
1,705
|
Scottsdale, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Preserve Acquisition Series 1999,
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,859,064
|
|
|
5.000%, 7/01/34
|
|||||
|
4,320
|
Total Tax Obligation/General
|
4,640,933
|
|||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited – 36.5% (25.9% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
138
|
Centerra Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
113,170
|
|
|
2005, 5.500%, 7/15/29
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
DC Ranch Community Facilities District, Scottsdale, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
A1
|
2,019,080
|
|
|
2002, 5.000%, 7/15/27 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special Assessment Bonds,
|
|||||
|
Montecito Assessment District, Series 2007:
|
|||||
|
248
|
5.700%, 7/01/27
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
214,637
|
|
|
154
|
5.800%, 7/01/32
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
128,582
|
|
|
236
|
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, Special Assessment
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
238,240
|
|
|
Lien Bonds, Series 2001A, 7.875%, 7/01/25
|
|||||
|
525
|
Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%,
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
551,024
|
|
|
8/01/23 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
975
|
Marana, Arizona, Tangerine Farms Road Improvement District Revenue Bonds, Series 2006,
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
A2
|
986,827
|
|
|
4.600%, 1/01/26
|
|||||
|
290
|
Marley Park Community Facilities District, City of Surprise, Arizona, Limited Tax General
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
251,305
|
|
|
Obligation Bonds, Series 2008 (Bank Qualified), 6.100%, 7/15/32
|
|||||
|
490
|
Merrill Ranch Community Facilities District 1, Florence, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
488,677
|
|
|
Series 2008A, 7.400%, 7/15/33
|
|||||
|
2,175
|
Mohave County, Arizona, Certificates of Participation, Series 2004, 5.250%, 7/01/19 –
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
2,321,551
|
|
|
AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
640
|
Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
506,778
|
|
|
2006, 5.300%, 7/15/31
|
|||||
|
425
|
Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, Limited Tax General Obligation
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
354,803
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2007, 5.800%, 7/15/32
|
|||||
|
160
|
Parkway Community Facilities District 1, Prescott Valley, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
127,526
|
|
|
Series 2006, 5.350%, 7/15/31
|
|||||
|
1,250
|
Pinal County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Correctional Facilities Contract
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB–
|
1,252,038
|
|
|
Revenue Bonds, Florence West Prison LLC, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 10/01/18 – ACA Insured
|
|||||
|
250
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, First Subordinate Series
|
2/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
252,178
|
|
|
2010A, 5.375%, 8/01/39
|
|||||
|
1,130
|
San Luis Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Municipal Facilities Excise Tax Revenue
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,168,917
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/25 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
Scottsdale Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Water & Sewer
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
2,129,859
|
|
|
Improvements Project, Series 2010, 5.000%, 7/01/36
|
|||||
|
665
|
Tartesso West Community Facility District, Buckeye, Arizona, Limited Tax General Obligation
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
562,198
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2007, 5.900%, 7/15/32
|
32 Nuveen Investments
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued)
|
|||||
|
$ 1,250
|
Vistancia Community Facilities District, Arizona, Restricted General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A1
|
$ 1,320,338
|
|
|
2005, 5.750%, 7/15/24
|
|||||
|
638
|
Watson Road Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
524,991
|
|
|
2005, 6.000%, 7/01/30
|
|||||
|
425
|
Westpark Community Facilities District, Buckeye, Arizona, General Obligation Tax Increment
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
334,322
|
|
|
Bonds Series 2006, 5.250%, 7/15/31
|
|||||
|
16,064
|
Total Tax Obligation/Limited
|
15,847,041
|
|||
|
Transportation – 6.1% (4.3% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien Airport Revenue Bonds,
|
|||||
|
Series 2002B:
|
|||||
|
300
|
5.750%, 7/01/16 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
309,456
|
|
|
2,300
|
5.250%, 7/01/21 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,329,255
|
|
|
2,600
|
Total Transportation
|
2,638,711
|
|||
|
U.S. Guaranteed – 4.8% (3.4% of Total Investments) (5)
|
|||||
|
1,575
|
Maricopa County Union High School District 210, Phoenix, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds,
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
AA+ (5)
|
1,770,568
|
|
|
Series 2004A, 5.000%, 7/01/20 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14) – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
270
|
Maricopa County, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Sun Health Corporation, Series 2005, 5.000%,
|
4/15 at 100.00
|
N/R (5)
|
311,791
|
|
|
4/01/16 (Pre-refunded 4/01/15)
|
|||||
|
1,845
|
Total U.S. Guaranteed
|
2,082,359
|
|||
|
Utilities – 15.5% (11.1% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,200
|
Maricopa County Pollution Control Corporation, Arizona, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
A1
|
1,236,348
|
|
|
Bonds, Southern California Edison Company, Series 2000A, 5.000%, 6/01/35
|
|||||
|
1,250
|
Maricopa County Pollution Control Corporation, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Arizona Public Service
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,253,563
|
|
|
Company – Palo Verde Project, Series 2002A, 5.050%, 5/01/29 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
665
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Tucson Electric Power
|
1/15 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
673,858
|
|
|
Company, Refunding Series 2008, 5.750%, 9/01/29
|
|||||
|
1,660
|
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2005RR, 5.000%, 7/01/26 –
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A3
|
1,666,491
|
|
|
SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
|||||
|
775
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
910,594
|
|
|
Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 09-9W, 17.121%, 1/01/38 (IF) (6)
|
|||||
|
1,165
|
Salt Verde Financial Corporation, Arizona, Senior Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Energy Inc
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
1,006,746
|
|
|
Prepay Contract Obligations, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/37
|
|||||
|
6,715
|
Total Utilities
|
6,747,600
|
|||
|
Water and Sewer – 15.3% (10.9% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
955
|
Goodyear, Arizona, Water and Sewer Revenue Obligations, Series 2010, 5.625%, 7/01/39
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
975,915
|
|
|
405
|
Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
416,150
|
|
|
2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Wastewater System Revenue
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,002,820
|
|
|
Refunding Bonds, Series 2001, 5.125%, 7/01/21 – FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Water System Revenue Bonds, Series
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
2,070,459
|
|
|
2002, 5.000%, 7/01/18 – FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
750
|
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewerage Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2008A,
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
752,843
|
|
|
6.000%, 7/01/38
|
Nuveen Investments 33
|
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (continued)
|
|
|
NXE
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Water and Sewer (continued)
|
|||||
|
Surprise Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
|
|||||
|
$ 425
|
4.700%, 4/01/22
|
4/14 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
$ 428,698
|
|
|
490
|
4.900%, 4/01/32
|
4/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
454,475
|
|
|
615
|
Yuma County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Exempt Revenue Bonds, Far West Water &
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
549,767
|
|
|
Sewer Inc. Refunding, Series 2007A, 6.375%, 12/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
6,640
|
Total Water and Sewer
|
6,651,127
|
|||
|
$ 61,094
|
Total Investments (cost $60,309,923) – 140.6%
|
61,122,292
|
|||
|
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (47.9)% (7)
|
(20,846,000)
|
||||
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 7.3%
|
3,198,173
|
||||
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100%
|
$ 43,474,465
|
|
(1)
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Investment valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by, or at the discretion of, the Board of Trustees. For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in inverse floating rate transactions.
|
|
|
(7)
|
MuniFund Term Preferred shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 34.1%.
|
|
|
N/R
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
(IF)
|
Inverse floating rate investment.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
34 Nuveen Investments
|
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund
|
|||||
|
NTX
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
||||
|
August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|||||
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Consumer Staples – 1.5% (1.0% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
$ 2,235
|
Puerto Rico, The Children’s Trust Fund, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds,
|
5/12 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
$ 2,084,450
|
|
|
Series 2002, 5.375%, 5/15/33
|
|||||
|
Education and Civic Organizations – 10.0% (6.7% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Hale Center Education Facilities Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Wayland Baptist University
|
3/21 at 100.00
|
A–
|
973,050
|
|
|
Project, Improvement and Refunding Series 2010, 5.000%, 3/01/35
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
Laredo Community College District, Wells County, Texas, Combined Fee Revenue Bonds, Series
|
8/20 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
2,088,920
|
|
|
2010, 5.250%, 8/01/35 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
Red River Education Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Hockaday School, Series 2005:
|
|||||
|
1,170
|
5.000%, 5/15/27
|
5/15 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,210,061
|
|
|
1,230
|
5.000%, 5/15/28
|
5/15 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,268,265
|
|
|
1,290
|
5.000%, 5/15/29
|
5/15 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,325,217
|
|
|
Texas Public Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Texas Southern University Financing System,
|
|||||
|
Series 2003:
|
|||||
|
1,710
|
5.000%, 5/01/18 – FGIC Insured
|
5/13 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
1,715,301
|
|
|
1,795
|
5.000%, 5/01/19 – FGIC Insured
|
5/13 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
1,796,005
|
|
|
1,885
|
5.000%, 5/01/20 – FGIC Insured
|
5/13 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
1,862,700
|
|
|
1,665
|
Texas State University System, Financing Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 3/15/24 –
|
9/14 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,808,623
|
|
|
AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
70
|
Texas State University System, Financing Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%,
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
71,536
|
|
|
3/15/20 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
13,815
|
Total Education and Civic Organizations
|
14,119,678
|
|||
|
Energy – 2.0% (1.3% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
3,000
|
Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority, Texas, Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Valero Energy
|
10/11 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
2,838,750
|
|
|
Corporation Project, Series 1998, 5.600%, 4/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
Health Care – 14.0% (9.4% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
Brazoria County Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Brazosport
|
|||||
|
Memorial Hospital, Series 2004:
|
|||||
|
1,745
|
5.250%, 7/01/20 – RAAI Insured
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,730,290
|
|
|
1,835
|
5.250%, 7/01/21 – RAAI Insured
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,788,152
|
|
|
1,350
|
Harrison County Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds,
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,247,549
|
|
|
Good Shepherd Health System, Refunding Series 2010, 5.250%, 7/01/28
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
North Central Texas Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds,
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
2,102,760
|
|
|
Children’s Medical Center Dallas Project, Series 2009, 5.750%, 8/15/39
|
|||||
|
Richardson Hospital Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Richardson Regional Medical Center,
|
|||||
|
Series 2004:
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
5.875%, 12/01/24
|
12/13 at 100.00
|
A
|
2,041,880
|
|
|
1,000
|
6.000%, 12/01/34
|
12/13 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,008,870
|
|
|
2,500
|
Tarrant County Cultural & Educational Facilities Financing Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds,
|
11/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,453,300
|
|
|
Texas Health Resources, Series 2007B, 5.000%, 11/15/42
|
|||||
|
1,250
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue
|
8/20 at 100.00
|
A1
|
1,250,850
|
|
|
Bonds, Scott & White HealthCare Project, Series 2010, 5.250%, 8/15/40
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Refunding
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
2,151,000
|
|
|
Bonds, Christus Health, Series 2008, 6.500%, 7/01/37 – AGC Insured
|
|||||
|
1,720
|
Tyler Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, East Texas
|
11/17 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
1,472,234
|
|
|
Medical Center Regional Healthcare System, Series 2007A, 5.375%, 11/01/37
|
|||||
|
700
|
Tyler Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mother Frances
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
610,260
|
|
|
Hospital Regional Healthcare Center, Series 2007B, 5.000%, 7/01/37
|
|||||
|
2,250
|
Tyler Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mother Frances
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
2,020,838
|
|
|
Hospital Regional Healthcare Center, Series 2007, 5.000%, 7/01/33
|
|||||
|
20,350
|
Total Health Care
|
19,877,983
|
Nuveen Investments 35
|
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (continued)
|
|
|
NTX
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Housing/Multifamily – 1.7% (1.2% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
Bexar County Housing Finance Corporation, Texas, Insured Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds,
|
|||||
|
Waters at Northern Hills Apartments Project, Series 2001A:
|
|||||
|
$ 2,000
|
6.000%, 8/01/31 – NPFG Insured
|
2/12 at 102.00
|
Baa1
|
$ 1,780,840
|
|
|
750
|
6.050%, 8/01/36 – NPFG Insured
|
2/12 at 102.00
|
Baa1
|
655,388
|
|
|
2,750
|
Total Housing/Multifamily
|
2,436,228
|
|||
|
Housing/Single Family – 2.6% (1.7% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,247
|
El Paso Housing Finance Corporation, Texas, GNMA Collateralized Single Family Mortgage Revenue
|
10/11 at 106.75
|
AA+
|
1,313,471
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2001A-3, 6.180%, 4/01/33
|
|||||
|
2,325
|
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, Single Family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2002B,
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
2,331,371
|
|
|
5.550%, 9/01/33 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
3,572
|
Total Housing/Single Family
|
3,644,842
|
|||
|
Long-Term Care – 1.1% (0.7% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
Bexar County, Texas, Health Facilities Development Corporation Revenue Bonds, Army Retirement
|
|||||
|
Residence, Series 2007:
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
5.000%, 7/01/27
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
959,770
|
|
|
600
|
5.000%, 7/01/37
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
536,088
|
|
|
1,600
|
Total Long-Term Care
|
1,495,858
|
|||
|
Materials – 2.1% (1.4% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
3,000
|
Cass County Industrial Development Corporation, Texas, Environmental Improvement Revenue
|
9/11 at 100.50
|
BBB
|
3,021,210
|
|
|
Bonds, International Paper Company, Series 2000A, 6.600%, 3/15/24 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
Tax Obligation/General – 42.4% (28.5% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,260
|
Bexar County, Texas, Combined Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2004,
|
6/14 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
1,367,755
|
|
|
5.000%, 6/15/19
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
Borger Independent School District, Hutchison County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
2/16 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
2,078,780
|
|
|
2006, 5.000%, 2/15/36
|
|||||
|
400
|
Calallen Independent School District, Nueces County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, School
|
2/18 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
416,432
|
|
|
Building Series 2008, 5.000%, 2/15/38
|
|||||
|
1,190
|
Canutillo Independent School District, El Paso County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
8/15 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,329,290
|
|
|
2006A, 5.000%, 8/15/22
|
|||||
|
325
|
Copperas Cove, Texas, Certificates of Obligation, Series 2003, 5.000%, 8/15/23 – NPFG Insured
|
8/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
335,949
|
|
|
2,305
|
Corpus Christi, Texas, Combination Tax and Municipal Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenue Certificates
|
9/12 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
2,396,716
|
|
|
of Obligation, Series 2002, 5.500%, 9/01/21 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
1,750
|
El Paso County, Texas, Certificates of Obligation, Series 2001, 5.000%, 2/15/21 – AGM Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA+
|
2,090,988
|
|
|
Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District 25, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005:
|
|||||
|
1,330
|
5.000%, 10/01/26 – FGIC Insured
|
10/12 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,340,401
|
|
|
1,320
|
