Lakeland Industries, Inc.
L
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To
Be Held on Wednesday, June 18, 2008
To Our
Stockholders:
WHAT:
|
Our
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
WHEN:
|
Wednesday,
June 18, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., local
time
|
3845
Veterans Memorial Highway
Ronkonkoma,
NY 11779
WHY:
|
At
this meeting, you will be asked to:
|
(1) Elect
three (3) directors for three years and until their respective successors have
been elected and qualified;
(2)
Approve the adoption of amendments to Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements applicable to
the approval of certain
business
combinations (the “Charter Amendment Proposal”);
(3)
Ratify the selection of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31,
2009;
(4) Vote
on any proposal to adjourn or postpone the annual meeting, if necessary,
including adjournments or postponements to provide additional time to solicit
additional proxies in favor of the Charter Amendment Proposal if there are not
sufficient votes for approval of the Charter Amendment Proposal at the annual
meeting; and
(5)
Transact any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders or any adjournments, postponements or reschedulings of the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
A
complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be open for
examination by our stockholders, during regular business hours, for a period of
ten days prior to the meeting, at 701 Koehler Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma,
NY 11779. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 27,
2008 will receive notice of, and be eligible to vote at, the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders or any adjournment thereof. The foregoing items of business are
more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this
notice.
Your
vote is important. Please read the proxy statement and the voting instructions
on the enclosed proxy card. Then, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders in person, and no matter how many shares you own, please
sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope,
which requires no additional postage if mailed in the United
States.
To reduce
the expense of delivering duplicate voting materials to our stockholders who may
have more than one Lakeland stock account, we may deliver only one set of the
proxy statement and the Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2008 to certain stockholders who share an address, unless otherwise
requested. A separate proxy card is included in the voting materials for each of
these stockholders. If your shares are registered directly in your name and you
share an address with another stockholder and have received only one set of
voting materials, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, please contact
Lakeland Industries, Inc. by telephone at (631) 981-9700 or by mail at 701
Koehler Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma, NY 11779, or alternatively, please contact
Investor Relations by telephone at (631) 367-1866 or by mail at
jdarrow@darrowir.com. If your shares were held in an account at a bank,
brokerage firm, or other agent or nominee and you have received only one set of
voting materials, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, please contact
your bank, broker or agent.
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
/s/
Christopher J. Ryan
|
|
|
|
Christopher J. Ryan
|
|
Secretary
|
May 16,
2008
Ronkonkoma,
New York
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Lakeland Industries, Inc.
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC.
701
Koehler Avenue, Suite 7
Ronkonkoma,
New York 11779
(631)
981-9700
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To
Be Held on Wednesday, June 18, 2008
WHY
DID YOU SEND ME THIS PROXY STATEMENT?
The Board
of Directors of Lakeland Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, seeks your
proxy for use in voting at our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual
Meeting”) or at any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. Our
Annual Meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn, located at 3845 Veterans
Memorial Highway, Ronkonkoma, NY 11779, on Wednesday, June 18, 2008 at
10:00 a.m., local time. We intend to begin mailing this proxy statement,
the attached notice of Annual Meeting and the accompanying white proxy card on
or about May 19, 2008 to all record holders of our common stock, par value
$0.01, entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Along with this proxy statement,
we are also sending our Annual Report on Form 10-K to stockholders for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 (the “Annual Report”).
WHAT
AM I VOTING ON?
At the
Annual Meeting, stockholders will act upon the:
(1) Election
of three (3) directors for three years and until their respective
successors have been elected and qualified;
(2) Approval
of the adoption of amendments to Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements applicable to
the approval of certain business combinations (the “Charter Amendment
Proposal”);
(3) Ratification
of the selection of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31,
2009;
(4) Any
proposal to adjourn or postpone the annual meeting, if necessary, including
adjournments or postponements to provide additional time to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the Charter Amendment Proposal if there are not sufficient
votes for approval of the Charter Amendment Proposal at the annual meeting;
and
(5) Transaction
of any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any
adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
WHO
CAN VOTE?
Only
holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on April 27,
2008, the record date, will receive notice of, and be entitled to vote at, our
Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the record date,
5,437,027 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote.
Our common stock is our only class of outstanding voting
securities.
Stockholder
of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name
If, on
April 27, 2008, your shares were registered directly in your name with our
transfer agent, The Registrar and Transfer Company, then you are a stockholder
of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the meeting or
vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to
sign, date and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card to ensure your vote is
counted.
Beneficial
Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or
Agent
If, on
April 27, 2008, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in an
account at a bank, brokerage firm, or other agent or nominee, then you are the
beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are
being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your
account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the
Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank,
broker or other agent or nominee on how to vote the shares in your account. You
are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the
stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting
unless you request and obtain a power of attorney or other proxy authority from
your bank, broker or other agent or nominee, and bring it to our Annual
Meeting.
WHAT
CONSTITUTES A QUORUM?
A quorum
of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present
if at least a majority of the outstanding shares are represented by stockholders
present at the meeting or by proxy. On the record date, there were
5,437,027 shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus, at least 2,718,514
shares must be represented by stockholders present at the meeting or by proxy to
have a quorum.
Your
shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or
one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee) or if you
vote in person at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted
towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, a majority of the votes
present at the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another date.
WHAT
ARE THE VOTING RIGHTS OF THE HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK?
In
deciding all matters, a holder of common stock on the record date will be
entitled to cast one vote for each share of common stock registered in that
holder’s name, on each matter to be voted upon at the Annual
Meeting.
WHAT
VOTE IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL?
Proposal No. 1,
the election of three directors, requires a plurality of the votes cast to elect
a director. The three nominees receiving the most “For” votes (among votes
properly cast in person or by proxy) will be elected. Only votes “For” will
affect the outcome. Withheld votes or broker non-votes, as described below, will
not affect the outcome of the vote on Proposal No. 1.
Proposal No. 2, approval
of the adoption of amendments to Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements applicable to
the approval of certain business combinations, requires the affirmative vote of
at least 66 2/3% of Lakeland common stock outstanding on the record
date.
Proposal
No. 3, the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm,
which will ratify the appointment of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm, must receive a “For” vote by the
majority of shares present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. If you
“Abstain” from voting, it will have the same effect as an “Against” vote. Broker
non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
Proposal
No. 4, the approval of any proposal to adjourn or postpone the annual meeting,
if necessary, including adjournments or postponements to provide additional time
to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Charter Amendment Proposal if
there are not sufficient votes for approval of the Charter Amendment Proposal at
the annual meeting, must receive a “For” vote by the majority of shares present
or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. If you “Abstain” from voting, it
will have the same effect as an “Against” vote. Broker non-votes will have no
effect on the outcome of the vote.
HOW
ARE VOTES COUNTED AND HOW ARE ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES
TREATED?
Votes
will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting,
who will separately count “For” votes, “Against” votes, abstentions, withheld
votes and broker non-votes.
Votes
withheld and abstentions are deemed as “present” at the Annual Meeting and are
counted for quorum purposes. Votes withheld and abstentions will have the same
effect as a vote against the matter with respect to Proposal No. 2,
Proposal No. 3, and Proposal 4, but will have no effect on
Proposal No. 1.
A “broker
non-vote” is when a broker votes in its discretion on one or more “routine”
matters, but does not receive instructions from a beneficial owner of shares as
to how to vote those shares on “non-routine” matters. Broker non-votes will be
counted for purposes of a quorum. As for the effect on the outcome of votes on
proposals, under the current Nasdaq Stock Market rules, brokers have
discretionary voting power to vote without receiving voting instructions from
the owner on “routine” matters, but not on “non-
routine”
matters. Routine matters include, among other things, the uncontested election
of directors and the ratification of the appointment of independent registered
public accountants. There are no non-routine matters being voted on
at this Annual Meeting. This means that if you hold your shares through a
broker, bank or other nominee (that is, in “street name”), and do not provide
voting instructions by the tenth day before the Annual Meeting, the broker, bank
or other nominee will have the discretion to vote your shares on
Proposal No. 1, Proposal No. 2, Proposal No. 3 and Proposal
4.
WHO
WILL BEAR THE COSTS OF SOLICITING PROXIES FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING?
We are
soliciting the proxies and will bear the entire cost of this solicitation,
including the preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this proxy
statement and any additional materials furnished to our
stockholders. The Company has retained Georgeson, Inc., a proxy
solicitation firm, for assistance in connection with the solicitation of proxies
for the Annual Meeting at a cost of $7,500 plus reimbursement of reasonable out
of pocket expenses. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may
be solicited personally or by telephone by officers and employees of the Company
who will not receive any additional compensation for their services. Proxies and
proxy material will also be distributed at our expense by brokers, nominees,
custodians, and other similar parties.
HOW
DO I VOTE IF I ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING?
If you
are a stockholder of record, you can attend the Annual Meeting and vote in
person the shares you hold directly in your name on any matters properly brought
before the Annual Meeting. If you choose to do that, please bring the enclosed
WHITE proxy card or proof of identification. If you want to vote in person at
our Annual Meeting and you hold our common stock through a bank, broker or other
agent or nominee, you must obtain a power of attorney or other proxy authority
from that organization and bring it to our Annual Meeting. Follow the
instructions from your bank, broker or other agent or nominee included with
these proxy materials, or contact your bank, broker or other agent or nominee to
request a power of attorney or other proxy authority. If you vote in person at
the Annual Meeting, you will revoke any prior proxy you may have
submitted.
HOW
DO I VOTE IF I DO NOT ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING?
Stockholders
of record who do not attend the Annual Meeting should vote by mail: Please sign,
date and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid
return envelope.
By
executing and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card, you are authorizing the
individuals listed on the WHITE proxy card to vote your shares in accordance
with your instructions.
If you
are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your bank, broker or
other agent or nominee, you should have received a WHITE proxy card and voting
instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from
us. Simply complete and mail the proxy card to ensure that your vote is counted.
If you did not receive a white proxy card, please follow the instructions from
your bank, broker or other agent or nominee included with these proxy materials,
or contact your bank, broker or other agent or nominee to request a proxy
card.
WHAT
IF I DO NOT SPECIFY HOW MY SHARES ARE TO BE VOTED ON THE PROXY
CARD?
If you
return a signed and dated WHITE proxy card without marking any voting
selections, your shares will be voted as follows:
(1) FOR the election of the three
nominees for director proposed by the Board of Directors;
(2) FOR the approval of the
adoption of amendments to Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to
eliminate the supermajority voting requirements applicable to the approval of
certain business combinations;
(3) FOR the ratification of the
selection of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009; and
(4) FOR any proposal to adjourn or
postpone the annual meeting, if necessary, including adjournments or
postponements to provide additional time to solicit additional proxies in favor
of the Charter Amendment Proposal if there are not sufficient votes for approval
of the Charter Amendment Proposal at the annual meeting, except that no proxy
voted against the Charter Amendment Proposal will be voted in favor of any
adjournment or postponement; and
If any
other matter is properly presented at the meeting, the individuals named on your
proxy card will vote your shares using their best judgment.
YOUR
VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT, NO MATTER HOW MANY OR HOW FEW SHARES YOU OWN.
PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED WHITE PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED
POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROMPTLY.
WHAT
DOES IT MEAN IF I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE PROXY CARD FROM LAKELAND?
If you
receive more than one proxy card from us or your bank, your shares are
registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. Please
complete, sign and return each WHITE proxy card to ensure that all of your
shares are voted.
HAS
THE LAKELAND BOARD OF DIRECTORS MADE A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE MATTERS TO
BE ACTED UPON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?
Our Board
of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of its three nominees
for director, “FOR” the adoption of amendments to Lakeland’s Restated
Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirements
applicable to the approval of certain business combinations, “FOR” the
ratification of the selection of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
January 31, 2009, and “FOR” any proposal to adjourn or postpone the annual
meeting, if necessary, including adjournments or postponements to provide
additional time to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Charter Amendment
Proposal if there are not sufficient votes for approval of the Charter Amendment
Proposal at the annual meeting. Please vote on the enclosed WHITE proxy
card.
CAN
I CHANGE MY VOTE?
Yes. You
may revoke your proxy by doing any of the following:
(1) You
may send a written notice that you are revoking your proxy to our Corporate
Secretary at the address indicated below, so long as it is received prior to the
Annual Meeting.
(2) You
may submit another properly completed proxy card with a later date to the
Company, so long as it is received prior to the Annual Meeting.
(3) You
may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. Simply attending the meeting
will not, by itself, revoke your proxy.
Any
written notice of revocation, or later dated WHITE proxy card, should be
delivered to:
Lakeland
Industries, Inc.
701
Koehler Avenue, Suite 7
Ronkonkoma,
New York 11779
Attention:
Christopher J. Ryan, Secretary
If your
shares are held by your broker or bank as a nominee or agent, you should follow
the instructions provided by your broker or bank.
HOW
CAN I FIND OUT THE RESULTS OF THE VOTING AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?
Preliminary
voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results
will be published in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second
quarter of FY 2009 ending July 31, 2008.
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
GENERAL
Our Board
of Directors, or the Board, consists of seven directors. As indicated below,
each nominee will be elected for a three-year term, which will expire at the
2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected
and qualified or until any such director’s earlier resignation or removal. Our
Board’s nominees are Christopher J. Ryan, CEO, President, General Counsel and
Secretary; Michael Cirenza, Audit Committee Chairman and director/member of the
Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees; and A. John
Kreft, Director/member of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance
Committee, all of whom are currently serving as
Directors. Our Nominating and Governance Committee (excluding members
who are nominees) considered the qualifications of each of the Board’s nominees
for election at the Annual Meeting, and unanimously recommended that each
nominee be submitted for re-election to the Board.
Directors
are elected by a plurality of the votes properly cast in person or by proxy. If
a quorum is present and voting, the three nominees receiving the highest number
of affirmative votes will be elected. Shares represented by executed WHITE proxy
cards will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of
the three nominees named below. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no
effect on the votes. If any Board nominee becomes unavailable for election as a
result of an unexpected occurrence, your shares will be voted for the election
of a substitute nominee determined by our Board. Each person nominated by the
Board for election has agreed to serve if elected. We have no reason to believe
that any Board nominee will be unable to serve.
