UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.   20549

FORM 10 - Q

x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to ____________

Commission File Number 0-21743

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.
(Exact Name of Issuer as Specified In Its Charter)

Delaware
 
36-3680347
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
 
Identification No.)

Two Concourse Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta, GA 30328
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

678-638-0460
(Registrants’ telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x   No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes ¨   No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨  Accelerated filer ¨   Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨    No x

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common Stock on November 9, 2010 was 24,551,867.
  


 
 

 

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2010
Index

   
Page
     
PART I
Financial Information
2
     
ITEM 1.
Financial Statements
2
ITEM 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
29
ITEM 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
35
ITEM 4.
Controls and Procedures
35
     
PART II
Other Information
37
     
ITEM 1.
Legal Proceedings
37
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors
37
ITEM 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
37
ITEM 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
37
ITEM 4.
(Removed and Reserved)
37
ITEM 5.
Other Information
37
ITEM 6.
Exhibits
38
     
Signatures
47

 
1

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.  Financial Statements

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
  
 
(Unaudited)
       
ASSETS             
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 290     $ 198  
Trade accounts receivable
    645       374  
Inventories, net of allowance of $127 and $136
    112       124  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    224       294  
Total current assets
    1,271       990  
                 
Property and equipment, net
    93       129  
Goodwill
    3,418       3,418  
Proprietary software, net
    1,580       2,076  
Patents and other intangible assets, net
    1,798       1,996  
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies
    698       659  
Other long-term assets
    186       156  
Total assets
  $ 9,044     $ 9,424  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 346     $ 558  
Taxes payable
    2       4  
Accrued expenses
    8,689       7,292  
Deferred revenues and customer prepayments
    423       791  
Note payable
    109       69  
Note payable - YA Global
    -       500  
Accrued purchase price guarantee
    4,535       4,535  
Deferred tax liability
    706       706  
Derivative financial instruments - warrants
    3,904       9,912  
Derivative financial instruments - Series C and D preferred stock and debentures payable
    23,309       50,985  
Debentures payable - carried at amortized cost
    14,488       12,523  
Debentures payable - carried at fair value
    26,805       37,678  
Total current liabilities
    83,316       125,553  
                 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
               
                 
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 27,000
               
shares authorized, 8,369 and 8,642 shares issued and outstanding,
               
liquidation value of $8,369 and $8,642
    8,369       8,642  
Series D convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000
               
shares authorized, 25,000 and 0 shares issued and outstanding,
               
liquidation value of $2,500 and $0
    2,500       -  
                 
Shareholders’ deficit:
               
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000,000 shares authorized, 24,583,382 and
               
22,707,093 shares issued and 24,551,867 and 22,675,678 shares
               
outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
    25       23  
Additional paid-in capital
    153,719       153,059  
Accumulated deficit
    (237,990 )     (276,985 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (116 )     (89 )
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,012 shares of common stock
    (779 )     (779 )
Total shareholders’ deficit
    (85,141 )     (124,771 )
 Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit
  $ 9,044     $ 9,424  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
2

 

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
 (in thousands, except share and per share data)

   
Three Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
             
Revenues
  $ 338     $ 189  
Cost of revenues
    236       238  
Gross profit (deficit)
    102       (49 )
                 
Sales and marketing expenses
    231       149  
General and administrative expenses
    835       984  
Research and development costs
    465       330  
Impairment of investment
    -       261  
                 
Operating loss
    (1,429 )     (1,773 )
                 
Loss from change in fair value of hybrid financial instruments
    (6,941 )     (7,802 )
Gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivative liability - warrants
    (1,105 )     5,800  
Loss from change in fair value of derivative liability - Series C and D preferred stock and debentures
    (15,561 )     (8,651 )
Interest expense related to convertible debt
    (595 )     (1,140 )
                 
Net loss
    (25,631 )     (13,566 )
                 
Dividends on convertible preferred stock
    -       (234 )
                 
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
    (25,631 )     (13,800 )
                 
Comprehensive loss:
               
Net loss
    (25,631 )     (13,566 )
Other comprehensive income (loss) - foreign currency translation adjustment
    23       (7 )
                 
Comprehensive loss
  $ (25,608 )   $ (13,573 )
                 
Net loss per share, basic and diluted
  $ (1.13 )   $ (0.70 )
                 
Weighted average number of common shares
    22,678,877       19,578,409  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
3

 

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
 (in thousands, except share and per share data)

   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
             
Revenues
  $ 1,206     $ 815  
Cost of revenues
    830       1,046  
Gross profit (deficit)
    376       (231 )
                 
Sales and marketing expenses
    812       613  
General and administrative expenses
    2,971       2,770  
Research and development costs
    1,166       1,004  
Impairment of investment
    -       261  
                 
Operating loss
    (4,573 )     (4,879 )
                 
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    (6,006 )     -  
Gain (loss) from change in fair value of hybrid financial instruments
    12,611       (7,490 )
Gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivative liability - warrants
    9,751       (6,602 )
Gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivative liability - Series C and D preferred stock and debentures
    31,263       (18,327 )
Interest expense related to convertible debt
    (1,551 )     (4,803 )
                 
Net income (loss)
    41,495       (42,101 )
                 
Dividends on convertible preferred stock
    (2,500 )     (977 )
                 
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
    38,995       (43,078 )
                 
Comprehensive income (loss):
               
Net income (loss)
    41,495       (42,101 )
Other comprehensive income (loss) - foreign currency translation adjustment
    (27 )     (86 )
                 
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 41,468     $ (42,187 )
                 
Net income (loss) per share, basic and diluted:
               
Basic
  $ 1.74     $ (2.51 )
Fully diluted
  $ (0.02 )   $ (2.51 )
                 
Weighted average number of common shares:
               
Basic
    22,470,014       17,132,131  
Fully diluted
    301,266,858       17,132,131  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
4

 

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Deficit (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)

               
Accumulated Other
                   
   
Common Stock
   
Additional
   
Comprehensive Income
   
Accumulated
   
Treasury Stock
   
Total
 
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Paid-in Capital
   
(Loss)
   
 Deficit
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shareholders' Deficit
 
Balance, December 31, 2009, as previously reported
    22,675,678     $ 22,676     $ 130,406     $ (89 )   $ (276,985 )     2,012     $ (779 )   $ (124,771 )
                                                                 
Effect of 1 for 100 share reverse stock split and change in par value
    -       (22,653 )     22,653       -       -       -       -       -  
Balance, December 31, 2009, after retroactive adjustment
    22,675,678       23       153,059       (89 )     (276,985 )     2,012       (779 )     (124,771 )
                                                                 
Shares issued to YA Global on conversion of Series C convertible preferred stock
    1,876,289       2       522       -       -       -       -       524  
                                                                 
Deemed dividend on Series D Preferred Stock issued to YA Global
    -       -       -       -       (2,500 )     -       -       (2,500 )
                                                                 
Stock-based compensation expense
    -       -       138       -       -       -       -       138  
                                                                 
Comprehensive income - foreign currency translation adjustment
    -       -       -       (27 )     -       -       -       (27 )
                                                                 
Net income
    -       -       -       -       41,495       -       -       41,495  
Balance, September 30, 2010
    24,551,967     $ 25     $ 153,719     $ (116 )   $ (237,990 )     2,012     $ (779 )   $ (85,141 )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
5

 

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
  
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
           
Net income (loss)
  $ 41,495     $ (42,101 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    757       760  
Impairment of investment
    -       261  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    6,006       -  
(Gain) loss from change in fair value of hybrid financial instruments
    (12,611 )     7,490  
(Gain) loss from change in fair value of derivative liability - warrants
    (9,751 )     6,602  
(Gain) loss from change in fair value of derivative liability - Series C and D preferred stock and debentures
    (31,263 )     18,327  
Interest expense related to convertible debt
    1,551       4,803  
Stock-based compensation expense
    138       280  
Increase in value of life insurance policies
    (39 )     (151 )
                 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
               
Trade and other accounts receivable
    (271 )     56  
Inventories
    12       (70 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    40       136  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    (351 )     (55 )
Deferred revenue and other current liabilities
    (367 )     (178 )
Net cash used in operating activities
    (4,654 )     (3,840 )
                 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
               
Acquisition of property and equipment
    (13 )     (65 )
Net cash used in investing activities
    (13 )     (65 )
                 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
               
Proceeds from issuance of Series D convertible preferred stock
    2,500       -  
Costs attributed to issuance of Series D convertible preferred stock
    (100 )     -  
Repayment of note payable - YA Global
    (500 )     -  
Borrowings under convertible debt instruments, net
    2,865       2,610  
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options
    -       116  
Net cash provided by financing activities
    4,765       2,726  
                 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
    (6 )     (6 )
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    92       (1,185 )
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    198       1,259  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 290     $ 74  
                 
Supplemental cash flow information:
               
Interest paid during the period
  $ 1     $ 3  
Accretion of dividends on Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
  $ -     $ 977  
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock converted to common stock
  $ 273     $ 9,285  
Deemed dividend on Series D Convertible Preferred Stock issued
  $ 2,500     $ -  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
6

 

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
  
Note 1 - General

Business - NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“NeoMedia”, and also referred to herein as “us”, “we” and “our”), is the innovator and global market leader in 2D mobile barcode technology and infrastructure solutions that enable the mobile barcode ecosystem world-wide.  NeoMedia harnesses the power of the mobile phone with state-of-the art mobile barcode technology. With this technology, mobile phones with cameras become barcode scanners and this enables a range of practical applications including consumer oriented advertising, mobile ticketing and couponing, and business-to-business commercial track and trace solutions. We believe that combining this technology with analytics and reporting capabilities improves the way advertisers market to mobile consumers.

As a technology pioneer in the global mobile barcode industry, our suite of products, services and IP portfolio allows us to offer a comprehensive end-to-end mobile barcode solution.  We offer barcode management and infrastructure technology solutions, barcode reader solutions and IP licensing, as well as mobile couponing and ticketing products and services. NeoMedia has been a pioneer in the mobile barcode field, since the mid 1990s, and during that time has spearheaded the development of a robust IP portfolio that encompasses many preferred mobile barcode implementations.  We have an IP portfolio currently consisting of over sixty (60) issued and pending patents.

Going Concern – We have historically incurred net losses from operations and we expect that we will continue to have negative cash flows as we implement our business plan.  There can be no assurance that our continuing efforts to execute our business plan will be successful and that we will be able to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP”), which contemplate our continuation as a going concern.  Net income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $41.5 million and ($42.1) million, respectively and net cash used by operations during the same periods was $4.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively.  During 2010 and 2009, $53.6 million of net income and $32.4 million of net loss was attributed to the change in fair values of hybrid financial instruments and derivative liabilities. At September 30, 2010, we have an accumulated deficit of $238.0 million. We also have a working capital deficit of $82.0 million, of which $68.5 million is related to our financing instruments, including $30.7 million related to the fair value of warrants and those debentures that are recorded as hybrid financial instruments, and $37.8 million related to the amortized cost carrying value of certain of our debentures and the fair value of the associated derivative liabilities.
 
The items discussed above raise substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.
 
We currently do not have sufficient cash to sustain us for the next twelve months. We will require additional financing in order to execute our operating plan and continue as a going concern. Our management’s plan is to attempt to secure adequate funding to bridge the commercialization of our barcode ecosystem business. We cannot attempt to predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity, debt, or another form and we may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all.  In the event that these financing sources do not materialize, or that we are unsuccessful in increasing our revenues and profits, we may be unable to implement our current plans for expansion, repay our debt obligations as they become due or continue as a going concern, any of which circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Should our lender, YA Global Investments, L.P. (“YA Global”) choose not to provide us with capital financing, or if we do not find alternative sources of financing to fund our operations, or if we are unable to generate significant product revenues, we only have sufficient funds to sustain our current operations through approximately November 30, 2010. We currently do not have any commitments for additional financing.
 
The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and reclassification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary, should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

 
7

 
 
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP for interim financial information and Rule 8.03 of Regulation S-X. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to our financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and for the years then ended, including notes thereto in the Company’s Form 10-K.

Basis of Presentation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries.  We operate as one reportable segment.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates, which are recorded in the period in which they become known.

Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we reported net income per share and included dilutive instruments in the fully diluted net income per share calculation. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we reported a net loss per share, and as such, basic and diluted loss per share were equivalent. We excluded all outstanding stock options, warrants, convertible debt and convertible preferred stock from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because these securities were anti-dilutive.

