Q1-10Q-2013.3.31
Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C.  20549

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended                                           March 31, 2013                                                   

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________________ to ____________________

Commission file number 0-12379
 
FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio
 
31-1042001
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
 
255 East Fifth Street, Suite 700
Cincinnati, Ohio
 
45202
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (877) 322-9530

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes     x        No   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer o
 
 
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of Exchange Act).
Yes  o No   x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class
 
Outstanding at May 6, 2013
Common stock, No par value
 
57,852,390



Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP.

INDEX

 
Page No.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)

 
March 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
$
106,249

 
$
134,502

Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
1,170

 
24,341

Investment securities available-for-sale, at market value (cost $942,999 at March 31, 2013 and $1,017,104 at December 31, 2012)
952,039

 
1,032,096

Investment securities held-to-maturity (market value $723,226 at March 31, 2013 and $778,474 at December 31, 2012)
716,214

 
770,755

Other investments
75,375

 
71,492

Loans held for sale
28,126

 
16,256

Loans
 
 
 
Commercial
892,381

 
861,033

Real estate-construction
87,542

 
73,517

Real estate-commercial
1,433,182

 
1,417,008

Real estate-residential
330,260

 
318,210

Installment
53,509

 
56,810

Home equity
365,943

 
367,500

Credit card
32,465

 
34,198

Lease financing
53,556

 
50,788

Total loans - excluding covered loans
3,248,838

 
3,179,064

Less:  Allowance for loan and lease losses - uncovered
48,306

 
47,777

Net loans - excluding covered loans
3,200,532

 
3,131,287

Covered loans
687,798

 
748,116

Less:  Allowance for loan and lease losses - covered
45,496

 
45,190

Net loans – covered
642,302

 
702,926

Net loans
3,842,834

 
3,834,213

Premises and equipment
146,889

 
146,716

Goodwill
95,050

 
95,050

Other intangibles
7,078

 
7,648

FDIC indemnification asset
112,428

 
119,607

Accrued interest and other assets
265,565

 
244,372

Total assets
$
6,349,017

 
$
6,497,048

 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 

 
 

Deposits
 

 
 

Interest-bearing
$
1,113,940

 
$
1,160,815

Savings
1,620,874

 
1,623,614

Time
1,030,124

 
1,068,637

Total interest-bearing deposits
3,764,938

 
3,853,066

Noninterest-bearing
1,056,409

 
1,102,774

Total deposits
4,821,347

 
4,955,840

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
130,863

 
122,570

Federal Home Loan Bank short-term borrowings
502,200

 
502,000

Total short-term borrowings
633,063

 
624,570

Long-term debt
74,498

 
75,202

Total borrowed funds
707,561

 
699,772

Accrued interest and other liabilities
118,495

 
131,011

Total liabilities
5,647,403

 
5,786,623

 
 
 
 
Shareholders' equity
 

 
 

Common stock - no par value
 

 
 

Authorized - 160,000,000 shares; Issued - 68,730,731 shares in 2013 and 2012
575,514

 
579,293

Retained earnings
327,635

 
330,004

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(21,475
)
 
(18,677
)
Treasury stock, at cost, 10,701,808 shares in 2013 and 10,684,496 shares in 2012
(180,060
)
 
(180,195
)
Total shareholders' equity
701,614

 
710,425

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
$
6,349,017

 
$
6,497,048


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


1

Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
Interest income
 
 
 
Loans, including fees
$
56,025

 
$
66,436

Investment securities
 
 
 
Taxable
8,376

 
10,517

Tax-exempt
580

 
134

Total interest on investment securities
8,956

 
10,651

Other earning assets
(1,472
)
 
(1,990
)
Total interest income
63,509

 
75,097

Interest expense
 
 
 
Deposits
3,860

 
7,716

Short-term borrowings
329

 
12

Long-term borrowings
654

 
680

Total interest expense
4,843

 
8,408

Net interest income
58,666

 
66,689

Provision for loan and lease losses - uncovered
3,041

 
3,258

Provision for loan and lease losses - covered
9,042

 
12,951

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses
46,583

 
50,480

 
 
 
 
Noninterest income
 
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
4,717

 
4,909

Trust and wealth management fees
3,950

 
3,791

Bankcard income
2,433

 
2,536

Net gains from sales of loans
706

 
940

Gains on sales of investment securities
1,536

 
0

FDIC loss sharing income
8,934

 
12,816

Accelerated discount on covered loans
1,935

 
3,645

Other
2,487

 
3,288

Total noninterest income
26,698

 
31,925

 
 
 
 
Noninterest expenses
 
 
 
Salaries and employee benefits
27,329

 
28,861

Net occupancy
6,165

 
5,382

Furniture and equipment
2,371

 
2,244

Data processing
2,469

 
1,901

Marketing
897

 
1,154

Communication
833

 
894

Professional services
1,803

 
2,147

State intangible tax
1,014

 
1,026

FDIC assessments
1,125

 
1,163

Loss - other real estate owned
502

 
996

(Gain) loss - covered other real estate owned
(157
)
 
1,292

Loss sharing expense
2,286

 
1,751

Other
6,469

 
6,967

Total noninterest expenses
53,106

 
55,778

Income before income taxes
20,175

 
26,627

Income tax expense
6,351

 
9,633

Net income
$
13,824

 
$
16,994

 
 
 
 
Net earnings per common share - basic
$
0.24

 
$
0.29

Net earnings per common share - diluted
$
0.24

 
$
0.29

Cash dividends declared per share
$
0.28

 
$
0.31

Average common shares outstanding - basic
57,439,029

 
57,795,258

Average common shares outstanding - diluted
58,283,467

 
58,881,043


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

Table of Contents


FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
Net income
$
13,824

 
$
16,994

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
 
 
 
Unrealized (losses) gains on investment securities arising during the period
(3,357
)
 
2,439

Change in retirement obligation
445

 
355

Unrealized gain on derivatives
126

 
0

Unrealized (loss) gain on foreign currency exchange
(12
)
 
9

Other comprehensive (loss) income
(2,798
)
 
2,803

Comprehensive income
$
11,026

 
$
19,797

 
 
 
 
                   See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


3

Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Retained
 
Accumulated other comprehensive
 
Treasury stock
 
 
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Earnings
 
income (loss)
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Total
Balances at January 1, 2012
68,730,731

 
$
579,871

 
$
331,351

 
$
(21,490
)
 
(10,463,677
)
 
$
(177,511
)
 
$
712,221

Net income
 

 
 

 
16,994

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
16,994

Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,803

 
 
 
 
 
2,803

Cash dividends declared:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock at $0.31 per share
 
 
 
 
(17,782
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(17,782
)
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation
 
 
283

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
283

Exercise of stock options, net of shares purchased
 
 
(825
)
 
 
 
 
 
47,169

 
800

 
(25
)
Restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures
 
 
(4,406
)
 
 
 
 
 
225,235

 
3,853

 
(553
)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 
752

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
752

Balances at March 31, 2012
68,730,731

 
$
575,675

 
$
330,563

 
$
(18,687
)
 
(10,191,273
)
 
$
(172,858
)
 
$
714,693

Balances at January 1, 2013
68,730,731

 
$
579,293

 
$
330,004

 
$
(18,677
)
 
(10,684,496
)
 
$
(180,195
)
 
$
710,425

Net income
 
 
 
 
13,824

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13,824

Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,798
)
 
 
 
 
 
(2,798
)
Cash dividends declared:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock at $0.28 per share
 
 
 
 
(16,193
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(16,193
)
Purchase of common stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(249,000
)
 
(3,831
)
 
(3,831
)
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation
 
 
73

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
73

Exercise of stock options, net of shares purchased
 
 
(479
)
 
 
 
 
 
20,370

 
343

 
(136
)
Restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures
 
 
(4,460
)
 
 
 
 
 
211,318

 
3,623

 
(837
)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 
1,087

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,087

Balances at March 31, 2013
68,730,731

 
$
575,514

 
$
327,635

 
$
(21,475
)
 
(10,701,808
)
 
$
(180,060
)
 
$
701,614


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
Operating activities
 
 
 
Net income
$
13,824

 
$
16,994

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Provision for loan and lease losses
12,083

 
16,209

Depreciation and amortization
3,875

 
3,601

Stock-based compensation expense
1,087

 
752

Pension expense (income)
15

 
(143
)
Net amortization of premiums/accretion of discounts on investment securities
3,788

 
2,240

Gains on sales of investment securities
(1,536
)
 
0

Originations of loans held for sale
(47,969
)
 
(48,278
)
Net gains from sales of loans held for sale
(706
)
 
(940
)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale
35,868

 
52,410

Deferred income taxes
(2,114
)
 
(1,253
)
Increase in interest receivable
(1,660
)
 
(196
)
(Increase) decrease in cash surrender value of life insurance
(423
)
 
2,498

Increase in prepaid expenses
(2,501
)
 
(382
)
Decrease in indemnification asset
7,179

 
16,612

(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses
(6,215
)
 
1,985

Decrease in interest payable
(282
)
 
(543
)
Other
7,583

 
5,223

Net cash provided by operating activities
21,896

 
66,789

 
 
 
 
Investing activities
 

 
 

Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale
48,686

 
0

Proceeds from calls, paydowns and maturities of securities available-for-sale
53,351

 
75,468

Purchases of securities available-for-sale
(54,838
)
 
(291,496
)
Proceeds from calls, paydowns and maturities of securities held-to-maturity
51,591

 
8,151

Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits with other banks
23,171

 
351,297

Net increase in loans and leases - excluding covered loans
(72,053
)
 
(6,372
)
Net decrease in covered assets
44,904

 
51,622

Proceeds from disposal of other real estate owned
5,500

 
6,309

Purchases of premises and equipment
(3,857
)
 
(6,782
)
Net cash provided by investing activities
96,455

 
188,197

 
 
 
 
Financing activities
 

 
 

Net decrease in total deposits
(134,493
)
 
(241,925
)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
8,493

 
(20,812
)
Payments on long-term borrowings
(697
)
 
(792
)
Cash dividends paid on common stock
(16,149
)
 
(15,624
)
Treasury stock purchase
(3,831
)
 
0

Proceeds from exercise of stock options
0

 
180

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation
73

 
283

Net cash used in financing activities
(146,604
)
 
(278,690
)
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks:
 

 
 

Net decrease in cash and due from banks
(28,253
)
 
(23,704
)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
134,502

 
149,653

Cash and due from banks at end of period
$
106,249

 
$
125,949


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


5

Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(Unaudited)

The consolidated financial statements for interim periods are unaudited; however, in the opinion of the management of First Financial Bancorp. (First Financial or the Company), all material adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

NOTE 1:  BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The Consolidated Financial Statements of First Financial, a bank holding company, principally serving Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, include the accounts and operations of First Financial and its wholly-owned subsidiary – First Financial Bank, N.A. (First Financial Bank or the Bank).  All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.  Certain reclassifications of prior periods’ amounts have been made to conform to the current period’s presentation and had no effect on net earnings.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes.  Actual realized amounts could differ materially from those estimates.  

These interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and serve to update the First Financial Bancorp. Annual Report on Form 10-K (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2012.  These interim financial statements may not include all information and notes necessary to constitute a complete set of financial statements under GAAP applicable to annual periods and accordingly should be read in conjunction with the financial information contained in the Form 10-K.  Management believes these unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented.  The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year or any other interim period.  The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012, has been derived from the audited financial statements in the Company’s 2012 Form 10-K.

NOTE 2:  RECENTLY ADOPTED AND ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In December 2011, the FASB issued an update (ASU 2011-11, Disclosures About Offsetting Assets and Liabilities) which creates new disclosure requirements about the nature of an entity's rights of offset and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. These disclosure requirements are required for recognized financial and derivative instruments that are offset in accordance with the guidance in FASB ASC Topic 210-20-45, Balance Sheet - Offsetting - Other Presentation Matters, FASB ASC Topic 815-10-45, Derivatives and Hedging - Other Presentation Matters, or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Scope Clarification of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which limits the scope of ASU 2011-11 to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions. Companies are required to disclose information to enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on its financial position, including the effect or potential effect of rights of set-off associated with certain financial instruments and derivative instruments. The provisions of ASU 2011-11 became effective for the interim reporting period ended March 31, 2013. For further detail, see Note 6 - Derivatives.

In July 2012, the FASB issued an update (ASU 2012-02, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment) which allows an entity testing an indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the asset. This update also addresses circumstances that a company should consider in interim periods, but does not remove the requirement for testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually and between annual tests if there is a change in events and circumstances. The provisions of ASU 2012-02 became effective for the interim reporting period ended March 31, 2013 and did not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In October 2012, the FASB issued an update (ASU 2012-06, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution) which clarifies the applicable guidance for subsequently measuring an indemnification asset recognized as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. When a company recognizes an indemnification asset as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution and subsequently a change in the cash flows expected to be

6

Table of Contents

collected on the indemnification asset occurs (as a result of a change in cash flows expected to be collected on the assets subject to indemnification), the company should subsequently account for the change in the measurement of the indemnification asset on the same basis as the change in the assets subject to indemnification. Any amortization of changes in value should be limited to the contractual term of the indemnification agreement (that is, the lesser of the term of the indemnification agreement and the remaining life of the indemnified assets). The provisions of ASU 2012-06 became effective for the interim reporting period ended March 31, 2013 and did not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

On February 5, 2013, the FASB issued an update (ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)) which requires preparers to report in one place information about reclassifications out of AOCI. The ASU also requires companies to report changes in AOCI balances and expands the disclosure requirements in FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income (ASC 220), for presentation of changes in AOCI. This ASU requires companies to disaggregate the total change of each component of other comprehensive income and separately present (1) reclassification adjustments and (2) current-period OCI. ASU 2013-02 also requires companies to present information about significant items reclassified out of AOCI by component either (1) on the face of the statement where net income is presented or (2) as a separate disclosure in the notes to the financial statements. The provisions of ASU 2013-02 became effective for the interim reporting period ended March 31, 2013. For further detail, see Note 14 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).

NOTE 3:  GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill. Assets and liabilities of acquired entities are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess cost of the acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized, but is measured for impairment on an annual basis as of October 1 of each year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying value.  First Financial performed its annual impairment test as of October 1, 2012 and no impairment was indicated.  As of March 31, 2013, no events or changes in circumstances indicated that the fair value of a reporting unit was below its carrying value. First Financial had goodwill of $95.1 million as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Other intangible assets. Other intangible assets consist primarily of core deposit intangibles.  Core deposit intangibles are recorded at their estimated fair value as of the acquisition date and are then amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives. Core deposit intangibles were $6.9 million and $7.4 million as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. First Financial's core deposit intangibles have an estimated weighted average remaining life of 7.6 years. Amortization expense recognized on intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, was $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

NOTE 4:  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of business, First Financial offers a variety of financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk to its clients to assist them in meeting their requirements for liquidity and credit enhancement. These financial instruments include standby letters of credit and outstanding commitments to extend credit.  GAAP does not require these financial instruments to be recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

First Financial’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for standby letters of credit, and outstanding commitments to extend credit, is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments.  First Financial uses the same credit policies in issuing commitments and conditional obligations as it does for credit instruments recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Letters of credit. These transactions are conditional commitments issued by First Financial to guarantee the performance of a client to a third party.  First Financial’s portfolio of standby letters of credit consists primarily of performance assurances made on behalf of clients who have a contractual commitment to produce or deliver goods or services.  The risk to First Financial arises from its obligation to make payment in the event of the client's contractual default to produce the contracted good or service to a third party.  First Financial has issued letters of credit (including standby letters of credit) aggregating $14.9 million and $14.8 million at March 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively. Management conducts regular reviews of these instruments on an individual client basis.

Loan commitments. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a client as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.  Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  First Financial evaluates each client’s

7

Table of Contents

creditworthiness on an individual basis.  The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by First Financial upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the client.  The collateral held varies, but may include securities, real estate, inventory, plant or equipment.  First Financial had commitments outstanding to extend credit totaling $1.3 billion at March 31, 2013, and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2012.

First Financial utilizes the allowance for loan and lease losses methodology to maintain a reserve that it considers sufficient to absorb probable losses inherent in standby letters of credit and outstanding loan commitments and records the reserve within Accrued interest and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Contingencies/Litigation. First Financial and its subsidiaries are engaged in various matters of litigation, other assertions of improper or fraudulent loan practices or lending violations and other matters from time to time, and have a number of unresolved claims pending. Additionally, as part of the ordinary course of business, First Financial and its subsidiaries are parties to litigation involving claims to the ownership of funds in particular accounts, the collection of delinquent accounts, challenges to security interests in collateral and foreclosure interests, that is incidental to our regular business activities. While the ultimate liability with respect to these other litigation matters and claims cannot be determined at this time, First Financial believes that damages, if any, and other amounts relating to pending matters are not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated as of March 31, 2013. Reserves are established for these various matters of litigation, when appropriate under FASB ASC Topic 450, Contingencies, based in part upon the advice of legal counsel.

