UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-07278
---------------------
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Kevin J. McCarthy
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (312) 917-7700
-------------------
Date of fiscal year end: July 31
------------------
Date of reporting period: July 31, 2007
------------------
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with
the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of
any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may
use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review,
inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR,
and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not
required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR
unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the
information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the
burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information
under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. ss. 3507.
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
Annual Report
July 31, 2007
Nuveen Investments
Municipal Closed-End Funds
Photo of: Small child
NUVEEN ARIZONA
PREMIUM INCOME
MUNICIPAL FUND, INC.
NAZ
NUVEEN ARIZONA
DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE
MUNICIPAL FUND
NFZ
NUVEEN ARIZONA
DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE
MUNICIPAL FUND 2
NKR
NUVEEN ARIZONA
DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE
MUNICIPAL FUND 3
NXE
NUVEEN TEXAS
QUALITY INCOME
MUNICIPAL FUND
NTX
It's not what you earn, it's what you keep.(R)
Logo: NUVEEN Investments
Photo of: Man working on computer
Life is complex.
Nuveen
makes things
e-simple.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It only takes a minute to sign up for e-Reports. Once enrolled, you'll
receive an e-mail as soon as your Nuveen Investments Fund information is
ready--no more waiting for delivery by regular mail. Just click on the link
within the e-mail to see the report and save it on your computer if you
wish.
Free e-Reports right to your e-mail!
www.investordelivery.com
If you receive your Nuveen Fund
dividends and statements from your
financial advisor or brokerage account.
OR
www.nuveen.com/accountaccess
If you receive your Nuveen Fund dividends
and statements directly from Nuveen.
Logo: NUVEEN Investments
Chairman's
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
Photo of: Timothy R. Schwertfeger
Timothy R. Schwertfeger
Chairman of the Board
Once again, I am pleased to report that over the twelve-month period covered by
this report your Fund continued to provide you with monthly tax-free income. For
more details about the management strategy and performance of your Fund, please
read the Portfolio Managers' Comments, the Dividend and Share Price Information,
and the Performance Overview sections of this report.
I also wanted to take this opportunity to report some important news about
Nuveen Investments. We have accepted a "buyout" offer from Madison Dearborn
Partners, LLC. While this will affect the corporate structure of Nuveen
Investments, it will have no impact on the investment objectives of the Funds,
portfolio management strategies or their dividend policies. We will provide you
with additional information about this transaction as more details become
available.
With the recent volatility in the stock market, many have begun to wonder which
way the market is headed, and whether they need to adjust their holdings of
investments. No one knows what the future will bring, which is why we think a
well-balanced portfolio that is structured and carefully monitored with the help
of an investment professional is an important component in achieving your
long-term financial goals. A well-diversified portfolio may actually help to
reduce your overall investment risk, and we believe that investments like your
Nuveen Investments Fund can be important building blocks in a portfolio crafted
to perform well through a variety of market conditions.
We also are pleased to be able to offer you a choice concerning how you receive
your shareholder reports and other Fund information. As an alternative to mailed
copies, you can sign up to receive future Fund reports and other Fund
information by e-mail and the internet. The inside front cover of this report
contains information on how you can sign up.
We are grateful that you have chosen us as a partner as you pursue your
financial goals and we look forward to continuing to earn your trust in the
months and years ahead. At Nuveen Investments, our mission continues to be to
assist you and your financial advisor by offering investment services and
products that can help you to secure your financial objectives.
Sincerely,
/s/ Timothy R. Schwertfeger
Timothy R. Schwertfeger
Chairman of the Board
September 14, 2007
Portfolio Managers' COMMENTS
Nuveen Investments Municipal Closed-End Funds
NAZ, NFZ, NKR, NXE, NTX
Portfolio managers Scott Romans and Daniel Close review national and state
economic and municipal market environments, key investment strategies and the
annual performance of these five Nuveen Funds. Scott, who has been with Nuveen
since 2000, has managed the Arizona Funds since 2003. Dan, who also joined
Nuveen in 2000, assumed portfolio management responsibility for NTX in March
2007.
WHAT FACTORS AFFECTED THE U.S. ECONOMY AND MUNICIPAL MARKET DURING THE ANNUAL
REPORTING PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 2007?
Between August 1, 2006 and July 31, 2007, we saw interest rates at the short end
of the municipal bond yield curve hold relatively steady, while longer-term
rates declined during much of the period. For the entire 12-month period, the
yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note dropped more than 20 basis
points to end July 2007 at 4.77%. In the municipal market, the yield on the Bond
Buyer 25 Revenue Bond Index, a widely followed measure of longer-term municipal
market rates, fell to 4.63% at the end of July 2007, a decline of 50 basis
points from the end of July 2006. Over the reporting period as a whole, the
municipal bond yield curve continued to flatten as shorter-term rates remained
steady and longer-term rates fell. In this environment, longer duration1 bonds
generally outperformed those with shorter durations.
July 2006 marked the end of the Federal Reserve's unprecedented series of 17
consecutive 0.25% rate hikes that brought the fed funds rate to 5.25% over a
two-year span. Although many market observers expected the Fed to act on rates
in early 2007, the Fed stayed on the sidelines throughout this reporting period,
leaving monetary policy unchanged as it kept close tabs on the pace of economic
growth, a slumping housing market, and inflationary pressures, including higher
energy prices. Through much of this period, the U.S. gross domestic product
(GDP), a closely watched measure of economic growth, operated at below-trend
levels, expanding at a rate of 1.1% in the third quarter of 2006, 2.1% in the
fourth quarter of 2006, and 0.6% in the first quarter of 2007, the weakest
reading since 2002 (all GDP numbers annualized). However, in the second quarter
of 2007, increases in government and business spending and exports helped GDP
growth rebound sharply to 4.0%, overcoming the 12% decline in residential
investment and a noticeable deceleration in consumer spending. While the
Consumer Price Index registered a 2.4% year-over-year gain as of July 2007, the
increase in this inflation gauge for the first seven months of 2007 was 4.5%,
driven largely by gains in energy and food prices. By comparison, the core CPI
(which excludes food and energy prices) rose 2.3% between January and July 2007.
1 Duration is a measure of a bond's price sensitivity as interest rates change,
with longer duration bonds displaying more sensitivity to these changes than
bonds with shorter durations.
4
Over the 12 months ended July 2007, municipal bond issuance nationwide totaled
$439.6 billion, up more than 22% from the previous 12 months. This total
reflected increased supply during the first seven months of 2007, when $261.3
billion in new securities came to market, up 26% over the same period in 2006. A
major factor in 2007 volume was the 59% increase in advance refundings,2 driven
by attractive borrowing rates for issuers during the first half of the year. The
strength and diversity of demand for municipal bonds were as important as the
increase in supply, as the surge in issuance was easily absorbed by a
broad-based universe of buyers, including retail investors, institutional
investors such as hedge funds and arbitragers, and overseas investors.
HOW WERE THE ECONOMIC AND MARKET ENVIRONMENTS IN ARIZONA AND TEXAS DURING THIS
PERIOD?
In terms of gross domestic product by state, Arizona had the third fastest
growing economy in the nation in 2006, with growth of 6.8%, twice the national
average of 3.4%. During this period, the government sector as well as
manufacturing, finance, and retail trade were among the main economic drivers
for the state. Real estate and construction also played major roles, although
weakness in the housing market could slow development, especially around
Phoenix, the hub of Arizona's growth. However, consumer spending remained
strong, as did employment growth. As of July 2007, Arizona's jobless rate was
3.7%, down from 4.1% in July 2006. With a year-round climate that both retirees
and younger workers find attractive, Arizona's population trends continued to be
strong, with growth of more than 20% over the past six years, ranking the state
second only to Nevada in rate of population growth. Reflecting this growth and
the state's expanding infrastructure needs, Arizona's $10.6 billion fiscal 2008
budget called for an increase of almost 9% over 2007's budget. As of July 2007,
Moody's issuer rating for Arizona was Aa3, while Standard & Poor's reconfirmed
its rating of AA with a stable outlook in June 2007. For the 12 months ended
July 31, 2007, municipal issuance in Arizona totaled $7.6 billion, an increase
of 6% over the previous 12 months. During the first seven months of 2007,
Arizona issuance rose sharply to $5.35 billion, up 64% from that of January-July
2006. According to Moody's, Arizona's debt levels were moderate in relation to
the state's economic base, with both tax-supported debt per capita and debt as a
percentage of personal income ranking below national medians.
With a 4.3% increase in GDP by state, Texas ranked as the 10th fastest growing
state economy in the nation in 2006. Although the Texas economy remained
resource-based, industries in the state continued to be well diversified, with
contributions from agriculture and technology as well as from services and
transportation spurred by NAFTA and its impact on cross-border trade. High crude
oil prices resulted in increased employment as well as improved income. Over the
past 12 months, the unemployment rate in Texas fell from 4.9% in July 2006 to
4.4% in July 2007. Population trends in the state also remained positive, as
growth of almost 13% over the past six years (compared with the national average
of 6.4%) placed Texas among the top seven states in population growth.
Educational funding accounted for approximately 60% of
2 Advance refundings, also known as pre-refundings or refinancings, occur when
an issuer sells new bonds and uses the proceeds to fund principal and interest
payments of older existing bonds. This process often results in lower borrowing
costs for bond issuers.
5
the $71.4 billion Texas state budget for fiscal 2008, reflecting the state's
commitment to education as well as continuing growth in the school-age
population. As of July 31, 2007, Moody's, S&P, and Fitch maintained their
ratings on Texas-backed debt at Aa1, AA, and AA+, respectively, with stable
outlooks. For the 12 months ended July 31, 2007, municipal issuance in Texas
reached $46.1 billion, an increase of 66% over the previous 12 months. Issuance
during the first seven months of 2007 was up 47% from the same period in 2006,
to $27.2 billion, making Texas the second largest state issuer in the nation
(behind California) for both periods. According to Moody's, Texas ranked 41st
among the 50 states in terms of tax-supported debt per capita, and the state's
debt as a percentage of personal income ratio was 1.3%, compared with the
national median of 2.4%.
WHAT KEY STRATEGIES WERE USED TO MANAGE THE ARIZONA AND TEXAS FUNDS DURING THIS
REPORTING PERIOD?
In the municipal bond interest rate environment of the past 12 months, where the
flattening yield curve remained a dominant market factor, we continued to
emphasize a disciplined approach to duration management and yield curve
positioning. In all five of these Funds, our duration management strategies
during this period included the use of inverse floating rate trusts,3 a type of
derivative financial instrument. The inverse floaters had the dual benefit of
bringing the Funds' durations closer to our preferred strategic target and
increasing their distributable income.
As discussed in past shareholder reports, we have also used Treasury futures
contracts and forward interest rate swaps (additional types of derivative
instruments) as duration management tools when we believed this supported our
overall investment performance strategies. The goal of this strategy is to help
us manage net asset value (NAV) volatility without having a negative impact on
the Funds' income streams or common share dividends over the short term. During
this reporting period, we used swaps in NXE and futures contracts in NFZ. As of
July 31, 2007, the swaps in NXE had been removed, while the futures contracts
remained in place in NFZ.
During the first part of this reporting period, NTX also added bonds that could
help to manage duration and increase the Fund's income-generating potential,
including zero coupon bonds. As progress was made toward the Fund's duration
goal, our purchases in NTX during the second part of this period focused mainly
on attractively priced bonds maturing in 20 to 25 years, while the Arizona Funds
emphasized bonds maturing in 20 to 30 years and longer throughout this period.
In Arizona, however, our purchase decisions were generally more heavily
influenced by credit ratings and sectors than by maturity.
3 An inverse floating rate trust is a financial instrument designed to pay
long-term tax-exempt interest at a rate that varies inversely with a short-term
tax-exempt interest rate index. For the Nuveen Funds, the index typically used
is the Securities Industry and Financial Markets (SIFM) Municipal Swap Index
(previously referred to as the Bond Market Association Index or BMA). Inverse
floaters, including those inverse floating rate securities in which the Funds
invested during the 12-month period, are further defined within the "Notes to
Financial Statements" and "Glossary of Terms Used in This Report" sections of
this shareholder report.
6
We also continued to emphasize individual credit selection. As previously
mentioned, both Arizona and Texas saw increased municipal issuance during this
period, and steady new issuance as well as a number of advance refundings and
debt restructurings provided us with a greater variety of bonds and sectors from
which to choose. Since Arizona and Texas are high-quality states, much of the
new supply was highly rated and/or insured. However, we also found opportunities
to diversify our exposure to lower credit quality bonds by incrementally adding
credits that we considered attractive based on their strong performance and the
support they could provide for the Funds' income streams.
This was particularly true in Arizona, where rapid population growth and
expanding infrastructure needs resulted in a number of value opportunities in
the lower-rated and non-rated sectors. During this period, we added new
positions in non-rated community facilities district bonds to NFZ, NKR, and NXE.
The relative newness of this type of credit in the Arizona market, plus the
state's continued growth, made these bonds attractive value prospects. Also
during this period, a number of noninsured, lower-rated hospital offerings came
to market at very attractive prices. We found these opportunities attractive
based not only on their price, but also on their performance potential and the
support they could provide for the Funds' income streams. Apart from credit
quality, we also purchased higher-rated single family housing bonds as a good
way to add income to all of the Arizona Funds.
In NTX during this period, we added to the Fund's positions in tax-supported
bonds (i.e., general obligation, revenue, and appropriation bonds), lower-rated
health care bonds (both hospital and long-term/continuing care facility issues),
and insured education bonds. NTX also sold a GNMA collateralized multi-family
housing project issue maturing in 2035 that was priced at a premium to par
because we were of the opinion that declining underlying project financials may
cause the issue to be called at par.
To generate cash for purchases and to help maintain the Funds' durations within
our preferred strategic range, we selectively sold some of the Funds' holdings
with shorter durations, including pre-refunded bonds and short-dated paper. In
the Arizona Funds, we also found some opportunities to sell a few of our insured
holdings that were purchased when yields were lower and replace them with
similar, newer credits that yielded comparatively more. This process allowed us
to maintain the Funds' current portfolio characteristics while strengthening
their future income streams.
7
HOW DID THE FUNDS PERFORM?
Individual results for these Arizona and Texas Funds, as well as relevant index
and peer group information, are presented in the accompanying table.
Total Returns on Net Asset Value*
For periods ended 7/31/07
1-Year 5-Year 10-Year
Arizona Funds
NAZ 3.62% 5.34% 4.88%
NFZ 3.24% 5.68% NA
NKR 3.59% 5.84% NA
NXE 3.81% NA NA
Texas Fund
NTX 3.82% 5.60% 5.55%
Lehman Brothers
Municipal
Bond Index4 4.27% 4.50% 5.23%
Lipper Other States
Municipal Debt Funds
Average5 3.92% 5.88% 5.75%
For the 12 months ended July 31, 2007, the total returns on NAV for all five of
these Funds underperformed the return on the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond
Index. NXE and NTX performed in line with the average return for the Lipper
Other States Municipal Debt Funds Average peer group, while NAZ, NFZ, and NKR
trailed this average. Shareholders should note that the performance of the
Lipper Other States category represents the overall average of returns for funds
from 10 different states with a wide variety of municipal market conditions,
making direct comparisons less meaningful.
Factors that influenced the Funds' returns during this period included yield
curve and duration positioning, individual security selection and sector
allocations, exposure to lower-rated credits, and advance refunding activity.
As the yield curve continued to flatten over the course of this period,
municipal bonds with maturities of 10 years and longer, as measured by the
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index, performed best, generally outpacing
municipal bonds with shorter maturities. While our strategies during this period
included adding longer-term bonds to our portfolios, most of these Funds
remained slightly short of our strategic target in terms of their holdings of
bonds in the longest part of the yield curve, which was negative for
performance. However, this was generally offset by the Funds' heavier exposure
to the intermediate part of the curve, which performed well, and lower
allocations to the shorter part of the curve, which underperformed the general
municipal market.
*Annualized.
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be
higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of
taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale
of Fund shares.
For additional information, see the individual Performance Overview for your
Fund in this report.
4 The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index is an unleveraged, unmanaged national
index comprising a broad range of investment-grade municipal bonds. Results for
the Lehman index do not reflect any expenses.
5 The Lipper Other State Municipal Debt Funds category average is calculated
using the returns of all closed-end funds in this category for each period as
follows: 1 year, 46; 5 years, 37; and 10 years, 18. Fund and Lipper returns
assume reinvestment of dividends.
8
During this reporting period, NTX benefited from its positions in tax-supported
credits. Other sectors of the market that performed well during this period
included transportation, education and zero coupon bonds.
In general, lower-rated credits, especially securities rated BB or lower and
non-rated bonds, continued to outperform other credit quality sectors during
this period. This outperformance was largely the result of investor demand for
the higher yields typically associated with lower-rated bonds. While NTX
benefited from its weightings of bonds rated BBB or lower during this period,
the performance story in the Arizona Funds was more mixed. Holdings of non-rated
bonds in the Arizona Funds tended to have higher coupons and remained at a
premium as interest rates backed up in June and July 2007, enabling these bonds
to outperform or at least perform in line with the market during this period.
However, some of the BBB-rated hospital bonds added to the Funds during the
earlier part of this period did not have higher coupons and were priced at par
or even a slight discount, leading to underperformance as rates rose and credit
spreads widened. In addition, the Funds' holdings of lower-rated waste
management bonds had very short durations, which meant that they did not capture
as much of the outperformance of the lower-rated sector as other BBB-rated bonds
during the first 10 months of this period.
We continued to see positive contributions from advance refunding activity,
which benefited the Funds through price appreciation and enhanced credit
quality. Pre-refunded bonds, especially those that were advance refunded before
the rise in interest rates in June 2007, were among the best performing holdings
in the Arizona Funds for this period, including a Phoenix Children's Hospital
issue that had been rated Baa3 prior to refinancing. The different rates of
pre-refundings in each of the Funds also had a direct effect on relative
performance during this period, as advance refundings totaled approximately 19%
in NXE, 27% in NAZ, 17% in NKR and 16% in NTX, but only 8% of NFZ's portfolio.
At the same time, holdings of older, previously pre-refunded bonds tended to
underperform the general municipal market during this period, due primarily to
their shorter effective maturities. In addition, the health care sector, which
had ranked among the top performing revenue sectors in the Lehman Brothers
Municipal Bond Index over the past few years, underperformed the general
municipal market for this period as rates rose and credit spreads widened in
June and July 2007. Among these Funds, exposure to the health care sector ranged
from 7% to 12%, which generally detracted from the Funds' performance. NTX also
held some individual housing bonds that did not perform well during this period.
9
Dividend and Share Price
INFORMATION
As previously noted, these five Arizona and Texas Funds use leverage to
potentially enhance opportunities for additional income for common shareholders.
Although the Funds' use of this strategy continued to provide incremental
income, the extent of this benefit was reduced during this period due to
short-term interest rates that remained relatively high, which--in turn--kept
the Funds' borrowing costs high. The Funds' income streams were also impacted as
the proceeds from older, higher-yielding bonds that matured or were called were
reinvested into bonds currently available in the market, which generally offered
lower yields during this period. The combination of these factors resulted in
one monthly dividend reduction in NKR, NXE, and NTX and three in NFZ over the
12-month period ended July 31, 2007. The dividend of NAZ remained stable
throughout this reporting period.
Due to normal portfolio activity, common shareholders of the following Funds
received capital gains and net ordinary income distributions at the end of
December 2006, as follows:
Short-Term Capital Gains
Long-Term Capital Gains and/or Ordinary Income
(per share) (per share)
NFZ $0.0614 $0.0016
NKR $0.0405 --
NTX $0.0363 --
All of the Funds in this report seek to pay stable dividends at rates that
reflect each Fund's past results and projected future performance. During
certain periods, each Fund may pay dividends at a rate that may be more or less
than the amount of net investment income actually earned by the Fund during the
period. If a Fund has cumulatively earned more than it has paid in dividends, it
holds the excess in reserve as undistributed net investment income (UNII) as
part of the Fund's NAV. Conversely, if a Fund has cumulatively paid dividends in
excess of its earnings, the excess constitutes negative UNII that is likewise
reflected in the Fund's NAV. Each Fund will, over time, pay all of its net
investment income as dividends to shareholders. As of July 31, 2007, all of the
Funds in this report had positive UNII balances for tax purposes and negative
UNII balances for financial statement purposes.
10
As of July 31, 2007, the Funds' share prices were trading at premiums or
discounts to their NAVs as shown in the accompanying chart:
7/31/07 12-Month Average
Premium/Discount Premium/Discount
NAZ -6.64% -3.18%
NFZ -7.80% +2.64%
NKR +3.46% +2.41%
NXE -5.35% -2.93%
NTX -6.59% -3.71%
11
NAZ
Performance
OVERVIEW
Nuveen Arizona
Premium Income
Municipal Fund, Inc.
as of July 31, 2007
Pie Chart:
Credit Quality (as a % of total investments)
AAA/U.S.
Guaranteed 75%
AA 8%
A 5%
BBB 10%
N/R 2%
Bar Chart:
Monthly Tax-Free Dividends Per Share -- 2006-2007
Aug 0.051
Sep 0.051
Oct 0.051
Nov 0.051
Dec 0.051
Jan 0.051
Feb 0.051
Mar 0.051
Apr 0.051
May 0.051
Jun 0.051
Jul 0.051
Line Chart:
Share Price Performance -- Weekly Closing Price
Aug 1, 2006 13.73
13.82
13.68
13.767
13.75
13.72
13.69
13.85
13.8
13.69
13.8
13.7
13.7501
13.86
13.75
13.88
14.01
13.86
13.9212
14.2
13.97
13.75
13.81
13.88
13.94
13.88
13.85
14.03
14.16
14.05
14.05
14.099
14.1501
14.09
14.35
14.34
14.35
14.35
14.34
14.26
14.15
14.1
13.93
13.78
13.69
13.5601
13.26
13.3401
13.42
13.4
13.32
13
12.9401
Jul 31, 2007 13.0701
FUND SNAPSHOT
------------------------------------
Common Share Price $13.07
------------------------------------
Common Share
Net Asset Value $14.00
------------------------------------
Premium/(Discount) to NAV -6.64%
------------------------------------
Market Yield 4.68%
------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1 6.81%
------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares ($000) $62,534
------------------------------------
Average Effective
Maturity on Securities (Years) 14.28
------------------------------------
Leverage-Adjusted Duration 9.00
------------------------------------
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURN
(Inception 11/19/92)
------------------------------------
ON SHARE PRICE ON NAV
------------------------------------
1-Year -0.22% 3.62%
------------------------------------
5-Year 0.11% 5.34%
------------------------------------
10-Year 3.73% 4.88%
------------------------------------
INDUSTRIES
(as a % of total investments)
------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed 28.9%
------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/Limited 22.6%
------------------------------------
Water and Sewer 14.5%
------------------------------------
Health Care 11.2%
------------------------------------
Utilities 7.9%
------------------------------------
Education and Civic
Organizations 6.2%
------------------------------------
Housing/Single Family 5.0%
------------------------------------
Other 3.7%
------------------------------------
1 Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully
taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax
basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 31.3%.
When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income,
the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
12
NFZ
Performance
OVERVIEW
Nuveen Arizona
Dividend Advantage
Municipal Fund
as of July 31, 2007
Pie Chart:
Credit Quality (as a % of total investments)
AAA/U.S.
Guaranteed 67%
AA 11%
A 7%
BBB 11%
N/R 4%
Bar Chart:
Monthly Tax-Free Dividends Per Share -- 2006-2007(2)
Aug 0.0655
Sep 0.0615
Oct 0.0615
Nov 0.0615
Dec 0.0585
Jan 0.0585
Feb 0.0585
Mar 0.0585
Apr 0.0585
May 0.0585
Jun 0.0555
Jul 0.0555
Line Chart:
Share Price Performance -- Weekly Closing Price
Aug 1, 2006 15.75
16
16.45
16.13
16
16.18
15.97
16
16.1
15.9
16.22
15.79
15.54
15.66
15.7699
15.85
15.65
15.51
15.7
15.5
15.29
15.24
15.045
15.35
15.24
14.98
14.9
14.79
14.93
15.03
14.85
15.15
14.93
14.96
14.86
14.9501
15.2
15.32
15.07
15.35
15.4
15.26
15.22
15
15.18
15.1
14.8
14.75
14.75
14.78
14.21
13.78
13.2
Jul 31, 2007 13.35
FUND SNAPSHOT
-------------------------------------
Common Share Price $13.35
-------------------------------------
Common Share
Net Asset Value $14.48
-------------------------------------
Premium/(Discount) to NAV -7.80%
-------------------------------------
Market Yield 4.99%
-------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1 7.26%
-------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares ($000) $22,439
-------------------------------------
Average Effective
Maturity on Securities (Years) 17.77
-------------------------------------
Leverage-Adjusted Duration 10.65
-------------------------------------
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURN
(Inception 1/30/01)
-------------------------------------
ON SHARE PRICE ON NAV
-------------------------------------
1-Year -11.63% 3.24%
-------------------------------------
5-Year 2.48% 5.68%
-------------------------------------
Since
Inception 3.92% 6.23%
-------------------------------------
INDUSTRIES
(as a % of total investments)
-------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/Limited 29.3%
-------------------------------------
Utilities 15.2%
-------------------------------------
Housing/Single Family 10.8%
-------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/General 10.7%
-------------------------------------
Health Care 9.5%
-------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed 7.9%
-------------------------------------
Water and Sewer 7.8%
-------------------------------------
Other 8.8%
-------------------------------------
1 Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully
taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax
basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 31.3%.
When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income,
the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
2 The Fund paid shareholders capital gains and net ordinary income distributions
in December 2006 of $0.0630 per share.
13
NKR
Performance
OVERVIEW
Nuveen Arizona
Dividend Advantage
Municipal Fund 2
as of July 31, 2007
Pie Chart:
Credit Quality (as a % of total investments)
AAA/U.S.
Guaranteed 69%
AA 5%
A 10%
BBB 12%
N/R 4%
Bar Chart:
Monthly Tax-Free Dividends Per Share -- 2006-2007(2)
Aug 0.0645
Sep 0.0615
Oct 0.0615
Nov 0.0615
Dec 0.0615
Jan 0.0615
Feb 0.0615
Mar 0.0615
Apr 0.0615
May 0.0615
Jun 0.0615
Jul 0.0615
Line Chart:
Share Price Performance -- Weekly Closing Price
Aug 1, 2006 15.37
15.95
15.9
15.75
15.9
15.66
15.55
15.35
15.55
15.71
16.28
15.73
15.55
15.47
15.7
15.82
15.24
15.35
15.27
15.23
15.2
15.19
15.0307
15.21
14.94
14.89
15.0501
14.94
15.31
15.17
15.5
15.29
15.4645
15.34
15.49
15.2999
15.32
15.65
15.75
15.87
15.96
15.9
16.23
16.06
16.6
15.6
15.05
14.86
15
15.2
15.45
15.2
15.42
Jul 31, 2007 15.27
FUND SNAPSHOT
------------------------------------
Common Share Price $15.27
------------------------------------
Common Share
Net Asset Value $14.76
------------------------------------
Premium/(Discount) to NAV 3.46%
------------------------------------
Market Yield 4.83%
------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1 7.03%
------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares ($000) $35,976
------------------------------------
Average Effective
Maturity on Securities (Years) 15.51
------------------------------------
Leverage-Adjusted Duration 9.54
------------------------------------
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURN
(Inception 3/25/02)
------------------------------------
ON SHARE PRICE ON NAV
------------------------------------
1-Year 4.52% 3.59%
------------------------------------
5-Year 5.29% 5.84%
------------------------------------
Since
Inception 6.23% 6.48%
------------------------------------
INDUSTRIES
(as a % of total investments)
------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/Limited 29.0%
------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed 17.0%
------------------------------------
Health Care 13.6%
------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/General 13.5%
------------------------------------
Water and Sewer 8.1%
------------------------------------
Housing/Multifamily 5.1%
------------------------------------
Housing/Single Family 5.0%
------------------------------------
Other 8.7%
------------------------------------
1 Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully
taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax
basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 31.3%.
When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income,
the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
2 The Fund paid shareholders a capital gains distribution in December 2006 of
$0.0405 per share.
14
NXE
Performance
OVERVIEW
Nuveen Arizona
Dividend Advantage
Municipal Fund 3
as of July 31, 2007
Pie Chart:
Credit Quality (as a % of total investments)
AAA/U.S.