 
8

 

The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share calculations for each period:

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands except share and per share data)
 
Numerator:
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ (25,631 )   $ (13,566 )   $ 41,495     $ (42,101 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to income (loss) applicable to common stockholders:
                               
Accretion of preferred stock dividends
    -       (234 )     (2,500 )     (977 )
Numerator for basic earnings per share - income available to common stockholders
  $ (25,631 )   $ (13,800 )   $ 38,995     $ (43,078 )
                                 
                                 
Effect of dilutive securities:
                               
Adjustment for change in fair value of derivative liability-Series C and D preferred stock and debentures
    -       -       (31,263 )     -  
Adjustment for change in fair value of derivative liability- warrants
    -       -       (9,751 )     -  
Adjustment for loss on extinguishment of debt (excluding non-dilutive instrument)
    -       -       5,643       -  
Adjustment for change in fair value of hybrid financial instruments
    -       -       (12,611 )     -  
Adjustment for interest expense related to convertible debt (excluding non-dilutive instrument)
    -       -       1,515       -  
      -       -       (46,467 )     -  
Numerator for diluted earnings per share-income available for  common stockholders after assumed conversions of debentures and exercise of warrants
  $ (25,631 )   $ (13,800 )   $ (7,472 )   $ (43,078 )
                                 
Denominator:
                               
Weighted average shares used to compute basic EPS
    22,678,877       19,578,409       22,470,014       17,132,131  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                               
Employee stock options
                    99,337       -  
Convertible debentures
                    204,313,469       -  
Convertible preferred stock
                    74,384,038       -  
Dilutive potential common shares
    -       -       278,796,844       -  
                                 
Denominator for diluted earnings per share-adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions
    22,678,877       19,578,409       301,266,858       17,132,131  
                                 
Basic net income (loss) per share
  $ (1.13 )   $ (0.70 )   $ 1.74     $ (2.51 )
Fully diluted loss per share
  $ (1.13 )   $ (0.70 )   $ (0.02 )   $ (2.51 )

As shown on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations, our loss on extinguishment of debt for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $6.0 million; however, the table above does not reflect losses of approximately $363,000 related to the extinguishment of the April 2010 promissory note since that note was not a dilutive instrument.

The above table includes only dilutive instruments and their effects on earnings per common share.

The following outstanding stock options, warrants, convertible debt and convertible preferred securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, are anti-dilutive and therefore have been excluded from diluted net income (loss) per share:

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Stock options
    1,099,557       952,635       823,171       945,612  
Warrants
    17,621,125       10,061,958       14,412,242       10,061,958  
Convertible debt
    213,076,644       64,929,363       -       62,155,934  
Convertible preferred stock
    74,698,729       19,222,062       -       21,343,582  
      306,496,055       95,166,018       15,235,413       94,507,086  

 
9

 

Inventories – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and are comprised of barcode-reading equipment at our NeoMedia Europe location.  Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - The following Accounting Standards Codification Updates have been issued, or will become effective, after the end of the period covered by this discussion:

Pronouncement
 
Issued
 
Title
         
ASU No. 2010-20
 
July  2010
 
Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses
         
ASU No. 2010-21
 
August  2010
 
Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies (SEC Update)
         
ASU No. 2010-22
 
August  2010
 
Accounting for Various Topics—Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs (SEC Update)
         
ASU No. 2010-23
 
August  2010
 
Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Measuring Charity Care for Disclosure—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force
         
ASU No. 2010-24
 
August  2010
 
Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation of Insurance Claims and Related Insurance Recoveries (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
         
ASU No. 2010-25
 
September  2010
 
Plan Accounting—Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962): Reporting Loans to Participants by Defined Contribution Pension Plans (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
         
ASU No. 2010-26
 
October  2010
 
Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944): Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)

To the extent appropriate, the guidance in the above Accounting Standards Codification Updates is already reflected in our consolidated financial statements and management does not anticipate that these accounting pronouncements will have any future effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 – Capital Stock

Common Stock On March 30, 2010, we held a special meeting of our stockholders, at which our stockholders approved amendments to our certificate of incorporation as follows:

·
To effect a 1 share for 100 shares reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock; and

·
To fix the amount of authorized shares of common stock at 5,000,000,000 shares; and

·
To effect a change in our common stock par value from $0.01 to $0.001.

In accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings per Share, and SAB Topic 4.C, Changes in Capital Structure, all of the share and per share information related to our common stock included in these financial statements has been retroactively re-stated to reflect the above changes.

We filed an amendment to our certificate of incorporation on April 1, 2010 to reflect the above amendments. On April 19, 2010, we filed for, and were assigned a new CUSIP number 640505-301 in connection with the issuance of new common stock securities pursuant to the reverse stock split. On April 21, 2010 we filed a request for regulatory approval from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). On May 7, 2010, final regulatory approval was granted and became effective on May 10, 2010.

 
10

 

Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on each matter submitted to a vote of shareholders. Holders of our common stock do not have a cumulative voting right, which means that the holders of more than one half of our outstanding shares of common stock, subject to the rights of the holders of preferred stock, can elect all of our directors, if they choose to do so. In this event, the holders of the remaining shares of common stock would not be able to elect any directors. Subject to the prior rights of any class or series of preferred stock which may from time to time be outstanding, if any, holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably, dividends when, as, and if declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. Upon our liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, the holders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and payment of accrued dividends and liquidation preferences on the preferred stock, if any. Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights, nor rights to convert their common stock into any other securities. Except as otherwise required by Delaware law, and subject to the rights of the holders of preferred stock, all stockholder action is taken by the vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present at a meeting of stockholders at which a quorum consisting of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock is present in person or by proxy.  Shares repurchased are held as treasury shares and used for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to, satisfying obligations under our employee benefit plans. Treasury stock is recorded at cost.

Note 4 – Financing

At September 30, 2010, our financing transactions with YA Global, an accredited investor, included shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock issued in February 2006, Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock issued in January 2010, a series of seventeen secured convertible debentures issued between August 2006 and September 2010 and various warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.

2010 Financing Transactions - On January 5, 2010, we entered into an investment agreement with YA Global which included (i) the issuance to YA Global of 25,000 shares of our $100 Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (ii) the modification of the conversion terms of all of our outstanding secured convertible debentures and extension of their maturity dates to July 29, 2012 (iii) issuance of additional warrants to acquire 225,000 shares of our common stock and, (iv) modification of the terms of three outstanding warrants to acquire a total of 350,000 shares of our common stock. The gross amount of this transaction was $2.5 million and we received net proceeds of $1.9 million after fees of $100,000 and the redemption of a $500,000 promissory note issued to YA Global on December 23, 2009.

In addition, the January 5, 2010 investment agreement required us to seek shareholder approval to enact the following changes relating to our common stock, a 1 share for 100 shares reverse stock split, the fixing of our authorized shares at 5,000,000,000, and the reduction in the par value from $0.01 to $0.001. On March 30, 2010, we held a Special Meeting of our shareholders at which the shareholders approved amending the Company’s certificate of incorporation to reflect these changes. (See Note 3).

On May 27, 2010, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement to issue and sell a secured convertible debenture to YA Global in the principal amount of $2.0 million and we also entered into an agreement which amended certain terms of all previously issued and outstanding warrants between us and YA Global which changed the ownership limitation provision from 4.99% to 9.99%. On August 13, 2010 and September 29, 2010, we entered into additional Securities Purchase Agreements to issue and sell secured convertible debentures to YA Global in the principal amounts of $550,000 and $475,000.  In conjunction with the convertible debentures, we also issued warrants to YA Global to purchase 1,000,000 and 750,000 shares of common stock, respectively, for an exercise price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years.  Additional details related to these financings are disclosed below.

Subsequent to September 30, 2010, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement to issue and sell a secured convertible debenture to YA Global in the principal amount of $400,000.  The debenture, dated October 28, 2010, is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.20 or (ii) 95% of the lowest closing bid price of our common stock for the 60 trading days preceding the date of conversion. The stated maturity date of the debenture is July 29, 2012. In conjunction with the convertible debenture, we also issued a warrant to YA Global to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock for an exercise price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years.

 
11

 

Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock - The Series D Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock issued on January 5, 2010 has a stated value of $100 per share and provides for an 8% cumulative dividend, subject to Board declaration. Each share of Series D Preferred is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $2.00 or (ii) 97% of the lowest closing bid price of our common stock for the 125 trading days preceding the date of conversion, provided that no conversion will be at a price less than the par value of the common stock. The conversion price is subject to adjustment for down-round, anti-dilution protection. Accordingly, if we sell common stock or common share indexed financial instruments below the conversion price, the Series D Preferred conversion price adjusts to that lower amount. The Series D Preferred conversion price is also subject to adjustment for traditional equity restructuring and reorganizations. The Series D Preferred has a liquidation amount equal to $100 per share plus all declared and unpaid dividends and is redeemable by us, at our option, at an amount of $100 per share plus a redemption premium of 10%. The instrument is also redeemable at the holder’s option upon certain events of default, which include events and factors that are not related to interest or credit risk.

The Series D Preferred is a hybrid financial instrument that embodies the risks and rewards typically associated with both equity and debt instruments. Accordingly, we are required to evaluate the features of this contract to determine its nature as either an equity-type contract or a debt-type contract. We determined that the Preferred Stock is generally more akin to a debt-type contract, principally due to its variable conversion price and redemption features. This determination is subjective. However, in complying with the guidance provided in FASB ASC 815, we concluded, based upon the preponderance and weight of all terms, conditions and features of the host contracts, that the Series D Preferred was more akin to a debt instrument for purposes of considering the clear and close relationship of the embedded derivative features to the host contract. The principal accounting concept requires bifurcation in these instances when the embedded feature and the host contract have risks that are not clearly and closely related. Certain exemptions to this rule, such as the traditional conventional convertible exemption and the common-indexed exemption were not available to us because the Preferred Stock is not indexed, as that term is defined, only to our common stock. Accordingly, the conversion feature, along with certain other features that have risks of equity, required bifurcation and classification in liabilities as a compound embedded derivative financial instrument. Derivative financial instruments are required to be measured at fair value both at inception and on an ongoing basis.

As discussed in further detail below, the initial allocation of the basis in the Series D Preferred financing transaction resulted in no basis being ascribed to the redeemable preferred stock. According to FASB ASC 480-10, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, if the security is not currently redeemable and it is not probable that the security will be become redeemable, accretion to face value is not necessary.  The Series D Preferred is convertible upon inception and there was no persuasive evidence that the Preferred Stock would not be redeemed.  Based on this information, redemption could not be considered “not probable” of occurring and accretion was necessary. Redeemable preferred stock may be accreted to its redemption value through periodic charges to retained earnings or over the period from the date of issuance to the earliest redemption date. Because there was no term of redemption embodied in the contract, the issuance date was considered the earliest possible redemption date. As a result, a day-one deemed dividend of $2.5 million was recorded to accrete the Series D Preferred to its redemption value.

In conjunction with the Series D Preferred financing, we also issued warrants to acquire 225,000 shares of our common stock.   We evaluated the warrants for purposes of classification under FASB ASC 480 and determined the warrants require liability classification because they embody down-round anti-dilution that precludes the instrument from being considered indexed to the Company’s own stock.

Our accounting required the allocation of the proceeds to the individual financial instruments comprising the Series D Preferred financing.  Current accounting concepts generally provide that the allocation is made, first to the instruments that are required to be recorded at fair value; that is, the compound embedded derivative and the warrants, and the remainder to the host instrument. The fair value of the embedded conversion feature and the warrants exceeded the proceeds which resulted in a day-one derivative loss.

 
12

 

The allocation of the basis arising from the issuance of Series D Preferred and warrants is summarized in the table below:

   
Proceeds
   
Deemed
   
Total
 
   
Allocation
   
Dividend
   
Allocation
 
   
(in thousands)
 
                   
Gross proceeds
  $ 2,500           $ 2,500  
Financing costs paid to investor
    (100 )           (100 )
    $ 2,400           $ 2,400  
                       
Derivative liabilities:
                     
Investor warrants
  $ (2,431 )         $ (2,431 )
Compound derivative
    (4,551 )           (4,551 )
Total derivative liabilities
    (6,982 )           (6,982 )
                       
Redeemable preferred stock:
                     
Series D Preferred Stock
    -       -       -  
Deemed dividend
    -     $ (2,500 )     (2,500 )
Total redeemable preferred stock
    -       (2,500 )     (2,500 )
                         
Accumulated deficit (deemed dividend)
    -       2,500       2,500  
                         
Day-one derivative loss
    4,582               4,582  
    $ (2,400 )   $ -     $ (2,400 )

Series C Convertible Preferred Stock - On February 17, 2006, we issued 22,000 shares of $1,000 Series C 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, with a face value of $22.0 million, to YA Global. The Series C Preferred Stock was originally convertible into shares of common stock at the lower of $2.00 per share and 97% of the lowest closing bid price of the common stock for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date. On January 5, 2010, we entered into an amendment to the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which modified the conversion provisions to increase the look-back period in the variable conversion rate calculation to 125 days.

On September 15, 2010, YA Global converted 273 shares of our Series C preferred stock into 1,876,289 shares of our common stock. As of September 30, 2010, YA Global has converted a total of 13,631 shares of the original 22,000 shares of Series C Preferred stock into 12,240,428 share of our common stock, leaving 8,369 shares of Series C Preferred stock with a face value of $8.4 million outstanding.

Secured Convertible Debentures - The underlying agreements for each of the seventeen debentures issued to YA Global are essentially the same, except in regard to the interest rate, varying conversion prices per share, and the number of warrants that were issued in conjunction with each of the debentures. The debentures are convertible into our common stock, at the option of the holder, at the lower of a fixed conversion price per share or a percentage of the lowest volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) for a specified number of days prior to the conversion (the “look-back period”). The conversion is limited such that the holder cannot exceed 9.99% ownership, unless the holder waives their right to such limitation. All of the convertible debentures are secured according to the terms of a Security Pledge Agreement dated August 23, 2006, which was entered into in connection with the first convertible debenture issued to YA Global and which provides YA Global with a security interest in substantially all of our assets.  The debentures are also secured by a Patent Security Agreement dated July 29, 2008. On August 13, 2010 our wholly owned subsidiary, NeoMedia Europe AG, became a guarantor of all outstanding financing transactions between us and YA Global, through pledges of their intellectual property and other movable assets. As security for our obligations to YA Global, all of our Pledged Property, Patent Collateral and other collateral is affirmed through the several successive Ratification Agreements which have been executed in connection with each of the 2010 financings.