NOTE 5:  INVESTMENTS

The following is a summary of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investment securities as of March 31, 2013:
  
 
Held-to-Maturity
 
Available-for-Sale
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Gain
 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Market
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Gain
 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Market
Value
U.S. Treasuries
 
$
0

 
$
0

 
$
0

 
$
0

 
$
97

 
$
1

 
$
0

 
$
98

Securities of U.S. government agencies and corporations
 
20,222

 
579

 
0

 
20,801

 
10,573

 
299

 
0

 
10,872

Mortgage-backed securities
 
686,962

 
6,818

 
(642
)
 
693,138

 
765,679

 
11,277

 
(3,569
)
 
773,387

Obligations of state and other political subdivisions
 
9,030

 
257

 
0

 
9,287

 
34,930

 
83

 
(202
)
 
34,811

Asset-backed securities
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
55,604

 
191

 
0

 
55,795

Other securities
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
76,116

 
1,141

 
(181
)
 
77,076

Total
 
$
716,214

 
$
7,654

 
$
(642
)
 
$
723,226

 
$
942,999

 
$
12,992

 
$
(3,952
)
 
$
952,039


The following is a summary of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investment securities as of December 31, 2012:
  
 
Held-to-Maturity
 
Available-for-Sale
 
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Market
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Market
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Cost
 
Gain
 
Loss
 
Value
 
Cost
 
Gain
 
Loss
 
Value
Securities of U.S. government agencies and corporations
 
$
20,512

 
$
679

 
$
0

 
$
21,191

 
$
15,562

 
$
333

 
$
0

 
$
15,895

Mortgage-backed securities
 
740,891

 
8,077

 
(1,290
)
 
747,678

 
854,150

 
14,564

 
(1,485
)
 
867,229

Obligations of state and other political subdivisions
 
9,352

 
265

 
(12
)
 
9,605

 
35,913

 
169

 
(84
)
 
35,998

Asset-backed securities
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
57,000

 
90

 
(1
)
 
57,089

Other securities
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
54,479

 
1,569

 
(163
)
 
55,885

Total
 
$
770,755

 
$
9,021

 
$
(1,302
)
 
$
778,474

 
$
1,017,104

 
$
16,725

 
$
(1,733
)
 
$
1,032,096



8

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of investment securities by estimated maturity as of March 31, 2013:
 
Held-to-Maturity
 
Available-for-Sale
(Dollars in thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 
Market
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Market
Value
Due in one year or less
$
279

 
$
283

 
$
10,129

 
$
10,604

Due after one year through five years
574,250

 
578,018

 
393,101

 
400,391

Due after five years through ten years
98,462

 
100,884

 
242,072

 
243,406

Due after ten years
43,223

 
44,041

 
297,697

 
297,638

Total
$
716,214

 
$
723,226

 
$
942,999

 
$
952,039


The following tables present the age of gross unrealized losses and associated fair value by investment category:
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or More
 
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
Mortgage-backed securities
 
$
356,139

 
$
(3,547
)
 
$
25,022

 
$
(366
)
 
$
381,161

 
$
(3,913
)
Obligations of state and other political subdivisions
 
25,604

 
(202
)
 
0

 
0

 
25,604

 
(202
)
Other securities
 
21,092

 
(111
)
 
845

 
(70
)
 
21,937

 
(181
)
Total
 
$
402,835

 
$
(3,860
)
 
$
25,867

 
$
(436
)
 
$
428,702

 
$
(4,296
)

 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or More
 
Total
 
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Value
 
Loss
 
Value
 
Loss
 
Value
 
Loss
Mortgage-backed securities
 
$
240,641

 
$
(1,635
)
 
$
25,513

 
$
(405
)
 
$
266,154

 
$
(2,040
)
Obligations of state and other political subdivisions
 
21,341

 
(96
)
 
0

 
0

 
21,341

 
(96
)
Asset-backed securities
 
9,999

 
(1
)
 
0

 
0

 
9,999

 
(1
)
Other securities
 
8,454

 
(163
)
 
0

 
0

 
8,454

 
(163
)
Total
 
$
280,435

 
$
(1,895
)
 
$
25,513

 
$
(405
)
 
$
305,948

 
$
(2,300
)

Gains and losses on debt securities are generally due to higher current market yields relative to the yields of the debt securities at their amortized cost. All securities with unrealized losses are reviewed quarterly to determine if any impairment is considered other than temporary, requiring a write-down to fair market value. First Financial considers the percentage loss on a security, duration of the loss, average life or duration of the security, credit rating of the security, and payment performance as well as the Company's intent and ability to hold the security to maturity when determining whether any impairment is other than temporary. At this time First Financial does not intend to sell, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell debt securities temporarily impaired prior to maturity or recovery of book value. First Financial had no other than temporary impairment expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 or the year ended December 31, 2012.

For further detail on the fair value of investment securities, see Note 13 – Fair Value Disclosures.

NOTE 6:  DERIVATIVES

First Financial uses derivative instruments, including interest rate caps, floors and swaps, to meet the needs of its clients while managing the interest rate risk associated with certain transactions.  First Financial does not use derivatives for speculative purposes.

While authorized to use a variety of derivative products, First Financial primarily utilizes interest rate swaps as a means to offer borrowers credit-based products that meet their needs and may from time to time utilize interest rate swaps to manage the

9

Table of Contents

macro interest rate risk profile of the Company. The interest rate swap agreements establish the basis on which interest rate payments are exchanged with counterparties referred to as the notional amount.

The following table summarizes the notional values of derivative financial instruments utilized by First Financial by the nature of the underlying asset or liability:
(Dollars in thousands)
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
Instruments associated with loans
 
$
912,689

 
$
935,493


As only interest rate payments are exchanged, the cash requirements and credit risk associated with interest rate swaps are significantly less than the notional amount and the Company’s credit risk exposure is limited to the market value of the instruments. First Financial manages the market value credit risk associated with counterparties through counterparty credit policies. These policies require the Company to maintain a total derivative notional position of less than 35% of assets, total credit exposure of less than 3% of capital and no single counterparty credit risk exposure greater than $20.0 million. The Company is currently well below all single counterparty and portfolio limits. At March 31, 2013, the Company had a total counterparty notional amount outstanding of approximately $497.6 million, spread among eight counterparties, with an outstanding liability from these contracts of $22.8 million. At December 31, 2012, the Company had a total counterparty notional amount outstanding of approximately $509.1 million, spread among eight counterparties, with an outstanding liability from these contracts of $26.0 million.

First Financial’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by a borrower, is limited to the market value of the derivative instrument associated with that borrower. First Financial monitors its derivative credit exposure to borrowers through the normal credit review processes the Company performs on all borrowers. Additionally, the Company monitors derivative credit risk exposure related to problem loans through the Company's allowance for loan and lease losses committee. First Financial considers the market value of a derivative instrument to be part of the carrying value of the related loan for these purposes as the borrower is contractually obligated to pay First Financial this amount in the event the derivative contract is terminated.

The following table summarizes the derivative financial instruments utilized by First Financial and their balances:
  
 
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
Estimated fair value
 
 
 
Estimated fair value
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Balance Sheet Classification
 
Notional
amount
 
Gain
 
Loss
 
Notional
amount
 
Gain
 
Loss
Fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pay fixed interest rate swaps with counterparty
 
Accrued interest and other liabilities
 
$
12,501

 
$
0

 
$
(1,302
)
 
$
12,739

 
$
0

 
$
(1,445
)
Matched interest rate swaps with borrower
 
Accrued interest and other assets
 
450,094

 
21,444

 
(113
)
 
461,377

 
24,135

 
0

Matched interest rate swaps with counterparty
 
Accrued interest and other liabilities
 
450,094

 
113

 
(22,224
)
 
461,377

 
0

 
(24,978
)
Total
 
 
 
$
912,689

 
$
21,557

 
$
(23,639
)
 
$
935,493

 
$
24,135

 
$
(26,423
)

In connection with its use of derivative instruments, from time to time First Financial and its counterparties are required to post cash collateral to offset the market position of the derivative instruments. First Financial maintains the right to offset these derivative positions with the collateral posted against them by or with the relevant counterparties. First Financial classifies the derivative cash collateral outstanding with its counterparties as an adjustment to the fair value of the derivative contracts within Accrued interest and other assets or Accrued interest and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


10

Table of Contents

The following table discloses the gross and net amounts of liabilities recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
Gross amounts of recognized liabilities
 
Gross amounts offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
Net amounts of liabilities presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
Gross amounts of recognized liabilities
 
Gross amounts offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
Net amounts of liabilities presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pay fixed interest rate swaps with counterparty
$
1,302

 
$
(723
)
 
$
579

 
$
1,445

 
$
(669
)
 
$
776

Matched interest rate swaps with counterparty
22,337

 
(21,833
)
 
504

 
24,978

 
(23,057
)
 
1,921

Total
$
23,639

 
$
(22,556
)
 
$
1,083

 
$
26,423

 
$
(23,726
)
 
$
2,697


The following table details the derivative financial instruments, the average remaining maturities and the weighted-average interest rates being paid and received by First Financial at March 31, 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average rate
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Notional
amount
 
Average
maturity
(years)
 
Fair
value
 
Receive
 
Pay
Asset conversion swaps
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pay fixed interest rate swaps with counterparty
 
$
12,501

 
3.3
 
$
(1,302
)
 
2.29
%
 
6.82
%
Receive fixed, matched interest rate swaps with borrower
 
450,094

 
4.3
 
21,331

 
5.04
%
 
2.95
%
Pay fixed, matched interest rate swaps with counterparty
 
450,094

 
4.3
 
(22,111
)
 
2.95
%
 
5.04
%
Total asset conversion swaps
 
$
912,689

 
4.3
 
$
(2,082
)
 
3.97
%
 
4.03
%

The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative instrument and the resulting designation.  Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges.  Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

Fair Value Hedges. First Financial utilizes interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges as a means to offer commercial borrowers products that meet their needs, but are also designed to achieve First Financial’s desired interest rate risk profile.  First Financial accomplishes this by entering into swap agreements with commercial borrowers and simultaneously entering into offsetting swap agreements, with substantially matching terms, with institutional counterparties. These interest rate swap agreements generally involve the receipt by First Financial of floating rate amounts from counterparties in exchange for payments to these counterparties by First Financial of fixed rate amounts received from commercial borrowers over the life of the agreements. These interest rate swap agreements do not involve an exchange of the underlying principal or notional amount. This results in First Financial’s loan customers receiving fixed rate funding, while providing First Financial with a floating rate asset.  First Financial's matched interest rate swaps economically hedge offsetting "receive fixed" and "pay fixed" exposures, but do not qualify for hedge accounting.

The net interest receivable or payable on matched interest rate swaps is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to the interest income of the hedged item.  The fair value of matched interest rate swaps is included within Accrued interest and other assets and Accrued interest and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  

For the unmatched, pay fixed interest rate swaps, which qualify for hedge accounting, the corresponding fair-value adjustment is included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in the carrying value of the hedged item.  The net interest receivable or payable on unmatched interest rate swaps is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to the interest income of the hedged item. Derivative gains and losses not considered effective in hedging the change in fair value of the hedged item, if any, are recognized in income immediately.


11

Table of Contents

The following table details the location and amounts recognized for fair value hedges:
  
 
 
 
Decrease to Interest income
(Dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
Three months ended
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships
 
Location of change in fair value
 
March 31,
 
 
 
 
2013
 
2012
Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
 
Interest income - loans
 
$
(142
)
 
$
(196
)
Total
 
 
 
$
(142
)
 
$
(196
)

Cash Flow Hedges. First Financial utilizes interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges to manage the variability of cash flows, primarily net interest income, attributable to changes in interest rates. The net interest receivable or payable on an interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest income or interest expense. The fair value of interest rate swaps is included within accrued interest and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Derivative gains and losses not considered effective in hedging the cash flows related to the hedged items, if any, are recognized in income immediately.

In 2012, First Financial executed a cash flow hedge utilizing an interest rate swap to hedge against interest rate volatility on $35.0 million of floating rate interest-bearing deposits indexed to the U.S. Federal Funds Target Rate. This interest rate swap involves the receipt by First Financial of variable-rate interest amounts in exchange for fixed-rate interest payments by First Financial for a period of 7 years and does qualify for hedge accounting. Accrued interest and other liabilities included $0.1 million at March 31, 2013 and $0.2 million at December 31, 2012 reflecting the fair value of this cash flow hedge.

NOTE 7:  BORROWINGS

Short-term borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheets include repurchase agreements utilized for corporate sweep accounts with cash management account agreements in place as well as overnight advances from the Federal Loan Home Bank (FHLB). All repurchase agreements are subject to terms and conditions of repurchase/security agreements between First Financial Bank and the client. To secure the Bank's liability to the client, First Financial Bank is authorized to sell or repurchase U. S. Treasury, government agency and mortgage-backed securities.

First Financial had $502.2 million in short-term borrowings with the FHLB at March 31, 2013 and $502.0 million as of December 31, 2012. These short-term borrowings are used to manage the Company's normal liquidity needs and support the Company's asset and liability management strategies.

Long-term debt primarily consists of FHLB long-term advances and repurchase agreements utilizing investment securities pledged as collateral.  These instruments are primarily utilized to reduce overnight liquidity risk and to mitigate interest rate sensitivity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  First Financial has $65.0 million in repurchase agreements which have remaining maturities of less than 3 years and a weighted average rate of 3.50%.  Securities pledged as collateral in conjunction with the repurchase agreements are included within Investment securities available-for-sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  

The following is a summary of long-term debt:
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Amount
 
Average Rate
 
Amount
 
Average Rate
Federal Home Loan Bank
 
$
8,724

 
3.74
%
 
$
9,427

 
3.74
%
National Market Repurchase Agreement
 
65,000

 
3.50
%
 
65,000

 
3.50
%
Capital loan with municipality
 
774

 
0.00
%
 
$
775

 
0.00
%
Total long-term debt
 
$
74,498

 
3.50
%
 
$
75,202

 
3.49
%

Under Federal Reserve Board guidelines, a company can issue qualifying debentures up to 25% of qualifying Tier I capital. First Financial has the capacity to issue approximately $159.7 million in additional qualifying debentures under these guidelines.


12

Table of Contents

NOTE 8:  LOANS - EXCLUDING COVERED LOANS

First Financial offers clients a variety of commercial and consumer loan and lease products with various interest rates and payment terms. Lending activities are primarily concentrated in Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, where the Bank currently operates banking centers. Additionally, First Financial provides equipment and leasehold improvement financing for franchisees in the quick service and casual dining restaurant sector throughout the United States.

Credit Quality. To facilitate the monitoring of credit quality for commercial loans, and for purposes of determining an appropriate allowance for loan and lease losses, First Financial utilizes the following categories of credit grades:

Pass - Higher quality loans that do not fit any of the other categories described below.

Special Mention - First Financial assigns a Special Mention rating to loans and leases with potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or lease or in First Financial's credit position at some future date.

Substandard - First Financial assigns a substandard rating to loans or leases that are inadequately protected by the current sound financial worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard loans and leases have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize repayment of the debt. Substandard loans and leases are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not addressed.

Doubtful - First Financial assigns a doubtful rating to loans and leases with all the attributes of a substandard rating with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors that may work to the advantage and strengthening of the credit quality of the loan or lease, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral and refinancing plans.

The credit grades described above, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions, are assigned upon initial approval of credit to borrowers and updated periodically thereafter.

First Financial considers repayment performance as the best indicator of credit quality for consumer loans. Consumer loans that have principal and interest payments that are past due by ninety days or more are generally classified as nonperforming. Additionally, consumer loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) are classified as nonperforming unless such loans have a sustained period of repayment performance of six months or greater and are reasonably assured of repayment in accordance with the restructured terms.


13

Table of Contents

Commercial and consumer credit exposure by risk attribute was as follows:
 
 
As of March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
Commercial
 
Total
Pass
 
$
832,181

 
$
79,735

 
$
1,318,714

 
$
2,230,630

Special Mention
 
36,758

 
65

 
42,128

 
78,951

Substandard
 
23,442

 
7,742

 
72,340

 
103,524

Doubtful
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

Total
 
$
892,381

 
$
87,542

 
$
1,433,182

 
$
2,413,105


(Dollars in thousands)
 
Real Estate
Residential
 
Installment
 
Home Equity
 
Other
 
Total
Performing
 
$
321,965

 
$
53,168

 
$
362,884

 
$
85,525

 
$
823,542

Nonperforming
 
8,295

 
341

 
3,059

 
496

 
12,191

Total
 
$
330,260

 
$
53,509

 
$
365,943

 
$
86,021

 
$
835,733


 
 
As of December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
Commercial
 
Total
Pass
 
$
803,351

 
$
64,866

 
$
1,307,370

 
$
2,175,587

Special Mention
 
29,663

 
65

 
38,516

 
68,244

Substandard
 
28,019

 
8,586

 
71,122

 
107,727

Doubtful
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

Total
 
$
861,033

 
$
73,517

 
$
1,417,008

 
$
2,351,558


(Dollars in thousands)
 
Real Estate
Residential
 
Installment
 
Home Equity
 
Other
 
Total
Performing
 
$
310,341

 
$
56,358

 
$
364,248

 
$
84,490

 
$
815,437

Nonperforming
 
7,869

 
452

 
3,252

 
496

 
12,069

Total
 
$
318,210

 
$
56,810

 
$
367,500

 
$
84,986

 
$
827,506


Delinquency. Loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or any portion thereof remains unpaid after the date of the scheduled payment.


14

Table of Contents

Loan delinquency, including nonaccrual loans, was as follows:
 
 
As of March 31, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)
 
30 – 59
days
past due
 
60 – 89
days
past due
 
> 90 days
past due
 
Total
past
due
 
Current
 
Total
 
> 90 days
past due
and
 accruing
Loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
1,471

 
$
208

 
$
4,025

 
$
5,704

 
$
886,677

 
$
892,381

 
$
0

Real estate - construction
 
354

 
0

 
890

 
1,244

 
86,298

 
87,542

 
0

Real estate - commercial
 
8,961

 
2,868

 
25,951

 
37,780

 
1,395,402

 
1,433,182

 
0

Real estate - residential
 
4,438

 
511

 
5,741

 
10,690

 
319,570

 
330,260

 
0

Installment
 
353

 
66

 
239

 
658

 
52,851

 
53,509

 
0

Home equity
 
1,051

 
484

 
1,857

 
3,392

 
362,551

 
365,943

 
0

Other
 
1,403

 
120

 
653

 
2,176

 
83,845

 
86,021

 
157

Total
 
$
18,031

 
$
4,257

 
$
39,356

 
$
61,644

 
$
3,187,194

 
$
3,248,838

 
$
157


 
 
As of December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
30 - 59
days
past due
 
60 - 89
days
past due
 
> 90 days
past due
 
Total
past
due
 
Current
 
Total
 
> 90 days
past due and accruing
Loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
1,770

 
$
832

 
$
4,197

 
$
6,799

 
$
854,234

 
$
861,033

 
$
0

Real estate - construction
 
0

 
0

 
892

 
892

 
72,625

 
73,517

 
0

Real estate - commercial
 
2,549

 
1,931

 
27,966

 
32,446

 
1,384,562

 
1,417,008

 
0

Real estate - residential
 
6,071

 
1,463

 
6,113

 
13,647

 
304,563

 
318,210

 
0

Installment
 
280

 
148

 
344

 
772

 
56,038

 
56,810

 
0

Home equity
 
1,311

 
869

 
1,440

 
3,620

 
363,880

 
367,500

 
0

Other
 
386

 
168

 
708

 
1,262

 
83,724

 
84,986

 
212

Total
 
$
12,367

 
$
5,411

 
$
41,660

 
$
59,438

 
$
3,119,626

 
$
3,179,064

 
$
212


Nonaccrual. Loans are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful or when principal or interest payments are ninety days or more past due. Generally, loans are placed in nonaccrual status due to the continued failure to adhere to contractual payment terms by the borrower coupled with other pertinent factors, such as insufficient collateral value. The accrual of interest income is discontinued and previously accrued, but unpaid interest is reversed when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status. Any payments received while a loan is on nonaccrual status are applied as a reduction to the carrying value of the loan. A loan may be placed back on accrual status if all contractual payments have been received and collection of future principal and interest payments is no longer doubtful.

