e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended November 7, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-08395
Morgans Foods, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-0562210 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
4829 Galaxy Parkway, Suite S, Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
44128 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(216) 359-9000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated
filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of December 17, 2010, the issuer had 2,934,995 common shares outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MORGANS FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
November 7, 2010 |
|
|
November 8, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
21,257,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,645,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food, paper and beverage |
|
|
6,718,000 |
|
|
|
6,375,000 |
|
Labor and benefits |
|
|
6,300,000 |
|
|
|
5,867,000 |
|
Restaurant operating expenses |
|
|
5,607,000 |
|
|
|
5,374,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
571,000 |
|
|
|
685,000 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,402,000 |
|
|
|
1,241,000 |
|
Loss on restaurant assets |
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
(9,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
620,000 |
|
|
|
1,112,000 |
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment and deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,000 |
) |
Bank debt and notes payable |
|
|
516,000 |
|
|
|
584,000 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Other income and expense, net |
|
|
(63,000 |
) |
|
|
(42,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
143,000 |
|
|
|
643,000 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
197,000 |
|
|
|
217,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(54,000 |
) |
|
$ |
426,000 |
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share: |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share: |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
|
|
2,995,541 |
|
See notes to these consolidated financial statements.
2
MORGANS FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-six Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
November 7, 2010 |
|
|
November 8, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
65,100,000 |
|
|
$ |
66,778,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food, paper and beverage |
|
|
20,203,000 |
|
|
|
21,141,000 |
|
Labor and benefits |
|
|
18,879,000 |
|
|
|
18,700,000 |
|
Restaurant operating expenses |
|
|
16,958,000 |
|
|
|
17,254,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,866,000 |
|
|
|
2,113,000 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
4,141,000 |
|
|
|
4,087,000 |
|
Loss on restaurant assets |
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
2,915,000 |
|
|
|
3,471,000 |
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment and deferred financing costs |
|
|
98,000 |
|
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
Bank debt and notes payable |
|
|
1,611,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Other income and expense, net |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
(129,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,125,000 |
|
|
|
1,741,000 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
441,000 |
|
|
|
641,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
684,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share: |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share: |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
2,995,804 |
|
|
|
2,983,002 |
|
See notes to these consolidated financial statements
3
MORGANS FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 7, 2010 |
|
|
February 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
(UNAUDITED) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
3,793,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,205,000 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
439,000 |
|
|
|
470,000 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
765,000 |
|
|
|
682,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
802,000 |
|
|
|
742,000 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
640,000 |
|
|
|
678,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,454,000 |
|
|
|
6,792,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
9,308,000 |
|
|
|
9,558,000 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
21,041,000 |
|
|
|
20,960,000 |
|
Property under capital leases |
|
|
1,314,000 |
|
|
|
1,314,000 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
10,320,000 |
|
|
|
10,373,000 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
|
20,375,000 |
|
|
|
20,337,000 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
626,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,388,000 |
|
|
|
63,168,000 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
31,665,000 |
|
|
|
31,941,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,723,000 |
|
|
|
31,227,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
483,000 |
|
|
|
546,000 |
|
Franchise agreements, net |
|
|
1,040,000 |
|
|
|
1,133,000 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
9,227,000 |
|
|
|
9,227,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,927,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,925,000 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, current |
|
$ |
3,260,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,165,000 |
|
Current maturities of capital lease obligations |
|
|
47,000 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,149,000 |
|
|
|
3,683,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
4,304,000 |
|
|
|
3,884,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,760,000 |
|
|
|
10,776,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
26,879,000 |
|
|
|
29,725,000 |
|
Long-term capital lease obligations |
|
|
1,027,000 |
|
|
|
1,061,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
3,628,000 |
|
|
|
3,853,000 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
2,326,000 |
|
|
|
1,887,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized shares - 25,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued shares - 2,969,405 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Treasury shares - 34,410 |
|
|
(81,000 |
) |
|
|
(81,000 |
) |
Capital in excess of stated value |
|
|
29,488,000 |
|
|
|
29,488,000 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(27,130,000 |
) |
|
|
(27,814,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,307,000 |
|
|
|
1,623,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,927,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,925,000 |
|
|
|
|
See notes to these consolidated financial statements
4
MORGANS FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Treasury Shares |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Stated Value |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Balance February 28, 2010 |
|
|
2,969,405 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
(34,410 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,000 |
) |
|
$ |
29,488,000 |
|
|
$ |
(27,814,000 |
) |
|
$ |
1,623,000 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684,000 |
|
|
|
684,000 |
|
|
|
|
Balance November 7, 2010 |
|
|
2,969,405 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
(34,410 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,000 |
) |
|
$ |
29,488,000 |
|
|
$ |
(27,130,000 |
) |
|
$ |
2,307,000 |
|
|
|
|
See notes to these consolidated financial statements.
