DEF 14A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant
þ |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o |
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
o Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ No fee required. |
|
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11. |
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
SEC 1913 (02-02) |
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information
contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid
OMB control number. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ISABELLA
BANK CORPORATION
401 N. Main St.
Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858
NOTICE OF
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held May 5, 2009
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of Isabella Bank Corporation will be held on Tuesday,
May 5, 2009 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time,
at the Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission Street, Mount
Pleasant, Michigan. The meeting is for the purpose of
considering and acting upon the following:
1. The election of four directors.
2. Such other business as may properly come before the
meeting, or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed April 1, 2009 as the
record date for determination of shareholders entitled to notice
of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the meeting,
please date and sign the enclosed proxy form, indicate your
choice with respect to the matters to be voted upon, and return
it promptly in the enclosed envelope. Note that if stock is held
in more than one name, all parties should sign the proxy form.
By order of the Board of Directors
Debra Campbell, Secretary
Dated: April 10, 2009
ISABELLA
BANK CORPORATION
401 N. Main St
Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858
PROXY
STATEMENT
General
Information
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Isabella
Bank Corporation (the Corporation) a Michigan financial holding
company, to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
the Corporation to be held on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at
5:00 p.m. at the Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission
Street, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, or at any adjournment or
adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth in the
accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and in
this Proxy Statement.
This Proxy Statement has been mailed on April 10, 2009 to
all holders of record of common stock as of the record date. If
a shareholders shares are held in the name of a broker,
bank or other nominee, then that party should give the
shareholder instructions for voting the shareholders
shares.
Voting at
the Meeting
The Board of Directors of the Corporation has fixed the close of
business on April 1, 2009 as the record date for the
determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournment
thereof. The Corporation has only one class of common stock and
no preferred stock. As of April 1, 2009, there were
7,531,472 shares of common stock of the Corporation
outstanding. Each outstanding share entitles the holder thereof
to one vote on each separate matter presented for vote at the
meeting. Shareholders may vote on matters that are properly
presented at the meeting by either attending the meeting and
casting a vote or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy.
If the enclosed proxy is executed and returned, it may be
revoked at any time before it is exercised at the meeting. All
shareholders are encouraged to date and sign the enclosed proxy,
indicate their choice with respect to the matters to be voted
upon, and return it to the Corporation.
The Corporation will hold the Annual Meeting of Shareholders if
holders of a majority of the Corporations shares of common
stock entitled to vote are represented in person or by proxy at
the meeting. If a shareholder signs and returns the proxy, those
shares will be counted to determine whether the Corporation has
a quorum, even if the shareholder abstains or fails to vote on
any of the proposals listed on the proxy.
If a shareholders shares are held in the name of a
nominee, and the shareholder does not tell the nominee how to
vote the shares (referred to as broker non-votes), then the
nominee can vote them as they see fit only on matters that are
determined to be routine and not on any other proposal. Broker
non-votes will be counted as present to determine if a quorum
exists but will not be counted as present and entitled to vote
on any non-routine proposals.
In the election of directors, director nominees receiving a
plurality of votes cast at the meeting will be elected directors
of the Corporation. Shares not voted, including broker
non-votes, have no effect on the election of directors.
Election
of Directors
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with the
directors in each class being elected for a term of three years.
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, four directors will be
elected for terms ending with the annual meeting of shareholders
in 2012.
Except as otherwise specified in the proxy, proxies will be
voted for election of the four nominees named below. If a
nominee becomes unable or unwilling to serve, proxies will be
voted for such other person, if any, as shall be designated by
the Board of Directors. However, the Corporations
management now knows of no reason to anticipate that this will
occur. The four nominees for election as directors who receive
the greatest number of votes cast will be elected directors.
Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a director if
elected.
1
Nominees for election and current directors are listed below.
Also shown for each nominee and each current director is his or
her principal occupation for the last five or more years, age
and length of service as a director of the Corporation.
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR
the election of each of the four director nominees nominated by
the Board of Directors.
Director
Nominees for Terms Ending in 2012
Dennis P. Angner (age 53) has been a director
of the Corporation since 2000. He also serves as an ex-officio
member of all of the Corporations subsidiary Boards of
Directors and the Finance and Planning Committee.
Mr. Angner also serves on the Board of Financial Group
Information Services. Mr. Angner has been President and CEO
of the Corporation since December 30, 2001. Prior to his
appointment as President and CEO, he served as Executive Vice
President of the Corporation. Mr. Angner is the past Chair
of the Michigan Bankers Association and has served on the
Central Michigan American Red Cross board for over 20 years.
David J. Maness (age 55) has been a director of
the Corporation since 2004, and serves on the Audit Committee,
the Compensation and Human Resource Committee and is currently
Chairperson on the Finance and Planning Committee. He also
serves on the Board of Directors of Isabella Bank and is
Chairperson of Financial Group Information Services. He is
President of Maness Petroleum, a geological and geophysical
consulting services company. Mr. Maness served as a school
board member of the Mount Pleasant School board.
W. Joseph Manifold (age 57) has been a
director of the Corporation since 2003, and serves on the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Compensation
and Human Resource Committee, and serves as Chairperson of the
Audit Committee. Mr. Manifold is a Certified Public
Accountant and CFO of Federal Broach Holdings, a manufacturing
company. Previously, he was a senior auditor with
Ernst & Young Certified Public Accounting firm working
principally on external bank audits and was CFO of the Delfield
Corporation. Prior to joining Isabella Bank Corporation
Mr. Manifold also served on the Isabella Community Credit
Union Board and was Chair of the Mount Pleasant School board.
William J. Strickler (age 68) has been a
director of the Corporation since 2002, and serves on the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Finance and
Planning Committee, and the Compensation and Human Resource
Committee. He has been a director of Isabella Bank since 1995
and is currently serving as Chairperson. Mr. Strickler is
President of Michiwest Energy, an oil and gas producer. Prior to
joining the Corporation and the Bank Board he served as a
director of the National City Community Bank Board.
Current
Directors with Terms Ending in 2010
James C. Fabiano (age 65) has been a director
of Isabella Bank since 1979 and of the Corporation since 1988,
of which he is currently serving as Chairperson and is an
ex-officio member of all corporate committees. He also serves as
an ex-officio member of all subsidiary Boards of Directors of
the Corporation and serves as Chairperson of the Compensation
and Human Resource Committee. Mr. Fabiano is Chairman and
CEO of Fabiano Brothers, Inc., a wholesale beverage distributor
operating in several counties throughout Michigan.
Mr. Fabiano is a past recipient of the Mount Pleasant Area
Chamber of Commerce Citizen of the year award. He is also a past
Chairman of Central Michigan University board of trustees.
Dale D. Weburg (age 65) has served on the Board
of the Corporation since 2000 and is a member of the Financial
Group Information Services Board of Directors. He also serves as
the Chairperson for the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, serves on the Audit Committee, and the Compensation
and Human Resource Committee. He has been a director of the
Breckenridge division of Isabella Bank since 1987, of which he
is currently serving as Chairperson. Mr. Weburg is
President of Weburg Farms, a cash crop farm operation.
Mr. Weburg also serves as a trustee of the Board of
Directors of Gratiot Health System.
Theodore W. Kortes (age 68) was appointed
director of the Corporation on January 1, 2008, and serves
on the Finance and Planning Committee and the Compensation and
Human Resource Committee. He is a director and Chairperson of
the Greenville division of Isabella Bank. Mr. Kortes was
President and CEO of Greenville Community Bank and Greenville
Community Financial Corporation since its founding in 1998,
until his retirement in 2007.
2
Current
Directors with Terms Ending in 2011
Richard J. Barz (age 60) has been a director of
the Corporation since 2002. He has been a director of Isabella
Bank since 2000. Mr. Barz also serves on the Board of
Financial Group Information Services and is a member of the
Finance and Planning Committee. Mr. Barz has been President
and CEO of Isabella Bank since December 30, 2001. Prior to
his appointment as President and CEO he served as Executive Vice
President of Isabella Bank.
Sandra L. Caul (age 65) has been a director of
the Corporation since 2005. She currently serves as director of
Isabella Bank, and serves on the Audit Committee, the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation and
Human Resource Committee. Ms. Caul is Vice Chair of Central
Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors and is
Chairperson of the Central Michigan American Red Cross.
Ms. Caul retired in January 2005 as a state representative
of the Michigan State House of Representatives. Ms. Caul is
a registered nurse.
W. Michael McGuire (age 59) has been a
director of the Corporation since 2007, and serves on the Audit
Committee, Finance and Planning Committee, and the Compensation
and Human Resource Committee. He is a director of the Farwell
division of Isabella Bank. Mr. McGuire is currently an
attorney and the Director of the Office of the Corporate
Secretary and Assistant Secretary of The Dow Chemical Company, a
manufacturer of chemicals, plastics and agricultural products.
Each of the directors has been engaged in their stated
professions for more than five years. The principal occupation
of Dennis P. Angner is with the Corporation, and he has been
employed by Isabella Bank
and/or the
Corporation since 1984. Other executive officers of the
Corporation include: Richard J. Barz, President of Isabella
Bank, an employee of Isabella Bank
and/or the
Corporation since 1972; Timothy M. Miller (age 58),
President of the Breckenridge division of Isabella Bank, an
employee of Breckenridge division
and/or the
Corporation since 1985; Peggy L. Wheeler (age 49), Senior
Vice President and Controller of the Corporation, employed by
Isabella Bank
and/or the
Corporation since 1977; and Steven D. Pung (age 59), Chief
Operations Officer of Isabella Bank, employed by Isabella Bank
and/or the
Corporation since 1978. All officers of the Corporation serve at
the pleasure of the Board of Directors.
Corporate
Governance
Director
Independence
The Corporation has adopted the director independence standards
as defined in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15). The
Board has determined that James C. Fabiano, Dale D. Weburg,
David J. Maness, W. Joseph Manifold, William J. Strickler,
Sandra L. Caul, W. Michael McGuire, and Ted W. Kortes are
independent directors. Dennis P. Angner is not independent as he
is employed as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation. Richard J. Barz is not independent as he is
employed as President and Chief Executive Officer of Isabella
Bank.
Committees
of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance
The Board of Directors of the Corporation met 14 times during
2008. All incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the
meetings held in 2008. The Board of Directors has an Audit
Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a
Compensation and Human Resource Committee, and a Finance and
Planning Committee.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee is composed of independent directors who
meet the requirements for independence as defined in NASDAQ
Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15). Information regarding the
functions performed by the Committee, its membership, and the
number of meetings held during the year, is set forth in the
Report of the Audit Committee included elsewhere in
this annual proxy statement. The Audit Committee is governed by
a written charter approved by the Board of Directors and was
included as Appendix A to the Corporations proxy
statement for the 2008 Annual Shareholders Meeting.
3
In accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, Director Manifold meets the requirements of
Audit Committee Financial Expert and has been so designated by
the Board of Directors. The committee also consists of directors
Caul, Fabiano, Maness, McGuire and Weburg.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
The Corporation has a standing Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee consisting of independent directors who
meet the requirements for independence as defined in NASDAQ
Marketplace Rule 4200(a) (15). The Committee consists of
directors Caul, Fabiano, Manifold, Strickler and Weburg. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met as a full
board and held two meetings in 2008, and all directors attended
75% or more of the meetings in 2008. The Board of Directors has
approved a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter
and it was included as Appendix B to the Corporations
proxy statement for the 2008 Annual Shareholders Meeting.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible
for evaluating and recommending individuals for nomination to
the Board of Directors for approval. In making its selections
and recommendations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee considers a variety of factors, which generally
include the candidates personal and professional
integrity, independence, business judgment, and communication
skills.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider
as potential nominees, persons recommended by shareholders.
Recommendations should be submitted in writing to the Secretary
of the Corporation, 401 N. Main St., Mount Pleasant,
Michigan 48858 and include the shareholders name, address
and number of shares of the Corporation owned by the
shareholder. The recommendation should also include the name,
age, address and qualifications of the recommended candidate for
nomination. Recommendations for the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders should be delivered no later than December 11,
2009. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not
evaluate potential nominees for director differently based on
whether they are recommended to the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee by a shareholder or otherwise.
Compensation
and Human Resource Committee
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Corporation
is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the
Corporations Board of Directors the compensation of the
President and executive officers of the Corporation, benefit
plans and the overall percentage increase in salaries. The
committee consists of all independent directors, Fabiano, Caul,
Kortes, McGuire, Maness, Manifold, Strickler, and Weburg. The
Committee held one meeting during 2008 with all directors
attending the meeting. This committee is governed by a written
charter approved by the Board of Directors that was attached as
Appendix A to the Corporations proxy statement for
the 2007 Annual Shareholders Meeting.
Finance
and Planning Committee
The Finance and Planning Committee evaluates new business
opportunities and business acquisitions, assists management in
establishing financial goals, reviews all strategic plans of
subsidiaries to assure consistency with overall corporate goals,
and reviews interest rate risks, credit risks and insurance
coverage. The committee consists of directors Maness, Angner,
Barz, Fabiano, Kortes, McGuire, and Strickler.
Communications
with the Board
Shareholders may communicate with the Corporations Board
of Directors by sending written communications to the
Corporations Secretary, Isabella Bank Corporation,
401 N. Main St., Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858.
Communications will be forwarded to the Board of Directors or
the appropriate committee, as soon as practicable.
Code
of Ethics
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics that is applicable to the Corporations principal
executive officer and the principal financial officer and
controller. The Corporations Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics may be obtained free of charge by sending a request to
Debra Campbell, Secretary, Isabella Bank Corporation,
401 N. Main St., Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858.
4
Report
of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the Corporations financial
reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. The
Committee consists of directors Fabiano, Caul, Maness, Manifold,
McGuire, and Weburg.
The Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all
auditing services and permitted non-audit services over $5,000
for the Corporation by its independent auditors or any other
auditing or accounting firm, except as noted below. The Audit
Committee has established general guidelines for the permissible
scope and nature of any permitted non-audit services in
connection with its annual review of the audit plan and reviews
the guidelines with the Board of Directors.
Management has the primary responsibility for the consolidated
financial statements and the reporting process including the
systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited
consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report with
management including a discussion of the quality, not just the
acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness
of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee also
reviewed with management and the independent auditors,
managements assertion on the design and effectiveness of
the Corporations internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2008.
The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who
are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of
those audited consolidated financial statements with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability,
of the Corporations accounting principles and such other
matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee
by the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), including those described in AU
Section 380 Communication with Audit
Committees, as may be modified or supplemented. In
addition, the Audit Committee has received the written
disclosures and the letter from the independent accountants
required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit
Committees Concerning Independence, as may be modified or
supplemented, and has discussed with the independent accountant
the independent accountants independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Corporations
internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans
for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the
internal and independent auditors, with and without management
present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their
evaluations of the Corporations internal controls and the
overall quality of the Corporations financial reporting
process. The Audit Committee held four meetings during 2008, and
all directors attended 75% or more of the meetings held in 2008.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above,
the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and
the Board has approved) that the audited consolidated financial
statements be included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has
appointed Rehmann Robson as the independent auditors for the
2009 audit.
Respectfully submitted,
W. Joseph Manifold, Audit Committee Chairperson
James C. Fabiano
David J. Maness
Sandra L. Caul
W. Michael McGuire
Dale D. Weburg
5
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee (the
Committee) is responsible for the compensation and
benefits for the President and executive officers of the
Corporation. The Committee evaluates and approves the executive
officer and senior management compensation plans, policies and
programs of the Corporation and its affiliates. The Committee
also evaluates and establishes the compensation of the President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. The President
and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis P. Angner, conducts annual
performance reviews for all Named Executive Officers, excluding
himself. Mr. Angner recommends an appropriate salary
increase to the Committee based on the performance review and
the officers years of service along with competitive
market data.
Compensation
Objectives
The Committee considers asset growth and earnings per share to
be the primary ratios in measuring financial performance. The
Corporations philosophy is to maximize long-term return to
shareholders consistent with safe and sound banking practices
while maintaining the commitment to superior customer and
community service. The Corporation believes that the performance
of our executive officers in managing our business should be the
basis for determining overall compensation. Consideration is
also given to overall economic conditions and current
competitive forces in the market place. The objectives of the
Committee are to effectively balance salaries and potential
compensation to an officers individual management
responsibilities and encourage them to realize their potential
for future contributions to the Corporation. The objectives are
designed to attract and retain high performing executive
officers who will lead the Corporation while attaining the
Corporations earnings and performance goals.
What the
Compensation Programs are Designed to Reward
The compensation programs are designed to reward dedicated and
conscientious employment with the Corporation, loyalty in terms
of continued employment, attainment of job related goals and
overall profitability of the Corporation. In measuring an
executive officers contributions to the Corporation, the
Committee considers numerous factors including, among other
things, the Corporations growth in terms of asset size and
increase in earnings per share. In rewarding loyalty and
long-term service, the Corporation provides attractive
retirement benefits.
Elements
of Compensation
The Corporations executive compensation program has
consisted primarily of base salary and benefits, annual cash
bonus incentives, stock awards, and participation in the
Corporations retirement plans.
Why Each
of the Elements of Compensation is Chosen
Base Salary and Benefits are set to provide competitive
levels of compensation to attract and retain officers with
strong motivated leadership. Each officers performance,
current compensation and responsibilities within the Corporation
are considered by the Committee when establishing base salaries.
The Corporation also believes it is best to pay sufficient base
salary because it believes an over-reliance on equity incentive
compensation could potentially skew incentives toward short-term
maximization of shareholder value as opposed to building
long-term shareholder value. Base salary encourages management
to operate the Corporation in a safe and sound manner even when
incentive goals may prove unattainable.
Annual Performance Incentives are used to reward
executive officers for the Corporations overall financial
performance. This element of the Corporations compensation
programs is included in the overall compensation in order to
reward employees above and beyond their base salaries when the
Corporations performance and profitability exceed
established annual targets. The inclusion of incentive
compensation encourages management to be more creative, diligent
and exhaustive in managing the Corporation to achieve specified
financial goals.
Stock Awards are also provided as stock awards are the
element of compensation that is most effective in aligning the
financial interests of management with those of shareholders and
because stock awards are a traditional
6
and well-proven element of compensation among community banks
and bank holding companies. These stock awards are granted
pursuant to the Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (Directors
Plan), under which eligible executive officers elect to
defer their director fees, which deferred fees are then
converted, on a quarterly basis, into shares of the
Corporations common stock. The Corporation has established
a Trust to fund the Directors Plan. The directors of the
Corporation and its subsidiaries are required to defer at least
25% of their earned board fees into the Directors Plan.
Retirement Plans. The Corporations
retirement plans are designed to assist executives in providing
themselves with a financially secure retirement. Our retirement
plans include: a frozen defined benefit pension plan, a 401(k)
plan, and a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP),
which is frozen to new participants, and a retirement bonus plan.
How the
Corporation Chose Amounts for Each Element
The Committees approach to determining the annual base
salary of executive officers is to offer competitive salaries in
comparison with other comparable financial institutions. The
Committee utilized both an independent consultant to perform a
compensation survey of similar sized Michigan based institutions
for 2007 and compensation information provided by the Michigan
Bankers Association for banks in the State of Michigan with
assets over $500 million to provide salary ranges for its
executive officers. Specific factors used to decide where an
executive officers salary should be within the established
range include the historical financial performance, financial
performance outlook, years of service, and job performance.
The annual performance incentive is based on goals set on
individual performance and recognition of individual
performance. A subjective analysis is conducted by the Chief
Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer makes a
recommendation to the Committee for the appropriate amount for
each individual executive officer. The Committee reviews,
modifies, if necessary, and approves the recommendations of the
Chief Executive Officer. The Committee reviews the performance
of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee uses the following
factors as quantitative measures of corporate performance in
determining annual cash bonus amounts to be paid.
|
|
|
|
|
peer group financial performance compensation;
|
|
|
|
1 and 5 year shareholder returns;
|
|
|
|
earnings per share and earnings per share growth;
|
|
|
|
budgeted as compared to actual annual operating performance;
|
|
|
|
community and industry involvement;
|
|
|
|
results of audit and regulatory exams; and
|
|
|
|
other strategic goals as established by the board of directors
|
While no particular weight is given to any specific factor, the
Committee gives at least equal weight to the subjective analyses
as described above.
Stock awards are granted pursuant to the Directors Plan,
under which participants elect to defer their director fees,
which director fees are then converted, on a quarterly basis,
into shares of the Corporations common stock based on the
fair market value of a share of the Corporations common
stock at that time. Shares of stock credited to a
participants account under the Directors Plan are
eligible for stock and cash dividends as payable.
Total compensation in 2008 was based on the committee targeting
its executive officers compensation to approximate the
median of the ranges provided by independent consultants and
Michigan Bankers Association surveys.
Retirement plans. In December 2006, the Board
of Directors voted to curtail the defined benefit plan effective
March 1, 2007. The effect of the curtailment was recognized
in the first quarter of 2007 and the current participants
accrued benefits were frozen as of March 1, 2007.
Participation in the plan was limited to eligible employees as
of December 31, 2006.
The Corporation has a 401(k) plan in which substantially all
employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute
up to 100% of their compensation subject to certain limits based
on federal tax laws. As a result of the curtailment of the
defined benefit plan noted above, the Corporation increased the
contributions to the 401(k)
7
plan effective January 1, 2007. The enhancement includes a
discretionary 3.0% contribution for all eligible employees and
matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an
employees compensation contributed to the Plan during the
year.
The Corporation maintains a non-leveraged employee stock
ownership plan (ESOP) which covers substantially all of its
employees. The plan was frozen effective December 31, 2006
to new participants. Contributions to the plan are
discretionary and approved by the Board of Directors.
The Corporation maintains a plan for officers to provide death
benefits to each participant. Insurance policies, designed
primarily to fund death benefits, have been purchased on the
life of each participant with the Corporation as the sole owner
and beneficiary of the policies.
The retirement bonus plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred
compensation benefits for eligible employees effective
January 1, 2007. An initial amount has been credited for
each eligible employee as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent
amounts will be credited on each allocation date thereafter as
defined in the plan. The amount of the initial allocation and
the annual allocation will be determined pursuant the payment
schedule adopted at the sole and exclusive discretion of the
Board of Directors, as set forth in the plan.
How
Elements Fit into Overall Compensation Objectives
The elements of the Corporations compensation are
structured to reward past and current performance, continued
service and motivate its leaders to excel in the future. The
Corporations salary compensation has generally been used
to retain and attract motivated leadership. The Corporation
intends to continually ensure salaries are sufficient to attract
and retain exceptional officers. The Corporations cash
bonus incentive rewards current performance based upon personal
and corporate goals and targets. The Corporation makes stock
awards to motivate its officers to enhance value for
shareholders by aligning the interests of management with those
of its shareholders.
As part of its goal of attracting and retaining quality team
members, the Corporation has developed employee benefit plans
that make it stand out from the rest of the competition.
Management feels that the combination of all of the plans listed
above makes the Corporations total compensation packages
attractive.
Compensation
and Benefits Committee Report
The following Report of the Compensation and Human Resource
Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not
be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other
Corporation filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the
Corporation specifically incorporates this Report by reference
therein.
