Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File No. 0-50534

 

 

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   77-0485570

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

5480 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054-3644

(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)

(408) 773-5200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   x    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  ¨    No  x

As of April 14, 2010, 69,925,055 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0005, were issued and outstanding.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

INDEX TO

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

 

          Page
   PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION   
Item 1.    Financial Statements (Unaudited)    3
   Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets    3
   Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations    4
   Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows    5
   Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements    6
Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    16
Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    23
Item 4.    Controls and Procedures    24
   PART II – OTHER INFORMATION   
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings    25
Item 1A.    Risk Factors    26
Item 5.    Exhibits    26
Signatures    27

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

     March 31,
2010
   December  31,
2009

ASSETS

     

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 128,927    $ 148,376

Short-term marketable securities

     314,684      253,859

Accounts receivable, net

     69,818      58,012

Inventory

     80,385      70,396

Prepaid expenses, deferred income taxes and other current assets

     27,190      26,985
             

Total current assets

     621,004      557,628

Property and equipment, net

     14,482      14,955

Long-term investments

     12,899      15,523

Goodwill

     188,877      188,877

Acquired intangible assets, net

     126,237      135,352

Deferred income taxes and other assets

     4,062      3,014
             

Total assets

   $ 967,561    $ 915,349
             
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      

Current liabilities:

     

Accounts payable

   $ 61,519    $ 59,866

Accrued and other current liabilities

     77,684      81,202
             

Total current liabilities

     139,203      141,068
             

Deferred income taxes and other long-term liabilities

     41,697      42,421

Commitments and contingencies

     

Stockholders’ equity:

     

Common stock

     699,618      663,474

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     787      1,869

Retained earnings

     86,256      66,517
             

Total stockholders’ equity

     786,661      731,860
             

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 967,561    $ 915,349
             

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2010     2009  

Net revenue

   $ 214,705      $ 87,925   

Operating costs and expenses:

    

Cost of goods sold

     111,315        45,844   

Research and development

     42,970        29,045   

Sales and marketing

     20,653        13,416   

General and administrative

     9,508        5,930   

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

     9,115        2,885   

Acquisition-related charges

     466        —     
                

Total operating costs and expenses

     194,027        97,120   
                

Income (loss) from operations

     20,678        (9,195

Interest income, net

     1,145        1,671   

Realized gain (impairment) of long-term investments, net

     196        (1,107
                

Income (loss) before income taxes

     22,019        (8,631

Income tax benefit (provision)

     (2,280     1,079   
                

Net income (loss)

   $ 19,739      $ (7,552
                

Basic net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.29      $ (0.12
                

Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share

     68,791        60,918   
                

Diluted net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.27      $ (0.12
                

Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share

     71,813        60,918   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2010     2009  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

Net income (loss)

   $ 19,739      $ (7,552

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     1,787        1,855   

Stock-based compensation

     13,030        9,153   

Impairment of long-term investments

     370        1,107   

Amortization of acquired intangible assets and other

     11,749        2,885   

Deferred income taxes

     1,688        415   

Tax benefit from employee stock-based awards

     305        —     

Excess tax benefit from employee stock-based awards

     (286     —     

Change in assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

     (11,806     1,652   

Inventory

     (12,623     18,262   

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     (3,269     (3,916

Accounts payable

     1,187        (20,327

Accrued and other current liabilities

     (3,525     (8,020
                

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     18,346        (4,486
                

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

    

Purchase of property and equipment, net

     (610     (468

Purchase of marketable securities

     (107,663     (20,716

Maturities and sales of marketable securities

     47,383        16,314   
                

Net cash used in investing activities

     (60,890     (4,870
                

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

Issuance of common stock

     22,809        250   

Excess tax benefits from employee stock-based awards

     286        —     
                

Net cash provided by financing activities

     23,095        250   
                

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     (19,449     (9,106

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of period

     148,376        114,530   
                

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of period

   $ 128,927      $ 105,424   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Organization—Atheros Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), was incorporated in May 1998 in the state of Delaware and commenced operations in December 1998. The Company is a developer of semiconductor system solutions for communications products.

Basis of Presentation—The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) related to interim financial statements based on applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. This information reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of the Company, of a normal and recurring nature and necessary to present fairly the statements of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the dates and periods presented. The December 31, 2009 balance sheet was derived from the audited financial statements as of that date. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company reclassified certain amounts reported in the previous period to conform to the current period presentation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed on February 12, 2010 with the SEC (the “Annual Report”). The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future periods.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in its audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in the Annual Report.

Product Warranty – Components of the accrual for warranty costs during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
March  31,
 
     2010     2009  

Beginning balance

   $ 2,605      $ 1,433   

Additions related to current period sales

     2,007        530   

Warranty costs incurred in the current period

     (317     (309

Adjustments to accruals related to prior period sales

     (833     (403
                

Ending balance

   $ 3,462      $ 1,251   
                

Recent Accounting Pronouncements With the exception of those stated below, there have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in the Annual Report that are of material significance, or have potential material significance, to the Company.

Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB’s”) updated guidance related to subsequent events, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The updated guidance initially required the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date – that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. However, in February 2010, the FASB amended the guidance to remove the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated. Adoption of the updated guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

 

6


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the FASB’s updated guidance related to fair value measurements and disclosures, which requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3, a reporting entity should disclose separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than one net number). The updated guidance also requires that an entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements for Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for interim or annual financial reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Therefore, the Company has not yet adopted the guidance with respect to the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company has updated its disclosures to comply with the updated guidance, however, adoption of the updated guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

3. Financial Instruments

The following table represents the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value as of March 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 

     Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2010
     Total    Level 1    Level 2    Level 3

Money market funds

   $ 29,953    $ 29,953    $ —      $ —  

U.S. government securities

     172,478      26,697      145,781      —  

Corporate bonds and notes

     122,222      —        122,222      —  

Commercial paper

     42,891      —        42,891      —  

Auction-rate securities and other

     10,899      —        —        10,899
                           

Total

   $ 378,443    $ 56,650    $ 310,894    $ 10,899
                           

The Company’s Level 2 asset values were based on either the last trade of the security, broker or dealer quotes or the pricing of a similar security.

The Company’s Level 3 assets consist of long-term auction-rate securities and perpetual, non-cumulative preferred stocks, which were acquired as the result of the forced conversion of certain auction-rate securities. In April 2010, the Company sold certain of these auction-rate securities. Therefore, at March 31, 2010 the Company has valued these securities using the sales price. For all other auction-rate securities and related preferred stock, the Company used a discounted cash flow model to value the investments (see Note 5).

