UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission file number 1-12993
ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
|
95-4502084 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
385 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 299, Pasadena, California 91101
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(626) 578-0777
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of November 8, 2011, 61,954,215 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investments in real estate |
|
$ |
6,635,872 |
|
$ |
6,060,821 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
(710,580 |
) |
(616,007 |
) | ||
Investments in real estate, net |
|
5,925,292 |
|
5,444,814 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
73,056 |
|
91,232 |
| ||
Restricted cash |
|
27,929 |
|
28,354 |
| ||
Tenant receivables |
|
6,599 |
|
5,492 |
| ||
Deferred rent |
|
132,954 |
|
116,849 |
| ||
Investments |
|
88,777 |
|
83,899 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
200,949 |
|
135,221 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,455,556 |
|
$ |
5,905,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities, Noncontrolling Interests, and Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Secured notes payable |
|
$ |
760,882 |
|
$ |
790,869 |
|
Unsecured line of credit |
|
814,000 |
|
748,000 |
| ||
Unsecured term loans |
|
1,000,000 |
|
750,000 |
| ||
Unsecured convertible notes |
|
84,484 |
|
295,293 |
| ||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits |
|
330,044 |
|
304,257 |
| ||
Dividends payable |
|
35,287 |
|
31,114 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
3,024,697 |
|
2,919,533 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
15,931 |
|
15,920 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Series C preferred stock |
|
129,638 |
|
129,638 |
| ||
Series D convertible preferred stock |
|
250,000 |
|
250,000 |
| ||
Common stock |
|
614 |
|
550 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
3,025,444 |
|
2,566,238 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
734 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(32,202 |
) |
(18,335 |
) | ||
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s stockholders equity |
|
3,373,494 |
|
2,928,825 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interests |
|
41,434 |
|
41,583 |
| ||
Total equity |
|
3,414,928 |
|
2,970,408 |
| ||
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and equity |
|
$ |
6,455,556 |
|
$ |
5,905,861 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Rental |
|
$ |
106,160 |
|
$ |
89,567 |
|
$ |
321,306 |
|
$ |
266,349 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
34,792 |
|
29,179 |
|
100,262 |
|
81,655 |
| ||||
Other income |
|
2,475 |
|
1,568 |
|
4,195 |
|
3,555 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
143,427 |
|
120,314 |
|
425,763 |
|
351,559 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Rental operations |
|
42,608 |
|
33,154 |
|
123,544 |
|
94,275 |
| ||||
General and administrative |
|
10,297 |
|
8,042 |
|
30,552 |
|
25,777 |
| ||||
Interest |
|
14,273 |
|
16,078 |
|
48,650 |
|
52,351 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
39,652 |
|
31,758 |
|
116,189 |
|
91,334 |
| ||||
Total expenses |
|
106,830 |
|
89,032 |
|
318,935 |
|
263,737 |
| ||||
Income from continuing operations before loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
36,597 |
|
31,282 |
|
106,828 |
|
87,822 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
(2,742 |
) |
(1,300 |
) |
(6,485 |
) |
(42,796 |
) | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
33,855 |
|
29,982 |
|
100,343 |
|
45,026 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net |
|
(906 |
) |
479 |
|
(458 |
) |
1,996 |
| ||||
Gain on sale of land parcel |
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
32,995 |
|
30,461 |
|
99,931 |
|
47,022 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
966 |
|
920 |
|
2,833 |
|
2,785 |
| ||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
7,089 |
|
7,089 |
|
21,267 |
|
21,268 |
| ||||
Net income attributable to unvested restricted stock awards |
|
278 |
|
217 |
|
818 |
|
502 |
| ||||
Net income attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders |
|
$ |
24,662 |
|
$ |
22,235 |
|
$ |
75,013 |
|
$ |
22,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings per share attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
(0.01 |
) |
0.01 |
|
(0.01 |
) |
0.04 |
| ||||
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings per share attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
(0.01 |
) |
0.01 |
|
(0.01 |
) |
0.04 |
| ||||
Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity and Noncontrolling Interests
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Series C |
|
Series D |
|
Number of |
|
Common |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
Redeemable |
| |||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
129,638 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
54,966,925 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
$ |
2,566,238 |
|
$ |
734 |
|
$ |
(18,335 |
) |
$ |
41,583 |
|
$ |
2,970,408 |
|
$ |
15,920 |
|
Net income |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
97,098 |
|
- |
|
1,942 |
|
99,040 |
|
891 |
| |||||||||
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(2,604 |
) |
- |
|
(2,604 |
) |
- |
| |||||||||
Unrealized gain on interest rate hedge agreements |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
8,044 |
|
- |
|
8,044 |
|
- |
| |||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(19,307 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(19,314 |
) |
59 |
| |||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(2,084 |
) |
(2,084 |
) |
(939 |
) | |||||||||
Equity component related to repurchase of unsecured convertible notes (see Note 6) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(2,981 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(2,981 |
) |
- |
| |||||||||
Issuances of common stock, net of offering costs |
|
- |
|
- |
|
6,250,651 |
|
63 |
|
451,476 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
451,539 |
|
- |
| |||||||||
Issuances pursuant to stock plan |
|
- |
|
- |
|
246,263 |
|
1 |
|
16,107 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
16,108 |
|
- |
| |||||||||
Dividends declared on preferred stock |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(21,267 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(21,267 |
) |
- |
| |||||||||
Dividends declared on common stock |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(5,396 |
) |
(76,565 |
) |
- |
|
- |
|
(81,961 |
) |
- |
| |||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
129,638 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
61,463,839 |
|
$ |
614 |
|
$ |
3,025,444 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(32,202 |
) |
$ |
41,434 |
|
$ |
3,414,928 |
|
$ |
15,931 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
99,931 |
|
$ |
47,022 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
117,060 |
|
92,089 |
| ||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
6,485 |
|
42,796 |
| ||
Amortization of loan fees and costs |
|
6,749 |
|
5,893 |
| ||
Amortization of debt premiums/discount |
|
3,254 |
|
7,967 |
| ||
Amortization of acquired above and below market leases |
|
(8,520 |
) |
(5,504 |
) | ||
Deferred rent |
|
(17,239 |
) |
(13,740 |
) | ||
Stock compensation expense |
|
8,449 |
|
8,049 |
| ||
Equity in income related to investments |
|
|
|
(48 |
) | ||
Gain on sales of investments |
|
(3,555 |
) |
(1,263 |
) | ||
Loss on sales of investments |
|
1,240 |
|
155 |
| ||
Gain on sales of property |
|
(46 |
) |
(24 |
) | ||
Non-cash impairment of real estate |
|
994 |
|
|
| ||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Restricted cash |
|
489 |
|
2,258 |
| ||
Tenant receivables |
|
(1,107 |
) |
(776 |
) | ||
Other assets |
|
(54,348 |
) |
(27,475 |
) | ||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits |
|
26,005 |
|
5,053 |
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
185,841 |
|
162,452 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Additions to properties |
|
(302,578 |
) |
(327,448 |
) | ||
Purchase of properties |
|
(305,030 |
) |
(29,881 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sales of properties |
|
17,339 |
|
10,514 |
| ||
Change in restricted cash related to construction projects |
|
(2,654 |
) |
15,032 |
| ||
Contributions to unconsolidated real estate entity |
|
(3,256 |
) |
(2,299 |
) | ||
Transfer of cash to unconsolidated real estate entity upon deconsolidation |
|
|
|
(154 |
) | ||
Additions to investments |
|
(19,663 |
) |
(11,849 |
) | ||
Proceeds from investments |
|
14,496 |
|
3,527 |
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(601,346 |
) |
(342,558 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Principal reductions of secured notes payable |
|
(30,181 |
) |
(63,868 |
) | ||
Principal borrowings from unsecured line of credit and unsecured term loans |
|
1,990,317 |
|
455,000 |
| ||
Repayments of borrowings from unsecured line of credit |
|
(1,674,317 |
) |
(377,000 |
) | ||
Payment on exchange of 8.00% unsecured convertible notes |
|
|
|
(43,528 |
) | ||
Repurchase of unsecured convertible notes |
|
(221,439 |
) |
(12,755 |
) | ||
Change in restricted cash related to financings |
|
2,590 |
|
(8,156 |
) | ||
Deferred financing costs paid |
|
(20,268 |
) |
(497 |
) | ||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
451,539 |
|
342,342 |
| ||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
1,165 |
|
2,673 |
| ||
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
(77,787 |
) |
(48,503 |
) | ||
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
|
(21,267 |
) |
(21,268 |
) | ||
Contributions by redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
674 |
| ||
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
(939 |
) |
(1,017 |
) | ||
Redemption of redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
(2,346 |
) | ||
Contributions by noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
711 |
| ||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
(2,084 |
) |
(2,173 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
397,329 |
|
220,289 |
| ||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(18,176 |
) |
40,183 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
91,232 |
|
70,628 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
73,056 |
|
$ |
110,811 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Background
As used in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, references to the Company, we, our, and us refer to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., Landlord of Choice to the Life Science Industry®, is the largest owner and preeminent real estate investment trust (REIT) focused principally on cluster development through the ownership, operation, management, and selective acquisition, redevelopment, and development of properties containing life science laboratory space. We are the leading provider of high-quality, environmentally sustainable real estate, technical infrastructure, and services to the broad and diverse life science industry. Client tenants include institutional (universities and independent non-profit institutions), pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, product, and service entities, and government agencies. Our operating platform is based on the principle of clustering, with assets and operations located adjacent to life science entities driving growth and technological advances within each cluster. Our asset base contains 171 properties approximating 14.9 million rentable square feet consisting of the following, as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
Rentable Square Feet |
|
Operating properties |
|
13,590,125 |
|
Redevelopment properties |
|
747,248 |
|
Development properties |
|
531,486 |
|
Total |
|
14,868,859 |
|
2. Basis of presentation
We have prepared the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In our opinion, the interim condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary to fairly present the interim condensed consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
We hold interests, together with certain third parties, in companies that we consolidate in our financial statements. We consolidate the companies because we exercise significant control over major decisions by these entities, such as investing activity and changes in financing.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
2. Basis of presentation (continued)
International operations
The functional currency for our subsidiaries operating in the United States is the United States dollar. We have five operating properties in Canada, as well as construction projects in India and China. The functional currencies for our foreign subsidiaries are the local currencies in each respective country. The assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at the exchange rate in effect as of the financial statement date. Income statement accounts of our foreign subsidiaries are translated using the average exchange rate for the periods presented. Gains or losses resulting from the translation are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of total equity.
