a6849025.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended July 30, 2011

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 001-12951
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Nebraska
47-0366193
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
 
2407 West 24th Street, Kearney, Nebraska  68845-4915
(Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (308) 236-8491

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of class
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $.01 par value
New York Stock Exchange
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

___________________________________________________________

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant  has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for a shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. (See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
þ Large accelerated filer; o Accelerated filer; o Non-accelerated filer; o Smaller Reporting Company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock, as of September 2, 2011, was 47,353,305.
 
 
 

 
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.
 
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
 
 
 
Pages
Part I. Financial Information (unaudited)
     
3
     
 
 
17
     
26
     
26
     
     
Part II. Other Information
     
27
     
27
     
27
     
27
     
27
     
27
     
27
     
 
28
 
 
2

 
 
           
             
BALANCE SHEETS
           
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
           
(Unaudited)
           
             
   
July 30,
   
January 29,
 
ASSETS
 
2011
   
2011
 
             
CURRENT ASSETS:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 114,903     $ 116,470  
Short-term investments
    24,628       22,892  
Receivables
    9,388       14,363  
Inventory
    126,842       88,593  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    15,074       14,718  
Total current assets
    290,835       257,036  
                 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
    355,525       342,413  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (180,361 )     (173,179 )
      175,164       169,234  
                 
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS
    58,563       66,162  
OTHER ASSETS
    2,416       2,412  
                 
    $ 526,978     $ 494,844  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
                 
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 46,469     $ 33,489  
Accrued employee compensation
    17,225       36,018  
Accrued store operating expenses
    9,346       9,653  
Gift certificates redeemable
    11,514       17,213  
Total current liabilities
    84,554       96,373  
                 
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
    8,547       7,727  
DEFERRED RENT LIABILITY
    37,736       37,430  
OTHER LIABILITIES
    7,187       7,649  
Total liabilities
    138,024       149,179  
                 
COMMITMENTS
               
                 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
               
Common stock, authorized 100,000,000 shares of $.01 par value; 47,361,905 and 47,127,926
               
shares issued and outstanding at July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively
    474       471  
Additional paid-in capital
    94,804       89,719  
Retained earnings
    294,235       256,146  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (559 )     (671 )
Total stockholders’ equity
    388,954       345,665  
                 
    $ 526,978     $ 494,844  
                 
See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
               
 
 
3

 
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.
                       
                         
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
                       
(Amounts in Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
                   
(Unaudited)
                       
                         
   
Thirteen Weeks Ended
   
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
 
   
July 30,
   
July 31,
   
July 30,
   
July 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
                         
SALES, Net of returns and allowances
  $ 212,378     $ 188,639     $ 452,470     $ 403,436  
                                 
COST OF SALES (Including buying,
                               
distribution, and occupancy costs)
    125,233       113,251       262,381       234,597  
                                 
Gross profit
    87,145       75,388       190,089       168,839  
                                 
OPERATING EXPENSES:
                               
Selling
    42,428       36,644       85,159       76,487  
General and administrative
    7,942       6,218       16,801       13,639  
      50,370       42,862       101,960       90,126  
                                 
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
    36,775       32,526       88,129       78,713  
                                 
OTHER INCOME, Net
    506       566       2,118       2,399  
                                 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    37,281       33,092       90,247       81,112  
                                 
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    13,723       12,345       33,220       30,255  
                                 
NET INCOME
  $ 23,558     $ 20,747     $ 57,027     $ 50,857  
                                 
                                 
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.50     $ 0.45     $ 1.22     $ 1.10  
                                 
Diluted
  $ 0.50     $ 0.44     $ 1.21     $ 1.08  
                                 
Basic weighted average shares
    46,824       46,165       46,786       46,109  
Diluted weighted average shares
    47,314       47,059       47,289       47,026  
                                 
See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
                               
 
 
4

 
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.
                                   
                                     
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                                   
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
                               
(Unaudited)
                                   
                                     
                           
Accumulated
       
               
Additional
         
Other
       
   
Number
   
Common
   
Paid-in
   
Retained
   
Comprehensive
       
   
of Shares
   
Stock
   
Capital
   
Earnings
   
Loss
   
Total
 
                                     
  FISCAL 2011
                                   
BALANCE, January 30, 2011
    47,127,926     $ 471     $ 89,719     $ 256,146     $ (671 )   $ 345,665  
                                                 
Net income
    -       -       -       57,027       -       57,027  
Dividends paid on common stock,
                                               
($0.40 per share)
    -       -       -       (18,938 )     -       (18,938 )
Common stock issued on exercise
                                               
of stock options
    105,244       1       570       -       -       571  
Issuance of non-vested stock, net of forfeitures
    128,735       2       (2 )     -       -       -  
Amortization of non-vested stock grants,
                                               
net of forfeitures
    -       -       3,128       -       -       3,128  
Income tax benefit related to exercise of
                                               
stock options
    -       -       1,389       -       -       1,389  
Unrealized loss on investments, net of tax
    -       -       -       -       112       112  
                                                 
BALANCE, July 30, 2011
    47,361,905     $ 474     $ 94,804     $ 294,235     $ (559 )   $ 388,954  
                                                 
                                                 
  FISCAL 2010
                                               
BALANCE, January 31, 2010
    46,381,263     $ 464     $ 78,837     $ 275,751     $ (793 )   $ 354,259  
                                                 
Net income
    -       -       -       50,857       -       50,857  
Dividends paid on common stock,
                                               
($0.40 per share)
    -       -       -       (18,694 )     -       (18,694 )
Common stock issued on exercise
                                               
of stock options
    166,323       2       839       -       -       841  
Issuance of non-vested stock, net of forfeitures
    243,235       2       (2 )     -       -       -  
Amortization of non-vested stock grants,
                                               
net of forfeitures
    -       -       2,168       -       -       2,168  
Stock option compensation expense
    -       -       32       -       -       32  
Income tax benefit related to exercise of
                                               
stock options
    -       -       1,842       -       -       1,842  
Unrealized loss on investments, net of tax
    -       -       -       -       126       126  
                                                 
BALANCE, July 31, 2010
    46,790,821     $ 468     $ 83,716     $ 307,914     $ (667 )   $ 391,431  
                                                 
See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
                           
 
 
5

 
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.
           