Troubled Debt Restructurings. A loan modification is considered a TDR when two conditions are met: 1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and 2) concessions are made by the Company that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower with similar credit characteristics. The most common types of modifications include interest rate reductions, maturity extensions and modifications to principal amortization including interest only structures. Modified terms are dependent upon the financial position and needs of the individual borrower. If the modification agreement is violated, the loan is handled by the Company’s credit administration group for resolution, which may result in foreclosure in the case of real estate.

TDRs are generally classified as nonaccrual for a minimum period of six months and may qualify for return to accrual status once they have demonstrated performance with the terms of the loan modification.


15

Table of Contents

First Financial had 198 TDRs totaling $35.1 million at March 31, 2013, including $12.8 million on accrual status and $22.3 million classified as nonaccrual. First Financial had $2.7 million of commitments outstanding to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified through TDRs. At March 31, 2013, the allowance for loan and lease losses included reserves of $4.2 million related to TDRs. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, First Financial charged off $0.9 million for the portion of TDRs determined to be uncollectible. Additionally, at March 31, 2013, approximately $4.9 million of the accruing TDRs have been performing in accordance with the restructured terms for more than one year.

First Financial had 145 TDRs totaling $25.0 million at December 31, 2012, including $10.9 million of loans on accrual status and $14.1 million classified as nonaccrual. First Financial had $3.5 million of commitments outstanding to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified through TDRs. At December 31, 2012, the allowance for loan and lease losses included reserves of $3.0 million related to TDRs. For the year ended December 31, 2012, First Financial charged off $7.2 million for the portion of TDRs determined to be uncollectible. At December 31, 2012, approximately $2.7 million of the accruing TDRs had been performing in accordance with the restructured terms for more than one year.

The following tables provide information on loan modifications classified as TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
 
Three months ended
 
March 31, 2013
 
March 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
Number of loans
 
Pre-modification loan balance
 
Period end balance
 
Number of loans
 
Pre-modification loan balance
 
Period end balance
Commercial
6

 
$
7,568

 
$
7,561

 
8

 
$
4,505

 
$
4,496

Real estate - construction
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

Real estate - commercial
4

 
1,592

 
1,588

 
6

 
3,840

 
3,817

Real estate - residential
21

 
1,373

 
1,320

 
0

 
0

 
0

Installment
8

 
138

 
130

 
0

 
0

 
0

Home equity
24

 
801

 
798

 
0

 
0

 
0

Total
63

 
$
11,472

 
$
11,397

 
14

 
$
8,345

 
$
8,313


 
The following table provides information on how TDRs were modified during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31, (2)
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2013
 
2012
Extended maturities
 
$
8,481

 
$
6,854

Adjusted interest rates
 
568

 
0

Combination of rate and maturity changes
 
98

 
95

Forbearance
 
0

 
1,143

Other (1)
 
2,250

 
221

Total
 
$
11,397

 
$
8,313

(1) Other includes covenant modifications and other concessions or combination of concessions that do not consist of interest rate adjustments, forbearance, and maturity extensions.
(2) Balances are as of period end.

First Financial considers repayment performance as an indication of the effectiveness of the Company's loan modifications. A borrower that is ninety days or more past due on any principal or interest payments for a TDR, or who prematurely terminates a restructured loan agreement without satisfying the contractual principal balance (for example, in a deed-in-lieu arrangement), is considered to be in payment default of the terms of the TDR agreement.


16

Table of Contents

The following table provides information on TDRs for which there was a payment default during the period that occurred within twelve months of the loan modification:
 
 
March 31,
 
 
2013
 
2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Number of Loans
 
Period End Balance
 
Number of Loans
 
Period End Balance
Commercial
 
2
 
$
85

 
0
 
$
0

Real estate - construction
 
0
 
0
 
0
 
0
Real estate - commercial
 
1
 
72
 
0
 
0
Real estate - residential
 
2
 
119
 
0
 
0
Installment
 
1
 
16
 
0
 
0
Home equity
 
1
 
54
 
0
 
0
Total
 
7
 
$
346

 
0
 
$
0


Impaired Loans. Loans placed in nonaccrual status and TDRs are considered impaired. The following table provides information on nonaccrual, TDRs and total impaired loans.
(Dollars in thousands)
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Impaired loans
 
 
 
 
Nonaccrual loans
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
4,044

 
$
10,562

Real estate-construction
 
945

 
950

Real estate-commercial
 
30,311

 
31,002

Real estate-residential
 
4,371

 
5,045

Installment
 
211

 
376

Home equity
 
1,750

 
2,499

Other
 
496

 
496

Nonaccrual loans
 
42,128

 
50,930

Troubled debt restructurings
 
 
 
 
Accruing
 
12,757

 
10,856

Nonaccrual
 
22,324

 
14,111

Total troubled debt restructurings
 
35,081

 
24,967

Total impaired loans
 
$
77,209

 
$
75,897


 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2013
 
2012
Interest income effect on impaired loans
 
 
 
 
Gross amount of interest that would have been recorded under original terms
 
$
1,122

 
$
1,330

Interest included in income
 
 
 
 
Nonaccrual loans
 
72

 
209

Troubled debt restructurings
 
243

 
83

Total interest included in income
 
315

 
292

Net impact on interest income
 
$
807

 
$
1,038

 
 
 
 
 
Commitments outstanding to borrowers with nonaccrual loans
 
$
2,691

 
$
0



17

Table of Contents

First Financial individually reviews all impaired commercial loan relationships greater than $250,000, as well as consumer loan TDRs greater than $100,000, to determine if a specific allowance based on the borrower’s overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support from guarantors and the realizable value of any collateral is necessary. Specific allowances are based on expected cash flows, discounted using the loan's initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans.

First Financial's investment in impaired loans was as follows:
 
 
As of March 31, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Current Balance
 
Contractual
Principal
Balance
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Current
Balance
 
YTD Interest
Income
Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
13,057

 
$
15,119

 
$
0

 
$
14,009

 
$
73

Real estate - construction
 
459

 
669

 
0

 
461

 
0

Real estate - commercial
 
17,620

 
23,114

 
0

 
16,701

 
112

Real estate - residential
 
9,751

 
11,472

 
0

 
9,487

 
35

Installment
 
412

 
451

 
0

 
432

 
2

Home equity
 
3,244

 
3,904

 
0

 
3,248

 
11

Other
 
326

 
326

 
0

 
326

 
0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans with an allowance recorded
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
6,336

 
7,032

 
2,596

 
4,948

 
45

Real estate - construction
 
1,635

 
2,168

 
832

 
1,637

 
7

Real estate - commercial
 
22,150

 
25,035

 
6,352

 
23,082

 
21

Real estate - residential
 
1,948

 
1,997

 
290

 
1,952

 
9

Installment
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

Home equity
 
101

 
101

 
2

 
101

 
0

Other
 
170

 
170

 
92

 
170

 
0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial
 
19,393

 
22,151

 
2,596

 
18,957

 
118

Real estate - construction
 
2,094

 
2,837

 
832

 
2,098

 
7

Real estate - commercial
 
39,770

 
48,149

 
6,352

 
39,783

 
133

Real estate - residential
 
11,699

 
13,469

 
290

 
11,439

 
44

Installment
 
412

 
451

 
0

 
432

 
2

Home equity
 
3,345

 
4,005

 
2

 
3,349

 
11

Other
 
496

 
496

 
92

 
496

 
0

Total
 
$
77,209

 
$
91,558

 
$
10,164

 
$
76,554

 
$
315



18

Table of Contents

 
 
As of December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Current
Balance
 
Contractual
Principal
Balance
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Current
Balance
 
Interest
Income
Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
14,961

 
$
17,269

 
$
0

 
$
9,337

 
$
215

Real estate - construction
 
462

 
672

 
0

 
3,857

 
15

Real estate - commercial
 
15,782

 
21,578

 
0

 
15,554

 
277

Real estate - residential
 
9,222

 
10,817

 
0

 
8,463

 
81

Installment
 
452

 
556

 
0

 
452

 
2

Home equity
 
3,251

 
4,132

 
0

 
2,423

 
19

Other
 
326

 
326

 
0

 
65

 
0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans with an allowance recorded
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
3,560

 
4,252

 
1,151

 
5,350

 
161

Real estate - construction
 
1,640

 
2,168

 
838

 
5,033

 
81

Real estate - commercial
 
24,014

 
25,684

 
7,155

 
25,499

 
235

Real estate - residential
 
1,956

 
2,003

 
290

 
2,278

 
38

Installment
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

Home equity
 
101

 
101

 
2

 
81

 
1

Other
 
170

 
170

 
92

 
34

 
0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial
 
18,521

 
21,521

 
1,151

 
14,687

 
376

Real estate - construction
 
2,102

 
2,840

 
838

 
8,890

 
96

Real estate - commercial
 
39,796

 
47,262

 
7,155

 
41,053

 
512

Real estate - residential
 
11,178

 
12,820

 
290

 
10,741

 
119

Installment
 
452

 
556

 
0

 
452

 
2

Home equity
 
3,352

 
4,233

 
2

 
2,504

 
20

Other
 
496

 
496

 
92

 
99

 
0

Total
 
$
75,897

 
$
89,728

 
$
9,528

 
$
78,426

 
$
1,125


OREO. Other real estate owned (OREO) is comprised of properties acquired by the Company through the loan foreclosure or repossession process, or other resolution activity that results in partial or total satisfaction of problem loans. The acquired properties are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs of disposal (net realizable value) upon acquisition. Losses arising at the time of acquisition of such properties are charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Subsequent write-downs in the carrying value of OREO properties are expensed as incurred. Improvements to the properties may be capitalized if the improvements contribute to the overall value of the property, but may not be capitalized in excess of the net realizable value of the property.


19

Table of Contents

Changes in OREO were as follows:
 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2013
 
2012
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
12,526

 
$
11,317

Additions
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
557

 
4,541

Residential
 
147

 
922

Total additions
 
704

 
5,463

Disposals
 
 

 
 
Commercial
 
241

 
462

Residential
 
294

 
299

Total disposals
 
535

 
761

Write-downs
 
 

 
 
Commercial
 
405

 
958

Residential
 
297

 
25

Total write-downs
 
702

 
983

Balance at end of period
 
$
11,993

 
$
15,036


NOTE 9:  COVERED LOANS

Loans acquired in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-assisted transactions initially covered under loss sharing agreements whereby the FDIC will reimburse First Financial for the majority of any losses incurred are referred to as covered loans. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, covered loans are subject to a stated loss threshold, as outlined in each loss sharing agreement, whereby the FDIC will reimburse First Financial for 80% of losses up to a stated loss threshold, and 95% of losses in excess of the threshold. First Financial will reimburse the FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid First Financial a reimbursement under the loss sharing agreement. The FDIC’s obligation to reimburse First Financial for losses with respect to covered loans began with the first dollar of loss incurred.

First Financial accounts for the majority of covered loans under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, except loans with revolving privileges, which are outside the scope of this guidance, and loans for which cash flows could not be estimated, which are accounted for under the cost recovery method. Loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 are referred to as purchased impaired loans.

Purchased impaired loans are not classified as nonperforming assets as the loans are considered to be performing under FASB ASC Topic 310-30. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying value of the loans and the expected cash flows (accretable difference) is recognized on all covered purchased impaired loans.


20

Table of Contents

The following table reflects the carrying value of all covered purchased impaired and nonimpaired covered loans:
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Loans
accounted
for under
FASB ASC
Topic 310-30
 
Loans
excluded
from FASB
ASC Topic
310-30
 
Total
purchased
loans
 
Loans
accounted
for under
FASB ASC
Topic 310-30
 
Loans
excluded
from FASB
ASC Topic
310-30
 
Total
purchased
loans
Commercial
 
$
83,262

 
$
7,162

 
$
90,424

 
$
94,775

 
$
7,351

 
$
102,126

Real estate - construction
 
9,866

 
0

 
9,866

 
10,631

 
0

 
10,631

Real estate - commercial
 
419,177

 
6,773

 
425,950

 
458,066

 
7,489

 
465,555

Real estate - residential
 
95,991

 
0

 
95,991

 
100,694

 
0

 
100,694

Installment
 
6,938

 
702

 
7,640

 
7,911

 
763

 
8,674

Home equity
 
1,706

 
53,315

 
55,021

 
2,080

 
55,378

 
57,458

Other covered loans
 
0

 
2,906

 
2,906

 
0

 
2,978

 
2,978

Total covered loans
 
$
616,940

 
$
70,858

 
$
687,798

 
$
674,157

 
$
73,959

 
$
748,116


The balance of all loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, including all contractual principal, interest, fees and penalties, was $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. These balances include $237.0 million and $220.4 million of contractual interest not yet accrued as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Changes in the carrying amount of accretable difference for covered purchased impaired loans were as follows:
 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2013
 
2012
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
224,694

 
$
344,410

Reclassification from nonaccretable difference
 
7,751

 
14,384

Accretion
 
(17,947
)
 
(25,919
)
Other net activity (1)
 
(5,828
)
 
(19,206
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
208,670

 
$
313,669

 (1) Includes the impact of loan repayments and charge-offs.

First Financial regularly reviews its forecast of expected cash flows for covered purchased impaired loans. The Company recognized improvement in the cash flow expectations related to certain loan pools resulting in the reclassification from nonaccretable to accretable difference during the first quarter of 2013 of $7.8 million. Similarly, the Company reclassified $14.4 million from nonaccretable to accretable difference during the first quarter of 2012. These reclassifications resulted in yield adjustments on the related loan pools on a prospective basis. The Company also recognized declines in the cash flow expectations of certain loan pools. Any decline in expected cash flows for a pool of loans is considered impairment and recorded as provision expense, and a related allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans, on a discounted basis during the period. Improved cash flow expectations for loan pools that were impaired during prior periods is first recorded as a reversal of previously recorded impairment and then as an increase in prospective yield when all previously recorded impairment has been recaptured. For further detail on impairment and provision expense related to covered purchased impaired loans, see "Covered Loans" in Note 10 - Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses.


21

Table of Contents

Credit Quality. For further discussion of First Financial's monitoring of credit quality for commercial and consumer loans, including discussion of the risk attributes noted below, please see Note 8 - Loans, excluding covered loans.

Covered commercial and consumer credit exposure by risk attribute was as follows:
 
 
As of March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
Commercial
 
Total
Pass
 
$
43,544

 
$
1,608

 
$
209,130

 
$
254,282

Special Mention
 
10,071

 
1

 
49,927

 
59,999

Substandard
 
34,823

 
8,257

 
166,893

 
209,973

Doubtful
 
1,986

 
0

 
0

 
1,986

Total
 
$
90,424

 
$
9,866


$
425,950

 
$
526,240


(Dollars in thousands)
 
Real estate
residential
 
Installment
 
Home equity
 
Other
 
Total
Performing
 
$
95,991

 
$
7,640

 
$
52,906

 
$
2,893

 
$
159,430

Nonperforming
 
0

 
0

 
2,115

 
13

 
2,128

Total
 
$
95,991

 
$
7,640

 
$
55,021

 
$
2,906

 
$
161,558


 
 
As of December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
Commercial
 
Total
Pass
 
$
48,213

 
$
2,304

 
$
213,143

 
$
263,660

Special Mention
 
16,293

 
7

 
70,894

 
87,194

Substandard
 
35,596

 
8,320

 
181,345

 
225,261

Doubtful
 
2,024

 
0

 
173

 
2,197

Total
 
$
102,126

 
$
10,631

 
$
465,555

 
$
578,312


(Dollars in thousands)
 
Real estate
residential
 
Installment
 
Home
equity
 
Other
 
Total
Performing
 
$
100,694

 
$
8,674

 
$
53,231

 
$
2,967

 
$
165,566

Nonperforming
 
0

 
0

 
4,227

 
11

 
4,238

Total
 
$
100,694

 
$
8,674

 
$
57,458

 
$
2,978

 
$
169,804


Delinquency. Covered loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or any portion thereof remains unpaid after the due date of the scheduled payment.