Guaranteed 67%
AA 7%
A 10%
BBB 12%
N/R 4%
Bar Chart:
Monthly Tax-Free Dividends Per Share -- 2006-2007
Aug 0.0565
Sep 0.0565
Oct 0.0565
Nov 0.0565
Dec 0.0565
Jan 0.0565
Feb 0.0565
Mar 0.0545
Apr 0.0545
May 0.0545
Jun 0.0545
Jul 0.0545
Line Chart:
Share Price Performance -- Weekly Closing Price
Aug 1, 2006 13.72
13.89
13.81
14
13.95
13.98
13.8201
13.78
13.8635
13.8
14.05
13.75
13.8
13.99
14.1
13.9
14.08
14
14.19
14.4
14.42
13.8
13.85
13.9
14.1
13.76
13.99
14.1
14.45
14.41
14.26
14.15
14.49
14.29
14.24
14.3
14.46
14.36
14.6
14.49
14.51
14.48
14.53
14.39
14.22
14.55
13.88
13.92
14
13.95
13.91
13.58
13.4
Jul 31, 2007 13.44
FUND SNAPSHOT
------------------------------------
Common Share Price $13.44
------------------------------------
Common Share
Net Asset Value $14.20
------------------------------------
Premium/(Discount) to NAV -5.35%
------------------------------------
Market Yield 4.87%
------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1 7.09%
------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares ($000) $43,552
------------------------------------
Average Effective
Maturity on Securities (Years) 16.16
------------------------------------
Leverage-Adjusted Duration 9.26
------------------------------------
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURN
(Inception 9/25/02)
------------------------------------
ON SHARE PRICE ON NAV
------------------------------------
1-Year 4.21% 3.81%
------------------------------------
Since
Inception 3.05% 5.10%
------------------------------------
INDUSTRIES
(as a % of total investments)
------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/Limited 21.9%
------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed 18.6%
------------------------------------
Health Care 15.4%
------------------------------------
Education and Civic
Organizations 8.7%
------------------------------------
Transportation 8.6%
------------------------------------
Water and Sewer 7.8%
------------------------------------
Utilities 7.7%
------------------------------------
Housing/Single Family 5.0%
------------------------------------
Other 6.3%
------------------------------------
1 Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully
taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax
basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 31.3%.
When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income,
the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
15
NTX
Performance
OVERVIEW
Nuveen Texas
Quality Income
Municipal Fund
as of July 31, 2007
Pie Chart:
Credit Quality (as a % of total investments)
AAA/U.S.
Guaranteed 72%
AA 11%
A 3%
BBB 11%
BB or Lower 1%
N/R 2%
Bar Chart:
Monthly Tax-Free Dividends Per Share -- 2006-2007(2)
Aug 0.0635
Sep 0.0605
Oct 0.0605
Nov 0.0605
Dec 0.0605
Jan 0.0605
Feb 0.0605
Mar 0.0605
Apr 0.0605
May 0.0605
Jun 0.0605
Jul 0.0605
Line Chart:
Share Price Performance -- Weekly Closing Price
Aug 1, 2006 14.6599
14.79
15
14.95
14.86
14.96
14.88
14.84
14.9
14.83
14.73
14.59
14.64
14.67
14.86
14.81
14.87
14.87
14.87
14.8
14.58
14.62
14.64
14.6
14.69
14.61
14.63
14.61
14.5801
14.7
14.56
14.75
14.7
14.6806
14.72
14.64
14.697
14.53
14.58
14.61
14.69
14.62
14.4
14.42
14.44
14.3
14.2
14.2999
14.4
14.5499
14.16
13.87
13.83
Jul 31, 2007 13.89
FUND SNAPSHOT
------------------------------------
Common Share Price $13.89
------------------------------------
Common Share
Net Asset Value $14.87
------------------------------------
Premium/(Discount) to NAV -6.59%
------------------------------------
Market Yield 5.23%
------------------------------------
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1 7.26%
------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares ($000) $141,238
------------------------------------
Average Effective
Maturity on Securities (Years) 15.72
------------------------------------
Leverage-Adjusted Duration 7.67
------------------------------------
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURN
(Inception 10/17/91)
------------------------------------
ON SHARE PRICE ON NAV
------------------------------------
1-Year -0.52% 3.82%
------------------------------------
5-Year 4.40% 5.60%
------------------------------------
10-Year 5.18% 5.55%
------------------------------------
INDUSTRIES
(as a % of total investments)
------------------------------------
Tax Obligation/General 29.3%
------------------------------------
U.S. Guaranteed 16.9%
------------------------------------
Education and Civic
Organizations 12.4%
------------------------------------
Health Care 10.6%
------------------------------------
Water and Sewer 7.3%
------------------------------------
Utilities 6.5%
------------------------------------
Transportation 4.3%
------------------------------------
Other 12.7%
------------------------------------
1 Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully
taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax
basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund
to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent
Yield is lower.
2 The Fund paid shareholders a capital gains distribution in December 2006 of
$.0363 per share.
16
Report of
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES AND SHAREHOLDERS
NUVEEN ARIZONA PREMIUM INCOME MUNICIPAL FUND, INC.
NUVEEN ARIZONA DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE MUNICIPAL FUND
NUVEEN ARIZONA DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE MUNICIPAL FUND 2
NUVEEN ARIZONA DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE MUNICIPAL FUND 3
NUVEEN TEXAS QUALITY INCOME MUNICIPAL FUND
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including
the portfolios of investments, of Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund,
Inc., Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund, Nuveen Arizona Dividend
Advantage Municipal Fund 2, Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3
and Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (the "Funds"), as of July 31,
2007, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the
statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then
ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein.
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of
the Funds' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were
not engaged to perform an audit of the Funds' internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Funds' internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of
securities owned as of July 31, 2007, by correspondence with the custodian and
brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers
were not received. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positions of
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Arizona Dividend
Advantage Municipal Fund, Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2,
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 and Nuveen Texas Quality
Income Municipal Fund at July 31, 2007, the results of their operations for the
year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the two years in
the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods
indicated therein in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
September 24, 2007
17
NAZ
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc.
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2007
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER STAPLES - 1.4% (0.9% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 875 Puerto Rico, The Children's Trust Fund, Tobacco Settlement 5/12 at 100.00 BBB $ 886,708
Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%, 5/15/33
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDUCATION AND CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS - 9.5% (6.2% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,000 Arizona State University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,034,450
5.000%, 7/01/25 - FGIC Insured
Arizona State University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005:
2,455 5.000%, 7/01/20 - AMBAC Insured 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 2,582,660
750 5.000%, 7/01/21 - AMBAC Insured 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 787,095
1,500 Tempe Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Lease Revenue 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 1,544,250
Bonds, Arizona State University Foundation Project, Series 2003,
5.000%, 7/01/34 - AMBAC Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5,705 Total Education and Civic Organizations 5,948,455
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEALTH CARE - 17.3% (11.2% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,430 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 1/17 at 100.00 AA- 1,467,209
Banner Health Systems, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/25
675 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 12/15 at 100.00 BBB 658,989
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2005B,
5.000%, 12/01/37
1,110 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 12/17 at 100.00 BBB 1,075,235
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2007,
5.000%, 12/01/42
550 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 5/16 at 100.00 AA 561,534
Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, Mayo Clinic, Series 2006,
5.000%, 11/15/36
2,150 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 7/14 at 100.00 A 2,212,372
Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West,
Series 2004A, 5.375%, 7/01/23 (UB)
2,800 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 7/17 at 100.00 A 2,863,981
Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West,
Series 2007A, 5.250%, 7/01/32 (UB)
385 Maricopa County, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Sun Health 4/15 at 100.00 Baa1 395,457
Corporation, Series 2005, 5.000%, 4/01/16
515 Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and 11/10 at 101.00 AA 553,707
Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Hospital
Revenue Bonds, Hospital de la Concepcion, Series 2000A,
6.375%, 11/15/15
1,055 Winslow Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital 6/08 at 101.00 N/R 1,041,760
Revenue Bonds, Winslow Memorial Hospital, Series 1998,
5.500%, 6/01/22
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10,670 Total Health Care 10,830,244
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/MULTIFAMILY - 1.5% (1.0% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
400 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, GNMA 6/11 at 102.00 Aaa 414,368
Collateralized Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Campaigne
Place on Jackson, Series 2001, 5.700%, 6/20/31 (Alternative
Minimum Tax)
530 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, GNMA 4/15 at 100.00 Aaa 521,647
Collateralized Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Park Lee
Apartments, Series 2004A, 5.050%, 10/20/44
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
930 Total Housing/Multifamily 936,015
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/SINGLE FAMILY - 7.8% (5.0% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 1,690 The Industrial Development Authority of The City of Tucson, 1/17 at 103.00 Aaa $ 1,728,786
Arizona, Tax-Exempt Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds,
Series 2007A-1, 5.100%, 7/01/38
3,010 Tucson and Pima County Industrial Development Authority, 6/17 at 101.00 Aaa 3,140,092
Arizona, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B,
5.350%, 6/01/47 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4,700 Total Housing/Single Family 4,868,878
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INDUSTRIALS - 2.2% (1.4% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,345 Yavapai County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, No Opt. Call BBB 1,343,077
Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Waste Management Inc.,
Series 2003B, 4.450%, 3/01/28 (Mandatory put 3/01/08)
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/GENERAL - 0.6% (0.4% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
330 Puerto Rico, General Obligation and Public Improvement Bonds, 7/11 at 100.00 BBB- 342,289
Series 2001A, 5.375%, 7/01/28
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/LIMITED - 34.8% (22.6% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
Bullhead City, Arizona, Special Assessment Bonds, Parkway
District Improvements, Series 1993:
720 6.100%, 1/01/08 No Opt. Call Baa2 725,364
775 6.100%, 1/01/09 1/08 at 100.00 Baa2 780,611
454 Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Goodyear, 7/10 at 102.00 N/R 491,945
Arizona, Special Assessment Lien Bonds, Series 2001A,
7.875%, 7/01/25
Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue
Bonds, Series 2006A:
740 5.000%, 8/01/23 - MBIA Insured 8/16 at 100.00 AAA 776,911
875 5.000%, 8/01/25 - MBIA Insured 8/16 at 100.00 AAA 915,329
1,280 Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue 8/16 at 100.00 AAA 1,346,778
Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 8/01/22 - MBIA Insured
575 Marana Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 591,422
Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/28 - AMBAC Insured
1,110 Marana, Arizona, Tangerine Farms Road Improvement District 7/16 at 100.00 Baa1 1,062,070
Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 4.600%, 1/01/26
3,400 Maricopa County Stadium District, Arizona, Revenue Refunding 6/12 at 100.00 Aaa 3,593,460
Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%, 6/01/18 - AMBAC Insured
3,400 Mesa, Arizona, Street and Highway User Tax Revenue Bonds, 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 3,556,978
Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/24 - FSA Insured
1,200 Prescott Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, 1/13 at 100.00 AAA 1,232,280
Municipal Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2003,
5.000%, 1/01/27 - FGIC Insured
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax
Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A:
7,160 0.000%, 7/01/42 - FGIC Insured (UB) No Opt. Call AAA 1,339,851
2,875 0.000%, 7/01/43 - AMBAC Insured (UB) No Opt. Call AAA 509,191
343 Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Bonds No Opt. Call AAA 210,660
Residual, Series 1534, 5.604%, 7/01/42 (IF)
1,000 Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Guaranteed Government 7/12 at 100.00 BBB- 1,027,920
Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002D,
5.125%, 7/01/24
1,610 San Luis Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Municipal 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,676,654
Facilities Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005,
5.000%, 7/01/25 - XLCA Insured
1,350 Tempe, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 7/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,435,104
5.250%, 7/01/20 - AMBAC Insured
500 Tucson, Arizona, Certificates of Participation, Series 2000, 7/08 at 100.00 AAA 508,100
5.700%, 7/01/20 - MBIA Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29,367 Total Tax Obligation/Limited 21,780,628
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19
NAZ
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. (continued)
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS July 31, (2007)
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. GUARANTEED - 44.6% (28.9% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS) (4)
$ 800 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 7/10 at 101.00 A (4) $ 867,472
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 1999A, 6.625%, 7/01/20
(Pre-refunded 7/01/10)
1,000 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital System Revenue 12/10 at 102.00 BBB (4) 1,114,700
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2000,
7.000%, 12/01/25 (Pre-refunded 12/01/10)
1,000 Arizona State University, Certificates of Participation, 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,066,990
Series 2002, 5.375%, 7/01/19 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12) -
MBIA Insured
Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority, Tax Revenue Bonds,
Multipurpose Stadium Facility Project, Series 2003A:
500 5.375%, 7/01/20 (Pre-refunded 7/01/13) - MBIA Insured 7/13 at 100.00 Aaa 539,575
1,000 5.375%, 7/01/21 (Pre-refunded 7/01/13) - MBIA Insured 7/13 at 100.00 Aaa 1,079,150
1,250 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 5/11 at 101.00 A- (4) 1,347,575
Bonds, Midwestern University, Series 2001A, 5.875%, 5/15/31
(Pre-refunded 5/15/11)
1,250 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, No Opt. Call AAA 1,493,513
Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds, Samaritan Health Services,
Series 1990A, 7.000%, 12/01/16 - MBIA Insured (ETM)
630 Maricopa County Union High School District 210 Phoenix, 7/16 at 100.00 AAA 677,086
Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C,
5.000%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/16) - MBIA Insured
1,525 Maricopa County Union High School District 210, Phoenix, 7/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,627,221
Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004A,
5.000%, 7/01/21 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14) - FSA Insured
3,000 Mesa Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, 1/10 at 101.00 AAA 3,164,340
Discovery Health System, Series 1999A, 5.750%, 1/01/25
(Pre-refunded 1/01/10) - MBIA Insured
1,050 Northern Arizona University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 6/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,103,918
5.000%, 6/01/34 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) - FGIC Insured
2,000 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/10 at 101.00 AAA 2,139,680
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2000,
6.000%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/10) - FGIC Insured
2,000 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Subordinate 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 2,121,140
Lien Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 7/01/21
(Pre-refunded 7/01/13) - MBIA Insured
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Government
Office Lease Revenue Bonds, Capitol Mall LLC, Series 2000:
700 5.375%, 9/15/22 (Pre-refunded 9/15/10) - AMBAC Insured 9/10 at 100.00 AAA 732,494
2,000 5.500%, 9/15/27 (Pre-refunded 9/15/10) - AMBAC Insured 9/10 at 100.00 AAA 2,100,140
1,000 Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Highway 7/10 at 101.00 BBB+ (4) 1,083,810
Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B, 6.500%, 7/01/27
(Pre-refunded 7/01/10)
1,500 Scottsdale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital 12/11 at 101.00 A3 (4) 1,625,535
Revenue Bonds, Scottsdale Healthcare, Series 2001,
5.800%, 12/01/31 (Pre-refunded 12/01/11)
3,215 Tucson Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Senior Living 7/10 at 101.00 AA (4) 3,402,885
Facilities Revenue Bonds, Christian Care Project, Series 2000A,
5.625%, 7/01/20 (Pre-refunded 7/01/10) - RAAI Insured
600 Tucson, Arizona, Junior Lien Street and Highway User Revenue 7/10 at 100.00 AAA 620,100
Bonds, Series 2000E, 5.000%, 7/01/18 (Pre-refunded 7/01/10) -
FGIC Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26,020 Total U.S. Guaranteed 27,907,324
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UTILITIES - 12.2% (7.9% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,000 Arizona Power Authority, Special Obligation Power Resource No Opt. Call AA 1,085,570
Revenue Refunding Crossover Bonds, Hoover Project,
Series 2001, 5.250%, 10/01/15
620 Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Lease 1/08 at 100.00 AAA 636,579
Obligation Revenue Refunding Bonds, Tucson Electric Power
Company, Series 1988A, 7.250%, 7/15/10 - FSA Insured
2,170 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue Bonds, 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 2,265,762
Series 2005RR, 5.000%, 7/01/27 - XLCA Insured
530 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, 1/13 at 100.00 Aa1 549,032
Arizona, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002B,
5.000%, 1/01/22
20
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UTILITIES (continued)
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District,
Arizona, Electric System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A:
$ 2,000 5.125%, 1/01/27 1/12 at 101.00 Aa1 $ 2,075,960
1,000 5.000%, 1/01/31 1/12 at 101.00 Aa1 1,028,890
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7,320 Total Utilities 7,641,793
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATER AND SEWER - 22.4% (14.5% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,005 Cottonwood, Arizona, Senior Lien Water System Revenue Bonds, 7/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,043,924
Municipal Property Corporation, Series 2004, 5.000%, 7/01/24 -
XLCA Insured
3,500 Glendale, Arizona, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Subordinate 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 3,614,096
Lien, Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/28 - AMBAC Insured
600 Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 623,304
Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 -
MBIA Insured
1,000 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,041,770
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004,
5.000%, 7/01/24 - MBIA Insured
1,500 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,545,360
Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 7/01/26 -
FGIC Insured
3,295 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 3,451,644
Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/23 -
MBIA Insured
1,250 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien No Opt. Call AAA 1,413,538
Water System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2001,
5.500%, 7/01/21 - FGIC Insured
Surprise Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater
System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
600 4.700%, 4/01/22 4/14 at 100.00 BBB 585,426
695 4.900%, 4/01/32 4/17 at 100.00 BBB 667,554
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13,445 Total Water and Sewer 13,986,616
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 100,707 Total Investments (cost $94,092,719) - 154.3% 96,472,027
=============-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Floating Rate Obligations - (7.5)% (4,708,335)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Assets Less Liabilities - 1.2% 769,938
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value - (48.0)% (30,000,000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares - 100% $ 62,533,630
====================================================================================================================
The Fund may invest in "zero coupon" securities. A zero
coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to
its holders during the life of the security. Tax-exempt
income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of
the difference between the original purchase price of the
security at issuance and the par value of the security at
maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. Such
securities are included in the portfolio with a 0.00% coupon
rate in their description. The market prices of zero coupon
securities generally are more volatile than the market
prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
All of the bonds in the Portfolio of Investments are either
covered by Original Issue Insurance, Secondary Market
Insurance or Portfolio Insurance, or are backed by an escrow
or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S
Government agency securities, any of which ensure the timely
payment of principal and interest.
(1) All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are
based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless
otherwise noted.
(2) Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of
independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month
and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or
redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying
prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities
may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
(3) Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered
public accounting firm): Using the higher of Standard &
Poor's or Moody's rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard &
Poor's Group or Baa by Moody's Investor Service, Inc. are
considered to be below investment grade.
(4) Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S.
Government or U.S. Government agency securities which ensure
the timely payment of principal and interest. Such
investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA
rated securities.
N/R Not rated.
(ETM) Escrowed to maturity.
(IF) Inverse floating rate investment.
(UB) Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected
as a financing transaction pursuant to the provisions of
SFAS No. 140.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
21
NFZ
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2007
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDUCATION AND CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS - 7.3% (4.6% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 1,000 Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and 2/09 at 101.00 BBB- $ 1,017,100
Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher
Education Revenue Bonds, Ana G. Mendez University System,
Series 1999, 5.375%, 2/01/29
300 Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and 9/11 at 100.00 BBB 306,054
Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher
Education Revenue Bonds, University of the Sacred Heart, Series
2001, 5.250%, 9/01/21
305 Tucson Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School 9/14 at 100.00 BBB- 315,770
Revenue Bonds, Arizona Agribusiness and Equine Center Charter
School, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/34
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,605 Total Education and Civic Organizations 1,638,924
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEALTH CARE - 15.2% (9.5% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
565 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 1/17 at 100.00 AA- 579,701
Banner Health Systems, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/25
10 California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Health Facility 3/13 at 100.00 A 10,048
Revenue Bonds, Adventist Health System/West, Series 2003A,
5.000%, 3/01/28
250 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 12/15 at 100.00 BBB 244,070
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2005B,
5.000%, 12/01/37
415 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 12/17 at 100.00 BBB 402,002
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2007,
5.000%, 12/01/42
200 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 5/16 at 100.00 AA 204,194
Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, Mayo Clinic, Series 2006,
5.000%, 11/15/36
750 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 7/14 at 100.00 A 771,758
Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West,
Series 2004A, 5.375%, 7/01/23 (UB)
1,025 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 7/17 at 100.00 A 1,048,422
Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West,
Series 2007A, 5.250%, 7/01/32 (UB)
140 Maricopa County, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Sun Health 4/15 at 100.00 Baa1 143,802
Corporation, Series 2005, 5.000%, 4/01/16
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,355 Total Health Care 3,403,997
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/MULTIFAMILY - 6.8% (4.2% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,000 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 7/09 at 102.00 Aaa 1,031,930
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Whispering Palms
Apartments, Series 1999A, 5.900%, 7/01/29 - MBIA Insured
275 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, GNMA 6/11 at 102.00 Aaa 284,878
Collateralized Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Campaigne
Place on Jackson, Series 2001, 5.700%, 6/20/31 (Alternative
Minimum Tax)
205 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, GNMA 4/15 at 100.00 Aaa 201,769
Collateralized Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Park Lee
Apartments, Series 2004A, 5.050%, 10/20/44
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,480 Total Housing/Multifamily 1,518,577
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/SINGLE FAMILY - 17.3% (10.8% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 10 Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 11/10 at 101.00 AAA $ 10,252
FNMA/GNMA Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds,
Series 2001A-4, 5.050%, 5/01/17
2,000 The Industrial Development Authority of The City of Tucson, 7/16 at 103.00 Aaa 2,090,040
Arizona, Tax-Exempt Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds,
Series 2006A-1, 5.350%, 1/01/38 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
635 The Industrial Development Authority of The City of Tucson, 1/17 at 103.00 Aaa 649,573
Arizona, Tax-Exempt Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds,
Series 2007A-1, 5.100%, 7/01/38
1,085 Tucson and Pima County Industrial Development Authority, 6/17 at 101.00 Aaa 1,131,894
Arizona, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B,
5.350%, 6/01/47 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,730 Total Housing/Single Family 3,881,759
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/GENERAL - 15.7% (9.8% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,000 Maricopa County Unified School District 11, Peoria, Arizona, 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,052,000
General Obligation Bonds, Second Series 2005,
5.000%, 7/01/20 - FGIC Insured
2,340 Yuma & La Paz Counties Community College District, Arizona, 7/16 at 100.00 AAA 2,473,496
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 7/01/21 -
MBIA Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,340 Total Tax Obligation/General 3,525,496
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/LIMITED - 46.7% (29.3% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,220 Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority, Tax Revenue Bonds, 7/13 at 100.00 Aaa 1,253,562
Multipurpose Stadium Facility Project, Series 2003A,
5.000%, 7/01/31 - MBIA Insured
96 Centerra Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, 7/15 at 100.00 N/R 97,572
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.500%, 7/15/29
210 Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Arizona, 1/17 at 100.00 N/R 211,109
Special Assessment Bonds, Montecito Assessment District,
Series 2007, 5.700%, 7/01/27
176 Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Goodyear, 7/10 at 102.00 N/R 190,710
Arizona, Special Assessment Lien Bonds, Series 2001A,
7.875%, 7/01/25
275 Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue 8/16 at 100.00 AAA 288,717
Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 8/01/23 - MBIA Insured
1,000 Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue 8/16 at 100.00 AAA 1,052,170
Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 8/01/22 - MBIA Insured
1,180 Marana Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 1,225,831
Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 - AMBAC Insured
415 Marana, Arizona, Tangerine Farms Road Improvement District 7/16 at 100.00 Baa1 397,080
Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 4.600%, 1/01/26
330 Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 333,765
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.300%, 7/15/31
100 Parkway Community Facilities District 1, Prescott Valley, Arizona, 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 100,527
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.350%, 7/15/31
900 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Government 3/12 at 100.00 AAA 949,644
Bonds, Capitol Mall LLC II, Series 2001, 5.250%, 9/15/16 -
AMBAC Insured
680 Pinal County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, No Opt. Call A 687,351
Correctional Facilities Contract Revenue Bonds, Florence West
Prison LLC, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 10/01/18 - ACA Insured
4,495 Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Revenue No Opt. Call AAA 841,149
Bonds, Series 2005A, 0.000%, 7/01/42 - FGIC Insured (UB)
77 Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Bonds, No Opt. Call AAA 47,451
Residual Series 1534, 5.604%, 7/01/43 (IF)
600 San Luis Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Municipal 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 624,840
Facilities Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005,
5.000%, 7/01/25 - XLCA Insured
23
NFZ
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (continued)
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS July 31, (2007)
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/LIMITED (continued)
$ 1,000 Tempe, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 7/14 at 100.00 AAA $ 1,063,040
5.250%, 7/01/20 - AMBAC Insured
500 Vistancia Community Facilities District, Arizona, Restricted 7/15 at 100.00 Baa1 534,840
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.750%, 7/15/24
355 Watson Road Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 360,240
Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 6.000%, 7/01/30
225 Westpark Community Facilities District, Buckeye, Arizona, General 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 219,749
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds Series 2006, 5.250%, 7/15/31
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13,834 Total Tax Obligation/Limited 10,479,347
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. GUARANTEED - 12.6% (7.9% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS) (4)
365 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 7/10 at 101.00 A (4) 395,784
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 1999A, 6.625%, 7/01/20
(Pre-refunded 7/01/10)
1,000 Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority, Tax Revenue Bonds, 7/13 at 100.00 Aaa 1,079,150
Multipurpose Stadium Facility Project, Series 2003A,
5.375%, 7/01/21 (Pre-refunded 7/01/13) - MBIA Insured
240 Maricopa County Union High School District 210 Phoenix, 7/16 at 100.00 AAA 257,938
Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C,
5.000%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/16) - MBIA Insured
1,000 Scottsdale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital 12/11 at 101.00 A3 (4) 1,083,690
Revenue Bonds, Scottsdale Healthcare, Series 2001,
5.800%, 12/01/31 (Pre-refunded 12/01/11)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,605 Total U.S. Guaranteed 2,816,562
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UTILITIES - 24.3% (15.2% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,500 Arizona Power Authority, Special Obligation Power Resource No Opt. Call AA 1,636,680
Revenue Refunding Crossover Bonds, Hoover Project,
Series 2001, 5.250%, 10/01/17
1,000 Mesa, Arizona, Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds, No Opt. Call AAA 1,095,460
Series 2002, 5.250%, 7/01/17 - FGIC Insured
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue Bonds,
Series 2005RR:
1,000 5.000%, 7/01/26 - XLCA Insured 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,044,810
170 5.000%, 7/01/27 - XLCA Insured 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 177,502
200 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, 1/13 at 100.00 Aa1 207,182
Arizona, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002B,
5.000%, 1/01/22
235 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, 1/08 at 101.00 Aa1 238,215
Arizona, Electric System Revenue Refunding Bonds,
Series 1997A, 5.000%, 1/01/20
1,000 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, 1/12 at 101.00 Aa1 1,053,360
Arizona, Electric System Revenue Refunding Bonds,
Series 2002A, 5.250%, 1/01/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5,105 Total Utilities 5,453,209
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATER AND SEWER - 12.4% (7.8% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
225 Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 233,739
Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 -
MBIA Insured
1,500 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,545,360
Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 7/01/26 -
FGIC Insured
520 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 544,721
Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/23 -
MBIA Insured
Surprise Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater
System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
225 4.700%, 4/01/22 4/14 at 100.00 BBB 219,536
260 4.900%, 4/01/32 4/17 at 100.00 BBB 249,734
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,730 Total Water and Sewer 2,793,090
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 37,784 Total Long-Term Investments (cost $34,973,190) - 158.3% 35,510,961
=============-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24
PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS - 1.3% (0.9% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 300 Puerto Rico Government Development Bank, Adjustable Refunding VMIG-1 $ 300,000
Bonds, Variable Rate Demand Obligations, Series 1985,
3.490%, 12/01/15 - MBIA Insured (5)
=============-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Short-Term Investments (cost $300,000) 300,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Investments (cost $35,273,190) - 159.6% 35,810,961
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Floating Rate Obligations - (8.1)% (1,818,983)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Assets Less Liabilities - 2.0% 446,831
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value - (53.5)% (12,000,000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares - 100% $ 22,438,809
====================================================================================================================
FUTURES CONTRACTS OUTSTANDING AT JULY 31, 2007:
UNREALIZED
CONTRACT NUMBER OF CONTRACT VALUE AT APPRECIATION
COUNTERPARTY POSITION CONTRACTS EXPIRATION JULY 31, 2007 (DEPRECIATION)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. 3-Year Treasury Bond Short (14) 9/07 $(1,540,875) $(42,042)
====================================================================================================================================
The Fund may invest in "zero coupon" securities. A zero
coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to
its holders during the life of the security. Tax-exempt
income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of
the difference between the original purchase price of the
security at issuance and the par value of the security at
maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. Such
securities are included in the portfolio with a 0.00% coupon
rate in their description. The market prices of zero coupon
securities generally are more volatile than the market
prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
All of the bonds in the Portfolio of Investments are either
covered by Original Issue Insurance, Secondary Market
Insurance or Portfolio Insurance, or are backed by an escrow
or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S
Government agency securities, any of which ensure the timely
payment of principal and interest.