             
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
           
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
           
(Unaudited)
           
             
   
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
 
   
July 30,
   
July 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
           
Net income
  $ 57,027     $ 50,857  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows
               
from operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    15,308       13,362  
Amortization of non-vested stock grants, net of forfeitures
    3,128       2,168  
Stock option compensation expense
    -       32  
Deferred income taxes
    (1,157 )     (815 )
Other
    428       272  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Receivables
    (348 )     1,401  
Inventory
    (38,249 )     (20,493 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    203       (8,203 )
Accounts payable
    14,482       16,628  
Accrued employee compensation
    (18,793 )     (25,187 )
Accrued store operating expenses
    (307 )     (528 )
Gift certificates redeemable
    (5,699 )     (4,197 )
Income taxes payable
    5,436       (6,809 )
Deferred rent liabilities and deferred compensation
    1,126       2,101  
                 
Net cash flows from operating activities
    32,585       20,589  
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Purchase of property and equipment
    (23,170 )     (37,492 )
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
    2       14  
Change in other assets
    (4 )     (794 )
Purchases of investments
    (7,973 )     (32,281 )
Proceeds from sales/maturities of investments
    14,014       23,760  
                 
Net cash flows from investing activities
    (17,131 )     (46,793 )
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
    571       841  
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises
    1,346       1,799  
Payment of dividends
    (18,938 )     (18,694 )
                 
Net cash flows from financing activities
    (17,021 )     (16,054 )
                 
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    (1,567 )     (42,258 )
                 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of period
    116,470       135,340  
                 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of period
  $ 114,903     $ 93,082  
                 
See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
               
 
 
6

 
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THIRTEEN AND TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED JULY 30, 2011 AND JULY 31, 2010
 (Dollar Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
 
1.
Management Representation
   
 
The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Because of the seasonal nature of the business, results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of a full year's operations. The accounting policies followed by the Company and additional footnotes are reflected in the financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, included in The Buckle, Inc.'s 2010 Form 10-K.
   
 
The Company follows generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). References to GAAP in these notes are to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).
 
2.
Description of the Business
   
 
The Company is a retailer of medium to better priced casual apparel, footwear, and accessories for fashion conscious young men and women. The Company operates its business as one reportable industry segment. The Company had 427 stores located in 41 states throughout the continental United States as of July 30, 2011 and 419 stores in 41 states as of July 31, 2010. During the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2011, the Company opened nine new stores, substantially remodeled sixteen stores, and closed two stores; which includes seven new stores, ten substantial remodels, and two closed stores during the second quarter. During the twenty-six week period ended July 31, 2010, the Company opened eighteen new stores and substantially remodeled fifteen stores; which includes seven new stores and twelve substantial remodels during the second quarter.
 
 
The following is information regarding the Company’s major product lines, stated as a percentage of the Company’s net sales:
 
     
Percentage of Net Sales
   
Percentage of Net Sales
 
     
Thirteen Weeks Ended
   
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
 
 
Merchandise Group
 
July 30, 2011
   
July 31, 2010
   
July 30, 2011
   
July 31, 2010
 
                           
 
Denims
    38.5 %     37.8 %     41.7 %     41.9 %
 
Tops (including sweaters)
    34.5       36.3       32.8       34.5  
 
Sportswear/Fashions
    11.1       10.9       10.2       9.6  
 
Accessories
    8.9       8.9       8.3       7.6  
 
Footwear
    5.6       4.9       5.5       5.1  
 
Outerwear
    0.5       0.5       0.6       0.7  
 
Casual bottoms
    0.6       0.5       0.6       0.5  
 
Other
    0.3       0.2       0.3       0.1  
        100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
 
 
7

 
 
3.
Net Earnings Per Share
 
 
Basic earnings per share data are based on the weighted average outstanding common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share data are based on the weighted average outstanding common shares and the effect of all dilutive potential common shares, including stock options.
 
     
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
     
July 30, 2011
 
July 31, 2010
           
Weighted
             
Weighted
     
           
Average
 
Per Share
       
Average
 
Per Share
     
Income
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Income
 
Shares
 
Amount
                                       
 
Basic EPS
  $ 23,558       46,824     $ 0.50     $ 20,747       46,165     $ 0.45  
 
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
                                               
 
    Stock options and
                                               
 
    non-vested shares
    -       490       -       -       894       (0.01 )
 
Diluted EPS
  $ 23,558       47,314     $ 0.50     $ 20,747       47,059     $ 0.44  
 
     
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
 
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
     
July 30, 2011
 
July 31, 2010
           
Weighted
               
Weighted
     
           
Average
   
Per Share
       
Average
 
Per Share
     
Income
 
Shares
   
Amount
 
Income
 
Shares
 
Amount
                                       
 
Basic EPS
  $ 57,027       46,786     $ 1.22     $ 50,857       46,109     $ 1.10  
 
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
                                               
 
    Stock options and
                                               
 
    non-vested shares
    -       503       (0.01 )     -       917       (0.02 )
 
Diluted EPS
  $ 57,027       47,289     $ 1.21     $ 50,857       47,026     $ 1.08  
 
4.
Investments
 
 
The following is a summary of investments as of July 30, 2011:
 
                                 
     
Amortized
   
Gross
   
Gross
   
Other-than-
   
Estimated
 
     
Cost or
   
Unrealized
   
Unrealized
   
Temporary
   
Fair
 
     
Par Value
   
Gains
   
Losses
   
Impairment
   
Value
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
                             
 
Auction-rate securities
  $ 19,025     $ -     $ (887 )   $ (725 )   $ 17,413  
 
Preferred stock
    2,000       -       -       (1,974 )     26  
      $ 21,025     $ -     $ (887 )   $ (2,699 )   $ 17,439  
                                           
 
Held-to-maturity securities:
                                       
 
State and municipal bonds
  $ 51,569     $ 537     $ (30 )   $ -     $ 52,076  
 
Fixed maturities
    5,036       50       -       -       5,086  
 
Certificates of deposit
    600       20       -       -       620  
      $ 57,205     $ 607     $ (30 )   $ -     $ 57,782  
                                           
 
Trading securities:
                                       
 
Mutual funds
  $ 8,787     $ -     $ (240 )   $ -     $ 8,547  
 
 
8

 
 
 
The following is a summary of investments as of January 29, 2011:
 
                                 
     
Amortized
   
Gross
   
Gross
   
Other-than-
   
Estimated
 
     
Cost or
   
Unrealized
   
Unrealized
   
Temporary
   
Fair
 
     
Par Value
   
Gains
   
Losses
   
Impairment
   
Value
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
                             
 
Auction-rate securities
  $ 21,725     $ -     $ (1,065 )   $ (725 )   $ 19,935  
 
Preferred stock
    2,000       -       -       (1,974 )     26  
      $ 23,725     $ -     $ (1,065 )   $ (2,699 )   $ 19,961  
                                           
 
Held-to-maturity securities:
                                       
 
State and municipal bonds
  $ 52,352     $ 428     $ (39 )   $ -     $ 52,741  
 
Fixed maturities
    6,314       80       -       -       6,394  
 
Certificates of deposit
    700       22       -       -       722  
 
U.S. treasuries
    2,000       -       -       -       2,000  
      $ 61,366     $ 530     $ (39 )   $ -     $ 61,857  
                                           
 
Trading securities:
                                       
 
Mutual funds
  $ 7,453     $ 274     $ -     $ -     $ 7,727  
 
 
The auction-rate securities and preferred stock were invested as follows as of July 30, 2011:
 
             
 
Nature
 
Underlying Collateral
 
Par Value
 
             
 
Municipal revenue bonds
 
98% insured by AAA/AA/A-rated bond insurers at July 30, 2011
  $ 10,375  
 
Municipal bond funds
 
Fixed income instruments within issuers' money market funds
    5,700  
 
Student loan bonds
 
Student loans guaranteed by state entities
    2,950  
 
Preferred stock
 
Underlying investments of closed-end funds
    2,000  
 
Total par value
      $ 21,025  
 
 
As of July 30, 2011, the Company’s auction-rate securities portfolio was 27% AAA/Aaa-rated, 50% AA/Aa-rated, 14% A-rated, and 9% below A-rated.
 