The name
and age of each director nominee, his position with us and the year in which he
first became a director is set forth below:
INCUMBENT
DIRECTORS - CLASS I
Terms
Expiring in June 2008
_________________________________________
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Director
Since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
J. Ryan
|
|
56
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer,
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
|
President,
General Counsel,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secretary
and Director
|
|
|
Michael
E. Cirenza
|
|
52
|
|
Director
|
|
2003
|
A.
John Kreft
|
|
57
|
|
Director
|
|
2004
|
The
principal occupations and employment of the nominees for director are set forth
below:
Nominee
Directors
Christopher J. Ryan has
served as our Chief Executive Officer and President of Lakeland since February
1, 2004, Secretary since April 1991, General Counsel since February 2000 and a
director since May 1986. Mr. Ryan was our Executive Vice President -
Finance from May 1986 until becoming our President on February 1, 2004 and his
term as director will expire at our annual meeting of stockholders in 2008. Mr.
Ryan also worked as a Corporate Finance Partner at Furman Selz Mager Dietz &
Birney, Senior Vice President-Corporate Finance at Laidlaw Adams & Peck,
Inc., Managing-Corporate Finance Director of Brean Murray Foster Securities, Inc
and Senior Vice President-Corporate Finance of Rodman & Renshaw,
respectively between 1983-1990. Mr. Ryan has served as a Director of Lessing,
Inc., a privately held restaurant chain based in New York, since 1995. Mr. Ryan
received his MBA from Columbia Business School and his J.D. from Vanderbilt Law
School. Mr. Ryan is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors
(NACD).
Michael E. Cirenza has been a
Partner at the accounting firm of Anchin, Block and Anchin since March 2007 and
was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Country Life,
LLC, a manufacturer and distributor of vitamins and nutritional supplements,
from September 2002 until March 2007. Mr. Cirenza was the Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Resilien, Inc., an independent
distributor of computers, components and peripherals from January 2000 to
September 2002. He was an Audit Partner with the international accounting firm
of Grant Thornton LLP from August 1993 to January 2000 and an Audit
Manager
with
Grant Thornton LLP from May 1989 to August 1993. Mr. Cirenza was employed by the
international accounting firm of Pricewaterhouse from July 1980 to May 1989. Mr.
Cirenza is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of New York and a member
of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the New York State
Society of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Cirenza has served as
one of our directors since June 18, 2003 and his term as a director will expire
at our annual meeting of stockholders in 2008. Mr. Cirenza received his MBA from
Cornell University Johnson School of Management in 1980.
A. John Kreft has been
President of Kreft Interests, a Houston based private investment firm, since
2001. Between 1998 and 2001, he was CEO of Baker Kreft Securities, LLC, a NASD
broker-dealer. From 1996 to 1998, he was a co-founder and manager of TriCap
Partners, a Houston based venture capital firm. From 1994 to 1996 he was
employed as a director at Alex Brown and Sons. He also held senior positions at
CS First Boston including employment as a managing director from 1989 to
1994. Mr. Kreft has served as a director since November 17, 2004 and
his term as a director will expire at our annual meeting of Stockholders June
2008. Mr. Kreft received his MBA from the Wharton School of Business in 1975.
Mr. Kreft is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors
(NACD).
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE
ELECTION OF THE CLASS I NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.
INCUMBENT
DIRECTORS- CLASS III
Terms
Expiring in June 2010
_________________________________________
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Director
Since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond
J. Smith
|
|
68
|
|
Chairman of the
Board of
Directors
|
|
1982
|
INCUMBENT
DIRECTORS - CLASS II
Terms
Expiring in June 2009
__________________________________________
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Director
Since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen
M. Bachelder
|
|
56
|
|
Director
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
J. Collins, Jr.
|
|
64
|
|
Director
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric
O. Hallman
|
|
63
|
|
Director
|
|
1982
|
Incumbent
Directors
Raymond J. Smith, one of our
co-founders of Lakeland, has been Chairman of our Board of Directors since our
incorporation in 1982 and was President from 1982 to January 31,
2004. Prior to starting Lakeland, Mr. Smith was a Sales Executive
with the International Paper Company (NYSE: IP) from 1961 to 1966, then the
President of Abandaco, Inc. from 1966 to 1982. Mr. Smith received his B.A. from
Georgetown University in 1960. Mr. Smith has served as a director since 1982 and
his term as a director will expire at our annual meeting of stockholder in
2010.
Stephen M. Bachelder was with
Swiftview, Inc. a Portland, Oregon based software company from 1999-2007 and
President since 2002. Swiftview, Inc. was sold to a private equity firm in
October 2006. Mr. Bachelder is currently working on plans for a new venture.
From 1991 to 1999 Mr. Bachelder ran a consulting firm advising technology
companies in the Pacific Northwest. Mr. Bachelder was the president and owner of
an apparel company, Bachelder Imports, from 1982 to 1991 and worked in executive
positions for Giant Foods, Inc. and Pepsico, Inc. between 1976 and 1982. Mr.
Bachelder is a 1976 Graduate of the Harvard Business School. Mr.
Bachelder has served as a director since 2004 and his term as a director will
expire at our annual meeting of stockholders in June 2009.
John J. Collins, Jr. was
Executive Vice President of Chapdelaine GSI, a government securities firm, from
1977 to January 1987. He was Senior Vice President of Liberty Brokerage, a
government securities firm, between January 1987 and November
1998. Presently, Mr. Collins is self-employed, managing a direct
investment portfolio of small business enterprises for his own
accounts. Mr. Collins has served as one of our directors since 1986
and his term as a director will expire at our annual meeting of stockholders in
June 2009.
Eric O. Hallman was President
of Naess Hallman Inc., a ship brokering firm, from 1974 to 1991 owned equally by
Arne Naess and Mr. Hallman. Mr. Hallman was also affiliated between 1991 and
1992 with Finanshuset (U.S.A.), Inc., a ship brokering and international
financial services and consulting concern, and was the Owners Representative of
Sylvan Lawrence, the then largest privately owned commercial real estate
development company in New York City, between 1992 and 1998. Between 1998 and
2000, Mr. Hallman was President of PREMCO, a real estate management company, and
currently is Comptroller of the law firm Murphy, Bartol & O’Brien,
LLP. Mr. Hallman has served as one of our directors since our
incorporation in 1982 and his term as a director will expire at our annual
meeting of stockholders in June 2009.
DIRECTORS’
COMPENSATION
Members of the Board of Directors, in
their capacity as directors, are reimbursed for all travel expenses to and from
meetings of the Board or Committee meetings. Non-Employee or Outside
Directors received $6,250 quarterly as compensation for serving on the Board and
its committees, committee chairmen receive an additional $500 quarterly. In
addition, Directors receive only $500 if they attend meetings by telephone, but
$1,500 for meetings attended in person. There are no charitable award or
director legacy programs and no deferred compensation programs for Directors. In
their deliberations relating to directors’ compensation, the Compensation
Committee reviewed a study conducted by the National Association of Corporate
Directors and the Center for Board Leadership, entitled “2006-2007 Director
Compensation Report”. Messrs. Collins, Hallman, Raleigh, Cirenza, Kreft, and
Bachelder participate in our Non-Employee Directors' Option Plan and 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan.
The following table sets forth
compensation information for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 (sometimes
referred to in this proxy statement as “FY08”) for each member of the Board of
Directors who is not also an executive officer. Raymond J. Smith and
Christopher J. Ryan, as employee directors, are not compensated for their
service on our Board. Disclosures relating to compensation for
Messrs. Smith and Ryan can be found in “Executive Officers – Executive
Compensation” below.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL 2008
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or Paid in Cash*
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
|
|
|
Change
in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Earnings
|
|
|
All
Other Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
(1)
|
|
|
($)(1)(2)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
Eric
O. Hallman
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
11,528 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
45,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
John
J. Collins
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
9,607 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
43,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
Michael
Cirenza
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
11,528 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
45,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
A.
John Kreft
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
14,310 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
47,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
Stephen
Bachelder
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
9,607 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
43,607 |
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
the dollar amount recognized by us for financial statement purposes for
fiscal 2008 in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payments (“SFAS
123 (R)”).
|
|
(2)
|
At
January 31, 2008 our non-employee directors owned the following
unexercised options: Mr. Hallman 2,431, Mr. Collins 2,431, Mr.
Cirenza 605, Mr. Kreft 6,050, Mr. Bachelder
6,050.
|
We
currently grant stock options to our directors under our non-employee directors’
option plan (the “Directors’ Plan”), which provides for an automatic one-time
grant of options to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock to each non-employee
director newly elected or appointed to the Board of Directors. Under the
Directors’ Plan, 60,000 shares of common stock have been authorized for
issuance. Options are granted at not less than fair market value, become
exercisable commencing six months from the date of grant and expire six years
from the date of grant. In addition, all non-employee directors re-elected to
the Company’s Board of Directors at any annual meeting of the stockholders will
automatically be granted additional options to purchase 1,000 shares of common
stock on each of such dates. No grants were made pursuant to the
Directors’ Plan in 2008.
The
following table sets forth information with respect to outstanding unvested
performance based awards under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan that were made to
our non-employee directors in June 2006 that are represented in the number of
minimum, baseline and maximum number of shares that may be awarded at the end of
the performance cycle in June 2009.
Grantee
Directors
|
|
Minimum#
of Shares (1)
|
|
|
Baseline#
of Shares
|
|
|
Maximum
# of Shares
|
|
Michael
M. Cirenza
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
John
J. Collins, Jr.
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
Eric
O. Hallman
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
Stephen
M. Bachelder
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
A.
John Kreft
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
|
(1)
|
Based
on our closing stock price on January 31, 2008, at the minimum level these
awards have the following values, Messrs. Cirenza, Hallman and Bachelder:
$26,030; Messrs. Collins and Kreft:
$21,692.
|
Director
Independence
Our Board
is composed of seven directors. As required under the Marketplace Rules of the
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”), a majority of the members of a NASDAQ listed
company’s board of directors must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively
determined by the Company. Our Board consults with our counsel to ensure that
the Board’s determinations are consistent with all relevant securities and other
laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent,” including those
set forth in pertinent NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, as in effect from time to
time.
Consistent
with these considerations, after review of all relevant transactions or
relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, our
senior management and our independent registered public accounting firm, the
Board affirmatively has determined that, other than Raymond J. Smith, Chairman
and founder of the Company and Christopher J. Ryan, who is our CEO, President,
General Counsel and Secretary, each of the members of our Board is an
independent director for purposes of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. In making
this determination, the Board found that none of these directors or nominees for
director has a direct or indirect material or other disqualifying relationship
with us, which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise
of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The
Board holds executive sessions of its independent directors when it deems
necessary but at least once per year.
Board
and Committee Meetings and Attendance
The Board
has three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and
a Nominating and Governance Committee. Each of these committees operates under a
written charter adopted by the Board. Copies of these charters are available on
our website at
www.lakeland.com under the headings Financial Information – Corporate
Governance. Board committee charters are also available in print to stockholders
upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary, at 701 Koehler Avenue, Suite
7, Ronkonkoma, New York 11779.
The Board
held seven meetings during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008. Each director
attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and of the
committees, on which he served, held during the period for which he was a
director or committee member, respectively. The following table sets forth the
standing committees of the Board, the number of meetings held by each committee
and the membership of each committee during the year ended January 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Governance
|
|
|
Michael
Cirenza
|
|
Chairman
|
|
Member
|
|
Member
|
Alfred
J. Kreft
|
|
Member
|
|
Member
|
|
Member
|
Stephen
Bachelder
|
|
Member
|
|
Member
|
|
Chairman
|
Eric
O. Hallman
|
|
Member
|
|
Chairman
|
|
Member
|
John
J. Collins
|
|
Member
|
|
Member
|
|
Member
|
Number
of Meetings held in 2008
|
|
6
|
|
3
|
|
2
|
Audit
Committee
Our Audit
Committee currently consists of Michael Cirenza (Chairman), A. John Kreft,
Stephen Bachelder, Eric O. Hallman and John J. Collins. The Board annually
reviews the definition of independence for Audit Committee members
and has determined that all members of our Audit Committee are independent (as
independence is currently defined in Rule 4350(d)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) of
the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules). Our Board has determined that Mr. Cirenza is
an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined in applicable
rules and regulations based on, among other things, his education and experience
as a partner in the accounting firms of Grant Thornton and Anchin, Block and
Anchin LP and as chief financial officer of Country Life LCC which was sold in
2006 and Resilien Inc. prior to that.
The
formal report of our Audit Committee is included in this proxy statement. The
Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:
|
•
|
the
oversight of the quality of our financial statements and our compliance
with legal and regulatory
requirements;
|
|
•
|
the
selection, evaluation and oversight of our independent registered public
accountants, including conducting a review of their independence,
determining fees for our independent registered public accountants,
overseeing the independent registered public accountants’ audit work, and
reviewing and pre-approving any non-audit services that may be performed
by them;
|
|
•
|
the
oversight of annual audit and quarterly reviews, including review of our
consolidated financial statements, our critical accounting policies and
the application of accounting principles and any material related-party
transactions; and
|
|
•
|
the
oversight of financial reporting process and internal controls, including
a review of the adequacy of our accounting and internal controls and
procedures.
|
Compensation
Committee
Our
Compensation Committee currently consists of Eric O. Hallman (Chairman), A. John
Kreft, Michael Cirenza, Stephen Bachelder and John J. Collins, each of whom is
an independent director (as independence is currently defined in
rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules). This proxy statement
includes the report of our Compensation Committee and management’s Compensation
Discussion & Analysis, which focuses on executive compensation. Our
Compensation Committee’s role includes setting and administering the policies
governing the compensation of executive officers, including cash compensation
and equity incentive programs, and reviewing and establishing the compensation
of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. Our Compensation
Committee’s principal responsibilities, which have been authorized by the Board,
are:
|
•
|
approving
the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive
officers (after considering the recommendation of our Chief Executive
Officer with respect to the form and amount of compensation for executive
officers other than the Chief Executive
Officer);
|
|
•
|
approving
the amount of and vesting of equity awards;
and
|
|
•
|
advising
the Board on our compensation and benefits matters, including making
recommendations and decisions where authority has been granted regarding
our restricted stock plan, bonuses and incentive compensation
plans.
|
Our
Compensation Committee does not delegate any of its responsibilities to other
committees or persons. Participation by executive officers in the recommendation
or determination of compensation for executive officers or directors is limited
to (i) recommendations our Chief Executive Officer makes to our
Compensation Committee regarding the compensation of executive officers other
than himself and (ii) our Chief Executive Officer’s participation in Board
determinations of non-employee directors.