(1) All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are
based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless
otherwise noted.
(2) Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of
independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month
and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or
redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying
prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities
may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
(3) Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered
public accounting firm): Using the higher of Standard &
Poor's or Moody's rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard &
Poor's Group or Baa by Moody's Investor Service, Inc. are
considered to be below investment grade.
(4) Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S.
Government or U.S. Government agency securities which ensure
the timely payment of principal and interest. Such
investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA
rated securities.
(5) Investment has a maturity of more than one year, but has
variable rate and demand features which qualify it as a
short-term investment. The rate disclosed is that in effect
at the end of the reporting period. This rate changes
periodically based on market conditions or a specified
market index.
N/R Not rated.
(IF) Inverse floating rate investment.
(UB) Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected
as a financing transaction pursuant to the provisions of
SFAS No. 140.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
25
NKR
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2007
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDUCATION AND CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS - 4.0% (2.5% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 460 Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter 12/14 at 100.00 BBB- $ 478,694
School Revenue Bonds, Noah Webster Basic Schools Inc.,
Series 2004, 6.000%, 12/15/24
320 Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and 2/09 at 101.00 BBB- 326,403
Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Higher
Education Revenue Bonds, Ana G. Mendez University System,
Series 1999, 5.375%, 2/01/19
480 Tucson Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School 9/14 at 100.00 BBB- 496,949
Revenue Bonds, Arizona Agribusiness and Equine Center Charter
School, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/34
University of Arizona, Certificates of Participation, Series 2002A:
65 5.500%, 6/01/18 - AMBAC Insured 6/12 at 100.00 AAA 69,052
40 5.125%, 6/01/22 - AMBAC Insured 6/12 at 100.00 AAA 41,583
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,365 Total Education and Civic Organizations 1,412,681
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEALTH CARE - 21.5% (13.6% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
845 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 1/17 at 100.00 AA- 866,987
Banner Health Systems, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/25
600 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Blood 4/14 at 100.00 A- 609,990
Systems Inc., Series 2004, 5.000%, 4/01/20
400 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 12/15 at 100.00 BBB 390,512
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2005B,
5.000%, 12/01/37
655 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 12/17 at 100.00 BBB 634,485
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2007,
5.000%, 12/01/42
320 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 5/16 at 100.00 AA 326,710
Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, Mayo Clinic, Series 2006,
5.000%, 11/15/36
500 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 5/08 at 101.00 AA 509,110
Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Series 1998,
5.250%, 11/15/37
1,375 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 7/14 at 100.00 A 1,414,889
Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West,
Series 2004A, 5.375%, 7/01/23 (UB)
1,650 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 7/17 at 100.00 A 1,687,703
Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West,
Series 2007A, 5.250%, 7/01/32 (UB)
225 Maricopa County, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Sun Health 4/15 at 100.00 Baa1 231,111
Corporation, Series 2005, 5.000%, 4/01/16
1,000 Yavapai County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 8/13 at 100.00 Baa2 1,059,520
Hospital Revenue Bonds, Yavapai Regional Medical Center,
Series 2003A, 6.000%, 8/01/33
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7,570 Total Health Care 7,731,017
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/MULTIFAMILY - 8.0% (5.1% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,000 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 10/11 at 105.00 AAA 1,052,300
GNMA Collateralized Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding
Bonds, Pine Ridge, Cambridge Court, Cove on 44th and Fountain
Place Apartments, Series 2001A-1, 6.000%, 10/20/31
325 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, GNMA 4/15 at 100.00 Aaa 319,878
Collateralized Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Park Lee
Apartments, Series 2004A, 5.050%, 10/20/44 (Alternative
Minimum Tax)
1,425 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, GNMA 7/12 at 105.00 AAA 1,522,940
Collateralized Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Summit
Apartments, Series 2002, 6.450%, 7/20/32
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,750 Total Housing/Multifamily 2,895,118
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/SINGLE FAMILY - 8.0% (5.0% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 1,000 The Industrial Development Authority of The City of Tucson, 1/17 at 103.00 Aaa $ 1,022,950
Arizona, Tax-Exempt Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds,
Series 2007A-1, 5.100%, 7/01/38
1,775 Tucson and Pima County Industrial Development Authority, 6/17 at 101.00 Aaa 1,851,716
Arizona, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B,
5.350%, 6/01/47 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,775 Total Housing/Single Family 2,874,666
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/GENERAL - 20.5% (13.0% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
670 Goodyear Community Facilities Utility District 1, Arizona, General 7/13 at 100.00 A3 685,256
Obligation Bonds, Series 2003, 5.350%, 7/15/28 - ACA Insured
1,000 Maricopa County School District 6, Arizona, General Obligation No Opt. Call AAA 1,104,210
Refunding Bonds, Washington Elementary School, Series 2002A,
5.375%, 7/01/16 - FSA Insured
1,165 Maricopa County Unified School District 69, Paradise Valley, No Opt. Call AAA 1,259,132
Arizona, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A,
5.250%, 7/01/14 - FGIC Insured
1,405 Mesa, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, No Opt. Call AAA 1,537,435
5.375%, 7/01/15 - FGIC Insured
Phoenix, Arizona, Various Purpose General Obligation Bonds,
Series 2002B:
1,700 5.000%, 7/01/22 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,762,084
500 5.000%, 7/01/27 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 515,120
510 Scottsdale, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 7/11 at 100.00 AAA 525,693
5.000%, 7/01/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6,950 Total Tax Obligation/General 7,388,930
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/LIMITED - 46.0% (29.0% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
Arizona State, Certificates of Participation, Series 2002A:
750 5.000%, 11/01/17 - MBIA Insured 5/12 at 100.00 AAA 780,690
1,000 5.000%, 11/01/18 - MBIA Insured 5/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,035,590
500 5.000%, 11/01/20 - MBIA Insured 5/12 at 100.00 AAA 517,140
134 Centerra Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, General 7/15 at 100.00 N/R 136,195
Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.500%, 7/15/29
345 Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Arizona, 1/17 at 100.00 N/R 348,740
Special Assessment Bonds, Montecito Assessment District,
Series 2007, 5.800%, 7/01/32
278 Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Goodyear, 7/10 at 102.00 N/R 301,235
Arizona, Special Assessment Lien Bonds, Series 2001A,
7.875%, 7/01/25
650 Marana, Arizona, Tangerine Farms Road Improvement District 7/16 at 100.00 Baa1 621,933
Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 4.600%, 1/01/26
Maricopa County Stadium District, Arizona, Revenue Refunding
Bonds, Series 2002:
840 5.375%, 6/01/18 - AMBAC Insured 6/12 at 100.00 Aaa 887,796
2,645 5.375%, 6/01/19 - AMBAC Insured 6/12 at 100.00 Aaa 2,795,500
530 Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 536,047
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.300%, 7/15/31
140 Parkway Community Facilities District 1, Prescott Valley, Arizona, 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 140,738
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.350%, 7/15/31
1,500 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Government 3/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,582,740
Bonds, Capitol Mall LLC II, Series 2001, 5.250%, 9/15/16 -
AMBAC Insured
1,070 Pinal County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, No Opt. Call A 1,081,567
Correctional Facilities Contract Revenue Bonds, Florence West
Prison LLC, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 10/01/18 - ACA Insured
7,065 Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Revenue No Opt. Call AAA 1,322,073
Bonds, Series 2005A, 0.000%, 7/01/42 - FGIC Insured (UB)
113 Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Bonds, No Opt. Call AAA 69,065
Residual Series 1534, 5.604%, 7/01/43 - (IF)
1,000 Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Guaranteed Government 7/12 at 100.00 BBB- 1,027,920
Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002D,
5.125%, 7/01/24
960 San Luis Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Municipal 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 999,744
Facilities Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005,
5.000%, 7/01/25 - XLCA Insured
27
NKR
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (continued)
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS July 31, (2007)
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/LIMITED (continued)
$ 750 Vistancia Community Facilities District, Arizona, Restricted 7/15 at 100.00 Baa1 $ 802,260
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.750%, 7/15/24
560 Watson Road Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 568,266
Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 6.000%, 7/01/30
350 Westpark Community Facilities District, Buckeye, Arizona, General 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 341,831
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds Series 2006, 5.250%, 7/15/31
640 Yuma Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Municipal 7/10 at 100.00 AAA 656,102
Facilities Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, 5.000%, 7/01/21 -
AMBAC Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21,820 Total Tax Obligation/Limited 16,553,172
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSPORTATION - 5.7% (3.6% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,000 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien 7/08 at 101.00 AAA 1,017,840
Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 1998A, 5.000%, 7/01/25 -
FSA Insured
1,000 Phoenix, Arizona, Civic Improvement Corporation, Senior Lien 7/12 at 100.00 Aaa 1,030,710
Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2002B, 5.250%, 7/01/27 -
FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,000 Total Transportation 2,048,550
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. GUARANTEED - 26.9% (17.0% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS) (4)
400 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 7/10 at 101.00 A (4) 433,736
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 1999A, 6.625%, 7/01/20
(Pre-refunded 7/01/10)
735 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital System Revenue 2/12 at 101.00 Baa3 (4) 813,505
Bonds, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Series 2002A,
6.250%, 2/15/21 (Pre-refunded 2/15/12)
715 Arizona State University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 776,133
5.750%, 7/01/27 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12) - FGIC Insured
1,725 Chandler, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,816,580
5.000%, 7/01/17 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12)
870 Maricopa County Public Finance Corporation, Arizona, Lease 7/11 at 100.00 Aaa 923,488
Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, 5.500%, 7/01/15 (Pre-refunded
7/01/11) - AMBAC Insured
100 Maricopa County Unified School District 89, Dysart, Arizona, 7/14 at 100.00 AAA 108,206
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004B, 5.250%, 7/01/20
(Pre-refunded 7/01/14) - FSA Insured
375 Maricopa County Union High School District 210 Phoenix, 7/16 at 100.00 AAA 403,028
Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C,
5.000%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/16) - MBIA Insured
1,000 Mesa, Arizona, Street and Highway User Tax Revenue Bonds, 7/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,074,550
Series 2004, 5.125%, 7/01/23 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14) -
FSA Insured
1,000 Scottsdale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital 12/11 at 101.00 A3 (4) 1,083,690
Revenue Bonds, Scottsdale Healthcare, Series 2001,
5.800%, 12/01/31 (Pre-refunded 12/01/11)
990 Scottsdale, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 7/11 at 100.00 AAA 1,033,738
5.000%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/11)
University of Arizona, Certificates of Participation, Series 2002A:
685 5.500%, 6/01/18 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) - AMBAC Insured 6/12 at 100.00 Aaa 735,156
460 5.125%, 6/01/22 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) - AMBAC Insured 6/12 at 100.00 Aaa 486,137
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9,055 Total U.S. Guaranteed 9,687,947
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UTILITIES - 4.2% (2.6% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,115 Arizona Power Authority, Special Obligation Power Resource No Opt. Call AA 1,210,411
Revenue Refunding Crossover Bonds, Hoover Project,
Series 2001, 5.250%, 10/01/15
270 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue Bonds, 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 281,915
Series 2005RR, 5.000%, 7/01/27 - XLCA Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,385 Total Utilities 1,492,326
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATER AND SEWER - 12.9% (8.1% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 500 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 12/07 at 102.00 AAA $ 511,660
Water System Improvement Revenue Bonds, Chaparral City
Water Company, Series 1997A, 5.400%, 12/01/22 -
AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
360 Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 373,982
Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 -
MBIA Insured
765 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 801,368
Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/23 -
MBIA Insured
1,000 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien No Opt. Call AAA 1,135,230
Water System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2001,
5.500%, 7/01/22 - FGIC Insured
Surprise Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater
System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
350 4.700%, 4/01/22 4/14 at 100.00 BBB 341,499
410 4.900%, 4/01/32 4/17 at 100.00 BBB 393,809
1,000 Tucson, Arizona, Water System Revenue Refunding Bonds, 7/12 at 102.00 AAA 1,081,609
Series 2002, 5.500%, 7/01/18 - FGIC Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4,385 Total Water and Sewer 4,639,157
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 60,055 Total Long-Term Investments (cost $55,289,992) - 157.7% 56,723,564
=============-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS - 0.8% (0.5% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 300 Puerto Rico Government Development Bank, Adjustable Refunding VMIG-1 300,000
Bonds, Variable Rate Demand Obligations, Series 1985,
3.490%, 12/01/15 - MBIA Insured (5)
=============-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Short-Term Investments (cost $300,000) 300,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Investments (cost $55,589,992) - 158.5% 57,023,564
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Floating Rate Obligations - (8.4)% (3,025,615)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Assets Less Liabilities - 1.3% 477,731
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value - (51.4)% (18,500,000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares - 100% $ 35,975,680
====================================================================================================================
The Fund may invest in "zero coupon" securities. A zero
coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to
its holders during the life of the security. Tax-exempt
income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of
the difference between the original purchase price of the
security at issuance and the par value of the security at
maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. Such
securities are included in the portfolio with a 0.00% coupon
rate in their description. The market prices of zero coupon
securities generally are more volatile than the market
prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
All of the bonds in the Portfolio of Investments are either
covered by Original Issue Insurance, Secondary Market
Insurance or Portfolio Insurance, or are backed by an escrow
or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S
Government agency securities, any of which ensure the timely
payment of principal and interest.
(1) All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are
based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless
otherwise noted.
(2) Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of
independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month
and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or
redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying
prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities
may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
(3) Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered
public accounting firm): Using the higher of Standard &
Poor's or Moody's rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard &
Poor's Group or Baa by Moody's Investor Service, Inc. are
considered to be below investment grade.
(4) Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S.
Government or U.S. Government agency securities which ensure
the timely payment of principal and interest. Such
investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA
rated securities.
(5) Investment has a maturity of more than one year, but has
variable rate and demand features which qualify it as a
short-term investment. The rate disclosed is that in effect
at the end of the reporting period. This rate changes
periodically based on market conditions or a specified
market index.
N/R Not rated.
(IF) Inverse floating rate investment.
(UB) Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected
as a financing transaction pursuant to the provisions of
SFAS No. 140.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
29
NXE
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2007
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER STAPLES - 1.2% (0.8% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 555 Puerto Rico, The Children's Trust Fund, Tobacco Settlement 5/12 at 100.00 BBB $ 562,426
Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%, 5/15/33
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDUCATION AND CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS - 13.8% (8.7% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,250 Arizona State University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,315,000
5.000%, 7/01/20 - AMBAC Insured
1,130 Energy Management Services LLC, Arizona State University, 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,187,042
Energy Conservation Revenue Bonds, Main Campus Project,
Series 2002, 5.250%, 7/01/18 - MBIA Insured
270 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 5/08 at 101.00 A- 274,201
Bonds, Midwestern University, Series 1998A, 5.375%, 5/15/28
540 Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter 12/14 at 100.00 BBB- 561,946
School Revenue Bonds, Noah Webster Basic Schools Inc.,
Series 2004, 6.000%, 12/15/24
565 Tucson Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter 9/14 at 100.00 BBB- 584,950
School Revenue Bonds, Arizona Agribusiness and Equine
Center Charter School, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/34
2,000 University of Arizona, Certificates of Participation, Series 2002B, 6/12 at 100.00 AAA 2,082,260
5.125%, 6/01/20 - AMBAC Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5,755 Total Education and Civic Organizations 6,005,399
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEALTH CARE - 24.3% (15.4% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,015 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 1/17 at 100.00 AA- 1,041,410
Banner Health Systems, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/25
625 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Blood 4/14 at 100.00 A- 635,406
Systems Inc., Series 2004, 5.000%, 4/01/20
475 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 12/15 at 100.00 BBB 463,733
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2005B,
5.000%, 12/01/37
785 Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue 12/17 at 100.00 BBB 760,414
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2007,
5.000%, 12/01/42
390 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 5/16 at 100.00 AA 398,178
Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, Mayo Clinic, Series 2006,
5.000%, 11/15/36
2,000 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 5/08 at 101.00 AA 2,036,440
Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Series 1998,
5.250%, 11/15/37
1,825 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 7/14 at 100.00 A 1,877,943
Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West,
Series 2004A, 5.375%, 7/01/23 (UB)
1,985 Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 7/17 at 100.00 A 2,030,357
Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West,
Series 2007A, 5.250%, 7/01/32 (UB)
270 Maricopa County, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Sun Health 4/15 at 100.00 Baa1 277,333
Corporation, Series 2005, 5.000%, 4/01/16
1,000 Yavapai County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, 8/13 at 100.00 Baa2 1,059,520
Hospital Revenue Bonds, Yavapai Regional Medical Center,
Series 2003A, 6.000%, 8/01/33
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10,370 Total Health Care 10,580,734
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/MULTIFAMILY - 4.5% (2.9% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 1,545 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, GNMA 6/11 at 102.00 Aaa $ 1,591,118
Collateralized Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Campaigne
Place on Jackson, Series 2001, 5.600%, 6/20/21 (Alternative
Minimum Tax)
380 Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, GNMA 4/15 at 100.00 Aaa 374,011
Collateralized Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Park Lee
Apartments, Series 2004A, 5.050%, 10/20/44
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,925 Total Housing/Multifamily 1,965,129
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/SINGLE FAMILY - 7.9% (5.0% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,175 The Industrial Development Authority of The City of Tucson, 1/17 at 103.00 Aaa 1,201,966
Arizona, Tax-Exempt Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds,
Series 2007A-1, 5.100%, 7/01/38
2,130 Tucson and Pima County Industrial Development Authority, 6/17 at 101.00 Aaa 2,222,059
Arizona, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B,
5.350%, 6/01/47 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,305 Total Housing/Single Family 3,424,025
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INDUSTRIALS - 2.2% (1.4% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
945 Yavapai County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, No Opt. Call BBB 943,649
Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Waste Management Inc.,
Series 2003B, 4.450%, 3/01/28 (Mandatory put 3/01/08)
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/GENERAL - 1.9% (1.2% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
800 Goodyear Community Facilities Utility District 1, Arizona, General 7/13 at 100.00 A3 818,216
Obligation Bonds, Series 2003, 5.350%, 7/15/28 - ACA Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/LIMITED - 34.7% (21.9% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,000 Arizona State Transportation Board, Highway Revenue Refunding 7/12 at 102.00 AAA 1,068,700
Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.250%, 7/01/18
154 Centerra Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, 7/15 at 100.00 N/R 156,523
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.500%, 7/15/29
2,250 DC Ranch Community Facilities District, Scottsdale, Arizona, 7/13 at 100.00 Aaa 2,327,153
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 7/15/27 -
AMBAC Insured
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Arizona,
Special Assessment Bonds, Montecito Assessment District, Series
2007:
255 5.700%, 7/01/27 1/17 at 100.00 N/R 256,346
155 5.800%, 7/01/32 1/17 at 100.00 N/R 156,680
326 Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, 7/10 at 102.00 N/R 353,247
Goodyear, Arizona, Special Assessment Lien Bonds,
Series 2001A, 7.875%, 7/01/25
525 Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue 8/16 at 100.00 AAA 551,187
Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 8/01/23 - MBIA Insured
785 Marana, Arizona, Tangerine Farms Road Improvement District 7/16 at 100.00 Baa1 751,104
Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 4.600%, 1/01/26
2,000 Mohave County, Arizona, Certificates of Participation, 7/14 at 100.00 AAA 2,133,500
Series 2004, 5.250%, 7/01/19 - AMBAC Insured
640 Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 647,302
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.300%, 7/15/31
160 Parkway Community Facilities District 1, Prescott Valley, 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 160,843
Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.350%, 7/15/31
1,250 Pinal County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, No Opt. Call A 1,263,513
Correctional Facilities Contract Revenue Bonds, Florence
West Prison LLC, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 10/01/18 -
ACA Insured
8,470 Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Revenue No Opt. Call AAA 1,584,991
Bonds, Series 2005A, 0.000%, 7/01/42 - FGIC Insured (UB)
31
NXE
Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (continued)
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS July 31, (2007)
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/LIMITED (continued)
$ 139 Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Bonds, No Opt. Call AAA $ 85,074
Residual Series 1534, 5.604%, 7/01/43 (IF)
1,130 San Luis Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Municipal 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,176,782
Facilities Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005,
5.000%, 7/01/25 - XLCA Insured
1,250 Vistancia Community Facilities District, Arizona, Restricted 7/15 at 100.00 Baa1 1,337,100
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.750%, 7/15/24
665 Watson Road Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 674,815
Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 6.000%, 7/01/30
425 Westpark Community Facilities District, Buckeye, Arizona, General 7/16 at 100.00 N/R 415,081
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds Series 2006, 5.250%, 7/15/31
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21,579 Total Tax Obligation/Limited 15,099,941
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSPORTATION - 13.6% (8.6% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
Phoenix, Arizona, Civic Improvement Corporation, Senior Lien
Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2002B:
1,000 5.750%, 7/01/16 - FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) 7/12 at 100.00 Aaa 1,069,320
2,300 5.250%, 7/01/21 - FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) 7/12 at 100.00 Aaa 2,377,280
2,450 Tucson Airport Authority Inc., Arizona, Revenue Refunding Bonds, 6/11 at 100.00 AAA 2,495,129
Series 2001B, 5.000%, 6/01/20 - AMBAC Insured
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5,750 Total Transportation 5,941,729
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. GUARANTEED - 29.4% (18.6% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS) (4)
300 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 7/10 at 101.00 A (4) 325,302
Catholic Healthcare West, Series 1999A, 6.625%, 7/01/20
(Pre-refunded 7/01/10)
1,000 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital System Revenue 12/10 at 102.00 BBB (4) 1,110,990
Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2000,
6.875%, 12/01/20 (Pre-refunded 12/01/10)
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital System Revenue
Bonds, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Series 1999A:
350 6.125%, 11/15/22 (Pre-refunded 11/15/09) 11/09 at 100.00 Baa3 (4) 367,773
520 6.250%, 11/15/29 (Pre-refunded 11/15/09) 11/09 at 100.00 Baa3 (4) 547,815
2,660 Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority, Tax Revenue Bonds, 7/13 at 100.00 Aaa 2,870,539
Multipurpose Stadium Facility Project, Series 2003A,
5.375%, 7/01/20 (Pre-refunded 7/01/13) - MBIA Insured
660 Chandler, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 695,039
5.000%, 7/01/18 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12)
445 Maricopa County Union High School District 210 Phoenix, 7/16 at 100.00 AAA 478,259
Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C,
5.000%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/16) - MBIA Insured
1,575 Maricopa County Union High School District 210, Phoenix, 7/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,680,572
Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004A,
5.000%, 7/01/20 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14) - FSA Insured
1,250 Scottsdale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital 12/11 at 101.00 A3 (4) 1,354,613
Revenue Bonds, Scottsdale Healthcare, Series 2001,
5.800%, 12/01/31 (Pre-refunded 12/01/11)
2,770 Tempe, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 2,934,786
Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/22 (Pre-refunded 7/01/13)
440 Tucson, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2001B, 7/11 at 100.00 AA (4) 459,114
5.000%, 7/01/20 (Pre-refunded 7/01/11)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11,970 Total U.S. Guaranteed 12,824,802
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UTILITIES - 12.2% (7.7% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 1,250 Maricopa County Pollution Control Corporation, Arizona, Revenue 11/12 at 100.00 AAA $ 1,293,675
Bonds, Arizona Public Service Company - Palo Verde Project,
Series 2002A, 5.050%, 5/01/29 - AMBAC Insured
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Power Revenue Bonds,
Series 2005RR:
1,660 5.000%, 7/01/26 - XLCA Insured 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,734,385
935 5.000%, 7/01/27 - XLCA Insured 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 976,262
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District,
Arizona, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002B:
270 5.000%, 1/01/22 1/13 at 100.00 Aa1 279,696
1,000 5.000%, 1/01/31 1/13 at 100.00 Aa1 1,028,890
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5,115 Total Utilities 5,312,908
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATER AND SEWER - 12.4% (7.8% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
405 Oro Valley Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien 7/13 at 100.00 AAA 420,730
Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 7/01/23 -
MBIA Insured
1,000 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/11 at 100.00 AAA 1,036,890
Wastewater System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2001,
5.125%, 7/01/21 - FGIC Insured
2,000 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/12 at 100.00 AAA 2,077,100
Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 7/01/18 -
FGIC Insured
920 Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien 7/15 at 100.00 AAA 963,737
Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/23 -
MBIA Insured
Surprise Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater
System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
425 4.700%, 4/01/22 4/14 at 100.00 BBB 414,678
490 4.900%, 4/01/32 4/17 at 100.00 BBB 470,651
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5,240 Total Water and Sewer 5,383,786
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 73,309 Total Investments (cost $67,868,799) - 158.1% 68,862,744
=============-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Floating Rate Obligations - (8.6)% (3,754,569)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Assets Less Liabilities - 1.0% 443,423
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value - (50.5)% (22,000,000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares - 100% $ 43,551,598
====================================================================================================================
The Fund may invest in "zero coupon" securities. A zero
coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to
its holders during the life of the security. Tax-exempt
income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of
the difference between the original purchase price of the
security at issuance and the par value of the security at
maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. Such
securities are included in the portfolio with a 0.00% coupon
rate in their description. The market prices of zero coupon
securities generally are more volatile than the market
prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
All of the bonds in the Portfolio of Investments are either
covered by Original Issue Insurance, Secondary Market
Insurance or Portfolio Insurance, or are backed by an escrow
or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S
Government agency securities, any of which ensure the timely
payment of principal and interest.
(1) All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are
based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless
otherwise noted.
(2) Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of
independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month
and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or
redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying
prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities
may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
(3) Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered
public accounting firm): Using the higher of Standard &
Poor's or Moody's rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard &
Poor's Group or Baa by Moody's Investor Service, Inc. are
considered to be below investment grade.
(4) Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S.
Government or U.S. Government agency securities which ensure
the timely payment of principal and interest. Such
investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA
rated securities.
N/R Not rated.
(IF) Inverse floating rate investment.
