UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY

Iowa		42-0644327
(State of Incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

118 Second Avenue, S.E., Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52407
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (319) 399-5700

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES o NO þ

As of April 27, 2009, 26,591,386 shares of common stock were outstanding.

 

 

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
March 31, 2009

		Page
Forward-Looking Information			2
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 (unaudited) and December 31, 2008			3
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008			4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited) for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008			5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008			6
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements			7
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			17
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			18
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			27
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			28
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			28
Item 1A. Risk Factors			28
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			28
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			29
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			29
Item 5. Other Information			29
Item 6. Exhibits			29
Signatures and Certifications			30
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

It is important to note that our actual results could differ materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements. Information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

		March 31,				December 31,
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data and Number of Shares)		2009				2008
		(unaudited)
ASSETS
Investments
Fixed maturities
Held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value $13,033 in 2009 and $15,146 in 2008)		$	13,027			$	15,177
Available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost $1,973,713 in 2009 and $1,942,466 in 2008)			1,957,298				1,898,569
Equity securities, at fair value (cost $67,057 in 2009 and $66,246 in 2008)			93,283				120,985
Trading securities, at fair value (amortized cost $10,789 in 2009 and $8,713 in 2008)			10,405				8,055
Mortgage loans			7,701				7,821
Policy loans			7,734				7,808
Other long-term investments			11,307				11,216
Short-term investments			23,202				26,142
		$	2,123,957			$	2,095,773
Cash and cash equivalents		$	106,146			$	109,582
Accrued investment income			28,861				27,849
Premiums receivable			141,835				134,295
Deferred policy acquisition costs			150,602				158,265
Property and equipment (primarily land and buildings, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $28,609 in 2009 and $27,994 in 2008)			17,480				15,275
Reinsurance receivables and recoverables			50,856				60,275
Prepaid reinsurance premiums			1,783				1,559
Income taxes receivable			25,300				26,974
Deferred income taxes			15,110				8,297
Other assets			48,939				48,986
TOTAL ASSETS		$	2,710,869			$	2,687,130
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Future policy benefits and losses, claims and loss settlement expenses:
Property and casualty insurance		$	577,415			$	586,109
Life insurance			1,197,144				1,167,665
Unearned premiums			222,561				216,966
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			78,490				74,649
TOTAL LIABILITIES		$	2,075,610			$	2,045,389
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $3.33 1/3 par value; authorized 75,000,000 shares; 26,591,286 and 26,624,086 shares issued and outstanding in 2009 and 2008, respectively		$	88,638			$	88,747
Additional paid-in capital			138,952				138,511
Retained earnings			409,910				410,634
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax			(2,241	)			3,849
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	635,259			$	641,741
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	2,710,869			$	2,687,130

The Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data and Number of Shares)		2009				2008
Revenues
Net premiums earned		$	118,321			$	122,943
Investment income, net of investment expenses			23,271				28,055
Realized investment losses			(3,488	)			(1,154	)
Other income			159				199
		$	138,263			$	150,043
Benefits, Losses and Expenses
Losses and loss settlement expenses		$	86,078			$	67,482
Future policy benefits			3,388				5,846
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs			29,406				32,526
Other underwriting expenses			8,486				6,920
Disaster charges and other related expenses, net of recoveries			(358	)			—
Interest on policyholders’ accounts			9,772				10,446
		$	136,772			$	123,220
Income before income taxes		$	1,491			$	26,823
Federal income tax expense (benefit)			(1,779	)			6,696
Net Income		$	3,270			$	20,127
Weighted average common shares outstanding			26,613,378				27,190,796
Basic earnings per common share		$	0.12			$	0.74
Diluted earnings per common share		$	0.12			$	0.74
Cash dividends declared per common share		$	0.15			$	0.15

The Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands Except Number of Shares)		2009				2008
Common stock
Balance, beginning of year		$	88,747			$	90,653
Shares repurchased (33,300 in 2009 and 6,800 in 2008)			(111	)			(23	)
Shares issued from stock-based awards (500 in 2009 and 2,250 in 2008)			2				8
Balance, end of period		$	88,638			$	90,638
Additional paid-in capital
Balance, beginning of year		$	138,511			$	149,511
Compensation expense and related tax benefit for stock-based award grants			863				405
Shares repurchased			(427	)			(167	)
Shares issued from stock-based awards			5				29
Balance, end of period		$	138,952			$	149,778
Retained earnings
Balance, beginning of year		$	410,634			$	439,860
Net income			3,270				20,127
Dividends on common stock ($0.15 per share in 2009 and 2008)			(3,994	)			(4,079	)
Balance, end of period		$	409,910			$	455,908
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Balance, beginning of year		$	3,849			$	71,473
Change in net unrealized appreciation (1)			(6,295	)			(8,659	)
Change in underfunded status of employee benefit plans (2)			205				191
Balance, end of period		$	(2,241	)		$	63,005
Summary of changes
Balance, beginning of year		$	641,741			$	751,497
Net income			3,270				20,127
All other changes in stockholders’ equity accounts			(9,752	)			(12,295	)
Balance, end of period		$	635,259			$	759,329

The Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)		2009				2008
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income		$	3,270			$	20,127
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net bond premium accretion			705				581
Depreciation and amortization			899				897
Stock-based compensation expense			858				391
Realized investment losses			3,488				1,154
Net cash flows from trading investments			(2,068	)			(4,247	)
Deferred income tax benefit			(3,208	)			(1,024	)
Changes in:
Accrued investment income			(1,012	)			(187	)
Premiums receivable			(7,540	)			(17,713	)
Deferred policy acquisition costs			(1,927	)			(1,322	)
Reinsurance receivables			9,419				2,089
Prepaid reinsurance premiums			(224	)			69
Income taxes receivable/payable			1,674				8,417
Other assets			47				(630	)
Future policy benefits and losses, claims and loss settlement expenses			(6,489	)			1,669
Unearned premiums			5,595				9,856
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			4,157				8,800
Deferred income taxes			—				(546	)
Other, net			1,545				1,137
Total adjustments		$	5,919			$	9,391
Net cash provided by operating activities		$	9,189			$	29,518
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale investments		$	8,049			$	—
Proceeds from call and maturity of held-to-maturity investments			2,156				8,054
Proceeds from call and maturity of available-for-sale investments			83,586				157,940
Proceeds from short-term and other investments			5,234				30,682
Purchase of available-for-sale investments			(129,264	)			(159,669	)
Purchase of short-term and other investments			(2,046	)			(42,009	)
Net purchases and sales of property and equipment			(3,094	)			(347	)
Net cash used in investing activities		$	(35,379	)		$	(5,349	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Policyholders’ account balances:
Deposits to investment and universal life contracts		$	75,338			$	41,836
Withdrawals from investment and universal life contracts			(48,064	)			(45,876	)
Payment of cash dividends			(3,994	)			(4,079	)
Repurchase of common stock			(538	)			(190	)
Issuance of common stock			7				36
Tax benefit from issuance of common stock			5				15
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		$	22,754			$	(8,258	)
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents		$	(3,436	)		$	15,911
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period			109,582				252,565
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period		$	106,146			$	268,476

The Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The terms “United Fire,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to United Fire & Casualty Company or United Fire & Casualty Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliate, as the context requires. In the opinion of the management of United Fire, the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results reported for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year. The unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The review report of Ernst & Young LLP as of and for the three-month period ending March 31, 2009, accompanies the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I.

We maintain our records in conformity with the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the insurance departments of the states in which we are domiciled. To the extent that certain of these practices differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we have made adjustments to present the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial statement categories that are most dependent on management estimates and assumptions include investments, deferred policy acquisition costs, and future policy benefits and losses, claims and loss settlement expenses.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash, money market accounts and non-negotiable certificates of deposit with original maturities of three months or less. We made no payments for income taxes for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. We made no significant payments of interest for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, other than interest credited to policyholders’ accounts.

Income Taxes

For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we reported a federal income tax benefit of $1.8 million, compared to federal income tax expense of $6.7 million at an effective tax rate of 25.0 percent for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. Our effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate of 35.0 percent due principally to the effect of tax-exempt municipal bond interest income and non-taxable dividend income. In 2008, a reduction in the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets also had an effect on our effective tax rate.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examination by tax authorities for years before 2004 and state income tax examination for years before 2003. There are no ongoing examinations of income tax returns by federal or state tax authorities.

Contingent Liabilities

We have been named as a defendant in various lawsuits, including actions seeking certification from the court to proceed as a class action suit and actions filed by individual policyholders, relating to disputes arising from damages that occurred as a result of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. As of March 31, 2009, there were in excess of 350 individual policyholder cases pending, and an additional 11 class action cases pending. These cases have been filed in Louisiana state courts and federal district courts and involve, among other claims, disputes as to the amount of reimbursable claims in particular cases, as well as the scope of insurance coverage under homeowners and commercial property policies due to flooding, civil authority actions, loss of use and business interruption. Certain of these cases also claim a breach of duty of good faith or violations of Louisiana insurance claims-handling laws or regulations and involve claims for punitive or exemplary damages. Other cases claim that under Louisiana’s so-called “Valued Policy Law,” the insurers must pay the total insured value of a home that is totally destroyed if any portion of such damage was caused by a covered peril, even if the principal cause of the loss was an excluded peril. Other cases challenge the scope or enforceability of the water damage exclusion in the policies.

Several actions pending against various insurers, including us, were consolidated for purposes of pretrial discovery and motion practice under the caption In re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation, Civil Action No. 05-4182 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana.

In light of an April 8, 2008 Louisiana Supreme Court decision finding that flood damage was clearly excluded from coverage, state and federal courts have been reviewing the pending lawsuits seeking class certification and other pending lawsuits in order to expedite pre-trial discovery and to move the cases towards trial.

In June 2008, a commercial policyholder was awarded approximately $21.0 million in additional Hurricane Katrina damages by a Federal Court jury sitting in New Orleans. The claims associated with this litigation represent what we consider to be our single largest exposure as a result of that hurricane. In response to this verdict, we recorded an incurred loss, net of excess of loss of reinsurance, of $10.8 million in 2008. However, we have filed an appeal of this verdict, as we believe that the award includes damages that were attributable to flooding (and thus excluded from coverage) and that there were other errors at trial prejudicial to us. According to Louisiana law we were required to place $29.0 million on deposit with the State of Louisiana for this case while we pursue an appeal. This appeal remains pending as of March 31, 2009.

In July 2008, Lafayette Insurance Company participated in a hearing in St Bernard Parish, Louisiana after which the court entered an order certifying a class defined as all Lafayette Insurance Company personal lines policyholders within an eight parish area in and around New Orleans who sustained wind damage as a result of Hurricane Katrina and whose claim was at least partially denied or misadjusted. We have appealed this order as we feel it is not supported by the evidence. We expect the appeal process to take many additional months.

We intend to continue to defend the cases related to losses incurred as a consequence of Hurricane Katrina. We have established our loss and loss settlement expense reserves on the assumption that the application of the Valued Policy Law will not result in our having to pay damages for perils not otherwise covered. We believe that, in the aggregate, these reserves should be adequate. However, our evaluation of these claims and the adequacy of recorded reserves may change if we encounter adverse developments in the further defense of these claims.

We consider all of our other litigation pending as of March 31, 2009 to be ordinary, routine, and incidental to our business.