5.000%, 10/01/27 – FGIC Insured
|
10/12 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,328,659
|
|
|
3,615
|
Frisco, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 2/15/26 – FGIC Insured
|
2/16 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
3,871,520
|
|
|
8,500
|
Grand Prairie Independent School District, Dallas County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds,
|
8/18 at 22.64
|
AA
|
1,344,700
|
|
|
Capital Appreciation Refunding Series 2009, 0.000%, 8/15/39
|
|||||
|
Houston Community College System, Texas, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003:
|
|||||
|
2,500
|
5.000%, 2/15/20 – AMBAC Insured
|
2/13 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
2,631,250
|
|
|
2,235
|
5.000%, 2/15/21 – AMBAC Insured
|
2/13 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
2,349,678
|
|
|
5,000
|
Houston, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005E, 5.000%, 3/01/23 – AMBAC Insured
|
3/15 at 100.00
|
AA
|
5,371,900
|
|
|
100
|
Judson Independent School District, Bexar County, Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds,
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
100,375
|
|
|
Series 2002, 5.250%, 2/01/21
|
|||||
|
4,900
|
Leander Independent School District, Williamson and Travis Counties, Texas, General Obligation
|
8/14 at 17.78
|
AAA
|
745,094
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2006, 0.000%, 8/15/45
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Leander Independent School District, Williamson and Travis Counties, Texas, General Obligation
|
8/17 at 33.01
|
AAA
|
244,250
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2008, 0.000%, 8/15/36
|
36 Nuveen Investments
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/General (continued)
|
|||||
|
$ 365
|
Lone Star College System, Harris and Montgomery Counties, Texas, General Obligation Bonds,
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
$ 396,518
|
|
|
Series 2009, 5.000%, 8/15/34
|
|||||
|
1,750
|
Martin County Hospital District, Texas, Combination Limited Tax and Revenue Bonds, Series
|
4/21 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,815,870
|
|
|
2011A, 7.250%, 4/01/36
|
|||||
|
1,010
|
Mercedes Independent School District, Hidalgo County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
8/15 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,128,221
|
|
|
2005, 5.000%, 8/15/23
|
|||||
|
5,515
|
Midlothian Independent School District, Ellis County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
2/15 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
5,693,962
|
|
|
2005, 5.000%, 2/15/34
|
|||||
|
1,500
|
Montgomery County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2008B, 5.250%, 3/01/32
|
3/19 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,646,430
|
|
|
2,000
|
Plano Independent School District, Collin County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
2/18 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
2,150,980
|
|
|
2008A, 5.250%, 2/15/34
|
|||||
|
1,425
|
Port of Houston Authority, Harris County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010E,
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
433,799
|
|
|
0.000%, 10/01/35
|
|||||
|
Roma Independent School District, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005:
|
|||||
|
1,110
|
5.000%, 8/15/22
|
8/15 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,239,926
|
|
|
1,165
|
5.000%, 8/15/23 – AGM Insured
|
8/15 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,301,363
|
|
|
1,250
|
Southside Independent School District, Bexar County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
1,367,075
|
|
|
2004A, 5.000%, 8/15/22
|
|||||
|
1,140
|
Sunnyvale School District, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 5.250%, 2/15/25
|
2/14 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,235,623
|
|
|
5,000
|
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Transportation Commission Mobility Fund, Series 2006A,
|
4/17 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
5,269,550
|
|
|
5.000%, 4/01/33 (UB)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Transportation Commission Mobility Fund, Series 2008,
|
4/18 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
1,076,830
|
|
|
5.000%, 4/01/30 (UB)
|
|||||
|
1,110
|
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Water Utility, Series 2001, 5.250%, 8/01/23
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
1,114,029
|
|
|
3,025
|
Victoria Independent School District, Victoria County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
2/17 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
3,207,650
|
|
|
2007, 5.000%, 2/15/32
|
|||||
|
West Texas Independent School District, McLennan and Hill Counties, General Obligation
|
|||||
|
Refunding Bonds, Series 1998:
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
0.000%, 8/15/22
|
8/13 at 61.20
|
AAA
|
571,530
|
|
|
1,000
|
0.000%, 8/15/24
|
8/13 at 54.88
|
AAA
|
508,810
|
|
|
White Settlement Independent School District, Tarrant County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds,
|
|||||
|
Series 2006:
|
|||||
|
1,500
|
0.000%, 8/15/43
|
8/15 at 23.12
|
AAA
|
283,035
|
|
|
1,500
|
0.000%, 8/15/44
|
8/15 at 21.88
|
AAA
|
267,660
|
|
|
425
|
0.000%, 8/15/45
|
8/15 at 20.76
|
AAA
|
71,910
|
|
|
73,520
|
Total Tax Obligation/General
|
60,124,508
|
|||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited – 11.3% (7.6% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Bexar County, Texas, Venue Project Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2010, 5.250%, 8/15/38 –
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,033,380
|
|
|
AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
7,940
|
Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Refunding Series 2007,
|
12/16 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
8,226,555
|
|
|
5.000%, 12/01/36 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Junior Lien Series 2001H:
|
|||||
|
1,720
|
0.000%, 11/15/34 – NPFG Insured
|
11/31 at 83.17
|
Baa1
|
301,258
|
|
|
930
|
0.000%, 11/15/36 – NPFG Insured
|
11/31 at 73.51
|
Baa1
|
139,500
|
|
|
3,265
|
0.000%, 11/15/38 – NPFG Insured
|
11/31 at 64.91
|
Baa1
|
421,316
|
|
|
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2001G:
|
|||||
|
2,250
|
5.250%, 11/15/22 – NPFG Insured
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
2,087,528
|
|
|
2,475
|
0.000%, 11/15/41 – NPFG Insured
|
11/31 at 53.78
|
Baa1
|
287,966
|
|
|
1,470
|
Houston, Texas, Hotel Occupancy Tax and Special Revenue Bonds, Convention and Entertainment
|
No Opt. Call
|
A2
|
402,030
|
|
|
Project, Series 2001B, 0.000%, 9/01/32 – AMBAC Insured
|
Nuveen Investments 37
|
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (continued)
|
|
|
NTX
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued)
|
|||||
|
$ 2,000
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Special Projects System Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A,
|
9/21 at 100.00
|
AA
|
$ 2,155,460
|
|
|
5.500%, 9/01/41
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Uptown Development Authority, Houston, Texas, Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Infrastructure
|
9/19 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,022,060
|
|
|
Improvement Facilities, Series 2009, 5.500%, 9/01/29
|
|||||
|
24,050
|
Total Tax Obligation/Limited
|
16,077,053
|
|||
|
Transportation – 12.1% (8.1% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Austin, Texas, Airport System Prior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.250%, 11/15/16 –
|
11/13 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,080,690
|
|
|
NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2010:
|
|||||
|
2,945
|
0.000%, 1/01/36
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB–
|
588,264
|
|
|
2,205
|
0.000%, 1/01/37
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB–
|
409,226
|
|
|
2,000
|
0.000%, 1/01/38
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB–
|
346,420
|
|
|
3,260
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Travis and Williamson Counties, Toll Road Revenue
|
1/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
3,257,164
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 1/01/22 – FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
2,600
|
Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport Facility Improvement Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds,
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
CCC+
|
1,929,668
|
|
|
American Airlines Inc., Series 1999, 6.375%, 5/01/35 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport, Texas, Joint Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2010A,
|
11/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,013,510
|
|
|
5.000%, 11/01/42
|
|||||
|
500
|
Houston, Texas, Subordinate Lien Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A, 5.625%, 7/01/30 –
|
1/12 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
500,250
|
|
|
AGM Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
3,000
|
Love Field Airport Modernization Corporation, Texas, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds,
|
11/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
2,829,180
|
|
|
Southwest Airlines Company, Series 2010, 5.250%, 11/01/40
|
|||||
|
395
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, First Tier System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008A,
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
A2
|
405,385
|
|
|
5.750%, 1/01/40
|
|||||
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, First Tier System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008B:
|
|||||
|
325
|
5.750%, 1/01/40
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
A2
|
333,544
|
|
|
225
|
5.750%, 1/01/40 – NPFG Insured
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
A2
|
230,915
|
|
|
2,500
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, First Tier System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008D,
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA+
|
571,200
|
|
|
0.000%, 1/01/36 – AGC Insured
|
|||||
|
950
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Second Tier System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008F,
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
A3
|
950,162
|
|
|
5.750%, 1/01/38
|
|||||
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, System Revenue Bonds, First Tier Series 2009A:
|
|||||
|
100
|
6.100%, 1/01/28
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
A2
|
109,013
|
|
|
2,000
|
6.250%, 1/01/39
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
A2
|
2,139,720
|
|
|
1,250
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, Central Texas Turnpike System Revenue Bonds, First Tier Series
|
8/12 at 37.09
|
BBB+
|
422,738
|
|
|
2002A, 0.000%, 8/15/29 – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
26,255
|
Total Transportation
|
17,117,049
|
|||
|
U.S. Guaranteed – 16.2% (10.9% of Total Investments) (4)
|
|||||
|
295
|
Coppell Independent School District, Dallas County, Texas, Unlimited Tax School Building and
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
288,843
|
|
|
Refunding Bonds, Series 1992, 0.000%, 8/15/14 – NPFG Insured (ETM)
|
|||||
|
950
|
Copperas Cove, Texas, Certificates of Obligation, Series 2003, 5.000%, 8/15/23 (Pre-refunded
|
8/12 at 100.00
|
BBB (4)
|
993,368
|
|
|
8/15/12) – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
2,595
|
Denton County, Texas, Permanent Improvement General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%,
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
2,700,253
|
|
|
7/15/25 (Pre-refunded 7/15/12)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Mansfield Independent School District, Tarrant County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series
|
2/14 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,105,540
|
|
|
2004, 5.000%, 2/15/20 (Pre-refunded 2/15/14)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
North Central Texas Health Facilities Development Corporation, Hospital Revenue Bonds,
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aaa
|
1,247,320
|
|
|
Presbyterian Healthcare System, Series 1996B, 5.750%, 6/01/26 – NPFG Insured (ETM)
|
|||||
|
2,500
|
Retama Development Corporation, Texas, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Retama Park
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
3,597,925
|
|
|
Racetrack, Series 1993, 8.750%, 12/15/18 (Pre-refunded 12/15/17)
|
38 Nuveen Investments
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. Guaranteed (4) (continued)
|
|||||
|
$ 1,750
|
San Antonio, Texas, Electric and Gas System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%,
|
2/12 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
$ 1,787,433
|
|
|
2/01/20 (Pre-refunded 2/01/12)
|
|||||
|
1,440
|
South Texas Community College District, Hidalgo and Starr Counties, Texas, General Obligation
|
8/12 at 100.00
|
Aa2 (4)
|
1,510,747
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2002, 5.500%, 8/15/17 (Pre-refunded 8/15/12) – AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
1,930
|
Texas State University System, Financing Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 3/15/20
|
3/12 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
1,977,690
|
|
|
(Pre-refunded 3/15/12) – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
1,500
|
Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Public Finance Authority, Series 2002, 5.000%,
|
10/12 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
1,577,790
|
|
|
10/01/18 (Pre-refunded 10/01/12)
|
|||||
|
1,000
|
Tyler Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mother Frances
|
7/12 at 100.00
|
Baa1 (4)
|
1,047,530
|
|
|
Hospital Regional Healthcare Center, Series 2001, 6.000%, 7/01/31 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12)
|
|||||
|
5,000
|
University of North Texas, Financing System Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, 5.000%, 4/15/24
|
4/12 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
5,151,000
|
|
|
(Pre-refunded 4/15/12) – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
20,960
|
Total U.S. Guaranteed
|
22,985,439
|
|||
|
Utilities – 16.5% (11.1% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
2,560
|
Brazos River Authority, Texas, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, TXU Electric
|
4/13 at 101.00
|
Ca
|
769,920
|
|
|
Company, Series 1999C, 7.700%, 3/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
2,400
|
Brazos River Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Reliant Energy Inc., Series 1999A,
|
10/11 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
2,402,304
|
|
|
5.375%, 4/01/19
|
|||||
|
5,000
|
Brownsville, Texas, Utility System Priority Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/27 –
|
9/15 at 100.00
|
A+
|
5,159,800
|
|
|
AMBAC Insured
|
|||||
|
2,000
|
Bryan, Brazos County, Texas, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2009, 5.000%, 7/01/34
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
A+
|
2,055,340
|
|
|
3,000
|
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 5/15/40
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
A1
|
3,058,110
|
|
|
2,000
|
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Series 2008, 5.750%, 5/15/37
|
5/15 at 100.00
|
A1
|
2,077,040
|
|
|
1,000
|
Matagorda County Navigation District 1, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Reliant Energy Inc., Series
|
11/11 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
999,990
|
|
|
1999B, 5.950%, 5/01/30 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
|||||
|
1,500
|
Matagorda County Navigation District Number One, Texas, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding
|
7/19 at 102.00
|
BBB
|
1,612,485
|
|
|
Bonds, Central Power and Light Company Project, Series 2009A, 6.300%, 11/01/29
|
|||||
|
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corporation I, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Senior
|
|||||
|
Lien Series 2008D:
|
|||||
|
1,500
|
5.625%, 12/15/17
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
1,597,530
|
|
|
2,000
|
6.250%, 12/15/26
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
2,042,300
|
|
|
Texas Municipal Power Agency, Revenue Bonds, Transmission Refunding Series 2010:
|
|||||
|
640
|
5.000%, 9/01/34
|
9/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
663,706
|
|
|
1,000
|
5.000%, 9/01/40
|
9/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,028,840
|
|
|
24,600
|
Total Utilities
|
23,467,365
|
|||
|
Water and Sewer – 15.5% (10.4% of Total Investments)
|
|||||
|
2,500
|
Bexar Metropolitan Water District, Texas, Waterworks System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
A1
|
2,651,225
|
|
|
2010, 5.875%, 5/01/40
|
|||||
|
Coastal Water Authority, Texas, Contract Revenue Bonds, Houston Water Projects, Series 2004:
|
|||||
|
1,005
|
5.000%, 12/15/20 – FGIC Insured
|
12/14 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,058,265
|
|
|
1,030
|
5.000%, 12/15/21 – FGIC Insured
|
12/14 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,078,698
|
|
|
1,000
|
El Paso, Texas, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2008C, 5.375%, 3/01/29
|
3/18 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,085,460
|
|
|
3,000
|
Houston, Texas, First Lien Combined Utility System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.250%,
|
5/14 at 100.00
|
AA
|
3,269,970
|
|
|
5/15/23 – FGIC Insured
|
|||||
|
3,500
|
Houston, Texas, Junior Lien Water and Sewerage System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2001A,
|
12/11 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
3,542,839
|
|
|
5.500%, 12/01/17 – AGM Insured
|
|||||
|
Irving, Texas, Subordinate Lien Waterworks and Sewerage Revenue Bonds, Series 2004:
|
|||||
|
1,680
|
5.000%, 8/15/22 – AMBAC Insured
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
1,829,233
|
|
|
1,760
|
5.000%, 8/15/23 – AMBAC Insured
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
1,916,340
|
Nuveen Investments 39
|
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (continued)
|
|
|
NTX
|
Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
|
|
Water and Sewer (continued)
|
|||||
|
$ 4,000
|
Laredo, Webb County, Texas, Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2010,
|
3/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
$ 4,185,519
|
|
|
5.250%, 3/01/40
|
|||||
|
1,260
|
Rowlett, Rockwall and Dallas Counties, Texas, Waterworks and Sewerage System Revenue Bonds,
|
3/14 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,318,400
|
|
|
Series 2004A, 5.000%, 3/01/22 – NPFG Insured
|
|||||
|
20,735
|
Total Water and Sewer
|
21,935,949
|
|||
|
$ 240,442
|
Total Investments (cost $205,862,861) – 149.0%
|
211,226,362
|
|||
|
Floating Rate Obligations – (2.8)%
|
(3,960,000)
|
||||
|
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (50.0)% (5)
|
(70,920,000)
|
||||
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 3.8%
|
5,419,074
|
||||
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100%
|
$ 141,765,436
|
|
(1)
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
|
|
|
(5)
|
MuniFund Term Preferred shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 33.6%.
|
|
|
N/R
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
(ETM)
|
Escrowed to maturity.