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):

 

     Auction-Rate Securities  
     Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010
 

Balance, January 1, 2010

   $ 13,523   

Total losses - realized/unrealized

  

Included in earnings

     (370

Included in other comprehensive income

     (765

Purchases, issuances and settlements

     (1,489

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

     —     
        

Balance, March 31, 2010

   $ 10,899   
        

Total losses for the period included in earnings relating to assets still held at March 31, 2010

   $ (370
        

 

7


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Short-term marketable securities consist of (in thousands):

 

     March 31, 2010  
     Amortized
Cost
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
    Fair Value  

Money market funds

   $ 29,953      $ —        $ —        $ 29,953   

U.S. government securities

     172,379        222        (123     172,478   

Corporate bonds and notes

     121,624        639        (41     122,222   

Commercial paper

     42,891        —          —          42,891   
                                

Total

     366,847        861        (164     367,544   

Less: Amounts included in cash and cash equivalents

     (52,860     —          —          (52,860
                                
   $ 313,987      $ 861      $ (164   $ 314,684   
                                
     December 31, 2009  
     Amortized
Cost
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
    Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
    Fair Value  

Money market funds

   $ 91,625      $ —        $ —        $ 91,625   

U.S. government securities

     139,972        456        (138     140,290   

Corporate bonds and notes

     112,972        861        (10     113,823   

Commercial paper

     21,992        —          (2     21,990   
                                

Total

     366,561        1,317        (150     367,728   

Less: Amounts included in cash and cash equivalents

     (113,871     (3     5       (113,869
                                
   $ 252,690      $ 1,314      $ (145   $ 253,859   
                                

The contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities at March 31, 2010 are presented in the following table (in thousands):

 

     Amortized
Cost
   Fair
Value

Due in one year or less

   $ 213,620    $ 214,482

Due between one and two years

     100,367      100,202
             
   $ 313,987    $ 314,684
             

4. Inventory

Inventory consists of (in thousands):

 

     March 31,
2010
   December  31,
2009

Finished goods

   $ 40,176    $ 37,164

Work-in-process

     28,250      18,166

Raw materials

     11,959      15,066
             

Total

   $ 80,385    $ 70,396
             

 

8


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

5. Long-term Investments

Long-term investments consist of (in thousands):

 

     March 31,
2010
   December  31,
2009

Auction-rate securities and other

   $ 10,899    $ 13,523

Other long-term investments

     2,000      2,000
             

Total

   $ 12,899    $ 15,523
             

Long-term investments consist primarily of auction-rate securities representing the Company’s interest in insurance capital notes, issued by special purpose entities sponsored by insurance companies; such securities were rated AAA and AA at the date of purchase. Additionally, the Company acquired perpetual, non-cumulative preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”) issued by two monoline insurance companies that is currently illiquid, with an original par value of $7,500,000, in the fourth quarter of 2008, resulting from the forced conversion of two auction-rate securities held by the Company. In February 2010, the Company sold one of its auction-rate securities with an original par value of $2,800,000 and a carrying value at December 31, 2009 of $1,489,000 for $1,568,000. As of March 31, 2010, the Company held auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock with an aggregate par value of $27,800,000 and a fair value of $10,899,000. A portion of the auction-rate securities are collateralized by tradable short-term corporate and government notes, bonds and commercial paper. Since September 2007, there have been no active markets for these auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock. The Company will not be able to liquidate any of its remaining auction-rate securities or Preferred Stock until a buyer is found for these instruments or the securities are redeemed.

These auction-rate securities generally continue to earn and receive interest at the maximum contractual rate which averaged 2.33% as of March 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2010, none of the Company’s Preferred Stocks are paying dividends. In April 2010, the Company sold certain of these auction-rate securities. Therefore, at March 31, 2010 the Company has valued these securities using the sales price. For all other auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock, the Company used a discounted cash flow model to value the investments. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include recovery rate in the event of a default, liquidity risk premium, probability of earning maximum interest rate to maturity, probability of passing an auction at some point in the future, probability of default, estimates for interest rates and timing of cash flows. As of March 31, 2010, the Company has determined that, for its auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock, an other-than-temporary-impairment (“OTTI”) has occurred and the Company intends to sell these investment securities prior to any potential recovery. In the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded OTTI charges for these securities of $370,000 and $1,107,000, respectively. To date, all OTTI losses on the Company’s long-term investments have been recorded in earnings.

6. Acquired Intangible Assets

The carrying amounts of the acquired amortizable intangible assets as of March 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Gross
Carrying
Value
   Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
Carrying
Amount

Developed technology

   $ 133,280    $ (33,584   $ 99,696

Customer relationships

     23,298      (4,956     18,342

Covenant not-to-compete

     1,327      (1,170     157

Backlog

     2,428      (2,092     336
                     

Total (excluding in-process research and development)

   $ 160,333    $ (41,802   $ 118,531
                     

In addition, the Company acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) of $7,706,000 in its acquisition of Intellon Corporation in December 2009. The fair value of the IPR&D was determined through estimates and valuation techniques based on the terms and details of the acquisition. The amounts allocated to IPR&D will not be expensed until completion of the related project, as it was determined that the underlying project had not reached technological feasibility at the date of acquisition. The IPR&D project represents the Company’s next-generation Powerline Communications (“PLC”) chip which includes enhanced throughput functionality to allow faster and increased processing of data. Upon completion of development, the acquired IPR&D will be amortized over the useful life of the completed technology.

 

9


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $9,115,000 and $2,885,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At March 31, 2010 estimated amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal 2010 and years thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Estimated
Amortization
Expense

2010 (remainder)

   $ 22,677

2011

     24,862

2012

     22,766

2013

     22,730

2014

     21,080

Thereafter

     4,416
      

Total

   $ 118,531
      

The carrying amounts of the acquired intangible assets as of December 31, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Gross
Carrying
Value
   Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
Carrying
Amount

Developed technology

   $ 133,280    $ (26,879   $ 106,401

Customer relationships

     23,298      (4,175     19,123

Covenant not-to-compete

     1,327      (1,111     216

Backlog

     2,428      (522     1,906
                     

Total (excluding in-process research and development)

   $ 160,333    $ (32,687   $ 127,646
                     

7. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of (in thousands):

 

     March 31,
2010
   December  31,
2009

Accrued customer incentives

   $ 38,824    $ 37,426

Accrued compensation and benefits

     20,080      24,090

Other liabilities

     18,780      19,686
             

Total

   $ 77,684    $ 81,202
             

8. Standby Letters of Credit

As of March 31, 2010, the Company had standby letters of credit outstanding totaling $2,246,000 to secure operating leases for equipment. These standby letters of credit are secured by certificates of deposit, which are classified in the Company’s balance sheet as other current assets.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is involved in various legal actions. The Company would record a charge equal to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss contingency if information available prior to issuance of financial statements indicated that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred as of the date of the financial statements and the loss can be reasonably estimated. Actual liabilities in any such disputes or litigation may be materially different from the Company’s estimates, which could result in the need to record additional charges in future periods. The Company has not recorded a material contingent liability or impairment of an asset due to existing litigations.