Securities Lending

We participate in a securities lending program, which generates net investment income and discounts other investment fees we are charged, by lending certain investments to other institutions for short periods of time. Borrowers of these securities must deposit and maintain, at all times, collateral in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury securities with Northern Trust Company (“Northern Trust”), the third-party custodian, equal to at least 102% of the market value of the securities loaned plus accrued interest. If a borrower fails to return the borrowed security, Northern Trust will use the collateral to purchase the same or similar security as a replacement for the borrowed security that was not returned by the borrower. However, we would receive the collateral in place of the borrowed security if Northern Trust is unable to purchase the same or similar security.

All collateral is held by Northern Trust. We have the right to access the collateral only if the institution borrowing our securities is in default under the lending agreement. Therefore, we do not recognize the receipt of the collateral held by Northern Trust or the obligation to return the collateral at the conclusion of the lending agreement in our Consolidated Financial Statements. We also maintain effective control of the loaned securities and have the right and ability to redeem the securities loaned on short notice. Therefore, we continue to classify these securities as invested assets in our Consolidated Financial Statements. At March 31, 2009, we had securities totaling $78.9 million on loan under the program.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141(R), “Business Combinations,” a replacement of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) provides revised guidance on how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. In addition, SFAS No. 141(R) provides revised guidance on the recognition and measurement of goodwill, as well as guidance specific to the recognition, classification, and measurement of assets and liabilities related to insurance and reinsurance contracts acquired in a business combination. We will apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) prospectively to business combinations occurring on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) did not have any impact on the amounts reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Pending Accounting Standards

FSP SFAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets”

In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” FSP SFAS 132(R)-1 requires an employer to provide certain disclosures about the assets held by its defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The required disclosures include the investment policies and strategies of the plans, the fair value of the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques used to develop fair value measurements and a description of significant concentrations of risk in plan assets. FSP SFAS 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of FSP SFAS 132(R)-1 to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

FSP SFAS No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly”

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” Under FSP SFAS No. 157-4, transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value if an entity determines that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or the liability in relation to the normal market activity for the asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities). In addition, if there is evidence that the transaction for the asset or liability is not orderly, the entity shall place little, if any weight on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. FSP SFAS No. 157-4 is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009 subject to the early adoption of FSP SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2. We did not elect to early adopt FSP SFAS No. 157-4; however, we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

FSP SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“FSP SFAS No. 115-2”). FSP SFAS No. 115-2 provides new guidance on the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”) for fixed maturity securities that are classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity if management does not intend to sell the impaired security and it is more likely than not it will not be required to sell the impaired security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis.

If management concludes a security is other-than-temporarily impaired, FSP SFAS No. 115-2 requires that the difference between the fair value and the amortized cost of the security be presented as an OTTI realized loss with an offset for any noncredit-related loss component of the OTTI realized loss to be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. Accordingly, only the credit loss component will have an impact on earnings for the reporting period. FSP SFAS No. 115-2 also requires extensive new interim and annual disclosures for both fixed maturity securities and equity securities to provide further disaggregated information as well as information about how the credit loss component of the OTTI realized loss was determined along with a roll forward of such amount for each reporting period. FSP SFAS No. 115-2 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009 subject to the early adoption of FSP SFAS 157-4. We did not elect to early adopt FSP SFAS No. 115-2; however, we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) No. 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP SFAS No. 107-1”). FSP SFAS No. 107-1 amends SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to require fair value of financial instrument disclosure in interim financial statements and amends APB No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in all interim financial statements. The provisions of FSP SFAS No. 107-1 are effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect to early adopt FSP SFAS No. 107-1; however, we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE 2. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We estimate the fair value of our financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” and related pronouncements.

SFAS No. 157, as amended, establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Our financial instruments are categorized into a three level hierarchy, which is based upon the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

Financial instruments recorded at fair value are categorized in the fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level 1: Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical financial instruments.

Level 2: Valuations are based on quoted prices, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, in markets that are not active or on inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3: Valuations are based on pricing or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement of the financial instrument. Such inputs may reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the financial instrument.

The following table presents the categorization for our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2009:

(In Thousands)						Fair Value Measurements
Description		March 31, 2009				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
Assets:
Available-for-sale fixed maturities		$	1,957,298			$	—			$	1,945,122			$	12,176
Equity securities			93,283				91,474				1,809				—
Trading securities			10,405				735				9,670				—
Short-term investments			23,202				1,200				22,002				—
Money market accounts			52,801				52,801				—				—
Total assets		$	2,136,989			$	146,210			$	1,978,603			$	12,176

The fair value of securities that are categorized as Level 1 is based on quoted market prices that are readily and regularly available.

The fair value of securities that are categorized as Level 2 is determined by management, relying in part on market values obtained from independent pricing services and brokers. Such estimated fair values do not necessarily represent the values for which these securities could have been sold at the reporting date. Our independent pricing services and brokers obtain prices from reputable pricing vendors in the marketplace. They continually monitor and review the external pricing sources, while actively participating to resolve any pricing issues that may arise.

The securities categorized as Level 3 include holdings in certain private placement fixed maturity and equity securities and certain impaired securities for which there is not an active market. The fair value of our Level 3 impaired securities was determined primarily based upon management’s assumptions regarding the timing and amount of future cash inflows.

If a security has been written down or the issuer is in bankruptcy, management relies in part on outside opinions from rating agencies, our lien position on the security, general economic conditions and management’s expertise to determine fair value. We have the ability and the positive intent to hold securities until such time that we are able to recover all or a portion of our original investment. If a security does not have a market at the balance sheet date, management will estimate the security’s fair value based on other securities in the market. Management will continue to monitor securities after the balance sheet date to confirm that their estimated fair value is reasonable.