|
|
|
(UB)
|
Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
40 Nuveen Investments
|
Statement of
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets & Liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
August 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Investments, at value (cost $83,837,864, $31,983,575,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
$52,462,074, $60,309,923 and $205,862,861, respectively)
|
$ | 87,744,251 | $ | 32,563,062 | $ | 53,458,603 | $ | 61,122,292 | $ | 211,226,362 | |||||||||
|
Cash
|
2,129,512 | 84,504 | 44,311 | — | 2,394,495 | ||||||||||||||
|
Receivables:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest
|
928,004 | 349,040 | 636,585 | 633,291 | 2,777,598 | ||||||||||||||
|
Investments sold
|
— | — | — | 2,490,493 | 115,407 | ||||||||||||||
|
Deferred offering costs
|
96,821 | 406,603 | 505,357 | 604,649 | 1,199,726 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other assets
|
12,833 | 3,965 | 11,169 | 11,162 | 30,682 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
90,911,421 | 33,407,174 | 54,656,025 | 64,861,887 | 217,744,270 | ||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash overdraft
|
— | — | — | 8,603 | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Floating rate obligations
|
— | — | — | — | 3,960,000 | ||||||||||||||
|
Payables:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common share dividends
|
264,007 | 97,726 | 159,482 | 192,619 | 611,415 | ||||||||||||||
|
Interest
|
32,756 | 18,962 | 31,988 | 50,378 | 135,930 | ||||||||||||||
|
Offering costs
|
98,359 | 175,952 | 182,521 | 223,158 | 170,448 | ||||||||||||||
|
MuniFund Term Preferred (MTP) Shares, at
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
liquidation value
|
— | 11,100,000 | 18,725,000 | 20,846,000 | 70,920,000 | ||||||||||||||
|
Variable MuniFund Term Preferred (VMTP) Shares, at
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
liquidation value
|
28,000,000 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Management fees
|
49,344 | 17,617 | 27,282 | 35,548 | 114,556 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
40,297 | 22,649 | 29,475 | 31,116 | 66,485 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
28,484,763 | 11,432,906 | 19,155,748 | 21,387,422 | 75,978,834 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net assets applicable to Common shares
|
$ | 62,426,658 | $ | 21,974,268 | $ | 35,500,277 | $ | 43,474,465 | $ | 141,765,436 | |||||||||
|
Common shares outstanding
|
4,470,695 | 1,548,312 | 2,439,551 | 3,066,030 | 9,569,068 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net asset value per Common share outstanding (net assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares, divided by Common
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
shares outstanding)
|
$ | 13.96 | $ | 14.19 | $ | 14.55 | $ | 14.18 | $ | 14.81 | |||||||||
|
Net assets applicable to Common shares consist of:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common shares, $.01 par value per share
|
$ | 44,707 | $ | 15,483 | $ | 24,396 | $ | 30,660 | $ | 95,691 | |||||||||
|
Paid-in surplus
|
61,888,522 | 21,878,468 | 34,533,508 | 43,232,739 | 135,608,172 | ||||||||||||||
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income
|
1,259,202 | 175,299 | 294,446 | 367,184 | 1,427,575 | ||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
|
(4,672,160 | ) | (674,469 | ) | (348,602 | ) | (968,487 | ) | (729,503 | ) | |||||||||
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
3,906,387 | 579,487 | 996,529 | 812,369 | 5,363,501 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net assets applicable to Common shares
|
$ | 62,426,658 | $ | 21,974,268 | $ | 35,500,277 | $ | 43,474,465 | $ | 141,765,436 | |||||||||
|
Authorized shares:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
|
200,000,000 |
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
||||||||||||||
|
Auction Rate Preferred Shares (ARPS)
|
1,000,000 |
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
||||||||||||||
|
MTP
|
— |
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
||||||||||||||
|
VMTP
|
Unlimited
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 41
|
Statement of
|
|||||
|
Operations
|
|||||
|
Six Months ended August 31, 2011
|
|||||
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Investment Income
|
$ | 2,248,132 | $ | 818,857 | $ | 1,360,721 | $ | 1,623,896 | $ | 5,370,869 | |||||||||
|
Expenses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Management fees
|
286,416 | 101,983 | 172,614 | 206,502 | 666,657 | ||||||||||||||
|
Auction fees
|
12,656 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Dividend disbursing agent fees
|
5,041 | — | — | 6,712 | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Shareholders’ servicing agent fees
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
and expenses
|
1,630 | 11,074 | 8,325 | 9,753 | 14,231 | ||||||||||||||
|
Interest expense and amortization
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
of offering costs
|
35,935 | 161,884 | 252,343 | 371,010 | 959,991 | ||||||||||||||
|
Custodian’s fees and expenses
|
10,036 | 5,628 | 8,514 | 8,287 | 22,577 | ||||||||||||||
|
Directors’/Trustees’ fees and expenses
|
1,026 | 405 | 672 | 778 | 2,630 | ||||||||||||||
|
Professional fees
|
18,780 | 19,122 | 18,703 | 7,361 | 15,128 | ||||||||||||||
|
Shareholders’ reports – printing and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
mailing expenses
|
5,221 | 4,538 | 11,188 | 5,200 | 9,547 | ||||||||||||||
|
Stock exchange listing fees
|
4,461 | 98 | 12,172 | 7,875 | 16,055 | ||||||||||||||
|
Investor relations expense
|
3,514 | 1,502 | 2,391 | 2,771 | 8,627 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other expenses
|
10,795 | 20,630 | 10,233 | 10,867 | 17,869 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total expenses before custodian fee
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
credit and expense reimbursement
|
395,511 | 326,864 | 497,155 | 637,116 | 1,733,312 | ||||||||||||||
|
Custodian fee credit
|
(424 | ) | (143 | ) | (209 | ) | (365 | ) | (670 | ) | |||||||||
|
Expense reimbursement
|
— | — | (16,009 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
|
Net expenses
|
395,087 | 326,721 | 480,937 | 636,751 | 1,732,642 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
1,853,045 | 492,136 | 879,784 | 987,145 | 3,638,227 | ||||||||||||||
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Net realized gain (loss) from investments
|
87,348 | 29,781 | 252,615 | 110,226 | 8,657 | ||||||||||||||
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(depreciation) of investments
|
2,945,968 | 1,421,729 | 1,496,822 | 2,285,007 | 7,104,666 | ||||||||||||||
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
3,033,316 | 1,451,510 | 1,749,437 | 2,395,233 | 7,113,323 | ||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to Auction Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Shareholders
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
From net investment income
|
(39,286 | ) | — | — | (5,491 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
|
Decrease in net assets applicable to
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common shares from distributions to
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Auction Rate Preferred shareholders
|
(39,286 | ) | — | — | (5,491 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
from operations
|
$ | 4,847,075 | $ | 1,943,646 | $ | 2,629,221 | $ | 3,376,887 | $ | 10,751,550 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
42 Nuveen Investments
|
Statement of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Changes in Net Assets(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Premium Income (NAZ)
|
Dividend Advantage (NFZ)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Operations
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
$ | 1,853,045 | $ | 2,184,168 | $ | 3,766,020 | $ | 492,136 | $ | 679,295 | $ | 1,318,611 | |||||||||||
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from investments
|
87,348 | 70,746 | 211,410 | 29,781 | 70,054 | 3,081 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Change in net unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
appreciation (depreciation)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
of investments
|
2,945,968 | (3,534,279 | ) | 4,067,325 | 1,421,729 | (1,397,076 | ) | 2,172,884 | |||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to Auction Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Shareholders:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From net investment income
|
(39,286 | ) | (67,929 | ) | (115,298 | ) | — | (12,050 | ) | (44,516 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
From accumulated net realized gains
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from operations
|
4,847,075 | (1,347,294 | ) | 7,929,457 | 1,943,646 | (659,777 | ) | 3,450,060 | |||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to Common Shareholders
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From net investment income
|
(1,676,511 | ) | (1,955,790 | ) | (3,146,573 | ) | (599,196 | ) | (699,030 | ) | (1,070,455 | ) | |||||||||||
|
From accumulated net realized gains
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Decrease in net assets applicable to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common shares from distributions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
to Common shareholders
|
(1,676,511 | ) | (1,955,790 | ) | (3,146,573 | ) | (599,196 | ) | (699,030 | ) | (1,070,455 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Capital Share Transactions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net proceeds from Common shares
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
issued to shareholders due to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
reinvestment of distributions
|
— | 10,632 | 10,931 | — | 4,230 | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from capital share transactions
|
— | 10,632 | 10,931 | — | 4,230 | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
3,170,564 | (3,292,452 | ) | 4,793,815 | 1,344,450 | (1,354,577 | ) | 2,379,605 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net assets applicable to Common
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
shares at the beginning of period
|
59,256,094 | 62,548,546 | 57,754,731 | 20,629,818 | 21,984,395 | 19,604,790 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net assets applicable to Common
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
shares at the end of period
|
$ | 62,426,658 | $ | 59,256,094 | $ | 62,548,546 | $ | 21,974,268 | $ | 20,629,818 | $ | 21,984,395 | |||||||||||
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
net investment income
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
at the end of period
|
$ | 1,259,202 | $ | 1,121,954 | $ | 961,516 | $ | 175,299 | $ | 282,359 | $ | 278,947 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 43
|
Statement of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Changes in Net Assets (Unaudited) (continued)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR) | Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Operations
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
$ | 879,784 | $ | 1,087,152 | $ | 2,199,716 | $ | 987,145 | $ | 1,453,852 | $ | 2,646,131 | |||||||||||
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from investments
|
252,615 | 55,036 | 15,295 | 110,226 | 190,001 | 103,076 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Change in net unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
appreciation (depreciation)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
of investments
|
1,496,822 | (1,860,579 | ) | 2,615,288 | 2,285,007 | (2,270,250 | ) | 3,715,857 | |||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to Auction Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Shareholders:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From net investment income
|
— | (18,967 | ) | (69,894 | ) | (5,491 | ) | (45,179 | ) | (76,983 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
From accumulated net realized gains
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from operations
|
2,629,221 | (737,358 | ) | 4,760,405 | 3,376,887 | (671,576 | ) | 6,388,081 | |||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to Common Shareholders
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From net investment income
|
(980,699 | ) | (1,144,149 | ) | (1,856,497 | ) | (1,158,959 | ) | (1,352,119 | ) | (2,236,669 | ) | |||||||||||
|
From accumulated net realized gains
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Decrease in net assets applicable to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common shares from distributions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
to Common shareholders
|
(980,699 | ) | (1,144,149 | ) | (1,856,497 | ) | (1,158,959 | ) | (1,352,119 | ) | (2,236,669 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Capital Share Transactions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net proceeds from Common shares
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
issued to shareholders due to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
reinvestment of distributions
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from capital share transactions
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
1,648,522 | (1,881,507 | ) | 2,903,908 | 2,217,928 | (2,023,695 | ) | 4,151,412 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net assets applicable to Common
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
shares at the beginning of period
|
33,851,755 | 35,733,262 | 32,829,354 | 41,256,537 | 43,280,232 | 39,128,820 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net assets applicable to Common
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
shares at the end of period
|
$ | 35,500,277 | $ | 33,851,755 | $ | 35,733,262 | $ | 43,474,465 | $ | 41,256,537 | $ | 43,280,232 | |||||||||||
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
net investment income
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
at the end of period
|
$ | 294,446 | $ | 395,361 | $ | 427,638 | $ | 367,184 | $ | 544,489 | $ | 487,582 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
44 Nuveen Investments
|
Texas
|
|||||||||||
| Quality Income (NTX) | |||||||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year
|
|||||||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
|||||||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
|||||||||
|
Operations
|
|||||||||||
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
$ | 3,638,227 | $ | 4,618,090 | $ | 8,942,581 | |||||
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|||||||||||
|
from investments
|
8,657 | 213,495 | 197,927 | ||||||||
|
Change in net unrealized
|
|||||||||||
|
appreciation (depreciation)
|
|||||||||||
|
of investments
|
7,104,666 | (8,455,145 | ) | 10,122,568 | |||||||
|
Distributions to Auction Rate
|
|||||||||||
|
Preferred Shareholders:
|
|||||||||||
|
From net investment income
|
— | (85,730 | ) | (257,907 | ) | ||||||
|
From accumulated net realized gains
|
— | — | (19,921 | ) | |||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
|||||||||||
|
from operations
|
10,751,550 | (3,709,290 | ) | 18,985,248 | |||||||
|
Distributions to Common Shareholders
|
|||||||||||
|
From net investment income
|
(4,101,871 | ) | (4,775,546 | ) | (7,745,753 | ) | |||||
|
From accumulated net realized gains
|
— | (63,947 | ) | (114,136 | ) | ||||||
|
Decrease in net assets applicable to
|
|||||||||||
|
Common shares from distributions
|
|||||||||||
|
to Common shareholders
|
(4,101,871 | ) | (4,839,493 | ) | (7,859,889 | ) | |||||
|
Capital Share Transactions
|
|||||||||||
|
Net proceeds from Common shares
|
|||||||||||
|
issued to shareholders due to
|
|||||||||||
|
reinvestment of distributions
|
265,849 | 318,797 | 441,175 | ||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
|||||||||||
|
from capital share transactions
|
265,849 | 318,797 | 441,175 | ||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|||||||||||
|
applicable to Common shares
|
6,915,528 | (8,229,986 | ) | 11,566,534 | |||||||
|
Net assets applicable to Common
|
|||||||||||
|
shares at the beginning of period
|
134,849,908 | 143,079,894 | 131,513,360 | ||||||||
|
Net assets applicable to Common
|
|||||||||||
|
shares at the end of period
|
$ | 141,765,436 | $ | 134,849,908 | $ | 143,079,894 | |||||
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of)
|
|||||||||||
|
net investment income
|
|||||||||||
|
at the end of period
|
$ | 1,427,575 | $ | 1,891,219 | $ | 2,042,050 | |||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 45
|
Statement of
|
|||
|
Cash Flows
|
|||
|
Six Months ended August 31, 2011
|
|||
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
|||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
|||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
|||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
|||||||||
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net Increase (Decrease) In Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
|
|||||||||||
|
from Operations
|
$ | 4,847,075 | $ | 1,943,646 | $ | 2,629,221 | |||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile the net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable
|
|||||||||||
|
to Common shares from operations to net cash provided by (used in)
|
|||||||||||
|
operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Purchases of investments
|
(3,368,523 | ) | (1,406,867 | ) | (5,899,537 | ) | |||||
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
|
4,260,582 | 1,180,025 | 5,940,108 | ||||||||
|
Amortization (Accretion) of premiums and discounts, net
|
37,371 | 35,456 | 22,928 | ||||||||
|
(Increase) Decrease in:
|
|||||||||||
|
Receivable for interest
|
(25,831 | ) | (9,267 | ) | (43,204 | ) | |||||
|
Receivable for investments sold
|
30,000 | — | 2,520,336 | ||||||||
|
Other assets
|
(2,625 | ) | 173 | (4,800 | ) | ||||||
|
Increase (Decrease) in:
|
|||||||||||
|
Payable for Auction Rate Preferred Share dividends
|
(966 | ) | — | — | |||||||
|
Payable for interest
|
32,756 | — | — | ||||||||
|
Payable for investments purchased
|
— | — | (3,027,216 | ) | |||||||
|
Accrued management fees
|
6,588 | 2,447 | 5,480 | ||||||||
|
Accrued other expenses
|
4,203 | 11,591 | 12,040 | ||||||||
|
Net realized (gain) loss from investments
|
(87,348 | ) | (29,781 | ) | (252,615 | ) | |||||
|
Change in net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation of investments
|
(2,945,968 | ) | (1,421,729 | ) | (1,496,822 | ) | |||||
|
Taxes paid on undistributed capital gains
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
2,787,314 | 305,694 | 405,919 | ||||||||
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
(Increase) Decrease in:
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
Deferred offering costs
|
(96,821 | ) | 48,111 | 60,415 | |||||||
|
Increase (Decrease) in:
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash overdraft balance
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
Payable for offering costs
|
98,359 | (2,081 | ) | (27,703 | ) | ||||||
|
ARPS noticed for redemption, at liquidation value
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
MTP Shares, at liquidation value
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
VMTP Shares, at liquidation value
|
28,000,000 | — | — | ||||||||
|
ARPS, at liquidation value
|
(27,875,000 | ) | — | — | |||||||
|
Cash distributions paid to Common shareholders
|
(1,674,565 | ) | (598,560 | ) | (980,527 | ) | |||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(1,548,027 | ) | (552,530 | ) | (947,815 | ) | |||||
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
1,239,287 | (246,836 | ) | (541,896 | ) | ||||||
|
Cash at the beginning of period
|
890,225 | 331,340 | 586,207 | ||||||||
|
Cash at the End of Period
|
$ | 2,129,512 | $ | 84,504 | $ | 44,311 | |||||
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
|||||||||||
|
Non-cash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestments of Common share distributions as follows:
|
|||||||||||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
|||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
|||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
|||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
|||||||||
| $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
|
Cash paid for interest (excluding amortization of offering costs) was as follows:
|
|||||||||||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
|||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
|||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
|||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
|||||||||
| $ | — | $ | 113,773 | $ | 191,928 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
46 Nuveen Investments
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
||||||
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
||||||
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
||||||
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
||||||
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|||||||
|
Net Increase (Decrease) In Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
|
|||||||
|
from Operations
|
$ | 3,376,887 | $ | 10,751,550 | |||
|
Adjustments to reconcile the net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable
|
|||||||
|
to Common shares from operations to net cash provided by (used in)
|
|||||||
|
operating activities:
|
|||||||
|
Purchases of investments
|
(5,275,313 | ) | (4,579,425 | ) | |||
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
|
5,315,701 | 5,480,841 | |||||
|
Amortization (Accretion) of premiums and discounts, net
|
36,964 | (35,191 | ) | ||||
|
(Increase) Decrease in:
|
|||||||
|
Receivable for interest
|
3,065 | (102,348 | ) | ||||
|
Receivable for investments sold
|
(2,490,493 | ) | 2,307,144 | ||||
|
Other assets
|
9,293 | (7,555 | ) | ||||
|
Increase (Decrease) in:
|
|||||||
|
Payable for Auction Rate Preferred Share dividends
|
(1,682 | ) | — | ||||
|
Payable for interest
|
48,844 | — | |||||
|
Payable for investments purchased
|
— | (1,725,080 | ) | ||||
|
Accrued management fees
|
5,876 | 14,840 | |||||
|
Accrued other expenses
|
(2,637 | ) | 9,008 | ||||
|
Net realized (gain) loss from investments
|
(110,226 | ) | (8,657 | ) | |||
|
Change in net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation of investments
|
(2,285,007 | ) | (7,104,666 | ) | |||
|
Taxes paid on undistributed capital gains
|
— | (19,001 | ) | ||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(1,368,728 | ) | 4,981,460 | ||||
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|||||||
|
(Increase) Decrease in:
|
|||||||
|
Cash equivalents
|
18,409,700 | — | |||||
|
Deferred offering costs
|
40,775 | 135,990 | |||||
|
Increase (Decrease) in:
|
|||||||
|
Cash overdraft balance
|
8,603 | — | |||||
|
Payable for offering costs
|
(136,842 | ) | (33,007 | ) | |||
|
ARPS noticed for redemption, at liquidation value
|
(18,400,000 | ) | — | ||||
|
MTP Shares, at liquidation value
|
1,800,000 | — | |||||
|
VMTP Shares, at liquidation value
|
— | — | |||||
|
ARPS, at liquidation value
|
— | — | |||||
|
Cash distributions paid to Common shareholders
|
(1,158,376 | ) | (3,832,252 | ) | |||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
563,860 | (3,729,269 | ) | ||||
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
(804,868 | ) | 1,252,191 | ||||
|
Cash at the beginning of period
|
804,868 | 1,142,304 | |||||
|
Cash at the End of Period
|
$ | — | $ | 2,394,495 | |||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Non-cash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestments of Common share distributions as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
||||||
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
||||||
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
||||||
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
||||||
| $ | — | $ | 265,849 | ||||
|
Cash paid for interest (excluding amortization of offering costs) was as follows:
|
|||||||
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
||||||
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
||||||
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
||||||
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
||||||
| $ | 255,624 | $ | 824,000 | ||||
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
||
Nuveen Investments 47
|
Financial
|
||||||||||||
|
Highlights(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||
|
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
|
||||||||||||
| Investment Operations | Less Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions
|
Distributions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from Net
|
from
|
Discount
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment
|
Capital
|
Net
|
from
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income to
|
Gains to
|
Investment
|
Capital
|
Common
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Beginning
|
|
Net
|
Auction
|
Auction
|
Income
|
Gains
|
Shares
|
Common
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
|
Net
|
Realized/
|
Rate | Rate | to | to |
Repur-
|
Share
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Share
|
Investment
|
Unrealized
|
Preferred
|
Preferred
|
Common
|
Common
|
chased
|
Net |
Ending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Asset
|
Income
|
Gain |
Share-
|
Share-
|
Share-
|
Share-
|
and
|
Asset
|
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Value
|
(Loss)
|
(Loss)
|
holders(a)
|
holders(a) |
Total
|
holders
|
holders
|
Total |
Retired
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
$ | 13.25 | $ | .41 | $ | .69 | $ | (.01 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1.09 | $ | (.38 | ) | $ | — | $ | (.38 | ) | $ | — | $ | 13.96 | $ | 12.98 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
13.99 | .49 | (.77 | ) | (.02 | ) | — | (.30 | ) | (.44 | ) | — | (.44 | ) | — | 13.25 | 12.32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
12.92 | .84 | .96 | (.03 | ) | — | 1.77 | (.70 | ) | — | (.70 | ) | — | 13.99 | 13.34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
13.00 | .85 | (.16 | ) | (.13 | ) | — | .56 | (.64 | ) | — | (.64 | ) | — | 12.92 | 12.29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
14.00 | .88 | (1.05 | ) | (.22 | ) | — | (.39 | ) | (.61 | ) | — | (.61 | ) | — | 13.00 | 13.35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
14.10 | .83 | (.10 | ) | (.22 | ) | — | .51 | (.61 | ) | — | (.61 | ) | — | 14.00 | 13.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
14.53 | .83 | (.39 | ) | (.18 | ) | — | .26 | (.69 | ) | — | (.69 | ) | — | 14.10 | 13.69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011(f)
|
13.32 | .32 | .94 | — | — | 1.26 | (.39 | ) | — | (.39 | ) | — | 14.19 | 13.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
14.20 | .44 | (.86 | ) | (.01 | ) | — | (.43 | ) | (.45 | ) | — | (.45 | ) | — | 13.32 | 12.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
12.66 | .85 | 1.41 | (.03 | ) | — | 2.23 | (.69 | ) | — | (.69 | ) | — | 14.20 | 14.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
13.26 | .84 | (.67 | ) | (.14 | ) | — | .03 | (.63 | ) | — | (.63 | ) | — | * | 12.66 | 12.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
14.48 | .91 | (1.23 | ) | (.25 | ) | — | * | (.57 | ) | (.64 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.65 | ) | — | 13.26 | 13.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
14.77 | .91 | (.17 | ) | (.24 | ) | (.02 | ) | .48 | (.71 | ) | (.06 | ) | (.77 | ) | — | 14.48 | 13.35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
15.37 | .93 | (.40 | ) | (.20 | ) | (.01 | ) | .32 | (.84 | ) | (.08 | ) | (.92 | ) | — | 14.77 | 15.90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(a)
|
The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents.