22

Table of Contents

Covered loan delinquency, excluding loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, was as follows:

 
As of March 31, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)
30 - 59
days
past due
 
60 - 89
days
past due
 
> 90 days
past due
 
Total
past
due
 
Current
 
Total
 
> 90 days 
past due and
accruing
Loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
0

 
$
33

 
$
2,022

 
$
2,055

 
$
5,107

 
$
7,162

 
$
0

Real estate - commercial
0

 
81

 
1,274

 
1,355

 
5,418

 
6,773

 
0

Installment
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
702

 
702

 
0

Home equity
99

 
343

 
1,614

 
2,056

 
51,259

 
53,315

 
0

All other
11

 
11

 
41

 
63

 
2,843

 
2,906

 
28

Total
$
110

 
$
468

 
$
4,951

 
$
5,529

 
$
65,329

 
$
70,858

 
$
28


 
As of December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
30 - 59
days
past due
 
60 - 89
days
past due
 
> 90 days
past due
 
Total
past
due
 
Current
 
Total
 
> 90 days 
past due and
accruing
Loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
351

 
$
148

 
$
3,781

 
$
4,280

 
$
3,071

 
$
7,351

 
$
0

Real estate - commercial
138

 
1,149

 
2,201

 
3,488

 
4,001

 
7,489

 
0

Installment
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
763

 
763

 
0

Home equity
286

 
296

 
3,697

 
4,279

 
51,099

 
55,378

 
0

All other
19

 
26

 
42

 
87

 
2,891

 
2,978

 
31

Total
$
794

 
$
1,619

 
$
9,721

 
$
12,134

 
$
61,825

 
$
73,959

 
$
31


Nonaccrual. Covered purchased impaired loans are classified as performing, even though they may be contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the periodic re-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period covered loan loss provision or prospective yield adjustments.

Similar to uncovered loans, covered loans accounted for outside FASB ASC Topic 310-30 are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful or when principal or interest payments are 90 days or more past due. Generally, these loans are placed on nonaccrual status due to the continued failure to adhere to contractual payment terms by the borrower coupled with other pertinent factors, such as insufficient collateral value. The accrual of interest income is discontinued and previously accrued, but unpaid interest is reversed when a loan is placed in nonaccrual status. Any payments received while a loan is in nonaccrual status are applied as a reduction to the carrying value of the loan. A loan may be returned to accrual status if all contractual payments have been received and collection of future principal and interest payments is no longer doubtful.

Information on covered nonaccrual loans was as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Nonaccrual loans
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
2,097

 
$
4,498

Real estate-commercial
 
1,282

 
2,986

Home equity
 
2,115

 
4,227

All other
 
13

 
11

Total
 
$
5,507

 
$
11,722



23

Table of Contents

 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2013
 
2012
Interest income effect on impaired loans
 
 
 
 
Gross amount of interest that would have been recorded under original terms
 
$
138

 
$
208

Interest included in income
 
7

 
48

Net impact on interest income
 
$
131

 
$
160


Impaired Loans. Covered loans placed in nonaccrual status, excluding loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, are considered impaired. First Financial’s investment in covered impaired loans, excluding loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, was as follows:

 
 
As of March 31, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Current Balance
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
YTD Interest
Income
Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
2,097

 
$
4,345

 
$
0

 
$
3,298

 
$
3

Real estate - commercial
 
1,282

 
2,673

 
0

 
2,134

 
1

Home equity
 
2,115

 
3,342

 
0

 
3,171

 
3

All other
 
13

 
13

 
0

 
12

 
0

Total
 
$
5,507

 
$
10,373

 
$
0

 
$
8,615

 
$
7


 
 
As of December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Current Balance
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Interest
Income
Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
4,498

 
$
4,660

 
$
0

 
$
4,526

 
$
62

Real estate - commercial
 
2,986

 
3,216

 
0

 
2,153

 
18

Home equity
 
4,227

 
5,260

 
0

 
2,006

 
5

All other
 
11

 
11

 
0

 
13

 
0

Total
 
$
11,722

 
$
13,147

 
$
0

 
$
8,698

 
$
85


Covered OREO. Covered OREO is comprised of properties acquired by the Company through the loan foreclosure or repossession process, or other resolution activities that result in partial or total satisfaction of problem covered loans. These properties remain subject to loss sharing agreements whereby the FDIC reimburses First Financial for the majority of any losses incurred. The acquired properties are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value upon acquisition. Losses arising at the time of acquisition of such properties are charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Subsequent write-downs in the carrying value of covered OREO properties are expensed as incurred. Estimated reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to any losses upon acquisition or subsequent write-downs in the carrying value of covered OREO are recorded as noninterest income and an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset in the same period. Improvements to the properties may be capitalized if the improvements contribute to the overall value of the property, but may not be capitalized in excess of the net realizable value of the property.


24

Table of Contents

Changes in covered OREO were as follows:

 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2013
 
2012
Balance at beginning of period
$
28,862

 
$
44,818

Additions
 
 
 
Commercial
6,462

 
2,750

Residential
216

 
2,624

Total additions
6,678

 
5,374

Disposals
 
 
 
Commercial
4,621

 
5,005

Residential
344

 
543

Total disposals
4,965

 
5,548

Write-downs
 
 
 
Commercial
1,125

 
3,084

Residential
105

 
71

Total write-downs
1,230

 
3,155

Balance at end of period
$
29,345

 
$
41,489


NOTE 10:  ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES

Loans - excluding covered loans. For each reporting period, management maintains the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that it considers sufficient to absorb probable loan and lease losses inherent in the portfolio. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on historical loss experience as well as other significant factors such as composition of the portfolio, economic conditions, geographic footprint, the results of periodic internal and external evaluations of delinquent, nonaccrual and classified loans and any other adverse situations that may affect a specific borrower's ability to repay (including the timing of future payments). This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires utilizing material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change.

In the commercial portfolio, which includes commercial loans, construction and commercial real estate loans and lease financing, impaired loan relationships greater than $250,000 are evaluated to determine the need for a specific allowance based on the borrower's overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support from guarantors and the realizable value of any collateral. Loans are considered impaired when, in the judgment of management, based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected.

The allowance for non-impaired commercial loans and impaired commercial loan relationships less than $250,000 includes a process of estimating the probable losses inherent in the portfolio by category, based on First Financial's internal system of credit risk ratings and historical loss data. These estimates may also be adjusted for management's estimate of probable losses on specific loan types dependent upon trends in the values of the underlying collateral, delinquent and nonaccrual loans, prevailing economic conditions, changes in lending strategies and other influencing factors.

With the exception of loans modified as TDRs, consumer loans are evaluated by loan type (i.e. residential real estate, installment, etc.), as these loans exhibit homogeneous characteristics. The allowance for consumer loans, which includes residential real estate, installment, home equity, credit card loans and overdrafts, is established by estimating losses inherent in each particular category of consumer loans. The estimate of losses is primarily based on historical loss rates for each category, as well as trends in delinquent and nonaccrual loans, prevailing economic conditions and other significant influencing factors. Consumer loans modified as TDRs greater than $100,000 are individually reviewed to determine if a specific allowance is necessary.

There were no material changes to First Financial's accounting policies or methodology related to the allowance for loan and lease losses during the first three months of 2013, however certain modifications were made to the estimation process in the third quarter of 2012 to place greater emphasis on quantitative factors such as historical loan losses and less emphasis on qualitative factors. This resulted in a shift in the allocation of the allowance between certain consumer and commercial loan types but had no significant impact on the total allowance for loan and lease losses at March 31, 2013.

25

Table of Contents


The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and decreased by actual charge-offs, net of recoveries of amounts previously charged-off. First Financial's policy is to charge-off all or a portion of a loan when, in management's opinion, it is unlikely to collect the principal amount owed in full either through payments from the borrower or from the liquidation of collateral.

Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the previous five quarters are presented in the table that follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
2013
 
2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Mar. 31,
 
Dec. 31,
 
Sep. 30,
 
June 30,
 
Mar. 31,
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
47,777

 
$
49,192

 
$
50,952

 
$
49,437

 
$
52,576

Provision for loan and lease losses
 
3,041

 
3,882

 
3,613

 
8,364

 
3,258

Loans charged off
 
(3,210
)
 
(5,548
)
 
(5,804
)
 
(7,138
)
 
(6,822
)
Recoveries
 
698

 
251

 
431

 
289

 
425

Balance at end of period
 
$
48,306

 
$
47,777

 
$
49,192

 
$
50,952

 
$
49,437

Allowance for loan and lease losses to total ending loans
 
1.49
%
 
1.50
%
 
1.60
%
 
1.69
%
 
1.67
%

Year-to-date changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses by loan category were as follows:
  
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
Commercial
 
Residential
 
Installment
 
Home Equity
 
Other
 
Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
7,926

 
$
3,268

 
$
24,151

 
$
3,599

 
$
522

 
$
5,173

 
$
3,138

 
$
47,777

Provision for loan and lease losses
 
1,620

 
(296
)
 
457

 
365

 
(38
)
 
848

 
85

 
3,041

Gross charge-offs
 
781

 
0

 
995

 
223

 
100

 
701

 
410

 
3,210

Recoveries
 
319

 
136

 
39

 
4

 
77

 
52

 
71

 
698

Total net charge-offs
 
462

 
(136
)
 
956

 
219

 
23

 
649

 
339

 
2,512

Ending allowance for loan and lease losses
 
$
9,084

 
$
3,108

 
$
23,652

 
$
3,745

 
$
461

 
$
5,372

 
$
2,884

 
$
48,306

Ending allowance on loans individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
2,596

 
$
832

 
$
6,352

 
$
290

 
$
0

 
$
2

 
$
92

 
$
10,164

Ending allowance on loans collectively evaluated for impairment
 
6,488

 
2,276

 
17,300

 
3,455

 
461

 
5,370

 
2,792

 
38,142

Ending allowance for loan and lease losses
 
$
9,084

 
$
3,108

 
$
23,652

 
$
3,745

 
$
461

 
$
5,372

 
$
2,884

 
$
48,306

Loans - excluding covered loans
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
17,612

 
$
2,068

 
$
35,828

 
$
3,953

 
$
0

 
$
525

 
$
496

 
$
60,482

Ending balance of loans collectively evaluated for impairment
 
874,769

 
85,474

 
1,397,354

 
326,307

 
53,509

 
365,418

 
85,525

 
3,188,356

Total loans - excluding covered loans
 
$
892,381

 
$
87,542

 
$
1,433,182

 
$
330,260

 
$
53,509

 
$
365,943

 
$
86,021

 
$
3,248,838



26

Table of Contents

 
 
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
Commercial
 
Residential
 
Installment
 
Home Equity
 
Other
 
Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
10,289

 
$
4,424

 
$
18,228

 
$
4,994

 
$
1,659

 
$
10,751

 
$
2,231

 
$
52,576

Provision for loan and lease losses
 
1,556

 
1,528

 
16,670

 
346

 
(883
)
 
(2,032
)
 
1,932

 
19,117

Gross charge-offs
 
4,312

 
2,684

 
11,012

 
1,814

 
577

 
3,661

 
1,252

 
25,312

Recoveries
 
393

 
0

 
265

 
73

 
323

 
115

 
227

 
1,396

Total net charge-offs
 
3,919

 
2,684

 
10,747

 
1,741

 
254

 
3,546

 
1,025

 
23,916

Ending allowance for loan and lease losses
 
$
7,926

 
$
3,268

 
$
24,151

 
$
3,599

 
$
522

 
$
5,173

 
$
3,138

 
$
47,777

Ending allowance on loans individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
1,151

 
$
838

 
$
7,155

 
$
290

 
$
0

 
$
2

 
$
92

 
$
9,528

Ending allowance on loans collectively evaluated for impairment
 
6,775

 
2,430

 
16,996

 
3,309

 
522

 
5,171

 
3,046

 
38,249

Ending allowance for loan and lease losses
 
$
7,926

 
$
3,268

 
$
24,151

 
$
3,599

 
$
522

 
$
5,173

 
$
3,138

 
$
47,777

Loans - excluding covered loans
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
16,661

 
$
2,076

 
$
35,422

 
$
2,604

 
$
0

 
$
101

 
$
496

 
$
57,360

Ending balance of loans collectively evaluated for impairment
 
844,372

 
71,441

 
1,381,586

 
315,606

 
56,810

 
367,399

 
84,490

 
3,121,704

Total loans - excluding covered loans
 
$
861,033

 
$
73,517

 
$
1,417,008

 
$
318,210

 
$
56,810

 
$
367,500

 
$
84,986

 
$
3,179,064


Covered Loans. In accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, there was no allowance brought forward on covered loans as any credit deterioration evident in the loans at the time of acquisition was included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date.

The majority of covered loans are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, whereby First Financial is required to periodically re-estimate the expected cash flows on the loans. For purposes of applying the guidance under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, First Financial grouped acquired loans into pools based on common risk characteristics. Generally, a decline in expected cash flows for a pool of loans is referred to as impairment and recorded as provision expense, and a related allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans, on a discounted basis during the period. Estimated reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to any declines in expected cash flows for a pool of loans are recorded as noninterest income and an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset in the same period. Improvement in expected cash flows for a pool of loans, once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured, is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the yield on the loans in the pool and a related adjustment to the yield on the FDIC indemnification asset.

First Financial performs periodic valuation procedures to re-estimate the expected cash flows on covered loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 and compare the present value of expected cash flows to the carrying value of the loans at the pool level. In order to estimate expected cash flows, First Financial specifically reviews a sample of these covered loans to assist in the determination of appropriate probability of default and loss given default assumptions to be applied to the remainder of the portfolio. The estimate of expected cash flows may also be adjusted for management's estimate of probable losses on specific loan types dependent upon trends in observable market and industry data, such as prepayment speeds and collateral values. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.

First Financial updated the valuations related to covered loans during the first quarter of 2013, and as a result of impairment in certain loan pools, recognized total provision expense of $9.0 million and realized net charge-offs of $8.7 million during the quarter, resulting in an allowance for covered loan losses of $45.5 million as of March 31, 2013. For the first quarter of 2012, First Financial recognized provision expense on covered loans of $13.0 million related to net charge-offs of $9.6 million during the period.  Additionally, the Company recognized loss sharing expenses of $2.1 million and $3.0 million for the first quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively, primarily related to attorney fees and delinquent taxes during the periods.  The receivable due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to covered loan provision expenses, losses on covered OREO and loss sharing expenses of $8.9 million for the first quarter of 2013 and $12.8 million for the first quarter of 2012, was recognized as FDIC loss sharing income and a corresponding increase to the FDIC indemnification asset. 


27

Table of Contents

The allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans is presented in the tables below:
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Commercial
 
Commercial
 
Residential
 
Installment
 
Total
Ending allowance on loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (ASC 310-30)
 
$
15,362

 
$
26,391

 
$
3,384

 
$
359

 
$
45,496

Ending allowance on acquired loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

Ending allowance on covered loans
 
$
15,362

 
$
26,391

 
$
3,384

 
$
359

 
$
45,496


 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
Real Estate
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Commercial
 
Commercial
 
Residential
 
Installment
 
Total
Ending allowance on loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (ASC 310-30)
 
$
19,136

 
$
22,918

 
$
2,599

 
$
537

 
$
45,190

Ending allowance on acquired loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30
 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

Ending allowance on covered loans
 
$
19,136

 
$
22,918

 
$
2,599

 
$
537

 
$
45,190


Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans for the previous five quarters were as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
2013
 
2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Mar. 31,
 
Dec. 31,
 
Sep. 30,
 
June 30,
 
Mar. 31,
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
45,190

 
$
48,895

 
$
48,327

 
$
46,156

 
$
42,835

Provision for loan and lease losses
 
9,042

 
5,283

 
6,622

 
6,047

 
12,951

Loans charged-off
 
(9,684
)
 
(9,568
)
 
(9,058
)
 
(5,163
)
 
(10,118
)
Recoveries
 
948

 
580

 
3,004

 
1,287

 
488

Balance at end of period
 
$
45,496

 
$
45,190

 
$
48,895

 
$
48,327

 
$
46,156


NOTE 11:  INCOME TAXES

For the first quarter 2013, income tax expense was $6.4 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 31.5%, compared with income tax expense of $9.6 million and an effective tax rate of 36.2% for the first quarter 2012. The decrease in the effective tax rate during the first quarter 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily the result of higher income earned on tax-exempt investment securities as well as a favorable tax reversal related to an intercompany tax obligation associated with an unconsolidated former Irwin subsidiary.

At March 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, First Financial had no FASB ASC Topic 740-10 unrecognized tax benefits recorded.  First Financial does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase within the next twelve months.

First Financial recognizes interest and penalties on income tax assessments or income tax refunds in the Consolidated Financial Statements as a component of noninterest expense.

First Financial regularly reviews its tax positions and establishes reserves for income tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether it is more likely than not that the tax uncertainty would be sustained upon challenge by the appropriate tax authorities which would then result in additional taxes, penalties and interest due.  These evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates and may be susceptible to significant change.  Provision for tax reserves, if any, is included in income tax expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management determined that no reserve for income tax-related uncertainties was necessary as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.


28

Table of Contents

First Financial and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as state and local income tax in several jurisdictions.  Tax years prior to 2010 have been closed and are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations. Tax years 2010 and 2011 remain open to examination by the federal taxing authority.

First Financial is no longer subject to state and local income tax examinations for years prior to 2009.  Tax years 2009 through 2011 remain open to state and local examination in various jurisdictions.

NOTE 12:  EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

First Financial sponsors a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees and uses a December 31 measurement date for its defined benefit pension plan.

First Financial made no cash contributions to fund the pension plan in 2012 and does not expect to make cash contributions to its pension plan in 2013.  As a result of the plan’s actuarial projections for 2013, First Financial recorded expense related to its pension plan in the first three months of 2013 of $15 thousand, compared to income of $0.1 million for the same period in 2012.

The following table sets forth information concerning amounts recognized in First Financial’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Income:
 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2013
 
2012
Service cost
 
$
975

 
$
832

Interest cost
 
619

 
690

Expected return on assets
 
(2,294
)
 
(2,235
)
Amortization of prior service cost
 
(105
)
 
(105
)
Net actuarial loss
 
820

 
675

     Net periodic benefit cost (income)
 
$
15

 
$
(143
)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2013
 
2012
Net actuarial loss
 
$
820

 
$
675

Amortization of prior service cost
 
(105
)
 
(105
)
Deferred tax liabilities
 
(270
)
 
(215
)
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
 
$
445

 
$
355



29

Table of Contents

NOTE 13:  FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Fair Value Measurement
The fair value framework as disclosed in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure Topic of FASB ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments (Fair Value Topic) includes a hierarchy which focuses on prioritizing the inputs used in valuation techniques.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), a lower priority to observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 2) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).  When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, First Financial looks to active markets to price identical assets or liabilities whenever possible and classifies such items in Level 1.  When identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, First Financial looks to observable market data for similar assets and liabilities and classifies such items as Level 2.  Certain assets and liabilities are not actively traded in observable markets and First Financial must use alternative techniques, based on unobservable inputs, to determine the fair value and classifies such items as Level 3. The level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant in the fair value measurement.

