Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009
OR
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-9595
BEST BUY CO., INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota | 41-0907483 | |
State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization | Identification No.) | |
7601 Penn Avenue South |
55423 |
|
Richfield, Minnesota | (Zip Code) | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code 612-291-1000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
---|---|---|
Common Stock, par value $.10 per share | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ý Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes ý No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ý | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) o Yes ý No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 30, 2008, was approximately $11.6 billion, computed by reference to the price of $44.77 per share, the price at which the common equity was last sold on August 30, 2008, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange-Composite Index. (For purposes of this calculation all of the registrant's directors and executive officers are deemed affiliates of the registrant.)
As of April 27, 2009, the registrant had 416,280,233 shares of its Common Stock issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement dated May 12, 2009 (to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the registrant's fiscal year-end of February 28, 2009), for the regular meeting of shareholders to be held on June 24, 2009 ("Proxy Statement"), are incorporated by reference into Part III.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), provide a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their companies. With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements and may be identified by the use of words such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "foresee," "plan," "project," "outlook," and other words and terms of similar meaning. Such statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. A variety of factors could cause our future results to differ materially from the anticipated results expressed in such forward-looking statements. Readers should review Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, general domestic and foreign economic conditions, acquisitions and development of new businesses, product availability, new product introductions, sales volumes, the promotional activity of our competitors, profit margins, weather, foreign currency fluctuation, availability of suitable real estate locations, disaster recovery response times, and the impact of labor markets on our overall profitability, among other things, could cause our future results to differ materially from those projected in any such forward-looking statements.
BEST BUY FISCAL 2009 FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Description of Business
Unless the context otherwise requires, the use of the terms "Best Buy," "we," "us" and "our" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refers to Best Buy Co., Inc. and, as applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries. We are a specialty retailer of consumer electronics, home office products, entertainment software, appliances and related services. We operate retail stores and Web sites under a variety of brand names such as Best Buy (BestBuy.com, BestBuy.ca, BestBuy.com.cn, espanol.BestBuy.com, BestBuyMobile.com), The Carphone Warehouse (CarphoneWarehouse.com), Five Star (Five-Star.cn), Future Shop (FutureShop.ca), Geek Squad (GeekSquad.com and GeekSquad.ca), Magnolia Audio Video (MagnoliaAV.com), Napster (Napster.com), Pacific Sales (PacificSales.com), The Phone House (PhoneHouse.com) and Speakeasy (Speakeasy.net). References to our Web site addresses do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the Web sites.
Our vision is to make life fun and easy for consumers. Our business strategy is to treat customers as unique individuals, engaging and energizing our employees to serve them, and meeting their needs with end-to-end solutions, while maximizing overall profitability. We believe we offer consumers meaningful advantages in store environment, multi-channel shopping, product value, product selection, and a variety of in-store and in-home services related to the merchandise we offer, all of which advance our objectives of enhancing our business model, gaining market share and improving profitability.
Information About Our Segments
During fiscal 2009, we operated two reportable segments: Domestic and International. The Domestic segment is comprised of the store, call center and online operations in all states, districts and territories of the U.S. operating under the brand names Best Buy, Best Buy Mobile, Geek Squad, Magnolia Audio Video, Napster, Pacific Sales and Speakeasy. U.S. Best Buy stores offer a wide variety of consumer electronics, home office products, entertainment software, appliances and related services. Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores offer a wide selection of mobile phones, accessories and related services in a small-format store. Geek Squad provides residential and commercial product repair, support and installation services. Magnolia Audio Video stores offer high-end audio and video products and related services. Napster is an online provider of digital music. Pacific Sales stores offer high-end home-improvement products including primarily appliances, consumer electronics and related services. Speakeasy provides broadband, voice, data and information technology services to small businesses.
The International segment is comprised of: (i) all Canada store, call center and online operations, operating under the brand names Best Buy, Best Buy Mobile, Future Shop and Geek Squad; (ii) all Europe store, call center and online operations, operating under the brand names The Carphone Warehouse, The Phone House and Geek Squad; (iii) all China store, call center and online operations, operating under the brand names Best Buy, Geek Squad and Five Star and (iv) all Mexico store operations, operating under the brand names Best Buy and Geek Squad. Our International segment offers products and services similar to that of our U.S. Best Buy stores. However, Best Buy Canada stores do not carry appliances and Best Buy China stores and Five Star stores do not carry entertainment software. Further, our store format and offerings in Europe are similar to our Best Buy Mobile format and offerings in the U.S., primarily offering mobile phones and related accessories and services.
Financial information about our segments is included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Note 11, Segment and Geographic Information, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Domestic Segment
We were incorporated in the state of Minnesota in 1966 as Sound of Music, Inc. We began as an audio components retailer and, with the introduction of the videocassette recorder in the early 1980s, expanded into video products. In 1983, we changed our name to Best Buy Co., Inc. and began using mass-merchandising techniques, which included offering a wider variety of products and operating stores under a "superstore" concept. In 1989, we dramatically changed our method of retailing by introducing a self-service, noncommissioned,
4
discount-style store concept designed to give the customer a variety of brands and more control over the purchasing process.
In fiscal 2000, we established our first online shopping site, BestBuy.com. Our "clicks-and-mortar" strategy is designed to empower consumers to research and purchase products seamlessly, either online or in our retail stores. Our online shopping sites offer expanded assortments in all of our principal revenue categories.
In fiscal 2001, we acquired Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. a Seattle-based, high-end retailer of audio and video products and services to access an upscale customer segment. During fiscal 2004, Magnolia Hi-Fi began doing business as Magnolia Audio Video.
In fiscal 2003, we acquired Geek Squad Inc. Geek Squad provides residential and commercial repair, support and installation services. We acquired Geek Squad to further our plans of providing technology support services to customers. Geek Squad service is available in all Best Buy stores, as well as in six stand-alone stores in the U.S. Our goal is to build Geek Squad into one of the largest multi-national providers of residential and commercial product repair, support and installation services.
In fiscal 2005, we opened our first Magnolia Home Theater store-within-a-store experience in a U.S. Best Buy store. We believe Magnolia Home Theater with its high-end brands, home-like displays and specially trained employees offers a unique solution for our customers. The Magnolia Home Theater store- within-a-store experience was in 353 U.S. Best Buy stores at the end of fiscal 2009.
In fiscal 2005, we also began converting U.S. Best Buy stores to our customer centricity operating model and we completed this transition in fiscal 2007. These stores offer variations in product assortments, staffing, promotions and store design, and are focused on key customer segments. The stores tailor their store merchandising, staffing, marketing and presentation to address specific customer groups. Originally, these customer groups included affluent professional males, young entertainment enthusiasts who appreciate a digital lifestyle, upscale suburban mothers, families who are practical technology adopters and small businesses. In fiscal 2007, we evolved our customer centricity segmentation to address the needs of customer lifestyle groups, rather than specific customer groups. Our stores now focus on lifestyles such as affluent suburban families, trend-setting urban dwellers, and the closely knit families of Middle America.
In fiscal 2007, we acquired Pacific Sales Kitchen and Bath Centers, Inc. ("Pacific Sales"). Pacific Sales specializes in the sale of ultra-premium and mass-premium kitchen appliances, plumbing fixtures and home entertainment products, with a focus on builders and remodelers. We acquired Pacific Sales to enhance our ability to grow with an affluent customer base and premium brands using a proven and successful showroom format. With minimal changes to the existing store format, we expect to increase the number of stores over time in order to capitalize on the high-end segment of the U.S. home market.
In fiscal 2007, we developed the Best Buy Mobile concept through a management consulting agreement with The Carphone Warehouse Group PLC ("CPW") and test marketed five stand-alone stores located in New York. Best Buy Mobile seeks to satisfy the needs of all our customer lifestyle groups by providing a comprehensive assortment of mobile phones, accessories and related services offered by experienced sales personnel in all U.S. Best Buy stores and eight Best Buy Canada stores, as well as 38 stand-alone stores at the end of fiscal 2009.
In fiscal 2008, we acquired Speakeasy Inc. ("Speakeasy"). Speakeasy provides broadband, voice, data and information technology services. We believe our acquisition of Speakeasy will generate synergies by providing new technology solutions for our existing and future customers.
In fiscal 2009, we acquired Napster, Inc. ("Napster"). We believe Napster provides one of the most comprehensive and easy-to-use digital download music offerings in the industry. We also believe that the combined capabilities of our two companies will allow us to build stronger relationships with customers and expand the number of subscribers.
5
The following table lists by brand name the number of stores, total square footage and average revenue per store in our Domestic segment at the end of fiscal 2009:
Store Brand |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
Total Square Footage (in millions) |
Fiscal 2009 Average Revenue per Store (in millions) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Buy |
1,023 | 39.9 | $ | 34.2 | ||||||
Best Buy Mobile |
38 | 0.06 | 1.1 | |||||||
Pacific Sales |
34 | 0.92 | 12.0 | |||||||
Magnolia Audio Video |
6 | 0.08 | 7.0 | |||||||
Geek Squad |
6 | 0.01 | 0.2 |
International Segment
Our International segment was established in connection with our acquisition of Canada-based Future Shop Ltd. ("Future Shop") in fiscal 2002. The Future Shop acquisition provided us with an opportunity to increase revenue, gain market share and leverage our operational expertise in consumer electronics retailing. Since the acquisition, we have continued to build on Future Shop's position as the leading consumer electronics retailer in Canada.
During fiscal 2003, we launched our dual-branding strategy in Canada by introducing the Best Buy brand. The dual-branding strategy allows us to retain Future Shop's brand equity and attract more customers by offering a choice of store experiences. As we expand the presence of Best Buy stores in Canada, we expect to gain continued operating efficiencies by leveraging our capital investments, supply chain management, advertising, merchandising and administrative functions. Our goal is to reach differentiated customers with each brand by giving them the unique shopping experiences they desire. The primary differences between our two principal brands in Canada are:
In-store experience The customer's interaction with store employees is different at each of the two brands. Future Shop stores have predominantly commissioned sales associates who take a more proactive role in assisting customers. Through their expertise and attentiveness, the sales associate drives the transaction. In contrast, Best Buy Canada store employees, like employees in U.S. Best Buy stores, are noncommissioned, and the stores offer more interactive displays and grab-and-go merchandising. This design allows customers to drive the transaction as they experience the products themselves, with store employees available to demonstrate and explain product features.
Products and services Only Future Shop stores carry appliances. In addition, Geek Squad service is available in all Best Buy Canada stores, but is not available in Future Shop stores.
Store size At the end of fiscal 2009, the average Future Shop store was approximately 26,700 square feet, compared with an average of approximately 32,500 square feet for Best Buy Canada stores. Best Buy Canada stores generally have wider aisles, as well as more square footage devoted to entertainment software.
In fiscal 2007, we acquired a 75% interest in Jiangsu Five Star Appliance Co., Ltd. ("Five Star"), one of China's largest appliance and consumer electronics retailers. We made the investment in Five Star to further our international growth plans, to increase our knowledge of Chinese customers and to obtain an immediate retail presence in China. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed the acquisition of the remaining 25% interest in Five Star.
In fiscal 2007, we opened our first Best Buy China store, located in Shanghai. In fiscal 2009, we furthered our expansion of Best Buy in China by opening an additional four stores.
In fiscal 2009, we acquired a 50% share in Best Buy Europe Distributions Limited ("Best Buy Europe"). Best Buy Europe is a venture with CPW, consisting of CPW's former retail and distribution business with over 2,400 The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House stores, online channels as well as device insurance operations and mobile and fixed-line telecommunication services. The transaction also included CPW's economic interest in both Best Buy Mobile in the U.S. and the Geek Squad in the U.K. and Spain. We made the investment in Best Buy Europe to further our international growth plans, to increase our knowledge of European customers and to obtain an immediate retail presence in Europe. We plan to launch large-format Best Buy-branded stores and related online channels in the European market beginning in fiscal
6
2011. The primary features of Best Buy Europe's small-format stores are:
In-store experience Stores have predominantly commissioned sales associates who provide independent advice on the best service and hardware suited to each customer. The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House stores offer interactive displays which allow customers to experience the products themselves, with store employees available to demonstrate and explain product features. Most phone sales require an in-store registration process between the customer and the mobile network operator facilitated by our employees via our systems. Typically, credit checks and registration carried out in conjunction with the mobile network operator systems are on-the-spot, and the customer can leave the store with a fully active phone and service contract. There is also grab-and-go merchandising mainly in the form of mobile phone, laptop and gaming accessories.
Products and services Best Buy Europe primarily sells mobile phone connections. A connection is defined as the sale and activation of mobile phone service, and it is usually combined with the sale of a subsidized handset. Our stores also sell mobile phones without a connection. Connections are either subscription-based, for which the customer commits to a contracted term with a mobile network operator, typically for 12 to 24 months, or pre-pay, for which a customer pays for usage but has no ongoing obligation. In addition, we sell mobile phone accessories. We recently expanded our product portfolio to include laptops, mobile broadband connections, gaming consoles, accessories and software. Geek Squad service is available in certain stores in the U.K. and Spain.
Best Buy Europe also offers a range of insurance products to its customers, providing protection primarily for the replacement of a lost, stolen or damaged handset. Finally, Best Buy Europe offers mobile telecommunication services in Germany and the U.K., fixed-line telecommunication services in Spain and Switzerland, and billing management services.
Store size At the end of fiscal 2009, the average store for The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House was approximately 600 retail square feet.
In fiscal 2009, we expanded our Best Buy Mobile operations to Canada by opening three stand-alone stores and eight store-within-a-store experiences in our Best Buy stores and opened our first Best Buy Mexico store, located in Mexico City.
The following lists by geographic location the number of stores, total square footage and average revenue per store in our International segment at the end of fiscal 2009:
Country |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
Total Square Footage (in millions) |
Fiscal 2009 Average Revenue per Store (in millions) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Europe(1) |
2,465 | 1.5 | $ | 0.9 | ||||||
Canada(2) |
200 | 5.6 | 28.1 | |||||||
China(3) |
169 | 6.2 | 9.8 | |||||||
Mexico(4) |
1 | 0.1 | 3.9 |
We consolidate the financial results of our Europe, China and Mexico operations on a two-month lag. Consistent with such consolidation, the financial and non-financial information presented in this filing relative to our Europe, China and Mexico operations is also presented on a two-month lag.
Operations
Domestic Segment
U.S. Best Buy store operations are organized into eight territories. Each territory is divided into districts and is under the management of a retail field officer who oversees store performance through district managers. District managers monitor store operations and meet regularly with store managers to discuss merchandising, new product introductions, sales promotions, customer loyalty programs, employee satisfaction surveys and store operating performance. Advertising, merchandise purchasing and pricing, as well as inventory policies, are generally controlled centrally.
7
U.S. Best Buy stores are generally open 80 hours per week, seven days a week, with extended holiday hours. A typical store is staffed by one general manager and four assistant managers. The average staff per store in fiscal 2009 was approximately 99 employees, including full-time, part-time and seasonal employees, and varied by store depending on sales volumes. We have developed for the U.S. Best Buy stores a standard operating platform ("SOP") that includes procedures for inventory management, transaction processing, customer relations, store administration, product sales and services, and merchandise display. All U.S. Best Buy stores generally operate in the same manner under the SOP adjusted to local customer needs.
U.S. Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores are generally open 73 hours a week, seven days a week, with extended holiday hours. During fiscal 2009, a typical store was staffed with one general manager, and an average of six to seven additional sales associates, including full-time, part-time and seasonal employees, which varied depending on the sales volume of each respective store.
Pacific Sales stores are typically managed by a store manager who also sells appliances. Pacific Sales stores are generally open 40 hours per week, five days a week. Depending on an individual store's volume and product offerings, store staffing includes approximately nine noncommissioned sales personnel and approximately four sales support personnel. Corporate management for Pacific Sales stores generally controls advertising, merchandise purchasing and pricing, as well as inventory policies.
Magnolia Audio Video stores are typically managed by a store manager and an audio/video sales manager. Magnolia Audio Video stores are generally open 72 hours per week, seven days a week. Depending on an individual store's volume and product offerings, store staffing includes eight to 20 commissioned sales personnel and one to three hourly personnel. Corporate management for Magnolia Audio Video stores generally controls advertising, merchandise purchasing and pricing, as well as inventory policies.
International Segment
The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House stores in Europe are significantly smaller than our Best Buy stores, with approximately 9,000 full-time and part-time sales associates across 2,465 Best Buy Europe stores. The stores are generally staffed with a general manager and three to four sales associates. Europe stores are generally open 60 to 80 hours per week, seven days a week. Area managers are responsible for several stores within a particular region and regional managers manage regions within a particular geography. Advertising, merchandise purchasing and pricing, and inventory policies for our stores are controlled by corporate management in each respective local market. Meetings involving store management and corporate management are held on a regular basis to review operating results and to establish future objectives.
Canada store operations are organized to support two brands. Each brand has national management that closely monitors store operations and meets regularly with store managers to review management and staff training programs, customer feedback and requests, store operating performance and other matters. Meetings involving store management, product managers, and advertising, financial and administrative staff, as well as senior management, are held quarterly to review operating results and to establish future objectives.
Canada stores are generally open 60 to 75 hours per week, seven days a week. An average Future Shop store is staffed by a general manager, an operations manager, one to four department managers and 50 to 150 sales associates, including full-time and part-time sales associates. An average Best Buy Canada store is staffed with a general manager; assistant managers for operations, merchandising, inventory, sales and services; and 80 to 110 sales associates, including full-time and part-time sales associates. The number of sales associates is dependent upon store size and sales volume.
Canada stores use a standardized operating system that includes procedures for inventory management, transaction processing, customer relations, store administration, staff training, performance appraisals and merchandise display. Advertising, merchandise purchasing and pricing, and inventory policies are centrally controlled.
Five Star stores are generally open 77 to 84 hours per week, seven days a week. A typical Five Star store is staffed by a general manager, six to 10 department managers, 27 to 100 full-time sales associates, and 50 to 200 vendor employees who sell products. Corporate management at Five Star centrally controls advertising, merchandise purchasing and pricing and inventory policies
8
for major brand products, while management for individual regions control these operations for local brands. Meetings involving store management and corporate management are held on a regular basis to review operating results and establish future objectives.
Our Best Buy China stores employ an operating model similar to Best Buy stores in the U.S. and Canada. Our Best Buy China stores are staffed with a general manager; assistant managers for operations, merchandising, inventory and sales; and approximately 181 sales associates, including full-time and part-time sales associates. Advertising, merchandise purchasing, pricing and inventory policies for our Best Buy China stores are centrally controlled by corporate management. Meetings involving store management and corporate management are held on a regular basis to review operating results and to establish future objectives.
Our Best Buy Mexico store employs an operating model similar to that used in our U.S. Best Buy stores.
Merchandise and Services
Domestic Segment
U.S. Best Buy stores have offerings in six revenue categories: consumer electronics, home office, entertainment software, appliances, services and other. Consumer electronics consists of video and audio products. Video products include televisions, digital cameras and accessories, digital camcorders and accessories and DVD players. Audio products consists of MP3 players and accessories, navigation products, home theater audio systems and components, and mobile electronics such as car stereo and satellite radio products. The home office revenue category includes notebook and desktop computers, monitors, mobile phones and related subscription service commissions, hard drives, networking equipment and accessories. The entertainment software revenue category includes video gaming hardware and software, DVDs, CDs, digital downloads and computer software. The appliances revenue category includes major appliances as well as small electrics. The services revenue category consists primarily of service contracts, extended warranties, computer-related services, product repair, and delivery and installation for home theater, mobile audio and appliances. The other revenue category includes non-core offerings such as snacks and beverages.
U.S. Best Buy Mobile offerings are in our home office revenue category. Revenue from U.S. Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores is primarily derived from mobile phone hardware, subscription service commissions and associated mobile phone accessories.
Pacific Sales stores have offerings in three revenue categories: appliances, consumer electronics and services. Appliances consists of major appliances, evenly split between high-end and mass-market premium brands, and plumbing, which consists of kitchen and bath fixtures including faucets, sinks, toilets and bath tubs. Consumer electronics consists of video and audio products, including televisions and home theater systems. The services revenue category consists primarily of repair services.
Magnolia Audio Video stores have offerings in two revenue categories: consumer electronics and services. Consumer electronics consists of video and audio products. Video products include televisions, DVD players and accessories. Audio products include home theater audio systems and components, mobile electronics and accessories. The services revenue category consists primarily of home theater system installation as well as service contracts and extended warranties.