|
|
(b)
|
Total Return Based on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation.
|
|
Total returns are not annualized.
|
|
|
Total Return Based on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
|
48 Nuveen Investments
| Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets |
Ratios to Average Net Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Applicable to Common Shares |
Applicable to Common Shares
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Returns
|
Before Reimbursement(c) |
After Reimbursement(c)(d)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Based
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
on
|
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Based
|
Common
|
Assets
|
Net
|
Net
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
on
|
Share Net
|
Applicable
|
Investment
|
Investment
|
Portfolio
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Market
|
Asset
|
to Common
|
Income
|
Income
|
Turnover
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Value(b)
|
Value(b)
|
Shares (000)
|
Expenses(e)
|
(Loss)
|
Expenses(e)
|
(Loss)
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.50 | % | 8.30 | % | $ | 62,427 | 1.30 | %** | 6.08 | %** | N/A | N/A | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| (4.55 | ) | (2.23 | ) | 59,256 | 1.19 | ** | 6.11 | ** | N/A | N/A | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 14.47 | 13.94 | 62,549 | 1.21 | 6.13 | N/A | N/A | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (2.61 | ) | 4.73 | 57,755 | 1.33 | 7.01 | N/A | N/A | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.10 | (2.87 | ) | 58,097 | 1.40 | 6.42 | N/A | N/A | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (.22 | ) | 3.62 | 62,534 | 1.32 | 5.81 | N/A | N/A | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (5.62 | ) | 1.84 | 63,024 | 1.21 | 5.83 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.46 | 9.58 | 21,974 | 3.07 | ** | 4.62 | ** | 3.07 | %** | 4.62 | %** | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (11.47 | ) | (3.10 | ) | 20,630 | 2.29 | ** | 5.37 | ** | 2.23 | ** | 5.43 | ** | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| 23.34 | 17.93 | 21,984 | 1.35 | 6.12 | 1.23 | 6.23 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (6.12 | ) | .58 | 19,605 | 1.51 | 6.70 | 1.30 | 6.91 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.72 | (4.09 | ) | 20,552 | 1.58 | 6.14 | 1.31 | 6.42 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (11.63 | ) | 3.24 | 22,439 | 1.48 | 5.74 | 1.14 | 6.08 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.54 | 2.14 | 22,862 | 1.36 | 5.79 | .94 | 6.21 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(c)
|
Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Auction Rate Preferred shareholders, where applicable; Net Investment Income (Loss) ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets attributable to ARPS, MTP Shares and/or VMTP Shares, where applicable.
|
|
(d)
|
Ratios do not reflect the effect of custodian fee credits earned on the Fund’s net cash on deposit with the custodian bank, where applicable. As of January 31, 2011, the Adviser is no longer reimbursing Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ) for any fees and expenses.
|
|
(e)
|
The expense ratios reflect, among other things, all interest expense and other costs related to MTP and VMTP Shares and/or the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, both as described in Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, Variable MuniFund Term Preferred Shares and Inverse Floating Rate Securities, respectively, as follows:
|
|
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
|
|||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||
|
2012(f)
|
.12 | %** | |
|
2011(g)
|
— | ||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||
|
2010
|
— | ||
|
2009
|
— | ||
|
2008
|
.14 | ||
|
2007
|
.08 | ||
|
2006
|
— | ||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ)
|
|||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||
|
2012(f)
|
1.52 | %** | |
|
2011(g)
|
.96 | ** | |
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||
|
2010
|
— | ||
|
2009
|
— | ||
|
2008
|
.14 | ||
|
2007
|
.10 | ||
|
2006
|
— | ||
|
(f)
|
For the six months ended August 31, 2011.
|
|
(g)
|
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
|
|
*
|
Rounds to less than $.01 per share.
|
|
**
|
Annualized.
|
| N/A | The Fund does not have a contractual reimbursement agreement with the Adviser. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 49
|
Financial
|
||||||||||||
|
Highlights (Unaudited) (continued)
|
||||||||||||
|
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
|
||||||||||||
| Investment Operations | Less Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions
|
Distributions
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from Net
|
from
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment
|
Capital
|
Discount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Gains
|
Net
|
from
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Beginning
|
to
|
to
|
Investment
|
Capital
|
Common
|
Ending
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
|
Net
|
Auction | Auction | Income | Gains |
Shares
|
Common
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Share
|
Net
|
Realized/
|
Rate | Rate | to | to |
Repur-
|
Share
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net
|
Investment
|
Unrealized
|
Preferred
|
Preferred
|
Common
|
Common
|
chased
|
Net
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset |
Income
|
Gain |
Share-
|
Share-
|
Share- |
Share-
|
and
|
Asset |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Value
|
(Loss)
|
(Loss)
|
holders(a)
|
holders(a) |
Total
|
holders
|
holders
|
Total |
Retired
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
$ | 13.88 | $ | .36 | $ | .71 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1.07 | $ | (.40 | ) | $ | — | $ | (.40 | ) | $ | — | $ | 14.55 | $ | 13.35 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
14.65 | .45 | (.74 | ) | (.01 | ) | — | (.30 | ) | (.47 | ) | — | (.47 | ) | — | 13.88 | 12.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
13.46 | .90 | 1.08 | (.03 | ) | — | 1.95 | (.76 | ) | — | (.76 | ) | — | 14.65 | 13.92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
13.66 | .93 | (.29 | ) | (.14 | ) | — | .50 | (.70 | ) | — | (.70 | ) | — | * | 13.46 | 12.52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
14.76 | .96 | (1.03 | ) | (.24 | ) | (.02 | ) | (.33 | ) | (.71 | ) | (.06 | ) | (.77 | ) | — | 13.66 | 14.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
15.00 | .97 | (.18 | ) | (.24 | ) | (.01 | ) | .54 | (.74 | ) | (.04 | ) | (.78 | ) | — | 14.76 | 15.27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
15.56 | .96 | (.37 | ) | (.20 | ) | (.01 | ) | .38 | (.83 | ) | (.11 | ) | (.94 | ) | — | 15.00 | 15.37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
13.46 | .32 | .78 | — | * | — | 1.10 | (.38 | ) | — | (.38 | ) | — | 14.18 | 12.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
14.12 | .47 | (.68 | ) | (.01 | ) | — | (.22 | ) | (.44 | ) | — | (.44 | ) | — | 13.46 | 12.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
12.76 | .86 | 1.26 | (.03 | ) | — | 2.09 | (.73 | ) | — | (.73 | ) | — | 14.12 | 13.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
13.07 | .88 | (.41 | ) | (.13 | ) | — | .34 | (.65 | ) | — | (.65 | ) | — | * | 12.76 | 11.73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
14.20 | .91 | (1.15 | ) | (.24 | ) | — | (.48 | ) | (.65 | ) | — | (.65 | ) | — | 13.07 | 13.30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
14.32 | .90 | (.10 | ) | (.25 | ) | — | .55 | (.67 | ) | — | (.67 | ) | — | 14.20 | 13.44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
14.62 | .88 | (.26 | ) | (.19 | ) | — | .43 | (.73 | ) | — | (.73 | ) | — | 14.32 | 13.52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(a)
|
The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents.
|
|
(b)
|
Total Return Based on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation.
|
|
Total returns are not annualized.
|
|
|
Total Return Based on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
|
50 Nuveen Investments
| Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Applicable to Common Shares
|
Applicable to Common Shares
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Returns
|
Before Reimbursement(c)
|
After Reimbursement(c)(d)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Based
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
on
|
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Based
|
Common
|
Assets
|
Net
|
Net
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
on
|
Share Net
|
Applicable
|
Investment
|
Investment
|
Portfolio
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Market
|
Asset
|
to Common
|
Income
|
Income
|
Turnover
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Value(b)
|
Value(b)
|
Shares (000)
|
Expenses(e)
|
(Loss)
|
Expenses(e)
|
(Loss)
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.75 | % | 7.60 | % | $ | 35,500 | 2.86 | %** | 4.97 | %** | 2.77 | %** | 5.07 | %** | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||
| (5.84 | ) | (1.90 | ) | 33,852 | 2.22 | ** | 5.18 | ** | 2.06 | ** | 5.34 | ** | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
| 17.65 | 14.75 | 35,733 | 1.27 | 6.11 | 1.07 | 6.31 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (4.99 | ) | 4.09 | 32,829 | 1.40 | 6.93 | 1.11 | 7.22 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (3.16 | ) | (2.38 | ) | 33,311 | 1.49 | 6.32 | 1.13 | 6.68 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.52 | 3.59 | 35,976 | 1.39 | 5.92 | .96 | 6.35 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| .82 | 2.49 | 36,465 | 1.28 | 5.88 | .83 | 6.33 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.68 | 8.27 | 43,474 | 3.00 | ** | 4.65 | ** | 3.00 | ** | 4.65 | ** | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (3.63 | ) | (1.60 | ) | 41,257 | 1.46 | ** | 5.85 | ** | 1.43 | ** | 5.88 | ** | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| 18.58 | 16.66 | 43,280 | 1.22 | 6.15 | 1.08 | 6.29 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (6.18 | ) | 3.08 | 39,129 | 1.37 | 6.97 | 1.09 | 7.25 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.96 | (3.48 | ) | 40,081 | 1.46 | 6.17 | 1.08 | 6.55 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.21 | 3.81 | 43,552 | 1.36 | 5.69 | .88 | 6.16 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1.80 | ) | 3.03 | 43,913 | 1.26 | 5.63 | .79 | 6.11 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
(c)
|
Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Auction Rate Preferred shareholders, where applicable; Net Investment Income (Loss) ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets attributable to ARPS and/or MTP Shares, where applicable.
|
|
(d)
|
After expense reimbursement from the Adviser, where applicable. Ratios do not reflect the effect of custodian fee credits earned on the Fund’s net cash on deposit with the custodian bank, where applicable. As of September 30, 2010, the Adviser is no longer reimbursing Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE) for any fees and expenses.
|
|
(e)
|
The expense ratios reflect, among other things, all interest expense and other costs related to MTP Shares and/or the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, each as described in Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, MuniFund Term Preferred Shares and Inverse Floating Rate Securities, respectively, as follows:
|
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR)
|
|||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||
|
2012(f)
|
1.45 | %** | |
|
2011(g)
|
.91 | ** | |
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||
|
2010
|
— | ||
|
2009
|
— | ||
|
2008
|
.15 | ||
|
2007
|
.10 | ||
|
2006
|
— | ||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE)
|
|||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||
|
2012(f)
|
1.75 | ** | |
|
2011(g)
|
.01 | ** | |
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||
|
2010
|
— | ||
|
2009
|
— | ||
|
2008
|
.16 | ||
|
2007
|
.10 | ||
|
2006
|
— | ||
|
(f)
|
For the six months ended August 31, 2011.
|
|
(g)
|
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
|
|
*
|
Rounds to less than $.01 per share.
|
|
**
|
Annualized.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 51
|
Financial
|
||||||||||||
|
Highlights (Unaudited) (continued)
|
||||||||||||
|
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
|
||||||||||||
| Investment Operations | Less Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions
|
Distributions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from Net
|
from
|
Discount
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment
|
Capital
|
Net
|
from
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Beginning
|
Income to
|
Gains to
|
Investment
|
Capital
|
Common
|
Ending
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
|
Net
|
Auction
|
Auction
|
Income
|
Gains
|
Shares
|
Common
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Share
|
Net
|
Realized/
|
Rate | Rate | to | to | Repur- |
Share
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net
|
Investment
|
Unrealized
|
Preferred
|
Preferred
|
Common
|
Common
|
chased
|
Net
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset |
Income
|
Gain |
Share-
|
Share-
|
Share-
|
Share-
|
and
|
Asset |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Value
|
(Loss)
|
(Loss)
|
holders(a)
|
holders(a) |
Total
|
holders
|
holders
|
Total |
Retired
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
$ | 14.12 | $ | .38 | $ | .74 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1.12 | $ | (.43 | ) | $ | — | $ | (.43 | ) | $ | — | $ | 14.81 | $ | 15.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
15.01 | .48 | (.85 | ) | (.01 | ) | — | (.38 | ) | (.50 | ) | (.01 | )* | (.51 | ) | — | 14.12 | 15.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
13.84 | .94 | 1.08 | (.03 | ) | — | * | 1.99 | (.81 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.82 | ) | — | 15.01 | 16.92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
13.98 | .94 | (.17 | ) | (.13 | ) | (.02 | ) | .62 | (.71 | ) | (.05 | ) | (.76 | ) | — | 13.84 | 14.78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
14.87 | .94 | (.83 | ) | (.23 | ) | (.02 | ) | (.14 | ) | (.69 | ) | (.06 | ) | (.75 | ) | — | 13.98 | 12.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
15.06 | .95 | (.11 | ) | (.25 | ) | (.01 | ) | .58 | (.73 | ) | (.04 | ) | (.77 | ) | — | 14.87 | 13.89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
15.46 | .96 | (.32 | ) | (.22 | ) | — | .42 | (.82 | ) | — | (.82 | ) | — | 15.06 | 14.71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(a)
|
The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents.
|
|
(b)
|
Total Return Based on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation.
|
|
Total returns are not annualized.
|
|
|
Total Return Based on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
|
52 Nuveen Investments
| Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Returns
|
Applicable to Common Shares(c)(d)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Based
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
on
|
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Based
|
Common
|
Assets
|
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
on
|
Share Net
|
Applicable
|
Investment
|
Portfolio
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Market
|
Asset
|
to Common
|
Income
|
Turnover
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Value(b)
|
Value(b)
|
Shares (000)
|
Expenses(e)
|
(Loss)
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||
| 8.15 | % | 8.04 | % | $ | 141,765 | 2.50 | %** | 5.25 | %** | 2 | % | ||||||||||
| (7.15 | ) | (2.61 | ) | 134,850 | 1.92 | ** | 5.69 | ** | 10 | ||||||||||||
| 20.92 | 14.71 | 143,080 | 1.19 | 6.42 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| 25.98 | 4.80 | 131,513 | 1.27 | 7.06 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| (5.16 | ) | (1.04 | ) | 132,713 | 1.26 | 6.46 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| (.52 | ) | 3.82 | 141,238 | 1.24 | 6.24 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
| (4.03 | ) | 2.77 | 143,009 | 1.19 | 6.31 | 13 | |||||||||||||||
|
(c)
|
Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Auction Rate Preferred shareholders, where applicable; Net Investment Income (Loss) ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets attributable to ARPS and/or MTP Shares, where applicable.
|
|
(d)
|
Ratios do not reflect the effect of custodian fee credits earned on the Fund’s net cash on deposit with the custodian bank, where applicable.
|
|
(e)
|
The expense ratios reflect, among other things, all interest expense and other costs related to MTP Shares and/or the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, each as described in Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, MuniFund Term Preferred Shares and Inverse Floating Rate Securities, respectively, as follows:
|
|
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
|
|||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||
|
2012(f)
|
1.39 | %** | |
|
2011(g)
|
.80 | ** | |
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||
|
2010
|
.02 | ||
|
2009
|
.01 | ||
|
2008
|
.05 | ||
|
2007
|
.06 | ||
|
2006
|
— | ||
|
(f)
|
For the six months ended August 31, 2011.