 
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity as of July 30, 2011 is as follows:
 
               
     
Amortized
   
Fair
 
     
Cost
   
Value
 
 
Held-to-maturity securities
           
 
Less than 1 year
  $ 24,628     $ 24,760  
 
1 - 5 years
    31,837       32,197  
 
5 - 10 years
    496       566  
 
Greater than 10 years
    244       259  
      $ 57,205     $ 57,782  
 
 
At July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, $17,439 and $19,961 of available-for-sale securities and $32,577 and $38,474 of held-to-maturity securities are classified in long-term investments. Trading securities are held in a Rabbi Trust, intended to fund the Company’s deferred compensation plan, and are classified in long-term investments.
 
 
9

 
 
 
The Company’s investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”) and preferred securities are classified as available-for-sale and reported at fair market value. As of July 30, 2011, the reported investment amount is net of $887 of temporary impairment and $2,699 of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) to account for the impairment of certain securities from their stated par value. The $887 temporary impairment is reported, net of tax, as an “accumulated other comprehensive loss” of $559 in stockholders’ equity as of July 30, 2011. For the investments considered temporarily impaired, the Company believes that these ARS can be successfully redeemed or liquidated through future auctions at par value plus accrued interest. The Company believes it has the ability and maintains its intent to hold these investments until such recovery of market value occurs; therefore, the Company believes the current lack of liquidity has created the temporary impairment in valuation.
   
 
As of July 30, 2011, the Company had $19,025 invested in ARS and $2,000 invested in preferred securities, at par value, which are reported at their estimated fair value of $17,413 and $26, respectively. As of January 29, 2011, the Company had $21,725 invested in ARS and $2,000 invested in preferred securities, which were reported at their estimated fair value of $19,935 and $26, respectively. ARS have a long-term stated maturity, but are reset through a “dutch auction” process that occurs every 7 to 49 days, depending on the terms of the individual security. Until February 2008, the ARS market was highly liquid. During February 2008, however, a significant number of auctions related to these securities failed, meaning that there was not enough demand to sell the entire issue at auction. The failed auctions have limited the current liquidity of certain of the Company’s investments in ARS and the Company has reason to believe that certain of the underlying issuers of its ARS are currently at risk. The Company does not, however, anticipate that further auction failures will have a material impact on the Company’s ability to fund its business. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company was able to successfully liquidate $2,250 of its investments in ARS at par value. The Company reviews all investments for OTTI at least quarterly or as indicators of impairment exist. Indicators of impairment include the duration and severity of decline in market value. In addition, the Company considers qualitative factors including, but not limited to, the financial condition of the investee, the credit rating of the investee, and the current and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee operates.
   
 
As of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, all of the Company’s investments in ARS and preferred securities were classified in long-term investments.
 
5.
Fair Value Measurements
   
 
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:
 
 
Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Short-term and long-term investments with active markets or known redemption values are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs.
 
Level 2 – Observable market-based inputs (either directly or indirectly) such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or inputs that are corroborated by market data.
 
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data and are projections, estimates, or interpretations that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets. The Company has concluded that certain of its ARS represent Level 3 valuation and should be valued using a discounted cash flow analysis. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates for interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, and expected holding periods of the ARS.
 
 
10

 
 
 
As of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, the Company held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis including available-for-sale and trading securities. The Company’s available-for-sale securities include its investments in ARS, as further described in Note 4. The failed auctions, beginning in February 2008, related to certain of the Company’s investments in ARS have limited the availability of quoted market prices. The Company has determined the fair value of its ARS using Level 1 inputs for known or anticipated subsequent redemptions at par value, Level 2 inputs using observable inputs, and Level 3 using unobservable inputs where the following criteria were considered in estimating fair value:
 
 
Pricing was provided by the custodian of ARS;
 
Pricing was provided by a third-party broker for ARS;
 
Sales of similar securities;
 
Quoted prices for similar securities in active markets;
 
Quoted prices for publicly traded preferred securities;
 
Quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are not active - including markets where there are few transactions for the asset, the prices are not current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers, or in which little information is released publicly;
 
Pricing was provided by a third-party valuation consultant (using Level 3 inputs).
 
 
In addition, the Company considers other factors including, but not limited to, the financial condition of the investee, the credit rating, insurance, guarantees, collateral, cash flows, and the current and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee operates. Management believes it has used information that was reasonably obtainable in order to complete its valuation process and determine if the Company’s investments in ARS had incurred any temporary and/or other-than-temporary impairment as of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011.
   
 
Future fluctuations in fair value of ARS that the Company judges to be temporary, including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would be recorded as an adjustment to “accumulated other comprehensive loss.”  The value and liquidity of ARS held by the Company may be affected by continued auction-rate failures, the credit quality of each security, the amount and timing of interest payments, the amount and timing of future principal payments, and the probability of full repayment of the principal. Additional indicators of impairment include the duration and severity of the decline in market value. The interest rates on these investments will be determined by the terms of each individual ARS. The material risks associated with the ARS held by the Company include those stated above as well as the current economic environment, downgrading of credit ratings on investments held, and the volatility of the entities backing each of the issues.
 
 
The Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
 
         
     
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
 
     
Quoted Prices in
                   
     
Active Markets
   
Significant
   
Significant
       
     
for Identical
   
Observable
   
Unobservable
       
     
Assets
   
Inputs
   
Inputs
       
 
July 30, 2011
 
(Level 1)
   
(Level 2)
   
(Level 3)
   
Total
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
                       
 
Auction-rate securities
  $ -     $ 5,999     $ 11,414     $ 17,413  
 
Preferred stock
    26       -       -       26  
 
Trading securities (including mutual funds)
    8,547       -       -       8,547  
 
Totals
  $ 8,573     $ 5,999     $ 11,414     $ 25,986  
 
 
11

 
 
         
     
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
 
     
Quoted Prices in
                   
     
Active Markets
   
Significant
   
Significant
       
     
for Identical
   
Observable
   
Unobservable
       
     
Assets
   
Inputs
   
Inputs
       
 
January 29, 2011
 
(Level 1)
   
(Level 2)
   
(Level 3)
   
Total
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
                       
 
Auction-rate securities
  $ -     $ 11,349     $ 8,586     $ 19,935  
 
Preferred stock
    26       -       -       26  
 
Trading securities (including mutual funds)
    7,727       -       -       7,727  
 
Totals
  $ 7,753     $ 11,349     $ 8,586     $ 27,688  
 
 
Securities included in Level 1 represent securities which have a known or anticipated upcoming redemption as of the reporting date and those that have publicly traded quoted prices. ARS included in Level 2 represent securities which have not experienced a successful auction subsequent to the end of fiscal 2007. The fair market value for these securities was determined by applying a discount to par value based on auction prices for similar securities and by utilizing a discounted cash flow model, using market-based inputs, to determine fair value. The Company used a discounted cash flow model to value its Level 3 investments, using estimates regarding recovery periods, yield, and liquidity. The assumptions used are subjective based upon management’s judgment and views on current market conditions, and resulted in $786 of the Company’s recorded temporary impairment and $725 of the OTTI as of July 30, 2011. The use of different assumptions would result in a different valuation and related temporary impairment charge.
 
