UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
OR
¨ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-35966
bluebird bio, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware |
|
13-3680878 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
150 Second Street Cambridge, Massachusetts |
|
02141 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(339) 499-9300
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer |
|
x |
|
Accelerated filer |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|||
Non-accelerated filer |
|
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of October 30, 2015, there were 36,676,917 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We make such forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” or the negative of these words or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:
|
· |
the initiation, timing, progress and results of our preclinical and clinical studies, and our research and development programs; |
|
· |
our ability to advance product candidates into, and successfully complete, clinical studies; |
|
· |
our ability to advance our viral vector manufacturing and transduction capabilities; |
|
· |
the timing or likelihood of regulatory filings and approvals for our product candidates; |
|
· |
the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved; |
|
· |
the pricing and reimbursement of our product candidates, if approved; |
|
· |
the implementation of our business model, strategic plans for our business, product candidates and technology; |
|
· |
the scope of protection we are able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering our product candidates and technology; |
|
· |
estimates of our expenses, future revenues, capital requirements and our needs for additional financing; |
|
· |
the potential benefits of strategic collaboration agreements and our ability to enter into strategic arrangements; |
|
· |
our ability to maintain and establish collaborations or obtain additional grant funding; |
|
· |
our financial performance; |
|
· |
developments relating to our competitors and our industry; and |
|
· |
other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors. |
Any forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect our current views with respect to future events or to our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, those listed under Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available in the future.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q also contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business, and the markets for certain diseases, including data regarding the estimated size of those markets, and the incidence and prevalence of certain medical conditions. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances reflected in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources.
Form 10-Q
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
2 |
|||
Item 1. |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|
5 |
Item 2. |
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
17 |
Item 3. |
|
|
28 |
|
Item 4. |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
28 |
|||
Item 1. |
|
|
28 |
|
Item 1A. |
|
|
28 |
|
Item 5. |
|
|
55 |
|
Item 6. |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS |
|
|
|
|
bluebird bio, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except par value amounts)
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
417,510 |
|
|
$ |
347,845 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
289,954 |
|
|
|
125,710 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
734 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
4,521 |
|
Total current assets |
|
713,155 |
|
|
|
479,989 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
194,247 |
|
|
|
18,448 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
61,564 |
|
|
|
15,740 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
25,397 |
|
|
|
28,219 |
|
Goodwill |
|
13,128 |
|
|
|
13,128 |
|
Restricted cash and other non-current assets |
|
10,150 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
1,017,641 |
|
|
$ |
556,739 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
$ |
3,469 |
|
|
$ |
2,954 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
24,219 |
|
|
|
14,649 |
|
Deferred revenue, current portion |
|
5,889 |
|
|
|
25,375 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
33,577 |
|
|
|
42,978 |
|
Deferred rent, net of current portion |
|
8,010 |
|
|
|
8,674 |
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion |
|
37,431 |
|
|
|
5,302 |
|
Contingent consideration, net of current portion |
|
4,840 |
|
|
|
6,321 |
|
Construction financing lease obligation |
|
43,777 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
734 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
266 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
128,635 |
|
|
|
65,482 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 125,000 shares authorized; 36,641 and 32,340 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively |
|
366 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
1,155,482 |
|
|
|
638,389 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
50 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
(266,892 |
) |
|
|
(147,384 |
) |
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
889,006 |
|
|
|
491,257 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ |
1,017,641 |
|
|
$ |
556,739 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration revenue |
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
$ |
6,250 |
|
|
$ |
12,607 |
|
|
$ |
18,750 |
|
Research and license fees |
|
— |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Total revenue |
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
|
|
12,607 |
|
|
|
19,035 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
30,395 |
|
|
|
16,649 |
|
|
|
98,380 |
|
|
|
42,043 |
|
General and administrative |
|
13,704 |
|
|
|
6,648 |
|
|
|
31,765 |
|
|
|
17,924 |
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
352 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
44,451 |
|
|
|
23,375 |
|
|
|
132,685 |
|
|
|
60,045 |
|
Loss from operations |
|
(43,127 |
) |
|
|
(17,010 |
) |
|
|
(120,078 |
) |
|
|
(41,010 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
263 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
(42,864 |
) |
|
|
(17,030 |
) |
|
|
(119,448 |
) |
|
|
(40,962 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
11,797 |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(42,924 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,030 |
) |
|
$ |
(119,508 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,165 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
103 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
Comprehensive loss |
$ |
(42,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,104 |
) |
|
$ |
(119,387 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,239 |
) |
Net loss per share - basic and diluted: |
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.52 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.14 |
) |
Weighted-average number of common shares used in computing net loss per share - basic and diluted: |
|
36,384 |
|
|
|
28,115 |
|
|
|
33,979 |
|
|
|
25,593 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|||||
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ |
(119,508 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,165 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash benefit on release of tax valuation allowance |
|
— |
|
|
|
(11,797 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
5,381 |
|
|
|
2,558 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
31,011 |
|
|
|
7,757 |
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
528 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
(2,717 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
623 |
|
|
|
(2,604 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
5,613 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
12,643 |
|
|
|
(19,005 |
) |
Deferred rent |
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
2,124 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(65,344 |
) |
|
|
(44,029 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
(8,816 |
) |
|
|
209 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
(3,618 |
) |
|
|
(6,303 |
) |
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired |
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,673 |
) |
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
(470,499 |
) |
|
|
(174,021 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities |
|
132,239 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(350,694 |
) |
|
|
(184,788 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for contingent purchase price consideration |
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from public offering of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
477,247 |
|
|
|
109,766 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
8,909 |
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
485,703 |
|
|
|
112,141 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
69,665 |
|
|
|
(116,676 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
347,845 |
|
|
|
206,279 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ |
417,510 |
|
|
$ |
89,603 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired in acquisition |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
43,759 |
|
Liabilities assumed in acquisition |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
12,768 |
|
Equity issued in acquisition |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
19,348 |
|
Construction financing lease obligation |
$ |
43,777 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ |
1,475 |
|
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
Stock option exercise proceeds receivable |
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Description of the business
bluebird bio, Inc. (the “Company” or “bluebird”) was incorporated in Delaware on April 16, 1992, and is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Company develops, manufactures and intends to market therapies to safely and effectively deliver genes useful in the treatment of severe genetic and rare diseases and in the field of T cell-based immunotherapy. Since its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all of its resources to its research and development efforts relating to its product candidates, including activities to manufacture product candidates, conduct clinical studies of its product candidates, perform preclinical research to identify new product candidates and provide general and administrative support for these operations.
In June 2015, the Company sold 2,941,176 shares of common stock through an underwritten public offering at a price of $170.00 per share. The aggregate net proceeds received by the Company from the offering were $477.2 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of approximately $22.8 million.
2. Summary of significant accounting policies and basis of presentation
Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the interim periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the notes thereto, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 25, 2015.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Precision Genome Engineering, Inc. (“Pregenen”), bluebird bio France – SARL, bluebird bio Australia Pty Ltd. and bluebird bio Securities Corporation. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to GAAP. The Company views its operations and manages its business in one operating segment. All material long-lived assets of the Company reside in the United States.
Summary of accounting policies
The significant accounting policies and estimates used in preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements are described in the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the notes thereto, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Beginning in the third quarter of 2015, the Company records certain estimated construction costs incurred and reported to us by a landlord as an asset and corresponding construction financing lease obligation on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. See Note 7, “Commitments and contingencies,” for additional information. There have been no other material changes in the Company’s significant accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
Contingent consideration
Each reporting period, the Company revalues the contingent consideration obligations associated with business combinations to their fair value and records within operating expenses increases in their fair value as contingent consideration expense and decreases in the fair value as contingent consideration income. Changes in contingent consideration result from changes in the assumptions regarding probabilities of successful achievement of related milestones, the estimated timing in which the milestones are achieved and the discount rate used to estimate the fair value of the liability. Contingent consideration may change significantly as development of the Company’s programs in certain indications progress and additional data are obtained, impacting the Company’s assumptions. The
5
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
assumptions used in estimating fair value require significant judgment. The use of different assumptions and judgments could result in a materially different estimate of fair value. See Note 4, “Fair value measurements,” for additional information.
Net income (loss) per share
Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated by dividing the net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common equivalent shares outstanding for the period, including any dilutive effect from outstanding stock options, unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units, employee stock purchase plan, warrants, and acquisition holdback shares using the treasury stock method.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used in the following areas, among others: fair value estimates used to assess potential impairment of long-lived assets, construction financing lease obligations, contingent consideration, stock-based compensation expense, accrued expenses, revenue and income taxes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
3. Marketable securities
The following table summarizes the available-for-sale securities held at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
Description |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
September 30, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities and treasuries |
|
$ |
472,191 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
(82 |
) |
|
$ |
472,235 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
11,960 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
11,966 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
484,151 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
484,201 |
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
131,589 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
131,536 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
12,640 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
12,622 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
144,229 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
$ |
144,158 |
|
No available-for-sale securities held as of September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014 had remaining maturities greater than three years.
6
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
The following table sets forth the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
Description |
|
Total |
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) |
|
|
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
|
||||
September 30, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
417,510 |
|
|
$ |
338,073 |
|
|
$ |
79,437 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities and treasuries |
|
|
472,235 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
472,235 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
11,966 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,966 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
901,711 |
|
|
$ |
338,073 |
|
|
$ |
563,638 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration |
|
$ |
8,336 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
8,336 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
8,336 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
8,336 |
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
347,845 |
|
|
$ |
347,845 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
131,536 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
131,536 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
12,622 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
12,622 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
492,003 |
|
|
$ |
347,845 |
|
|
$ |
144,158 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration |
|
$ |
6,796 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
6,796 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
6,796 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
6,796 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original final maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, cash and cash equivalents comprise funds in cash, money market accounts and U.S. government agency securities.
Marketable securities
The amortized cost of available-for-sale securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the balance in the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was composed solely of activity related to the Company’s available-for-sale marketable securities. There were no realized gains or losses recognized on the sale or maturity of available-for-sale securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and as a result, the Company did not reclassify any amounts out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the same period.
The aggregate fair value of securities held by the Company in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $197.0 million and $134.4 million, respectively. The Company has the intent and ability to hold such securities until recovery. The Company determined that there was no material change in the credit risk of the above investments. As a result, the Company determined it did not hold any investments with an other-than-temporary impairment as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
7
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
In connection with the acquisition of Pregenen, the Company recorded contingent consideration pertaining to the amounts potentially payable to Pregenen’s former equityholders pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, Pregenen and Pregenen’s former equityholders. Contingent consideration is measured at fair value and is based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The valuation of contingent consideration uses assumptions the Company believes would be made by a market participant. The Company assesses these estimates on an on-going basis as additional data impacting the assumptions is obtained. Future changes in the fair value of contingent consideration related to updated assumptions and estimates are recognized within the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
Contingent consideration may change significantly as development progresses and additional data are obtained, impacting the Company’s assumptions regarding probabilities of successful achievement of related milestones used to estimate the fair value of the liability and the timing in which they are expected to be achieved. In evaluating the fair value information, considerable judgment is required to interpret the market data used to develop the estimates. The estimates of fair value may not be indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. Accordingly, the use of different market assumptions and/or different valuation techniques could result in materially different fair value estimates.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the measurement of fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration are probabilities of successful achievement of preclinical, clinical and commercial milestones, the period in which these milestones are expected to be achieved ranging from 2016 to 2026 and discount rates ranging from 9.8% to 14.0%. Significant increases or decreases in any of the probabilities of success would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement, respectively. Significant increases or decreases in these other inputs would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement, respectively.
The table below provides a roll-forward of fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration obligations, which include Level 3 inputs (in thousands):
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2015 |
|
|
Beginning balance |
$ |
6,796 |
|
Additions |
|
— |
|
Changes in fair value |
|
2,540 |
|
Payments |
|
(1,000 |
) |
Ending balance |
$ |
8,336 |
|
As of September 30, 2015, $3.5 million of the fair value of the Company’s total contingent consideration obligations was reflected as a component of accrued expenses and other current liabilities within the condensed consolidated balance sheets, with the remaining balance of $4.8 million reflected as a non-current liability. A $1.0 million milestone under the Stock Purchase Agreement was achieved during the second quarter of 2015, and was paid to the former equityholders of Pregenen during the third quarter of 2015.
8
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
5. Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment, net, consists of the following (in thousands):
|
September 30, 2015 |
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
||
Computer equipment and software |
$ |
1,092 |
|
|
$ |
814 |
|
Office equipment |
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
Laboratory equipment |
|
9,747 |
|
|
|
7,223 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
10,969 |
|
|
|
10,318 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
44,527 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total property and equipment, gross |
|
67,420 |
|
|
|
19,141 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
(5,856 |
) |
|
|
(3,401 |
) |
Total Property and equipment, net |
$ |
61,564 |
|
|
$ |
15,740 |
|
Construction-in-progress as of September 30, 2015 includes $43.8 million related to construction costs incurred by the landlord at 60 Binney Street in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Please refer to Note 7, "Commitments and contingencies," for further information.
6. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
September 30, 2015 |
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
||
Employee compensation |
$ |
5,358 |
|
|
$ |
4,943 |
|
Accrued goods and services |
|
13,034 |
|
|
|
7,358 |
|
Accrued professional fees |
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
Deferred rent, current portion |
|
938 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
Contingent consideration, current portion |
|
3,496 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Other |
|
330 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
$ |
24,219 |
|
|
$ |
14,649 |
|
The change in fair value of contingent consideration was primarily related to an increase in the probability of successful achievement of milestones expected to be achieved within the next twelve months.
7. Commitments and contingencies
The Company is party to various agreements, principally relating to licensed technology, that require future payments relating to milestones not met at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 or royalties on future sales of specified products.
The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, generally the Company’s business partners or customers, in connection with claims by any third party with respect to the Company’s products or business activities. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual any time after execution of the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited. The Company has never incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements.
The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary bluebird bio France – SARL participates in the French Crédit d’Impôt Recherche (“CIR”) program, which allows companies to monetize up to 30% of eligible research expenses. The Company received aggregate reimbursement of €1.6 million related to years 2012 through 2014. The Company has not yet applied for €0.5 million related to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which is classified as a current asset within the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2015. The years 2012 through 2015 are open and subject to examination.
9
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
On June 30, 2014, the Company acquired Pregenen. During the second quarter of 2015, a $1.0 million milestone under the Stock Purchase Agreement was achieved, which resulted in a $1.0 million payment to the former equityholders of Pregenen during the third quarter of 2015. The Company may be required to make up to an additional $134.0 million in future contingent cash payments to the former equityholders of Pregenen upon the achievement of certain preclinical, clinical and commercial milestones related to the Pregenen technology, of which $14.0 million relates to preclinical milestones, $20.1 million relates to clinical milestones and $99.9 million relates to commercial milestones. In accordance with accounting for business combinations guidance, contingent consideration liabilities are required to be recognized on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Estimating the fair value of contingent consideration requires the use of significant assumptions primarily relating to probabilities of successful achievement of certain preclinical, clinical and commercial milestones, the expected timing in which these milestones will be achieved and discount rates. The use of different assumptions could result in materially different estimates of fair value. See Note 4, “Fair value measurements,” for additional information.
On June 3, 2013, the Company entered into a nine-year building lease for approximately 43,600 square feet of space located at 150 Second Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, commencing on the earlier of the substantial completion of the Company’s build-out work or January 1, 2014. This lease was amended in June 2014 to add an additional approximately 9,900 square feet. The lease originally had monthly lease payments of $0.2 million for the first 12 months, which increased to $0.3 million per month beginning in December 2014 due to the lease amendment, with annual rent escalations thereafter and provides a rent abatement of $0.2 million per month for the first six months. The total operating lease obligation of the noncancellable term of this agreement is $29.5 million. In addition, the lease provides a contribution from the landlord towards the initial build-out of the space of up to $7.8 million. The Company has the option to extend this lease by an additional five years. In accordance with the lease, the Company entered into a cash-collateralized irrevocable standby letter of credit in the amount of $1.3 million, naming the landlord as beneficiary. This letter of credit was reduced to $0.8 million during the second quarter of 2015, which was the first anniversary of the rent commencement date, and may be further reduced to $0.6 million upon the second anniversary of the rent commencement date.
On June 29, 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for additional office space located at 215 First Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Under the terms of the lease, the Company leased approximately 15,120 square feet starting on July 13, 2015 for $0.5 million per year in base rent, which is subject to a 3% annual rent increase plus certain operating expenses and taxes. The lease will continue until the end of the 60th full calendar month following the date the landlord delivers the premises to the Company, and includes early termination provisions that could allow the Company to terminate the lease at the end of the 20th full calendar month following the delivery of the premises if the Company meets certain conditions specified within the lease. Under the terms of the lease, the Company will also lease an additional 8,075 square feet of office space in the same premises starting on January 1, 2016 for an additional $0.3 million per year in base rent, which is subject to a 3% annual rent increase plus certain operating expenses and taxes.
On September 21, 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for additional office and laboratory space located in a building (the “Building”) under construction at 60 Binney Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts (the “60 Binney Lease”). Under the terms of the 60 Binney Lease, starting on October 1, 2016, the Company will lease approximately 253,108 square feet of office and laboratory space at $72.50 per square foot per year, or $18.4 million per year in base rent, which is subject to scheduled annual rent increases of 1.75% plus certain operating expenses and taxes. The Company also executed a $9.2 million letter of credit upon signing the 60 Binney Lease, which was required to be collateralized with a bank account at a financial institution in accordance with the 60 Binney Lease agreement. The 60 Binney Lease will continue until the end of the 120th full calendar month following April 2017 or the earlier the date the Company occupies the Building or other conditions specified in the 60 Binney Lease occur. Pursuant to a work letter entered into in connection with the 60 Binney Lease, the landlord will contribute an aggregate of $42.4 million toward the cost of construction and tenant improvements for the Building. The purpose of the 60 Binney Lease is to supplement and eventually replace the Company’s current leased premises at 150 Second Street and 215 First Street in Cambridge, Massachusetts and the Company intends to move its corporate headquarters to 60 Binney Street in mid-2017. The Company has the option to extend the 60 Binney Lease for two successive five-year terms.
Because the Company is involved in the construction project, including having responsibility to pay for a portion of the costs of finish work and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing elements of the Building, the Company is deemed for accounting purposes to be the owner of the Building during the construction period. Accordingly, the Company has recorded project construction costs incurred by the landlord as an asset in “Property and equipment, net” and a related financing obligation in “Construction financing lease obligation” on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.
10
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
The Company bifurcates its future lease payments pursuant to the 60 Binney Lease into (i) a portion that is allocated to the Building and (ii) a portion that is allocated to the land on which the Building is being constructed, which is recorded as rental expense. Although the Company estimates that the Company will not begin making lease payments pursuant to the 60 Binney Lease until April 2017, the portion of the lease obligation allocated to the land is treated for accounting purposes as an operating lease that commenced upon execution of the 60 Binney Lease in September 2015. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized $0.1 million of non-cash rental expense attributable to the land.
As of September 30, 2015, Property and equipment, net, includes $43.8 million related to construction costs for the Building. The construction financing lease obligation related to the Building was $43.8 million. No cash was paid to the landlord related to the Building for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.
Once the landlord completes the construction of the Building, the Company will evaluate the 60 Binney Lease in order to determine whether or not the 60 Binney Lease meets the criteria for “sale-leaseback” treatment. If the 60 Binney Lease meets the “sale-leaseback” criteria, the Company will remove the asset and the related liability from its consolidated balance sheet and treat the 60 Binney Lease as either an operating or a capital lease based on the Company’s assessment of the accounting guidance. The Company expects that upon completion of construction of the Building the 60 Binney Lease will not meet the “sale-leaseback” criteria. If the 60 Binney Lease does not meet “sale-leaseback” criteria, the Company will treat the 60 Binney Lease as a financing obligation and will depreciate the asset in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy.
As of September 30, 2015, future minimum commitments under the 60 Binney Lease were as follows (in thousands):
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
$ |
— |
|
2016 |
|
$ |
— |
|
2017 |
|
$ |
13,061 |
|
2018 |
|
$ |
18,591 |
|
2019 |
|
$ |
18,917 |
|
2020 and thereafter |
|
$ |
147,379 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
197,948 |
|
The table above sets forth the future minimum rental payments that the Company is obligated to pay after taking occupancy of the 60 Binney Lease, including amounts reflected on the condensed consolidated balance sheet under the caption "Construction financing lease obligation". The Company expects to commence these rental payments upon completion of the Building, estimated to be April 2017.
8. Significant agreements
Celgene Corporation
Original Collaboration Agreement
On March 19, 2013, the Company entered into a Master Collaboration Agreement (the “Collaboration Agreement”) with Celgene Corporation (“Celgene”) to discover, develop and commercialize potentially disease-altering gene therapies in oncology. The collaboration is focused on applying gene therapy technology to genetically modify a patient’s own T cells, known as chimeric antigen receptor, or CAR T cells, to target and destroy cancer cells. Additionally, on March 19, 2013, the Company entered into a Platform Technology Sublicense Agreement (the “Sublicense Agreement”) with Celgene pursuant to which the Company obtained a sublicense to certain intellectual property from Celgene, originating under Celgene’s license from Baylor College of Medicine, for use in the collaboration.
Under the terms of the Collaboration Agreement, the Company received a $75.0 million up-front, non-refundable cash payment. The Company was responsible for conducting discovery, research and development activities through completion of Phase I clinical studies, if any, during the initial term of the Collaboration Agreement, or three years. The collaboration is governed by a joint steering committee (“JSC”) formed by an equal number of representatives from the Company and Celgene. The JSC, among other activities, reviews the collaboration program, reviews and evaluates product candidates and approves regulatory plans. In addition to the JSC,
11
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
the Collaboration Agreement provides that the Company and Celgene each appoint representatives to a patent committee, which is responsible for managing the intellectual property developed and used during the collaboration.
Amended Collaboration Agreement
On June 3, 2015, the Company and Celgene amended and restated the Collaboration Agreement (the “Amended Collaboration Agreement”). Under the Amended Collaboration Agreement, the parties will now focus the collaboration exclusively on anti- B-cell maturation antigen (“BCMA”) product candidates for a new three-year term. In connection with the Amended Collaboration Agreement, the Company received an upfront, one-time, non-refundable, non-creditable payment of $25.0 million to fund research and development under the collaboration. The collaboration will continue to be governed by the JSC.
Under the terms of the Amended Collaboration Agreement, for up to two product candidates selected for development under the collaboration, the Company is responsible for conducting and funding all research and development activities performed up through completion of the initial Phase I clinical study, if any, of such product candidate.
On a product candidate-by-product candidate basis, up through a specified period following enrollment of the first patient in an initial Phase I clinical study for such product candidate (the “Option Period”), the Company has granted Celgene an option to obtain an exclusive worldwide license to develop and commercialize such product candidate pursuant to a written agreement, the form of which the Company has already agreed upon, provided that, if Celgene does not exercise its option with respect to the first product candidate under the Amended Collaboration Agreement prior to the expiration of the applicable Option Period then it will not be permitted to exercise its option with respect to any future product candidates under the Amended Collaboration Agreement. In the event that Celgene exercises its option with respect to any product candidate, the Company may elect to co-develop and co-promote the product candidate in the United States, provided that, if the Company does not exercise its option co-develop and co-promote the first product candidate in-licensed by Celgene under the Amended Collaboration Agreement, then the Company will not be permitted to exercise its option to co-develop and co-promote any future product candidates under the Amended Collaboration Agreement.
If Celgene elects to exercise its option to exclusively in-license a product candidate, it must pay the Company an option fee in the amount of $10.0 million for the first product candidate and $15.0 million for any additional product candidates, plus an additional fee in the amount of $10.0 million in the event the Company does not exercise its option to co-develop and co-promote that product candidate in the United States. In addition to the applicable option fee, for each product candidate that is in-licensed by Celgene, and for which the Company does not exercise its option to co-develop and co-promote in the United States, the Company will be eligible to receive up to $10.0 million in clinical milestone payments, up to $117.0 million in regulatory milestone payments and up to $78.0 million in commercial milestone payments. The Company will also be eligible to receive a percentage of net sales as a royalty in a range from the mid-single digits to low-teens. The royalties payable to the Company are subject to certain reductions, including for any royalty payments required to be made by Celgene to acquire patent rights, with an aggregate minimum floor. Celgene will assume certain development obligations and must report on its progress in achieving these milestones on a quarterly basis.
If the Company elects to co-develop and co-promote a product candidate licensed by Celgene, then the Company and Celgene would share equally in all costs incurred relating to the development, commercialization and manufacturing of the product candidate within the United States and share equally in the profits generated by such product candidate in the United States. Additionally, if the Company elects to co-develop and co-promote a product candidate, then the milestones and royalties would decrease compared to those described above. Under this scenario, the Company would receive, per product, up to $10.0 million in clinical milestone payments and, outside of the United States, up to $54.0 million in regulatory milestone payments and up to $36.0 million in commercial milestone payments. In addition, to the extent any of the product candidates licensed by Celgene and co-developed and co-promoted by the Company are commercialized, the Company would be entitled to receive tiered royalty payments ranging from the mid-single digits to low-teens based on a percentage of net sales from sales generated outside of the United States. The royalties payable to the Company are subject to certain reductions, including for any royalty payments required to be made by Celgene to acquire patent rights, with an aggregate minimum floor. The co-development and co-promotion agreement would be governed by a joint governance committee, or JGC, formed by representatives from the Company and Celgene. The JGC will, among other activities, supervise the overall performance of the development and commercialization of elected product candidates and licensed products for United States administration.
Celgene is solely responsible for the manufacture and supply of drug product for any optioned product candidate. Under the Amended Collaboration Agreement, subject to customary “back-up” supply rights granted to Celgene, the Company has the sole right to manufacture or have manufactured supplies of vectors and associated payloads manufactured for incorporation into the optioned
12
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
product candidate. Celgene would reimburse the Company for its costs to manufacture and supply such vectors and associated payloads, plus a mid-single digit mark-up.
If Celgene does not exercise its option with respect to any product candidate prior to expiration of the applicable option period, then the Company has the right to develop that product candidate outside the scope of the Amended Collaboration Agreement.
Either party may terminate the Amended Collaboration Agreement upon written notice to the other party in the event of the other party’s uncured material breach. Celgene may terminate the Amended Collaboration Agreement for any reason upon prior written notice to the Company. If the agreement is terminated, rights to product candidates in development at the time of such termination will be allocated to the parties through a mechanism included in the agreement. In addition, if Celgene terminates the agreement for the Company’s breach, any then-existing co-development and co-promotion agreement will be automatically terminated and replaced with a license agreement for such product candidate and any amounts payable by Celgene under any then-existing product license agreements will be reduced.
Under the Amended Collaboration Agreement, the so-called “call option” under the prior collaboration agreement, pursuant to which Celgene had the option to terminate the collaboration agreement and obtain fully paid-up licenses to product candidates in the event of a change of control transaction involving the Company, has been eliminated.
Under the Sublicense Agreement, the Company will continue to have access to certain intellectual property rights in-licensed to Celgene pursuant to its collaboration agreement with the Baylor College of Medicine, which was first established in connection with the initiation of the original Collaboration Agreement between the Company and Celgene.
Accounting Analysis
The Company’s Amended Collaboration Agreement with Celgene contains the following deliverables: (i) research and development services, (ii) participation on the JSC, (iii) participation on the patent committee, (iv) a license to the first product candidate, (v) manufacture of vectors and associated payload for incorporation into the first optioned product candidate under the license, and (vi) participation on the JGC under the co-development and co-promotion agreement for the first optioned product candidate under the license.
The license to the first product candidate is considered a deliverable at the inception of the arrangement and therefore the associated option fee is included in allocable arrangement consideration. The Company believes there is minimal risk with regard to whether Celgene will exercise the option based on the successful completion of preclinical activities and proximity of enrollment of the first patient in an initial Phase I clinical study for this product candidate. Further, Celgene loses the right to option any other product candidates if it does not agree to license the first product candidate. The Company has determined that the obligation within the license to manufacture or have manufactured supplies of vectors and associated payloads for incorporation into the first optioned product candidate is a deliverable, consistent with the option to license the first product candidate.
However, the Company has determined that the options to license any additional product candidates are substantive options and therefore are not considered deliverables at execution of the Amended Collaboration Agreement. Celgene is not contractually obligated to exercise the options. Additionally, as a result of the uncertain outcome of the discovery, research and development activities, the Company is at risk with regard to whether Celgene will exercise the options to license additional product candidates. Moreover, the Company has determined that the options are not priced at a significant and incremental discount. Accordingly, the options to other product candidates are not considered deliverables at the inception of the arrangement and the associated option fees are not included in allocable arrangement consideration.
The Company concluded that each of the three delivered elements at the inception of the agreement (research and development services, participation on the JSC and participation on the patent committee) has standalone value from the other undelivered elements. Additionally, the Amended Collaboration Agreement does not include return rights related to the collaboration term. Accordingly, each deliverable qualifies as a separate unit of accounting.
The Company determined that each of the identified deliverables have the same period of performance (the three year term through projected initial Phase I study completion) and have the same pattern of revenue recognition, ratably over the period of performance as there is no other discernible pattern of recognition. The Company identified the allocable arrangement consideration as the $25.0 million up-front research and development funding payment, $10.0 million option fee for the first product candidate, $20.0
13
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
million related to remaining deferred revenue from the original Collaboration Agreement, and $54.1 million of contingent revenue related to the estimated amounts that will be received from Celgene for manufacturing services. The $109.0 million total allocable arrangement consideration was allocated based on the relative estimated selling price of the separate units of accounting at the inception of the amended agreement, resulting in $17.3 million allocated to the three delivered elements at the inception of the agreement, which will be recognized over an initial three year term. This initial term will be revisited as the development plan timing changes or as a result of other events that impact the period over which the Company’s obligations relate.
The Company evaluated all of the milestones that may be received in connection with Celgene’s option to license a product candidate resulting from the collaboration. In evaluating if a milestone is substantive, the Company assesses whether: (i) the consideration is commensurate with either the Company’s performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the Company’s performance to achieve the milestone, (ii) the consideration relates solely to past performance and (iii) the consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. All clinical and regulatory milestones that may be received under the option to the license agreement are considered substantive on the basis of the contingent nature of the milestone, specifically reviewing factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the milestone as well as the level of effort and investment required. Accordingly, such amounts will be recognized as revenue in full in the period in which the associated milestone is achieved, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met. All commercial milestones will be accounted for in the same manner as royalties and recorded as revenue upon achievement of the milestone, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 the Company recognized $12.6 million and $18.7 million, respectively, of revenue associated with its collaboration with Celgene related to the recognition of discovery, research and development services. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there was $43.3 million and $30.7 million, respectively, of total deferred revenue related to the Company’s collaboration with Celgene, which is classified as current or non-current in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, $15.6 million of which is currently expected to be recognized through the first half of 2018 with the remaining amount deferred until a later date.
9. Stock-based compensation and warrants
In January 2015, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2013 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (“2013 Plan”) was increased by approximately 1.3 million shares as a result of the automatic increase provision of the 2013 Plan. As of September 30, 2015, the total number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2013 Plan was approximately 0.6 million.
Stock-based compensation expense
Stock-based compensation expense by award type was as follows (in thousands):
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Stock options |
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
$ |
2,303 |
|
|
$ |
28,472 |
|
|
$ |
7,115 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
— |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
66 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
9,529 |
|
|
$ |
2,914 |
|
|
$ |
31,011 |
|
|
$ |
7,757 |
|
As of September 30, 2015, the Company had $97.1 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock options, restricted stock units, and the employee stock purchase plan that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.0 years.
On January 29, 2015, the Company entered into a Transitional Services and Separation Agreement with its Chief Scientific Officer, ending his employment with the Company effective July 6, 2015. Subsequent to this separation date, he is serving as a member of the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board. Under the terms of the agreement, outstanding options held by the Chief
14
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Scientific Officer were modified. The incremental value of the modification was estimated to be $3.0 million using a Black-Scholes option valuation model, which is being recognized within research and development expense on a straight-line basis through the date of separation. As a result of the modification, the Company recognized $0.2 million and $3.0 million of stock-based compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.
On April 10, 2015, the Company modified the vesting conditions of a stock option award held by a non-employee founder, which resulted in $6.7 million of stock-based compensation expense recognized to research and development expense during the second quarter of 2015.
Stock options
The following table summarizes the stock option activity under the Company’s equity award plans (shares in thousands):
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price per share |
|
||
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 |
|
3,652 |
|
|
$ |
12.30 |
|
Granted |
|
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
115.69 |
|
Exercised |
|
(1,124 |
) |
|
$ |
7.58 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
(55 |
) |
|
$ |
43.05 |
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2015 |
|
3,661 |
|
|
$ |
46.83 |
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2015 |
|
1,090 |
|
|
$ |
9.47 |
|
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2015 |
|
3,552 |
|
|
$ |
37.87 |
|
Options exercisable for approximately 1.1 million shares of common stock were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, resulting in total proceeds to the Company of $8.5 million. In accordance with the Company’s equity award plans, the shares were issued from a pool of shares reserved for issuance under the equity award plans.
Restricted stock units
The following table summarizes the restricted stock unit activity under the Company’s equity award plans (shares in thousands):
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value |
|
||
Unvested balance at December 31, 2014 |
|
179 |
|
|
$ |
30.47 |
|
Granted |
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
165.62 |
|
Vested |
|
(62 |
) |
|
$ |
30.47 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
30.47 |
|
Unvested balance at September 30, 2015 |
|
149 |
|
|
$ |
64.11 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan
The Company’s 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2013 ESPP”) authorizes the initial issuance of up to a total of 238,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to participating employees. The first offering period under the 2013 ESPP closed on January 31, 2015, resulting in the purchase of 6,780 shares of common stock. The second offering period under the 2013 ESPP closed on July 31, 2015, resulting in the purchase of 3,765 shares of common stock.
Warrants
As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had no and 0.2 million warrants outstanding to purchase common stock. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, there were 0.2 million warrants exercised and no cancellations or expirations.
15
bluebird bio, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
10. Income taxes
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using statutory rates. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of the favorable tax attributes in future tax returns, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against the Company’s otherwise recognizable net deferred tax assets. The Company has allocated its valuation allowance in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, which resulted in a current deferred tax asset of $0.7 million and a non-current deferred tax liability of $0.7 million as of September 30, 2015.
11. Net loss per share
The following common stock equivalents were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share for the periods indicated because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect (in thousands):
|
September 30, |
|
|||||
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Warrants |
|
— |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Outstanding stock options |
|
3,661 |
|
|
|
4,042 |
|
Unvested restricted stock |
|
— |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
149 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
ESPP shares |
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Acquisition holdback |
|
94 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
4,667 |
|
16
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial information and the notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited financial information and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on February 25, 2015.
Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may be deemed to be forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We make such forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” and similar expressions (as well as other words or expressions referencing future events, conditions or circumstances) are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Our actual results and the timing of certain events may differ materially from the results discussed, projected, anticipated, or indicated in any forward-looking statements. We caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we operate may differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we operate are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report, they may not be predictive of results or developments in future periods.
The following information and any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of factors discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including those risks identified under Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors.
We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements made by us, which speak only as of the date they are made. We disclaim any obligation, except as specifically required by law and the rules of the SEC, to publicly update or revise any such statements to reflect any change in our expectations or in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements may be based, or that may affect the likelihood that actual results will differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company committed to developing potentially transformative gene therapies for severe genetic and rare diseases and in the field of T cell-based immunotherapy. With our lentiviral-based gene therapy and gene editing capabilities, we have built an integrated product platform with broad potential application in these areas. We believe that gene therapy for severe genetic diseases has the potential to change the way these patients are treated by correcting the underlying genetic defect that is the cause of their disease, rather than offering treatments that only address their symptoms. We and our scientific collaborators have generated what we believe is human proof-of-concept data for our gene therapy platform in three underserved diseases.
We are conducting a Phase II/III clinical study, called the Starbeam Study, of our most advanced product candidate, Lenti-D, to evaluate its safety and efficacy in subjects with childhood cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy, or CCALD, a rare, hereditary neurological disorder affecting young boys that is often fatal. In October 2013, we announced that the first subject had been treated in this study and in May 2015 we announced the achievement of enrollment of 18 subjects in this study. We are also conducting an observational study of subjects with CCALD treated by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant referred to as the ALD-103 study. Lenti-D has been granted Orphan Drug status by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, for the treatment of adrenoleukodystrophy.
We are also conducting two Phase I/II clinical studies in the United States, Australia, and Thailand and in France, called the Northstar (HGB-204) and HGB-205 studies, respectively, of our product candidate, LentiGlobin, to evaluate its safety and efficacy in subjects with beta-thalassemia major and sickle cell disease, or SCD, which are rare, hereditary blood disorders that often lead to severe anemia and shortened lifespans. We have initiated a Phase I clinical study in the United States, called the HGB-206 Study, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LentiGlobin in subjects with severe SCD. In June 2015, we announced that the first patient with severe SCD had been infused in the HGB-206 Study and we are planning to increase the number of subjects to be enrolled in the HGB-206 study from eight to twenty subjects. LentiGlobin has been granted Orphan Drug status by the FDA and EMA for both beta-thalassemia and severe SCD. LentiGlobin was granted Fast-Track designation by the FDA for the treatment of beta-thalassemia major in January 2013 and for the treatment of certain patients with severe SCD in May 2014. In January 2015, the FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation to LentiGlobin for the treatment of transfusion dependent patients with beta-thalassemia.
17
We have announced clinical data from our ongoing clinical studies of LentiGlobin in subjects with beta-thalassemia major and SCD. These data are summarized below.
|
· |
In December 2014, at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), we announced data from the first eight subjects treated with LentiGlobin in these studies. As of December 2014, in the first four subjects, each of whom had at least three months of follow-up, treatment with LentiGlobin resulted in sufficient hemoglobin production to reduce or eliminate the need for transfusion support among patients with beta-thalassemia major who would otherwise require chronic blood transfusions. These data included the first five subjects treated in the Northstar study and the first three subjects (two with beta-thalassemia major and one with severe SCD) from the HGB-205 study. |
|
· |
In June 2015, at the 20th Congress of the European Hematology Association, we announced long-term follow up of two subjects with beta-thalassemia major and early safety and efficacy data in the first subject with severe SCD treated with LentiGlobin in the HGB-205 study. As of May 2015, the two patients with beta-thalassemia major remained transfusion-independent for 16 and 14 months, respectively, and neither experienced a LentiGlobin-related adverse event. As of May 2015, the proportion of anti-sickling hemoglobin being produced by the first-ever subject with severe SCD treated with gene therapy has risen steadily and accounted for 45% of all hemoglobin production at the patient’s six-month visit post-drug product infusion; this is above the 30% threshold expected to potentially achieve a disease-modifying clinical effect. Further, as of May 2015, the patient with severe SCD had been free of transfusions for more than three months without complications or hospitalizations for SCD-related events post-transplant, and has demonstrated improvement in hemolysis markers. |
In November 2015, we announced that three abstracts related to our ongoing clinical studies of LentiGlobin have been accepted for presentation at the ASH annual meeting to be held in December 2015. As of the July 31, 2015 data cutoff for these abstracts:
|
· |
With respect to the Northstar study, for the seven subjects that have been monitored for at least 6 months post-infusion, three of the β0/β0 genotype and four of the non- β0/β0 genotype, the median level of HbAT87Q expression among these seven subjects was 5.2 g/dL, a range of 1.9 to 8.2 g/dL, with total hemoglobin ranging from 8.5 to 11.1 g/dL at last visit. All four non-β0/β0 subjects had been transfusion-free for at least 90 days, with a median of 287 days transfusion-free (range: 171 to 396 days). Two of the β0/β0 subjects received a single transfusion post-discharge, and one remained transfusion-dependent. |
|
· |
With respect to the HGB-205 study, the patient with severe SCD was producing approximately 51.5% anti-sickling hemoglobin (48 percent HbAT87Q, 1.8 percent HbF, 1.7 percent HbA2) at nine months post-infusion and remained free of transfusions. The patient with severe SCD had not had a post-treatment hospitalization for a disease-related event despite ceasing chronic transfusions on Day 88. Both patients in the study with beta-thalassemia major have remained transfusion-free for at least 15 months post-infusion, with consistent expression of HbAT87Q – both subjects are the β0/ βE genotype. |
|
· |
With respect to the HGB-206 study, LentiGlobin drug product had been manufactured for two patients with severe SCD and one subject had been infused. |
We currently plan to initiate two new clinical trials of LentiGlobin, called HGB-207, for adult and adolescent patients with beta-thalassemia major, and HGB-208, for pediatric patients with beta-thalassemia major. Each of these trials, once initiated, are currently expected to enroll approximately 15 patients to be evaluated for 24 months following treatment, and we expect that the primary endpoint of these trials will be 12 months of transfusion independence following treatment.
In May 2015, we announced that we believe we have reached general agreement with regulatory authorities in Europe and the United States regarding our development plans for LentiGlobin, which could potentially result in accelerated approvals in these jurisdictions. These discussions are summarized below.
|
· |
In Europe, we are participating in the Adaptive Pathways (formerly referred to as Adaptive Licensing) pilot program of the European Medicines Agency, or EMA. Based on our discussions with EMA, we believe it is possible to seek conditional approval of LentiGlobin for the treatment of adults and adolescents with beta-thalassemia major on the basis of the totality of clinical data, in particular reduction in transfusion need, from the ongoing Northstar study and supportive HGB-205 study. We believe that conversion to full approval will be subject to the successful completion of the HGB-207 and HGB-208 clinical trials, and collection of supportive long-term follow-up data and “real-life” post-approval data. |
|
· |
In the United States, we believe we have reached general agreement with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, on the major elements of our planned HGB-207 and HGB-208 clinical trials. Based on our discussions with the FDA, we believe that the data from these trials, together with data from our ongoing beta-thalassemia major clinical studies (Northstar and HGB-205), could form the basis for a Biologics License Application, or BLA, submission for LentiGlobin for the treatment of beta-thalassemia major. |
18
In March 2013, we entered into a global strategic collaboration with Celgene Corporation, or Celgene, to discover, develop and commercialize chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells, or CAR T cells, as potentially disease-altering therapies in oncology. This collaboration had an initial term of three years, and Celgene made a $75.0 million up-front, non-refundable cash payment to us as consideration for entering into the collaboration. In June 2015, we amended and restated the collaboration agreement, or the Amended Collaboration Agreement, to focus exclusively on anti-BCMA product candidates for a new three-year term. B-cell maturation antigen, or BCMA, is a cell surface protein that is expressed in normal plasma cells and in most multiple myeloma cells, but is absent from other normal tissues. As consideration for the Amended Collaboration Agreement, we received an upfront, non-refundable cash payment of $25.0 million to fund research and development under the collaboration. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized $1.3 million and $12.6 million, respectively, of revenue associated with our collaboration with Celgene related to the research and development services performed. As of September 30, 2015, we have classified $43.3 million of deferred revenue related to our collaboration with Celgene in the accompanying balance sheets. We expect the first anti-BCMA product candidate from this collaboration, bb2121, to enter clinical trials in early 2016.
In June 2014, we acquired Precision Genome Engineering, Inc., or Pregenen, a privately-held biotechnology company headquartered in Seattle, Washington. Through the acquisition, we obtained rights to Pregenen’s gene editing and cell signaling technology. The agreement provided for up to $135.0 million in future contingent cash payments by us upon the achievement of certain preclinical, clinical and commercial milestones related to the Pregenen technology, of which $15.0 million relates to preclinical milestones, $20.1 million relates to clinical milestones and $99.9 million relates to commercial milestones. During the second quarter of 2015, a $1.0 million milestone was achieved, which resulted in a $1.0 million payment to the former equityholders of Pregenen during the third quarter of 2015. We estimate future contingent cash payments have a fair value of $8.3 million as of September 30, 2015, $3.5 million of which is classified as a current liability.
As of September 30, 2015, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of approximately $901.7 million. We expect that our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our current operations through 2018.
Since our inception in 1992, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to our development efforts relating to our product candidates, including activities to manufacture product in compliance with good manufacturing practices, or GMP, to conduct clinical studies of our product candidates, to provide general and administrative support for these operations and to protect our intellectual property. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We have funded our operations primarily through the sale of common stock in our public offerings, private placements of preferred stock and warrants and through collaborations.
We have never been profitable and have incurred net losses in each year since inception. Our net losses were $119.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and our accumulated deficit was $266.9 million as of September 30, 2015. Substantially all our net losses resulted from costs incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for at least the next several years. We expect our expenses will increase substantially in connection with our ongoing and planned activities, as we:
|
· |
conduct clinical studies for our Lenti-D and LentiGlobin product candidates; |
|
· |
increase research and development-related activities for the discovery and development of oncology product candidates, including bb2121; |
|
· |
continue our research and development efforts; |
|
· |
manufacture clinical study materials and develop large-scale manufacturing capabilities; |
|
· |
seek regulatory approval for our product candidates; and |
|
· |
add personnel to support our product development and commercialization efforts. |
We do not expect to generate revenue from product sales unless and until we successfully complete development and obtain regulatory approval for one or more of our product candidates, which we expect will take a number of years and is subject to significant uncertainty. We have no commercial-scale manufacturing facilities, and all of our manufacturing activities are contracted out to third parties. Additionally, we currently utilize third-party contract research organizations, or CROs, to carry out our clinical development activities; and we do not yet have a sales and marketing organization. If we seek to obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses as we prepare for product sales, marketing, manufacturing, and distribution. Accordingly, we will seek to fund our operations through public or private equity or debt financings, strategic collaborations, or other sources. However, we may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other arrangements
19
when needed on favorable terms or at all. Our failure to raise capital or enter into such other arrangements as and when needed would have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to develop our products.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate revenues from the sale of our products, we may not become profitable. If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable to continue our operations at planned levels and be forced to reduce our operations.
Financial operations overview
Revenue
To date, we have not generated any revenues from the sale of products. Our revenues have been derived from collaboration arrangements, research fees, license fees and grant revenues.
Collaboration revenue is generated exclusively from our collaboration arrangement with Celgene. The terms of this arrangement contain multiple deliverables, which include: (i) research and development services, (ii) participation on the joint steering committee (iii) participation on the patent committee, (iv) a license to the first product candidate, (v) manufacture of vectors and associated payload for incorporation into the first optioned product candidate under the license, and (vi) participation on the joint governance committee under the co-development and co-promotion agreement for the first optioned product candidate under the license. We recognize arrangement consideration allocated to each unit of accounting when all of the revenue recognition criteria in Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, or ASC 605, are satisfied for that particular unit of accounting. We expect that $17.3 million of revenue from the Celgene arrangement associated with research and development services, joint steering committee services and patent committee services will be recognized ratably over the associated period of performance, which was initially estimated to be three years from the date of the agreement in June 2015.
Research and license fee revenue is primarily generated through license and research and development agreements with strategic partners and nonprofit organizations for the development and commercialization of our product candidates. There are no performance, cancellation, termination, or refund provisions in any of our arrangements that contain material financial consequences to us.
Nonrefundable license fees are recognized as revenue upon delivery provided there are no undelivered elements in the arrangement. Research fees are recognized as revenue over the period we perform the associated services or on a straight-line basis if the pattern of performance cannot be estimated.
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for the development of our product candidates, which include:
|
· |
employee-related expenses, including salaries, benefits, travel and stock-based compensation expense; |
|
· |
expenses incurred under agreements with CROs and clinical sites that conduct our clinical studies; |
|
· |
costs of acquiring, developing, and manufacturing clinical study materials; |
|
· |
facilities, depreciation, and other expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities, insurance, and other supplies; |
|
· |
costs associated with our research platform and preclinical activities; |
|
· |
costs associated with in-licensing other product candidates or technologies for use in preclinical and clinical activities; |
|
· |
costs associated with our regulatory, quality assurance and quality control operations; and |
|
· |
amortization of intangible assets. |
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Costs for certain development activities are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using information and data provided to us by our vendors and our clinical sites. We cannot determine with certainty the duration and completion costs of the current or future clinical studies of our product candidates or if, when, or to what extent we will generate revenues from the commercialization and sale of any of our product candidates that obtain regulatory approval. We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for any of our product candidates.
20
The duration, costs, and timing of clinical studies and development of our product candidates will depend on a variety of factors, including:
|
· |
the scope, rate of progress, and expense of our ongoing as well as any additional clinical studies and other research and development activities we undertake; |
|
· |
future clinical study results; |
|
· |
uncertainties in clinical study enrollment rates; |
|
· |
changing standards for regulatory approval; and |
|
· |
the timing and receipt of any regulatory approvals. |
A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of a product candidate could mean a significant change in the costs and timing associated with the development of that product candidate. For example, if the FDA, or another regulatory authority were to require us to conduct clinical studies beyond those that we currently anticipate will be required for the completion of clinical development of a product candidate or if we experience significant delays in enrollment in any of our clinical studies, we could be required to expend significant additional financial resources and time on the completion of clinical development for our product candidates.
We plan to increase our research and development expenses for the foreseeable future as we continue to advance the clinical development of our Lenti-D and LentiGlobin product candidates, conduct research and development activities in the field of oncology and continue the research and development of product candidates using our gene editing technology platform. Our research and development activities include the following:
|
· |
We are conducting a Phase II/III clinical study to examine the safety and efficacy of our Lenti-D product candidate in the treatment of CCALD. In October 2013, we announced that the first subject had been treated in this study and in May 2015 we announced the achievement of enrollment of 18 subjects in this study. We are also conducting an observational study of subjects with CCALD treated by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. |
|
· |
We are conducting a Phase I/II clinical study in the United States, Australia and Thailand to study the safety and efficacy of our LentiGlobin product candidate in the treatment of subjects with beta-thalassemia major. In March 2014, we announced that the first subject had been treated in this study. We recently amended the protocol for this study to expand enrollment to include up to three adolescent patients. |
|
· |
We are conducting a Phase I/II clinical study in France to study the safety and efficacy of our LentiGlobin product candidate in the treatment of subjects with beta-thalassemia major and severe SCD. In December 2013, we announced that the first subject beta-thalassemia major had been treated in this study and in October 2014, we announced that the first subject with SCD had been treated in this study. |
|
· |
We have initiated a Phase I clinical study in the United States to study the safety and efficacy of our LentiGlobin product candidate in the treatment of subjects with severe SCD. In June 2015, we announced that the first patient with severe SCD had been infused in the HGB-206 Study and we are planning to increase the number of subjects to be enrolled in the HGB-206 study from eight to twenty subjects. |
|
· |
We are conducting research and development activities in the field of oncology and expect the first product candidate from our collaboration with Celgene, bb2121 to treat multiple myeloma, to enter clinical trials in early 2016. |
|
· |
We are planning to initiate two new clinical trials of LentiGlobin, called HGB-207, for adult and adolescent patients with beta-thalassemia major, and HGB-208, for pediatric patients with beta-thalassemia major. |
|
· |
We will continue to manufacture clinical study materials in support of our clinical studies. |
21
Our direct research and development expenses consist principally of external costs, such as fees paid to investigators, consultants, central laboratories and CROs in connection with our clinical studies, costs to in-license product candidates and new technologies, and costs related to acquiring and manufacturing clinical study materials. We allocate salary and benefit costs directly related to specific programs. We do not allocate personnel-related discretionary bonus or stock-based compensation costs, costs associated with our general discovery platform improvements, depreciation or other indirect costs that are deployed across multiple projects under development and, as such, the costs are separately classified as personnel and other expenses in the table below:
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Lenti-D |
$ |
2,837 |
|
|
$ |
2,762 |
|
|
$ |
10,729 |
|
|
$ |
7,804 |
|
LentiGlobin |
|
10,937 |
|
|
|
5,789 |
|
|
|
25,070 |
|
|
|
15,927 |
|
Pre-clinical programs |
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
11,596 |
|
|
|
3,723 |
|
Total direct research and development expense |
|
17,454 |
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|