|
|
(g)
|
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
|
|
*
|
Rounds to less than $.01 per share.
|
|
**
|
Annualized.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 53
|
Financial
|
|||||||||
|
Highlights (Unaudited) (continued)
|
|||||||||
|
ARPS at the End of Period
|
MTP Shares at the End of Period (h)
|
VMTP Shares at the End of Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aggregate
|
Aggregate
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Liquidation
|
Asset
|
Amount
|
Liquidation
|
Asset
|
Amount
|
Liquidation
|
Asset
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding
|
Value
|
Coverage
|
Outstanding
|
Value
|
Coverage
|
Outstanding
|
Value
|
Coverage
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (000 | ) |
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
(000 | ) |
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
(000 | ) |
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 28,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 322,952 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
27,875 | 25,000 | 78,144 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
27,875 | 25,000 | 81,097 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
27,875 | 25,000 | 76,798 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
30,000 | 25,000 | 73,414 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
30,000 | 25,000 | 77,111 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
30,000 | 25,000 | 77,520 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
— | — | — | 11,100 | 10.00 | 29.80 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
— | — | — | 11,100 | 10.00 | 28.59 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
10,600 | 25,000 | 76,850 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
10,600 | 25,000 | 71,238 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
12,000 | 25,000 | 67,817 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
12,000 | 25,000 | 71,748 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
12,000 | 25,000 | 72,628 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(f)
|
For the six months ended August 31, 2011.
|
|
(g)
|
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
|
|
(h)
|
The Ending and Average Market Value Per Share for each Series of the Fund’s MTP Shares were as follows:
|
|
Ending
|
Average
|
||||||||||
|
Market Value
|
Market Value
|
||||||||||
|
Series
|
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
|||||||||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ)
|
|||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
2015
|
9.73 | 9.78 | ||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
2015
|
9.63 |
9.83
|
^ | |||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2009
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2008
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2007
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2006
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
^
|
For the period October 18, 2010 (first issuance date of shares) through February 28, 2011.
|
54 Nuveen Investments
|
ARPS and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MTP Shares at
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ARPS at the End of Period
|
MTP Shares at the End of Period (h)
|
the End of Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aggregate
|
Aggregate
|
Asset Coverage
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Liquidation
|
Asset
|
Amount
|
Liquidation
|
Asset
|
Per $1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding
|
Value
|
Coverage
|
Outstanding
|
Value
|
Coverage
|
Liquidation
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| (000 | ) |
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
(000 | ) |
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
Preference
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 18,725 | $ | 10.00 | $ | 28.96 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
— | — | — | 18,725 | 10.00 | 28.08 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
16,625 | 25,000 | 78,734 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
16,625 | 25,000 | 74,367 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
18,500 | 25,000 | 70,015 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
18,500 | 25,000 | 73,616 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
18,500 | 25,000 | 74,277 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
— | — | — | 20,846 | 10.00 | 30.86 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
18,400 | 25,000 | 52,544 | 19,046 | 10.00 | 21.02 | 2.10 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
18,400 | 25,000 | 83,805 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
18,400 | 25,000 | 78,164 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
22,000 | 25,000 | 70,546 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
22,000 | 25,000 | 74,490 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
22,000 | 25,000 | 74,902 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
(f)
|
For the six months ended August 31, 2011.
|
|
(g)
|
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
|
|
(h)
|
The Ending and Average Market Value Per Share for each Series of the Fund’s MTP Shares were as follows:
|
|
Ending
|
Average
|
||||||||||
|
Market Value
|
Market Value
|
||||||||||
|
Series
|
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
|||||||||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR)
|
|||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
2015
|
$ | 9.91 | $ | 9.79 | ||||||
|
2011(g)
|
2015
|
9.58 |
9.71
|
^ | |||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2009
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2008
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2007
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2006
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE)
|
|||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
2016 | 10.10 | 10.06 | ||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
2016 | 9.97 |
9.96
|
^^ | |||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2009
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2008
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2007
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2006
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
^
|
For the period October 18, 2010 (first issuance date of shares) through February 28, 2011.
|
|
^^
|
As of February 28, 2011 (issuance date of shares).
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 55
Financial
Highlights (Unaudited) (continued)
| ARPS at the End of Period |
MTP Shares at the End of Period (h)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aggregate
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Liquidation
|
Asset
|
Amount
|
Liquidation
|
Asset
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding
|
Value
|
Coverage
|
Outstanding
|
Value
|
Coverage
|
||||||||||||||||||
| (000 | ) |
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
(000 | ) |
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 70,920 | $ | 10.00 | $ | 29.99 | |||||||||||
|
2011(g)
|
— | — | — | 70,920 | 10.00 | 29.01 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
65,050 | 25,000 | 79,988 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
65,050 | 25,000 | 75,543 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
69,000 | 25,000 | 73,084 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2007
|
69,000 | 25,000 | 76,173 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
69,000 | 25,000 | 76,815 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
(f)
|
For the six months ended August 31, 2011.
|
|
(g)
|
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
|
|
(h)
|
The Ending and Average Market Value Per Share for each Series of the Fund’s MTP Shares were as follows:
|
|
Ending
|
Average
|
||||||||||
|
Market Value
|
Market Value
|
||||||||||
|
Series
|
Per Share
|
Per Share
|
|||||||||
|
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
|
|||||||||||
|
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
|
|||||||||||
|
2012(f)
|
2015
|
$ | 10.00 | $ | 9.92 | ||||||
|
2011(g)
|
2015
|
9.85 |
9.86
|
^ | |||||||
|
Year Ended 7/31:
|
|||||||||||
|
2010
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2009
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2008
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2007
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
2006
|
— | — | — | ||||||||
|
^
|
For the period November 2, 2010 (first issuance date of shares) through February 28, 2011.
|
56 Nuveen Investments
Notes to
Financial Statements(Unaudited)
1. General Information and Significant Accounting Policies
General Information
The funds covered in this report and their corresponding Common share stock exchange symbols are Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. (NAZ), Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (NFZ), Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (NKR), Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (NXE) and Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (NTX) (each a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”). Common shares of Arizona Premium Income (NAZ) and Texas Quality Income (NTX) are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) while Common shares of Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ), Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR) and Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE) are traded on the NYSE Amex. The Funds are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as closed-end, registered investment companies.
Each Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from both regular federal and designated state income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of municipal obligations issued by state and local government authorities within a single state or certain U.S. territories.
Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
Investment Valuation
Prices of municipal bonds are provided by a pricing service approved by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees. These securities are generally classified as Level 2 for fair value measurement purposes. When price quotes are not readily available (which is usually the case for municipal bonds) the pricing service establishes a security’s fair value using methods that may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. In pricing certain securities, particularly less liquid and lower quality securities, the pricing service may consider information about a security, its issuer, or market activity, provided by Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc. (the “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (“Nuveen”). These securities are generally classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the priority of the significant inputs.
Certain securities may not be able to be priced by the pre-established pricing methods as described above. Such securities may be valued by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees or its designee at fair value. These securities generally include, but are not limited to, restricted securities (securities which may not be publicly sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) for which a pricing service is unable to provide a market price; securities whose trading has been formally suspended; debt securities that have gone into default and for which there is no current market quotation; a security whose market price is not available from a pre-established pricing source; a security with respect to which an event has occurred that is likely to materially affect the value of the security after the market has closed but before the calculation of a Fund’s net asset value (as may be the case in non-U.S. markets on which the security is primarily traded) or make it difficult or impossible to obtain a reliable market quotation; and a security whose price, as provided by the pricing service, is not deemed to reflect the security’s fair value. As a general principle, the fair value of a security would appear to be the amount that the owner might reasonably expect to receive for it in a current sale. A variety of factors may be considered in determining the fair value of these securities, which may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. These securities are generally classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the priority of the significant inputs. Regardless of the method employed to value a particular security, all valuations are subject to review by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees or its designee.
Refer to Footnote 2 – Fair Value Measurements for further details on the leveling of securities held by the Funds as of the end of the reporting period.
Nuveen Investments 57
Notes to
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
Investment Transactions
Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from transactions are determined on the specific identification method, which is the same basis used for federal income tax purposes. Investments purchased on a when-issued/delayed delivery basis may have extended settlement periods. Any investments so purchased are subject to market fluctuation during this period. The Funds have instructed the custodian to segregate assets with a current value at least equal to the amount of the when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments. At August 31, 2011, there were no such outstanding purchase commitments in any of the other Funds.
Investment Income
Interest income, which reflects the amortization of premiums and includes accretion of discounts for financial reporting purposes, is recorded on an accrual basis. Investment income also reflects paydown gains and losses, if any.
Income Taxes
Each Fund is a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net capital gains to shareholders and to otherwise comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. Furthermore, each Fund intends to satisfy conditions that will enable interest from municipal securities, which is exempt from regular federal and designated state income taxes, to retain such tax-exempt status when distributed to shareholders of the Funds. Net realized capital gains and ordinary income distributions paid by the Funds are subject to federal taxation.
For all open tax years and all major taxing jurisdictions, management of the Funds has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Open tax years are those that are open for examination by taxing authorities (i.e., generally the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then). Furthermore, management of the Funds is also not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders
Dividends from net investment income are declared monthly. Net realized capital gains and/or market discount from investment transactions, if any, are distributed to shareholders at least annually. Furthermore, capital gains are distributed only to the extent they exceed available capital loss carryforwards.
Distributions to Common shareholders of net investment income, net realized capital gains and/or market discount, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount and timing of distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP.
Auction Rate Preferred Shares
Each Fund is authorized to issue Auction Rate Preferred Shares (“ARPS”). As of February 28, 2011, each Fund, with the exception of Arizona Premium Income (NAZ), redeemed all of their outstanding ARPS at liquidation value. During the six months ended August 31, 2011, Arizona Premium Income (NAZ) had issued and outstanding ARPS, $25,000 stated value per share, which approximates market value, as a means of effecting financial leverage. The Fund’s ARPS were issued in one Series. The dividend rate paid by the Fund was determined every seven days, pursuant to a dutch auction process overseen by the auction agent, and was payable at the end of the rate period.
Beginning in February 2008, more shares for sale were submitted in the regularly scheduled auctions for the ARPS issued by the Funds than there were offers to buy. This meant that these auctions “failed to clear,’’ and that many ARPS shareholders who wanted to sell their shares in these auctions were unable to do so. ARPS shareholders unable to sell their shares received distributions at the “maximum rate’’ applicable to failed auctions as calculated in accordance with the pre-established terms of the ARPS. As of August 31, 2011, each Fund redeemed all of their outstanding ARPS, at liquidation value, as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
ARPS redeemed, at liquidation value
|
$ | 30,000,000 | $ | 12,000,000 | $ | 18,500,000 | $ | 22,000,000 | $ | 69,000,000 | |||||||||
During the seven months ended February 28, 2011, lawsuits pursuing claims made in a demand letter alleging that Arizona Dividend Advantage 3’s (NXE) Board of Trustees breached its fiduciary duties related to the redemption at par of the Fund’s ARPS had been filed on behalf of shareholders of the Fund, against the Adviser, the Nuveen holding company, the majority owner of the holding company, the lone interested trustee, and current and former officers of the Fund. The court has heard the Fund’s motion to dismiss the lawsuits and has take the matter under advisement. Nuveen and the other named defendants believe these lawsuits to be without merit, and all named parties are defending themselves vigorously against these charges.
During the current reporting period, Nuveen Investments, LLC, known as Nuveen Securities, LLC, effective April 30, 2011, (“Nuveen Securities”) entered into a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) with respect to certain allegations regarding Nuveen-sponsored
58 Nuveen Investments
closed-end fund ARPS marketing brochures. As part of this settlement, Nuveen Securities neither admitted to nor denied FINRA’s allegations. Nuveen Securities is the broker-dealer subsidiary of Nuveen.
The settlement with FINRA concludes an investigation that followed the widespread failure of auctions for ARPS and other auction rate securities, which generally began in mid-February 2008. In the settlement, FINRA alleged that certain marketing materials provided by Nuveen Securities were false and misleading. Nuveen Securities agreed to a censure and the payment of a $3 million fine.
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares
The following Funds have issued and outstanding MuniFund Term Preferred (“MTP”) Shares, with a $10 stated value per share. Proceeds from the issuance of MTP Shares, net of offering expenses, were used to redeem all, or a portion of, each Fund’s outstanding ARPS. Each Fund’s MTP Shares are issued in one Series. Dividends, which are recognized as interest expense for financial reporting purposes, are paid monthly at a fixed annual rate, subject to adjustments in certain circumstances. The MTP Shares trade on the NYSE. As of August 31, 2011, the number of MTP Shares outstanding, annual interest rate and NYSE “ticker” symbol for each Fund’s series of MTP Shares are as follows:
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ)
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR)
|
||||||
|
Shares
|
Annual
|
NYSE
|
Shares
|
Annual
|
NYSE
|
||
|
Outstanding
|
Interest Rate
|
Ticker
|
Outstanding
|
Interest Rate
|
Ticker
|
||
|
Series 2015
|
1,110,000
|
2.05%
|
NFZ Pr C
|
1,872,500
|
2.05%
|
NKR Pr C
|
|
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE)
|
|||||||
|
Shares
|
Annual
|
NYSE
|
|||||
|
Outstanding
|
Interest Rate
|
Ticker
|
|||||
|
Series 2016
|
2,084,600
|
2.90%
|
NXE Pr C
|
||||
|
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
|
|||||||
|
Shares
|
Annual
|
NYSE
|
|||||
|
Outstanding
|
Interest Rate
|
Ticker
|
|||||
|
Series 2015
|
7,092,000
|
2.30%
|
NTX Pr C
|
||||
Each Fund is obligated to redeem its MTP Shares by the date as specified in its offering document (“Term Redemption Date”), unless earlier redeemed or repurchased by the Fund. MTP Shares are subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. MTP Shares will be subject to redemption at the option of each Fund (“Optional Redemption Date”), subject to a payment of premium for one year following the Optional Redemption Date (“Premium Expiration Date”), and at par thereafter. MTP Shares also will be subject to redemption, at the option of each Fund, at par in the event of certain changes in the credit rating of the MTP Shares. Each Fund may be obligated to redeem certain of the MTP Shares if the Fund fails to maintain certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements and such failures are not cured by the applicable cure date. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. The Term Redemption Date, Optional Redemption Date and Premium Expiration Date for each Fund’s series of MTP Shares are as follows.
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|
|
Series 2015
|
Series 2015
|
Series 2016
|
Series 2015
|
|
|
Term Redemption Date
|
November 1, 2015
|
November 1, 2015
|
March 1, 2016
|
December 1, 2015
|
|
Optional Redemption Date
|
November 1, 2011
|
November 1, 2011
|
March 1, 2012
|
December 1, 2011
|
|
Premium Expiration Date
|
October 31, 2012
|
October 31, 2012
|
February 28, 2013
|
November 30, 2012
|
|
The average liquidation value of all MTP Shares outstanding for each Fund during the six months ended August 31, 2011, was as follows:
|
||||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|
|
Average liquidation value of MTP Shares outstanding
|
$11,100,000
|
$18,725,000
|
$20,767,656
|
$70,920,000
|
For financial reporting purposes only, the liquidation value of MTP Shares is recorded as a liability on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Unpaid dividends on MTP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest payable” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends paid on MTP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.
Nuveen Investments 59
Notes to
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
Net amounts earned by Nuveen as underwriter of each Fund’s MTP Share offering were recorded as reductions of offering costs recognized by the Funds. For the six months ended August 31, 2011, the amounts earned by Nuveen for each Fund were as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|
|
Net amounts earned by Nuveen
|
$1,011
|
$639
|
$1,145
|
$6,153
|
Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ) has issued and outstanding Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred (“VMTP”) Shares, with a $100,000 liquidation value per share. The Fund issued its VMTP Shares in a privately negotiated offering in July 2011. Proceeds from the issuance of VMTP Shares, net of offering expenses, were used to redeem the Fund’s outstanding ARPS. The Fund’s VMTP Shares were offered to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. As of August 31, 2011, the number of VMTP Shares outstanding for the Fund are as follows:
|
Arizona
Premium
Income
(NAZ)
|
|
|
Series 2014
|
$28,000,000
|
The Fund is obligated to redeem its VMTP Shares by the date as specified in its offering document (“Term Redemption Date”), unless earlier redeemed or repurchased by the Fund. VMTP Shares are subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. The VMTP Shares are subject to redemption at the option of each Fund (“Optional Redemption Date”), subject to payment of premium for one year following the Optional Redemption Date (“Premium Expiration Date”), and at par thereafter. The Fund may be obligated to redeem certain of the VMTP Shares if the Fund fails to maintain certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements and such failures are not cured by the applicable cure date. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. The Term Redemption Date, Optional Redemption Date and Premium Expiration Date for the Fund’s VMTP Shares are as follows:
|
Arizona
Premium
Income
(NAZ)
|
|
|
Term Redemption Date
|
August 1, 2014
|
| Optional Redemption Date |
August 1, 2012
|
| Premium Expiration Date |
July 31, 2012
|
The average liquidation value of VMTP Shares outstanding and average annualized dividend rate of VMTP Shares for the Fund during the six months ended August 31, 2011, were as follows:
|
Arizona
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(NAZ)*
|
|
|
Average liquidation value of VMTP Shares outstanding
|
$28,000,000
|
|
Average annualized dividend rate
|
1.22%
|
|
* For the period July 28, 2011 (issuance date of shares) through August 31, 2011.
|
Dividends on MTP shares (which are treated as interest payments for financial reporting purposes) are set weekly.