The following methods, assumptions and valuation techniques were used by First Financial to measure different financial assets and liabilities at fair value and in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments.

Cash and short-term investments. The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and short-term investments, such as federal funds sold, approximated the fair value of those instruments. The Company classifies cash and short-term investments in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

Investment securities. Investment securities classified as trading and available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.  Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1).  If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar investment securities.  First Financial compiles prices from various sources who may apply such techniques as matrix pricing to determine the value of identical or similar investment securities (Level 2).  Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique widely used in the banking industry to value investment securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific investment securities but rather relying on the investment securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted investment securities.  Any investment securities not valued based upon the methods above are considered Level 3.

First Financial utilizes information provided by a third-party investment securities administrator in analyzing the investment securities portfolio in accordance with the fair value hierarchy of the Fair Value Topic.  The administrator’s evaluation of investment security portfolio pricing is performed using a combination of prices and data from other sources, along with internally developed matrix pricing models and assistance from the administrator’s internal fixed income analysts and trading desk.  The administrator’s month-end pricing process includes a series of quality assurance activities where prices are compared to recent market conditions, previous evaluation prices and between the various pricing services.  These processes produce a series of quality assurance reports on which price exceptions are identified, reviewed and where appropriate, securities are repriced.  In the event of a materially different price, the administrator will report the variance as a “price challenge” and review the pricing methodology in detail.  The results of the quality assurance process are incorporated into the selection of pricing providers by the portfolio manager.

First Financial reviews the pricing methodologies utilized by the administrator to ensure the fair value determination is consistent with the applicable accounting guidance and that the investments are properly classified in the fair value hierarchy. Further, the Company periodically validates the fair values for a sample of securities in the portfolio by comparing the fair values provided by the administrator to prices from other independent sources for the same or similar securities. First Financial analyzes unusual or significant variances, conducts additional research with the administrator, if necessary, and takes appropriate action based on its findings.

Loans held for sale. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.  These loans currently consist of one-to-four family residential real estate loans originated for sale to qualified third parties.  Fair value is based on the contractual price to be received from these third parties, which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2).  As such, First Financial records any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis.  Gains and losses on the sale of loans are recorded as net gains from sales of loans within noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Loans - excluding covered loans. The fair value of commercial, commercial real estate, residential real estate and consumer loans were estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities or repricing frequency.  The Company classifies the estimated fair value of uncovered loans as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

30

Table of Contents


Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected.  Impaired loans are valued at the lower of cost or fair value for purposes of determining the appropriate amount of impairment to be allocated to the allowance for loan and lease losses.  Fair value is generally measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans.  Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable.  The vast majority of the collateral is real estate.  The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed third party appraiser (Level 3). The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable borrower financial statements if not considered significant.  Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on borrower financial statement balances or aging reports on a discounted basis as appropriate (Level 3).  Impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan and lease losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan and lease losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Covered loans. Fair values for covered loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considered factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of the loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing and a discount rate reflecting the Company's assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. These covered loans are grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. First Financial estimated the cash flows expected to be collected on these loans based upon the expected remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.

Fair values for covered loans accounted for outside of FASB ASC Topic 310-30 were estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities or repricing frequency. The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value.

The Company classifies the estimated fair value of covered loans as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

FDIC indemnification asset. The accounting for FDIC indemnification assets is closely related to the accounting for the underlying, indemnified assets. Fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentages. First Financial re-estimates the expected indemnification asset cash flows in conjunction with the periodic re-estimation of cash flows on covered loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30. Improvements in cash flow expectations on covered loans generally result in a related decline in the expected indemnification cash flows while declines in cash flow expectations on covered loans generally result in an increase in expected indemnification cash flows.

The expected cash flows are discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss sharing reimbursement from the FDIC. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of the indemnification asset as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Deposit liabilities. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money-market deposits was the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.  The carrying amounts for variable-rate certificates of deposit approximated their fair values at the reporting date.  The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit was estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation which applies the interest rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.  The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of deposit liabilities as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Borrowings. The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.  The Company classifies the estimated fair value of short-term borrowings as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of long-term debt is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation which utilizes the interest rates currently offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities.  Third-party valuations are used for long-term debt with embedded options, such as call features. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of long-term debt as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.


31

Table of Contents

Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Pricing of these financial instruments is based on the credit quality and relationship, fees, interest rates, probability of funding and compensating balance and other covenants or requirements.  Loan commitments generally have fixed expiration dates, are variable rate and contain termination and other clauses which provide for relief from funding in the event that there is a significant deterioration in the credit quality of the client.  Many loan commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon.  The rates and terms of the commitments to extend credit and the standby letters of credit are competitive with those in First Financial’s market area.  The carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of the fair value of these financial instruments.  Carrying amounts, which are comprised of the
unamortized fee income and, where necessary, reserves for any expected credit losses from these financial instruments, are immaterial.

Derivatives. The fair values of derivative instruments are based primarily on a net present value calculation of the cash flows related to the interest rate swaps at the reporting date, using primarily observable market inputs such as interest rate yield curves.  The discounted net present value calculated represents the cost to terminate the swap if First Financial should choose to do so. Additionally, First Financial utilizes a vendor-developed, proprietary model to value the credit risk component of both the derivative assets and liabilities.  The credit valuation adjustment is recorded as an adjustment to the fair value of the derivative asset or liability on the reporting date. Derivative instruments are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.


32

Table of Contents

The estimated fair values of First Financial’s financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis in the consolidated financial statements were as follows:
 
Carrying
Estimated Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)
value
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and short-term investments
$
107,419

$
107,419

$
107,419

$
0

$
0

Investment securities held-to-maturity
716,214

723,226

0

723,226

0

Other investments
75,375

75,375

0

75,375

0

Loans held for sale
28,126

28,126

0

28,126

0

Loans - excluding covered loans
3,200,532

3,197,264

0

0

3,197,264

Covered loans
642,302

658,010

0

0

658,010

FDIC indemnification asset
112,428

100,882

0

0

100,882

 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
 
 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing
$
1,056,409

$
1,056,409

$
0

$
1,056,409

$
0

Interest-bearing demand
1,113,940

1,113,940

0

1,113,940

0

Savings
1,620,874

1,620,874

0

1,620,874

0

Time
1,030,124

1,032,099

0

1,032,099

0

Total deposits
4,821,347

4,823,322

0

4,823,322

0

Short-term borrowings
633,063

633,063

633,063

0

0

Long-term debt
74,498

77,641

0

77,641

0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Carrying
Estimated Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)
value
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and short-term investments
$
158,843

$
158,843

$
158,843

$
0

$
0

Investment securities held-to-maturity
770,755

778,474

0

778,474

0

Other investments
71,492

71,492

0

71,492

0

Loans held for sale
16,256

16,256

0

16,256

0

Loans - excluding covered loans
3,131,287

3,145,120

0

0

3,145,120

Covered loans
702,926

713,797

0

0

713,797

FDIC indemnification asset
119,607

106,380

0

0

106,380

 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
 
 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing
$
1,102,774

$
1,102,774

$
0

$
1,102,774

$
0

Interest-bearing demand
1,160,815

1,160,815

0

1,160,815

0

Savings
1,623,614

1,623,614

0

1,623,614

0

Time
1,068,637

1,072,201

0

1,072,201

0

Total deposits
4,955,840

4,959,404

0

4,959,404

0

Short-term borrowings
624,570

624,570

624,570

0

0

Long-term debt
75,202

78,941

0

78,941

0



33

Table of Contents

The financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated financial statements were as follows:
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Netting
Adjustments (1)
 
Assets/Liabilities
at Fair Value
March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
$
0

 
$
21,557

 
$
0

 
$
(21,557
)
 
$
0

Available-for-sale investment securities
 
186

 
951,853

 
0

 
0

 
952,039

Total
 
$
186

 
$
973,410

 
$
0

 
$
(21,557
)
 
$
952,039

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Derivatives
 
$
0

 
$
23,689

 
$
0

 
$
(21,557
)
 
$
2,132


 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Netting
Adjustments (1)
 
Assets/Liabilities
at Fair Value
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
$
0

 
$
24,135

 
$
0

 
$
(24,135
)
 
$
0

Available-for-sale investment securities
 
144

 
1,031,952

 
0

 
0

 
1,032,096

Total
 
$
144

 
$
1,056,087

 
$
0

 
$
(24,135
)
 
$
1,032,096

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Derivatives
 
$
0

 
$
26,652

 
$
0

 
$
(24,135
)
 
$
2,517


(1) Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting arrangements that allow First Financial to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral held with the same counterparties.


34

Table of Contents

Certain financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  Adjustments to the fair market value of these assets usually result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.  The following table summarizes financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impaired loans (1)
 
$
0

 
$
0

 
$
20,836

OREO
 
0

 
0

 
6,077

Covered OREO
 
0

 
0

 
12,263


 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impaired loans (1)
 
$
0

 
$
0

 
$
19,564

OREO
 
0

 
0

 
5,651

Covered OREO
 
0

 
0

 
14,059


(1) Amounts represent the fair value of collateral for impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan and lease losses.  Fair values are determined using actual market prices (Level 1), independent third party valuations and borrower records, discounted as appropriate (Level 3).


NOTE 14:  ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Shareholders’ equity is affected by transactions and valuations of asset and liability positions that require adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).  The related tax effects allocated to other comprehensive income and reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
 
March 31, 2013
 
Total other comprehensive income
 
Total accumulated
other comprehensive income
(Dollars in thousands)
Prior to
Reclassification
 
Reclassification
from
 
Pre-tax
 
Tax-effect
 
Net of tax
 
Beginning Balance
 
Net Activity
 
Ending Balance
Unrealized gains on investment securities
$
(3,857
)
 
$
1,536

 
$
(5,393
)
 
$
2,036

 
$
(3,357
)
 
$
12,802

 
$
(3,357
)
 
$
9,445

Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges
136

 
(66
)
 
202

 
(76
)
 
126

 
(143
)
 
126

 
(17
)
Retirement obligation
0

 
(715
)
 
715

 
(270
)
 
445

 
(31,338
)
 
445

 
(30,893
)
Foreign currency translation
(12
)
 
0

 
(12
)
 
0

 
(12
)
 
2

 
(12
)
 
(10
)
Total
$
(3,733
)
 
$
755

 
$
(4,488
)
 
$
1,690

 
$
(2,798
)
 
$
(18,677
)
 
$
(2,798
)
 
$
(21,475
)

 
 
March 31, 2012
 
 
Total other comprehensive income
 
Total accumulated
other comprehensive income
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Pre-tax
 
Tax-effect
 
Net of tax
 
Beginning Balance
 
Net Activity
 
Ending Balance
Unrealized gains on investment securities
 
$
3,919

 
$
(1,480
)
 
$
2,439

 
$
12,669

 
$
2,439

 
$
15,108

Retirement obligation
 
570

 
(215
)
 
355

 
(34,136
)
 
355

 
(33,781
)
Foreign currency translation
 
9

 
0

 
9

 
(23
)
 
9

 
(14
)
Total
 
$
4,498

 
$
(1,695
)
 
$
2,803

 
$
(21,490
)
 
$
2,803

 
$
(18,687
)


35

Table of Contents

The following table details the activity reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income during the period:
 
 
March 31, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income *
 
Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Income
Gains and loss on cash flow hedges
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
$
(66
)
 
Interest expense - deposits
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale
 
1,536

 
Gains on sales of investments securities
 
 
 
 
 
Defined benefit pension plan
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost
 
105

 
 
Recognized net actuarial loss
 
(820
)
 
 
Amortization of defined benefit pension items
 
(715
)
 
Salaries and benefits expense
 
 
 
 
 
Total reclassifications for the period, before tax
 
$
755

 
 

* Amounts in parentheses are debits to profit/loss.


NOTE 15:  EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
2013
 
2012
Numerator
 
 
 
 
Net income available to common shareholders
 
$
13,824

 
$
16,994

 
 
 
 
 
Denominator
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per common share - weighted average shares
 
57,439,029

 
57,795,258

Effect of dilutive securities —
 
 
 
 
Employee stock awards
 
744,503

 
957,800

Warrants
 
99,935

 
127,985

Diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares
 
58,283,467

 
58,881,043

 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per share available to common shareholders
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
0.24

 
$
0.29

Diluted
 
$
0.24

 
$
0.29


Warrants to purchase 465,117 shares of the Company's common stock were outstanding as of March 31, 2013 and 2012. These warrants, each representing the right to purchase one share of common stock, no par value per share, have an exercise price of $12.26 and expire on December 23, 2018.

Stock options and warrants, where the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares were not included in the computation of net income per diluted share as they would have been antidilutive.  These out-of-the-money options were 346,765 and 282,163 at March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  


36

Table of Contents

ITEM 2-MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)

Reclassifications of prior period amounts, if applicable, have been made to conform to the current period’s presentation and had no effect on previously reported net income amounts or financial condition.

SUMMARY

First Financial Bancorp. (First Financial or the Company) is a $6.3 billion bank holding company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio.  As of March 31, 2013 First Financial, through its subsidiaries, operated primarily in Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky.  These subsidiaries include a commercial bank, First Financial Bank, N.A. (First Financial Bank or the Bank) with 113 banking centers and 142 ATMs. First Financial conducts three primary activities through its bank subsidiary: commercial banking, retail banking and wealth management.  First Financial Bank provides credit-based products, deposit accounts, corporate cash management support and other services to commercial and retail clients.  Additionally, the Bank provides franchise lending products, primarily equipment and leasehold improvement financing, for select franchisees and concepts in the quick service and casual dining restaurant sector throughout the United States. First Financial Wealth Management provides wealth planning, portfolio management, trust and estate, brokerage and retirement plan services.  

First Financial acquired the banking operations of Peoples Community Bank (Peoples), and Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company and Irwin Union Bank, F.S.B. (collectively, Irwin), through Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-assisted transactions in 2009. The acquisitions of the Peoples and Irwin franchises significantly expanded the First Financial footprint, opened new markets and strengthened the Company through the generation of additional capital.

In connection with the Peoples and Irwin FDIC-assisted transactions, First Financial entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Under the terms of these agreements the FDIC reimburses First Financial for a percentage of losses with respect to certain loans (covered loans) and other real estate owned (covered OREO) (collectively, covered assets). These agreements provide for loss protection on single-family, residential loans for a period of ten years and First Financial is required to share any recoveries of previously charged-off amounts for the same time period, on the same pro-rata basis with the FDIC. All other loans are provided loss protection for a period of five years and recoveries of previously charged-off amounts must be shared with the FDIC for an additional three year period, again on the same pro-rata basis. The FDIC's obligation to reimburse First Financial for losses with respect to covered assets for all three assisted transactions began with the first dollar of loss incurred.

Covered loans represent approximately 17% of First Financial’s loans at March 31, 2013.

MARKET STRATEGY

First Financial serves a combination of metropolitan and non-metropolitan markets in Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky through its full-service banking centers, while providing franchise lending services to borrowers throughout the United States. First Financial’s market selection process includes a number of factors, but markets are primarily chosen for their potential for growth and long-term profitability. First Financial’s goal is to develop a competitive advantage utilizing a local market focus, building long-term relationships with clients to help them reach greater levels of success in their financial life and providing a superior level of service.  First Financial intends to continue to concentrate future growth plans and capital investments in its metropolitan markets.  Smaller markets have historically provided stable, low-cost funding sources to First Financial and remain an important part of its funding base.  

As part of the on-going evaluation of its banking center network, First Financial consolidated ten banking centers located in Ohio and Indiana during the first quarter 2013. These banking center actions allow the Company to focus additional resources in the Cincinnati, Dayton and Indianapolis metropolitan markets. Customer relationships related to the consolidated banking centers were transferred to the nearest First Financial location where those customers continue to receive the same high level of service.

OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS

First quarter 2013 net income was $13.8 million, and earnings per diluted share were $0.24.  This compares with first quarter 2012 net income of $17.0 million and earnings per diluted share of $0.29.


37

Table of Contents

Return on average assets for the first quarter of 2013 was 0.88% compared to 1.05% for the comparable period in 2012.  Return on average shareholders’ equity for the first quarter of 2013 was 7.91% compared to 9.67% for the comparable period in 2012.

A discussion of the first quarter of 2013 results of operations follows.

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income, First Financial’s principal source of income, is the excess of interest received from earning assets over interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.  For analytical purposes, net interest income is also presented in the table that follows, adjusted to a tax equivalent basis assuming a 35% marginal tax rate for interest earned on tax-exempt assets such as municipal loans and investments.  This is to recognize the income tax savings that facilitates a comparison between taxable and tax-exempt assets.  Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest margin and net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis.  Therefore, management believes these measures provide useful information to make peer comparisons.

The majority of First Financial's covered loans are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (FASB ASC Topic 310-30). As such, the Company is required to periodically update its forecast of expected cash flows from these loans. Impairment, as a result of a decrease in expected cash flows, is recognized in the period it is measured as provision expense and has no impact on net interest income or net interest margin. Improvements in expected cash flows are recognized on a prospective basis through an upward adjustment to the yield earned on the portfolio, impacting both net interest income and net interest margin. Impairment and improvement are both partially offset by the impact of changes in the value of the FDIC indemnification asset. Impairment is partially offset by an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset as a result of FDIC loss sharing income and has no impact on net interest income or net interest margin. Improvement, which is reflected as a higher yield on the loans, is partially offset by a lower yield earned on the FDIC indemnification asset until the next periodic valuation of the loans and the indemnification asset. The weighted average yield of the acquired loan portfolio can also be subject to change as loans with higher yields pay down more quickly or slowly than loans with lower yields.
 
Three months ended
 
March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2013
 
2012
Net interest income
$
58,666

 
$
66,689

Tax equivalent adjustment
477

 
218

Net interest income - tax equivalent
$
59,143

 
$
66,907

 
 
 
 
Average earning assets
$
5,887,810

 
$
5,950,151

 
 
 
 
Net interest margin *
4.04
%
 
4.51
%
Net interest margin (fully tax equivalent) *
4.07
%
 
4.52
%
* Margins are calculated using annualized net interest income divided by average earning assets.

Net interest income for the first quarter 2013 was $58.7 million, declining $8.0 million or 12.0% from first quarter 2012 net interest income of $66.7 million. Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the first quarter 2013 was $59.1 million as compared to $66.9 million for the first quarter 2012. Net interest margin was 4.04% for the first quarter 2013 as compared to 4.51% for the first quarter 2012.  The declines in net interest income and net interest margin were primarily related to changes in the composition of the Company's earning assets as well as the current low interest rate environment for loans and investment securities.

The decline in net interest income in the first quarter 2013 as compared to the first quarter 2012 was the result of an $11.6 million or 15.4% decline in total interest income partially offset by a $3.6 million or 42.4% decline in total interest expense. The decline in total interest income resulted from a decline in interest income and fees earned on loans, primarily as a result of continued amortization and paydowns in the Company's high-yielding covered loan portfolio, as well as lower interest income earned on the investment portfolio due to the current low rate environment.

Contributing to the lower interest income earned on loans, and a related decline in net interest margin, was a $295.4 million or 29.0% decline in the average balance of covered loans as compared to the first quarter 2012. Declines in covered loan balances

38

Table of Contents

are a result of payments received, including full payoffs, charge-offs and other loan resolution activities. The decline in covered loan balances was partially offset by growth in lower yielding assets as average uncovered loan balances increased $224.9 million or 7.6% from the first quarter of 2012. Average interest-bearing deposits with other banks also declined $123.3 million or 97.6% from the first quarter of 2012.

While average uncovered loan balances increased from the first quarter 2012 as a result of strong new loan origination activity in recent periods, payoff activity was also elevated. As a result of the low interest rate environment and heightened competition, recent loan originations have been recorded at yields significantly lower than the yields on loans that paid off during the same period, muting the impact of increased balances on interest income earned and net interest margin. Interest income and net interest margin were also negatively impacted, to a lesser extent, by a decline in loan fees.

The decline in total interest income was also due to lower interest income earned on investment securities despite a $174.1 million increase in the average balance of the Company's investment securities portfolio in the first quarter 2013 as compared to the first quarter 2012. The average yield on investment securities declined 59 basis points, to 1.98% in the first quarter 2013 from 2.57% in the first quarter 2012, primarily as a result of elevated prepayment activity related to higher yielding mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and lower reinvestment rates in recent periods.

Interest expense and net interest margin continued to benefit from the impact of deposit pricing and rationalization strategies as the average balance of interest-bearing deposits declined $759.7 million or 16.7% and the cost of funds related to these deposits decreased 27 basis points to 41 basis points for the first quarter 2013 compared to 68 basis points for the comparable quarter in 2012. However, interest expense and net interest margin were also impacted by a $574.7 million increase in the average balance of short-term borrowings for the first quarter 2013 as compared with the comparable quarter in 2012. Short-term borrowings, which are utilized to manage the Company's normal liquidity needs, increased as a result of loan demand as well as deposit rationalization, banking center consolidation and investment portfolio strategies during 2012 and into 2013.

The Consolidated Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Income Analysis that follows are presented on a GAAP basis.


39

Table of Contents

QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS

  
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
March 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Average
Balance
 
Interest
 
Average
Rate
 
Average
Balance
 
Interest
 
Average
Rate
 
Average
Balance
 
Interest
 
Average
Rate
Earning assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
 
$
3,056

 
$
4

 
0.53
%
 
$
5,146

 
$
7

 
0.54
%
 
$
126,330

 
$
89

 
0.28
%
Investment securities
 
1,838,783

 
8,956

 
1.98
%
 
1,746,961

 
8,780

 
1.99
%
 
1,664,643

 
10,651

 
2.57
%
Gross loans including covered loans and indemnification asset (1)
 
4,045,971

 
54,549

 
5.47
%
 
4,027,862

 
58,818

 
5.79
%
 
4,159,178

 
64,357

 
6.21
%
Total earning assets
 
5,887,810

 
63,509

 
4.37
%
 
5,779,969

 
67,605

 
4.64
%
 
5,950,151

 
75,097

 
5.06
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nonearning assets
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and due from banks
 
111,599

 
 

 
 

 
118,619

 
 

 
 

 
123,634

 
 

 
 

Allowance for loan and lease losses
 
(95,512
)
 
 

 
 

 
(98,725
)
 
 

 
 

 
(100,665
)
 
 

 
 

Premises and equipment
 
147,355

 
 

 
 

 
148,047

 
 

 
 

 
140,377

 
 

 
 

Other assets
 
339,797

 
 

 
 

 
346,174

 
 

 
 

 
365,434

 
 

 
 

Total assets
 
$
6,391,049

 
 

 
 

 
$
6,294,084

 
 

 
 

 
$
6,478,931

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing liabilities
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Deposits
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest-bearing
 
$
1,112,664

 
$
325

 
0.12
%
 
$
1,145,800

 
370

 
0.13
%
 
$
1,285,196

 
437

 
0.14
%
Savings
 
1,618,239

 
413

 
0.10
%
 
1,640,427

 
450

 
0.11
%
 
1,682,507

 
615

 
0.15
%
Time
 
1,054,499

 
3,122

 
1.20
%
 
1,126,627

 
3,978

 
1.40
%
 
1,577,448

 
6,664

 
1.69
%
Short-term borrowings
 
660,587

 
329

 
0.20
%
 
363,982

 
159

 
0.17
%
 
85,891

 
12

 
0.06
%
Long-term borrowings
 
74,740

 
654

 
3.55
%
 
75,326

 
672

 
3.54
%
 
76,020

 
680

 
3.59
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
4,520,729

 
4,843

 
0.43
%
 
4,352,162

 
5,629

 
0.51
%
 
4,707,062

 
8,408

 
0.72
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing liabilities and shareholders' equity
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Noninterest-bearing demand
 
1,049,943

 
 

 
 

 
1,112,072

 
 

 
 

 
931,347

 
 

 
 

Other liabilities
 
111,515

 
 

 
 

 
115,477

 
 

 
 

 
133,975

 
 

 
 

Shareholders' equity
 
708,862

 
 

 
 

 
714,373

 
 

 
 

 
706,547

 
 

 
 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
 
$
6,391,049

 
 

 
 

 
$
6,294,084

 
 

 
 

 
$
6,478,931

 
 

 
 

Net interest income
 
 

 
$
58,666

 
 

 
 

 
$
61,976

 
 

 
 

 
$
66,689

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest spread
 
 

 
 

 
3.94
%
 
 

 
 

 
4.13
%
 
 

 
 

 
4.34
%
Contribution of noninterest-bearing sources of funds
 
 

 
 

 
0.10
%
 
 

 
 

 
0.14
%
 
 

 
 

 
0.17
%
Net interest margin (2)
 
 

 
 

 
4.04
%
 
 

 
 

 
4.27
%
 
 

 
 

 
4.51
%
(1)
Nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale are included in average balances.
(2)
Because noninterest-bearing funding sources, demand deposits, other liabilities and shareholders' equity also support earning assets, the net interest margin exceeds the interest spread.

40

Table of Contents

RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS

The impact of changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and interest rates on net interest income is illustrated in the table below:
  
 
Changes for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
 
 
Linked Qtr. Income Variance
 
Comparable Qtr. Income Variance
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Rate
 
Volume
 
Total
 
Rate
 
Volume
 
Total
Earning assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities
 
$
(82
)
 
$
258

 
$
176

 
$
(2,453
)
 
$
758

 
$
(1,695
)
Other earning assets
 
0

 
(3
)
 
(3
)
 
78

 
(163
)
 
(85
)
Gross loans (1)
 
(3,306
)
 
(963
)
 
(4,269
)
 
(7,659
)
 
(2,149
)
 
(9,808
)
Total earning assets
 
(3,388
)
 
(708
)
 
(4,096
)
 
(10,034
)
 
(1,554
)
 
(11,588
)
Interest-bearing liabilities
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Total interest-bearing deposits
 
$
(719
)
 
$
(219
)
 
$
(938
)
 
$
(3,030
)
 
$
(826
)
 
$
(3,856
)
Borrowed funds
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Short-term borrowings
 
26

 
144

 
170

 
31

 
286

 
317

Federal Home Loan Bank long-term debt
 
2

 
(20
)
 
(18
)
 
(7
)
 
(19
)
 
(26
)
Total borrowed funds
 
28

 
124

 
152

 
24

 
267

 
291

Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
(691
)
 
(95
)
 
(786
)
 
(3,006
)
 
(559
)
 
(3,565
)
Net interest income
 
$
(2,697
)
 
$
(613
)
 
$
(3,310
)
 
$
(7,028
)
 
$
(995
)
 
$
(8,023
)

(1) Loans held for sale, nonaccrual loans, covered loans and indemnification asset are included in gross loans.

NONINTEREST INCOME

First quarter 2013 noninterest income was $26.7 million, a $5.2 million or 16.4% decrease from noninterest income of $31.9 million in the first quarter 2012.  The decline in noninterest income from the comparable quarter in 2012 was due primarily to a $3.9 million decline in reimbursements due from the FDIC, a $1.7 million decline in accelerated discount on covered loans and a $0.8 million decline in other noninterest income. These declines were partially offset by $1.5 million of gains on sales of investment securities during the first quarter 2013.

When losses are incurred on covered loans, the Company recognizes those credit losses as provision expense, while losses incurred on covered OREO are recognized as noninterest expense. Reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to these credit losses are referred to as loss sharing income and are recorded as noninterest income.  The impact on earnings of this offsetting activity is the net effect of the credit losses and FDIC reimbursement, representing the Company’s proportionate share of the credit losses realized on covered assets.

Accelerated discount is recognized when acquired loans, which are recorded on the Company’s balance sheet at an amount less than the unpaid principal balance, prepay at an amount greater than their recorded book value. Prepayments can occur either through customer driven payments before the maturity date or loan sales.  The amount of discount attributable to the credit loss component of each loan varies and the recognized amount is offset by a related reduction in the FDIC indemnification asset.

The decrease in other noninterest income was primarily related to lower fee income related to the client derivatives program during the first quarter 2013.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

First quarter 2013 noninterest expense was $53.1 million compared with $55.8 million in the first quarter of 2012. The $2.7 million or 4.8% decrease from the comparable quarter in 2012 was primarily attributable to a $1.5 million decline in salaries and benefits expense, a $1.9 million decline in losses recorded on both covered and uncovered OREO, a $0.3 million decline in professional services expense and a $0.5 million decline in other noninterest expense. These declines were partially offset by increases of $0.8 million in net occupancy expenses, $0.6 million in data processing expenses and $0.5 million of loss sharing expenses.

The decline in salaries and benefits expenses was primarily attributable to staffing reductions and branch consolidations throughout 2012 and into 2013. Losses on OREO are generally the result of declines in fair value and/or losses on final

41

Table of Contents

disposition of OREO properties during the period. Loss sharing expense represents costs incurred to resolve problem covered assets. Losses on covered OREO and loss sharing expenses are partially reimbursed by the FDIC.

The decline in other noninterest expenses was primarily due to a $0.5 million decline in legal costs, a $0.6 million decline in administrative costs associated with the Company's benefit plans and a $0.3 million decline in the reserve for unfunded commitments. These declines were partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in fixed asset-related expenses in conjunction with branches consolidated during the first quarter of 2013.

Higher net occupancy expenses during the first quarter of 2013 were primarily attributable to $0.7 million of lease termination expenses related to branches consolidated during the quarter as well as additional costs associated with facilities that came online during 2012. The increase in data processing expense was due to software and system implementations, including new internet and mobile banking platforms introduced in late 2012.

The increase in loss sharing expense relates to elevated collection costs incurred on covered assets, primarily taxes, legal fees and appraisal costs. First Financial views the combination of provision expense on covered loans, losses on covered OREO and loss sharing expense, net of the related reimbursements due under loss sharing agreements recorded as FDIC loss sharing income, as the total net credit costs associated with covered assets during the period. For additional discussion of the credit costs associated with covered assets, see "Allowance for loan and lease losses - covered loans."

During the third quarter 2012, First Financial completed a comprehensive efficiency study across all business lines and support functions. As a result, the Company identified approximately $17.1 million of annualized cost savings impacting several expense categories. In the first quarter 2013, the Company incurred certain pre-tax expenses resulting from its efficiency initiative and other staffing-related changes of $2.9 million. Approximately $1.2 million was related to employee benefit expenses associated with staffing reductions and $1.7 million was related to real estate expenses associated with previously announced banking center consolidation and closure plans. Realization of the identified cost savings began during the fourth quarter 2012, and the Company recognized net savings of $2.6 million during the first quarter 2013 as one-time costs associated with implementing the efficiency plan offset estimated expense reductions. Ultimately, the achievement of these cost savings will be contingent upon management's ability to successfully implement the efficiency plan while managing external factors, such as regulatory changes and a dynamic business environment, without impacting service levels throughout the Company and to our customers.

In the event that staff reductions and turnover reach certain levels, as a result of First Financial's efficiency plan and/or other associate-related actions, it is possible that the Company could incur pension settlement charges in future periods. Pension settlement charges are an acceleration of previously deferred costs that would have been recognized in future periods and would be determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits.

INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was $6.4 million and $9.6 million for the first quarters of 2013 and 2012, respectively. The effective tax rates for the first quarters of 2013 and 2012 were 31.5% and 36.2%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate during the first quarter 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily the result of higher income earned on tax-exempt investment securities as well as a favorable tax reversal related to an intercompany tax obligation associated with an unconsolidated former Irwin subsidiary. First Financial estimates that a normalized effective tax rate reflecting the impact of the increasing investment in tax-exempt securities is approximately 35.1%.

LOANS - EXCLUDING COVERED LOANS

Loans, excluding covered loans and loans held for sale, totaled $3.2 billion as of March 31, 2013, increasing $69.8 million, or 8.9% on an annualized basis, compared to December 31, 2012.  The increase in loan balances from December 31, 2012 was primarily related to a $31.3 million increase in commercial loans, a $16.2 million increase in commercial real estate and a $14.0 million increase in construction lending with continued solid performance from residential mortgage and lease financing, which increased $12.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

First quarter 2013 average loans, excluding covered loans and loans held for sale, increased $224.9 million or 7.6% from the first quarter of 2012.  The increase in average loans, excluding covered loans and loans held for sale, was primarily the result of a $176.2 million increase in commercial real estate loans, a $36.0 million increase in residential real estate loans, and a $32.5 million increase in lease financing, partially offset by a $31.8 million decrease in real estate construction loans.

42

Table of Contents

LOANS - COVERED

Covered loans continued to decline during the quarter, totaling $687.8 million at March 31, 2013, a $60.3 million or 8.1% decline compared to December 31, 2012.  Declines in covered loan balances were expected as there were no acquisitions of loans subject to loss sharing agreements during the period.  The covered loan portfolio will continue to decline through payoffs, loan sales, charge-offs and termination or expiration of loss share coverage unless First Financial acquires additional loans subject to loss sharing agreements in the future. Loans with coverage terminated, or removed, generally represent loans to primarily high quality borrowers involving a change in loan terms which caused the respective loans to no longer qualify for reimbursement from the FDIC in the event of credit losses.

INVESTMENTS

First Financial's investment portfolio totaled $1.7 billion or 27.5% of total assets at March 31, 2013, compared with $1.9 billion or 28.8% of total assets at December 31, 2012.  Securities available-for-sale at March 31, 2013, totaled $952.0 million, compared with $1.0 billion at December 31, 2012, while held-to-maturity securities totaled $716.2 million at March 31, 2013 compared to $770.8 million at December 31, 2012.

The investment portfolio decreased $130.7 million, or 7.0%, during the first three months of 2013 as $54.8 million of purchases were offset by amortizations and paydowns in the portfolio, driven partially by continued elevated prepayment activity. The Company also sold of $70.4 million of agency MBSs and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) during the quarter in order to enhance liquidity and reduce prepayment and premium risks, resulting in a gain of $1.5 million. The decrease in the investment portfolio was also related to the deployment of cash to fund increased loan demand during the quarter. First Financial purchased $54.8 million of investment securities consisting of $40.0 million of agency MBSs and US government guaranteed notes as well as $14.7 million of investment grade corporate securities.

The overall duration of the investment portfolio increased to 3.1 years as of March 31, 2013 from 2.8 years as of December 31, 2012 primarily due to the impact of sales of floating rate CMOs and shorter duration securities during the period.  The Company is managing the refinancing and premium risk associated with higher prepayment speeds by capping the premium at which it has purchased securities and by selectively purchasing agency MBSs collateralized by assets less subject to refinancing in this interest rate environment.

First Financial has recorded, as a component of equity in accumulated other comprehensive income, a $9.4 million unrealized after-tax gain on the investment portfolio at March 31, 2013, compared with a $12.8 million unrealized after-tax gain at December 31, 2012.

DEPOSITS AND FUNDING

Total deposits as of March 31, 2013 were $4.8 billion, a decrease of $134.5 million or 2.7% compared to December 31, 2012.  The decrease in total deposits at March 31, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2012 was driven by a $38.5 million or 3.6% decline in total time deposits as well as a $96.0 million or 2.5% decline in total non-time deposit balances. The decline in time deposit balances was primarily the result of lower consumer balances related to the Company's continued efforts to manage deposit funding costs, partially offset by an increase in public fund balances. The decline in non-time deposit balances was primarily due to seasonal declines in commercial balances of $56.2 million and public fund balances of $77.7 million, partially offset by an increase of $49.7 million in consumer balances.