(UB) Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected
as a financing transaction pursuant to the provisions of
SFAS No. 140.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
33
NTX
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2007
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER STAPLES - 1.9% (1.3% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 2,620 Puerto Rico, The Children's Trust Fund, Tobacco Settlement 5/12 at 100.00 BBB $ 2,655,056
Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%, 5/15/33
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDUCATION AND CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS - 18.7% (12.4% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
6,000 Board of Regents, University of Texas System, Financing System 2/17 at 100.00 AAA 5,543,280
Revenue Bonds, Series 2006F, 4.250%, 8/15/36 (UB)
Red River Education Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds,
Hockaday School, Series 2005:
1,170 5.000%, 5/15/27 5/15 at 100.00 AA 1,207,616
1,230 5.000%, 5/15/28 5/15 at 100.00 AA 1,269,545
1,290 5.000%, 5/15/29 5/15 at 100.00 AA 1,331,474
Texas Public Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Texas Southern
University Financing System, Series 2003:
1,710 5.000%, 5/01/18 - FGIC Insured 5/13 at 100.00 Aaa 1,784,009
1,795 5.000%, 5/01/19 - FGIC Insured 5/13 at 100.00 Aaa 1,868,972
1,885 5.000%, 5/01/20 - FGIC Insured 5/13 at 100.00 Aaa 1,958,760
1,665 Texas State University System, Financing Revenue Bonds, 9/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,728,004
Series 2004, 5.000%, 3/15/24 - FSA Insured
2,000 Texas State University System, Financing Revenue Refunding 3/12 at 100.00 AAA 2,068,620
Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 3/15/20 - FSA Insured
2,330 Universal City Education Facilities Corporation, Texas, 3/11 at 102.00 A- 2,439,277
Revenue Bonds, Wayland Baptist University Project,
Series 2001, 5.625%, 3/01/26
5,000 University of North Texas, Financing System Revenue Bonds, 4/12 at 100.00 AAA 5,146,899
Series 2001, 5.000%, 4/15/24 - FSA Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26,075 Total Education and Civic Organizations 26,346,456
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY - 2.1% (1.4% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
3,000 Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority, Texas, Waste Disposal 4/08 at 102.00 BBB 3,013,140
Revenue Bonds, Valero Energy Corporation Project, Series 1998,
5.600%, 4/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEALTH CARE - 15.9% (10.6% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
3,500 Abilene Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, 9/07 at 100.00 AAA 3,505,775
Hospital Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds,
Hendrick Medical Center Project, Series 1995C,
6.150%, 9/01/25 - MBIA Insured
Brazoria County Health Facilities Development Corporation,
Texas, Revenue Bonds, Brazosport Memorial Hospital, Series 2004:
1,745 5.250%, 7/01/20 - RAAI Insured 7/14 at 100.00 AA 1,803,649
1,835 5.250%, 7/01/21 - RAAI Insured 7/14 at 100.00 AA 1,894,472
5,750 Midland County Hospital District, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, No Opt. Call N/R 4,529,160
Series 1992, 0.000%, 6/01/11
2,000 North Central Texas Health Facilities Development Corporation, 5/11 at 100.00 AA- 2,018,340
Hospital Revenue Bonds, Baylor Healthcare System,
Series 2001A, 5.125%, 5/15/29
2,000 Richardson Hospital Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, 12/13 at 100.00 BBB 2,106,600
Richardson Regional Medical Center, Series 2004,
5.875%, 12/01/24
2,500 Tarrant County Cultural & Educational Facilities Financing 11/17 at 100.00 AA- 2,500,800
Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Tarrant County Health
Resources, Series 2007B, 5.000%, 11/15/42
34
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEALTH CARE (continued)
$ 2,000 Tom Green County Health Facilities Development Corporation, 5/11 at 101.00 Baa3 $ 2,134,780
Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Shannon Health System
Project, Series 2001, 6.750%, 5/15/21
2,000 Tyler Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital 7/17 at 100.00 BBB+ 1,958,660
Revenue Bonds, Mother Frances Hospital Regional Healthcare
Center, Series 2007, 5.000%, 7/01/33
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23,330 Total Health Care 22,452,236
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/MULTIFAMILY - 2.0% (1.3% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
Bexar County Housing Finance Corporation, Texas, Insured
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Waters at Northern Hills
Apartments Project, Series 2001A:
2,000 6.000%, 8/01/31 - MBIA Insured 8/11 at 102.00 Aaa 2,037,860
750 6.050%, 8/01/36 - MBIA Insured 8/11 at 102.00 Aaa 764,595
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,750 Total Housing/Multifamily 2,802,455
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING/SINGLE FAMILY - 3.8% (2.6% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
2,255 El Paso Housing Finance Corporation, Texas, GNMA Collateralized 4/11 at 106.75 AAA 2,379,432
Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2001A-3,
6.180%, 4/01/33
90 Galveston Property Finance Authority Inc., Texas, Single Family 9/07 at 100.00 Caa1 88,118
Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1991A, 8.500%, 9/01/11
2,900 Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, Single 3/12 at 100.00 AAA 2,964,119
Family Mortgage Bonds, Series 2002B, 5.550%, 9/01/33 -
MBIA Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5,245 Total Housing/Single Family 5,431,669
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONG-TERM CARE - 1.1% (0.7% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
Bexar County, Texas, Health Facilities Development Corporation
Revenue Bonds, Army Retirement Residence, Series 2007:
1,000 5.000%, 7/01/27 7/17 at 100.00 BBB 994,340
600 5.000%, 7/01/37 7/17 at 100.00 BBB 582,306
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,600 Total Long-Term Care 1,576,646
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MATERIALS - 4.4% (2.9% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
3,000 Cass County Industrial Development Corporation, Texas, 3/10 at 101.00 BBB 3,131,070
Environmental Improvement Revenue Bonds, International Paper
Company, Series 2000A, 6.600%, 3/15/24
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
3,000 Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, Texas, Sewage and Solid 10/07 at 101.00 A 3,033,930
Waste Disposal Facility Bonds, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and
Company Project, Series 1996, 6.400%, 4/01/26
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6,000 Total Materials 6,165,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/GENERAL - 43.9% (29.3% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,260 Bexar County, Texas, Combined Tax and Revenue Certificates 6/14 at 100.00 AA 1,314,218
of Obligation, Series 2004, 5.000%, 6/15/19
2,500 Borger Independent School District, Hutchison County, Texas, 2/16 at 100.00 AAA 2,574,350
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 2/15/36
1,190 Canutillo Independent School District, El Paso County, Texas, 8/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,242,384
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 8/15/22
4,130 Coppell Independent School District, Dallas County, Texas, 8/09 at 75.34 AAA 2,861,016
Unlimited Tax School Building and Refunding Bonds,
Series 1992, 0.000%, 8/15/14 - MBIA Insured
1,275 Copperas Cove, Texas, Certificates of Obligation, Series 2003, 8/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,315,953
5.000%, 8/15/23 - MBIA Insured
2,305 Corpus Christi, Texas, Combination Tax and Municipal Hotel 9/12 at 100.00 AAA 2,448,371
Occupancy Tax Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2002,
5.500%, 9/01/21 - FSA Insured
2,595 Denton County, Texas, Permanent Improvement General 7/12 at 100.00 AA+ 2,667,089
Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/15/25
2,110 Duncanville Independent School District, Dallas County, Texas, 2/15 at 100.00 AAA 2,181,550
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 2/15/26
35
NTX
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (continued)
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS July 31, (2007)
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/GENERAL (continued)
$ 1,750 El Paso County, Texas, Certificates of Obligation, Series 2001, No Opt. Call AAA $ 1,877,505
5.000%, 2/15/21 - FSA Insured
Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District 25, Texas, General
Obligation Bonds, Series 2005:
1,330 5.000%, 10/01/26 - FGIC Insured 10/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,358,728
1,320 5.000%, 10/01/27 - FGIC Insured 10/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,347,298
3,615 Frisco, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 2/16 at 100.00 AAA 3,756,202
5.000%, 2/15/26 - FGIC Insured
Houston Community College, Texas, Limited Tax General Obligation
Bonds, Series 2003:
2,500 5.000%, 2/15/20 - AMBAC Insured 2/13 at 100.00 AAA 2,597,250
2,235 5.000%, 2/15/21 - AMBAC Insured 2/13 at 100.00 AAA 2,321,942
5,000 Houston, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005E, 3/15 at 100.00 AAA 5,216,049
5.000%, 3/01/23 - AMBAC Insured
100 Judson Independent School District, Bexar County, Texas, General 2/11 at 100.00 Aaa 103,797
Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.250%, 2/01/21
4,900 Leander Independent School District, Williamson and Travis 8/14 at 17.78 AAA 611,863
Counties, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006,
0.000%, 8/15/45
5,220 Leander Independent School District, Williamson and Travis 8/09 at 46.74 AAA 2,235,413
Counties, Texas, Unlimited Tax School Building and Refunding
Bonds, Series 2000, 0.000%, 8/15/21
1,000 Mansfield Independent School District, Tarrant County, Texas, 2/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,039,230
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 2/15/20
1,010 Mercedes Independent School District, Hidalgo County, Texas, 8/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,052,380
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 8/15/23
5,515 Midlothian Independent School District, Ellis County, Texas, 2/15 at 100.00 Aaa 5,670,024
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 2/15/34
625 Montgomery County, Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, No Opt. Call AAA 450,938
Series 1997, 0.000%, 3/01/14 - MBIA Insured
925 Northside Independent School District, Bexar County, Texas, 8/10 at 100.00 AAA 973,609
Unlimited Tax School Building and Refunding Bonds,
Series 2000, 5.875%, 8/15/25
500 Puerto Rico, General Obligation and Public Improvement Bonds, No Opt. Call AAA 559,110
Series 2001A, 5.500%, 7/01/29
Roma Independent School District, Texas, General Obligation
Bonds, Series 2005:
1,110 5.000%, 8/15/22 8/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,158,862
1,165 5.000%, 8/15/23 - FSA Insured 8/15 at 100.00 AAA 1,213,883
1,250 Southside Independent School District, Bexar County, Texas, 8/14 at 100.00 Aaa 1,299,175
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 8/15/22
1,140 Sunnyvale School District, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, 2/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,207,135
Series 2004, 5.250%, 2/15/25
1,110 Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Water Utility, 8/11 at 100.00 Aa1 1,154,988
Series 2001, 5.250%, 8/01/23
5,000 Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Transportation Commission 4/17 at 100.00 Aa1 5,187,949
Mobility Fund, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 4/01/33
1,500 Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Public Finance 10/12 at 100.00 Aa1 1,560,435
Authority, Series 2002, 5.000%, 10/01/18
West Texas Independent School District, McLennan and Hill
Counties, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1998:
1,000 0.000%, 8/15/22 8/13 at 61.20 AAA 462,050
1,000 0.000%, 8/15/24 8/13 at 54.88 AAA 412,100
White Settlement Independent School District, Tarrant County,
Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006:
1,500 0.000%, 8/15/43 8/15 at 23.11 AAA 231,660
1,500 0.000%, 8/15/44 8/15 at 21.88 AAA 219,225
425 0.000%, 8/15/45 8/15 at 20.76 AAA 58,939
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,610 Total Tax Obligation/General 61,942,670
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
36
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAX OBLIGATION/LIMITED - 3.7% (2.5% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
$ 2,670 Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas, Senior Lien Sales Tax Revenue 12/16 at 100.00 AAA $ 2,944,209
Bonds, Series 2007, Drivers 1771, 7.225%, 12/01/36 -
AMBAC Insured (IF)
2,250 Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Senior Lien 11/11 at 100.00 AAA 2,336,333
Revenue Bonds, Series 2001G, 5.250%, 11/15/22 -
MBIA Insured
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4,920 Total Tax Obligation/Limited 5,280,542
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSPORTATION - 6.5% (4.3% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
1,000 Austin, Texas, Airport System Prior Lien Revenue Bonds, 11/13 at 100.00 AAA 1,063,580
Series 2003, 5.250%, 11/15/16 - MBIA Insured
3,260 Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Travis and Williamson 1/15 at 100.00 AAA 3,381,468
Counties, Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Series 2005,
5.000%, 1/01/22 - FGIC Insured
2,600 Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport Facility Improvement 11/09 at 101.00 CCC+ 2,646,124
Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, American Airlines Inc.,
Series 1999, 6.375%, 5/01/35 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
2,000 Houston, Texas, Subordinate Lien Airport System Revenue Bonds, 7/10 at 100.00 AAA 2,068,240
Series 2000A, 5.625%, 7/01/30 - FSA Insured
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8,860 Total Transportation 9,159,412
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. GUARANTEED - 25.4% (16.9% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS) (4)
Bell County Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas,
Retirement Facility Revenue Bonds, Buckner Retirement
Services Inc. Obligated Group, Series 1998:
3,400 5.250%, 11/15/19 (Pre-refunded 11/15/08) 11/08 at 101.00 A- (4) 3,492,548
5,000 5.250%, 11/15/28 (Pre-refunded 11/15/08) 11/08 at 101.00 A- (4) 5,136,100
Gregg County Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas,
Hospital Revenue Bonds, Good Shepherd Medical Center Project,
Series 2000:
2,000 6.875%, 10/01/20 (Pre-refunded 10/01/10) - RAAI Insured 10/10 at 101.00 AA (4) 2,196,340
3,250 6.375%, 10/01/25 (Pre-refunded 10/01/10) - RAAI Insured 10/10 at 101.00 AA (4) 3,521,538
500 Harris County Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, 8/11 at 100.00 AAA 530,195
Revenue Bonds, St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Series 2001A,
5.500%, 2/15/21 (Pre-refunded 8/15/11)
1,400 Judson Independent School District, Bexar County, Texas, 2/11 at 100.00 Aaa 1,465,100
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002,
5.250%, 2/01/21 (Pre-refunded 2/01/11)
920 Montgomery County, Texas, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 9/07 at 72.39 AAA 663,872
Series 1997, 0.000%, 3/01/14 (Pre-refunded 9/01/07) -
MBIA Insured
1,000 North Central Texas Health Facilities Development Corporation, No Opt. Call AAA 1,143,080
Hospital Revenue Bonds, Presbyterian Healthcare System,
Series 1996B, 5.750%, 6/01/26 - MBIA Insured (ETM)
1,075 Northside Independent School District, Bexar County, Texas, 8/10 at 100.00 AAA 1,139,059
Unlimited Tax School Building and Refunding Bonds,
Series 2000, 5.875%, 8/15/25 (Pre-refunded 8/15/10)
1,760 Parker County Hospital District, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 8/09 at 102.00 BB- (4) 1,877,110
Campbell Health System, Series 1999, 6.250%, 8/15/19
(Pre-refunded 8/15/09)
2,500 Retama Development Corporation, Texas, Special Facilities 12/17 at 100.00 AAA 3,140,700
Revenue Bonds, Retama Park Racetrack, Series 1993,
8.750%, 12/15/18 (Pre-refunded 12/15/17) (5)
1,750 San Antonio, Texas, Electric and Gas System Revenue Refunding 2/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,855,228
Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%, 2/01/20 (Pre-refunded 2/01/12)
1,440 South Texas Community College District, General Obligation 8/12 at 100.00 AAA 1,546,834
Bonds, Series 2002, 5.500%, 8/15/17 (Pre-refunded 8/15/12) -
AMBAC Insured
1,050 Tarrant County Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, 11/08 at 101.00 A2 1,081,154
Hospital Revenue Bonds, Adventist Health System - Sunbelt
Obligated Group, Series 1998, 5.375%, 11/15/20
(Pre-refunded 11/15/08)
37
NTX
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (continued)
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS July 31, (2007)
PRINCIPAL OPTIONAL CALL
AMOUNT (000) DESCRIPTION (1) PROVISIONS (2) RATINGS (3) VALUE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. GUARANTEED (4) (continued)
$ 3,500 Tarrant County Health Facilities Development Corporation, 11/10 at 101.00 A+ (4) $ 3,825,115
Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Adventist Health System -
Sunbelt Obligated Group, Series 2000, 6.625%, 11/15/20
(Pre-refunded 11/15/10)
2,000 Tarrant County Health Facilities Development Corporation, 1/08 at 105.00 AAA 2,116,980
Texas, Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds, South Central
Nursing Homes Inc., Series 1997A, 6.000%, 1/01/37
(Pre-refunded 1/01/08) - MBIA Insured
1,000 Tyler Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital 7/12 at 100.00 Baa1 (4) 1,090,520
Revenue Bonds, Mother Frances Hospital Regional Healthcare
Center, Series 2001, 6.000%, 7/01/31 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
33,545 Total U.S. Guaranteed 35,821,473
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UTILITIES - 9.6% (6.5% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
2,560 Brazos River Authority, Texas, Pollution Control Revenue 4/13 at 101.00 Baa2 2,870,400
Refunding Bonds, TXU Electric Company, Series 1999C,
7.700%, 3/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
2,400 Brazos River Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Reliant Energy 4/09 at 101.00 BBB- 2,420,688
Inc., Series 1999A, 5.375%, 4/01/19
5,000 Brownsville, Texas, Utility System Priority Revenue Bonds, 9/15 at 100.00 AAA 5,179,649
Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/27 - AMBAC Insured
2,000 Harris County Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, 2/10 at 100.00 AAA 2,072,180
Thermal Utility Revenue Bonds, TECO Project, Series 2000,
5.750%, 2/15/15 - AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
1,000 Matagorda County Navigation District 1, Texas, Revenue Bonds, 5/09 at 101.00 BBB- 1,021,860
Reliant Energy Inc., Series 1999B, 5.950%, 5/01/30
(Alternative Minimum Tax)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12,960 Total Utilities 13,564,777
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATER AND SEWER - 10.9% (7.3% OF TOTAL INVESTMENTS)
Coastal Water Authority, Texas, Contract Revenue Bonds, Houston
Water Projects, Series 2004:
1,005 5.000%, 12/15/20 - FGIC Insured 12/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,049,964
1,030 5.000%, 12/15/21 - FGIC Insured 12/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,074,764
3,000 Houston, Texas, First Lien Combined Utility System Revenue 5/14 at 100.00 AAA 3,182,370
Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.250%, 5/15/23 - FGIC Insured
3,500 Houston, Texas, Junior Lien Water and Sewerage System 12/11 at 100.00 AAA 3,722,670
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2001A, 5.500%, 12/01/17 -
FSA Insured
Irving, Texas, Subordinate Lien Waterworks and Sewerage
Revenue Bonds, Series 2004:
1,680 5.000%, 8/15/22 - AMBAC Insured 8/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,748,158
1,760 5.000%, 8/15/23 - AMBAC Insured 8/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,828,147
1,260 Rowlett, Rockwall and Dallas Counties, Texas, Waterworks 3/14 at 100.00 AAA 1,303,848
and Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A,
5.000%, 3/01/22 - MBIA Insured
1,500 Texas Water Development Board, Senior Lien State Revolving 7/09 at 100.00 AAA 1,540,470
Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A, 5.500%, 7/15/21
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14,735 Total Water and Sewer 15,450,391
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 218,250 Total Investments (cost $205,771,791) - 149.9% 211,661,923
=============-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Floating Rate Obligations - (2.7)% (3,775,000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Assets Less Liabilities - 1.7% 2,351,315
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value - (48.9)% (69,000,000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares - 100% $ 141,238,238
====================================================================================================================
38
The Fund may invest in "zero coupon" securities. A zero
coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to
its holders during the life of the security. Tax-exempt
income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of
the difference between the original purchase price of the
security at issuance and the par value of the security at
maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. Such
securities are included in the portfolio with a 0.00% coupon
rate in their description. The market prices of zero coupon
securities generally are more volatile than the market
prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
(1) All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are
based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless
otherwise noted.
(2) Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of
independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month
and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or
redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying
prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities
may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
(3) Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered
public accounting firm): Using the higher of Standard &
Poor's or Moody's rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard &
Poor's Group or Baa by Moody's Investor Service, Inc. are
considered to be below investment grade.
(4) Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S.
Government or U.S. Government agency securities which ensure
the timely payment of principal and interest. Such
investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA
rated securities.
(5) The issuer has received a formal adverse determination from
the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") regarding the
tax-exempt status of the bonds' coupon payments. The Fund
will continue to treat coupon payments as tax-exempt income
until such time it is formally determined that the interest
on the bonds should be treated as taxable.
N/R Not rated.
(ETM) Escrowed to maturity.
(IF) Inverse floating rate investment.
(UB) Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected
as a financing transaction pursuant to the provisions of
SFAS No. 140.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
39
Statement of
ASSETS & LIABILITIES
July 31, 2007
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
(NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
Investments, at value (cost $94,092,719,
$35,273,190, $55,589,992, $67,868,799,
and $205,771,791, respectively) $96,472,027 $35,810,961 $57,023,564 $68,862,744 $211,661,923
Cash 429,643 301,296 241,819 191,947 --
Receivables:
Interest 630,527 261,297 422,478 445,634 3,157,597
Investments sold -- -- -- -- 24,476
Other assets 9,866 5,866 7,576 2,642 16,543
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets 97,542,063 36,379,420 57,695,437 69,502,967 214,860,539
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES
Cash overdraft -- -- -- -- 31,494
Floating rate obligations 4,708,335 1,818,983 3,025,615 3,754,569 3,775,000
Variation margin -- 6,125 -- -- --
Accrued expenses:
Management fees 49,512 12,615 17,640 17,349 111,723
Other 32,419 14,731 26,194 12,868 180,177
Common share dividends payable 205,430 81,485 139,665 164,655 499,444
Preferred share dividends payable 12,737 6,672 10,643 1,928 24,463
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 5,008,433 1,940,611 3,219,757 3,951,369 4,622,301
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred shares, at liquidation value 30,000,000 12,000,000 18,500,000 22,000,000 69,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets applicable to Common shares $62,533,630 $22,438,809 $35,975,680 $43,551,598 $141,238,238
====================================================================================================================================
Common shares outstanding 4,468,210 1,549,939 2,436,687 3,067,630 9,495,144
====================================================================================================================================
Net asset value per Common share outstanding
(net assets applicable to Common shares,
divided by Common shares outstanding) $ 14.00 $ 14.48 $ 14.76 $ 14.20 $ 14.87
====================================================================================================================================
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES CONSIST OF:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common shares, $.01 par value per share $ 44,682 $ 15,499 $ 24,367 $ 30,676 $ 94,951
Paid-in surplus 62,143,653 21,926,440 34,534,100 43,248,456 134,624,791
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net
investment income (120,660) (65,588) (93,093) (140,010) (62,971)
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
from investments and
derivative transactions (1,913,353) 66,729 76,734 (581,469) 691,335
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
of investments and derivative transactions 2,379,308 495,729 1,433,572 993,945 5,890,132
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets applicable to Common shares $62,533,630 $22,438,809 $35,975,680 $43,551,598 $141,238,238
====================================================================================================================================
Authorized shares:
Common 200,000,000 Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Preferred 1,000,000 Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
====================================================================================================================================
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
40
Statement of
OPERATIONS
Year Ended July 31, 2007
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
(NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INVESTMENT INCOME $4,556,929 $1,667,206 $2,694,761 $3,138,098 $10,791,923
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPENSES
Management fees 595,546 222,545 351,086 421,917 1,341,780
Preferred shares - auction fees 75,000 29,999 46,249 54,998 172,499
Preferred shares - dividend disbursing agent fees 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000
Shareholders' servicing agent fees and expenses 4,181 365 264 240 11,196
Interest expense on floating rate obligations 54,121 22,871 37,136 45,000 84,103
Custodian's fees and expenses 35,305 19,011 23,766 26,530 52,376
Directors'/Trustees' fees and expenses 2,561 885 1,948 1,979 5,856
Professional fees 13,713 10,986 11,888 12,407 18,801
Shareholders' reports - printing and
mailing expenses 16,093 7,892 10,180 12,420 27,635
Stock exchange listing fees 9,735 135 207 261 9,739
Investor relations expense 12,026 4,396 6,921 8,199 25,928
Other expenses 15,789 12,610 13,655 12,823 16,632
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total expenses before custodian fee credit
and expense reimbursement 844,070 341,695 513,300 606,774 1,786,545
Custodian fee credit (15,574) (9,113) (11,899) (13,827) (23,394)
Expense reimbursement -- (79,068) (156,899) (212,868) --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net expenses 828,496 253,514 344,502 380,079 1,763,151
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net investment income 3,728,433 1,413,692 2,350,259 2,758,019 9,028,772
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS)
Net realized gain (loss) from:
Investments 189,070 66,786 241,754 75,705 896,242
Forward swaps -- -- -- 10,344 --
Change in net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) of:
Investments (676,216) (293,258) (656,316) (354,681) (1,939,151)
Forward swaps -- -- -- (48,098) --
Futures -- (42,042) -- -- --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) (487,146) (268,514) (414,562) (316,730) (1,042,909)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED SHAREHOLDERS
From net investment income (996,807) (378,572) (593,932) (755,446) (2,392,641)
From accumulated net realized gains -- (24,096) (24,790) -- (97,712)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decrease in net assets applicable to Common shares
from distributions to Preferred shareholders (996,807) (402,668) (618,722) (755,446) (2,490,353)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to
Common shares from operations $2,244,480 $ 742,510 $1,316,975 $1,685,843 $ 5,495,510
====================================================================================================================================
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
41
Statement of
CHANGES in NET ASSETS
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA
PREMIUM INCOME (NAZ) DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE (NFZ) DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE 2 (NKR)
---------------------------- ---------------------------- -----------------------------
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
7/31/07 7/31/06 7/31/07 7/31/06 7/31/07 7/31/06
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATIONS
Net investment income $ 3,728,433 $ 3,721,825 $ 1,413,692 $ 1,443,824 $ 2,350,259 $ 2,339,566
Net realized gain (loss) from:
Investments 189,070 118,668 66,786 129,877 241,754 124,725
Forward swaps -- -- -- 45,960 -- 89,291
Change in net unrealized
appreciation of:
Investments (676,216) (1,870,680) (293,258) (781,653) (656,316) (1,063,447)
Forward swaps -- -- -- (25,345) -- (50,556)
Futures -- -- (42,042) -- -- --
Distributions to
Preferred shareholders:
From net investment income (996,807) (787,320) (378,572) (305,984) (593,932) (485,176)
From accumulated net
realized gains -- -- (24,096) (14,818) (24,790) (34,003)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
applicable to Common shares
from operations 2,244,480 1,182,493 742,510 491,861 1,316,975 920,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
From net investment income (2,734,545) (3,081,682) (1,105,248) (1,299,911) (1,803,414) (2,009,891)
From accumulated net
realized gains -- -- (95,091) (118,137) (98,537) (256,786)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decrease in net assets applicable to
Common shares from distributions
to Common shareholders (2,734,545) (3,081,682) (1,200,339) (1,418,048) (1,901,951) (2,266,677)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS
Net proceeds from Common shares
issued to shareholders due to
reinvestment of distributions -- 100,418 35,133 35,014 95,591 106,998
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase in net assets
applicable to Common shares
from capital share transactions -- 100,418 35,133 35,014 95,591 106,998
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease)
in net assets
applicable to Common shares (490,065) (1,798,771) (422,696) (891,173) (489,385) (1,239,279)
Net assets applicable to
Common shares at the
beginning of year 63,023,695 64,822,466 22,861,505 23,752,678 36,465,065 37,704,344
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets applicable to Common
shares at the end of year $62,533,630 $63,023,695 $22,438,809 $22,861,505 $35,975,680 $36,465,065
====================================================================================================================================
Undistributed (Over-distribution of)
net investment income
at the end of year $ (120,660) $ (115,641) $ (65,588) $ 4,540 $ (93,093) $ (45,252)
====================================================================================================================================
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
42
ARIZONA TEXAS
DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE 3 (NXE) QUALITY INCOME (NTX)
---------------------------- -----------------------------
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
7/31/07 7/31/06 7/31/07 7/31/06
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATIONS
Net investment income $ 2,758,019 $ 2,706,006 $ 9,028,772 $ 9,149,206
Net realized gain (loss) from:
Investments 75,705 111,246 896,242 1,401,122
Forward swaps 10,344 143,857 -- --
Change in net unrealized appreciation of:
Investments (354,681) (1,013,672) (1,939,151) (4,517,912)
Forward swaps (48,098) (30,567) -- --
Futures -- -- -- --
Distributions to Preferred shareholders:
From net investment income (755,446) (597,775) (2,392,641) (2,071,629)
From accumulated net realized gains -- -- (97,712) --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
applicable to Common shares
from operations 1,685,843 1,319,095 5,495,510 3,960,787
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
From net investment income (2,049,116) (2,239,245) (6,921,959) (7,757,330)
From accumulated net realized gains -- -- (344,674) --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decrease in net assets applicable to
Common shares from distributions
to Common shareholders (2,049,116) (2,239,245) (7,266,633) (7,757,330)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS
Net proceeds from Common shares
issued to shareholders due to
reinvestment of distributions 1,401 4,304 -- 88,073
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase in net assets
applicable to Common shares
from capital share transactions 1,401 4,304 -- 88,073
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
applicable to Common shares (361,872) (915,846) (1,771,123) (3,708,470)
Net assets applicable to Common
shares at the beginning of year 43,913,470 44,829,316 143,009,361 146,717,831
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets applicable to Common
shares at the end of year $43,551,598 $43,913,470 $141,238,238 $143,009,361
====================================================================================================================================
Undistributed (Over-distribution of)
net investment income
at the end of year $ (140,010) $ (93,467) $ (62,971) $ 236,581
====================================================================================================================================
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
43
Notes to
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. GENERAL INFORMATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The state funds (the "Funds") covered in this report and their corresponding
Common share stock exchange symbols are Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal
Fund, Inc. (NAZ), Nuveen Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (NFZ), Nuveen
Arizona Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (NKR), Nuveen Arizona Dividend
Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (NXE) and Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund
(NTX). Common shares of Arizona Premium Income (NAZ) and Texas Quality Income
(NTX) are traded on the New York Stock Exchange while Common shares of Arizona
Dividend Advantage (NFZ), Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR) and Arizona
Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE) are traded on the American Stock Exchange. The Funds
are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as
closed-end management investment companies.
Each Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from both regular federal and
designated state income taxes by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio
of municipal obligations issued by state and local government authorities within
a single state or certain U.S. territories.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the
Funds in the preparation of their financial statements in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
Investment Valuation
The prices of municipal bonds in each Fund's investment portfolio are provided
by a pricing service approved by the Fund's Board of Directors/Trustees. When
market price quotes are not readily available (which is usually the case for
municipal securities), the pricing service may establish fair value based on
yields or prices of municipal bonds of comparable quality, type of issue,
coupon, maturity and rating, indications of value from securities dealers,
evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral and general market
conditions. Prices of forward swap contracts are also provided by an independent
pricing service approved by each Fund's Board of Directors/Trustees. Futures
contracts are valued using the closing settlement price, or in the absence of
such a price, at the mean of the bid and asked prices. If the pricing service is
unable to supply a price for a municipal bond, forward swap contract or futures
contract, each Fund may use a market price or fair market value quote provided
by a major broker/dealer in such investments. If it is determined that the
market price or fair market value for an investment is unavailable or
inappropriate, the Board of Directors/Trustees of the Funds, or its designee,
may establish a fair value for the investment. Temporary investments in
securities that have variable rate and demand features qualifying them as
short-term investments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market
value.