 
13

 

As discussed above, on January 5, 2010, the terms of all of the prior debentures were modified to extend the stated maturity date to July 29, 2012.  The January 5, 2010 amendments also increased the look-back period used to calculate the variable conversion price per share for all debentures to a period of 125 days and increased the fixed portion of the conversion price for certain of the debentures from $1.00 to $2.00 per share.

On May 27, 2010, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement to issue and sell a secured convertible debenture to YA Global in the principal amount of $2.0 million. The debenture bears interest at 14% and matures on July 29, 2012. The debenture provided net proceeds of $1.4 million after payment of $90,000 in fees and the use of $506,137 to repay the outstanding principal and interest on a promissory note dated April 1, 2010 owed to YA Global. In addition to the debenture, we also issued a warrant to YA Global to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock for an exercise price of $0.30 per share for a period of five years.  We have the right to redeem a portion or all amounts outstanding under the debenture at a redemption premium of 10%, plus accrued interest. YA Global may require cash redemption of all or a portion of the debenture at any time after August 26, 2010.

On August 13, 2010 and September 29, 2010, we entered into Securities Purchase Agreements to issue and sell secured convertible debentures to YA Global in the principal amount of $550,000 and $475,000, respectively. The debentures bear interest at 14% and mature on July 29, 2012. The debentures provided net proceeds of $980,000 after payment of $45,000 in fees. In addition to the August 13, 2010 and September 29, 2010 debentures, we also issued warrants to YA Global to purchase 1,000,000 and 750,000 shares of common stock, respectively, for an exercise price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years.  We have the right to redeem a portion or all amounts outstanding under the debenture at a redemption premium of 10%, plus accrued interest.

At inception, a summary of the allocation of the components of the new debentures and warrants issued this quarter was as follows:

   
August 13, 2010
Convertible Debenture
   
September 29, 2010
Convertible Debenture
 
   
(in thousands)
 
             
Gross proceeds
  $ (550 )   $ (475 )
Structuring and due diligence fee
    20       25  
    $ (530 )   $ (450 )
                 
Derivative liabilities:
               
Investor warrants
  $ (233 )   $ (167 )
Compound derivative
    (704 )     (493 )
Total derivative liabilities
    (937 )     (660 )
                 
Day one derivative loss
    407       210  
Convertible debenture-initial carrying value
    -       -  
    $ (530 )   $ (450 )

 
14

 

The compound derivatives were valued using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation method. Significant assumptions used to value the compound derivatives as of inception of the financings included exercise estimates/behaviors and the following significant estimates:

   
August 13, 2010
Embedded Conversion
Feature
   
September 29, 2010
Embedded Conversion
Feature
 
             
Conversion price
  $ 0.1425     $ 0.1520  
Equivalent volatility
    181 %     166 %
Equivalent interest risk
    13.12 %     13.30 %
Equivalent credit risk
    8.13 %     7.79 %

The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation methodology. Significant assumptions used to value the warrants as of their inception included the following significant estimates:

   
August 13, 2010
Warrants
   
September 29, 2010
Warrants
 
             
Exercise price
  $ 0.20     $ 0.20  
Expected life
 
5 years
   
5 years
 
Estimated volatility
    156 %     155 %
Risk free rate of return
    1.47 %     1.27 %
Dividend yield
           

For the risk-free rates of return, we use the published yields on zero-coupon Treasury Securities with maturities consistent with the term of the warrants and volatility is based upon our expected stock price volatility over the term of the warrants.

The table below summarizes the significant terms of each of the debentures as of September 30, 2010:

                       
Conversion Price – Lower of Fixed Price or Percentage of
                 
Default
   
VWAP for Preceding Period
   
Face
     
Interest
   
Interest
   
Fixed
         
Default
 
Preceding
Debenture Issue Date
 
Amount
 
Maturity
 
Rate
   
Rate
   
Price
   
%
   
%
 
Period
                                         
August 24, 2006
  $ 5,000,000  
7/29/2012
    10 %     n/a     $ 2.00       90 %     n/a  
125 Days
December 29, 2006
  $ 2,500,000  
7/29/2012
    10 %     n/a     $ 2.00       90 %     n/a  
125 Days
March 27, 2007
  $ 7,458,651  
7/29/2012
    13 %     n/a     $ 2.00       90 %     n/a  
125 Days
August 24, 2007
  $ 1,775,000  
7/29/2012
    14 %     n/a     $ 2.00       80 %     n/a  
125 Days
April 11, 2008
  $ 390,000  
7/29/2012
    15 %     24 %   $ 1.50       80 %     75 %
125 Days
May 16, 2008
  $ 500,000  
7/29/2012
    15 %     24 %   $ 1.50       80 %     50 %
125 Days
May 29, 2008
  $ 790,000  
7/29/2012
    15 %     24 %   $ 1.00       80 %     50 %
125 Days
July 10, 2008
  $ 137,750  
7/29/2012
    15 %     24 %   $ 1.00       80 %     50 %
125 Days
July 29, 2008
  $ 2,325,000  
7/29/2012
    14 %     24 %   $ 2.00       95 %     50 %
125 Days
October 28, 2008
  $ 2,325,000  
7/29/2012
    14 %     20 %   $ 2.00       95 %     50 %
125 Days
May 1, 2009
  $ 294,000  
7/29/2012
    14 %     20 %   $ 2.00       95 %     50 %
125 Days
June 5, 2009
  $ 715,000  
7/29/2012
    14 %     20 %   $ 2.00       95 %     50 %
125 Days
July 15, 2009
  $ 535,000  
7/29/2012
    14 %     20 %   $ 2.00       95 %     50 %
125 Days
August 14, 2009
  $ 475,000  
7/29/2012
    14 %     20 %   $ 2.00       95 %     50 %
125 Days
May 27, 2010
  $ 2,006,137  
7/29/2012
    14 %     20 %   $ 0.30       95 %     50 %
60 Days
August 13, 2010
  $ 550,000  
7/29/2012
    14 %     20 %   $ 0.20       95 %     50 %
60 Days
September 29, 2010
  $ 475,000  
7/29/2012
    14 %     20 %   $ 0.20       95 %     50 %
60 Days

 
15

 

All debentures with YA Global contain provisions for acceleration of principal and interest upon default. Certain debentures also contain default interest rates and conversion prices, as reflected in the table above.
 
In our evaluation of these financing transactions, we concluded that the conversion features were not afforded the exemption as conventional convertible instruments due to the variable conversion rate; and they did not otherwise meet the conditions set forth in current accounting standards for equity classification. Because equity classification was not available for the conversion features, we elected to bifurcate the compound derivatives, and carry them as derivative liabilities, at fair value. Each compound derivative consists of (i) the embedded conversion feature, (ii) down-round anti-dilution protection features, and (iii) default, non-delivery and buy-in puts which were combined into one compound instrument that is carried as a component of derivative liabilities.

Fair Value Considerations - In accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, we determined that the conversion features of the Series C and Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, and the August 2006, December 2006, July 2008, October 2008, April 2009, May 2009, June 2009, July 2009, August 2009, May 2010, August 2010 and September 2010 Debentures met the criteria of embedded derivatives and that the conversion features of these instruments required bifurcation and accounting as derivative instrument liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the derivative liability for the embedded conversion option are charged or credited to income each period. As permitted by FASB ASC 815-15-25, Recognition of Embedded Derivatives, we elected not to bifurcate the embedded derivatives in the March 2007, August 2007, April 2008 or May 2008 Debentures and accordingly, these convertible instruments are being carried in their entirety at their fair values, with the changes in the fair value of the Debentures charged or credited to income each period.

Derivative financial instruments arising from the issuance of convertible financial instruments are initially recorded, and continuously carried, at fair value. Upon conversion of any of the convertible financial instruments, the carrying amount of the debt, including any unamortized premium or discount, and the related derivative instrument liability are credited to the capital accounts upon conversion to reflect the stock issued and no gain or loss is recognized.

Embedded Derivative Instruments – Series C and Series D Preferred Stock and August 2006, December 2006, July 2008, October 2008, April 2009, May 2009, June 2009, July 2009, August 2009, May 2010, August 2010 and September 2010 Convertible Debentures - Embedded derivative financial instruments arising from the convertible instruments consist of multiple individual features that were embedded in each instrument. For each convertible instrument, we evaluated all significant features and, as required under current accounting standards, aggregated the components into one compound derivative financial instrument for financial reporting purposes. For financings recorded in accordance with FASB ASC 815, the compound embedded derivative instruments are valued using the Monte Carlo Simulation methodology because that model embodies certain relevant assumptions (including, but not limited to, interest rate risk, credit risk, and conversion/redemption privileges) that are necessary to value these complex derivatives.

The conversion price in each of the convertible debentures is subject to adjustment for down-round, anti-dilution protection.  Accordingly, if we sell common stock or common share indexed financial instruments below the stated or variable conversion price in the agreement, the conversion price adjusts to that lower amount.

As discussed above, on January 5, 2010, we entered into amendments to the convertible debentures, which extended the maturity dates to July 29, 2012, and modified the terms of the conversion prices.

 
16

 

The assumptions included in the calculations are highly subjective and subject to interpretation.  Assumptions used as of September 30, 2010 included exercise estimates/behaviors and the following other significant estimates:

         
Remaining
         
Equivalent
   
Equivalent
 
   
Conversion
   
Term
   
Equivalent
   
Interest-Risk
   
Credit-Risk
 
   
Prices
   
(years)
   
Volatility
   
Adjusted Rate
   
Adjusted Rate
 
                               
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
  $ 0.15       1.83       166 %     7.60 %     7.79 %
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
  $ 0.15       1.83       166 %     7.60 %     7.79 %
                                         
August 24, 2006
  $ 0.14       1.83       166 %     9.50 %     7.79 %
December 29, 2006
  $ 0.14       1.83       166 %     9.50 %     7.79 %
July 10, 2008
  $ 0.12       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %
July 29, 2008
  $ 0.14       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %
October 28, 2008
  $ 0.14       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %
May 1, 2009
  $ 0.14       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %
June 5, 2009
  $ 0.14       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %
July 15, 2009
  $ 0.14       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %
August 14, 2009
  $ 0.14       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %
May 27, 2010
  $ 0.15       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %
August 13, 2010
  $ 0.15       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %
September 29, 2010
  $ 0.15       1.83       166 %     13.03 %     7.79 %

Equivalent amounts reflect the net results of multiple modeling simulations that the Monte Carlo Simulation methodology applies to underlying assumptions.

Due to the variable component of the conversion price, rapid fluctuations in the trading market price may result in significant variations to the calculated conversion price. For each debenture, we analyze the ratio of the conversion price (as calculated based on the percentage of VWAP for the appropriate look back period) to the trading market price for a period of time equal to the term of the debenture to determine the average ratio for the term of the note. Each quarter, the ratio in effect on the date of the valuation is compared with the average ratio over the term of the debenture to determine if the calculated conversion price is representative of past trends or if it is considered unrepresentative due to a large fluctuation in the stock price over a short period of time. If the calculated conversion price results in a ratio that deviates significantly from the average ratio over the term of the agreement, the average ratio of the conversion price to the trading market price is then multiplied by the current trading market price to determine the variable portion of the conversion price for use in the fair value calculations. This variable conversion price is then compared with the fixed conversion price and, as required by the terms of the debentures, the lower of the two amounts is used as the conversion price in the Monte Carlo Simulation model used for valuation purposes. On September 30, 2010, the fixed conversion price for each of the debentures was equal to or higher than the calculated variable conversion price. Accordingly, the variable conversion price was used in the Monte Carlo Simulation model. This analysis is performed each quarter to determine if the calculated conversion price is reasonable for purposes of determining the fair value of the embedded conversion features (for instruments recorded under FASB ASC 815) or the fair value of the hybrid instrument (for instruments recorded under FASB ASC 815-15-25).

Hybrid Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value – 2007 and 2008 Convertible Debentures - The March 2007, August 2007, April 2008 and May 2008 convertible debentures are recorded in accordance with FASB ASC 815-15-25 and the entire hybrid instrument was initially recorded at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value charged or credited to income each period. These financial instruments are valued using the common stock equivalent approach. The common stock equivalent is calculated using the shares indexed to the debentures valued at the market price of our stock and the present value of the coupon.

 
17

 

Subsequent to the January 5, 2010 amendment, the shares indexed to the debentures issued prior to that date were calculated using the variable conversion price based on the 125 day look-back period and the present value of the coupon from inception of the debentures to the revised maturity date of July 29, 2012.

Current Period Valuations - For the Series C Preferred Stock and the August 2006 and December 2006 debentures, due to our previous default position with respect to these instruments, the carrying value of each instrument in effect as of December 31, 2006 was written up to its full face value during the fourth quarter of 2006. For these instruments and the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock and the July 2008, October 2008, April 2009, May 2009, June 2009, July 2009, August 2009, May 2010, August 2010 and September 2010 debentures, the embedded derivative instrument, primarily the conversion feature, has been separated and accounted for as a derivative instrument liability, as discussed above. This derivative instrument liability is marked-to-market each reporting period.