The appropriate amounts of foreign exchange rate gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reflected in income when there is a sale or partial sale of our investment in these operations or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of the investment.
Investments in real estate
We recognize assets acquired (including the intangible values of above or below market leases, acquired in-place leases, tenant relationships, and other intangible assets or liabilities), liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquired entity at their fair value as of the acquisition date. The value of tangible assets acquired is based upon our estimation of value on an as if vacant basis. The value of acquired in-place leases includes the estimated carrying costs during the hypothetical lease-up period and other costs that would have been incurred to execute similar leases, considering market conditions at the acquisition date of the acquired in-place lease. The values of acquired in-place leases are classified as leasing costs, included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, and amortized over the remaining terms of the related leases. We assess the fair value of tangible and intangible assets based on numerous factors, including estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. We also recognize the fair value of assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in acquisitions of less than a 100% interest when the acquisition constitutes a change in control of the acquired entity. In addition, acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
We capitalize project costs clearly related to the construction, redevelopment, and development of a real estate project as a cost of the project. Indirect project costs such as construction administration, legal fees, and office costs that clearly relate to projects under construction, redevelopment, and development are also capitalized as a cost of the project. We capitalize project costs only during periods in which activities necessary to prepare an asset for its intended use are in progress. We also capitalize interest cost as a cost of the project only during the period for which activities necessary to prepare an asset for its intended use are ongoing, provided that expenditures for the asset have been made and interest cost is being incurred. In addition, should activities necessary to prepare an asset for its intended use cease, interest, taxes, insurance, and certain other costs would be expensed as incurred. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Long-lived assets to be held and used, including our rental properties, construction in progress, land held for future development, and intangibles, are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist that may indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset to be held and used is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Impairment indicators for long-lived assets to be held and used, including our rental properties, land held for future development, and construction in progress, are assessed by project and include, but are not limited to, significant fluctuations in estimated net operating income, occupancy changes, construction costs, estimated completion dates, rental rates, and other market factors. We assess the expected undiscounted cash flows based upon numerous factors, including, but not limited to, construction costs, available market information, historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property, and our assumptions about the use of the asset, including, if necessary, a probability-weighted approach if multiple outcomes are under consideration. Upon determination that an impairment has occurred, a write-down is recorded to reduce the carrying amount to its estimated fair value.
We use a held for sale impairment model for our properties classified as held for sale. The held for sale impairment model is different from the held and used impairment model in that under the held for sale impairment model, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the long-lived asset classified as held for sale exceeds its fair value less cost to sell.
2. Basis of presentation (continued)
Variable interest entities
We consolidate a variable interest entity (VIE) if it is determined that we are the primary beneficiary, an evaluation that we perform on an ongoing basis. A VIE is broadly defined as an entity in which either (1) the equity investors as a group, if any, do not have a controlling financial interest, or (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entitys activities without additional subordinated financial support. We use qualitative analyses when determining whether or not we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Consideration of various factors includes, but is not limited to, the purpose and design of the VIE, risks that the VIE was designed to create and pass through, the form of our ownership interest, our representation on the entitys governing body, the size and seniority of our investment, our ability to participate in policy-making decisions, and the rights of the other investors to participate in the decision-making process and to replace us as manager and/or liquidate the venture, if applicable. Our ability to correctly assess our influence or control over an entity at the inception of our involvement with the entity or upon reevaluation of the entitys continuing status as a VIE and determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE affects the presentation of these entities in our condensed consolidated financial statements. See Note 3, Investments in Real Estate.
Interest rate hedge agreements
We utilize interest rate hedge agreements to hedge a portion of our exposure to variable interest rates primarily associated with our unsecured line of credit and unsecured term loans. We recognize our interest rate hedge agreements as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the hedged exposure, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Our interest rate hedge agreements are considered cash flow hedges as they are designated and qualify as hedges of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of the gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities |
|
$ |
3,553 |
|
$ |
6,157 |
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate hedge agreements |
|
(36,763 |
) |
(44,807 |
) | ||
Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation |
|
1,008 |
|
20,315 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
(32,202 |
) |
$ |
(18,335 |
) |
2. Basis of presentation (continued)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (continued)
The following table provides a reconciliation of comprehensive income attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
32,995 |
|
$ |
30,461 |
|
$ |
99,931 |
|
$ |
47,022 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities |
|
(2,616 |
) |
434 |
|
(2,604 |
) |
(1,419 |
) | ||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate hedge agreements |
|
2,558 |
|
(2,115 |
) |
8,044 |
|
(4,196 |
) | ||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on foreign currency translation |
|
(25,814 |
) |
8,718 |
|
(19,255 |
) |
6,089 |
| ||||
Comprehensive income |
|
7,123 |
|
37,498 |
|
86,116 |
|
47,496 |
| ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
1,024 |
|
928 |
|
2,885 |
|
2,877 |
| ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. |
|
$ |
6,099 |
|
$ |
36,570 |
|
$ |
83,231 |
|
$ |
44,619 |
|
Income taxes
We are organized and qualify as a REIT pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). Under the Code, a REIT that distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income as a dividend to its shareholders each year and that meets certain other conditions is not subject to federal income taxes, but is subject to certain state and local taxes. We generally distribute 100% or more of our taxable income. Therefore, no provision for federal income taxes is required. We file tax returns, including returns for our subsidiaries, with federal, state, and local jurisdictions, including jurisdictions located in the United States, Canada, China, India, and other international locations. Our tax returns are subject to examination in various jurisdictions for the calendar years 2007 through 2010.
We recognize tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained, based solely on its technical merits, with the taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. The measurement of a tax benefit for an uncertain tax position that meets the more likely than not threshold is based on a cumulative probability model under which the largest amount of tax benefit recognized is the amount with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority having full knowledge of all the relevant information. As of September 30, 2011, there were no unrecognized tax benefits. We do not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
Interest expense and penalties, if any, would be recognized in the first period the interest or penalty would begin accruing, according to the provisions of the relevant tax law at the applicable statutory rate of interest. We did not incur any tax-related interest expense or penalties for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Earnings per share and dividends declared
We use income from continuing operations attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders as the control number in determining whether potential shares of common stock, including potential shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of our 8.00% unsecured senior convertible notes (8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes), are dilutive or antidilutive to earnings per share.
We account for unvested restricted stock awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends as participating securities and include these securities in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Under the two-class method, we allocate net income after preferred stock dividends and amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests to (1) common stockholders and (2) unvested restricted stock awards based on their respective participation rights to dividends declared (or accumulated) and undistributed earnings. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding determined for the basic earnings per share computation, plus the effect of any dilutive securities, including the dilutive effect of stock options using the treasury stock method.