The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value of our Level 3 securities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009:

		Available-for-sale
(In Thousands)		fixed maturities				Equity securities				Total
Balance at December 31, 2008		$	6,254			$	1,851			$	8,105
Unrealized losses (1)			(733	)			(273	)			(1,006	)
Amortization			4				—				4
Purchases and disposals			(494	)			—				(494	)
Transfers in/out			7,145				(1,578	)			5,567
Balance at March 31, 2009		$	12,176			$	—			$	12,176

The amount reported in the previous table as available-for-sale fixed maturities “transfers in” primarily relates to a credit-tenant lease of $4.8 million, which had no quoted price available at March 31, 2009 and $3.0 million in certain fixed maturity securities in default.

NOTE 3. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Our pension and postretirement benefit expense for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are displayed in the following table.

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)		2009				2008
Pension expense		$	757			$	707
Other postretirement benefit expense			570				450

We previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 that we expected to contribute $4.0 million to our pension plan in 2009. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we have contributed $1.0 million to the pension plan. We do not anticipate that the total contribution in 2009 will vary significantly from the expected contribution.

NOTE 4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Nonqualified Employee Stock Award Plan

Our 2008 Stock Plan authorizes the issuance of restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, incentive stock options, and nonqualified stock options for up to 1,900,000 shares of United Fire common stock to employees, with 1,029,625 authorized shares available for future issuance at March 31, 2009. The plan is administered by the Board of Directors who has the authority to determine which employees will receive awards under the plan, when awards will be granted, and the terms and conditions of the awards. The Board of Directors may also take any action it deems necessary and appropriate for the administration of the plan. Pursuant to the plan, the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, grant awards to employees of United Fire or any of its affiliated companies who are in positions of substantial responsibility with United Fire.

Option awards granted pursuant to the 2008 Stock Plan are granted to buy shares of United Fire’s common stock at the market value of the stock on the date of grant. All outstanding option awards vest and are exercisable in installments of 20.0 percent of the number of shares covered by the option award each year from the grant date, unless the Board of Directors accelerates the vesting. To the extent not exercised, vested option awards accumulate and are exercisable by the awardee, in whole or in part, in any subsequent year included in the option period, but not later than 10 years from the grant date. Restricted stock awards granted pursuant to the 2008 Stock Plan fully vest after five years from the date of issuance, unless accelerated upon the approval of the Board of Directors, at which time United Fire common stock will be issued to the awardee. Restricted stock awards are generally granted free of charge to the eligible employees of United Fire as designated by the Board of Directors.

The activity in our 2008 Stock Plan is displayed in the following table.

		Three
		Months Ended				Inception
Authorized Shares Available for Future Award Grants		March 31, 2009				to Date
Beginning balance			1,021,025				1,000,000
Additional authorization from 2008 Stock Plan			—				900,000
Number of awards granted			—				(921,475	)
Number of awards forfeited or expired			8,600				51,100
Ending balance			1,029,625				1,029,625
Number of option awards exercised			500				166,942
Number of restricted stock awards vested			—				—

Nonqualified Nonemployee Director Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan

We have a nonemployee director stock option and restricted stock plan that authorizes United Fire to grant restricted stock and nonqualified stock options to purchase 150,000 shares of United Fire’s common stock, with 70,003 options available for future issuance at March 31, 2009. The Board of Directors has the authority to determine which nonemployee directors receive awards under the plan, when options and restricted stock shall be granted, the option price, the option expiration date, the date of grant, the vesting schedule of options or whether the options shall be immediately vested, the terms and conditions of options and restricted stock (other than those terms and conditions set forth in the plan) and the number of shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to an option agreement or restricted stock agreement. The Board of Directors may also take any action it deems necessary and appropriate for the administration of the plan.

The activity in our nonemployee director stock option and restricted stock plan is displayed in the following table.

		Three
		Months Ended				Inception
Authorized Shares Available for Future Award Grants		March 31, 2009				to Date
Beginning balance			70,003				150,000
Number of awards granted			—				(86,000	)
Number of awards forfeited or expired			—				6,003
Ending balance			70,003				70,003
Number of awards exercised			—				—

For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $.9 million and $.4 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, we have $4.2 million in stock-based compensation expense that has yet to be recognized through our results of operations. This compensation will be recognized over a term of five years, except with respect to awards that are accelerated by the Board of Directors, in which case any remaining compensation expense will be recognized in the period in which the awards are accelerated.

NOTE 5. SEGMENT INFORMATION

We have two reportable business segments in our operations: property and casualty insurance and life insurance. All of our property and casualty offices are aggregated, as they target a similar customer base, market the same products, and use the same marketing strategies. All of our insurance is sold domestically; we have no revenues allocable to foreign operations.

Our management evaluates the two segments on the basis of both statutory accounting practices prescribed by our states of domicile and GAAP. We analyze results based on profitability (i.e., loss ratios), expenses, and return on equity. The basis we use to determine and analyze segments and to measure segment profit or loss have not changed from that reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The following analyses for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 have been reconciled to the amounts reported in our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements to adjust for inter-segment eliminations.

		Property and
(In Thousands)		Casualty Insurance				Life Insurance				Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Net premiums earned		$	109,214			$	9,185			$	118,399
Investment income, net of investment expenses			6,091				17,223				23,314
Realized investment losses			(717	)			(2,771	)			(3,488	)
Other income			28				131				159
Revenues		$	114,616			$	23,768			$	138,384
Inter-segment eliminations			(43	)			(78	)			(121	)
Total revenues		$	114,573			$	23,690			$	138,263
Net income		$	1,864			$	1,406			$	3,270
Assets		$	1,289,833			$	1,421,036			$	2,710,869
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Net premiums earned		$	113,352			$	9,652			$	123,004
Investment income, net of investment expenses			8,833				19,243				28,076
Realized investment gains (losses)			127				(1,281	)			(1,154	)
Other income (loss)			(11	)			210				199
Revenues		$	122,301			$	27,824			$	150,125
Inter-segment eliminations			(41	)			(41	)			(82	)
Total revenues		$	122,260			$	27,783			$	150,043
Net income		$	18,526			$	1,601			$	20,127
Assets		$	1,327,376			$	1,451,846			$	2,779,222

NOTE 6. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share calculates the effect of all dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The dilutive shares we consider in our diluted earnings per share calculation relate to our outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards.