International Segment
The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House stores in Europe have offerings in two revenue categories: home office and services. Home office consists primarily of mobile phones and related accessories as well as subscription service commissions. Services consists of device insurance operations, mobile and fixed-line telecommunication services, billing management services and Geek Squad repair services.
Best Buy Canada and Future Shop stores have offerings in five revenue categories: consumer electronics, home office, entertainment software, services and other, and for Future Shop only, a sixth revenue category, appliances. Consumer electronics consists of video and audio products. Video products include televisions, digital cameras and accessories, DVD players and digital camcorders and accessories. Audio products encompass MP3 players, home theater audio systems and components, navigation products, mobile electronics and accessories. The home office revenue category includes desktop and notebook computers and their respective accessories, monitors, hard drives, printers and mobile phones and related accessories. The entertainment
9
software revenue category includes video game hardware and software, DVDs, CDs and computer software. The appliances revenue category includes major appliances as well as small electrics. The services revenue category includes service contracts, extended warranties, repair, delivery, computer-related services and home theater installation. The other revenue category includes non-core offerings such as snacks and beverages.
Although Best Buy Canada and Future Shop stores offer similar revenue categories (except for appliances), there are differences in product brands and depth of selection within revenue categories. On average, approximately 29% of the product assortment (excluding entertainment software) overlaps between the two store brands.
Best Buy China and Five Star stores have offerings in four revenue categories: appliances, consumer electronics, home office and services. Our China stores do not carry entertainment software. Appliances includes major appliances, air conditioners, small electrics and housewares. The consumer electronics revenue category consists of video and audio products, including televisions, digital cameras, MP3 players and accessories. The home office revenue category includes desktop and notebook computers, mobile phones, traditional telephones and accessories. The services revenue category includes computer support services.
Our Best Buy Mexico store has offerings in six revenue categories: consumer electronics, home office, entertainment software, appliances, services and other, with products and offerings similar to our U.S. Best Buy stores.
Distribution
Domestic Segment
Generally, U.S. Best Buy stores' and U.S. Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores' merchandise, except for major appliances and large-screen televisions, is shipped directly from manufacturers to our distribution centers located throughout the U.S. Major appliances and large-screen televisions are shipped to satellite warehouses in each major market. U.S. Best Buy stores are dependent upon the distribution centers for inventory storage and shipment of most merchandise. However, in order to meet release dates for selected products and to improve inventory management, certain merchandise is shipped directly to our stores from manufacturers and distributors. On average, U.S. Best Buy stores receive product shipments two or three times per week, with additional shipments during periods of high revenue volume. Contract carriers ship merchandise from the distribution centers to stores. Generally, online merchandise sales are either picked up at U.S. Best Buy stores or fulfilled directly to customers through our distribution centers.
We receive and warehouse Pacific Sales stores' merchandise at two distribution centers in California. Most merchandise is fulfilled directly to customers through our distribution centers.
We receive and warehouse Magnolia Audio Video stores' merchandise at U.S. Best Buy distribution centers. Merchandise is delivered to stores an average of three times per week pursuant to an in-house distribution system.
International Segment
The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House stores' merchandise is shipped directly from our suppliers to our distribution centers across Europe. Stores hold the immediate stock requirement and the distribution center in each market holds additional inventory. Our stores typically receive product shipments three to four times per week, with additional shipments during periods of high revenue volume.
Our Canada stores' merchandise is shipped directly from our suppliers to our distribution centers in British Columbia and Ontario. Our Canada stores are dependent upon the distribution centers for inventory storage and shipment of most merchandise. However, in order to meet release dates for selected products and to improve inventory management, certain merchandise is shipped directly to our stores from manufacturers and distributors. Our Canada stores typically receive product shipments twice per week, with additional shipments during periods of high revenue volume. Contract carriers ship merchandise from the distribution centers to stores.
We receive our Five Star stores' merchandise at more than 50 distribution centers and warehouses located throughout the Five Star retail chain, the largest of which is located in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province. Our Five Star stores are dependent upon the distribution centers for inventory storage and shipment of most merchandise. Most merchandise is fulfilled directly to customers through our distribution centers and warehouses.
10
Our Best Buy China stores' merchandise is shipped directly from our suppliers to our distribution center in Shanghai. Our Best Buy China stores are dependent upon the distribution center for inventory storage and shipment of most merchandise. However, in order to meet release dates for selected products and to improve inventory management, certain merchandise is shipped directly to our stores from manufacturers and distributors. In certain circumstances, merchandise is shipped directly to our customers from manufacturers and distributors. Our Best Buy China stores typically receive product shipments three to four times per week, with additional shipments during periods of high revenue volume.
Our Best Buy Mexico store has distribution methods similar to that of our U.S. Best Buy stores.
Suppliers
Our strategy depends, in part, upon our ability to offer customers a broad selection of name-brand products and, therefore, our success is dependent upon satisfactory and stable supplier relationships. In fiscal 2009, our 20 largest suppliers accounted for just under half of the merchandise we purchased, with five suppliers Sony, Hewlett-Packard, Samsung, Apple, and Toshiba representing 28% of total merchandise purchased. The loss of or disruption in supply from any one of these major suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and earnings. We generally do not have long-term written contracts with our major suppliers that would require them to continue supplying us with merchandise. We have no indication that any of our suppliers plan to discontinue selling us merchandise. We have not experienced significant difficulty in maintaining satisfactory sources of supply, and we generally expect that adequate sources of supply will continue to exist for the types of merchandise we sell.
We operate a global sourcing office in China in order to purchase products directly from manufacturers in Asia. This office has improved our product sourcing efficiency and provides us with the capability to offer private-label products that complement our existing product assortment. In the future, we expect purchases from our global sourcing office to increase as a percentage of total purchases. We also believe that the expected increase in our global sourcing volumes will help drive gross profit rate improvements by lowering our overall product cost.
Store Development
The addition of new stores has played, and we believe will continue to play, a significant role in our growth and success. Our store development program has historically focused on entering new markets; adding stores within existing markets; and relocating, remodeling and expanding existing stores in order to offer new products and services to our customers. During fiscal 2009, we opened 285 new stores in addition to acquiring 2,414 Best Buy Europe stores, relocated 34 stores and closed 67 stores. We offer Geek Squad support services in all Best Buy stores. At February 28, 2009, we offered the Best Buy Mobile store-within-a-store experience in all U.S. Best Buy stores as well as eight Best Buy Canada stores.
The following table reconciles U.S. Best Buy stores open at the beginning and end of each of the last five fiscal years:
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward |
NA | NA | 608 | |||||||
2005 |
61 | (1 | ) | 668 | ||||||
2006 |
74 | | 742 | |||||||
2007 |
80 | | 822 | |||||||
2008 |
101 | | 923 | |||||||
2009 |
100 | | 1,023 |
The following table reconciles U.S. Best Buy Mobile stores open at the beginning and end of each of the last three fiscal years (the first Best Buy Mobile stand-alone store was opened in fiscal 2007):
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward |
NA | NA | NA | |||||||
2007 |
5 | | 5 | |||||||
2008 |
4 | | 9 | |||||||
2009 |
32 | (3 | ) | 38 |
11
The following table reconciles Pacific Sales stores open at the beginning and end of each of the last three fiscal years:
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward(1) |
NA | NA | 14 | |||||||
2007 |
| | 14 | |||||||
2008 |
5 | | 19 | |||||||
2009 |
15 | | 34 |
The following table reconciles Magnolia Audio Video stores open at the beginning and end of each of the last five fiscal years:
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward |
NA | NA | 22 | |||||||
2005 |
| (2 | ) | 20 | ||||||
2006 |
| | 20 | |||||||
2007 |
| | 20 | |||||||
2008 |
| (7 | ) | 13 | ||||||
2009 |
| (7 | ) | 6 |
The following table reconciles U.S. Geek Squad stores open at the beginning and end of each of the last five fiscal years:
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward |
NA | NA | 1 | |||||||
2005 |
5 | | 6 | |||||||
2006 |
7 | (1 | ) | 12 | ||||||
2007 |
| | 12 | |||||||
2008 |
| (5 | ) | 7 | ||||||
2009 |
| (1 | ) | 6 |
The following table reconciles The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House stores open at the beginning and end of the last fiscal year:
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward(1) |
NA | NA | 2,414 | |||||||
2009 |
105 | (54 | ) | 2,465 |
The following table reconciles Future Shop stores open at the beginning and end of each of the last five fiscal years:
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward |
NA | NA | 108 | |||||||
2005 |
6 | | 114 | |||||||
2006 |
5 | (1 | ) | 118 | ||||||
2007 |
3 | | 121 | |||||||
2008 |
10 | | 131 | |||||||
2009 |
9 | (1 | ) | 139 |
The following table reconciles Best Buy Canada stores open at the beginning and end of each of the last five fiscal years:
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward |
NA | NA | 19 | |||||||
2005 |
11 | | 30 | |||||||
2006 |
14 | | 44 | |||||||
2007 |
3 | | 47 | |||||||
2008 |
4 | | 51 | |||||||
2009 |
7 | | 58 |
The following table reconciles Best Buy Mobile Canada stores open at the beginning and end of the last fiscal year (the first Best Buy Mobile Canada store was opened in fiscal 2009):
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward |
NA | NA | NA | |||||||
2009 |
3 | | 3 |
The following table reconciles Five Star stores open at the beginning and end of each of the last three fiscal years:
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward(1) |
NA | NA | 131 | |||||||
2007 |
8 | (4 | ) | 135 | ||||||
2008 |
31 | (6 | ) | 160 | ||||||
2009 |
9 | (5 | ) | 164 |
12
The following table reconciles Best Buy China stores open at the beginning and end of each of the last three fiscal years (the first Best Buy China store was opened in fiscal 2007):
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward |
NA | NA | NA | |||||||
2007 |
1 | | 1 | |||||||
2008 |
| | 1 | |||||||
2009 |
4 | | 5 |
The following table reconciles the Best Buy Mexico store open at the beginning and end of the fiscal year (the first Best Buy Mexico store was opened in fiscal 2009):
Fiscal Year |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal Year |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance forward |
NA | NA | NA | |||||||
2009 |
1 | | 1 |
During fiscal 2010, we expect to open approximately 65 net new stores in the U.S., Europe, Canada, China, Mexico and Turkey. Most of the new stores will be opened in markets where we already have stores, leveraging our infrastructure and making shopping more convenient for our customers. In the U.S., we anticipate opening 40 to 50 new Best Buy stores. In Canada, we expect to open approximately three Future Shop stores and four Best Buy stores. In Europe, we expect to open and close approximately the same number of The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House stores. In China, we plan to open 12 Five Star stores and close five Five Star stores. We also expect to open one additional Best Buy store in China and five Best Buy stores in Mexico in fiscal 2010. Finally, we anticipate extending our international presence by opening our first store in Turkey in the second half of fiscal 2010.
Intellectual Property
We believe we own and have the rights to use valuable intellectual property including trademarks, service marks and tradenames, some of which are of material importance to our business, such as "Best Buy," "Best Buy Mobile," "The Carphone Warehouse," "Dynex," "Five Star," "Future Shop," "Geek Squad," "Insignia," "Magnolia Audio Video," "Napster," "Pacific Sales," "The Phone House," "Rocketfish," "Speakeasy" and the "Yellow Tag" logo. Some of our intellectual property is the subject of numerous U.S. and foreign trademark and service mark registrations. Our trademark and service mark registrations in the U.S. generally have 10-year renewable terms. We believe our intellectual property has significant value and is an important factor in the marketing of our company, our stores and our Web sites. We also believe we own valuable intellectual property for which we have patents pending. We are not aware of any facts that could negatively impact our continuing use of any of our intellectual property.
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("GAAP"), our balance sheets include the cost of acquired intellectual property. The only material acquired intellectual properties presently included in our consolidated balance sheets are the tradenames The Carphone Warehouse, Five Star, Future Shop, Napster, Pacific Sales, The Phone House and Speakeasy, which collectively had a total carrying value of $173 million at the end of fiscal 2009. The values of these tradenames are based on the continuation of the brands. We currently classify these tradenames as indefinite-lived intangible assets, except for The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House brands, which have definite lives. If we were to abandon any of our brands or if the expected cash flows associated with these brands were to materially decrease, we could incur an impairment charge based on the then-carrying value of the associated tradename.
Seasonality
Our business, like that of many retailers, is seasonal. Historically, we have realized more of our revenue and earnings in the fiscal fourth quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Europe and Canada, than in any other fiscal quarter.
Working Capital
We fund our business operations through a combination of available cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and cash flows generated from operations. In addition, our revolving credit facilities are available for additional working capital needs or investment opportunities.
13
Customers
We do not have a significant concentration of sales with any individual customer and, therefore, the loss of any one customer would not have a material impact on our business. No single customer has accounted for 10% or more of our total revenue.
Backlog
Our stores, call centers and online shopping sites do not have a material amount of backlog orders.
Government Contracts
No material portion of our business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of any government or government agencies or affiliates.
Competition
Our stores compete against other consumer electronics retailers, specialty home office retailers, mass merchants, online retailers, home-improvement superstores and a number of direct-to-consumer alternatives. Our stores also compete against independent dealers, regional chain discount stores, wholesale clubs, mobile phone service carriers and other specialty retail stores. Mass merchants continue to increase their assortment of consumer electronics products, primarily those that are less complex to sell, install and operate, and have been expanding their product offerings into higher-end categories. Similarly, large home-improvement retailers are expanding their assortment of appliances. In addition, consumers are increasingly downloading music, entertainment and computer software directly via the Internet.
We believe our store experience, broad product assortment, store formats and brand marketing strategies differentiate us from most competitors by positioning our stores as the preferred destination for new technology and entertainment products in a fun and informative shopping environment. Our stores compete by aggressively advertising and emphasizing a complete product and service solution, value pricing and financing alternatives. In addition, our trained and knowledgeable sales and service staffs allow us to tailor the offerings to meet the needs of our customers.
Research and Development
We have not engaged in any material research and development activities during the past three fiscal years.
Environmental Matters
We are not aware of any federal, state or local provisions which have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, that have materially affected, or will materially affect, our net earnings or competitive position, or have resulted or will result in material capital expenditures. During fiscal 2009, we had no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities and no such material expenditures are anticipated in the foreseeable future.
Number of Employees
At the end of fiscal 2009, we employed approximately 155,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal employees worldwide. We consider our employee relations to be good. In the U.S., we offer our employees a wide array of company-paid benefits, which we believe are competitive relative to others in our industry. In our operations outside the U.S., we offer benefits that may vary from those offered to our U.S. employees due to customary local practices and statutory requirements.
Financial Information About Geographic Areas
We operate two reportable segments: Domestic and International. Financial information regarding the Domestic and International geographic areas is included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Note 11, Segment and Geographic Information, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Available Information
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and its rules and regulations. The Exchange Act requires us to file reports, proxy statements and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Copies of these reports, proxy
14
statements and other information can be read and copied at:
SEC
Public Reference Room
100 F Street N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a Web site that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. These materials may be obtained electronically by accessing the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov.
We make available, free of charge on our Web site, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these documents with, or furnish them to, the SEC. These documents are posted on our Web site at www.BestBuy.com select the "For Our Investors" link and then the "SEC Filings" link.
We also make available, free of charge on our Web site, the Corporate Governance Principles of our Board of Directors ("Board") and our Code of Business Ethics (including any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Business Ethics) adopted by our Board, as well as the charters of the Board's Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Resources Committee, Finance and Investment Policy Committee and Nominating, Corporate Governance and Public Policy Committee. These documents are posted on our Web site at www.BestBuy.com select the "For Our Investors" link and then the "Corporate Governance" link.
Copies of any of the above-referenced documents will also be made available, free of charge, upon written request to:
Best
Buy Co., Inc.
Investor Relations Department
7601 Penn Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423-3645
Described below are certain risks that our management believes are applicable to our business and the industry in which we operate. There may be additional risks that are not presently material or known. You should carefully consider each of the following risks and all other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If any of the events described below occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or access to the capital markets could be materially adversely affected. The following risks could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and from results predicted by forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf related to conditions or events that we anticipate may occur in the future. The following risks should not be construed as an exhaustive list of all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. All forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf are qualified by the risks described below.
Economic conditions in the U.S. and key international markets, a decline in consumer discretionary spending or other conditions may materially adversely impact our operating results.
We sell products and services that consumers may view as discretionary items rather than necessities. As a result, our results of operations tend to be more sensitive to changes in macro-economic conditions that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending. Challenging macro-economic conditions also impact our customers' ability to obtain consumer credit in a timely manner, if at all. Other factors, including consumer confidence, employment levels, interest rates, tax rates, consumer debt levels, and fuel and energy costs could reduce consumer spending or change consumer purchasing habits. In the past fiscal year, many of these factors adversely affected consumer spending and, consequently, our business and results of operations. A continued slowdown in the U.S. or global economy, or an uncertain economic outlook, could materially adversely affect consumer spending habits and our operating results in the future.
The domestic and international political situation also affects consumer confidence. The threat or outbreak of domestic or international terrorism or other hostilities could lead to a decrease in consumer spending. Any of these
15
events and factors could cause a decrease in revenue or an increase in inventory markdowns or certain operating expenses, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations.
If we do not anticipate and respond to changing consumer preferences in a timely manner, our operating results could materially suffer.
Our business depends, in large part, on our ability to successfully introduce new products, services and technologies to consumers, the frequency of such introductions, the level of consumer acceptance, and the related impact on the demand for existing products, services and technologies. Failure to accurately predict constantly changing consumer tastes, preferences, spending patterns and other lifestyle decisions, or to effectively address consumer concerns, could have a material adverse effect on our revenue, results of operations and standing with our customers.
Our results of operations could materially deteriorate if we fail to attract, develop and retain qualified employees.
Our performance is dependent on attracting and retaining qualified employees who are able to meet the wants and needs of our customers. We believe our competitive advantage is providing unique end-to-end solutions for each individual customer, which requires us to have highly trained and engaged employees. Our success depends in part upon our ability to attract, develop and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including store, service and administrative personnel. The turnover rate in the retail industry is high, and qualified individuals of the requisite caliber and number needed to fill these positions may be in short supply in some areas. Our inability to recruit a sufficient number of qualified individuals in the future may delay planned openings of new stores or affect the speed with which we expand initiatives such as our international operations. Delayed store openings, significant increases in employee turnover rates or significant increases in labor costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face strong competition from traditional store-based retailers, Internet businesses and other forms of retail commerce, which could materially adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
The retail business is highly competitive. We compete for customers, employees, locations, products and other important aspects of our business with many other local, regional, national and international retailers. Pressure from our competitors, some of which have a greater market presence and financial resources than we do, could require us to reduce our prices or increase our costs of doing business. As a result of this competition, we may experience lower revenue and/or higher operating costs, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations.
The failure to control our costs and reduce our expense structure could have a material adverse impact on our profitability.
Customer traffic within our stores and overall consumer spending have decreased in the past fiscal year, driven by turmoil in the financial markets and other macro-economic factors, which makes it more challenging for us to maintain or grow our operating income rates. As a result, we must continue to reduce our expense structure to more competitive levels. Any unplanned increases in our labor and benefit rates, advertising and marketing expenses, other store expenses or indirect spending could delay or prevent us from achieving increased profitability or otherwise have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
Our liquidity may be materially adversely affected by the financial crisis in the U.S. and key international markets.
We must have sufficient sources of liquidity to fund our working capital requirements, pay operating expenses, service our outstanding indebtedness and finance investment opportunities. Without sufficient liquidity, we could be forced to curtail our operations or we may not be able to pursue promising business opportunities. The principal sources of our liquidity are funds generated from operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents, and borrowings under credit facilities and other debt financings.
As widely reported, global financial markets have been experiencing extreme disruption in recent months,
16
including, among other things, severely diminished liquidity, constrained credit availability and extreme volatility in securities prices. These market conditions affected, to a degree, our ability to borrow committed portions of our $2.5 billion five-year unsecured revolving credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndication of banks ("Credit Agreement"). Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. ("Lehman CPI"), a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in September 2008, provided a commitment of $180 million under the Credit Agreement. Since September 2008, Lehman CPI has declined requests for funding under the Credit Agreement and no other lender assumed Lehman CPI's obligation to fund. We cannot be certain whether another lender might assume Lehman CPI's commitment or whether one or more other syndicate lenders under the Credit Agreement might also seek bankruptcy protection or otherwise fail to satisfy their financing obligations under the Credit Agreement.