2. Basis of presentation (continued)
Earnings per share and dividends declared (continued)
The table below is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations for income from continuing operations and dividends declared per share of common stock (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
Earnings per share basic |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
33,855 |
|
$ |
29,982 |
|
$ |
100,343 |
|
$ |
45,026 |
|
Gain on sale of land parcel |
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
(966 |
) |
(920 |
) |
(2,833 |
) |
(2,785 |
) | ||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
(7,089 |
) |
(7,089 |
) |
(21,267 |
) |
(21,268 |
) | ||||
Net income attributable to unvested restricted stock awards |
|
(278 |
) |
(217 |
) |
(818 |
) |
(502 |
) | ||||
Income from continuing operations attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders basic |
|
25,568 |
|
21,756 |
|
75,471 |
|
20,471 |
| ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
(906 |
) |
479 |
|
(458 |
) |
1,996 |
| ||||
Net income attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders |
|
$ |
24,662 |
|
$ |
22,235 |
|
$ |
75,013 |
|
$ |
22,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
61,295,659 |
|
49,807,241 |
|
58,271,270 |
|
46,188,308 |
| ||||
Earnings per share attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
(0.01 |
) |
0.01 |
|
(0.01 |
) |
0.04 |
| ||||
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
33,855 |
|
$ |
29,982 |
|
$ |
100,343 |
|
$ |
45,026 |
|
Gain on sale of land parcel |
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
(966 |
) |
(920 |
) |
(2,833 |
) |
(2,785 |
) | ||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
(7,089 |
) |
(7,089 |
) |
(21,267 |
) |
(21,268 |
) | ||||
Net income attributable to unvested restricted stock awards |
|
(278 |
) |
(217 |
) |
(818 |
) |
(502 |
) | ||||
Effect of assumed conversion and dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Assumed conversion of 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Amounts attributable to unvested restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from continuing operations attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders diluted |
|
25,568 |
|
21,756 |
|
75,471 |
|
20,471 |
| ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
(906 |
) |
479 |
|
(458 |
) |
1,996 |
| ||||
Net income attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders |
|
$ |
24,662 |
|
$ |
22,235 |
|
$ |
75,013 |
|
$ |
22,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
61,295,659 |
|
49,807,241 |
|
58,271,270 |
|
46,188,308 |
| ||||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
8,310 |
|
23,098 |
|
13,475 |
|
31,813 |
| ||||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding diluted |
|
61,303,969 |
|
49,830,339 |
|
58,284,745 |
|
46,220,121 |
| ||||
Earnings per share attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
(0.01 |
) |
0.01 |
|
(0.01 |
) |
0.04 |
| ||||
Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
2. Basis of presentation (continued)
Earnings per share and dividends declared (continued)
We apply the if-converted method of accounting for our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes. In applying the if-converted method of accounting, conversion is assumed for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share if the effect is dilutive to earnings per share. If the assumed conversion pursuant to the if-converted method of accounting is dilutive, diluted earnings per share would be calculated by adding back interest charges applicable to our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes to the numerator and our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes would be assumed to have been converted at the beginning of the period presented (or from the date of issuance, if occurring on a date later than the date that the period begins), and the resulting incremental shares associated with the assumed conversion would be included in the denominator. Furthermore, we assume that our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes are converted for the period prior to any retirement or actual conversion if the effect of such assumed conversion is dilutive, and any shares of common stock issued upon retirement or actual conversion are included in the denominator for the period after the date of retirement or conversion. For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, we did not assume conversion of our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, since the impact was antidilutive to earnings per share attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders from continuing operations during those periods.
We also apply the if-converted method of accounting to our series D cumulative convertible preferred stock (Series D Convertible Preferred Stock). For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, we did not assume conversion of our Series D Convertible Preferred Stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, since the impact was antidilutive to earnings per share attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders from continuing operations during those periods.
Our calculation of weighted average diluted shares will include additional shares related to our 3.70% unsecured senior convertible notes (3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes) when the average market price of our common stock is higher than the conversion price ($117.36 as of September 30, 2011). The number of additional shares that will be included in the weighted average diluted shares is equal to the number of shares that would be issued upon the settlement of the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes assuming the settlement occurred at the end of the reporting period pursuant to the treasury stock method. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the weighted average shares of common stock related to our 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes have been excluded from the diluted weighted average shares of common stock as the average market price of our common stock was lower than the conversion price of $117.36 and the impact of conversion would have been antidilutive to earnings per share attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s common stockholders from continuing operations during those periods.
Net income attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
The following table shows income (loss) from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
33,855 |
|
$ |
29,982 |
|
$ |
100,343 |
|
$ |
45,026 |
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
(966 |
) |
(920 |
) |
(2,833 |
) |
(2,785 |
) | ||||
Add: gain on sale of land parcel |
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
| ||||
Income from continuing operations attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. |
|
$ |
32,935 |
|
29,062 |
|
97,556 |
|
42,241 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net |
|
$ |
(906 |
) |
$ |
479 |
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
$ |
1,996 |
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. |
|
$ |
(906 |
) |
$ |
479 |
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
$ |
1,996 |
|
2. Basis of presentation (continued)
Stock-based compensation expense
We have historically issued two forms of stock-based compensation under our equity incentive plan: options to purchase common stock (options) and restricted stock awards. We have not granted any options since 2002. We recognize all stock-based compensation in the condensed consolidated statements of income based on the grant date fair value. The fair value is based on the market value of the common stock on the grant date and such cost is then recognized on a straight-line basis over the period during which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (the vesting period). We compute stock-based compensation based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest. As a result, future forfeitures of awards are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments that are forfeited or are anticipated to be forfeited.
Fair value
We are required to disclose fair value information about all financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. We measure and disclose the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities utilizing a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity and the reporting entitys own assumptions about market participant assumptions based on the best available information. This hierarchy consists of the following three broad levels: (1) using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, (2) significant other observable inputs, and (3) significant unobservable inputs. Significant other observable inputs can include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Significant unobservable inputs are typically based on an entitys own assumptions, since there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
The following tables set forth the fair value of assets and liabilities that we measure at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||
Description |
|
Total |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Available for sale securities |
|
$ |
5,080 |
|
$ |
5,080 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate hedge agreements |
|
$ |
36,709 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
36,709 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||
Description |
|
Total |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Available for sale securities |
|
$ |
8,033 |
|
$ |
8,033 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate hedge agreements |
|
$ |
44,645 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
44,645 |
|
$ |
|
|
2. Basis of presentation (continued)
Fair value (continued)
The following table sets forth the fair value of assets that we measure at fair value on a nonrecurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||
Description |
|
Total |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Property held for sale (1) |
|
$ |
2,900 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,900 |
|
$ |
|
|
(1) Represents the fair value of one asset held for sale. This asset is reflected on the balance sheet at its fair value less cost to sell. See Note 10, Discontinued Operations.
There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2010.