For financial reporting purposes only, the liquidation value of VMTP Shares is recorded as a liability on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Unpaid dividends on VMTP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest payable” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends paid on VMTP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.
Inverse Floating Rate Securities
Each Fund is authorized to invest in inverse floating rate securities. An inverse floating rate security is created by depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose trust created by a broker-dealer. In turn, this trust (a) issues floating rate certificates, in face amounts equal to some fraction of the deposited bond’s par amount or market value, that typically pay short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties, and (b) issues to a long-term investor (such as one of the Funds) an inverse floating rate certificate (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) that
60 Nuveen Investments
represents all remaining or residual interest in the trust. The income received by the inverse floater holder varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to the floating rate certificates’ holders, and in most circumstances the inverse floater holder bears substantially all of the underlying bond’s downside investment risk and also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the underlying bond’s value. The price of an inverse floating rate security will be more volatile than that of the underlying bond because the interest rate is dependent on not only the fixed coupon rate of the underlying bond but also on the short-term interest paid on the floating rate certificates, and because the inverse floating rate security essentially bears the risk of loss of the greater face value of the underlying bond.
A Fund may purchase an inverse floating rate security in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond (referred to as an “externally-deposited inverse floater”), or instead by first selling a fixed-rate bond to a broker-dealer for deposit into the special purpose trust and receiving in turn the residual interest in the trust (referred to as a “self-deposited inverse floater”). The inverse floater held by a Fund gives the Fund the right (a) to cause the holders of the floating rate certificates to tender their notes at par, and (b) to have the broker transfer the fixed-rate bond held by the trust to the Fund, thereby collapsing the trust. An investment in an externally-deposited inverse floater is identified in the Portfolio of Investments as “(IF) – Inverse floating rate investment.” An investment in a self-deposited inverse floater is accounted for as a financing transaction. In such instances, a fixed-rate bond deposited into a special purpose trust is identified in the Portfolio of Investments as “(UB) – Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction,” with the Fund accounting for the short-term floating rate certificates issued by the trust as “Floating rate obligations” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. In addition, the Fund reflects in “Investment Income” the entire earnings of the underlying bond and related interest paid to the holders of the short-term floating rate certificates as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.
During the six months ended August 31, 2011, each Fund invested in externally-deposited inverse floaters and/or self-deposited inverse floaters.
Each Fund may also enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements (sometimes referred to as a “recourse trust” or “credit recovery swap”) (such agreements referred to herein as “Recourse Trusts”) with a broker-dealer by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the broker-dealer, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the fixed-rate bond held by the trust and the liquidation value of the floating rate certificates issued by the trust plus any shortfalls in interest cash flows. Under these agreements, a Fund’s potential exposure to losses related to or on inverse floaters may increase beyond the value of a Fund’s inverse floater investments as a Fund may potentially be liable to fulfill all amounts owed to holders of the floating rate certificates. At period end, any such shortfall is recognized as “Unrealized depreciation on Recourse Trusts” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
|
At August 31, 2011, each Fund’s maximum exposure to externally-deposited Recourse Trusts is as follows:
|
|||||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|
|
Maximum exposure to Recourse Trusts
|
$2,145,000
|
$1,680,000
|
$1,350,000
|
$2,325,000
|
$ —
|
The average floating rate obligations outstanding and average annual interest rate and fees related to self-deposited inverse floaters during the six months ended August 31, 2011, were as follows:
|
Texas
|
|
|
Quality
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(NTX)
|
|
|
Average floating rate obligations outstanding
|
$3,960,000
|
|
Average annual interest rate and fees
|
0.42%
|
Derivative Financial Instruments
Each Fund is authorized to invest in certain derivative instruments, including foreign currency forwards, futures, options and swap contracts. Although the Funds are authorized to invest in such derivative instruments, and may do so in the future, they did not make any such investments during the six months ended August 31, 2011.
Market and Counterparty Credit Risk
In the normal course of business each Fund may invest in financial instruments and enter into financial transactions where risk of potential loss exists due to changes in the market (market risk) or failure of the other party to the transaction to perform (counterparty credit risk). The potential loss could exceed the value of the financial assets recorded on the financial statements. Financial assets, which potentially expose each Fund to counterparty credit risk, consist principally of cash due from counterparties on forward, option and swap transactions, when applicable. The extent of each Fund’s exposure to counterparty credit risk in respect to these financial assets approximates their carrying value as recorded on the Statement of Assets and
Nuveen Investments 61
Notes to
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
Liabilities. Futures contracts, when applicable, expose a Fund to minimal counterparty credit risk as they are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, which is counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Each Fund helps manage counterparty credit risk by entering into agreements only with counterparties the Adviser believes have the financial resources to honor their obligations and by having the Adviser monitor the financial stability of the counterparties. Additionally, counterparties may be required to pledge collateral daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial asset) on behalf of each Fund with a value approximately equal to the amount of any unrealized gain above a pre-determined threshold. Reciprocally, when each Fund has an unrealized loss, the Funds have instructed the custodian to pledge assets of the Funds as collateral with a value approximately equal to the amount of the unrealized loss above a pre-determined threshold. Collateral pledges are monitored and subsequently adjusted if and when the valuations fluctuate, either up or down, by at least the pre-determined threshold amount.
Zero Coupon Securities
Each Fund is authorized to invest in zero coupon securities. A zero coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the security. Tax-exempt income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the security at issuance and the par value of the security at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon securities generally are more volatile than the market prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
Offering Costs
Costs incurred by the Funds in connection with their offerings of MTP Shares or VMTP Shares were recorded as a deferred charge, which will be amortized over the life of the shares. Each Fund’s amortized deferred charges are recognized as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations. As of August 31, 2011, each Fund’s offering costs incurred were as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|
|
MTP Shares offering costs
|
$491,500
|
$588,375
|
$672,690
|
$1,366,300
|
|
Arizona
|
||||
|
Premium
|
||||
|
Income
|
||||
|
(NAZ)
|
||||
|
VMTP Shares offering costs
|
$100,000
|
Custodian Fee Credit
Each Fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby certain custodian fees and expenses are reduced by net credits earned on each Fund’s cash on deposit with the bank. Such deposit arrangements are an alternative to overnight investments. Credits for cash balances may be offset by charges for any days on which a Fund overdraws its account at the custodian bank.
Indemnifications
Under the Funds’ organizational documents, their officers and directors/trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Funds enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occurred. However, the Funds have not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expect the risk of loss to be remote.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets applicable to Common shares from operations during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
2. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that the Funds would receive upon selling an investment or transferring a liability in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment. A three-tier hierarchy is used to maximize the use of observable market data and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs are based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are based on the best information available in the circumstances.
62 Nuveen Investments
The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2 – Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs (including management’s assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The following is a summary of each Fund’s fair value measurements as of August 31, 2011:
|
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
Investments:
|
||||
|
Municipal Bonds
|
$ —
|
$85,819,326
|
$1,924,925
|
$87,744,251
|
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
Investments:
|
||||
|
Municipal Bonds
|
$ —
|
$32,347,470
|
$215,592
|
$32,563,062
|
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
Investments:
|
||||
|
Municipal Bonds
|
$ —
|
$52,588,537
|
$870,066
|
$53,458,603
|
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
Investments:
|
||||
|
Municipal Bonds
|
$ —
|
$60,591,013
|
$531,279
|
$61,122,292
|
|
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
Investments:
|
||||
|
Municipal Bonds
|
$ —
|
$211,226,362
|
$ —
|
$211,226,362
|
The following is a reconciliation of each Fund’s Level 3 investments held at the beginning and end of the measurement period:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
||||||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
||||||||||||
|
Level 3
|
Level 3
|
Level 3
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||||||||
|
Bonds
|
Bonds
|
Bonds
|
Bonds
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at the beginning of period
|
$ | 1,867,750 | $ | 209,188 | $ | 844,223 | $ | 515,499 | |||||||
|
Gains (losses):
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
— | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
57,175 | 6,404 | 25,843 | 15,780 | |||||||||||
|
Purchases at cost
|
— | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Sales at proceeds
|
— | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Net discounts (premiums)
|
— | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Transfers in to
|
— | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Transfers out of
|
— | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Balance at the end of period
|
$ | 1,924,925 | $ | 215,592 | $ | 870,066 | $ | 531,279 | |||||||
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) during the period of
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Level 3 securities held at the end of period
|
$ | 57,175 | $ | 6,404 | $ | 25,843 | $ | 15,780 | |||||||
During the six months ended August 31, 2011, the Funds recognized no significant transfers to or from Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3.
3. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Funds record derivative instruments at fair value with changes in fair value recognized on the Statement of Operations, when applicable. Even though the Funds’ investments in derivatives may represent economic hedges, they are not considered to be hedge transactions for financial reporting purposes. The Funds did not invest in derivative instruments during the six months ended August 31, 2011.
Nuveen Investments 63
Notes to
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
4. Fund Shares
Common Shares
Transactions in Common shares were as follows:
| Arizona Premium | Arizona Dividend | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income (NAZ) | Advantage (NFZ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Six
|
Seven
|
Six
|
Seven
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Months
|
Months
|
Year
|
Months
|
Months
|
Year
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Common shares issued to shareholders
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
due to reinvestment of distributions
|
— | 743 | 798 | — | 292 | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Arizona Dividend | Arizona Dividend | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advantage 2 (NKR) | Advantage 3 (NXE) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Six
|
Seven
|
Six
|
Seven
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Months
|
Months
|
Year
|
Months
|
Months
|
Year
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Common shares issued to shareholders
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
due to reinvestment of distributions
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Texas Quality | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income (NTX) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Six
|
Seven
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Months
|
Months
|
Year
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common shares issued to shareholders
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
due to reinvestment of distributions
|
18,243 | 20,941 | 29,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Shares
|
||||||
|
Transactions in ARPS were as follows:
|
||||||
| Arizona Premium Income (NAZ) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
ARPS redeemed and/or noticed for redemption:
|
||||||
|
Series TH
|
1,115
|
$27,875,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
—
|
$ —
|
| Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
ARPS redeemed and/or noticed for redemption:
|
||||||
|
Series T
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
424
|
$10,600,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
| Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
ARPS redeemed and/or noticed for redemption:
|
||||||
|
Series W
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
665
|
$16,625,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
64 Nuveen Investments
| Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
ARPS redeemed and/or noticed for redemption:
|
||||||
|
Series M
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
736
|
$18,400,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
| Texas Quality Income (NTX) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
ARPS redeemed and/or noticed for redemption:
|
||||||
|
Series M
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
716
|
$17,900,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
|
Series TH
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
1,886
|
47,150,000
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
2,602
|
$65,050,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
|
N/A – As of February 28, 2011, the Fund redeemed all of its outstanding ARPS at liquidation value.
|
||||||
|
Transactions in MTP shares were as follows:
|
||||||
| Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
MTP Shares issued:
|
||||||
|
Series 2015
|
—
|
$ —
|
1,110,000
|
$11,100,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
| Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
MTP Shares issued:
|
||||||
|
Series 2015
|
—
|
$ —
|
1,872,500
|
$18,725,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
| Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
MTP Shares issued:
|
||||||
|
Series 2016
|
180,000
|
$1,800,000
|
1,904,600
|
$19,046,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
| Texas Quality Income (NTX) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
MTP Shares issued:
|
||||||
|
Series 2015
|
—
|
$ —
|
7,092,000
|
$70,920,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
Nuveen Investments 65
|
Notes to
|
|
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
|
|
Transactions in VMTP Shares were as follows:
|
||||||
| Arizona Premium Income (NAZ) | ||||||
|
Six Months
|
Seven Months
|
Year | ||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
||||
|
8/31/11
|
2/28/11
|
7/31/10
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
VMTP Shares issued:
|
||||||
|
Series 2014
|
280
|
$28,000,000
|
—
|
$ —
|
—
|
$ —
|
5. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales (including maturities but excluding short-term investments, where applicable) during the six months ended August 31, 2011, were as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|
|
Purchases
|
$3,368,523
|
$1,406,867
|
$5,899,537
|
$5,275,313
|
$4,579,425
|
|
Sales and maturities
|
4,260,582
|
1,180,025
|
5,940,108
|
5,315,701
|
5,480,841
|
6. Income Tax Information
The following information is presented on an income tax basis. Differences between amounts for financial statement and federal income tax purposes are primarily due to timing differences in recognizing taxable market discount, timing differences in recognizing certain gains and losses on investment transactions and the treatment of investments in inverse floating rate securities reflected as financing transactions, if any. To the extent that differences arise that are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts as detailed below. Temporary differences do not require reclassification. Temporary and permanent differences do not impact the net asset values of the Funds.
At August 31, 2011, the cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Cost of investments
|
$ | 85,969,081 | $ | 31,960,226 | $ | 52,429,102 | $ | 60,271,456 | $ | 202,743,980 | |||||||||
|
Gross unrealized:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Appreciation
|
$ | 5,380,120 | $ | 1,570,482 | $ | 2,451,853 | $ | 2,178,924 | $ | 9,532,404 | |||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
(3,604,950 | ) | (967,646 | ) | (1,422,352 | ) | (1,328,088 | ) | (5,010,170 | ) | |||||||||
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments
|
$ | 1,775,170 | $ | 602,836 | $ | 1,029,501 | $ | 850,836 | $ | 4,522,234 | |||||||||
Permanent differences, primarily due to federal taxes paid, taxable market discount, expiration of capital loss carryforwards, nondeductible offering costs and distribution character reclassifications, resulted in reclassifications among the Funds’ components of Common share net assets at February 28, 2011, the Funds’ last tax year end, as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Paid-in surplus
|
$ | (288,967 | ) | $ | (35,775 | ) | $ | (44,464 | ) | $ | (353 | ) | $ | (92,138 | ) | ||||
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income
|
(11 | ) | 35,197 | 43,687 | 353 | 92,355 | |||||||||||||
|
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
|
288,978 | 578 | 777 | — | (217 | ) | |||||||||||||
66 Nuveen Investments
The tax components of undistributed net tax-exempt income, net ordinary income and net long-term capital gains at February 28, 2011, the Funds’ last tax year end, were as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Undistributed net tax-exempt income *
|
$ | 1,289,020 | $ | 382,271 | $ | 566,266 | $ | 711,421 | $ | 2,605,089 | |||||||||
|
Undistributed net ordinary income **
|
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Undistributed net long-term capital gains
|
— | — | — | — | 213,826 | ||||||||||||||
|
*
|
Undistributed net tax-exempt income (on a tax basis) has not been reduced for the dividend declared on February 1, 2011, paid on March 1, 2011.
|
|
**
|
Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any.
|
The tax character of distributions paid during the seven months ended February 28, 2011, and during the tax year ended July 31, 2010, was designated for purposes of the dividends paid deduction as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Seven months ended February 28, 2011
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Distributions from net tax-exempt income
|
$ | 2,023,334 | $ | 776,662 | $ | 1,271,647 | $ | 1,396,904 | $ | 5,262,746 | |||||||||
|
Distributions from net ordinary income**
|
— | — | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||||
|
Distributions from net long-term capital gains
|
— | — | — | — | 64,372 | ||||||||||||||
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Texas
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Quality
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Year ended July 31, 2010
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
(NTX)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Distributions from net tax-exempt income
|
$ | 3,223,648 | $ | 1,096,403 | $ | 1,905,599 | $ | 2,287,520 | $ | 7,910,812 | |||||||||
|
Distributions from net ordinary income**
|
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Distributions from net long-term capital gains
|
— | — | — | — | 134,057 | ||||||||||||||
|
** Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
At February 28, 2011, the Funds’ last tax year end, the following Funds had unused capital loss carryforwards available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future capital gains, if any. If not applied, the carryforwards will expire as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
||||||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
||||||||||||
|
Expiration:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
February 29, 2012
|
$ | 1,553,627 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
|
February 28, 2013
|
— | — | — | 129,388 | |||||||||||
|
February 28, 2014
|
— | — | — | 218,127 | |||||||||||
|
February 29, 2016
|
562,384 | 175,939 | 157,090 | 363,937 | |||||||||||
|
February 28, 2017
|
323,876 | 210,308 | 220,271 | 258,905 | |||||||||||
|
February 28, 2018
|
43,720 | 318,004 | 223,857 | 108,356 | |||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,483,607 | $ | 704,251 | $ | 601,218 | $ | 1,078,713 | |||||||
During the seven months ended February 28, 2011, the Funds’ last tax year end, the following Funds utilized capital loss carryforwards as follows:
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
Arizona
|
||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
Dividend
|
||||||||||||
|
Income
|
Advantage
|
Advantage 2
|
Advantage 3
|
||||||||||||
|
(NAZ)
|
(NFZ)
|
(NKR)
|
(NXE)
|
||||||||||||
|
Utilized capital loss carryforwards
|
$ | 70,757 | $ | 70,632 | $ | 55,813 | $ | 190,001 | |||||||
At February 28, 2011, the Funds’ last tax year end, $288,967 of Arizona Premium Income’s (NAZ) capital loss carryforward expired.