If our sources of liquidity do not satisfy our requirements, we may have to seek additional financing. The availability of financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as economic and market conditions, the availability of credit and our credit ratings, as well as the possibility that lenders could develop a negative perception of us or the retail industry generally. If required, we may not be able to obtain additional financing ,on favorable terms, or at all.
Changes in our credit ratings may limit our access to capital markets and materially increase our borrowing costs.
In fiscal 2009, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. maintained its rating and outlook of our debt securities while Fitch Ratings Ltd. reaffirmed its rating of our debt securities as BBB+ but assigned a negative outlook and Standard & Poor's Ratings Services announced that it had downgraded the rating of our debt securities to BBB- with a stable outlook.
Future downgrades to our long-term credit ratings and outlook could negatively impact our access to the capital markets and the perception of us by lenders and other third parties. Our credit ratings are based upon information furnished by us or obtained by a rating agency from its own sources and is subject to revision, suspension or withdrawal by the rating agency at any time. Rating agencies may review the ratings assigned to us due to developments that are beyond our control.
Any further downgrade to our debt securities will result in higher interest costs for certain of our credit facilities and other debt financings, and could result in higher interest costs on future financings. Further, in the event of such a downgrade, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing, if necessary, on favorable terms, or at all.
Our growth is dependent on the success of our strategies.
Our growth is dependent on our ability to identify, develop and execute strategies. While we believe customer centricity and the pursuit of international growth opportunities will enable us to grow our business, misjudgments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our growth strategy includes expanding our business by opening stores both in existing markets and in new markets.
Our future growth is dependent, in part, on our ability to build, buy or lease new stores. We compete with other retailers and businesses for suitable locations for our stores. Local land use, local zoning issues, environmental regulations and other regulations applicable to the types of stores we desire to construct may impact our ability to find suitable locations, and also influence the cost of building, buying and leasing our stores. We also may have difficulty negotiating real estate purchase agreements and leases on acceptable terms. Failure to manage effectively these and other similar factors will affect our ability to build, buy and lease new stores, which may have a material adverse effect on our future profitability.
We seek to expand our business in existing markets in order to attain a greater overall market share. Because our stores typically draw customers from their local areas, a new store may draw customers away from our nearby existing stores and may cause customer traffic and comparable store sales performance to decline at those existing stores.
We also intend to open stores in new markets. The risks associated with entering a new market include difficulties in attracting customers where there is a lack of customer familiarity with our brands, our lack of familiarity with local customer preferences, seasonal differences in the market
17
and our ability to obtain the necessary governmental approvals. In addition, entry into new markets may bring us into competition with new competitors or with existing competitors with a large, established market presence. We cannot ensure that our new stores will be profitably deployed. As a result, our future profitability may be materially adversely affected.
Failure in our pursuit or execution of new business ventures, strategic alliances and acquisitions could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Our growth strategy includes expansion via new business ventures, strategic alliances and acquisitions. Assessing a potential growth opportunity involves extensive due diligence. However, the amount of information we can obtain about a potential growth opportunity may be limited, and we can give no assurance that new business ventures, strategic alliances and acquisitions will positively affect our financial performance or will perform as planned. Integrating new businesses, stores and concepts can be a difficult task. Cultural differences in some markets into which we expand or into which we introduce new retail concepts may result in customers in those markets being less receptive than originally anticipated. These types of transactions may divert our capital and our management's attention from other business issues and opportunities. We may not be able to successfully assimilate or integrate companies that we acquire, including their personnel, financial systems, distribution, operations and general operating procedures. We may also encounter challenges in achieving appropriate internal control over financial reporting in connection with the integration of an acquired company. If we fail to assimilate or integrate acquired companies successfully, our business and operating results could suffer materially.
Failure to protect the integrity and security of our customers' information could expose us to litigation and materially damage our standing with our customers.
The use of individually identifiable data by our business and our business associates is regulated at the state, federal and international levels. Increasing costs associated with information security such as increased investment in technology, the costs of compliance with consumer protection laws and costs resulting from consumer fraud could cause our business and results of operations to suffer materially. Additionally, the success of our online operations depends upon the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks, including the use of cashless payments. While we have taken significant steps to protect customer and confidential information, there can be no assurance that advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments will prevent the compromise of our customer transaction processing capabilities and personal data. If any such compromise of our security were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, operating results and financial condition. Any such compromise may materially increase the costs we incur to protect against such information security breaches and could subject us to additional legal risk.
Risks associated with the vendors from whom our products are sourced could materially adversely affect our revenue and gross profit.
The products we sell are sourced from a wide variety of domestic and international vendors. Global sourcing is an important part of our business and positively affects our financial performance. Our 20 largest suppliers account for just under half of the merchandise we purchase. If any of our key vendors fails to supply us with products or continue to develop new technologies, we may not be able to meet the demands of our customers and our revenue could materially decline. We require all of our vendors to comply with applicable laws, including labor and environmental laws, and otherwise be certified as meeting our required vendor standards of conduct. Our ability to find qualified vendors who meet our standards and supply products in a timely and efficient manner is a significant challenge, especially with respect to goods sourced from outside the U.S. Political or financial instability, merchandise quality issues, product safety concerns, trade restrictions, work stoppages, tariffs, foreign currency exchange rates, transportation capacity and costs, inflation, outbreak of pandemics and other factors relating to foreign trade are beyond our control. These and other issues affecting our vendors could materially adversely affect our revenue and gross profit.
We are subject to certain regulatory and legal developments which could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Our regulatory and legal environment exposes us to complex compliance and litigation risks that could
18
materially adversely affect our operations and financial results. The most significant compliance and litigation risks we face are:
Defending against lawsuits and other proceedings may involve significant expense and divert management's attention and resources from other matters.
Changes to the National Labor Relations Act could have a material adverse impact on our business.
The Employee Free Choice Act ("EFCA") is pending before the U.S. Congress. The EFCA, also referred to as the "card check" bill, if passed in its current or similar form, could significantly change the nature of labor relations in the U.S. Specifically, it would impact how union elections and contract negotiations are conducted. The pending or similar legislation could make it easier for unions to be formed, and employers of newly unionized employees may face mandatory, binding arbitration of labor scheduling, costs and standards, which could increase the costs of doing business.
At February 28, 2009, we had 1,107 stores operating in the U.S. None of the employees in those stores were represented by labor unions or worked under collective bargaining agreements. Passage of the pending or similar legislation could materially adversely affect our results of operations.
Regulatory developments in the U.S. could impact our private-label credit card financing offers and have a material adverse impact on our revenue and profitability.
We offer private-label credit cards in the U.S. through third-party financial institutions that manage and directly extend credit to our customers. Cardholders who choose the private-label card can receive low- or no-interest promotional financing on qualifying purchases. If a customer utilizes a deferred interest financing offer and fails to comply with the terms of the offer, all deferred interest becomes due and payable to the third-party financial institution. Private label credit card sales accounted for 18%, 16% and 17% of our Domestic segment's revenue in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In December 2008, the Federal Reserve issued a wide range of new regulations intended to improve the disclosures that consumers receive in connection with credit card accounts and other revolving credit plans. These new provisions, effective July 1, 2010, could limit the ability of card issuers to charge interest to customers who utilize deferred interest financing offers but do not comply with the terms of the offer. Pending the Federal Reserve's issuance of its final ruling, there can be no assurance that some of our deferred interest financing offers on our private-label credit card will continue to be available in their existing form. If we are unable to continue to make low- or no-interest financing offers, our revenue and profitability may be materially adversely affected.
Our International activities subject us to risks associated with the legislative, judicial, accounting, regulatory, political and economic conditions specific to the countries or regions in which we operate, which could materially adversely affect our financial performance.
We have a presence in various foreign countries including Belgium, Bermuda, Canada, China, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Republic of Mauritius, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, Turks and Caicos, and the United Kingdom. During fiscal 2009, our International segment's operations generated 22% of our revenue. Our growth strategy includes expansion into new or existing international markets, and we expect that our International segment's operations will account for a larger portion of our revenue in the future. Our future operating results in these countries and in other countries or regions throughout the world where we may operate in the future could be materially adversely affected by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control including political conditions, economic conditions, legal and regulatory constraints and foreign currency regulations.
19
In addition, foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations may have an impact on our future costs or on future cash flows from our International segment's operations, and could materially adversely affect our financial performance. Moreover, the economies of some of the countries in which we have operations have in the past suffered from high rates of inflation and currency devaluations, which, if they were to occur again, could materially adversely affect our financial performance. Other factors which may materially adversely impact our International segment's operations include foreign trade, monetary, tax and fiscal policies both of the U.S. and of other countries; laws, regulations and other activities of foreign governments, agencies and similar organizations; and maintaining facilities in countries which have historically been less stable than the U.S.
Additional risks inherent in our International segment's operations generally include, among others, the costs and difficulties of managing international operations, adverse tax consequences and greater difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights in countries other than the U.S. The various risks inherent in doing business in the U.S. generally also exist when doing business outside of the U.S., and may be exaggerated by the difficulty of doing business in numerous sovereign jurisdictions due to differences in culture, laws and regulations.
We rely heavily on our management information systems for inventory management, distribution and other functions. If our systems fail to perform these functions adequately or if we experience an interruption in their operation, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
The efficient operation of our business is dependent on our management information systems. We rely heavily on our management information systems to manage our order entry, order fulfillment, pricing, point-of-sale and inventory replenishment processes. The failure of our management information systems to perform as we anticipate could disrupt our business and could result in decreased revenue, increased overhead costs and excess or out-of-stock inventory levels, causing our business and results of operations to suffer materially.
A disruption in our relationship with Accenture, who helps us manage our information technology and human resources operations and conducts certain procurement activities, could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We have engaged Accenture LLP ("Accenture"), a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company, to manage significant portions of our information technology and human resources operations as well as to conduct certain procurement activities. We rely heavily on our management information systems for inventory management, distribution and other functions. We also rely heavily on human resources support to attract, develop and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees. We also use Accenture to provide procurement support to research and to purchase certain non-merchandise products and services. Any disruption in our relationship with Accenture could result in decreased revenue and increased overhead costs, causing our business and results of operations to suffer materially.
We have various commercial insurance agreements and sell extended warranties to customers on behalf of a subsidiary of AIG, whose parent company has experienced and continues to experience financial difficulties.
We have various commercial insurance relationships with AIG Commercial Insurance Group, Inc. ("AIG CI"), a subsidiary of American International Group, Inc. ("AIG"), including workers' compensation, directors and officers, commercial property, general liability and other insurance policies. We also sell extended warranties on behalf of AIG CI. Commissions received from AIG CI from the sale of extended warranties represented 2.0%, 2.1% and 2.2% of our revenue in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At February 28, 2009 and March 1, 2008, claims receivable from AIG CI were $35 million and $28 million, respectively.
Although AIG has advised that its commercial insurance subsidiaries remain well-capitalized and they have sufficient reserves and liquidity to pay claims despite the parent company's recent issues and diminished financial position, we can give no assurance that AIG CI or applicable regulatory authorities will be able to fulfill the insurer's obligations under our existing insurance policies or on our customers' outstanding product warranties in the
20
event of a failure of AIG CI. Further, in the event of a failure of AIG CI, we could be required to replace our existing insurance policies and seek a new provider of extended warranties, which may be difficult to do in a timely manner or on substantially similar terms as our existing agreements with AIG CI. Failure to do so could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, as well as damage customer relationships.
We are highly dependent on the cash flows and net earnings we generate during our fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday selling season.
Approximately one-third of our revenue and more than one-half of our net earnings are generated in our fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Europe and Canada. Unexpected events or developments such as natural or man-made disasters, product sourcing issues or adverse economic conditions in our fourth quarter could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
21
Stores, Distribution Centers and Corporate Facilities
Domestic Segment
The following table summarizes the geographic location of our Domestic segment stores at the end of fiscal 2009:
|
U.S. Best Buy Stores |
U.S. Best Buy Mobile Stores |
Pacific Sales Stores |
Magnolia Audio Video Stores |
U.S. Geek Squad Stores |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama |
14 | | | | | |||||||||||
Alaska |
1 | | | | | |||||||||||
Arizona |
27 | | 2 | | | |||||||||||
Arkansas |
8 | | | | | |||||||||||
California |
117 | | 31 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
Colorado |
22 | | | | 1 | |||||||||||
Connecticut |
12 | 3 | | | | |||||||||||
Delaware |
4 | | | | | |||||||||||
District of Columbia |
2 | | | | | |||||||||||
Florida |
62 | | | | | |||||||||||
Georgia |
30 | 4 | | | 1 | |||||||||||
Hawaii |
2 | | | | | |||||||||||
Idaho |
5 | | | | | |||||||||||
Illinois |
57 | 2 | | | | |||||||||||
Indiana |
20 | 1 | | | | |||||||||||
Iowa |
13 | | | | | |||||||||||
Kansas |
8 | | | | | |||||||||||
Kentucky |
9 | | | | | |||||||||||
Louisiana |
13 | | | | | |||||||||||
Maine |
6 | | | | | |||||||||||
Maryland |
22 | 5 | | | | |||||||||||
Massachusetts |
27 | | | | | |||||||||||
Michigan |
32 | | | | | |||||||||||
Minnesota |
27 | 1 | | | 2 | |||||||||||
Mississippi |
7 | | | | | |||||||||||
Missouri |
21 | | | | | |||||||||||
Montana |
3 | | | | | |||||||||||
Nebraska |
6 | | | | | |||||||||||
Nevada |
10 | | 1 | | | |||||||||||
New Hampshire |
6 | | | | | |||||||||||
New Jersey |
23 | 2 | | | | |||||||||||
New Mexico |
5 | | | | | |||||||||||
New York |
46 | 4 | | | | |||||||||||
North Carolina |
32 | 6 | | | | |||||||||||
North Dakota |
4 | | | | | |||||||||||
Ohio |
38 | | | | | |||||||||||
Oklahoma |
11 | | | | | |||||||||||
Oregon |
10 | | | | | |||||||||||
Pennsylvania |
33 | 5 | | | | |||||||||||
Puerto Rico |
4 | | | | | |||||||||||
Rhode Island |
2 | | | | | |||||||||||
South Carolina |
14 | 4 | | | | |||||||||||
South Dakota |
2 | | | | | |||||||||||
Tennessee |
15 | | | | | |||||||||||
Texas |
101 | | | | | |||||||||||
Utah |
9 | | | | | |||||||||||
Vermont |
1 | | | | | |||||||||||
Virginia |
34 | 1 | | | | |||||||||||
Washington |
20 | | | 2 | | |||||||||||
West Virginia |
3 | | | | | |||||||||||
Wisconsin |
23 | | | | | |||||||||||
Total |
1,023 | 38 | 34 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
Note: At the end of fiscal 2009, we owned 24 of our U.S. Best Buy store locations and operated 34 U.S. Best Buy stores for which we owned the building and leased the land. All other stores in the Domestic segment at the end of fiscal 2009 were leased.
22
At the end of fiscal 2009, we operated 1,023 U.S. Best Buy stores, 38 U.S. Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores, 34 Pacific Sales stores, six Magnolia Audio Video stores, and six Geek Squad stand-alone stores, totaling approximately 40.9 million retail square feet.
We have 22 distribution centers throughout the U.S. to service our Domestic segment operations, of which approximately 7.0 million square feet are leased and approximately 3.2 million square feet are owned.
We also lease approximately 0.2 million square feet of space in Louisville, Kentucky, that is used by our Geek Squad operations to service notebook and desktop computers.
Our principal corporate office is located in Richfield, Minnesota, and is an owned facility consisting of four interconnected buildings totaling approximately 1.5 million square feet. Accenture, who manages our information technology and human resources operations and conducts certain procurement activities for us, and certain other of our vendors who provide us with a variety of additional corporate services, occupy a portion of our principal corporate office. We also lease an aggregate of approximately 0.1 million square feet of corporate office space in California for both our Pacific Sales and Napster operations and in Washington for our Speakeasy operations.
23
International Segment
The following table summarizes the geographic location of our International segment stores at the end of fiscal 2009:
|
Europe | Canada | China | Mexico | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The Carphone Warehouse Stores |
The Phone House Stores |
Best Buy and Best Buy Mobile Stores |
Future Shop Stores |
Best Buy Stores |
Five Star Stores |
Best Buy Stores |
||||||||||||||||
Europe |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Belgium |
| 85 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
France |
| 322 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| 263 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
76 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Netherlands |
| 190 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Portugal |
| 163 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Spain |
| 442 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Sweden |
| 103 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
821 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Canada |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Alberta |
| | 9 | 17 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
British Columbia |
| | 8 | 21 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Manitoba |
| | 2 | 5 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
New Brunswick |
| | | 3 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Newfoundland |
| | | 1 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Nova Scotia |
| | 1 | 3 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Ontario |
| | 31 | 56 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Prince Edward Island |
| | | 1 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Quebec |
| | 9 | 29 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Saskatchewan |
| | 1 | 3 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
China |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Anhui |
| | | | | 13 | | ||||||||||||||||
Henan |
| | | | | 9 | | ||||||||||||||||
Jiangsu |
| | | | | 99 | | ||||||||||||||||
Shandong |
| | | | | 8 | | ||||||||||||||||
Shanghai |
| | | | 5 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Sichuan |
| | | | | 6 | | ||||||||||||||||
Yunnan |
| | | | | 5 | | ||||||||||||||||
Zhejiang |
| | | | | 24 | | ||||||||||||||||
Mexico |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Estado de Mexico |
| | | | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
897 | 1,568 | 61 | 139 | 5 | 164 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Note: At the end of fiscal 2009, we owned none of The Carphone Warehouse and two of The Phone House store locations, three of our Best Buy Canada store locations, six of our Five Star store locations and one of our Best Buy China store locations. All other stores in the International segment at the end of fiscal 2009 were leased.
24
At the end of fiscal 2009, we operated 897 The Carphone Warehouse stores, 1,568 The Phone House stores, 58 Best Buy Canada stores, three Best Buy Mobile Canada stores, 139 Future Shop stores, five Best Buy China stores, 164 Five Star stores and one Best Buy Mexico store totaling approximately 13.3 million retail square feet.
We lease approximately 0.8 million square feet of distribution center space throughout nine European countries to service our Europe operations.
We lease approximately 1.1 million square feet of distribution center space in Brampton, Ontario, and approximately 0.4 million square feet of distribution center space in Vancouver, British Columbia, to service our Canada operations.
We lease approximately 1.0 million square feet of distribution center space in Jiangsu Province and an additional approximately 0.6 million square feet of distribution center space throughout the Five Star retail chain to support our Five Star distribution network in China. We lease approximately 0.1 million square feet of distribution center space in Shanghai to service our Best Buy China operations.
We lease approximately 34,000 square feet of distribution center space in Estado de Mexico, Mexico, to support our Best Buy Mexico store.
The principal office for our Best Buy Europe operations is located in a 156,000-square-foot leased facility in Acton, West London. The principal office for our Canada operations is located in a 141,000-square-foot leased facility in Burnaby, British Columbia. The principal office for our Five Star operations is located in a 46,000-square-foot owned facility in Nanjing, Jiangsu. The principal office for our Best Buy China operations is located in a 27,000-square-foot leased facility in Shanghai. The principal office for Best Buy Mexico is located in a 20,000-square-foot leased facility in Mexico City, Mexico. In addition, we lease a 4,000-square-foot facility in Vancouver, British Columbia to support our International segment operations.
Global Sourcing
We lease approximately 45,000 square feet of office space in Shanghai, China, to support of our global sourcing operations.
Operating Leases
Almost all of our stores and a majority of our distribution facilities are leased. Terms of the lease agreements generally range from 10 to 20 years. Most of the leases contain renewal options and rent escalation clauses.
Additional information regarding our operating leases is available in Note 8, Leases, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In December 2005, a purported class action lawsuit captioned, Jasmen Holloway, et al. v. Best Buy Co., Inc., was filed against us in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. This federal court action alleges that we discriminate against women and minority individuals on the basis of gender, race, color and/or national origin in our stores with respect to our employment policies and practices. The action seeks an end to discriminatory policies and practices, an award of back and front pay, punitive damages and injunctive relief, including rightful place relief for all class members. The Court has scheduled a class certification hearing. We believe the allegations are without merit and intend to defend this action vigorously.
We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of conducting business. We believe the amounts provided in our consolidated financial statements, as prescribed by GAAP, are adequate in light of the probable and estimable liabilities. The resolution of those proceedings is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
25
Executive Officers of the Registrant
(As of February 28, 2009)
Name |
Age |
Position With the Company |
Years With the Company |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bradbury H. Anderson |
59 | Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | 36 | ||||||
Shari L. Ballard |
42 | Executive Vice President Retail Channel Management | 16 | ||||||
David P. Berg(1) |
47 | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Best Buy International | 7 | ||||||
Brian J. Dunn |
48 | President and Chief Operating Officer | 24 | ||||||
Susan S. Grafton |
52 | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer | 8 | ||||||
Joseph M. Joyce |
57 | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary | 18 | ||||||
Allen U. Lenzmeier(2) |
65 | Vice Chairman | 25 | ||||||
David J. Morrish(2) |
51 | Executive Vice President Connected Digital Solutions | 11 | ||||||
James L. Muehlbauer |
47 | Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer | 7 | ||||||
John Noble(1) |
50 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Best Buy International | 7 | ||||||
Kalendu Patel |
45 | Executive Vice President Emerging Business | 6 | ||||||
Jonathan E. Pershing |
38 | Executive Vice President Human Capital | 20 | ||||||
Michael J. Pratt |
41 | President of Best Buy Canada | 18 | ||||||
Ryan D. Robinson |
43 | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer U.S. Strategic Business Unit and Treasurer | 7 | ||||||
Richard M. Schulze |
68 | Founder and Chairman of the Board | 43 | ||||||
Michael A. Vitelli |
53 | Executive Vice President Customer Operating Groups | 5 | ||||||
Robert A. Willett |
62 | Chief Executive Officer Best Buy International and Chief Information Officer | 5 |
Bradbury H. Anderson has been a director since August 1986 and is currently a Vice Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer. We have announced that Mr. Anderson will retire as our Chief Executive Officer on June 24, 2009. He assumed the responsibility of Chief Executive Officer in June 2002, having previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer since April 1991. He has been employed in various capacities with us since 1973. In addition, he serves on the board of General Mills, Inc., as well as on the boards of the Retail Industry Leaders Association, the American Film Institute, Minnesota Early Learning Foundation, Best Buy Children's Foundation, Minnesota Public Radio and Waldorf College.
Shari L. Ballard was named Executive Vice President Retail Channel Management in September 2007. Prior to her new position, she served as Executive Vice President Human Resources and Legal since December 2004. Ms. Ballard joined us in 1993 and has held positions as Senior Vice President, Vice President, and general and assistant store manager.
David P. Berg was named Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Best Buy International in March 2008. Prior to his strategy and development role, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Best Buy International. Mr. Berg joined Best Buy in 2002 as Vice President and Associate General Counsel.
Brian J. Dunn was named President and Chief Operating Officer in February 2006. We have announced that Mr. Dunn will become our Chief Executive Officer on June 24, 2009. A 24-year veteran of Best Buy, Mr. Dunn began his career with us as a store associate in 1985. Prior to being named to his current position, Mr. Dunn served as President Retail, North America since December 2004. Prior to that, he held the positions of Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President, Regional Vice President, Regional Manager, District Manager, and
26
Store Manager. Mr. Dunn serves on the board of Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., a full-line sporting goods retailer.
Susan S. Grafton was named Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer in December 2006. Ms. Grafton joined us in 2000 and has held positions as Vice President Financial Operations and Controller, Vice President Planning and Performance Management, Senior Director and Director. Prior to joining us, she was with The Pillsbury Company and Pitney Bowes, Inc. in numerous finance and accounting positions. Ms. Grafton serves on the Finance Leaders Council for the Retail Industry Leaders Association and the Financial Executive Council for the National Retail Federation.
Joseph M. Joyce was named Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary in 1997. Mr. Joyce joined us in 1991 as Vice President Human Resources and General Counsel. Prior to joining us, Mr. Joyce was with Tonka Corporation, a toy maker, having most recently served as vice president, secretary and general counsel.
Allen U. Lenzmeier has been a director since February 2001 and is a Vice Chairman. Prior to his promotion to Vice Chairman in 2004, he served in various capacities since joining us in 1984. His prior positions include President and Chief Operating Officer from 2002 to 2004, and President of Best Buy Retail Stores from 2001 to 2002. He serves on the boards of UTStarcom, Inc. and Envoy Medical Corp., and serves as chairman of the board of American TeleCare Inc. In addition, he is a national trustee for the Boys and Girls Clubs of America, and serves on its Twin Cities board of directors.
David J. Morrish became Executive Vice President Connected Digital Solutions on March 2, 2008. Mr. Morrish joined us in 1998 as Vice President, Merchandising and most recently served as a Senior Vice President PC Mobility Solutions. Prior to joining us, he spent 17 years with Sears Canada Inc., where he held a variety of positions of increasingly responsibility including as vice president/general merchandising manager.
James L. Muehlbauer was named Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer in April 2008. Previously he served as Enterprise Chief Financial Officer (interim), Chief Financial Officer Best Buy U.S., Senior Vice President Finance, and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Musicland, a former Best Buy company. Prior to joining us, Mr. Muehlbauer spent 10 years with The Pillsbury Company, a consumer packaged goods company, where he held various senior-level finance management positions, including vice president and worldwide controller, vice president of operations, divisional finance director, director of mergers and acquisitions, and director of internal audit. A certified public accountant (inactive), Mr. Muehlbauer spent eight years with Coopers & Lybrand LLP, where he held senior manager positions in the firm's audit and consulting practices.
John Noble was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Best Buy International in May 2006. Mr. Noble joined us in 2002 and has held positions as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Best Buy Canada, and Vice President Finance. Prior to joining us, Mr. Noble spent 10 years with The Pillsbury Company, and most recently served as its vice president finance for operations.
Kalendu Patel was named Executive Vice President Emerging Business in September 2007. Mr. Patel joined us in 2003 and has held positions as Executive Vice President Strategy and International, Senior Vice President and Vice President. Prior to joining us, Mr. Patel was a partner at Strategos, a strategic consulting firm. Prior to that, he held various positions with KPMG Consulting Inc. and Courtaulds PLC in the United Kingdom.
Jonathan E. Pershing was named Executive Vice President Human Capital in December 2007. Mr. Pershing joined us in 1989 as a retail manager and steadily advanced to positions of increasing responsibility. He has held positions such as Divisional Manager Loss Prevention, Vice President of Retail Operations Musicland, a former Best Buy company, and as Vice President Organizational Alignment. He serves as a member of the board of directors for Project Success, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Michael J. Pratt became President Best Buy Canada in January 2008. Prior to his assuming that position, Mr. Pratt was a Senior Vice President Best Buy Canada. Prior to that, he had held numerous roles in his 17 years with Future Shop and Best Buy Canada, most recently responsible for Best Buy Canada stores, marketing, advertising and store design and our Commercial Sales Group in Canada.
27
Ryan D. Robinson was named Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer U.S. Strategic Business Unit and Treasurer in December 2007. Mr. Robinson joined us in 2002 and has held positions as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer New Growth Platforms, Senior Vice President Finance and Treasurer, and Vice President Finance and Treasurer. Prior to joining us, he spent 15 years at ABN AMRO Holding N.V., an international bank, and most recently served as senior vice president and director of that financial institution's North American private-equity activities. Mr. Robinson also held management positions in ABN AMRO Holding N.V.'s corporate finance, finance advisory, acquisitions and asset securitization divisions.
Richard M. Schulze is a founder of Best Buy. He has been an officer and director from our inception in 1966 and currently is Chairman of the Board. Effective in June 2002, he relinquished the duties of Chief Executive Officer, having served as our principal executive officer for more than 30 years. He is on the board of the University of St. Thomas, chairman of its Executive and Institutional Advancement Committee, and a member of its Board Affairs Committee. Mr. Schulze is also chairman of the board of governors of the University of St. Thomas Business School.
Michael A. Vitelli became Executive Vice President Customer Operating Groups in March 2008. Mr. Vitelli joined us in February 2004 and has held positions such as Senior Vice President and General Manager Home Solutions. Prior to joining us, his professional career included 23 years at Sony Electronics, Inc., serving in positions of increasing responsibility, including executive vice president of Sony's Visual Products Company. Mr. Vitelli serves on the boards of the Minnesota chapter of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and the National Consumer Technology Industry chapter of the Anti-Defamation League, where he serves as the industry chair.
Robert A. Willett is our Chief Executive Officer Best Buy International and Chief Information Officer. He previously served as an Executive Vice President Operations from April 2004 to April 2006. In April 2002, we engaged Mr. Willett as a consultant and special advisor to our Board on matters relating to operational efficiency and excellence. Prior to that, he was the global managing partner for the retail practice at Accenture, where he was a member of its executive committee. Mr. Willett began his career in store management at Marks & Spencer P.L.C., a leading British department store chain, and has held executive positions of managing director and group CEO at other retailers in Europe. In 2008, Mr. Willett joined the board of directors of Lighthaus Logic Inc., a Canadian company that develops and deploys high-performance video analytics for security and business intelligence applications.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
28
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol BBY. The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index during the periods indicated.
|
Sales Price | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High |
Low |
|||||
Fiscal 2009 |
|||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 45.95 | $ | 38.75 | |||
Second Quarter |
48.03 | 36.10 | |||||
Third Quarter |
47.50 | 16.42 | |||||
Fourth Quarter |
31.25 | 19.02 | |||||
Fiscal 2008 |
|||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 50.19 | $ | 44.70 | |||
Second Quarter |
49.44 | 41.85 | |||||
Third Quarter |
51.98 | 42.39 | |||||
Fourth Quarter |
53.90 | 41.92 |
Holders
As of April 27, 2009, there were 3,514 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
In fiscal 2004, our Board initiated the payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend with respect to shares of our common stock. A quarterly cash dividend has been paid in each subsequent quarter and the dividend rate has historically increased each year. Effective with the quarterly cash dividend paid in the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we increased our quarterly cash dividend per share by 30% to $0.13 per share. Effective with the quarterly cash dividend paid in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we increased our quarterly cash dividend per share by 8% to $0.14 per share. The payment of cash dividends is subject to customary legal and contractual restrictions.
Future dividend payments will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by our Board.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
From time to time, we repurchase our common stock in the open market pursuant to programs approved by our Board. We may repurchase our common stock for a variety of reasons, such as acquiring shares to offset dilution related to equity-based incentives, including stock options and our employee stock purchase plan, and optimizing our capital structure.
In June 2007, our Board authorized a $5.5 billion share repurchase program. The program, which became effective on June 26, 2007, terminated and replaced a $1.5 billion share repurchase program authorized by our Board in June 2006. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can make our share repurchases under the June 2007 share repurchase program.
In accordance with our June 2007 share repurchase program, on June 26, 2007, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase ("ASR") program that consisted of two agreements to purchase shares of our common stock from Goldman, Sachs & Co. ("Goldman") for an aggregate purchase price of $3.0 billion. The ASR program concluded in February 2008 with 65.8 million total shares delivered to us at an average purchase price of $45.59 per share. At the end of fiscal 2008, $2.5 billion of the $5.5 billion of the share repurchase program authorized by our Board in June 2007 was available for future share repurchases. We made no share repurchases in fiscal 2009.
We consider several factors in determining when to make share repurchases including, among other things, our cash needs and the market price of our stock. We expect that cash provided by future operating activities, as well as available cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, will be the sources of funding for our share repurchase program. Based on the anticipated amounts to be generated from those sources of funds in relation to the remaining authorization approved by our Board under the June 2007 share repurchase program, we do not expect that future share repurchases will have a material impact on our short-term or long-term liquidity. We do not anticipate making any share repurchases in fiscal 2010.
29
The following table presents the total number of shares repurchased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 by fiscal month, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased as part of a publicly announced repurchase plan, and the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased pursuant to the $5.5 billion share repurchase program as of the end of fiscal 2009:
Fiscal Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
November 30, 2008, through January 3, 2009 |
| | | $ | 2,500,000,000 | ||||||||
January 4, 2009, through January 31, 2009 |
| | | 2,500,000,000 | |||||||||
February 1, 2009, through February 28, 2009 |
| | | 2,500,000,000 | |||||||||
Total Fiscal 2009 Fourth Quarter |
| | | $ | 2,500,000,000 | ||||||||
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of February 28, 2009.
Plan Category |
Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options |
Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share(1) |
Securities Available for Future Issuance(2) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(3) |
42,954,756 | (4) | $ | 38.37 | 10,369,619 | |||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(5) |
11,250 | 34.44 | NA | |||||||
Total |
42,966,006 | $ | 38.37 | 10,369,619 | ||||||
30
Best Buy Stock Comparative Performance Graph
The information contained in this Best Buy Stock Comparative Performance Graph section shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or "filed" or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on Best Buy common stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ("S&P 500"), of which we are a component, and the Standard & Poor's Retailing Group Industry Index ("S&P Retailing Group"), of which we are also a component. The S&P Retailing Group is a capitalization-weighted index of domestic equities traded on the NYSE and NASDAQ, and includes high-capitalization stocks representing the retail sector of the S&P 500.
The graph assumes an investment of $100 at the close of trading on February 27, 2004, the last trading day of fiscal 2004, in Best Buy common stock, the S&P 500 and the S&P Retailing Group.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Best Buy Co., Inc., the S&P 500
and the S&P Retailing Group
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY06 |
FY07 |
FY08 |
FY09 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Buy Co., Inc. |
$ | 100.00 | $ | 97.83 | $ | 154.57 | $ | 133.46 | $ | 125.03 | $ | 85.07 | |||||||
S&P 500 |
100.00 | 106.98 | 115.96 | 129.84 | 125.17 | 70.95 | |||||||||||||
S&P Retailing Group |
100.00 | 110.07 | 123.02 | 136.39 | 107.35 | 71.56 |
Source: Research Data Group, Inc.
31
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table presents our selected financial data. The table should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In fiscal 2004, we sold our interest in Musicland. All fiscal years presented reflect the classification of Musicland's financial results as discontinued operations.
Five-Year Financial Highlights
$ in millions, except per share amounts
Fiscal Year |
2009(1)(2) |
2008 |
2007(3) |
2006(4) |
2005(5) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings Data |
||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 45,015 | $ | 40,023 | $ | 35,934 | $ | 30,848 | $ | 27,433 | ||||||||
Operating income |
1,870 | 2,161 | 1,999 | 1,644 | 1,442 | |||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations |
1,003 | 1,407 | 1,377 | 1,140 | 934 | |||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | | 50 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings |
1,003 | 1,407 | 1,377 | 1,140 | 984 | |||||||||||||
Per Share Data(6) |
||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 2.39 | $ | 3.12 | $ | 2.79 | $ | 2.27 | $ | 1.86 | ||||||||
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations |
| | | | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings |
2.39 | 3.12 | 2.79 | 2.27 | 1.96 | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared and paid |
0.54 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.28 | |||||||||||||
Common stock price: |
||||||||||||||||||
High |
48.03 | 53.90 | 59.50 | 56.00 | 41.47 | |||||||||||||
Low |
16.42 | 41.85 | 43.51 | 31.93 | 29.25 | |||||||||||||
Operating Statistics |
||||||||||||||||||
Comparable store sales (decline) gain(7) |
(1.3 | )% | 2.9 | % | 5.0 | % | 4.9 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit rate |
24.4 | % | 23.9 | % | 24.4 | % | 25.0 | % | 23.7 | % | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses rate |
20.0 | % | 18.5 | % | 18.8 | % | 19.7 | % | 18.4 | % | ||||||||
Operating income rate |
4.2 | % | 5.4 | % | 5.6 | % | 5.3 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||||||
Year-End Data |
||||||||||||||||||
Current ratio(8) |
1.0 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | |||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 15,826 | $ | 12,758 | $ | 13,570 | $ | 11,864 | $ | 10,294 | ||||||||
Debt, including current portion |
1,963 | 816 | 650 | 596 | 600 | |||||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity |
4,643 | 4,484 | 6,201 | 5,257 | 4,449 | |||||||||||||
Number of stores |
||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
1,107 | 971 | 873 | 774 | 694 | |||||||||||||
International(9) |
2,835 | 343 | 304 | 167 | 144 | |||||||||||||
Total(9) |
3,942 | 1,314 | 1,177 | 941 | 838 | |||||||||||||
Retail square footage (000s) |
||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
40,924 | 37,511 | 34,092 | 30,874 | 28,513 | |||||||||||||
International(9) |
13,331 | 11,069 | 9,419 | 4,652 | 4,057 | |||||||||||||
Total(9) |
54,255 | 48,580 | 43,511 | 35,526 | 32,570 |
32
33
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect our future results. Our MD&A is presented in seven sections:
We consolidate the financial results of our Europe, China and Mexico operations on a two-month lag. Consistent with such consolidation, the financial and non-financial information presented in our MD&A relative to these operations is also presented on a two-month lag. No significant intervening event occurred in these operations that would have materially affected our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or other factors had it been recorded during fiscal 2009.
Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest the end of February. Fiscal 2009 and 2008 each included 52 weeks, whereas our fiscal 2007 included 53 weeks.
Overview
Best Buy is a specialty retailer of consumer electronics, home office products, entertainment software, appliances and related services.
We operate two reportable segments: Domestic and International. The Domestic segment is comprised of all store, call center and online operations, including Best Buy, Best Buy Mobile, Geek Squad, Magnolia Audio Video, Napster, Pacific Sales and Speakeasy operations located within the U.S. and its territories. U.S. Best Buy stores offer a wide variety of consumer electronics, home office products, entertainment software, appliances and related services, operating 1,023 stores in 49 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico at the end of fiscal 2009. Best Buy Mobile offers a wide selection of mobile phones, accessories and services through 38 stand-alone stores located in 12 states as well as in all U.S. Best Buy stores at the end of fiscal 2009. Geek Squad offers residential and commercial repair, support and installation services in all U.S. Best Buy stores and six stand-alone stores at the end of fiscal 2009. Magnolia Audio Video stores offer high-end audio and video products and related services from six stores located in California and Washington, as well as through 353 Magnolia Home Theater rooms located in U.S. Best Buy stores at the end of fiscal 2009. Napster is an online provider of digital music. Pacific Sales stores offer high-end home-improvement products including appliances, consumer electronics and related services, operating 34 stores in Arizona, California and Nevada at the end of fiscal 2009. Speakeasy provides broadband voice, data and information technology services to home and small-business users through a network of experienced sales associates.
The International segment is comprised of: (i) all Canada store, call center and online operations, including Best Buy, Best Buy Mobile, Future Shop and Geek Squad; (ii) all Europe store, call center and online operations, including The Carphone Warehouse, The Phone House and Geek Squad; (iii) all China store and online operations, including Best Buy, Five Star and Geek Squad; and (iv) all Mexico store operations, including Best Buy and Geek Squad. Our International segment offers products and services similar to those of our U.S. Best Buy stores. However, Best Buy Canada stores do not carry appliances, our Best Buy China stores and Five Star stores do not carry entertainment software, and Geek Squad services are offered only through our Best Buy stores in Canada and China and in select stores in the U.K. and Spain. Further, our store format and offerings in Europe are similar to our Best Buy Mobile format and offerings in the U.S., primarily offering mobile phones and related accessories and services.
34
At the end of fiscal 2009, we operated 2,465 The Carphone Warehouse and The Phone House stores throughout Europe, 58 Best Buy Canada stores, three Best Buy Mobile Canada stores, 139 Future Shop stores in Canada, 164 Five Star stores in China, five Best Buy China stores, and one Best Buy Mexico store.
In support of our retail store operations, we also operate Web sites for each of our brands (BestBuy.com, BestBuy.ca, BestBuy.com.cn, espanol.BestBuy.com and BestBuyMobile.com, CarphoneWarehouse.com, Five-Star.cn, FutureShop.ca, GeekSquad.com, GeekSquad.ca, MagnoliaAV.com, Napster.com, PacificSales.com, PhoneHouse.com and Speakeasy.net)
Our business, like that of many retailers, is seasonal. Historically, we have realized more of our revenue and earnings in the fiscal fourth quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Europe and Canada, than in any other fiscal quarter. The timing of new store openings, costs associated with the development of new businesses, as well as general economic conditions may affect our future results of operations.
Throughout this MD&A, we refer to comparable store sales. Comparable store sales is a measure commonly used in the retail industry which indicates the performance of a store by measuring the growth in sales for such store for a particular fiscal period from the store's sales in the corresponding period in the prior year. Our comparable store sales is comprised of revenue at our stores, call centers and Web sites operating for at least 14 full months, as well as remodeled and expanded locations. Relocated stores are excluded from our comparable store sales calculation until at least 14 full months after reopening. Acquired stores are included in our comparable store sales calculation beginning with the first full quarter following the first anniversary of the date of the acquisition. The portion of our calculation of the comparable store sales percentage change attributable to our International segment excludes the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The method of calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our method of calculating comparable store sales may not be the same as other retailers' methods.
Acquisitions
Best Buy Europe
On June 28, 2008, we acquired a 50% stake in Best Buy Europe for $2.2 billion, or $2.1 billion net of cash acquired. Best Buy Europe is our venture with CPW, consisting of CPW's retail and distribution business comprised of more than 2,400 stores, its online and direct business, insurance operations and mobile and fixed-line telecommunication businesses. The transaction also included CPW's economic interests in Best Buy Mobile in the U.S. and Geek Squad in the U.K. and Spain. Best Buy Europe is Europe's largest independent mobile phone retailer. We made the investment in Best Buy Europe to further our international growth plans and obtain an immediate retail presence in Europe.
Napster
On October 25, 2008, we completed our acquisition of Napster for $121 million, or $100 million net of cash acquired. Napster is an online provider of digital music. We believe the combined capabilities of our two companies will allow us to build stronger relationships with customers and to expand the number of digital music and entertainment subscribers over an increasing array of devices.
Five Star
We acquired a 75% interest in Five Star on June 8, 2006, for $184 million, which included a working capital injection of $122 million. At the time of the acquisition, we also entered into an agreement with Five Star's minority shareholders to acquire the remaining 25% interest in Five Star within four years, subject to Chinese government approval. On February 6, 2009, we were granted a business license to acquire the remaining 25% interest in Five Star and our subsequent acquisition converted Five Star into a wholly-owned foreign enterprise that is now 100% owned by us. The $190 million purchase price for the 25% interest was primarily based on a previously agreed-upon pricing formula. The acquisition furthers our international growth plans and accelerates the integration of Best Buy and Five Star in China.
Financial Reporting Changes
To maintain consistency and comparability, we reclassified certain prior-year amounts to conform to the current-year
35
presentation as described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Business Strategy and Core Philosophies
Our business, broadly defined, is about meeting the wants and needs of our consumers. We believe that our assets position us to solve more customer problems than ever. Specifically, our assets include approximately 155,000 engaged employees; valuable relationships with vendors all over the world; continuing and emerging relationships with companies like Apple, Dell and CPW; and all of the other mutually enriching business relationships that our people continue to establish and develop wherever we go around the world. We also generate significant positive cash flows. All of these assets are at our disposal as we envision how we will deepen our relationships with customers in order to increase shareholder value.
Our business strategy is customer centricity. We define customer centricity through its parts, which we call our three core philosophies: inviting our employees to contribute their unique ideas and experiences in service of customers; treating customers uniquely and honoring their differences; and meeting customers' unique needs, end-to-end.
We start with a view of all of our customers, including their problems and their desires. We try to match that against everything we know about the solutions that now exist, or that could be created. Then, we determine ways to deliver to customers the right solutions by using our employees' unique capabilities, as well as our network of vendors and other third-party providers. If we accomplish what we have set out to do, we believe we have offered a truly unique and differentiated solution to the marketplace.
Mass merchants, direct sellers, other specialty retailers and online retailers are increasingly interested in our revenue categories because of rising consumer interest. Yet they do not have a strategy of unleashing their employees to understand customers' unique needs, and they lack our unique combination of assets, including those mentioned above as well as our stores, Web sites and call centers. We believe that by inspiring our employees to have richer interactions with customers, and understanding our customers better than our competitors do, we can differentiate ourselves and compete more effectively for customers' loyalty than either mass merchants or purely online players. We further believe that this strategy can be successful for us with a variety of products and services, store formats, customer groups and even countries.
The currently challenging global economy has resulted in our heightened focus on carefully managing expenses and capital expenditures. Accordingly, we have adjusted our new store opening plans, inventory levels and reduced our overall spending at stores, distribution centers and headquarters. Yet great retailers never stop improving their offerings to customers and growing their business. Our future growth plans and strategy revolve around four business priorities in fiscal 2010. These four priorities represent business opportunities where we believe we can navigate the current economic conditions to put us in the strongest possible position to take advantage of economic recovery long-term. These priorities are:
36
out of the assets we already possess, including expanding our Best Buy Mobile concept to existing Canadian stores, integrating our Five Star and Best Buy operations in China, and delivering on planned synergies in Europe.
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2009 Summary
37
Consolidated Results
The following table presents selected consolidated financial data for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions, except per share amounts):
Consolidated Performance Summary |
2009(1)(2) |
2008 |
2007(3) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue |
$ | 45,015 | $ | 40,023 | $ | 35,934 | ||||
Revenue gain % |
13 | % | 11 | % | 16 | % | ||||
Comparable store sales % (decline) gain |
(1.3 | )% | 2.9 | % | 5.0 | % | ||||
Gross profit as % of revenue(4) |
24.4 | % | 23.9 | % | 24.4 | % | ||||
SG&A as % of revenue(4) |
20.0 | % | 18.5 | % | 18.8 | % | ||||
Operating income |
$ | 1,870 | $ | 2,161 | $ | 1,999 | ||||
Operating income as % of revenue |
4.2 | % | 5.4 | % | 5.6 | % | ||||
Net earnings |
$ | 1,003 | $ | 1,407 | $ | 1,377 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 2.39 | $ | 3.12 | $ | 2.79 |
Fiscal 2009 Results Compared With Fiscal 2008
Fiscal 2009 net earnings were $1.0 billion, or $2.39 per diluted share, compared with $1.4 billion, or $3.12 per diluted share, in fiscal 2008. The decrease in net earnings was driven by a comparable store sales decline of 1.3%, deterioration in our SG&A rate, and an increase in restructuring and impairment charges, partially offset by improvement in our gross profit rate.
Revenue in fiscal 2009 increased 13% to $45.0 billion, compared with $40.0 billion in fiscal 2008. The revenue increase resulted primarily from the acquisition of Best Buy Europe which contributed $3.2 billion of revenue in the fiscal year, the net addition of 214 new stores during fiscal 2009, and a full year of revenue from new stores added in fiscal 2008. The increase was partially offset by a 1.3% comparable store sales decline and the unfavorable effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
The components of the net revenue increase in fiscal 2009 were as follows:
Acquisition of Best Buy Europe |
8 | % | ||
Net new stores |
7 | % | ||
1.3% comparable store sales decline |
(1 | )% | ||
Unfavorable impact of foreign currency |
(1 | )% | ||
Total revenue increase |
13 | % | ||
38
The following table presents consolidated revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2009 and 2008:
|
Revenue Mix Summary | Comparable Store Sales Summary | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Year Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
|
February 28, 2009 |
March 1, 2008 |
February 28, 2009 |
March 1, 2008 |
|||||||||
Consumer electronics |
36 | % | 41 | % | (5.1 | )% | (1.3 | )% | |||||
Home office |
34 | % | 28 | % | 8.2 | % | 7.1 | % | |||||
Entertainment software |
17 | % | 19 | % | (4.9 | )% | 7.9 | % | |||||
Appliances |
6 | % | 6 | % | (10.9 | )% | (2.6 | )% | |||||
Services |
7 | % | 6 | % | 4.0 | % | 5.5 | % | |||||
Other |
<1 | % | <1 | % | n/a | n/a | |||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | (1.3 | )% | 2.9 | % | |||||
Our comparable store sales decline in fiscal 2009 reflected a decrease in customer traffic. Partially offsetting the decline in traffic was an increase in the average ticket as our revenue mix continued to shift toward large-ticket items, such as notebook computers and mobile phones. Products having the largest impact on the fiscal 2009 comparable store sales decline include digital cameras, tube and projection televisions, DVDs and CDs, partially offset by gains in notebook computers, flat-panel televisions and mobile phones. Revenue from our online operations increased more than 21% in fiscal 2009 and partially offset the overall comparable store sales decline.
Our gross profit rate in fiscal 2009 increased by 0.5% of revenue to 24.4% of revenue. The gross profit rate increase for fiscal 2009 was due to increases in both our Domestic and International segments' gross profit rates. The acquisition of Best Buy Europe increased our gross profit rate by 0.4% of revenue for fiscal 2009. For further discussion of each segment's gross profit rate changes, see the Segment Performance Summary for Domestic and International below.
Our SG&A rate in fiscal 2009 increased by 1.5% of revenue to 20.0% of revenue. The SG&A rate increase for fiscal 2009 was due to an increase in both our Domestic and International segments' SG&A rates. The acquisition of Best Buy Europe increased our SG&A rate by 0.7% of revenue for fiscal 2009. For further discussion of each segment's SG&A rate changes, see the Segment Performance Summary for Domestic and International below.
Our operating income in fiscal 2009 also included restructuring and goodwill and tradename impairment charges recorded in the fiscal fourth quarter. The $78 million restructuring charge related primarily to employee termination benefits offered pursuant to voluntary and involuntary separation programs at our corporate headquarters and certain other locations. The restructuring charges were recorded as a result of measures we took to create a more effective and efficient operating cost structure and to support our fiscal 2010 strategic priorities. The $66 million goodwill and tradename impairment charges related to impairment of our Speakeasy business recorded as a result our annual test of goodwill for impairment.
Fiscal 2008 Results Compared With Fiscal 2007
Fiscal 2008 net earnings were slightly more than $1.4 billion, or $3.12 per diluted share, compared with nearly $1.4 billion, or $2.79 per diluted share, in fiscal 2007. The modest increase in net earnings was driven by revenue growth and a decrease in our SG&A rate, offset by a decrease in our gross profit rate and a higher effective income tax rate. The increase in net earnings per diluted share was due primarily to the lower average number of shares outstanding, resulting from our share repurchases in fiscal 2008.
Revenue in fiscal 2008 increased 11% to $40.0 billion, compared with $35.9 billion in fiscal 2007. The increase resulted primarily from the net addition of 137 new Best Buy, Future Shop, Five Star, Pacific Sales and Best Buy Mobile stores during fiscal 2008, a full year of revenue from new stores added in fiscal 2007, a 2.9% comparable store sales gain and the non-comparable store sales generated from the acquisition of Five Star, Pacific Sales and Speakeasy. The remainder of the revenue increase was due primarily to the favorable effect of fluctuations in
39
foreign currency exchange rates. Excluding the impact of the extra week in fiscal 2007, the net addition of new stores during the past fiscal year accounted for more than one-half of the revenue increase in fiscal 2008; the comparable store sales gain accounted for more than two-tenths of the revenue increase; the non-comparable store sales generated from the acquisition of Five Star, Pacific Sales and Speakeasy accounted for more than one-tenth of the revenue increase; and the remainder of the revenue increase was due to the favorable effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
The following table presents consolidated revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2008 and 2007:
|
Revenue Mix Summary | Comparable Store Sales Summary | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Year Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
|
March 1, 2008 |
March 3, 2007 |
March 1, 2008 |
March 3, 2007 |
|||||||||
Consumer electronics |
41 | % | 42 | % | (1.3 | )% | 9.1 | % | |||||
Home office |
28 | % | 27 | % | 7.1 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||
Entertainment software |
19 | % | 18 | % | 7.9 | % | 3.2 | % | |||||
Appliances |
6 | % | 6 | % | (2.6 | )% | (0.8 | )% | |||||
Services |
6 | % | 6 | % | 5.5 | % | 9.5 | % | |||||
Other |
<1 | % | <1 | % | n/a | n/a | |||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 2.9 | % | 5.0 | % | |||||
Our comparable store sales gain in fiscal 2008 benefited from a higher average transaction amount driven by the continued growth in higher-ticket items, including video gaming hardware, flat-panel televisions and notebook computers. Products having the largest impact on our fiscal 2008 comparable store sales gain included video gaming hardware and software, notebook computers, flat-panel televisions and navigation products. An increase in online purchases also contributed to the fiscal 2008 comparable store sales gain. Revenue from our online operations increased more than 25% in fiscal 2008 and added to the overall comparable store sales increase.
Our gross profit rate in fiscal 2008 decreased by 0.5% of revenue to 23.9% of revenue. The decrease was due primarily to increased sales of lower-margin products, including increased revenue from notebook computers and video gaming hardware. Our acquired China operations, which carry a significantly lower gross profit rate than our other operations, reduced our gross profit rate in fiscal 2008 by approximately 0.2% of revenue. These factors were partially offset by better promotional programs in home theater, as well as lower financing rates and Reward Zone costs.
Our SG&A rate in fiscal 2008 decreased by 0.3% of revenue to 18.5% of revenue. The improvement was due primarily to the leveraging effect of the 11% growth in revenue and store operating model improvements. Our acquired China operations, which carry a significantly lower SG&A rate than our other operations, reduced our SG&A rate by approximately 0.1% of revenue in fiscal 2008.
40
Segment Performance
Domestic
The following table presents selected financial data for our Domestic segment for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions):
Domestic Segment Performance Summary |
2009(1) |
2008 |
2007(2) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue |
$ | 35,070 | $ | 33,328 | $ | 31,031 | ||||
Revenue gain % |
5 | % | 7 | % | 13 | % | ||||
Comparable store sales % (decline) gain |
(1.3 | )% | 1.9 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||
Gross profit as % of revenue |
24.6 | % | 24.5 | % | 24.8 | % | ||||
SG&A as % of revenue |
19.2 | % | 18.5 | % | 18.7 | % | ||||
Operating income |
$ | 1,758 | $ | 1,999 | $ | 1,900 | ||||
Operating income as % of revenue |
5.0 | % | 6.0 | % | 6.1 | % |
Fiscal 2009 Results Compared With Fiscal 2008
In fiscal 2009, our Domestic segment's operating income was $1.8 billion, or 5.0% of revenue, compared with $2.0 billion, or 6.0% of revenue, in fiscal 2008. The Domestic segment's operating income rate in fiscal 2009 decreased due to an increase in the SG&A rate as well as restructuring and goodwill and tradename impairment charges, partially offset by a slight increase in the gross profit rate.
Our Domestic segment's revenue in fiscal 2009 increased 5% to $35.1 billion. The net addition of 136 new stores contributed to the revenue increase, partially offset by the 1.3% comparable store sales decline.
The components of the net revenue increase in the Domestic segment in fiscal 2009 were as follows:
Net new stores |
6 | % | ||
1.3% comparable store sales decline |
(1 | )% | ||
Total revenue increase |
5 | % | ||
The following table presents the Domestic segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2009 and 2008:
|
Revenue Mix Summary | Comparable Store Sales Summary | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Year Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
|
February 28, 2009 |
March 1, 2008 |
February 28, 2009 |
March 1, 2008 |
|||||||||
Consumer electronics |
39 | % | 41 | % | (5.8 | )% | (2.4 | )% | |||||
Home office |
31 | % | 28 | % | 10.4 | % | 7.0 | % | |||||
Entertainment software |
19 | % | 20 | % | (5.9 | )% | 6.1 | % | |||||
Appliances |
5 | % | 5 | % | (15.4 | )% | (5.0 | )% | |||||
Services |
6 | % | 6 | % | 4.1 | % | 4.1 | % | |||||
Other |
<1 | % | <1 | % | n/a | n/a | |||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | (1.3 | )% | 1.9 | % | |||||
Our Domestic segment's comparable store sales decline in fiscal 2009 reflected a decrease in customer traffic, partially offset by an increase in the average ticket.
Our Domestic segment's consumer electronics revenue category posted a 5.8% comparable store sales decline, driven by declines in the sales of digital cameras, tube and projection televisions and MP3 players and accessories, which were partially offset by gains in the sales of flat-panel televisions.
A 10.4% comparable store sales gain in our Domestic segment's home office revenue category was driven
41
primarily by a continuation of increases in the sales of notebook computers and mobile phones.
Our Domestic segment's entertainment software revenue category recorded a 5.9% comparable store sales decline due primarily to continued declines in the sales of DVDs and CDs. The comparable store sales decline was partially offset by gains in the sales of video gaming hardware and software, fueled by the increased availability of hardware and a greater selection of software.
A 15.4% comparable store sales decline in our Domestic segment's appliances revenue category was driven primarily by declines in the sales of major appliances and small electrics due to weakness in the housing sector.
Our Domestic segment's services revenue category recorded a 4.1% comparable store sales gain due primarily to growth in the sales of service contracts and extended warranties and in our product repair business.
Our Domestic segment's gross profit rate in fiscal 2009 increased by 0.1% of revenue to 24.6% of revenue. The increase was due primarily to margin rate improvements in our television and computing categories and increased sales of higher-margin products within our mobile phone category, partially offset by a continued shift in our revenue mix to sales of lower-margin notebook computers.
Our Domestic segment's SG&A rate in fiscal 2009 increased by 0.7% of revenue to 19.2% of revenue. The increase was due primarily to the deleveraging impact of lower comparable store sales on payroll, benefits and overhead; increased spending on investments, including the roll-out and staffing of the Best Buy Mobile store-within-a-store experience; and store projects such as resets of the navigation products, computing and video gaming selling spaces and information technology enhancements to our point-of-sale systems. Partially offsetting the increase was lower incentive compensation as a result of lower profitability.
Our Domestic segment's operating income in fiscal 2009 also included restructuring, goodwill and tradename impairment charges recorded in the fiscal fourth quarter. The $72 million restructuring charge related primarily to employee termination benefits offered pursuant to voluntary and involuntary separation plans at our corporate headquarters and certain other locations. The $66 million goodwill and tradename impairment was recognized within our Speakeasy business, as a result of our annual test of goodwill for impairment. The impairment charges consist of a $62 million goodwill impairment and $4 million tradename impairment. The principal factor that contributed to the impairments was changes to our expectations of Speakeasy's revenue growth relative to the assumptions we made in the prior fiscal year.
The following table reconciles Domestic stores open at the beginning and end of fiscal 2009:
|
Total Stores at End of Fiscal 2008 |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal 2009 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Buy |
923 | 100 | | 1,023 | |||||||||
Best Buy Mobile |
9 | 32 | (3 | ) | 38 | ||||||||
Pacific Sales |
19 | 15 | | 34 | |||||||||
Magnolia Audio Video |
13 | | (7 | ) | 6 | ||||||||
Geek Squad |
7 | | (1 | ) | 6 | ||||||||
Total Domestic stores |
971 | 147 | (11 | ) | 1,107 | ||||||||
Note: During fiscal 2009, we relocated six Best Buy stores. No other store in the Domestic segment was relocated during fiscal 2009.
42
The following table reconciles Domestic stores open at the beginning and end of fiscal 2008:
|
Total Stores at End of Fiscal 2007 |
Stores Opened |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal 2008 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Buy |
822 | 101 | | 923 | |||||||||
Best Buy Mobile |
5 | 4 | | 9 | |||||||||
Pacific Sales |
14 | 5 | | 19 | |||||||||
Magnolia Audio Video |
20 | | (7 | ) | 13 | ||||||||
Geek Squad |
12 | | (5 | ) | 7 | ||||||||
Total Domestic stores |
873 | 110 | (12 | ) | 971 | ||||||||
Note: During fiscal 2008, we relocated eight Best Buy stores. No other store in the Domestic segment was relocated during fiscal 2008.
Fiscal 2008 Results Compared With Fiscal 2007
In fiscal 2008, our Domestic segment's operating income was $2.0 billion, or 6.0% of revenue, compared with $1.9 billion, or 6.1% of revenue, in fiscal 2007. The Domestic segment's operating income rate in fiscal 2008 benefited from revenue gains and an improvement in the SG&A rate, partially offset by a decrease in the gross profit rate.
Our Domestic segment's revenue in fiscal 2008 increased 7% to $33.3 billion. Excluding the impact of an extra week of business in fiscal 2007, revenue increased 9% in fiscal 2008. Excluding the impact of the extra week, the net addition of new stores accounted for nearly eight-tenths of the revenue increase in fiscal 2008; the 1.9% comparable store sales gain accounted for nearly two-tenths of the revenue increase; and the remainder of the revenue increase was due to the non-comparable store sales generated from the acquisition of Speakeasy.
The following table presents the Domestic segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2008 and 2007:
|
Revenue Mix Summary | Comparable Store Sales Summary | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Year Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
|
March 1, 2008 |
March 3, 2007 |
March 1, 2008 |
March 3, 2007 |
|||||||||
Consumer electronics |
41 | % | 42 | % | (2.4 | )% | 8.3 | % | |||||
Home office |
28 | % | 27 | % | 7.0 | % | (1.2 | )% | |||||
Entertainment software |
20 | % | 19 | % | 6.1 | % | 2.4 | % | |||||
Appliances |
5 | % | 6 | % | (5.0 | )% | (1.7 | )% | |||||
Services |
6 | % | 5 | % | 4.1 | % | 9.0 | % | |||||
Other |
<1 | % | <1 | % | n/a | n/a | |||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 1.9 | % | 4.1 | % | |||||
Our Domestic segment's comparable store sales gain in fiscal 2008 benefited from a higher average transaction amount driven by the continued growth in sales of higher-ticket items, including video gaming hardware, flat-panel televisions and notebook computers. Also contributing to the fiscal 2008 comparable store sales gain was an increase in online purchases, as we continued to add features and capabilities to our Web sites, including the launch of a Spanish-language version of BestBuy.com and the ability of our loyalty club members to redeem Reward Zone certificates online. Revenue from our Domestic segment's online operations increased approximately 30% in fiscal 2008 and added to the overall comparable store sales increase.
Our Domestic segment's consumer electronics revenue category posted a 2.4% comparable store sales decline, driven by declines in the sales of tube and projection televisions and MP3 players and accessories, which was offset by gains in the sales of flat-panel televisions and navigation products.
A 7.0% comparable store sales gain in our Domestic segment's home office revenue category was driven primarily by increased sales of notebook computers. The
43
comparable store sales gain was partially offset by declines in the sales of desktop computers, printers and monitors.
Our Domestic segment's entertainment software revenue category recorded a 6.1% comparable store sales gain due primarily to sales growth in video gaming hardware and software, fueled by the increased availability of hardware and a greater selection of software. The comparable store sales gain was partially offset by continued declines in the sales of CDs and DVDs.
A 5.0% comparable store sales decline in our Domestic segment's appliances revenue category was driven primarily by declines in the sales of major appliances and small electrics due to soft macro-economic conditions in the housing sector.
Our Domestic segment's services revenue category recorded a 4.1% comparable store sales gain due primarily to sales growth in home theater installation and computer services, partially offset by declines in the sales of service contracts and extended warranties.
Our Domestic segment's gross profit rate in fiscal 2008 decreased by 0.3% of revenue to 24.5% of revenue. The decrease was due primarily to a lower-margin revenue mix, including increased revenue from video gaming hardware and notebook computers. These declines were partially offset by better promotional spending in home theater, music and movies, as well as lower financing rates and Reward Zone costs.
Our Domestic segment's SG&A rate in fiscal 2008 decreased by 0.2% of revenue to 18.5% of revenue. The improvement was due primarily to the leveraging effect of the 7% growth in revenue and store operating model improvements, which includes labor efficiencies and an operating procedure change.
International
The following table presents selected financial data for our International segment for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions):
International Segment Performance Summary |
2009(1) |
2008 |
2007(2) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue |
$ | 9,945 | $ | 6,695 | $ | 4,903 | ||||
Revenue gain % |
49 | % | 37 | % | 41 | % | ||||
Comparable store sales % (decline) gain |
(0.9 | )% | 9.0 | % | 11.7 | % | ||||
Gross profit as % of revenue |
23.9 | % | 20.7 | % | 21.6 | % | ||||
SG&A as % of revenue |
22.7 | % | 18.3 | % | 19.6 | % | ||||
Operating income |
$ | 112 | $ | 162 | $ | 99 | ||||
Operating income as % of revenue |
1.1 | % | 2.4 | % | 2.0 | % |
Fiscal 2009 Results Compared With Fiscal 2008
In fiscal 2009, our International segment's operating income was $112 million, or 1.1% of revenue, compared with $162 million, or 2.4% of revenue, in fiscal 2008. The decrease in our International segment's operating income rate resulted primarily from deterioration in the SG&A rate, partially offset by improvement in the gross profit rate.
Our International segment's revenue increased 49% to $9.9 billion in fiscal 2009, compared with $6.7 billion in fiscal 2008. Excluding the acquisition of Best Buy Europe, which had revenue of $3.2 billion in fiscal 2009, and the effects of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, our International segment's revenue increased 5% in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008. In fiscal 2009, excluding the acquisition of Best Buy Europe and the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, the net addition of 78 new stores (of which 51 were Best Buy Europe stores) accounted for the entire increase in revenue, partially offset by a 0.9% comparable store sales decline. The decrease in comparable store sales was the result of a 1.2% decline in comparable store sales in Canada, and a 0.1% comparable store sales decline in China.
44
The components of the net revenue increase in fiscal 2009 were as follows:
Acquisition of Best Buy Europe |
48 | % | ||
Net new stores |
6 | % | ||
0.9% comparable store sales decline |
(1 | )% | ||
Unfavorable impact of foreign currency |
(4 | )% | ||
Total revenue increase |
49 | % | ||
The following table presents the International segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2009 and 2008:
|
Revenue Mix Summary | Comparable Store Sales Summary | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Year Ended | |
|
||||||||||
|
Year Ended | ||||||||||||
|
|
March 1, 2008 |
|||||||||||
|
February 28, 2009(1) |
February 28, 2009 |
March 1, 2008 |
||||||||||
Consumer electronics |
26 | % | 39 | % | (0.9 | )% | 5.4 | % | |||||
Home office |
45 | % | 30 | % | (2.7 | )% | 7.7 | % | |||||
Entertainment software |
9 | % | 13 | % | 3.3 | % | 23.7 | % | |||||
Appliances |
10 | % | 13 | % | (2.2 | )% | 6.5 | % | |||||
Services |
10 | % | 5 | % | 3.1 | % | 14.7 | % | |||||
Other |
<1 | % | <1 | % | n/a | n/a | |||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | (0.9 | )% | 9.0 | % | |||||
The products having the largest impact on our International segment's comparable store sales decline in fiscal 2009 were projection and tube televisions, computer monitors and printers partially offset by gains in video gaming hardware and software and flat-panel televisions.
In fiscal 2009, our International segment's consumer electronics revenue category posted a 0.9% comparable store sales decline resulting primarily from declines in the sales of projection and tube TVs and MP3 players and accessories, partially offset by gains in the sales of flat-panel televisions and navigation products. The home office revenue category posted a 2.7% comparable store sales decline, which resulted from comparable store sales declines in the sales of computer monitors and printers, partially offset by a gain in the sales of notebook computers. The entertainment software revenue category recorded a 3.3% comparable store sales gain reflecting an increase in the sales of video gaming hardware and software, partially offset by a decline in the sales of CDs and DVDs. The appliances revenue category recorded a 2.2% comparable store sales decline resulting primarily from decreases in the sales of major appliances and small electrics in our Five Star operations. Our services revenue category posted a 3.1% comparable store sales gain due primarily to an increase in revenue from our product repair business.
Our International segment's gross profit rate in fiscal 2009 increased by 3.2% of revenue to 23.9% of revenue. The acquisition of Best Buy Europe increased our International segment's gross profit rate by 3.0% of revenue in fiscal 2009. Excluding the acquisition of Best Buy Europe, the modest gross profit rate increase was primarily driven by improved promotional control and other gross profit optimization initiatives in China, as well as the stabilization of the gross profit rate in Canada.
Our International segment's SG&A rate in fiscal 2009 increased by 4.4% of revenue to 22.7% of revenue. The acquisition of Best Buy Europe increased our International segment's SG&A rate by 3.3% of revenue in fiscal 2009. Excluding the acquisition of Best Buy Europe, the increase in the International segment's SG&A rate was primarily
45
driven by the deleveraging impact of the comparable store sales decline on payroll, benefits and overhead costs; planned investments in China, Mexico and Turkey for future store expansion and new store start-up; inflationary pressures on rent and other operating costs in China; and information technology and customer analytic investments to support our international growth.
The following table reconciles International stores open at the beginning and end of fiscal 2009:
|
Total Stores at End of Fiscal 2008 |
Stores Opened |
Stores Acquired |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal 2009 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Buy Europe |
| 105 | 2,414 | (54 | ) | 2,465 | ||||||||||
Future Shop |
131 | 9 | | (1 | ) | 139 | ||||||||||
Best Buy Canada |
51 | 7 | | | 58 | |||||||||||
Best Buy Mobile Canada |
| 3 | | | 3 | |||||||||||
Five Star |
160 | 9 | | (5 | ) | 164 | ||||||||||
Best Buy China |
1 | 4 | | | 5 | |||||||||||
Best Buy Mexico |
| 1 | | | 1 | |||||||||||
Total International stores |
343 | 138 | 2,414 | (60 | ) | 2,835 | ||||||||||
Note: During fiscal 2009, we relocated 20 Best Buy Europe stores, six Future Shop stores and two Five Star stores. No other store in the International segment was relocated during fiscal 2009.
The following table reconciles International stores open at the beginning and end of fiscal 2008:
|
Total Stores at End of Fiscal 2007 |
Stores Opened |
Stores Acquired |
Stores Closed |
Total Stores at End of Fiscal 2008 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Future Shop |
121 | 10 | | | 131 | |||||||||||
Best Buy Canada |
47 | 4 | | | 51 | |||||||||||
Five Star |
135 | 31 | | (6 | ) | 160 | ||||||||||
Best Buy China |
1 | | | | 1 | |||||||||||
Total International stores |
304 | 45 | | (6 | ) | 343 | ||||||||||
Note: During fiscal 2008, we relocated one Future Shop store. No other store in the International segment was relocated during fiscal 2008.
Fiscal 2008 Results Compared With Fiscal 2007
In fiscal 2008, our International segment's operating income was $162 million, or 2.4% of revenue, compared with $99 million, or 2.0% of revenue, in fiscal 2007. The increase in our International segment's operating income resulted primarily from revenue gains and a significant improvement in the SG&A rate. These factors were partially offset by a decrease in the gross profit rate.
Our International segment's revenue increased 37% to $6.7 billion in fiscal 2008, compared with $4.9 billion in fiscal 2007. Excluding the impact of the extra week of business in fiscal 2007, revenue increased 38% in fiscal 2008. Excluding the impact of the extra week, the favorable effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates accounted for slightly more than three- tenths of the revenue increase; the non-comparable store sales generated from the acquisition of Five Star accounted for nearly three-tenths of the revenue increase; the 9.0% comparable store sales gain accounted for more than two-tenths of the revenue increase; and the remainder of the revenue increase was due to the net addition of new Future Shop and Best Buy stores in Canada and new Five Star stores in China during the past fiscal year. Revenue from our International segment's online operations increased approximately 12% in fiscal 2008 and added to the segment's comparable store sales increase.
46
The following table presents the International segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2008 and 2007:
|
Revenue Mix Summary | Comparable Store Sales Summary | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Year Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
|
March 1, 2008 |
March 3, 2007 |
March 1, 2008 |
March 3, 2007 |
|||||||||
Consumer electronics |
39 | % | 41 | % | 5.4 | % | 15.7 | % | |||||
Home office |
30 | % | 32 | % | 7.7 | % | 7.4 | % | |||||
Entertainment software |
13 | % | 12 | % | 23.7 | % | 11.3 | % | |||||
Appliances |
13 | % | 10 | % | 6.5 | % | 8.0 | % | |||||
Services |
5 | % | 5 | % | 14.7 | % | 13.8 | % | |||||
Other |
<1 | % | <1 | % | n/a | n/a | |||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 9.0 | % | 11.7 | % | |||||
Our International segment's comparable store sales gain in fiscal 2008 reflected an increase in the average transaction amount, which was driven by continued growth in the sales of higher-priced products. The products having the largest positive effect on our International segment's comparable store sales gain were video gaming hardware and software, flat-panel televisions, notebook computers and navigation products. Growth in the sales of these products was partially offset by comparable store sales declines in projection and tube televisions, computer software and CDs.
In fiscal 2008, our International segment's consumer electronics revenue category posted a 5.4% comparable store sales gain resulting primarily from gains in the sales of flat-panel televisions, navigation products and digital cameras, partially offset by declines in the sales of tube and projection televisions and MP3 players and accessories. The home office revenue category posted a 7.7% comparable store sales gain, which resulted from comparable store sales gains in notebook and desktop computers, partially offset by a decline in the sales of mobile phones. The entertainment software revenue category recorded a 23.7% comparable store sales gain reflecting an increase in the sales of video gaming hardware and software, partially offset by an expected decline in the sales of computer software and CDs. The appliances revenue category recorded a 6.5% comparable store sales gain resulting primarily from increases in the sales of appliances in our Five Star operations, where appliances represent a larger percentage of the sales and whose results were included in the comparable store sales figures for the first time in fiscal 2008. Our services revenue category posted a 14.7% comparable store sales gain due primarily to an increase in revenue from our product repair business.
Our International segment's gross profit rate in fiscal 2008 decreased by 0.9% of revenue to 20.7% of revenue. Our China operations, which operate at a significantly lower gross profit rate than our Canada operations, reduced our International segment's gross profit rate by approximately 0.7% of revenue in fiscal 2008. The remainder of the decrease in our International segment's gross profit rate was due primarily to the increased sales of lower-margin products in both our Canada and China operations, which was partially offset by rate improvements in certain product categories as well as lower financing costs in Canada.
Our International segment's SG&A rate in fiscal 2008 decreased by 1.3% of revenue to 18.3% of revenue. Our China operations, which carry a significantly lower SG&A rate than our Canada operations, reduced our International segment's SG&A rate by approximately 0.5% of revenue in fiscal 2008. The remainder of the improvement in our International segment's SG&A rate was due primarily to the leveraging effect of the 37% growth in revenue and continued focus on SG&A optimization initiatives. Partially offsetting the decrease were continued costs incurred for infrastructure investments in China, the build-out of an international support team and the start-up costs for entry into Mexico and Turkey.
Additional Consolidated Results
Other Income (Expense)
Our investment income and other in fiscal 2009 decreased to $35 million, compared with $129 million and $162 million in fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 was due to the impact of lower average cash and investment balances, as investments were liquidated to fund our acquisition of Best Buy Europe in fiscal 2009, as well as
47
lower interest rates earned on our cash and investment balances in fiscal 2009. The decrease in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 was due to the impact of lower average cash and investment balances, as investments were liquidated to fund our ASR program in fiscal 2008. We also had a one-time $20 million gain on the sale of an equity investment in fiscal 2007.
Interest expense in fiscal 2009 increased to $94 million, compared with $62 million and $31 million in fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 was due primarily to increased borrowings under our credit facilities, higher debt balances related to the purchase of Best Buy Europe and greater working capital needs in fiscal 2009. The increase in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 was due primarily to increased borrowings under our credit facilities to fund our ASR program in fiscal 2008.
Investment Impairment
During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we purchased in the open market 26.1 million shares of CPW common stock for $183 million, representing nearly 3% of CPW's then outstanding shares. In accordance with our policy for evaluating investments for impairment, we determined, based on specific facts and circumstances, that our investment in CPW had incurred an other-than-temporary impairment in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, resulting in a $111 million impairment charge.
Effective Income Tax Rate
Our effective income tax rate increased to 39.6% in fiscal 2009, compared with 36.6% in fiscal 2008 and 35.3% in fiscal 2007. The increase in the effective income tax rate in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 was due primarily to the other-than-temporary impairment of our investment in the common stock of CPW and the non-deductibility of our $62 million goodwill impairment charge. The increase in the effective income tax rate in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 was due primarily to a reduced tax benefit from foreign operations, lower tax-exempt interest income and an increase in state income taxes.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
Highly competitive market conditions and the general economic environment minimized inflation's impact on the selling prices of our products and services, and on our expenses. In addition, price deflation and the continued commoditization of key technology products affected our ability to increase our gross profit rate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Summary
We ended fiscal 2009 with $509 million of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, compared with $1.5 billion at the end of fiscal 2008. Our short-term debt outstanding under our various credit agreements was $783 million, an increase from $156 million at March 1, 2008. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents and increase in short-term debt was due primarily to the liquidation of a substantial portion of our cash and investment balances to fund our acquisitions of Best Buy Europe, Napster and the remaining 25% interest in Five Star and for normal working capital needs in fiscal 2009.
Working capital, the (deficiency) excess of current assets over current liabilities, was $(243) million at the end of fiscal 2009, down from $573 million at the end of fiscal 2008.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions):
|
2009 |
2008 |
2007 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total cash provided by (used in): |
|||||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 1,877 | $ | 2,025 | $ | 1,762 | |||||
Investing activities |
(3,573 | ) | 1,464 | (780 | ) | ||||||
Financing activities |
737 | (3,378 | ) | (513 | ) | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
19 | 122 | (12 | ) | |||||||
(Decrease)increase in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (940 | ) | $ | 233 | $ | 457 | ||||
48
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $1.9 billion in fiscal 2009, compared with $2.0 billion and $1.8 billion in fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in fiscal 2009 was due primarily to changes in accounts receivable, merchandise inventories, other assets, other liabilities and accrued income taxes. The decrease in cash provided by accounts receivable was due to the timing of the receipt of customer and network operator receivables in our Europe business (reported on a two-month lag), which are typically collected subsequent to the December month-end. The increase in cash used for other assets was due primarily to increases in restricted cash balances as well as a decrease in cash provided by long-term receivables associated with our Europe business due to timing of collection. In addition, we had increases in cash used for other liabilities due primarily to the timing of payments of payroll and employer taxes and other accruals as well as a decrease in cash provided by gift card sales. Finally, the increase in cash used for accrued income taxes was due to the timing of tax payments. These changes were largely offset by the decrease in cash used for merchandise inventories due to our efforts to control inventory spending given changes in consumer demand experienced in the latter half of fiscal 2009.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $3.6 billion in fiscal 2009, compared with cash provided by investing activities of $1.5 billion in fiscal 2008 and cash used in investing activities of $780 million in fiscal 2007. The change in cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2009, compared with cash provided in fiscal 2008, was due to a decrease in the net sales of investments of $2.3 billion and increases in cash used for acquisition activities and capital expenditures. We liquidated a substantial portion of our investment portfolio in fiscal 2008 in order to repay debt incurred to fund our ASR program. We acquired Best Buy Europe, Napster and the remaining 25% interest in Five Star for an aggregate $2.3 billion in fiscal 2009 and Speakeasy for $89 million in fiscal 2008. In addition, capital expenditures in fiscal 2009 increased to $1.3 billion, compared to $797 million in fiscal 2008. Refer to Capital Expenditures below for additional information.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $737 million in fiscal 2009, compared with cash used of $3.4 billion and $513 million in fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The change in cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2009, compared with cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2008, was due primarily to a decrease in repurchases of our common stock. During fiscal 2009, we did not repurchase any of our common stock, compared with repurchases of $3.5 billion in share repurchases in fiscal 2008. Also, proceeds from the issuance of debt, net of repayments, were $894 million in fiscal 2009, compared with $133 million in fiscal 2008. In fiscal 2009, we engaged in various debt financing activities in connection with our acquisition of Best Buy Europe.
Sources of Liquidity
Funds generated by operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents, and our credit facilities continue to be our most significant sources of liquidity. We believe our sources of liquidity will be sufficient to sustain operations, including restructuring costs, and to finance anticipated expansion plans and strategic initiatives in fiscal 2010. However, in the event our liquidity is insufficient, we may be required to limit our future expansion plans or we may not be able to pursue promising business opportunities. There can be no assurance that we will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our existing credit facilities or obtain additional financing, if necessary, on favorable terms.
Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, we have a $2.5 billion five-year unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks, of which $162 million was outstanding at February 28, 2009. The Credit Agreement permits borrowings up to $2.5 billion, which may be increased up to $3.0 billion at our option upon the consent of the administrative agent under the Credit Agreement and each of the banks providing an incremental credit commitment. The Credit Agreement terminates in September 2012. At April 27, 2009, we had $275 outstanding under the facility.
In September 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. ("Lehman") filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. A subsidiary of Lehman, Lehman CPI, is one of the lenders under the Credit Agreement and represents a commitment of $180 million. Since
49
September 2008, Lehman CPI has declined requests for funding under the Credit Agreement and no other lender has assumed Lehman CPI's obligation to fund. As a result, our borrowing base of $2.5 billion has been effectively reduced by $180 million.
We have $879 million available for borrowing under secured and unsecured revolving demand and credit facilities related to our International segment operations, of which $621 million and $36 million was outstanding at February 28, 2009, and March 1, 2008, respectively.
Our ability to access our credit facilities is subject to our compliance with the terms and conditions of the credit facilities, including financial covenants. The financial covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios. At February 28, 2009, we were in compliance with all such covenants. In the event we were to default on any of our other debt, it would likely constitute a default under our credit facilities as well.
An interest coverage ratio represents the ratio of pre-tax earnings before fixed charges (interest expense and the interest portion of rent expense) to fixed charges. Our interest coverage ratio, calculated as reported in Exhibit No. 12.1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, was 5.5 and 8.9 in fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Our credit ratings and outlooks at April 27, 2009, are summarized below. The rating issued by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") is consistent with the rating and outlook reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2008. In November 2008, Fitch Ratings Ltd. ("Fitch") reaffirmed our BBB+ rating, but assigned a negative outlook because it believed declines in our comparable store sales were significant. In November 2008, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("Standard & Poor's") downgraded our rating to BBB- and assigned a stable outlook due to the current weak economic environment in the U.S. This downgrade has not impacted our borrowing costs.
Rating Agency |
Rating |
Outlook |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fitch |
BBB+ | Negative | ||
Moody's |
Baa2 | Stable | ||
Standard & Poor's |
BBB- | Stable |
Factors that can affect our credit ratings include changes in our operating performance, the economic environment, conditions in the retail and consumer electronics industries, our financial position, and changes in our business strategy. We are not aware of any reasonable circumstances under which our credit ratings would be significantly downgraded. If a downgrade were to occur, it could adversely impact, among other things, our future borrowing costs, access to capital markets, vendor financing terms and future new-store occupancy costs. In addition, the conversion rights of the holders of our convertible debentures could be accelerated if our credit ratings were to be downgraded.
Auction Rate Securities and Restricted Cash
At February 28, 2009, and March 1, 2008, we had $314 million and $417 million, respectively, of auction-rate securities ("ARS") recorded at fair value within equity and other investments in our consolidated balance sheets. The majority of our ARS portfolio is AAA/Aaa-rated and collateralized by student loans, which are guaranteed 95% to 100% by the U.S. government. See Note 3, Investments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
Due to the auction failures that began in mid-February 2008, we have been unable to liquidate many of our ARS. The investment principal associated with our ARS subject to failed auctions will not be accessible until successful auctions occur, a buyer is found outside of the auction process, the issuers establish a different form of financing to replace these securities, or final payments come due according to the contractual maturities of the debt issues, which range from 8 to 40 years. We intend to hold our ARS until we can recover the full principal amount through one of the means described above, and have the ability to do so based on our other sources of liquidity.
Our liquidity is also affected by restricted cash that is pledged as collateral or restricted to use for vendor payables, general liability insurance, workers' compensation insurance and customer warranty and insurance programs. Restricted cash was $487 million and $309 million at February 28, 2009, and March 1, 2008, respectively, and was included in other current assets.
Capital Expenditures
A component of our long-term strategy is our capital expenditure program. This program includes, among other things, investments in new stores, store remodeling, store relocations and expansions, new distribution facilities and information technology enhancements. During fiscal 2009,
50
we invested $1.3 billion in property and equipment, including opening 285 new stores; adding Best Buy Mobile store-within-a-store experiences inside new and existing Best Buy stores in the U.S. and Canada; expanding and remodeling existing stores; and upgrading our information technology systems and capabilities. Capital expenditures are funded through cash provided by operating activities, as well as available cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.
The following table presents our capital expenditures for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions):
|
2009 |
2008 |
2007 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New stores |
$ | 387 | $ | 267 | $ | 253 | ||||
Store-related projects(1) |
333 | 222 | 251 | |||||||
Information technology |
494 | 259 | 121 | |||||||
Other |
89 | 49 | 108 | |||||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 1,303 | $ | 797 | $ | 733 | ||||
Debt and Capital
6.75% Notes
In June 2008, we sold $500 million principal amount of notes due July 15, 2013 ("Notes"). The Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.75% per year, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on January 15, 2009. The interest payable on the Notes is subject to adjustment if either Moody's or Standard & Poor's downgrades to below investment grade the rating assigned to the Notes. Net proceeds from the sale of the Notes were $496 million, after an initial issuance discount of approximately $1 million and other transaction costs.
We may redeem some or all of the Notes at any time, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date and an applicable make-whole amount as described in the indenture relating to the Notes.
In October 2008, we filed a registration statement under the Securities Act to permit either the exchange of the Notes for registered notes having terms substantially identical to the Notes (except that the registered notes would not be subject to additional interest provisions or restrictions on ownership or transfer) or, in the alternative, the registered resale of the Notes. The registration statement was declared effective on December 15, 2008.
The Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated debt. The Notes contain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our North American subsidiaries to incur debt secured by liens, enter into sale and lease-back transactions and, in the case of such subsidiaries, incur debt.
Convertible Debentures
In January 2002, we sold convertible subordinated debentures having an aggregate principal amount of $402 million. The proceeds from the offering, net of $6 million in offering expenses, were $396 million. The debentures mature in 2022 and are callable at par, at our option, for cash on or after January 15, 2007.
Holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their debentures on January 15, 2012, and January 15, 2017, at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures plus accrued and unpaid interest up to but not including the date of purchase. We have the option to settle the purchase price in cash, stock, or a combination of cash and stock. On January 15, 2007, holders had the option to require us to purchase all or a portion of their debentures, at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures plus accrued and unpaid interest up to but not including the date of purchase. However, no debentures were so purchased.
The debentures become convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 21.7391 shares per $1,000 principal amount of debentures, equivalent to an initial conversion price of $46.00 per share, if the closing price of our common stock exceeds a specified price for 20 consecutive trading days in a 30-trading day period preceding the date of conversion, if our credit rating falls below specified levels, if the debentures are called for redemption or if certain specified corporate transactions
51
occur. During a portion of fiscal 2007, our closing stock price exceeded the specified stock price for more than 20 trading days in a 30-day trading period. Therefore, debenture holders had the option to convert their debentures into shares of our common stock. However, no debentures were so converted. Due to changes in the price of our common stock, the debentures were no longer convertible at the holders' option at March 3, 2007, and have not been convertible through April 27, 2009.
The debentures have an interest rate of 2.25% per annum. The interest rate may be reset, but not below 2.25% or above 3.25%, on July 15, 2011, and July 15, 2016. One of our subsidiaries has guaranteed the convertible debentures.
Other
At the end of fiscal 2009, $200 million was outstanding under financing lease obligations.
Share Repurchases and Dividends
From time to time, we repurchase our common stock in the open market pursuant to programs approved by our Board. We may repurchase our common stock for a variety of reasons, such as acquiring shares to offset dilution related to equity-based incentives, including stock options and our employee stock purchase plan, and optimizing our capital structure.
In June 2007, our Board authorized a $5.5 billion share repurchase program. The program, which became effective on June 26, 2007, terminated and replaced a $1.5 billion share repurchase program authorized by our Board in June 2006. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can make our share repurchases under the June 2007 share repurchase program. The June 2006 share repurchase program, which became effective June 21, 2006, terminated and replaced a $1.5 billion share repurchase program authorized by our Board in April 2005.
We made no share repurchases during fiscal 2009.
In accordance with our June 2007 share repurchase program, in fiscal 2008, we entered into an ASR program authorized by the Board. The ASR program consisted of two agreements to purchase shares of our common stock from Goldman for an aggregate purchase price of $3.0 billion. The ASR program concluded in February 2008. Total aggregate shares repurchased under the ASR program were 65.8 million shares at an average purchase price of $45.59 per share. At the end of fiscal 2008, $2.5 billion of the $5.5 billion authorized by our Board was available for future share repurchases under the June 2007 share repurchase program. In fiscal 2008, we also purchased and retired 9.8 million shares at a cost of $461 million under the June 2006 share repurchase program.
During fiscal 2007, we purchased and retired 5.6 million shares at a cost of $267 million under the June 2006 share repurchase program, and 6.2 million shares at a cost of $332 million under the April 2005 share repurchase program.
We consider several factors in determining when to make share repurchases including, among other things, our cash needs and the market price of our stock. We expect that cash provided by future operating activities, as well as available cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, will be the sources of funding for our share repurchase program. Based on the anticipated amounts to be generated from those sources of funds in relation to the remaining authorization approved by our Board under the June 2007 share repurchase program, we do not expect that future share repurchases will have a material impact on our short-term or long-term liquidity. We do not anticipate making any share repurchases in fiscal 2010.
In fiscal 2004, our Board initiated the payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common stock. A quarterly cash dividend has been paid in each subsequent quarter. Effective with the quarterly cash dividend paid in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we increased our quarterly cash dividend per share by 25% to $0.10 per share per quarter. Effective with the quarterly cash dividend paid in the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we increased our quarterly cash dividend per share by 30% to $0.13 per share per quarter. Effective with the quarterly cash dividend paid in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we increased our quarterly cash dividend per share by 8% to $0.14 per share per quarter. The payment of cash dividends is subject to customary legal and contractual restrictions. During fiscal 2009, we made four dividend payments totaling $0.54 per share, or $222 million in the aggregate.
Other Financial Measures
Our debt-to-capitalization ratio, which represents the ratio of total debt, including the current portion of long-term debt, to total capitalization (total debt plus total
52
shareholders' equity), increased to 30% at the end of fiscal 2009, compared with 15% at the end of fiscal 2008. The increase was due primarily to increased borrowings in connection with our purchase of Best Buy Europe and to fund normal working capital needs. We view our debt-to-capitalization ratio as an important indicator of our creditworthiness. Our adjusted debt-to-capitalization ratio, including capitalized operating lease obligations (rental expense for all operating leases multiplied by eight), was 68% at the end of fiscal 2009, compared with 60% at the end of fiscal 2008.
Our adjusted debt-to-capitalization ratio, including capitalized operating lease obligations, is considered a non-GAAP financial measure and is not in accordance with, or preferable to, the ratio determined in accordance with GAAP. However, we have included this information as we believe that our adjusted debt-to-capitalization ratio, including capitalized operating lease obligations, is important for understanding our operations and provides meaningful additional information about our ability to service our long-term debt and other fixed obligations, and to fund our future growth. In addition, we believe our adjusted debt-to-capitalization ratio, including capitalized operating lease obligations, is relevant because it enables investors to compare our indebtedness to retailers who own, rather than lease, their stores. Our decision to own or lease real estate is based on an assessment of our financial liquidity, our capital structure, our desire to own or to lease the location, the owner's desire to own or to lease the location, and the alternative that results in the highest return to our shareholders.
The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to our adjusted debt-to-capitalization ratio, including capitalized operating lease obligations, is our debt-to-capitalization ratio. Our debt-to-capitalization ratio excludes capitalized operating lease obligations in both the numerator and denominator of the calculation.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of our adjusted debt-to-capitalization ratio, including capitalized operating lease obligations ($ in millions):
|
2009 |
2008 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Debt (including current portion) |
$ | 1,963 | $ | 816 | |||
Capitalized operating lease obligations (8 times rental expense)(1) |
8,114 | 5,902 | |||||
Total debt (including capitalized operating lease obligations) |
$ | 10,077 | $ | 6,718 | |||
Debt (including current portion) |
$ | 1,963 | $ | 816 | |||
Capitalized operating lease obligations (8 times rental expense)(1) |
8,114 | 5,902 | |||||
Total shareholders' equity |
4,643 | 4,484 | |||||
Adjusted capitalization |
$ | 14,720 | $ | 11,202 | |||
Debt-to-capitalization ratio |
30 | % | 15 | % | |||
Adjusted debt-to-capitalization ratio (including capitalized operating lease obligations) |
68 | % | 60 | % |
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
Other than operating leases, we do not have any off-balance-sheet financing. A summary of our operating lease obligations by fiscal year is included in the "Contractual Obligations" section below. Additional information regarding our operating leases is available in Item 2, Properties, and Note 8, Leases, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
53
The following table presents information regarding our contractual obligations by fiscal year ($ in millions):
|
|
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contractual Obligations |
Total |
Less Than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
3-5 Years |
More Than 5 Years |
|||||||||||
Short-term debt obligations |
$ | 783 | $ | 783 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Long-term debt obligations |
915 | 10 | 403 | 501 | 1 | |||||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
65 | 24 | 22 | 1 | 18 | |||||||||||
Financing lease obligations |
200 | 20 | 43 | 47 | 90 | |||||||||||
Interest payments |
373 | 90 | 111 | 78 | 94 | |||||||||||
Operating lease obligations(1) |
8,600 | 1,097 | 2,009 | 1,746 | 3,748 | |||||||||||
Purchase obligations(2) |
2,668 | 1,787 | 757 | 124 | | |||||||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits(3) |
349 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation(4) |
55 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 14,008 | $ | 3,811 | $ | 3,345 | $ | 2,497 | $ | 3,951 | ||||||
Note: For additional information refer to Note 6, Debt; Note 8, Leases; Note 10, Income Taxes and Note 12, Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
54
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, we review the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We have reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board.
Description |
Judgments and Uncertainties |
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Inventory Reserves | ||||
We value our inventory at the lower of the cost of the inventory or fair market value through the establishment of markdown and inventory loss reserves. Our markdown reserve represents the excess of the carrying value, typically average cost, over the amount we expect to realize from the ultimate sale or other disposal of the inventory. Markdowns establish a new cost basis for our inventory. Subsequent changes in facts or circumstances do not result in the restoration of previously recorded markdowns or an increase in that newly established cost basis. Our inventory loss reserve represents anticipated physical inventory losses (e.g., theft) that have occurred since the last physical inventory date. Independent physical inventory counts are taken on a regular basis to ensure the inventory reported in our consolidated financial statements is properly stated. During the interim period between physical inventory counts, we reserve for anticipated physical inventory losses on a location-by-location basis. |
Our markdown reserve contains uncertainties because the calculation requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment regarding inventory aging, forecasted consumer demand, the promotional environment and technological obsolescence. Our inventory loss reserve contains uncertainties because the calculation requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment regarding a number of factors, including historical results and current inventory loss trends. |
We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to establish our markdown or inventory loss reserves during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our markdown reserve. However, if estimates regarding consumer demand are inaccurate or changes in technology affect demand for certain products in an unforeseen manner, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% difference in our actual markdown reserve at February 28, 2009, would have affected net earnings by approximately $7 million in fiscal 2009. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our inventory loss reserve. However, if our estimates regarding physical inventory losses are inaccurate, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% difference in actual physical inventory losses reserved for at February 28, 2009, would have affected net earnings by approximately $5 million in fiscal 2009. |
55
Description |
Judgments and Uncertainties |
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Vendor Allowances |
||||
We receive funds from vendors for various programs, primarily as reimbursements for costs such as markdowns, margin protection, advertising and sales incentives. Vendor allowances provided as a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to promote a vendor's products are included as an expense reduction when the cost is incurred. All other vendor allowances are initially deferred and recorded as a reduction of merchandise inventories. The deferred amounts are then included as a reduction of cost of goods sold when the related product is sold. |
Based on the provisions of our vendor agreements, we develop vendor fund accrual rates by estimating the point at which we will have completed our performance under the agreement and the deferred amounts will be earned. During the year, due to the complexity and diversity of the individual vendor agreements, we perform analyses and review historical trends to ensure the deferred amounts earned are appropriately recorded. As a part of these analyses, we apply rates negotiated with our vendors to actual purchase volumes to determine the amount of funds accrued and receivable from the vendor. Certain of our vendor agreements contain purchase volume incentives that provide for increased funding when graduated purchase volumes are met. Amounts accrued throughout the year could be impacted if actual purchase volumes differ from projected annual purchase volumes. |
We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to record vendor receivables during the past three fiscal years. If actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and estimates used, we may be exposed to additional adjustments that could materially, either positively or negatively, impact our gross profit rate and inventory. However, substantially all receivables associated with these activities are collected within the following fiscal year and all amounts deferred against inventory turnover within the following fiscal year and therefore do not require subjective long-term estimates. Adjustments to our gross profit rate and inventory in the following fiscal year have historically not been material. A 10% difference in our vendor receivables at February 28, 2009, would have affected net earnings by approximately $23 million in fiscal 2009. |
||
Long-Lived Assets |
||||
Long-lived assets other than goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, which are separately tested for impairment, are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. When evaluating long-lived assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). If the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated fair value, which may be based on estimated future cash flows (discounted and with interest charges). We recognize an impairment loss if the amount of the asset's carrying value exceeds the asset's estimated fair value. If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis will be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. |
Our impairment loss calculations contain uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including forecasting useful lives of the assets and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows. |
We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to assess impairment loss during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate long-lived asset impairment losses. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to losses that could be material. |
56
Description |
Judgments and Uncertainties |
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
||||
We evaluate goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the goodwill or other intangible assets may not be recoverable. We complete our impairment evaluation by performing internal valuation analyses, considering other publicly available market information and using an independent valuation firm, as appropriate. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed our annual impairment testing of goodwill and other intangible assets using the methodology described herein, and determined there was impairment of $66 million. The carrying value of goodwill at February 28, 2009, was $2.2 billion. The carrying value of tradenames at February 28, 2009, was $173 million. |
We determine fair value using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows and market multiple analyses. These types of analyses contain uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate industry economic factors and the profitability of future business strategies. It is our policy to conduct impairment testing based on our current business strategy in light of present industry and economic conditions, as well as our future expectations. |
We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to assess impairment loss during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to test for impairment losses on goodwill and other intangible assets. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to an impairment charge that could be material. |
||
Tax Contingencies |
||||
Our income tax returns, like those of most companies, are periodically audited by domestic and foreign tax authorities. These audits include questions regarding our tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. At any one time, multiple tax years are subject to audit by the various tax authorities. In evaluating the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we record a liability for probable exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which we have established a liability, is audited and fully resolved or clarified. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and income tax provision in the period in which an uncertain tax position is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available. |
Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits contains uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions. Our effective income tax rate is also affected by changes in tax law, the tax jurisdiction of new stores or business ventures, the level of earnings and the results of tax audits. |
Although we believe that the judgments and estimates discussed herein are reasonable, actual results could differ, and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. To the extent we prevail in matters for which a liability has been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our established liability, our effective income tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement generally would require use of our cash and result in an increase in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement would be recognized as a reduction in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. |
57
Description |
Judgments and Uncertainties |
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue Recognition |
||||
See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a complete discussion of our revenue recognition policies. We recognize revenue, net of estimated returns, at the time the customer takes possession of the merchandise or receives services. We estimate the liability for sales returns based on our historical return levels. We sell gift cards to customers in our retail stores, through our Web sites and through selected third parties. A liability is initially established for the cash value of the gift card. We recognize revenue from gift cards when: (i) the card is redeemed by the customer; or (ii) the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote ("gift card breakage"). We determine our gift card breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns, which show that after 24 months, we can determine the portion of the liability for which redemption is remote. We have customer loyalty programs which allow members to earn points for each purchase completed at any of our Best Buy stores in the U.S., Canada and China, or through our related Web sites or when using our co-branded credit cards. Points earned enable members to receive a certificate that may be redeemed on future purchases at Best Buy stores and Web sites in the U.S. Canada and China. The value of points earned by our loyalty program members is included in accrued liabilities and recorded as a reduction in revenue at the time the points are earned, based on the value of points that are projected to be redeemed. |
Our revenue recognition accounting methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future sales returns and the amount and timing of gift cards and certificates projected to be redeemed by gift card recipients and members of our customer loyalty programs. Our estimate of the amount and timing of sales returns and gift cards or certificates projected to be redeemed is based primarily on historical transaction experience. |
We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to measure sales returns or to recognize revenue for our gift card and customer loyalty programs during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to measure sales returns or to recognize revenue for our gift card and customer loyalty programs. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in our sales return reserve at February 28, 2009, would have affected net earnings by approximately $1 million in fiscal 2009. A 10% change in our gift card breakage rate at February 28, 2009, would have affected net earnings by approximately $8 million in fiscal 2009. A 10% change in our customer loyalty program liability at February 28, 2009, would have affected net earnings by approximately $7 million in fiscal 2009. |
58
Description |
Judgments and Uncertainties |
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Costs Associated With Exit Activities |
||||
We occasionally vacate stores and other locations prior to the expiration of the related lease. For vacated locations that are under long-term leases, we record an expense for the difference between our future lease payments and related costs (e.g., real estate taxes and common area maintenance) from the date of closure through the end of the remaining lease term, net of expected future sublease rental income. Our estimate of future cash flows is based on historical experience; our analysis of the specific real estate market, including input from independent real estate firms; and economic conditions that can be difficult to predict. Cash flows are discounted using a risk-free interest rate that coincides with the remaining lease term. |
The liability recorded for location closures contains uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the duration of future vacancy periods, the amount and timing of future settlement payments, and the amount and timing of potential sublease rental income. When making these assumptions, management considers a number of factors, including historical settlement experience, the owner of the property, the location and condition of the property, the terms of the underlying lease, the specific marketplace demand and general economic conditions. |
We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to establish our location closing liability during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our location closing liability. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in our location closing liability at February 28, 2009, would have affected net earnings by approximately $5 million in fiscal 2009. |
||
Stock-Based Compensation |
||||
We have a stock-based compensation plan, which includes non-qualified stock options and nonvested share awards, and an employee stock purchase plan. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 6, Shareholders' Equity, to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a complete discussion of our stock-based compensation programs. We determine the fair value of our non-qualified stock option awards at the date of grant using option-pricing models. Non-qualified stock option awards granted through fiscal 2005 were valued using a Black-Scholes model. Non-qualified stock option awards granted after fiscal 2005 were primarily valued using a lattice model. We determine the fair value of our market-based and performance-based nonvested share awards at the date of grant using generally accepted valuation techniques and the closing market price of our stock. Management reviews its assumptions and the valuations provided by independent third-party valuation advisors to determine the fair value of stock-based compensation awards. |
Option-pricing models and generally accepted valuation techniques require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to determine the fair value of our awards. These assumptions and judgments include estimating the future volatility of our stock price, expected dividend yield, future employee turnover rates and future employee stock option exercise behaviors. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. Performance-based nonvested share awards require management to make assumptions regarding the likelihood of achieving company or personal performance goals. |
We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to determine stock-based compensation expense. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to changes in stock-based compensation expense that could be material. If actual results are not consistent with the assumptions used, the stock-based compensation expense reported in our financial statements may not be representative of the actual economic cost of the stock-based compensation. A 10% change in our stock-based compensation expense for the year ended February 28, 2009, would have affected net earnings by approximately $7 million in fiscal 2009. |
59
Description |
Judgments and Uncertainties |
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Self-Insured Liabilities |
||||
We are self-insured for certain losses related to health, workers' compensation and general liability claims. However, we obtain third-party insurance coverage to limit our exposure to these claims. When estimating our self-insured liabilities, we consider a number of factors, including historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and valuations provided by independent third-party actuaries. Periodically, we review our assumptions and the valuations provided by independent third-party actuaries to determine the adequacy of our self-insured liabilities. |
Our self-insured liabilities contain uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the ultimate cost to settle reported claims and claims incurred but not reported at the balance sheet date. |
We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to establish our self-insured liabilities during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our self-insured liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in our self-insured liabilities at February 28, 2009, would have affected net earnings by approximately $8 million in fiscal 2009. |
||
Acquisitions Purchase Price Allocation |
||||
In accordance with accounting for business combinations, we allocate the purchase price of an acquired business to its identifiable assets and liabilities based on estimated fair values. Minority interests' proportionate ownership of assets and liabilities are recorded at historical carrying values. The excess of the purchase price over the amount allocated to the assets and liabilities, if any, is recorded as goodwill. We use all available information to estimate fair values. We typically engage outside appraisal firms to assist in the fair value determination of inventory, identifiable intangible assets such as tradenames, and any other significant assets or liabilities. We adjust the preliminary purchase price allocation, as necessary, up to one year after the acquisition closing date as we obtain more information regarding asset valuations and liabilities assumed. |
Our purchase price allocation methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. Management estimates the fair value of assets and liabilities based upon quoted market prices, the carrying value of the acquired assets and widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows and market multiple analyses. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the accuracy of our fair value estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies. |
During the last three fiscal years, we completed five significant acquisitions: In October 2008, we acquired Napster for $121 million, including transaction costs. In June 2008, we acquired a 50% interest in Best Buy Europe for $2.2 billion, including transaction costs. In May 2007, we acquired Speakeasy for $103 million, including transaction costs and repayment of debt. In June 2006, we acquired a 75% interest in Five Star for $184 million, including a working capital injection of $122 million and transaction costs and in February 2009, we acquired the remaining 25% interest for $190 million. In May 2006, we acquired Pacific Sales for $411 million, including transaction costs. See Note 2, Acquisitions, to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the complete purchase price allocation calculations for acquisitions completed in fiscal 2009. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to complete the purchase price allocation and estimate the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. |
60
New Accounting Standards
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). FSP Accounting Principles Board ("APB")14-1 clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon either mandatory or optional conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt issued with Stock Purchase Warrants. Additionally, FSP APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity's nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not believe our adoption of FSP APB 14-1 beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 will have an impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP for non-governmental entities. We adopted SFAS No. 162 on its effective date, November 15, 2008, and it did not have a material impact on the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand the effect these instruments and activities have on an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about: how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We adopted SFAS No. 161 on November 30, 2008, which did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(revised 2007), Business Combinations ("141R"). SFAS No. 141R significantly changes the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, preacquisition contingencies, transaction costs, in-process research and development and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS No. 141R, changes in an acquired entity's deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted SFAS No. 141R on March 1, 2009, which changed our accounting treatment for business combinations on a prospective basis.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of shareholders' equity. This new consolidation method significantly changes the accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted SFAS No. 160 on March 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements other than the reporting change for minority interests reported on our consolidated balance sheets, which required us to retroactively reclassify minority interests as a component of shareholders' equity. At February 28, 2009 and March 1, 2008, our consolidated balance sheets included minority interests of $513 million and $40 million, respectively.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to
61
mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Companies are not allowed to adopt SFAS No. 159 on a retrospective basis unless they choose early adoption. We adopted SFAS No. 159 on March 2, 2008, and did not elect the fair value option for eligible items that existed at the date of adoption.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value, sets out a fair value hierarchy to be used to classify the source of information used in fair value measurements, and requires new disclosures of assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on their level in the hierarchy. The Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSPs No. 157-1 and No. 157-2, which, respectively, removed leasing transactions from the scope of SFAS No. 157 and deferred for one year the effective date for SFAS No. 157 as it applies to certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. On March 2, 2008, we adopted, on a prospective basis, the SFAS No. 157 definition of fair value and became subject to the new disclosure requirements (excluding FSP 157-2) with respect to our fair value measurements of (a) nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in our financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) and (b) all financial assets and liabilities. Our adoption did not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations. The additional disclosures required by SFAS No. 157 are included in Note 4, Fair Value Measurements.
The deferral provided by FSP No. 157-2 applied to such items as nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination (but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods) and nonfinancial long-lived asset groups measured at fair value for an impairment assessment and on March 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 as it related to these nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The adoption did not impact our consolidated financial position or results of opertions.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active, which amended SFAS No. 157 to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset in an inactive market. FSP No. 157-3 was effective for us in our third quarter of fiscal 2009. Its additional guidance was incorporated into the measurements of fair value of applicable financial assets disclosed in Note 4, Fair Value Measurements, and did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
In addition to the risks inherent in our operations, we are exposed to certain market risks, including adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We have market risk arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our International segment operations. On a limited basis, we use forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our Canada and Europe businesses enter into the contracts primarily to hedge U.S. dollar merchandise inventory payables. The contracts typically have terms of less than 270 days, and we do not apply hedge accounting to them. The aggregate notional amount and fair value recorded on our consolidated balance sheet related to our forward foreign exchange contracts outstanding was $50 million and $4 million, respectively, at February 28, 2009. The aggregate gains recorded in our consolidated statement of net earnings related to all contracts settled and outstanding was a gain of $14 million in fiscal 2009.
Since July 2008, the U.S. dollar has been generally stronger relative to the currencies of the foreign countries in which we operate. The overall strength of the U.S. dollar had a negative impact on our International segment's revenue and net earnings because the foreign denominations translated into fewer U.S. dollars.
It is not possible to determine the exact impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes; however, the effect on reported revenue and net earnings can be estimated. We estimate that the overall strength of the U.S. dollar had an unfavorable impact on our revenue of approximately $276 million in fiscal 2009. In addition, we estimate that such strength had a favorable impact of approximately $3 million on our net earnings in fiscal 2009, due in part to our $111 million investment impairment in the common
62
stock of CPW, which was made by one of our Canadian subsidiaries.
Interest Rate Risk
Short-term and long-term debt
At February 28, 2009, our short-term and long-term debt was comprised primarily of credit facilities and our convertible debentures and Notes. We do not manage the interest rate risk on our debt through the use of derivative instruments.
Our credit facilities are not subject to material interest rate risk. The credit facilities' interest rates may be reset due to fluctuations in a market-based index, such as the federal funds rate, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), or the base rate or prime rate of our lenders. A hypothetical 100-basis-point change in the interest rates of our credit facilities would change our annual pre-tax earnings by $8 million.
Our convertible debentures are not subject to material interest rate risk. The interest rate on our debentures may be reset but not more than 100-basis-points higher than the current rates. If the interest rate on the debentures at February 28, 2009, were to be reset 100-basis-points higher, our annual pre-tax earnings would increase by $4 million.
There is no interest rate risk associated with our Notes as the interest rate is fixed at 6.75%.
Long-term investments in debt securities
At February 28, 2009, our long-term investments in debt securities were comprised of auction-rate securities. These investments are not subject to material interest rate risk. A hypothetical 100-basis-point change in the interest rate would change our annual pre-tax earnings by $3 million. We do not currently manage interest rate risk on our investments through the use of derivative instruments.
Other Market Risks
Investments in auction-rate securities
At February 28, 2009, we held $314 million in investments in ARS, after recognizing a $15 million temporary impairment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Given current conditions in the ARS market as described above in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section, included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we may incur additional temporary unrealized losses or other-than-temporary realized losses in the future if market conditions were to persist and we are unable to recover the cost of our ARS investments. A hypothetical 100-basis-point loss from the par value of these investments would result in a $3 million impairment.
Insurance relationships
We have various commercial insurance relationships with AIG CI, a subsidiary of AIG, including our sale of extended warranties on behalf of AIG CI. AIG has advised us that its commercial insurance subsidiaries remain well-capitalized with sufficient reserves and liquidity to pay claims despite the parent company's recent issues and diminished financial position. Accordingly, we anticipate that we will continue to be able to sell extended warranties on behalf of AIG CI, as well as to maintain our other insurance relationships with AIG CI. We have no reason to believe that the current financial condition of AIG will have a material adverse effect on AIG CI or on us.
63
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Management's Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements
Our management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the related financial information. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP and necessarily include certain amounts that are based on estimates and informed judgments. Our management also prepared the related financial information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is responsible for its accuracy and consistency with the consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, which conducted its audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (U.S.). The independent registered public accounting firm's responsibility is to express an opinion as to the fairness with which such financial statements present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with GAAP.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and effected by our Board, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and include those policies and procedures that:
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2009, using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 28, 2009. During our assessment, we did not identify any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. We have excluded from our assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Best Buy Europe, which was acquired on June 28, 2008, and whose financial statements reflect total assets and total revenue constituting 26% and 7%, respectively, of our consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended February 28, 2009. We have also excluded from our assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Napster, which was acquired on October 25, 2008, and whose financial statements reflect total assets and total revenue that constitute less than 1% of our consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended February 28, 2009. Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2009, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary
64
Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an unqualified attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2009.
Bradbury H. Anderson Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
James L. Muehlbauer Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) |
65
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Best Buy Co., Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of February 28, 2009 and March 1, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended February 28, 2009, March 1, 2008 and March 3, 2007. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2009 and March 1, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended February 28, 2009, March 1, 2008 and March 3, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective March 4, 2007, Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries changed their method of accounting for uncertain tax benefits upon adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 24, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
April 24, 2009
66
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Best Buy Co., Inc.
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of February 28, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Best Buy Europe, which was acquired on June 28, 2008, and whose financial statements reflect total assets and total revenues constituting 26% and 7%, respectively, of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended February 28, 2009. Management has also excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Napster, which was acquired on October 25, 2008, and whose financial statements reflect total assets and total revenues that constitute less than 1% of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended February 28, 2009. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Best Buy Europe and Napster. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
67
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended February 28, 2009 of the Company and our report dated April 24, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's change effective March 4, 2007, in its method of accounting for uncertain tax benefits.
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
April 24, 2009
68
Consolidated Balance Sheets
$ in millions, except per share and share amounts
|
February 28, 2009 |
March 1, 2008 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets |
|||||||||
Current Assets |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 498 | $ | 1,438 | |||||
Short-term investments |
11 | 64 | |||||||
Receivables |
1,868 | 549 | |||||||
Merchandise inventories |
4,753 | 4,708 | |||||||
Other current assets |
1,062 | 583 | |||||||
Total current assets |
8,192 | 7,342 | |||||||
Property and Equipment |
|||||||||
Land and buildings |
755 | 732 | |||||||
Leasehold improvements |
2,013 | 1,752 | |||||||
Fixtures and equipment |
4,060 | 3,057 | |||||||
Property under capital lease |
112 | 67 | |||||||
|
6,940 | 5,608 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
2,766 | 2,302 | |||||||
Net property and equipment |
4,174 | 3,306 | |||||||
Goodwill |
2,203 | 1,088 | |||||||
Tradenames |
173 | 97 | |||||||
Customer Relationships |
322 | 5 | |||||||
Equity and Other Investments |
395 | 605 | |||||||
Other Assets |
367 | 315 | |||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 15,826 | $ | 12,758 | |||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity |
|||||||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,997 | $ | 4,297 | |||||
Unredeemed gift card liabilities |
479 | 531 | |||||||
Accrued compensation and related expenses |
459 | 373 | |||||||
Accrued liabilities |
1,382 | 975 | |||||||
Accrued income taxes |
281 | 404 | |||||||
Short-term debt |
783 | 156 | |||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
54 | 33 | |||||||
Total current liabilities |
8,435 | 6,769 | |||||||
Long-Term Liabilities |
1,109 | 838 | |||||||
Long-Term Debt |
1,126 | 627 | |||||||
Minority Interests |
513 | 40 | |||||||
Shareholders' Equity |
|||||||||
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value: Authorized 400,000 shares; Issued and outstanding none |
| | |||||||
Common stock, $0.10 par value: Authorized 1.0 billion shares; Issued and outstanding 413,684,000 and 410,578,000 shares, respectively |
41 | 41 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
205 | 8 | |||||||
Retained earnings |
4,714 | 3,933 | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
(317 | ) | 502 | ||||||
Total shareholders' equity |
4,643 | 4,484 | |||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity |
$ | 15,826 | $ | 12,758 | |||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
69
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
$ in millions, except per share amounts
Fiscal Years Ended |
February 28, 2009 |
March 1, 2008 |
March 3, 2007 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue |
$ | 45,015 | $ | 40,023 | $ | 35,934 | |||||
Cost of goods sold |
34,017 | 30,477 | 27,165 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
10,998 | 9,546 | 8,769 | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
8,984 | 7,385 | 6,770 | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
78 | | | ||||||||
Goodwill and tradename impairment |
66 | | | ||||||||
Operating income |
1,870 | 2,161 | 1,999 | ||||||||
Other income (expense) |
|||||||||||
Investment income and other |
35 | 129 | 162 | ||||||||
Investment impairment |
(111 | ) | | | |||||||
Interest expense |
(94 | ) | (62 | ) | (31 | ) | |||||
Earnings before income tax expense, minority interests and equity in income (loss) of affiliates |
1,700 | 2,228 | 2,130 | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
674 | 815 | 752 | ||||||||
Minority interests in earnings |
(30 | ) | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates |
7 | (3 | ) | | |||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 1,003 | $ | 1,407 | $ | 1,377 | |||||
Earnings per share |
|||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 2.43 | $ | 3.20 | $ | 2.86 | |||||
Diluted |
$ | 2.39 | $ | 3.12 | $ | 2.79 | |||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions) |
|||||||||||
Basic |
412.5 | 439.9 | 482.1 | ||||||||
Diluted |
422.9 | 452.9 | 496.2 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
70
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
$ in millions
Fiscal Years Ended |
February 28, 2009 |
March 1, 2008 |
March 3, 2007 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating Activities |
||||||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 1,003 | $ | 1,407 | $ | 1,377 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to total cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation |
730 | 580 | 509 | |||||||||
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets |
63 | 1 | | |||||||||
Asset impairments |
177 | | | |||||||||
Restructuring charges |
78 | | | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
110 | 105 | 121 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(43 | ) | 74 | 82 | ||||||||
Minority interests |
30 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
(6 | ) | (24 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||
Other, net |
12 | (7 | ) | 20 | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Receivables |
(419 | ) | 12 | (70 | ) | |||||||
Merchandise inventories |
258 | (562 | ) | (550 | ) | |||||||
Other assets |
(175 | ) | 42 | (47 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable |
139 | 221 | 320 | |||||||||
Other liabilities |
(75 | ) | 74 | 185 | ||||||||
Income taxes |
(5 | ) | 99 | (136 | ) | |||||||
Total cash provided by operating activities |
1,877 | 2,025 | 1,762 | |||||||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||||||
Additions to property and equipment, net of $42 and $80 non-cash capital expenditures in fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively |
(1,303 | ) | (797 | ) | (733 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of investments |
(81 | ) | (8,501 | ) | (4,789 | ) | ||||||
Sales of investments |
246 | 10,935 | 5,095 | |||||||||
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired |
(2,316 | ) | (89 | ) | (421 | ) | ||||||
Change in restricted assets |
(97 | ) | (85 | ) | 63 | |||||||
Other, net |
(22 | ) | 1 | 5 | ||||||||
Total cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(3,573 | ) | 1,464 | (780 | ) | |||||||
Financing Activities |
||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
| (3,461 | ) | (599 | ) | |||||||
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan and for the exercise of stock options |
83 | 146 | 217 | |||||||||
Dividends paid |
(223 | ) | (204 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||||
Repayments of debt |
(4,712 | ) | (4,353 | ) | (84 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
5,606 | 4,486 | 96 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
6 | 24 | 50 | |||||||||
Other, net |
(23 | ) | (16 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||
Total cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
737 | (3,378 | ) | (513 | ) | |||||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
19 | 122 | (12 | ) | ||||||||
(Decrease) increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
(940 | ) | 233 | 457 | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year |
1,438 | 1,205 | 748 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year |
$ | 498 | $ | 1,438 | $ | 1,205 | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information |
||||||||||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 766 | $ | 644 | $ | 804 | ||||||
Interest paid |
83 | 49 | 14 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
71
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
$ and shares in millions
|
Common Shares |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balances at February 25, 2006 |
485 | $ | 49 | $ | 643 | $ | 4,304 | $ | 261 | $ | 5,257 | |||||||||
Net earnings |
| | | 1,377 | | 1,377 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
| | | | (33 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments |
| | | | (12 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
1,332 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
7 | 1 | 167 | | | 168 | ||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options exercised and employee stock purchase plan |
| | 47 | | | 47 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan |
1 | | 49 | | | 49 | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 121 | | | 121 | ||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends, $0.36 per share |
| | | (174 | ) | | (174 | ) | ||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(12 | ) | (2 | ) | (597 | ) | | | (599 | ) | ||||||||||
Balances at March 3, 2007 |
481 | 48 | 430 | 5,507 | 216 | 6,201 | ||||||||||||||
Net earnings |
| | | 1,407 | | 1,407 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
| | | | 311 | 311 | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments |
| | | | (25 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
1,693 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of adopting a new accounting standard |
| | | (13 | ) | | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
4 | | 93 | | | 93 | ||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options exercised and employee stock purchase plan |
| | 17 | | | 17 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan |
1 | | 53 | | | 53 | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 105 | | | 105 | ||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends, $0.46 per share |
| | | (204 | ) | | (204 | ) | ||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(75 |