The March 2007, August 2007, April 2008 and May 2008 debentures were each initially recorded at their full fair value pursuant to FASB ASC 815-15-25. That fair value is marked-to-market each reporting period, with any changes in the fair value charged or credited to income.

On January 5, 2010, the terms of all of the debentures issued prior to that date were modified to increase the look-back period used to calculate the variable conversion price per share for all debentures to a period of 125 days and to extend the stated maturity date to July 29, 2012, which increased our future anticipated cash flows related to those instruments.  Because that increase exceeded the threshold prescribed by FASB ASC 470-50, Debt Modifications and Extinguishments, the modification of the amounts due under these instruments was accounted for as an extinguishment. Accordingly, the original convertible debentures were considered extinguished and the revised convertible debentures were recorded at their fair value, resulting in an extinguishment loss of approximately ($5.6) million.

For instruments which were recorded under FASB ASC 815-15, the instruments were first adjusted to fair value as of January 5, 2010 using the conversion rate and maturity date prior to the amendment. The fair value of the instrument was then calculated using the modified conversion rate and maturity date to determine the fair value of the instrument subsequent to the amendment. The difference in the fair value before and after the amendment was recorded as an extinguishment loss.

For instruments recorded under FASB ASC 815-10, the embedded conversion feature was first adjusted to fair value as of the date of the amendment using the conversion rate and maturity date prior to the amendment. The carrying value of the host instrument and the embedded conversion feature, less any deferred financing costs, was then compared with the fair value of the hybrid instrument subsequent to the amendment and the difference was recorded as an extinguishment loss.

 
18

 
 
For our Series C and Series D Convertible Preferred Stock and convertible debentures, the following table reflects the face value of the instruments and, as appropriate, either their amortized cost carrying value and the fair value of the separately-recognized compound embedded derivative or, for those debentures recorded in their entirety at fair value, their fair value, as well as for each of the instruments and the number of common shares (in thousands) into which the instruments are convertible as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
  
               
Embedded
         
Common
 
September 30, 2010
 
Face
   
Carrying
   
Conversion
         
Stock
 
   
Value
   
Value
   
Feature
   
Fair Value
   
Shares
 
   
(in thousands)
 
                               
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
  $ 8,369     $ 8,369     $ 5,435     $ -       57,517  
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
  $ 2,500     $ 2,500       1,624       -       17,182  
                                         
August 24, 2006 
  $ 5,000     $ 5,000       4,449       -       50,025  
December 29, 2006
    2,500       2,500       2,287       -       25,011  
March 27, 2007
    7,459       -       -       17,749       55,249  
August 24, 2007
    1,775       -       -       4,612       14,792  
April 11, 2008
    390       -       -       1,037       3,250  
May 16 ,2008
    500       -       -       1,322       4,167  
May 29, 2008
    790       -       -       2,085       6,583  
July 10, 2008
    138       138       174       -       1,537  
July 29, 2008
    2,325       2,325       2,084       -       21,298  
October 23, 2008
    2,325       2,325       2,096       -       20,721  
May 1, 2009
    294       294       236       -       2,628  
June 5, 2009
    715       660       684       -       5,952  
July 15, 2009
    535       535       494       -       4,401  
August 14, 2009
    475       475       439       -       3,869  
May 27, 2010
    2,006       223       2,233       -       13,836  
August 13, 2010
    550       8       581       -       3,685  
September 29, 2010
    475       5       493       -       3,126  
Total
  $ 28,252     $ 14,488     $ 23,309     $ 26,805       314,829  

               
Embedded
         
Common
 
December 31, 2009
 
Face
   
Carrying
   
Conversion
         
Stock
 
   
Value
   
Value
   
Feature
   
Fair Value
   
Shares
 
   
(in thousands)
 
                               
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
  $ 8,642     $ 8,642     $ 16,397     $ -       22,158  
                                         
August 24, 2006 
  $ 5,000     $ 5,000       14,131       -       13,889  
December 29, 2006
    2,500       2,500       6,926       -       9,260  
March 27, 2007
    7,459       -       -       25,046       20,718  
August 24, 2007
    1,775       -       -       6,573       5,547  
April 11, 2008
    390       -       -       1,412       1,219  
May 16 ,2008
    500       -       -       1,803       1,563  
May 29, 2008
    790       -       -       2,844       2,469  
July 10, 2008
    137       127       337       -       430  
July 29, 2008
    2,325       2,109       4,618       -       6,118  
October 28, 2008
    2,325       2,130       4,594       -       6,118  
May 1, 2009
    294       120       580       -       774  
June 5, 2009
    715       71       1,410       -       1,882  
July 15, 2009
    535       253       1,056       -       1,408  
August 14, 2009
    475       213       936       -       1,250  
Total
  $ 25,220     $ 12,523     $ 50,985     $ 37,678       94,803  

 
19

 

The terms of the embedded conversion features in the convertible instruments presented above provide for variable conversion rates that are indexed to our trading common stock price. As a result, the number of indexed shares is subject to continuous fluctuation. For presentation purposes, the number of shares of common stock into which the embedded conversion feature of the Series C and Series D Preferred Stock was convertible as of September 30, 2010 was calculated as face value plus assumed dividends (if declared), divided by the lesser of the fixed rate or the calculated variable conversion price using the 125 day look-back period. The number of shares of common stock into which the embedded conversion feature in the convertible debentures was convertible as of September 30, 2010 was calculated as the face value of each instrument divided by the variable conversion price using a 125 day look-back period.

The March 2007, August 2007, April 2008 and May 2008 debentures are carried in their entirety at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 815-15-25 and the value of the embedded conversion feature is effectively embodied in those fair values.

Changes in the fair value of convertible instruments that are carried in their entirety at fair value (the March 2007, August 2007, April 2008 and May 2008 debentures) are reported as “Gain (loss) from change in fair value of hybrid financial instruments” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The changes in fair value of these hybrid financial instruments were as follows:

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
   
(in thousands)
 
                         
March 27, 2007
  $ (4,587 )   $ (5,272 )   $ 8,218     $ (5,382 )
August 24, 2007
    (1,223 )     (1,388 )     2,216       (1,232 )
April 11, 2008
    (263 )     (264 )     505       (215 )
May 16, 2008
    (336 )     (341 )     648       (257 )
May 29, 2008
    (532 )     (537 )     1,024       (404 )
Gain (loss) from changes in fair value of hybrid instruments
  $ (6,941 )   $ (7,802 )   $ 12,611     $ (7,490 )

The carrying value of our liability for convertible instruments carried at fair value decreased $10.9 million during the nine month period from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010. However, the fair values of these liabilities decreased $12.6 million. The difference between the change in carrying value and change in fair value is an extinguishment loss of $1.7 million resulting from the January 5, 2010 amendment.

Changes in the fair value of derivative instrument liabilities related to the bifurcated embedded derivative features of convertible instruments not carried at fair value are reported as “Gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivative liability – Series C and Series D preferred stock and debentures” in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

 
20

 

The changes in fair value of these derivative financial instruments were as follows:

   
Three Months Ended Sept 30
   
Nine Months Ended Sept 30
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
   
(in thousands)
 
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
  $ (4,827 )   $ (1,837 )   $ 10,709     $ (13,226 )
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
    (1,375 )     -       2,927       -  
                                 
August 24, 2006
    (2,922 )     (3,001 )     10,158       (2,382 )
December 29, 2006
    (1,525 )     (1,323 )     4,878       (1,034 )
July 10, 2008
    (92 )     (59 )     236       (42 )
July 29, 2008
    (1,285 )     (726 )     3,087       (365 )
October 28, 2008
    (1,282 )     (699 )     2,810       (410 )
April 6, 2009
    -       (167 )     -       (88 )
May 1, 2009
    (149 )     (167 )     423       (200 )
June 5, 2009
    (357 )     (218 )     831       (126 )
July 15, 2009
    (295 )     (235 )     695       (235 )
August 14, 2009
    (261 )     (219 )     604       (219 )
May 27, 2010
    (696 )     -       (271 )     -  
August 13, 2010
    122       -       122       -  
September 29, 2010
    -       -       -       -  
      (14,944 )     (8,651 )     37,209     $ (18,327 )
Less:  Day-one loss from Series D Convertible Preferred financing
    -       -       (4,582 )     -  
Less:  Day-one loss from May 27, 2010 financing
    -       -       (747 )     -  
Less: Day-one loss from August 13, 2010 financing
    (407 )     -       (407 )     -  
Less: Day-one loss from September 29, 2010 financing
    (210 )     -       (210 )     -  
Gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivative liability
  $ (15,561 )   $ (8,651 )   $ 31,263     $ (18,327 )

The carrying value of the derivative liabilities-Series C and Series D preferred stock and debentures increased $15.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 resulting from (i) $14.9 million increase in the fair value of the derivative liability, as shown in the table above, (ii) conversion of a portion of the Series C Preferred Stock resulting in a reduction of $253,000 and (iii) an increase of $703,000 and $493,000 due to the inception date fair value of the derivative liabilities resulting from the August 13, 2010 and September 29, 2010 financings, respectively. 

The carrying value of the derivative liabilities-Series C and Series D preferred stock and debentures decreased $27.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 due to (i) $ 37.2 million reduction in the derivative liability fair value, as provided above, (ii) conversion of a portion of the Series C Preferred Stock resulting in a reduction of $253,000 (iii) increases of $4.5 million, $2.0 million, $703,000 and $493,000 due to the inception date fair value of the derivative liabilities resulting from the Series D Preferred Stock and the May 27, 2010, August 13, 2010 and September 29, 2010 financings, respectively and iv) an increase of $2.1 resulting from a loss on extinguishment due to the January 5, 2010 modification mentioned above. 

Warrants - YA Global holds warrants to purchase shares of our common stock that were issued in connection with the convertible debentures and the Series C and Series D Preferred Stock. The warrants are exercisable at the lower of a fixed exercise price or a specified percentage of the current market price. From time to time, the fixed exercise prices of the warrants held by YA Global have been reduced as an inducement for YA Global to enter into subsequent financing arrangements. In addition to the warrants issued to YA Global, certain other warrants have been issued to consultants and other service providers.

The warrants issued to YA Global and others do not meet all of the established criteria for equity classification in FASB ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, and accordingly, are recorded as derivative liabilities at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the warrants are charged or credited to income each period.

The January 5, 2010 investment agreement with YA Global amended the exercise price of warrants indexed to 350,000 shares of common stock, which were issued in July 2008. Due to down-round anti-dilution provisions, the exercise price of the warrants prior to the amendment was based on the lowest conversion price of convertible debentures issued subsequent to July 2008; however, the amendment fixed the exercise price at $1.00, subject to subsequent adjustment for anti-dilution, resulting in an approximate decrease in fair value of $3,500.

 
21

 

In connection with the January 5, 2010 investment agreement, we also issued to YA Global warrants to purchase 225,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.00, expiring after seven years. These warrants were accounted for as a derivative liability and their fair value at inception was approximately $2.4 million.

The following table summarizes the warrants outstanding (in thousands) and their fair value:

   
September 30,
   
December 31,
     
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
     
2010
   
2009
 
   
Exercise
   
Exercise
 
Expiration
       
Fair
         
Fair
 
   
Price
   
Price
 
Date
 
Warrants
   
Value
   
Warrants
   
Value
 
                 
(in thousands)
   
(in thousands)
 
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
  $ 0.12     $ 0.32  
2/17/2011
    450     $ 96       750     $ 712  
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
    0.43        
1/5/2017
    2,250       499              
                                                   
August 24, 2006
    0.12       0.32  
8/24/2011
    1,750       285       1,750       1,697  
December 29, 2006
    0.12       0.32  
12/29/2011
    420       76       420       412  
March 27, 2007
    0.12       0.32  
3/27/2012
    1,250       226       1,250       1,238  
August 24, 2007
    0.12       0.32  
8/24/2012
    750       155       750       750  
May 16, 2008
    0.12       0.32  
5/16/2015
    75       17       75       77  
May 29, 2008
    0.12       0.32  
5/29/2015
    500       112       500       515  
July 29, 2008
    0.14       0.95  
7/29/2015
    1,000       223       1,000       1,000  
July 29, 2008
    0.43       0.95  
7/29/2015
    3,500       735       3,500       3,500  
May 27, 2010
    0.28        
5/27/2015
    5,000       1,091              
August 13, 2010
    0.20        
8/13/2015
    1,000       222              
September 29, 2010
    0.20        
9/29/2015
    750       167              
Other warrants
    1.10     $ 1.10- $3.50  
1/16/2011
    1             67       11  
                 
Total
    18,696     $ 3,904       10,062     $ 9,912  

The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation methodology because that model embodies all of the relevant assumptions that address the features underlying these instruments. Significant assumptions used in this model as of September 30, 2010 included an expected life equal to the remaining term of the warrants, an expected dividend yield of zero, estimated volatility ranging from 102% to 185%, and risk-free rates of return of 0.16% to 1.91%. For the risk-free rates of return, we use the published yields on zero-coupon Treasury Securities with maturities consistent with the remaining term of the warrants and volatility is based upon our expected stock price volatility over the remaining term of the warrants.