We determine the dilutive effect of our stock options outstanding using the “treasury stock” method. Under this method, we assume the exercise of all of the outstanding awards whose exercise price is less than the weighted-average fair market value of our common stock during the period. This method also assumes that the proceeds from the hypothetical award exercises are used to repurchase shares of our common stock at the weighted-average fair market value of the stock during the period. The net of the assumed awards exercised and assumed common shares repurchased represent the number of dilutive common shares, which we add to the denominator of the earnings per share calculation.

The components of basic and diluted earnings per share are displayed in the following tables:

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands Except Per Share Data)		2009								2008
		Basic				Diluted				Basic				Diluted
Net income		$	3,270			$	3,270			$	20,127			$	20,127
Weighted-average common shares outstanding			26,613				26,613				27,191				27,191
Add dilutive effect of restricted stock awards			—				19				—				—
Add dilutive effect of stock options			—				10				—				43
Weighted-average common shares for EPS calculation			26,613				26,642				27,191				27,234
Earnings per common share		$	0.12			$	0.12			$	0.74			$	0.74
Awards excluded from diluted EPS calculation(1)			—				681				—				431

NOTE 7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by shareholders and dividends to shareholders. The primary components of our comprehensive income (loss) are net income and the change in net unrealized appreciation on available-for-sale securities, as adjusted for amounts that have been reclassified as realized investment gains and losses.

The table below displays our comprehensive income (loss) and the related tax effects for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)		2009				2008
Net income		$	3,270			$	20,127
Other comprehensive loss:
Change in net unrealized appreciation on investments			(13,173	)			(14,482	)
Adjustment for net realized losses included in income			3,488				1,154
Adjustment for costs included in employee benefit expense			316				295
Other comprehensive loss, before tax			(9,369	)			(13,033	)
Income tax effect			3,279				4,562
Other comprehensive loss, after tax			(6,090	)			(8,471	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		$	(2,820	)		$	11,656

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders of
United Fire & Casualty Company

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of United Fire & Casualty Company as of March 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the interim consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of United Fire & Casualty Company as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated March 2, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

		/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
		Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
May 4, 2009

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report may contain forward-looking statements about our operations, anticipated performance and other similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected and/or projected. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about our company, the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and assumptions made by management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “continues,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “will continue,” “might,” “hope,” “can” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed in such forward-looking statements. Information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this document. Among other factors that could cause our actual outcomes and results to differ are:

•

The impact of the current unprecedented volatility in the financial markets, including the duration of the credit crisis and the effectiveness of governmental solutions.

•

The adequacy of our loss reserves established for Hurricane Katrina, which are based on management estimates.

•

Additional government and NASDAQ policies relating to corporate governance, and the cost to comply.

•

Changing rates of inflation.

•

The valuation of invested assets.

•

The valuation of pension and other postretirement benefit obligations.

•

The calculation and recovery of deferred policy acquisition costs.

•

The ability to maintain and safeguard the security of our data.

•

The resolution of regulatory issues and litigation pertaining to and arising out of Hurricane Katrina.

•

Our relationship with our reinsurers.

•

Our relationship with our agents.

•

The pricing of our products.

•

The adequacy of the reinsurance coverage that we purchase.

These are representative of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from what is expressed in forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report or as of the date they are made. Except as required under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we do not have any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Critical accounting estimates are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties and that potentially may result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which we have prepared in accordance with GAAP. As we prepare these financial statements, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our critical accounting estimates are: the valuation of investments; the valuation of reserves for losses, claims, and loss settlement expenses; the valuation of reserves for future policy benefits; and the calculation of the deferred policy acquisition costs asset. These critical accounting estimates are more fully described in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK

Our Business

We operate property and casualty and life insurance businesses, marketing our products through independent agents. Although we maintain a broad geographic presence that includes most of the United States, more than half of our property and casualty premiums were written in Iowa, Texas, Louisiana, Missouri and Illinois for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009. Approximately three-fourths of our life insurance premiums were written in Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska and Illinois for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.

We conduct our operations through two distinct segments: property and casualty insurance and life insurance. We manage these segments separately because they generally do not share the same customer base, and they each have different pricing and expense structures. We evaluate segment profit or loss based upon operating and investment results. Segment profit or loss described in the following sections of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis is reported on a pre-tax basis.

Financial Overview

From an operational standpoint our first quarter 2009 results were comparable to the first quarter of 2008. However, our earnings were significantly reduced by an increase in our loss reserves for litigation related to Hurricane Katrina. We continue to settle lawsuits related to Hurricane Katrina, but the legal environment in New Orleans has become increasingly challenging. To address the increasing uncertainty associated with claims being litigated in the Louisiana courts, we increased our reserves for losses that occurred in prior years by $11.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.

In the property and casualty segment, we experienced a decline of 3.7 percent in our net premiums earned for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 as compared to same period in 2008. We have seen some evidence that the pricing environment has improved from December 2008, as well as signs that premium rates have bottomed out. However, in order to achieve our profitability goals for 2009, pricing must increase.