Nominating
and Governance Committee
Our
Nominating and Governance Committee currently consists of Stephen Bachelder
(Chairman), A. John Kreft, Michael Cirenza, Eric O. Hallman and John J. Collins,
each of whom is an independent director (as independence is currently defined in
Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules). The purpose of the
Nominating and Governance Committee is to identify, screen and recommend to the
Board qualified candidates to serve as directors, to develop and recommend to
the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to us, and to
oversee corporate governance and other organizational matters. The Nominating
and Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other
things:
|
•
|
reviewing
qualified candidates to serve as
directors;
|
|
•
|
aiding
in attracting qualified candidates to serve on the
Board;
|
|
•
|
considering,
reviewing and investigating (including with respect to potential conflicts
of interest of prospective candidates) and either accepting or rejecting
candidates suggested by our stockholders, directors, officers, employees
and others;
|
|
•
|
recommending
to the full Board nominees for new and vacant positions on the Board and
providing profiles of the qualifications of the
candidates;
|
|
•
|
Monitoring
our overall corporate governance and corporate compliance
program;
|
|
•
|
reviewing
and adopting policies governing the qualification and composition of the
Board;
|
|
•
|
recommending
remuneration for non-employee Board
members;
|
|
•
|
reviewing
and making recommendations to the Board regarding Board structure,
including establishing criteria for committee membership, recommending
processes for new Board member orientation, and reviewing and monitoring
the performance of incumbent
directors;
|
|
•
|
recommending
to the Board action with respect to implementing resignation, retention
and retirement policies of the
Board;
|
|
•
|
reviewing
the role and effectiveness of the Board, the respective Board committees
and the directors in our corporate governance
process; and
|
|
•
|
reviewing
and making recommendations to the Board regarding the nature and duties of
Board committees, including evaluating the committee charters,
recommending appointments to committees, and recommending the appropriate
chairperson for the Board.
|
Director
Nomination Procedures
The
Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates
recommended by stockholders. In considering candidates submitted by
stockholders, the Nominating and Governance Committee will take into
consideration the needs of the Board and the qualifications of the candidate.
The Nominating and Governance Committee may also take into consideration the
number of shares held by the recommending stockholder and the length of time
that such shares have been held. To have a candidate considered by the
Nominating and Governance Committee, a stockholder must submit the
recommendation in writing and must include the following
information:
|
•
|
the
name of the stockholder and evidence of the person’s ownership of our
stock, including the number of shares owned and the length of time of
ownership;
|
|
•
|
the
name of the candidate, the candidate’s written detailed resume and a
listing of his or her qualifications to be a director of the company and
the person’s consent to be named as a director if selected by the
Nominating and Governance Committee; and nominated by the
Board; and
|
|
•
|
the
written consent of the proposed candidate to be named as a nominee and to
serve as a director if elected.
|
The
stockholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to the
Corporate Secretary at 701 Koehler Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma, New York 11779
and must be received by the Corporate Secretary before January 31st of the
calendar year.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the minimum qualifications for
serving as a director are that a nominee demonstrate, by significant
accomplishment in his or her field, an ability to make a meaningful contribution
to the Board’s oversight of the business and affairs of Lakeland and have an
impeccable record and reputation for honest and ethical conduct in both his or
her professional and personal activities. In addition, the Nominating and
Governance Committee examines a candidate’s specific experiences and skills,
relevant industry background and knowledge, time availability in light of other
commitments, potential conflicts of interest, interpersonal skills and
compatibility with the Board, and independence from management and the company.
The Nominating and Governance Committee also seeks to have the Board represent a
diversity of backgrounds and experience.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee identifies potential nominees through
independent research and through consultation with current directors and
executive officers and other professional colleagues. The Nominating and
Governance Committee looks for persons meeting the criteria above, and takes
note of individuals who have had a change in circumstances that might make
them
available
to serve on the Board — for example, retirement as a Chief Executive
Officer or Chief Financial Officer of a company. The Nominating and Governance
Committee also, from time to time, may engage firms that specialize in
identifying director candidates. As described above, the Nominating and
Governance Committee will also consider candidates recommended by
stockholders.
Once a
person has been identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee as a
potential candidate, the committee may collect and review publicly available
information regarding the person to assess whether the person should be
considered further. If the Nominating and Governance Committee determines that
the candidate warrants further consideration by the committee, the Chairman or
another member of the committee contacts the person. Generally, if the person
expresses a willingness to be considered and to serve on the Board, the
Nominating and Governance Committee requests a resume and other information from
the candidate, reviews the person’s accomplishments and qualifications,
including in light of any other candidates that the committee might be
considering. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also conduct one or
more interviews with the candidate, either in person, telephonically or both. In
certain instances, Nominating and Governance Committee members may conduct a
background check, may contact one or more references provided by the candidate
or may contact other members of the business community or other persons that may
have greater first-hand knowledge of the candidate’s accomplishments. The
Nominating and Governance Committee’s evaluation process does not vary based on
whether or not a candidate is recommended by a stockholder, although, as stated
above, the committee may take into consideration the number of shares held by
the recommending stockholder and the length of time that such shares have been
held.
Stockholder
Communications with Directors
The Board
has established a process to receive communications from stockholders.
Stockholders may contact any member (or all members) of the Board by mail. To
communicate with the Board, any individual director or any group or committee of
directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board or any such
individual director or group or committee of directors by either name or title.
All such correspondence should be sent “c/o Corporate Secretary,” 701 Koehler
Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma, New York 11779.
All
communications received as set forth in the preceding paragraph will be opened
by the office of our Corporate Secretary for the sole purpose of determining
whether the contents represent a message to our directors. Any contents that are
not in the nature of advertising, promotions of a product or service, or
patently offensive material will be forwarded promptly to the addressee. In the
case of communications to the Board or any group or committee of directors, the
Corporate Secretary’s office will make sufficient copies of the contents to send
to each director who is a member of the group or committee to which the envelope
is addressed.
Director
Attendance at Annual Stockholder Meetings
We expect
that each of our directors attend our Annual Stockholder Meetings, as provided
in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. All of our directors were in attendance
at the June 20, 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Corporate
Governance Guidelines and Practices
We are
committed to good corporate governance practices and as such we have adopted
formal Corporate Governance Guidelines. A copy of the Corporate Governance
Guidelines may be found at our website at www.lakeland.com by following the
headings “Financial Information/Corporate Governance.” Below are some highlights
of our corporate governance guidelines and practices:
|
•
|
Board
Independence. We believe that the Board should be
comprised of a substantial majority of independent directors and that no
more than two management executives may serve on the Board at the same
time. Currently, the Board has seven directors, five of whom are
independent directors under the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and only two of
whom are members of management.
|
|
•
|
Board
Committees. All of our Board committees consist entirely
of independent directors.
|
|
•
|
Chairman, CEO and Lead
Independent Director. The offices of Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer are held by two different people. In our case
the Chairman is not an independent director, thus the Board’s policy is to
designate one of the independent directors to serve as the Lead
Independent Director to preside at executive sessions of the independent
directors.
|
|
•
|
Executive Session of
Independent Directors. The Board’s current practice is
to hold an executive session of its independent directors at least once a
year. In FY 2008, the independent members of our Board met in executive
session three times.
|
|
•
|
Independent
Advisors. The Board and each committee has the power to
hire independent legal, financial or other advisors at any time as they
deem necessary and appropriate to fulfill their Board and committee
responsibilities.
|
|
•
|
Directors Are Subject to our
Code of Conduct. Board members must act at all times in
accordance with the requirements of our Code of Conduct. This obligation
includes adherence to our policies with respect to conflicts of interest,
ethical conduct in business dealings and respect for and compliance with
applicable law. Any requested waiver of the requirements of the Code of
Conduct with respect to any individual director or executive officer must
be reported to, and subject to, the approval of the Board, or the Audit
Committee.
|
|
•
|
Board
Engagement. The Board has regularly scheduled
presentations from our finance, products, sales and marketing departments.
The Board’s annual agenda also includes, among other items, the long-term
strategic plan for us as well as management succession
planning.
|
|
•
|
No Corporate
Loans. Our stock plans and practices prohibit us from
making corporate loans to employees for the exercise of stock options or
for any other purpose.
|
|
•
|
New Director
Orientation. New directors are provided with orientation
information designed to familiarize new directors with our businesses,
strategies and challenges, and to assist new directors in developing and
maintaining the skills necessary or appropriate for the performance of
their responsibilities.
|
Code
of Conduct
The Board
adopted our Code of Conduct on December 1, 2000 that applies to all officers,
directors and employees. The Code of Conduct is available on our website at
www.lakeland.com under the headings “Financial Information/Corporate
Governance.” Amendments to, and waivers from, the Code of Conduct will be
disclosed at the same website address provided above and in such filings as may
be required pursuant to applicable law or listing standards. We intend to
satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05(c) of Form 8-K regarding
certain amendments to, or waivers from a provision of this code of ethics by
posting such information on our website at www.lakeland.com under “Corporate
Governance”.
Whistleblower
Procedures
In
accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee has
established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and for
the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding
accounting or auditing matters. We have established a confidential email and
hotline for employees to report violations of our Code of Conduct or other
company policy and to report any ethical concerns.
Director
and Executive Officer Stock Transactions
Under the regulations of the SEC,
directors and executive officers are required to file notice with the SEC within
two (2) business days of any purchase or sale of the Company’s stock.
Information on filings made by any of our directors or executive officers can be
found on the Company’s website at http://www.lakeland.com under “Investor
Relations” then “Insiders.”
RECOMMENDATION
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE
ELECTION
OF THE BOARD’S THREE NOMINEES IDENTIFIED ABOVE
IN
PROPOSAL NO. 1 ON THE WHITE PROXY CARD
AMENDMENTS
TO LAKELAND’S
RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO
ELIMINATE
THE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINED
THEREIN APPLICABLE TO THE APPROVAL
OF
CERTAIN BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
The Board
of Directors recommends that Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation be
amended to repeal the supermajority voting requirements contained in Article
TWELFTH that are applicable to the approval of certain business
combinations. Article TWELFTH of Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of
Incorporation currently requires a 66 2/3% supermajority vote of the outstanding
shares of Lakeland’s common stock for the approval of certain business
combinations with persons who beneficially own more than five percent (5%) of
Lakeland’s common stock (each, a “Related Person”), unless the transaction is
approved by the affirmative vote of 66 2/3% of the directors who were directors
prior to the acquisition of the more than five percent (5%) beneficial ownership
by such Related Persons.
Supermajority
voting requirements, like those contained in Article TWELFTH of Lakeland’s
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, applicable to the approval of certain
business combinations, are a form of anti-takeover measure designed to help
companies defend against and inhibit abusive conduct on the part of a potential
acquirer and are intended to protect stockholders against practices that do not
treat all stockholders fairly and equally, including, among other types of
transactions, inadequate or coercive, two-tiered tender offers and self-dealing
transactions. In a coercive, two-tiered tender offer, a potential
acquirer will offer one price for the shares needed to gain a “toehold” or
control of a target company and then offer a lower price or other less favorable
consideration for the remaining shares, thereby creating pressure for
stockholders to tender their shares for the tender offer price, regardless of
their value.
Accordingly,
Lakeland’s supermajority voting requirements applicable to business combinations
were designed to provide safeguards to:
(i) ensure
that a proposal from a Related Person expected to result in a business
combination would have to be scrutinized and approved by the disinterested
directors on the Lakeland Board;
(ii) encourage
a potential acquirer, considering an unsolicited bid to acquire Lakeland, to
negotiate with the Lakeland Board in arm’s-length discussions;
(iii) preserve
the ability of the Lakeland Board to properly evaluate an acquisition offer and
determine whether such an offer reflects the full value of Lakeland and is fair
to, and in the best interests of, all stockholders;
(iv) enhance
negotiating leverage of the Lakeland Board to engage in discussions with a
potential acquirer; and
(v) protect
Lakeland’s stockholders from the use of unfair, abusive and coercive takeover
tactics.
Section
203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law ("DGCL") contains provisions that
provide similar protection to those provided by Article TWELFTH of Lakeland’s
Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Section 203 of the DGCL was
enacted in 1988. Accordingly, when the supermajority voting
requirement for the approval of certain business combinations that is now
contained in Article TWELFTH of Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation
was adopted in 1986, Section 203 of the DGCL had not yet been
enacted.
The
Lakeland Board considered the protection afforded by Section 203 of the DGCL as
compared to that provided by the supermajority voting requirements contained in
Article TWELFTH of Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and
concluded that the protection afforded by Section 203 is sufficient, and that a
separate protective provision in Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of
Incorporation is no longer necessary. The Lakeland Board still believes that the
supermajority voting requirements contained in Lakeland’s Restated Certificate
of Incorporation provide some protection against self-interested actions by one
or a few large stockholders and encourage persons considering unsolicited
acquisition bids for Lakeland to negotiate with the Lakeland Board to reach
terms that are fair to, and in the best interest of, all
stockholders. However, the Lakeland Board believes that
notwithstanding the safeguards provided by the supermajority voting
requirements, they can be eliminated without posing unacceptable risks to
Lakeland’s stockholders.