 

10


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Wi-LAN Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et al. & Wi-LAN Inc. v. Westell Technologies, Inc. et al.

On October 31, 2007, Wi-LAN Inc. filed two complaints against the Company and thirteen of the Company’s direct and indirect customers in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. In the complaint, Wi-LAN alleges that certain of the Company’s products infringe U.S. patent numbers 5,282,222 and RE37,802. Wi-LAN seeks unspecified damages and other relief. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to such allegations and intends to defend these lawsuits vigorously. The Company has answered the complaints, denying all allegations and asserting affirmative defenses. The Company also asserted counterclaims requesting declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity. While the Company believes it has meritorious defense against Wi-LAN’s claim, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in such defense.

Wi-LAN Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et al.

On April 7, 2010, Wi-LAN Inc. also filed a complaint against the Company and 27 other defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. In the complaint, Wi-LAN Inc. alleges that certain of the Company’s products infringe U.S. Patent Number 5,515,369. Wi-LAN Inc. seeks unspecified damages and other relief. While the Company has undertaken an analysis of the patent, it has not yet answered the complaint.

Broadcom Corporation and Atheros Communications, Inc. v. Wi-LAN Inc.

On December 10, 2008, the Company and Broadcom filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against Wi-LAN Inc. in the U.S. District Court for Northern District of California, requesting the court to declare, among other things, that U.S. patent number 6,549,759, or the ’759 Patent, assigned to Wi-LAN is invalid, unenforceable and that the Company does not infringe any valid claims of the ‘759 Patent. This declaratory judgment action stemmed from Wi-LAN's threat to add this patent into the complaints filed by Wi-LAN against the Company and others, now pending in the Eastern District of Texas. Similar declaratory judgment actions were filed by a number of other companies against Wi-LAN. More recently, the Company’s declaratory action against Wi-LAN has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in seeking declaratory relief from Wi-LAN’s threat.

Atheros Communications, Inc. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.

On January 30, 2009, the Company filed a Proof of Claim in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against Lehman Brothers, Inc. seeking compensatory damages incurred in connection with Lehman Brothers’ investment of the Company’s cash in auction-rate securities and resulting losses of income and liquidity, as well as punitive damages. On the same day and for related reasons, the Company filed a Customer Claim against Lehman Brothers with the federal Securities Investor Protection Corporation. There can be no assurance that the Company will obtain compensation for its claims.

PACid Group, LLC v. Apple Inc. et al.

On March 30, 2009, PACid Group, LLC, or PACid, filed a complaint against the Company and 18 other defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. In the complaint, PACid alleges that certain of the Company’s products infringe U.S. Patent Numbers 5,963,646 and 6,049,612 which relate to generation of encryption keys and methods of protecting information files using such keys. PACid seeks unspecified damages and other relief. The Company has answered the complaints, denying all allegations and asserting affirmative defenses. The Company also asserted counterclaims requesting declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in such defense.

Broadcom Corporation et al. v. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

On November 10, 2009, the Company and Broadcom filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (“CSIRO”) in the United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas, requesting the court to declare, among other things, that U.S. patent number 5,487,069, or the ‘’069 Patent, assigned to CSIRO is invalid, unenforceable and that the Company does not infringe any valid claims of the ‘069 Patent. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in seeking declaratory relief from CSIRO’s threat.

Lonestar Inventions, LP. V. Atheros Communications, Inc et al.

On February 4, 2010, Lonestar Inventions, LP filed a complaint against the Company and PMC-Sierra, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. In the complaint, Lonestar Inventions alleges that one of the Company’s products infringes U.S. Patent Number 5,208,725. Lonestar Inventions seeks unspecified damages and other relief. While the Company has undertaken an analysis of the patent, it has not yet answered the complaint.

 

11


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Indemnifications

Pursuant to its Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers. These agreements require the Company to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to the Company, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. The Company has not incurred any material costs in connection with these indemnification agreements through March 31, 2010.

Under the indemnification provisions of the Company’s standard software license agreements and standard terms and conditions of semiconductor sales, the Company agrees, subject to restrictions and after certain conditions are met to defend the customer/licensee against third-party claims asserting infringement of certain intellectual property rights, which may include patents, copyrights, trademarks or trade secrets, and to pay any judgments entered on such claims against the customer/licensee. Through March 31, 2010, the Company has received a number of claims from its customers and other third parties for indemnification under such agreements with respect to alleged infringement of third-party intellectual property rights by the Company’s products. The Company has not incurred any material costs in connection with these indemnification claims through March 31, 2010. In addition, certain of the Company’s customers and other third parties have been involved in patent infringement litigation and in April 2009 agreed to settle certain of these claims. The Company has been asked by certain of these customers and other third parties and is likely to be asked by others to indemnify them for all or a portion of the losses they incur in connection with this litigation, including damages, legal expenses and settlement payments. At this time the Company is unable to determine if or when the Company would be required to make any payments under these indemnification obligations or the amount of such payments. However, the amounts of any such payments could be significant.

10. Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The Company’s 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, 2009 Inducement Grant Incentive Plan and 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) are described in the Annual Report.

The fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards to employees was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions for the grants made in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:

 

Option Plan Shares

   Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
   2010     2009  

Estimated life (in years)

     5.3        5.2   

Expected volatility

     47.1     61.8

Risk-free interest rate

     2.7     1.4

Expected dividends

     —          —     

Weighted average grant-date fair value

   $ 15.64      $ 7.75   

During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 there were no purchases under the ESPP.

Stock-based Compensation Expense

The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
     2010    2009

Cost of sales

   $ 216    $ 173

Research and development

     6,599      4,616

Sales and marketing

     4,067      2,842

General and administrative

     2,148      1,522
             

Total

   $ 13,030    $ 9,153
             

Management has estimated expected forfeitures and is recognizing compensation costs only for the stock-based awards expected to vest.

 

12


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

At March 31, 2010, the total compensation cost related to unvested stock-based awards granted to employees under the Company’s stock incentive plans but not yet recognized was approximately $121,044,000, net of estimated forfeitures. This cost will be amortized on a graded vesting basis for awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, and on a straight-line basis for awards granted after December 31, 2005, except for performance-based awards which are amortized on a graded vesting basis, over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.9 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures or achievability of established milestones. Future option grants will increase the amount of compensation expense to be recorded in these periods.

Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units Activity

The following is a summary of option activity for the Company’s stock incentive plans for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

     Number
of Shares
    Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Outstanding at January 1, 2010

   8,841      $ 18.39      

Granted

   833        34.48      

Exercised

   (1,397     16.10      

Forfeitures and cancellations

   (40     23.63      
                  

Outstanding at March 31, 2010

   8,237      $ 20.38    5.71    $ 151,024
                        

Exercisable at March 31, 2010

   4,992      $ 16.53    4.59    $ 110,727
                        

As of March 31, 2010, 7,726,000 shares are vested and expected to vest. These shares had a weighted average exercise price of $19.91, a weighted average remaining contractual life of 5.57 years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $145,256,000.

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock for the 8,236,000 options that were in-the-money at March 31, 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under the Company’s stock incentive plans was $27,457,000 and $440,000, respectively, determined as of the date of option exercise. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had 3,669,000 authorized shares available for future issuance under all of its stock incentive plans.

The following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock unit activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

     Number
of Shares
    Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

Nonvested stock at January 1, 2010

   3,172      $ 24.55

Granted

   989        35.66

Vested

   (457     34.23

Forfeited

   (15     29.91
            

Nonvested stock at March 31, 2010

   3,689      $ 35.04
            

The Company has granted restricted stock units whereby vesting is contingent upon the Company’s achievement of certain financial targets and service requirements.

The intrinsic value of vested restricted stock units was $15,392,000 and $2,725,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total intrinsic value of all outstanding restricted stock units was $142,788,000 and $43,000,000 as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

13


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

11. Income Taxes

As of December 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $42,193,000 of unrecognized tax benefits, substantially all of which would, if recognized, affect its tax expense. The Company recorded an increase of its unrecognized tax benefits of $373,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

The Company recorded a tax provision of $2,280,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The Company’s estimated 2010 effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to profits earned in jurisdictions where the tax rate is lower than the U.S. tax rate, the benefit of state research and development income tax credits and certain discrete benefits received from employee stock incentive and stock purchase plans during the first three months of 2010.

The Company's federal income tax return for the year ended December 31, 2006 is under examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

12. Net Income Per Share

Net income per share is calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2010    2009  

Numerator:

     

Net income (loss)

   $ 19,739    $ (7,552
               

Denominator:

     

Weighted average basic shares outstanding

     68,791      60,918   

Effect of dilutive securities

     3,022      —     
               

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

     71,813      60,918   
               

Basic net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.29    $ (0.12
               

Diluted net income (loss) per share

   $ 0.27    $ (0.12
               

The Company excludes potentially dilutive securities from its diluted net income per share calculation when their effect would be antidilutive to net income per share amounts. The common stock equivalents related to options to purchase 1,092,000 and 5,550,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were excluded from the net income per share calculation in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as their effect would have been antidilutive. In addition, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, the incremental shares from the assumed exercise of 1,334,000 stock options were not included in computing the dilutive per share amounts as the Company’s net loss would result in these options having an anti-dilutive effect.

13. Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2010     2009  

Net income (loss)

   $ 19,739      $ (7,552

Other comprehensive income:

    

Unrealized gain (loss) on investments

     (1,082     141   
                

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 18,657      $ (7,411
                

14. Segment Information, Operations by Geographic Area and Significant Customers

The Company currently operates in one reportable segment, the design and marketing of semiconductors for the communications industry. The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker is the Chief Executive Officer.

 

14


Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Information regarding net revenue by target market is as follows (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
     2010    2009

Networking

   $ 110,306    $ 42,316

Personal Computers

     74,934      27,206

Consumer

     29,465      18,403
             

Net revenue

   $ 214,705    $ 87,925
             

Geographic Information

Net revenue consists of sales to customers in the following countries:

 

     Three Months Ended
March  31,
 
     2010     2009  

Taiwan

   30   32

China

   25      22   

Japan

   11      18   

Hong Kong

   15      14   

United States

   5      2   

Other

   14      12   
            

Total

   100   100
            

Significant Customers

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Customer A accounted for 13% of the Company’s net revenue. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, Customer A and Customer B accounted for 17% and 16% of the Company’s net revenue, respectively. The Company has major concentrations of sales to a relatively small number of original design manufacturers which sell to a diversified base of end customers.

Customer A accounted for 20% and 15% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

 

15


Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this quarterly report. This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements about the expected benefits of our strategic opportunities, the general conditions in the semiconductor industry, our expectations regarding the benefits and features of our products, our competitive position, the markets for our products, our average selling prices, our customer base and concentration, our revenue and sources of revenue, our sales and revenue to customers in Asia, sales by original design manufacturers through to original equipment manufacturers outside Asia, estimated customer incentives, our estimated expenses, amortization of acquired intangible assets, cost of goods sold, our effective tax rate, our anticipated cash needs, our anticipated capital expenditures and capital requirements, the adequacy of our capital resources, our needs for additional financing, the estimated market risk of our investments and foreign currency exchange risk, our auction-rate securities, our legal proceedings and our disclosure controls and procedures. These statements may be identified by such terms as “anticipate,” “will,” “expect,” “may,” “might,” “intend,” “could,” “can,” or the negative of those terms or similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the factors affecting our quarterly results, our ability to manage our growth, our ability to sustain or increase profitability, demand for our chipsets, our reliance on third party foundries, the effect of declines in average selling prices for our products, our ability to compete in new and existing markets, acceptance of our new products, general economic conditions, and other risks discussed in Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings and 1A, Risk Factors, in this report. These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Unless required by law, we undertake no responsibility to update these forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a global leader in innovative technologies for wireless and wired communications products that are used by a broad base of customers, including manufacturers of personal computers, or PCs, networking equipment and consumer electronics devices. We combine our wireless and wired systems and software expertise with our high-performance radio frequency, or RF, mixed signal and digital semiconductor design skills to provide highly integrated chipsets that are manufactured on low-cost, standard complementary metal-oxide semiconductor, or CMOS, processes. Our ability to design radios in semiconductors using standard CMOS processes provides us with increased manufacturing flexibility and, we believe, a competitive advantage. Our product portfolio includes solutions for Wireless Local Area Network, or WLAN, Mobile WLAN, Ethernet, Bluetooth, Global Positioning System, or GPS, and Powerline Communications, or PLC.

An element of our business strategy involves the acquisition of businesses, assets, products or technologies that allow us to reduce the time required to develop new technologies and products and bring them to market, incorporate enhanced functionality into and complement our existing product offerings, augment our engineering workforce, and enhance our technological capabilities. We plan to continue to evaluate strategic opportunities as they arise, including acquisitions and other business combination transactions, strategic partnerships and the purchase or sale of assets. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the acquired companies commencing on their respective acquisition dates.