Changes in the fair value of the warrants are reported as "(Gain) loss from change in fair value of derivative liability - warrants" in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

 
22

 

The changes in the fair value of the warrants were as follows:

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
   
(in thousands)
 
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
  $ (29 )   $ 389     $ 616     $ (517 )
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
    (157 )     -       1,931       -  
                                 
August 24, 2006
    (96 )     980       1,412       (1,120 )
December 29, 2006
    (21 )     231       336       (273 )
March 27, 2007
    (62 )     688       1,012       (813 )
August 24, 2007
    (49 )     420       595       (487 )
May 16, 2008
    (6 )     46       60       (50 )
May 28, 2008
    (38 )     305       403       (330 )
July 29, 2008
    (294 )     2,700       3,542       (2,998 )
May 27, 2010
    (364 )     -       (178 )     -  
August 13, 2010
    11       -       11       -  
September 29, 2010
    -       -       -       -  
Other warrants
    -       41       11       (14 )
Total
  $ (1,105 )   $ 5,800     $ 9,751     $ (6,602 )

The carrying value of warrants increased $1.5 million during the three month period from June 30, 2010 to September 30, 2010 due to the issuance of warrants on August 13, 2010 and September 29, 2010 with a fair value of $233,000 and $167,000, respectively, in addition to warrant fair value adjustments of $1.1 million as shown in the table above.

The carrying value of warrants decreased approximately $6.0 million during the nine month period from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 as described in the table above. This decrease was due to (i) a reduction in the warrant fair value of $9.7 million as described in the table below and (ii) the issuance of warrants on January 5, 2010, May 27, 2010, August 13, 2010 and September 29, 2010 with a fair value of $2.4 million, $912,000, $233,000 and $167,000, respectively, totaling $3.7 million. Accordingly, the difference between the change in the carrying value of the warrants and the gain from the change in fair value of the warrant derivative liability is $3.7 million.

Fair Value Considerations – As required by FASB ASC 820, assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement. Our derivative financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis under FASB ASC 815-15-25 or FASB ASC 815 are all measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 
23

 

The following represents a reconciliation of the changes in fair value of financial instruments measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010:

   
Compound
             
   
Embedded
   
Warrant
       
   
Derivatives
   
Derivatives
   
Total
 
                   
Beginning balance, December 31, 2009:
  $ 50,985     $ 9,912     $ 60,897  
                         
Issuances:
                       
January 5, 2010
    4,551       2,431       6,982  
                         
Extinguished:
    2,076       -       2,076  
                         
Fair value adjustments:
                       
Compound embedded derivatives
    (44,761 )     -       (44,761 )
Warrant derivatives
    -       (6,551 )     (6,551 )
                         
Ending balance, March 31, 2010
  $ 12,851     $ 5,792     $ 18,643  
                         
Issuances:
                       
May 27, 2010
    1,964       912       2,876  
                         
Fair value adjustments:
                       
Compound embedded derivatives
    (7,393 )     -       (7,393 )
Warrant derivatives
    -       (4,305 )     (4,305 )
Ending balance, June 30, 2010
  $ 7,422     $ 2,399     $ 9,821  
                         
Issuances:
                       
August 13, 2010
    704       233       937  
September 29, 2010
    493       167       660  
                         
Conversions:
                       
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
    (255 )     -       (255 )
                         
Fair value adjustments:
                       
Compound embedded derivatives
    14,945       -       14,945  
Warrant derivatives
    -       1,105       1,105  
Ending balance, September 30, 2010
  $ 23,309     $ 3,904     $ 27,213  

Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, valuation techniques are sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock, which has a high estimated historical volatility. Because derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, our income will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.
 
Note 5 – Stock-Based Compensation
 
A total of 220,000 stock options were issued to employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, exercisable at strike prices ranging from $0.199 to $0.205 per share. A total of 282,860 stock options were issued to employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 exercising at strike prices ranging from $1.00 to $2.00 per share.

 
24

 
 
The grant date fair values of the options issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were $21,100 and $184,000, respectively, which amount is being recognized over the vesting period of the options. Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in the statement of operations was $40,200 and $103,000, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and $137,700 and $280,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

We used the following assumptions to value the stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

   
Nine months ended September 30,
 
   
2010
 
2009
 
Volatility
 
145% - 210%
 
138% - 282%
 
Expected dividends
 
 -
 
 -
 
Expected term (in years)
 
6.5
 
5.6
 
Risk-free rate
 
1.85% - 2.68%
 
0.50%
 

A summary of the transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 with respect to our stock option plans follows:

                     
Weighted-
 
                     
Average
 
         
Weighted-
         
Contractual
 
         
Average
   
Aggregate
   
Life
 
         
Exercise
   
Intrinsic
   
Remaining
 
   
Shares
   
Price
   
Value
   
in Years
 
   
(in thousands)
         
(in thousands)
       
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
    946     $ 2.00                  
Granted
    220     $ 0.20                  
Exercised
    -     $ -                  
Forfeited
    (106 )   $ 2.29                  
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
    1,060     $ 1.79     $ 8       6.0  
Exercisable at September 30, 2010
    787     $ 2.25     $ 1       7.1  

A summary of the status of our non-vested options as of September 30, 2010 and changes during the three and nine months ended is presented below:

         
Weighted
 
         
Average
 
         
Grant Date
 
Nonvested Shares
 
Shares
   
Fair Value
 
   
(in thousands)
       
Nonvested at December 31, 2009
    249     $ 1.00  
Granted
    220     $ 0.20  
Vested
    (154 )   $ 1.02  
Forfeited
    (42 )   $ 0.49  
Nonvested at September 30, 2010
    273     $ 1.81  

 
25

 

The following table summarizes information about our stock options outstanding at September 30, 2010:

Options Outstanding
   
Options Exercisable
 
Exercise Prices
 
Number of
Shares
   
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Life
   
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
   
Number of
Shares
   
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
   
(in thousands)
   
(in years)
         
(in thousands)
       
                               
$0.20 to $4.70
    993       8.0     $ 1.27       720     $ 1.57  
$5.00 to $10.00
    44       4.6     $ 7.61       44     $ 7.61  
$12.50
    20       4.8     $ 12.50       20     $ 12.50  
$17.50
    3       5.4     $ 17.50       3     $ 17.50  
      1,060       6.0     $ 1.79       787     $ 2.25  

There were no stock options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 options to purchase 116,000 shares of our common stock were exercised. The exercise price of these options was $1.00 per share, providing us with proceeds of $116,000.
 
Note 6 – Accrued Liabilities
 
Accrued liabilities consist of the following as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
 
             
Accruals for disputed services
  $ 2,318     $ 2,318  
Accrued operating expenses
    1,671       1,702  
Accrued payroll related expenses
    198       158  
Accrued interest
    4,502       3,114  
Total
  $ 8,689     $ 7,292  
 
Note 7 – Contingencies
 
We are involved in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business, both as claimant and defendant. Although it is not possible to determine with certainty the outcome of these matters, it is the opinion of management that the eventual resolution of the following legal actions is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or operating results.

Ephrian Saguy, iPoint – media, plc. and iPoint – media, Ltd. – On or around March 5, 2008, we received a summons and notice that the plaintiffs had commenced a third party action in the Magistrate Court in Tel-Aviv-Jaffa, Israel seeking damages from us and YA Global for breach of contract and unjust enrichment related to services provided by iPoint, and investment in us by YA Global. We have entered into an assignment agreement with YA Global and have retained legal counsel in Israel to represent us. The Company plans to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

 
26

 

Rothschild Trust Holdings, LLC – On September 19, 2008, we received a complaint filed in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, by Rothschild Trust Holding, LLC alleging we owed royalty payments for the use of certain patents. On February 25, 2009, we filed an answer to the complaint. On July 20, 2009 we entered into non-binding mediation and an interim agreement which required us to provide documentation for review by Rothschild Trust Holding, LLC. The non-binding mediation and interim agreement did not settle the matter. On January 4, 2010, we filed a motion for summary judgment seeking to terminate the litigation, but this motion was denied in a hearing held on April 28, 2010. We believe the complaint is without merit and we intend to vigorously defend against it.

William Klawonn v. Y.A. Global Investments, L.P. and NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. – On April 28, 2010, William Klawonn, a shareholder of NeoMedia, filed a derivative action, in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, against YA Global and us claiming trading activities that violated section 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b).  On July 8, 2010, an order was granted in the case stipulating that the plaintiff had agreed that we have no liability in the action.  The order also stipulated that we will be considered a nominal party to the action, and as such we remain subject to the discovery rights and obligations of the action.  At this time, we are unable to predict with any certainty the outcome of this litigation including the merits or value of the complaint.

The Webb Law firm On August 25, 2010, we were notified by The Webb Law Firm that they had filed a request for ex parte reexamination with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), of our U.S. Patent No. 6,199,048; System and Method for Automatic Access of a Remote Computer over a Network (“the ‘048 patent”). The request for reexamination asserted that certain claims in our patent are invalid over prior art references not previously before the USPTO. Although the 048 patent is an important NeoMedia patent, we have a broad portfolio consisting of U.S. and foreign patents and pending applications relating to various inventions surrounding the processing of machine readable codes over wireless networks. At this time the USPTO has not granted the request for reexamination.
 
Note 8 – Geographic Reporting

We are structured and evaluated by our Board of Directors and management as one business unit.
 
Consolidated net revenues and net income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the identifiable assets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by geographic area were as follows:

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
   
(in thousands)
 
Revenue:
                       
United States
  $ 297     $ 73     $ 922     $ 228  
Germany
    41       116       284       587  
Total
  $ 338     $ 189     $ 1,206     $ 815  
                                 
Net income (loss):
                               
United States
  $ (25,160 )   $ (13,246 )   $ 42,673     $ (40,998 )
Germany
    (471 )     (320 )     (1,178 )     (1,103 )
Total
  $ (25,631 )   $ (13,566 )   $ 41,495     $ (42,101 )
                                 
                   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
                   
2010
   
2009
 
Identifiable assets:
                               
United States
                  $ 8,574     $ 8,738  
Germany
                    470       686  
Total
                  $ 9,044     $ 9,424  

 
27

 
 
Note 9 – Changes in Management Team and Transactions with Related Parties

On October 19, 2010, Ms. Laura A. Marriott was appointed as our acting Chairperson of the Board of Directors and Acting Chief Executive Officer, both effective on October 8, 2010. Ms. Marriot was also appointed as a member of the Compensation Committee and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors. Ms. Marriott previously served as a member of our Board of Directors.

Ms. Marriott agreed to forego the compensation offered to a non-employee Chairperson of the Board of Directors and has instead agreed to be compensated in the same manner as a member of the Board including, without limitation, a retainer amount equal to $16,000 per annum plus $4,000 per quarterly and annual meeting. For her services as a member of the Compensation Committee and Stock Option Committee she is eligible to earn, without limitation, $5,000 per annum. During 2010, Ms. Marriott has provided marketing and business development consulting services to us on a per-diem basis. Through September 30, 2010 she has been paid approximately $75,000 for those services. Ms. Marriott’s fees for her services as Acting Chief Executive Officer will total approximately $63,000 for the period from October 8, 2010 through December 31, 2010. If a Chief Executive Officer has not been hired by January 1, 2011, Ms. Marriott’s consulting fees will continue at a rate of $24,000 per month.

On October 19, 2011, we also named a member of the Board of Directors, Mr. George G. O’Leary, as acting Chief Operating Officer. Mr. O’Leary’s compensation as a member of the Board was unchanged. In addition to his compensation as a member of our Board of Directors, we have paid to him $10,300 through September 30, 2010 as compensation in the form of consulting fees for other services. We anticipate that we will pay additional consulting fees to Mr. O’Leary for his services as our Chief Operating Officer, approximately $17,000 for the period from October 19, 2010 through December 31, 2010.

 
28

 

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“NeoMedia”, and also referred to herein as “us”, “we” and “our”), is the innovator and global market leader in 2D mobile barcode technology and infrastructure solutions that enable the mobile barcode ecosystem world-wide.  NeoMedia harnesses the power of the mobile phone in a whole new way with state-of-the art mobile barcode technology. With this technology, mobile phones with cameras become barcode scanners and this enables a range of practical applications including consumer oriented advertising, mobile ticketing and couponing, and business-to-business commercial track and trace solutions. As the leading technology pioneer in the global mobile barcode industry, our suite of products, services and IP portfolio makes us the only provider able to offer a comprehensive end-to-end mobile barcode solution.  We offer barcode management and infrastructure, reader solutions and IP licensing, as well as mobile couponing and ticketing products and services.  Our current customers include handset manufacturers, platform providers, brands and agencies looking to offer innovative mobile barcode solutions to their customer base.  NeoMedia offers ‘one stop’ for all of our customers’ mobile barcode needs.