The
Lakeland Board recognizes the growing public sentiment that suggests that
supermajority voting requirements applicable to business combinations conflict
with principles of good corporate governance and that their elimination would
increase the Lakeland
Board’s
accountability to its stockholders. The Lakeland Board considered the
views of some investors that supermajority voting requirements limit the ability
of stockholders to participate effectively in corporate
governance. According to such views, the requirement of a
supermajority vote can limit the ability of a majority of the stockholders at
any particular time to effect change by, in effect, providing a veto to a large
minority stockholder or group of stockholders. Accordingly,
that view holds that a lower threshold for stockholder votes can increase
stockholders’ ability to participate effectively in corporate
governance.
The
Lakeland Board also considered the potential effect that supermajority voting
requirements applicable to business combinations could have in hindering or
discouraging potential acquirers that would otherwise consider acquiring
Lakeland pursuant to a transaction that could potentially be in the best
interests of, and at a price that is fair to and maximizes value for, our
stockholders. As the Lakeland Board is committed to acting, at all
times, in the best interests of all of Lakeland’s stockholders, and to
continuing to enhance, grow and maximize stockholder value, the Lakeland Board
believes that continuing to include supermajority voting requirements in the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation with respect to business combination
transactions would be inconsistent with the Lakeland Board’s guiding principle
of maximizing stockholder value.
Weighing
the various considerations discussed above, the Lakeland Board, after
consultation with its Nominating and Governance Committee, adopted resolutions
approving and declaring advisable, and in the best interests of Lakeland’s
stockholders, and has recommended for stockholder approval, the proposed
amendments to Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to repeal Article
TWELFTH of Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and to conform
Article ELEVENTH thereof to reflect the repeal of Article TWELFTH and,
accordingly, eliminate the supermajority voting requirement of Article ELEVENTH
applicable to amendments to Article TWELFTH.
The
Lakeland Board’s proposal, if adopted, would reduce the stockholder approval
threshold for the approval of all business combinations, including business
combinations with Related Persons, to a simple majority vote of Lakeland’s
outstanding shares, subject to Section 203 of the DGCL. Attached to
this proxy statement as Annex A is a marked version of Articles ELEVENTH and
TWELFTH of Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which reflects the
proposed changes, with deletions indicated by strikeouts, and additions
indicated by underlining (the “Simple Majority Vote Amendments”). The
description of the Simple Majority Vote Amendments contained in this proxy
statement is only a summary of the material terms and provisions of the Simple
Majority Vote Amendments and, accordingly, does not purport to be complete and
is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the full text of such
amendments contained in Annex A.
The
Repeal of the Supermajority Voting Requirements for the Approval of Certain
Business Combinations
Article
TWELFTH of Lakeland’s Certificate of Incorporation requires the affirmative vote
of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding shares of Lakeland common stock to
approve certain business transactions involving Lakeland and a Related
Person. The Simple Majority Vote Amendments would repeal Article
TWELFTH of Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation in its
entirety. The restrictions contained in Article TWELFTH apply to the
following transactions between a Related Person and Lakeland:
(1) A
merger or consolidation;
(2) Any
sale or exchange of all or a substantial part (more than ten percent (10%)) of
the book value or fair market value) of the assets of Lakeland and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole; or
(3) The
issuance, sale, exchange, transfer, or other disposition by Lakeland of any of
its securities.
The 66
2/3% voting requirement does not apply to transactions approved by a vote of 66
2/3% of the directors who were directors before the Related Person became a
Related Person. Nor does it apply to any transaction solely between
Lakeland and another corporation fifty (50%) percent or more of the voting stock
of which is owned by Lakeland.
Article
ELEVENTH of Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation currently requires
the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding shares of Lakeland
common stock in order to amend or repeal Article TWELFTH of Lakeland’s Restated
Certificate of Incorporation. In light of the proposal to repeal
Article TWELFTH of Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Simple
Majority Vote Amendments would also conform Article ELEVENTH to reflect the
repeal of Article TWELFTH and, accordingly, eliminate the supermajority voting
requirement of Article ELEVENTH applicable to amendments to Article
TWELFTH.
Effect
of the Simple Majority Vote Amendments
The
repeal of Article TWELFTH will have two principal effects on stockholder voting:
First, those transactions covered by Article TWELFTH that would otherwise
require a stockholder vote under the DGCL would now generally only require the
vote of the holders of a majority of Lakeland’s outstanding common stock, rather
than an a 66 2/3% percent supermajority vote. Second, the Lakeland
Board of Directors will be able to effect, without obtaining stockholder
approval, those transactions covered by Article TWELFTH that do not otherwise
require stockholder approval under the DGCL.
Continued
Applicability of Section 203 of the DGCL
Lakeland
will continue to be subject to the protections of Section 203 of the DGCL
without regard to whether the proposed amendments are
approved. Section 203 provides, in general, that a transaction
constituting a "business combination" within the meaning of Section 203
involving a person owning 15 percent or more of Lakeland’s common stock
(referred to as an "interested stockholder"), cannot be completed for a period
of three years after the date the person became an interested stockholder unless
the following occurs:
(1) the
Lakeland Board approved either the business combination or the transaction that
resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder prior to such business
combination or transaction,
(2) upon
consummation of the transaction that resulted in the person becoming an
interested stockholder, that person owned at least 85 percent of our outstanding
voting stock (excluding shares owned by persons who are directors and also
officers of Lakeland and shares owned by certain Lakeland employee benefit
plans), or
(3) the
business combination was approved by the Lakeland Board and by the affirmative
vote of at least 66 2/3% of Lakeland’s outstanding common stock not owned by the
interested stockholder.
Vote
Required for Approval
The
affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding shares of Lakeland’s
common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required for
approval of the Simple Majority Vote Amendments. While abstentions are counted
as present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of this proposal, an abstention on
the proposal is not an affirmative vote and, accordingly, abstentions will have
the same effect as votes against the proposal. This proposal will qualify
for the broker “routine vote” under NASDAQ Marketplace
Rules. This permits brokers to vote FOR the proposal on behalf of
any of their customers who do not return instructions. Broker
non-votes will have no effect on the approval of this
proposal. Proxies that are granted without providing voting
instructions will be voted FOR the approval of this
proposal.
Effective
Time of the Simple Majority Vote Amendments
If the
Simple Majority Vote Amendments are approved by our stockholders, the Board of
Directors will restate Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to
reflect the Simple Majority Vote Amendments. The resulting Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (reflecting the Simple Majority Vote
Amendments) will become effective upon being executed, acknowledged, filed and
recorded with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in accordance with
the DGCL, which Lakeland intends to undertake promptly following stockholder
approval of the Simple Majority Vote Amendments.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE
APPROVAL OF THE SIMPLE MAJORITY VOTE AMENDMENTS TO REPEAL THE SUPERMAJORITY
VOTING REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THE LAKELAND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION APPLICABLE TO THE APPROVAL OF CERTAIN BUSINESS
COMBINATIONS.
RATIFICATION
OF SELECTION OF HOLTZ RUBENSTEIN REMINICK LLP
AS
OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit
Committee of our Board has selected Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP, or (“HRR”),
as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009, and has
directed that management submit the selection of HRR as our independent
registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the
Annual Meeting. HRR has audited our consolidated financial statements since the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2005. A representative of HRR is expected to
be present at the Annual Meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate
questions from our stockholders and will be given an opportunity to make a
statement if he or she desires to do so.
Stockholder
ratification of the selection of HRR as our independent registered public
accounting firm is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise. However, the Audit
Committee is submitting the selection of HRR to the stockholders for
ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. If the stockholders fail
to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to
retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may in
its discretion direct the appointment of different independent registered public
accountants at any time during the year if they determine that such a change
would be in the best interests of us and our stockholders.
The
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or
represented by proxy and entitled to vote will be required to ratify the
selection of HRR. Abstentions will be counted toward the tabulation of votes
cast on proposals presented to the stockholders and will have the same effect as
negative votes. Broker non-votes are counted towards a quorum, but are not
counted for any purpose in determining whether this matter has been
approved.
RECOMMENDATION
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
“FOR”
RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF
HOLTZ
RUBENSTEIN REMINICK LLP AS OUR
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Fees Paid to Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP
For the
fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and January 31, 2007, the total fees we
incurred for services by our independent registered public accounting firm,
Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP, were as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Fees (1)
|
|
$ |
261,720 |
|
|
$ |
292,000 |
|
Tax
Preparation Fees(2)
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
All
Other Fees
|
|
|
43,050 |
(b) |
|
|
74,000 |
(b) |
Total
|
|
$ |
334,770 |
|
|
$ |
401,000 |
|
(1)
|
Fees
for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our
annual financial statements in our Forms 10-K, including income tax
provision procedures, the reviews of the financial statements included in
our Forms 10-Q, services related to acquisitions, overseas statutory
audits, consents to Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)
filings, assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC, and
attestation-related services in connection with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
(2)
|
Fees
for professional services rendered in connection with tax services
including tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, as
follows:
|
|
a.
|
Tax Compliance/Preparation
Fees: $30,000 and $35,000 for 2007 and 2008,
respectively, representing fees in connection with tax compliance
preparation services including assistance in the preparation of our
U.S. federal, state and local tax returns as well as international
subsidiaries returns, tax audits and appeals, and tax services for
employee benefit plans; and
|
|
b.
|
Tax Consulting
Fees: $34,550 and $48,855 (included in “All Other Fees”,
above) for 2007 and 2008, respectively, representing fees in connection
with tax consulting services including tax advice related to an IRS audit,
mergers and acquisitions and restructuring of foreign
operations.
|
The Audit
Committee determined that the rendering of non-audit services by HRR was
compatible with maintaining HRR’s independence.
Financial
Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees
During the years ended January 31, 2008
and 2007, Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP rendered no professional services to us
in connection with the design and implementation of financial information
systems.
Audit
Committee Pre-Approval Policy
In
accordance with applicable laws and regulations, the Audit Committee reviews and
pre-approves any non-audit services to be performed by our independent
registered public accounting firm to ensure that the work does not compromise
their independence in performing their audit services. The Audit
Committee generally also reviews and pre-approves all audit, audit related, tax
and all other fees, as applicable. In some cases, pre-approval is
provided by the full committee for up to a year, and relates to a particular
category or group of services and is subject to a specific budget and SEC rules.
In other cases, the chairman of the Audit Committee has the delegated authority
from the committee to pre-approve additional services, and such pre-approvals
are then communicated to the full Audit Committee at its next
meeting
The
following is the report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of
Lakeland Industries, Inc., describing the Audit Committee’s responsibilities and
practices, specifically with respect to matters involving Lakeland’s accounting,
auditing, financial reporting and internal control functions. Among other
things, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management and with
Lakeland’s independent registered public accounting firm the results of
Lakeland’s year-end audit, including the audit report and audited financial
statements. We, the members of the Audit Committee of the Board, are presenting
this report for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008.
The Audit
Committee acts pursuant to a written charter that was originally adopted by the
Board in 2001. The Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board consider
membership of the Audit Committee annually. The Audit Committee reviews and
assesses the adequacy of its charter annually. The Audit Committee held five
meetings during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008.
All
members of the Audit Committee are independent directors, qualified to serve on
the Audit Committee pursuant to NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. In accordance with its
charter, the Audit Committee oversees accounting, financial reporting, internal
control over financial reporting, financial practices and audit activities of
Lakeland and its subsidiaries. Except for Mr. Cirenza, the other Audit Committee
members are not professional accountants or auditors, and their functions are
not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management or the
independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee provides
advice, counsel and direction to management and the independent registered
public accounting firm on the basis of the information it receives, discussions
with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, and the
experience of the Audit Committee’s members in business, financial and
accounting matters. The Audit Committee relies, without independent
verification, on the information provided by Lakeland and on the representations
made by management that the financial statements have been prepared with
integrity and objectivity, on the representations of management, and the opinion
of the independent registered public accounting firm that such financial
statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, or GAAP.
In
connection with its review of Lakeland’s audited financial statements for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, the Audit Committee reviewed and
discussed the audited financial statements with management and discussed with
Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP (“HRR”), Lakeland’s independent registered public
accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61 (Codification of
Statements on Auditing Standards, AU §380). The Audit Committee received the
written disclosures and the letter from HRR required by Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees) and
discussed with HRR its independence from Lakeland. The Audit Committee has also
considered whether the provision of certain permitted non-audit services by HRR
is compatible with their independence.
Based on
the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended
to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in Lakeland’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended January 31, 2008,
for filing with the SEC.
During
Fiscal 2008, the Audit Committee met with management and Lakeland’s independent
registered public accountants and received the results of the audit examination,
evaluations of Lakeland’s internal controls and the overall quality of
Lakeland’s financial organization and financial reporting. The Audit Committee
also meets at least once each quarter with Lakeland’s independent registered
public accountants and management to review Lakeland’s interim financial results
before the publication of Lakeland’s quarterly earnings press releases. The
Audit Committee believes that a candid, substantive and focused dialogue with
the independent registered public accountants is fundamental to the committee’s
responsibilities. To support this belief, the Audit Committee meets separately
with the independent registered public accountants without the members of
management present on at least an annual basis.
The Audit
Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of
complaints received by Lakeland regarding accounting, internal accounting
controls, or auditing matters, including the confidential, anonymous submission
by Lakeland employees, received through established procedures, of concerns
regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. We have established a
confidential email and hotline for employees to report violations of Lakeland’s
Code of Conduct or other company policies and to report any ethical
concerns.
The
information contained in this report shall not be deemed “soliciting material”
or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by
reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
(the “Securities Act”) or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), except to the extent that Lakeland specifically incorporates it
by reference into such filing.
Audit
Committee:
Michael
Cirenza (Chairman)
A. John
Kreft
John J.
Collins
Stephen
Bachelder
Eric O.
Hallman
Our
Executive Officers are appointed by our Board and serve at their discretion. Set
forth below is information regarding our current Executive
Officers:
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
J. Ryan
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President, General Counsel and
Secretary
|
|
56
|
Gregory
Willis
|
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
51
|
Gary
Pokrassa
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
60
|
Harvey
Pride, Jr.
|
|
Senior
Vice President, Manufacturing
|
|
61
|
Paul
Smith
|
|
Vice
President, Sales
|
|
41
|
Gregory
Pontes
|
|
Vice
President, Manufacturing
|
|
41
|
Biographical
information regarding our Executive Officers can be found in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008.
We
currently qualify as a “smaller reporting company” as such term is defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Item 10 of Regulation
S-K. Accordingly, and in accordance with relevant Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and guidance, we have elected, with respect to the
disclosures required by Item 402 (Executive Compensation) of Regulation S-K, to
comply, in some cases, with the requirements applicable to larger companies and,
in other cases, with the disclosure requirements applicable to smaller reporting
companies. The following Executive Compensation Overview is not
comparable to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” that is required of SEC
reporting companies that are not smaller reporting companies.
Compensation Committee. The
Compensation Committee of the board of directors (the “Committee”) assists the
board of directors of the Company in discharging its responsibilities relating
to compensation of the Company’s executive officers and supervision of the
Company’s Restricted Stock and 401-K Plans. The Committee reports to the board
of directors and is responsible for:
|
•
|
developing
guidelines for, and reviewing the compensation and performance of, the
Company’s executive officers;
|
|
•
|
evaluating
the executive officers’ performance in light of these goals and
objectives; and
|
|
•
|
making
recommendations to the board of directors regarding the management
contracts of executive officers when they are proposed or
renewed.
|
The
Committee also is responsible for approving the compensation of the Chief
Executive Officer.
Compensation Philosophy and
Objectives. The Company seeks to pay its executive officers total
compensation that is competitive with other companies of comparable size and
complexity. Generally, the types of compensation and benefits provided to the
Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers are comparable to those
provided to other executive officers of small cap, publicly traded and similarly
sized companies in the industry in which the Company operates.
The
compensation policies of the Company are designed to:
|
•
|
attract,
motivate and retain experienced and qualified
executives,
|
|
•
|
increase
the overall performance of the
Company,
|
|
•
|
increase
stockholder value, and
|
|
•
|
Incentivize
the executive officers to achieve the highest level of Company financial
performance.
|
While the
Company seeks to maintain competitive compensation arrangements for its
executives, it also strongly believes that the competitiveness of the
compensation packages should be based on the total compensation achievable by
the executive officers and that a large portion of that compensation should be
linked to the performance of the Company. Accordingly, the executive
compensation packages provided to the Chief Executive Officer and the other
executive officers are structured to include, among other things and in addition
to base salary and benefits, equity incentives. A reasonable portion of the
compensation packages for executive officers is in the form of Restricted Stock
grants, which are intended to provide incentives to executive officers to
achieve long-term growth in the price of the Company’s common stock and
additionally annual cash bonus opportunities, which are intended to reward
executive officers for meeting annual financial performance goals. Overall
compensation levels are set such that, for executive officers to achieve a
competitive compensation level, there must be both growth in the market price of
the Company’s common stock and growth in the Company’s earnings and revenues at
rates that equal or exceed the recent growth rate of the Company’s earnings and
revenues. The determination that such goals have been met and merit
pay-outs pursuant to the incentive-portion of the overall compensation rests
with the Committee.
The
Committee believes that executive officer compensation should seek to align the
interests of executives with those of the Company’s stockholders, by seeking to
reward long-term growth (not short term) in the value of the Company’s common
stock and to reward the achievement of annual financial goals by the Company.
The incentive components of compensation, Restricted Stock grants and annual
cash bonuses, for executive officers are linked to corporate financial
performance as well as individual goals. This is intended to keep the executive
team focused on the core goal of overall long term corporate
performance.
When
setting or recommending compensation levels, the Committee considers the overall
performance of the Company, the individual performance of each of the executive
officers, and their individual contributions to and ability to influence the
Company’s performance, and also seeks to encourage teamwork amongst the
executives. The Committee believes that the level of total compensation,
including base salary, bonus, restricted stock grants and benefits, of
executives should generally be maintained to compete with other public and
private companies of comparable size and complexity. The Committee bases its
determinations on a variety of factors, including the personal knowledge of
market conditions that each member of the Committee has gained in his own
experience managing businesses, salary surveys available to the Company, the
knowledge of the Chief Executive Officer and other executives as to local market
conditions, and information learned regarding the compensation levels at other
small cap companies in the industrial apparel industry and other similarly sized
businesses. The Committee periodically evaluates the types and levels of
compensation paid by the Company to ensure that it is able to attract and retain
qualified executive officers and that their compensation remains comparable to
compensation paid to similarly situated executives in comparable
companies.
The
following describes in more specific terms the elements of compensation that
implement the compensation philosophy and objectives described above, with
specific reference to compensation earned by the named executive officers for
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008.
Base Salaries. The base
salary of each of our named executive officers is fixed pursuant to the terms of
their respective employment agreements with us at the time a person initially
becomes an executive officer by evaluating the responsibilities of the position,
the experience and knowledge of the individual and the competitive marketplace
at that time for executive talent, including a comparison to base salaries for
comparable positions (considered in the context of the total compensation paid
by such companies). Salaries are reviewed from time to time thereafter,
generally in connection with the expiration of employment agreements or when
other considerations warrant such consideration in the discretion of the
Committee and board of directors, considering the foregoing factors as well as
the executive’s performance and the other factors considered in setting total
compensation described above.
When
salary adjustments are considered, they are made in the context of the total
compensation for executive officers, consistent with the core principles
discussed earlier in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. In each case,
the participants involved in recommending and approving salary adjustments
consider the performance of each executive officer, including consideration of
new responsibilities and the previous year’s corporate performance. Individual
performance evaluations take into account such factors as achievement of
specific goals that are driven by the Company’s strategic plan and attainment of
specific individual objectives. The factors impacting base salary levels are not
assigned specific weights but are considered as a totality, against the backdrop
of the Company’s overall compensation philosophy, and salary adjustments are
determined in the discretion of the Committee and the board of directors. All
base salaries paid in FY08 were set in prior years; no base salary adjustments
were made in FY07, for those executive officers under contract.
Bonuses. The Company has
historically paid annual bonuses to its executive officers based on corporate
performance, as
measured
by reference to factors which the Committee believes reflect objective
performance criteria over which management generally has the ability to exert
some degree of control. For each of our named executive officers, all cash
bonuses are at the discretion of the Committee.
Restricted Stock Grants. A
third component of executive officers’ compensation is grants of Restricted
Shares of common stock issued pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The
Committee or the full Board of Directors grants Restricted Stock to the
Company’s executives in order to align their interests with the interests of the
stockholders. In the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, no option
grants to the Company’s directors and executive officers were
made. Stock grants are considered by the Company to be an effective
long-term incentive because the executives’ gains are linked to increases in
stock value, which in turn provides stockholder gains. Restricted Stock is
granted to executive officers in accordance with the terms of the 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan approved by the Company’s shareholders in FY06. The full benefit
of the Restricted Stock grants is realized only as a result of appreciation of
the stock price in future periods, thus providing an incentive to create value
for the Company’s stockholders through appreciation of stock price. The
Restricted Stock granted to executive officers “cliff” vest at the end of three
years, which the Company believes makes the grants a more effective retention
incentive.
Restricted
Stock grants made to the executive officers in the fiscal year ended January 31,
2007 reflected the significant individual contributions the Committee expects
they will make to the Company’s operations and implementation of the Company’s
development and growth programs, and the amounts of such grants were determined
based on the same considerations discussed above in the context of setting
salaries and annual bonuses. The number of shares of Restricted Stock granted is
not tied to a formula or comparable company target ranges, but rather determined
at the end of the three-year performance period in the discretion of the
Committee and the Board of Directors consistent with the compensation philosophy
described above. At the end of the three-year performance period, the
determined number of shares (baseline, minimum, maximum or zero), will then
vest.
Setting Executive
Compensation. Base salaries and other compensation for the Chief
Executive Officer and other executive officers are set by the Committee and
reflect a number of elements including recommendations by Mr. Ryan as to
the other executive officers based on evaluation of their performance and the
other factors described above. The Committee works closely with Mr. Ryan in
establishing compensation levels for the other executive officers. Mr. Ryan
and the individual executive typically engage in discussions regarding the
executive’s salary, and Mr. Ryan reports on such discussions and makes his
own recommendations to the Committee. The Committee will separately discuss with
Mr. Ryan any proposed adjustment to his own compensation. The Committee
reports to the board of directors on all proposed changes in executive
compensation, after it has formed a view on appropriate adjustments, and makes
recommendations for consideration of the board for the Chief Executive Officer
and the other executive officers. The Committee considers such recommendations
and, thereafter, sets the compensation level for Mr. Ryan, and for the
other executive officers. Salary levels and other aspects of compensation for
executive officers historically have been set forth in employment agreements
having terms of two years.
The
Committee is charged with the responsibility for approving the compensation
package for the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer is not
present during voting or deliberation on his performance or
compensation.
In
recognition of the Company and its acquisition of Mifflin, its entrance into
more complex international production and into new product markets, a
comprehensive review of the executive compensation program for the Chief
Executive Officer and other executive officers was undertaken beginning in
August of 2005. The Committee retained the services of Shareholder Value
Adviser, Inc. to review the principal elements of the compensation packages. The
review was intended to recognize what other public companies of Lakeland’s size
and scope paid comparable executive, the added complexity of managing the
Company resulting from its international growth, and to suggest by comparison
appropriate incentives to achieve the increased business goals set by the
Company for its new markets. The Committee also considered the additional
expense associated with restricted stock grants. At present, no services are
rendered to the Company by Shareholder Value Adviser, Inc.
The board
of directors or the Committee can exercise the right to modify any recommended
adjustments or awards to the executive officers.
Retirement Benefits. The
Company does not provide any retirement benefits to its executive officers,
other than matching a portion of employee contributions to a 401-K plan. This
benefit is generally available to all employees of the Company.
Employment Agreements. The
Company currently enters into employment agreements with its executive officers
because it generally believes that, in respect of key executive officers, there
is a significant value in its competitive markets to setting out compensation
and benefit expectations in a writing, maintaining appropriate non-competition,
non-solicitation of employees and confidentiality agreements with key
executives, and agreeing in advance on post-termination payments and other
obligations. These employment agreements are described in more detail under the
caption “Employment Agreements.”
Taxation
and Accounting Matters.
The
Committee considers the deductibility of executive compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides that the
Company may not deduct compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid to
certain individuals. Generally, the Company expects that compensation paid to
its executive officers will be fully deductible for federal income tax purposes.
However, in certain situations, the Company may approve compensation that will
not meet these requirements in order to ensure competitive levels of total
compensation for its executive officers.
The table below sets forth all
salary, bonus and other compensation paid to our chief executive officer, chief
financial officer and each of our three highest paid executive officers other
than the chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our “Named
Executive Officers”) for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and
2007:
Name
and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
|
|
|
Change
in Pension Value and Nonqua-lified Deferred Compensation
Earnings
|
|
|
All
other Compensation
|
|
|
Total
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
J
|
|
2008
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
(2) |
|
|
38,792 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
33,335 |
(3) |
|
|
472,127 |
|
Ryan
|
|
2007
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
(2) |
|
|
20,561 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
31,600 |
|
|
|
452,161 |
|
CEO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
Pokrassa
|
|
2008
|
|
|
208,015 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
23,613 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
16,447 |
(4) |
|
|
248,075 |
|
CFO
|
|
2007
|
|
|
195,733 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
10,757 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
15,089 |
|
|
|
221,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory
D.
|
|
2008
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
25,005 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
236,963 |
(5) |
|
|
461,968 |
|
Willis
|
|
2007
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
9,590 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
269,417 |
|
|
|
438,343 |
|
Executive
VP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond
J.
|
|
2008
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
31,522 |
(6) |
|
|
281,522 |
|
Smith
|
|
2007
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
33,461 |
|
|
|
283,461 |
|
Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
C. Smith
|
|
2008
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
10,918 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
126,772 |
(7) |
|
|
267,290 |
|
Vice
President
|
|
2007
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
6,556 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
106,612 |
|
|
|
257,168 |
|
(1) The
amounts shown in this column represent the dollar amounts recognized as an
expense by us for financial statement reporting purposes in the fiscal years
ended January 31, 2008 and 2007 as expense as determined pursuant to SFAS
123(R). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 for a discussion of
the relevant assumptions used in calculating grant date fair value pursuant to
SFAS 123(R).
(2) Mr.
Ryan voluntarily declined any bonus for FY07 and FY08.
(3)
Includes $26,585 in life and disability insurance premiums paid by us and a
$6,750 matching 401(k) contribution.
(4)
Includes $1,237 in life insurance and disability insurance premiums paid by us,
$9,000 in automobile allowance and a $6,510 matching 401(k)
contribution.
(5)
Includes $248,180 in sales commissions, $9,000 in automobile allowance and a
$6,750 matching 401(k) contribution.
(6)
Includes $14,752 in life and disability insurance premiums paid by us, $10,020
in automobile allowance and a $6,750 matching 401(k) contribution.
(7)
Includes $119,989 in sales commissions and a $6,783 matching 401(k)
contribution.
The
following table set forth information for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008
regarding all grants of plan-based awards made to our Named Executive Officers
under our incentive plans.
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Estimated
Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
Estimated
Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
|
|
All
Other Stock Awards Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)
|
|
All
other Option Awards; Number of Securities Underlying Options
(#)
|
|
Exercise
or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)
|
|
Grant
Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maxi-mum
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maxi-mum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
|
(i)
|
|
(j)
|
|
(k)
|
|
(l)
|
|
Christopher
J. Ryan CEO
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
Pokrassa CFO
|
|
July
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,497 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory
D. Willis Exec. VP
|
|
July
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
9,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond
J. Smith Chairman
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
C. Smith, Vice President
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
No
performance based awards were granted in FY08. In FY07 we
granted performance based awards the amount of which will be determined in
June 2009. These awards are set forth, at the threshold amount,
in the outstanding equity awards table,
below.
|
(2)
|
Shares
granted pursuant to Company’s Bonus in Stock Plan under the 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan.
|
NARRATIVE
TO SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE AND PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE
Employment
Agreements
Raymond J.