We recorded other-than-temporary investment write-downs of $4.6 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, related to the severe economic downturn. While investment strategies remain conservative, there is a potential for additional other-than-temporary investment write-downs in upcoming quarters as more businesses struggle in a weak global economy.

Our stockholders’ equity declined 1.0 percent to $635.3 million at March 31, 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008. This is due primarily to unrealized losses in our investment portfolio.

Our annuity sales increased over 100.0 percent in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, however, our life insurance sales were down. We attribute the significant increase in our annuity sales to more consumers choosing investment products that offer guaranteed rates of return. Also, because we had fewer annuities with expiring interest rate guarantees in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we experienced a net cash inflow of $19.4 million related to our annuity business, compared with a net cash outflow of $11.3 million related to our annuity business in the three-month period ended March 31, 2008.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Financial Highlights

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)		2009				2008				%
Revenues
Net premiums earned		$	118,321			$	122,943				-3.8
Investment income, net of investment expenses			23,271				28,055				-17.1
Realized investment losses			(3,488	)			(1,154	)			202.3
Other income			159				199				-20.1
		$	138,263			$	150,043				-7.9
Benefits, Losses and Expenses
Losses and loss settlement expenses		$	86,078			$	67,482				27.6
Future policy benefits			3,388				5,846				-42.0
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs			29,406				32,526				-9.6
Other underwriting expenses			8,486				6,920				22.6
Disaster charges and other related expenses, net of recoveries			(358	)			—				N/A
Interest on policyholders’ accounts			9,772				10,446				-6.5
		$	136,772			$	123,220				11.0
Income before income taxes		$	1,491			$	26,823				-94.4
Federal income tax expense (benefit)			(1,779	)			6,696				-126.6
Net Income		$	3,270			$	20,127				-83.8

Our results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 deteriorated when compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, due primarily to $11.9 million in development of Hurricane Katrina reserves resulting from claims litigation.

Investment results also negatively impacted our income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, with investment income decreasing by $4.8 million or 17.1 percent. Lower market interest rates and changes in the fair value of certain investments in limited liability partnership holdings contributed to the decrease. Our largest limited liability partnership fund investment invests in U.S. subregional banks.

The decrease in realized investment gains and losses was due primarily to $4.6 million in other-than-temporary investment write-downs of fixed maturity securities and equity securities in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.

For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we reported a federal income tax benefit of $1.8 million, compared to a federal income tax expense of $6.7 million with an effective tax rate of 25.0 percent for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. Our effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate of 35.0 percent due principally to the effect of tax-exempt municipal bond interest income and non-taxable dividend income. In 2008 a reduction in the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets also had an effect on our effective tax rate.

Property and Casualty Insurance Segment Results

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)		2009				2008
Net premiums written (1)		$	114,649			$	123,443
Net premiums earned		$	109,214			$	113,352
Losses and loss settlement expenses			(82,279	)			(63,613	)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs			(26,898	)			(29,651	)
Other underwriting expenses			(6,451	)			(4,645	)
Underwriting income (loss)		$	(6,414	)		$	15,443
Investment income, net of underwriting expenses			6,048				8,792
Realized investment gains (losses)			(717	)			127
Other income (loss)			28				(11	)
Disaster charges and other related expenses, net of recoveries			358				—
Income (loss) before income taxes		$	(697	)		$	24,351
GAAP Ratios:
Loss ratio			75.3	%			56.1	%
Expense ratio (2)			30.5				30.3
Combined ratio (1)			105.8	%			86.4	%
Combined ratio (without catastrophes) (1)			103.1				83.7

Our GAAP combined ratio worsened by 19.4 percentage points to 105.8 percent in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, compared with 86.4 percent in the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. The deterioration in our combined ratio is a result of depressed pricing, an increase in our loss reserves for Hurricane Katrina litigation, and increased claims severity. Although the average size of large claims over $250,000 remained relatively flat for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, our total direct claim counts decreased over 5 percent for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.

Our loss ratio deteriorated to 75.3 percent for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, compared with 56.1 percent for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, while our expense ratio remained the same at approximately 30.0 percent for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

The following table displays our premiums earned, losses and loss settlement expenses and loss ratio by line of business for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

		Three Months Ended March 31,
		2009												2008
						Losses & Loss												Losses & Loss
(In Thousands)		Premiums				Settlement				Loss				Premiums				Settlement				Loss
Unaudited		Earned				Expenses Incurred				Ratio				Earned				Expenses Incurred				Ratio
Commercial lines:
Other liability (1)		$	31,052			$	20,105				64.7	%		$	33,472			$	14,853				44.4	%
Fire and allied lines (2)			25,400				27,073				106.6				27,217				19,810				72.8
Automobile			24,386				15,210				62.4				24,765				15,193				61.3
Workers’ compensation			13,211				11,776				89.1				12,771				5,967				46.7
Fidelity and surety			5,413				273				5.0				5,436				530				9.7
Miscellaneous			210				51				24.3				207				(23	)			(11.1	)
Total commercial lines		$	99,672			$	74,488				74.7	%		$	103,868			$	56,330				54.2	%
Personal lines:
Fire and allied lines (3)		$	5,339			$	3,808				71.3	%		$	5,283			$	3,036				57.5	%
Automobile			3,086				2,351				76.2				3,144				3,025				96.2
Miscellaneous			84				294				350.0				77				337				437.7
Total personal lines		$	8,509			$	6,453				75.8	%		$	8,504			$	6,398				75.2	%
Reinsurance assumed		$	1,033			$	1,338				129.5	%		$	980			$	885				90.3	%
Total		$	109,214			$	82,279				75.3	%		$	113,352			$	63,613				56.1	%

Net premiums written declined $8.8 million to $114.6 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, compared with $123.4 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. The decline in net premiums written is attributable to reduced premiums from continuing competition and pricing pressure in the insurance market, as well as the nonrenewal of business that did not meet our underwriting guidelines. Our premium writings have also been affected by the downturn in the economy, specifically related to our surety business and the residential contracting business in our western states.

During the first quarter of 2009, we had an average of low single-digit decreases in premium level for our commercial lines business and an average of low single-digit increases in premium level for our personal lines business. All regions continued to experience pricing pressure on renewal business, primarily medium and large accounts and in some instances smaller accounts. The decreases in premium levels were relatively modest in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009; however, premium levels have been decreasing gradually in some lines of business since the third quarter of 2004.

Our policy retention rate remained strong in both the personal and commercial lines of business for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.

Net investment income decreased $2.8 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 due to lower market interest rates and a decrease in the fair value of our investments in limited liability partnership holdings, which we record under the equity method. We recorded realized investment losses of $.7 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, compared with realized investment gains of $.1 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. Investment losses for the property and casualty insurance segment were primarily due to the other-than-temporary investment write-down of $1.8 million for a fixed maturity security in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.

Life Insurance Segment Results

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)		2009				2008
Revenues
Net premiums written (1)		$	6,197			$	9,424
Net premiums earned		$	9,107			$	9,591
Investment income, net			17,223				19,263
Realized investment losses			(2,771	)			(1,281	)
Other income			131				210
Total Revenues		$	23,690			$	27,783
Benefits, Losses and Expenses
Losses and loss settlement expenses		$	3,799			$	3,869
Future policy benefits			3,388				5,846
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs			2,508				2,875
Other underwriting expenses			2,035				2,275
Interest on policyholders’ accounts			9,772				10,446
Total Benefits, Losses and Expenses		$	21,502			$	25,311
Income Before Income Taxes		$	2,188			$	2,472

For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, our life insurance segment recorded pre-tax income of $2.2 million, compared to $2.5 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. The slight deterioration was due to a decrease in investment income and other-than-temporary investment write-downs, offset by a reduction in expenses.

Net premiums earned decreased $.5 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, reflecting reduced sales of our traditional products, primarily single premium whole life insurance. The reduced sales coupled with an increase in surrenders of our traditional life insurance products decreased future policy benefits recorded between years.

Investment income decreased $2.0 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 due primarily to lower market interest rates.

Realized investment losses were $2.8 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, compared with realized investment losses of $1.3 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. Investment losses for first quarter 2009 were primarily attributable to other-than-temporary investment write-downs of $2.8 million in fixed maturity securities and equity securities.

During the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we recorded $63.5 million in annuity deposits compared to $28.4 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, as consumers chose to invest their money in products with guaranteed rates of return. We expect this trend to continue throughout 2009. Pursuant to GAAP, we do not report annuity deposits as net premiums earned. Rather, we record annuity deposits as liabilities for future policyholder benefits. Revenues from annuities consist of policy surrender charges and investment income earned on policyholder deposits.

The growth in sales of fixed annuities generated net cash inflows of $19.4 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, compared with net cash outflows of $11.3 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. We also attribute the $19.4 million in net cash inflows to fewer annuities with expiring interest rate guarantees withdrawn in the first quarter of 2009. The net cash outflows related to our annuity business in first quarter of 2008 reflect the challenges we have been facing in retaining our existing annuitants and attracting new annuitants with a rate of interest that was competitive in the marketplace while still allowing for an acceptable profit margin.

Interest on policyholders’ accounts decreased $.7 million during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 due to lower level of annuity balances in recent years and lower interest rates paid on our annuity products.

Investment Results

We recorded net investment income (before tax) of $23.3 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, compared to $28.1 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease between years was primarily the result of the lower market interest rates and changes in the fair value of certain investments in limited liability partnership holdings, which we record under the equity method.

Realized investment losses were $3.5 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, compared to realized investment losses of $1.2 million for the same period of 2008, primarily due to $4.6 million in other-than-temporary investment write-downs of fixed maturity securities and equity securities. No write-downs were recorded for the three-months ended March 31, 2008.

We continually monitor the difference between our cost basis and the estimated fair value of our investments. Our accounting policy for impairment recognition requires other-than-temporary impairment charges to be recorded when we determine that it is more likely than not that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the fixed maturity security or that the anticipated recovery in market value of the equity security will not occur in a reasonable amount of time. Impairment charges on investments are recorded based on the fair value of the investments at the measurement date and are included in net realized investment gains (losses). Factors considered in evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary include: the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; the financial conditions and near-term prospects of the issuer; company specific news; credit ratings; the economic environment; and our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery.

Changes in unrealized gains do not affect net income (loss) and earnings per common share but do impact comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and book value per common share. We believe that our unrealized losses at March 31, 2009 are temporary based upon our current analysis of the issuers of the securities that we hold and current market events. It is possible that we could recognize future impairment losses on some securities that we own at March 31, 2009 if future events, information, and the passage of time cause us to determine that a decline in value is other-than-temporary. However, we investment in high quality assets, to provide protection from future credit quality issues and corresponding impairment write-downs.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

Liquidity measures our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our short- and long-term cash obligations. Our sources of cash inflows are primarily a result of premiums, annuity deposits, sales or maturities of investments, and investment income. Historically, we have generated substantial cash inflows from operations because cash from premium payments is usually received in advance of cash payments made to settle losses. When investing the cash generated from operations, we invest in securities with maturities that correlate to the anticipated timing of payments for losses and loss settlement expenses of the underlying insurance policies. The majority of our assets are invested in available-for-sale fixed maturity securities.

Our cash outflows are a result of losses and loss settlement expenses, commissions, premium taxes, income taxes, operating expenses, dividends, annuity withdrawals, and investment purchases. Cash outflows may be variable because of the uncertainty regarding settlement dates for losses. In addition, the timing and amount of individual catastrophe losses are inherently unpredictable and could increase our liquidity requirements.

