UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Applied Materials, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
Gary E. Dickerson PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
![]() |
January 25, 2018
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
We invite you to attend Applied Materials 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Thursday, March 8, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time at our corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054.
The attached Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement describe the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. We have also made available a copy of our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K with the Proxy Statement.
Your vote is very important to us, and voting your proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote as soon as possible and submit your proxy via the Internet, or if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by telephone or by signing, dating and returning your proxy card.
Thank you for your attention to these important matters and for your continued support of Applied Materials.
Sincerely,
Gary E. Dickerson
President and Chief Executive Officer
3050 Bowers Avenue Santa Clara, California 95054 Phone: (408) 727-5555 |
Mailing Address: Applied Materials, Inc. 3050 Bowers Avenue P.O. Box 58039 Santa Clara, California 95052-8039 |
NOTICE OF
2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Thursday, March 8, 2018
at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time
The 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Applied Materials, Inc. will be held on Thursday, March 8, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time at our corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054.
Items of Business
1. | To elect ten directors to serve for a one-year term and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. |
2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2017. |
3. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018. |
4. | To consider two shareholder proposals, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. |
5. | To transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. |
Your vote is important. You may vote via the Internet or by telephone, or if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by signing, dating and returning your proxy card. If you are voting via the Internet or by telephone, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 7, 2018. For specific voting instructions, please refer to the information provided in the following Proxy Statement, together with your proxy card or the voting instructions you receive by e-mail or that are provided via the Internet.
If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet, a proxy card was not sent to you, and you may vote only via the Internet, unless you have requested a paper copy of the proxy materials, in which case, you may also vote by telephone or by signing, dating and returning your proxy card. Shares cannot be voted by marking, writing on and returning the Notice of Internet Availability. Any Notices of Internet Availability that are returned will not be counted as votes. Instructions for requesting a paper copy of the proxy materials are set forth on the Notice of Internet Availability.
By Order of the Board of Directors |
![]() |
Thomas F. Larkins Corporate Secretary |
Santa Clara, California
January 25, 2018
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on March 8, 2018: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.
2018 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Your proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Applied Materials, Inc. We are making this Proxy Statement available to shareholders beginning on January 25, 2018. This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. We encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement for more information prior to voting.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Date and Time: | March 8, 2018, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time | |
Location: | Applied Materials, Inc., 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054 | |
Record Date: | January 10, 2018 | |
Voting: | Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on. | |
Attendance: | Shareholders and their duly appointed proxies may attend the meeting. |
Proposals and Board Recommendations
For More Information | Board Recommendation | |||||||
Proposal 1 Election of Directors | Pages 1 to 6 | ✓ FOR each Nominee | ||||||
Judy Bruner |
Stephen R. Forrest |
Scott A. McGregor |
||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen |
Thomas J. Iannotti |
Dennis D. Powell |
||||||
Aart J. de Geus Gary E. Dickerson |
Alexander A. Karsner Adrianna C. Ma |
|||||||
Proposal 2 Executive Compensation | Page 19 | ✓ FOR | ||||||
Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2017 |
||||||||
Proposal 3 Ratification of Registered Accounting Firm | Page 48 | ✓ FOR | ||||||
Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018 |
||||||||
Proposal 4 Shareholder Proposal to Provide for Right to Act by Written Consent | Pages 50 to 52 | ✘ AGAINST | ||||||
Shareholder proposal requesting that the Board take steps to permit shareholder action by written consent without a meeting |
||||||||
Proposal 5 Shareholder Proposal for Annual Disclosure of EEO-1 Data | Pages 53 to 55 | ✘ AGAINST | ||||||
Shareholder proposal requesting that the Board adopt and enforce a policy to disclose annually Applieds EEO-1 data |
Applied Materials, Inc. i
Name and Occupation | Age | Director Since | Independent | Committees | ||||
Judy Bruner | 59 | 2016 | ✓ | Governance (Chair) | ||||
Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, SanDisk Corporation (retired) |
Audit | |||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen | 48 | 2015 | ✓ | Compensation | ||||
Chief Executive Officer, BaseBit Technologies, Inc. |
Strategy | |||||||
Aart J. de Geus | 63 | 2007 | ✓ | Strategy (Chair) | ||||
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Synopsys, Inc. |
Investment | |||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | 60 | 2013 | ||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer, Applied Materials, Inc. |
||||||||
Stephen R. Forrest | 67 | 2008 | ✓ | Audit | ||||
Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, University of Michigan |
Strategy Investment | |||||||
Thomas J. Iannotti | 61 | 2005 | ✓ | Compensation (Chair) | ||||
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise Services, Hewlett-Packard Company (retired) |
||||||||
Alexander A. Karsner | 50 | 2008 | ✓ | Compensation | ||||
Managing Partner, Emerson Collective |
Governance | |||||||
Adrianna C. Ma | 44 | 2015 | ✓ | Investment (Chair) | ||||
Managing Partner, Fremont Group |
Audit Governance | |||||||
Scott A. McGregor | 61 | 2018 | ✓ | |||||
President and Chief Executive Officer, Broadcom Corporation (retired) |
||||||||
Dennis D. Powell | 70 | 2007 | ✓ | Audit (Chair) | ||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Cisco Systems, Inc. (retired) |
Governance Investment |
Board Practices and Composition
Ensuring the Board is composed of directors who possess a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders, is a top priority of the Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
Director Nominee Expertise | Key Attributes | |
|
|
ii 2018 Proxy Statement
Semiconductor Industry and Technology 6 Financial and Accounting 3 Global Business 6 Strategy and Innovation 6 Operations and Infrastructure 4 Government Policy 2 M&A and Organizational Growth 5 Risk Management 6 Public Company Board Experience 8 Executive Leadership 6 Independent Board Chair 89% Director Independence Regular refreshment resulting in average director tenure of 7 years
2018 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Board Practices Support Thoughtful Board Composition
Board Composition to Support Company Strategy |
The Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee regularly evaluate the size and composition of the Board to ensure appropriate alignment with the Companys evolving business and strategic needs. |
Director Succession Planning |
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the short- and long-term strategies and interests of Applied to determine what current and future skills and experience are required of the Board in exercising its oversight function. |
Annual Board Evaluations |
The Board conducts an annual assessment of Board, Board Committees and individual directors to evaluate effectiveness. |
Board Diversity |
The Board values diversity of background, skills and viewpoints, and gender and ethnicity in the recruitment of new directors. |
Board Refreshment |
The Board believes the fresh perspectives brought by new directors are critical to a forward-looking and strategic Board when appropriately balanced by the deep understanding of Applieds business provided by longer-serving directors. |
We are committed to effective corporate governance that is informed by our shareholders, promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders, and strengthens Board and management accountability.
Governance Highlights
✓ Annual Election of Directors |
✓ Shareholder Right to Call a Special Meeting | |
✓ Independent Chairman of the Board |
✓ Annual Board, Committee and Individual Evaluations | |
✓ Highly Independent Board (9 of 10 Directors) and Committees |
✓ Robust Board Succession Planning | |
✓ Majority Voting for Directors |
✓ Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors | |
✓ No Supermajority Vote Requirements |
✓ Active Shareholder Engagement Practices | |
✓ Shareholder Proxy Access |
✓ No Poison Pill | |
✓ Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executives |
✓ Clawback Policy for Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plans |
Shareholder Engagement
We believe that strong corporate governance should include regular engagement with our shareholders to enable us to understand and respond to shareholder concerns. We have a robust shareholder outreach program led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our Investor Relations, Global Rewards and Legal departments. Independent members of our Board are also involved, as appropriate. In the fall, we solicit feedback on our executive compensation program, corporate governance and disclosure practices, and sustainability and corporate citizenship initiatives, as well as any matters voted on at our prior annual meeting. After the filing of our proxy statement, we engage again with our shareholders about important topics to be addressed at our annual meeting. Following our annual meeting, we review the results of the meeting and investor feedback, as well as evaluate emerging trends in corporate governance and other areas. We share feedback we receive from our shareholders with our Human Resources and Compensation Committee, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the full Board. See Shareholder Engagement on page 12 for more information.
Applied Materials, Inc. iii
Company Overview
Applied Materials is the leader in materials engineering solutions used to produce virtually every new chip and advanced display in the world. We develop, design, produce and service semiconductor and display equipment for manufacturers that sell into highly competitive and rapidly changing end markets. At Applied Materials, our innovations make possible the technology shaping the future.
2017 Performance Highlights
In 2017, we celebrated our 50th anniversary and delivered all-time record revenue, operating profit and earnings per share.
Key highlights include:
● | Grew revenue to $14.5 billion in fiscal 2017, up 34% from the prior year, resulting in our second consecutive year of record revenue; |
● | Achieved record revenue across all of our segments; |
● | Grew operating profit to a new all-time record, resulting in record GAAP EPS of $3.17, up 106% over fiscal 2016, and record non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $3.25, an increase of 86% over fiscal 2016 (see the Appendix for a reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted measures); |
● | Delivered record operating cash flow of over $3.6 billion, equal to 25% of revenue; and |
● | Returned $1.6 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. |
Highlights of five-year performance achievements across key financial measures
|
![]() |
![]() |
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and non-GAAP adjusted EPS are performance targets under our bonus and long-term incentive plans. See Appendix for non-GAAP reconciliations.
iv 2018 Proxy Statement
Revenue RECORD HIGH $7.5B FY13 +93% $14.5B FY17 Non-GAAP Operating Margin 13.7% FY13 +14 PTS 27.9% FY17 Non-GAAP EPS RECORD HIGH $0.59 FY13 +451% $3.25 FY17
2018 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Strategic and Operational Highlights
In fiscal 2017, we continued to drive profitable growth by targeting major technology inflections and introducing new, differentiated, enabling products and services to help our customers address their most critical technological challenges.