Investment Transactions
Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and
losses from transactions are determined on the specific identification method.
Investments purchased on a when-issued/delayed delivery basis may have extended
settlement periods. Any investments so purchased are subject to market
fluctuation during this period. The Funds have instructed the custodian to
segregate assets with a current value at least equal to the amount of the
when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments. At July 31, 2007, there were
no such outstanding purchase commitments in any of the Funds.
Investment Income
Interest income, which includes the amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts for financial reporting purposes, is recorded on an accrual basis.
Investment income also includes paydown gains and losses, if any.
Income Taxes
Each Fund is a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund
intends to distribute substantially all net investment income and net capital
gains to shareholders and to otherwise comply with the requirements of
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment
companies. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. Furthermore,
each Fund intends to satisfy conditions which will enable interest from
municipal securities, which is exempt from regular federal and designated state
income taxes, to retain such tax-exempt status when distributed to shareholders
of the Funds. Net realized capital gains and ordinary income distributions paid
by the Funds are subject to federal taxation.
44
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders
Dividends from tax-exempt net investment income are declared monthly. Net
realized capital gains and/or market discount from investment transactions, if
any, are distributed to shareholders not less frequently than annually.
Furthermore, capital gains are distributed only to the extent they exceed
available capital loss carryforwards.
Distributions to Common shareholders of tax-exempt net investment income, net
realized capital gains and/or market discount, if any, are recorded on the
ex-dividend date. The amount and timing of distributions are determined in
accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
Preferred Shares
The Funds have issued and outstanding Preferred shares, $25,000 stated value per
share, as a means of effecting financial leverage. Each Fund's Preferred shares
are issued in one or more Series. The dividend rate paid by the Funds on each
Series is determined every seven days, pursuant to a dutch auction process
overseen by the auction agent, and is payable at the end of each rate period.
The number of Preferred shares outstanding, by Series and in total, for each
Fund is as follows:
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
(NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of shares:
Series M -- -- -- 880 760
Series T -- 480 -- -- --
Series W -- -- 740 -- --
Series TH 1,200 -- -- -- 2,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1,200 480 740 880 2,760
=====================================================================================================================
Inverse Floating Rate Securities
Each Fund may invest in inverse floating rate securities. An inverse floating
rate security is created by depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed
interest rate, into a special purpose trust created by a broker-dealer. In turn,
this trust (a) issues floating rate certificates, in face amounts equal to some
fraction of the deposited bond's par amount or market value, that typically pay
short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties, and (b) issues to a
long-term investor (such as one of the Funds) an inverse floating rate
certificate (sometimes referred to as an "inverse floater") that represents all
remaining or residual interest in the trust. The income received by the inverse
floater holder varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to the floating
rate certificates' holders, and in most circumstances the inverse floater holder
bears substantially all of the underlying bond's downside investment risk and
also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the
underlying bond's value. The price of an inverse floating rate security will be
more volatile than that of the underlying bond because the interest rate is
dependent on not only the fixed coupon rate of the underlying bond but also on
the short-term interest paid on the floating rate certificates, and because the
inverse floating rate security essentially bears the risk of loss of the greater
face value of the underlying bond.
A Fund may purchase an inverse floating rate security in a secondary market
transaction without first owning the underlying bond (referred to as an
"externally-deposited inverse floater"), or instead by first selling a
fixed-rate bond to a broker-dealer for deposit into the special purpose trust
and receiving in turn the residual interest in the trust (referred to as a
"self-deposited inverse floater"). An investment in an externally-deposited
inverse floater is identified in the Portfolio of Investments as an "Inverse
floating rate investment". An investment in a self-deposited inverse floater is
accounted for as a financing transaction in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 140 "Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities". In such
instances, a fixed-rate bond deposited into a special purpose trust is
identified in the Portfolio of Investments as an "Underlying bond of an inverse
floating rate trust", with the Fund accounting for the short-term floating rate
certificates issued by the trust as "Floating rate obligations" on the Statement
of Assets and Liabilities. In addition, the Fund reflects in Investment Income
the entire earnings of the underlying bond and accounts for the related interest
paid to the holders of the short-term floating rate certificates as "Interest
expense on floating rate obligations" in the Statement of Operations.
During the fiscal year ended July, 31, 2007, each Fund invested in externally
deposited inverse floaters and/or self-deposited inverse floaters.
45
The average floating rate obligations outstanding and average annual interest
rate and fees related to self-deposited inverse floaters during the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2007, were as follows:
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
(NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average floating rate obligations $1,389,149 $586,210 $952,413 $1,154,467 $2,161,575
Average annual interest rate and fees 3.90% 3.90% 3.90% 3.90% 3.89%
=====================================================================================================================
Forward Swap Transactions
The Funds are authorized to invest in certain derivative financial instruments.
Each Funds' use of forward interest rate swap transactions is intended to help
the Fund manage its overall interest rate sensitivity, either shorter or longer,
generally to more closely align the Fund's interest rate sensitivity with that
of the broader municipal market. Forward interest rate swap transactions involve
each Fund's agreement with a counterparty to pay, in the future, a fixed or
variable rate payment in exchange for the counterparty paying the Fund a
variable or fixed rate payment, the accruals for which would begin at a
specified date in the future (the "effective date"). The amount of the payment
obligation is based on the notional amount of the forward swap contract and the
termination date of the swap (which is akin to a bond's maturity). The value of
the Fund's swap commitment would increase or decrease based primarily on the
extent to which long-term interest rates for bonds having a maturity of the
swap's termination date increases or decreases. The Funds may terminate a swap
contract prior to the effective date, at which point a realized gain or loss is
recognized. When a forward swap is terminated, it ordinarily does not involve
the delivery of securities or other underlying assets or principal, but rather
is settled in cash on a net basis. Each Fund intends, but is not obligated, to
terminate its forward swaps before the effective date. Accordingly, the risk of
loss with respect to the swap counterparty on such transactions is limited to
the credit risk associated with a counterparty failing to honor its commitment
to pay any realized gain to the Fund upon termination. To reduce such credit
risk, all counterparties are required to pledge collateral daily (based on the
daily valuation of each swap) on behalf of each Fund with a value approximately
equal to the amount of any unrealized gain above a pre-determined threshold.
Reciprocally, when any of the Funds have an unrealized loss on a swap contract,
the Funds have instructed the custodian to pledge assets of the Funds as
collateral with a value approximately equal to the amount of the unrealized loss
above a pre-determined threshold. Collateral pledges are monitored and
subsequently adjusted if and when the swap valuations fluctuate, either up or
down, by at least the predetermined threshold amount.
Futures Contracts
The Funds are authorized to invest in futures contracts. Upon entering into a
futures contract, a Fund is required to deposit with the broker an amount of
cash or liquid securities equal to a specified percentage of the contract
amount. This is known as the "initial margin." Subsequent payments ("variation
margin") are made or received by a Fund each day, depending on the daily
fluctuation of the value of the contract.
During the period the futures contract is open, changes in the value of the
contract are recognized as an unrealized gain or loss by "marking-to-market" on
a daily basis to reflect the changes in market value of the contract. When the
contract is closed or expired, a Fund records a realized gain or loss equal to
the difference between the value of the contract on the closing date and value
of the contract when originally entered into. Cash held by the broker to cover
initial margin requirements on open futures contracts, if any, is recognized in
the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Additionally, the Statement of Assets
and Liabilities reflects a receivable or payable for the variation margin when
applicable.
Risks of investments in futures contracts include the possible adverse movement
of the securities or indices underlying the contracts, the possibility that
there may not be a liquid secondary market for the contracts and/or that a
change in the value of the contract may not correlate with a change in the value
of the underlying securities or indices.
Custodian Fee Credit
Each Fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby certain custodian
fees and expenses are reduced by net credits earned on each Fund's cash on
deposit with the bank. Such deposit arrangements are an alternative to overnight
investments. Credits for cash balances may be offset by charges for any days on
which the Fund overdraws its account at the custodian bank.
Indemnifications
Under the Funds' organizational documents, their Officers and Directors/Trustees
are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of
their duties to the Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the
Funds enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other
parties. The Funds' maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this
would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet
occurred. However, the Funds have not had prior claims or losses pursuant to
these contracts and expect the risk of loss to be remote.
46
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and
decreases in net assets applicable to Common shares from operations during the
reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
2. FUND SHARES
Transactions in Common shares were as follows:
ARIZONA PREMIUM ARIZONA DIVIDEND ARIZONA DIVIDEND
INCOME (NAZ) ADVANTAGE (NFZ) ADVANTAGE 2 (NKR)
------------------------ ----------------------- -----------------------
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
7/31/07 7/31/06 7/31/07 7/31/06 7/31/07 7/31/06
==================================================================================================================
Common shares issued to
shareholders due to
reinvestment of distributions -- 6,761 2,295 2,135 6,191 6,848
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA DIVIDEND TEXAS QUALITY
ADVANTAGE 3 (NXE) INCOME (NTX)
----------------------- -----------------------
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
7/31/07 7/31/06 7/31/07 7/31/06
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common shares issued to
shareholders due to
reinvestment of distributions 99 288 -- 5,523
==================================================================================================================
3. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales (including maturities but excluding short-term investments
and derivative transactions) during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, were as
follows:
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
(NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purchases $17,850,563 $10,396,703 $11,266,093 $14,420,110 $24,092,194
Sales and maturities 12,864,801 7,052,124 8,090,426 10,557,509 19,643,171
=====================================================================================================================
4. INCOME TAX INFORMATION
The following information is presented on an income tax basis. Differences
between amounts for financial statement and federal income tax purposes are
primarily due to the treatment of paydown gains and losses, timing differences
in recognizing taxable market discount, timing differences in recognizing
certain gains and losses on investment transactions and the treatment of
investments in inverse floating rate transactions subject to SFAS No.140. To the
extent that differences arise that are permanent in nature, such amounts are
reclassified within the capital accounts on the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities presented in the annual report, based on their federal tax basis
treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification. Temporary and
permanent differences do not impact the net asset values of the Funds.
At July 31, 2007, the cost of investments was as follows:
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
(NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of investments $89,352,348 $33,444,398 $52,669,074 $64,156,569 $201,777,312
=====================================================================================================================
47
Gross unrealized appreciation and gross unrealized depreciation of investments
at July 31, 2007, were as follows:
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
(NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross unrealized:
Appreciation $3,027,883 $ 808,428 $1,844,407 $1,464,667 $6,963,616
Depreciation (623,259) (266,563) (521,934) (512,008) (995,184)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
of investments $2,404,624 $ 541,865 $1,322,473 $ 952,659 $5,968,432
=====================================================================================================================
The tax components of undistributed net tax-exempt income, net ordinary income
and net long-term capital gains at July 31, 2007, the Funds' tax year end, were
as follows:
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
(NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Undistributed net tax-exempt income * $94,638 $23,011 $66,180 $26,437 $457,648
Undistributed net ordinary income ** -- -- -- -- --
Undistributed net long-term capital gains -- 24,687 189,057 -- 691,335
=====================================================================================================================
* Undistributed net tax-exempt income (on a tax basis) has not been reduced
for the dividend declared on July 2, 2007, paid on August 1, 2007.
** Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net
short-term capital gains, if any.
The tax character of distributions paid during the Funds' tax years ended July
31, 2007 and July 31, 2006, was designated for purposes of the dividends paid
deduction as follows:
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
2007 (NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributions from net tax-exempt income*** $3,727,652 $1,496,276 $2,402,229 $2,822,896 $9,349,744
Distributions from net ordinary income ** -- 3,027 -- -- --
Distributions from net long-term capital gains **** -- 119,187 123,327 -- 442,386
=====================================================================================================================
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
2006 (NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributions from net tax-exempt income $3,923,547 $1,618,663 $2,507,532 $2,850,308 $9,881,946
Distributions from net ordinary income ** -- -- -- -- 22,028
Distributions from net long-term capital gains -- 132,955 290,789 -- --
=====================================================================================================================
** Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net
short-term capital gains, if any.
*** The Funds hereby designate these amounts paid during the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2007, as Exempt Interest Dividends.
**** The Funds hereby designate these amounts paid during the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2007, as long-term capital gain dividends pursuant to Internal
Revenue Code Section 852(b)(3).
At July 31, 2007, the following Funds had unused capital loss carryforwards
available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future capital
gains, if any. If not applied, the carryforwards will expire as follows:
ARIZONA ARIZONA
PREMIUM DIVIDEND
INCOME ADVANTAGE 3
(NAZ) (NXE)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expiration year:
2011 $ 359,726 $ --
2012 1,553,627 158,487
2013 -- 160,902
2014 -- 218,127
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $1,913,353 $537,516
===============================================================================
48
5. MANAGEMENT FEES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Each Fund's management fee is separated into two components - a complex-level
component, based on the aggregate amount of all fund assets managed by Nuveen
Asset Management (the "Adviser"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Nuveen
Investments, Inc. ("Nuveen"), and a specific fund-level component, based only on
the amount of assets within each individual Fund. This pricing structure enables
Nuveen fund shareholders to benefit from growth in the assets within each
individual fund as well as from growth in the amount of complex-wide assets
managed by the Adviser.
The annual fund-level fee, payable monthly, for each Fund is based upon the
average daily net assets (including net assets attributable to Preferred shares)
of each Fund as follows:
AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS ARIZONA PREMIUM INCOME (NAZ)
(INCLUDING NET ASSETS TEXAS QUALITY INCOME (NTX)
ATTRIBUTABLE TO PREFERRED SHARES) FUND-LEVEL FEE RATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the first $125 million .4500%
For the next $125 million .4375
For the next $250 million .4250
For the next $500 million .4125
For the next $1 billion .4000
For the next $3 billion .3875
For net assets over $5 billion .3750
===============================================================================
ARIZONA DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE (NFZ)
AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS ARIZONA DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE 2 (NKR)
(INCLUDING NET ASSETS ARIZONA DIVIDEND ADVANTAGE 3 (NXE)
ATTRIBUTABLE TO PREFERRED SHARES) FUND-LEVEL FEE RATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the first $125 million .4500%
For the next $125 million .4375
For the next $250 million .4250
For the next $500 million .4125
For the next $1 billion .4000
For net assets over $2 billion .3750
===============================================================================
The annual complex-level fee, payable monthly, which is additive to the
fund-level fee, for all Nuveen sponsored funds in the U.S., is based on the
aggregate amount of total fund assets managed as stated in the tables below. As
of July 31, 2007, the complex-level fee rate was .1831%.
Effective August 20, 2007, the complex-level fee schedule was as follows:
COMPLEX-LEVEL ASSET BREAKPOINT LEVEL (1) EFFECTIVE RATE AT BREAKPOINT LEVEL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$55 billion .2000%
$56 billion .1996
$57 billion .1989
$60 billion .1961
$63 billion .1931
$66 billion .1900
$71 billion .1851
$76 billion .1806
$80 billion .1773
$91 billion .1691
$125 billion .1599
$200 billion .1505
$250 billion .1469
$300 billion .1445
===============================================================================
49
Prior to August 20, 2007, the complex-level fee schedule was as follows:
COMPLEX-LEVEL ASSET BREAKPOINT LEVEL (1) EFFECTIVE RATE AT BREAKPOINT LEVEL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$55 billion .2000%
$56 billion .1996
$57 billion .1989
$60 billion .1961
$63 billion .1931
$66 billion .1900
$71 billion .1851
$76 billion .1806
$80 billion .1773
$91 billion .1698
$125 billion .1617
$200 billion .1536
$250 billion .1509
$300 billion .1490
===============================================================================
(1) The complex-level fee component of the management fee for the funds is
calculated based upon the aggregate Managed Assets ("Managed Assets" means
the average daily net assets of each fund including assets attributable to
preferred stock issued by or borrowings by the Nuveen funds) of
Nuveen-sponsored funds in the U.S.
The management fee compensates the Adviser for overall investment advisory and
administrative services and general office facilities. The Funds pay no
compensation directly to those of its Directors/Trustees who are affiliated with
the Adviser or to its Officers, all of whom receive remuneration for their
services to the Funds from the Adviser or its affiliates. The Board of
Directors/Trustees has adopted a deferred compensation plan for independent
Directors/Trustees that enables Directors/Trustees to elect to defer receipt of
all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from
certain Nuveen advised funds. Under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as
though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of select Nuveen advised
funds.
For the first ten years of Arizona Dividend Advantage's (NFZ) operations, the
Adviser has agreed to reimburse the Fund, as a percentage of average daily net
assets (including net assets attributable to Preferred shares), for fees and
expenses in the amounts and for the time periods set forth below:
YEAR ENDING YEAR ENDING
JANUARY 31, JANUARY 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001* .30% 2007 .25%
2002 .30 2008 .20
2003 .30 2009 .15
2004 .30 2010 .10
2005 .30 2011 .05
2006 .30
================================================================================
* From the commencement of operations.
The Adviser has not agreed to reimburse Arizona Dividend Advantage (NFZ) for any
portion of its fees and expenses beyond January 31, 2011.
For the first ten years of Arizona Dividend Advantage 2's (NKR) operations, the
Adviser has agreed to reimburse the Fund, as a percentage of average daily net
assets (including net assets attributable to Preferred shares), for fees and
expenses in the amounts and for the time periods set forth below:
YEAR ENDING YEAR ENDING
MARCH 31, MARCH 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002* .30% 2008 .25%
2003 .30 2009 .20
2004 .30 2010 .15
2005 .30 2011 .10
2006 .30 2012 .05
2007 .30
================================================================================
* From the commencement of operations.
50
The Adviser has not agreed to reimburse Arizona Dividend Advantage 2 (NKR) for
any portion of its fees and expenses beyond March 31, 2012.
For the first eight years of Arizona Dividend Advantage 3's (NXE) operations,
the Adviser has agreed to reimburse the Fund, as a percentage of average daily
net assets (including net assets attributable to Preferred shares), for fees and
expenses in the amounts and for the time periods set forth below:
YEAR ENDING YEAR ENDING
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002* .32% 2007 .32%
2003 .32 2008 .24
2004 .32 2009 .16
2005 .32 2010 .08
2006 .32
================================================================================
* From the commencement of operations.
The Adviser has not agreed to reimburse Arizona Dividend Advantage 3 (NXE) for
any portion of its fees and expenses beyond September 30, 2010.
Agreement and Plan of Merger
On June 20, 2007, Nuveen Investments announced that it had entered into a
definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger ("Merger Agreement") with Windy City
Investments, Inc. ("Windy City"), a corporation formed by investors led by
Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, pursuant to which Windy City would acquire
Nuveen Investments. Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC is a private equity
investment firm based in Chicago, Illinois. The investors include an affiliate
of Merrill Lynch. It is anticipated that Merrill Lynch and its affiliates will
be indirect "affiliated persons" (as that term is defined in the Investment
Company Act of 1940) of the Funds upon and after the acquisition. One important
implication of this is that the Funds will not be able to buy securities from or
sell securities to Merrill Lynch, but the portfolio management teams and Fund
management do not expect that this will significantly impact the ability of the
Funds to pursue their investment objectives and policies. Under the terms of the
merger, each outstanding share of Nuveen Investments' common stock (other than
dissenting shares) will be converted into the right to receive a specified
amount of cash, without interest. The merger is expected to be completed by the
end of the year, subject to customary conditions, including obtaining necessary
fund and client consents sufficient to satisfy the terms of the Merger
Agreement. The obligations of Windy City to consummate the merger are not
conditioned on its obtaining financing.
The consummation of the merger will be deemed to be an "assignment" (as defined
in the 1940 Act) of the investment management agreement between each Fund and
the Adviser, and will result in the automatic termination of each Fund's
agreement. The Board of Directors/Trustees of each Fund has approved a new
investment management agreement with the Adviser. The agreement is being
presented to the Fund's shareholders for approval, and, if so approved by
shareholders, would take effect upon consummation of the merger. There can be no
assurance that the merger described above will be consummated as contemplated or
that necessary shareholder approvals will be obtained.
6. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48
On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB
Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN
48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized,
measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires
the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of
preparing the Funds' tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are
"more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax
positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be
recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is
required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and is to be
applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. Recent SEC guidance
allows funds to delay implementing FIN 48 into NAV calculations until the fund's
last NAV calculation in the first required financial statement reporting period.
As a result, the Funds must begin to incorporate FIN 48 into their NAV
calculations by January 31, 2008. At this time, management is continuing to
evaluate the implications of FIN 48 and does not expect the adoption of FIN 48
will have a significant impact on the net assets or results of operations of the
Funds.
51
Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, "Fair Value
Measurements." This standard establishes a single authoritative definition of
fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires
additional disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to
fair value measurements already required or permitted by existing standards.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The changes to current generally accepted accounting principles from the
application of this standard relate to the definition of fair value, the methods
used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value
measurements. As of July 31, 2007, management does not believe the adoption of
SFAS No. 157 will impact the financial statement amounts; however, additional
disclosures may be required about the inputs used to develop the measurements
and the effect of certain of the measurements included within the Statement of
Operations for the period.
7. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Distributions to Common Shareholders
The Funds declared Common share dividend distributions from their tax-exempt net
investment income which were paid on September 4, 2007, to shareholders of
record on August 15, 2007, as follows:
ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA ARIZONA TEXAS
PREMIUM DIVIDEND DIVIDEND DIVIDEND QUALITY
INCOME ADVANTAGE ADVANTAGE 2 ADVANTAGE 3 INCOME
(NAZ) (NFZ) (NKR) (NXE) (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dividend per share $.0510 $.0555 $.0615 $.0545 $.0605
=====================================================================================================================
52
Financial
HIGHLIGHTS
53
Financial
HIGHLIGHTS
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
Investment Operations Less Distributions
------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
Distributions Distributions
from Net from Net
Beginning Investment Capital Investment Capital
Common Net Income to Gains to Income to Gains to
Share Net Realized/ Preferred Preferred Common Common
Net Asset Investment Unrealized Share- Share- Share- Share-
Value Income Gain (Loss) holders+ holders+ Total holders holders Total
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA PREMIUM
INCOME (NAZ)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $14.10 $ .83 $(.10) $(.22) $ -- $ .51 $(.61) $ -- $(.61)
2006 14.53 .83 (.39) (.18) -- .26 (.69) -- (.69)
2005 14.04 .86 .56 (.09) -- 1.33 (.84) -- (.84)
2004 13.66 .92 .43 (.05) -- 1.30 (.92) -- (.92)
2003 14.25 .97 (.57) (.07) -- .33 (.92) -- (.92)
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE (NFZ)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 14.77 .91 (.17) (.24) (.02) .48 (.71) (.06) (.77)
2006 15.37 .93 (.40) (.20) (.01) .32 (.84) (.08) (.92)
2005 15.00 .97 .46 (.10) -- 1.33 (.92) (.04) (.96)
2004 14.45 .99 .57 (.06) -- 1.50 (.91) (.04) (.95)
2003 14.81 1.00 (.38) (.07) (.01) .54 (.88) (.04) (.92)
=================================================================================================================================
Total Returns
--------------------
Offering Based
Costs and Ending on
Preferred Common Based Common
Share Share Ending on Share Net
Underwriting Net Asset Market Market Asset
Discounts Value Value Value* Value*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA PREMIUM
INCOME (NAZ)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $ -- $14.00 $13.07 (.22)% 3.62%
2006 -- 14.10 13.69 (5.62) 1.84
2005 -- 14.53 15.22 5.17 9.69
2004 -- 14.04 15.27 7.97 9.66
2003 -- 13.66 15.00 (5.98) 2.21
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE (NFZ)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 -- 14.48 13.35 (11.63) 3.24
2006 -- 14.77 15.90 4.54 2.14
2005 -- 15.37 16.08 10.88 9.04
2004 -- 15.00 15.40 7.05 10.56
2003 .02 14.45 15.30 3.06 3.67
==================================================================================
Ratios/Supplemental Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratios to Average Net Assets Ratios to Average Net Assets
Applicable to Common Shares Applicable to Common Shares
Before Credit/Reimbursement After Credit/Reimbursement**
-------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Ending
Net
Assets
Applicable Expenses Expenses Net Expenses Expenses Net Portfolio
to Common Including Excluding Investment Including Excluding Investment Turnover
Shares (000) Interest++(a) Interest++(a) Income++ Interest++(a) Interest++(a) Income++ Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA PREMIUM
INCOME (NAZ)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $62,534 1.32% 1.24% 5.81% 1.30% 1.21% 5.84% 13%
2006 63,024 1.21 1.21 5.83 1.19 1.19 5.84 22
2005 64,822 1.20 1.20 5.91 1.19 1.19 5.92 17
2004 62,431 1.22 1.22 6.49 1.21 1.21 6.50 26
2003 60,547 1.25 1.25 6.81 1.24 1.24 6.82 17
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE (NFZ)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 22,439 1.48 1.38 5.74 1.10 1.00 6.12 19
2006 22,862 1.36 1.36 5.79 .92 .92 6.23 24
2005 23,753 1.34 1.34 5.82 .87 .87 6.28 18
2004 23,153 1.30 1.30 6.10 .83 .83 6.57 24
2003 22,290 1.35 1.35 6.11 .91 .91 6.55 20
====================================================================================================================================
Floating Rate Obligations
Preferred Shares at End of Period at End of Period
-------------------------------------- -------------------------
Aggregate Liquidation Aggregate
Amount and Market Asset Amount Asset
Outstanding Value Coverage Outstanding Coverage
(000) Per Share Per Share (000) Per $1,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA PREMIUM
INCOME (NAZ)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $30,000 $25,000 $77,111 $4,708 $20,653
2006 30,000 25,000 77,520 -- --
2005 30,000 25,000 79,019 -- --
2004 30,000 25,000 77,026 -- --
2003 30,000 25,000 75,456 -- --
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE (NFZ)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 12,000 25,000 71,748 1,819 19,933
2006 12,000 25,000 72,628 -- --
2005 12,000 25,000 74,485 -- --
2004 12,000 25,000 73,235 -- --
2003 12,000 25,000 71,438 -- --
================================================================================
* Total Return on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market
price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested
capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at
the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which
is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is
assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual
reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place
over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market
price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price
used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
Total Return on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes
in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset
value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if
any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on
the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested
at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last
dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund's market
price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from
the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
** After custodian fee credit and expense reimbursement, where applicable.
+ The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents.
++ Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Preferred
shareholders; income ratios reflect income earned on assets attributable to
Preferred shares.