The semiconductor industry in which we operate is highly cyclical and has, from time to time, experienced significant downturns, often connected with, or in anticipation of, maturing product cycles of both semiconductor companies’ and their customers’ products and declines in general economic conditions. The industry experienced a significant downturn during the recent global recession. These downturns are frequently characterized by decreases in product demand, excess customer inventories, and accelerated erosion of prices. These factors could cause substantial fluctuations in the revenue and results of our operations as evidenced by the 29% and 11% sequential decreases in our revenue during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, respectively. In addition, during these downturns some competitors may become more aggressive in their pricing practices, which would adversely impact our gross profits. Any downturns in the semiconductor industry may be severe and prolonged, and any failure of the industry or wired and wireless communications markets to fully recover from downturns could negatively impact the revenue, business, financial condition and our results of operations. The semiconductor industry also periodically experiences increased demand and production capacity constraints, which may affect our ability to ship sufficient products to meet our customers’ purchase requests. Accordingly, our operating results may vary significantly as a result of the general conditions in the semiconductor industry, which could cause large fluctuations in our stock price. Although conditions in the semiconductor industry have recently improved and we have experienced sequential revenue growth during each of the four preceding quarters ended March 31, 2010, there is no assurance that this trend will continue or at what rate.

         Revenue. Our revenue is derived primarily from the sale of wired and wireless chipsets. Our sales have historically been made on the basis of purchase orders rather than long-term agreements. Original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, utilize our chipsets in developing their wireless and wired system solutions such as access points, routers, wired and wireless switches, embedded laptop clients, handsets, cardbus, minicards, hand-held and console video game devices, set-top boxes, powerline adapters and personal navigation devices, or PNDs. Some OEMs purchase chipsets directly from us and manufacture their products. Other OEMs utilize original design manufacturers, or ODMs, to design and build subsystem products that the OEM then purchases from the ODM and incorporates into the OEM’s system solution. Accordingly, we ship our products either directly to the OEM or to the ODM based on the requirements of each OEM. Purchase orders are received from an OEM or an ODM and we generally recognize revenue based on the shipment of chipsets to this customer. A single ODM usually provides our chipsets to numerous OEMs. However, we attempt to maintain a close relationship with the target OEM to monitor end-market demand. Due to the use of ODMs, our direct customer base is relatively concentrated, although we believe that the number of total OEMs who purchase our chipsets through ODMs is broader. We anticipate that we may continue to experience changes in our ODM customer base as our end customers change ODMs for a variety of reasons while still using our chipsets.

We provide customer incentives to some of our direct and indirect customers. These obligations are estimated and recorded as a reduction of revenue when we ship product to the customers based on approved quotes provided to the customer. Estimating incentive amounts requires that we make estimates regarding the percentage of committed incentives that will be submitted by our customers and the value of the incentives at the time of redemption. These estimates are adjusted on a quarterly basis to reflect actual sales data submitted by customers. These adjustments may have the effect of significantly increasing or decreasing net revenue in particular periods.

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Customer A accounted for 13% of our net revenue. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, Customer A and Customer B accounted for 17% and 16% of our net revenue, respectively. We expect to continue to have major concentrations of sales to a relatively small number of ODM and OEM customers.

 

16


Table of Contents

Substantially all of our sales are to customers outside the United States and Canada. Sales to customers in Asia accounted for 83% and 88% of net revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Because many of our ODM customers are located in Asia, we anticipate that a majority of our revenue will continue to come from sales to customers in that region. Although a large percentage of our sales are made to customers in Asia, we believe that a significant number of the systems designed by these customers are then sold through to OEMs outside of Asia. All of our sales are denominated in United States dollars.

Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold relates primarily to the purchase of silicon wafers, costs associated with assembly, test and inbound and outbound shipping of our chipsets, fluctuations in the price of raw materials such as gold used in the manufacturing of our chips, costs of personnel, materials and occupancy associated with manufacturing support and quality assurance, royalty costs and write downs to state inventory at the lower of cost or market caused by product obsolescence and transitions from older to newer products. Additionally, our cost of goods sold includes accruals for estimated warranty obligations, which we record when revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty obligations are adjusted each period to reflect actual warranty experience. Because we do not have long-term, fixed supply agreements, our wafer, assembly and test costs are subject to changes based on the cyclical demand for semiconductors. In addition, after we purchase wafers from foundries, we also typically bear the yield risk related to manufacturing these wafers into finished goods.

Research and Development. Research and development expense relates primarily to compensation and associated costs related to research and development employees and contractors, mask and reticle costs, prototype wafers, software and computer-aided design software licenses, intellectual property license costs, reference design development costs, development testing and evaluation costs, regulatory testing costs, depreciation expense and allocated occupancy costs. All research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expense relates primarily to compensation and associated costs for marketing and sales personnel, sales commissions to independent sales representatives, public relations, promotional and other marketing expenses, expenses for travel, trade shows, depreciation and amortization and allocated occupancy costs.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expense relates primarily to compensation and associated costs for general and administrative personnel, legal and professional fees, charges related to allowance for doubtful accounts, depreciation and amortization and allocated occupancy costs.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets. Amortization of acquired intangible assets relates to acquired identified intangible assets, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic lives of three to five years for purchased technology, two to seven years for customer relationships and two to four years for covenants-not-to-compete.

Acquisition-Related Charges. Acquisition-related charges include expenses incurred in connection with our acquisition activities including legal and severance costs related to employees terminated post acquisition.

Interest Income and Expense. Interest income consists of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and investment balances and realized gains or losses from the sale of marketable securities and auction-rate securities.

Realized gain (impairment) of long-term investments, net. Impairment of long-term investments relates to the other-than-temporary, non-operating write down of the carrying value of our investments in auction-rate securities and the related perpetual, non-cumulative preferred stock, or Preferred Stock, that resulted from the involuntarily exchange of certain auction-rate securities; these auction-rate securities were rated AAA and AA at the date of purchase. The liquidity and fair value of these securities has been negatively impacted by the failure of these markets and the exposure of these securities to the financial condition of bond insurance companies. All of our auction-rate securities have been subject to multiple auction processes for which there have been insufficient bidders on the scheduled rollover dates and the auctions have subsequently failed. The investment bank that organized the auctions for these securities filed for bankruptcy during the three months ended September 30, 2008, and since such time, no auctions have occurred. Additionally, the market for the Preferred Stock we hold is limited. In April 2010, we sold certain of our auction-rate securities. Therefore, at March 31, 2010 we have valued these securities using the sales price. For all other auction-rate securities and related preferred stock, we used a discounted cash flow model to value the investments. To date, we have determined that, for our auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock, other-than-temporary-impairment, or OTTI, has occurred and we intend to sell these investment securities prior to recovery and therefore, we have recorded OTTI charges as a reduction to earnings.