NeoMedia provides a full end-to-end solution for global mobile 2D barcode implementations.  NeoMedia is able to provide comprehensive solutions for mobile barcode creation, management, resolution, and data reporting as well as mobile coupon, ticketing and hardware scanning solutions.  This comprehensive offering is unlike any other provider in the marketplace. NeoMedia has been a pioneer in the mobile barcode field since the mid-1990s, and during that time has spearheaded the development of a robust IP portfolio that encompasses many preferred mobile barcode implementations.  We have an IP portfolio currently consisting of over sixty (60) issued and pending patents.  We are willing and able to license our IP and platforms to the entire ecosystem, including competitors, to facilitate the growth of the mobile barcode ecosystem world-wide.  We have also worked closely with the standards bodies to help overcome the hurdles to full market development and will continue to do so.  Brands are interested in scale and are not interested in proprietary solutions.  We promote an open and interoperable approach to the market to empower the mobile ecosystem.

The market for barcode services is rapidly developing in several regions around the world.  Brands of all sizes are recognizing the enormous potential for mobile barcodes and we continue to position ourselves to take part in this growing marketplace.  We are focusing our efforts primarily in the United States and Europe and continue to maximize our five key solution portfolios.  We are expanding our sales and business development activities both directly to brands and to advertising agencies in these key markets, and we are working with our customers to help drive consumer awareness and adoption of mobile barcodes.

Two of our strategic approaches continue to show success. The first is the maximization of our patent portfolio through IP licensing, and the second is to partner with key mobile agency/platform resellers to maximize the reach for our barcode management, infrastructure solutions and our barcode reader products.  These strategies continue to be successful. However, we anticipate that by broadening our outreach and approaching brands directly, we can accelerate our sales activities beginning in the fourth quarter of 2010. Our NeoMedia Europe business continues to focus on building the opportunities for mobile couponing, ticketing and hardware scanning solutions in Europe.  NeoMedia Europe has had success in markets in Europe and Asia and we will build on these successes, with heavy emphasis in Europe, which will continue to contribute to our overall revenue mix.

Since 2009, we have been building strong IP licensing programs around our robust patent portfolio.  A summary of our key IP licensing agreements is as follows:

 
·
Mobile Tag:  On July 28, 2009, we entered into a three year non-exclusive patent licensing agreement with Mobile Tag, Inc. (“Mobile Tag”). Under the terms of that agreement, we will receive annual minimum royalties and then a percentage of revenue generated by Mobile Tag through the use of our barcode ecosystem patent portfolio within a defined field of use in the United States.

 
29

 

 
·
Neustar:  On October 2, 2009, we entered into a four year agreement with Neustar, Inc. (“Neustar”) in which we granted to Neustar a right to sub-license our barcode ecosystem patent portfolio to their customers primarily for the purpose of establishing and providing registry and clearinghouse services within a defined field of use in the territory of the United States and Mexico. Neustar’s sub-license rights were originally exclusive within their territory. However, this right has recently changed to a non-exclusive right. On February 12, 2010 we entered into an agreement with Neustar to participate in and to facilitate a leadership role in the 2010 Neustar Mobile Codes Pilot Program.

 
·
Scanbuy: On October 16, 2009, we entered into a ten year settlement and license agreement with Scanbuy, Inc. (“Scanbuy”), in which we and Scanbuy settled all of our pending litigation against each other and we granted non-exclusive licenses and a sublicense to each other. Under the terms of that agreement, we will receive annual minimum royalties and then a percentage of revenue generated by Scanbuy through the use of our barcode ecosystem patent portfolio within a defined field of use in the United States.

During 2009 and 2010, we have also entered into strategic agreements with mobile marketing agencies and platform resellers for our services.  These resellers typically represent brands and mobile technology solutions in Europe and the United States.  To date, we have signed eight (8) of these agreements and have begun to conduct trial initiatives in markets in the US and Europe.  We anticipate that these partnerships will begin to drive revenue for the company in late 2010 and early 2011.

Given the need to drive consumer adoption of barcode scanning, it is also a necessity to have the barcode reader scanning software pre-installed on the mobile phones in order to make it easy for the consumer to access the barcode reader application.  Thus far, we have entered a strategic relationship with Sony Ericsson and Samsung Electronics Italy. Discussions with other leading handset manufacturers are also underway.  In parallel, we also have our NeoReader scanning product available for download in the key ‘app stores’ including Android, Nokia Ovi, Apple and Blackberry.

 
·
Sony Ericsson: On November 27, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications, AB, through which they have selected NeoMedia as their strategic 2D barcode partner and NeoReader will be pre-installed across all Sony Ericsson platforms.

 
·
Samsung Electronics Italy: On September 13, 2010, we entered into an agreement with Samsung Electronics Italy, Italian subsidiary of Samsung Electronics, to pre-load NeoReader onto Samsung’s Omnia II devices.

We will continue to take this diversified sales approach to ensure that we maximize all revenue opportunities for our business in this time of tremendous market growth and opportunity.
 
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

Results of Operations

Beginning in 2009 and continuing into 2010, we continued to focus on the development of our patent licensing and barcode ecosystem technology. During the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, our operating losses were $1.4 million and $1.8 million, and our net loss was $25.6 million and $13.6, respectively. During the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, our operating losses were $4.6 million and $4.9, respectively, and our net income in 2010 was $41.5 million, compared with a net loss of $42.1 million in 2009. Our operating results include non-cash gains and losses from the change in fair value of our hybrid financial instruments, warrants and debentures. We incur these non-cash gains and losses principally as a result of changes in the market value of our common stock. During the three months ended September 2010, we reported non-cash losses on our hybrid financial instruments, warrants and debentures, totaling $23.6 million, and during the nine months ended September 2010, we reported non-cash gains on our hybrid financial instruments, warrants and debentures, totaling $53.6 million, respectively.

 
30

 

The following table sets forth certain data derived from our consolidated statements of operations:

   
Three months ended September 30,
   
Increase (decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(in thousands)
       
Revenues:
                       
Hardware
  $ 13     $ 21     $ (8 )     -38 %
Lavasphere
    22       93       (71 )     -76 %
Barcode ecosystem
    5       1       4       400 %
Patent licensing
    277       6       271       4517 %
Legacy products
    -       67       (67 )     -100 %
Other
    21       1       20    
2000
Total revenues
  $ 338     $ 189     $ 149       79 %

   
Nine months ended September 30,
   
Increase (decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(in thousands)
       
Revenues:
                       
Hardware
  $ 175     $ 449     $ (274 )     -61 %
Lavasphere
    89       123       (34 )     -28 %
Barcode ecosystem
    16       6       10       167 %
Patent licensing
    899       16       883       5519 %
Legacy products
    2       212       (210 )     -99 %
Other
    25       9       16       173 %
Total revenues
  $ 1,206     $ 815     $ 391       48 %
 
Revenues. Revenues for the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, were $338,000 and $189,000, an increase of $149,000, or 79%. Revenues for the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, were $1.2 million and $815,000, an increase of $391,000, or 48%. Our revenues and product mix have changed as a result of changes in our operations and business strategy. For the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, our hardware product sales were $13,000 and $21,000, a decrease of 38%. For the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, our hardware product sales were $175,000 and $449,000, a decrease of 61%. During 2009, we introduced our newest barcode scanners and sold most remaining quantities of our older models. Our hardware products tend to be sold in large transactions and revenues can fluctuate significantly from period to period. For the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, our Lavasphere product sales were $22,000 and $93,000, a decrease of $71,000, or 76%. For the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, our Lavasphere product sales were $89,000 and $123,000, a decrease of $34,000, or 28%, as a result of slightly slower demand for these products and services. For the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, our Barcode ecosystem revenue was $5,000 and $1,000. For the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, our Barcode ecosystem revenue was $16,000 and $6,000. We are focusing additional sales resources in this category in response to important opportunities with agencies and brands in the U.S. and Europe. Revenues related to patent licensing agreements were $277,000 and $6,000 during the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, were $899,000 and $16,000, as a result of licensing agreements we entered into in late 2009 and 2010 as a result of revenue recognized under our current licenses. In succeeding quarters, we expect our revenues to continue to change as we shift the focus of our efforts toward patent licensing, and the barcode ecosystem. We believe this focus will deliver the most value in the future.

 
31

 
 
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues was $236,000 for the three months ended September 2010 compared with $238,000 for the three months ended September 2009, a decrease of $2,000, or 1%. Cost of revenues was $830,000 for the nine months ended September 2010 compared with $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 2009, a decrease of $216,000, or 21%. Cost of revenues for NeoMedia Europe, related to our hardware products, was $4,700 and $2,300 for the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was $133,000 and $336,000 for the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively. Amortization costs related to our patents, and the proprietary software of NeoMedia Europe was $231,000 and $236,000 for the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was $697,000 and $710,000 for the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $231,000 and $149,000 for the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of $82,000 or 55%, and $812,000 and $613,000 for the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of $199,000 or 32%. The increase in sales and marketing expense resulted from additional efforts in late 2009 and 2010 to promote our business strategy and core technology.
 
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $835,000 and $984,000 for the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, a decrease of $149,000, or 15%, and $3.0 million and $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of $201,000, or 7%. Expenses increased as a result of increased professional services fees related to legal and accounting, as well as business travel related to increased business development.
 
Research and Development.  Research and development expenses were $465,000 and $330,000 for the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of $135,000, or 41%, and $1.2 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of $162,000, or 16%. Research and development increased as we continued the development of our barcode ecosystem products.
 
Loss from Operations.  For the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, our loss from operations decreased to $1.4 million, from $1.8 million. This improvement was primarily the result of increases in our sales and decreased general and administrative expenses partially offset by increases in selling and research and development cost and decreased impairment of investment expense. For the nine months ended September 2010, our loss from operations was $4.6 million, compared with $4.9 million for 2009, a decrease of $306,000, or 6.3%. This improvement was primarily the result of increased sales and decreased cost of operations.

Gain (Loss) from Change in Fair Value of Hybrid Financial Instruments.  We carry certain of our convertible debentures at fair value, in accordance with FASB ASC 815-15-25, and do not separately account for the embedded conversion feature.  The change in the fair value of these liabilities includes changes in the value of the accrued interest due under these instruments, as well as changes in the fair value of the common stock underlying the instruments. For the three months ended September 2010, liability related to these hybrid instruments increased resulting in a loss of $6.9 million, a decrease from the $7.8 million loss in 2009. For the nine months ended September 2010, liability related to these hybrid instruments decreased, resulting in a gain of $12.6 million compared with a loss of $7.5 million in 2009. These fair value changes were primarily the result of fluctuations in the value of our common stock during the periods. Because our stock price has been volatile and because many of our hybrid financial instruments include relatively low fixed conversion prices, it is possible that further fluctuations in the market price of our stock could cause the fair value of our hybrid financial instruments to change significantly in future periods.

Gain (Loss) from Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities - Warrants.  We account for our outstanding common stock warrants that were issued in connection with the preferred stock and our debentures, at fair value. For the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, the liability related to warrants fluctuated resulting in a loss of $1.1 million in 2010 and a gain of $5.8 million in 2009. For the nine months ended September 2010, the change in the liability related to warrants resulted in a gain of $9.8 million, compared with a loss of $6.6 million in 2009. These fair value changes were primarily the result of fluctuations in the value of our common stock during the period. Because our stock price has been volatile and because many of our warrants include relatively low fixed exercise prices it is possible that further fluctuations in the market price of our common stock could cause the fair value of our warrants to change significantly in future periods.

 
32

 

Gain (Loss) from Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities - Series C and D Preferred Stock and Debentures. For our Series C and D convertible preferred stocks, and certain of our convertible debentures, we account for the embedded conversion feature separately as a derivative financial instrument.  We carry these derivative financial instruments at fair value. For the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, the liability related to the derivative instruments embedded in the Series C and D preferred stocks and these debentures increased, resulting in a loss of $15.6 million and a loss of $8.7 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 2010, the liability related to the derivative instruments embedded in the Series C and D preferred stocks and these debentures decreased, resulting in a gain of $31.3 million compared with a loss of $18.3 million in 2009. These fair value changes were primarily the result fluctuations in the value of our common stock during the period. Because our stock price has been volatile and because many of our derivative financial instruments include relatively low fixed conversion prices, it is possible that further fluctuations in the market price of our common stock could cause the fair value of our derivative financial instruments to change significantly in future periods.

Interest Expense Related to Convertible Debt. Interest expense related to convertible debentures that are carried at amortized cost and which are not carried as hybrid financial instruments at fair value was $595,000 and $1.1 million for the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $1.6 million and $4.8 million for the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively. These fluctuations in interest expense in 2010 were primarily the result of reductions in amortization of deferred financing cost and debt discounts not applicable during 2009, and other interest adjustments accounted for under ASC 815-15-25.
 
Net Income (Loss).  As a result of the above, during the three months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, we experienced net losses of $25.6 million and $13.6 million. During the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, we experienced net income of $41.5 million, and a net loss of $42.1 million, resulting in an overall increase of $83.6 million. This positive change primarily resulted from gains associated with our derivative instruments of $86.0 million and a decrease in interest expense related to convertible debt of $3.3 million, and offset by a loss on extinguishment of debt of $6.0 million, and a decrease in our loss from operations of $306,000.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
As of September 30, 2010, we had $290,000 in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $92,000, or 46%, compared with a total of $198,000 on December 31, 2009.
 
Cash used in operating activities increased to $4.7 million for the nine months ended September 2010 compared with $3.8 million for the period ended September 2009, representing increased operational expenses in connection with furthering our sales and business development, and the continued development of our barcode ecosystem.
 
Cash used in investing activities was $13,000 and $65,000 for the nine months ended September 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing the purchase of equipment.
 
Cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 2010 was $4.8 million, which included the following:
 
 
·
Gross proceeds of $2,500,000 of our Series D Preferred Stock, offset by fees paid of $100,000 and the repayment of a $500,000 promissory note issued December 23, 2009 and due to YA Global, resulting in net proceeds of $1,900,000; and
 
 
·
Gross proceeds of $500,000 in connection with a promissory note issued to YA Global on April 1, 2010, accruing interest at 8% per annum, less structuring fees of $10,000 and monitoring fees of $15,000, resulting in net proceeds of $475,000; and
 
 
·
Gross proceeds of $2,006,137 in connection with a Secured Convertible Debenture entered into with YA Global on May 27, 2010, accruing interest at 14% per annum and payable on the maturity date of July 29, 2012, less repayment of the April 1, 2010 promissory note of $500,000, less accrued interest on the promissory note of $6,137, less structuring and due diligence fees of $90,000, resulting in net proceeds of $1,410,000; and
 
 
·
Gross proceeds of $550,000 in connection with a Secured Convertible Debenture entered into with YA Global on August 13, 2010, accruing interest at 14% per annum and payable on the maturity date of July 29, 2012, less structuring and due diligence fee of $20,000, resulting in net proceeds of $530,000; and

 
33

 
 
 
·
Gross proceeds of $475,000 in connection with a Secured Convertible Debenture entered into with YA Global on September 28, 2010, accruing interest at 14% per annum and payable on the maturity date of July 29, 2012, less structuring and due diligence fee of $25,000, resulting in net proceeds of $450,000.
 
Cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 2009 was $2.7 million, which resulted from $2.6 million in convertible debt instruments, net of fees, from Y.A. Global, and proceeds received upon exercise of stock options by two former employees totaling $116,000.

Subsequent Event - Subsequent to September 30, 2010, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement to issue and sell secured convertible debentures to YA Global in the principal amount of $400,000.  The debenture, dated October 28, 2010, is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.20 or (ii) 95% of the lowest closing bid price of our common stock for the 60 trading days preceding the date of conversion. The stated maturity date of the debenture is July 29, 2012. In conjunction with the convertible debenture, we also issued warrants to YA Global to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock for an exercise price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years.

Going Concern – We have historically incurred net losses from operations and we expect that we will continue to have negative cash flows as we implement our business plan.  There can be no assurance that our continuing efforts to execute our business plan will be successful and that we will be able to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP”), which contemplate our continuation as a going concern.  Net income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $41.5 million and ($42.1) million, respectively and net cash used by operations during the same periods was $4.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively.  During 2010 and 2009, $53.6 million of net income and $32.4 million of net loss was attributed to the change in fair values of hybrid financial instruments and derivative liabilities. At September 30, 2010, we have an accumulated deficit of $238.0 million. We also have a working capital deficit of $82.0 million, of which $68.5 million is related to our financing instruments, including $30.7 million related to the fair value of warrants and those debentures that are recorded as hybrid financial instruments, and $37.8 million related to the amortized cost carrying value of certain of our debentures and the fair value of the associated derivative liabilities.

The items discussed above raise substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.
 
We currently do not have sufficient cash to sustain us for the next twelve months. We will require additional financing in order to execute our operating plan and continue as a going concern.  Our management’s plan is to attempt to secure adequate funding to bridge the commercialization of our barcode ecosystem business. We cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity, debt, or another form and we may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all.  In the event that these financing sources do not materialize, or that we are unsuccessful in increasing our revenues and profits, we may be unable to implement our current plans for expansion, repay our debt obligations as they become due or continue as a going concern, any of which circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Should our lender YA Global Investments, L.P. (“YA Global”) choose not to provide us with capital financing, or if we do not find alternative sources of financing to fund our operations, or if we are unable to generate significant product revenues, we only have sufficient funds to sustain our current operations through approximately November 30, 2010. We do not have a commitment for any additional financing.
 
The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and reclassification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary, should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Sources of Cash and Projected Cash Requirements - As of September 30, 2010, our cash balance was $290,000. NeoMedia’s reliance on YA Global as our primary financing source has certain ramifications that could affect future liquidity and business operations.  For example, pursuant to the terms of the convertible debenture agreements between us and YA Global, without YA Global’s consent we cannot (i) issue or sell any shares of our common stock or our preferred stock without consideration or for consideration per share less than the closing bid price immediately prior to its issuance, (ii) issue or sell any preferred stock, warrant, option, right, contract, call, or other security or instrument granting the holder thereof the right to acquire our common stock for consideration per share less than the closing bid price immediately prior to its issuance, (iii) enter into any security instrument granting the holder a security interest in any of our assets or (iv) file any registration statements on Form S-8.  In addition, pursuant to security agreements between us and YA Global, YA Global has a security interest in all of our assets.  Such covenants could severely harm our ability to raise additional funds from sources other than YA Global, and would likely result in a higher cost of capital in the event we secured funding.

 
34

 
 
Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement between us and YA Global in connection with our Series C convertible preferred stock, we cannot (i) enter into any debt arrangements in which we are the borrower, (ii) grant any security interest in any of our assets or (iii) grant any security below market price.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
 
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide information under this item.
 
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures - Our management, with the participation of our CEO and our CFO, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report.
 
These controls are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2010 at a reasonable assurance level, because of material weaknesses with respect to entity level controls over financial reporting, identified as of December 31, 2009, which we are in the process of remediating.  Such weaknesses were:

 
·
Our senior management did not establish and maintain a proper tone as to internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.  Specifically, our senior management was unable, due to time constraints, to promptly address the control weaknesses brought to their attention throughout the 2009 and 2008 audits; and
 
 
·
We, through our senior management, failed to maintain formalized accounting policies and procedures as of December 31, 2009. Once implemented, the polices and procedures should provide guidance to accounting personnel in the proper treatment and recording of financial transactions, as well as proper internal controls over financial reporting.
 
As noted, we have commenced efforts to address the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and the ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and, although remediation efforts are underway, the above material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until new controls over financial reporting are fully designed and operating effectively for an adequate period of time.
 
Notwithstanding the material weaknesses described above, we believe that our consolidated financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10−Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of the end of the period covered herein.

 
35

 

Inherent Limitations - Our management, including our CEO and CFO, do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdown can occur because of simple error or mistake. In particular, many of our current processes rely upon manual reviews and processes to ensure that neither human error nor system weakness has resulted in erroneous reporting of financial data.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting - There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period ended September 30, 2010, which were identified in conjunction with management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
36

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.  Legal Proceedings
 
There have been no material developments relating to certain pending legal proceedings.  For a description of certain non-material pending legal proceedings, see Note 7 – Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in this Form 10-Q.

ITEM 1A.  Risk Factors

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide information under this item.

ITEM 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

ITEM 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

ITEM 4.  (Removed and Reserved)

Not Applicable

ITEM 5.  Other Information

None

 
37

 
 
ITEM 6.  Exhibits

(a) Exhibits:
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
                     
3.1
 
Articles of Incorporation of Dev-Tech Associates, Inc. and amendment thereto
     
SB-2
 
3.1
 
11/25/1996
3.2
 
Bylaws of DevSys, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.2
 
11/25/1996
3.3
 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of DevSys, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.3
 
11/25/1996
3.4
 
By-laws of DevSys, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.4
 
11/25/1996
3.5
 
Articles of Merger and Agreement and Plan of Merger of DevSys, Inc and Dev-Tech Associates, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.5
 
11/25/1996
3.6
 
Certificate of Merger of Dev-Tech Associates, Inc. into DevSys, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.6
 
11/25/1996
3.7
 
Articles of Incorporation of Dev-Tech Migration, Inc. and amendment thereto
     
SB-2
 
3.7
 
11/25/1996
3.8
 
By-laws of Dev-Tech Migration, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.8
 
11/25/1996
3.9
 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of DevSys Migration, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.9
 
11/25/1996
3.10
 
Form of By-laws of DevSys Migration, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.1
 
11/25/1996
3.11
 
Form of Agreement and Plan of Merger of Dev-Tech Migration, Inc. into DevSys Migration, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.11
 
11/25/1996
3.12
 
Form of Certificate of Merger of Dev-Tech Migration, Inc. into DevSys Migration, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.12
 
11/25/1996
3.13
 
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of DevSys, Inc. changing our name to NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.
     
SB-2
 
3.13
 
11/25/1996
3.14
 
Form of Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. authorizing a reverse stock split
     
SB-2
 
3.14
 
11/25/1996
3.15
 
Form of Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. increasing authorized capital and creating preferred stock
     
SB-2
 
3.15
 
11/25/1996
3.16
 
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock date January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
3.1
 
1/11/2010
3.17
 
Certificate of Designation of the Series "D" Convertible Preferred Stock date January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
3.2
 
1/11/2010
3.18
 
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the Series "D" Convertible Preferred Stock dated January 7, 2010
     
8-K
 
3.3
 
1/11/2010
3.19
 
Certificate of amendment to the certificate of designation of the series D convertible preferred stock issued by the Company to YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
3.1
 
3/11/2010
10.1
 
Warrant dated March 30, 2005, granted by NeoMedia to Thornhill Capital LLC
     
S-3/A
 
10.12
 
7/18/2005
10.2
  
Warrant dated March 30, 2005, granted by NeoMedia to Cornell Capital Partners LP
  
 
  
S-3/A
  
10.13
  
7/18/2005

 
38

 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
                     
10.3
 
Definitive Sale and Purchase Agreement between NeoMedia and Gavitec
     
8-K
 
16.1
 
2/21/2006
10.4
 
Definitive Sale and Purchase Agreement between NeoMedia and Sponge
     
8-K
 
16.1
 
2/22/2006
10.5
 
Investment Agreement, dated February 17, 2006 between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
2/21/2006
10.6
 
Investor Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 17, 2006 between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
2/21/2006
10.7
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instruction, dated February 17, 2006, by and among NeoMedia, Cornell Capital Partners and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co.
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
2/21/2006
10.8
 
Warrant, dated February 17, 2006
     
8-K
 
10.4
 
2/21/2006
10.9
 
Warrant, dated February 17, 2006
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
2/21/2006
10.10
 
Warrant, dated February 17, 2006
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
2/21/2006
10.11
 
Assignment Agreement, dated February 17, 2006 by NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
2/21/2006
10.12
 
Assignment of Common Stock, dated February 17, 2006 between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners
     
8-K
 
10.8
 
2/21/2006
10.13
 
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 24, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
8/30/2006
10.14
 
Investor Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 24, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
8/30/2006
10.15
 
Pledge and Security Agreement, dated August 24, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
8/30/2006
10.16
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, dated August 24, 2006, issued by the Company to Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.4
 
8/30/2006
10.17
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions, dated August 24, 2006, by and among the Company, Cornell Capital Partners, LP and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co.
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
8/30/2006
10.18
 
A Warrant, dated August 24, 2006
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
8/30/2006
10.19
 
B Warrant, dated August 24, 2006
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
8/30/2006
10.20
 
C Warrant, dated August 24, 2006
     
8-K
 
10.8
 
8/30/2006
10.21
 
D Warrant, dated August 24, 2006
     
8-K
 
10.9
 
8/30/2006
10.22
 
Amendment to Warrant No. CCP-002, dated August 24, 2006,  between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
8/30/2006
10.23
 
Amendment to “A” Warrant No. CCP-001,  dated August 24, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.11
 
8/30/2006
10.24
 
Amendment to “B” Warrant No. CCP-002, dated August 24, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.12
 
8/30/2006
10.25
 
Amendment to “C” Warrant No. CCP-003,  dated August 24, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.13
 
8/30/2006
10.26
 
Definitive share purchase and settlement agreement between NeoMedia and Sponge, dated November 14, 2006
     
8-K
 
16.1
 
11/20/2006
10.27
 
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 29, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
1/8/2007
10.28
 
Investor Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 29, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
1/8/2007
10.29
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, dated December 29, 2006, issued by the Company to Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
1/8/2007
10.30
  
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions, dated December 29, 2006, by and among the Company, Cornell Capital Partners, LP and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co.
  