We are required to disclose fair value information about all financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheets, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant receivables, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits approximate fair value. As further described in Notes 4 and 7, our available for sale securities and our interest rate hedge agreements, respectively, have been recorded at fair value. The fair values of our secured notes payable, unsecured line of credit, unsecured term loan, and unsecured convertible notes were estimated using significant other observable inputs such as available market information and discounted cash flows analyses based on borrowing rates we believe we could obtain with similar terms and maturities. Because the valuations of our financial instruments are based on these types of estimates, the actual fair value of our financial instruments may differ materially if our estimates do not prove to be accurate. Additionally, the use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the book and fair values of our available for sale securities, interest rate hedge agreements, secured notes payable, unsecured line of credit, unsecured term loans, and unsecured convertible notes were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Book Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Book Value |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
Available for sale securities |
|
$ |
5,080 |
|
$ |
5,080 |
|
$ |
8,033 |
|
$ |
8,033 |
|
Interest rate hedge agreements |
|
36,709 |
|
36,709 |
|
44,645 |
|
44,645 |
| ||||
Secured notes payable |
|
760,882 |
|
846,292 |
|
790,869 |
|
865,939 |
| ||||
Unsecured line of credit |
|
814,000 |
|
834,600 |
|
748,000 |
|
707,518 |
| ||||
Unsecured term loans |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,002,960 |
|
750,000 |
|
748,085 |
| ||||
Unsecured convertible notes |
|
84,484 |
|
84,716 |
|
295,293 |
|
302,486 |
| ||||
Impact of recently issued accounting standards
In July 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (collectively the Boards) re-exposed their joint leases proposal. The leases proposal is anticipated to result in key differences from existing GAAP. Leases would no longer be classified as operating or capital leases and all leases would be recorded on balance sheets using a financing model, except for leases of less than a year. Lessees would no longer account for lease expense on a straight-line basis, resulting in accelerated expense recognition. Reassessment of key considerations such as lease term or residual value guarantees would be required throughout the life of a lease. The Boards have tentatively decided that lessors should apply a single approach to all leases and recognize a lease receivable and a residual asset for each lease, except for leases of one year or less or leases of investment property carried at fair value. The Boards re-exposure has likely delayed the issuance of a final standard until 2012, and the effective date has not yet been determined. We anticipate the adoption of the final standard may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
2. Basis of presentation (continued)
Impact of recently issued accounting standards (continued)
The FASB proposed a new standard for entities that invest primarily in real estate properties and meet other criteria. These investment property entities would measure real estate investment property at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in net income. The proposed definition of investment property entities will likely evolve during the review of the proposed standard and therefore it is unclear today if the Company will qualify as an investment property entity. The FASB tentatively decided to require investment property entities to recognize rental revenue on a contractual basis, thereby eliminating rental revenue recognition on a straight line basis. The FASBs proposal, if adopted, would represent a significant change from our current accounting model. We anticipate the adoption of the final standard may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued an Accounting Standard Update (ASU) to substantially converge the guidance in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards on fair value measurements and disclosures. The ASU changes several aspects of the fair value measurement guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurement, including (1) the application of the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise, (2) the introduction of an option to measure groups of offsetting assets and liabilities on a net basis, (3) the incorporation of certain premiums and discounts in fair value measurements, and (4) the measurement of the fair value of certain instruments classified in shareholders equity. In addition, the ASU includes several new fair value disclosure requirements, including, among other things, information about valuation techniques and unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements and a narrative description of Level 3 measurements sensitivity to changes in unobservable inputs. The ASU is effective for public companies during the interim and annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt the ASU in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. We anticipate the adoption of the ASU may affect valuation methodologies, although we do not anticipate the adoption of the final standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued an ASU to make presentation of items within other comprehensive income (OCI) more prominent. Entities are required to present items of net income, items of OCI, and total comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. There no longer exists the option to present OCI in the statement of changes in stockholders equity. In October 2011, the FASB decided to expose a proposed deferral of the requirement that companies present reclassification adjustments for each component of OCI in both net income and OCI on the face of the financial statements. The deferral, if finalized, would not change the requirement to present items of net income, items of other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income in either one continuous statement or two separate consecutive statements. The ASU is effective for public companies during the interim and annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt the ASU in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. We anticipate the adoption of the ASU will affect presentation of our consolidated financial statements.
3. Investments in real estate
Our investments in real estate, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Land (related to rental properties) |
|
$ |
460,649 |
|
$ |
456,940 |
|
Buildings and building improvements |
|
4,355,276 |
|
3,906,689 |
| ||
Other improvements |
|
184,775 |
|
183,140 |
| ||
Rental properties |
|
5,000,700 |
|
4,546,769 |
| ||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
(710,580 |
) |
(616,007 |
) | ||
Rental properties, net |
|
4,290,120 |
|
3,930,762 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Construction in progress (CIP)/current value-added projects: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Active redevelopment |
|
300,398 |
|
248,651 |
| ||
Active development |
|
190,427 |
|
134,758 |
| ||
Projects in India and China |
|
113,136 |
|
98,327 |
| ||
|
|
603,961 |
|
481,736 |
| ||
Land/future value-added projects: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land held for future development |
|
452,732 |
|
431,838 |
| ||
Land undergoing preconstruction activities (additional CIP) |
|
538,437 |
|
563,800 |
| ||
|
|
991,169 |
|
995,638 |
| ||
Investment in unconsolidated real estate entity |
|
40,042 |
|
36,678 |
| ||
Investments in real estate, net |
|
$ |
5,925,292 |
|
$ |
5,444,814 |
|
Rental properties, construction in progress, and land held for future development
As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, we had approximately $4.3 billion and $3.9 billion of rental properties, net, aggregating 13.6 and 12.4 million rentable square feet, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, we had various projects classified as construction in progress, including redevelopment and development projects, and projects in India and China. As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, we had 747,248 and 755,463 rentable square feet, respectively, undergoing active redevelopment. Additionally, as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, we had 531,486 and 475,818 rentable square feet, respectively, undergoing active ground-up development consisting of vertical aboveground construction of life science properties. We also had construction projects in India and China aggregating approximately 0.9 million rentable square feet as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. We are required to capitalize project costs, indirect project costs, and interest during the period an asset is undergoing activities to prepare it for its intended use. Capitalization of interest ceases after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. In addition, should construction activity cease, interest would be expensed as incurred. Total interest capitalized related to construction activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, was approximately $44.9 million and $58.2 million, respectively.
Additionally, as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, we had approximately $452.7 million and $431.8 million, respectively, of land held for future development, aggregating 11.7 million and 8.3 million rentable square feet, respectively. Land held for future development represents real estate we plan to develop in the future but on which, as of each period presented, no construction activities were ongoing. As a result, interest, property taxes, insurance, and other costs are expensed as incurred. Additionally, as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, we had land supporting an aggregate of 2.5 million and 3.0 million rentable square feet of future ground-up development, respectively, undergoing preconstruction activities (consisting of Building Information Modeling (3-D virtual modeling), design development and construction drawings, sustainability and energy optimization review, budgeting, planning for future site and infrastructure work, and other activities prior to commencement of vertical construction of aboveground shell and core improvements) that are also classified as construction in progress. Our objective with preconstruction is to reduce the time it takes to deliver projects to prospective tenants. Project costs are capitalized as a cost of the project during periods when activities necessary to prepare an asset for its intended use are in progress. We generally will not commence ground-up development of any parcels undergoing preconstruction activities without first securing significant pre-leasing for such space. If vertical aboveground construction is not initiated at completion of preconstruction activities, the land parcel will be classified as land held for future development. The two largest projects included in preconstruction consist of our 1.9 million developable square foot site at Alexandria Center at Kendall Square in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and our 407,000 developable square foot site for the second tower at Alexandria Center for Life Science New York City.
3. Investments in real estate
Investment in unconsolidated real estate entity
In 2007, we formed an entity with a development partner for the purpose of owning, developing, leasing, managing, and operating a development parcel supporting a future building aggregating 428,000 rentable square feet. The development parcel serves as collateral for a non-recourse secured loan due in 2012 with an outstanding balance of $38.4 million as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. We also have an option to extend the maturity of the loan to April 2013. We determined that the entity did not qualify as the primary beneficiary since we do not have the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact its economic performance. The decisions that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance require both our consent and that of our partner, including all major operating, investing, and financing decisions as well as decisions involving major expenditures. Because we share power over the decisions that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance, we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the entity. As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, our investment in the unconsolidated entity was approximately $40.0 million and $36.7 million, respectively.
Our investment in the unconsolidated real estate entity is adjusted for additional contributions and distributions, the proportionate share of the net earnings or losses, and other comprehensive income or loss. Distributions, profits, and losses related to this entity are allocated in accordance with the operating agreement. When circumstances indicate there may have been a reduction in value of an equity investment, we evaluate the equity investment and any advances made for impairment by estimating our ability to recover our investment from future expected cash flows. If we determine the loss in value is other-than-temporary, we recognize an impairment charge to reflect the equity investment and any advances made at fair value.
4. Investments
We hold equity investments in certain publicly traded companies and privately held entities primarily involved in the life science industry. All of our investments in publicly traded companies for which an active market exists are considered available for sale and are recorded at fair value. Fair value of our investments in publicly traded companies for which an active market exists has been based upon the closing price as of the balance sheet date, with unrealized gains and losses shown as a separate component of total equity. The classification of each investment is determined at the time each investment is made, and such determination is reevaluated at each balance sheet date. The cost of each investment sold is determined by the specific identification method, with net realized gains and losses included in other income. Investments in privately held entities are generally accounted for under the cost method when our interest in the entity is so minor that we have virtually no influence over the entitys operating and financial policies.
Individual investments are evaluated for impairment when changes in conditions exist that may indicate an impairment exists. The factors that we consider in making these assessments include, but are not limited to, market prices, market conditions, available financing, prospects for favorable or unfavorable clinical trial results, new product initiatives, and new collaborative agreements. If there are no identified events or changes in circumstance that would have an adverse effect on our cost method investments, we do not estimate their fair value. For all of our investments, if a decline in the fair value of an investment below the carrying value is determined to be other-than-temporary, such an investment is written down to its estimated fair value with a non-cash charge to current earnings. We use significant other observable inputs and significant unobservable inputs to determine the fair value of privately held entities. We did not recognize impairment charges related to our investments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
The following table summarizes our available for sale securities (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Adjusted cost of available for sale securities |
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
$ |
1,876 |
|
Gross unrealized gains |
|
3,938 |
|
6,196 |
| ||
Gross unrealized losses |
|
(385 |
) |
(39 |
) | ||
Fair value of available for sale securities |
|
$ |
5,080 |
|
$ |
8,033 |
|
We believe that the gross unrealized losses related to our available for sale securities as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, shown above are temporary.