Provision for Income Taxes. We make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expenses for tax and financial statement purposes and the realizability of assets in future years. U.S. income tax has not been provided on earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries to the extent that such earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested.

 

17


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and the results of operations are based on our financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting policies are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed on February 12, 2010 with the SEC, or the Annual Report, and there have been no material changes.

Results of Operations

The following table shows the percentage relationships of the listed items from our condensed consolidated statements of operations, as a percentage of net revenue for the periods indicated.

 

     Three Months Ended
March  31,
 
     2010     2009  

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

    

Net revenue

   100   100

Operating costs and expenses:

    

Cost of goods sold

   52      52   

Research and development

   20      33   

Sales and marketing

   10      15   

General and administrative

   4      7   

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

   4      3   

Acquisition-related charges

   —        —     
            

Total operating costs and expenses

   90      110   
            

Income (loss) from operations

   10      (10

Interest income, net

   —        2   

Realized gain (impairment) of long-term investments, net

   —        (1

Income tax benefit (provision)

   (1   —     
            

Net income (loss)

   9   (9 )% 
            

Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

(tables presented in thousands, except percentage amounts)

Net Revenue

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
      
     2010    2009    % Change  

Networking

   $ 110,306    $ 42,316    161

PC

     74,934      27,206    175

Consumer

     29,465      18,403    60
                

Net revenue

   $ 214,705    $ 87,925    144
                

During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the semiconductor industry experienced a significant downturn. The increases in revenues in all of our target markets during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009 were partially due to the impact of these unfavorable industry conditions in the first quarter of 2009.

The increase in revenue in our Networking channel during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with 2009 resulted primarily from increased demand for our 802.11n, 802.11ag and 802.11g wireless networking products, our Ethernet solutions, resulting from further adoption of these products with our retail, carrier and enterprise customers and sales of PLC products introduced through our acquisition of Intellon Corporation, or Intellon, in December 2009. These increases were partially offset by decreased average selling prices for our 802.11n wireless networking products during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with 2009.

 

18


Table of Contents

The increase in revenue in our PC OEM channel during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with 2009 resulted primarily from increased demand for our 802.11n wireless networking products and our Ethernet solutions. This was partially offset by decreased demand for our 802.11g solutions. Additionally, our 802.11g, 802.11n and Ethernet chipsets have all experienced decreases in average selling prices during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with 2009.

The increase in revenue in our Consumer channel during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with 2009 resulted from the adoption of our mobile WLAN solutions due to increasing shipments of gaming, consumer electronics and mobile phone devices, partially offset by declining average selling prices.

Cost of Goods Sold

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
       
     2010     2009     % Change  

Cost of goods sold

   $ 111,315      $ 45,844      143

% of net revenue

     52     52  

Costs of goods sold as a percentage of revenue remained relatively flat during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2009, primarily due to a decline in product costs related to supply chain efficiencies offset by declining average selling prices. We expect our cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenue to remain relatively stable in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the first quarter of 2010.

Research and Development

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
       
     2010     2009     % Change  

Research and development

   $ 42,970      $ 29,045      48

% of net revenue

     20     33  

The increase in research and development expenses of $13.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2009, was primarily due to additional compensation-related costs of $9.4 million, partly attributable to a 27% increase in the number of employees engaged in research and development activities, due in part to our Intellon acquisition in December 2009. Of the increase in compensation related costs, $2.0 million was due to an increase in stock-based compensation. In addition, increased tapeout activity and the impact of tapeouts in lower geometries resulted in an increase of $1.6 million in research and development expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Software expenses increased by $1.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in the prior year due to additional software amortization from an increase in licensed design tools to support our growing global engineering workforce. We anticipate that research and development expenses will increase in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the first quarter of 2010.

Sales and Marketing

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
       
     2010     2009     % Change  

Sales and marketing

   $ 20,653      $ 13,416      54

% of net revenue

     10     15  

 

19


Table of Contents

The increase in sales and marketing expenses of $7.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2009, was primarily due to additional compensation-related costs of $5.0 million, partly attributable to a 34% increase in the number of employees engaged in sales and marketing activities. Our sales and marketing personnel increased due to the addition of Intellon employees and employees we hired to support our growth. Of the increase in compensation-related expenses, $1.2 million was due to the increase in stock-based compensation. We anticipate that sales and marketing expenses will remain relatively flat or decline slightly in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the first quarter of 2009.

General and Administrative

 

     Three Months Ended
March  31,
       
     2010     2009     % Change  

General and administrative

   $ 9,508      $ 5,930      60

% of net revenue

     4     7  

General and administrative expenses increased $3.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2009, primarily due to increases in compensation-related costs of $2.0 million, partially attributable to a 17% increase in the number of employees engaged in general and administrative activities including employees assumed in the Intellon acquisition in December 2009. We expect that general and administrative expenses will increase in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the first quarter of 2010.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets

 

     Three Months Ended
March  31,
       
     2010     2009     % Change  

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

   $ 9,115      $ 2,885      216

% of net revenue

     4     3  

Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased by $6.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to amortization of additional intangible assets acquired as a result of our Intellon acquisition in December 2009. We amortize acquisition-related identified intangibles on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives of three to five years for purchased technology, two to seven years for customer relationships and two to four years for covenants-not-to-compete. We expect that amortization of our acquired intangible assets will decrease in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2010.

In addition, we acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) of $7,706,000 in our acquisition of Intellon in December 2009. The fair value of the IPR&D was determined through estimates and valuation techniques based on the terms and details of the acquisition. The amounts allocated to IPR&D will not be expensed until completion of the related project, as it was determined that the underlying project had not reached technological feasibility at the date of acquisition. The IPR&D project represents our next-generation PLC chip which includes enhanced throughput functionality to allow faster and increased processing of data. Upon completion of development, the acquired IPR&D will be amortized over the useful life of the completed technology. As of March 31, 2010, there was no significant change to the expected costs and time to completion of the project.

Acquisition-Related Charges

Beginning January 1, 2009, as a result of changes in accounting standards, acquisition related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition consideration and are expensed as incurred. We recognized a total of $466,000 of acquisition-related charges during the three months ended March 31, 2010 in connection with our Intellon acquisition, consisting primarily of legal costs and severance costs related to employees of Intellon terminated post acquisition. We expect acquisition-related charges to decrease in the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the first quarter of 2010.

 

20


Table of Contents

Interest Income, Net

 

     Three Months Ended
March  31,
       
     2010     2009     % Change  

Interest income, net

   $ 1,145      $ 1,671      (31 )% 

% of net revenue

     —       2  

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, interest income decreased 31% compared with the three months ended March 31, 2009 due primarily to lower interest rates on our cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and long-term investments. These decreases were partially offset by a 54% increase in our ending cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances as of March 31, 2010 resulting primarily from the generation of cash from operations and the exercise of employee stock options.

Realized gain (impairment) of long-term investments, net

Our long-term investments consist primarily of auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we determined that certain of our auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock were other-than-temporarily impaired and we recorded impairment charges of $370,000 to reduce the carrying value of certain of these auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock. This impairment was offset by a realized net gain of $566,000 during the same period. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded impairment charges of $1.1 million to reduce the carrying value of certain of these auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock. We have sold certain of these securities in April 2010 and intend to sell the remaining securities. See the discussion at “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Part I Item 2, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in Part II Item 3, as well as Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for more detailed information on our investments in auction-rate securities and this impairment charge. The estimated fair value of these securities could decrease or increase significantly in the future based on market conditions and we may be required to record additional losses for impairment if we determine there are further declines in fair value.

Benefit/(Provision) for Income Taxes

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
       
     2010     2009     % Change  

Income tax benefit (provision)

   $ (2,280   $ 1,079      (311 )% 

% of net revenue

     1     —    

The net provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2010, was $2.3 million, compared to a benefit of $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the benefit for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were derived using our estimated annual effective tax rates for 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our estimated annual 2010 effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to profits earned in jurisdictions where the tax rate is lower than the U.S. tax rate, from the benefit of state research and development tax credits, and due to certain discrete benefits received from transactions related to employee stock incentive and stock purchase plans during the first three months of 2010. Our effective tax rate may change during the remainder of 2010 if operating results differ significantly from current projections.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

Our principal source of liquidity is cash provided by operations and proceeds from sale of common stock to our employees under employee stock compensation arrangements. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities increased from $402.2 million at December 31, 2009 to $443.6 million at March 31, 2010.

 

21


Table of Contents

Consolidated Cash Flow Data

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2010     2009  
     (in thousands)  

Net cash provided by (used in):

    

Operating activities

   $ 18,346      $ (4,486

Investing activities

     (60,890     (4,870

Financing activities

     23,095        250  
                

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   $ (19,449   $ (9,106
                

Operating Activities

For the three months ended March 31, 2010, cash flow provided by operations of $18.3 million resulted primarily from our net income of $19.7 million and the following additional reasons:

 

   

Our net income included stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, depreciation and other non-cash charges. These non-cash charges totaled $28.6 million.

 

   

We invested $30.0 million in working capital for the three months ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to growth in inventories and receivables resulting from growth in our business.

Working capital is comprised of accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued and other current liabilities. Accounts receivable increased by $11.8 million in the first quarter of 2010, reflecting the timing of chipset sales and customer payments. Inventory increased $12.6 million in the first quarter of 2010 due to the timing of inventory shipments and receipts. Prepaid expenses and other assets increased by $3.3 million due primarily to increased employee contributions to our employee stock purchase plan. Accounts payable and accrued and other current liabilities decreased by $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2010, primarily due to the timing of inventory received and payments to our vendors.

For the three months ended March 31, 2009, cash flow used in operations of $4.5 million resulted primarily from our net loss of $7.6 million and the following additional reasons:

 

   

Our net loss included substantial non-cash charges in the form of stock-based compensation, an impairment of the fair value of our long-term investments, taxes and depreciation and amortization of acquired intangible assets. These non-cash charges totaled $15.4 million.

 

   

We invested $12.3 million in working capital for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Working capital is comprised of accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued and other current liabilities. Accounts receivable decreased by $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2009, reflecting the timing of chipset sales and customer payments. Inventory decreased $18.3 million in the first quarter of 2009 due to reduced inventory purchases and our efforts to increase inventory turns. Prepaid expenses and other assets increased by $3.9 million due primarily to increased employee contributions to our employee stock purchase plan. Accounts payable and accrued and other current liabilities decreased by $28.3 million in the first quarter of 2009, primarily due to the timing of inventory received and payments to our vendors.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was primarily a result of the purchase of marketable securities, net of proceeds from maturities, of $60.3 million and $4.4 million, respectively. Our investments are in money market funds, U.S. government notes and bonds, corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper, auction-rate securities, Preferred Stock and other cost-based investments.

We purchased $610,000 and $468,000 of property and equipment in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

22


Table of Contents

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities consisted primarily of proceeds from stock option exercises of $22.8 million and $250,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Liquidity

We expect to experience an increase in our operating expenses in absolute dollars for the foreseeable future in order to execute our business strategy. As a result, we anticipate that operating expenses, as well as planned capital expenditures, will constitute a material use of our cash resources.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including our rate of revenue growth, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing products, the costs to ensure access to adequate manufacturing capacity, the continuing market acceptance of our products and the expenditures associated with possible future acquisitions or other business combination transactions.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Information regarding our contractual obligations is provided in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” section of our Annual Report. We recorded $373,000 of additional liability due to unrecognized tax benefits in the three months ended March 31, 2010, and to date we have recorded a total of $32.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2010.

As of March 31, 2010, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, refer to Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The primary objectives of our investment activities are, in order of importance, to preserve principal, provide liquidity and maximize income without significantly increasing risk. As of March 31, 2010, our investments were primarily in money market funds, corporate notes, corporate bonds, commercial paper, U.S. government securities and to a lesser extent, auction-rate securities, Preferred Stock and other cost-based investments. Some of the securities we invest in are subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. To minimize this risk, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of securities, including money market funds and government and non-government debt securities. Our long-term investments primarily consist of auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock, which have been classified as long-term due to the lack of a liquid market for these securities. The risk associated with fluctuating interest rates is limited to our investment portfolio and we believe that a 10% change in interest rates will not have a significant impact on the fair value of our portfolio or on our interest income.

Long-term investments consist primarily of auction-rate securities representing our interest in insurance capital notes, issued by special purpose entities sponsored by insurance companies; such securities were rated AAA and AA at the date of purchase. Additionally, we acquired Preferred Stock issued by two monoline insurance companies that is currently illiquid, with an original par value of $7.5 million, in the fourth quarter of 2008, resulting from the forced conversion of two auction-rate securities we held. In February 2010, we sold one of our auction-rate securities with an original par value of $2.8 million and a carrying value at December 31, 2009 of $1.5 million for $1.6 million. As of March 31, 2010, we held auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock with an aggregate par value of $27.8 million and a fair value of $10.9 million. A portion of the auction-rate securities are collateralized by tradable short-term corporate and government notes, bonds and commercial paper. Since September 2007, there have been no active markets for these auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock. We will not be able to liquidate any of our remaining auction-rate securities or Preferred Stock until a buyer is found for these instruments or the securities are redeemed.