(a) Interest expense arises from the application of SFAS No. 140 to certain
inverse floating rate transactions entered into by the Fund as more fully
described in Footnote 1 - Inverse Floating Rate Securities.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
54-55 spread
Financial
HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
Investment Operations Less Distributions
------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
Distributions Distributions
from Net from Net
Beginning Investment Capital Investment Capital
Common Net Income to Gains to Income to Gains to
Share Net Realized/ Preferred Preferred Common Common
Net Asset Investment Unrealized Share- Share- Share- Share-
Value Income Gain (Loss) holders+ holders+ Total holders holders Total
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE 2 (NKR)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $15.00 $.97 $(.18) $(.24) $(.01) $ .54 $ (.74) $(.04) $(.78)
2006 15.56 .96 (.37) (.20) (.01) .38 (.83) (.11) (.94)
2005 15.10 .97 .59 (.11) (.01) 1.44 (.86) (.12) (.98)
2004 14.57 .96 .53 (.06) -- 1.43 (.86) (.04) (.90)
2003 14.88 .96 (.31) (.08) -- .57 (.86) (.01) (.87)
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE 3 (NXE)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 14.32 .90 (.10) (.25) -- .55 (.67) -- (.67)
2006 14.62 .88 (.26) (.19) -- .43 (.73) -- (.73)
2005 14.01 .89 .62 (.10) -- 1.41 (.80) -- (.80)
2004 13.45 .89 .54 (.06) -- 1.37 (.80) -- (.80)
2003(b) 14.33 .66 (.67) (.05) -- (.06) (.61) -- (.61)
=================================================================================================================================
Total Returns
--------------------
Offering Based
Costs and Ending on
Preferred Common Based Common
Share Share Ending on Share Net
Underwriting Net Asset Market Market Asset
Discounts Value Value Value** Value**
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE 2 (NKR)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $ -- $14.76 $15.27 4.52% 3.59%
2006 -- 15.00 15.37 .82 2.49
2005 -- 15.56 16.19 16.30 9.74
2004 -- 15.10 14.82 9.46 9.98
2003 (.01) 14.57 14.40 (3.53) 3.67
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE 3 (NXE)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 -- 14.20 13.44 4.21 3.81
2006 -- 14.32 13.52 (1.80) 3.03
2005 -- 14.62 14.48 15.11 10.21
2004 (.01) 14.01 13.30 1.01 10.25
2003(b) (.21) 13.45 13.97 (2.76) (2.05)
====================================================================================
Ratios/Supplemental Data
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratios to Average Net Assets Ratios to Average Net Assets
Applicable to Common Shares Applicable to Common Shares
Before Credit/Reimbursement After Credit/Reimbursement***
-------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Ending
Net
Assets
Applicable Expenses Expenses Net Expenses Expenses Net Portfolio
to Common Including Excluding Investment Including Excluding Investment Turnover
Shares (000) Interest++(a) Interest++(a) Income++ Interest++(a) Interest++(a) Income++ Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE 2 (NKR)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $35,976 1.39% 1.29% 5.92% .93% .83% 6.38% 14%
2006 36,465 1.28 1.28 5.88 .82 .82 6.34 11
2005 37,704 1.27 1.27 5.76 .82 .82 6.22 11
2004 36,543 1.27 1.27 5.83 .80 .80 6.30 14
2003 35,237 1.27 1.27 5.78 .82 .82 6.23 4
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE 3 (NXE)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 43,552 1.36 1.26 5.69 .85 .75 6.19 15
2006 43,913 1.26 1.26 5.63 .78 .78 6.12 12
2005 44,829 1.25 1.25 5.63 .76 .76 6.12 15
2004 42,983 1.25 1.25 5.80 .76 .76 6.29 22
2003(b) 41,247 1.19* 1.19* 5.05* .73* .73* 5.52* 16
====================================================================================================================================
Floating Rate Obligations
Preferred Shares at End of Period at End of Period
-------------------------------------- -------------------------
Aggregate Liquidation Aggregate
Amount and Market Asset Amount Asset
Outstanding Value Coverage Outstanding Coverage
(000) Per Share Per Share (000) Per $1,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE 2 (NKR)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $18,500 $25,000 $73,616 $3,026 $19,005
2006 18,500 25,000 74,277 -- --
2005 18,500 25,000 75,952 -- --
2004 18,500 25,000 74,382 -- --
2003 18,500 25,000 72,618 -- --
ARIZONA DIVIDEND
ADVANTAGE 3 (NXE)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 22,000 25,000 74,490 3,755 18,459
2006 22,000 25,000 74,902 -- --
2005 22,000 25,000 75,942 -- --
2004 22,000 25,000 73,844 -- --
2003(b) 22,000 25,000 71,872 -- --
================================================================================
* Annualized.
** Total Return on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market
price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested
capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at
the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which
is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is
assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual
reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place
over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market
price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price
used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
Total Return on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes
in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset
value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if
any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on
the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested
at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last
dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund's market
price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from
the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
*** After custodian fee credit and expense reimbursement, where applicable.
+ The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents.
++ Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Preferred
shareholders; income ratios reflect income earned on assets attributable to
Preferred shares.
(a) Interest expense arises from the application of SFAS No. 140 to certain
inverse floating rate transactions entered into by the Fund as more fully
described in Footnote 1 - Inverse Floating Rate Securities.
(b) For the period September 25, 2002 (commencement of operations) through July
31, 2003.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
56-57 spread
Financial
HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
Investment Operations Less Distributions
------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
Distributions Distributions
from Net from Net
Beginning Investment Capital Investment Capital
Common Net Income to Gains to Income to Gains to
Share Net Realized/ Preferred Preferred Common Common
Net Asset Investment Unrealized Share- Share- Share- Share-
Value Income Gain (Loss) holders+ holders+ Total holders holders Total
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXAS QUALITY
INCOME (NTX)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $15.06 $ .95 $ (.11) $ (.25) $ (.01) $ .58 $(.73) $(.04) $(.77)
2006 15.46 .96 (.32) (.22) -- .42 (.82) -- (.82)
2005 15.12 1.00 .41 (.13) -- 1.28 (.94) -- (.94)
2004 14.57 1.03 .55 (.07) -- 1.51 (.96) -- (.96)
2003 15.14 1.05 (.58) (.08) -- .39 (.95) (.01) (.96)
=================================================================================================================================
Total Returns
--------------------
Offering Based
Costs and Ending on
Preferred Common Based Common
Share Share Ending on Share Net
Underwriting Net Asset Market Market Asset
Discounts Value Value Value* Value*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXAS QUALITY
INCOME (NTX)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $ -- $14.87 $13.89 (.52)% 3.82%
2006 -- 15.06 14.71 (4.03) 2.77
2005 -- 15.46 16.19 17.83 8.61
2004 -- 15.12 14.59 5.87 10.51
2003 -- 14.57 14.71 4.14 2.54
===================================================================================
Ratios/Supplemental Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratios to Average Net Assets Ratios to Average Net Assets
Applicable to Common Shares Applicable to Common Shares
Before Credit/Reimbursement After Credit/Reimbursement**
-------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Ending
Net
Assets
Applicable Expenses Expenses Net Expenses Expenses Net Portfolio
to Common Including Excluding Investment Including Excluding Investment Turnover
Shares (000) Interest++(a) Interest++(a) Income++ Interest++(a) Interest++(a) Income++ Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXAS QUALITY
INCOME (NTX)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $141,238 1.24% 1.18% 6.24% 1.22% 1.16% 6.26% 9%
2006 143,009 1.19 1.19 6.31 1.18 1.18 6.33 13
2005 146,718 1.18 1.18 6.42 1.16 1.16 6.44 14
2004 143,233 1.18 1.18 6.77 1.18 1.18 6.77 16
2003 137,975 1.20 1.20 6.93 1.19 1.19 6.94 12
====================================================================================================================================
Floating Rate Obligations
Preferred Shares at End of Period at End of Period
-------------------------------------- -------------------------
Aggregate Liquidation Aggregate
Amount and Market Asset Amount Asset
Outstanding Value Coverage Outstanding Coverage
(000) Per Share Per Share (000) Per $1,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXAS QUALITY INCOME (NTX)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended 7/31:
2007 $69,000 $25,000 $76,173 $3,775 $56,692
2006 69,000 25,000 76,815 -- --
2005 69,000 25,000 78,159 -- --
2004 69,000 25,000 76,896 -- --
2003 69,000 25,000 74,991 -- --
================================================================================
* Total Return on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market
price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested
capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at
the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which
is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is
assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual
reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place
over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market
price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price
used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
Total Return on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes
in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset
value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if
any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on
the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested
at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last
dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund's market
price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from
the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
** After custodian fee credit and expense reimbursement, where applicable.
+ The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents.
++ Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Preferred
shareholders; income ratios reflect income earned on assets attributable to
Preferred shares.
(a) Interest expense arises from the application of SFAS No. 140 to certain
inverse floating rate transactions entered into by the Fund as more fully
described in Footnote 1 - Inverse Floating Rate Securities.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
58-59 spread
Board Members & OFFICERS
The management of the Funds, including general supervision of the duties
performed for the Funds by the Adviser, is the responsibility of the Board
Members of the Funds. The number of board members of the Fund is currently set
at nine. None of the board members who are not "interested" persons of the Funds
has ever been a director or employee of, or consultant to, Nuveen or its
affiliates. The names and business addresses of the board members and officers
of the Funds, their principal occupations and other affiliations during the past
five years, the number of portfolios each oversees and other directorships they
hold are set forth below.
NUMBER
NAME, POSITION(S) HELD YEAR FIRST OF PORTFOLIOS PRINCIPAL
BIRTHDATE WITH THE FUNDS ELECTED OR IN FUND OCCUPATION(S)
& ADDRESS APPOINTED COMPLEX INCLUDING OTHER
AND TERM(2) OVERSEEN BY DIRECTORSHIPS
BOARD MEMBER DURING PAST 5 YEARS
BOARD MEMBER WHO IS AN INTERESTED PERSON OF THE FUNDS:
[] TIMOTHY R. SCHWERTFEGER(1) Director (since 1994) and Chairman (since
3/28/49 Chairman of 1994 1996) and Non-Executive Chairman (since July
333 W. Wacker Drive the Board ANNUAL 176 1, 2007) formerly, Chief Executive Officer
Chicago, IL 60606 and Board Member (1996-June 30, 2007) of Nuveen Investments,
Inc. and Nuveen Asset Management and certain
other subsidiaries of Nuveen Investments,
Inc.; formerly, Director (1992-2006) of
Institutional Capital Corporation.
BOARD MEMBERS WHO ARE NOT INTERESTED PERSONS OF THE FUNDS:
[] ROBERT P. BREMNER Private Investor and Management Consultant.
8/22/40 Lead 1997
333 W. Wacker Drive Independent CLASS III 176
Chicago, IL 60606 Board member
[] JACK B. EVANS President, The Hall-Perrine Foundation, a
10/22/48 1999 private philanthropic corporation (since
333 W. Wacker Drive Board member CLASS III 176 1996); Director and Vice Chairman, United
Chicago, IL 60606 Fire Group, a publicly held company; Member
of the Board of Regents for the State of
Iowa University System; Director, Gazette
Companies; Life Trustee of Coe College and
Iowa College Foundation; Member of the
Advisory Council of the Department of
Finance in the Tippie College of Business,
University of Iowa; formerly, Director,
Alliant Energy; formerly, Director, Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago; formerly, President
and Chief Operating Officer, SCI Financial
Group, Inc., a regional financial services firm.
[] WILLIAM C. HUNTER Dean, Tippie College of Business, University
3/6/48 2004 of Iowa (since July 2006); formerly, Dean
333 W. Wacker Drive Board member CLASS II 176 and Distinguished Professor of Finance,
Chicago, IL 60606 School of Business at the University of
Connecticut (2003-2006); previously, Senior
Vice President and Director of Research at
the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(1995-2003); Director (since 1997), Credit
Research Center at Georgetown University;
Director (since 2004) of Xerox Corporation;
Director, SS&C Technologies, Inc. (May
2005-October 2005).
60
NUMBER
NAME, POSITION(S) HELD YEAR FIRST OF PORTFOLIOS PRINCIPAL
BIRTHDATE WITH THE FUNDS ELECTED OR IN FUND OCCUPATION(S)
& ADDRESS APPOINTED COMPLEX INCLUDING OTHER
AND TERM(2) OVERSEEN BY DIRECTORSHIPS
BOARD MEMBER DURING PAST 5 YEARS
BOARD MEMBERS WHO ARE NOT INTERESTED PERSONS OF THE FUNDS:
[] DAVID J. KUNDERT Director, Northwestern Mutual Wealth
10/28/42 2005 Management Company; Retired (since 2004) as
333 W. Wacker Drive Board member CLASS II 174 Chairman, JPMorgan Fleming Asset Management,
Chicago, IL 60606 President and CEO, Banc One Investment
Advisors Corporation, and President, One
Group Mutual Funds; prior thereto, Executive
Vice President, Banc One Corporation and
Chairman and CEO, Banc One Investment
Management Group; Board of Regents, Luther
College; member of the Wisconsin Bar
Association; member of Board of Directors,
Friends of Boerner Botanical Gardens; member
of Board of Directors, Milwaukee Repertory
Theater.
[] WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER Chairman of Miller-Valentine Partners Ltd.,
9/24/44 1997 a real estate investment company; formerly,
333 W. Wacker Drive Board member ANNUAL 176 Senior Partner and Chief Operating Officer
Chicago, IL 60606 (retired, 2004) of Miller-Valentine Group;
formerly, Vice President, Miller-Valentine
Realty; Board Member, Chair of the Finance
Committee and member of the Audit Committee
of Premier Health Partners, the
not-for-profit company of Miami Valley
Hospital; Vice President, Dayton
Philharmonic Orchestra Association; Board
Member, Regional Leaders Forum, which
promotes cooperation on economic development
issues; Director, Dayton Development
Coalition; formerly, Member, Community
Advisory Board, National City Bank, Dayton,
Ohio and Business Advisory Council,
Cleveland Federal Reserve Bank.
[] JUDITH M. STOCKDALE Executive Director, Gaylord and Dorothy
12/29/47 1997 Donnelley Foundation (since 1994); prior
333 W. Wacker Drive Board member CLASS I 176 thereto, Executive Director, Great Lakes
Chicago, IL 60606 Protection Fund (from 1990 to 1994).
[] CAROLE E. STONE Director, Chicago Board Options Exchange
6/28/47 2007 (since 2006); Chair New York Racing
333 West Wacker Drive Board member CLASS I 176 Association Oversight Board (since 2005);
Chicago, IL 60606 Commissioner, New York State Commission on
Public Authority Reform (since 2005);
formerly Director, New York State Division
of the Budget (2000-2004), Chair, Public
Authorities Control Board (2000-2004) and
Director, Local Government Assistance
Corporation (2000-2004).
61
NUMBER
NAME, POSITION(S) HELD YEAR FIRST OF PORTFOLIOS PRINCIPAL
BIRTHDATE WITH THE FUNDS ELECTED OR IN FUND OCCUPATION(S)
AND ADDRESS APPOINTED(4) COMPLEX DURING PAST 5 YEARS
OVERSEEN
BY OFFICER
OFFICERS OF THE FUND:
[] GIFFORD R. ZIMMERMAN Managing Director (since 2002), Assistant
9/9/56 Chief Secretary and Associate General Counsel,
333 W. Wacker Drive Administrative 1988 176 formerly, Vice President and Assistant
Chicago, IL 60606 Officer General Counsel, of Nuveen Investments, LLC;
Managing Director (since 2002) and Assistant
Secretary and Associate General Counsel,
formerly, Vice President (since 1997), of
Nuveen Asset Management; Managing Director
(since 2004) and Assistant Secretary (since
1994) of Nuveen Investments, Inc.; Assistant
Secretary of NWQ Investment Management
Company, LLC. (since 2002); Vice President
and Assistant Secretary of Nuveen
Investments Advisers Inc. (since 2002);
Managing Director, Associate General Counsel
Assistant Secretary of Rittenhouse Asset
Management, Inc., Symphony Asset Management
LLC (since 2003), Tradewinds Global
Investors, LLC and Santa Barbara Asset
Management, LLC; (since 2006); formerly,
Managing Director (2002-2004), General
Counsel (1998-2004) and Assistant Secretary,
formerly, Vice President of Nuveen Advisory
Corp. and Nuveen Institutional Advisory
Corp.(3); Chartered Financial Analyst.
[] WILLIAMS ADAMS IV Executive Vice President, U.S. Structured
6/9/55 Products of Nuveen Investments, LLC, (since
333 West Wacker Drive Vice President 2007 119 1999), prior thereto, Managing Director of
Chicago, IL 60606 Structured Investments.
[] JULIA L. ANTONATOS Managing Director (since 2005), formerly
9/22/63 Vice President (since 2002) of Nuveen
333 W. Wacker Drive Vice President 2004 176 Investments, LLC; Chartered Financial
Chicago, IL 60606 Analyst.
[] CEDRIC H. ANTOSIEWICZ Managing Director, (since 2004) previously,
1/11/62 Vice President (1993-2004) of Nuveen
333 W. Wacker Drive Vice President 2007 119 Investments, LLC.
Chicago, IL 60606
[] MICHAEL T. ATKINSON Vice President (since 2002) of Nuveen
2/3/66 Vice President Investments, LLC.
333 W. Wacker Drive and Assistant 2000 176
Chicago, IL 60606 Secretary
[] PETER H. D'ARRIGO Vice President and Treasurer of Nuveen
11/28/67 Investments, LLC and of Nuveen Investments,
333 W. Wacker Drive Vice President 1999 176 Inc. (since 1999); Vice President and
Chicago, IL 60606 Treasurer of Nuveen Asset Management (since
2002) and of Nuveen Investments Advisers
Inc. (since 2002); Assistant Treasurer of
NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC.
(since 2002); Vice President and Treasurer
of Nuveen Rittenhouse Asset Management, Inc.
(since 2003); Treasurer of Symphony Asset
Management LLC (since 2003) and Santa
Barbara Asset Management, LLC (since 2006);
Assistant Treasurer, Tradewinds Global
Investors, LLC (since 2006); formerly, Vice
President and Treasurer (1999-2004) of
Nuveen Advisory Corp. and Nuveen
Institutional Advisory Corp.(3); Chartered
Financial Analyst.
[] LORNA C. FERGUSON
10/24/45 Managing Director (since 2004), formerly,
333 W. Wacker Drive Vice President 1998 176 Vice President of Nuveen Investments, LLC,
Chicago, IL 60606 Managing Director (2004) formerly, Vice
President (1998-2004) of Nuveen Advisory
Corp. and Nuveen Institutional Advisory
Corp.(3); Managing Director (since 2005) of
Nuveen Asset Management.
62
NUMBER
NAME, POSITION(S) HELD YEAR FIRST OF PORTFOLIOS PRINCIPAL
BIRTHDATE WITH THE FUNDS ELECTED OR IN FUND OCCUPATION(S)
AND ADDRESS APPOINTED(4) COMPLEX DURING PAST 5 YEARS
OVERSEEN
BY OFFICER
OFFICERS OF THE FUND:
[] WILLIAM M. FITZGERALD Managing Director (since 2002), formerly,
3/2/64 Vice President of Nuveen Investments, LLC;
333 W. Wacker Drive Vice President 1995 176 Managing Director (1997-2004) of Nuveen
Chicago, IL 60606 Advisory Corp. and Nuveen Institutional
Advisory Corp.(3); Managing Director (since
2001) of Nuveen Asset Management; Vice
President (since 2002) of Nuveen Investments
Advisers Inc.; Chartered Financial Analyst.
[] STEPHEN D. FOY Vice President (since 1993) and Funds
5/31/54 Vice President Controller (since 1998) of Nuveen
333 W. Wacker Drive and Controller 1998 176 Investments, LLC; formerly, Vice President
Chicago, IL 60606 and Funds Controller (1998-2004) of Nuveen
Investments, Inc.; Certified Public
Accountant.
[] WALTER M. KELLY Assistant Vice President and Assistant
2/24/70 Chief Compliance Secretary of the Nuveen Funds (2003-2006);
333 West Wacker Drive Officer and 2003 176 Vice President (since 2006) formerly,
Chicago, IL 60606 Vice President Assistant Vice President and Assistant
General Counsel (2003-2006) of Nuveen
Investments, LLC; previously, Associate
(2001-2003) at the law firm of Vedder,
Price, Kaufman & Kammholz.
[] DAVID J. LAMB Vice President (since 2000) of Nuveen
3/22/63 Investments, LLC; Certified Public Accountant.
333 W. Wacker Drive Vice President 2000 176
Chicago, IL 60606
[] TINA M. LAZAR Vice President of Nuveen Investments, LLC
8/27/61 (since 1999).
333 W. Wacker Drive Vice President 2002 176
Chicago, IL 60606
[] LARRY W. MARTIN Vice President, Assistant Secretary and
7/27/51 Vice President Assistant General Counsel of Nuveen
333 W. Wacker Drive and Assistant 1988 176 Investments, LLC; formerly, Vice President
Chicago, IL 60606 Secretary and Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Advisory
Corp. and Nuveen Institutional Advisory
Corp.(3); Vice President (since 2005) and
Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Investments,
Inc.; Vice President (since 2005) and
Assistant Secretary (since 1997) of Nuveen
Asset Management; Vice President (since
2000), Assistant Secretary and Assistant
General Counsel (since 1998) of Rittenhouse
Asset Management, Inc.; Vice President and
Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Investments
Advisers Inc. (since 2002); Assistant
Secretary of NWQ Investment Management
Company, LLC (since 2002), Symphony Asset
Management LLC (since 2003) and Tradewinds
Global Investors, LLC and Santa Barbara
Asset Management, LLC (since 2006).
[] KEVIN J. MCCARTHY Vice President and Assistant General
3/26/66 Vice President Counsel, Nuveen Investments, LLC (since
333 W. Wacker Drive and Secretary 2007 176 2007); Vice President, Nuveen Investments,
Chicago, IL 60606 LLC (since 2007); Vice President and
Assistant Secretary, Nuveen Asset Management
and Rittenhouse Asset Management, Inc.
(since 2007); prior thereto, Partner, Bell,
Boyd & Lloyd LLP (1997-2007)
[] JOHN V. MILLER Managing Director (since 2007), formerly,
4/10/67 Vice President (2002-2007) of Nuveen
333 W. Wacker Drive Vice President 2007 176 Investments, LLC; Chartered Financial
Chicago, IL 60606 Analyst.
(1) Mr. Schwertfeger is an "interested person" of the Funds, as defined in the
Investment Company Act of 1940, because he is an officer and board member
of the Adviser.
(2) Board Members serve three year terms, except for two board members who are
elected by the holders of Preferred Shares. The Board of Trustees is
divided into three classes, Class I, Class II, and Class III, with each
being elected to serve until the third succeeding annual shareholders'
meeting subsequent to its election or thereafter in each case when its
respective successors are duly elected or appointed, except two board
members are elected by the holders of Preferred Shares to serve until the
next annual shareholders' meeting subsequent to its election or thereafter
in each case when its respective successors are duly elected or appointed.
The first year elected or appointed represents the year in which the board
member was first elected or appointed to any fund in the Nuveen Complex.
(3) Nuveen Advisory Corp. and Nuveen Institutional Advisory Corp. were
reorganized into Nuveen Asset Management, effective January 1, 2005.
(4) Officers serve one year terms through July of each year. The year first
elected or appointed represents the year in which the Officer was first
elected or appointed to any fund in the Nuveen Complex.
63
Annual Investment
Management Agreement
Approval PROCESS
The Board Members are responsible for overseeing the performance of the
investment adviser to the Funds and determining whether to continue the advisory
arrangements. At the annual review meeting held on May 21, 2007 (the "May
Meeting"), the Board Members of the Funds, including the Independent Board
Members, unanimously approved the continuance of the Investment Management
Agreement between each Fund (a "Fund") and Nuveen Asset Management ("NAM"). The
foregoing Investment Management Agreements with NAM are hereafter referred to as
"Original Investment Management Agreements."
Subsequent to the May Meeting, Nuveen Investments, Inc. ("Nuveen"), the parent
company of NAM, entered into a merger agreement providing for the acquisition of
Nuveen by Windy City Investments, Inc., a corporation formed by investors led by
Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC ("MDP"), a private equity investment firm (the
"Transaction"). Each Original Investment Management Agreement, as required by
Section 15 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act") provides for
its automatic termination in the event of its "assignment" (as defined in the
1940 Act). Any change in control of the adviser is deemed to be an assignment.
The consummation of the Transaction will result in a change of control of NAM as
well as its affiliated sub-advisers and therefore cause the automatic
termination of each Original Investment Management Agreement, as required by the
1940 Act. Accordingly, in anticipation of the Transaction, at a meeting held on
July 31, 2007 (the "July Meeting"), the Board Members, including the Independent
Board Members, unanimously approved new Investment Management Agreements (the
"New Investment Management Agreements") with NAM on behalf of each Fund to take
effect immediately after the Transaction or shareholder approval of the new
advisory contracts, whichever is later. The 1940 Act also requires that each New
Investment Management Agreement be approved by the respective Fund's
shareholders in order for it to become effective. Accordingly, to ensure
continuity of advisory services, the Board Members, including the Independent
Board Members, unanimously approved Interim Investment Management Agreements to
take effect upon the closing of the Transaction if shareholders have not yet
approved the New Investment Management Agreements.
Because the information provided and considerations made at the annual review
continue to be relevant with respect to the evaluation of the New Investment
Management Agreements, the Board considered the foregoing as part of its
deliberations of the New Investment Management Agreements. Accordingly, as
indicated, the discussions immediately below outline the materials and
information presented to the Board in connection with the Board's prior annual
review and the analysis undertaken and the conclusions reached by Board Members
when determining to continue the Original Investment Management Agreements.
I. APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS
During the course of the year, the Board received a wide variety of materials
relating to the services provided by NAM and the performance of the Funds. At
each of its quarterly meetings, the Board reviewed investment performance and
various matters relating to the operations of the Funds and other Nuveen funds,
including the compliance program, shareholder services, valuation, custody,
distribution and other information relating to the nature, extent and quality of
services provided by NAM. Between the regularly scheduled quarterly meetings,
the Board Members received information on particular matters as the need arose.
In preparation for their considerations at the May Meeting, the Independent
Board Members received extensive materials, well in advance of the meeting,
which outlined or are related to, among other things:
[] the nature, extent and quality of services provided by NAM;
[] the organization and business operations of NAM, including the
responsibilities of various departments an key personnel;
64
[] each Fund's past performance as well as the Fund's performance compared to
funds with similar investment objectives based on data and information
provided by an independent third party and to customized benchmarks;
[] the profitability of Nuveen and certain industry profitability analyses for
unaffiliated advisers;
[] the expenses of Nuveen in providing the various services;
[] the advisory fees and total expense ratios of each Fund, including
comparisons of such fees and expenses with those of comparable,
unaffiliated funds based on information and data provided by an independent
third party (the "Peer Universe") as well as compared to a subset of funds
within the Peer Universe (the "Peer Group") of the respective Fund (as
applicable);
[] the advisory fees NAM assesses to other types of investment products or
clients;
[] the soft dollar practices of NAM, if any; and
[] from independent legal counsel, a legal memorandum describing among other
things, applicable laws, regulations and duties in reviewing and approving
advisory contracts.
At the May Meeting, NAM made a presentation to, and responded to questions from,
the Board. Prior to and after the presentations and reviewing the written
materials, the Independent Board Members met privately with their legal counsel
to review the Boardduties in reviewing advisory contracts and considering the
renewal of the advisory contracts. The Independent Board Members, in
consultation with independent counsel, reviewed the factors set out in judicial
decisions and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") directives relating to
the renewal of advisory contracts. As outlined in more detail below, the Board
Members considered all factors they believed relevant with respect to each Fund,
including, but not limited to, the following: (a) the nature, extent and quality
of the services to be provided by NAM; (b) the investment performance of the
Fund and NAM; (c) the costs of the services to be provided and profits to be
realized by Nuveen and its affiliates; (d) the extent to which economies of
scale would be realized; and (e) whether fee levels reflect those economies of
scale for the benefit of the Fund's investors. In addition, as noted, the Board
Members met regularly throughout the year to oversee the Funds. In evaluating
the Original Investment Management Agreements, the Board Members also relied
upon their knowledge of NAM, its services and the Funds resulting from their
meetings and other interactions throughout the year. It is with this background
that the Board Members considered each Original Investment Management Agreement.
A. NATURE, EXTENT AND QUALITY OF SERVICES
In considering the renewal of the Original Investment Management Agreements, the
Board Members considered the nature, extent and quality of NAM's services. The
Board Members reviewed materials outlining, among other things, Nuveen's
organization and business; the types of services that NAM or its affiliates
provide and are expected to provide to the Funds; the performance record of the
applicable Fund (as described in further detail below); and, any initiatives
Nuveen had taken for the municipal fund product line. As noted, at the annual
review, the Board Members were already familiar with the organization,
operations and personnel of NAM due to the Board Members' experience in
governing the respective Funds and working with NAM on matters relating to the
Funds. With respect to personnel, the Board Members recognized NAM's investment
in additional qualified personnel throughout the various groups in the
organization and recommended to NAM that it continue to review staffing needs as
necessary. In addition, the Board Members reviewed materials describing the
current status and, in particular, the developments in 2006 with respect to
NAM's investment process, investment strategies (including additional tools used
in executing such strategies), personnel (including portfolio management and
research teams), trading process, hedging activities, risk management operations
(e.g., reviewing credit quality, duration limits, and derivatives use, as
applicable), and investment operations (such as enhancements to trading
procedures, pricing procedures, and client services). The Board Members
recognized NAM's investment of resources and efforts to continue to enhance and
refine its investment process.
In addition to advisory services, the Independent Board Members considered the
quality of administrative and non-advisory services provided by NAM and noted
that NAM and its affiliates provide the Funds with a wide variety of services
and officers and other personnel as are necessary for the operations of the
Funds, including:
65
ANNUAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
APPROVAL PROCESS (continued)
[] product management;
[] fund administration;
[] oversight by shareholder services and other fund service providers;
[] administration of Board relations;
[] regulatory and portfolio compliance; and
[] legal support.