Average deposits declined to $4.8 billion at March 31, 2013 from $5.5 billion at March 31, 2012 primarily due to decreases in average interest-bearing demand deposits of $172.5 million and average time deposits of $522.9 million, partially offset by an increase in noninterest-bearing deposits of $118.6 million.

Borrowed funds increased to $707.6 million at March 31, 2013 from $699.8 million at December 31, 2012, due to an $8.3 million increase in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase as a result of the Bank's funding needs.

For further discussion of First Financial's borrowing capacity and liquidity management, see the Liquidity section of Management's Discussion and Analysis.


43

Table of Contents

RISK MANAGEMENT

First Financial manages risk through a structured enterprise risk management (ERM) approach that routinely assesses the overall level of risk, identifies specific risks and evaluates the steps being taken to mitigate those risks. First Financial continues to enhance its risk management capabilities and the development of risk awareness as a component of the culture of the Company and the operating policies of its business lines.  First Financial has identified nine types of risk that it monitors in its ERM framework.  These risks include information technology, market, legal, strategic, reputation, credit, regulatory (compliance), operational and external/environmental.

For further discussion of these risks, see the Risk Management section of the Management's Discussion and Analysis of First Financial’s 2012 Annual Report and the information below.

CREDIT RISK

Credit risk represents the risk of loss due to failure of a customer or counterparty to meet its financial obligations in accordance with contractual terms. First Financial manages credit risk through its underwriting process and periodically reviewing and approving its credit exposures using credit policies and guidelines approved by its board of directors.  Due to the significant differences in the accounting for covered loans and the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, management believes that asset quality measures excluding covered loans are generally more meaningful.  Therefore, management has included asset quality measures that exclude covered loans in this section.

Allowance for loan and lease losses - excluding covered loans. Management maintains the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that it considers sufficient to absorb probable loan and lease losses inherent in the portfolio. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on historical loss experience and other significant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires utilizing material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change. See Note 10, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of First Financial's allowance for uncovered loans.

The allowance for uncovered loan and lease losses was $48.3 million as of March 31, 2013 compared to $47.8 million as of December 31, 2012.  As a percentage of period-end loans, the allowance for loan and lease losses was 1.49% as of March 31, 2013 compared to 1.50% as of December 31, 2012.  The increase in the allowance for uncovered loan and lease losses from December 31, 2012 was primarily the result of continued loan growth as well as increases in specific reserves recorded on certain impaired loans. The decrease in the allowance as a percentage of loans is primarily attributable to loan growth as newly originated loans are generally reserved for at lower rates.

First quarter 2013 net charge-offs were $2.5 million or 0.32% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis, compared with $6.4 million or 0.87% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis for the comparable quarter in 2012. Net charge-offs during the first quarter 2013 included $0.8 million related to three commercial real estate credits and $0.7 million related to two commercial credits, none of which were individually significant. Significant items driving net charge-offs during the first quarter 2012 included $1.7 million related to a commercial construction and land development credit, $1.1 million related to a hotel real estate loan and three commercial credits totaling $0.9 million in the aggregate. The timing and amount of net charge-offs are dependent on the individual credit characteristics of each loan relationship as well as the Company's resolution strategies and can vary from period to period.

Provision expense related to uncovered loans and leases is a product of the Company's allowance for loan and lease losses model as well as net charge-off activity during the period. First quarter 2013 provision expense related to uncovered loans and leases was $3.0 million as compared to $3.3 million during the comparable quarter in 2012.

The table that follows includes the activity in the allowance for loan losses, excluding covered loans, for the quarterly periods presented.

44

Table of Contents

 
Three months ended
 
2013
 
2012
(Dollars in thousands)
Mar. 31,
 
Dec. 31,
 
Sep. 30,
 
June 30,
 
Mar. 31,
Allowance for loan and lease loss activity
Balance at beginning of period
$
47,777

 
$
49,192

 
$
50,952

 
$
49,437

 
$
52,576

Provision for loan losses
3,041

 
3,882

 
3,613

 
8,364

 
3,258

Gross charge-offs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
781

 
657

 
1,340

 
1,129

 
1,186

Real estate-construction
0

 
0

 
180

 
717

 
1,787

Real estate-commercial
995

 
2,221

 
2,736

 
3,811

 
2,244

Real estate-residential
223

 
454

 
565

 
191

 
604

Installment
100

 
267

 
134

 
116

 
60

Home equity
701

 
1,722

 
380

 
915

 
644

All other
410

 
227

 
469

 
259

 
297

Total gross charge-offs
3,210

 
5,548

 
5,804

 
7,138

 
6,822

Recoveries
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
319

 
71

 
202

 
48

 
72

Real estate-construction
136

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

Real estate-commercial
39

 
46

 
38

 
68

 
113

Real estate-residential
4

 
3

 
33

 
9

 
28

Installment
77

 
53

 
72

 
75

 
123

Home equity
52

 
32

 
31

 
28

 
24

All other
71

 
46

 
55

 
61

 
65

Total recoveries
698

 
251

 
431

 
289

 
425

Total net charge-offs
2,512

 
5,297

 
5,373

 
6,849

 
6,397

Ending allowance for loan and lease losses
$
48,306

 
$
47,777

 
$
49,192

 
$
50,952

 
$
49,437

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net charge-offs to average loans and leases (annualized)
Commercial
0.22
 %
 
0.28
%
 
0.56
%
 
0.53
%
 
0.53
 %
Real estate-construction
(0.68
)%
 
0.00
%
 
0.78
%
 
2.91
%
 
6.36
 %
Real estate-commercial
0.27
 %
 
0.63
%
 
0.81
%
 
1.18
%
 
0.69
 %
Real estate-residential
0.27
 %
 
0.58
%
 
0.72
%
 
0.25
%
 
0.81
 %
Installment
0.17
 %
 
1.46
%
 
0.41
%
 
0.26
%
 
(0.39
)%
Home equity
0.72
 %
 
1.82
%
 
0.38
%
 
0.99
%
 
0.70
 %
All other
1.63
 %
 
0.94
%
 
2.51
%
 
1.46
%
 
1.88
 %
Total net charge-offs
0.32
 %
 
0.68
%
 
0.71
%
 
0.93
%
 
0.87
 %

Allowance for loan and lease losses - covered loans. The majority of covered loans are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, whereby First Financial is required to periodically re-estimate the expected cash flows on the loans. For purposes of applying the guidance under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, First Financial grouped acquired loans into pools based on common risk characteristics. A decline in expected cash flows for a pool of loans is referred to as impairment and recorded as provision expense, and a related allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans, on a discounted basis during the period.  Estimated reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to any declines in expected loan cash flows are recorded as noninterest income and an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset in the same period. Improvement in expected cash flows for a pool of loans, once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured, is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the yield on the loans in the pool and a related adjustment to the yield on the FDIC indemnification asset. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. See Note 10, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of First Financial's allowance for covered loans.


45

Table of Contents

The allowance for covered loan and lease losses was $45.5 million as of March 31, 2013 compared to $45.2 million as of December 31, 2012 as a result of changes in expected cash flows on loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, as well as portfolio activity during the period, including payments received and charge-offs.

First Financial recognized total provision expense related to covered loans of $9.0 million and realized net charge-offs related to covered loans of $8.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The Company recognized total provision expense related to covered loans of $13.0 million and net charge-offs of $9.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

The Company also recognized loss sharing expenses of $2.3 million and modest net gains on covered OREO during the first quarter of 2013. Loss sharing expenses and losses on covered OREO were $1.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, in the first quarter of 2012. Loss sharing expenses include attorney fees, taxes, insurance and other collection expenses related to the resolution of covered assets.  

The receivables due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to covered provision expense, loss sharing expense and losses on covered OREO of $8.9 million and $12.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were recognized as FDIC loss sharing income and corresponding increases to the FDIC indemnification asset in those periods.
 
 
Three months ended
 
 
2013
 
2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Mar. 31,
 
Dec. 31,
 
Sep. 30,
 
June 30,
 
Mar. 31,
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
45,190

 
$
48,895

 
$
48,327

 
$
46,156

 
$
42,835

Provision for loan and lease losses
 
9,042

 
5,283

 
6,622

 
6,047

 
12,951

Loans charged-off
 
(9,684
)
 
(9,568
)
 
(9,058
)
 
(5,163
)
 
(10,118
)
Recoveries
 
948

 
580

 
3,004

 
1,287

 
488

Ending allowance for covered loan losses
 
$
45,496

 
$
45,190

 
$
48,895

 
$
48,327

 
$
46,156


Nonperforming/Underperforming Assets - excluding covered assets. Nonperforming loans totaled $77.2 million and nonperforming assets totaled $89.2 million as of March 31, 2013 compared with $75.9 million and $88.4 million, respectively, at December 31, 2012.  Nonaccrual loans, including troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) classified as nonaccrual, totaled $64.5 million as of March 31, 2013 compared to $65.0 million as of December 31, 2012, representing a $0.6 million, or 0.9% decrease.

The first quarter 2013 allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of nonaccrual loans, including nonaccrual TDRs was 75.0% compared with 73.5% at December 31, 2012, while the allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 62.6% at March 31, 2013, compared with 63.0% at December 31, 2012.

Total classified assets as of March 31, 2013 totaled $130.4 million compared to $129.0 million at December 31, 2012. Classified assets are defined by the Company as nonperforming assets plus performing loans internally rated substandard or worse.

Troubled Debt Restructurings - excluding covered loans. TDRs totaled $35.1 million at March 31, 2013, a $10.1 million increase from December 31, 2012.  Accruing TDRs increased $1.9 million from December 31, 2012, generally as a result of renewals and term extensions of performing, substandard-rated loans that are experiencing operating cash flow stress but have strong underlying collateral and guarantor support. TDRs classified as nonaccrual increased $8.2 million from December 31, 2012 primarily as a result of modified borrowing terms related to a $6.9 million commercial nonaccrual credit in the first quarter 2013.

TDRs are generally classified as nonaccrual for a minimum period of six months and may qualify for return to accrual status once they have demonstrated performance with the terms of the loan modification.

Delinquent Loans - excluding covered loans. At March 31, 2013, loans 30-to-89 days past due increased to $18.2 million, or 0.56% of period end loans, as compared to $16.3 million, or 0.51%, at December 31, 2012. The increase in delinquent loans compared to December 31, 2012 primarily resulted from higher delinquencies in the commercial real estate and equipment financing portfolios partially offset by lower delinquencies in commercial and residential real estate loans.


46

Table of Contents

Other Real Estate Owned. At March 31, 2013, First Financial had OREO properties originating from uncovered loans totaling $12.0 million, compared with $12.5 million at December 31, 2012. Uncovered OREO decreased $0.5 million from December 31, 2012 to March 31, 2013 as resolutions and valuation adjustments of $1.2 million exceeded $0.7 million of additions during the quarter. There were no individually material items included in either the additions or resolutions during the first quarter 2013.

OREO originating from covered loans was $29.3 million at March 31, 2013, compared with $28.9 million at December 31, 2012. Covered OREO increased $0.5 million, or 1.7%, from December 31, 2012 as additions of $6.7 million slightly exceeded resolutions and valuation adjustments of $6.2 million during the quarter.

The table that follows shows the categories that are included in nonperforming and underperforming assets, excluding covered assets, as well as related credit quality ratios as of March 31, 2013, and the four previous quarters.
 
 
Quarter ended
 
 
2013
 
2012
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Mar. 31,
 
Dec. 31,
 
Sep. 30,
 
June 30,
 
Mar. 31,
Nonperforming loans, nonperforming assets, and underperforming assets
Nonaccrual loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
4,044

 
$
10,562

 
$
4,563

 
$
12,065

 
$
5,936

Real estate - construction
 
945

 
950

 
2,536

 
7,243

 
7,005

Real estate - commercial
 
30,311

 
31,002

 
33,961

 
36,116

 
35,581

Real estate - residential
 
4,371

 
5,045

 
5,563

 
5,069

 
5,131

Installment
 
211

 
376

 
284

 
319

 
377

Home equity
 
1,750

 
2,499

 
2,497

 
2,281

 
1,915

Lease financing
 
496

 
496

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans
 
42,128

 
50,930

 
49,404

 
63,093

 
55,945

Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Accruing
 
12,757

 
10,856

 
11,604

 
9,909

 
9,495

  Nonaccrual
 
22,324

 
14,111

 
13,017

 
10,185

 
17,205

Total TDRs
 
35,081

 
24,967

 
24,621

 
20,094

 
26,700

Total nonperforming loans
 
77,209

 
75,897

 
74,025

 
83,187

 
82,645

Other real estate owned (OREO)
 
11,993

 
12,526

 
13,912

 
15,688

 
15,036

Total nonperforming assets
 
89,202

 
88,423

 
87,937

 
98,875

 
97,681

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
 
157

 
212

 
108

 
143

 
203

Total underperforming assets
 
$
89,359

 
$
88,635

 
$
88,045

 
$
99,018

 
$
97,884

Total classified assets
 
$
130,436

 
$
129,040

 
$
133,382

 
$
145,621

 
$
154,684

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Credit quality ratios (excluding covered assets)
Allowance for loan and lease losses to
 
 

Nonaccrual loans
 
114.66
%
 
93.81
%
 
99.57
%
 
80.76
%
 
88.37
%
Nonaccrual loans plus nonaccrual TDRs
 
74.95
%
 
73.46
%
 
78.81
%
 
69.53
%
 
67.58
%
Nonperforming loans
 
62.57
%
 
62.95
%
 
66.45
%
 
61.25
%
 
59.82
%
Total ending loans
 
1.49
%
 
1.50
%
 
1.60
%
 
1.69
%
 
1.67
%
Nonperforming loans to total loans
 
2.38
%
 
2.39
%
 
2.41
%
 
2.76
%
 
2.79
%
Nonperforming assets to
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ending loans, plus OREO
 
2.74
%
 
2.77
%
 
2.86
%
 
3.27
%
 
3.28
%
Total assets, including covered assets
 
1.40
%
 
1.36
%
 
1.41
%
 
1.57
%
 
1.52
%
Nonperforming assets, excluding accruing TDRs to
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ending loans, plus OREO
 
2.34
%
 
2.43
%
 
2.48
%
 
2.94
%
 
2.96
%
Total assets, including covered assets
 
1.20
%
 
1.19
%
 
1.22
%
 
1.42
%
 
1.37
%


47

Table of Contents

MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. The primary source of market risk for First Financial is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and the value of equity arising from changes in market interest rates and arises in the normal course of business to the extent that there is a divergence between the amount of First Financial’s interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid/withdrawn, re-price or mature in specified periods. First Financial seeks to achieve consistent growth in net interest income and equity while managing volatility arising from shifts in market interest rates. First Financial’s board of directors establishes policy limits with respect to interest rate risk and changes in the economic value of equity. First Financial’s Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO), a group of senior officers from the lending, deposit gathering, finance, risk management and treasury areas, oversees market risk management, monitoring risk measures, limits and policy guidelines for managing the amount of interest rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital.

Interest rate risk management is an active process that encompasses monitoring loan and deposit flows complemented by investment and funding activities. Effective interest rate risk management begins with understanding the dynamic characteristics of assets and liabilities and determining the appropriate interest rate risk position given business activities, management objectives, market expectations and ALCO policy limits and guidelines.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity management is the process by which First Financial manages the continuing flow of funds necessary to meet its financial commitments on a timely basis and at a reasonable cost.  These funding commitments include withdrawals by depositors, credit commitments to borrowers, shareholder dividends, expenses of its operations and capital expenditures. Liquidity is monitored and closely managed by ALCO. It is ALCO’s responsibility to ensure First Financial has the necessary level of funds available for normal operations as well as to maintain a contingency funding policy to ensure that liquidity stress events are quickly identified and management plans to respond are in place.  This is accomplished through the use of policies which establish limits and require measurements to monitor liquidity trends, including modeling and management reporting that identifies the amounts and costs of all available funding sources.  These sources are periodically tested for funding availability.

Liquidity is derived primarily from deposit growth, principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities, maturing loans and investment securities, access to wholesale funding sources and collateralized borrowings. First Financial’s most stable source of liability-funded liquidity for both long and short-term needs is deposit growth and retention of the core deposit base. The deposit base is diversified among individuals, partnerships, corporations, public entities and geographic markets. This diversification helps First Financial minimize dependence on large concentrations of wholesale funding sources.

Capital expenditures, such as banking center expansions and technology investments were $3.9 million and $6.8 million for the first three months of 2013 and 2012, respectively. Management believes that First Financial has sufficient liquidity to fund its future capital expenditure commitments.

As of March 31, 2013, First Financial had pledged certain eligible residential and farm real estate loans, home equity lines of credit and government and agency securities, totaling $1.6 billion as collateral for borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB).  For ease of borrowing execution, First Financial utilizes a blanket collateral agreement with the FHLB.

First Financial utilizes its short-term line of credit and longer-term advances from the FHLB as funding sources.  At March 31, 2013, the Company had $502.2 million in short-term borrowings from the FHLB. At December 31, 2012, the Company had $502.0 million in short-term borrowings from the FHLB.  At March 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, total long-term borrowings from the FHLB were $8.7 million and $9.4 million, respectively.  First Financial's total remaining borrowing capacity from the FHLB was $354.0 million at March 31, 2013.

First Financial's principal source of asset-funded liquidity is marketable investment securities, particularly those of shorter maturities. The market value of investment securities classified as available-for-sale totaled $952.0 million at March 31, 2013.  Securities classified as held-to-maturity that are maturing within a short period of time are also a source of liquidity and totaled $0.3 million at March 31, 2013.  In addition, other types of assets such as cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with other banks, as well as loans maturing within one year, are sources of liquidity.