Nuveen Investments 67
Notes to
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
7. Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Each Fund’s management fee consists of two components – a fund-level fee, based only on the amount of assets within the Fund, and a complex-level fee, based on the aggregate amount of all eligible fund assets managed by the Adviser. This pricing structure enables Fund shareholders to benefit from growth in the assets within their Fund as well as from growth in the amount of complex-wide assets managed by the Adviser.
|
The annual fund-level fee for each Fund, payable monthly, is calculated according to the following schedule:
|
|
|
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
|
|
|
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
|
|
|
Average Daily Managed Assets*
|
Fund-Level Fee Rate
|
|
For the first $125 million
|
.4500%
|
|
For the next $125 million
|
.4375
|
|
For the next $250 million
|
.4250
|
|
For the next $500 million
|
.4125
|
|
For the next $1 billion
|
.4000
|
|
For the next $3 billion
|
.3875
|
|
For managed assets over $5 billion
|
.3750
|
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ)
|
|
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR)
|
|
|
Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE)
|
|
|
Average Daily Managed Assets*
|
Fund-Level Fee Rate
|
|
For the first $125 million
|
.4500%
|
|
For the next $125 million
|
.4375
|
|
For the next $250 million
|
.4250
|
|
For the next $500 million
|
.4125
|
|
For the next $1 billion
|
.4000
|
|
For managed assets over $2 billion
|
.3750
|
The annual complex-level fee for each Fund, payable monthly, is calculated according to the following schedule:
|
Complex-Level Managed Asset Breakpoint Level*
|
Effective Rate at Breakpoint Level
|
|
$55 billion
|
.2000%
|
|
$56 billion
|
.1996
|
|
$57 billion
|
.1989
|
|
$60 billion
|
.1961
|
|
$63 billion
|
.1931
|
|
$66 billion
|
.1900
|
|
$71 billion
|
.1851
|
|
$76 billion
|
.1806
|
|
$80 billion
|
.1773
|
|
$91 billion
|
.1691
|
|
$125 billion
|
.1599
|
|
$200 billion
|
.1505
|
|
$250 billion
|
.1469
|
|
$300 billion
|
.1445
|
|
*
|
For the fund-level and complex-level fees, managed assets include closed-end fund assets managed by the Adviser that are attributable to financial leverage. For these purposes, financial leverage includes the funds’ use of preferred stock and borrowings and certain investments in the residual interest certificates (also called inverse floating rate securities) in tender option bond (TOB) trusts, including the portion of assets held by a TOB trust that has been effectively financed by the trust’s issuance of floating rate securities, subject to an agreement by the Adviser as to certain funds to limit the amount of such assets for determining managed assets in certain circumstances. The complex-level fee is calculated based upon the aggregate daily managed assets of all Nuveen funds that constitute “eligible assets.” Eligible assets do not include assets attributable to investments in other Nuveen funds and assets in excess of $2 billion added to the Nuveen Fund complex in connection with the Adviser’s assumption of the management of the former First American Funds effective January 1, 2011. As of August 31, 2011, the complex-level fee rate for these Funds was .1781%.
|
The management fee compensates the Adviser for overall investment advisory and administrative services and general office facilities. The Adviser has entered into sub-advisory agreements with Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (the “Sub-Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, under which the Sub-Adviser manages the investment portfolios of the Funds. The Sub-Adviser is compensated for its services to the Funds from the management fees paid to the Adviser.
68 Nuveen Investments
The Funds pay no compensation directly to those of its directors/trustees who are affiliated with the Adviser or to its officers, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the Funds from the Adviser or its affiliates. The Board of Directors/Trustees has adopted a deferred compensation plan for independent directors/trustees that enables directors/trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from certain Nuveen-advised funds. Under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of select Nuveen-advised funds.
For the first ten years of Arizona Dividend Advantage 2’s (NKR) operations, the Adviser has agreed to reimburse the Fund, as a percentage of average daily managed assets, for fees and expenses in the amounts and for the time periods set forth below:
|
Year Ending
|
Year Ending
|
||
|
March 31,
|
March 31,
|
||
|
2002*
|
.30%
|
2008
|
.25%
|
|
2003
|
.30
|
2009
|
.20
|
|
2004
|
.30
|
2010
|
.15
|
|
2005
|
.30
|
2011
|
.10
|
|
2006
|
.30
|
2012
|
.05
|
|
2007
|
.30
|
||
|
* From the commencement of operations.
|
The Adviser has not agreed to reimburse Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR) for any portion of its fees and expenses beyond March 31, 2012.
8. New Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
On May 12, 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04 (“ASU No. 2011-04”) modifying Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. At the same time, the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) issued International Financial Reporting Standard (“IFRS”) 13, Fair Value Measurement. The objective of the FASB and IASB is convergence of their guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures. Specifically, ASU No. 2011-04 requires reporting entities to disclose i) the amounts of any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, the reasons for the transfers, ii) for Level 3 fair value measurements, a) quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used, b) a description of the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and c) a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs if a change in those inputs might result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The effective date of ASU No. 2011-04 is for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of this guidance and the impact it will have on the financial statement amounts and footnote disclosures, if any.
Nuveen Investments 69
Annual Investment Management
Agreement Approval Process(Unaudited)
The Board of Trustees or Directors (as the case may be) (each, a “Board” and each Trustee or Director, a “Board Member”) of the Funds, including the Board Members who are not parties to the Funds’ advisory or sub-advisory agreements or “interested persons” of any such parties (the “Independent Board Members”), are responsible for approving the advisory agreements (each, an “Investment Management Agreement”) between each Fund and Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc. (the “Advisor”) and the sub-advisory agreements (each a “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) between the Advisor and Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (the “Sub-Advisor”) (the Investment Management Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements are referred to collectively as the “Advisory Agreements”) and their periodic continuation. Pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), the Board is generally required to consider the continuation of advisory agreements and sub-advisory agreements on an annual basis. Accordingly, at an in-person meeting held on May 23-25, 2011 (the “May Meeting”), the Board, including a majority of the Independent Board Members, considered and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds for an additional one-year period.
In preparation for their considerations at the May Meeting, the Board requested and received extensive materials prepared in connection with the review of the Advisory Agreements. The materials provided a broad range of information regarding the Funds, the Advisor and the Sub-Advisor (the Advisor and the Sub-Advisor are collectively, the “Fund Advisers” and each, a “Fund Adviser”). As described in more detail below, the information provided included, among other things, a review of Fund performance, including Fund investment performance assessments against peer groups and appropriate benchmarks, a comparison of Fund fees and expenses relative to peers, a description and assessment of shareholder service levels for the Funds, a summary of the performance of certain service providers, a review of product initiatives and shareholder communications and an analysis of the Advisor’s profitability with comparisons to comparable peers in the managed fund business. As part of their annual review, the Board also held a separate meeting on April 19-20, 2011, to review the Funds’ investment performance and consider an analysis provided by the Advisor of the Sub-Advisor which generally evaluated the Sub-Advisor’s investment team, investment mandate, organizational structure and history, investment philosophy and process, performance of the applicable Fund, and significant changes to the foregoing. As a result of their review of the materials and discussions, the Board presented the Advisor with questions and the Advisor responded.
70 Nuveen Investments
The materials and information prepared in connection with the review of the Advisory Agreements at the May Meeting supplemented the information provided to the Board during the year. In this regard, throughout the year, the Board, acting directly or through its committees, regularly reviews the performance and various services provided by the Advisor and, since the internal restructuring described in Section A below, the Sub-Advisor. The Board meets at least quarterly as well as at other times as the need arises. At its quarterly meetings, the Board reviews reports by the Advisor which include, among other things, Fund performance, a review of the investment teams and compliance reports. The Board also meets with key investment personnel managing the Fund portfolios during the year. In addition, the Board continues its program of seeking to visit each sub-advisor to the Nuveen funds at least once over a multiple year rotation, meeting with key investment and business personnel. The Board also met with State Street Bank & Trust Company, the Funds’ accountant and custodian, in 2010. The Board considers factors and information that are relevant to its consideration of the renewal of the Advisory Agreements at these meetings held throughout the year. Accordingly, the Board considered the information provided and knowledge gained at these meetings when performing its review at the May Meeting of the Advisory Agreements. The Independent Board Members are assisted throughout the process by independent legal counsel who provided materials describing applicable law and the duties of directors or trustees in reviewing advisory contracts and met with the Independent Board Members in executive sessions without management present.
The Board considered all factors it believed relevant with respect to each Fund, including among other factors: (a) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Fund Advisers, (b) the investment performance of the Fund and Fund Advisers, (c) the advisory fees and costs of the services to be provided to the Funds and the profitability of the Fund Advisers, (d) the extent of any economies of scale, (e) any benefits derived by the Fund Advisers from the relationship with the Fund and (f) other factors. Each Board Member may have accorded different weight to the various factors in reaching his or her conclusions with respect to a Fund’s Advisory Agreements. The Independent Board Members did not identify any single factor as all important or controlling. The Independent Board Members’ considerations were instead based on a comprehensive consideration of all the information presented. The principal factors considered by the Board and its conclusions are described below.
A. Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering renewal of the Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members considered the nature, extent and quality of the Fund Adviser’s services, including advisory services and the resulting Fund performance and administrative services. The Independent Board Members reviewed materials outlining, among other things, the Fund Adviser’s organization and business; the types of services that the Fund Adviser or its affiliates provide to the Funds; the performance record of the applicable Fund (as described in further detail below); and any initiatives Nuveen had taken for the applicable fund product line.
Nuveen Investments 71
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
In considering advisory services, the Board recognized that the Advisor provides various oversight, administrative, compliance and other services for the Funds and the Sub-Advisor provides the portfolio investment management services to the Funds. The Board recognized that Nuveen engaged in an internal restructuring in 2010 pursuant to which portfolio management services the Advisor had provided directly to the Funds were transferred to the Sub-Advisor, a newly-organized, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Advisor consisting of largely the same investment personnel. Accordingly, in reviewing the portfolio management services provided to each Fund, the Board reviewed the materials provided by the Nuveen Investment Services Oversight Team analyzing, among other things, the Sub-Advisor’s investment team and changes thereto, organization and history, assets under management, Fund objectives and mandate, the investment team’s philosophy and strategies in managing the Fund, developments affecting the Sub-Advisor or Fund and Fund performance. The Independent Board Members also reviewed portfolio manager compensation arrangements to evaluate each Fund Adviser’s ability to attract and retain high quality investment personnel, preserve stability, and reward performance but not provide an incentive to take undue risks. In addition, the Board considered the Advisor’s execution of its oversight responsibilities over the Sub-Advisor. Given the importance of compliance, the Independent Board Members also considered Nuveen’s compliance program, including the report of the chief compliance officer regarding the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures.
In addition to advisory services, the Board considered the quality and extent of administrative and other non-investment advisory services the Advisor and its affiliates provide to the Funds, including product management, investment services (such as oversight of investment policies and procedures, risk management, and pricing), fund administration, oversight of service providers, shareholder services, administration of Board relations, regulatory and portfolio compliance, legal support, managing leverage and promoting an orderly secondary market for common shares.
In reviewing the services provided, the Board also reviewed materials describing various notable initiatives and projects the Advisor performed in connection with the closed-end fund product line. These initiatives included continued activities to refinance auction rate preferred securities; ongoing services to manage leverage that has become increasingly complex; continued secondary market offerings and share repurchases for certain funds; and continued communications efforts with shareholders, fund analysts and financial advisers. With respect to the latter, the Independent Board Members noted Nuveen’s continued commitment to supporting the secondary market for the common shares of its closed-end funds through a comprehensive secondary market communication program designed to raise investor and analyst awareness and understanding of closed-end funds. Nuveen’s support services included, among other things: continuing communications in support of refinancing efforts related to auction rate preferred securities; participating in conferences; communicating continually with closed-end fund analysts covering the Nuveen funds; providing marketing for the closed-end funds; share purchases; and maintaining and enhancing a closed-end fund website.
72 Nuveen Investments
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members found that, overall, the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the respective Funds under each applicable Advisory Agreement were satisfactory.
B. The Investment Performance of the Funds and Fund Advisers
The Board, including the Independent Board Members, reviewed and considered the performance history of each Fund over various time periods. The Board reviewed, among other things, each Fund’s historic investment performance as well as information comparing the Fund’s performance information with that of other funds (the “Performance Peer Group”) based on data provided by an independent provider of mutual fund data and with recognized and/or customized benchmarks.
The Board reviewed reports, including a comprehensive analysis of the Funds’ performance and the applicable investment team. In this regard, the Board reviewed each Fund’s total return information compared to its Performance Peer Group for the quarter, one-, three- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2010 and for the same periods ending March 31, 2011. In addition, the Board reviewed each Fund’s total return information compared to recognized and/or customized benchmarks for the quarter, one-and three-year periods ending December 31, 2010 and for the same periods ending March 31, 2011. The Independent Board Members also reviewed historic premium and discount levels, including a summary of actions taken to address or discuss other developments affecting the secondary market discounts of various funds. This information supplemented the Fund performance information provided to the Board at each of its quarterly meetings.
In reviewing performance comparison information, the Independent Board Members recognized that the usefulness of the comparisons of the performance of certain funds with the performance of their respective Performance Peer Group may be limited because the Performance Peer Group may not adequately represent the objectives and strategies of the applicable funds or may be limited in size or number. In this regard, the Independent Board Members noted that the Performance Peer Groups of each of the Funds were classified as having significant differences from the respective Funds based on various considerations such as special fund objectives, potential investable universe and the composition of the peer set (e.g., the number and size of competing funds and number of competing managers). The Independent Board Members also noted that the investment experience of a particular shareholder in the Nuveen funds will vary depending on when such shareholder invests in the applicable fund, the class held (if multiple classes are offered) and the performance of the fund (or respective class) during that shareholder’s investment period. With respect to any Nuveen funds that underper-formed their peers and/or benchmarks from time to time, the Board monitors such funds closely and considers any steps necessary or appropriate to address such issues.
The Independent Board Members considered the performance of the Funds (which, as noted above, each had significant differences with their Performance Peer Groups) compared to their benchmarks. In this regard, the Independent Board Members noted
Nuveen Investments 73
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
that (a) the Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 and the Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 outperformed their benchmarks in the one- and three-year periods, (b) the Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund underperformed its benchmark in the one- and three-year periods and (c) the Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. (the “Arizona Premium Income Fund”) and the Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (the “Texas Quality Income Fund”) underperformed their benchmarks in the one-year period, but outperformed their benchmarks in the three-year period.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members determined that each Fund’s investment performance had been satisfactory.
C. Fees, Expenses and Profitability
1. Fees and Expenses
The Board evaluated the management fees and expenses of each Fund reviewing, among other things, such Fund’s gross management fees, net management fees and net expense ratios in absolute terms as well as compared to the fee and expenses of a comparable universe of funds based on data provided by an independent fund data provider (the “Peer Universe”) and in certain cases, to a more focused subset of funds in the Peer Universe (the “Peer Group”) and any expense limitations.
The Independent Board Members further reviewed the methodology regarding the construction of the applicable Peer Universe and Peer Group (if any). In reviewing the comparisons of fee and expense information, the Independent Board Members took into account that in certain instances various factors such as: the asset level of a fund relative to peers; the limited size and particular composition of the Peer Universe or Peer Group; the investment objectives of the peers; expense anomalies; changes in the funds comprising the Peer Universe or Peer Group from year to year; levels of reimbursement; the timing of information used; the differences in the type and use of leverage; and differences in the states reflected in the Peer Universe or Peer Group may impact the comparative data thereby limiting the ability to make a meaningful comparison with peers.
In reviewing the fee schedule for a Fund, the Independent Board Members also considered the fund-level and complex-wide breakpoint schedules (described in further detail below) and any fee waivers and reimbursements provided by Nuveen (applicable, in particular, for certain closed-end funds launched since 1999). In reviewing fees and expenses, the Board considered the expenses and fees to be higher if they were over 10 basis points higher, slightly higher if they were 6 to 10 basis points higher, in line if they were within 5 basis points higher than the peer average and below if they were below the peer average of the Peer Group (if available) or Peer Universe if there was no separate Peer Group.
The Independent Board Members noted that the Arizona Premium Income Fund and the Texas Quality Income Fund had net management fees slightly higher or higher than the peer average but a net expense ratio below or in line with the peer
74 Nuveen Investments
average. They observed that each of the other Funds had net management fees and net expense ratios below or in line with their peer averages.
Based on their review of the fee and expense information provided, the Independent Board Members determined that each Fund’s management fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund.
2. Comparisons with the Fees of Other Clients
The Independent Board Members further reviewed information regarding the nature of services and fee rates offered by the Advisor to other clients, including municipal separately managed accounts and passively managed exchange traded funds (ETFs) sub-advised by the Advisor. In evaluating the comparisons of fees, the Independent Board Members noted that the fee rates charged to the Funds and other clients vary, among other things, because of the different services involved and the additional regulatory and compliance requirements associated with registered investment companies, such as the Funds. Accordingly, the Independent Board Members considered the differences in the product types, including, but not limited to, the services provided, the structure and operations, product distribution and costs thereof, portfolio investment policies, investor profiles, account sizes and regulatory requirements. The Independent Board Members noted, in particular, that the range of services provided to the Funds (as discussed above) is much more extensive than that provided to separately managed accounts. Given the inherent differences in the products, particularly the extensive services provided to the Funds, the Independent Board Members believe such facts justify the different levels of fees.
In considering the fees of the Sub-Advisor, the Independent Board Members also considered the pricing schedule or fees that the Sub-Advisor charges for similar investment management services for other Nuveen funds.