Smith, a co-founder of the Company, has served as the Chairman of the
Board since 1982. Mr. Smith retired as President and CEO in November
2003, but continues to serve as the Chairman of the Board pursuant to a contract
dated April 16, 2007, the term of which commenced on May 1, 2007 and expires on
April 30, 2009.
Mr. Smith
receives an annual base salary at the rate of $250,000 and participates in
benefit plans available to all other senior executives. Mr. Smith
receives, to the extent eligible, health coverage, disability and life
insurance, 401(k) plan contributions and travel expenses to board meetings as
well as an auto allowance of $835 monthly. The disability and life
insurance ($14,752), 401(k) plan matching contributions ($6,750), and car
allowance totaled $31,522 for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2008.
If Mr.
Smith's employment were terminated "for cause," he would be paid within 30 days
that portion of his base salary and benefits accrued but unpaid as of the date
of such termination. "Cause" is defined as (i) the failure to
substantially perform his duties, (ii) an act of fraud, theft, misappropriation,
dishonesty or embezzlement, (iii) conviction for a felony or pleading nolo contendere to a felony,
(iv) failure to follow a lawful directive of the Board of Directors, or (v)
material breach of his employment agreement.
Mr. Smith
has the right to terminate his agreement at any time on 45 days written
notice. The Company has the right to terminate Mr. Smith’s employment
at any time for any reason other than cause, death or disability, in which
event, it can, in exchange for a general release, pay to Mr. Smith six months’
Base Salary.
Upon
death, Mr. Smith’s estate is entitled to receive his base salary through the
last day of the month in which his death occurs and all benefits generally paid
by the Company on an employees death. In the event of disability for
more than 90 consecutive days (or for periods aggregating 120 days within a 180
day period), Mr. Smith's agreement will terminate.
Pursuant
to the agreement, Mr. Smith has agreed that during the term of his employment
and for a period of one year thereafter, he shall not directly or indirectly,
whether as agent, employee, stockholder, director or investor or otherwise,
engage in any activities in competition with the Company, solicit any employee
of the Company for employment or solicit any of the Company's customers for
business. Mr. Smith has also agreed not to disclose at any time any
confidential information relating to the Company's business.
.
Christopher J.
Ryan serves as Chief Executive Officer, President, General Counsel, and
Secretary of the Company. He also serves as President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company’s three Chinese subsidiaries, and the President
of its Indian and one Mexican subsidiary. Pursuant to Mr. Ryan’s
contract with the Company, which commenced on April 22, 2006 and will expire on
April 30, 2008, he was paid an annual base salary at the rate of $400,000 in
FY08. He has received no stock option grants since
FY01, but is eligible for incentive bonuses and participates in
benefit plans and other benefits available to all other senior
executives. These benefits include health coverage, disability and
life insurance, 401-K plan contribution, a mobile phone and a non-luxury company
car. The premium payments for disability and life coverage ($26,585)
and matching 401-K plan contribution ($6,750) totaled $33,335 in FY08. Mr. Ryan
voluntarily declined any bonuses for FY07 and FY08. Mr. Ryan also participates
in the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. All Restricted Stock under this
plan is awarded on a Threshold, Target, or Maximum basis, at the discretion of
the independent Compensation Committee, and has been held at Threshold for the
last 2 fiscal years.
Mr. Ryan
may terminate his employment agreement for “good reason”, including the
Company’s failure after 30 days written notice to perform or observe any of the
material terms or provisions of the employment agreement or a material reduction
in the scope of Mr. Ryan’s responsibilities and duties. The Company
may terminate the agreement if Mr. Ryan becomes disabled for more than 90
consecutive days or for periods aggregating 120 days in any 180 period or on the
date of his death. In addition, the Company may terminate the agreement for
“cause”, which includes his failure to substantially perform his duties (except
due to his incapacity), his commission of an act of fraud, theft, or dishonesty,
conviction of a felony, failure to follow a lawful directive of the Board or a
material breach of his employment agreement. If the Company terminates the
agreement for cause or upon Mr. Ryan’s death or disability, or if Mr. Ryan
terminates it other than for “good reason”, the Company must pay Mr. Ryan his
full base salary through the date of termination, and all other paid amounts, if
any, to which he is entitled as of the date of termination in connection with
any benefits
or under any incentive compensation plan or programs. If Mr. Ryan is terminated
without cause or Mr. Ryan terminates for “good reason”, the Company is obligated
to pay him, within 30 days, (a) his annual base salary and target bonus as of
the date of termination and (b) his base salary and current target bonus as
though he had remained in the Company’s employ until the contract expiration
date or, if longer, for a period of one year after the termination
date. The Company may elect to make the balance of such payments then
remaining in a lump sum discounted to present value. In addition Mr. Ryan would
be entitled to a continuation of his medical and health benefits for a period of
two years beginning on the date of termination.
Pursuant
to the agreement, Mr. Ryan has agreed that during the term of his employment and
for a period of two years thereafter (unless his employment is terminated by the
Company without “cause” or by Mr. Ryan for “good reason”), he will not compete
with the Company or solicit its employees. The ownership by Mr. Ryan
of less than 5% of any competitive business will not be viewed as a violation of
his non-competition agreement.
Gregory
Willis serves our Executive Vice President. Pursuant to Mr.
Willis' employment contract with the Company, the term of which commenced on May
1, 2007 and which expires on April 30, 2009, Mr. Willis was paid a base salary
of $200,000 for FY08. He received no grants of stock options in
FY08. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Willis is entitled to
commissions in the form of sales overrides on various products that he directly
oversees and in FY08, Mr. Willis received $248,180 in such overrides and was
awarded by the Compensation Committee a discretionary bonus of 2,352 shares of
Restricted Stock. Mr. Willis participates in benefit plans and
other benefits
available to all other senior executives and received health coverage, life
insurance, 401(k) contributions and a car allowance of $750 per
month. The life coverage, 401(k) plan contributions ($6,750) and car
allowance ($9,000) totaled $15,750 in FY08. Mr. Willis also
participates in the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. All Restricted Stock
under this plan is awarded on a minimum, baseline, or maximum basis, at the
total discretion of the Compensation Committee.
If Mr.
Willis' employment were terminated "for cause," he would be paid within 30 days
that portion of his base salary and all benefits under his contract
that were due as of the date of his termination. "Cause" is defined
as (i) the failure to substantially perform his duties, (ii) an act of fraud,
theft, misappropriation, dishonesty or embezzlement, (iii) conviction for a
felony or pleading nolo
contendere to a felony, (iv) failure to follow a lawful directive of the
Board of Directors, or (v) material breach of his employment
agreement.
Mr.
Willis has the right to terminate his employment at any time on 45 days written
notice. The Company also has the right to terminate Mr. Willis’
employment at any time for any other reason in which event it can, in exchange
for a general release, pay to Mr. Willis six month’s Base Salary, and the bonus
and commissions to which he would have been entitled for that six month
period.
Upon
death, Mr. Willis’s estate is entitled to receive his base salary and all
benefits through the last day of the month in which his death occurred, as well
as a pro rata portion of his annual bonus for the year in which his death
occurred. In the event of disability for more than 90 consecutive
days (or for periods aggregating 120 days within a 180 day period), Mr. Willis'
agreement will terminate.
Pursuant
to the agreement, Mr. Willis has agreed that during the term of his employment
and for a period of one year thereafter, he will not directly or indirectly,
whether as agent, employee, stockholder, director or investor or otherwise,
engage in any activities in competition with the Company, solicit any employee
of the Company for employment or solicit any of the Company's customers for
business. Mr. Willis has also agreed not to disclose at any time any
confidential information relating to the Company's business.
Paul C.
Smith, the son
of Raymond J. Smith, the Chairman of the Company, serves as a Vice President of
the Company. Pursuant to a contract dated April 4, 2007 Mr. Smith’s
employment is for a two year period which commenced May 1, 2007 and expires on
April 30, 2009.
Mr. Smith
receives an annual base salary at the rate of $130,000 and participates in
benefit plans and other benefits available to all other senior
executives. Mr. Smith received no grants or stock options in
FY08. Mr. Smith receives, to the extent eligible, health coverage,
disability and life insurance, 401(k) plan contributions, and a non-luxury car.
Mr. Smith is entitled to receive sales overrides on various products and earned
$119,989 in sales commissions in FY08. In addition, the Company made
a matching 401(k) contribution in the amount of $6,750.
If Mr.
Smith's employment were terminated "for cause," he would be paid within 30 days
that portion of his base salary and benefits under his contract that were due as
of the date of his termination. "Cause" is defined as (i) the failure
to substantially perform his duties, (ii) an act of fraud, theft,
misappropriation, dishonesty or embezzlement, (iii) conviction for a felony or
pleading nolo
contendere to a felony, (iv) failure to follow a lawful directive of the
Board of Directors, or (v) material breach of his employment
agreement.
Mr. Smith
has the right to terminate his agreement at any time on 45 days written
notice. The Company also has the right to terminate Mr. Smith’s
employment at any time for any other reason, in which event, it can, in exchange
for a general release, pay to Mr. Smith six months’ Base Salary, and the bonus
and commission to which he would have been entitled for that six-month
period.
Upon
death, Mr. Smith’s estate is entitled to receive his base salary and all
benefits through the last day of the month in which his death
occurred. In the event of disability for more than 90 consecutive
days (or for periods aggregating 120 days within a 180 day period), Mr. Smith's
agreement will terminate.
Pursuant
to the agreement, Mr. Smith has agreed that during the term of his employment
and for a period of one year thereafter, he shall not directly or indirectly,
whether as agent, employee, stockholder, director or investor or otherwise,
engage in any activities in competition with the Company, solicit any employee
of the Company for employment or solicit any of the Company's customers for
business. Mr. Smith has also agreed not to disclose at any time any
confidential information relating to the Company's business.
Gary
Pokrassa serves as the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company. Pursuant to his contract with the Company
which commenced on February 1, 2008 and will expire on January 31, 2010, he is
paid an annual base salary at the annual rate of $225,000. He received no stock
option grants during FY07, FY07 and FY08. Mr. Pokrassa received health coverage,
disability and life insurance, 401(k) plan contributions, and a $750 per month
car allowance. The disability and life coverage’s, 401-K plan contributions
($6,089) and car allowance ($9,000) were totaled $16,747 in FY08. His
annual bonus is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr.
Pokrassa received 1,497 shares of Restricted Stock as bonus shares in FY08. Mr.
Pokrassa also participates in the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. All performance
based Restricted Stock under this plan is awarded on a minimum, baseline, or
maximum basis, at the total discretion of the Compensation Committee.
If Mr.
Pokrassa’s employment were terminated "for cause," he would be paid within 30
days that portion of his base salary and
benefits
under his contract that were due as of the date of his
termination. "Cause" is defined as (i) the failure to substantially
perform his duties, (ii) an act of fraud, theft, misappropriation, dishonesty or
embezzlement, (iii) conviction for a felony or pleading nolo contendere to a felony,
(iv) failure to follow a lawful directive of the Board of Directors, or (v)
material breach of his employment agreement.
Mr.
Pokrassa has the right to terminate his agreement at any time on 60 days written
notice. The Company also has the right to terminate Mr. Pokrassa’s
employment at any time for any other reason, in which event, it can, in exchange
for a general release, pay to Mr. Pokrassa six months’ Base Salary, and the
bonus and commission to which he would have been entitled for that six-month
period.
Upon
death, Mr. Pokrassa’s estate is entitled to receive his base salary and all
benefits through the last day of the month in which his death
occurred. In the event of disability for more than 90 consecutive
days (or for periods aggregating 120 days within a 180 day period), Mr.
Pokrassa's agreement will terminate.
Pursuant
to his employment agreement, Mr. Pokrassa has agreed that during the term of his
employment and for a period of one year thereafter, he will not compete with the
Company or solicit its employees.
The
following table sets forth information with respect to outstanding equity-based
awards at January 31, 2008 for our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Un-exercised Options (#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)
Unexercised
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned
Options (#)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise Price ($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
|
|
Number
of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (#)
|
|
|
Market
Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested ($)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights
that have not Vested (#)(1)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout of Unearned Shares, Units or Other
Rights that have not Vested ($)(1)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
J. Ryan CEO
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,050 |
|
|
|
59,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
Pokrassa CFO
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
34,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory
D. Willis Executive VP
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,630 |
|
|
|
35,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond
J. Smith Chairman
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
C. Smith VP
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
22,777 |
|
(1) Number of shares
and grant date fair values reflect the threshold number of performance
shares.
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding exercise of options and
vesting of restricted stock held by our named executive officers during the year
ended January 31, 2008.
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of Shares Acquired on Exercise
|
|
|
Value
Realized on Exercise
|
|
|
Number
of Shares Acquired on Vesting
|
|
|
Value
Realized on Vesting
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
J. Ryan CEO
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
Pokrassa CFO
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory
D. Willis Executive VP
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond
J. Smith Chairman
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
C. Smith Vice
President
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
OR
CHANGE
IN CONTROL PROVISIONS
Raymond J.
Smith, If Mr. Smith's employment were terminated "for cause,"
he would be paid within 30 days that portion of his base salary and benefits
accrued but unpaid as of the date of such termination. "Cause" is
defined as (i) the failure to substantially perform his duties, (ii) an act of
fraud, theft, misappropriation, dishonesty or embezzlement, (iii) conviction for
a felony or pleading nolo
contendere to a felony, (iv) failure to follow a lawful directive of the
Board of Directors, or (v) material breach of his employment
agreement.
Mr. Smith
has the right to terminate his agreement at any time on 45 days written
notice. The Company has the right to terminate Mr. Smith’s employment
at any time for any reason other than cause, death or disability, in which
event, it can, in exchange for a general release, pay to Mr. Smith six months’
Base Salary.