 

23


Table of Contents

These auction-rate securities generally continue to earn and receive interest at the maximum contractual rate which averaged 2.33% as of March 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2010, none our Preferred Stocks are paying dividends. In April 2010, we sold certain of these auction-rate securities. Therefore, at March 31, 2010 we have valued these securities using the sales price. For all other auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock, we used a discounted cash flow model to value the investments. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include recovery rate in the event of a default, liquidity risk premium, probability of earning maximum interest rate to maturity, probability of passing an auction at some point in the future, probability of default, estimates for interest rates and timing of cash flows. As of March 31, 2010, we have determined that, for our auction-rate securities and Preferred Stock, an OTTI has occurred and we intend to sell these investment securities prior to any potential recovery. In the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recorded OTTI charges for these securities of $370,000 and $1,107,000, respectively. To date, all OTTI losses on the Company’s long-term investments have been recorded in earnings.

Currently, our direct exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations for revenues and cost of goods sold is not material. Our sales agreements generally provide for pricing and payment in U.S. dollars and, therefore, are not subject to exchange rate fluctuations. Similarly, the majority of our purchases related to cost of goods sold, are denominated and paid in U.S. dollars and, therefore, are not subject to exchange rate fluctuations. The risk associated with fluctuating currency exchange rates is generally limited to our operating expenses and capital expenditures denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar as over 50% of our employees are located outside of the U.S. Increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies could make our products more or less expensive, which could have an impact on our business. Future fluctuations in currency exchange rates could have a material impact on our business.

We do not currently engage in foreign currency hedging transactions, nor do we believe that we currently have material exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet the reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

24


Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Wi-LAN Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et al. & Wi-LAN Inc. v. Westell Technologies, Inc. et al.

On October 31, 2007, Wi-LAN Inc. filed two complaints against us and thirteen of our direct and indirect customers in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. In the complaint, Wi-LAN alleges that certain of our products infringe U.S. patent numbers 5,282,222 and RE37,802. Wi-LAN seeks unspecified damages and other relief. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to such allegations and intend to defend these lawsuits vigorously. We have answered the complaints, denying all allegations and asserting affirmative defenses. We also asserted counterclaims requesting declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity. While we believe we have meritorious defense against Wi-LAN’s claim, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such defense.

Wi-LAN Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et al.

On April 7, 2010, Wi-LAN Inc. also filed a complaint against us and 27 other defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. In the complaint, Wi-LAN Inc. alleges that certain of our products infringe U.S. Patent Number 5,515,369. Wi-LAN Inc. seeks unspecified damages and other relief. While we have undertaken an analysis of the patent, we have not yet answered the complaint.

Broadcom Corporation and Atheros Communications, Inc. v. Wi-LAN Inc.

On December 10, 2008, we and Broadcom filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against Wi-LAN Inc. in the U.S. District Court for Northern District of California, requesting the court to declare, among other things, that U.S. patent number 6,549,759, or the ’759 Patent, assigned to Wi-LAN is invalid, unenforceable and that we do not infringe any valid claims of the ‘759 Patent. This declaratory judgment action stemmed from Wi-LAN’s threat to add this patent into the complaints filed by Wi-LAN against Atheros and others, now pending in the Eastern District of Texas. Similar declaratory judgment actions were filed by a number of other companies against Wi-LAN. More recently, our declaratory action against Wi-LAN has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in seeking declaratory relief from Wi-LAN’s threat.

Atheros Communications, Inc. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.

On January 30, 2009, we filed a Proof of Claim in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against Lehman Brothers, Inc. seeking compensatory damages incurred in connection with Lehman Brothers’ investment of our cash in auction-rate securities and resulting losses of income and liquidity, as well as punitive damages. On the same day and for related reasons, we filed a Customer Claim against Lehman Brothers with the federal Securities Investor Protection Corporation. There can be no assurance that we will obtain compensation for our claims.

PACid Group, LLC v. Apple Inc. et al.

On March 30, 2009, PACid Group, LLC, or PACid, filed a complaint against us and 18 other defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. In the complaint, PACid alleges that certain of our products infringe U.S. Patent Numbers 5,963,646 and 6,049,612 which relate to generation of encryption keys and methods of protecting information files using such keys. PACid seeks unspecified damages and other relief. We have answered the complaints, denying all allegations and asserting affirmative defenses. We also asserted counterclaims requesting declaratory judgment for non-infringement and invalidity. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such defense.

Broadcom Corporation et al. v. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

On November 10, 2009, we and Broadcom filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, or CSIRO, in the U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Texas, requesting the court to declare, among other things, that U.S. patent number 5,487,069, or the ‘’069 Patent, assigned to CSIRO is invalid, unenforceable and that we do not infringe any valid claims of the ‘069 Patent. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in seeking declaratory relief from CSIRO’s threat.

Lonestar Inventions, LP. V. Atheros Communications, Inc et al.

On February 4, 2010, Lonestar Inventions, LP filed a complaint against us and PMC-Sierra, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. In the complaint, Lonestar Inventions alleges that one of our products

infringes U.S. Patent Number 5,208,725. Lonestar Inventions seeks unspecified damages and other relief. While we have undertaken an analysis of the patent, we have not yet answered the complaint.

 

25


Table of Contents

For an additional discussion of certain risks associated with legal proceedings, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our Annual Report.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

This Report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report, and this Report should be read in conjunction with such risk factors. The risks and uncertainties described in the Annual Report are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also affect our business. If any of these known or unknown risks or uncertainties actually occurs and have material adverse effects on Atheros, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed.

 

Item 5. Exhibits

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

31.1

   Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

31.2

   Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

    32.1(1)

   Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

    32.2(1)

   Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

 

(1) The material contained in Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

26


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: April 19, 2010

 

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

/s/    CRAIG H. BARRATT        

Craig H. Barratt
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)

/s/    JACK R. LAZAR        

Jack R. Lazar
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Corporate Development, and Secretary
(Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer)

/s/    DAVID D. TORRE        

David D. Torre
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Duly authorized officer and principal accounting officer)

 

27


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

31.1

   Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

31.2

   Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

    32.1(1)

   Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

    32.2(1)

   Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

 

(1) The material contained in Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

28