3. Profitability of Fund Advisers
In conjunction with its review of fees, the Independent Board Members also considered the profitability of Nuveen for its advisory activities (which incorporated Nuveen’s wholly-owned affiliated sub-advisers) and its financial condition. The Independent Board Members reviewed the revenues and expenses of Nuveen’s advisory activities for the last two years, the allocation methodology used in preparing the profitability data and an analysis of the key drivers behind the changes in revenues and expenses that impacted profitability in 2010. The Independent Board Members noted this information supplemented the profitability information requested and received during the year to help keep them apprised of developments affecting profitability (such as changes in fee waivers and expense reimbursement commitments). In this regard, the Independent Board Members noted that they have an Independent Board Member serve as a point person to review and keep them apprised of changes to the profitability analysis and/or methodologies during the year. The Independent Board Members also considered Nuveen’s revenues for advisory activities, expenses, and profit margin compared to
Nuveen Investments 75
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
that of various unaffiliated management firms with similar amounts of assets under management and relatively comparable asset composition prepared by Nuveen.
In reviewing profitability, the Independent Board Members recognized the subjective nature of determining profitability which may be affected by numerous factors including the allocation of expenses. Further, the Independent Board Members recognized the difficulties in making comparisons as the profitability of other advisers generally is not publicly available and the profitability information that is available for certain advisers or management firms may not be representative of the industry and may be affected by, among other things, the adviser’s particular business mix, capital costs, types of funds managed and expense allocations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Independent Board Members reviewed Nuveen’s methodology and assumptions for allocating expenses across product lines to determine profitability. In reviewing profitability, the Independent Board Members recognized Nuveen’s investment in its fund business. Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that the Advisor’s level of profitability for its advisory activities was reasonable in light of the services provided.
In evaluating the reasonableness of the compensation, the Independent Board Members also considered other amounts paid to a Fund Adviser by the Funds as well as any indirect benefits (such as soft dollar arrangements, if any) the Fund Adviser and its affiliates receive, or are expected to receive, that are directly attributable to the management of the Funds, if any. See Section E below for additional information on indirect benefits a Fund Adviser may receive as a result of its relationship with the Funds. Based on their review of the overall fee arrangements of each Fund, the Independent Board Members determined that the advisory fees and expenses of the respective Fund were reasonable.
D. Economies of Scale and Whether Fee Levels Reflect These Economies of Scale
With respect to economies of scale, the Independent Board Members have recognized the potential benefits resulting from the costs of a fund being spread over a larger asset base, although economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, particularly on a fund-by-fund basis. One method to help ensure the shareholders share in these benefits is to include breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule. Generally, management fees for funds in the Nuveen complex are comprised of a fund-level component and a complex-level component, subject to certain exceptions. Accordingly, the Independent Board Members reviewed and considered the applicable fund-level breakpoints in the advisory fee schedules that reduce advisory fees as asset levels increase. Further, the Independent Board Members noted that although closed-end funds may from time-to-time make additional share offerings, the growth of their assets will occur primarily through the appreciation of such funds’ investment portfolio.
In addition to fund-level advisory fee breakpoints, the Board also considered the Funds’ complex-wide fee arrangement. Pursuant to the complex-wide fee arrangement, the
76 Nuveen Investments
fees of the funds in the Nuveen complex are generally reduced as the assets in the fund complex reach certain levels. The complex-wide fee arrangement seeks to provide the benefits of economies of scale to fund shareholders when total fund complex assets increase, even if assets of a particular fund are unchanged or have decreased. The approach reflects the notion that some of Nuveen’s costs are attributable to services provided to all its funds in the complex and therefore all funds benefit if these costs are spread over a larger asset base.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that the breakpoint schedules and complex-wide fee arrangement were acceptable and reflect economies of scale to be shared with shareholders when assets under management increase.
E. Indirect Benefits
In evaluating fees, the Independent Board Members received and considered information regarding potential “fall out” or ancillary benefits the respective Fund Adviser or its affiliates may receive as a result of its relationship with each Fund. In this regard, the Independent Board Members considered any revenues received by affiliates of the Advisor for serving as agent at Nuveen’s trading desk and as co-manager in initial public offerings of new closed-end funds.
In addition to the above, the Independent Board Members considered whether the Fund Advisers received any benefits from soft dollar arrangements whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a Fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research that may be useful to the Fund Adviser in managing the assets of the Funds and other clients. The Independent Board Members recognized that each Fund Adviser has the authority to pay a higher commission in return for brokerage and research services if it determines in good faith that the commission paid is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided. Nevertheless, the Independent Board Members noted that commissions are generally not paid in connection with municipal securities transactions typically executed on a principal basis.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that any indirect benefits received by a Fund Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Funds were reasonable and within acceptable parameters.
F. Other Considerations
The Independent Board Members did not identify any single factor discussed previously as all-important or controlling. The Board Members, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously concluded that the terms of each Advisory Agreement are fair and reasonable, that the respective Fund Adviser’s fees are reasonable in light of the services provided to each Fund and that the Advisory Agreements be renewed and that the Advisory Agreements be renewed.
Nuveen Investments 77
Reinvest Automatically,
Easily and Conveniently
Nuveen makes reinvesting easy. A phone call is all it takes to set up your reinvestment account.
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Automatic Reinvestment Plan
Your Nuveen Closed-End Fund allows you to conveniently reinvest distributions in additional Fund shares.
By choosing to reinvest, you’ll be able to invest money regularly and automatically, and watch your investment grow through the power of compounding. Just like distributions in cash, there may be times when income or capital gains taxes may be payable on distributions that are reinvested.
It is important to note that an automatic reinvestment plan does not ensure a profit, nor does it protect you against loss in a declining market.
Easy and convenient
To make recordkeeping easy and convenient, each month you’ll receive a statement showing your total distributions, the date of investment, the shares acquired and the price per share, and the total number of shares you own.
How shares are purchased
The shares you acquire by reinvesting will either be purchased on the open market or newly issued by the Fund. If the shares are trading at or above net asset value at the time of valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at the greater of the net asset value or 95% of the then-current market price. If the shares are trading at less than net asset value, shares for your account will be purchased on the open market. If the Plan Agent begins purchasing Fund shares on the open market while shares are trading below net asset value, but the Fund’s shares subsequently trade at or above their net asset value before the Plan Agent is able to complete its purchases, the Plan Agent may cease open-market purchases and may invest the uninvested portion of the distribution in newly-issued Fund shares at a price equal to the greater of the shares’ net asset value or 95% of the shares’ market value on the last business day immediately prior to the purchase date. Distributions received to purchase shares in the open market will normally be invested shortly after the distribution payment date. No interest will be paid on distributions awaiting reinvestment. Because the market price of the shares may increase before purchases are completed, the average purchase price per share may
78 Nuveen Investments
exceed the market price at the time of valuation, resulting in the acquisition of fewer shares than if the distribution had been paid in shares issued by the Fund. A pro rata portion of any applicable brokerage commissions on open market purchases will be paid by Plan participants. These commissions usually will be lower than those charged on individual transactions.
Flexible
You may change your distribution option or withdraw from the Plan at any time, should your needs or situation change.
You can reinvest whether your shares are registered in your name, or in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee. Ask your investment advisor if his or her firm will participate on your behalf. Participants whose shares are registered in the name of one firm may not be able to transfer the shares to another firm and continue to participate in the Plan.
The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Although the Fund reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants, there is no direct service charge to participants in the Plan at this time.
Call today to start reinvesting distributions
For more information on the Nuveen Automatic Reinvestment Plan or to enroll in or withdraw from the Plan, speak with your financial advisor or call us at (800) 257-8787.
Nuveen Investments 79
Glossary of Terms
Used in this Report
|
■
|
Auction Rate Bond: An auction rate bond is a security whose interest payments are adjusted periodically through an auction process, which process typically also serves as a means for buying and selling the bond. Auctions that fail to attract enough buyers for all the shares offered for sale are deemed to have “failed,” with current holders receiving a formula-based interest rate until the next scheduled auction.
|
|
■
|
Average Annual Total Return: This is a commonly used method to express an investment’s performance over a particular, usually multi-year time period. It expresses the return that would have been necessary each year to equal the investment’s actual cumulative performance (including change in NAV or market price and reinvested dividends and capital gains distributions, if any) over the time period being considered.
|
|
■
|
Average Effective Maturity: The market-value-weighted average of the effective maturity dates of the individual securities including cash. In the case of a bond that has been advance-refunded to a call date, the effective maturity is the date on which the bond is scheduled to be redeemed using the proceeds of an escrow account. In most other cases the effective maturity is the stated maturity date of the security.
|
|
■
|
Effective Leverage: Effective leverage is a Fund’s effective economic leverage, and includes both structural leverage and the leverage effects of certain derivative investments in the Fund’s portfolio. Currently, the leverage effects of Tender Option Bond (TOB) inverse floater holdings are included in effective leverage values, in addition to any structural leverage.
|
|
■
|
Inverse Floaters: Inverse floating rate securities, also known as inverse floaters, are created by depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose trust created by a broker-dealer. This trust, in turn, (a) issues floating rate certificates typically paying short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties in amounts equal to some fraction of the deposited bond’s par amount or market value, and (b) issues an inverse floating rate certificate (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) to an investor (such as a Fund) interested in gaining investment exposure to a long-term municipal bond. The income received by the holder of the inverse floater varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to the floating rate certificates’ holders, and in most circumstances the holder of the inverse floater bears substantially all of the underlying bond’s downside investment risk. The holder of the inverse floater typically also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the underlying bond’s value. Hence, an inverse floater essentially represents an investment in the underlying bond on a leveraged basis.
|
|
■
|
Leverage: Using borrowed money to invest in securities or other assets.
|
|
■
|
Leverage-Adjusted Duration: Duration is a measure of the expected period over which a bond’s principal and interest will be paid, and consequently is a measure of the sensitivity of a bond’s or bond Fund’s value to changes when market interest rates
|
80 Nuveen Investments
|
|
change. Generally, the longer a bond’s or Fund’s duration, the more the price of the bond or Fund will change as interest rates change. Leverage-adjusted duration takes into account the leveraging process for a Fund and therefore is longer than the duration of the Fund’s portfolio of bonds.
|
|
■
|
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Classification Average: Calculated using the returns of all closed-end funds in this category for each period as follows: 6-month, 46 funds; 1-year, 46 funds; 5-year, 46 funds; and 10-year, 27 funds. Lipper returns account for the effects of management fees and assume reinvestment of dividends, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges. The Lipper average is not available for direct investment.
|
|
■
|
Market Yield (also known as Dividend Yield or Current Yield): An investment’s current annualized dividend divided by its current market price.
|
|
■
|
Net Asset Value (NAV): The net market value of all securities held in a portfolio.
|
|
■
|
Net Asset Value (NAV) Per Share: The market value of one share of a mutual fund or closed-end fund. For a Fund, the NAV is calculated daily by taking the Fund’s total assets (securities, cash, and accrued earnings), subtracting the Fund’s liabilities, and dividing by the number of shares outstanding.
|
|
■
|
Pre-Refunding: Pre-Refunding, also known as advanced refundings or refinancings, is a procedure used by state and local governments to refinance municipal bonds to lower interest expenses. The issuer sells new bonds with a lower yield and uses the proceeds to buy U.S. Treasury securities, the interest from which is used to make payments on the higher-yielding bonds. Because of this collateral, pre-refunding generally raises a bond’s credit rating and thus its value.
|
|
■
|
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Arizona and Texas Municipal Bond Indexes: Are unlever-aged, market value-weighted indexes designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment-grade municipal bond markets in Arizona and Texas, respectively. The index returns assume reinvestment of dividends but do not reflect any applicable sales charges. You cannot invest directly in an index.
|
|
■
|
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) National Municipal Bond Index: An unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment-grade U.S. municipal bond market. The index returns assume reinvestment of dividends but do not reflect any applicable sales charges. You cannot invest directly in an index.
|
|
■
|
Structural Leverage: Structural Leverage consists of preferred shares or debt issued by the fund. Both of these are part of a fund’s capital structure. Structural leverage is sometimes referred to as “’40 Act Leverage” and is subject to asset coverage limits set in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
|
|
■
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield: The yield necessary from a fully taxable investment to equal, on an after-tax basis, the yield of a municipal bond investment.
|
|
■
|
Zero Coupon Bond: A zero coupon bond does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the bond. Tax-exempt income to the holder of the bond comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the bond at issuance and the par value of the bond at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon bonds generally are more volatile than the market prices of bonds that pay interest periodically.
|
Nuveen Investments 81
Notes
82 Nuveen Investments
Other Useful Information
Board of Directors/Trustees
John P. Amboian
Robert P. Bremner
Jack B. Evans
William C. Hunter
David J. Kundert
William J. Schneider
Judith M. Stockdale
Carole E. Stone
Virginia L. Stringer
Terence J. Toth
Fund Manager
Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Custodian
State Street Bank
& Trust Company
Boston, MA
Transfer Agent and Shareholder Services
State Street Bank &
Trust Company
Nuveen Funds
P.O. Box 43071
Providence, RI 02940-3071
(800) 257-8787
Legal Counsel
Chapman and Cutler LLP
Chicago, IL
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, IL
Quarterly Portfolio of Investments and Proxy Voting Information
You may obtain (i) each Fund’s quarterly portfolio of investments, (ii) information regarding how each Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, and (iii) a description of the policies and procedures that each Fund used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities without charge, upon request, by calling Nuveen Investments toll-free at (800) 257-8787 or on Nuveen’s website at www.nuveen.com.
You may also obtain this and other Fund information directly from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC may charge a copying fee for this information. Visit the SEC on-line at http://www.sec.gov or in person at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call the SEC at (202) 942-8090 for room hours and operation. You may also request Fund information by sending an e-mail request to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing to the SEC’s Public References Section at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
CEO Certification Disclosure
Each Fund’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) the annual CEO certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
Each Fund has filed with the SEC the certification of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Common and Preferred Share Information
Each Fund intends to repurchase and/or redeem shares of its own common and/or auction rate preferred stock in the future at such times and in such amounts as is deemed advisable. During the period covered by this report, the Funds repurchased and/or redeemed shares of their common and/or auction rate preferred stock as shown in the accompanying table.
|
Common Shares
|
Preferred Shares
|
|
|
Fund
|
Repurchased
|
Redeemed
|
|
NAZ
|
—
|
1,115
|
|
NFZ
|
—
|
—
|
|
NKR
|
—
|
—
|
|
NXE
|
—
|
—
|
|
NTX
|
—
|
—
|
Any future repurchases will be reported to shareholders in the next annual or semi-annual report.
Nuveen Investments 83
Nuveen Investments:
Serving Investors for Generations
Since 1898, financial advisors and their clients have relied on Nuveen Investments to provide dependable investment solutions through continued adherence to proven, long-term investing principles. Today, we offer a range of high quality equity and fixed-income solutions designed to be integral components of a well-diversified core portfolio.
Focused on meeting investor needs.
Nuveen Investments is a global investment management firm that seeks to help secure the long-term goals of institutions and high net worth investors as well as the consultants and financial advisors who serve them. We market our growing range of specialized investment solutions under the high-quality brands of HydePark, NWQ, Nuveen Asset Management, Santa Barbara, Symphony, Tradewinds and Winslow Capital. In total, Nuveen Investments managed approximately $210 billion of assets as of June 30, 2011.
Find out how we can help you.
To learn more about how the products and services of Nuveen Investments may be able to help you meet your financial goals, talk to your financial advisor, or call us at (800) 257-8787. Please read the information provided carefully before you invest. Investors should consider the investment objective and policies, risk considerations, charges and expenses of any investment carefully. Where applicable, be sure to obtain a prospectus, which contains this and other relevant information. To obtain a prospectus, please contact your securities representative or Nuveen Investments, 333 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60606. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Learn more about Nuveen Funds at: www.nuveen.com/cef
It only takes a minute to sign up for e-Reports. Once enrolled, you’ll receive an e-mail as soon as your Nuveen Fund information is ready - no more waiting for delivery by regular mail. Just click on the link within the e-mail to see the report and save it on your computer if you wish.
Free e-Reports right to your e-mail!
www.investordelivery.com
If you receive your Nuveen Fund distributions and statements from your financial advisor or brokerage account.
OR
www.nuveen.com/accountaccess
If you receive your Nuveen Fund distributions and statements directly from Nuveen.
Distributed by
Nuveen Securities, LLC
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
www.nuveen.com
ESA-D-0811D
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
(a) See Portfolio of Investments in Item 1.
(b) Not applicable.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant's Board of Directors or Trustees implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to this Item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
|
(a)
|
The registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act") (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")(17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)).
|
|
(b)
|
There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.
File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form.
|
(a)(1)
|
Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Not applicable to this filing.
|
|
(a)(2)
|
A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) in the exact form set forth below: See Ex-99.CERT attached hereto.
|
|
(a)(3)
|
Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.23c-1) sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons: Not applicable.
|
|
(b)
|
If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)); Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: See Ex-99.906 CERT attached hereto.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc.
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Kevin J. McCarthy
Kevin J. McCarthy
(Vice President and Secretary)
Date: November 7, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Gifford R. Zimmerman
Gifford R. Zimmerman
Chief Administrative Officer
(principal executive officer)
Date: November 7, 2011
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Stephen D. Foy
Stephen D. Foy
Vice President and Controller
(principal financial officer)
Date: November 7, 2011