Our investments in privately held entities as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, totaled approximately $83.7 million and $75.9 million, respectively. Of these totals, approximately $32,000 and $82,000, as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, are accounted for under the equity method. The remainder are accounted for under the cost method. As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, there were no unrealized losses in our investments in privately held entities.
5. Unsecured line of credit and unsecured term loans
The following table summarizes balances outstanding under our unsecured line of credit and unsecured term loans (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Unsecured line of credit |
|
$ |
814,000 |
|
$ |
748,000 |
|
2012 Unsecured Term Loan |
|
250,000 |
|
750,000 |
| ||
2016 Unsecured Term Loan |
|
750,000 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
$ |
1,814,000 |
|
$ |
1,498,000 |
|
Unsecured Line of Credit and 2012 Unsecured Term Loan
In January 2011, we entered into a third amendment (the Third Amendment) to our second amended and restated credit agreement dated October 31, 2006, as further amended on December 1, 2006, and May 2, 2007 (the Prior Credit Agreement). The Third Amendment amended the Prior Credit Agreement to, among other things, increase permitted borrowings under our unsecured line of credit from $1.15 billion to $1.5 billion, and continued to provide a $750 million unsecured term loan (the 2012 Unsecured Term Loan and together with the unsecured line of credit, the Unsecured Credit Facility) and provided an accordion option to increase commitments under the Unsecured Credit Facility by up to an additional $300 million. Borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility will bear interest at LIBOR or the specified base rate, plus in either case a margin specified in the Unsecured Credit Facility agreement (the Applicable Margin). The Applicable Margin for LIBOR borrowings outstanding under the unsecured line of credit was 2.3% as of September 30, 2011. The Applicable Margin for the LIBOR borrowings under the 2012 Unsecured Term Loan was not amended in the Third Amendment and was 0.7% as of September 30, 2011.
Under the Third Amendment, the maturity date for the unsecured line of credit is January 2015, assuming we exercise our sole right under the amendment to extend this maturity date twice by an additional six months. The maturity date for the 2012 Unsecured Term Loan is October 2012.
As of September 30, 2011, we had borrowings of $814 million and $250 million outstanding under our unsecured line of credit and 2012 Unsecured Term Loan, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate, including the impact of our interest rate swap agreements, of approximately 3.25%.
5. Unsecured line of credit and unsecured term loans
2016 Unsecured Term Loan
In February 2011, we entered into a $250 million unsecured term loan. In June 2011, we amended this $250 million unsecured term loan (as amended, the 2016 Unsecured Term Loan) to, among other things, increase the borrowings from $250 million to $750 million and to extend the maturity from January 2015 to June 2016, assuming we exercise our sole right to extend the maturity date by one year. Borrowings under the 2016 Unsecured Term Loan bear interest at LIBOR or the specified base rate, plus in either case a margin specified in the amended unsecured term loan agreement. The applicable margin for the LIBOR borrowings under the 2016 Unsecured Term Loan as of September 30, 2011, was 1.65%. Under the 2016 Unsecured Term Loan agreement, the financial covenants were not amended and are identical to the financial covenants required under our existing Unsecured Credit Facility. The net proceeds from this amendment were used to reduce outstanding borrowings on the 2012 Unsecured Term Loan from $750 million to $250 million. As a result of this early repayment of our 2012 Unsecured Term Loan in June 2011, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.2 million in June 2011, related to the write-off of unamortized loan fees.
The requirements of the key financial covenants under the Unsecured Credit Facility and 2016 Unsecured Term Loan are as follows:
Covenant |
|
Requirement |
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio |
|
Less than or equal to 60.0% |
|
|
|
Unsecured Leverage Ratio |
|
Less than or equal to 60.0% |
|
|
|
Fixed Charge Coverage |
|
Greater than or equal to 1.5 |
|
|
|
Unsecured Debt Yield |
|
Greater than or equal to 12.00% |
|
|
|
Minimum Book Value |
|
Greater than or equal to the sum of $2.0 billion and 50% of the net proceeds of equity offerings after January 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
Secured Debt Ratio |
|
Less than or equal to 40.0% |
In addition, the terms of the agreements restrict, among other things, certain investments, indebtedness, distributions, mergers, developments, land, and borrowings available for developments, land, encumbered, and unencumbered assets. The terms of the agreements also limit our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders in excess of the greater of 1) 95% of consolidated Funds From Operations (as defined in the Third Amendment) for the preceding four quarters and 2) the minimum amount sufficient to permit us to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes or the amount necessary to avoid the payment of federal or state income or excise tax. In addition, we are prohibited from paying cash dividends in excess of the amount necessary for us to qualify for taxation as a REIT if a default or event of default exists. As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all such covenants.
6. Unsecured convertible notes
The following tables summarize the balances, significant terms, and components of interest cost recognized (excluding amortization of loan fees and before the impact of capitalized interest) on our unsecured convertible notes outstanding as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands, except conversion rates):
|
|
8.00% Unsecured |
|
3.70% Unsecured |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Principal amount |
|
$ |
250 |
|
$ |
250 |
|
$ |
84,801 |
|
$ |
301,934 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
16 |
|
20 |
|
551 |
|
6,871 |
| ||||
Net carrying amount of liability component |
|
$ |
234 |
|
$ |
230 |
|
$ |
84,250 |
|
$ |
295,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Carrying amount of equity component |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
8,080 |
|
$ |
28,769 |
|
Number of shares on which the aggregate consideration to be delivered on conversion is determined |
|
6,047 |
|
6,047 |
|
N/A |
(1) |
N/A |
(1) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Issuance date |
|
April 2009 |
|
January 2007 |
| ||||||||
Stated interest rate |
|
8.00% |
|
3.70% |
| ||||||||
Effective interest rate |
|
11.00% |
|
5.96% |
| ||||||||
Conversion rate per $1,000 principal value of unsecured convertible notes, as adjusted |
|
24.1887 |
|
8.5207 |
|
|
|
8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Contractual interest |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
8,801 |
|
Amortization of discount on liability component |
|
2 |
|
7 |
|
4 |
|
2,080 |
| ||||
Total interest cost |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
35 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
10,881 |
|
|
|
3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Contractual interest |
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
$ |
3,558 |
|
$ |
5,228 |
|
$ |
10,675 |
|
Amortization of discount on liability component |
|
673 |
|
1,993 |
|
3,056 |
|
5,891 |
| ||||
Total interest cost |
|
$ |
1,805 |
|
$ |
5,551 |
|
$ |
8,284 |
|
$ |
16,566 |
|
(1) Our 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes require that upon conversion, the entire principal amount is to be settled in cash, and any excess value above the principal amount, if applicable, is to be settled in shares of our common stock. Based on the September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, closing stock prices of our common stock of $61.39 and $73.26, respectively, and the conversion price of our 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes of $117.36 as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the if-converted value of the notes did not exceed the principal amount as of September 30, 2011, or December 31, 2010, and accordingly, no shares of our common stock would have been issued if the notes had been settled on September 30, 2011, or December 31, 2010.
6. Unsecured convertible notes (continued)
8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes
In April 2009, we completed a private offering of $240 million principal amount of 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes. At issuance, the 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes had an initial conversion rate of approximately 24.1546 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes, representing a conversion price of approximately $41.40 per share of our common stock.
In June 2010, we completed an exchange of our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes for shares of our common stock and cash (the Exchange Offer). The terms of the Exchange Offer included an offer price per $1,000 principal amount of our outstanding unsecured convertible notes of an equivalent number of shares of common stock per bond allowed for under the holder conversion option, or 24.1546 shares, plus a cash premium of $180. Upon completion of the Exchange Offer, we retired approximately $232.7 million principal amount of our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes (representing approximately 97% of the $240.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes outstanding prior to the Exchange Offer) in exchange for 5,620,256 shares of our common stock and cash payments of approximately $41.9 million. Additionally, we paid approximately $3.1 million in accrued and unpaid interest on the retired portion of our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes to, but excluding, the settlement date.
Upon completion of the Exchange Offer, the total value of the consideration of the Exchange Offer was allocated to the extinguishment of the liability component equal to the fair value of that component immediately prior to extinguishment, with the difference between this allocation and the net carrying amount of the liability component and unamortized debt issuance costs recognized as a loss on early extinguishment of debt. The remaining settlement consideration was allocated to the reacquisition of the equity component and was recognized as a reduction of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s stockholders equity. In connection with the Exchange Offer, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $41.5 million, including approximately $4.7 million in unamortized issuance costs. The loss was classified as loss on early extinguishment of debt.