● | Increased our investments in research and development by more than $230 million over fiscal 2016, to almost $1.8 billion, and converted over 90% of our development positions into volume production wins. |
● | Delivered strong growth in key areas of our semiconductor equipment business in fiscal 2017 our process equipment business and our metrology and inspection business delivered all-time record revenues, and our physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) and thermal products had an especially strong year, driven by the mass adoption of advanced interconnects in logic as well as increasing use of logic-like processes in memory. |
● | Made strong gains in patterning and 3D NAND memory, and positioned the company to grow in DRAM as customers transition to new higher performance devices. |
● | Built upon Applieds large installed base of manufacturing systems and drove a 25% increase in the number of tools under comprehensive service agreements; these agreements enable us to generate more value by helping our customers achieve and maintain higher yields, and optimize factory output and operating costs. |
● | Ramped a new generation of equipment in our Display business for Gen 10.5 display factories, allowing customers to manufacture larger and more advanced TVs, and established the leading position in thin-film encapsulation, which enables next generation OLED displays for mobile devices. |
Chief Financial Officer Transition. In August 2017, we welcomed a new Chief Financial Officer, Daniel J. Durn, who succeeded Robert J. Halliday. Mr. Durn brings significant industry experience and knowledge that will further accelerate our strategy.
Stock Price Performance
Our strong strategic and financial performance in fiscal 2017 also resulted in meaningful value creation for our shareholders. As illustrated below, Applied significantly outperformed both our peer group and the S&P 500 Information Technology Index.
FY2013 FY2017 Total Shareholder Return vs. Key Peers
Applied Materials, Inc. v
Pay Mix
In fiscal 2017, a significant portion of our executive compensation consisted of variable compensation and long-term incentives. As illustrated below, 93% of CEO compensation for fiscal 2017 comprised variable compensation elements, and 75% of Mr. Dickersons overall compensation was delivered in equity with multi-year vesting.
FY2017 Compensation Mix1 | ||
CEO |
All Other NEOs | |
|
|
1Represents | total direct compensation for fiscal 2017; excludes new CFO Daniel J. Durn, who joined Applied in August 2017. |
Summary of Fiscal 2017 Total Direct Compensation
The following table summarizes elements of annual total direct compensation for our named executive officers (NEOs) for fiscal 2017, consisting of (1) base salary, (2) annual incentive bonus and (3) annual long-term incentive awards (the grant date fair value of stock awards). This table excludes amounts not considered by the HRCC to be annual total direct compensation that are required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table (see page 41 of this Proxy Statement).
Name and Principal Position | Salary ($) |
Annual Incentive Bonus ($) |
Annual Long-Term Incentive Award ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
1,000,000 | 2,640,000 | 10,844,501 | 14,484,501 | ||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn(1) |
138,462 | | 2,952,086 | 3,090,548 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday |
625,000 | 1,113,750 | 4,231,139 | 5,969,889 | ||||||||||||
Former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour |
591,346 | 1,060,290 | 3,868,486 | 5,520,122 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, General Manager, Services, Display and Flexible Technologies |
||||||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu |
484,808 | 770,770 | 2,176,031 | 3,431,609 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer |
||||||||||||||||
Thomas F. Larkins |
480,000 | 702,768 | 2,176,031 | 3,358,799 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
(1) | Mr. Durn joined Applied in August 2017. Amounts for Mr. Durn exclude a sign-on bonus and a new-hire equity award, both of which are reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
vi 2018 Proxy Statement
75% Long-Term Incentives 93% Variable Compensation 68% Long-Term Incentives 88% Variable Compensation
2018 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Key Fiscal 2017 Executive Compensation Highlights
Key compensation decisions for fiscal 2017 included:
Limited Salary Increases for Select NEOs. Two NEOs received modest salary increases from 2016 levels to reflect each officers responsibilities.
Annual Bonuses Reflect Strong Company Performance. The average annual bonus payouts to our NEOs was 134% of target bonus, reflecting our strong performance against fiscal 2017 objectives.
Adopted New Long-Term Incentive Program. In response to shareholder feedback as well as a broad review of our executive compensation program in fiscal 2016, the HRCC completed a comprehensive redesign of the long-term incentive program that was effective beginning with fiscal 2017 grants. Key redesign elements included:
● | Performance measurement periods extended from one year to three years; |
● | Tighter alignment of performance metrics with our strategic goals; and |
● | Re-balanced equity mix to achieve performance alignment and retention goals. |
Our new long-term incentive program equity mix establishes a more direct balance between rigorous, performance-based incentives and retention-based incentives, both of which the HRCC believes are critical components of our compensation program. Additionally, new performance measures (non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) market share) consider both our absolute and relative performance, and align with our stated strategic priorities to ensure our management teams long-term incentives match our long-term goals.
Summary of Changes to Long-Term Incentive Program
Wholesale Redesign of the Long-Term Incentive Program
| ||||||||
∎ |
In fiscal 2017, the HRCC enacted a wholesale redesign of the long-term incentive program to address shareholder feedback and meet the needs of the evolving business
| |||||||
∎ | New equity mix includes performance share units (PSUs) to provide rigorous long-term performance alignment and restricted stock units (RSUs) to provide a link to shareholder value creation and retention value
| |||||||
∎ | PSUs (75% for CEO; 50% for all other NEOs) -- new performance measures:
| |||||||
∎ |
3-year average non-GAAP adjusted operating margin
| |||||||
∎ |
3-year average WFE market share
| |||||||
∎ | RSUs (25% for CEO; 50% for all other NEOs):
| |||||||
∎ | 3-year ratable vesting
| |||||||
∎ |
No performance retesting ability in new PSU design shares not earned in performance period are forfeited
| |||||||
∎ |
New PSU metrics have threshold, target and maximum performance levels that can result in payout below, at or above target
|
Stock Ownership Guidelines. In fiscal 2017, the HRCC approved changes to our stock ownership guidelines to increase the CEO ownership level from 5x to 6x of annual base salary and expanded the applicability of the guidelines (3x of annual base salary) to all Section 16 officers on the CEO Executive Staff.
Applied Materials, Inc. vii
Alignment of Pay with Performance
The following chart shows the alignment between total shareholder return (TSR) and the total direct compensation of our CEO for the last five fiscal years. While TSR has grown significantly over the last four years, our CEOs total direct compensation has remained relatively flat during that period.
(1) | Total direct compensation consists of annual base salary (annualized for 2013 for Mr. Dickerson, who became our CEO in September 2013), annual incentive bonus and annual long-term incentive award (grant date fair value of annual equity awards for all fiscal years, except for fiscal 2014, which consists of the total amount of cash-settled performance units). Total direct compensation shown above excludes other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | TSR line illustrates the total shareholder return on our common stock during the period from October 25, 2013 through October 27, 2017, assuming $100 was invested on October 25, 2013 and assuming reinvestment of dividends. |
viii 2018 Proxy Statement
2018 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Sustainability and Corporate Citizenship
Applied is committed to growing its business in a sustainable and socially responsible manner, and we demonstrate our commitment through our corporate citizenship programs and initiatives. We publish an annual Citizenship Report on our website to highlight our social responsibility accomplishments and provide key performance data to our shareholders. Sustainability is integrated into our operations, and we have an Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) organization that is focused on maintaining a safe and healthy working environment, demonstrating environmental leadership, and meeting or exceeding regulatory compliance standards. The Head of EHS reports to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis and provides a more in-depth environmental and sustainability update to the Audit Committee on an annual basis.
We believe that investing in operating our business in a sustainable manner, investing in our people, and investing in our communities benefits Applied and its shareholders.
Key Sustainability Initiatives
Human Capital Management | Supply Chain | |
Our people are our greatest strength, and we have established practices to nurture our human capital.
● Advance diversity and inclusion through recruiting and mentoring programs, sponsoring employee resource groups and hosting annual diversity events with the participation of our Board, CEO and Executive Staff.
● Promote next generation of technology leaders by supporting STEM education programs and promoting participation of girls, women and under-represented minorities in STEM education and careers in technology. |
Sustainable supply chains are core to our success, and we actively promote global best practices.
● Member of Responsible Business Alliance (formerly EICC), an industry coalition promoting safe supply chains and environmentally responsible, sustainable and ethical business operations.
● Committed to high standards have adopted the RBA Code of Conduct and require companies in our global supply chain to conform to this Code. | |
Environment | Ethics | |
We seek to operate and develop products in a way that minimizes environmental impact.
● Water reduction efforts resulted in ~6.3M gallons of water recycled in 2016.
● Reduced non-hazardous waste by 30% in 2016.
● Minimize carbon footprint through on-site renewable energy production and use of green energy to support 100% of power needs of our two Santa Clara campuses. |
We maintain the highest ethical standards in interactions with employees, customers, suppliers, competitors and public.
● Our Standards of Business Conduct include key provisions on human rights, including prohibitions on use of child labor or forced, bonded or indentured labor in our operations.
● Responsible sourcing of materials for our products.
● Conduct global training programs and offer 24/7 Business Ethics helplines. |
Applied Materials, Inc. ix
PROPOSAL 1ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROXY STATEMENT
PROPOSAL 1ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
✓ | THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTOR NOMINEES
|
![]() |
Judy Bruner
Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, SanDisk Corporation (retired)
|
|
|
|
Independent Director
Director since 2016
Age 59
Board Committees: Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair) Audit
Other Current Public Boards: Rapid7, Inc. Seagate Technology plc Varian Medical Systems
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and management experience
● Accounting principles, financial controls, financial reporting rules and regulations, and audit procedures
● Global business, industry and operational experience
● Risk management and controls
● Public company board experience | |||||
Judy Bruner served as Executive Vice
President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer of SanDisk |
||||||||||
Corporation, a supplier of flash storage products, from June 2004 until its acquisition by Western Digital in May 2016. Previously, she was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Palm, Inc., a provider of handheld computing and communications solutions, from September 1999 until June 2004. Prior to Palm, Inc., Ms. Bruner held financial management positions at 3Com Corporation, Ridge Computers and Hewlett-Packard Company. She currently serves as a member of the boards of directors of Rapid7, Inc., Seagate Technology plc and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Ms. Bruner is a member of the board of trustees of the Computer History Museum, and previously served as a member of the board of directors of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., from 2009 until its acquisition in November 2017.
|
Applied Materials, Inc. 1
![]() |
Xun (Eric) Chen
Chief Executive Officer,
|
|
Independent Director
Director since 2015
Age 48
Board Committees: Human Resources and Compensation Strategy
Other Current Public Boards: None
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and management experience
● Semiconductor industry leadership
● Global business, industry and operational experience in the technology and information sector
● Mergers and acquisitions, capital markets
● Public company board experience | |||||
Eric Chen is the Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of BaseBit Technologies, Inc., a technology company in |
||||||||
Silicon Valley. Dr. Chen has served as CEO of BaseBit Technologies since it was founded in October 2015, except from March 2016 until December 2017, when BaseBit was a portfolio company of Team Curis Group, a group of integrated biotechnology and data technology companies and laboratories, during which time Dr. Chen served as CEO of Team Curis Group. From 2008 to 2015, Dr. Chen served as a managing director of Silver Lake, a leading private investment firm focused on technology-enabled and related growth industries. Prior to Silver Lake, Dr. Chen was a senior vice president and served on the executive committee of ASML Holding N.V. He joined ASML following its 2007 acquisition of Brion Technologies, Inc., a company he co-founded in 2002 and served as Chief Executive Officer. Prior to Brion Technologies, Dr. Chen was a senior vice president at J.P. Morgan. He served as a member of the boards of directors of Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd. from 2014 to July 2016 and of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (Varian) from 2004 until its acquisition by Applied in 2011.
|
![]() |
Aart J. de Geus
Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer,
|
|
Independent Director
Director since 2007
Age 63
Board Committees: Strategy (Chair) Investment
Other Current Public Boards: Synopsys, Inc.
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and management experience
● Semiconductor industry leadership
● Innovation, management development and understanding of global challenges and opportunities
● Navigating a company from start-up through various stages of growth
● Mergers and acquisitions
● Public company board leadership | |||||
Aart J. de Geus is a co-founder of Synopsys, Inc., a provider of electronic design automation software and related services |
||||||||
for semiconductor design companies, and currently serves as its Chairman of the Board of Directors and Co-Chief Executive Officer. Since 1986, Dr. de Geus has held various positions at Synopsys, including President, Senior Vice President of Engineering and Senior Vice President of Marketing, and has served as a member of its board of directors. From 1982 to 1986, Dr. de Geus was employed by the General Electric Company, a global infrastructure, finance and media company, where he was the Manager of the Advanced Computer-Aided Engineering Group.
|
2 2018 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 1ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
|
Gary E. Dickerson
President and Chief Executive Officer, Applied Materials, Inc.
|
Director since 2013
Age 60
Other Current Public Boards: None
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and management experience
● Semiconductor industry leadership
● Global business, industry and operational experience
● Extensive engineering and technological leadership
● Understanding of complex industry and global challenges
● Expertise in driving innovation and product development
| ||||||
Gary E. Dickerson was named President of
Applied in June 2012 and was appointed Chief Executive Officer and a |
||||||||
member of the Board of Directors in September 2013. Before joining Applied, he served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of Varian, a supplier of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, from 2004 until its acquisition by Applied in November 2011. Prior to Varian, Mr. Dickerson served 18 years with KLA-Tencor Corporation, a supplier of process control and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and related industries, where he held a variety of operations and product development roles, including President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Dickerson started his semiconductor career in manufacturing and engineering management at General Motors Delco Electronics Division and AT&T Technologies.
|
![]() |
Stephen R. Forrest
Professor of Electrical
Engineering & Computer
|
Independent Director
Director since 2008
Age 67
Board Committees: Audit Strategy Investment
Other Current Public Boards: None
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Semiconductor, display and alternative energy technologies
● Research and development portfolio management
● Government policy
● Innovation, technology licensing and product commercialization
● Establishing partnerships to develop businesses in new markets focused on alternative energy and other technologies | ||||||
Stephen R. Forrest holds faculty appointments
as |
||||||||
Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, as Professor of Physics, and as Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Michigan, and leads the Universitys Optoelectronics Components and Materials Group. From January 2006 to December 2013, Mr. Forrest also served as Vice President for Research at the University of Michigan. From 1992 to 2005, Dr. Forrest served in a number of positions at Princeton University, including Chair of the Electrical Engineering Department, Director of the Center for Photonics and Optoelectronic Materials, and director of the National Center for Integrated Photonic Technology. Prior to Princeton, Dr. Forrest was a faculty member of the Electrical Engineering and Materials Science Departments at the University of Southern California.
|
||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. 3
![]() |
Thomas J. Iannotti
Senior Vice President and General
Manager,
|
|
Chairman of the Board
Independent Director
Director since 2005
Age 61
Board Committees: Human Resources and Compensation (Chair)
Other Current Public Boards: Atento S.A.
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Service management for technology companies on a global, regional and country level
● Senior leadership and management experience
● Global business, industry and operational experience
● International strategic and business development
● Public company board experience
| |||||
Thomas J. Iannotti served as Senior Vice
President and |
||||||||
General Manager, Enterprise Services, for Hewlett-Packard Company, a technology solutions provider to consumers, businesses and institutions globally, from February 2009 until his retirement in October 2011. From 2002 to January 2009, Mr. Iannotti held various executive positions at Hewlett-Packard, including Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Enterprise Business Group, Americas. From 1978 to 2002, Mr. Iannotti worked at Digital Equipment Corporation, a vendor of computer systems and software, and at Compaq Computer Corporation, a supplier of personal computing systems, after its acquisition of Digital Equipment Corporation. Mr. Iannotti currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Atento S.A.
|
![]() |
Alexander A. Karsner
Managing Partner, Emerson Collective
|
Independent Director
Director since 2008
Age 50
Board Committees: Human Resources and Compensation Corporate Governance and Nominating
Other Current Public Boards: None
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Expertise in public policy and government relations
● Domestic and international trade, development and investment markets
● Entrepreneurial leadership
● Renewable energy policy, technologies and commercialization
● Public company board experience | ||||||
Alexander A. Karsner has served as Managing
Partner of Emerson Collective, an investment platform funding non-profit, philanthropic and for-profit portfolios advancing |
||||||||
education, immigration, the environment and other social justice initiatives, since January 2016. Mr. Karsner has been Founder and CEO of Manifest Energy Inc., an energy technology development and investment firm, since July 2009, and has served as its Executive Chairman since January 2013. From March 2006 to August 2008, he served as Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy at the U.S. Department of Energy. From August 2002 to March 2006, Mr. Karsner was Founder and Managing Director of Enercorp, a private company involved in international project development, management and financing of energy infrastructure. Mr. Karsner has also worked with Tondu Energy Systems of Texas, Wartsila Power Development of Finland and other multi-national energy firms and developers. He is also Senior Strategist at X, part of Alphabet Inc., and a Precourt Energy Scholar at Stanford Universitys School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and serves on Advisory Boards of MIT Medialab, Sandia National Laboratory and The Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship at the University of Chicagos Booth School of Business. Mr. Karsner served as a member of the board of directors of Codexis, Inc. from 2009 to 2014.
|
4 2018 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 1ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
![]() |
Adrianna C. Ma
Managing Partner, Fremont Group
|
Independent Director
Director since 2015
Age 44
Board Committees: Investment (Chair) Audit Corporate Governance and Nominating
Other Current Public Boards: None
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Broad experience with technology companies
● Expertise in global growth investment
● Financial and accounting expertise
● Mergers and acquisitions, capital markets
● Board experience with technology-enabled growth companies | ||||||
Adrianna C. Ma has been a Managing Partner at the Fremont Group, a private investment company, since May 2015. At the Fremont Group, she oversees BF Global, the flagship portfolio |
||||||||
of funds, including its investment strategy, asset allocation, manager selection and risk management. From 2005 to April 2015, Ms. Ma served as a Managing Director at General Atlantic LLC, a global growth equity firm, where she invested in and served on the boards of directors of technology-enabled growth companies around the world. Prior to joining General Atlantic, Ms. Ma worked at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated as an investment banker in the Mergers, Acquisitions and Restructuring Department. Ms. Ma served as a member of the board of directors of C&J Energy Services, Inc. from 2013 to 2015.
|
![]() |
Scott A. McGregor
President and Chief Executive
Officer,
|
Independent Director
Director since 2018
Age 61
Other Current Public Boards: Equifax Inc. (since October 2017)
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Executive leadership and management experience
● Semiconductor industry leadership
● Global business, industry and operational experience
● Innovation, management development and understanding of global challenges and opportunities
● Public company Board leadership
| ||||||
Scott A. McGregor served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the board of directors of | ||||||||
Broadcom Corporation, a world leader in wireless connectivity, broadband, automotive and networking infrastructure, from 2005 until the company was acquired by Avago Technologies Limited in 2016. Mr. McGregor joined Broadcom from Philips Semiconductors (now NXP Semiconductors), where he was President and Chief Executive Officer. He previously served in a range of senior management positions at Santa Cruz Operation Inc., Digital Equipment Corporation (now part of HP), Xerox PARC and Microsoft, where he was the architect and development team leader for Windows 1.0. Mr. McGregor currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Equifax Inc. He previously served as a member of the boards of directors of Ingram Micro Inc. and Xactly Corporation.
|
Applied Materials, Inc. 5
![]() |
Dennis D. Powell
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer,
|
Independent Director
Director since 2007
Age 70
Board Committees: Audit (Chair) Corporate Governance and Nominating Investment
Other Current Public Boards: Intuit, Inc.
Key Qualifications and Expertise:
● Global financial and executive leadership
● Accounting principles, financial controls, financial reporting rules and regulations, and audit procedures
● Mergers and acquisitions
● Risk management and controls
● Public company board experience | ||||||
Dennis D. Powell served as an Executive Advisor at Cisco Systems, Inc., a provider of networking products |
||||||||
and services, from February 2008 to September 2010. He served as Ciscos Chief Financial Officer from May 2003 to February 2008 and, in addition, served as an Executive Vice President from 2007 to 2008 and a Senior Vice President from 2003 to 2007. After joining Cisco in 1997, Mr. Powell also served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance and Vice President, Corporate Controller. Before joining Cisco, Mr. Powell worked for 26 years at Coopers & Lybrand LLP, an accounting firm, where he was last a senior partner. Mr. Powell served as a member of the board of directors of VMware, Inc. from 2007 to 2015 and currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Intuit, Inc.
|
6 2018 Proxy Statement
Our nominees have an average tenure of 6 years, which is lower than the average tenure of other S&P 500 companies, and four of our nominees have been members of the Board for four years or less.
Regular refreshment resulting in average director tenure of 6 years |
![]() |
8 2018 Proxy Statement
2017 Board Evaluation Process
10 2018 Proxy Statement
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
Applied Materials, Inc. 11
12 2018 Proxy Statement
Audit Committee
Members:
Dennis D. Powell, Chair* Judy Bruner* Stephen R. Forrest+ Adrianna C. Ma* |
Primary responsibilities:
● Oversee financial statements, internal control over financial reporting and auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes ● Oversee the qualifications, independence, performance and engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm ● Oversee disclosure controls and procedures, and internal audit function ● Review and pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services and fees ● Oversee tax, legal, regulatory and ethical compliance ● Review and approve related-person transactions ● Oversee financial-related risks, enterprise risk management program and cybersecurity
|
Meetings in Fiscal 2017: 12 | ||
* Audit Committee Financial Expert + Appointed to Committee in March 2017
|
Human Resources and Compensation Committee
Members:
Thomas J. Iannotti, Chair Xun (Eric) Chen Alexander A. Karsner |
Primary responsibilities:
● Oversee human resources programs, compensation and employee benefits programs, policies and plans ● Review and advise on management succession planning and executive organizational development ● Determine compensation policies for executive officers and employees ● Review the performance and determine the compensation of executive officers ● Approve and oversee equity-related incentive plans and executive bonus plans ● Review compensation policies and practices as they relate to risk management practices ● Approve the compensation program for Board members
|
Meetings in Fiscal 2017: 5 |
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
Members:
Judy Bruner, Chair+ Alexander A. Karsner Adrianna C. Ma+ Dennis D. Powell |
Primary responsibilities:
● Oversee the composition, structure and evaluation of the Board and its committees ● Identify and recommend qualified candidates for election to the Board ● Establish procedures for director candidate nomination and evaluation ● Oversee corporate governance policies and practices, including Corporate Governance Guidelines ● Review and approval of director service on the board of directors of other companies and oversight of director education ● Review shareholder proposals and recommend to the Board actions to be taken in response to each proposal ● Review and monitor takeover defenses and takeover defense preparedness to maximize long-term shareholder value
|
Meetings in Fiscal 2017: 8 | ||
+ Appointed to Committee in March 2017
|
14 2018 Proxy Statement
Director Compensation for Fiscal 2017
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) |
Stock Awards ($)(1)(2) |
All Other Compensation ($)(3) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||
Judy Bruner |
108,026 | 222,643 | 3,000 | 333,669 | ||||||||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen |
91,625 | 222,643 | 2,000 | 316,268 | ||||||||||||
Aart J. de Geus |
92,125 | 222,643 | | 314,768 | ||||||||||||
Stephen R. Forrest |
96,390 | 222,643 | | 319,033 | ||||||||||||
Thomas J. Iannotti |
202,760 | 222,643 | 1,750 | 427,153 | ||||||||||||
Susan M. James(4) |
41,017 | | | 41,017 | ||||||||||||
Alexander A. Karsner |
94,669 | 222,643 | 2,000 | 319,312 | ||||||||||||
Adrianna C. Ma |
102,956 | 222,643 | | 325,599 | ||||||||||||
Scott A. McGregor(5) |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Dennis D. Powell |
130,750 | 222,643 | | 353,393 | ||||||||||||
Willem P. Roelandts(4) |
76,717 | | | 76,717 |
(1) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the directors. Instead, these amounts represent the grant date fair value of stock awards granted in fiscal 2017 (consisting of 6,019 restricted stock units granted to each continuing director on March 9, 2017), as determined pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718 (ASC 718). The assumptions used to calculate the value of stock awards are set forth in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Applieds Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017 filed with the SEC on December 15, 2017. |
(2) | Each continuing director had 6,019 restricted stock units outstanding at the end of fiscal 2017. In addition, certain directors had restricted stock units that had vested in previous years and for which settlement was deferred until the date of his or her termination of service from the Board, as follows: Mr. Chen, 10,219 units; Ms. Ma, 10,219 units; and Mr. Powell, 57,191 units. |
(3) | Amount shown represents The Applied Materials Foundations matching contribution of the directors donations to eligible non-profit organizations. |
(4) | The term of office for each of Ms. James and Mr. Roelandts expired upon the election of directors at the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders on March 9, 2017, so they did not receive annual grants in fiscal 2017. |
(5) | Mr. McGregor was appointed to the Board in fiscal 2018. |
16 2018 Proxy Statement
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2017 by each person known by Applied to own 5% or more of our common stock. In general, beneficial ownership refers to shares that an entity or individual had the power to vote or the power to dispose of, and shares that such entity or individual had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2017.
Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||||
Name | Number | Percent(1) | ||||||
The Vanguard Group |
70,920,938 | (2) | 6.7 | % | ||||
BlackRock, Inc. |
66,066,425 | (3) | 6.3 | % |
(1) | Percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group by 1,051,802,947 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2017. |
(2) | The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by The Vanguard Group (Vanguard) on February 9, 2017 indicates that as of December 31, 2016, Vanguard had sole dispositive power over 69,034,547 shares, shared dispositive power over 1,886,391 shares, sole voting power over 1,701,589 shares, and shared voting power over 209,026 shares. |
(3) | The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock) on January 19, 2017 indicates that as of December 31, 2016, BlackRock had sole dispositive power over 66,066,425 shares and sole voting power over 55,558,435 shares. |
Applied Materials, Inc. 17
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2017 by: (1) each director nominee, (2) each NEO and (3) the current directors and executive officers as a group. In general, beneficial ownership refers to shares that a director or executive officer had the power to vote or the power to dispose of, and shares that such individual had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2017.
Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||||
Name | Number(1) | Percent(2) | ||||||
Directors, not including the CEO: |
||||||||
Judy Bruner |
10,777 | (3) | * | |||||
Xun (Eric) Chen |
20,389 | (4) | * | |||||
Aart J. de Geus |
137,678 | (3) | * | |||||
Stephen R. Forrest |
75,178 | (3) | * | |||||
Thomas J. Iannotti |
73,178 | (3) | * | |||||
Alexander A. Karsner |
16,238 | (3) | * | |||||
Adrianna C. Ma |
18,815 | (4) | * | |||||
Scott A. McGregor(5) |
| * | ||||||
Dennis D. Powell |
83,656 | (6) | * | |||||
Named Executive Officers: |
||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
2,050,555 | (7) | * | |||||
Daniel J. Durn |
29,810 | (8) | * | |||||
Robert J. Halliday |
254,131 | * | ||||||
Thomas F. Larkins |
274,058 | * | ||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu |
199,062 | * | ||||||
Ali Salehpour |
135,080 | * | ||||||
Current Directors and Executive Officers, as a Group (18 persons) |
3,672,686 | (9) | * |
* | Less than 1% |
(1) | Except as subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of their shares of common stock. |
(2) | Percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group by the sum of 1,051,802,947 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2017, plus the number of shares of common stock that such person or group had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2017. |
(3) | Includes 6,019 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2017. |
(4) | Includes (a) 10,278 restricted stock units that have vested and which, pursuant to the directors election to defer, will be converted to shares of Applied common stock and paid to the director on the date of the directors termination of service from the Applied Board and (b) 6,019 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2017. |
(5) | Mr. McGregor was appointed to the Board on January 22, 2018. Upon his appointment, he received an automatic grant of 472 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days of December 31, 2017. |
(6) | Includes (a) 57,638 restricted stock units that have vested and which, pursuant to Mr. Powells election to defer, will be converted to shares of Applied common stock and paid to him on the date of his termination of service from the Applied Board and (b) 6,019 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2017. |
(7) | Includes an option to purchase 1,000,000 shares that is exercisable within 60 days after December 31, 2017. |
(8) | Consists of restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2017. |
(9) | Includes (a) an option to purchase 1,000,000 shares that is exercisable within 60 days after December 31, 2017, (b) 111,563 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2017 and (c) 78,194 restricted stock units that have vested and which, pursuant to each directors election to defer, will be converted to shares of Applied common stock and paid to the director on the date of the directors termination of service from the Applied Board. |
18 2018 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 2APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
PROPOSAL 2APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
✓ | THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT
|
Applied Materials, Inc. 19
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Our Business and Strategy
Applied Materials is the leader in materials engineering solutions used to produce virtually every new chip and advanced display in the world. Our expertise in modifying materials at atomic levels and on an industrial scale enables customers to transform possibilities into reality. At Applied Materials, our innovations make possible the technology shaping the future.
We develop, design, produce and service semiconductor and display equipment for manufacturers that sell into highly competitive and rapidly changing end markets. Our competitive positioning is driven by our ability to identify major materials engineering technology inflections early, and to develop highly differentiated solutions for our customers to enable those technology inflections. Through our broad portfolio of products and technologies, innovation leadership and focused investments in research and development, we are enabling our customers success, thereby generating record performance for the company and creating significant value for our shareholders.
Our Performance Highlights
In 2017, we celebrated our 50th anniversary and delivered all-time record revenue, operating profit and earnings per share. Key highlights include:
● | Grew revenue to $14.5 billion in fiscal 2017, up 34% from the prior year, resulting in our second consecutive year of record revenue; |
● | Achieved record revenue across all of our segments; |
● | Grew operating profit to a new all-time record, resulting in record GAAP EPS of $3.17, up 106% over fiscal 2016, and record non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $3.25, an increase of 86% over fiscal 2016 (see the Appendix for a reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted measures); |
● | Delivered record operating cash flow of over $3.6 billion, equal to 25% of revenue; and |
● | Returned $1.6 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. |
Highlights of five-year performance achievements across key financial measures
|
|
|
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and non-GAAP adjusted EPS are performance targets under our bonus and long-term incentive plans. See Appendix for non-GAAP reconciliations.
20 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Key financial highlights for our reporting segments in fiscal 2017 include the following:
● | Semiconductor Systems segment: we delivered record annual revenue of $9.5 billion, up 38% from the prior year. |
● | Applied Global Services segment: we grew revenue to a record $3.0 billion, up 17% from fiscal 2016. We accelerated our momentum by introducing new ways to help our customers manage increasing complexity. |
● | Display and Adjacent Markets segment: we delivered manufacturing equipment for increasingly larger and more advanced TVs as well as high-resolution mobile displays, growing revenue to a record $1.9 billion, and achieving the highest year-over-year growth of 58% for the company. |
Strategic and Operational Highlights
Applieds strategy is to deliver highly differentiated materials engineering products and services that enable major technology inflections and drive our customers success.
In fiscal 2017, we continued to drive profitable growth by executing against our strategy. Key highlights include:
● | Increased our investments in research and development by more than $230 million over fiscal 2016, to almost $1.8 billion, and converted over 90% of our development positions into volume production wins. |
● | Delivered strong growth in key areas of our semiconductor equipment business in fiscal 2017 our process equipment business and our metrology and inspection business delivered all-time record revenues, and our physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) and thermal products had an especially strong year, driven by the mass adoption of advanced interconnects in logic as well as increasing use of logic-like processes in memory. |
● | Made strong gains in patterning and 3D NAND memory, and positioned the company to grow in DRAM as customers transition to new higher performance devices. |
● | Built upon Applieds large installed base of manufacturing systems and drove a 25% increase in the number of tools under comprehensive service agreements; these agreements enable us to generate more value by helping our customers achieve and maintain higher yields, and optimize factory output and operating costs. |
● | Ramped a new generation of equipment in our Display business for Gen 10.5 display factories, allowing customers to manufacture larger and more advanced TVs, and established the leading position in thin-film encapsulation, which enables next generation OLED displays for mobile devices. |
Chief Financial Officer Transition. In August 2017, we welcomed a new Chief Financial Officer, Daniel J. Durn, who succeeded Robert J. Halliday. Mr. Durn brings significant industry experience and knowledge that will further accelerate our strategy.
Applied Materials, Inc. 21
Stock Price Performance
Our strong strategic and financial performance in fiscal 2017 also resulted in meaningful value creation for our shareholders. As illustrated below, Applied significantly outperformed both our peer group and the S&P 500 Information Technology Index.
FY2013 FY2017 Total Shareholder Return vs. Key Peers
Key Fiscal 2017 Executive Compensation Highlights
Key compensation decisions for fiscal 2017 include:
Limited Salary Increases for Select NEOs. Two NEOs received modest salary increases from 2016 levels to reflect each officers responsibilities.
Annual Bonuses Reflect Strong Company Performance. The average annual bonus payouts to our NEOs was 134% of target bonus, reflecting our strong performance against fiscal 2017 objectives.
Adopted New Long-Term Incentive Program. In response to shareholder feedback as well as a broad review of our executive compensation program in fiscal 2016, the HRCC completed a comprehensive redesign of the long-term incentive program that was effective beginning with fiscal 2017 grants. Key redesign elements included:
● | Performance measurement periods extended from one year to three years; |
● | Tighter alignment of performance metrics with our strategic goals; and |
● | Re-balanced equity mix to achieve performance alignment and retention goals. |
Our new long-term incentive program equity mix establishes a more direct balance between rigorous, performance-based incentives and retention-based incentives, both of which the HRCC believes are critical components of our compensation program. Additionally, new performance measures (non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) market share) consider both our absolute and relative performance, and align with our stated strategic priorities to ensure our management teams long-term incentives match our long-term goals.
22 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Summary of Changes to Long-Term Incentive Program
Wholesale Redesign of the Long-Term Incentive Program
| ||||
∎ |
In fiscal 2017, the HRCC enacted a wholesale redesign of the long-term incentive program to address shareholder feedback and meet the needs of the evolving business | |||
∎ |
New equity mix includes performance share units (PSUs) to provide rigorous long-term performance alignment and restricted stock units (RSUs) to provide a link to shareholder value creation and retention value | |||
∎ |
PSUs (75% for CEO; 50% for all other NEOs) -- new performance measures: | |||
∎ |
3-year average non-GAAP adjusted operating margin | |||
∎ |
3-year average WFE market share | |||
∎ |
RSUs (25% for CEO; 50% for all other NEOs): | |||
∎
|
3-year ratable vesting
| |||
∎
|
No performance retesting ability in new PSU design shares not earned in performance period are forfeited
| |||
∎
|
New PSU metrics have threshold, target and maximum performance levels that can result in payout below, at or above target
|
Stock Ownership Guidelines. In fiscal 2017, the HRCC approved changes to our stock ownership guidelines to increase the CEO ownership level from 5x to 6x of annual base salary and expanded the applicability of the guidelines (3x of annual base salary) to all Section 16 officers on the CEO Executive Staff.
Applied Materials, Inc. 23
Primary Compensation Elements for Fiscal 2017
The primary elements of our compensation program consist of base salary, annual incentive bonuses and annual long-term incentive awards. Other elements of compensation include a 401(k) savings plan, deferred compensation benefits and other benefits programs that are generally available to all employees. Primary elements of our fiscal 2017 compensation program were as follows:
Element of Pay | Philosophy | Structure | ||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary (see page 29)
|
∎ |
Fixed cash compensation for expected day-to-day responsibilities
| ||||||||||||||||||
∎ | Reviewed annually and adjusted when appropriate, based on scope of responsibility, performance, time in role, experience and competitive market for executive talent
| |||||||||||||||||||
Annual Incentive Bonuses (see page 29)
|
∎ |
Variable compensation paid in cash
|
∎ |
NEO annual incentives determined through three-step performance measurement process:
| ||||||||||||||||
∎ |
Based on performance
against
Financial and non-financial metrics
Performance metrics evaluated annually for alignment with strategy and market trends |
|||||||||||||||||||
∎
∎ |
|
|
Initial Performance Goal Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Share
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate Scorecard Business and Strategic Goals
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Individual Performance Modifier Individual NEO Performance
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentives (see page 35)
|
∎ |
Performance share units to establish rigorous long-term performance alignment
|
∎ |
Performance share units vest based on
| ||||||||||||||||
∎ | Restricted stock units to provide link to shareholder value creation and retention value
|
∎ |
Restricted stock units vest ratably over 3 years
|
24 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Pay Mix
In fiscal 2017, a significant portion of our executive compensation consisted of variable compensation and long-term incentives. As illustrated below, 93% of CEO compensation for fiscal 2017 comprised variable compensation elements, and 75% of Mr. Dickersons overall compensation was delivered in equity with multi-year vesting.
FY2017 Compensation Mix1 | ||
CEO |
All Other NEOs | |
![]() |
![]() |
1Represents total direct compensation for fiscal 2017; excludes new CFO Daniel J. Durn, who joined Applied in August 2017.
Summary of 2017 Total Direct Compensation
The following table summarizes elements of annual total direct compensation for our NEOs for fiscal 2017, consisting of (1) base salary, (2) annual incentive bonus and (3) annual long-term incentive awards (the grant date fair value of stock awards). This table excludes amounts not considered by the HRCC to be annual total direct compensation that are required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table (see page 41 of this Proxy Statement).
Name and Principal Position | Salary ($) |
Annual ($) |
Annual ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
1,000,000 | 2,640,000 | 10,844,501 | 14,484,501 | ||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn(1) |
138,462 | | 2,952,086 | 3,090,548 | ||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday |
625,000 | 1,113,750 | 4,231,139 | 5,969,889 | ||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour |
591,346 | 1,060,290 | 3,868,486 | 5,520,122 | ||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu |
484,808 | 770,770 | 2,176,031 | 3,431,609 | ||||||||||||
Thomas F. Larkins |
480,000 | 702,768 | 2,176,031 | 3,358,799 |
(1) | Mr. Durn joined Applied in August 2017. Amounts for Mr. Durn exclude a sign-on bonus and a new-hire equity award, both of which are reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
Applied Materials, Inc. 25
Alignment of Pay with Performance
The following chart shows the alignment between total shareholder return (TSR) and the total direct compensation of our CEO for the last five fiscal years. While TSR has grown significantly over the last four years, our CEOs total direct compensation has remained relatively flat during that period.
(1) | Total direct compensation consists of annual base salary (annualized for 2013 for Mr. Dickerson, who became our CEO in September 2013), annual incentive bonus and annual long-term incentive award (grant date fair value of annual equity awards for all fiscal years, except for fiscal 2014, which consists of the total amount of cash-settled performance units). Total direct compensation shown above excludes other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | TSR line illustrates the total shareholder return on our common stock during the period from October 25, 2013 through October 27, 2017, assuming $100 was invested on October 25, 2013 and assuming reinvestment of dividends. |
26 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Other Key Compensation Practices
We are committed to executive compensation practices that drive performance, mitigate risk and align the interests of our leadership team with the interests of our shareholders. Below is a summary of best practices that we have implemented and practices that we avoid because we believe they are not in the best interests of Applied or our shareholders.
WHAT WE DO | WHAT WE DO NOT DO | |||||||
✓ |
Pay for Performance Significant majority of NEO target compensation is performance-based and tied to pre-established performance goals aligned with our short- and long-term objectives. | Ò | No Guaranteed Bonuses Our annual bonus plans are performance-based and do not include any minimum payment levels. | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ |
Mitigation of Risk Use of varied performance measures in incentive programs mitigates risk that executives will be motivated to pursue results with respect to any one performance measure to the detriment of Applied as a whole. | Ò | No Hedging or Pledging Our insider trading policy prohibits all NEOs and directors from engaging in hedging or other speculative trading, or pledging their shares. | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ |
Compensation Recoupment Policy Both our annual cash bonus plan and our stock incentive plan contain clawback provisions providing for reimbursement of incentive compensation from NEOs in certain circumstances. | Ò | No Perquisites We do not provide material perquisites or other personal benefits to our NEOs or directors, except in connection with business-related relocation. | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ |
Stock Ownership Guidelines All officers and directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines to align their interests with shareholders interests. | Ò | No Dividends on Unvested Equity Awards We do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards. | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ |
Double-Trigger Change-in-Control Provisions Equity awards for all NEOs require a double-trigger of both a change-in-control and termination of employment for vesting acceleration benefits to apply. | Ò | No Executive Pensions We do not offer any executive pension or executive retirement plans. | |||||
|
| |||||||
✓ |
Annual Say-On-Pay Vote We seek annual shareholder feedback on our executive compensation program. | Ò | No Tax Gross-Ups We do not pay tax gross-ups, except in connection with business-related relocation or expatriate assignments. |
Applied Materials, Inc. 27
Assessing Performance and Payout. The determination of fiscal 2017 performance and annual incentive bonuses for our NEOs consisted of three key steps, as illustrated in the diagram below and the following discussion.
The HRCC believes that this multi-step performance framework appropriately emphasizes financial performance, while also providing a mechanism to assess achievement of key business imperatives by individual NEOs
30 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Scorecard Category
|
Link to Company Strategy and Performance
| |
Financial and Market Performance | Financial, market share and TSR goals align with a focus on delivering sustainable performance that increases shareholder value | |
Products and Growth | Reinforces strategy of developing new and differentiated products and services, and positioning Applied and its products for future revenue and market share growth | |
Execution | Incentivizes increased efficiency in operational process, product development success and quality and safety performance | |
Customers, Field and Service | Promotes focus on driving customer loyalty relative to competitors achievements and improving growth and efficiency at key accounts | |
People and Organization | Drives focus on greater employee engagement to promote hiring, retention and development of key talent |
Applied Materials, Inc. 31
The following table details fiscal 2017 corporate scorecard objectives, their relative weightings for each NEO who participated in the Bonus Plan, the achievements based on performance against objectives and the resulting scores, as approved by the HRCC (see Appendix for non-GAAP reconciliations).
Weightings | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Objectives | Dickerson and Halliday |
Salehpour | Nalamasu | Larkins | Achievements | Score | ||||||||||||||||
Financial and Market Performance |
50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Grow wafer fabrication equipment (measured by Gartner) and Display market share |
● Estimating 22% of wafer fabrication equipment market share in calendar 2017 and ~70% share gains in Display equipment served available market |
0.6 | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve gross margin targets (gross margin reported externally) |
● Achieved 46.1% non-GAAP adjusted gross margin |
1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve adjusted operating margin goal (operating margin reported externally) |
● Achieved 27.9% non-GAAP adjusted operating margin |
1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve TSR target relative to peers |
● Achieved targeted TSR performance in semiconductor equipment peer group |
1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Products and Growth |
15.0% | 19.0% | 32.0% | 15.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Win development tool of record and production tool of record positions at key Semiconductor Systems and Display customers |
● Exceeded target number of development tool of record and production tool of record positions |
1.7 | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
● Grow service revenue and number of tools under service contracts |
● Increased net tools under service agreements in line with annual target |
1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Develop organic growth pipeline to deliver targeted incremental fiscal 2019 revenue in new and adjacent markets |
● Developed pipeline to deliver risk-adjusted 2019 revenues in excess of published financial model |
1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Execution |
15.0% | 15.0% | 8.0% | 15.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Reduce order-to-cash cycle time per plan |
● Achieved below targeted order-to-cash cycle time |
0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Improve product success rate and commercialization of winning products |
● Implemented Winning Team best practices for top 12 programs; developed Capability Maturing Model and assessment plan for Product Development Engine and achieved a winning ROI assessment for 70% of the programs |
1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Improve operational, quality and safety performance |
● Successfully drove improvements in on time delivery, materials cost and safety |
1.1 | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Customer, Field and Service |
10.0% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 10.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve 5 growth and efficiency metrics at 8 key accounts |
● Achieved targeted growth and efficiency metrics at key accounts |
1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Improve win rate of prioritized opportunities by customer |
● Exceeded targets for prioritized opportunities |
1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
People and Organization |
10.0% | 6.0% | 10.0% | 10.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
● Improve priority practices and overall employee engagement score relative to 2016 OHI survey results, measured by survey administered by McKinsey |
● Increased priority practices scores on average of 3.6 points and overall employee engagement score by 2.7 points |
1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
● Implement next phase of employee development and training strategies |
● Updated integrated training curriculum and trained over 90% of the targeted population |
2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goals tied to objective and quantifiable metrics |
|
(1) Reflects weighted average of the scores of multiple underlying goals.
32 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following table shows the highlights of each NEOs performance in fiscal 2017 that the HRCC considered in determining their respective IPFs.
NEO |
Fiscal 2017 Individual Performance Highlights | |||
Dickerson |
● |
Delivered all-time record-high revenue and operating profit, representing a year-over-year increase of more than 30% and 70%, respectively | ||
● |
Made strategic investments to create long-term sustainable profitable growth across the company and position Applied to capitalize on major technology inflections | |||
Halliday |
● |
Executed tax strategy to optimize tax rate and cash management | ||
● |
Raised $2.2 billion in debt capital to support financial flexibility | |||
● |
Successfully transitioned Mr. Durn into the Chief Financial Officer role | |||
Salehpour |
● |
Delivered all-time record Applied Global Services (AGS) revenues of $3.0 billion | ||
● |
Delivered record revenues in Display of $1.9 billion | |||
● |
Won more than 85% of targeted applications in Display | |||
Nalamasu |
● |
Delivered more than 10 new ideation programs and progressed 7 existing ideation programs to incubation | ||
● |
Secured external funding for R&D programs and executed targeted number of Applied Ventures deals to provide strategic insight into new and adjacent markets | |||
Larkins |
● |
Developed and implemented global IP protection model | ||
● |
Addressed highly complex legal matters with successful resolution |
Applied Materials, Inc. 33
Actual Bonus Payouts. The NEOs performance against corporate scorecard goals and IPF ratings resulted in an average bonus payout of 1.34 of target bonus. The diagram below shows the results for each of the three key steps in determining the NEOs fiscal 2017 annual incentive bonuses.
Fiscal 2017 Annual Incentive Calculation
Performance Measures |
Fiscal 2017 Achievement | |||||||
![]() |
∎ Fiscal 2017 non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $1.75
|
✓ Achieved non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $3.25
| ||||||
![]() |
∎ Strong performance on core objectives: Financial and Market Performance Products and Growth Execution Customer, Field and Service People and Organization
|
✓ NEO scorecard results achieved in a range from 1.19 to 1.30 based on individual weightings
| ||||||
![]() |
∎ Strong NEO performance against personal objectives and individual contribution to business performance
|
✓ IPF achieved at 1.10 for all NEOs
| ||||||
![]() | ||||||||
Average NEO
bonus, as
|
The following table shows for each NEO: (1) the maximum amount payable under the Bonus Plan, (2) the target bonus amounts expressed as a percentage of base salary, (3) the target bonus expressed as a dollar amount and (4) the actual fiscal 2017 bonus amount approved by the HRCC and paid to the NEO.
NEO | (1) Maximum Bonus Payable ($) |
(2) Target Salary (%) |
(3) Target Bonus ($) |
(4) Actual Bonus ($) |
||||||||||
Dickerson |
$ | 5,000,000 | 200% | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,640,000 | |||||||
Durn |
| | | | ||||||||||
Halliday |
$ | 2,531,250 | 135% | $ | 843,750 | $ | 1,113,750 | |||||||
Salehpour |
$ | 2,430,000 | 135% | $ | 810,000 | $ | 1,060,290 | |||||||
Nalamasu |
$ | 1,617,000 | 110% | $ | 539,000 | $ | 770,770 | |||||||
Larkins |
$ | 1,584,000 | 110% | $ | 528,000 | $ | 702,768 |
34 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Pay and Performance Alignment. Our process for determining annual bonus awards has resulted in strong pay and performance alignment. The chart below illustrates the rigor of our scorecard and alignment between the actual annual bonus awards for our CEO and our non-GAAP adjusted EPS achievements.
CEO Actual Annual Bonus vs. Earnings Per Share
Non-GAAP adjusted EPS is a performance target under our bonus plan. See Appendix for non-GAAP reconciliations.
Applied Materials, Inc. 35
36 2018 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Applied Materials, Inc. 37
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Applied Materials, Inc. 39
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015
The following table shows compensation information for fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 for our NEOs.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)(1) |
Bonus ($)(2) |
Stock Awards ($)(3) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) |
All Other Compensation ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
|
2017 2016 2015 |
|
1,000,000 1,019,231 995,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,844,501 11,111,985 10,818,374 |
|
|
2,640,000 2,449,440 2,090,000 |
|
|
838,204 5,099,766 4,189,049 |
(5) (6)
|
|
15,322,705 19,680,422 18,092,808 |
| ||||||||
Daniel J. Durn(7) |
|
2017 2016 2015 |
|
138,462 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
5,421,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
411,239 |
(8)
|
|
6,471,610 |
| ||||||||
Robert J. Halliday(9) |
|
2017 2016 2015 |
|
625,000 637,019 613,462 |
|
|
2,203,125 |
|
|
4,231,139 4,321,318 4,207,134 |
|
|
1,113,750 1,033,358 961,875 |
|
|
12,705 25,818 41,082 |
(10)
|
|
5,982,594 8,220,638 5,823,553 |
| ||||||||
Ali Salehpour |
|
2017 2016 2015 |
|
591,346 560,577 550,000 |
|
|
1,732,500 |
|
|
3,868,486 3,086,656 3,005,095 |
|
|
1,060,290 882,651 846,450 |
|
|
12,058 9,230 12,815 |
(11)
|
|
5,532,180 6,271,614 4,414,360 |
| ||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu |
|
2017 2016 2015 |
|
|
484,808 468,846 460,000 |
|
|
1,380,000 |
|
|
2,176,031 2,160,671 2,103,581 |
|
|
770,770 622,659 430,100 |
|
|
12,323 12,841 15,046 |
(12)
|
|
3,443,932 4,645,017 3,008,727 |
| |||||||
Thomas F. Larkins |
|
2017 2016 2015 |
|
480,000 489,231 480,000 |
|
|
1,512,000 |
|
|
2,176,031 1,975,455 2,103,581 |
|
|
702,768 640,494 476,520 |
|
|
12,899 12,847 12,808 |
(13)
|
|
3,371,698 4,630,027 3,072,909 |
|
(1) | Applieds fiscal 2016 contained 53 weeks, and fiscal 2017 and 2015 each contained 52 weeks. Amounts shown reflect salaries for services rendered for the number of weeks in the respective fiscal years. |
(2) | Amount shown for Mr. Durn is a new-hire bonus of $500,000, which is subject to repayment by Mr. Durn if he resigns or his employment is terminated by Applied for cause within two years of his hire. Amount shown for fiscal 2016 for each other NEO is a retention bonus paid to the applicable NEO in the beginning of fiscal 2016, six months after the termination of a proposed business combination with Tokyo Electron, pursuant to the terms of the NEOs amended and restated retention agreement. |
(3) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the executive officer. Instead, the amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of target stock awards granted in the respective fiscal years, as determined pursuant to ASC 718 (but excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures for performance-based awards). For fiscal 2017, the grant date fair value of maximum number of stock awards for each NEO is as follows: Mr. Dickerson: $18,951,240; Mr. Durn: $6,892,083; Mr. Halliday: $6,332,900; Mr. Salehpour: $5,790,104; Dr. Nalamasu: $3,256,945; and Mr. Larkins: $3,256,945. See Fiscal 2017 Equity Awards on page 35 for more information regarding the stock awards. The assumptions used to calculate the value of awards are set forth in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Applieds Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017 filed with the SEC on December 15, 2017. |
(4) | Amounts consist of bonuses earned under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan for services rendered in the respective fiscal years. |
(5) | Amount includes Applieds matching contribution of $12,150 under the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan, Applieds payment on behalf of Mr. Dickerson of $780 in term life insurance premiums and a payment of $1,125 under Applieds Patent Incentive Award Program. Amount also includes $34,226 paid by Applied on behalf of Mr. Dickerson for tax consultation, $254,131 for taxes incurred and $535,792 of tax equalization payments for Japanese tax liabilities and taxes incurred as a result of these payments made under Applieds relocation program in connection with Mr. Dickersons international assignment in Japan in contemplation of the closing of a proposed business combination with Tokyo Electron. Tax equalization ensures that the tax costs incurred by Mr. Dickerson on the international assignment are equivalent to what the tax costs would have been had he remained in the U.S. The tax equalization amounts were not paid to Mr. Dickerson but were paid directly to the appropriate tax authorities. See Relocation Program on page 38 for more information regarding Mr. Dickersons international assignment. |
(6) | Amount includes (a) Applieds matching contribution of $11,925 under the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan, (b) Applieds payment on behalf of Mr. Dickerson of $960 in term life insurance premiums and (c) a payment of $875 under Applieds Patent Incentive Award Program. Amount also includes payments made under Applieds relocation program in connection with Mr. Dickersons international assignment in Japan in contemplation of the closing of a proposed business combination with Tokyo Electron and his repatriation to the U.S. following the termination of the business combination. These amounts are as follows: $84,136 in housing, moving, and other direct assignment-related expenses for fiscal 2016 covered under our relocation program; $3,352,117 paid by Applied for taxes incurred in connection with assignment-related expenses in 2015 and 2016 due to the timing of final determination of tax liabilities and tax filings; and $1,649,753 of tax equalization payments for Japanese tax liabilities and taxes incurred as a result of these payments. |
(7) | Mr. Durn was appointed CFO effective August 24, 2017. |
(8) | Amount consists of (a) Applieds matching contribution of $1,038 under the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan, (b) Applieds payment on behalf of Mr. Durn of $780 in term life insurance premiums, (c) a lump-sum payment of $7,500 to cover incidental costs related to Mr. Durns relocation, (d) Applieds payment on behalf of Mr. Durn of $268,302 for relocation expenses and (e) the reimbursement to Mr. Durn of $133,619 for taxes incurred in connection with his relocation. |
Applied Materials, Inc. 41
(9) | Mr. Halliday stepped down as CFO on August 24, 2017. |
(10) | Amount consists of (a) Applieds matching contribution of $11,925 under the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan and (b) Applieds payment on behalf of Mr. Halliday of $780 in term life insurance premiums. |
(11) | Amount consists of (a) Applieds matching contribution of $11,278 under the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan and (b) Applieds payment on behalf of Mr. Salehpour of $780 in term life insurance premiums. |
(12) | Amount consists of (a) Applieds matching contribution of $10,855 under the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan, (b) Applieds payment on behalf of Dr. Nalamasu of $718 in term life insurance premiums and (c) a payment of $750 under Applieds Patent Incentive Award Program. |
(13) | Amount consists of (a) Applieds matching contribution of $12,150 under the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan and (b) Applieds payment on behalf of Mr. Larkins of $749 in term life insurance premiums. |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 2017
The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the NEOs during fiscal 2017.