Upon
death, Mr. Smith’s estate is entitled to receive his base salary through the
last day of the month in which his death occurs and all benefits generally paid
by the Company on an employees death. In the event of disability for
more than 90 consecutive days (or for periods aggregating 120 days within a 180
day period), Mr. Smith's agreement will terminate.
Christopher J.
Ryan Under the terms of his employment agreement in
effect at January 31, 2008, Mr. Ryan may terminate his employment agreement for
“good reason”, including the Company’s failure after 30 days written notice to
perform or observe any of the material terms or provisions of the employment
agreement or a material reduction in the scope of Mr. Ryan’s responsibilities
and duties. In addition, Mr. Ryan can terminate his agreement for
“good reason” if, in the event of a “Triggering Event” (essentially a change of
control), any successor to the Company fails to expressly assume and agree to
perform the Company’s then current obligations under Mr. Ryan’s then current
employment agreement. A change of control is defined as (i) the acquisition by
any individual, entity or group of more than 50% of the voting power of the
company’s voting securities, (ii) individuals who constituted the board (and
those board members approved by those individuals) at the time of entering into
the contract fail to constitute at least a majority of the board, and (iii) a
liquidation of the Company, a sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets
or a sale of more than 50% of the then outstanding voting power of the Company’s
securities (subject to certain exceptions). If Mr. Ryan is terminated
without cause or Mr. Ryan terminates for “good reason”, the Company is obligated
to pay him, within 30 days, (a) his annual base salary and target bonus as of
the date of termination and (b) his base salary and current target bonus as
though he had remained in the Company’s employ until the contract expiration
date (April 30, 2008) or, if longer, for a period of one year after the
termination date. The Company may elect to make the balance of such
payments then remaining in a lump sum discounted to present value. In addition
Mr. Ryan would be entitled to a continuation of his medical and health benefits
for a period of two years beginning on the date of termination.
The
Company may terminate Mr. Ryan’s employment agreement if he becomes disabled for
more than 90 consecutive days or for periods aggregating 120 days in any 180
period or on the date of his death. In addition, the Company may terminate the
agreement for “cause”, which includes his failure to substantially perform his
duties (except due to his incapacity), his commission of an act of fraud, theft,
or dishonesty, conviction of a felony, failure to follow a lawful directive of
the Board or a material breach of his employment agreement. If the Company
terminates the agreement for cause or upon Mr. Ryan’s death or disability, or if
Mr. Ryan terminates it other than for “good reason”, the Company must pay Mr.
Ryan his full base salary through the date of termination, and all other paid
amounts, if any, to which he is entitled as of the date of termination in
connection with any benefits or under any incentive compensation plan or
programs.
Gregory
Willis Under
the terms of his employment agreement, if Mr. Willis' employment were terminated
"for cause," he would be paid within 30 days that portion of his base salary and
all benefits under his contract that were due as of the date of his
termination. "Cause" is defined as (i) the failure to substantially
perform his duties, (ii) an act of fraud, theft, misappropriation, dishonesty or
embezzlement, (iii) conviction for a felony or pleading nolo contendere to a felony,
(iv) failure to follow a lawful directive of the Board of Directors, or (v)
material breach of his employment agreement.
Mr.
Willis has the right to terminate his employment at any time on 45 days written
notice. The Company also has the right to terminate Mr. Willis’
employment at any time for any other reason in which event it can, in exchange
for a general release, pay to Mr. Willis six month’s Base Salary, and the bonus
and commissions to which he would have been entitled for that six month
period.
Upon
death, Mr. Willis’s estate is entitled to receive his base salary and all
benefits through the last day of the month in which his death occurred, as well
as a pro rata portion of his annual bonus for the year in which his death
occurred. In the event of disability for
more than
90 consecutive days (or for periods aggregating 120 days within a 180 day
period), Mr. Willis' agreement will terminate.
Paul C. Smith
Under the terms of his employment agreement, if Mr. Smith's employment
were terminated "for cause," he would be paid within 30 days that portion of his
base salary and benefits under his contract that were due as of the date of his
termination. "Cause" is defined as (i) the failure to substantially
perform his duties, (ii) an act of fraud, theft, misappropriation, dishonesty or
embezzlement, (iii) conviction for a felony or pleading nolo contendere to a felony,
(iv) failure to follow a lawful directive of the Board of Directors, or (v)
material breach of his employment agreement.
Mr. Smith
has the right to terminate his agreement at any time on 45 days written
notice. The Company also has the right to terminate Mr. Smith’s
employment at any time for any other reason, in which event, it can, in exchange
for a general release, pay to Mr. Smith six months’ Base Salary, and the bonus
and commission to which he would have been entitled for that six-month
period.
Upon
death, Mr. Smith’s estate is entitled to receive his base salary and all
benefits through the last day of the month in which his death
occurred. In the event of disability for more than 90 consecutive
days (or for periods aggregating 120 days within a 180 day period), Mr. Smith's
agreement will terminate.
Gary Pokrassa,
Under the terms of his employment agreement, if Mr. Pokrassa’s employment
were terminated "for cause," he would be paid within 30 days that portion of his
base salary and benefits under his contract that were due as of the date of his
termination. "Cause" is defined as (i) the failure to substantially
perform his duties, (ii) an act of fraud, theft, misappropriation, dishonesty or
embezzlement, (iii) conviction for a felony or pleading nolo contendere to a felony,
(iv) failure to follow a lawful directive of the Board of Directors, or (v)
material breach of his employment agreement.
Mr.
Pokrassa has the right to terminate his agreement at any time on 60 days written
notice. The Company also has the right to terminate Mr. Pokrassa’s
employment at any time for any other reason, in which event, it can, in exchange
for a general release, pay to Mr. Pokrassa six months’ Base Salary, and the
bonus and commission to which he would have been entitled for that six-month
period.
Upon
death, Mr. Pokrassa’s estate is entitled to receive his base salary and all
benefits through the last day of the month in which his death
occurred. In the event of disability for more than 90 consecutive
days (or for periods aggregating 120 days within a 180 day period), Mr.
Pokrassa's agreement will terminate.
Compensation committee
interlocks and insider participation
As
discussed above, during FY08 our Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs.
Hallman (Chairman), Cirenza, Kreft, Bachelder and Collins. None of these members
is an officer or employee of Lakeland, and none of our executive officers serve
as a member of a Compensation Committee of any entity that has one or more
executive officers serving as a member of our Compensation Committee.
Indemnification of Directors
and Executive Officers
Our
Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides for Indemnification of its
Directors and Officers in accordance with Delaware Law.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides
information as of January 31, 2008 about our common stock that may be issued
upon the exercise of options granted to members of our Board of
Directors.
|
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and
rights
|
|
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
17,567 |
|
|
$ |
13.48 |
|
|
|
215,671 |
(1) |
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total
|
|
|
17,567 |
|
|
$ |
13.48 |
|
|
|
215,671 |
(1) |
(1)
includes 17,000 securities available for future issuance under the Directors’
Stock Option Plan and up to 198,671 shares available for grant under our 2006
Equity Incentive Plan as set forth in the table below:
Plan
Category
|
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon attainment of performance goals or meeting
conditions of grant (1)
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price per share of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(1)
|
|
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a)(1))
|
|
Restricted
stock grants-employees
|
|
31,680
|
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
100,320
|
|
Restricted
stock grants-directors
|
|
12,320
|
|
|
$
0
|
|
|
31,680
|
|
Matching
award program
|
|
4,983
|
|
|
$
0
|
|
|
28,017
|
|
Bonus
on stock program-employees
|
|
5,346
|
|
|
$
0
|
|
|
27,654
|
|
Retainer
in stock program-directors
|
|
0
|
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
Total
Restricted Stock Plans
|
|
54,329
|
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
198,671
|
|
(1)
Indicates number of shares to be awarded at minimum threshold
levels. These restricted shares have a weighted average grant date
fair value of $12.83.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of April 27, 2008: (i) by
each person who is known by the Company to, beneficially own more than 5% of the
Common Stock; (ii) by each of the named executive officers of the Company; (iii)
by each director and nominee for director of the Company; and (iv) all directors
and executive officers of the Company as a group.
The
shares “beneficially owned” by a person are determined in accordance with the
definition of “beneficial ownership” set forth in the regulations of the SEC
and, accordingly, shares of our common stock underlying options and other
convertible securities that are exercisable or convertible within 60 days of
April 27, 2008 and shares of our common stock underlying restricted stock awards
that vest within 60 days of the Record Date are deemed to be beneficially owned
by the person holding such securities and to be outstanding for purposes of
determining such holder’s percentage ownership. Shares of common stock subject
to options or other convertible securities that are not exercisable or
convertible and restricted stock awards that do not vest within 60 days from the
Record Date are not included in the table below as “beneficially
owned”. The same securities may be beneficially owned by more than
one person.
Except as
otherwise noted, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment
power with respect to their shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned
by them and the address for each beneficial owner, unless otherwise noted, is
c/o Lakeland Industries, Inc. 701 Koehler Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma, Ney York
11779.
Directors
and Officers
Name
|
|
Number
of Common
Shares
Beneficially Owned
(C)
|
|
|
Percent
of Class
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond
J. Smith
|
|
|
527,442 |
|
|
|
9.70 |
% |
Chairman
of the Board of Directors
|
Christopher
J. Ryan
|
|
|
405,732 |
(A)(B) |
|
|
7.46 |
% |
Chief
Executive Officer, President, General Counsel, Secretary and
Director
|
John
J. Collins, Jr.
|
|
|
115,201 |
(1) |
|
|
2.12 |
% |
Director
|
Eric
O. Hallman
|
|
|
37,523 |
(1) |
|
|
* |
|
Director
|
Michael
E. Cirenza
|
|
|
605 |
(3) |
|
|
* |
|
Director
|
Stephen
M. Bachelder
|
|
|
9,475 |
(2) |
|
|
* |
|
Director
|
John
Kreft
|
|
|
8,250 |
(A)(2) |
|
|
* |
|
Director
|
Gary
Pokrassa
|
|
|
5,114 |
(A) |
|
|
* |
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Paul
C. Smith
|
|
|
1,332 |
(A) |
|
|
* |
|
Vice
President
|
Harvey
Pride, Jr.
|
|
|
----- |
|
|
|
* |
|
Sr.
Vice President-Manufacturing
|
Greg
Willis
|
|
|
----- |
|
|
|
* |
|
Executive
Vice President
|
Gregory
D. Pontes
|
|
|
----- |
|
|
|
* |
|
Vice
President-Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
officers and directors as a group (13 persons)
|
|
|
1,110,674 |
(A)(4) |
|
|
20.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5%
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heartland
Advisors
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
9.20 |
% |
|
789
N. Water Street, Ste. 500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53202 (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional
Fund Advisors, LP (6)
|
|
|
365,610 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
% |
|
Signia
Capital Management, LLC
|
|
|
311,398 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
% |
|
108
N. Washington St. Ste 305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spokane,
Washington 99201 (7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robeco
Investment Management, Inc.
|
|
|
444,187 |
(5) |
|
|
8.17 |
% |
|
909
Third Avenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
York, New York 10022 (8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holtzman
Opportunity Fund LP
|
|
|
395,661 |
(6) |
|
|
7.28 |
% |
|
c/o
Jewelcor Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
N. Wilkes Barre Blvd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilkes
Barre, Pennsylvania 18702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seymour
Holtzman (9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Less
than 1%.
(1)
|
Includes
1,331 options granted on June 18, 2003 and 1,100 options granted on June
21, 2006 to each of Mr. Hallman and Mr. Collins, current
directors;
|
(2)
|
Includes
6,050 options granted November 19, 2004 to each Mr. Bachelder and Mr.
Kreft, current directors;
|
(3)
|
Includes
605 options granted June 18, 2003, to Michael Cirenza, a current
director;
|
(4)
|
Includes
17,567 options granted between June 18, 2003 and June 21,
2006.
|
(5)
|
According
to Schedule 13G jointly filed on behalf of Heartland Advisors, Inc. and
William J. Nasgovitz on February 8,
2008.
|
(6)
|
According
to a Schedule 13G filed on behalf of Dimensional Fund Advisors on February
6, 2008.
|
(7)
|
According
to a Schedule 13G filed on behalf of Signia Capital Management, LLC on
February 4, 2008.
|
(8)
|
According
to a Schedule 13G filed on February 2, 2008, on behalf of Robeco
Investment Management (“Robeco”). Robeco possesses shared investment and
voting power over the above
shares.
|
(9)
|
According
to a Schedule 13D filed on April 22, 2008, which was jointly filed on
behalf of the Holtzman Opportunity Fund, Seymour Holtzman and Evelyn
Holtzman.
|
(A)
|
Does
not include 6,703 shares to be issued pursuant to the matching shares
provision of the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan as follows: Christopher J.
Ryan, 3,137 shares; Gary Pokrassa, 1,050 shares; Paul C. Smith, 665
shares; John Kreft, 1,100 shares; Stephen Bachelder, 750 shares. Also
excludes 5,346 shares to be issued pursuant to the bonus in shares plan as
follows: Gary Pokrassa 1,497 shares; Harvey pride Jr. 1,497 shares;
Gregory Willis 2,352 shares.
|
(B)
|
Includes 14,641
shares owned by Mr. Ryan’s wife, and 42,592 which Mr. Ryan votes as
Co-Executor of the Estate of Bernard J.
Ryan.
|
(C)
|
Table
does not include the following stock grants under the Company’s 2006
Equity Incentive Plan (performance vesting at end of 3 years, date of
grant June 2006):
|
Grantee
Directors
|
|
Minimum#
of Shares
|
|
|
Baseline#
of Shares
|
|
|
Maximum
# of Shares
|
|
Michael
M. Cirenza
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
John
J. Collins, Jr.
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
Eric
O. Hallman
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
Stephen
M. Bachelder
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
A.
John Kreft
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
|
|
|
12,320 |
|
|
|
24,090 |
|
|
|
36,410 |
|
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
J. Ryan (Director)
|
|
|
6,050 |
|
|
|
11,990 |
|
|
|
18,040 |
|
Gregory
D. Willis
|
|
|
3,630 |
|
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
|
10,780 |
|
James
M. McCormick
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
7,590 |
|
Harvey
Pride, Jr.