In July 2010, we repurchased, in a privately negotiated transaction, an additional $7.1 million principal amount of our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes for an aggregate cash price of approximately $12.8 million. Upon completion of this repurchase, the total value of the consideration of the repurchase was allocated to the extinguishment of the liability component equal to the fair value of that component immediately prior to extinguishment, with the difference between this allocation and the net carrying amount of the liability component and unamortized debt issuance costs recognized as a loss on early extinguishment of debt. The remaining settlement consideration of $5.2 million was allocated to the reacquisition of the equity component and was recognized as a reduction of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s stockholders equity. As a result of this repurchase, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.3 million, including approximately $140,000 in unamortized issuance costs. The loss was classified as loss on early extinguishment of debt.
3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes
In January 2007, we completed a private offering of $460 million principal amount of 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes. Prior to January 15, 2012, we will not have the right to redeem the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes, except to preserve our qualification as a REIT. On and after that date, we have the right to redeem the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes to be redeemed, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. Holders of the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes may require us to repurchase their notes, in whole or in part, on January 15, 2012, 2017, and 2022 for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date. Holders of the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their notes upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions, (each, a Fundamental Change), including a change in control, certain merger or consolidation transactions, or the liquidation of the Company, at a repurchase price in cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date.
6. Unsecured convertible notes (continued)
3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes (continued)
At issuance, the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes had an initial conversion rate of approximately 8.4774 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes, representing a conversion price of approximately $117.96 per share of our common stock. The conversion rate of the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes is subject to adjustments for certain events, including, but not limited to, certain cash dividends on our common stock in excess of $0.74 per share per quarter and dividends on our common stock payable in shares of our common stock. As of September 30, 2011, the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes had a conversion rate of approximately 8.5207 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $117.36 per share of our common stock.
In December 2010, we repurchased, in privately negotiated transactions, certain of our 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes aggregating approximately $82.8 million at an aggregate cash price of approximately $84.6 million. Upon completion of these repurchases, the total value of the consideration of the repurchases was allocated to the extinguishment of the liability component equal to the fair value of that component immediately prior to extinguishment, with the difference between this allocation and the net carrying amount of the liability component and unamortized debt issuance costs recognized as a loss on early extinguishment of debt. The remaining settlement consideration of approximately $1.7 million was allocated to the reacquisition of the equity component and was recognized as a reduction of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s stockholders equity. As a result of these repurchases, we recognized an aggregate loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.4 million, including approximately $0.4 million in unamortized issuance costs.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we repurchased, in privately negotiated transactions, additional 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes aggregating approximately $96.1 million at an aggregate cash price of approximately $98.6 million. Upon completion of these repurchases, the total value of the consideration of the repurchases was allocated to the extinguishment of the liability component equal to the fair value of that component immediately prior to extinguishment, with the difference between this allocation and the net carrying amount of the liability component and unamortized debt issuance costs recognized as a loss on early extinguishment of debt. The remaining settlement consideration of approximately $2.5 million was allocated to the reacquisition of the equity component and was recognized as a reduction of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s stockholders equity. As a result of these repurchases, we recognized an aggregate loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.5 million, including approximately $0.4 million in unamortized issuance costs.
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we repurchased, in privately negotiated transactions, additional 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes aggregating approximately $121.1 million at an aggregate cash price of approximately $122.8 million. Upon completion of these repurchases, the total value of the consideration of the repurchases was allocated to the extinguishment of the liability component equal to the fair value of that component immediately prior to extinguishment, with the difference between this allocation and the net carrying amount of the liability component and unamortized debt issuance costs recognized as a loss on early extinguishment of debt. The remaining settlement consideration of approximately $0.5 million was allocated to the reacquisition of the equity component and was recognized as a reduction of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s stockholders equity. As a result of these repurchases, we recognized an aggregate loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.7 million, including approximately $0.3 million in unamortized issuance costs.
7. Interest rate hedge agreements
We are exposed to certain risks arising from both our business operations and economic conditions. We principally manage our exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of our core business activities. We manage economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of our debt funding and by the use of interest rate hedge agreements. Specifically, we enter into interest rate hedge agreements to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which is determined by interest rates. Our interest rate hedge agreements are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of our known or expected cash payments principally related to our LIBOR-based borrowings. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and currently all of our derivatives are designated as hedges. Our objectives in using interest rate hedge agreements are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements in accordance with our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate hedge agreements designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed rate payments over the life of the interest rate hedge agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of our interest rate hedge agreements designated and qualified as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The amount is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, our interest rate hedge agreements were used primarily to hedge the variable cash flows associated with certain of our existing LIBOR-based variable rate debt, including our unsecured line of credit and unsecured term loan. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of our interest rate hedge agreements is recognized directly in earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, our interest rate hedge agreements were 100% effective. Accordingly, we did not recognize any of the change in fair value of our interest rate hedge agreements directly into earnings.
As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, our interest rate hedge agreements were classified in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits based upon their respective fair values aggregating a liability balance of approximately $36.7 million and $44.6 million, respectively, which included accrued interest and adjustments for non-performance risk, with the offsetting adjustment reflected as unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive loss in total equity. We have not posted any collateral related to our interest rate hedge agreements.
Balances in accumulated other comprehensive loss are recognized in the periods during which the forecasted hedge transactions affect earnings. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, approximately $5.4 million and $7.0 million, respectively, was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense as an increase to interest expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, approximately $16.1 million and $23.6 million, respectively, was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense as an increase to interest expense. During the next 12 months, we expect to reclassify approximately $20.4 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense as an increase to interest expense.
7. Interest rate hedge agreements (continued)
As of September 30, 2011, we had the following outstanding interest rate hedge agreements that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (dollars in thousands):
Transaction |
|
Effective |
|
Termination |
|
Interest |
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
| |||
December 2006 |
|
December 29, 2006 |
|
March 31, 2014 |
|
4.990 |
% |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
$ |
(5,529 |
) |
October 2007 |
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
4.546 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
(2,087 |
) | ||
October 2007 |
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2013 |
|
4.642 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
(4,190 |
) | ||
October 2007 |
|
July 1, 2008 |
|
March 31, 2013 |
|
4.622 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
(1,575 |
) | ||
October 2007 |
|
July 1, 2008 |
|
March 31, 2013 |
|
4.625 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
(1,576 |
) | ||
December 2006 |
|
November 30, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2014 |
|
5.015 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
(8,340 |
) | ||
December 2006 |
|
November 30, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2014 |
|
5.023 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
(8,355 |
) | ||
December 2006 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
October 31, 2012 |
|
5.015 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
(5,057 |
) | ||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(36,709 |
) | |
The fair value of each interest rate hedge agreement is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analyses on the expected cash flows of each derivative. These analyses reflect the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and use observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities (also referred to as significant other observable inputs). The fair values of our interest rate hedge agreements are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. The fair value calculation also includes an amount for risk of non-performance using significant unobservable inputs such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default, which we have determined to be insignificant to the overall fair value of our interest rate hedge agreements.
8. Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.s stockholders equity
In May 2011, we sold 6,250,651 shares of our common stock in a follow-on offering (including 750,651 shares issued upon partial exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option). The shares were issued at a price of $75.50 per share, resulting in aggregate proceeds of approximately $451.5 million (after deducting underwriters discounts and other offering costs).
In September 2010, we sold 5,175,000 shares of our common stock in a follow-on offering (including 675,000 shares issued upon full exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option). The shares were issued at a price of $69.25 per share, resulting in aggregate proceeds of approximately $342.3 million (after deducting underwriters discounts and other offering costs).
In June 2010, we completed our Exchange Offer. Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Offer, we issued 5,620,256 shares of our common stock and paid approximately $41.9 million in cash, as consideration for the exchange of approximately $232.7 million of our 8.00% Unsecured Convertible Notes. See Note 6, Unsecured Convertible Notes.
In September 2011, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock aggregating $29.1 million ($0.47 per share) for the three months ended September 30, 2011. In September 2011, we also declared cash dividends on our 8.375% series C cumulative redeemable preferred stock (Series C Preferred Stock) aggregating $2.7 million ($0.5234375 per share), for the period from July 15, 2011 through October 15, 2011. Additionally, in September 2011, we declared cash dividends on our Series D Convertible Preferred Stock aggregating approximately $4.4 million ($0.4375 per share), for the period from July 15, 2011 through October 15, 2011.
9. Noncontrolling interests
Noncontrolling interests represent the third-party interests in certain entities in which we have a controlling interest. These entities own seven properties and three development parcels as of September 30, 2011, and are included in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling interests are adjusted for additional contributions and distributions, the proportionate share of the net earnings or losses, and other comprehensive income or loss. Distributions, profits, and losses related to these entities are allocated in accordance with the respective operating agreements.