As the Funds operate in a highly regulated industry and given the importance of
compliance, the Board Members considered, in particular, Nuveen's compliance
activities for the Funds and enhancements thereto. In this regard, the Board
Members recognized the quality of Nuveen's compliance team. The Board Members
further noted Nuveen's negotiations with other service providers and the
corresponding reduction in certain service providers' fees at the May Meeting.
In addition to the foregoing services, the Board Members also noted the
additional services that NAM or its affiliates provide to Nuveen's closed-end
funds, including, in particular, its secondary market support activities. The
Board Members recognized Nuveen's continued commitment to supporting the
secondary market for the common shares of its closed-end funds through a variety
of programs designed to raise investor and analyst awareness and understanding
of closed-end funds. These efforts include:
[] maintaining shareholder communications;
[] providing advertising for the Nuveen closed-end funds;
[] maintaining its closed-end fund website;
[] maintaining continual contact with financial advisers;
[] providing educational symposia;
[] conducting research with investors and financial analysis regarding
closed-end funds; and
[] evaluating secondary market performance.
With respect to the Nuveen closed-end funds that utilize leverage through the
issuance of preferred shares ("Preferred Shares"), the Board Members noted
Nuveen's continued support for the holders of Preferred Shares by, among other
things:
[] maintaining an in-house trading desk;
[] maintaining a product manager for the Preferred Shares;
[] developing distribution for Preferred Shares with new market participants;
[] maintaining an orderly auction process;
[] managing leverage and risk management of leverage; and
[] maintaining systems necessary to test compliance with rating agency
criteria.
Based on their review, the Board Members found that, overall, the nature, extent
and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the respective
Funds under the Original Investment Management Agreements were satisfactory.
B. THE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE OF THE FUNDS AND NAM
At the May Meeting, the Board considered the investment performance for each
Fund, including the Fund's historic performance as well as its performance
compared to funds with similar investment objectives (the "Performance Peer
Group") based on data provided by an independent third party (as described
below). The Board Members also reviewed the respective Fund's portfolio level
performance (which does not reflect fund level fees and expenses, and leverage)
against customized benchmarks, described in further detail below.
66
In evaluating the performance information during the annual review at the May
Meeting, in certain instances, the Board Members noted that the closest
Performance Peer Group for a fund may not adequately reflect such fund's
investment objectives and strategies, thereby limiting the usefulness of the
comparisons of such fund's performance with that of the Performance Peer Group.
With respect to state-specific municipal funds, the Board Members also
recognized that certain funds do not have a corresponding state-specific
Performance Peer Group in which case their performance is measured against a
more general municipal category for various states. With respect to municipal
closed-end funds, funds that do not have corresponding state-specific
Performance Peer Groups are from states other than New York, California,
Florida, New Jersey, Michigan and Pennsylvania. However, with respect to funds
based in Florida, New Jersey, Michigan and Pennsylvania, the peer group may be
so small or the Nuveen funds may dominate the category to such an extent that
performance information for such funds was also compared to the more general
category for all states (other than New York and California).
The Board Members reviewed performance information including, among other
things, total return information compared with the Fund's Performance Peer Group
for the one-, three- and five-year periods (as applicable) ending December 31,
2006. The Board Members also reviewed the Fund's portfolio level performance
(which does not reflect fund level fees and expenses, and leverage) compared to
customized portfolio-level benchmarks for the one- and three-year periods ending
December 31, 2006 (as applicable). The analysis was used to assess the efficacy
of investment decisions against appropriate measures of risk and total return,
within specific market segments. This information supplemented the Fund
performance information provided to the Board at each of its quarterly meetings.
Based on their review, the Board Members determined that each Fund's investment
performance over time had been satisfactory, subject to the following. With
respect to various municipal closed-end funds, the Board Members noted relative
total return underperformance in recent years compared to peers. The Board
Members reviewed materials and discussed with NAM the factors contributing to
the shift in performance including, among other things, the degree of risk
undertaken by peers compared to the municipal closed-end funds (such as through
the increased use of leverage or taking concentrated positions in high risk
credits). In addition, the Board Members also considered a fund's dividend
performance and the extent of any secondary market discounts. The Board Members
noted NAM's efforts to evaluate the factors affecting performance and determine
whether modification to a fund's investment strategy is necessary or
appropriate, and concluded that they were satisfied with the steps being taken.
C. FEES, EXPENSES AND PROFITABILITY
1. FEES AND EXPENSES
During the annual review, in evaluating the management fees and expenses of
a Fund, the Board reviewed, among other things, the Fund's advisory fees
(net and gross management fees) and total expense ratios (before and after
expense reimbursements and/or waivers) in absolute terms as well as
comparisons to the gross management fees (before waivers), net management
fees (after waivers) and total expense ratios (before and after waivers) of
comparable funds in the Peer Universe and the Peer Group. In reviewing the
fee schedule for a Fund, the Board Members considered the fund-level and
complex-wide breakpoint schedules (described in further detail below) and
any fee waivers and reimbursements provided by Nuveen (applicable, in
particular, for certain funds launched since 1999). The Board Members
further reviewed data regarding the construction of Peer Groups as well as
the methods of measurement for the fee and expense analysis and the
performance analysis. In certain cases, due to the small number of peers in
the Peer Universe, the Peer Universe and Peer Group had significant overlap
or even consisted entirely of the same unaffiliated funds. In reviewing the
comparisons of fee and expense information, the Board Members recognized
that in certain cases, the fund size relative to peers, the small size and
odd composition of the Peer Group (including differences in objectives and
strategies), expense anomalies, timing of information used or other factors
impacting the comparisons thereby limited some of the usefulness of the
comparative data. The Board Members also considered the differences in the
use of leverage. Based on their review of the fee and expense information
provided, the Board Members determined that each Fund's net total expense
ratio was within an acceptable range compared to peers.
67
ANNUAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
APPROVAL PROCESS (continued)
2. COMPARISONS WITH THE FEES OF OTHER CLIENTS
At the annual review, the Board Members further reviewed data comparing the
advisory fees of NAM with fees NAM charges to other clients. With respect
to municipal funds, such clients include NAM's municipal separately managed
accounts. In general, the advisory fees charged for separate accounts are
somewhat lower than the advisory fees assessed to the Funds. The Board
Members considered the differences in the product types, including, but not
limited to, the services provided, the structure and operations, product
distribution and costs thereof, portfolio investment policies, investor
profiles, account sizes and regulatory requirements. The Board Members
noted, in particular, that the range of services provided to the Funds (as
discussed above) is much more extensive than that provided to separately
managed accounts. As described in further detail above, such additional
services include, but are not limited to: product management, fund
administration, oversight of third party service providers, administration
of Board relations, and legal support. The Board Members noted that the
Funds operate in a highly regulated industry requiring extensive compliance
functions compared to other investment products. Given the inherent
differences in the products, particularly the extensive services provided
to the Funds, the Board Members believe such facts justify the different
levels of fees.
3. PROFITABILITY OF NUVEEN
In conjunction with its review of fees, the Board Members also considered
the profitability of Nuveen for its advisory activities (which incorporated
Nuveen's wholly-owned affiliated sub-advisers) and its financial condition.
At the annual review, the Board Members reviewed the revenues and expenses
of Nuveen's advisory activities for the last three years, the allocation
methodology used in preparing the profitability data as well as the 2006
Annual Report for Nuveen. The Board Members noted this information
supplemented the profitability information requested and received during
the year to help keep them apprised of developments affecting profitability
(such as changes in fee waivers and expense reimbursement commitments). In
this regard, the Board Members noted the enhanced dialogue and information
regarding profitability with NAM during the year, including more frequent
meetings and updates from Nuveen's corporate finance group. The Board
Members also reviewed data comparing Nuveen's profitability with other fund
sponsors prepared by three independent third party service providers as
well as comparisons of the revenues, expenses and profit margins of various
unaffiliated management firms with similar amounts of assets under
management prepared by Nuveen.
In reviewing profitability, the Board Members recognized the subjective
nature of determining profitability which may be affected by numerous
factors, including the allocation of expenses. Further, the Board Members
recognized the difficulties in making comparisons as the profitability of
other advisers generally is not publicly available and the profitability
information that is available for certain advisers or management firms may
not be representative of the industry and may be affected by, among other
things, the adviser's particular business mix, capital costs, types of
funds managed and expense allocations.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board Members reviewed Nuveen's methodology
and assumptions for allocating expenses across product lines to determine
profitability. Last year, the Board Members also designated an Independent Board
Member as a point person for the Board to review the methodology determinations
during the year and any refinements thereto, which relevant information produced
from such process was reported to the full Board. In reviewing profitability,
the Board Members recognized Nuveen's increased investment in its fund business.
Based on its review, the Board Members concluded that Nuveen's level of
profitability for its advisory activities was reasonable in light of the
services provided.
In evaluating the reasonableness of the compensation, the Board Members also
considered other amounts paid to NAM by the Funds as well as any indirect
benefits (such as soft dollar arrangements, if any) NAM and its affiliates
receive, or are expected to receive, that are directly attributable to the
management of the Funds, if any. See Section E below for additional information
on indirect benefits NAM may receive as a result of its relationship with the
Funds. Based on their review of the overall fee arrangements of each Fund, the
Board Members determined that the advisory fees and expenses of the Funds were
reasonable.
68
D. ECONOMIES OF SCALE AND WHETHER FEE LEVELS REFLECT THESE ECONOMIES OF SCALE
With respect to economies of scale, the Board Members recognized the potential
benefits resulting from the costs of a Fund being spread over a larger asset
base. To help ensure the shareholders share in these benefits, the Board Members
reviewed and considered the breakpoints in the advisory fee schedules that
reduce advisory fees. In addition to advisory fee breakpoints, the Board also
approved a complex-wide fee arrangement in 2004. Pursuant to the complex-wide
fee arrangement, the fees of the funds in the Nuveen complex, including the
Funds, are reduced as the assets in the fund complex reach certain levels. In
evaluating the complex-wide fee arrangement, the Board Members noted that the
last complex-wide asset level breakpoint for the complex-wide fee schedule was
at $91 billion and that the Board Members anticipated further review and/or
negotiations prior to the assets of the Nuveen complex reaching such threshold.
Based on their review, the Board Members concluded that the breakpoint schedule
and complex-wide fee arrangement were acceptable and desirable in providing
benefits from economies of scale to shareholders, subject to further evaluation
of the complex-wide fee schedule as assets in the complex increase. See Section
II, Paragraph D - "Approval of the New Investment Management Agreements -
Economies of Scale and Whether Fee Levels Reflect These Economies of Scale" for
information regarding subsequent modifications to the complex-wide fee.
E. INDIRECT BENEFITS
In evaluating fees, the Board Members also considered any indirect benefits or
profits NAM or its affiliates may receive as a result of its relationship with
each Fund. With respect to closed-end funds, the Board Members considered the
revenues received by affiliates of NAM for serving as agent at Nuveen's
preferred trading desk and for serving as a co-manager in the initial public
offering of new closed-end exchange traded funds.
In addition to the above, the Board Members considered whether NAM received any
benefits from soft dollar arrangements whereby a portion of the commissions paid
by a Fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research that may be useful to
NAM in managing the assets of the Funds and other clients. With respect to NAM,
the Board Members noted that NAM does not currently have any soft dollar
arrangements; however, to the extent certain bona fide agency transactions that
occur on markets that traditionally trade on a principal basis and riskless
principal transactions are considered as generating "commissions," NAM intends
to comply with the applicable safe harbor provisions.
Based on their review, the Board Members concluded that any indirect benefits
received by NAM as a result of its relationship with the Funds were reasonable
and within acceptable parameters.
F. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
The Board Members did not identify any single factor discussed previously as
all-important or controlling in their considerations to continue an advisory
contract. The Board Members, including the Independent Board Members,
unanimously concluded that the terms of the Original Investment Management
Agreements are fair and reasonable, that NAM's fees are reasonable in light of
the services provided to each Fund and that the renewal of the Original
Investment Management Agreements be approved.
II. APPROVAL OF THE NEW INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS
Following the May Meeting, the Board Members were advised of the potential
Transaction. As noted above, the completion of the Transaction would terminate
each of the Original Investment Management Agreements. Accordingly, at the July
Meeting, the Board of each Fund, including the Independent Board Members,
unanimously approved the New Investment Management Agreements on behalf of the
respective Funds. Leading up to the July Meeting, the Board Members had several
meetings and deliberations with and without Nuveen management present, and with
the advice of legal counsel, regarding the proposed Transaction as outlined
below.
On June 8, 2007, the Board Members held a special telephonic meeting to discuss
the proposed Transaction. At that meeting, the Board Members established a
special ad hoc committee comprised solely of Independent Board Members to focus
on the Transaction and to keep the Independent Board Members updated with
developments regarding the Transaction. On June 15, 2007, the ad hoc committee
discussed with representatives of NAM the Transaction and modifications to the
complex-wide fee schedule that
69
ANNUAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
APPROVAL PROCESS (continued)
would generate additional fee savings at specified levels of complex-wide asset
growth. Following the foregoing meetings and several subsequent telephonic
conferences among Independent Board Members and independent counsel, and between
Independent Board Members and representatives of Nuveen, the Board met on June
18, 2007 to further discuss the proposed Transaction. Immediately prior to and
then again during the June 18, 2007 meeting, the Independent Board Members met
privately with their independent legal counsel. At that meeting, the Board met
with representatives of MDP, of Goldman Sachs, Nuveen's financial adviser in the
Transaction, and of the Nuveen Board to discuss, among other things, the history
and structure of MDP, the terms of the proposed Transaction (including the
financing terms), and MDP's general plans and intentions with respect to Nuveen
(including with respect to management, employees, and future growth prospects).
On July 9, 2007, the Board also met to be updated on the Transaction as part of
a special telephonic Board meeting. The Board Members were further updated at a
special in-person Board meeting held on July 19, 2007 (one Independent Board
Member participated telephonically). Subsequently, on July 27, 2007, the ad hoc
committee held a telephonic conference with representatives of Nuveen and MDP to
further discuss, among other things, the Transaction, the financing of the
Transaction, retention and incentive plans for key employees, the effect of
regulatory restrictions on transactions with affiliates after the Transaction,
and current volatile market conditions and their impact on the Transaction.
In connection with their review of the New Investment Management Agreements, the
Independent Board Members, through their independent legal counsel, also
requested in writing and received additional information regarding the proposed
Transaction and its impact on the provision of services by NAM and its
affiliates.
The Independent Board Members received, well in advance of the July Meeting,
materials which outlined, among other things:
[] the structure and terms of the Transaction, including MDP's co-investor
entities and their expected ownership interests, and the financing
arrangements that will exist for Nuveen following the closing of the
Transaction;
[] the strategic plan for Nuveen following the Transaction;
[] the governance structure for Nuveen following the Transaction;
[] any anticipated changes in the operations of the Nuveen funds following the
Transaction, including changes to NAM's and Nuveen's day-to-day management,
infrastructure and ability to provide advisory, distribution or other
applicable services to the Funds;
[] any changes to senior management or key personnel who work on Fund related
matters (including portfolio management, investment oversight, and
legal/compliance) and any retention or incentive arrangements for such
persons;
[] any anticipated effect on each Fund's expense ratio (including advisory
fees) following the Transaction;
[] any benefits or undue burdens imposed on the Funds as a result of the
Transaction;
[] any legal issues for the Funds as a result of the Transaction;
[] the nature, quality and extent of services expected to be provided to the
Funds following the Transaction, changes to any existing services and
policies affecting the Funds, and cost-cutting efforts, if any, that may
impact such services or policies;
[] any conflicts of interest that may arise for Nuveen or MDP with respect to
the Funds;
[] the costs associated with obtaining necessary shareholder approvals and who
would bear those costs; and
[] from legal counsel, a memorandum describing the applicable laws,
regulations and duties in approving advisory contracts, including, in
particular, with respect to a change of control.
Immediately preceding the July Meeting, representatives of MDP met with the
Board to further respond to questions regarding the Transaction. After the
meeting with MDP, the Independent Board Members met with
70
independent legal counsel in executive session. At the July Meeting, Nuveen also
made a presentation and responded to questions. Following the presentations and
discussions of the materials presented to the Board, the Independent Board
Members met again in executive session with their counsel. As outlined in more
detail below, the Independent Board Members considered all factors they believed
relevant with respect to each Fund, including the impact that the Transaction
could be expected to have on the following: (a) the nature, extent and quality
of services to be provided; (b) the investment performance of the Funds; (c) the
costs of the services and profits to be realized by Nuveen and its affiliates;
(d) the extent to which economies of scale would be realized; and (e) whether
fee levels reflect those economies of scale for the benefit of investors. As
noted above, the Board Members had completed their annual review of the
respective Original Investment Management Agreements at the May Meeting and many
of the factors considered at the annual review were applicable to their
evaluation of the New Investment Management Agreements. Accordingly, in
evaluating the New Investment Management Agreements, the Board Members relied
upon their knowledge and experience with NAM and considered the information
received and their evaluations and conclusions drawn at the annual review. While
the Board reviewed many Nuveen funds at the July Meeting, the Independent Board
Members evaluated all information available to them on a fund-by-fund basis, and
their determinations were made separately in respect of each Fund.
A. NATURE, EXTENT AND QUALITY OF SERVICES
In evaluating the nature, quality and extent of the services expected to be
provided by NAM under the New Investment Management Agreements, the Independent
Board Members considered, among other things, the expected impact, if any, of
the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of
NAM; the potential implications of regulatory restrictions on the Funds
following the Transaction; the ability of NAM and its affiliates to perform
their duties after the Transaction; and any anticipated changes to the current
investment and other practices of the Funds.
The Board noted that the terms of each New Investment Management Agreement,
including the fees payable thereunder, are substantially identical to those of
the Original Investment Management Agreement relating to the same Fund (with
both reflecting reductions to fee levels in the complex-wide fee schedule for
complex-wide assets in excess of $80 billion that have an effective date of
August 20, 2007). The Board considered that the services to be provided and the
standard of care under the New Investment Management Agreements are the same as
the Original Investment Management Agreements. The Board Members further noted
that key personnel who have responsibility for the Funds in each area, including
portfolio management, investment oversight, fund management, fund operations,
product management, legal/compliance and board support functions, are expected
to be the same following the Transaction. The Board Members considered and are
familiar with the qualifications, skills and experience of such personnel. The
Board also considered certain information regarding anticipated retention or
incentive plans designed to retain key personnel. Further, the Board Members
noted that no changes to Nuveen's infrastructure or operations as a result of
the Transaction were anticipated other than potential enhancements as a result
of an expected increase in the level of investment in such infrastructure and
personnel. The Board noted MDP's representations that it does not plan to have a
direct role in the management of Nuveen, appointing new management personnel, or
directly impacting individual staffing decisions. The Board Members also noted
that there were not any planned "cost cutting" measures that could be expected
to reduce the nature, extent or quality of services. After consideration of the
foregoing, the Board Members concluded that no diminution in the nature, quality
and extent of services provided to the Funds and their shareholders is expected.
In addition to the above, the Board Members considered potential changes in the
operations of each Fund. In this regard, the Board Members considered the
potential effect of regulatory restrictions on the Funds' transactions with
future affiliated persons. During their deliberations, it was noted that, after
the Transaction, a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch is expected to have an ownership
interest in Nuveen at a level that will make Merrill Lynch an affiliated person
of Nuveen. The Board Members recognized that applicable law would generally
prohibit the Funds from engaging in securities transactions with Merrill Lynch
as principal, and would also impose restrictions on using Merrill Lynch for
agency transactions. They recognized that having MDP and Merrill Lynch as
affiliates may restrict the Nuveen funds' ability to invest in securities of
issuers controlled by MDP or issued by Merrill Lynch and its affiliates even if
not bought directly from MDP or Merrill Lynch as principal. They also recognized
that various regulations may require the Nuveen funds to apply
71
ANNUAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
APPROVAL PROCESS (continued)
investment limitations on a combined basis with affiliates of Merrill Lynch. The
Board Members considered information provided by NAM regarding the potential
impact on the Nuveen funds' operations as a result of these regulatory
restrictions. The Board Members considered, in particular, the Nuveen funds that
may be impacted most by the restricted access to Merrill Lynch, including:
municipal funds (particularly certain state-specific funds), senior loan funds,
taxable fixed income funds, preferred security funds and funds that heavily use
derivatives. The Board Members considered such funds' historic use of Merrill
Lynch as principal in their transactions and information provided by NAM
regarding the expected impact resulting from Merrill Lynch's affiliation with
Nuveen and available measures that could be taken to minimize such impact. NAM
informed the Board Members that, although difficult to determine with certainty,
its management did not believe that MDP's or Merrill Lynch's status as an
affiliate of Nuveen would have a material adverse effect on any Nuveen fund's
ability to pursue its investment objectives and policies.
In addition to the regulatory restrictions considered by the Board, the Board
Members also considered potential conflicts of interest that could arise between
the Nuveen funds and various parties to the Transaction and discussed possible
ways of addressing such conflicts.
Based on its review along with its considerations regarding services at the
annual review, the Board concluded that the Transaction was not expected to
adversely affect the nature, quality or extent of services provided by NAM and
that the expected nature, quality and extent of such services supported approval
of the New Investment Management Agreements.
B. PERFORMANCE OF THE FUNDS
With respect to the performance of the Funds, the Board considered that the
portfolio management personnel responsible for the management of the Funds'
portfolios were expected to continue to manage the portfolios following the
completion of the Transaction.
In addition, the Board Members recently reviewed Fund performance at the May
Meeting, as described above, and determined that Fund performance was
satisfactory or better, subject to the following. With respect to certain
municipal closed-end funds with relative short-term underperformance, the Board
Members concluded NAM was taking steps to evaluate the factors affecting
performance and those steps would continue following the Transaction. Further,
the investment policies and strategies were not expected to change as a result
of the Transaction.
In light of the foregoing factors, along with the prior findings regarding
performance at the annual review, the Board concluded that its findings with
respect to performance supported approval of the New Investment Management
Agreements.
C. FEES, EXPENSES AND PROFITABILITY
As described in more detail above, during the annual review, the Board Members
considered, among other things, the management fees and expenses of the Funds,
the breakpoint schedules, and comparisons of such fees and expenses with peers.
At the annual review, the Board Members determined that the respective Fund's
advisory fees and expenses were reasonable. In evaluating the costs of services
to be provided by NAM under the New Investment Management Agreements and the
profitability of Nuveen for its advisory activities, the Board Members
considered their prior conclusions at the annual review and whether the
management fees or other expenses would change as a result of the Transaction.
As described above, the investment management fee is composed of two
components--a fund-level component and complex-wide level component. The fee
schedule under the New Investment Management Agreements to be paid to NAM is
identical to that under the Original Investment Management Agreements, including
the modified complex-wide fee schedule. As noted above, the Board recently
approved a modified complex-wide fee schedule that would generate additional fee
savings on complex-wide assets above $80 billion. The modifications have an
effective date of August 20, 2007 and are part of the Original Investment
Management Agreements. Accordingly, the terms of the complex-wide component
under the New Investment Management Agreements are the same as under the
Original Investment Management Agreements. The Board Members also noted that
Nuveen has committed for a period of two years from the date of closing of the
Transaction that it will not increase gross management fees for any Nuveen fund
and
72
will not reduce voluntary expense reimbursement levels for any Nuveen fund from
their currently scheduled prospective levels. Based on the information provided,
the Board Members did not expect that overall Fund expenses would increase as a
result of the Transaction.
In addition, the Board Members considered that additional fund launches were
anticipated after the Transaction which would result in an increase in total
assets under management in the complex and a corresponding decrease in overall
management fees under the complex-wide fee schedule. Taking into consideration
the Board's prior evaluation of fees and expenses at the annual renewal, and the
modification to the complex-wide fee schedule, the Board determined that the
management fees and expenses were reasonable.
While it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the impact of the
Transaction on Nuveen's profitability, at the recent annual review, the Board
Members were satisfied that Nuveen's level of profitability for its advisory
activities was reasonable. During the year, the Board Members had noted the
enhanced dialogue regarding profitability and the appointment of an Independent
Board Member as a point person to review methodology determinations and
refinements in calculating profitability. Given their considerations at the
annual review and the modifications to the complex-wide fee schedule, the Board
Members were satisfied that Nuveen's level of profitability for its advisory
activities continues to be reasonable.
D. ECONOMIES OF SCALE AND WHETHER FEE LEVELS REFLECT THESE ECONOMIES OF SCALE
The Board Members have been cognizant of economies of scale and the potential
benefits resulting from the costs of a Fund being spread over a larger asset
base. To help ensure that shareholders share in the benefits derived from
economies of scale, the Board adopted the complex-wide fee arrangement in 2004.
At the May Meeting, the Board Members reviewed the complex-wide fee arrangements
and noted that additional negotiations may be necessary or appropriate as the
assets in the complex approached the $91 billion threshold. In light of this
assessment coupled with the upcoming Transaction, at the June 15, 2007 meeting,
the ad hoc committee met with representatives of Nuveen to further discuss
modifications to the complex-wide fee schedule that would generate additional
savings for shareholders as the assets of the complex grow. The proposed terms
for the complex-wide fee schedule are expressed in terms of targeted cumulative
savings at specified levels of complex-wide assets, rather than in terms of
targeted marginal complex-wide fee rates. Under the modified schedule, the
schedule would generate additional fee savings beginning at complex-wide assets
of $80 billion in order to achieve targeted cumulative annual savings at $91
billion of $28 million on a complex-wide level (approximately $0.6 million
higher than those generated under the then current schedule) and generate
additional fee savings for asset growth above complex-wide assets of $91 billion
in order to achieve targeted annual savings at $125 billion of assets of
approximately $50 million on a complex-wide level (approximately $2.2 million
higher annually than that generated under the then current schedule). At the
July Meeting, the Board approved the modified complex-wide fee schedule for the
Original Investment Management Agreements and these same terms will apply to the
New Investment Management Agreements. Accordingly, the Board Members believe
that the breakpoint schedules and revised complex-wide fee schedule are
appropriate and desirable in ensuring that shareholders participate in the
benefits derived from economies of scale.
E. INDIRECT BENEFITS
During their recent annual review, the Board Members considered any indirect
benefits that NAM may receive as a result of its relationship with the Funds, as
described above. As the policies and operations of Nuveen are not anticipated to
change significantly after the Transaction, such indirect benefits should remain
after the Transaction. The Board Members further considered any additional
indirect benefits to be received by NAM or its affiliates after the Transaction.
The Board Members noted that other than benefits from its ownership interest in
Nuveen and indirect benefits from fee revenues paid by the Funds under the
management agreements and other Board-approved relationships, it was currently
not expected that MDP or its affiliates would derive any benefit from the Funds
as a result of the Transaction or transact any business with or on behalf of the
Funds (other than perhaps potential Fund acquisitions, in secondary market
transactions, of securities issued by MDP portfolio companies); or that Merrill
Lynch or its affiliates would derive any benefits from the Funds as a result of
the Transaction (noting that, indeed, Merrill Lynch would stand to experience
the discontinuation of principal transaction activity with the Nuveen funds and
likely would experience a noticeable reduction in the volume of agency
transactions with the Nuveen funds).
73
ANNUAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
APPROVAL PROCESS (continued)
F. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
In addition to the factors above, the Board Members also considered the
following with respect to the Funds:
[] Nuveen would rely on the provisions of Section 15(f) of the 1940 Act.
Section 15(f) provides, in substance, that when a sale of a controlling
interest in an investment adviser occurs, the investment adviser or any of
its affiliated persons may receive any amount or benefit in connection with
the sale so long as (i) during the three-year period following the
consummation of a transaction, at least 75% of the investment company's
board of directors must not be "interested persons" (as defined in the 1940
Act) of the investment adviser or predecessor adviser and (ii) an "unfair
burden" (as defined in the 1940 Act, including any interpretations or
no-action letters of the SEC) must not be imposed on the investment company
as a result of the transaction relating to the sale of such interest, or
any express or implied terms, conditions or understanding applicable
thereto. In this regard, to help ensure that an unfair burden is not
imposed on the Nuveen funds, Nuveen has committed for a period of two years
from the date of the closing of the Transaction (i) not to increase gross
management fees for any Nuveen fund; (ii) not to reduce voluntary expense
reimbursement levels for any Nuveen fund from their currently scheduled
prospective levels during that period; (iii) that no Nuveen fund whose
portfolio is managed by a Nuveen affiliate shall use Merrill Lynch as a
broker with respect to portfolio transactions done on an agency basis,
except as may be approved in the future by the Compliance Committee of the
Board; and (iv) that NAM shall not cause the Funds and other municipal
funds that NAM manages, as a whole, to enter into portfolio transactions
with or through the other minority owners of Nuveen, on either a principal
or an agency basis, to a significantly greater extent than both what one
would expect an investment team to use such firm in the normal course of
business, and what NAM has historically done, without prior Board or
Compliance Committee approval (excluding the impact of proportionally
increasing the use of such other "minority owners" to fill the void
necessitated by not being able to use Merrill Lynch).
[] The Funds would not incur any costs in seeking the necessary shareholder
approvals for the New Investment Management Agreements (except for any
costs attributed to seeking shareholder approvals of Fund specific matters
unrelated to the Transaction, such as approval of Board Members, in which
case a portion of such costs will be borne by the applicable Funds).
[] The reputation, financial strength and resources of MDP.
[] The long-term investment philosophy of MDP and anticipated plans to grow
Nuveen's business to the benefit of the Nuveen funds.
[] The benefits to the Nuveen funds as a result of the Transaction including:
(i) as a private company, Nuveen may have more flexibility in making
additional investments in its business; (ii) as a private company, Nuveen
may be better able to structure compensation packages to attract and retain
talented personnel; (iii) as certain of Nuveen's distribution partners are
expected to be equity or debt investors in Nuveen, Nuveen may be able to
take advantage of new or enhanced distribution arrangements with such
partners; and (iv) MDP's experience, capabilities and resources that may
help Nuveen identify and acquire investment teams or firms and finance such
acquisitions.
[] The historic premium and discount levels at which the shares of the Nuveen
funds have traded at specified dates with particular focus on the premiums
and discounts after the announcement of the Transaction, taking into
consideration recent volatile market conditions and steps or initiatives
considered or undertaken by NAM to address discount levels.
74
G. CONCLUSION
The Board Members did not identify any single factor discussed previously as
all-important or controlling. The Board Members, including the Independent Board
Members, unanimously concluded that the terms of the New Investment Management
Agreements are fair and reasonable, that the fees therein are reasonable in
light of the services to be provided to each Fund and that the New Investment
Management Agreements should be approved and recommended to shareholders.
III. APPROVAL OF INTERIM CONTRACTS
As noted above, at the July Meeting, the Board Members, including the
Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the Interim Investment
Management Agreements. If necessary to assure continuity of advisory services,
the Interim Investment Management Agreements will take effect upon the closing
of the Transaction if shareholders have not yet approved the New Investment
Management Agreements. The terms of each Interim Investment Management Agreement
are substantially identical to those of the corresponding Original Investment
Management Agreement and New Investment Management Agreement, respectively,
except for certain term and escrow provisions. In light of the foregoing, the
Board Members, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously determined
that the scope and quality of services to be provided to the Funds under the
respective Interim Investment Management Agreement are at least equivalent to
the scope and quality of services provided under the applicable Original
Investment Management Agreement.
75
Reinvest Automatically
EASILY and CONVENIENTLY
NUVEEN MAKES REINVESTING EASY. A PHONE CALL IS ALL IT TAKES TO SET UP YOUR
REINVESTMENT ACCOUNT.
NUVEEN CLOSED-END FUNDS DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
Your Nuveen Closed-End Fund allows you to conveniently reinvest dividends
and/or capital gains distributions in additional Fund shares.
By choosing to reinvest, you'll be able to invest money regularly and
automatically, and watch your investment grow through the power of tax-free
compounding. Just like dividends or distributions in cash, there may be
times when income or capital gains taxes may be payable on dividends or
distributions that are reinvested.
It is important to note that an automatic reinvestment plan does not ensure
a profit, nor does it protect you against loss in a declining market.
EASY AND CONVENIENT
To make recordkeeping easy and convenient, each month you'll receive a
statement showing your total dividends and distributions, the date of
investment, the shares acquired and the price per share, and the total
number of shares you own.
HOW SHARES ARE PURCHASED
The shares you acquire by reinvesting will either be purchased on the open
market or newly issued by the Fund. If the shares are trading at or above
net asset value at the time of valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at
the greater of the net asset value or 95% of the then-current market price.
If the shares are trading at less than net asset value, shares for your
account will be purchased on the open market. If the Plan Agent begins
purchasing Fund shares on the open market while shares are trading below
net asset value, but the Fund's shares subsequently trade at or above their
net asset value before the Plan Agent is able to complete its purchases,
the Plan Agent may cease open-market purchases and may invest the
uninvested portion of the distribution in newly-issued Fund shares at a
price equal to the greater of the shares' net asset value or 95% of the
shares' market value on the last business day immediately prior to the
purchase date. Dividends and distributions received to purchase shares in
the open market will normally be invested shortly after the dividend
payment date. No interest will be paid on dividends and distributions
awaiting reinvestment. Because the market price of the shares may increase
before purchases are completed, the average purchase price per share may
exceed the market price at the time of valuation, resulting in the
acquisition of fewer shares than if the dividend or distribution had been
paid in shares issued by the Fund. A pro rata portion of any applicable
brokerage commissions on open market purchases will be paid by Plan
participants. These commissions usually will be lower than those charged on
individual transactions.
76
FLEXIBLE
You may change your distribution option or withdraw from the Plan at any
time, should your needs or situation change. Should you withdraw, you can
receive a certificate for all whole shares credited to your reinvestment
account and cash payment for fractional shares, or cash payment for all
reinvestment account shares, less brokerage commissions and a $2.50 service
fee.
You can reinvest whether your shares are registered in your name, or in the
name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee. Ask your investment
advisor if his or her firm will participate on your behalf. Participants
whose shares are registered in the name of one firm may not be able to
transfer the shares to another firm and continue to participate in the
Plan.
The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time.
Although the Fund reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service
charge payable by the participants, there is no direct service charge to
participants in the Plan at this time.
CALL TODAY TO START REINVESTING DIVIDENDS AND/OR DISTRIBUTIONS
For more information on the Nuveen Automatic Reinvestment Plan or to enroll
in or withdraw from the Plan, speak with your financial advisor or call us
at (800) 257-8787.
77
Glossary of
TERMS USED in this REPORT
[] AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURN: This is a commonly used method to express
an investment's performance over a particular, usually multi-year time
period. It expresses the return that would have been necessary each
year to equal the investment's actual cumulative performance
(including change in NAV or market price and reinvested dividends and
capital gains distributions, if any) over the time period being
considered.
[] AVERAGE EFFECTIVE MATURITY: The average of the number of years to
maturity of the bonds in a Fund's portfolio, computed by weighting
each bond's time to maturity (the date the security comes due) by the
market value of the security. This figure does not account for the
likelihood of prepayments or the exercise of call provisions unless an
escrow account has been established to redeem the bond before
maturity. The market value weighting for an investment in an inverse
floating rate security is the value of the portfolio's residual
interest in the inverse floating rate trust, and does not include the
value of the floating rate securities issued by the trust.
[] INVERSE FLOATERS: Inverse floating rate securities are created by
depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed interest rate,
into a special purpose trust created by a broker-dealer. This trust,
in turn, (a) issues floating rate certificates typically paying
short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties in amounts equal
to some fraction of the deposited bond's par amount or market value,
and (b) issues an inverse floating rate certificate (sometimes
referred to as an "inverse floater") to an investor (such as a Fund)
interested in gaining investment exposure to a long-term municipal
bond. The income received by the holder of the inverse floater varies
inversely with the short-term rate paid to the floating rate
certificates' holders, and in most circumstances the holder of the
inverse floater bears substantially all of the underlying bond's
downside investment risk. The holder of the inverse floater typically
also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of
the underlying bond's value. Hence, an inverse floater essentially
represents an investment in the underlying bond on a leveraged basis.
[] LEVERAGE-ADJUSTED DURATION: Duration is a measure of the expected
period over which a bond's principal and interest will be paid, and
consequently is a measure of the sensitivity of a bond's or bond
Fund's value to changes when market interest rates change. Generally,
the longer a bond's or Fund's duration, the more the price of the bond
or Fund will change as interest rates change. Leverage-adjusted
duration takes into account the leveraging process for a Fund and
therefore is longer than the duration of the Fund's portfolio of
bonds.
[] MARKET YIELD (ALSO KNOWN AS DIVIDEND YIELD OR CURRENT YIELD): An
investment's current annualized dividend divided by its current market
price.
[] NET ASSET VALUE (NAV): A Fund's common share NAV per share is
calculated by subtracting the liabilities of the Fund (including any
MuniPreferred shares issued in order to leverage the Fund) from its
total assets and then dividing the remainder by the number of shares
outstanding. Fund NAVs are calculated at the end of each business day.
[] TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT YIELD: The yield necessary from a fully taxable
investment to equal, on an after-tax basis, the yield of a municipal
bond investment.
[] ZERO COUPON BOND: A zero coupon bond does not pay a regular interest
coupon to its holders during the life of the bond. Tax-exempt income
to the holder of the bond comes from accretion of the difference
between the original purchase price of the bond at issuance and the
par value of the bond at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity.
The market prices of zero coupon bonds generally are more volatile
than the market prices of bonds that pay interest periodically.
78
Other Useful INFORMATION
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS AND PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
Each Fund's (i) quarterly portfolio of investments, (ii) information regarding
how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the
12-month period ended June 30, 2007, and (iii) a description of the policies and
procedures that the Funds used to determine how to vote proxies relating to
portfolio securities are available without charge, upon request, by calling
Nuveen Investments toll-free at (800) 257-8787 or on Nuveen's website at
www.nuveen.com.
You may also obtain this and other Fund information directly from the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The SEC may charge a copying fee for this
information. Visit the SEC on-line at http://www.sec.gov or in person at the
SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call the SEC at 1-202-942-8090
for room hours and operation. You may also request Fund information by sending
an e-mail request to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing to the SEC's Public
References Section at 450 Fifth Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20549.
CEO CERTIFICATION DISCLOSURE
For Funds listed on the New York Stock Exchange, each Fund's Chief Executive
Officer has submitted to the Exchange the annual CEO certification as required
by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
Each Fund has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the
certification of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
INVESTMENT POLICY CHANGES
In February 2007, the Board of Directors/Trustees voted to remove investment
policy restrictions that limited the territorial bond holdings of these Funds to
a maximum of 10 percent of net assets. This change will give the Funds'
portfolio managers greater flexibility to achieve its investment objectives.
In May 2007, the Funds' Board of Directors/Trustees voted to permit the Funds'
to make loans from Fund assets to certain bond issuers. The amounts of these
loans are subject to strict limits. This policy is designed to enhance the
Funds' ability to meet their funds' investment objectives by providing for
increased portfolio management flexibility, greater diversification potential,
and opportunities for increased capital appreciation over time.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Robert P. Bremner
Jack B. Evans
William C. Hunter
David J. Kundert
William J. Schneider
Timothy R. Schwertfeger
Judith M. Stockdale
Carol E. Stone
FUND MANAGER
Nuveen Asset Management
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
CUSTODIAN
State Street Bank & Trust Company
Boston, MA
TRANSFER AGENT AND
SHAREHOLDER SERVICES
State Street Bank & Trust Company
Nuveen Funds
P.O. Box 43071 Providence, RI 02940-3071
(800) 257-8787
LEGAL COUNSEL
Chapman and Cutler LLP
Chicago, IL
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, IL
Each Fund intends to repurchase shares of its own common or preferred stock in
the future at such times and in such amounts as is deemed advisable. No shares
were repurchased during the period covered by this report. Any future
repurchases will be reported to shareholders in the next annual or semiannual
report.
79
Nuveen Investments:
-------------------
SERVING INVESTORS FOR GENERATIONS
Since 1898, financial advisors and their clients have relied on Nuveen
Investments to provide dependable investment solutions. For the past century,
Nuveen Investments has adhered to the belief that the best approach to investing
is to apply conservative risk-management principles to help minimize volatility.
Building on this tradition, we today offer a range of high quality equity and
fixed-income solutions that are integral to a well-diversified core portfolio.
Our clients have come to appreciate this diversity, as well as our continued
adherence to proven, long-term investing principles.
We offer many different investing solutions for our clients' different needs.
Managing approximately $172 billion in assets as of June 30, 2007, Nuveen
Investments offers access to a number of different asset classes and investing
solutions through a variety of products. Nuveen Investments markets its
capabilities under four distinct brands: Nuveen, a leader in fixed-income
investments; NWQ, a leader in value-style equities; Rittenhouse, a leader in
growth-style equities; and Symphony, a leading institutional manager of
market-neutral alternative investment portfolios.
Find out how we can help you reach your financial goals.
To learn more about the products and services Nuveen Investments offers, talk to
your financial advisor, or call us at (800) 257-8787. Please read the
information provided carefully before you invest. Be sure to obtain a
prospectus, where applicable. Investors should consider the investment objective
and policies, risk considerations, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully
before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information relevant to
an investment in the Fund. For a prospectus, please contact your securities
representative or Nuveen Investments, 333 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60606.
Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Learn more about Nuveen Funds at: www.nuveen.com/etf
Share prices
Fund details
Daily financial news
Investor education
Interactive planning tools
EAN-A-0707D
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a
code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or
persons performing similar functions. There were no amendments to or waivers
from the Code during the period covered by this report. The registrant has
posted the code of ethics on its website at www.nuveen.com/etf. (To view the
code, click on the Investor Resources drop down menu box, click on Fund
Governance and then click on Code of Conduct.)
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
The registrant's Board of Directors or Trustees determined that the registrant
has at least one "audit committee financial expert" (as defined in Item 3 of
Form N-CSR) serving on its Audit Committee. The registrant's audit committee
financial expert is Jack B. Evans, Chairman of the Audit Committee, who is
"independent" for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Mr. Evans was formerly President and Chief Operating Officer of SCI Financial
Group, Inc., a full service registered broker-dealer and registered investment
adviser ("SCI"). As part of his role as President and Chief Operating Officer,
Mr. Evans actively supervised the Chief Financial Officer (the "CFO") and
actively supervised the CFO's preparation of financial statements and other
filings with various regulatory authorities. In such capacity, Mr. Evans was
actively involved in the preparation of SCI's financial statements and the
resolution of issues raised in connection therewith. Mr. Evans has also served
on the audit committee of various reporting companies. At such companies, Mr.
Evans was involved in the oversight of audits, audit plans, and the preparation
of financial statements. Mr. Evans also formerly chaired the audit committee of
the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc.
The following tables show the amount of fees that Ernst & Young LLP, the Fund's
auditor, billed to the Fund during the Fund's last two full fiscal years. For
engagements with Ernst & Young LLP the Audit Committee approved in advance all
audit services and non-audit services that Ernst & Young LLP provided to the
Fund, except for those non-audit services that were subject to the pre-approval
exception under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (the "pre-approval exception"). The
pre-approval exception for services provided directly to the Fund waives the
pre-approval requirement for services other than audit, review or attest
services if: (A) the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes
no more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid by the Fund to its
accountant during the fiscal year in which the services are provided; (B) the
Fund did not recognize the services as non-audit services at the time of the
engagement; and (C) the services are promptly brought to the Audit Committee's
attention, and the Committee (or its delegate) approves the services before the
audit is completed.
The Audit Committee has delegated certain pre-approval responsibilities to its
Chairman (or, in his absence, any other member of the Audit Committee).
SERVICES THAT THE FUND'S AUDITOR BILLED TO THE FUND
AUDIT FEES BILLED AUDIT-RELATED FEES TAX FEES ALL OTHER FEES
FISCAL YEAR ENDED TO FUND (1) BILLED TO FUND (2) BILLED TO FUND (3) BILLED TO FUND (4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 31, 2007 $ 8,834 $ 0 $ 116 $ 3,100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage approved 0% 0% 0% 0%
pursuant to
pre-approval
exception
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 31, 2006 $ 8,382 $ 0 $ 400 $ 2,900
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage approved 0% 0% 0% 0%
pursuant to
pre-approval
exception
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) "Audit Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for professional services for
the audit of the Fund's annual financial statements and services provided
in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
(2) "Audit Related Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for assurance and
related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or
review of financial statements and are not reported under "Audit Fees".
(3) "Tax Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for professional services for tax
advice, tax compliance, and tax planning.
(4) "All Other Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for products and services
other than "Audit Fees", "Audit Related Fees", and "Tax Fees".
SERVICES THAT THE FUND'S AUDITOR BILLED TO THE
ADVISER AND AFFILIATED FUND SERVICE PROVIDERS
The following tables show the amount of fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP to
Nuveen Asset Management ("NAM" or the "Adviser"), and any entity controlling,
controlled by or under common control with NAM ("Control Affiliate") that
provides ongoing services to the Fund ("Affiliated Fund Service Provider"), for
engagements directly related to the Fund's operations and financial reporting,
during the Fund's last two full fiscal years.
The tables also show the percentage of fees subject to the pre-approval
exception. The pre-approval exception for services provided to the Adviser and
any Affiliated Fund Service Provider (other than audit, review or attest
services) waives the pre-approval requirement if: (A) the aggregate amount of
all such services provided constitutes no more than 5% of the total amount of
revenues paid to Ernst & Young LLP by the Fund, the Adviser and Affiliated Fund
Service Providers during the fiscal year in which the services are provided that
would have to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee; (B) the Fund did not
recognize the services as non-audit services at the time of the engagement; and
(C) the services are promptly brought to the Audit Committee's attention, and
the Committee (or its delegate) approves the services before the Fund's audit is
completed.
FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUDIT-RELATED FEES TAX FEES BILLED TO ALL OTHER FEES
BILLED TO ADVISER AND ADVISER AND BILLED TO ADVISER
AFFILIATED FUND AFFILIATED FUND AND AFFILIATED FUND
SERVICE PROVIDERS SERVICE PROVIDERS (1) SERVICE PROVIDERS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 31, 2007 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage approved 0% 0% 0%
pursuant to
pre-approval
exception
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 31, 2006 $ 0 $ 2,400 $ 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage approved 0% 0% 0%
pursuant to
pre-approval
exception
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The amounts reported for the Fund under the column heading "Tax Fees"
represents amounts billed to the Adviser exclusively for the preparation
for the Fund's tax return, the cost of which is borne by the Adviser. In
the aggregate, for all Nuveen funds for which Ernst & Young LLP serves as
independent registered public accounting firm, these fees amounted to
$161,400 in 2006. Beginning with fund fiscal years ending August 31, 2006,
Ernst & Young LLP will no longer prepare the fund tax returns.
NON-AUDIT SERVICES
The following table shows the amount of fees that Ernst & Young LLP billed
during the Fund's last two full fiscal years for non-audit services. The Audit
Committee is required to pre-approve non-audit services that Ernst & Young LLP
provides to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Services Provider, if the
engagement related directly to the Fund's operations and financial reporting
(except for those subject to the de minimis exception described above). The
Audit Committee requested and received information from Ernst & Young LLP about
any non-audit services that Ernst & Young LLP rendered during the Fund's last
fiscal year to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider. The
Committee considered this information in evaluating Ernst & Young LLP's
independence.
FISCAL YEAR ENDED TOTAL NON-AUDIT FEES
BILLED TO ADVISER AND
AFFILIATED FUND SERVICE TOTAL NON-AUDIT FEES
PROVIDERS (ENGAGEMENTS BILLED TO ADVISER AND
RELATED DIRECTLY TO THE AFFILIATED FUND SERVICE
TOTAL NON-AUDIT FEE OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL PROVIDERS (ALL OTHER
BILLED TO FUND REPORTING OF THE FUND) ENGAGEMENTS) TOTAL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 31, 2007 $ 3,216 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,216
July 31, 2006 $ 3,300 $ 2,400 $ 0 $ 5,700
"Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser" for both fiscal year ends represent "Tax
Fees" billed to Adviser in their respective amounts from the previous table.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. Generally, the Audit
Committee must approve (i) all non-audit services to be performed for the Fund
by the Fund's independent accountants and (ii) all audit and non-audit services
to be performed by the Fund's independent accountants for the Affiliated Fund
Service Providers with respect to operations and financial reporting of the
Fund. Regarding tax and research projects conducted by the independent
accountants for the Fund and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (with respect to
operations and financial reports of the Fund) such engagements will be (i)
pre-approved by the Audit Committee if they are expected to be for amounts
greater than $10,000; (ii) reported to the Audit Committee chairman for his
verbal approval prior to engagement if they are expected to be for amounts under
$10,000 but greater than $5,000; and (iii) reported to the Audit Committee at
the next Audit Committee meeting if they are expected to be for an amount under
$5,000.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
The registrant's Board of Directors or Trustees has a separately designated
Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A)). The
members of the audit committee are Robert P. Bremner, Jack B. Evans, William J.
Schneider and David J. Kundert. Mr. Eugene S. Sunshine, who also served as a
member of the Committee during this reporting period, has resigned from the
Board of Directors. His resignation became effective at 1 p.m. on July 31, 2007.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
See Portfolio of Investments in Item 1.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
The registrant invests its assets primarily in municipal bonds and cash
management securities. On rare occasions the registrant may acquire, directly or
through a special purpose vehicle, equity securities of a municipal bond issuer
whose bonds the registrant already owns when such bonds have deteriorated or are
expected shortly to deteriorate significantly in credit quality. The purpose of
acquiring equity securities generally will be to acquire control of the
municipal bond issuer and to seek to prevent the credit deterioration or
facilitate the liquidation or other workout of the distressed issuer's credit
problem. In the course of exercising control of a distressed municipal issuer,
NAM may pursue the registrant's interests in a variety of ways, which may entail
negotiating and executing consents, agreements and other arrangements, and
otherwise influencing the management of the issuer. NAM does not consider such
activities proxy voting for purposes of Rule 206(4)-6 under the 1940 Act, but
nevertheless provides reports to the registrant's Board of Trustees on its
control activities on a quarterly basis.
In the rare event that a municipal issuer were to issue a proxy or that the
registrant were to receive a proxy issued by a cash management security, NAM
would either engage an independent third party to determine how the proxy should
be voted or vote the proxy with the consent, or based on the instructions, of
the registrant's Board of Trustees or its representative. A member of NAM's
legal department would oversee the administration of the voting, and ensure that
records were maintained in accordance with Rule 206(4)-6, reports were filed
with the SEC on Form N-PX, and the results provided to the registrant's Board of
Trustees and made available to shareholders as required by applicable rules.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
THE PORTFOLIO MANAGER
The following individual has primary responsibility for the day-to-day
implementation of the registrant's investment strategies:
NAME FUND
Scott R. Romans Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc.
Other Accounts Managed. In addition to managing the registrant, the portfolio
manager is also primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of
the following accounts:
TYPE OF ACCOUNT NUMBER OF
PORTFOLIO MANAGER MANAGED ACCOUNTS ASSETS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott R. Romans Registered Investment Company 28 $ 6.1 billion
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles 0 $0
Other Accounts 3 $.53 million
o Assets are as of July 31, 2007. None of the assets in these accounts are
subject to an advisory fee based on performance.
Compensation. Each portfolio manager's compensation consists of three basic
elements--base salary, cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation. The
compensation strategy is to annually compare overall compensation, including
these three elements, to the market in order to create a compensation structure
that is competitive and consistent with similar financial services companies. As
discussed below, several factors are considered in determining each portfolio
manager's total compensation. In any year these factors may include, among
others, the effectiveness of the investment strategies recommended by the
portfolio manager's investment team, the investment performance of the accounts
managed by the portfolio manager, and the overall performance of Nuveen
Investments, Inc. (the parent company of NAM). Although investment performance
is a factor in determining the portfolio manager's compensation, it is not
necessarily a decisive factor. The portfolio manager's performance is evaluated
in part by comparing manager's performance against a specified investment
benchmark. This fund-specific benchmark is a customized subset (limited to bonds
in each Fund's specific state and with certain maturity parameters) of the
S&P/Investortools Municipal Bond index, an index comprised of bonds held by
managed municipal bond fund customers of Standard & Poor's Securities Pricing,
Inc. that are priced daily and whose fund holdings aggregate at least $2
million. As of August 30, 2007, the S&P/Investortools Municipal Bond index was
comprised of 51,454 securities with an aggregate current market value of $999
billion.
Base salary. Each portfolio manager is paid a base salary that is set at a level
determined by NAM in accordance with its overall compensation strategy discussed
above. NAM is not under any current contractual obligation to increase a
portfolio manager's base salary.
Cash bonus. Each portfolio manager is also eligible to receive an annual cash
bonus. The level of this bonus is based upon evaluations and determinations made
by each portfolio manager's supervisors, along with reviews submitted by his
peers. These reviews and evaluations often take into account a number of
factors, including the effectiveness of the investment strategies recommended to
the NAM's investment team, the performance of the accounts for which he serves
as portfolio manager relative to any benchmarks established for those accounts,
his effectiveness in communicating investment performance to stockholders and
their representatives, and his contribution to the NAM's investment process and
to the execution of investment strategies. The cash bonus component is also
impacted by the overall performance of Nuveen Investments, Inc. in achieving its
business objectives.
Long-term incentive compensation. Each portfolio manager is eligible to receive
bonus compensation in the form of equity-based awards issued in securities
issued by Nuveen Investments, Inc. The amount of such compensation is dependent
upon the same factors articulated for cash bonus awards but also factors in his
long-term potential with the firm.
Material Conflicts of Interest. Each portfolio manager's simultaneous management
of the registrant and the other accounts noted above may present actual or
apparent conflicts of interest with respect to the allocation and aggregation of
securities orders placed on behalf of the Registrant and the other account. NAM,
however, believes that such potential conflicts are mitigated by the fact that
the NAM has adopted several policies that address potential conflicts of
interest, including best execution and trade allocation policies that are
designed to ensure (1) that portfolio management is seeking the best price for
portfolio securities under the circumstances, (2) fair and equitable allocation
of investment opportunities among accounts over time and (3) compliance with
applicable regulatory requirements. All accounts are to be treated in a
non-preferential manner, such that allocations are not based upon account
performance, fee structure or preference of the portfolio manager. In addition,
NAM has adopted a Code of Conduct that sets forth policies regarding conflicts
of interest.
Beneficial Ownership of Securities. As of the July 31, 2007, the portfolio
manager beneficially owned the following dollar range of equity securities
issued by the Registrant and other Nuveen Funds managed by NAM's municipal
investment team.
DOLLAR RANGE OF
DOLLAR EQUITY SECURITIES
RANGE OF BENEFICIALLY OWNED
EQUITY IN THE REMAINDER OF
SECURITIES NUVEEN FUNDS
BENEFICIALLY MANAGED BY NAM'S
NAME OF PORTFOLIO OWNED IN MUNICIPAL
MANAGER FUND FUND INVESTMENT TEAM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott R. Romans Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. $0 $10,000-$50,000
PORTFOLIO MANAGER BIO:
Scott R. Romans, PhD, joined Nuveen Investments in 2000 as a senior analyst in
the education sector. In 2003, he was assigned management responsibility for
several closed- and open-ended municipal bond funds most of which are state
funds covering California and other western states. He has been Vice President
of NAM since 2004, Portfolio Manager since 2003, and was, formerly, Assistant
Vice President (2003-2004) and Senior Analyst (2000-2003). Currently, he manages
investments for 29 Nuveen-sponsored investment companies. He holds an
undergraduate degree from the University of Pennsylvania and an MA and PhD from
the University of Chicago.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT
COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may
recommend nominees to the registrants Board implemented after the registrant
last provided disclosure in response to this item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) The registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers,
or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
"1940 Act") (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within
90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure
required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the controls
and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR
270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")
(17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)).
(b) There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act
(17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter
of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.
File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form. Letter or number the
exhibits in the sequence indicated.
(a)(1) Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the
disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to
satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Not applicable
because the code is posted on registrant's website at www.nuveen.com/etf and
there were no amendments during the period covered by this report. (To view the
code, click on the Investor Resources drop down menu box, click on Fund
Governance and then Code of Conduct.)
(a)(2) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and
principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under
the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) in the exact form set forth below: Ex-99.CERT
Attached hereto.
(a)(3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under
the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.23c-1) sent or given during the period covered by the
report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons. Not applicable.
(b) If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR
270.30a-2(b)); Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished
pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference. Ex-99.906 CERT attached hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------
By (Signature and Title)* /s/ Kevin J. McCarthy
----------------------------------------------
Kevin J. McCarthy
Vice President and Secretary
Date: October 5, 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* /s/ Gifford R. Zimmerman
----------------------------------------------
Gifford R. Zimmerman
Chief Administrative Officer
(principal executive officer)
Date: October 5, 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------------
By (Signature and Title)* /s/ Stephen D. Foy
----------------------------------------------
Stephen D. Foy
Vice President and Controller
(principal financial officer)
Date: October 5, 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------------
* Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.