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
6,820 |
|
|
|
10,230 |
|
Gary
A. Pokrassa
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
6,930 |
|
|
|
10,450 |
|
Paul
C. Smith
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
4,620 |
|
|
|
7,040 |
|
Gregory
D. Pontes
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
3,630 |
|
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
|
|
23,320 |
|
|
|
46,200 |
|
|
|
69,630 |
|
Key
Employees 5 as a group
|
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
16,830 |
|
|
|
25,190 |
|
|
|
|
31,680 |
|
|
|
63,030 |
|
|
|
94,820 |
|
Grand
Total
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
|
87,120 |
|
|
|
131,230 |
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
__________________________________________________
It is the
Company’s policy that directors, officers and any other person that is a related
person within the meaning of SEC regulations are required to report any related
party transactions to our Chief Executive Officer. All such transactions also
are required to be reported to the Audit Committee, which, with the assistance
of legal counsel and such other advisors as it deems appropriate, is responsible
for reviewing and approving or ratifying any related party transaction. The
Audit Committee intends to approve only those related party transactions that it
believes are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company. A
written policy to this effect has been adopted by the board of directors.
Pursuant to our written policy, a related party transaction is defined as any
transaction in which (1) the Company is a participant, (2) any related
person has a direct or indirect material interest and (3) the amount
involved exceeds $15,000, but excludes any transaction that does not require
disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K A related person
is:
|
•
|
an
executive officer, director or director nominee of the
Company;
|
|
•
|
any
person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
Company’s common stock;
|
|
•
|
any
person who is an immediate family member (as defined under Item 404
of Regulation S-K) of an executive officer, director or director nominee
or beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock;
and
|
|
•
|
any
firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is
employed or is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which
such person, together with any other of the foregoing persons, has a 5% or
greater beneficial ownership
interest.
|
In
addition, every quarter, a report maintained by the Company’s accounting staff
is reviewed and approved by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors conducts an annual review
of all transactions between related parties and the Company.
On March
1, 1999, we entered into a one year (renewable for four additional one year
terms) lease agreement with Harvey Pride, Jr., our Vice President of
Manufacturing, for a 2,400 sq. ft. customer service office located next to our
existing Decatur, Alabama facility. This lease was renewed on March 1, 2004 to
run through March 31, 2009 at an annual rent of $18,000 for this
facility. We believe that the lease contains terms no less favorable
to us than we could have obtained from an unrelated third party.
We have
been doing business with Madison Mobile Storage, Inc., a company owned and
operated by the son of Harvey Pride, Jr. for over 20 years. The
orders for Lakeland’s storage trailers and the release of the trailers are
handled by Greg Pontes, our VP of manufacturing, who is unrelated to Mr.
Pride. We also rent from an independent offsite warehouse for
overflow products on a month to month basis. The storage trailers are
a bid item and they are on an open rental by the month. In FY08 we
paid $20,373 to Madison Mobile Storage Inc. for storage services. We
believe that these services were provided on terms no less favorable to us than
we could have obtained from an unrelated third party.
Since
2007, Charles Black Enterprises (“CBE”), an entity owned by the son-in-law of
Harvey Pride Jr. has provided janitorial services to us. In 2007 CBE
won the bid for our janitorial services. In FY08 we paid $51,925 to
CBE for janitorial and carpet cleaning services. We believe these
services were provided on terms no less favorable to us than we could have
obtained from an unrelated third party.
In July
2005 as part of the acquisition of Mifflin Valley Inc., (merged into Lakeland
Industries, Inc. on September 1, 2006) the Company entered into a five year
lease with Michael Gallen (an employee) to lease an 18,520 sq. ft. manufacturing
facility in Shillington, PA for $55,560 annually or a per square foot rental of
$3.00. This amount was agreed to prior to the acquisition after an
independent appraisal of the fair market rental value per square
foot. In addition the Company, commencing January 1, 2006 is renting
12,000 sq ft of warehouse space in a second location is Pennsylvania from this
employee, on a month by month basis, for the monthly amount of $3,350 or $3.35
per square foot annually. We believe that these lease terms are no
less favorable to us than could have been obtained from an unrelated third
party.
Mifflin
Valley also utilizes the services of Gallen Insurance (an affiliate of Michael
& Donna Gallen) to provide certain insurance in
Pennsylvania. Such payments for insurance aggregated of approximately
$34,000, $27,000 and $23,000 in fiscal 2008,
2007 and
2006, respectively. We believe that this insurance was procured
on terms that are no less favorable to us than could have been obtained from an
unrelated third party.
Paul
Smith, our Vice President of Sales, is the son of Raymond Smith the Chairman of
our Board of Directors. Paul Smith’s
compensation for 2008 is set forth in the Executive Compensation section of this
proxy statement.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section
16 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), requires the
Company’s directors, officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the
Common Stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership of the Company’s
equity securities and to file subsequent reports when there are
changes in such ownership. Officers, directors and beneficial owners of more
than 10% of the Common Stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish the
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
Based
solely upon our review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 filed by or received from our
reporting persons (or written representations received from such persons), we
are not aware of any failure by a reporting person to make timely filings of
those Forms as required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
with respect to the year ended January 31, 2008.
Stockholder
proposals may be included in our proxy materials for consideration at an Annual
Meeting so long as they are provided to us on a timely basis and satisfy the
requirements and conditions set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). For a stockholder
proposal to be included in our proxy materials for the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, the proposal must be submitted in writing by January 20, 2009, to
our Corporate Secretary at 701 Koehler Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma, New York
11779.
If you
wish to submit a proposal outside of the process of Rule 14a-8 under the
Exchange Act for consideration at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, in
order for such proposal to be considered “timely” for the purposes of Rule
14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act, the proposal must be received at the above
address not later than April 6, 2009. Pursuant to Rule 14a-4(c) under
the Exchange Act, management is permitted to vote proxies in its discretion if
Lakeland: (1) receives notice of the proposal before the close of business on
April 6, 2009 and advises stockholders in the 2009 Annual Meeting Proxy
Statement about the nature of the matter and how management intends to vote on
such matter; or (2) does not receive notice of the proposal prior to the close
of business on April 6, 2009.
In
addition to the above, stockholders are advised to review Lakeland’s bylaws, as
they may be amended from time to time, for additional requirements and deadlines
applicable to the submission of stockholder proposals, including, but not
limited to, proposals relating to the nomination of one or more candidates for
election to the Lakeland Board of Directors.
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY
MATERIALS
Some
banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the
practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This
means that only one copy of this proxy statement may have been sent to multiple
stockholders in your household. If you would like to obtain another
copy of the proxy, please contact Secretary, Lakeland Industries, Inc. 701
Koehler Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma, New York, 11779 by mail. If you
want to receive separate copies of our proxy statements and annual reports in
the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive
only one copy for your household, you should contact your bank, broker, or other
nominee record holder.
The Board
of Directors knows of no matters other than those described above that have been
submitted for consideration at this Annual Meeting. As to other matters, if any,
that properly may come before the Annual Meeting; the Board of Directors intends
that the WHITE proxy cards will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with
the judgment of the person or persons named thereon.
A copy of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008
is being mailed concurrently with this proxy statement (as part of our annual
report to stockholders). A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K is also
available without charge from our website at www.lakeland.com or upon written
request to: Lakeland Investor Relations, Lakeland Industries, Inc., 701 Koehler
Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christopher
J. Ryan |
|
|
|
Christopher
J. Ryan
|
|
Corporate
Secretary
|
May 16,
2008
Ronkonkoma,
New York
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS TO LAKELAND’S
RESTATED CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION
[Deletions
indicated by strike-out; additions indicated by underline]
ELEVENTH: From
time to time any of the provisions of this certificate of incorporation may be
amended, altered or repealed, and other provisions authorized by the laws of the
State of Delaware at the time in force may be added or inserted in the manner
and at the time prescribed by said laws; provided, however, that the provisions
set forth in Articles FIFTH, SIXTH, EIGHTH, NINTH, TENTH, and ELEVENTH and TWELFTH may
not be repealed or amended in any respect unless such repeal or amendment is
approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of
the total voting power of all outstanding shares of voting stock of this
Corporation. All rights at any time conferred upon the stockholders
of the Corporation by this certificate of incorporation are granted subject to
the provisions of this Article ELEVENTH.
TWELFTH: The affirmative vote of
the holders of not less than two-thirds of the outstanding stock of the
Corporation entitled to vote shall be required for approval if (1) this
Corporation merges or consolidates with any other corporation if, on the record
date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote on such transaction,
such other corporation and its affiliates singly or in the aggregate are
directly or indirectly the beneficial owners of more than five (5%) percent of
the total voting power of all outstanding shares of the voting stock of this
Corporation (such other corporation being herein referred to as a “Related
Corporation”), or if (2) this Corporation sells or exchanges all or a
substantial part of its assets to or with such Related Corporation, or if (3)
this Corporation issues or delivers any stock or other securities issued by it
in exchange or payment for any properties or assets of such Related Corporation
or securities issued by such Related Corporation, or in a merger of any
affiliate of this Corporation with or into such Related Corporation or any of
its affiliates; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply to any
such merger, consolidation, sale or exchange, or issuance or delivery of stock
or other securities which was (i) approved by resolution of the Board of
Directors adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the
directors as calculated prior to the acquisition of the beneficial ownership of
more than five (5%) percent of the total voting power of all outstanding shares
of the voting stock of the Corporation by such Related Corporation and its
affiliates, nor shall it apply to any such transaction solely between this
Corporation and another corporation fifty (50%) percent or more of the voting
stock of which is owned by this Corporation. For the purposes hereof,
an “affiliate” is any person (including a corporation, partnership, trust,
estate or individual) who directly, or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with,
the person specified. “Control” means the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and
policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by
contract, or otherwise; and in computing the percentage of outstanding voting
stock beneficially owned by any person the shares outstanding and the shares
owned shall be determined as of the record date fixed to determine the
stockholders entitled to vote or express consent with respect to such
proposal. The stockholder vote, if any, required for mergers,
consolidations, sales or exchanges of assets or issuance of stock or other
securities not expressly provided for in this Article, shall be such as may be
required by applicable law. A “substantial part” of the corporation’s
assets shall mean assets comprising more than ten (10%) percent of the book
value or fair market value of the total assets of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
S
|
PLEASE MARK
VOTES
AS IN THIS
EXAMPLE
|
REVOCABLE
PROXY
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
Withhold
|
For All Except
|
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS SCHEDULED TO BE HELD ON JUNE 18,
2008
|
|
Proposal
1.
|
To elect three (3) directors to
serve on our Board of Directors until the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and until their respective successors have been elected and
qualified.
|
|
|
£
|
The undersigned hereby appoints
Raymond J. Smith and Stephen Bachelder, and each of them, as
attorneys-in-fact and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of
substitution, to vote all shares of common stock of Lakeland Industries,
Inc. which the undersigned would be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders of Lakeland Industries, Inc. scheduled to be held on
Wednesday, June 18, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the Holiday Inn,
located at 3845 Veterans Memorial Highway, Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 and at any
postponements or adjournments thereof, with all powers that the
undersigned would possess if personally present, upon and in respect of
the following matters and in accordance with the following instructions,
with discretionary authority as to any and all other matters that may
properly come before the meeting or any postponements or adjournments
thereof.
|
|
|
Nominees:
Christopher J. Ryan, Michael Cirenza, and A. John
Kreft.
|
|
|
INSTRUCTION:
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark “For All
Except” and write that nominee’s name in the space provided
below.
|
|
Proposal
2.
|
Approval of the adoption of
amendments to Lakeland’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to
eliminate the supermajority voting requirements applicable to the approval
of certain business combinations (the “Charter Amendment
Proposal”).
|
For
£
|
Against
£
|
Abstain
£
|
|
|
Proposal
3.
|
Ratification of the selection of
Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP as Lakeland’s independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31,
2009.
|
For
£
|
Against
£
|
Abstain
£
|
|
|
Proposal
4.
|
Grant of discretionary authority
to vote in favor of any adjournments of postponements of the annual
meeting, if necessary, including adjournments or postponements to provide
additional time to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Charter
Amendment Proposal if there are not sufficient votes for approval of the
Charter Amendment Proposal at the annual meeting.
|
£
|
£
|
£
|
|
|
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY
EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED ABOVE. UNLESS A CONTRARY
DIRECTION IS INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL NOMINEES LISTED
IN PROPOSAL 1, “FOR” PROPOSAL 2, “FOR” PROPOSAL 3 AND “FOR” PROPOSAL 4 AS
MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT, EXCEPT THAT NO PROXY
VOTED “AGAINST” PROPOSAL 2 WILL BE VOTED “FOR” PROPOSAL 4. IF SPECIFIC
INSTRUCTIONS ARE INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE
THEREWITH.
|
Please
be sure to sign and date this Proxy in the box below.
|
Date |
|
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, “FOR”
PROPOSAL 2, “FOR” PROPOSAL 3 AND “FOR” PROPOSAL
4
|
Stockholder
sign above
|
Co-holder
(if any) sign above
|
|
Ç
|
Ç
|
¿ Detach above card,
sign, date and mail in postage paid envelope provided. ¿
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC.
The
above-signed hereby acknowledges receipt of Lakeland’s Annual Report for
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 and the accompanying Notice of
Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and hereby revokes any proxy or proxies
heretofore given with respect to the matters set forth above.
IMPORTANT:
Please sign as name(s) appear on this proxy and date this proxy. If a
joint account, each joint owner should sign. If signing for a corporation,
trust or partnership or as agent, attorney or fiduciary, indicate the
capacity in which you are signing.
PLEASE
ACT PROMPTLY
SIGN, DATE & MAIL YOUR
PROXY CARD TODAY
|
IF YOUR
ADDRESS HAS CHANGED, PLEASE CORRECT THE ADDRESS IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW AND
RETURN THIS PORTION WITH THE PROXY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________