Certain of our noncontrolling interests have the right to require us to redeem their ownership interests in the respective entities. We classify these ownership interests in the entities as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of total equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Redeemable noncontrolling interests are adjusted for additional contributions and distributions, the proportionate share of the net earnings or losses and other comprehensive income or loss. Distributions, profits, and losses related to these entities are allocated in accordance with the respective operating agreements. If the carrying amount of a redeemable noncontrolling interest is less than the maximum redemption value at the balance sheet date, such amount is adjusted to the maximum redemption value. Subsequent declines in the redemption value are recognized only to the extent that previously recorded increases have been recorded. As of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, our redeemable noncontrolling interest balance was approximately $15.9 million for both periods. Our remaining noncontrolling interests aggregating approximately $41.4 million and $41.6 million as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, do not have rights to require us to purchase their ownership interests and are classified in total equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
10. Discontinued operations and sale of land parcel
We classify a property as held for sale when all of the following criteria for a plan of sale have been met: (1) management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the property; (2) the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition, subject only to terms that are usual and customary; (3) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell have been initiated; (4) the sale of the property is probable and is expected to be completed within one year; (5) the property is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (6) actions necessary to complete the plan of sale indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. When all of these criteria have been met, the property is classified as held for sale; its operations, including any interest expense directly attributable to it, are classified as discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated statements of income; and amounts for all prior periods presented are reclassified from continuing operations to discontinued operations. Depreciation of assets ceases upon designation of a property as held for sale.
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, a vacant 30,000 rentable square foot operating property, located in the suburbs of Boston, Massachusetts, met the criteria for classification as held for sale. We recognized an impairment charge of approximately $1.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, to adjust the carrying value to the estimated fair value less costs to sell. In October 2011, we sold the property for approximately $2.9 million, representing a sale price of approximately $97 per rentable square foot.
10. Discontinued operations and sale of land parcel (continued)
The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations, net, and net assets of discontinued operations (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Total revenue |
|
$ |
923 |
|
$ |
1,315 |
|
$ |
2,875 |
|
$ |
4,367 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
497 |
|
552 |
|
1,431 |
|
1,540 |
| ||||
Revenue less operating expenses |
|
426 |
|
763 |
|
1,444 |
|
2,827 |
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
|
|
33 |
|
37 |
|
100 |
| ||||
Depreciation expense |
|
338 |
|
251 |
|
871 |
|
755 |
| ||||
Income from discontinued operations before non-cash impairment charge and gain on sale of real estate |
|
88 |
|
479 |
|
536 |
|
1,972 |
| ||||
Non-cash impairment charge |
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
| ||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
| ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net |
|
$ |
(906 |
) |
$ |
479 |
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
$ |
1,996 |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Properties held for sale, net |
|
$ |
22,786 |
|
$ |
24,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
639 |
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
23,425 |
|
$ |
25,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
Secured note payable |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
603 |
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
603 |
|
2,683 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net assets of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
22,822 |
|
$ |
22,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, includes the results of the operations of three operating properties that were classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2011. Income from discontinued operations, net, for the three months ended September 30, 2010, includes the results of operations of three properties that were classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2011. Income from discontinued operations, net, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, includes the results of operations of three properties that were classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2011, and the results of operations and gain on sale of one operating property that was sold during the three months ended March 31, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we sold one property located in the Seattle market at a price of approximately $11.8 million.
In August 2011, we completed the sale of a land parcel in San Diego for an aggregate sales price of approximately $17.3 million at a gain of approximately $46,000. The land parcel we sold during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, did not meet the criteria for discontinued operations since the parcel did not have any significant operations prior to disposition. Pursuant to the presentation and disclosure literature on gains/losses on sales or disposals by REITs required by the SEC, gains or losses on sales or disposals by a REIT that do not qualify as discontinued operations are classified below income from discontinued operations in the income statement. Accordingly for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we classified the $46,000 gain on sale of land parcel below income from discontinued operations, net, in the condensed consolidated income statements.
11. Subsequent events
In October 2011, we completed the sale of a property, previously classified as held for sale, for an aggregate sales price of approximately $2.9 million. We also extended the 2011 maturity date of our $76 million secured loan into 2012, and are in discussions for an additional 3-5 year extension.
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain information and statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements containing the words believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks, approximately, intends, plans, estimates, or anticipates, or the negative of these words or similar words, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties regarding events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operation, business strategy, results of operations, and financial position. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those included within or contemplated by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to the following:
· negative worldwide economic, financial, and banking conditions;
· worldwide economic recession, lack of confidence, and/or high structural unemployment;
· potential defaults on national debt by certain countries, including defaults by certain European countries;
· potential and further downgrades of the credit ratings of the federal, state, and foreign governments, or their perceived creditworthiness;
· failure of the United States government to agree on a debt ceiling or deficit reduction plan;
· potential and further downgrades of the credit ratings of major financial institutions, or their perceived creditworthiness;
· financial, banking, and credit market conditions;
· the seizure or illiquidity of credit markets;
· our inability to obtain capital (debt, construction financing, and/or equity) or refinance debt maturities;
· our inability to comply with financial covenants in our debt agreements;
· inflation or deflation;
· prolonged period of stagnant growth;
· increased interest rates and operating costs;
· adverse economic or real estate developments in our markets;
· our failure to successfully complete and lease our existing space held for redevelopment and new properties acquired for that purpose and any properties undergoing development;
· significant decreases in our active development, active redevelopment, or preconstruction activities resulting in significant increases in our interest, operating, and payroll expenses;
· our failure to successfully operate or lease acquired properties;
· the financial condition of our insurance carriers;
· general and local economic conditions;
· adverse developments concerning the life science industry and/or our life science client tenants;
· the nature and extent of future competition;
· lower rental rates, higher vacancy rates, or failure to renew or replace expiring leases;
· defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants;
· availability of and our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
· our failure to comply with laws or changes in law;
· compliance with environmental laws;
· our failure to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust (REIT);
· changes in laws, regulations, and financial accounting standards;
· certain ownership interests outside the United States that may subject us to different or greater risks than those associated with our domestic operations; and
· fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
This list of risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive. Additional information regarding risk factors that may affect us is included under the headings Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Readers of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should also read our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other publicly filed documents for further discussion regarding such factors.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. References to GAAP used herein refer to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Overview
We are a Maryland corporation formed in October 1994 that has elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We are the largest owner and preeminent REIT focused principally on cluster development through the ownership, operation, management, selective acquisition, redevelopment, and development of properties containing life science laboratory space. We are the leading provider of high-quality, environmentally sustainable real estate, technical infrastructure, and services to the broad and diverse life science industry. Client tenants include institutional (universities and independent non-profit institutions), pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, product, and service entities and government agencies. Our primary business objective is to maximize stockholder value by providing our stockholders with the greatest possible total return based on a multifaceted platform of internal and external growth. Our operating platform is based on the principle of clustering, with assets and operations located adjacent to life science entities driving growth and technological advances within each cluster.
As of September 30, 2011, we had 171 properties aggregating 14.9 million rentable square feet, composed of approximately 13.6 million rentable square feet of operating properties, approximately 747,248 rentable square feet undergoing active redevelopment, and approximately 531,486 rentable square feet undergoing active development. Our operating properties were approximately 94.6% leased as of September 30, 2011. Our primary sources of revenues are rental income and tenant recoveries from leases of our properties. The comparability of financial data from period to period is affected by the timing of our property acquisition, redevelopment, and development activities.
As further discussed under 2011 highlights below, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we:
· received Baa2/BBB- stable outlook investment grade issuer rating from two major rating agencies;
· executed 143 leases for 2,265,000 rentable square feet, including 634,000 rentable square feet of redevelopment and development space;
· reported occupancy of operating properties at approximately 94.6%, and occupancy of operating and redevelopment properties at approximately 89.3% as of September 30, 2011;
· completed a follow-on common stock offering with net proceeds of $451.5 million;
· repurchased approximately $217.1 million of our 3.70% unsecured senior convertible notes (3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes);
· closed a $750 million unsecured term loan;
· sold a parcel of land in the San Diego market for $17.3 million;
· extended the maturity date and increased commitments on our unsecured line of credit from $1.15 billion to $1.5 billion;
· completed the ground-up development of a 97,000 rentable square foot single tenant building located in the Research Triangle Park market, which is 100% leased;
· completed redevelopment of a 47,500 rentable square feet located in the Greater Boston market;
· completed the ground lease of land and improvements in Canada to a tenant for the construction of a 783,255 rentable square foot laboratory building;
· acquired 4755 Nexus Center Drive, a newly and partially completed 41,710 rentable square foot development project located in University Town Center in the San Diego market;
· acquired 409 and 499 Illinois Street, a newly and partially completed 453,256 rentable square foot development project in Mission Bay, San Francisco, for approximately $293 million;
· were awarded LEED® Platinum Certification for 10300 Campus Pointe Drive, a property located in University Town Center in the San Diego market; and
· were awarded LEED® Gold Certifications for the Alexandria Center for Life Science New York City, 199 E. Blaine Street, a property located in the Seattle market, and 455 Mission Bay Blvd., a property located in the San Francisco market.