At March 31, 2013, in addition to liquidity on hand of $107.4 million, First Financial had unused and available overnight wholesale funding of $2.3 billion or 36.7% of total assets to fund new loans, any deposit runoff that may occur as a result of the Company's deposit rationalization efforts and from markets that the Company is exiting, or for general corporate requirements.


48

Table of Contents

Certain restrictions exist regarding the ability of First Financial’s subsidiaries to transfer funds to First Financial in the form of cash dividends, loans, other assets or advances.  The approval of the subsidiaries’ respective primary federal regulators is required for First Financial’s subsidiaries to pay dividends in excess of regulatory limitations.  Dividends paid to First Financial from its subsidiaries totaled $16.2 million for the first three months of 2013.  As of March 31, 2013, First Financial’s subsidiaries had retained earnings of $349.6 million of which $24.3 million was available for distribution to First Financial without prior regulatory approval.  Additionally, First Financial had $99.9 million in cash as of March 31, 2013, which is approximately two times the Company’s annual regular shareholder dividend (currently $0.60 per share) and operating expenses.

Management is not aware of any other events or regulatory requirements that, if implemented, are likely to have a material effect on First Financial’s liquidity.

CAPITAL

Risk-Based Capital. First Financial and its subsidiary, First Financial Bank, are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies.  Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices.  Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate regulatory action.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require First Financial to maintain minimum amounts and ratios as defined by the regulations of Total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and to average assets.  Management believes, as of March 31, 2013, that First Financial met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.  At March 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, regulatory notifications categorized First Financial as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.  To be categorized as well-capitalized, First Financial must maintain minimum Total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below.  There have been no conditions or events since those notifications that management believes has changed the Company's category.

First Financial’s Tier I capital is comprised of total shareholders’ equity less unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available-for-sale accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities, and any amounts resulting from the application of FASB ASC Topic 715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits, that is recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), intangible assets and any valuation related to mortgage servicing rights.  Total risk-based capital consists of Tier I capital plus qualifying allowance for loan and lease losses and gross unrealized gains on equity securities.

For purposes of calculating the leverage ratio, average assets represents quarterly average assets less assets not qualifying for total risk-based capital including intangible assets and non-qualifying mortgage servicing rights and allowance for loan and lease losses.

Consolidated regulatory capital ratios at March 31, 2013, included the leverage ratio of 10.00%, Tier 1 capital ratio of 15.87%, and total capital ratio of 17.15%.  All regulatory capital ratios exceeded the amounts necessary to be classified as “well capitalized,” and total regulatory capital exceeded the “minimum” requirement by $364.4 million, on a consolidated basis.  First Financial’s tangible common equity ratio increased to 9.60% at March 31, 2013 as compared to 9.50% at December 31, 2012.

First Financial's Tier I and Total capital ratios were negatively impacted by an increase in risk weighted assets during 2013 primarily as a result of declines in lower risk weighted covered assets offset by increases in higher risk weighted uncovered loans and investment securities. First Financial's Leverage ratio was positively impacted by a decline in average assets in the first quarter 2013. Contributions to shareholders’ equity from earnings were limited in both 2013 and 2012 as a result of the Company's variable dividend payout.

The following tables illustrate the actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.


49

Table of Contents

 
 
Actual
 
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
 
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated
 
$
682,974

 
17.15
%
 
$
318,598

 
8.00
%
 
N/A

 
N/A

First Financial Bank
 
587,114

 
14.76
%
 
318,173

 
8.00
%
 
$
397,717

 
10.00
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Consolidated
 
632,020

 
15.87
%
 
159,299

 
4.00
%
 
N/A

 
N/A

First Financial Bank
 
529,275

 
13.31
%
 
159,087

 
4.00
%
 
238,630

 
6.00
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 capital to average assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Consolidated
 
632,020

 
10.00
%
 
252,701

 
4.00
%
 
N/A

 
N/A

First Financial Bank
 
529,275

 
8.39
%
 
252,450

 
4.00
%
 
315,563

 
5.00
%

 
 
Actual
 
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
 
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated
 
$
686,961

 
17.60
%
 
$
312,328

 
8.00
%
 
N/A

 
N/A

First Financial Bank
 
586,023

 
15.04
%
 
311,618

 
8.00
%
 
$
389,523

 
10.00
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Consolidated
 
637,176

 
16.32
%
 
156,164

 
4.00
%
 
N/A

 
N/A

First Financial Bank
 
529,196

 
13.59
%
 
155,809

 
4.00
%
 
233,714

 
6.00
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 capital to average assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Consolidated
 
637,176

 
10.25
%
 
248,761

 
4.00
%
 
N/A

 
N/A

First Financial Bank
 
529,196

 
8.52
%
 
248,408

 
4.00
%
 
310,511

 
5.00
%

Share Repurchases. In October 2012, First Financial's board of directors approved a share repurchase plan under which the Company has the ability to repurchase up to 5,000,000 shares. Under the plan, the Company expects to repurchase approximately 1,000,000 shares annually. This annual target will be subject to market conditions and quarterly evaluation by the board as well as balance sheet composition and growth. The share repurchase plan is not expected to impact the variable dividend and as a result the return of capital to shareholders is expected to exceed 100% of earnings through 2013. Subsequent to the expiration of the variable dividend, the Company expects to return to shareholders a target range of 60% - 80% of earnings through a combination of its regular dividend and share repurchases while still maintaining capital ratios that exceed internal target thresholds, current regulatory capital requirements and proposed capital requirements under the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's final framework for strengthening international capital and liquidity regulation released in December 2010 (Basel III). The Company repurchased 249,000 shares under this plan at an average price of $15.39 per share during the first quarter of 2013. At March 31, 2013, 4,290,500 common shares remained available for purchase under this repurchase plan.


50

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

First Financial’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared based on the application of accounting policies.  These policies require the reliance on estimates and assumptions.  Changes in underlying factors, assumptions or estimates in any of these areas could have a material impact on First Financial’s future financial condition and results of operations. In management’s opinion, some of these areas have a more significant impact than others on First Financial’s financial reporting.  For First Financial, these areas currently include accounting for the allowance for loan and lease losses (excluding covered loans), covered loans, the allowance for loan and lease losses - covered loans, the FDIC indemnification asset, goodwill, pension and income taxes.  These accounting policies are discussed in detail in the Critical Accounting Policies section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in First Financial’s 2012 Annual Report.  There were no material changes to these accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

ACCOUNTING AND REGULATORY MATTERS

Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting standards adopted by First Financial during 2013 and the expected impact of accounting standards recently issued but not yet required to be adopted.  To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affects financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable section(s) of Management’s Discussion and Analysis and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in this report which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (the Act). In addition, certain statements in future filings by First Financial with the SEC, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of First Financial which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, projections of revenues, income or loss, earnings or loss per share, the payment or non-payment of dividends, capital structure and other financial items, statements of plans and objectives of First Financial or its management or board of directors and statements of future economic performances and statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Words such as "believes," "anticipates," "likely," "expected," "intends," and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Management's analysis contains forward-looking statements that are provided to assist in the understanding of anticipated future financial performance. However, such performance involves risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

management's ability to effectively execute its business plan;
the risk that the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations may continue to deteriorate resulting in, among other things, a further deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit, including the resultant effect on our loan portfolio, allowance for loan and lease losses and overall financial performance;
U.S. fiscal debt and budget matters;
the ability of financial institutions to access sources of liquidity at a reasonable cost;
the impact of recent upheaval in the financial markets and the effectiveness of domestic and international governmental actions taken in response, and the effect of such governmental actions on us, our competitors and counterparties, financial markets generally and availability of credit specifically, and the U.S. and international economies, including potentially higher FDIC premiums arising from increased payments from FDIC insurance funds as a result of depository institution failures;
the effect of and changes in policies and laws or regulatory agencies (notably the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act);
the effect of the current low interest rate environment or changes in interest rates on our net interest margin and our loan originations and securities holdings;
our ability to keep up with technological changes;
failure or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third party vendors or other service providers;
our ability to comply with the terms of loss sharing agreements with the FDIC;
mergers and acquisitions, including costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquired companies and the wind-down of non-strategic operations that may be greater than expected, such as the risks and uncertainties associated with the Irwin Mortgage Corporation bankruptcy proceedings and other acquired subsidiaries;

51

Table of Contents

the risk that exploring merger and acquisition opportunities may detract from management's time and ability to successfully manage our Company;
expected cost savings in connection with the consolidation of recent acquisitions may not be fully realized or realized within the expected time frames, and deposit attrition, customer loss and revenue loss following completed acquisitions may be greater than expected;
our ability to increase market share and control expenses;
the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies as well as the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC;
adverse changes in the creditworthiness of our borrowers and lessees, collateral values, the value of investment securities and asset recovery values, including the value of the FDIC indemnification asset and related assets covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements;
adverse changes in the securities, debt and/or derivatives markets;
our success in recruiting and retaining the necessary personnel to support business growth and expansion and maintain sufficient expertise to support increasingly complex products and services;
monetary and fiscal policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve) and the U.S. government and other governmental initiatives affecting the financial services industry;
unpredictable natural or other disasters could have an adverse effect on us in that such events could materially disrupt our operations or our vendors' operations or willingness of our customers to access the financial services we offer;
our ability to manage loan delinquency and charge-off rates and changes in estimation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; and
the costs and effects of litigation and of unexpected or adverse outcomes in such litigation.

In addition, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as well as our other filings with the SEC, for a more detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties and other factors. Such forward-looking statements are meaningful only on the date when such statements are made, and First Financial undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such a statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.


52

Table of Contents

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. The primary source of market risk for First Financial is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and the value of equity arising from changes in market interest rates and arises in the normal course of business to the extent that there is a divergence between the amount of First Financial's interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid, withdrawn, re-priced or mature in specified periods. First Financial seeks to achieve consistent growth in net interest income and equity while managing volatility arising from shifts in market interest rates. First Financial's board of directors establishes policy limits with respect to interest rate risk. First Financial's ALCO oversees market risk management, monitoring risk measures, limits and policy guidelines for managing the amount of interest rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital.

Interest rate risk management is an active process that encompasses monitoring loan and deposit flows complemented by investment and funding activities. Effective interest rate risk management begins with understanding the dynamic characteristics of assets and liabilities and determining the appropriate interest rate risk position given business activities, management objectives, market expectations and ALCO policy limits and guidelines.

Interest rate risk for First Financial's Consolidated Balance Sheets consists of repricing, option and basis risks.  Repricing risk results from differences in the maturity, or repricing, of interest-bearing assets and liabilities.  Option risk in financial instruments arises from embedded options such as loan prepayments, early withdrawal of certificates of deposits and calls on investments and debt instruments that are primarily driven by third party or client behavior.  Basis risk refers to the potential for changes in the underlying relationship between market rates or indices, which subsequently result in a narrowing of the net interest margin.  Basis risk is also present in managed rate liabilities, such as interest-bearing checking accounts and savings accounts, where historical pricing relationships to market rates may change due to the level or directional change in market interest rates or competitive pressures.

The interest rate risk position is measured and monitored using income simulation models and economic value of equity (EVE) sensitivity analysis that capture both short-term and long-term interest rate risk exposure.  Income simulation involves forecasting net interest income (NII) under a variety of interest rate scenarios including instantaneous shocks. First Financial uses EVE sensitivity analysis to understand the impact of changes in interest rates on long-term cash flows, income and capital.  EVE is calculated by discounting the cash flows for all balance sheet instruments under different interest-rate scenarios.  

Presented below is the estimated impact on First Financial’s NII and EVE position as of March 31, 2013, assuming immediate, parallel shifts in interest rates:
 
% Change from Base Case for
 Immediate Parallel Changes in Rates
 
-100 BP (1)
 
+100 BP
 
+200 BP
NII-Year 1
(3.87
)%
 
(1.44
)%
 
(0.01
)%
NII-Year 2
(6.37
)%
 
0.40
 %
 
3.26
 %
EVE
(18.31
)%
 
0.74
 %
 
7.78
 %

(1) Because certain current interest rates are at or below 1.00%, the 100 basis point downward shock assumes that certain corresponding interest rates approach an implied floor that, in effect, reflects a decrease of less than the full 100 basis point downward shock.

Modeling the sensitivity of NII and EVE to changes in market interest rates is highly dependent on the assumptions incorporated into the modeling process.  These assumptions are periodically reviewed in the context of balance sheet changes, product offerings, external economic factors and anticipated client behavior.  In addition, the Company internally evaluates the impact of yield curve twist scenarios (i.e. flattening, steepening and inversions of the yield curve) on NII and EVE. First Financial's projected results for near-term earnings at risk indicates a risk-neutral position. Long-term EVE modeling indicates the Company has modest asset sensitivity.  First Financial is managing its balance sheet with a near-term bias toward a risk-neutral position given the outlook for future interest rates. First Financial's near-term and long-term positions have become modestly more liability sensitive as a result of growth in fixed rate loans and securities, coupled with a bias from the Company's depository base towards market-driven deposit products.

"Risk-neutral position" refers to the absence of a strong bias toward either asset or liability sensitivity. “Asset sensitive position” refers to an increase in interest rates, primarily short-term rates, that is expected to generate higher net interest

53

Table of Contents

income as rates earned on our interest-earning assets would reprice upward more quickly or in greater quantities than rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities would reprice. Conversely, “liability sensitive position” refers to an increase in short-term interest rates that is expected to generate lower net interest income as rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities would reprice upward more quickly or in greater quantities than rates earned on our interest-earning assets.

The interest rate risk analysis provides a framework as to what First Financial's overall sensitivity is as of the Company's most recent reported position. Management strategies may impact future reporting periods, as actual results may differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, the difference between actual experience and the characteristics assumed, as well as changes in portfolio composition and market conditions.  Market based and historical experience prepayment speeds are factored into the analysis for loan and securities portfolios.  Deposit premiums and rate sensitivity for transactional deposit accounts are modeled based on both historical experience and external industry studies. Due to the current low interest rate environment, funding rates on deposit and wholesale funding instruments were not reduced below 0.0% in the down 100 basis point scenario. First Financial continues to refine the assumptions used in its interest rate risk modeling.

See also “Item 2-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Net Interest Income.”

ITEM 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that are designed to cause the material information required to be disclosed by First Financial in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to be recorded, processed, summarized, and reported to the extent applicable within the time periods required by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.  In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.  Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, First Financial performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No changes were made to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.


54

Table of Contents

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.
Legal Proceedings.

There have been no material changes to the disclosure in response to "Part I - Item 3. Legal Proceedings" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 1A.
Risk Factors.

There are a number of factors that may adversely affect the Company's business, financial results, or stock price. See "Risk Factors" as disclosed in response to "Item 1A. to Part I - Risk Factors" of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.


55

Table of Contents

Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c)
The following table shows the total number of shares repurchased in the first quarter of 2013.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 
 
(a)
 
(b)
 
(c)
 
(d)
Period
 
Total Number
Of Shares
Purchased (1)
 
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans (2)
 
Maximum Number of
Shares that may yet
be purchased Under
the Plans
January 1 to January 31, 2013
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
Share repurchase program
 
84,000

 
$
14.83

 
84,000

 
4,455,500

Director Fee Stock Plan
 
3,336

 
14.54

 
NA

 
NA

Stock Plans
 
9,000

 
15.05

 
NA

 
NA

February 1 to February 28, 2013
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Share repurchase program
 
73,000

 
$
15.59

 
73,000

 
4,382,500

Director Fee Stock Plan
 
0

 
0.00

 
0

 
NA

Stock Plans
 
45,500

 
15.40

 
NA

 
NA

March 1 to March 31, 2013
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Share repurchase program
 
92,000

 
$
15.73

 
92,000

 
4,290,500

Director Fee Stock Plan
 
0

 
0.00

 
0

 
NA

Stock Plans
 
60,609

 
16.01

 
0

 
NA

Total
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Share repurchase program
 
249,000

 
$
15.39

 
249,000

 
 

Director Fee Stock Plan
 
3,336

 
$
14.54

 
NA

 
 

Stock Plans
 
115,109

 
$
15.69

 
NA

 
 


(1)
Except with respect to the share repurchase program, the number of shares purchased in column (a) and the average price paid per share in column (b) include the purchase of shares other than through publicly announced plans.  The shares purchased other than through publicly announced plans were purchased pursuant to First Financial’s Director Fee Stock Plan, 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan for Officers and Employees, 2009 Employee Stock Plan, Amended and Restated 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan and 2012 Stock Plan (the last five plans are referred to hereafter as the Stock Plans.)  The table shows the number of shares purchased pursuant to those plans and the average price paid per share.  The purchases for the Director Fee Stock Plan were made in open-market transactions.  Under the Stock Plans, shares were purchased from plan participants at the then current market value in satisfaction of stock option exercise prices.
(2)
First Financial has one previously announced stock repurchase plan under which it is authorized to purchase shares of its common stock.  The plan has no expiration date.  The table that follows provides additional information regarding this plan.

Announcement
Date
 
Total Shares
Approved for
Repurchase
 
Total Shares
Repurchased
Under
the Plan
 
Expiration
Date
10/25/2012
 
5,000,000

 
709,500

 
None


56

Table of Contents

Item 6.         Exhibits

(a)
Exhibits:
 
 
 
Exhibit Number
 
 
31.1
 
Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith.
 
 
 
31.2
 
Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith.
 
 
 
32.1
 
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 furnished herewith.
 
 
 
32.2
 
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 furnished herewith.
 
 
 
101.1
 
Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, as blocks of text and in detail*.

First Financial will furnish, without charge, to a security holder upon request a copy of the documents and will furnish any other Exhibit upon payment of reproduction costs.  Unless as otherwise noted, documents incorporated by reference involve File No. 000-12379.

*
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.



57

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 
 
 
 
FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP.
 
 
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Anthony M. Stollings
 
/s/ John M. Gavigan
Anthony M. Stollings
 
John M. Gavigan
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
First Vice President and Corporate Controller
 
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date
 
5/7/2013
 
Date
 
5/7/2013


58