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee, which includes
the independent directors of the board, has reviewed and
discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by
Item 402(b) of SEC
Regulation S-K
with management, and based on such review and discussion, the
Compensation and Human Resource Committee recommended to the
Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
be included in this Proxy Statement and Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Submitted by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee of
Isabella Bank Corporations Board of Directors:
James C. Fabiano, Chairperson
Sandra L. Caul
Ted W. Kortes
David J. Maness
W. Joseph Manifold
W. Michael McGuire
William J. Strickler
Dale D. Weburg
8
Executive
Officers
Executive Officers of the Corporation are compensated in
accordance with their employment with the applicable entity. The
following table shows information on compensation earned from
the Corporation or its subsidiaries for each of the last three
fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, by the President and
Chief Executive Officer, the Principal Financial Officer, and
the corporations three most highly compensated executive
officers.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and principal position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
294,670
|
|
|
$
|
9,450
|
|
|
$
|
41,425
|
|
|
$
|
28,089
|
|
|
$
|
18,453
|
|
|
$
|
392,087
|
|
President and CEO
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
288,101
|
|
|
|
8,225
|
|
|
|
26,280
|
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|
|
18,715
|
|
|
|
334,321
|
|
of Isabella Bank Corporation
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
255,237
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
16,228
|
|
|
|
70,646
|
|
|
|
8,233
|
|
|
|
360,344
|
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
123,716
|
|
Principal Financial Officer,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
102,023
|
|
Sr. Vice President
and Controller of
Isabella Bank Corporation
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
88,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,339
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
103,524
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
300,785
|
|
|
|
9,100
|
|
|
|
32,490
|
|
|
|
72,622
|
|
|
|
22,697
|
|
|
|
437,694
|
|
Executive Vice President of
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
274,706
|
|
|
|
7,875
|
|
|
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,226
|
|
|
|
323,932
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation President and CEO
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
237,175
|
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
15,100
|
|
|
|
134,235
|
|
|
|
10,948
|
|
|
|
411,858
|
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
160,145
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
6,715
|
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
14,127
|
|
|
|
187,598
|
|
Vice President of
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
155,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,880
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
14,167
|
|
|
|
176,218
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation President of the Breckenridge division
of Isabella Bank
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
149,117
|
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
7,223
|
|
|
|
17,030
|
|
|
|
5,778
|
|
|
|
182,715
|
|
Steven D. Pung(4)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
117,100
|
|
|
|
3,785
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
45,884
|
|
|
|
13,169
|
|
|
|
181,063
|
|
Sr. Vice President and COO Isabella Bank
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
108,100
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,194
|
|
|
|
127,719
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes compensation voluntarily deferred under the
Corporations 401(k) plan. Directors fees paid in cash are
also included, for calendar years 2008, 2007 and 2006
respectively as follows: Dennis P. Angner $14,670, $23,870 and
$20,237; Richard J. Barz $25,785, $20,475 and $12,175; and
Timothy M. Miller $17,445, $20,940 and $18,117. |
|
(2) |
|
For 2006, approximately 75% of the change in the present value
of the defined benefit is related to prior service, a decrease
in the assumed discount rate, and a change in the actuarial
mortality table. Amounts were determined using assumptions
consistent with those used in the Corporations
consolidated financial statements. The Board of Directors
approved a curtailment of this plan in December 2006 effective
March 1, 2007. Assumptions were consistent with those that
were presented in the consolidated financial statements. |
|
(3) |
|
For all noted executives all other compensation includes 401(k)
matching contributions. For Richard J. Barz and Steven D. Pung
this also includes club dues and auto allowance. For Dennis P.
Angner and Timothy M. Miller, this also includes auto allowance. |
|
(4) |
|
Not a named executive officer prior to 2007. |
9
2008
Pension Benefits
The following table indicates the present value of accumulated
benefits as of December 31, 2008 for each named executive
in the summary compensation table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of
|
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service as
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 01/01/09
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
During Last
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
297,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
177,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
79,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
46,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
625,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
201,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven D. Pung
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
313,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
105,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension plan. The Corporation
sponsors the Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan, a frozen
defined benefit pension plan. In December 2006, the Board of
Directors voted to curtail the defined benefit plan effective
March 1, 2007. The effect of the curtailment, which was
recognized in the first quarter of 2007, froze the current
participants accrued benefits as of March 1, 2007 and
limited participation in the plan to eligible employees as of
December 31, 2006. Due to the curtailment of the plan, the
number of years of credited service was frozen. As such, the
years of credited service for the plan may differ from the
participants actual years of service with the Corporation.
Annual contributions are made to the plan as required by
accepted actuarial principles, applicable federal tax law, and
expenses of operating and maintaining the plan. The amount of
contributions on behalf of any one participant cannot be
separately or individually computed.
Pension plan benefits are based on years of service and the
employees five highest consecutive years of compensation
out of the last ten years of service, effective through
December 31, 2006.
A participant may earn a benefit for up to 35 years of
accredited service. Earned benefits are 100 percent vested
after five years of service. Benefit payments normally start
when a participant reaches age 65. A participant with more
than five years of service may elect to take early retirement
benefits anytime after reaching age 55. Benefits payable
under early retirement are reduced actuarially for each month
prior to age 65 in which benefits begin.
Richard J. Barz, Timothy M. Miller, and Steven D. Pung are
eligible for early retirement under the Isabella Bank
Corporation Pension Plan. Under the provisions of the Plan,
participants are eligible for early retirement after reaching
the age of 55 with at least 5 years of service. The early
retirement benefit amount is the accrued benefit payable at
normal retirement date reduced by
5/9%
for each of the first 60 months and
5/18%
for each of the next 60 months that the benefit
commencement date precedes the normal retirement date.
Retirement bonus plan. The Corporation
sponsors the Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan.
The retirement bonus plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred
compensation benefits for eligible employees effective
January 1, 2007. This plan is intended to provide eligible
employees with additional retirement benefits. To be eligible,
the employee needed to be employed by the Corporation on
January 1, 2007, and be a participant in the
Corporations frozen Executive Supplemental Income
Agreement. Participants must also be an officer of the
Corporation with at least 10 years of service as of
December 31, 2006. The Corporation has sole and exclusive
discretion to add new participants to the plan by authorizing
such participation pursuant to action of the Corporations
Board of Directors.
An initial amount has been credited for each eligible employee
as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent amounts shall be credited
on each allocation date thereafter as defined in the plan. The
amount of the initial allocation and the
10
annual allocation shall be determined pursuant to the payment
schedule adopted by the sole and exclusive discretion of the
Board of Directors, as set forth in the plan.
Richard J. Barz, Timothy M. Miller, and Steven D. Pung are
eligible for early retirement under the Isabella Bank
Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan. Under the provisions of the
Plan, participants are eligible for early retirement upon
attaining 55 years of age. There is no difference between
the calculation of benefits payable upon early retirement and
normal retirement.
2008
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Last FY
|
|
|
Last FY
|
|
|
Last FYE
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
$
|
41,425
|
|
|
$
|
1,269
|
|
|
$
|
85,930
|
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
|
32,490
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
67,306
|
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
|
6,715
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
22,465
|
|
Steven D. Pung
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
6,042
|
|
The directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are
required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees into
the Directors Plan and may defer up to 100% of their
earned fees based on their annual election. These amounts are
reflected in the 2008 nonqualified deferred compensation table
above. Under the Directors Plan, these deferred fees are
converted on a quarterly basis into shares of the
Corporations common stock based on the fair market value
of shares of the Corporations common stock at that time.
Shares credited to a participants account are eligible for
stock and cash dividends as payable.
Distribution from the Directors Plan occurs when the
participant retires from the board, attains age 70 or upon
the occurrence of certain other events. Distributions must take
the form of shares of the Corporations common stock. Any
Corporation common stock issued under the Directors Plan
will be considered restricted stock under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The estimated pay outs payable to each named executive officer
upon severance from employment, retirement, termination upon
death or disability or termination following a change in control
of the Corporation are described below. For all termination
scenarios, the amounts assume such termination took place as of
December 31, 2008.
Any
Severance of Employment
Regardless of the manner in which a named executive
officers employment terminates, he or she is entitled to
receive amounts earned during his or her term of employment.
Such amounts include:
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts accrued and vested through the Defined Benefit Pension
Plan.
|
|
|
|
Amounts accrued and vested through the Retirement Bonus Plan.
|
|
|
|
Amounts deferred in the Directors Plan.
|
|
|
|
Unused vacation pay.
|
Retirement
In the event of the retirement of an executive officer, the
officer would receive the benefits identified above. As of
December 31, 2008, the named executive officers listed had
no unused vacation days.
11
Death or
Disability
In the event of death or disability of an executive officer, in
addition to the benefits listed above, the executive officer
will also receive payments under the Corporations life
insurance plan or benefits under the Corporations
disability plan as appropriate.
In addition to potential payments upon termination available to
all employees, the estates for the executive officers listed
below would receive the following payments upon death:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While an
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
$
|
560,000
|
|
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
|
285,400
|
|
|
|
142,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven D. Pung
|
|
|
234,200
|
|
|
|
117,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
Control
The Corporation currently does not have a change in control
agreement with any of the executive officers; provided, however,
pursuant to the Retirement Bonus Plan each participant would
become 100% vested in their benefit under the plan if, following
a change in control, they voluntarily terminate employment or
are terminated without just cause.
Director
Compensation
The following table summarizes the Compensation of each
non-employee director who served on the Board of Directors
during 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Sandra Caul
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,450
|
|
|
$
|
(174,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137,001
|
)
|
James Fabiano
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,750
|
|
|
|
(482,948
|
)
|
|
|
(435,198
|
)
|
Ted Kortes
|
|
|
18,737
|
|
|
|
12,038
|
|
|
|
(3,429
|
)
|
|
|
27,346
|
|
David Maness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,325
|
|
|
|
(79,544
|
)
|
|
|
(39,219
|
)
|
W. Joseph Manifold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,350
|
|
|
|
(55,389
|
)
|
|
|
(30,039
|
)
|
W. Michael McGuire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,275
|
|
|
|
(34,439
|
)
|
|
|
(4,164
|
)
|
William Strickler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,499
|
|
|
|
(215,151
|
)
|
|
|
(163,652
|
)
|
Dale Weburg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,435
|
|
|
|
(111,175
|
)
|
|
|
(78,740
|
)
|
The Corporation paid a $6,000 retainer plus $950 per board
meeting to its directors during 2008 and $225 per committee
meeting attended.
The Corporation sponsors a nonqualified deferred compensation
plan for directors (the Directors Plan),
pursuant to which the directors of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries are required to defer at least 25% of their earned
board fees. Under the Directors Plan, deferred
directors fees are converted on a quarterly basis into
shares of the Corporations common stock, based on the fair
market value of a share of the Corporations common stock
at that time. Shares of stock credited to a participants
account are eligible for cash and stock dividends as payable.
Participants deferred $483,405 under the Directors Plan in
2008.
Upon a participants attainment of age 70, retirement
from the board, or the occurrence of certain other events, the
participant is eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind
distribution of all of the stock that is then credited to his or
12
her account. The plan does not allow for cash settlement. Stock
issued under the Directors Plan is restricted stock under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The Corporation established a Trust effective as of
January 1, 2008 to fund the Directors Plan. The Trust
is an irrevocable grantor trust to which the Corporation may
contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a
nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although the
Corporation may not reach the assets of the Trust for any
purpose other than meeting its obligations under the
Directors Plan, the assets of the Trust remain subject to
the claims of the Corporations creditors. The Corporation
may contribute cash or common stock to the Trust from time to
time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors Plan.
The Trust will use any cash that the Corporation may contribute
to it to purchase shares of the Corporations common stock
on the open market through the Corporations brokerage
services department.
The Corporation transferred $248,693 to the Rabbi Trust in 2008,
which held 5,248 shares of the Corporations common
stock for settlement as of December 31, 2008. As of
December 31, 2008, there were 186,766 shares of stock
credited to participants accounts as adjusted for the 10%
stock dividend paid on February 29, 2008, which credits are
unfunded as of such date to the extent that they are in excess
of the stock and cash that has been credited to the Trust. All
amounts are unsecured claims against the Corporations
general assets. The net cost of this benefit to the Corporation
was $119,616 in 2008.
The following table displays the number of equity shares granted
pursuant to the terms of the Directors Plan as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Shares
|
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
Name
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Dennis P Angner
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
Richard J Barz
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
Sandra Caul
|
|
|
13,074
|
|
James Fabiano
|
|
|
35,657
|
|
Ted Kortes
|
|
|
338
|
|
David Maness
|
|
|
6,186
|
|
W. Joseph Manifold
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
W. Michael McGuire
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
William J Strickler
|
|
|
16,191
|
|
Dale Weburg
|
|
|
8,382
|
|
Compensation
and Human Resource Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Corporation
is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the
Corporations Board of Directors the compensation of the
President and executive officers of the Corporation, benefit
plans and the overall percentage increase in salaries. The
committee consists of directors Fabiano, Caul, Kortes, McGuire,
Maness, Manifold, Strickler, and Weburg.
Indebtedness
of and Transactions with Management
Certain directors and officers of the Corporation and members of
their families were loan customers of Isabella Bank, or have
been directors or officers of corporations, or partners of
partnerships which have had transactions with the subsidiary
Bank. In managements opinion, all such transactions are
made in the ordinary course of business and are substantially on
the same terms, including collateral and interest rates, as
those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions
with customers not related to the Bank. These transactions do
not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present
other unfavorable features. Total loans to these customers were
approximately $4,011,000 as of December 31, 2008. The
Corporation addresses transactions with related parties in its
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
policy. Conflicts of interest are prohibited as a
matter of Corporation policy, except under guidelines approved
by the Board of Directors or committees of the Board.
13
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
As of April 1, 2009 the Corporation does not have any
person who is known to the Corporation to be the beneficial
owner of more than 5% of the common stock of the Corporation.
The following table sets forth certain information as of
April 1, 2009 as to the common stock of the Corporation
owned beneficially by each director and director nominee, by
each named executive officer, and by all directors, director
nominees and executive officers of the Corporation as a group.
The shares to be granted from stock awards are not included in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
|
Sole Voting
|
|
|
Shared Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
and Investment
|
|
|
and Investment
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name of Owner
|
|
Powers
|
|
|
Powers
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Dennis P. Angner*
|
|
|
20,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,946
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
Richard J Barz*
|
|
|
23,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,915
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
Sandra L. Caul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,242
|
|
|
|
10,242
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
James C. Fabiano
|
|
|
250,930
|
|
|
|
6,059
|
|
|
|
256,989
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
%
|
Theodore W. Kortes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,115
|
|
|
|
15,115
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
W. Joseph Manifold
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
W. Michael McGuire
|
|
|
6,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,177
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
David J. Maness
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
William J. Strickler
|
|
|
78,126
|
|
|
|
13,029
|
|
|
|
91,154
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
%
|
Dale D. Weburg
|
|
|
25,642
|
|
|
|
29,969
|
|
|
|
55,611
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
%
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
3,024
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
Steven D. Pung
|
|
|
12,752
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
19,912
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
|
5,730
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors, nominees and Executive Officers as a Group
(13 persons)
|
|
|
425,268
|
|
|
|
87,727
|
|
|
|
512,995
|
|
|
|
6.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Trustees of the ESOP who vote ESOP stock. |
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has appointed Rehmann Robson as the
independent auditors of the Corporation for the year ending
December 31, 2009.
A representative of Rehmann Robson is expected to be present at
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to respond to appropriate
questions from shareholders and to make any comments they
believe appropriate.
Fees for
Professional Services Provided by Rehmann Robson P.C.
The following table shows the aggregate fees billed by Rehmann
Robson for the audit and other services provided to the
Corporation for 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
238,275
|
|
|
$
|
371,860
|
|
Audit Related Fees
|
|
|
52,415
|
|
|
|
31,365
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
65,257
|
|
|
|
28,750
|
|
Other Professional Services Fees
|
|
|
15,098
|
|
|
|
16,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
371,045
|
|
|
$
|
448,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
The audit fees were for performing the integrated audit of the
Corporations consolidated annual financial statements, and
the audit of internal control over financial reporting, review
of interim quarterly financial statements included in the
Corporations
Forms 10-Q,
auditing of the Corporations employee benefit plans and
services that are normally provided by Rehmann Robson in
connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
The audit fees have steadily declined over the past few years as
a result of the centralization of corporate processes and
diligently working on improving efficiencies related to Sarbanes
Oxley (SOX) compliance.
The audit related fees for 2008 and 2007 were for regulatory
filings and procedures related to the acquisition of Greenville
Community Financial Corporation and for various discussions
related to the adoption and interpretation of new accounting
pronouncements.
The tax fees were for the preparation of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries state and federal tax returns and for
consultation with the Corporation on various tax matters. The
increase in the 2008 tax fees is primarily related to tax
consulting for an audit conducted by the State of Michigan for
Single Business Tax (SBT), the 2007 Greenville Community
Financial Corporation final tax return preparation, and tax
consulting related to the joint venture with CT/IBT Title (refer
to Note 2 of the Corporations consolidated financial
statement).
The Audit Committee has considered whether the services provided
by Rehmann Robson, other than the audit fees, are compatible
with maintaining Rehmann Robsons independence and believes
that the other services provided are compatible.
Pre-approval
Policies and Procedures
All audit and non-audit services over $5,000 to be performed by
Rehmann Robson must be approved in advance by the Audit
Committee. As permitted by the SECs rules, the Audit
Committee has authorized its Chairperson to pre-approve audit,
audit-related, tax and non-audit services, provided that such
approved service is reported to the full Audit Committee at its
next meeting.
As early as practicable in each calendar year, the independent
auditor provides to the Audit Committee a schedule of the audit
and other services that the independent auditor expects to
provide or may provide during the next twelve months. The
schedule will be specific as to the nature of the proposed
services, the proposed fees, timing, and other details that the
Audit Committee may request. The Audit Committee will by
resolution authorize or decline the proposed services. Upon
approval, this schedule will serve as the budget for fees by
specific activity or service for the next twelve months.
A schedule of additional services proposed to be provided by the
independent auditor, or proposed revisions to services already
approved, along with associated proposed fees, may be presented
to the Audit Committee for their consideration and approval at
any time. The schedule will be specific as to the nature of the
proposed service, the proposed fee, and other details that the
Audit Committee may request. The Audit Committee will by
resolution authorize or decline authorization for each proposed
new service.
Applicable SEC rules and regulations permit waiver of the
pre-approval requirements for services other than audit, review
or attest services if certain conditions are met. Out of the
services characterized above as Audit-Related, Tax and
Professional Services, none were billed pursuant to these
provisions in 2008 and 2007 without pre-approval.
Shareholder
Proposals
Any proposals which shareholders of the Corporation intend to
present at the next annual meeting of the Corporation must be
received before December 11, 2009 to be considered for
inclusion in the Corporations proxy statement and proxy
for that meeting. Proposals should be made in accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission
Rule 14a-8.
15
Directors
Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The Corporations directors are encouraged to attend the
annual meeting of shareholders. At the 2008 annual meeting, all
directors were in attendance.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires the Corporations directors and certain officers
and persons who own more than ten percent of the
Corporations common stock, to file with the SEC initial
reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the
Corporations common stock. These officers, directors, and
greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC
regulation to furnish the Corporation with copies of these
reports.
To the Corporations knowledge, based solely on review of
the copies of such reports furnished to the Corporation, during
the year ended December 31, 2008 all Section 16(a)
filing requirements were satisfied, with respect to the
applicable officers, directors, and greater than 10 percent
beneficial owners.
Other
Matters
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Corporation.
In addition to solicitation by mail, officers and other
employees of the Corporation may solicit proxies by telephone or
in person, without compensation other than their regular
compensation.
As to
Other Business Which May Come Before the Meeting
Management of the Corporation does not intend to bring any other
business before the meeting for action. However, if any other
business should be presented for action, it is the intention of
the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote in
accordance with their judgment on such business.
By order of the Board of Directors
Debra Campbell, Secretary
16
Isabella
Bank Corporation
Financial
Information Index
17
SUMMARY
OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
61,385
|
|
|
$
|
53,972
|
|
|
$
|
44,709
|
|
|
$
|
36,882
|
|
|
$
|
33,821
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
35,779
|
|
|
|
28,013
|
|
|
|
24,977
|
|
|
|
23,909
|
|
|
|
23,364
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
7,001
|
|
|
|
6,776
|
|
|
|
6,645
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year assets
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
$
|
957,282
|
|
|
$
|
910,127
|
|
|
$
|
741,654
|
|
|
$
|
678,034
|
|
Daily average assets
|
|
|
1,113,102
|
|
|
|
925,631
|
|
|
|
800,174
|
|
|
|
700,624
|
|
|
|
675,157
|
|
Daily average deposits
|
|
|
817,041
|
|
|
|
727,762
|
|
|
|
639,046
|
|
|
|
576,091
|
|
|
|
567,145
|
|
Daily average loans/net
|
|
|
708,434
|
|
|
|
596,739
|
|
|
|
515,539
|
|
|
|
459,310
|
|
|
|
430,854
|
|
Daily average equity
|
|
|
143,626
|
|
|
|
119,246
|
|
|
|
91,964
|
|
|
|
74,682
|
|
|
|
70,787
|
|
PER SHARE DATA(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
Book value (at year end)
|
|
|
17.89
|
|
|
|
17.58
|
|
|
|
16.61
|
|
|
|
13.44
|
|
|
|
12.25
|
|
FINANCIAL RATIOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity to assets (at year end)
|
|
|
11.80
|
%
|
|
|
12.86
|
%
|
|
|
12.72
|
%
|
|
|
10.91
|
%
|
|
|
10.71
|
%
|
Return on average equity
|
|
|
2.86
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
|
|
|
7.61
|
|
|
|
9.07
|
|
|
|
9.39
|
|
Return on average tangible equity
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
|
8.54
|
|
|
|
8.31
|
|
|
|
9.12
|
|
|
|
10.01
|
|
Cash dividend payout to net income
|
|
|
118.82
|
|
|
|
54.27
|
|
|
|
53.92
|
|
|
|
48.02
|
|
|
|
46.20
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
Quarterly Operating Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
15,099
|
|
|
$
|
15,401
|
|
|
$
|
15,359
|
|
|
$
|
15,526
|
|
|
$
|
13,747
|
|
|
$
|
13,794
|
|
|
$
|
13,539
|
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,836
|
|
|
|
6,309
|
|
|
|
6,379
|
|
|
|
7,082
|
|
|
|
6,466
|
|
|
|
6,690
|
|
|
|
6,554
|
|
|
|
6,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
9,263
|
|
|
|
9,092
|
|
|
|
8,980
|
|
|
|
8,444
|
|
|
|
7,281
|
|
|
|
7,104
|
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,725
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
8,377
|
|
|
|
7,430
|
|
|
|
7,341
|
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
|
|
6,597
|
|
|
|
6,995
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
6,804
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(2,041
|
)
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
|
|
2,096
|
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
Per Share of Common Stock:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Book value (at quarter end)
|
|
|
17.89
|
|
|
|
18.78
|
|
|
|
18.75
|
|
|
|
19.07
|
|
|
|
17.58
|
|
|
|
17.38
|
|
|
|
17.04
|
|
|
|
16.77
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Retroactively restated for the 10% stock dividend, paid on
February 29, 2008. |
18
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Isabella Bank Corporation
Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Isabella Bank Corporation as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
changes in shareholders equity, income, comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2008. We also have audited
Isabella Bank Corporations internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Isabella
Bank Corporations management is responsible for
these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Isabella Bank Corporations
internal control over financial reporting, based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement and whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the
consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
audit of internal control over financial reporting included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material misstatement
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A corporations internal control over financial reporting
is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
consolidated financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
corporations internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the corporation; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and expenditures of the corporation are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the corporation; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the corporations
assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2008 the Corporation
adopted EITF Issue
No. 06-4,
Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement
Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements. Also, as described in Notes 17 and 20 to
the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1,
2007 the Corporation elected the early adoption of Statements of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.s 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, and 157, Fair Value Measurements, and
effective December 31, 2006 changed its method of
accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement
plans in accordance with SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans.
19
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Isabella Bank
Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and
the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion Isabella Bank Corporation maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the criteria
established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO)
of the Treadway Commission.
Rehmann Robson, P.C.
Saginaw, Michigan
March 6, 2009
20
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and demand deposits due from banks
|
|
$
|
23,554
|
|
|
$
|
25,583
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
|
|
25,064
|
|
Investment securities available for sale (amortized cost of
$248,741 in 2008 and $212,285 in 2007)
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
213,127
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
735,385
|
|
|
|
612,687
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
11,982
|
|
|
|
7,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loans
|
|
|
723,403
|
|
|
|
605,386
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
23,231
|
|
|
|
22,516
|
|
Corporate-owned life insurance policies
|
|
|
16,152
|
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
6,322
|
|
|
|
5,948
|
|
Acquisition intangibles and goodwill, net
|
|
|
47,804
|
|
|
|
27,010
|
|
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
|
|
|
17,345
|
|
|
|
7,353
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
12,324
|
|
|
|
9,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
$
|
957,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing
|
|
$
|
97,546
|
|
|
$
|
84,846
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
113,973
|
|
|
|
105,526
|
|
Certificates of deposit and other savings
|
|
|
422,689
|
|
|
|
410,782
|
|
Certificates of deposit over $100,000
|
|
|
141,422
|
|
|
|
132,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
775,630
|
|
|
|
733,473
|
|
Other borrowed funds ($23,130 in 2008 and 7,523 in 2007 at fair
value)
|
|
|
222,350
|
|
|
|
92,887
|
|
Escrow funds payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
6,807
|
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,004,787
|
|
|
|
834,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value 15,000,000 shares
authorized; outstanding 7,518,856 (including
5,248 shares to be issued) in 2008 and 6,364,120 in 2007
|
|
|
133,602
|
|
|
|
112,547
|
|
Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
4,015
|
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
7,027
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(5,569
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
134,476
|
|
|
|
123,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
$
|
957,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
21
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
6,364,120
|
|
|
|
6,335,861
|
|
|
|
4,974,715
|
|
Common stock dividends
|
|
|
687,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,299
|
|
Shares issued in exchange for bank acquisition
|
|
|
514,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
797,475
|
|
Other issuances of common stock
|
|
|
100,664
|
|
|
|
71,479
|
|
|
|
66,372
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(148,336
|
)
|
|
|
(43,220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of year
|
|
|
7,518,856
|
|
|
|
6,364,120
|
|
|
|
6,335,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
112,547
|
|
|
$
|
111,648
|
|
|
$
|
69,592
|
|
Common stock dividends (10)%
|
|
|
30,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,887
|
|
Regulatory capital transfer
|
|
|
(28,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,000
|
)
|
Issuances of common stock in exchange for bank acquisition
|
|
|
22,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,448
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,836
|
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
2,721
|
|
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of year
|
|
|
133,602
|
|
|
|
112,547
|
|
|
|
111,648
|
|
Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of year
|
|
|
4,015
|
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
7,027
|
|
|
|
4,451
|
|
|
|
10,112
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 159, net
of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply EITF
06-4, net of
tax
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
7,001
|
|
Common stock dividends (10)%
|
|
|
(30,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,887
|
)
|
Regulatory capital transfer
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.65 per share in 2008, $0.62 per share in
2007, $0.58 per share in 2006)
|
|
|
(4,873
|
)
|
|
|
(4,304
|
)
|
|
|
(3,775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of year
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
7,027
|
|
|
|
4,451
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
(1,506
|
)
|
Cumulative adjustment to initially apply the fair value option
of FASB Statement No. 159, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement
No. 158, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,728
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(5,303
|
)
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of year
|
|
|
(5,569
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
Total shareholders equity end of year
|
|
$
|
134,476
|
|
|
$
|
123,080
|
|
|
$
|
115,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
22
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees
|
|
$
|
49,674
|
|
|
$
|
43,808
|
|
|
$
|
36,575
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
5,433
|
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
Nontaxable
|
|
|
4,642
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
Trading account securities
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and other
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
61,385
|
|
|
|
53,972
|
|
|
|
44,709
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
22,605
|
|
|
|
17,164
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
5,733
|
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
2,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
25,606
|
|
|
|
25,959
|
|
|
|
19,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
35,779
|
|
|
|
28,013
|
|
|
|
24,977
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
26,279
|
|
|
|
26,802
|
|
|
|
24,295
|
|
Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
5,894
|
|
|
|
5,490
|
|
Title insurance revenue (Note 2)
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
2,389
|
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Net gain on trading securities
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
7,802
|
|
|
|
9,962
|
|
|
|
9,098
|
|
Noninterest Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
16,992
|
|
|
|
15,618
|
|
|
|
13,869
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
2,868
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,828
|
|
|
|
6,548
|
|
|
|
6,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
|
30,704
|
|
|
|
27,229
|
|
|
|
24,473
|
|
Income before federal income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
9,535
|
|
|
|
8,920
|
|
Federal income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
$
|
7,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
23
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
$
|
7,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the year
|
|
|
(3,104
|
)
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses
included in net income
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains
|
|
|
(3,128
|
)
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,771
|
)
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) reduction of unrecognized pension cost
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (loss) gain on defined benefit pension plan
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(5,303
|
)
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(1,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,254
|
|
|
$
|
7,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
24
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
$
|
7,001
|
|
Reconciliation of net income to cash provided by (used in)
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
Provision for foreclosed asset losses
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
1,852
|
|
Amortization and impairment of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Amortization of acquisition intangibles
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Net amortization of investment securities
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
Realized (gain) loss on sale of available-for-sale investment
securities
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Unrealized gains on trading securities
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on borrowings measured at fair value
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided
(used) cash, net in 2008 and 2006 of bank acquisitions and of
the 2008 joint venture formation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
8,513
|
|
|
|
53,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
(1,990
|
)
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(626
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(3,565
|
)
|
|
|
(4,667
|
)
|
|
|
(1,424
|
)
|
Escrow funds payable
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
|
|
(7,407
|
)
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,450
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
20,661
|
|
|
|
60,387
|
|
|
|
(1,789
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, calls, and sales
|
|
|
66,387
|
|
|
|
54,997
|
|
|
|
57,577
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(96,168
|
)
|
|
|
(132,115
|
)
|
|
|
(70,140
|
)
|
Loan principal originations, net
|
|
|
(42,700
|
)
|
|
|
(24,455
|
)
|
|
|
(44,805
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
Purchases of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(2,990
|
)
|
|
|
(3,722
|
)
|
|
|
(2,467
|
)
|
Bank acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(9,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,713
|
)
|
Cash contributed to title company joint venture formation
|
|
|
(4,542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of corporate owned life insurance policies
|
|
|
(1,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(88,728
|
)
|
|
|
(104,633
|
)
|
|
|
(62,523
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
|
|
|
(47,892
|
)
|
|
|
7,633
|
|
|
|
60,024
|
|
Net increase in other borrowed funds
|
|
|
123,016
|
|
|
|
34,365
|
|
|
|
6,138
|
|
Cash dividends paid on common stock
|
|
|
(4,873
|
)
|
|
|
(4,304
|
)
|
|
|
(3,775
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
|
|
2,459
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
66,038
|
|
|
|
38,470
|
|
|
|
64,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
|
(5,776
|
)
|
|
|
534
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
25,583
|
|
|
|
31,359
|
|
|
|
30,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
23,554
|
|
|
$
|
25,583
|
|
|
$
|
31,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flows information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
25,556
|
|
|
$
|
25,872
|
|
|
$
|
19,392
|
|
Federal income taxes paid
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
Transfer of loans to foreclosed assets
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
25
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
Note 1
Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Basis
of Presentation and Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Isabella Bank Corporation (the Corporation), a
financial services holding company, and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Isabella Bank (the Bank), Financial
Group Information Services, and IB&T Employee Leasing, LLC.
All intercompany balances and accounts have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Nature
of Operations:
Isabella Bank Corporation is a financial services holding
company offering a wide array of financial products and services
in mid-Michigan. Its banking subsidiary, Isabella Bank, offers
banking services through 24 locations,
24-hour
banking services locally and nationally through shared automatic
teller machines, 24- hour online banking, and direct deposits to
businesses, institutions, and individuals. Lending services
offered include commercial real estate loans and lines of
credit, agricultural loans, residential real estate loans,
consumer loans, student loans, and credit cards. Deposit
services include interest and noninterest bearing checking
accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and
certificates of deposit. Other related financial products
include trust services, safe deposit box rentals, and credit
life insurance. Active competition, principally from other
commercial banks, savings banks and credit unions, exists in all
of the Banks principal markets. The Corporations
results of operations can be significantly affected by changes
in interest rates or changes in the local economic environment.
In April 2007, the Corporation consolidated the charters of FSB
Bank and Isabella Bank. The consolidation into a single charter
helped to further reduce operating expenses through the
elimination of duplications in memberships, licensing, service
contracts, compliance, computer platforms, and computer
processing. The legal reorganization had no effect on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements (See
Note 23 Operating Segments).
On January 1, 2008, the Corporation acquired
100 percent of Greenville Community Financial Corporation
(GCFC). As a result of this acquisition, Greenville Community
Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GCFC, merged with and into
the Bank (see Note 2 Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation).
On March 1, 2008, IBT Title and Insurance Agency, Inc. (IBT
Title), a wholly owned subsidiary of Isabella Bank Corporation,
merged its assets and liabilities with Corporate
Title Agency, LLC (Corporate Title), a
third-party title business based in Traverse City, Michigan, to
form CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. As a result of this
transaction, the Corporation became a 50 percent joint
venture owner in CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. The joint
venture is accounted for as an equity investment. The purpose of
this joint venture was to help IBT Title and Insurance Agency,
Inc. expand its service area and to take advantage of economies
of scale (see Note 2 Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation).
Financial Group Information Services provides information
technology services to Isabella Bank Corporation and its
subsidiaries.
IB&T Employee Leasing provides payroll services, benefit
administration, and other human resource services to Isabella
Bank Corporation and its subsidiaries.
Use of
Estimates:
In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to
significant change in the near term relate to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses, the fair value of investment
securities, the valuation of real estate
26
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of
loans, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets,
determinations of assumptions in accounting for the defined
benefit pension plan, and other post-retirement liabilities. In
connection with the determination of the allowance for loan
losses and the carrying value of foreclosed real estate,
management obtains independent appraisals for significant
properties.
Significant
Group Concentrations of Credit Risk:
Most of the Corporations activities conducted are with
customers located within the central Michigan area. A
significant amount of its outstanding loans are secured by real
estate or are made to finance agricultural production. Other
than these types of loans, there is no significant concentration
to any other industry or customer.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash
and cash equivalents include cash and balances due from banks,
federal funds sold, and other deposit accounts, all of which
have original maturity dates within ninety days. Generally,
federal funds sold are for a one day period. The Corporation
maintains deposit accounts in various financial institutions
which generally exceed federally insured limits or are not
insured.
Trading
Securities:
Effective January 1, 2007, in conjunction with the early
adoption of the fair value option of SFAS No. 159 (see
Note 20), the Corporation engages in trading activities for
its own account. Securities that are held principally for resale
in the near term are recorded in the trading assets account at
fair value with unrealized changes in fair value recorded in
noninterest income. Interest and dividends are included in net
interest income.
Available-For-Sale
Investment Securities:
Securities classified as available-for-sale, other
than money market preferred securities, are recorded at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of the effect of
deferred income taxes, excluded from earnings and reported in
other comprehensive income. Available for-sale money
market preferred securities are recorded at fair value, with
unrealized gains and losses, considered not
other-than-temporary, excluded from earnings and reported in
other comprehensive income.
Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest
income using the interest method over the terms of the
securities. Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale
securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than
temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In
determining whether other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI)
losses exist, management considers (1) the length of time
and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost,
(2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the
issuer, and (3) the positive intent and ability of the
Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period
of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair
value (see Note 4). Realized gains and losses on the sale
of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined
using the specific identification method.
Loans:
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the
foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at
their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge
offs, the allowance for loans losses, and any deferred fees or
costs on originated loans. Interest income on loans is accrued
over the term of the loan based on the principal amount
outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan
origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component
of interest income over the term of the loan using the constant
yield method.
The accrual of interest on mortgage and commercial loans is
discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past
due unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of
collection. Credit card loans and other personal loans are
typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. Past
due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all
cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an
earlier date if collection of principal or interest is
considered doubtful.
27
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For loans that are placed on non-accrual status or charged-off,
all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not
collected, is reversed against interest income while interest
accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected is charged
against the allowance for loan losses. The interest on these
loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery
method, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are
returned to accrual status when all principal and interest
amounts contractually due are brought current and future
payments are reasonably assured. For impaired loans not
classified as nonaccrual, interest income continues to be
accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount
outstanding.
Allowance
for Loan Losses:
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are
estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses
charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the
allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of the
loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are
credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by
management and is based upon managements periodic review
of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical
experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse
situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay,
estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing
economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as
it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant
revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated
components. The specific component relates to loans that are
classified as either doubtful, substandard or special mention.
For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an
allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or
collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired
loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general
component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical
loss experience. An unallocated component is maintained to cover
uncertainties that management believes affect its estimate of
probable losses based on qualitative factors. The unallocated
component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision
inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies
for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to
collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment
include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of
collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.
Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment
shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management
determines the significance of payment delays and payment
shortfalls on a
case-by-case
basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstance
surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of
the delay, the reason for the delay, the borrowers prior
payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to
the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a
loan by loan basis for commercial and commercial real estate
loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the
loans obtainable market price, or the fair value of the
collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are
collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the
Corporation does not separately identify individual consumer and
residential loans for impairment disclosures.
Loans
Held for Sale:
Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary
market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value as
determined by aggregating outstanding commitments from investors
or current investor yield requirements. Net unrealized losses,
if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges
to income.
Mortgage loans held for sale can be sold with the mortgage
servicing rights retained by the Bank or sold to the investor.
The carrying value of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the cost
allocated to the associated mortgage servicing rights. Gains or
losses on sales of mortgage loans are recognized based on the
difference between the selling price and the carrying value of
the related mortgage loans sold.
28
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Transfers
of Financial Assets:
Transfers of financial assets, including held for sale mortgage
loans, as described above, and participation loans are accounted
for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered.
Control over transferred assets is determined to be surrendered
when 1) the assets have been isolated from the Bank,
2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions
that constrain it from taking advantage of the right) to pledge
or exchange the transferred assets and 3) the Bank does not
maintain effective control over the transferred assets through
an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Servicing:
Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights
are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial
assets. The Corporation has no purchased servicing rights. For
sales of mortgage loans, a portion of the cost of originating
the loan is allocated to the servicing right based on relative
fair value. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable
mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively,
is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value
of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model
incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in
estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to
service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an
inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default
rates and losses.
Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the
fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost.
Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into tranches
based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest
rate, loan type, and investor type. Impairment is recognized
through a valuation allowance for an individual tranche, to the
extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for
the tranche. If the Corporation later determines that all or a
portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular
tranche, a reduction of the allowance may be recorded as an
increase to income. Capitalized servicing rights are reported in
other assets and are amortized into non-interest income in
proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net
servicing income of the underlying financial assets.
Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing
loans for others. The fees are based on a contractual percentage
of the outstanding principal; or a fixed amount per loan and are
recorded as income when earned. The amortization of mortgage
servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income, a
component of noninterest income.
Loans
Acquired Through Transfer:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Statement of Position (SOP)
03-3
requires that a valuation allowance for loans acquired in a
transfer, including in a business combination, reflect only
losses incurred after acquisition, and should not be recorded at
acquisition. It applies to any loan acquired in a transfer that
shows evidence of credit quality deterioration since it was
originated. The effect on results of operations and financial
position of the Corporations acquisition of the allowance
for loan losses carried over from Farwell State Savings Bank
(Farwell) (see Note 2) was not material in
2006 due to the limited number of troubled loans held by
Farwell. Included in the fair value adjustments of nonintangible
net assets acquired from Greenville Community Financial
Corporation (GCFC), was a reduction in the allowance for loan
losses of $437. The $437 represented the identified impairments
in GCFCs loan portfolio as of December 31, 2007 (see
Note 2).
Foreclosed
Assets:
Assets acquired through, or in lieu, of loan foreclosure are
initially recorded at the lower of the Banks carrying
amount or fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of
transfer, establishing a new cost basis. Any write-downs based
on the assets fair value at the date of acquisition are
charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure,
property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost
basis or fair value less costs to sell. Impairment losses on
property to be held and used are measured at the amount by which
the carrying amount of property exceeds its fair value. Costs
relating to holding these assets are expensed as incurred.
Valuations are
29
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
periodically performed by management, and any subsequent
write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if
necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the
lower of the Banks carrying amount or fair value less
costs to sell. Foreclosed assets of $2,923 and $1,376 are
included in Other Assets on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Off-Balance-Sheet
Credit Related Financial Instruments:
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation has entered
into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under
credit card arrangements, home equity lines of credit,
commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit.
Such financial instruments are recorded only when funded.
Premises
and Equipment:
Land is carried at cost. Buildings and equipment are carried at
cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed
principally by the straight line method based upon the useful
lives of the assets which generally range from 5 to
30 years. Maintenance, repairs and minor alterations are
charged to current operations as expenditures occur and major
improvements are capitalized.
Equity
Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair
Values:
Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair
values are restricted securities of $9,340 in 2008 and $6,253 in
2007. Restricted securities include stock of the Federal Reserve
Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank, which are carried at cost
and have no contractual maturity. Also included as of
December 31, 2008 is the Corporations investment in
CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC, which was $6,905 at that date
(see Note 2 Business Combinations and
Joint Venture Formation).
Stock
Compensation Plans:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) No. 123(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment ,
compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions
are recognized in the financial statements and the cost is
measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability
instruments issued. SFAS No. 123(R) covers a wide
range of share-based compensation arrangements including stock
options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share
appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.
Compensation expense is based on the fair value of the awards,
which is generally the market price of the stock on the
measurement date and is recognized ratably over the service
period of the award, which is usually the vesting period.
SFAS 123(R) applies to new awards and awards modified,
repurchased, or cancelled after January 1, 2006.
Compensation cost related to the non-vested portion of the
awards outstanding as of December 31, 2005 was based on the
grant date fair value of those awards as calculated under the
original provisions of SFAS No. 123; that is, the
Corporation was not required to re-measure the grant date fair
value estimate of the unvested portion of awards granted prior
to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R).
Corporate
Owned Life Insurance:
The Corporation has purchased life insurance policies on key
members of management. In the event of death of one of these
individuals, the Corporation would receive a specified cash
payment equal to the face value of the policy. Such policies are
recorded at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can
be realized on the balance sheet dates. Increases in cash
surrender value in excess of single premiums paid are reported
as other noninterest income.
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 06-4,
Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement
Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements, ratified by the FASB in September, 2006,
requires that policyholders recognize a liability for any
postretirement benefits provided through
30
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the Corporations program. As of December 31, 2008,
the present value of the nature and amount of post retirement
benefits promised by the Corporation to the covered employees is
estimated to be $2,460. The periodic policy maintenance costs
were $85 for 2008.
Acquisition
Intangibles and Goodwill:
Isabella Bank previously acquired branch facilities and related
deposits in business combinations accounted for as a purchase.
During October 2006, Isabella Bank Corporation acquired Farwell
State Savings Bank (Farwell) resulting in identified
core deposit intangibles and goodwill (see Note 2). On
January 1, 2008, Isabella Bank acquired Greenville
Community Financial Corporation (GCFC) resulting in
identified core deposit intangibles and goodwill (see
Note 2). The acquisition of the branches included amounts
related to the valuation of customer deposit relationships (core
deposit intangibles). Such core deposit intangibles are included
in other assets and are being amortized on the straight line
basis over nine years. Core deposit intangibles arising from the
acquisition of Farwell are being amortized on a 10 year
sum-of-years digits amortization schedule. Core deposit
intangibles arising from the acquisition of GCFC are being
amortized on a 15 year sum-of-years digits
amortization schedule. Goodwill is included in other assets and
is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment at least
annually, or on an interim basis if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of the reporting unit below the carrying value.
Federal
Income Taxes:
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using
the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the
net deferred tax assets or liability is determined based on the
tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and
tax bases on the various balance sheet assets and liabilities
and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.
Advertising
Costs:
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred (see Note 11).
Computation
of Earnings Per Share:
Basic earnings per share represents income available to common
stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common
shares issued during the period, which includes shares held in
the Rabbi Trust controlled by the Corporation (see
Note 17). Diluted earnings per share reflects additional
common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive
potential common shares had been issued, as well as any
adjustments to income that would result from the assumed
issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the
Corporation relate solely to outstanding shares in the
Corporations Deferred Director fee plan (see Note 17).
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Average number of common shares issued*
|
|
|
7,492,677
|
|
|
|
6,973,508
|
|
|
|
6,269,465
|
|
Effect of shares in the Deferred Director fee plan*
|
|
|
184,473
|
|
|
|
197,055
|
|
|
|
181,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate
diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
7,677,150
|
|
|
|
7,170,563
|
|
|
|
6,450,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
$
|
7,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
As adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29,
2008 |
31
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reclassifications:
Certain amounts reported in the 2007 and 2006 consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the
2008 presentation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements:
In September of 2006, EITF Issue
No. 06-4,
Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement
Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements, was ratified by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB). The EITF reached a consensus
that for an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement
within the scope of this Issue, an employer should recognize a
liability for future benefits. The Corporation has purchased
corporation-owned life insurance on certain of its employees.
The cash surrender value of these policies is carried as an
asset on the consolidated balance sheets. These life insurance
policies are generally subject to endorsement split-dollar life
insurance arrangements. These arrangements were designed to
provide a pre-and postretirement benefit for senior officers of
the Corporation. The Corporation adopted EITF Issue
No. 06-4
effective January 1, 2008 and as a result recorded an
initial liability of $2,375. To establish this liability, the
Corporation recorded a one time charge of $1,571, net of tax,
directly to retained earnings at that date.
On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 161 (SFAS No. 161)
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. The objective of SFAS No. 161 is to
enhance disclosures about an entitys derivative and
hedging activities and thereby improve the transparency of
financial reporting. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008 and is not expected to
have a significant impact on the Corporations consolidated
financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 162 (SFAS No. 162) The Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The objective
of SFAS No. 162 is to identify the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the
principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements
of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the
United States (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS No. 162 is
effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity
With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and is not
expected to have a significant impact on the Corporations
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB staff issued Staff Position
No. FSP 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset is Not Active.
FSP 157-3
clarifies the application of SFAS 157, which the
Corporation adopted as of January 1, 2007, in cases where a
market is not active. The Corporation has considered the
guidance provided by
FSP 157-3,
which was effective on October 10, 2008, in its
determination of estimated fair values as of December 31,
2008.
In December 2008 the FASB issued FSP No. 132(R)-1
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets. FSP 132(R)-1 provides guidance related to an
employers disclosures about plan assets of defined benefit
pension or other post- retirement benefit plans. Under
FSP 132(R)-1, disclosures should provide users of financial
statements with an understanding of how investment allocation
decisions are made, the factors that are pertinent to an
understanding of investment policies and strategies, the major
categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques
used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the effect of
fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on
changes in plan assets for the period and significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. The disclosures
required by FSP 132(R)-1 will be included in the
Corporations financial statements beginning with the
financial statements for the year-ended December 31, 2009.
On January 12, 2009 EITF Issue
99-20-1,
Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EIFT Issue
No. 99-20
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to
be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets was
ratified by the FASB. The FSP retains and emphasizes the
objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment and
the related disclosure
32
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
requirements in FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and other
related guidance. EITF Issue
99-20-1 is
not expected to have a significant impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements.
The FASB Issued EITF
No. 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities in June
2008. FSP
EITF 03-6-1
provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents
(whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall
be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to
the two-class method. FSP
EITF 03-6-1
will be effective on January 1, 2009. All previously
reported earnings per share data will be retrospectively
adjusted to conform with the provisions of FSP
EITF 03-6-1.
FSP
EITF 03-6-1
is not expected to have a significant impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Note 2
Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation
Farwell
State Savings Bank
On October 3, 2006, Isabella Bank (the Bank)
acquired 100 percent of Farwell State Savings Bank
(Farwell). As a result of this acquisition, Farwell merged with
and into the Bank. Under the terms of the merger agreement, each
share of Farwell common stock was automatically converted into
the right to receive 3.0382 shares of Isabella Bank
Corporation common stock and $29.00 in cash. As a result of this
acquisition, the Corporation issued 797,475 shares of
Isabella Bank Corporation common stock valued at $30,448 and
paid a total of $7,612 in cash to Farwell shareholders. Included
in the purchase price was $382 of transaction costs. The total
consideration exchanged including the value of the common stock
issued, cash paid to shareholders, plus cash paid for
transaction costs resulted in a total purchase cost of $38,442.
The acquisition of Farwell has increased the overall market
share for Isabella Bank Corporation in furtherance of the
Banks strategic plan.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farwell
|
|
|
Nonintangible
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
October 3,
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
of Net Assets
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivelants
|
|
$
|
5,281
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,281
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
17,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,166
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
63,874
|
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
63,404
|
|
Bank premises and equipment
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
89,044
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
89,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
73,731
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
73,338
|
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
74,845
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
74,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
14,199
|
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
|
14,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value adjustments are being amortized over two years
using the straight line amortization method. The core deposit
intangible is being amortized using a 10 year
sum-of-the-years digits amortization schedule. Goodwill,
which is not amortized, is tested for impairment at least
annually. As the acquisition was considered a stock transaction,
goodwill is not deductible for federal income tax purposes.
The consolidated statements of income include operating results
of Farwell since the date of acquisition.
The unaudited pro forma information presented in the following
table has been prepared based on Isabella Bank
Corporations historical results combined with Farwell. The
information has been combined to present the results of
operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning
of the periods presented. The pro forma results are not
necessarily indicative of the results which would have actually
been attained if the acquisition had been consummated in the
past or what may be attained in the future and have not been
adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
27,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
8,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenville
Community Financial Corporation
Effective on the opening of business on January 1, 2008,
Isabella Bank Corporation acquired 100 percent of
Greenville Community Financial Corporation (GCFC). As a result
of this acquisition, Greenville Community Bank, a wholly owned
subsidiary of GCFC, merged with and into the Bank. Under the
terms of the merger agreement, each share of GCFC common stock
was automatically converted into the right to receive
0.6659 shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common stock and
$14.70 per share in cash. Exclusive of the effects of the 10%
stock dividend paid February 29, 2008, the Corporation
issued 514,809 shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common
stock valued at $22,652 and paid a total of $11,365 in cash to
GCFC shareholders. The total consideration exchanged including
the value of the common stock issued, cash paid to shareholders,
plus cash paid for $564 in transaction costs resulted in a total
purchase price of $34,581. The purchase price was determined
using the latest Isabella Bank Corporation stock transaction
price known to management as of November 27, 2007, the date
of the merger agreement. The acquisition of Greenville has
increased the overall market share for Isabella Bank Corporation
in furtherance of the Banks strategic plan.
34
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the estimate of the total
purchase price of the transaction as well as adjustments to
allocate the purchase price based on the preliminary estimates
of fair values of the assets and liabilities of GCFC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenville
|
|
|
Nonintangible
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
of Net Assets
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,339
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,339
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
88,613
|
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
88,215
|
|
Bank premises and equipment
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
107,987
|
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
107,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
90,151
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
90,049
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
5,625
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
95,922
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
96,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
12,065
|
|
|
$
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
11,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value adjustments of tangible net assets acquired are
being amortized over two years using the straight line
amortization method. The core deposit intangible is being
amortized using a 15 year sum-of-the-years digits
amortization schedule. Goodwill, which is not amortized, is
tested for impairment at least annually. As the acquisition was
considered a stock transaction, goodwill is not deductible for
federal income tax purposes.
The 2008 consolidated statements of income include the operating
results of GCFC for the entire year.
The unaudited pro forma information presented in the following
table has been prepared based on Isabella Bank
Corporations historical results combined with GCFC. The
information has been combined to present the results of
operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning
of the earliest period presented. The pro forma results are not
necessarily indicative of the results which would have actually
been attained if the acquisition had been consummated in the
past or what may be attained in the future:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
31,579
|
|
|
$
|
28,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
8,631
|
|
|
$
|
7,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share*
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
As adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29,
2008. |
35
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Title Company
Joint Venture Formation
On March 1, 2008, IBT Title and Insurance Agency, Inc. (IBT
Title), a wholly owned subsidiary of Isabella Bank Corporation,
merged its assets and liabilities with Corporate
Title Agency, LLC (Corporate Title), a
third-party title business based in Traverse City, Michigan, to
form CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. As a result of this
transaction, the Corporation became a 50 percent joint
venture owner in CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. The purpose of
this joint venture is to help IBT Title and Insurance Agency,
Inc. expand its service area and to take advantage of economies
of scale. As the Corporation is a 50 percent owner of this
new entity, revenues and expenses will now be recorded under the
equity method and, as such, our share of the net income or loss
from the joint venture will be included in other noninterest
income. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had a
recorded investment of $6,905 in the new entity, which is
included in equity securities without readily determinable fair
values. The following table summarizes the condensed balance
sheet of IBT Title as of March 1, 2008. These amounts were
excluded from the balance sheet detail of the Corporation and
are now included in investment in equity securities without
readily determinable fair values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IBT Title
|
|
|
|
March 1,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,542
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
Other assets, including intangibles of $1,590
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow funds
|
|
$
|
1,866
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities & equity
|
|
$
|
9,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets of the joint venture as of December 31, 2008
were $12,834. The total liabilities of the joint venture were
$1,287 and the equity was $11,547 as of December 31, 2008.
The Corporations share of the joint ventures
operating results for the ten-months ended December 31,
2008 was not significant.
Note 3
Trading Securities
Trading securities, at fair value, consist of the following
investments at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
4,014
|
|
|
$
|
4,024
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
11,556
|
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
Corporate obligations
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
9,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading securities
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
|
$
|
25,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 4
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities
available for sale, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are
as follows as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies
|
|
$
|
3,999
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,083
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
61,919
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
62,988
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
148,186
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
149,323
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
Money market preferred
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
16,492
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
248,741
|
|
|
$
|
3,407
|
|
|
$
|
5,693
|
|
|
$
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies
|
|
$
|
3,983
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,058
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
49,631
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
50,181
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
130,772
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
130,956
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Money market preferred
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
212,285
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
213,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation had pledged investments in the following amounts
as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or
requried by law
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,289
|
|
Pledged to secure repurchase agreements
|
|
|
64,876
|
|
|
|
16,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
82,876
|
|
|
$
|
42,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale
securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2008 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
32,057
|
|
|
$
|
27,163
|
|
Over 1 year through 5 years
|
|
|
73,531
|
|
|
|
74,888
|
|
After 5 years through 10 years
|
|
|
79,159
|
|
|
|
80,158
|
|
Over 10 years
|
|
|
47,502
|
|
|
|
47,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,249
|
|
|
|
229,518
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
16,492
|
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
248,741
|
|
|
$
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations.
Because of their variable payments, mortgage-backed securities
are not reported by a specific maturity group.
A summary of the activity related to the sale of
available-for-sale debt securities is as follows during the
years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of securities
|
|
$
|
6,096
|
|
|
$
|
5,396
|
|
|
$
|
15,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized
losses at December 31 aggregated by investment category and
length of time that individual securities have been in
continuous loss position, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than Twelve Months
|
|
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
27,015
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
Money market preferred
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
5,642
|
|
|
$
|
33,993
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
2,705
|
|
|
$
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Less Than Twelve Months
|
|
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
994
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
32,309
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
17,065
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
33,303
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
17,065
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized losses in the Corporations municipal bond
portfolio are largely due to the downgrading of the two largest
bond insurers from AAA to AA in June 2008. These downgrades
caused the market to demand higher returns on insured bonds,
which has resulted in declines in the value of the
Corporations municipal bond portfolio, as the majority of
the portfolio is insured. Despite the significant declines in
interest rates observed during the fourth quarter of 2008, the
municipal bond portfolio has struggled to increase in value.
The Corporation has invested $11,000 in auction rate money
market preferred investment security instruments, which are
classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at
estimated fair value. Due to recent events and general
uncertainty in credit markets, these investments have become
illiquid.
Due to the current illiquidity of these securities, the fair
values were estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis
or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as of
December 31, 2008. These analyses consider, among other
factors, the collateral underlying the security investments, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected
future cash flows, estimates of the next time the security is
expected to have a successful auction, and the
Corporations positive intent and ability to hold such
securities until credit markets improve. These securities were
also compared, when possible, to other securities with similar
characteristics.
Due to the lack of marketability of certain investments at this
time, management conducted an analysis to determine whether all
securities currently in an unrealized loss position, including
money market preferred securities, should be considered
other-than-temporarily-impaired (OTTI). Such analyses included,
among other factors, the following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
Has the value of the investment declined more than 20% based on
a risk and maturity adjusted discount rate?
|
|
|
|
Is the investment credit rating below investment grade?
|
|
|
|
Is it probable that the issuer will be unable to pay the amount
when due?
|
|
|
|
Does the Corporation have the ability and positive intent to
hold the security until maturity?
|
|
|
|
Has the duration of the investment been extended by more than
7 years?
|
Based on the Corporations analysis using the above
criteria, and the fact that the Corporation has the positive
intent and ability to hold debt securities for the reasonably
foreseeable future, management does not believe that the values
of these or any other securities are other-than-temporarily
impaired as of December 31, 2008 or 2007.
39
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 5
Loans
The Bank grants commercial, agricultural, consumer and
residential loans to customers situated primarily in Isabella,
Gratiot, Mecosta, Southwestern Midland, Western Saginaw,
Montcalm and Southern Clare counties in Michigan. The ability of
the borrowers to honor their repayment obligations is often
dependent upon the real estate, agricultural, and general
economic conditions of this region. Substantially all of the
consumer and residential mortgage loans are secured by various
items of property, while commercial loans are secured primarily
by real estate, business assets and personal guarantees; a
portion of loans are unsecured.
A summary of the major classifications of loans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
|
$
|
231,705
|
|
|
$
|
227,304
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
200,398
|
|
|
|
158,982
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
31,656
|
|
|
|
19,951
|
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
16,571
|
|
|
|
15,060
|
|
Second mortgages
|
|
|
46,103
|
|
|
|
36,393
|
|
Equity lines of credit
|
|
|
25,018
|
|
|
|
19,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans
|
|
|
551,451
|
|
|
|
476,870
|
|
Commercial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
124,408
|
|
|
|
79,324
|
|
Agricultural production
|
|
|
26,347
|
|
|
|
27,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
150,755
|
|
|
|
106,780
|
|
Consumer installment loans
|
|
|
33,179
|
|
|
|
29,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
735,385
|
|
|
|
612,687
|
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
11,982
|
|
|
|
7,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
723,403
|
|
|
$
|
605,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
$
|
7,605
|
|
|
$
|
6,899
|
|
Allowance of acquired bank
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(6,325
|
)
|
|
|
(2,146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,149
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
Provision charged to income
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
11,982
|
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
$
|
7,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired
loans at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
9,603
|
|
|
$
|
3,779
|
|
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total impaired loans accruing interest
|
|
$
|
2,796
|
|
|
$
|
1,292
|
|
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
2,065
|
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
$
|
11,175
|
|
|
$
|
4,156
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
$
|
1,251
|
|
|
$
|
1,727
|
|
Average investment in impaired loans
|
|
$
|
6,636
|
|
|
$
|
3,768
|
|
Total restructured loans
|
|
$
|
4,550
|
|
|
$
|
685
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans was not significant
during any of the three years ended December 31, 2008. No
additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with
impaired loans.
Note 6
Servicing
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others are not included
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid
principal balances of mortgages serviced for others was
$254,495, $255,839, and $255,577 at December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006 respectively; such loans are not included in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of
servicing rights was determined using a discount rate of 8.1%,
prepayment speeds ranging from 6.0% to 25.8%, depending upon the
stratification of the specific right and a weighted average
default rate of 0.0%. Servicing loans for others generally
consists of collecting mortgage payments, maintaining escrow
accounts, disbursing payments to investors and taxing
authorities, and foreclosure processing.
The following table summarizes the changes in each year of the
carrying value of mortgage servicing rights included in other
assets as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
|
$
|
2,155
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights capitalized
|
|
|
3,079
|
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
|
|
2,655
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(3,016
|
)
|
|
|
(2,785
|
)
|
|
|
(2,589
|
)
|
Impairment valuation allowance
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
2,105
|
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
|
$
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses recognized
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7
Premises and Equipment
A summary of premises and equipment at December 31 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
4,665
|
|
|
$
|
3,997
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
18,653
|
|
|
|
16,067
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
23,043
|
|
|
|
23,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
46,361
|
|
|
|
43,290
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
23,130
|
|
|
|
20,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
23,231
|
|
|
$
|
22,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense amounted to $2,171, $1,960 and $1,852 in
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
41
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
$
|
25,889
|
|
|
$
|
25,889
|
|
Goodwill identified in GCFC acquisition (See Note 2)
|
|
|
21,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassificaiton for goodwill contributed to CT/IBT
Title Agency, LLC joint venture (See Note 2)
|
|
|
(1,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31
|
|
$
|
45,618
|
|
|
$
|
25,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets at year end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit premium resulting from the Greenville acquisition
in 2008
|
|
$
|
1,480
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
Core deposit premium resulting from the Farwell acquisition in
2006
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
Core deposit premium resulting from previous acquisitions
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,373
|
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
|
$
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit premium resulting from the Farwell acquisition in
2006
|
|
$
|
1,442
|
|
|
$
|
321
|
|
|
$
|
1,121
|
|
Core deposit premium resulting from previous acquisitions
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
2,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,893
|
|
|
$
|
2,772
|
|
|
$
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible
assets was $415, $278, and $160 in 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively.
Estimated amortization expense associated with identifiable
intangibles for each of the next five years and thereafter is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
2010
|
|
|
337
|
|
2011
|
|
|
299
|
|
2012
|
|
|
261
|
|
2013
|
|
|
221
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 9
Deposits
Scheduled maturities of time deposits for the years succeeding
December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
240,339
|
|
2010
|
|
|
63,464
|
|
2011
|
|
|
29,771
|
|
2012
|
|
|
21,565
|
|
2013
|
|
|
24,860
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
381,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on time deposits greater than $100 was $6,525
in 2008, $6,649 in 2007, and $5,195 in 2006.
Note 10
Borrowed Funds
Borrowed funds consist of the following obligations at December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
$
|
150,220
|
|
|
$
|
66,023
|
|
Federal Funds purchased
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
15,883
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated
maturity dates
|
|
|
42,430
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated
maturity dates
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
222,350
|
|
|
$
|
92,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings are collateralized by a
blanket lien on all qualified 1-to-4 family whole mortgage loans
and U.S. government and federal agency securities. Advances
are also secured by FHLB stock owned by the Bank.
The maturity and weighted average interest rates of FHLB
advances are as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fixed rate advances due 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,131
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2009
|
|
|
42,215
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
%
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2010
|
|
|
29,516
|
|
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
|
|
18,392
|
|
|
|
5.08
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2011
|
|
|
10,225
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year putable advances due 2010
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
%
|
One year putable advances due 2011
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year putable advances due 2012
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2012
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
4.19
|
%
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
One year putable advances due 2013
|
|
|
10,264
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate advances due 2014
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate advances due 2015
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
4.84
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,220
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
|
$
|
66,023
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are classified as
secured borrowings. Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase without stated maturity dates generally mature within
one to four days from the transaction date. Securities sold
under agreements to repurchase are reflected at the amount of
cash received in
43
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
connection with the transaction. The U.S. government agency
securities underlying the agreements have a carrying value and a
fair value of $64,876 and $16,072 at December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Such securities remain under the control of
the Corporation. The Corporation may be required to provide
additional collateral based on the fair value of underlying
securities.
The maturity and weighted average interest rates of securities
sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates
are as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements due 2010
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Repurchase agreements due 2013
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
Repurchase agreements due 2014
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11
Other Noninterest Expenses
A summary of expenses included in Other Noninterest Expenses are
as follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Director fees
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
584
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
Audit and SOX compliance fees
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Other, not individually significant
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
4,527
|
|
|
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,828
|
|
|
$
|
6,548
|
|
|
$
|
6,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12
Federal Income Taxes
Components of the consolidated provision (benefit) for income
taxes are as follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Currently payable
|
|
$
|
1,088
|
|
|
$
|
1,304
|
|
|
$
|
1,645
|
|
Deferred (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
$
|
(724
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
$
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the provision (benefit) for federal income
taxes and the amount computed at the federal statutory tax rate
of 34% of income before federal income tax (benefit) expense is
as follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income taxes at 34% statutory rate
|
|
$
|
1,148
|
|
|
$
|
3,242
|
|
|
$
|
3,033
|
|
Effect of nontaxable income
|
|
|
(2,088
|
)
|
|
|
(1,782
|
)
|
|
|
(1,239
|
)
|
Effect of nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
$
|
(724
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
$
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for federal income tax purposes. Significant components of
the Corporations deferred tax assets and liabilities,
included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets, are as follows as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
3,145
|
|
|
$
|
1,658
|
|
Deferred directors fees
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
Employee benefit plans
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Net unrealized losses on trading securities
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Net unrecognized actuarial loss on pension plan
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
Life insurance death benefit payable
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
8,314
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Accretion on securities
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
Other
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
3,245
|
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
5,069
|
|
|
$
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes (FIN No. 48), an interpretation of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN No. 48 seeks
to reduce the significant diversity in practice associated with
financial statement recognition and measurement in accounting
for income taxes and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for disclosure of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken on an income tax return, in order for those
tax provisions to be recognized in the Corporations
financial statements. During 2007, the Corporation adopted the
provisions of FIN No. 48. The adoption had no effect
on the Corporations financial statements.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to
U.S. federal income tax. The Corporation is no longer
subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before
2005. The Corporation does not expect the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next
twelve months.
The Corporation recognizes interest
and/or
penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
The Corporation does not have any amounts accrued for interest
and penalties at December 31, 2008 and is not aware of any
claims for such amounts by federal income tax authorities.
45
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 13
Off-Balance-Sheet Activities
Credit-Related
Financial Instruments
The Corporation is party to credit related financial instruments
with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments are
entered into in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments,
which include commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit, involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and
interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of
these instruments reflect the extent of involvement the
Corporation has in a particular class of financial instrument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit
|
|
$
|
106,861
|
|
|
$
|
87,969
|
|
Commercial and standby letters of credit
|
|
|
6,429
|
|
|
|
4,405
|
|
Commitments to grant loans
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
Unfunded commitments under commercial lines-of-credit, revolving
credit home equity lines of credit and overdraft protection
agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of
credit to existing customers. The commitments for equity lines
of credit may expire without being drawn upon. These
lines-of-credit are uncollateralized and usually do not contain
a specified maturity date and may not be drawn upon to the total
extent to which the Bank is committed. A majority of such
commitments are at fixed rates of interest; a portion is
unsecured.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by
the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support
private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond
financing, and similar transactions.
The Corporation considers standby letters of credit to be
guarantees. These commitments to extend credit and letters of
credit mature within one year. The credit risk involved in these
transactions is essentially the same as that involved in
extending loans to customers. The Corporation evaluates each
customers credit worthiness on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by
the Corporation upon the extension of credit, is based on
managements credit evaluation of the borrower. While the
Corporation considers standby letters of credit to be
guarantees, the amount of the liability related to such
guarantees on the commitment date is not significant and a
liability related to such guarantees is not recorded on the
consolidated balance sheets.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. The commitments may expire without being drawn
upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral
obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Bank, is based on
managements credit evaluation of the customer.
The Corporations exposure to credit-related loss in the
event of nonperformance by the counter parties to the financial
instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of
those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies
in deciding to make these commitments as it does for extending
loans to customers.
|
|
Note 14
|
On-Balance
Sheet Activities
|
Derivative
Loan Commitments
Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan
commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the
commitment will be held for sale upon funding. The Corporation
enters into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at
specific times in the future, with the intention that these
loans will subsequently be sold in the secondary market. A
mortgage loan commitment binds the Corporation to lend funds to
a potential borrower at a specified interest rate within a
specified period of time, generally up to 60 days after
inception of the rate lock.
46
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Outstanding derivative loan commitments expose the Corporation
to the risk that the price of the loans arising from the
exercise of the loan commitment might decline from the inception
of the rate lock to funding of the loan due to increases in
mortgage interest rates. If interest rates increase, the value
of these loan commitments decreases. Conversely, if interest
rates decrease, the value of these loan commitments increases.
The notional amount of undesignated interest rate lock
commitments was $334 and $311 at December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
Forward
Loan Sale Commitments
To protect against the price risk inherent in derivative loan
commitments, the Corporation utilizes both mandatory
delivery and best efforts forward loan sale
commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the
values of loan that would result from the exercise of the
derivative loan commitments.
With a mandatory delivery contract, the Corporation
commits to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans
to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified
date. If the Corporation fails to deliver the amount of
mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified
date, it is obligated to pay a pair-off fee, based
on then current market prices, to the investor to compensate the
investor for the shortfall.
With a best efforts contract, the Corporation
commits to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified
principal amount and quality to an investor if the loan to the
underlying borrower closes. Generally, the price the investor
will pay the seller for an individual loan is specified prior to
the loan being funded (e.g. on the same day the lender commits
to lend funds to a potential borrower).
The Corporation expects that these forward loan sale commitments
will experience changes in fair value opposite to change in fair
value of derivate loan commitments. The notional amount of
undesignated forward loan sale commitments was $1,232 and $2,525
at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The fair values of the rate lock loan commitments related to the
origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale and the
forward loan sale commitments are deemed insignificant by
management and, accordingly, are not recorded in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Note 15
|
Commitments
and other Matters
|
Banking regulations require banks to maintain cash reserve
balances in currency or as deposits with the Federal Reserve
Bank. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the reserve balances
amounted to $700 and $370, respectively.
Isabella Bank sponsors the IBT Foundation (the
Foundation), which is a nonprofit entity formed for
the purpose of distributing charitable donations to recipient
organizations generally located in the communities serviced by
Isabella Bank. The Bank periodically makes charitable
contributions in the form of cash transfers to the Foundation.
The Foundation is administered by members of the Isabella Bank
Board of Directors. The assets and transactions of the
Foundation are not included in the consolidated financial
statements of Isabella Bank Corporation. During 2008, 2007, and
2006, the Corporation contributed $78 ,$0, and $0 respectively
to the Foundation. The assets of the Foundation as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $953 and $1,069,
respectively.
Banking regulations limit the transfer of assets in the form of
dividends, loans, or advances from the Bank to the Corporation.
At December 31, 2008, substantially all of the Banks
assets were restricted from transfer to the Corporation in the
form of loans or advances. Consequently, bank dividends are the
principal source of funds for the Corporation. Payment of
dividends without regulatory approval is limited to the current
years retained net income plus retained net income for the
preceding two years, less any required transfers to common
stock. At January 1, 2009, the amount available for
dividends without regulatory approval was approximately $7,831.
The Bank has obtained approval to borrow up to $200,000 from the
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Indianapolis. Under the terms
of the agreement, the Bank may obtain advances at the stated
rate at the time of the borrowings. The Bank has agreed to
pledge eligible mortgage loans and U.S. Treasury and
governmental agencies as collateral for any such borrowings.
47
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 16
|
Minimum
Regulatory Capital Requirements
|
The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are
subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (The Regulators). Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate mandatory and possibly additional
discretionary actions by The Regulators that if undertaken,
could have a material effect on the Corporations and
Banks financial statements. Under The Regulators
capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action, the Corporation and the Bank must meet
specific capital guidelines that include quantitative measures
of their assets, liabilities, capital, and certain
off-balance-sheet items, as calculated under regulatory
accounting standards. The Banks capital amounts and
classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by The
Regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank
holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure
capital adequacy require the Corporation and the Bank to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following
table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the
regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and
Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management
believes, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, that the
Corporation and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements
to which they are subject.
As of December 31, 2008, the most recent notifications from
The Regulators categorized the Bank as well capitalized under
the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be
categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain
total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1
leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. There are
no conditions or events since the notifications that management
believes has changed the Banks categories. The
Corporations and each Banks actual capital amounts
(in thousands) and ratios are also presented in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Under Prompt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Corrective Action
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Requirement
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
$
|
89,192
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
57,666
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
72,082
|
|
|
10.0%
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
98,867
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
58,485
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
80,145
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
28,833
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
43,249
|
|
|
6.0
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
89,694
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
29,242
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
80,145
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
43,069
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
53,836
|
|
|
5.0
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
89,694
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
42,603
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
$
|
75,769
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
47,705
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
59,632
|
|
|
10.0%
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
103,436
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
48,636
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
68,468
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
23,853
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
35,779
|
|
|
6.0
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
96,135
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
24,318
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
68,468
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
35,723
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
44,654
|
|
|
5.0
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
96,135
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
35,936
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
48
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 17
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Defined
Benefit Pension Plan
The Corporation has a non-contributory defined benefit pension
plan covering substantially all of its employees. In December
2006, the Board of Directors voted to curtail the defined
benefit plan effective March 1, 2007. The effect of the
curtailment, which was recognized in the first quarter of 2007,
suspended the current participants accrued benefits as of
March 1, 2007 and limited participation in the plan to
eligible employees as of December 31, 2006. Due to the
curtailment, future salary increases will not be considered and
the benefits are based on years of service and the
employees five highest consecutive years of compensation
out of the last ten years of service through March 1, 2007.
As a result of the curtailment, the Corporation does not
anticipate contributing to the plan in the near future.
The curtailment resulted in a reduction in 2007 of $2,939 in the
projected benefit obligation, which served to reduce
unrecognized net actuarial loss of $2,939, a component of
accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Subsequent to the decision to curtail the defined benefit plan,
the Corporation decided to increase the contributions to the
Corporations 401(k) plan effective January 1, 2007
(see Other Employee Benefit Plans on page 52).
Changes in the projected benefit obligation and plan assets
during each year, the funded status of the plan, and the net
amount recognized on the Corporations consolidated balance
sheets using an actuarial measurement date of December 31,
are summarized as follows during the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, January 1
|
|
$
|
8,206
|
|
|
$
|
10,996
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Benefits paid, including plan expenses
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
Plan curtailment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, December 31
|
|
|
8,436
|
|
|
|
8,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, January 1
|
|
|
9,607
|
|
|
|
9,199
|
|
Investment (loss) return
|
|
|
(1,309
|
)
|
|
|
558
|
|
Corporation contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Benefits paid, including plan expenses
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, December 31
|
|
|
7,669
|
|
|
|
9,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Deficiency in) funded status at December 31
|
|
$
|
(767
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change in (accrued) prepaid pension benefit costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost at January 1
|
|
$
|
1,401
|
|
|
$
|
(1,797
|
)
|
Contributions to the plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Net periodic benefit income (cost) for the year
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Plan curtailment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Net change in unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accrued) prepaid pension benefit cost at December 31
|
|
$
|
(767
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During 2006, the Corporation adopted the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans
(SFAS No. 158) and in accordance
therewith reflected the under funded status of the plan on its
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006.
Prospectively, the Corporation adjusts the liability to reflect
the current funded status of the plan. Any gains or losses that
arise during the year but are not recognized as components of
net periodic benefit cost are now recognized as a component of
other comprehensive income (loss).
The adoption of SFAS No. 158 had no effect on the
Corporations consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2006, and it will not affect the
Corporations operating results in future periods.
The incremental effects of applying FASB Statement No. 158
on individual line items on the consolidated statement of
financial position as of the December 31, 2006
implementation date are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Application of
|
|
|
Application
|
|
|
Application of
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
(Prepaid) accrued liability for pension benefits
|
|
$
|
(2,337
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,134
|
|
|
$
|
1,797
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
3,436
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
792,581
|
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
|
|
794,378
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(759
|
)
|
|
|
(2,728
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
118,477
|
|
|
|
(2,728
|
)
|
|
|
115,749
|
|
Amounts recognized as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Increase) reduction of unrecognized pension cost
|
|
$
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,890
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,134
|
)
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,907
|
|
|
$
|
(2,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation was $8,436 and $8,206 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The $4,134
adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158 in 2006
consisted primarily of previously unrecognized net actuarial
losses.
The components of net periodic benefit cost and other pension
related amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)
are as follows for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (income) cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost on benefits earned for services rendered during the
year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
637
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(659
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (income) cost
|
|
$
|
(152
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2008
includes net unrecognized actuarial losses of $3,564, of which
$170 is expected to be amortized into benefit cost during 2009.
Actuarial assumptions used in determining the projected benefit
obligation are as follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
6.10
|
%
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Rate of increase in future compensation
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Expected long-term rate of return
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
The actual weighted average assumptions used in determining the
net periodic pension costs are as follows for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.10
|
%
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
The expected long term rate of return is an estimate of
anticipated future long term rates of return on the
Corporations plan assets as measured on a market value
basis. Factors considered in arriving at this assumption include:
|
|
|
|
|
Historical longer term rates of return for broad asset classes.
|
|
|
|
Actual past rates of return achieved by the plan.
|
|
|
|
The general mix of assets held by the plan.
|
|
|
|
The stated investment policy for the plan.
|
The selected rate of return is net of anticipated investment
related expenses.
The Corporations actual pension plan weighted-average
asset allocations by asset category are as follows at December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
44.7
|
%
|
|
|
58.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, the plan held $188 (2.5% of total
plan assets) of funds in a money market account. The remaining
funds are invested in two mutual funds managed by the
plans investment advisors. These funds had $4,050 in
equity investments and $3,431 in debt securities as of
December 31, 2008.
The asset mix, the sector weighting of equity investments, and
debt issues to hold are based on a third party investment
advisor retained by the Corporation to manage the plan. The
Corporation reviews the performance of the advisor no less than
annually.
The Corporation does not expect to make contributions to the
pension plan in 2009.
51
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Estimated future benefit payments are as follows for the next
ten years:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
2010
|
|
|
379
|
|
2011
|
|
|
381
|
|
2012
|
|
|
400
|
|
2013
|
|
|
399
|
|
Years 2014 2018 (total)
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
Other
Employee Benefit Plans
The Corporation maintains a nonqualified supplementary employee
retirement plan (SERP) for qualified officers to provide
supplemental retirement benefits to each participant. Expenses
related to this program for 2008, 2007, and 2006 were $206,
$202, and $97, respectively, and are being recognized over the
participants expected years of service. As a result of
curtailing Isabella Bank Corporations defined benefit plan
in March 2007, the Corporation established an additional SERP to
maintain the benefit levels for all employees that were at least
forty years old and had at least 15 years of service. The
cost to provide this benefit was $128 and $120 for 2008 and
2007, respectively.
The Corporation maintains a non-leveraged employee stock
ownership plan (ESOP) and a profit sharing plan which cover
substantially all of its employees. Effective December 31,
2006, the ESOP plan was frozen to new participants.
Contributions to the plans are discretionary and are approved by
the Board of Directors and recorded as compensation expense.
Expenses related to the plans for 2008, 2007, and 2006 were $0,
$115, and $13, respectively. Total allocated shares outstanding
related to the ESOP at December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
were 271,520, 149,154, and 161,762, respectively, were included
in the computation of dividends and earnings per share in each
of the respective years and have not been adjusted for the 10%
stock dividend paid February 29, 2008.
The Corporation maintains a self-funded medical plan under which
the Corporation is responsible for the first $50 per year of
claims made by a covered family. Medical claims are subject to a
lifetime maximum of $5,000 per covered individual. Expenses are
accrued based on estimates of the aggregate liability for claims
incurred and the Corporations experience. Expenses were
$2,110 in 2008, $1,804 in 2007 and $1,316 in 2006.
The Corporation offers dividend reinvestment, and employee and
director stock purchase plans. The dividend reinvestment plan
allows shareholders to purchase previously unissued Isabella
Bank Corporation common shares. The stock purchase plan allows
employees and directors to purchase Isabella Bank Corporation
common stock through payroll deduction. The number of shares
reserved for issuance under these plans are 635,000, with
314,856 shares unissued at December 31, 2008, as
adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, 78,994 shares were issued for
$2,879, 63,233 shares were issued for $2,657 and
61,258 shares were issued for $2,459, respectively, in cash
pursuant to these plans, exclusive of the effects of the 10%
stock dividend paid February 29, 2008.
401(k)
Plan
The Corporation has a 401(k) plan in which substantially all
employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute
up to 100% of their compensation subject to certain limits based
on federal tax laws. The Corporation began making matching
contributions equal to 25% of the first 3% of an employees
compensation contributed to the plan in 2005. Employees are 0%
vested through their first two years of employment and are 100%
vested after 6 years of service.
As a result of the curtailment of the defined benefit plan noted
above, the Corporation decided to increase the contributions to
the Corporations 401(k) plan effective January 1,
2007. The enhancement includes an automatic 3.0% contribution
for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to
50% of the first 4.0% of an
52
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
employees compensation contributed to the Plan during the
year. For the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
expenses attributable to the Plan were $543 and $439,
respectively.
Equity
Compensation Plan
Pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan for
Directors, directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are
required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees to the
Plan. The fees are converted to stock units based on the fair
market value of a share of common stock as of the relevant
valuation date. Stock credited to a participants account
is eligible for stock and cash dividends as declared. Upon
retirement from the board or the occurrence of certain other
events, the participant is eligible to receive a lump-sum,
in-kind, distribution of all of the stock that is then in his or
her account, and any unconverted cash will be converted to and
rounded up to whole shares of stock and distributed, as well.
The Plan as modified does not allow for cash settlement, and
therefore, such share-based payment awards qualify for
classification as equity. All authorized but unissued shares of
common stock are eligible for issuance under this Plan. The
Corporation may also purchase shares of common stock from the
open market to meet its obligations under the Plan. Under the
Plan, the Corporation was to issue $3,766 in dollar value of
common stock or 186,766 shares and $3,772 or
198,939 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively as adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid on
February 29, 2008, pursuant to the antidilution provision
required by the Plan.
On December 17, 2008, the Corporation established a Rabbi
Trust effective as of July 1, 2008, to fund the Plan. A
Rabbi Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which the
Corporation may contribute assets for the limited purpose of
funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although the
Corporation may not reach the assets of the Rabbi Trust for any
purpose other than meeting its obligations under the plan, the
assets of the trust remain subject to the claims of the
Corporations creditors and are included in the
consolidated financial statements. The Corporation may
contribute cash or common stock to the trust from time to time
for the sole purpose of funding the Plan. The trust will use any
cash that the Corporation contributed to purchase shares of the
Corporations common stock on the open market through the
Corporations brokerage services department.
Since July 1, 2008, the Corporation has transferred $249 of
cash to the Rabbi Trust. As of December 31, 2008, the Trust
held 5,248 shares of the Corporations common stock
for settlement.
|
|
Note 18
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income as well as
unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale
investment securities owned and changes in the funded status of
the Corporations defined benefit pension plan, which are
excluded from net income. Unrealized investment securities gains
and losses and changes in the funded status of the pension plan,
net of tax, are excluded from net income, and are reflected as a
direct charge or credit to shareholders equity.
Comprehensive income (loss) and the related components are
disclosed in the accompanying consolidated statements of
comprehensive income for each of the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
The following is a summary of the components comprising the
balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss reported on the
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31 (presented net of
tax):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investment securities
|
|
$
|
(3,216
|
)
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
Unrecognized pension costs
|
|
|
(2,353
|
)
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(5,569
|
)
|
|
$
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 19
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank grants loans to
principal officers and directors and their affiliates (including
their families and companies in which they have 10% or more
ownership). Annual activity consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
10,461
|
|
|
$
|
10,749
|
|
New loans
|
|
|
3,488
|
|
|
|
8,720
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(9,938
|
)
|
|
|
(9,008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
4,011
|
|
|
$
|
10,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits of these principal officers and directors and
their affiliates amounted to $8,317 and $10,526 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In addition,
Isabella Bank Corporations Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(Note 17) held deposits with the Bank aggregating $370
and $928, respectively, at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
Note 20
|
Financial
Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect
existing standards which require assets or liabilities to be
carried at fair value. Under SFAS No. 159, the
Corporation may elect to measure many financial instruments and
certain other assets and liabilities at fair value (fair
value option FVO). The fair value measurement
option is not allowable for deposit or withdrawable on demand
liabilities. If the use of fair value is elected, any upfront
costs and fees related to the instrument must be recognized in
earnings and cannot be deferred, e.g., debt issue costs. The
fair value election is irrevocable and is generally made on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis, even if the Corporation has similar instruments that it
elects not to measure based on fair value. At the adoption date,
unrealized gains and losses on existing items for which fair
value has been elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment
to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2007.
Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 159, changes in
fair value are recognized in earnings. Although
SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and would have been required to be
adopted by Isabella Bank Corporation in the first quarter of
fiscal 2008, Isabella Bank Corporation elected to early adopt
SFAS No. 159 effective January 1, 2007, the
impact of which is detailed in the table below.
As shown in the following table, the Corporation elected to
transfer $77,839 of its $213,450 available-for-sale securities
investment portfolio to trading status to facilitate more active
trading of these securities. In determining which
available-for-sale securities to transfer, the Corporation
considered interest rates, duration, marketability, and balance
sheet management strategies. The securities transferred included
obligations of US Government Agencies, variable rate Federal
National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation mortgage backed securities, taxable municipal bonds,
and a limited number of tax exempt bonds.
54
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Corporation also elected to report $7,256 of long-term,
relatively high interest rate, Federal Home Loan Bank advances
at their fair value upon the early adoption of
SFAS No. 159 to provide a hedge against significant
movement in interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Net Gain/
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
1/1/2007 Prior to
|
|
|
(Loss ) Upon
|
|
|
1/1/2007 After
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FVO
|
|
|
Adoption of FVO
|
|
|
Adoption of FVO
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
$
|
79,198
|
|
|
$
|
(1,359
|
)
|
|
$
|
77,839
|
|
FHLB borrowings included in other borrowed funds
|
|
|
(7,256
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(7,488
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax cumulative loss effect of adoption of the fair value
option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative loss effect of adoption of the fair value option
(charged as a reduction to retained earnings as of
January 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation utilizes fair value measurements to record fair
value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to
determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale,
trading securities, derivatives and certain liabilities are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from
time to time, the Corporation may be required to record at fair
value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans
held-for-sale, loans held for investment in foreclosed assets,
mortgage servicing rights and certain other assets and
liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically
involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or
write-downs of individual assets.
Fair
Value Hierarchy
Under SFAS 157, the Corporation groups assets and
liabilities at fair value into three levels, based on the
markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the
reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.
These levels are:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for
identical instruments traded in active markets.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar
instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active, and
model-based valuation techniques for which all significant
assumptions are observable in the market.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Valuation is generated from model-based techniques
that use at least one significant assumption not observable in
the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability.
|
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used
for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.
Investment
Securities:
Investment securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if
available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are
measured using independent pricing models or other model-based
valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash
flows, adjusted for the securitys credit rating,
prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and
liquidity assumptions. Level 1 securities include those
traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock
Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by
dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets,
mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored
entities and money market funds. Level 2 securities include
municipal bonds and corporate debt securities in active markets.
Securities classified as Level 3 include securities in less
liquid markets,
55
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
including illiquid markets in some instances, and include
certain municipal securities and money market preferred auction
rate securities.
The Corporation has invested $11,000 in auction rate money
market preferred investment security instruments, which are
classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at
fair value. Due to recent events and uncertainty in credit
markets, these investments have become illiquid.
Due to the current illiquidity of these securities, these assets
were classified as Level 3 during 2008. The fair values of
these securities were estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow
analysis or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as of
December 31, 2008. These analyses consider, among other
factors, the collateral underlying the security investments, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected
future cash flows, estimates of the next time the security is
expected to have a successful auction, and the
Corporations positive intent and ability to hold such
securities until credit markets improve, as described in
Note 4.
Loans
Available-for-Sale:
Loans available for sale are carried at the lower of cost or
market value. The fair value of loans held-for-sale is based on
what price secondary markets are currently offering for
portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the Company
classifies loans subjected to nonrecurring fair value
adjustments as Level 2.
Loans:
The Corporation does not record loans at fair value on a
recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is
considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is
established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of
interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired.
Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management
measures impairment in accordance with SFAS 114,
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,
(SFAS 114). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated
using one of several methods, including collateral value, market
value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and
discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an
allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the
expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded
investments in such loans. At December 31, 2008, impaired
loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral
or based on the net present value of their expected cash flows.
Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the
fair value of collateral require classification in the fair
value hierarchy. When a current appraised value is not available
or management determines the fair value of the collateral is
further impaired below the appraised value and there is no
observable market price, or the impairment is determined using
the net present value of the expected cash flows, the
Corporation classifies the impaired loan as nonrecurring
Level 3.
Foreclosed
Assets:
Upon transfer from the loan portfolio, foreclosed assets are
adjusted to and subsequently carried at the lower of carrying
value or fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is based upon
independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or
managements estimation of the value of the collateral.
When a current appraised value is not available or management
determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired
below the appraised value and there is no observable market
price, the Corporation classifies the foreclosed asset as
nonrecurring Level 3.
Equity
Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair
Values:
The Corporation has investments in equity securities without
readily determinable fair values as well as an investment in a
joint venture. The assets are individually reviewed for
impairment on an annual basis by comparing the carrying value to
the estimated fair value. The lack of an independent source to
validate fair value estimates, including the impact of future
capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent
limitation in the valuation process. The Corporation classifies
nonmarketable equity securities and its investment in a joint
venture subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as
Level 3. During 2008 and 2007, there were no impairments
recorded on equity securities without readily determinable fair
values.
56
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Mortgage
Servicing Rights:
Loan servicing rights are subject to impairment testing. A
valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis
using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently
quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined
by management, is used for impairment testing. If the valuation
model reflects a value less than the carrying value, mortgage
servicing rights are adjusted to fair value through a valuation
allowance as determined by the model. As such, the Corporation
classifies loan servicing rights subjected to nonrecurring fair
value adjustments as Level 2.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets:
Goodwill and identified intangible assets are subject to
impairment testing. A projected cash flow valuation method is
used in the completion of impairment testing. This valuation
method requires a significant degree of management judgment. In
the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows
are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair
value as determined by the valuation model. If the testing
resulted in impairment, the Corporation would classify goodwill
and other intangible assets subjected to nonrecurring fair value
adjustments as Level 3. During 2008 and 2007, there were no
impairments recorded on goodwill and other intangible assets.
Other
Borrowed Funds:
The Corporation has elected to measure a portion of other
borrowed funds at their fair value. These borrowings are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the fair value
measurement being based upon quoted prices. Changes in the fair
value of these borrowings are included in noninterest income. As
such, the Corporation classifies other borrowed funds as
Level 1.
The table below represents the activity in Level 3 inputs
measured on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs January 1
|
|
$
|
12,694
|
|
|
$
|
13,723
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
(1,255
|
)
|
|
|
(1,029
|
)
|
Transfers of securities into level 3 due to changes in the
observability of significant inputs (illiquid markets)
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities
|
|
|
(5,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs December 31
|
|
$
|
19,391
|
|
|
$
|
12,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below present the recorded amount of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Description
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Recurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
|
$
|
10,175
|
|
|
$
|
11,600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
89,507
|
|
|
|
137,557
|
|
|
|
19,391
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
23,130
|
|
|
|
23,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonrecurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
|
10,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,014
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Description
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Recurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
25,064
|
|
|
$
|
14,741
|
|
|
$
|
10,323
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
213,127
|
|
|
|
57,871
|
|
|
|
142,562
|
|
|
|
12,694
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
7,523
|
|
|
|
7,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonrecurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation had 10.8% and 6.5% of Level 3 assets as a
percentage of total assets and liabilities measured at fair
value as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The changes in fair value of assets and liabilities recorded at
fair value through earnings on a recurring basis and changes in
assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis, for which impairment was recognized in the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Recurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
Nonrecurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, primarily as a result of declines in the rates
offered on new residential mortgage loans, the Corporation
recorded impairment charges of $115 related to the carrying
value of its mortgage servicing rights, in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 156. This decline in offering
rates decreased the expected lives of the loans serviced and in
turn decreased the value of the serving rights.
The impairment charges to foreclosed assets were the result of
the real estate held declining in value subsequent to the
properties being transferred to other real estate.
The activity in the trading portfolio of investment securities
was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
$
|
11,010
|
|
|
$
|
7,654
|
|
Sales, calls, and maturities
|
|
|
(14,544
|
)
|
|
|
(62,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(3,534
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The net loss on trading securities represents mark-to-market
adjustments. Included in the net trading losses of $245 during
2008, was $262 of net trading gains on securities that were held
in the Corporations trading portfolio as of
December 31, 2008.
The activity in borrowings carried at fair value was as follows
for years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Sales, calls, and maturities
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,966
|
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 21
|
Fair
Values of Financial Instruments
|
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount
that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a
forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon
quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no
quoted market prices for the Corporations various
financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are
not available, fair values are based on estimates using present
value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the
discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly,
the estimated amounts provided herein do not necessarily
indicate amounts which could be realized in a current exchange.
Furthermore, as the Corporation typically holds the majority of
its financial instruments until maturity, it does not expect to
realize all of the estimated amounts disclosed. The disclosures
also do not include estimated fair value amounts for items which
are not defined as financial instruments, but which have
significant value. These include such items as core deposit
intangibles, the future earnings of significant customer
relationships and the value of other fee generating businesses.
The Corporation believes the imprecision of an estimate could be
significant.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the
Corporation in estimating fair value disclosures for financial
instruments.
Cash
and cash equivalents:
The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments
approximate fair values.
Investment
securities:
Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market
prices, where available. If quoted market prices are
unavailable, fair values are based on quoted market prices of
comparable instruments or other model-based valuation techniques
such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the
securitys credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other
factors such as credit loss and liquidity assumptions.
Mortgage
loans available for sale:
Fair values of mortgage loans available for sale are based on
commitments on hand from investors or prevailing market prices.
Loans
receivable:
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no
significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on
carrying values. Fair values for other loans (e.g. , real estate
mortgage, agricultural, commercial, and installment) are
estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest
rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to
borrowers of similar credit quality. The resulting amounts are
adjusted to estimate the effect of declines, if any, in the
credit quality of borrowers since the loans were originated.
Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values,
where applicable.
59
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Mortgage
servicing rights:
Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with
similar characteristics when applicable, or based upon
discounted cash flow analyses.
Deposit
liabilities:
Demand, savings, and money market deposits are, by definition,
equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date
(i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for variable rate
certificates of deposit approximate their recorded carrying
value. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are
estimated using discounted cash flow calculation that applies
interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a
schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time
deposits.
Short-term
borrowings:
The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings
under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings
maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. Fair
values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses based on the Corporations
current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of
borrowings arrangements.
Borrowings:
The fair values of the Corporations long-term borrowings
are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the
Corporations current incremental borrowing arrangements.
The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and borrowings
under repurchase agreements approximate their fair value. The
fair values of other borrowings are estimated using discounted
cash flow analyses based on the Corporations current
incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Accrued
interest:
The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.
Derivative
financial instruments:
Fair values for derivative loan commitments and forward loan
sale commitments are based on fair values of the underlying
mortgage loans and the probability of such commitments being
exercised.
Off-balance-sheet
credit-related instruments:
Fair values for off-balance-sheet lending commitments are based
on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements,
taking into consideration the remaining terms of the agreements
and the counterparties credit standings. The Corporation
does not charge fees for lending commitments; thus it is not
practicable to estimate the fair value of these instruments.
60
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following sets forth the estimated fair value and recorded
carrying values of the Corporations financial instruments
as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and demand deposits due from banks
|
|
$
|
23,554
|
|
|
$
|
23,554
|
|
|
$
|
25,583
|
|
|
$
|
25,583
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
|
|
25,064
|
|
|
|
25,064
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
213,127
|
|
|
|
213,127
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
743,110
|
|
|
|
723,403
|
|
|
|
606,840
|
|
|
|
605,386
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
6,322
|
|
|
|
6,322
|
|
|
|
5,948
|
|
|
|
5,948
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Deposits with no stated maturities
|
|
|
394,042
|
|
|
|
394,042
|
|
|
|
387,054
|
|
|
|
387,054
|
|
Deposits with stated maturities
|
|
|
387,291
|
|
|
|
381,588
|
|
|
|
348,488
|
|
|
|
346,419
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
230,130
|
|
|
|
222,350
|
|
|
|
91,897
|
|
|
|
92,887
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
Note 22
|
Parent
Company Only Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
Condensed
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash on deposit at subsidiary Bank
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
|
$
|
14,265
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
82,673
|
|
|
|
77,486
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
2,043
|
|
|
|
3,637
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
52,096
|
|
|
|
26,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
140,096
|
|
|
$
|
123,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,620
|
|
|
$
|
827
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
134,476
|
|
|
|
123,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
140,096
|
|
|
$
|
123,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,800
|
|
|
$
|
15,975
|
|
|
$
|
4,025
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
Management fee and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,899
|
|
|
|
17,669
|
|
|
|
5,610
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,989
|
|
|
|
3,890
|
|
|
|
3,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed
earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
13,779
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
Federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,815
|
|
|
|
14,552
|
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
Undistributed earnings (distributions in excess of earnings) of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
(6,622
|
)
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
$
|
7,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
$
|
7,001
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
6,622
|
|
|
|
(4,438
|
)
|
Share based payment awards
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
Net amortization of investment securities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Realized loss on sale of investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Deferred income taxes (benefit)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided
(used) cash Interest receivable
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(817
|
)
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
(522
|
)
|
Accrued interest and other expenses
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
4,646
|
|
|
|
14,574
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, calls, and sales
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(4,380
|
)
|
Sales (purchases) of equipment and premises
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
Advances to subsidiaries
|
|
|
(11,927
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(8,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(10,517
|
)
|
|
|
(856
|
)
|
|
|
(6,784
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in other borrowed funds
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid on common stock
|
|
|
(4,873
|
)
|
|
|
(4,304
|
)
|
|
|
(3,775
|
)
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
|
|
2,459
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
|
|
|
(7,250
|
)
|
|
|
(3,528
|
)
|
|
|
(1,316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(13,121
|
)
|
|
|
10,190
|
|
|
|
(4,674
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivelants at beginning of year
|
|
|
14,265
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
8,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
|
$
|
14,265
|
|
|
$
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 23
|
Operating
Segments
|
In prior years, the Corporations reportable segments were
based on legal entities that account for at least 10% of
operating results. In April 2007, the individual bank charters
of Isabella Bank and FSB Bank were consolidated into one bank
charter as a part of the Corporations strategy to increase
efficiencies. Retail banking operations for 2008, 2007, and 2006
represent approximately 90% or greater of the Corporations
total assets and operating results. As such, no additional
segment information is presented.
|
|
Note 24
|
Adjustments
Affecting Fourth Quarter Results of Operations
|
In the fourth quarter of 2008, due to the increased
deterioration of the overall credit quality of the
Corporations loan portfolio as well as the increased
uncertainty related to the overall stability of the economy, the
Corporation recorded a provision for loan losses in the amount
of $5,725, which contributed to a net operating loss of $2,041
for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Management
does not believe this adjustment is attributable to conditions
that were apparent in previous quarters. The aggregate effect of
the $5,725 provision for loan losses ($3,779 net of tax)
was to reduce net income per share by $0.50.
64
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Opearations
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION FINANCIAL REVIEW
(All dollars in thousands)
The following is managements discussion and analysis of
the financial condition and results of operations for Isabella
Bank Corporation (the Corporation). This discussion
and analysis is intended to provide a better understanding of
the consolidated financial statements and statistical data
included elsewhere in the Annual Report. The Corporations
significant acquisitions of Greenville Community Financial
Corporation in January 2008 and Farwell State Savings Bank in
October 2006 were accounted for as purchase transactions, and as
such, the related results of operations are included from the
dates of acquisition. See Note 2 Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation in the
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere in the report.
During 2008, as a result of a significant downturn in economy,
the Corporation experienced significant increases in past due
and nonaccrual loans. This increase in delinquencies has led to
dramatic increases in net loans charged off as well as
collection expenses. For further discussion and analysis, see
below.
Critical
Accounting Policies:
The Corporations significant accounting policies are set
forth in Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Of these significant accounting policies, the Corporation
considers its policies regarding the allowance for loan losses,
acquisition intangibles, and the determination of the fair value
of investment securities to be its most critical accounting
policies.
The allowance for loan losses requires managements most
subjective and complex judgment. Changes in economic conditions
can have a significant impact on the allowance for loan losses
and, therefore, the provision for loan losses and results of
operations. The Corporation has developed appropriate policies
and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of
assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio.
The Corporations assessments may be impacted in future
periods by changes in economic conditions, and the discovery of
information with respect to borrowers which is not known to
management at the time of the issuance of the consolidated
financial statements. For additional discussion concerning the
Corporations allowance for loan losses and related
matters, see the Provision for Loan Losses discussion below.
United States generally accepted accounting principles require
the Corporation determine the fair value of the assets and
liabilities of an acquired entity, and record their fair value
on the date of acquisition. The Corporation employs a variety of
measures in determination of the fair value, including the use
of discounted cash flow analysis, market appraisals, and
projected future revenue streams. For certain items that
management believes it has the appropriate expertise to
determine the fair value, management may choose to use its own
calculations of the value. In other cases, where the value is
not easily determined, the Corporation consults with outside
parties to determine the fair value of the identified asset or
liability. Once valuations have been adjusted, the net
difference between the price paid for the acquired entity and
the value of its balance sheet, including identifiable
intangibles, is recorded as goodwill. This goodwill is not
amortized, but is tested for impairment on at least an annual
basis.
The Corporation currently has both available-for-sale and
trading investment securities that are carried at their fair
value. Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale
investment securities are included in other comprehensive
income, while declines in the fair value of these securities
below their cost that are other than temporary are reflected as
realized losses. The change in value of trading investment
securities is included in current earnings.
The market values for available-for-sale and trading investment
securities are typically obtained from outside sources and
applied to individual securities within the portfolio. The fair
values of investment securities with illiquid markets are
estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis or other
type of valuation adjustment methodology. These securities are
also compared, when possible, to other securities with similar
characteristics.
65
DISTRIBUTION
OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
INTEREST RATE AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
The following schedules present the daily average amount
outstanding for each major category of interest earning assets,
nonearning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and noninterest
bearing liabilities for the last three years. This schedule also
presents an analysis of interest income and interest expense for
the periods indicated. All interest income is reported on a
fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis using a 34% federal income
tax rate. Nonaccruing loans, for the purpose of the following
computations, are included in the average loan amounts
outstanding. Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Equity
holdings which are restricted are included in Other Assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
717,040
|
|
|
$
|
49,674
|
|
|
|
6.93
|
%
|
|
$
|
604,342
|
|
|
$
|
43,808
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
522,726
|
|
|
$
|
36,575
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
Taxable investment securities
|
|
|
108,919
|
|
|
|
5,433
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
%
|
|
|
68,398
|
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
%
|
|
|
123,316
|
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
Nontaxable investment securities
|
|
|
121,220
|
|
|
|
7,218
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
|
96,789
|
|
|
|
5,726
|
|
|
|
5.92
|
%
|
|
|
75,712
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
%
|
Trading account securities
|
|
|
26,618
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
50,904
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
%
|
|
|
6,758
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
5.03
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
17,600
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
7,143
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
|
|
5,012
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
|
996,595
|
|
|
|
64,173
|
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
|
834,334
|
|
|
|
56,242
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
%
|
|
|
729,528
|
|
|
|
46,335
|
|
|
|
6.35
|
%
|
NON EARNING ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(8,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
18,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
22,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income and other assets
|
|
|
83,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,113,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
925,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
114,889
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
$
|
109,370
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
$
|
105,476
|
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
213,410
|
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
|
|
188,323
|
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
158,327
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
393,190
|
|
|
|
16,621
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
349,941
|
|
|
|
16,493
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
301,593
|
|
|
|
12,825
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
145,802
|
|
|
|
5,733
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
|
68,586
|
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
|
|
53,256
|
|
|
|
2,568
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
867,291
|
|
|
|
25,606
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
|
716,220
|
|
|
|
25,959
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
618,652
|
|
|
|
19,732
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
|
95,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
143,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
1,113,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
925,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (FTE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Interest Income
The Corporation derives the majority of its gross income from
interest earned on loans and investments, while its most
significant expense is the interest cost incurred for funds
used. Net interest income is the amount by which interest income
on earning assets exceeds the interest cost of deposits and
borrowings. Net interest income is influenced by changes in the
balance and mix of assets and liabilities and market interest
rates. Management exerts
66
some control over these factors; however, Federal Reserve
monetary policy and competition have a significant impact.
Interest income includes loan fees of $1,808 in 2008, $1,330 in
2007, and $1,172 in 2006. For analytical purposes, net interest
income is adjusted to a taxable equivalent basis by
adding the income tax savings from interest on tax-exempt loans
and securities, thus making year-to-year comparisons more
meaningful.
VOLUME
AND RATE VARIANCE ANALYSIS
The following table details the dollar amount of changes in FTE
net interest income for each major category of interest earning
assets and interest bearing liabilities and the amount of change
attributable to changes in average balances (volume) or average
rates. The change in interest due to both volume and rate has
been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the
relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in
each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Compared to 2007
|
|
|
2007 Compared to 2006
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
7,877
|
|
|
$
|
(2,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,866
|
|
|
$
|
5,878
|
|
|
$
|
1,355
|
|
|
$
|
7,233
|
|
Taxable investment securities
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
(2,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
(1,197
|
)
|
Nontaxable investment securities
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
Trading account securities
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
(993
|
)
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Other
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes in interest income
|
|
|
10,443
|
|
|
|
(2,512
|
)
|
|
|
7,931
|
|
|
|
7,074
|
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
|
9,907
|
|
CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
(1,067
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
|
(1,793
|
)
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
(1,796
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
2,189
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes in interest expense
|
|
|
5,665
|
|
|
|
(6,018
|
)
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
6,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in interest margin (FTE)
|
|
$
|
4,778
|
|
|
$
|
3,506
|
|
|
$
|
8,284
|
|
|
$
|
3,505
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
3,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation, as well as all other financial institutions,
has experienced dramatic changes in interest rates in the last
two years. Since September of 2007, the Federal Reserve Bank
(The Fed) has lowered its target Fed Funds rate from
5.25% to its current level of 0.00% - 0.25%. The Feds
actions are a result of significant weakening of the
Nations economy.
The Corporations balance sheet was well positioned to
protect interest margins in this decreasing rate environment and
provided strong interest margin growth in 2008. Interest margins
are likely to decrease in 2009 due to the following three
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the current economic conditions, management does not
anticipate any changes in the target Fed Funds during 2009. As
such, the Corporation does not anticipate significant, if any,
changes in market rates. However, there is the potential for
declines in rates earned on interest earning assets. Most of the
potential declines would arise out of the Corporations
investment portfolio, as securities with call dates during 2009
will most likely be called and the Corporation will be
reinvesting those proceeds at significantly lower rates.
|
|
|
|
The recent substantial decline in residential mortgage rates
will also result in movement of the Corporations customers
from its three and five year balloon mortgages to fixed rate
products that are sold on the secondary market. The reinvestment
of these proceeds at lower interest rates will adversely impact
interest income.
|
|
|
|
The Corporation experienced a significant increase in
non-accrual loans in the fourth quarter of 2008. The increase is
a direct result of a decline in residential housing market
values, the inability of residential and commercial developers
to sell and or lease property, and a significant increase in
unemployment rates. The
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
increase in non-accrual loans will decrease 2009 interest income
as these loans will no longer be accruing interest income.
|
Net yield on interest earning assets increased by 0.24% when
2008 is compared to 2007. The primary reason for this increase
was that in early 2007, the Corporation, as part of a balance
sheet management strategy, extended the maturities of interest
earning assets, which as interest rates declined in the latter
half of 2007, had a positive impact on interest margins as the
cost of funding sources decreased more rapidly than the rates
earned on interest earning assets. Another contributing factor
for the increase in margins was a result of the loan growth,
primarily in higher yielding commercial loans.
The above mentioned balance sheet reorganization strategy was
accelerated by the Corporations election to early adopt
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, and SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements, effective January 1, 2007. The
purpose of the early adoption of these standards was to not only
provide the Corporation with an opportunity to accelerate the
restructuring of its balance sheet, but also to better manage
interest rate risk now and in the future.
Overall FTE net interest margin increased by $8,284 for the year
ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the same period in
2007. Changes in volume provided an additional $4,778 of net
interest margin, while changes in interest rates, both earned
and paid, provided an additional $3,506 of net interest margin.
During 2008, the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities
decreased by 0.67% while those earned on interest earning assets
declined by only 0.30%.
Net FTE interest income increased $3,680 for the year ended
December 31, 2007 when compared to the same period in 2006.
The net increase from the change in volume of interest earning
assets and interest bearing liabilities was $3,505 in 2007. Net
interest income increased $175 as a result of interest rate
changes. During 2007, the rates paid on interest bearing
liabilities increased 0.43%, while those earned on interest
earning assets increased 0.39%. The decline in interest rate
spread is a direct result of the continued use of high cost
funding sources such as certificates of deposit and other
borrowed funds. The increase in the cost of these deposits in
relation to other sources is a result of continued competition
for retail deposits.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses represents the current period loan
cost associated with maintaining an appropriate allowance for
loan losses as determined by management. Periodic fluctuations
in the provision for loan losses result from managements
best estimates as to the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses to absorb probable losses within the existing loan
portfolio. The provision for loan losses for each period is
further dependent upon many factors, including loan growth, net
charge-offs, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio,
delinquencies, assessment by management, third parties and
banking regulators of the quality of the loan portfolio, the
value of the underlying collateral on problem loans and the
general economic conditions in our market areas.
68
The following schedule shows the composition of the provision
for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses January 1
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
$
|
7,605
|
|
|
$
|
6,899
|
|
|
$
|
6,444
|
|
|
$
|
6,204
|
|
Allowance of acquired bank
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans charged off
|
|
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
5,641
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Provision charged to income
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses December 31
|
|
$
|
11,982
|
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
$
|
7,605
|
|
|
$
|
6,899
|
|
|
$
|
6,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to date average loans
|
|
$
|
717,040
|
|
|
$
|
604,342
|
|
|
$
|
522,726
|
|
|
$
|
466,001
|
|
|
$
|
437,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of loans outstanding
|
|
$
|
735,385
|
|
|
$
|
612,687
|
|
|
$
|
591,042
|
|
|
$
|
483,242
|
|
|
$
|
452,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a % of loans
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, the Corporation experienced a significant increase
in total loans charged off, primarily in the form of residential
real estate mortgages; total loans charged off increased by
$4,179 to $6,325. As a result of the increases in loans charged
off, as well as local and regional economic uncertainties of the
Corporations loan portfolio, the Corporation recorded a
provision for loan loss in the amount of $5,725 in the fourth
quarter of 2008.
The nationwide increase in residential mortgage loans past due
and in foreclosures has received considerable attention by the
Federal Government, the media, banking regulators, and industry
trade groups. Based on information provided by The Mortgage
Bankers Association, a substantial portion of the nationwide
increases in both past dues and foreclosures are related to
fixed and adjustable rate sub-prime mortgages. While the
Corporation does not hold sub-prime mortgage loans, the
difficulties experienced in the sub-prime market have adversely
impacted the entire market, and thus the overall credit quality
of the Corporations residential mortgage portfolio. The
increase in troubled residential mortgage loans and a tightening
of underwriting standards will most likely result in a continued
increase in the inventory of unsold homes. The inventory of
unsold homes has not reached these levels since the 1991
recession. The combination of all of these factors is expected
to further reduce average home values and thus homeowners
equity on a national level.
The Corporation originates and sells fixed rate residential real
estate mortgages to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
The Corporation has not originated loans for either trading or
its own portfolio that would be classified as sub prime, nor has
it originated adjustable rate mortgages or finance loans for
more than 80% of market value unless insured by private third
party insurance.
With increases in the net loans charged off to average loans and
nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans, the
Corporation increased the provision charged to income in 2008.
This additional provision increased the
69
allowance for loans losses as a percentage of loans by 0.44% to
1.63%. The increase in the allowance as a percentage of loans is
the result of increases in charge offs in the current year, an
increase in nonperforming loans, and the declines in the credit
quality of the loan portfolio. Management will continue to
closely monitor its overall credit quality during 2009 to ensure
that the allowance for loan losses remains adequate.
Based on managements analysis, the allowance for loan
losses of $11,982 is considered adequate as of December 31,
2008.
Allocation
of the Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses has been allocated according to
the amount deemed to be reasonably necessary to reflect for the
probability of losses being incurred within the following
categories as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
3,632
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
46.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
%
|
Consumer installment
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
Impaired loans
|
|
|
2,065
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,982
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,605
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,899
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,444
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management has evaluated impaired loans and believes the
valuation allowance related to these loans to be adequate.
Nonperforming
Assets
Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become
90 days past due, unless they are well secured and in the
process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual
status, any interest previously accrued and not collected is
generally reversed from income or charged off against the
allowance for loan losses. Loans are charged off when management
determines that collection has become unlikely. Restructured
loans are those where a concession has been granted on either
principal or interest paid due to financial difficulties of the
borrower. Other real estate owned (OREO) consists of real
property acquired through foreclosure on the related collateral
underlying defaulted loans.
70
The following table presents nonperforming assets for the past
five years:
Nonperforming
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
|
|
$
|
11,175
|
|
|
$
|
4,156
|
|
|
$
|
3,444
|
|
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
|
$
|
1,900
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
1,727
|
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
Restructured loans
|
|
|
4,550
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
16,976
|
|
|
|
6,568
|
|
|
|
5,326
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Repossessed assets
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperperforming assets
|
|
$
|
19,899
|
|
|
$
|
7,944
|
|
|
$
|
5,888
|
|
|
$
|
3,280
|
|
|
$
|
3,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans as a% of total loans
|
|
|
2.31
|
%
|
|
|
1.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets as a % of total assets
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the aforementioned residential real estate market
difficulties inherent in the market, the Corporation has
increased its efforts to identify potential problem loans.
Residential real estate loans are placed in nonaccrual status
when the foreclosure process has begun, generally after a loan
is 90 days past due, unless there is an abundance of
collateral. Additionally, these loans are charged down to their
estimated net realizable value when placed on nonaccrual.
Historically, residential real estate loans were placed in
nonaccrual status upon reaching the beginning of the legally
mandated borrower redemption period, which is typically six
months. Chargeoffs of any expected deficiency were recognized at
the end of the six month redemption period. These efforts have
had a significant impact on the increase in loans classified as
nonaccrual as well as the increase in gross chargeoffs in 2008.
The increase in the Corporations nonperforming loans is
primarily related to the current market difficulties previously
discussed related to real estate loans. These market
difficulties have also resulted in a substantial increase in
restructured loans. The majority of the increase in restructured
loans is the result of the Corporation working with borrowers to
develop a payment structure that will allow them to continue
making payments in lieu of foreclosure.
The increase in OREO is also related to the downturn in the
residential real estate market. Management has evaluated the
properties held as other real estate owned and has adjusted the
carrying value of each property to the lower of the Banks
carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, as necessary.
Management expects the balance of OREO to continue to increase
throughout 2009 both as the result of increases in foreclosures
as well as increases in the marketing time for home sales.
Management has devoted considerable attention to identifying
loans for which losses are possible and adjusting the value of
these loans to their current net realizable values. To
managements knowledge, there are no other loans which
cause management to have serious doubts as to the ability of a
borrower to comply with their loan repayment terms. A continued
decline in residential real estate values may require further
write downs of loans in foreclosure and other real estate owned
and could potentially have an adverse impact on the
Corporations financial performance.
As of December 31, 2008, there were no other interest
bearing assets which required classification. Management is not
aware of any recommendations by regulatory agencies that, if
implemented, would have a material impact on the
Corporations liquidity, capital, or operations.
71
Noninterest
Income
The following table shows the changes in noninterest income
between the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Service charges and fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NSF and overdraft fees
|
|
$
|
3,413
|
|
|
$
|
2,961
|
|
|
$
|
452
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,950
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Trust fees
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
−14.4
|
%
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
Freddie Mac servicing fee
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
−1.3
|
%
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
ATM and debit card fees
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
Net OMSR (loss) income
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
−12.9
|
%
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service charges and fees
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
5,894
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
5,490
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
Title insurance revenue
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
−89.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,389
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
−8.2
|
%
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Net gain on trading securities
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
−46.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance policies
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
Brokerage and advisory fees
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
%
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
%
|
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
%
|
Net loss on borrowings measured at fair value
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
All other
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
−61.5
|
%
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
−41.7
|
%
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$
|
7,802
|
|
|
$
|
9,962
|
|
|
$
|
(2,160
|
)
|
|
|
−21.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,098
|
|
|
$
|
864
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
Noninterest
Income (excluding the activity of GCFC since January 1,
2008 to make year to year comparisons more meaningful)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Service charges and fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NSF and overdraft fees
|
|
$
|
3,094
|
|
|
$
|
2,961
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,950
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Trust fees
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
−14.4
|
%
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
Freddie Mac servicing fee
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
−1.4
|
%
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
ATM and debit card fees
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
Net OMSR (loss) income
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
−23.9
|
%
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service charges and fees
|
|
|
5,957
|
|
|
|
5,894
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
5,490
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
Title insurance revenue
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
−89.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,389
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
−8.2
|
%
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
−1.0
|
%
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Net gain on trading securities
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
−48.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance policies
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
Brokerage and advisory fees
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
%
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
%
|
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
%
|
Net loss on borrowings measured at fair value
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
All other
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
−60.8
|
%
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
−46.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$
|
7,280
|
|
|
$
|
9,962
|
|
|
$
|
(2,682
|
)
|
|
|
−26.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,098
|
|
|
$
|
864
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management continuously analyzes various fees related to deposit
accounts, including service charges, NSF and overdraft fees, and
ATM and debit card fees. Based on these analyses, the
Corporation makes any necessary adjustments to ensure that its
fee structure is within the range of its competitors, while at
the same time making sure that the fees remain fair to deposit
customers. Management does not expect significant changes to its
deposit fee structure in 2009.
Trust fees fluctuate from period to period based on various
factors including changes in mix of their customers
portfolios and the closing of client estates (as much of their
estate fees are non-recurring in nature and are based on the
assets of the estate).
The increases in ATM and debit card fees are primarily the
result of the increased usage of debit cards by the Banks
customers. As management does not anticipate any significant
changes to the ATM and debit card fee structures, these fees are
expected to continue to increase as the usage of debit cards
increases.
The decline in net OMSR (originated mortgage servicing
rights) income was primarily due to an increase in amortization
expense. The increase in amortization was the result of the
estimated lives on the mortgage loans serviced decreasing, which
was driven by decreases in the rates offered on new loans in
December 2008. Typically as the rates on mortgages decline,
there is an increase in consumer refinancing, which results in
an increase in amortization of OMSR and eventually an increase
in the gain on sale of mortgage loans. As the large declines in
interest rates occurred so close to year end, the Corporation
had not observed any large increases in the gain on sale
73
of mortgage loans. However, the Corporation does anticipate
significant increases in gains from the sales from mortgage
loans in 2009.
Title insurance fees have decreased as a result of a joint
venture between IBT Title and Insurance Agency and Corporate
Title on March 1, 2008 (see Note 2
Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Net gains from trading activities have declined significantly
from last year. Exclusive of the effects of the merger with
GCFC, net gains on trading securities have declined by 48.7% to
$236. Significant losses on trading securities were incurred in
the second quarter, primarily related to municipal investment
securities. The reason for the large declines in value in this
sector was related to the downgrading of the two largest bond
insurers from AAA to AA in June 2008. These downgrades caused
the market to demand higher returns on insured bonds, which has
resulted in declines in the value of the Corporations
municipal bond portfolio, as the majority of the portfolio is
insured. Despite the significant declines in interest rates
observed during the fourth quarter of 2008, the trading
portfolio has struggled to increase in value. Typically, as
market rates decline, the value of these securities will
increase, while the value of borrowings carried at fair market
value will decrease. However, the increases in the value of
trading securities have not increased as much as the values of
borrowings carried at fair market value have decreased.
Income related to the value of Corporate owned life insurance
has increased as a result of the purchase of additional policies
as well as transferring the management of the policies to a new
investment advisor.
The year ended December 31, 2008 was a good year for
brokerage and advisory services income, and one of the most
productive years in the Corporations history. These
results are due to an increase in customer base and a conscious
effort by management to expand the Banks presence in the
local market. The Corporation anticipates this trend to continue
throughout 2009.
The increase in total noninterest income from 2006 to 2007 was
partially the result of the acquisition of Farwell State Savings
Bank in October 2006. Exclusive of the effects of the
acquisition, total noninterest income increased 6.29%. There
were no individually significant changes other than those noted
above between 2007 and 2006.
74
Noninterest
Expenses
The following table shows the changes in noninterest expenses
between the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased employee salaries
|
|
$
|
12,232
|
|
|
$
|
11,362
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,105
|
|
|
$
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
Leased employee benefits
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
3,608
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
61.3
|
%
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation
|
|
|
16,992
|
|
|
|
15,618
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
13,869
|
|
|
|
1,749
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Outside services
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
48.2
|
%
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
−0.6
|
%
|
Property taxes
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
Utilities
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Building rent
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
−95.8
|
%
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
−55.8
|
%
|
Building repairs
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
%
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
−22.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total occupancy
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Computer/service contracts
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
ATM and debit card fees
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
64.6
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
−8.2
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total furniture and equipment
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
2,868
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit and SOX compliance fees
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
−3.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
−42.3
|
%
|
Marketing
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
−7.9
|
%
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
Printing and supplies
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
Education and travel
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
Postage and freight
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Legal
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
41.6
|
%
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
Amortization of deposit premium
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
73.8
|
%
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
166.9
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Collection
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
149.1
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Brokerage and advisory
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
122.8
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
196.8
|
%
|
FDIC Insurance
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Consulting
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
69.3
|
%
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
−15.4
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
−5.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other
|
|
|
7,828
|
|
|
|
6,548
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
6,006
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
$
|
30,704
|
|
|
$
|
27,229
|
|
|
$
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,473
|
|
|
$
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
Noninterest Expenses (excluding the activity of GCFC since
January 1, 2008 to make year-to-year comparisons more
meaningful)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased employee salaries
|
|
$
|
11,152
|
|
|
$
|
11,362
|
|
|
$
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
−1.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,105
|
|
|
$
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
Leased employee benefits
|
|
|
4,144
|
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
3,608
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
%
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation
|
|
|
15,537
|
|
|
|
15,618
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
−0.5
|
%
|
|
|
13,869
|
|
|
|
1,749
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
−0.7
|
%
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Outside services
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
−0.6
|
%
|
Property taxes
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
Utilities
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
−1.2
|
%
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Building rent
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
−95.8
|
%
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
−55.8
|
%
|
Building repairs
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
−22.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total occupancy
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Computer/service contracts
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
ATM and debit card fees
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
64.6
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
−18.4
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total furniture and equipment
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
2,868
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit and SOX compliance fees
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
−4.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
−42.3
|
%
|
Marketing
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
−0.9
|
%
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
−7.9
|
%
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
−3.1
|
%
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
Printing and supplies
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
Education and travel
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
−2.7
|
%
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
Postage and freight
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Legal
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
38.9
|
%
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
Amortization of deposit premium
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
73.8
|
%
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
148.4
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Collection
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Brokerage and advisory
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
122.8
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
196.8
|
%
|
FDIC Insurance
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
189.5
|
%
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Consulting
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
−15.4
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
−23.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other
|
|
|
6,993
|
|
|
|
6,548
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
6,006
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
$
|
27,856
|
|
|
$
|
27,229
|
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,473
|
|
|
$
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
Leased employee salaries expenses have decreased as a result of
the new joint venture entered into during the first quarter of
2008 (see Note 2 Business Combinations
and Joint Venture Formation of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements). Exclusive of the effects of this joint
venture, leased employee salaries expenses have increased due to
annual merit increases and the continued growth of the
Corporation. Despite the reduction in salaries as a result of
the above mentioned joint venture, leased employee benefits
increased as a result of continued increases in health care
costs.
A significant portion of the increase in occupancy and equipment
is related to additional expenses incurred for snowplowing
during the fourth quarter of 2008. This increase was offset by a
decline in building rent, due to the new joint venture.
The increase in furniture and equipment expense in 2008 was
primarily the result of increases in ATM and debit card
expenses. These increases were the result of increased usage of
debit cards by the Banks customers, as the Bank incurs a
fee each time a card is used.
Management has been diligently working to decrease audit and
Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) compliance fees through improved
efficiencies. These fees have steadily declined over the past
few years as a result of the centralization of corporate
processes.
The increases in director fees in 2007 were the result of
additional meetings related to ongoing strategic planning, which
was partially related to the acquisition of Greenville Community
Financial Corporation and the joint venture with Corporate
Title, LLC (see Note 2 Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).
The Corporation places a strong emphasis on continuing
education. These educational programs help provide team members
with a competitive edge in the market place. Over the past three
years, the Corporation offered structured leadership training to
its employees. This program is designed to help develop and
optimize the communication skills of its participants.
Management feels that this investment in its employees today
will pay dividends for years to come.
The increase in the amortization of deposit premium is related
to the January 2008 acquisition of GCFC.
As a result of the recent increases in delinquencies and
foreclosures, the Corporation has experienced significant
increases in legal, foreclosed asset, and collection expenses.
These expenses are expected to continue to increase throughout
2009 as management anticipates that delinquency rates and
foreclosures will increase.
FDIC insurance expense has increased not only as a result of
growth of the Corporation, but primarily as a result of
increases in the premium rates charged by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation. These expenses are expected to
significantly increase in 2009 as a result of further premium
increases.
Consulting fees increased in 2008 primarily as a result of a
potential new branch location study that was performed.
All other expenses include title insurance expenses as well as
other miscellaneous expenses. All other expenses decreased by
$222 as a result of the new joint venture (see
Note 2 Business Combinations and Joint
Venture Formation of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements). The main reasons for the increase in this line item
in 2007 were related to expenses of approximately $130 incurred
to convert the Farwell Division to Isabella Banks core
banking platform in August of 2007. The remaining changes in
other expenses are individually not significant.
The increase in total noninterest expenses from 2006 to 2007 was
partially the result of the acquisition of Farwell State Savings
Bank in October 2006. Exclusive of the effects of the
acquisition, total noninterest expenses increased 4.9%, with no
individually significant changes when comparing 2007 to 2006.
Federal
Income Taxes
Federal income tax (benefit) expense for 2008 was ($724) or
(21.4%) of pre-tax income compared to $1,605 or 16.8% of pre-tax
income in 2007 and $1,919 or 21.5% in 2006. The primary factor
behind the reduction in the effective rate in 2008 and 2007 is
related to the increase in tax exempt income as a percentage of
net income. A
77
reconcilement of actual federal income tax expense reported and
the amount computed at the federal statutory rate of 34% is
found in Note 12, Federal Income Taxes, of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ANALYSIS
OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
As shown in the following tables, the Corporation experienced
another year of solid asset growth. This growth has been the
result of the Corporations continued growth strategies,
including the GCFC acquisition. See below for further discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
23,554
|
|
|
$
|
25,583
|
|
|
$
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
|
−7.93
|
%
|
Trading account securities
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
|
|
25,064
|
|
|
|
(3,289
|
)
|
|
|
−13.12
|
%
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
213,127
|
|
|
|
33,328
|
|
|
|
15.64
|
%
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
(1,316
|
)
|
|
|
−59.44
|
%
|
Loans
|
|
|
735,385
|
|
|
|
612,687
|
|
|
|
122,698
|
|
|
|
20.03
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(11,982
|
)
|
|
|
(7,301
|
)
|
|
|
(4,681
|
)
|
|
|
64.11
|
%
|
Bank premises and equipment
|
|
|
23,231
|
|
|
|
22,516
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
Acquisition intangibles, net
|
|
|
47,804
|
|
|
|
27,010
|
|
|
|
20,794
|
|
|
|
76.99
|
%
|
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
|
|
|
17,345
|
|
|
|
7,353
|
|
|
|
9,992
|
|
|
|
135.89
|
%
|
Other assets
|
|
|
34,798
|
|
|
|
29,029
|
|
|
|
5,769
|
|
|
|
19.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
$
|
957,282
|
|
|
$
|
181,981
|
|
|
|
19.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
775,630
|
|
|
$
|
733,473
|
|
|
$
|
42,157
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
222,350
|
|
|
|
92,887
|
|
|
|
129,463
|
|
|
|
139.38
|
%
|
Escrow funds payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
(1,912
|
)
|
|
|
−100.00
|
%
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
6,807
|
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
14.79
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,004,787
|
|
|
|
834,202
|
|
|
|
170,585
|
|
|
|
20.45
|
%
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
134,476
|
|
|
|
123,080
|
|
|
|
11,396
|
|
|
|
9.26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
$
|
957,282
|
|
|
$
|
181,981
|
|
|
|
19.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
Analysis of changes in financial condition (excluding the
effects of the acquisition of GCFC on January 1, 2008 to
make the year-to-year comparisons more useful)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
21,090
|
|
|
$
|
25,583
|
|
|
$
|
(4,493
|
)
|
|
|
−17.56
|
%
|
Trading account securities
|
|
|
16,796
|
|
|
|
25,064
|
|
|
|
(8,268
|
)
|
|
|
−32.99
|
%
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
239,448
|
|
|
|
213,127
|
|
|
|
26,321
|
|
|
|
12.35
|
%
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
(1,316
|
)
|
|
|
−59.44
|
%
|
Loans
|
|
|
646,772
|
|
|
|
612,687
|
|
|
|
34,085
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(11,982
|
)
|
|
|
(7,301
|
)
|
|
|
(4,681
|
)
|
|
|
64.11
|
%
|
Bank premises and equipment
|
|
|
21,177
|
|
|
|
22,516
|
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
−5.95
|
%
|
Acquisition intangibles, net
|
|
|
47,804
|
|
|
|
27,010
|
|
|
|
20,794
|
|
|
|
76.99
|
%
|
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
7,353
|
|
|
|
9,584
|
|
|
|
130.34
|
%
|
Other assets
|
|
|
32,336
|
|
|
|
29,029
|
|
|
|
3,307
|
|
|
|
11.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,031,276
|
|
|
$
|
957,282
|
|
|
$
|
73,994
|
|
|
|
7.73
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
685,479
|
|
|
$
|
733,473
|
|
|
$
|
(47,994
|
)
|
|
|
−6.54
|
%
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
216,725
|
|
|
|
92,887
|
|
|
|
123,838
|
|
|
|
133.32
|
%
|
Escrow funds payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
(1,912
|
)
|
|
|
−100.00
|
%
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
6,661
|
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
12.33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
908,865
|
|
|
|
834,202
|
|
|
|
74,663
|
|
|
|
8.95
|
%
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
122,411
|
|
|
|
123,080
|
|
|
|
(669
|
)
|
|
|
−0.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,031,276
|
|
|
$
|
957,282
|
|
|
$
|
73,994
|
|
|
|
7.73
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A discussion of changes in balance sheet amounts by major
categories follows:
Trading
account securities
As previously mentioned, the Corporation commenced a balance
sheet reorganization strategy in 2007 which resulted in a
transfer of available-for-sale securities to trading securities.
The Corporations overall intent was to maintain a trading
portfolio to enhance the ongoing restructuring of assets and
liabilities as part of our interest rate risk management
objectives (See Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements).
79
Available-for-sale
Investment Securities
The primary objective of the Corporations investing
activities is to provide for safety of the principal invested.
Secondary considerations include the need for earnings,
liquidity, and the Corporations overall exposure to
changes in interest rates. Securities are currently classified
as available-for-sale or trading and are stated at fair value.
The following is a schedule of the carrying value of investment
securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies
|
|
$
|
67,071
|
|
|
$
|
54,239
|
|
|
$
|
69,020
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
149,323
|
|
|
|
130,956
|
|
|
|
112,754
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,053
|
|
Money market preferred securities
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
|
|
20,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
246,455
|
|
|
$
|
213,127
|
|
|
$
|
213,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a schedule of the carrying value of trading
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Trading Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies
|
|
$
|
4,014
|
|
|
$
|
4,024
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
11,556
|
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
9,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
|
$
|
25,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding those holdings of the investment portfolio in
U.S. Government and federal agencies, there were no
investments in securities of any one issuer that exceeded 10% of
shareholders equity. The Corporation has a policy
prohibiting investments in securities that it deems are
unsuitable due to their inherent credit or market risks.
Prohibited investments include stripped mortgage backed
securities, zero coupon bonds, nongovernment agency asset backed
securities, and structured notes.
The Corporation has invested $11,000 in auction rate money
market preferred investment security instruments, which are
classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at
fair value. Due to recent events, the credit markets for these
investments have become illiquid.
Due to the current illiquidity of these securities, the fair
values were estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis
or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as of
December 31, 2008. These analyses consider, among other
factors, the collateral underlying the security investments, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected
future cash flows, estimates of the next time the security is
expected to have a successful auction, and the
Corporations positive intent and ability to hold such
securities until credit markets improve. These securities were
also compared, when possible, to other securities with similar
characteristics (see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements).
80
The following is a schedule of maturities of available for sale
investment securities (at carrying value) and their weighted
average yield as of December 31, 2008. Weighted average
yields have been computed on a fully taxable-equivalent basis
using a tax rate of 34%. Mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations are included in maturity
categories based on their stated maturity date. Expected
maturities may differ from contractual maturities because
issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
Trading securities have been excluded as they are not expected
to be held to maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One Year But
|
|
|
After Five Years But
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
|
Within Five Years
|
|
|
Within Ten Years
|
|
|
After Ten Years
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield (%)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield (%)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield (%)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield (%)
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies
|
|
$
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
$
|
37,324
|
|
|
|
4.40
|
|
|
$
|
25,664
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
9,956
|
|
|
|
5.14
|
|
|
|
37,564
|
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
54,494
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
|
|
|
47,309
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
2,459
|
|
|
|
5.34
|
|
|
|
14,092
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
Money market preferred securities
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27,188
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
|
|
$
|
75,249
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
82,617
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
|
|
$
|
61,401
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
The largest component of earning assets is loans. The proper
management of credit and market risk inherent in the loan
portfolio is critical to the financial well-being of the
Corporation. To control these risks, the Corporation has adopted
strict underwriting standards. The standards include specific
criteria against lending outside the Corporations defined
market areas, lending limits to a single borrower, and strict
loan to collateral value limits. The Corporation also monitors
and limits loan concentrations extended to volatile industries.
The Corporation has no foreign loans and there were no
concentrations greater than 10% of total loans that are not
disclosed as a separate category in the following table.
The following table presents the composition of the loan
portfolio for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
324,806
|
|
|
$
|
238,306
|
|
|
$
|
212,701
|
|
|
$
|
179,541
|
|
|
$
|
146,152
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
58,003
|
|
|
|
47,407
|
|
|
|
47,302
|
|
|
|
49,424
|
|
|
|
49,179
|
|
Residential real estate mortgage
|
|
|
319,397
|
|
|
|
297,937
|
|
|
|
300,650
|
|
|
|
226,251
|
|
|
|
227,421
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
33,179
|
|
|
|
29,037
|
|
|
|
30,389
|
|
|
|
28,026
|
|
|
|
30,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
735,385
|
|
|
$
|
612,687
|
|
|
$
|
591,042
|
|
|
$
|
483,242
|
|
|
$
|
452,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the change in the loan categories
for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
86,500
|
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,605
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
33,160
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
10,596
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
(2,122
|
)
|
|
|
−4.3
|
%
|
Residential real estate mortgage
|
|
|
21,460
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
(2,713
|
)
|
|
|
−0.9
|
%
|
|
|
74,399
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
Installment
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
(1,352
|
)
|
|
|
−4.4
|
%
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122,698
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,645
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
107,800
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
The following table presents the change in loan categories
between December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
excluding the loans acquired from GCFC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
from GCFC
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
324,806
|
|
|
$
|
44,605
|
|
|
$
|
280,201
|
|
|
$
|
238,306
|
|
|
$
|
41,895
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
58,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,003
|
|
|
|
47,407
|
|
|
|
10,596
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate mortgage
|
|
|
319,397
|
|
|
|
37,142
|
|
|
|
282,255
|
|
|
|
297,937
|
|
|
|
(15,682
|
)
|
|
|
−5.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
33,179
|
|
|
|
6,866
|
|
|
|
26,313
|
|
|
|
29,037
|
|
|
|
(2,724
|
)
|
|
|
−9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
735,385
|
|
|
$
|
88,613
|
|
|
$
|
646,772
|
|
|
$
|
612,687
|
|
|
$
|
34,085
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The growth in commercial and agricultural loans is a result of
the Corporations efforts to increase the commercial loan
portfolio as a percentage of total loans. A significant portion
of this growth has been driven by the Corporations new
business development team.
Excluding the effects of the Greenville acquisition, residential
mortgage loans declined during 2008 as a result of a shift in
demand from balloon mortgages to long term fixed rate (typically
30 year) mortgage products. This triggered a decrease in
residential mortgage loans as loans with maturity dates greater
than 15 years are typically sold to the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). Installment loans have been
steadily decreasing over the past few years. This is a result of
the increased competition from credit unions and financing
offered from other non traditional financial institutions.
Management expects both residential mortgages and installment
loans to decrease during 2009.
A substantial portion of the increase in total loans when
December 31, 2006 is compared to 2005, most notably the
increase in residential real estate mortgages, was the result of
the acquisition of the Farwell State Savings Bank in October
2006. Pursuant to the acquisition, the Corporation purchased
gross loans totaling $64,600.
Bank
Premises and Equipment
Exclusive of the effects of the GCFC acquisition, Bank premises
and equipment and escrow funds payable have declined as a result
of the merger of assets and liabilities between IBT Title and
Insurance Agency and Corporate Title Agency, LLC through a
joint venture transaction (see Note 2
Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements), resulting in a reduction
in such assets and liabilities.
Equity
securities without readily determinable fair values
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
includes Federal Home Loan Bank Stock and Federal Reserve Bank
Stock. The Corporation has purchased additional shares of stock
in 2008 as a result of the consolidation of the Banks
charter as well as to fulfill stock requirements to borrow
additional funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank. Also included
in the increase is the Corporations investment in the
joint venture between IBT Title and Insurance Agency and
Corporate Title Agency, LLC, which is accounted for under
the equity method of accounting (see
Note 2 Business Combinations and Joint
Venture Formation of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements).
82
Deposits
The main source of funds for the Corporation is deposits. The
deposit portfolio represents various types of non transaction
accounts as well as savings accounts and time deposits.
The following table presents the composition of our deposit
portfolio as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
97,546
|
|
|
$
|
84,846
|
|
|
$
|
83,902
|
|
|
$
|
73,839
|
|
|
$
|
65,736
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
113,973
|
|
|
|
105,526
|
|
|
|
111,406
|
|
|
|
104,251
|
|
|
|
101,362
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
182,523
|
|
|
|
196,682
|
|
|
|
178,001
|
|
|
|
153,397
|
|
|
|
162,516
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
340,976
|
|
|
|
311,976
|
|
|
|
320,226
|
|
|
|
250,246
|
|
|
|
234,262
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
28,185
|
|
|
|
28,197
|
|
|
|
27,446
|
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet certificates of deposit
|
|
|
12,427
|
|
|
|
6,246
|
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
775,630
|
|
|
$
|
733,473
|
|
|
$
|
725,840
|
|
|
$
|
592,478
|
|
|
$
|
563,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the change in the deposit
categories for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
12,700
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,063
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
8,447
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
(5,880
|
)
|
|
|
−5.3
|
%
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
(14,159
|
)
|
|
|
−7.2
|
%
|
|
|
18,681
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
24,604
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
(8,250
|
)
|
|
|
−2.6
|
%
|
|
|
69,980
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
20,370
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Internet certificates of deposit
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
99.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
42,157
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,633
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
133,362
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the change in deposit categories
between December 31, 2008 and 2007, excluding the deposits
acquired from GCFC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
from GCFC
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
97,546
|
|
|
$
|
10,251
|
|
|
$
|
87,295
|
|
|
$
|
84,846
|
|
|
$
|
2,449
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
113,973
|
|
|
|
12,236
|
|
|
|
101,737
|
|
|
|
105,526
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
−3.6
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
182,523
|
|
|
|
10,735
|
|
|
|
171,788
|
|
|
|
196,682
|
|
|
|
(24,894
|
)
|
|
|
−12.7
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
340,976
|
|
|
|
39,911
|
|
|
|
301,065
|
|
|
|
311,976
|
|
|
|
(10,911
|
)
|
|
|
−3.5
|
%
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
28,185
|
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
|
|
19,209
|
|
|
|
28,197
|
|
|
|
(8,988
|
)
|
|
|
−31.9
|
%
|
Internet certificates of deposit
|
|
|
12,427
|
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
|
|
4,385
|
|
|
|
6,246
|
|
|
|
(1,861
|
)
|
|
|
−29.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
775,630
|
|
|
$
|
90,151
|
|
|
$
|
685,479
|
|
|
$
|
733,473
|
|
|
$
|
(47,994
|
)
|
|
|
−6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As shown in the preceding table, exclusive of the effects of the
GCFC acquisition, the Corporation has observed a decline in
deposits during 2008. This decline has been the result of
increased competition with other depository institutions as well
as declines in brokered certificates of deposit and internet
certificates of deposit. Deposits also declined due to well
publicized bank failures, the collapse of the investment banking
industry, and uncertainty of the public in the financial
condition of banks in general. The decrease in savings accounts
is the result of large deposit customers looking for a secure
investment that is fully insured. As a result, the Corporation
expanded its repurchase sweep products to meet customers needs.
Since December 31, 2007, these repurchase agreements have
increased by $41,449; due to the nature of these accounts, they
are classified as borrowings. The
83
following table shows the average balances and corresponding
interest rates paid on deposit accounts as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
95,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
73,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
114,889
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
109,370
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
|
105,476
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
213,410
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
|
|
188,323
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
158,327
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
393,190
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
349,941
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
301,593
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
817,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
727,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
639,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The time remaining until maturity of time certificates and other
time deposits of $100 or more at December 31, 2008 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
Within 3 months
|
|
$
|
36,650
|
|
Within 3 to 6 months
|
|
|
15,550
|
|
Within 6 to 12 months
|
|
|
37,207
|
|
Over 12 months
|
|
|
52,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
141,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed
Funds
As a result of the Corporations recent loan growth, the
desire to increase its investment in high quality tax exempt
municipal bonds, and the increased level of competition for
deposits, the Corporation has increased its other borrowings
significantly over the past year. Included in the increase in
other borrowed funds is an increase of $41,449 in repurchase
agreements (see deposit discussion above). Management does
anticipate that the Corporation will continue to increase its
borrowings throughout 2009 (See Note 10 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).
Capital
The capital of the Corporation consists solely of common stock,
retained earnings, and accumulated other comprehensive
income / (loss). The Corporation offers dividend
reinvestment and employee and director stock purchase plans.
Under the provisions of these Plans, the Corporation issued
78,994 shares of common stock generating $2,879 of capital
during 2008, and 63,233 shares of common stock generating
$2,657 of capital in 2007. The Corporation also offers
share-based payment awards through its equity compensation plan
(See Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements). Pursuant to this plan, the Corporation generated
$603 and $758 of capital in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In October 2002, the Board of Directors authorized management to
repurchase up to $2,000 in dollar value of the
Corporations common stock. In March 2007, the Board of
Directors amended this plan which allowed for the repurchase of
up to 150,000 of additional shares. In May and July 2008 they
further amended the plan to allow for the repurchase of an
additional 25,000 and 5,000 shares, respectively. During
2008 and 2007, the Corporation repurchased 148,336 shares
of common stock at an average price of $43.41 and
43,220 shares of common stock at an average price of
$43.51, respectively. There were no shares repurchased in 2006.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $5,303 in 2008
and consists of a $3,771 increase in unrealized loss on
available-for-sale investment securities and a $1,532 increase
in unrecognized pension cost of the defined benefit pension
plan. These amounts are net of tax.
The Federal Reserve Boards current recommended minimum
primary capital to assets requirement is 6.0%. The
Corporations primary capital to average assets ratio,
which consists of shareholders equity plus the allowance
84
for loan losses less acquisition intangibles, was 9.26% at year
end 2008. There are no commitments for significant capital
expenditures.
The Federal Reserve Board has established a minimum risk based
capital standard. Under this standard, a framework has been
established that assigns risk weights to each category of on and
off-balance-sheet items to arrive at risk adjusted total assets.
Regulatory capital is divided by the risk adjusted assets with
the resulting ratio compared to the minimum standard to
determine whether a corporation has adequate capital. The
minimum standard is 8%, of which at least 4% must consist of
equity capital net of goodwill. The following table sets forth
the percentages required under the Risk Based Capital guidelines
and the Corporations values at December 31, 2008:
Percentage of Capital to Risk Adjusted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Required
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Equity Capital
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
12.27
|
%
|
Secondary Capital
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
13.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporations secondary capital includes only
the allowance for loan losses. The percentage for the secondary
capital under the required column is the maximum amount allowed
from all sources.
The Federal Reserve also prescribes minimum capital requirements
for the Corporations subsidiary Bank. At December 31,
2008, the Bank exceeded these minimums. For further information
regarding the Banks capital requirements, refer to
Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements.
Fair
Value
The Corporation utilizes fair value measurements to record fair
value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to
determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale,
trading securities and certain liabilities are recorded at fair
value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the
Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets
on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, loans held
for investment in foreclosed assets, mortgage servicing rights
and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring
fair value adjustments typically involve the application of
lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual
assets.
Fair
Value Hierarchy
Under SFAS 157, the Corporation groups assets and
liabilities at fair value into three levels, based on the
markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the
reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.
These levels are:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for
identical instruments traded in active markets.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar
instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active, and
model-based valuation techniques for which all significant
assumptions are observable in the market.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Valuation is generated from model-based techniques
that use at least one significant assumption not observable in
the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability.
|
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used
for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.
85
Investment
Securities:
Investment securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if
available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are
measured using independent pricing models or other model-based
valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash
flows, adjusted for the securitys credit rating,
prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and
liquidity assumptions. Level 1 securities include those
traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock
Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by
dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets,
mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored
entities and money market funds. Level 2 securities include
municipal bonds and corporate debt securities in active markets.
Securities classified as Level 3 include securities in less
liquid markets, including illiquid markets in some instances,
and include certain municipal securities and money market
preferred auction rate securities.
The Corporation has invested $11,000 in auction rate money
market preferred investment security instruments, which are
classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at
fair value. Due to recent events and uncertainty in credit
markets, these investments have become illiquid.
Due to the current illiquidity of these securities, these assets
were classified as Level 3 during 2008. The fair values of
these securities were estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow
analysis or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as of
December 31, 2008. These analyses consider, among other
factors, the collateral underlying the security investments, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected
future cash flows, estimates of the next time the security is
expected to have a successful auction, and the
Corporations positive intent and ability to hold such
securities until credit markets improve, as further described in
Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans
Available-for-Sale:
Loans available for sale are carried at the lower of cost or
market value. The fair value of loans held-for-sale is based on
what price secondary markets are currently offering for
portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the Company
classifies loans subjected to nonrecurring fair value
adjustments as Level 2.
Loans:
The Corporation does not record loans at fair value on a
recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is
considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is
established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of
interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired.
Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management
measures impairment in accordance with SFAS 114,
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,
(SFAS 114). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated
using one of several methods, including collateral value, market
value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and
discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an
allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the
expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded
investments in such loans. At December 31, 2008, impaired
loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral
or based on the net present value of their expected cash flows.
Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the
fair value of collateral require classification in the fair
value hierarchy. When a current appraised value is not available
or management determines the fair value of the collateral is
further impaired below the appraised value and there is no
observable market price, or the impairment is determined using
the net present value of the expected cash flows, the
Corporation classifies the impaired loan as nonrecurring
Level 3.
Foreclosed
Assets:
Upon transfer from the loan portfolio, foreclosed assets are
adjusted to and subsequently carried at the lower of carrying
value or fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is based upon
independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or
managements estimation of the value of the collateral.
When a current appraised value is not available or management
determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired
below the appraised value and there is no observable market
price, the Corporation classifies the foreclosed asset as
nonrecurring Level 3.
86
Equity
Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair
Values:
The Corporation has investments in equity securities without
readily determinable fair values as well as an investment in a
joint venture. The assets are individually reviewed for
impairment on an annual basis by comparing the carrying value to
the estimated fair value. The lack of an independent source to
validate fair value estimates, including the impact of future
capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent
limitation in the valuation process. The Corporation classifies
nonmarketable equity securities and its investment in a joint
venture subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as
Level 3. During 2008 and 2007, there were no impairments
recorded on equity securities without readily determinable fair
values.
Mortgage
Servicing Rights:
Loan servicing rights are subject to impairment testing. A
valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis
using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently
quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined
by management, is used for impairment testing. If the valuation
model reflects a value less than the carrying value, mortgage
servicing rights are adjusted to fair value through a valuation
allowance as determined by the model. As such, the Corporation
classifies loan servicing rights subjected to nonrecurring fair
value adjustments as Level 2.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets:
Goodwill and identified intangible assets are subject to
impairment testing. A projected cash flow valuation method is
used in the completion of impairment testing. This valuation
method requires a significant degree of management judgment. In
the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows
are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair
value as determined by the valuation model. If the testing
resulted in impairment, the Corporation would classify goodwill
and other intangible assets subjected to nonrecurring fair value
adjustments as Level 3. During 2008 and 2007, there were no
impairments recorded on goodwill and other intangible assets.
Other
Borrowed Funds:
The Corporation has elected to measure a portion of other
borrowed funds at their fair value. These borrowings are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the fair value
measurement being based upon quoted prices. Changes in the fair
value of these borrowings are included in noninterest income. As
such, the Corporation classifies other borrowed funds as
Level 2.
During 2008, primarily as a result of declines in the rates
offered on new residential mortgage loans, the Corporation
recorded impairment charges of $115 related to the carrying
value of its mortgage servicing rights, in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 156. This decline in offering
rates decreased the expected lives of the loans serviced and in
turn decreased the value of the serving rights.
The impairment charges to foreclosed assets were the result of
the real estate held declining in value subsequent to the
properties being transferred to other real estate.
Liquidity
The primary sources of the Corporations liquidity are cash
and cash equivalents, trading securities, and available-for-sale
investment securities, excluding money market preferred
securities in 2008 due to their illiquidity as of
December 31, 2008. These categories totaled $285,805 or
25.0% of assets as of December 31, 2008 as compared to
$263,774 or 27.6% in 2007. Liquidity is important for financial
institutions because of their need to meet loan funding
commitments, depositor withdrawal requests and various other
commitments discussed in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements. Liquidity varies significantly daily,
based on customer activity.
Operating activities provided $20,661 of cash in 2008 as
compared to $60,387 in 2007. The reduction in net cash provided
by operating activities was the result of the Corporation
reducing its trading portfolio by $8,513 in 2008 as compared to
$53,235 in 2007. Net cash provided by financing activities
equaled $66,038 in 2008 and
87
$38,470 in 2007, and was primarily the result of increases in
other borrowed funds during 2008. The Corporations
investing activities used cash amounting to $88,728 in 2008 and
$104,633 in 2007. The accumulated effect of the
Corporations operating, investing, and financing
activities used $2,029 and $5,776 of cash in 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
The primary source of funds for the Bank is deposits. The Bank
emphasizes interest-bearing time deposits as part of their
funding strategy. The Bank also seeks noninterest bearing
deposits, or checking accounts, which reduce the Banks
cost of funds in an effort to expand the customer base.
In recent periods, the Corporation has experienced some
competitive challenges in obtaining additional deposits to fuel
growth. As depositors continue to have wider access to the
Internet and other real-time interest rate monitoring resources,
deposit sourcing and pricing has become more competitive.
Deposit growth is achievable, but at a competitive price. As a
result of this increased competition, the Corporation (as
discussed above) has begun to rely more and more on brokered,
internet deposits, and other borrowed funds as a key funding
source.
In addition to these primary sources of liquidity, the
Corporation has the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan
Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank, and through various
correspondent banks as fed funds. As of December 31, 2008,
the Corporation had the capacity to borrow up to $50,809 from
the Federal Home Loan Bank based upon the current Board of
Director approved limits.. The Corporations liquidity is
considered adequate by the management of the Corporation.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
Interest rate sensitivity is determined by the amount of earning
assets and interest bearing liabilities repricing within a
specific time period, and their relative sensitivity to a change
in interest rates. Management also strives to achieve reasonable
stability in the net interest margin through periods of changing
interest rates. One tool used by management to measure interest
rate sensitivity is gap analysis. As shown in the following
table, the gap analysis depicts the Corporations position
for specific time periods and the cumulative gap as a percentage
of total assets.
Investment securities and other investments are scheduled
according to their contractual maturity. Fixed rate loans are
included in the appropriate time frame based on their scheduled
amortization. Variable rate loans are included in the time frame
of their earliest repricing. Of the $735,385 in total loans,
$156,389 are variable rate loans. Time deposit liabilities are
scheduled based on their contractual maturity except for
variable rate time deposits in the amount of $1,813 that are
included in the 0 to 3 month time frame.
Savings, NOW accounts, and money market accounts have no
contractual maturity date and are believed to be predominantly
noninterest rate sensitive by management. These accounts have
been classified in the gap table according to their estimated
withdrawal rates based upon managements analysis of
deposit runoff over the past five years. Management believes
this runoff experience is consistent with its expectation for
the future. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had
$69,230 more liabilities than assets maturing within one year. A
negative gap position results when more liabilities, within a
specified time frame, mature or reprice than assets.
88
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
The following table shows the time periods and the amount of
assets and liabilities available for interest rate repricing as
of December 31, 2008. The interest rate sensitivity
information for investment securities is based on the expected
prepayments and call dates versus stated maturities. For
purposes of this analysis, nonaccrual loans and the allowance
for loan losses are excluded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 to 3
|
|
|
4 to 12
|
|
|
1 to 5
|
|
|
Over 5
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Interest Sensitive Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
32,312
|
|
|
|
50,540
|
|
|
|
57,075
|
|
|
|
106,528
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
187,926
|
|
|
|
94,142
|
|
|
|
384,450
|
|
|
|
57,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
242,013
|
|
|
$
|
144,682
|
|
|
$
|
441,525
|
|
|
$
|
164,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Sensitive Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
$
|
55,659
|
|
|
$
|
39,500
|
|
|
$
|
97,191
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
79,488
|
|
|
|
161,477
|
|
|
|
139,034
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
36,670
|
|
|
|
35,706
|
|
|
|
110,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand
|
|
|
28,114
|
|
|
|
19,311
|
|
|
|
66,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
199,931
|
|
|
$
|
255,994
|
|
|
$
|
412,920
|
|
|
$
|
31,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative gap (deficiency)
|
|
$
|
42,082
|
|
|
$
|
(69,230
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,006
|
|
Cumulative gap (deficiency) as a % of assets
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
|
|
(6.08
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.57
|
)%
|
|
|
8.08
|
%
|
The following table shows the maturity of commercial and
agricultural loans outstanding at December 31, 2008. Also
provided are the amounts due after one year, classified
according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1 to 5
|
|
|
Over 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Less
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
95,292
|
|
|
$
|
262,546
|
|
|
$
|
24,971
|
|
|
$
|
382,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Sensitivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans maturing after one year that have:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
223,957
|
|
|
$
|
23,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,589
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
262,546
|
|
|
$
|
24,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Corporations primary market risks are interest rate
risk and liquidity risk. The Corporation has no significant
foreign exchange risk, holds limited loans outstanding to oil
and gas concerns, and does not utilize interest rate swaps or
derivatives, except for interest rate locks, in the management
of its interest rate risk. Any changes in foreign exchange rates
or commodity prices would have an insignificant impact, if any,
on the Corporations interest income and cash flows. The
Corporation does have a significant amount of loans extended to
borrowers in agricultural production. The cash flow of such
borrowers and ability to service debt is largely dependent on
the commodity prices for corn, soybeans, sugar beets, milk,
beef, and a variety of dry beans. The Corporation mitigates
these risks by using conservative price and production yields
when calculating a borrowers available cash flow to
service their debt.
Interest rate risk (IRR) is the exposure of the
Corporations net interest income, its primary source of
income, to changes in interest rates. IRR results from the
difference in the maturity or repricing frequency of a financial
institutions interest earning assets and its interest
bearing liabilities. IRR is the fundamental method in which
financial institutions earn income and create shareholder value.
Excessive exposure to IRR could pose a significant risk to the
Corporations earnings and capital.
89
The Federal Reserve Board, the Corporations primary
Federal regulator, has adopted a policy requiring the Board of
Directors and senior management to effectively manage the
various risks that can have a material impact on the safety and
soundness of the Corporation. The risks include credit, interest
rate, liquidity, operational, and reputational. The Corporation
has policies, procedures and internal controls for measuring and
managing these risks. Specifically, the IRR policy and
procedures include defining acceptable types and terms of
investments and funding sources, liquidity requirements, limits
on investments in long term assets, limiting the mismatch in
repricing opportunity of assets and liabilities, and the
frequency of measuring and reporting to the Board of Directors.
The Corporation uses several techniques to manage IRR. The first
method is gap analysis. Gap analysis measures the cash flows
and/or the
earliest repricing of the Corporations interest bearing
assets and liabilities. This analysis is useful for measuring
trends in the repricing characteristics of the balance sheet.
Significant assumptions are required in this process because of
the imbedded repricing options contained in assets and
liabilities. A substantial portion of the Corporations
assets are invested in loans and investment securities with
issuer call options. Loans have imbedded options that allow the
borrower to repay the balance prior to maturity without penalty.
The amount of prepayments is dependent upon many factors,
including the interest rate of a given loan in comparison to the
current interest rate for residential mortgages, the level of
sales of used homes, and the overall availability of credit in
the market place. Generally, a decrease in interest rates will
result in an increase in the Corporations cash flows from
these assets. A significant portion of the Corporations
securities are callable. The call option is more likely to be
exercised in a period of decreasing interest rates. Investment
securities, other than those that are callable, do not have any
significant imbedded options. Savings and checking deposits may
generally be withdrawn on request without prior notice. The
timing of cash flows from these deposits is estimated based on
historical experience. Time deposits have penalties that
discourage early withdrawals.
The second technique used in the management of IRR is to combine
the projected cash flows and repricing characteristics generated
by the gap analysis and the interest rates associated with those
cash flows to project future interest income. By changing the
amount and timing of the cash flows and the repricing interest
rates of those cash flows, the Corporation can project the
effect of changing interest rates on its interest income. Based
on the projections prepared for the year ended December 31,
2008, the Corporations net interest income would increase
during a period of decreasing interest rates.
90
The following tables provide information about the
Corporations assets and liabilities that are sensitive to
changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
The Corporation has no interest rate swaps, futures contracts,
or other derivative financial options. The principal amounts of
assets and time deposits maturing were calculated based on the
contractual maturity dates. Savings and NOW accounts are based
on managements estimate of their future cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Rate sensitive assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest bearing assets
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
7,867
|
|
|
$
|
4,902
|
|
|
$
|
3,181
|
|
|
$
|
2,937
|
|
|
$
|
1,089
|
|
|
$
|
1,799
|
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
3.89
|
%
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
|
|
3.11
|
%
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate securities
|
|
$
|
82,852
|
|
|
$
|
13,043
|
|
|
$
|
12,494
|
|
|
$
|
11,247
|
|
|
$
|
20,291
|
|
|
$
|
106,528
|
|
|
$
|
246,455
|
|
|
$
|
246,455
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate loans
|
|
$
|
136,854
|
|
|
$
|
105,529
|
|
|
$
|
110,218
|
|
|
$
|
80,163
|
|
|
$
|
88,540
|
|
|
$
|
57,692
|
|
|
$
|
578,996
|
|
|
$
|
598,703
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
6.73
|
%
|
|
|
6.78
|
%
|
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
|
|
7.20
|
%
|
|
|
6.86
|
%
|
|
|
6.34
|
%
|
|
|
6.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rate loans
|
|
$
|
61,795
|
|
|
$
|
25,166
|
|
|
$
|
16,524
|
|
|
$
|
8,049
|
|
|
$
|
27,505
|
|
|
$
|
17,350
|
|
|
$
|
156,389
|
|
|
$
|
156,389
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
5.34
|
%
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
5.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Rate sensitive liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
$
|
95,159
|
|
|
$
|
39,191
|
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
22,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
222,350
|
|
|
$
|
230,130
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
1.11
|
%
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
4.17
|
%
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
2.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW accounts
|
|
$
|
119,801
|
|
|
$
|
79,465
|
|
|
$
|
63,274
|
|
|
$
|
25,140
|
|
|
$
|
8,816
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
296,496
|
|
|
$
|
296,496
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate time deposits
|
|
$
|
239,152
|
|
|
$
|
62,838
|
|
|
$
|
29,771
|
|
|
$
|
21,565
|
|
|
$
|
24,860
|
|
|
$
|
1,589
|
|
|
$
|
379,775
|
|
|
$
|
385,478
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
|
4.55
|
%
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.81
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rate time deposits
|
|
$
|
1,187
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,813
|
|
|
$
|
1,813
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
|
1.67
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
Rate sensitive assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest bearing assets
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
3.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
9,342
|
|
|
$
|
2,213
|
|
|
$
|
3,269
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
2,820
|
|
|
$
|
4,670
|
|
|
$
|
25,064
|
|
|
$
|
25,064
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.98
|
%
|
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate securities
|
|
$
|
74,950
|
|
|
$
|
24,122
|
|
|
$
|
8,450
|
|
|
$
|
8,082
|
|
|
$
|
2,826
|
|
|
$
|
94,697
|
|
|
$
|
213,127
|
|
|
$
|
213,127
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
5.54
|
%
|
|
|
4.98
|
%
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.99
|
%
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate loans
|
|
$
|
124,447
|
|
|
$
|
99,132
|
|
|
$
|
98,275
|
|
|
$
|
78,152
|
|
|
$
|
63,957
|
|
|
$
|
58,037
|
|
|
$
|
522,000
|
|
|
$
|
523,454
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
6.72
|
%
|
|
|
6.65
|
%
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
7.28
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rate loans
|
|
$
|
41,596
|
|
|
$
|
14,613
|
|
|
$
|
18,792
|
|
|
$
|
4,796
|
|
|
$
|
6,435
|
|
|
$
|
4,455
|
|
|
$
|
90,687
|
|
|
$
|
90,687
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
7.94
|
%
|
|
|
7.67
|
%
|
|
|
7.66
|
%
|
|
|
7.52
|
%
|
|
|
7.31
|
%
|
|
|
7.56
|
%
|
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Rate sensitive liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
$
|
30,387
|
|
|
$
|
6,500
|
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
92,887
|
|
|
$
|
91,897
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
4.77
|
%
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.19
|
%
|
|
|
4.73
|
%
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW accounts
|
|
$
|
132,008
|
|
|
$
|
71,320
|
|
|
$
|
69,183
|
|
|
$
|
23,972
|
|
|
$
|
5,725
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
302,208
|
|
|
$
|
302,208
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate time deposits
|
|
$
|
226,090
|
|
|
$
|
33,477
|
|
|
$
|
42,835
|
|
|
$
|
23,067
|
|
|
$
|
18,853
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
344,459
|
|
|
$
|
346,528
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
|
|
4.81
|
%
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rate time deposits
|
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
|
$
|
585
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
91
Forward
Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. The Corporation intends such
forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the
Private Securities Reform Act of 1995, and is including this
statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions.
Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain
assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and
expectations of the Corporation, are generally identifiable by
use of the words believe, expect,
intend, anticipate,
estimate, project, or similar
expressions. The Corporations ability to predict results
or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently
uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on
the operations and future prospects of the Corporation and the
subsidiaries include, but are not limited to, changes in
interest rates, general economic conditions,
legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of
the U.S. Government including policies of the
U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality or
composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for
loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial
services in the Corporations market area, and accounting
principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and
uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking
statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such
statements. Further information concerning the Corporation and
its business, including additional factors that could materially
affect the Corporations financial results, is included in
the Corporations filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
COMMON
STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
The Corporations common stock is traded in the
over-the-counter market. The common stock has been quoted on the
Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service (Pink
Sheets) under the symbol ISBA since August of
2008 and under the symbol IBTM prior to August of 2008. Other
trades in the common stock occur in privately negotiated
transactions from time to time of which the Corporation may or
may not be aware.
Management has reviewed the information available to it as to
the range of reported high and low bid quotations, including
high and low bid information as reported by Pink Sheets and
closing price information as reported by the parties to
privately negotiated transactions. The following table sets
forth managements compilation of that information for the
periods indicated. Price information obtained from Pink Sheets
reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up,
mark-down or commissions and may not necessarily represent
actual transactions. Price information obtained from parties to
privately negotiated transactions reflects actual closing prices
that were disclosed to the Corporation, which management has not
independently verified. The following compiled data is provided
for information purposes only and should not be viewed as
indicative of the actual or market value of the
Corporations common stock. All of the information has been
adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend, paid
February 29, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Sale Price
|
|
Period
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
107,920
|
|
|
$
|
32.73
|
|
|
$
|
44.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
50,600
|
|
|
|
39.00
|
|
|
|
44.00
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
29,303
|
|
|
|
33.00
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
71,855
|
|
|
|
22.50
|
|
|
|
36.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
259,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
65,506
|
|
|
|
38.18
|
|
|
|
40.91
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
42,227
|
|
|
|
38.50
|
|
|
|
40.91
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
59,752
|
|
|
|
38.41
|
|
|
|
40.45
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
24,597
|
|
|
|
38.18
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
192,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid for the
following quarters, adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid on
February 29, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporations authorized common stock
consists of 15,000,000 shares, of which
7,518,856 shares are issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2008. As of that date, there were
2,979 shareholders of record.
On March 22, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted a
repurchase plan which allows for the repurchase of up to
150,000 shares of the Corporations issued and
outstanding common stock. This plan was amended in May 2008 to
allow for the repurchase of an additional 25,000 shares.
The plan was further amended to allow for an additional
5,000 shares to be repurchased in July 2008. As shares are
repurchased under this plan, they are retired and revert back to
the status of authorized, but unissued shares. This
authorization does not have an expiration date. The following
table provides information as of December 31, 2008, with
respect to this plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Maximum Number of
|
|
|
|
Shares Repurchased
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Shares That May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plan
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
or Program
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
October 1 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
November 1 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
December 1 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information concerning Securities Authorized for Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans appears under Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Shareholder Matters included elsewhere in this
annual report on
Form 10-K.
93
Stock
Performance
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder
return on Corporation common stock for the last five years with
the cumulative total return on (1) the NASDAQ Stock Market
Index, which is comprised of all United States common shares
traded on the NASDAQ and (2) the NASDAQ Bank Stock Index,
which is comprised of bank and bank holding company common
shares traded on the NASDAQ over the same period. The graph
assumes the value of an investment in the Corporation and each
index was $100 at December 31, 2003 and all dividends are
reinvested.
Stock
Performance
Five-Year Total Return
The dollar values for total shareholder return plotted in the
graph above are shown in the table below:
Comparison
of Five Year Cumulative
Among Isabella Bank Corporation, NASDAQ Stock Market,
and NASDAQ Bank Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ
|
|
Year
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
NASDAQ
|
|
|
Banks
|
|
|
12/31/2003
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
12/31/2004
|
|
|
117.2
|
|
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|
|
124.7
|
|
|
|
111.4
|
|
|
|
111.2
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
139.2
|
|
|
|
122.9
|
|
|
|
126.4
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
141.4
|
|
|
|
136.0
|
|
|
|
101.6
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
92.1
|
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
94
SHAREHOLDERS
INFORMATION
Annual
Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at
5:00 p.m., Tuesday, May 5, 2009, Comfort Inn,
2424 S. Mission Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan.
Financial
Information and
Form 10-K
Copies of the 2008 Annual Report, Isabella Bank Corporation
Form 10-K,
and other financial information not contained herein may be
obtained, without charge, by writing to:
Secretary
Isabella Bank Corporation
401 N. Main St.
Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858
Mission
Statement
The mission of Isabella Bank Corporation shall be:
To create an operating environment that will provide
shareholders with sustained growth in their investment while
maintaining our independence and subsidiaries autonomy.
Equal
Employment Opportunity
The equal employment opportunity clauses in Section 202 of
the Executive Order 11246, as amended; 38 USC 2012, Vietnam
Era Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974; Section 503 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; relative to equal
employment opportunity and implementing rules and regulations of
the Secretary of Labor are adhered to and supported by Isabella
Bank Corporation, and its subsidiaries.
95
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION PROXY
401 North Main Street
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Sandra L. Caul, Theodore W. Kortes, and Dale D. Weburg as proxies,
each with the power to appoint his/her substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to
vote as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of Isabella Bank Corporation held of
record by the undersigned on April 1, 2009 at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May
5, 2009 or any adjournments thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: |
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED BELOW
q
|
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE
q |
|
|
EXCEPT AS MARKED TO THE
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED |
|
|
CONTRARY BELOW |
|
|
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, circle the
nominees name in the list below.)
Dennis P. Angner David J. Maness W. Joseph Manifold William J. Strickler
(continued and to be signed on other side)
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned shareholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED TO ELECT ALL
NOMINEES. The shares represented by this proxy will be voted in the discretion of the proxies
on any other matters which may come before the meeting.
Please sign below as your name appears on the label. When shares are held by joint tenants, both
should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give
full title as such. If a corporation, please sign full corporate name by the President or other
authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: ______________________________, 2009
|
|
___________________________________________________
|
|
|
Please mark, sign, date and return
Proxy card promptly using the
enclosed envelope.
|
|
Signature |
|
|
|
|
___________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
Signature (if held jointly) |
|
|