In October 2011, we:
· extended the 2011 maturity date of a $76 million secured loan into 2012 and are in discussions for an additional 3-5 year extension;
· sold a 30,000 rentable square foot property for approximately $2.9 million; and
· repaid two secured loans aggregating $32.7 million.
We continue to demonstrate the strength and durability of our core operations providing life science laboratory space to the broad and diverse life science industry. Our core operating results were solid for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We intend to continue to focus on the completion of our existing active redevelopment projects aggregating approximately 747,248 rentable square feet and our existing active development projects aggregating approximately an additional 531,486 rentable square feet. Additionally, we intend to continue with preconstruction activities for certain land parcels for future ground-up development in order to preserve and create value for these projects. These important preconstruction activities add significant value to our land for future ground-up development and are required for the ultimate vertical construction of the buildings. We also intend to be very careful and prudent with any future decisions to add new projects to our active ground-up developments. We generally will not commence new development projects for aboveground vertical construction of new laboratory space without first securing significant pre-leasing for such space. We also intend to continue to reduce debt as a percentage of our overall capital structure over a multi-year period. During this period, we may also extend and/or refinance certain debt maturities. We expect the sources of funds for construction activities and repayment of outstanding debt to be provided over several years by cash flows from operations, opportunistic sales of real estate, joint ventures, new secured or unsecured debt, and the issuance of additional equity securities, as appropriate. As of September 30, 2011, we identified three assets as held for sale, which have been classified in discontinued operations.
2011 Highlights
Acquisitions
In June 2011, we acquired 285 Bear Hill Road, a 26,270 rentable square foot office property located in the Greater Boston market, for approximately $3.9 million. We plan to begin the redevelopment of this property into life science laboratory space in the three months ended December 31, 2011. Based on our view of existing market conditions and certain assumptions at the time of the acquisition, we expect to achieve a stabilized yield on a GAAP and cash basis for this property of approximately 8.6% and 8.0%, respectively. Stabilized yield on cost is calculated as the quotient of net operating income and our investment in the property at stabilization (Stabilized Yield).
In April 2011, we acquired 409 and 499 Illinois Street, a newly and partially completed world-class 453,256 rentable square foot laboratory/office development project located on a highly desirable waterfront location in Mission Bay, San Francisco, for approximately $293 million. 409 Illinois Street is a 241,659 rentable square foot tower that is 97% leased to a life science company through November 2023. 499 Illinois Street is a vacant 211,597 rentable square foot tower in shell condition for which we plan to complete the development. Based on our view of existing market conditions and certain assumptions at the time of the acquisition, we expect to achieve a Stabilized Yield on a GAAP and cash basis for this property in the range of 7.2% to 7.6% and 6.5% to 7.0%, respectively.
In March 2011, we acquired 4755 Nexus Center Drive, a newly and partially completed development project located in University Town Center in the San Diego market, for approximately $7.4 million. The property is a vacant 41,710 rentable square foot building in shell condition for which we plan to complete the development. Based on our view of existing market conditions and certain assumptions at the time of the acquisition, we expect to achieve a Stabilized Yield on a GAAP and cash basis for this property in the range of 9.0% to 9.5% and 8.0% to 8.5%, respectively.
Dispositions
In August 2011, we sold a parcel of land located in San Diego, California for approximately $17.3 million at a gain of $46,000. The buyer is expected to construct a building with approximately 249,000 rentable square feet, representing a sale price of approximately $70 per rentable square foot.
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, a vacant 30,000 rentable square foot operating property, located in the suburbs of Boston, Massachusetts, met the criteria for classification as held for sale. This property was occupied by a credit life science tenant through June 30, 2011. Upon move out, a user for the building presented an offer for the purchase of the building in the three months ended September 30, 2011. We recognized an impairment charge of approximately $1.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, to adjust the carrying value to the estimated fair value less costs to sell. In October 2011, we sold the property to that user, for approximately $2.9 million, representing a sale price of approximately $97 per rentable square foot.
Development
In August 2011, we completed the ground-up development of 7 Triangle Drive, a 97,000 rentable square foot single-tenant building located in the Research Triangle Park market, which is currently 100% leased as of September 30, 2011. Our Stabilized Yield on a GAAP and cash basis for this property was approximately 9.3% and 8.3%, respectively.
In July 2011, we executed a new lease for a 307,000 rentable square feet ground-up development with Biogen Idec, Inc. at Alexandria CenterTM at Kendall Square. The ground breaking for this project will occur in late October 2011, and we will add the project to our disclosure of active ground-up development for the three months ended December 31, 2011.
Unsecured credit facility
In January 2011, we entered into a third amendment (the Third Amendment) to our second amended and restated credit agreement dated October 31, 2006, as further amended on December 1, 2006 and May 2, 2007 (the Prior Credit Agreement, and as amended by the Third Amendment, the Amended Credit Agreement), with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and certain lenders. The Third Amendment amended the Prior Credit Agreement to, among other things, increase permitted borrowings under our unsecured line of credit from $1.15 billion to $1.5 billion, and continued to provide a $750 million unsecured term loan (the 2012 Unsecured Term Loan and together with the unsecured line of credit, the Unsecured Credit Facility) and provided an accordion option to increase commitments under the Unsecured Credit Facility by up to an additional $300 million. See Liquidity and capital resources Unsecured Credit Facility for additional information about our Unsecured Credit Facility.
Other financing activities
In June 2011, we amended the $250 million unsecured term loan (as amended, the 2016 Unsecured Term Loan) to, among other things, increase the borrowings from $250 million to $750 million and to extend the maturity from January 2015 to June 2016, assuming we exercise our sole right to extend the maturity date by one year. Borrowings under the 2016 Unsecured Term Loan bear interest at LIBOR or the specified base rate, plus in either case a margin specified in the 2016 Unsecured Term Loan agreement. The applicable margin for the LIBOR borrowings under the 2016 Unsecured Term Loan as of September 30, 2011, was 1.65%. Under the 2016 Unsecured Term Loan agreement, the financial covenants were not amended and are identical to the financial covenants required under our existing Unsecured Credit Facility. The 2016 Unsecured Term Loan may be repaid at any date prior to maturity without a prepayment penalty. The net proceeds from this amendment were used to reduce outstanding borrowings on the 2012 Unsecured Term Loan from $750 million to $250 million. As a result of this early repayment, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.2 million related to the write-off of unamortized loan fees.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we repurchased, in privately negotiated transactions, approximately $217.1 million of our 3.70% Unsecured Convertible Notes at an aggregate cash price of approximately $221.4 million. As a result of these repurchases, we recognized an aggregate loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Leasing
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we executed a total of 143 leases for approximately 2,265,000 rentable square feet at 60 different properties (excluding month-to-month leases). Of this total, approximately 1,171,000 rentable square feet related to new or renewal leases of previously leased space and approximately 1,094,000 rentable square feet related to developed, redeveloped, or previously vacant space. Of the 1,094,000 rentable square feet, approximately 634,000 rentable square feet were related to our development or redevelopment programs, and the remaining approximately 460,000 rentable square feet were related to previously vacant space. Rental rates for these new or renewal leases were on average approximately 2.5% higher on a GAAP basis than rental rates for expiring leases. Additionally, we granted tenant concessions/free rent averaging approximately 1.7 months with respect to the 2,265,000 rentable square feet leased during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
As of September 30, 2011, approximately 95% of our leases (on a rentable square footage basis) were triple net leases, requiring tenants to pay substantially all real estate taxes, insurance, common area, and other operating expenses (including increases thereto) in addition to base rent. Additionally, approximately 92% of our leases (on a rentable square footage basis) provided for the recapture of certain capital expenditures, and approximately 94% of our leases (on a rentable square footage basis) contained effective annual rent escalations that were either fixed or indexed based on the consumer price index or another index.
Investments in real estate
The following table summarizes our investments in real estate as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
Book Value |
|
Square Footage |
|
Book Value |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rental properties |
|
$ |
5,000,700 |
|
13,590,125 |
|
$ |
368 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
(710,580 |
) |
|
|
|
| ||
Rental properties, net |
|
4,290,120 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Construction in progress (CIP)/current value-added projects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Active redevelopment |
|
300,398 |
|
747,248 |
|
402 |
| ||
Active development |
|
190,427 |
|
531,486 |
|
358 |
| ||
Projects in India and China |
|
113,136 |
|
916,000 |
|
124 |
| ||
|
|
603,961 |
|
2,194,734 |
|
275 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |