DEFINITIVE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.      )

 

 

 

Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨  Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

¨  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

¨  Definitive Proxy Statement

 

x  Definitive Additional Materials

 

¨  Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

 

 

Corning Incorporated

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

 

 

  

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x  No fee required.

 

¨  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

  (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

  (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

  (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 

  (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 

  (5)  Total fee paid:

 

  

 

 

¨  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

  (1)  Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 

  (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 

  (3)  Filing Party:

 

  

 

  (4)  Date Filed:

 

  

 


Corning Incorporated is filing the attached additional materials in support of the Board of Directors’ recommended vote at our 2013 Annual Shareholders Meeting.

Corning Incorporated 2013 Proxy Statement Matters

 

   

Proposal 1 – Election of 12 directors for one-year term

 

  ISS recommends FOR all 12 directors

 

  Glass Lewis recommends FOR 10 of 12 directors

 

  Ø Withhold James Flaws (policy against CFO on the Board)

 

  Ø Withhold Robert Cummings (Corning uses JP Morgan)

 

   

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (the annual “Say on Pay” vote)

 

  ISS recommends AGAINST

 

  Glass Lewis recommends FOR

 

   

Proposal 3 – Ratification of Independent Public Accounting Firm

 

  ISS and Glass Lewis both recommend FOR

Who We Are

Corning has a distinctive identity

 

   

Corning is the world leader in specialty glass and ceramics

 

   

We invent, manufacture, and sell keystone components that enable high-technology systems

 

   

We have succeeded for more than 160 years through:

 

  Sustained investment in R&D

 

  Deep materials science and process engineering knowledge

 

  A highly collaborative culture


Corporate Strategy

We’ve aligned our culture and leadership approach

 

   

Deliver near-term performance while investing for future growth

 

  Drive operational excellence across all businesses and functions

 

  Nurture early stage research and innovation

 

  Select and pace promising projects

 

  Decide when to place major investments on new products

 

   

Consistent leadership with deep understanding of our innovation recipe and business model

 

   

The Board of Directors is an important part of this leadership approach

The Board is an important part of our leadership approach

 

   

What’s important?

 

  Consistency over time

 

  Diverse knowledge and experiences

 

  Commitment to understanding Corning’s technology

 

  Judgment to make and support major investments

 

   

The Board is experienced, informed and independent

 

  Financials and business updates at each meeting

 

  Annual Strategy Review

 

  Half-day technology review session before each meeting

 

  Provides input to management on key issues

 

  Executive sessions at every meeting

 

LOGO

Executive Compensation Overview

 

  CEO pay is 88% variable, Other NEO pay is 81% variable

 

  Base salary adjustments modest and in line with adjustments for all salaried employees

 

  Short term incentives for all NEOs are 100% tied to corporate financial performance (NPAT)


  Long Term incentives are balanced between equity and cash, and performance and time-based retention

 

  50% equity (RSUs, stock options) / 50% cash performance units

 

  Cash performance units are based on a blend of EPS and Operating Cash Flow

 

  Rigorous annual goal-setting process – payouts vary with performance

 

LOGO

Key Messages about 2012 Performance

 

   

Corning is an innovation company, with a 160 year history of inventing technologies and starting new businesses. These technology businesses can experience volatility from time to time

 

   

In late 2011 and 2012, we had major market upheavals in two of our main businesses (Display and Solar)

 

  Display experienced significant price declines (> 20%)

 

  Dow Corning impacted by solar industry upheaval with price down over 50%

 

   

These were permanent industry resets and were communicated to investors. The Board approved a 2012 plan focused on

 

  Stopping/mitigating decline in profitability in these two businesses

 

  Accelerating growth in the other businesses

 

  Extreme rigor in cost / cash management across the organization

 

  Careful program choices

 

   

Our leadership delivered results better than the plan and bonuses paid out accordingly

 

 

Corning delivered record revenues and the 3rd highest profit in our history

 

  Operating cash flow and our balance sheet are strong

 

  Cash bonus at 124% of target and LTI (cash performance units) at 117% of target

 

   

Flat TSR was disappointing but we have taken additional actions to deliver value to shareholders

 

  Dividend increase (2 increases in last 18 month)

 

  Share buy-back program ($1.5 Billion in 2011/2012)

 

  Our TSR was in line with or better than our two largest competitors in the display glass industry


2012 Performance impact on CEO Compensation

 

   

CEO pay is up 20% year over year

 

  3% salary increase (in line with merit budget for all salaried employees)

 

  Remainder driven by performance related pay coming off low 2011 payout

 

   

Short term cash bonus from 10% of target in 2011 to 124% of target in 2012,

 

   

Long term Cash Performance Units from 60% of target in 2011 to 117% of target in 2012

 

   

Our CEO is paid at or under median (actual reported pay for 2012 was at 80% of median for Company Peers, and 100% of median for ISS Peers) which is appropriate given our size and complexity

 

  Our pay practices and philosophies are conservative

 

  Both ISS and Corning take revenues and market cap into account to establish peer groups

 

   

Our Market Cap is top quartile (top 25%) and profitability is top-decile (top 10%) among the ISS peer group companies, even after the industry resets

“Say on Pay”

 

   

ISS acknowledges reset of Corning’s profitability was real and communicated to shareholders in a timely and appropriate form. However, they believe that targeted pay should have been reduced.

 

   

Corning’s Compensation Committee believes targeted pay is set by comparison to peers (ISS and Corning have overlapping peer groups)

 

  Corning CEO targeted total direct compensation up 1% in 2012

 

  CEO targeted pay at median for ISS peers

 

   

Corning’s Board recommends a FOR vote on “Say on Pay”

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR: the twelve nominees to the Board of Directors; the advisory vote to approve executive compensation; and the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers as our independent registered public accounting firm.