Delaware
Delaware
|
001-33443
000-29311
|
20-5653152
94-3248415
|
||
(State
or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation)
|
(Commission
File Number)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
1000
Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, Texas
|
77002
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
¨
|
Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)
|
¨
|
Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)
|
¨
|
Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
|
¨
|
Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
|
Item
1.01
|
Entry
into a Material Definitive
Agreement.
|
·
|
Amendments to Certain
Financial Ratios. To allow for more flexibility,
Amendment No. 4 modified the financial covenants in the Credit Facility
that require DHI to maintain a maximum ratio of Secured Debt to EBITDA (as
defined in the Credit Agreement) and a minimum ratio of EBITDA to
Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined in the Credit
Agreement). Furthermore, to provide additional flexibility,
Amendment No. 4 modified the ratio test of Total Indebtedness to EBITDA
(as defined in the Credit Agreement), the pro forma satisfaction of which
is a condition precedent to the incurrence of certain DHI indebtedness,
the addition of revolver commitments, making certain investments or
certain sales of assets or engaging in certain other permitted
activities. These three financial ratio requirements, as
modified by Amendment No. 4, are summarized in the following
table:
|
Measurement
Period
|
Ratio
of Secured Debt to EBITDA
(no
greater than)
|
Ratio
of EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense
(no
less than)
|
Ratio
of Total Indebtedness to EBITDA
(no
greater than)
|
June
30, 2009
|
2.50:1
|
1.625:1
|
6.50:1
|
September
30, 2009
|
3.00:1
|
1.75:1
|
6.00:1
|
December
31, 2009
|
3.00:1
|
1.75:1
|
6.00:1
|
March
31, 2010
|
3.25:1
|
1.70:1
|
6.50:1
|
June
30, 2010
|
3.25:1
|
1.60:1
|
6.50:1
|
September
30, 2010
|
3.50:1
|
1.30:1
|
6.50:1
|
December
31, 2010
|
3.50:1
|
1.30:1
|
6.50:1
|
March
31, 2011
|
3.50:1
|
1.35:1
|
6.50:1
|
June
30, 2011
|
3.50:1
|
1.40:1
|
6.50:1
|
September
30, 2011
|
3.25:1
|
1.60:1
|
6.25:1
|
December
31, 2011
|
3.00:1
|
1.60:1
|
6.00:1
|
Each
fiscal quarter thereafter
|
2.50:1
|
1.75:1
|
5.00:1
|
·
|
Post-Amendment Asset
Sales. Dynegy may designate up to $500 million of
proceeds from the sale of assets after August 5, 2009, as excluded from
the asset sale, reinvestment and prepayment provisions of the Credit
Facility.
|
·
|
Prepayment
Covenants. The debt prepayment covenants were amended to
provide that, in the event the maturity date of any of the 6.875
percent Senior Notes due 2011 or the 8.75 percent Senior Notes due
2012 issued by DHI is extended to a date, or refinanced with debt
maturing, after the April 2, 2013 Term L/C Facility maturity date,
DHI may prepay other longer-dated indebtedness in the amount of any such
notes so extended or refinanced.
|
·
|
Margin for
Borrowings. The margin for borrowings was amended to
provide that the applicable margin will be either 2.375 percent or
2.75 percent per annum for base rate loans and either 3.375 percent or
3.75 percent per annum for Eurodollar loans, with the lower
applicable margin being payable if the ratings for the Credit Facility
by S&P or Moody’s are BB+ or Ba1 or higher, respectively, and the
higher applicable margin being payable if such ratings are both less
than BB+ and Ba1.
|
·
|
Unused Commitment
Fee. The unused commitment fee was amended to increase
the fee to either 0.625 percent or 0.75 percent payable on the unused
portion of the Revolving Facility, with the lower commitment fee being
payable if the ratings for the Revolving Facility by S&P or
Moody’s are BB+ or Ba1 or higher, respectively, and the higher commitment
fee being payable if such ratings are both less than BB+ and
Ba1.
|
Item
2.02
|
Results
of Operations and Financial
Condition.
|
·
|
When
EBITDA is discussed in reference to performance on a consolidated
basis, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to
EBITDA is net income (loss) attributable to Dynegy Inc. It can
be reconciled using the following calculation: Net income (loss) plus
Income tax (benefit) expense, Interest expense and Depreciation and
amortization expense.
|
|
·
|
However,
information regarding interest expense for the range of Adjusted EBITDA
for 2010, which is required to reconcile Adjusted EBITDA to net income
(loss), is not available for 2010 without unreasonable effort.
The probable significance of this information is that such
information would be based on liability management assumptions, debt
retirements and other projections that management has not finalized.
Thus, management is reconciling Adjusted EBITDA for 2010 to operating
income (loss) as the comparable GAAP measure.
|
|
·
|
Further,
because management does not allocate interest expense and income taxes on
a segment level, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to
EBITDA when performance is discussed on a segment
level or plant
level is Operating income
(loss).
|
·
|
“Adjusted Cash Flow from
Operations” - We define “Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations” as
cash flow from operations excluding cash payments on significant items,
such as legal and regulatory
payments.
|
·
|
“Adjusted Free Cash
Flow” – We define “Adjusted Free Cash Flow” as cash flow from
operations excluding cash payments on significant items less maintenance
and environmental capital
expenditures.
|
Item
7.01
|
Regulation
FD Disclosure.
|
DYNEGY
INC.
|
||||
(Registrant)
|
||||
Dated:
August 10, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
KENT R. STEPHENSON
|
||
Name:
|
Kent
R. Stephenson
|
|||
Title:
|
Senior
Vice President, Deputy General Counsel
|
|||
DYNEGY
HOLDINGS INC.
|
||||
(Registrant)
|
||||
Dated:
August 10, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
KENT R. STEPHENSON
|
||
Name:
|
Kent
R. Stephenson
|
|||
Title:
|
Senior
Vice President, Deputy General
Counsel
|