Estimated Possible Payouts |
Estimated Future Payouts |
All Other (#) |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/share) |
Grant ($)(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
|
12/1/2016 12/1/2016 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
140,158 |
|
|
280,316 |
|
|
560,632 |
|
|
93,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,106,739 2,737,762 |
| |||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn |
|
9/6/2017 9/6/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,768 |
|
|
33,535 |
|
|
67,070 |
|
|
89,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470,174 3,951,735 |
| |||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday |
|
12/1/2016 12/1/2016 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
843,750 |
|
|
2,531,250 |
|
|
36,338 |
|
|
72,675 |
|
|
145,350 |
|
|
72,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,101,761 2,129,378 |
| |||||||||||
Ali Salehpour |
|
12/1/2016 12/1/2016 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
810,000 |
|
|
2,430,000 |
|
|
33,223 |
|
|
66,446 |
|
|
132,892 |
|
|
66,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,921,618 1,946,868 |
| |||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu |
|
12/1/2016 12/1/2016 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
539,000 |
|
|
1,617,000 |
|
|
18,688 |
|
|
37,376 |
|
|
74,752 |
|
|
37,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,914 1,095,117 |
| |||||||||||
Thomas F. Larkins |
|
12/1/2016 12/1/2016 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
528,000 |
|
|
1,584,000 |
|
|
18,688 |
|
|
37,376 |
|
|
74,752 |
|
|
37,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,914 1,095,117 |
|
(1) | Amounts shown were estimated possible payouts for fiscal 2017 under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan. These amounts were based on the individual NEOs fiscal 2017 base salary and position. The maximum amount shown is three times the target amount for the NEO, except the amount for Mr. Dickerson, which is the maximum amount payable per participant in any performance period under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan. Actual bonuses received by the NEOs for fiscal 2017 under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under the column titled Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. |
(2) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the NEOs. Instead, the amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards as determined pursuant to ASC 718 (but excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures for performance-based awards). The assumptions used to calculate the awards value are set forth in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Applieds Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017 filed with the SEC on December 15, 2017. |
42 2018 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2017 Year-End
The following table shows all outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs at the end of fiscal 2017.
Option Awards | Stock Awards(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.06 |
|
|
9/1/2020 |
|
|
278,465 356,955 93,439 |
(3) (4) (5)
|
|
15,786,181 20,235,779 5,297,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Daniel J. Durn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,891 33,535 |
(7) (8)
|
|
3,168,461 1,901,099 |
|
|
33,535 |
(9) |
|
|
| |||||||||
Robert J. Halliday |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,292 138,816 72,675 |
(10) (11) (12)
|
|
6,139,073 7,869,479 4,119,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Ali Salehpour |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 77,351 99,154 66,446 |
(13) (14) (15) (16)
|
|
1,700,700 4,385,028 5,621,040 3,766,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,146 69,408 37,376 |
(17) (18) (19)
|
|
3,069,537 3,934,740 2,118,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Thomas F. Larkins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,146 63,459 37,376 |
(17) (20) (19)
|
|
3,069,537 3,597,491 2,118,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Stock awards consist of restricted stock units, performance shares and PSUs, all of which will be converted into Applied common stock on a one-to-one basis upon vesting. All future vesting of shares is subject to the NEOs continued employment with Applied through each applicable vest date. See Long-Term Incentives on page 35 for more information regarding these awards. |
(2) | Market value was determined by multiplying the number of such shares by the closing price of Applied common stock of $56.69 on October 27, 2017, the last trading day of fiscal 2017, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. |
(3) | Performance shares were granted on December 8, 2014. Of these, 139,233 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 139,232 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2018. |
(4) | Performance shares were granted on December 7, 2015. Of these, 118,985 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 118,985 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. On December 14, 2017, an additional 237,970 shares became eligible to vest due to achievement of a TSR goal related to the grant. Of these additional TSR shares, 118,985 shares vested on December 19, 2017, 54,492 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2018 and 54,493 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2019. The additional TSR shares were earned based on Applieds TSR for the two-year period ended fiscal 2017 ranking at the 98th percentile among the companies in the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. |
(5) | Restricted stock units were granted on December 1, 2016. Of these, 31,146 shares vested on December 19, 2017, 31,146 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2018 and 31,147 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2019. |
(6) | PSUs were granted on December 1, 2016. The shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2019, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. The number of shares shown is the target amount, and the actual number of shares that may vest ranges from 0% to 200% of the target amount, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. |
(7) | Restricted stock units were granted on September 6, 2017. Of these, 18,631 shares are scheduled to vest on February 1, 2018 and 18,630 shares are scheduled to vest on February 1 of each of 2019 and 2020. |
(8) | Restricted stock units were granted on September 6, 2017. Of these, 11,179 shares are scheduled to vest on January 15, 2018 and 11,178 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. |
(9) | PSUs were granted on September 6, 2017. The shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2019, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. The number of shares shown is the target amount, and the actual number of shares that may vest ranges from 0% to 200% of the target amount, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. |
(10) | Performance shares were granted on December 8, 2014. Of these, 54,146 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 54,146 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2018. |
(11) | Performance shares were granted on December 7, 2015. Of these, 46,272 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 46,272 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. On December 14, 2017, an additional 92,544 shares became eligible to vest due to achievement of a TSR goal related to the grant. Of these additional TSR shares, 46,272 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 23,136 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 |
Applied Materials, Inc. 43
of each of 2018 and 2019. The additional TSR shares were earned based on Applieds TSR for the two-year period ended fiscal 2017 ranking at the 98th percentile among the companies in the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. |
(12) | Restricted stock units were granted on December 1, 2016. Of these, 24,225 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 24,225 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. |
(13) | Performance shares were granted on September 9, 2014. These shares are scheduled to vest on October 1, 2018. |
(14) | Performance shares were granted on December 8, 2014. Of these, 38,676 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 38,675 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2018. |
(15) | Performance shares were granted on December 7, 2015. Of these, 33,051 shares vested on December 19, 2017, 33,051 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2018 and 33,052 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2019. On December 14, 2017, an additional 66,103 shares became eligible to vest due to achievement of a TSR goal related to the grant. Of these additional TSR shares, 33,051 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 16,526 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. The additional TSR shares were earned based on Applieds TSR for the two-year period ended fiscal 2017 ranking at the 98th percentile among the companies in the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. |
(16) | Restricted stock units were granted on December 1, 2016. Of these, 22,148 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 22,149 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. |
(17) | Performance shares were granted on December 8, 2014. Of these, 27,073 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 27,073 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2018. |
(18) | Performance shares were granted on December 7, 2015. Of these, 23,136 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 23,136 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. On December 14, 2017, an additional 46,272 shares became eligible to vest due to achievement of a TSR goal related to the grant. Of these additional TSR shares, 23,136 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 11,568 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. The additional TSR shares were earned based on Applieds TSR for the two-year period ended fiscal 2017 ranking at the 98th percentile among the companies in the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. |
(19) | Restricted stock units were granted on December 1, 2016. Of these, 12,458 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 12,459 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. |
(20) | Performance shares were granted on December 7, 2015. Of these, 21,153 shares vested on December 19, 2017 and 21,153 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 of each of 2018 and 2019. On December 14, 2017, an additional 42,306 shares became eligible to vest due to achievement of a TSR goal related to the grant. Of these additional TSR shares, 21,153 shares vested on December 19, 2017, 10,576 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2018 and 10,577 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2019. The additional TSR shares were earned based on Applieds TSR for the two-year period ended fiscal 2017 ranking at the 98th percentile among the companies in the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2017
The following table shows all stock awards that vested and the value realized upon vesting for each NEO during fiscal 2017.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(1) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) |
||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
| | 454,628 | 14,748,132 | ||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday |
| | 205,965 | 6,509,405 | ||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour |
| | 216,369 | 7,502,040 | ||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu |
| | 159,234 | 5,387,301 | ||||||||||||
Thomas F. Larkins |
| | 113,500 | 3,681,940 |
(1) | Of the amounts shown in this column, Applied withheld the following number of shares to cover tax withholding obligations: 246,636 shares for Mr. Dickerson; 102,098 shares for Mr. Halliday; 111,816 shares for Mr. Salehpour; 81,580 shares for Dr. Nalamasu; and 54,745 shares for Mr. Larkins. |
(2) | Value realized equals the fair market value of Applied common stock on the vesting date, multiplied by the number of shares that vested. |
44 2018 Proxy Statement