5
MORGANS FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty-six Weeks Ended |
|
|
November 7, 2010 |
|
November 8, 2009 |
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
684,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,000 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,866,000 |
|
|
|
2,113,000 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
77,000 |
|
|
|
83,000 |
|
Amortization of supply agreement advances |
|
|
(840,000 |
) |
|
|
(846,000 |
) |
Funding from supply agreements |
|
|
803,000 |
|
|
|
42,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
439,000 |
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,000 |
|
Disposal of restaurant assets |
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
389,000 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(83,000 |
) |
|
|
54,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(33,000 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
11,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
466,000 |
|
|
|
(480,000 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
279,000 |
|
|
|
712,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
3,739,000 |
|
|
|
3,843,000 |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of restaurant |
|
|
234,000 |
|
|
|
119,000 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(1,603,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,072,000 |
) |
Purchase of license and other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,369,000 |
) |
|
|
(957,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(2,300,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,228,000 |
) |
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(31,000 |
) |
|
|
(28,000 |
) |
Bank debt repayment in advance |
|
|
(451,000 |
) |
|
|
(306,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,782,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,562,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(412,000 |
) |
|
|
324,000 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning balance |
|
|
4,205,000 |
|
|
|
5,257,000 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, ending balance |
|
$ |
3,793,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,581,000 |
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid on debt and capitalized leases was $1,823,000 and $2,027,000 in fiscal 2011
and 2010, respectively.
Cash payments/(refunds) for income taxes were ($29,728) and $4,000 in fiscal 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
See notes to these consolidated financial statements.
6
MORGANS FOODS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The interim consolidated financial statements of Morgans Foods, Inc. (the Company) have been
prepared without audit. In the opinion of Company management, all adjustments have been included.
Unless otherwise disclosed, all adjustments consist only of normal recurring adjustments necessary
for a fair statement of results of operations for the interim periods. These unaudited financial
statements have been prepared using the same accounting principles that were used in preparation of
the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010. Certain prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations. The results of
operations for the thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year. Although the Company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading, it is suggested that these condensed
consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 28, 2010.
The Companys debt is reported at historical cost, based upon stated interest rates which
represented market rates at the time of borrowing. Due to subsequent declines in credit quality
throughout the restaurant industry resulting from weak and volatile operating performance and
related declines in restaurant values, the market for fixed rate mortgage debt for restaurant
financing is currently extremely limited. The Companys debt is not publicly traded and there are
few lenders or financing transactions for similar debt in the marketplace at this time.
Consequently, management has not been able to identify a market for fixed rate restaurant mortgage
debt with a similar risk profile, and has concluded that it is not practicable to estimate the fair
value of the Companys debt as of November 7, 2010.
NOTE 2 RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Effective July 1, 2009, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) (Topic 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), became the single
source for authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. During
fiscal 2010, several Accounting Standards Updates (ASU) were issued.
ASU 2010-05 January, 2010 Topic 718 Compensation-Stock Compensation
This update is a clarification of the treatment of escrowed share arrangements and provides
guidance on the presumption of compensation under such arrangements. The Company has determined
that the changes to the accounting standards required by this update do not have a material effect
on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
ASU 2010-06 January, 2010 Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
This update improves the disclosures regarding fair value measurements including information
regarding the level of disaggregation of assets and liabilities and the valuation methods being
employed. The provisions of this update are effective for the Companys fiscal year ending
February 27, 2011. Management is evaluating what effect, if any, the adoption of these provisions
will have on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 3 NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is
based on the combined weighted average number of shares outstanding, which includes the assumed
exercise, or conversion of options. In computing diluted net income per common share, the Company
has utilized the treasury stock method. The following table reconciles the difference between
basic and diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended November 7, 2010 |
|
|
Quarter ended November 8, 2009 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(54,000 |
) |
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
426,000 |
|
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Stock Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(54,000 |
) |
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
426,000 |
|
|
|
2,995,541 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thrity-six weeks ended November 7, 2010 |
|
|
Thirty-six weeks ended November 8, 2009 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
- |
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
684,000 |
|
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
2,934,995 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Stock Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
684,000 |
|
|
|
2,995,804 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
2,983,002 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 149,000 common shares were outstanding during both the 2011 and 2010 fiscal
years and were included in the computation only for the time during which their exercise price was
greater than the average market price of the common shares and the Company was in a net income
position. The options for 149,000 shares, exercisable at $1.50 per share expire on November 5,
2018.
NOTE 4 DEBT
The Companys debt arrangements require the maintenance of a consolidated fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1.20 to 1 regarding all of the Companys loans and the maintenance of individual
restaurant fixed charge coverage ratios of between 1.20 and 1.50 to 1 on certain of the Companys
individual restaurant loans. A portion of the Companys debt also contains a funded debt to
EBITDAR (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent) requirement of 5.5.
Fixed charge coverage ratios are calculated by dividing the cash flow before rent and debt service
for the previous 12 months by the debt service and rent due in the coming 12 months. In the
calculation of funded debt to EBITDAR, funded debt is the next twelve month operating lease
obligation times eight plus the debt balance at the measurement date. The funded debt is then
divided by the prior twelve month EBITDAR to obtain the calculated ratio. The consolidated and
individual ratios are all computed quarterly. The Company has previously entered into a loan
modification agreement covering a portion of its debt which decreased the fixed charge coverage
ratio to 1.10 and increased the funded debt to EBITDAR ratio to 6.0 from 5.5 through the first
quarter of fiscal 2012 and is in compliance with that requirement. The Company has obtained
waivers of its noncompliance covering the appropriate time frames for its other debt. In exchange
for the waivers the Company will pay certain fees. As of the measurement date of November 7, 2010,
the Companys consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.11 to 1, funded debt to EBITDAR was
5.9 and management projects that the Company will be in compliance with its consolidated debt
covenants, as modified or waived, at the relevant future measurement dates. As of November 7,
2010, the Company was not in compliance with the individual fixed charge coverage ratio on 19 of
its restaurant properties and has obtained waivers of these requirements covering a period of
longer than one year. The debt obligations of the Company which contain fixed charge coverage
ratio and funded debt to EBITDAR requirements are classified as long-term, except for the amounts
due within one year. If the Company does not comply with the covenants of its various debt
agreements in the future, and if future waivers or loan modifications are not obtained, the
respective lenders will have certain remedies available to them which include calling the debt,
increasing the interest rates and the acceleration of payments. Noncompliance with the
requirements of the Companys debt agreements, if not waived, could also trigger cross-default
provisions contained in the respective agreements.
NOTE 5 STOCK OPTIONS
On April 2, 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a Stock Option Plan for Executives
and Managers. Under the plan 145,500 shares were reserved for the grant of options. The Stock
Option Plan for Executives and Managers provides for grants to eligible participants of
nonqualified stock options only. The exercise price for any option awarded under the Plan is
required to be not less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date that the
option is granted. Options are granted by the Stock Option Committee of the Company. Options for
145,150 shares were granted to executives and managers of the Company on April 2, 1999 at an
exercise price of $4.125, all of which have either expired or been exercised. Options for 350
common shares were granted on November 6, 2008 at the closing price on that day of $1.50 per share
all of which are currently outstanding. The options vested in six months and expire ten years
after date of issue.
At the Companys annual meeting on June 25, 1999 the shareholders approved the Key Employees Stock
Option Plan. This plan allows the granting of options covering 291,000 shares of stock and has
essentially the same provisions as the Stock Option Plan for Executives and Managers which was
discussed above. Options for 129,850 shares were granted to executives and managers of the Company
on January 7, 2000 at an exercise price of $3.00. Options for 11,500 shares were granted to
executives on April 27, 2001 at an exercise price of $.85, all of which have either expired or been
exercised. Options for 149,650 common shares were granted on November 6, 2008 at the closing price
on that day of $1.50 per share of which 148,650 are currently outstanding. The options vested in
six months and expire ten years after date of issue.
As of November 7, 2010, a total of 149,000 options were outstanding, fully vested and exercisable
at a weighted average exercise price of $1.50 per share. No options are available for grant.
8
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at November 7,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
Number |
Prices |
|
11-7-10 |
|
Average Life |
|
Exercisable |
|
1.50
|
|
149,000
|
|
8.0
|
|
149,000 |
|
|
|
NOTE 6 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
The Company is required by its franchise agreements to periodically bring its restaurants up
to the required image of the franchisor. In order to meet the terms and conditions of the franchise agreements, the Company has the
following image enhancement obligations as of November 7, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Units |
|
Period |
|
Type |
|
Total (1) |
|
|
Required (2) |
|
|
Additional (3) |
|
|
1 |
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
IE (4) |
|
$ |
340,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
1 |
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Relo (4) (5) |
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
1 |
|
Fiscal 2011 |
|
Relo (5) |
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Fiscal 2011 |
|
IE |
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
8 |
|
Fiscal 2012 |
|
IE |
|
|
2,560,000 |
|
|
|
2,240,000 |
|
|
|
320,000 |
|
5 |
|
Fiscal 2013 |
|
IE |
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
1 |
|
Fiscal 2015 |
|
Rebuild |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Fiscal 2015 |
|
Relo (5) |
|
|
5,600,000 |
|
|
|
5,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Fiscal 2016 |
|
Relo (5) |
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Fiscal 2020 |
|
Relo (5) |
|
|
5,600,000 |
|
|
|
5,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Fiscal 2020 |
|
Rebuild |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
22,850,000 |
|
|
$ |
22,090,000 |
|
|
$ |
760,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts are based on estimates of current construction costs and actual costs may vary. |
|
(2) |
|
These amounts include only the items required to meet the franchisors current image
requirements. |
|
(3) |
|
These amounts are for capital upgrades performed on or which may be performed on the image
enhanced restaurants which were or may be deemed by the Company to be advantageous to the operation
of the units and which may be done at the time of the image enhancement. |
|
(4) |
|
Not completed in fiscal 2010, as required. |
|
(5) |
|
Relocations of fee owned properties are shown net of expected recovery of capital from the sale
of the former location. Relocation of leased properties assumes the capital cost of only equipment
because it is not known until each lease is finalized whether the lease will be a capital or
operating lease. |
The Company has been negotiating with one of its franchisors (KFC Corporation or KFC) to
arrive at a revised schedule for the completion of its asset upgrade obligations or image
enhancement obligations. The Company is required by its franchise agreements to periodically bring
its restaurants up to the required image of the franchisor. This typically involves a new dining
room decor and seating package and exterior changes and related items but can, in some cases,
require the relocation of the restaurant. Also, significant numbers of restaurants may have image
enhancement deadlines that coincide, in which case, the Company will adjust the actual timing of
the image enhancements in order to facilitate an orderly construction schedule. During the image
enhancement process, each restaurant is normally closed for up to two weeks, which has a negative
impact on the Companys revenues and operating efficiencies. The franchise agreements with KFC and
Taco Bell Corporation require the Company to upgrade and remodel its restaurants to comply with the
franchisors current standards within agreed upon timeframes.
9
The Company did not meet its obligations with respect to four restaurants due in fiscal 2010 but
the image enhancement of one of the restaurants was completed in April 2010 and another in July
2010. Also during fiscal third quarter, the Company completed the image enhancement of a
restaurant which was scheduled as a fiscal 2012 obligation. In addition, management believes that
the Company will not meet the stated deadlines for seven additional image enhancement projects for
fiscal 2011 and beyond and is in discussions with KFC to obtain revised schedules. The Company
relies mainly on cash flow and borrowings to complete its image enhancements and experienced a
decline in cash flow during the later part of fiscal 2009 and early fiscal 2010 which caused the
Company to temporarily suspend its image enhancement activities resulting in the failure to
complete the referenced projects.
In connection with the Companys image enhancement obligations, on or about October 12, 2010, the
Company received notices of default from KFC regarding ten of the Companys restaurants. These
notices of default state that unless the Company corrected the defaults by November 7, 2010 that
KFC would exercise its right to terminate the franchise agreements. Before and after the receipt
of the notice of default the Company has continued to negotiate with KFC regarding the Companys
image enhancement obligations in order to reach a revised schedule of image enhancements that would
be mutually beneficial to both the Company and KFC. However, in furtherance of its negotiations
with KFC regarding the Companys required image enhancement obligations, on November 10, 2010 the
Company and KFC entered into a Pre-Negotiation Agreement outlining the conditions of reaching a
final agreement related to the Companys required image enhancement obligations.
Under the Pre-Negotiation Agreement KFC has agreed to forbear from terminating its franchise
agreements with the Company until January 31, 2011 as long as the Company is in compliance with
certain forbearance conditions, which include, among others, that (i) the Company is paid up on
amounts owing under the franchise agreements, (ii) the Company is not in default of its obligations
under the franchise agreements (other than the image enhancement obligations), and (iii) the
Company submits to KFC a written proposal within 30 days detailing how the Company will obtain the
necessary funds to enable it to comply with the Companys image enhancement obligations. [The
Company has timely provided KFC a written proposal and is awaiting further discussions with KFC.]
The Pre-Negotiation Agreement provides additional time for the Company to demonstrate to KFC the
Companys financial ability to complete image enhancements and to reach a definitive agreement
between the Company and KFC on a revised image enhancement schedule. As described above, as a
result of the Pre-Negotiation Agreement KFC will not exercise its termination rights until January
31, 2011.
While the Pre-Negotiation Agreement outlines generally the mutually acceptable terms of a final
agreement related to the Companys image enhancement obligations, there can be no assurance that
the Company (i) will be able to reach an agreement with KFC regarding image enhancements that would
extend the time periods for completion of the required image enhancements, or (ii) will complete
the restructuring or that the restructuring will create the ability for the Company to complete a
satisfactory number of image enhancements. If KFC exercises its termination rights, it
is unclear, what, if any, action the Companys landlords and creditors may take under
cross default provisions of the Companys agreements that would impede the Companys ability to
satisfy its obligations. The termination of those franchise agreements would have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. If an
agreement can be reached, the Company expects to restructure the financing of some of its
restaurants, including the conversion of a number of locations to sale/leasebacks, and to refinance
certain debt in order to enhance the Companys financial ability to continue its asset upgrade
progress.
In connection with the image enhancement program and negotiations, the Company has retained
Brookwood Associates, LLC as its financial advisor to evaluate alternatives for providing the
capital necessary for its capital improvements. The Company has paid a retainer to Brookwood which
can be applied to success fees generated by strategic objectives attained by them on behalf of the
Company. Brookwoods engagement began on November 23, 2010.
Capital expenditures to meet the image requirements of the franchisors and additional capital
expenditures on those same restaurants being image enhanced are a large portion of the Companys
annual capital expenditures. However, the Company also has made and may make capital expenditures
on restaurant properties not included on the foregoing schedule for upgrades or replacement of
capital items appropriate for the continued successful operation of its restaurants. The Company
may not be able to finance capital expenditures in the volume and time horizon required by the
image enhancement deadlines solely from existing cash balances and existing cash flow and the
Company expects that it will have to utilize financing for a portion of the capital expenditures.
The Company may use both debt and sale/leaseback financing but has no commitments for either.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to accomplish the image enhancements and
relocations required in the franchise agreements on terms acceptable to the Company. If the
Company is unable to meet the requirements of a franchise agreement, the franchisor may choose to
extend the time allowed for compliance or may terminate the franchise agreement for the affected
location.
10
NOTE 7 ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
The Company owns the land and building of two closed KFC restaurants and the land and building
adjacent to another of its restaurants, all of which are listed for sale and are shown on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet as Assets Held for Sale as of November 7, 2010.
NOTE 8 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to November 7, 2010 (i) the Company removed the Taco Bell brand from one of its KFC/Taco
Bell restaurants in Pennsylvania as management determined that the Taco Bell revenues at the
location were too low to profitably maintain the brand, (ii) the Company closed an unprofitable
Taco Bell restaurant in Pennsylvania by the early termination of its lease and (iii) the Company
closed an unprofitable KFC restaurant in St. Louis and sold the real estate formerly occupied by
the restaurant.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Description of Business. Morgans Foods, Inc. (the Company), which was formed in 1925,
operates through wholly-owned subsidiaries KFC restaurants under franchises from KFC Corporation,
Taco Bell restaurants under franchises from Taco Bell Corporation, Pizza Hut Express restaurants
under licenses from Pizza Hut Corporation and an A&W restaurant under a license from A&W
Restaurants, Inc. As of December 17, 2010, the Company operates 69 KFC restaurants, 5 Taco Bell
restaurants, 10 KFC/Taco Bell 2n1s under franchises from KFC Corporation and franchises or
licenses from Taco Bell Corporation, 3 Taco Bell/Pizza Hut Express 2n1s under franchises from
Taco Bell Corporation and licenses from Pizza Hut Corporation, 1 KFC/Pizza Hut Express 2n1 under
a franchise from KFC Corporation and a license from Pizza Hut Corporation and 1 KFC/A&W 2n1
operated under a franchise from KFC Corporation and a license from A&W Restaurants, Inc. The
Companys fiscal year is a 52 53 week year ending on the Sunday nearest the last day of February.
Summary of Expenses and Operating Income as a Percentage of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Thirty-six Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
November 7, 2010 |
|
|
November 8, 2009 |
|
|
November 7, 2010 |
|
|
November 8, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food, paper and beverage |
|
|
31.6 |
% |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
31.7 |
% |
Labor and benefits |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Restaurant operating expenses |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Revenues. The revenue increase of $612,000 in the quarter ended November 7, 2010 as
compared to the prior year quarter was primarily the result of a 3.9%, or $797,000, increase in
comparable restaurant revenues, partially offset by the permanent closing of one restaurant and the
temporary closing during the current year quarter of another restaurant for image enhancement. The
revenue decrease of $1,678,000 for the thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010 compared to the
thirty-six weeks ended November 8, 2009 was primarily the result of a 1.6%, or $1,076,000, decrease
in comparable restaurant revenues, as well as the permanent closing of two restaurants and the
temporary closing during the current year of three restaurants for image enhancement. The decline
in comparable restaurant revenues resulted primarily from higher sales in the prior year first
quarter during the introduction of grilled chicken (KGC) and a five and one half week national
advertising blackout during the second quarter of the current fiscal year.
Cost of Sales Food, Paper and Beverage. Food, paper and beverage costs increased as a
percentage of revenue to 31.6% for the quarter ended November 7, 2010 compared to 30.9% for the
quarter ended November 8, 2009. The increase in the current year quarter was primarily the result
of higher cost promotional items in the current year quarter as well as a slight increase in food
commodity costs. Food, paper and beverage costs for the thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010
decreased to 31.0% compared to 31.7% in the comparable prior year period primarily due to lower
average commodity costs during the current year period.
Cost of Sales Labor and Benefits. Labor and benefits increased as a percentage of
revenue for the quarter ended November 7, 2010 to 29.6% compared to 28.4% for the comparable year
earlier quarter. The increase was primarily due to the receipt, during the prior year third fiscal
quarter of a retrospective credit relating to prior years workers compensation insurance. Labor
and benefits increased to 29.0% of revenues for the thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010
compared to 28.0% in the comparable prior year period primarily due to decreased efficiencies
resulting from lower sales volume.
11
Restaurant Operating Expenses. Restaurant operating expenses increased slightly to 26.4%
of revenue in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to 26.0% in the third quarter of fiscal
2010 primarily due to higher manager bonuses resulting from higher sales volumes in the current
year period. For the thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010, restaurant operating expenses were
relatively unchanged as a percentage of revenue at 26.0% from 25.8% in the comparable prior year
period.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased to $571,000 for the
quarter and $1,866,000 for the thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010 compared to $685,000 for the
quarter and $2,113,000 for the thirty-six weeks ended November 8, 2009 primarily due to the greater
volume of assets becoming fully depreciated than new assets being acquired.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to
$1,402,000, or 6.6% of revenues, for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to $1,241,000, or
6.0% of revenues, in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to waiver fees and loan
modification expenses related to the second fiscal quarter. For the thirty-six weeks ended
November 7, 2010 general and administrative expenses were essentially unchanged at $4,141,000, or
6.4% of revenues, from $4,087,000, or 6.1% of revenues, in the comparable prior year period.
Loss on Restaurant Assets. The Company experienced a loss on restaurant assets of $39,000
for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to a gain of $9,000 for the third quarter of fiscal
2010. The current year amounts include $12,000 of loss related to the removal of the Taco Bell
concept at three restaurants and disposal of the assets of one restaurant. Prior year amounts
include reductions in the reserve for closed restaurants. The loss on restaurant assets for the
first thirty-six weeks of fiscal 2011 was $138,000 compared to a loss of $12,000 for the first
thirty-six weeks of fiscal 2010. Current year amounts consist mainly of reductions in the carrying
value of assets held for sale, the permanent closing of one restaurant, the sale of one restaurant
location and write offs caused by image enhancements. Prior year amounts reflect reductions in the
reserve for closed restaurants offset by a loss on the sale of one restaurant location and the
permanent closing of another.
Operating Income. Operating income in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 decreased to
$620,000, or 2.9% of revenues, compared to $1,112,000, or 5.4% of revenues, for the third quarter
of fiscal 2010 primarily due to the higher cost of sales items discussed above offset by a slight
increase in revenues in the current year period. Operating income for the thirty-six weeks ended
November 7, 2010 decreased to $2,915,000, or 4.5% of revenues, from $3,471,000, or 5.2% of
revenues, for the thirty-six weeks ended November 8, 2009 as a result of the items discussed above.
Interest Expense. The third quarter of fiscal 2010 contained a credit of $98,000
reflecting the return of fees related to the earlier payoff of certain debt compared to zero
expense in the comparable current year quarter. The thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010
contained fees related to the earlier payoff of certain debt in the amount of $98,000 compared to a
credit of $16,000 in the comparable prior year. The prior year credit amount consist of the
return, by a lender, of $98,000 of prepayment penalties which were charged in error offset by
$82,000 of prepayment charges and deferred financing cost write offs related to the early payoff of
debt. Interest expense on bank debt and notes payable including capitalized leases decreased to
$540,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 from $609,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 due
to lower debt balances in the current year. Interest expense on bank debt and notes payable
including capitalized leases for the thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010 was $1,683,000
compared to $1,875,000 for the comparable prior year period primarily for the reason discussed
above.
Other Income and Expense. Other income and expense was $63,000 of income for the
third quarter and expense of $9,000 for the first thirty-six weeks of fiscal 2011 compared to
income of $42,000 for the third quarter and income of $129,000 for the first thirty-six weeks of
fiscal 2010. Other expenses in the current year included $111,000 in charitable contributions to
the Susan G. Komen Foundation generated by KFCs Buckets for the Cure promotion during the first
quarter of fiscal 2011.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the quarter ended November
7, 2010 was $197,000 on pre-tax income of $143,000 compared to $217,000 on pre-tax income of
$643,000 for the comparable prior year period. The provision for income taxes is recorded at the
Companys projected annual effective tax rate and consists entirely of a deferred tax provision of
$197,000 compared to a current tax benefit of $4,000 and a deferred tax provision of $221,000 for
the comparable prior year period.
The provision for income taxes for the thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010 was $441,000 on
pre-tax income of $1,125,000 compared to $641,000 on pre-tax income of $1,741,000 for the
comparable prior year period. The components of the tax provision for the thirty-six weeks ended
November 7, 2010 were a current tax expense of $2,000 and deferred tax provision of $439,000
compared to a current income tax provision of $11,000 and a deferred tax provision of $630,000 for
the comparable prior year period.
The effective tax rate for the current year quarter is 138.0% compared to 33.8% the comparable
prior year period. The increase is caused by a change in projected full year pre-tax income which
increased the Companys projected full year effective tax rate from 24.8% based on the Companys
projection at the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to 38.9% based on current projections. The entire
change
in the estimated
12
full year effective tax rate applied to the Companys year to date pre-tax
income is recorded in the fiscal third quarter creating the unusually high tax rate for the third
quarter results. The changes in deferred taxes are non-cash items and do not affect the Companys
cash flow or cash balances.
Liquidity and Capital Resources. Cash provided by operating activities was $3,739,000 for
the thirty-six weeks ended November 7, 2010 compared to $3,843,000 for the thirty-six weeks ended
November 8, 2009. The decrease in operating cash flow was primarily the result of lower net income
in the current fiscal period, $191,000 less in cash provided by the change in deferred taxes,
$405,000 less in cash provided by the reduction of accounts receivable, $247,000 less of cash
provided by depreciation and amortization and $433,000 less cash provided by an increase in accrued
liabilities in the current year period compared the prior year period. These reductions were
partially offset by a $761,000 increase in cash provided by funding from supply agreements,
$126,000 more in cash provided by the disposal of restaurant assets, and $946,000 more in cash
provided by increases in accounts payable. The Company paid scheduled long-term bank and
capitalized lease debt of $2,331,000 and $451,000 of debt before its scheduled maturity in the
first thirty-six weeks of fiscal 2011 compared to payments of $2,256,000 and $306,000 for the same
period in fiscal 2010. Capital expenditures for the first thirty-six weeks of fiscal 2011 were
$1,603,000 less $234,000 of proceeds from the sale of assets, compared to $1,072,000 and $119,000,
respectively, for the same period in fiscal 2010. As of November 7, 2010 management believes that
it will not meet the deadlines for the remaining image enhancement projects scheduled through the
end of fiscal 2011 and is in discussions with one of its franchisors to obtain revised schedules.
Capital expenditure activity is discussed in more detail in Note 6 to the consolidated financial
statements.
The Companys debt arrangements require the maintenance of a consolidated fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1.20 to 1 regarding all of the Companys loans and the maintenance of individual
restaurant fixed charge coverage ratios of between 1.20 and 1.50 to 1 on certain of the Companys
individual restaurant loans. A portion of the Companys debt also contains a funded debt to
EBITDAR (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent) requirement of 5.5.
Fixed charge coverage ratios are calculated by dividing the cash flow before rent and debt service
for the previous 12 months by the debt service and rent due in the coming 12 months. In the
calculation of funded debt to EBITDAR, funded debt is the next twelve month operating lease
obligation times eight plus the debt balance at the measurement date. The funded debt is then
divided by the prior twelve month EBITDAR to obtain the calculated ratio. The consolidated and
individual ratios are all computed quarterly. The Company has previously entered into a loan
modification agreement covering a portion of its debt which decreased the fixed charge coverage
ratio to 1.10 and increased the funded debt to EBITDAR ratio to 6.0 from 5.5 through the first
quarter of fiscal 2012 and is in compliance with that requirement. The Company has obtained
waivers of its noncompliance covering the appropriate time frames for its other debt. In exchange
for the waivers the Company will pay certain fees. As of the measurement date of November 7, 2010,
the Companys consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.11 to 1, funded debt to EBITDAR was
5.9 and management projects that the Company will be in compliance with its consolidated debt
covenants, as modified or waived, at the relevant future measurement dates. As of November 7,
2010, the Company was not in compliance with the individual fixed charge coverage ratio on 19 of
its restaurant properties and has obtained waivers of these requirements covering a period of
longer than one year. The debt obligations of the Company which contain fixed charge coverage
ratio and funded debt to EBITDAR requirements are classified as long-term, except for the amounts
due within one year. If the Company does not comply with the covenants of its various debt
agreements in the future, and if future waivers or loan modifications are not obtained, the
respective lenders will have certain remedies available to them which include calling the debt,
increasing the interest rates and the acceleration of payments. Noncompliance with the
requirements of the Companys debt agreements, if not waived, could also trigger cross-default
provisions contained in the respective agreements.
On November 23, 2010, the Company engaged Brookwood Associates, LLP to act as its financial advisor
to evaluate alternatives for providing additional capital to fund its image enhancement program and
other corporate purposes. For additional information on this matter please see Note 6 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. Effective July 1, 2009, the FASB (Financial Accounting
Standards Board) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) (Topic 105, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles), became the single source for authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. During fiscal 2010, several Accounting Standards Updates (ASU) were
issued.
ASU 2010-05 January, 2010 Topic 718 Compensation-Stock Compensation
This update is a clarification of the treatment of escrowed share arrangements and provides
guidance on the presumption of compensation under such arrangements. The Company has determined
that the changes to the accounting standards required by this update do not have a material effect
on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
ASU 2010-06 January, 2010 Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
This update improves the disclosures regarding fair value measurements including information
regarding the level of disaggregation of assets and liabilities and the valuation methods being
employed. The provisions of this update are effective for the Companys fiscal year ending
February 27, 2011. Management is evaluating what effect, if any, the adoption of these provisions
will have on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
13
Seasonality. The operations of the Company are affected by seasonal fluctuations.
Historically, the Companys revenues and income have been highest during the summer months with the
fourth fiscal quarter representing the slowest period. This seasonality is primarily attributable
to weather conditions in the Companys marketplace, which consists of portions of Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Missouri, Illinois, West Virginia and New York.
Safe Harbor Statements. This report contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The statements include those identified by such words as may,
will, expect anticipate, believe, plan and other similar terminology. Forward looking
statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ
materially from those expressed or implied in this report. The forward-looking statements
reflect the Companys current expectations and are based upon data available at the time of the
statements. Actual results involve risks and uncertainties, including both those specific to the
Company and general economic and industry factors. Factors specific to the Company include, but
are not limited to, its debt covenant compliance, actions that lenders may take with respect to any
debt covenant violations, its ability to obtain waivers of any debt covenant violations and its
ability to pay all of its current and long-term obligations, the Companys ability to negotiate
extensions to franchisors image enhancement requirements and those factors described in Part I
Item 1A (Risk Factors) of the Companys annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 1,
2010. Economic and industry risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited, to, franchisor
promotions, business and economic conditions, legislation and governmental regulation, competition,
success of operating initiatives and advertising and promotional efforts, volatility of commodity
costs and increases in minimum wage and other operating costs, availability and cost of land and
construction, consumer preferences, spending patterns and demographic trends.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Certain of the Companys debt comprising approximately $12.6 million of principal balance has a
variable rate which is adjusted monthly. A one percent increase in the variable rate base (90 day
LIBOR) of the loans at the beginning of the year would cost the Company approximately $126,000 in
additional annual interest costs. The Company may choose to offset all, or a portion of the risk
through the use of interest rate swaps or caps. The Companys remaining borrowings are at fixed
interest rates, and accordingly the Company does not have market risk exposure for fluctuations in
interest rates relative to those loans. The Company does not enter into derivative financial
investments for trading or speculation purposes. Also, the Company is subject to volatility in
food costs as a result of market risk and we manage that risk through the use of a franchisee
purchasing cooperative which uses longer term purchasing contracts. Our ability to recover
increased costs through higher pricing is, at times, limited by the competitive environment in
which we operate. The Company believes that its market risk exposure is not material to the
Companys financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Principal Executive Officer (PEO) and Principal Financial Officer (PFO) carried out an
evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Companys PEO and PFO
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of November 7, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended November 7, 2010 that
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of
its business. The Company believes that the outcome of these matters will not have a material
adverse affect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 discusses the
risk factors facing the Company. There has been no material change in the risk factors facing our
business since February 28, 2010.
14
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders (removed and reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
The Company is saddened to note the death, on November 28, 2010, of Lawrence S. Dolin, a highly
respected Director of the Company. Mr. Dolin served as a Director of the Company since 1981 and
chaired the Audit Committee of the Board.
Item 6. Exhibits
Reference is made to Index to Exhibits, filed herewith.
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORGANS FOODS, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ Kenneth L. Hignett
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
|
|
December 22, 2010 |
|
16
MORGANS FOODS, INC.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
17