 
  
8-K
  
10.4
  
1/8/2007

 
39

 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
                     
10.31
 
A Warrant, dated December 29, 2006
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
1/8/2007
10.32
 
Amendment to Warrant No. CCP-002, dated December 29, 2006,  between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
1/8/2007
10.33
 
Amendment to “A” Warrant No. CCP-001,  dated December 29, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
1/8/2007
10.34
 
Amendment to “B” Warrant No. CCP-002, dated December 29, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.8
 
1/8/2007
10.35
 
Amendment to “C” Warrant No. CCP-003,  dated December 29, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.9
 
1/8/2007
10.36
 
Amendment to “A” Warrant No. CCP-001,  dated December 29, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
1/8/2007
10.37
 
Amendment to “B” Warrant No. CCP-001,  dated December 29, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.11
 
1/8/2007
10.38
 
Amendment to “C” Warrant No. CCP-001,  dated December 29, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.12
 
1/8/2007
10.39
 
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 29, 2006, between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP
     
8-K
 
10.13
 
1/8/2007
10.40
 
Amendment Agreement I to the Sale and Purchase Agreement between NeoMedia and certain former shareholders of Gavitec AG, dated January 23, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
1/29/2007
10.41
 
Consulting Agreement between the Company and SKS Consulting of South Florida Corp.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
2/6/2007
10.42
 
Securities Purchase Agreement between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners LP, dated March 27, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
3/27/2007
10.43
 
Investor Registration Rights Agreement between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners LP, dated March 27, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
3/27/2007
10.44
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, issued by NeoMedia to Cornell Capital Partners, LP, dated March 27, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
3/27/2007
10.45
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions, by and among NeoMedia, Cornell Capital Partners, LP and Worldwide Stock Transfer, dated March 27, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.4
 
3/27/2007
10.46
 
Warrant, issued by NeoMedia to Cornell Capital Partners, LP, dated March 27, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
3/27/2007
10.47
 
Master Amendment Agreement, by and between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners, LP, dated March 27, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
3/27/2007
10.48
 
Security Agreement, by and between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners, LP, dated on or about August 24, 2006
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
3/27/2007
10.49
 
Security Agreement, by and between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners, LP, dated March 27,2007
     
8-K
 
10.8
 
3/27/2007
10.50
 
Security Agreement (Patent), by and between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners, LP, dated March 27, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.9
 
3/27/2007
10.51
 
Pledge Shares Escrow Agreement, by and between NeoMedia and Cornell Capital Partners, dated March 27, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
3/27/2007
10.52
 
Completion of Acquisition of Disposition of Assets of BSD Software Inc.
     
8-K/A
 
10.1
 
6/8/2007
10.53
 
Registration Rights Agreement, by and between NeoMedia and YA Global Investments, L.P., dated August 24, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
8/30/2007
10.54
  
Secured Convertible Debenture, issued by NeoMedia to YA Global Investments, dated August 24, 2007
  
 
  
8-K
  
10.2
  
8/30/2007

 
40

 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
                     
10.55
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions, by and among NeoMedia, YA Global Investments, L.P. and Worldwide Stock Transfer, LLC, dated August 24, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
8/30/2007
10.56
 
Warrant issued by NeoMedia to YA Global Investments, L.P., dated August 24, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.4
 
8/30/2007
10.57
 
Repricing Agreement, by and between NeoMedia and YA Global Investments, L.P., dated August 24, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
8/30/2007
10.58
 
Security Agreement, by and between NeoMedia and YA Global Investments, L.P., dated August 24, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
8/30/2007
10.59
 
Security Agreement (Patent), by and between NeoMedia and YA Global Investments, L.P., dated August 24, 2007
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
8/30/2007
10.60
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, dated April 11, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
4/17/2008
10.61
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, dated May 16, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
5/22/2008
10.62
 
Warrant, dated May 16, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
5/22/2008
10.63
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, dated May 30, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
6/5/2008
10.64
 
Warrant, dated May 30, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
6/5/2008
10.65
 
Settlement Agreement and Release, dated June 3, 2008, by and between the Company and William Hoffman
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
6/5/2008
10.66
 
Employment Agreement, dated June 10, 2008, by and between NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and Iain McCready
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
6/16/2008
10.67
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, dated July 10, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
7/16/2008
10.68
 
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
8/4/2008
10.69
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, dated July 29, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
8/4/2008
10.70
 
Security Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
8/4/2008
10.71
 
Patent Security Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.4
 
8/4/2008
10.72
 
Warrant 9-1A, dated July 29, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
8/4/2008
10.73
 
Warrant 9-1B, dated July 29, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
8/4/2008
10.74
 
Warrant 9-1C, dated July 29, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
8/4/2008
10.75
 
Warrant 9-1D, dated July 29, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.8
 
8/4/2008
10.76
 
Escrow Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, YA Global Investments, L.P., Yorkville Advisors, LLC and David Gonzalez, Esq.
     
8-K
 
10.9
 
8/4/2008
10.77
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, the Investor, David Gonzalez, Esq. and WorldWide Stock Transfer, LLC
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
8/4/2008
10.78
  
Letter Agreement, dated September 24, 2008, by and among NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, L.P.
  
 
  
8-K
  
10.1
  
10/1/2008

 
41

 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
                     
10.79
 
Second Secured Convertible Debenture, dated October 28, 2008, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
11/3/2008
10.80
 
Revised Exhibit A to Escrow Agreement, dated October 28, 2008
     
8-K
 
10.12
 
11/3/2008
10.81
 
Letter Agreement, dated March 27, 2009, by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.13
 
4/13/2009
10.82
 
Amendment Agreement, dated April 6, 2009, by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.14
 
4/13/2009
10.83
 
Third Secured Convertible Debenture (first closing), dated April 6, 2009, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.15
 
4/13/2009
10.84
 
Waiver, effective as of December 31, 2008, by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.16
 
4/13/2009
10.85
 
Fourth Secured Convertible Debenture (second amended third closing), dated May 1, 2009, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.15
 
5/7/2009
10.86
 
Agreement, dated June 5, 2009 (Additional Agreement), by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.16
 
6/5/2009
10.87
 
Fifth Convertible Debenture (Additional Agreement closing), dated June 5, 2009, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.17
 
6/5/2009
10.88
 
Agreement, dated July 15, 2009 (Second Additional Agreement), by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.18
 
7/21/2009
10.89
 
Sixth Convertible Debenture dated July 15, 2009, (Second Additional Debenture), issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.19
 
7/21/2009
10.90
 
Agreement, dated July 17, 2009, by and between the Company and Silver Bay Software, LLC.
     
8-K
 
10.20
 
7/21/2009
10.91
 
Agreement, dated July 17, 2009, by and between the Company and Mr. Greg Lindholm.
     
8-K
 
10.21
 
7/21/2009
10.92
 
Non-Exclusive License Agreement between the Company and Mobile Tag, Inc. dated July 28, 2009
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
7/30/2009
10.93
 
Agreement dated August 14, 2009 (Third Additional Agreement) by and between the Company and Y.A. Global Investments, L.P.
     
10-Q
 
10.124
 
8/14/2009
10.94
 
Seventh Convertible Debenture dated August 14, 2009 (Fifth Additional Debenture) issued by the Company to Y.A. Global Investments, L.P.
     
10-Q
 
10.125
 
8/14/2009
10.95
 
Non-exclusive License Agreement with exclusive right to sub-license provision between Company and Neustar, Inc. dated October 2, 2009.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
10/6/2009
10.96
 
Non-Exclusive License Agreement to use the Licenced Platform between the Company and Brand Extension Mobile Solutions, S.A., a Madrid (Spain) corporation (“BEMS"), dated October 7, 2009.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
10/13/2009
10.97
 
Settlement Agreement and non-exclusive license and a sublicense between the Company and Scanbuy, Inc., dated October 16, 2009.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
10/20/2009
10.98
 
Investment Agreement between Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
1/11/2010
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 

 
42

 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
                     
10.99
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions letter issued by Company to WorldWide Stock Transfer, LLC dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
1/11/2010
10.100
 
Monitoring Fee Escrow Agreement between Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
1/11/2010
10.101
 
Investor Registration Rights Agreement between Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.4
 
1/11/2010
10.102
 
Issuance of Warrants by Company to YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
1/11/2010
10.103
 
Amendment to the August 24, 2006 Secured Convertible Debenture No. CCP-1 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
1/11/2010
10.104
 
Amendment to the December 29, 2006 Secured Convertible Debenture No. CCP-2 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
1/11/2010
10.105
 
Amendment to the March 27, 2007 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-4-1 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.8
 
1/11/2010
10.106
 
Amendment to the August 24, 2007 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-1-1 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.9
 
1/11/2010
10.107
 
Amendment to the April 11, 2008 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEO-2008-1 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.10
 
1/11/2010
10.108
 
Amendment to the May 16, 2008 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEO-2008-2 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.11
 
1/11/2010
10.109
 
Amendment to the May 29, 2008 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEO-2008-3 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.12
 
1/11/2010
10.110
 
Amendment to the July 10, 2008 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEO-2008-4 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.13
 
1/11/2010
10.111
 
Amendment to the July 29, 2008 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-9-1 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.14
 
1/11/2010
10.112
 
Amendment to the October 28, 2008 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-9-2 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.15
 
1/11/2010
10.113
 
Amendment to the May 1, 2009 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-9-4 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.16
 
1/11/2010
10.114
 
Amendment to the June 5, 2009 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-9-5 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.17
 
1/11/2010
10.115
 
Amendment to the July 15, 2009 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-9-6 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.18
 
1/11/2010
10.116
 
Amendment to the August 14, 2009 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-9-7 between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.19
 
1/11/2010
10.117
  
Amendment to the July 29, 2008 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-9-1B between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
  
 
  
8-K
  
10.20
  
1/11/2010

 
43

 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
                     
10.118
 
Amendment to the July 29, 2008 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-9-1C between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.21
 
1/11/2010
10.119
 
Amendment to the July 29, 2008 Secured Convertible Debenture No. NEOM-9-1D between the Company and YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.22
 
1/11/2010
10.120
 
Amendment of employment agreement entered into on June 10, 2008 between the company and Iain A. McCready.
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
1/20/2010
10.121
 
Amended and restated licensing agreement dated October 2, 2009 with NeuStar, Inc.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
1/28/2010
10.122
 
Agreement with Neu Star, Inc., dated February 12, 2010 (the Neu Star Mobile Codes Pilot Program Agreement).
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
2/16/2010
10.123
 
First amendment to the investment agreement between Company and  YA Global dated January 5, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
3/11/2010
10.124
 
Special meeting of shareholders held March 30, 2010.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
4/2/2010
10.125
 
Notification of new trading symbol "NEOMD" beginning May 10, 2010.
     
8-K
     
5/11/2010
10.126
 
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 27, 2010, by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
6/3/2010
10.127
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, dated May 27, 2010,  issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
6/3/2010
10.128
 
Warrant No. 0510, dated May 27, 2010, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
6/3/2010
10.129
 
Global Warrant Amendment, dated May 27, 2010, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.4
 
6/3/2010
10.130
 
Security Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
6/3/2010
10.131
 
Patent Security Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
6/3/2010
10.132
 
Ratification Agreement, dated May 27, 2010, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
6/3/2010
10.133
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions, dated May 27, 2010, by and among the Company, the Investor, David Gonzalez, Esq. and WorldWide Stock Transfer, LLC
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
6/3/2010
10.134
 
Agreement, dated August 13, 2010, by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
8/19/2010
10.135
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, No. NEOM-10-2, dated August 13, 2010,  issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
8/19/2010
10.136
 
Warrant, No. NEOM-0810, dated August 13, 2010, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
8/19/2010
10.137
 
Security Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.4
 
8/19/2010
10.138
 
Patent Security Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
8/19/2010
10.139
  
Agreement on the Pledge of Intellectual Property Rights as Collateral, dated August 13, 2010, by and between the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary NeoMedia Europe AG, and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
8/19/2010

 
44

 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
                     
10.140
 
Second Ratification Agreement, dated August 13, 2010, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto, and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
8/19/2010
10.141
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions, dated August 13, 2010, by and among the Company, the Buyer, David Gonzalez, Esq. and WorldWide Stock Transfer, LLC
     
8-K
 
10.8
 
8/19/2010
10.142
 
Security Transfer of Moveable Assets, dated August 13, 2010, by and between the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary NeoMedia Europe AG, and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.9
 
8/19/2010
10.143
 
Agreement, dated September 29, 2010, by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
10/1/2010
10.144
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, No. NEOM-10-3, dated September 29, 2010,  issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
10/1/2010
10.145
 
Warrant, No. NEOM-0910, dated September 29, 2010, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
10/1/2010
10.146
 
Security Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.4
 
10/1/2010
10.147
 
Patent Security Agreement, dated July 29, 2008, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.5
 
10/1/2010
10.148
 
Third Ratification Agreement, dated September 29, 2010, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto, and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
10/1/2010
10.149
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions, dated September 29, 2010, by and among the Company, the Buyer, David Gonzalez, Esq. and WorldWide Stock Transfer, LLC
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
10/1/2010
10.150
 
Compromise Agreement dated October 19, 2010, executed by Iain A. McCready
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
10/20/2010
10.151
 
Resignation Letter dated October 19, 2010, executed by Iain A. McCready
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
10/20/2010
10.152
 
Agreement, dated October 28, 2010, by and between the Company and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.1
 
11/3/2010
10.153
 
Secured Convertible Debenture, No. NEOM-10-4, dated October 28, 2010,  issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.2
 
11/3/2010
10.154
 
Warrant, No. NEOM-1010, dated October 28, 2010, issued by the Company to YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.3
 
11/3/2010
10.155
 
Fourth Ratification Agreement, dated October 28, 2010, by and among the Company, each of the Company’s subsidiaries made a party thereto, and YA Global Investments, L.P.
     
8-K
 
10.6
 
11/3/2010
10.156
 
Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions, dated October 28, 2010, by and among the Company, the Buyer, David Gonzalez, Esq. and WorldWide Stock Transfer, LLC
     
8-K
 
10.7
 
11/3/2010
 
45

 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
                     
14
 
Code of Professional Ethics
     
10-K
 
14.1
 
4/3/2007
31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
X
           
31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
X
           
32.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
 
X
           
32.2
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
X
  
 
  
 
  
 

 
46

 

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
(Registrant)
   
Dated:    November 12, 2010
/s/ Michael W.  Zima
 
Michael W. Zima
 
Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer

 
47