 
Changes in the fair value of the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:
 
         
     
Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 30, 2011
 
     
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
     
Available-for-Sale Securities
   
Trading Securities
       
     
Auction-rate
     
Preferred
   
Mutual
       
     
Securities
     
Stock
   
Funds
   
Total
 
 
Balance, beginning of year
  $ 8,586       $ -     $ -     $ 8,586  
 
Transfers into Level 3
    2,787  
(a)
    -       -       2,787  
 
Transfers out of Level 3
    -         -       -       -  
 
Total gains and losses:
                                 
 
Included in net income
    -         -       -       -  
 
Included in other
                                 
 
comprehensive income
    91         -       -       91  
 
Purchases, Issuances,
                                 
 
Sales, and Settlements:
                                 
 
Purchases
    -         -       -       -  
 
Issuances
    -         -       -       -  
 
Sales
    (50 )       -       -       (50 )
 
Settlements
    -         -       -       -  
 
Balance, end of quarter
  $ 11,414       $ -     $ -     $ 11,414  
 
 
(a)
Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 due to lack of observable market data due to reduction in market activity. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period in which the transfer occurred.
 
 
12

 
 
         
     
Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 31, 2010
 
     
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
     
Available-for-Sale Securities
   
Trading Securities
       
     
Auction-rate
   
Preferred
   
Mutual
       
     
Securities
   
Stock
   
Funds
   
Total
 
 
Balance, beginning of year
  $ 8,637     $ -     $ -     $ 8,637  
 
Transfers into Level 3
    -       -       -       -  
 
Transfers out of Level 3
    -       -       -       -  
 
Total gains and losses:
                               
 
Included in net income
    -       -       -       -  
 
Included in other
                               
 
comprehensive income
    -       -       -       -  
 
Purchases, Issuances,
                               
 
Sales, and Settlements:
                               
 
Purchases
    -       -       -       -  
 
Issuances
    -       -       -       -  
 
Sales
    (51 )     -       -       (51 )
 
Settlements
    -       -       -       -  
 
Balance, end of quarter
  $ 8,586     $ -     $ -     $ 8,586  
 
6.
Comprehensive Income
 
 
Comprehensive income consists of net income and unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities. Unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in auction-rate securities have been included in accumulated other comprehensive loss and are separately included as a component of stockholders’ equity, net of related income taxes.
 
         
     
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
     
July 30, 2011
   
July 31, 2010
 
               
 
Net income
  $ 23,558     $ 20,747  
 
Changes in net unrealized losses on investments,
               
 
net of taxes of $(53) and $(54)
    91       92  
 
Comprehensive Income
  $ 23,649     $ 20,839  
 
         
     
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
 
     
July 30, 2011
   
July 31, 2010
 
               
 
Net income
  $ 57,027     $ 50,857  
 
Changes in net unrealized losses on investments,
               
 
net of taxes of $(66) and $(74)
    112       126  
 
Comprehensive Income
  $ 57,139     $ 50,983  
 
7.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
   
 
The Company had non-cash investing activities during the twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 of $1,502 and $2,378, respectively. The non-cash investing activity relates to unpaid purchases of property, plant, and equipment included in accounts payable as of the end of the quarter. Amounts reported as unpaid purchases are recorded as cash outflows from investing activities for purchases of property, plant, and equipment in the statement of cash flows in the period they are paid.
   
 
Additional cash flow information for the Company includes cash paid for income taxes during the twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 of $27,352 and $36,081, respectively.
 
 
13

 
 
8.
Stock-Based Compensation
   
 
The Company has several stock option plans which allow for granting of stock options to employees, executives, and directors. The options are in the form of non-qualified stock options and are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The options generally expire ten years from the date of grant. The Company also has a restricted stock plan that allows for the granting of non-vested shares of common stock to employees and executives and a restricted stock plan that allows for the granting of non-vested shares of common stock to non-employee directors.
   
 
As of July 30, 2011, 639,343 shares were available for grant under the various stock option plans, of which 449,739 were available for grant to executive officers. Also as of July 30, 2011, 340,184 shares were available for grant under the Company’s various restricted stock plans, of which 288,060 shares were available for grant to executive officers.
   
 
Compensation expense was recognized during fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 for equity-based grants, based on the grant date fair value of the awards. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, while the fair value of grants of non-vested common stock awards is the stock price on the date of grant.
 
 
Information regarding the impact of stock-based compensation expense is as follows:
 
         
     
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
     
July 30, 2011
   
July 31, 2010
 
 
Stock-based compensation expense, before tax:
           
 
Stock options
  $ -     $ 16  
 
Non-vested shares of common stock
    1,507       668  
 
Total stock-based compensation expense, before tax
  $ 1,507     $ 684  
                   
 
Total stock-based compensation expense, after tax
  $ 949     $ 431  
 
         
     
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
 
     
July 30, 2011
   
July 31, 2010
 
 
Stock-based compensation expense, before tax:
           
 
Stock options
  $ -     $ 32  
 
Non-vested shares of common stock
    3,128       2,168  
 
Total stock-based compensation expense, before tax
  $ 3,128     $ 2,200  
                   
 
Total stock-based compensation expense, after tax
  $ 1,971     $ 1,386  
 
 
FASB ASC 718 requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for stock options exercised during the period to be classified as financing cash inflows. This amount is shown as “excess tax benefit from stock option exercises” on the statements of cash flows. For the twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, the excess tax benefit realized from exercised stock options was $1,346 and $1,799, respectively.
   
 
No stock options were granted during fiscal 2011 or fiscal 2010. On November 17, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized a $2.50 per share special cash dividend to be paid on December 21, 2010 to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 3, 2010. To preserve the intrinsic value for option holders, the Board also approved, pursuant to the terms of the Company’s various stock option plans, a proportional adjustment to both the exercise price and the number of shares covered by each award for all outstanding stock options. This adjustment did not result in any incremental compensation expense.
 
 
14

 
 
 
A summary of the Company’s stock-based compensation activity related to stock options for the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2011 is as follows:
 
                             
                 
Weighted
         
           
Weighted
   
Average
         
           
Average
   
Remaining
     
Aggregate
 
           
Exercise
   
Contractual
     
Intrinsic
 
     
Shares
   
Price
   
Life
     
Value
 
                             
 
Outstanding - beginning of year
    600,506     $ 4.54                
 
Granted
    -       -                
 
Expired/forfeited
    -       -                
 
Exercised
    (105,244 )     5.43                
 
Outstanding - end of quarter
    495,262     $ 4.36       2.61  
years
  $ 19,788  
                                     
 
Exercisable - end of quarter
    495,262     $ 4.36       2.61  
years
  $ 19,788  
 
 
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 was $3,945 and $5,117, respectively. As of July 30, 2011, there was no unrecognized compensation expense as all outstanding stock options were vested.
   
 
Non-vested shares of common stock granted during the twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 were granted pursuant to the Company’s 2005 Restricted Stock Plan and the Company’s 2008 Director Restricted Stock Plan. Shares granted under the 2005 Plan typically vest over a period of four years, only upon certification by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors that the Company has achieved its pre-established performance targets for the fiscal year. Shares granted under the 2008 Director Plan vest 25% on the date of grant and then in equal portions on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.
 
 
A summary of the Company’s stock-based compensation activity related to grants of non-vested shares of common stock for the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2011 is as follows:
 
               
           
Weighted Average
 
           
Grant Date
 
     
Shares
   
Fair Value
 
               
 
Non-Vested - beginning of year
    436,546     $ 26.07  
 
Granted
    245,500       35.59  
 
Forfeited
    (116,765 )     28.43  
 
Vested
    (32,060 )     28.91  
 
Non-Vested - end of quarter
    533,221     $ 29.77  
 
 
As of July 30, 2011, there was $8,361 of unrecognized compensation expense related to grants of non-vested shares. It is expected that this expense will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.1 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 was $1,169 and $1,871, respectively.
 
 
15

 
 
9.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
   
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such transfers. It also requires the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. The new disclosures about fair value measurements are presented in Note 5 to these financial statements. The adoption of this statement had no effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
   
 
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income –Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 requires comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively and are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
 
16

 
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and notes thereto of the Company included in this Form 10-Q.  All references herein to the “Company”, “Buckle”, “we”, “us”, or similar terms refer to The Buckle, Inc. and its subsidiary.  The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors which have affected the Company’s financial condition and results of operations during the periods included in the accompanying financial statements.
 
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
 
Company management considers the following items to be key performance indicators in evaluating Company performance.
 
Comparable Store Sales – Stores are deemed to be comparable stores if they were open in the prior year on the first day of the fiscal period being presented. Stores which have been remodeled, expanded, and/or relocated, but would otherwise be included as comparable stores, are not excluded from the comparable store sales calculation. Online sales are excluded from comparable store sales. Management considers comparable store sales to be an important indicator of current Company performance, helping leverage certain fixed costs when results are positive. Negative comparable store sales results could reduce net sales and have a negative impact on operating leverage, thus reducing net earnings.
 
Merchandise Margins – Management evaluates the components of merchandise margin including initial markup and the amount of markdowns during a period. Any inability to obtain acceptable levels of initial markups or any significant increase in the Company’s use of markdowns could have an adverse effect on the Company’s gross margin and results of operations.
 
Operating Margin – Operating margin is a good indicator for management of the Company’s success. Operating margin can be positively or negatively affected by comparable store sales, merchandise margins, occupancy costs, and the Company’s ability to control operating costs.
 
Cash Flow and Liquidity (working capital) – Management reviews current cash and short-term investments along with cash flow from operating, investing, and financing activities to determine the Company’s short-term cash needs for operations and expansion. The Company believes that existing cash, short-term investments, and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund current and long-term anticipated capital expenditures and working capital requirements for the next several years.
 
 
17

 
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The table below sets forth the percentage relationships of sales and various expense categories in the Statements of Income for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010:
 
                         
   
Percentage of Net Sales
   
Percentage
   
Percentage of Net Sales
   
Percentage
 
   
Thirteen Weeks Ended
   
Increase/
   
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
   
Increase/
 
   
July 30, 2011
   
July 31, 2010
   
(Decrease)
   
July 30, 2011
   
July 31, 2010
   
(Decrease)
 
                                     
Net sales
    100.0 %     100.0 %     12.6 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     12.2 %
Cost of sales (including buying,
                                               
distribution, and occupancy costs)
    59.0 %     60.0 %     10.6 %     58.0 %     58.1 %     11.8 %
Gross profit
    41.0 %     40.0 %     15.6 %     42.0 %     41.9 %     12.6 %
Selling expenses
    20.0 %     19.4 %     15.8 %     18.8 %     19.0 %     11.3 %
General and administrative expenses
    3.7 %     3.3 %     27.7 %     3.7 %     3.4 %     23.2 %
Income from operations
    17.3 %     17.3 %     13.1 %     19.5 %     19.5 %     12.0 %
Other income, net
    0.3 %     0.3 %     -10.7 %     0.4 %     0.6 %     -11.7 %
Income before income taxes
    17.6 %     17.6 %     12.7 %     19.9 %     20.1 %     11.3 %
Provision for income taxes
    6.5 %     6.6 %     11.2 %     7.3 %     7.5 %     9.8 %
Net income
    11.1 %     11.0 %     13.5 %     12.6 %     12.6 %     12.1 %
 
Net sales increased from $188.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $212.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, a 12.6% increase. Comparable store sales increased by $15.5 million, or 8.9%, for the thirteen week period ended July 30, 2011 compared to the same period in the prior year. The comparable store sales increase was primarily due to a 4.3% increase in the number of transactions at comparable stores during the period, a 3.9% increase in the average retail price per piece of merchandise sold during the period, and a 0.4% increase in the average number of units sold per transaction. Sales growth for the thirteen week period was also attributable to the inclusion of a full quarter of operating results for the 10 new stores opened after the first quarter of fiscal 2010, to the opening of 9 new stores during the first two quarters of fiscal 2011, and to growth in online sales. Online sales for the quarter (which are not included in comparable store sales) increased 21.8% to $14.3 million.
 
The Company’s average retail price per piece of merchandise sold increased $1.58, or 3.9%, during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2010. This $1.58 increase was primarily attributable to the following changes (with their corresponding effect on the overall average price per piece): a 3.2% increase in average denim price points ($0.51), a shift in the merchandise mix ($0.32), a 2.8% increase in average knit shirt price points ($0.32), a 5.1% increase in average active apparel price points ($0.21), a 3.3% increase in average woven shirt price points ($0.09), and increased price points in certain other categories ($0.13). These changes are primarily a reflection of merchandise shifts in terms of brands and product styles, fabrics, details, and finishes.
 
Net sales increased from $403.4 million for the first two quarters of fiscal 2010 to $452.5 million for the first two quarters of fiscal 2011, a 12.2% increase. Comparable store sales increased by $31.3 million, or 8.5%, for the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2011 compared to the same period in the prior year. The comparable store sales increase was primarily due to a 5.1% increase in the number of transactions at comparable stores during the period, a 1.9% increase in the average retail price per piece of merchandise sold during the period, and a 1.3% increase in the average number of units sold per transaction. Sales growth for the twenty-six week period was also attributable to the inclusion of a full two quarters of operating results for the 21 new stores opened during fiscal 2010, to the opening of 9 new stores during the first two quarters of fiscal 2011, and to growth in online sales. Online sales for the year-to-date period increased 20.1% to $31.4 million. Average sales per square foot increased 9.0% from $182.37 for the twenty-six week period ended July 31, 2010 to $198.74 for the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2011. Total square footage as of July 30, 2011 was 2.138 million.
 
 
18

 
 
The Company’s average retail price per piece of merchandise sold increased $0.81, or 1.9%, during the first two quarters of fiscal 2011 compared to the first two quarters of fiscal 2010. This $0.81 increase was primarily attributable to the following changes (with their corresponding effect on the overall average price per piece): a 6.0% increase in average active apparel price points ($0.23), a 7.2% increase in average woven shirt price points ($0.19), a 1.0% increase in average denim price points ($0.18), a 0.9% increase in average knit shirt price points ($0.10), and a 3.6% increase in average accessory price points ($0.13). These increases were partially offset by a shift in the merchandise mix (-$0.02). These changes are primarily a reflection of merchandise shifts in terms of brands and product styles, fabrics, details, and finishes.
 
Gross profit after buying, distribution, and occupancy expenses increased from $75.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $87.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, a 15.6% increase. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased from 40.0% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to 41.0% in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase was attributable to 0.80% improvement, as a percentage of net sales, in actual merchandise margins and the leveraging of certain occupancy costs (0.70%, as a percentage of net sales), which were partially offset by an increase in distribution costs (0.50%, as a percentage of net sales).
 
Year-to-date, gross profit increased from $168.8 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 31, 2010  to $190.1 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2011, a 12.6% increase. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased from 41.9% for the first half of fiscal 2010 to 42.0% for the first half of fiscal 2011. The increase was attributable to 0.20% improvement, as a percentage of net sales, in actual merchandise margins and the leveraging of certain occupancy costs (0.40%, as a percentage of net sales), which were partially offset by an increase in distribution costs (0.50%, as a percentage of net sales).
 
The increase in merchandise margins for both the quarter and year-to-date period was the result of reduced markdowns, as a result of strong sell-throughs on new product, which were partially offset by an increase in redemptions through the Company’s Primo Card loyalty program. The increase in distribution costs for both the quarter and year-to-date period was primarily attributable to additional depreciation expense related to the Company’s new distribution center that went live during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and increased shipping costs related to the shipment of merchandise from the distribution center to the stores and the transfer of inventory between stores.
 
Selling expenses increased from $36.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $42.4 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2011, a 15.8% increase. As a percentage of net sales, selling expenses increased from 19.4% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to 20.0% for the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.45%, as a percentage of net sales) and an increase in store payroll expense (0.15%, as a percentage of net sales).
 
Year-to-date, selling expenses increased from $76.5 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 to $85.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2011, an 11.3% increase. As a percentage of net sales, selling expenses decreased from 19.0% in fiscal 2010 to 18.8% in fiscal 2011. The reduction was primarily attributable to reductions in expense related to certain store supplies (0.20%, as a percentage of net sales) and health insurance claims (0.15%, as a percentage of net sales), which were partially offset by an increase in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.15%, as a percentage of net sales).
 
General and administrative expenses increased from $6.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $7.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, a 27.7% increase. As a percentage of net sales, general and administrative expenses increased from 3.3% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to 3.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in equity compensation expense (0.40%, as a percentage of net sales).
 
Year-to-date, general and administrative expense increased from $13.6 million for the first half of fiscal 2010 to $16.8 million for the first half of fiscal 2011, a 23.2% increase. As a percentage of net sales, general and administrative expenses increased from 3.4% in fiscal 2010 to 3.7% in fiscal 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in equity compensation expense (0.10%, as a percentage of net sales), an increase in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.10%, as a percentage of net sales), and current year expense related to the early termination of two store leases (0.10%, as a percentage of net sales).
 
 
19

 
 
As a result of the above changes, the Company's income from operations increased 13.1% to $36.8 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to $32.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Income from operations was 17.3% of net sales for both the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Income from operations, for the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2011, increased 12.0% to $88.1 million compared to $78.7 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 31, 2010. Income from operations was 19.5% of net sales for both the first half of fiscal 2011 and the first half of fiscal 2010.
 
Other income decreased from $0.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to $0.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Other income for the year-to-date period decreased from $2.4 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 31, 2010 to $2.1 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2011. The Company’s other income is derived primarily from interest and dividends received on the Company’s cash and investments.
 
Income tax expense as a percentage of pre-tax income was 36.8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 37.3% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, bringing net income to $23.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to $20.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, an increase of 13.5%. Income tax expense was also 36.8% of pre-tax income in the first half of fiscal 2011 and 37.3% in the first half of fiscal 2010, bringing year-to-date net income to $57.0 million for fiscal 2011 compared to $50.9 million for fiscal 2010, an increase of 12.1%.
 
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
As of July 30, 2011, the Company had working capital of $206.3 million, including $114.9 million of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $24.6 million. The Company’s cash receipts are generated from retail sales and from investment income, and the Company's primary ongoing cash requirements are for inventory, payroll, occupancy costs, dividend payments, new store expansion, remodeling, and other capital expenditures. Historically, the Company's primary source of working capital has been cash flow from operations. During the first half of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, the Company’s cash flow from operating activities was $32.6 million and $20.6 million, respectively.
 
The uses of cash for both twenty-six week periods include payment of annual bonuses accrued at fiscal year end, changes in inventory and accounts payable for build-up of inventory levels, dividend payments, construction costs for new and remodeled stores, and other capital expenditures.
 
During the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company invested $20.3 million and $22.5 million, respectively, in new store construction, store renovation, and store technology upgrades. The Company also spent $2.9 million and $15.0 million in the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, in capital expenditures for the corporate headquarters and distribution facility. Capital spending for the corporate headquarters and distribution facility during fiscal 2010 included payments made as work progressed on the Company’s new $25.0 million distribution center in Kearney, Nebraska. The Company transitioned to the new distribution center in late September 2010 and the new facility is the only operating store distribution center.
 
During the remainder of fiscal 2011, the Company anticipates completing approximately 13 additional store construction projects, including approximately 4 new stores and approximately 9 stores to be substantially remodeled and/or relocated. Management estimates that total capital expenditures during fiscal 2011 will be approximately $30 to $35 million. The Company believes that existing cash and cash equivalents, investments, and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund current and long-term anticipated capital expenditures and working capital requirements for the next several years. The Company has a consistent record of generating positive cash flow each year and, as of July 30, 2011, had total cash and investments of $198.1 million. The Company does not currently have plans for a merger or acquisition and has fairly consistent plans for new store expansion and remodels. Based upon past results and current plans, management does not anticipate any large swings in the Company’s need for cash in the upcoming years.
 
 
20

 
 
Future conditions, however, may reduce the availability of funds based upon factors such as a decrease in demand for the Company’s product, change in product mix, competitive factors, and general economic conditions as well as other risks and uncertainties which would reduce the Company’s sales, net profitability, and cash flows. Also, the Company’s acceleration in store openings and/or remodels or the Company entering into a merger, acquisition, or other financial related transaction could reduce the amount of cash available for further capital expenditures and working capital requirements.
 
The Company has available an unsecured line of credit of $17.5 million with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for operating needs and letters of credit. The line of credit provides that outstanding letters of credit cannot exceed $10.0 million. Borrowings under the line of credit provide for interest to be paid at a rate equal to the prime rate established by the Bank. The Company has, from time to time, borrowed against these lines during periods of peak inventory build-up. There were no bank borrowings during the first half of fiscal 2011 or 2010.
 
Auction-Rate Securities - As of July 30, 2011, total cash and investments included $17.4 million of auction-rate securities (“ARS”) and preferred securities, which compares to $20.0 million of ARS and preferred securities as of January 29, 2011. All of the $17.4 million of ARS and preferred securities as of July 30, 2011 has been included in long-term investments. ARS have a long-term stated maturity, but are reset through a “dutch auction” process that occurs every 7 to 49 days, depending on the terms of the individual security. During February 2008, a significant number of auctions related to these securities failed, meaning that there was not enough demand to sell the entire issue at auction. The failed auctions have limited the current liquidity of the Company’s investments in ARS and the Company has reason to believe that certain of the underlying issuers of its ARS are currently at risk. The Company does not anticipate, however, that further auction failures will have a material impact on the Company’s ability to fund its business.
 
ARS and preferred securities are reported at fair market value, and as of July 30, 2011, the reported investment amount is net of a $0.9 million temporary impairment and a $2.7 million other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) to account for the impairment of certain securities from their stated par value. The Company reported the $0.9 million temporary impairment, net of tax, as an “accumulated other comprehensive loss” of $0.6 million in stockholders’ equity as of July 30, 2011. The Company has accounted for the impairment as temporary, as it currently expects to be able to successfully liquidate its investments without loss once the ARS market resumes normal operations.
 
The Company reviews all investments for OTTI at least quarterly or as indicators of impairment exist. The value and liquidity of ARS held by the Company may be affected by continued auction-rate failures, the credit quality of each security, the amount and timing of interest payments, the amount and timing of future principal payments, and the probability of full repayment of the principal. Additional indicators of impairment include the duration and severity of the decline in market value. The interest rates on these investments will be determined by the terms of each individual ARS. The material risks associated with the ARS held by the Company include those stated above as well as the current economic environment, downgrading of credit ratings on investments held, and the volatility of the entities backing each of the issues. In addition, the Company considers qualitative factors including, but not limited to, the financial condition of the investee, the credit rating of the investee, and the current and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee operates. The Company believes it has the ability and intent to hold these investments until recovery of market value occurs.
 
 
21

 
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are based upon The Buckle, Inc.’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires that management make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the financial statement date, and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates its estimates, including those related to inventory, investments, incentive bonuses, and income taxes. Management bases its estimates on past experience and on various other factors that are thought to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that the estimates and judgments used in preparing these financial statements were the most appropriate at that time. Presented below are those critical accounting policies that management believes require subjective and/or complex judgments that could potentially affect reported results of operations. The critical accounting policies and estimates utilized by the Company in the preparation of its condensed consolidated financial statements for the period ending July 30, 2011 have not changed materially from those utilized for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, included in The Buckle Inc.’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
1.
Revenue Recognition. Retail store sales are recorded upon the purchase of merchandise by customers. Online sales are recorded when merchandise is delivered to the customer, with the time of delivery being based on estimated shipping time from the Company’s distribution center to the customer. Shipping fees charged to customers are included in revenue and shipping costs are included in selling expenses. The Company recognizes revenue from sales made under its layaway program upon delivery of the merchandise to the customer. Revenue is not recorded when gift cards and gift certificates are sold, but rather when a card or certificate is redeemed for merchandise. A current liability for unredeemed gift cards and certificates is recorded at the time the card or certificate is purchased. The amounts of the gift certificate and gift card liabilities are determined using the outstanding balances from the prior three and four years of issuance, respectively. The liability recorded for unredeemed gift certificates and gift cards was $11.5 million and $17.2 million as of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively. The Company records breakage as other income when the probability of redemption, which is based on historical redemption patterns, is remote.
   
 
The Company establishes a liability for estimated merchandise returns based upon the historical average sales return percentage. Customer returns could potentially exceed the historical average, thus reducing future net sales results and potentially reducing future net earnings. The accrued liability for reserve for sales returns was $0.8 million and $0.7 million as of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively.
   
2.
Inventory. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using an average cost method that approximates the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Management makes adjustments to inventory and cost of goods sold, based upon estimates, to reserve for merchandise obsolescence and markdowns that could affect market value, based on assumptions using calculations applied to current inventory levels within each of four different markdown levels. Management also reviews the levels of inventory in each markdown group and the overall aging of the inventory versus the estimated future demand for such product and the current market conditions. Such judgments could vary significantly from actual results, either favorably or unfavorably, due to fluctuations in future economic conditions, industry trends, consumer demand, and the competitive retail environment. Such changes in market conditions could negatively impact the sale of markdown inventory, causing further markdowns or inventory obsolescence, resulting in increased cost of goods sold from write-offs and reducing the Company’s net earnings. The liability recorded as a reserve for markdowns and/or obsolescence was $4.9 million and $5.1 million as of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively. The Company is not aware of any events, conditions, or changes in demand or price that would indicate that its inventory valuation may not be materially accurate at this time.
 
 
22

 
 
3.
Income Taxes. The Company records a deferred tax asset and liability for expected future tax consequences resulting from temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company considers future taxable income and ongoing tax planning in assessing the value of its deferred tax assets. If the Company determines that it is more than likely that these assets will not be realized, the Company would reduce the value of these assets to their expected realizable value, thereby decreasing net income. Estimating the value of these assets is based upon the Company’s judgment. If the Company subsequently determined that the deferred tax assets, which had been written down, would be realized in the future, such value would be increased. Adjustment would be made to increase net income in the period such determination was made. As of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, the Company’s non-current deferred tax liability includes a $0.2 million valuation allowance recorded to reduce the value of the Company’s capital loss carryforward to its expected realizable amount prior to expiration.
   
4.
Operating Leases. The Company leases retail stores under operating leases. Most lease agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, rent holidays, rent escalation clauses, and/or contingent rent provisions. For purposes of recognizing lease incentives and minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, the Company uses the date of initial possession to begin amortization, which is generally when the Company enters the space and begins to make improvements in preparation of intended use. For tenant improvement allowances and rent holidays, the Company records a deferred rent liability on the balance sheets and amortizes the deferred rent over the terms of the leases as reductions to rent expense on the statements of income.
   
 
For scheduled rent escalation clauses during the lease terms or for rental payments commencing at a date other than the date of initial occupancy, the Company records minimum rental expense on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases on the statements of income. Certain leases provide for contingent rents, which are determined as a percentage of gross sales in excess of specified levels. The Company records a contingent rent liability on the balance sheets and the corresponding rent expense when specified levels have been achieved or are reasonably probable to be achieved.
   
5.
Investments. Investments classified as short-term investments include securities with a maturity of greater than three months and less than one year, and a portion of the Company’s investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”), which are available-for-sale securities. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity (net of the effect of income taxes), using the specific identification method, until they are sold.
   
 
The Company reviews impairment to determine the classification of potential impairments as either temporary or other-than-temporary. A temporary impairment results in an unrealized loss being recorded in other comprehensive income. An impairment that is considered other-than-temporary would be recognized in net income. The Company considers various factors in reviewing impairment, including the duration and severity of the decline in market value. In addition, the Company considers qualitative factors including, but not limited to, the financial condition of the investee, the credit rating of the investee, the current and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee operates, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. The Company believes it has the ability and maintains its intent to hold these investments until recovery of market value occurs.
   
 
The Company determined the fair value of ARS using Level 1 inputs for known or anticipated subsequent redemptions at par value, Level 2 inputs using observable inputs, and Level 3 using unobservable inputs, where the following criteria were considered in estimating fair value:
 
 
Pricing was provided by the custodian of ARS;
 
Pricing was provided by a third-party broker for ARS;
 
Sales of similar securities;
 
Quoted prices for similar securities in active markets;
 
Quoted prices for publicly traded preferred securities;
 
Quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are not active - including markets where there are few transactions for the asset, the prices are not current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers, or in which little information is released publicly;
 
Pricing was provided by a third-party valuation consultant (using Level 3 inputs).
 
 
23

 
 
 
In addition, the Company considers other factors including, but not limited to, the financial condition of the investee, the credit rating, insurance, guarantees, collateral, cash flows, and the current and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee operates. Management believes it has used information that was reasonably obtainable in order to complete its valuation process and determine if the Company’s investments in ARS had incurred any temporary and/or other-than-temporary impairment as of July 30, 2011.
 
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS, CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS,
AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS

As referenced in the tables below, the Company has contractual obligations and commercial commitments that may affect the financial condition of the Company. Based on management’s review of the terms and conditions of its contractual obligations and commercial commitments, there is no known trend, demand, commitment, event, or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to occur which would have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

In addition, the commercial obligations and commitments made by the Company are customary transactions which are similar to those of other comparable retail companies. The operating lease obligations shown in the table below represent future cash payments to landlords required to fulfill the Company’s minimum rent requirements. Such amounts are actual cash requirements by year and are not reported net of any tenant improvement allowances received from landlords.

The following tables identify the material obligations and commitments as of July 30, 2011:
 
       
   
Payments Due by Period
 
Contractual obligations (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
Total
   
Less than
1 year
   
1-3 years
   
4-5 years
   
After 5
years
 
Long term debt and purchase obligations
  $ 5,953     $ 5,710     $ 243     $ -     $ -  
Deferred compensation
    8,547       -       -       -       8,547  
Operating leases
    362,458       54,036       99,585       80,927       127,910  
Total contractual obligations
  $ 376,958     $ 59,746     $ 99,828     $ 80,927     $ 136,457  
 
       
   
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
 
Other commercial commitments (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
Total
Amounts
Committed
 
Less than 1
year
 
1-3 years
   
4-5 years
   
After 5
years
 
Lines of credit
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Total commercial commitments
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
 
The Company has available an unsecured line of credit of $17.5 million, of which $10.0 million is available for letters of credit, which is excluded from the preceding table. Certain merchandise purchase orders require that the Company open letters of credit. When the Company takes possession of the merchandise, it releases payment on the letters of credit. The amounts of outstanding letters of credit reported reflect the open letters of credit on merchandise ordered, but not yet received or funded. The Company believes it has sufficient credit available to open letters of credit for merchandise purchases. There were no bank borrowings during the first half of fiscal 2011 or the first half of fiscal 2010. The Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $3.0 million and $1.4 million at July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively. The Company has no other off-balance sheet arrangements.
 
 
24

 
 
SEASONALITY AND INFLATION

The Company's business is seasonal, with the holiday season (from approximately November 15 to December 30) and the back-to-school season (from approximately July 15 to September 1) historically contributing the greatest volume of net sales. For fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, the holiday and back-to-school seasons accounted for approximately 35%, 35%, and 37%, respectively, of the Company's fiscal year net sales. Although the operations of the Company are influenced by general economic conditions, the Company does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on the results of operations during the twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010. Quarterly results may vary significantly depending on a variety of factors including the timing and amount of sales and costs associated with the opening of new stores, the timing and level of markdowns, the timing of store closings, the remodeling of existing stores, competitive factors, and general economic conditions.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such transfers. It also requires the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. The new disclosures about fair value measurements are presented in Note 5 to the financial statements included in this Form 10-Q. The adoption of this statement had no effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income –Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 requires comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively and are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.


FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Information in this report, other than historical information, may be considered to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “1995 Act”). Such statements are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the 1995 Act. In connection with these safe-harbor provisions, this management’s discussion and analysis contains certain forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s current views and estimates of future economic conditions, Company performance, and financial results. The statements are based on many assumptions and factors that could cause future results to differ materially. Such factors include, but are not limited to, changes in product mix, changes in fashion trends, competitive factors, and general economic conditions, economic conditions in the retail apparel industry, as well as other risks and uncertainties inherent in the Company’s business and the retail industry in general. Any changes in these factors could result in significantly different results for the Company. The Company further cautions that the forward-looking information contained herein is not exhaustive or exclusive. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, which may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.
 
 
25

 
 
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company has evaluated the disclosure requirements of Item 305 of S-K “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” and has concluded that the Company has inherent risks in its operations as it is exposed to certain market risks, including interest rates.

Interest Rate Risk - To the extent that the Company borrows under its line of credit facility, the Company would be exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. As of July 30, 2011, no borrowings were outstanding under the line of credit facility. The Company is not a party to any derivative financial instruments. Additionally, the Company is exposed to market risk related to interest rate risk on the cash and investments in interest-bearing securities. These investments have carrying values that are subject to interest rate changes that could impact earnings to the extent that the Company did not hold the investments to maturity. If there are changes in interest rates, those changes would also affect the investment income the Company earns on its cash and investments. For each one-quarter percent decline in the interest/dividend rate earned on cash and investments (approximately a 50% change in the rate earned), the Company’s net income would decrease approximately $0.3 million, or less than $0.01 per share. This amount could vary based upon the number of shares of the Company’s stock outstanding and the level of cash and investments held by the Company.

Other Market Risk – At July 30, 2011, the Company held $21.0 million, at par value, of investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”) and preferred stock. The Company concluded that a $0.9 million temporary impairment and $2.7 million other-than-temporary impairment existed related to these securities as of July 30, 2011. Given current market conditions in the ARS and equity markets, the Company may incur additional temporary or other-than-temporary impairment in the future if market conditions persist and the Company is unable to recover the cost of its investments in ARS.

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information, which is required to be timely disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely manner. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) was performed as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the Company’s reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.

Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
26

 
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.

PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION

Legal Proceedings:
         
None
               
Risk Factors:
           
               
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed under “Item 1A - Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.
               
               
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds:
           
               
The following table sets forth information concerning purchases made by the Company of its common stock for each of the months in the fiscal quarter ended July 30, 2011:

   
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
   
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
   
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
   
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased
Under Publicly
Announced Plans
 
                         
May 1, 2011 to May 28, 2011
    -       -       -       552,500  
May 29, 2011 to July 2, 2011
    -       -       -       552,500  
July 3, 2011 to July 30, 2011
    -       -       -       552,500  
      -       -       -          
                                 
The Board of Directors authorized a 1,000,000 share repurchase plan on November 20, 2008. The Company has 552,500 shares remaining to complete this authorization.
 

 
Defaults Upon Senior Securities:
       
None
             
Reserved.
         
             
Other Information:
       
None
             
Exhibits:
         

(a)
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 certifications, as well as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
(b)
Exhibit 101 includes the following materials from The Buckle, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Balance Sheets; (ii) Statements of Income; (iii) Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (iv) Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail.
   
 
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
 
 
27

 
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.

SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
THE BUCKLE, INC.
 
     
     
Dated:   September 8, 2011
/s/  DENNIS H. NELSON
 
 
DENNIS H. NELSON, President and CEO
 
 
(principal executive officer)
 
     
     
     
Dated:   September 8,  2011
/s/  KAREN B. RHOADS
 
 
KAREN B. RHOADS, Vice President
 
 
of Finance and CFO
 
 
(principal accounting officer)
 
 
 
28