The following table displays a summary of cash sources and uses in 2009 and 2008.

Cash Flow Summary		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)		2009				2008
Cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities		$	9,189			$	29,518
Investing activities			(35,379	)			(5,349	)
Financing activities			22,754				(8,258	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		$	(3,436	)		$	15,911

The decrease in cash provided by operating activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 correlates to the deterioration in our net income during 2009, which is due to the additional development of Hurricane Katrina reserves resulting from claims litigation and the severe downtown in the investment environment.

Net cash flows used in investing activities decreased $30.0 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008, due primarily to purchases exceeding sales, calls and maturities in 2009. We have significant cash inflows from sales of investments and from scheduled and unscheduled investment maturities, redemptions and prepayments, which totaled $99.0 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 and $196.7 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008.

For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, cash provided by financing activities increased $31.0 million as compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. We experienced positive annuity and universal life cash flows of $27.3 million during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, compared to negative annuity and universal life cash flows of $4.0 million during the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. We attribute the change of $31.3 million in cash inflows between periods to more consumers choosing to invest their money in products with guaranteed rates of return. We expect this trend to continue throughout 2009.

If our operating, investment and financing cash flows are not sufficient to support our operations, we have additional short-term investments that we could use. At March 31, 2009, our consolidated invested assets included $23.2 million of short-term investments, which consist primarily of fixed maturity securities that mature within one year. We may also borrow up to $50.0 million on our existing bank line of credit, which expires on July 9, 2009. We did not use our line of credit in the first three months of 2009, other than to secure letters of credit used in our reinsurance operations. As of March 31, 2009, $.2 million of the line of credit was allocated for that purpose. We do not anticipate the need to draw on the line of credit in the foreseeable future.

Capital Resources

Capital resources demonstrate our overall financial strength and ability to raise new capital to meet our needs. At March 31, 2009 our consolidated invested assets, which are primarily comprised of fixed maturity securities, increased $28.2 million or 1.3 percent to $2.124 billion, as compared to $2.096 billion at December 31, 2008. The increase in invested assets we experienced this year was primarily due to purchases ($134.1 million) exceeding sales, calls and maturities ($99.8 million) since December 31, 2008.

The composition of our investment portfolio at March 31, 2009 is presented in the following table:

		Property & Casualty								Life
		Insurance Segment								Insurance Segment								Total
						Percent								Percent								Percent
(Dollars in Thousands)						of Total								of Total								of Total
Fixed maturities(1)		$	766,740				87.4	%		$	1,203,585				96.6	%		$	1,970,325				92.7	%
Equity securities			83,819				9.5				9,464				0.8				93,283				4.4
Trading securities			10,405				1.2				—				—				10,405				0.5
Mortgage loans			—				—				7,701				0.6				7,701				0.4
Policy loans			—				—				7,734				0.6				7,734				0.4
Other long-term investments			11,307				1.3				—				0.0				11,307				0.5
Short-term investments			5,694				0.6				17,508				1.4				23,202				1.1
Total		$	877,965				100.0	%		$	1,245,992				100.0	%		$	2,123,957				100.0	%

At March 31, 2009, $1,957.3 million, or 99.3 percent of our fixed maturities portfolio, was classified as available-for-sale, compared to $1,898.6 million, or 99.2 percent, at December 31, 2008. We classify our remaining fixed maturity securities as held-to-maturity, which are reported at amortized cost, or trading. We record trading securities, primarily convertible redeemable preferred debt securities, at fair value, with any changes in fair value recognized in earnings. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we did not have exposure to investments in sub-prime mortgages, derivative securities or other credit enhancement vehicles.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity decreased 1.0 percent from $641.7 million at December 31, 2008 to $635.3 million at March 31, 2009. The primary decreases to stockholders’ equity included a reduction in net unrealized appreciation of $6.3 million, stockholder dividends of $4.0 million and stock repurchases of $.5 million. This was somewhat offset by net income of $3.3 million. At March 31, 2009, book value per common share was $23.89 compared to $24.10 at December 31, 2008.

STATUTORY AND OTHER NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

We believe that disclosure of certain statutory and other non-GAAP financial measures enhances investor understanding of our financial performance. The following such measures are utilized in this report:

Premiums written is a measure of our overall business volume. Net premiums written comprise direct and assumed premiums written, net of what we are charged for reinsurance policies. Direct premiums written is the amount of premiums charged for policies issued during the period. Assumed premiums written is consideration or payment we receive in exchange for insurance we provide to other insurance companies. We report these premiums as revenue as they are earned over the underlying policy period. We report premiums written applicable to the unexpired term of a policy as unearned premium subject to reinsurance. We evaluate premiums written as a measure of business production for the period under review.

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)		2009				2008
Net premiums written		$	120,846			$	132,867
Net change in unearned premium			(2,749	)			(9,855	)
Net change in prepaid reinsurance premium			224				(69	)
Net premiums earned		$	118,321			$	122,943

Catastrophe losses utilize the designations of the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) and are reported with loss and loss settlement expense amounts net of reinsurance recoverables, unless specified otherwise. According to the ISO, a catastrophe loss is a single unpredictable incident or series of closely related incidents causing severe insured losses that cause $25.0 million or more in industry-wide direct insured losses to property and that affect a significant number of insureds and insurers (“ISO catastrophes”). We also include as catastrophes those events we believe are, or will be, material to our operations, either in amount or in number of claims made. Management at times may determine for comparison purposes that it is more meaningful to exclude unusual catastrophe losses or litigation resulting from a catastrophe. The frequency and severity of catastrophic losses we experience in any year affect our results of operations and financial position. In analyzing the underwriting performance of our property and casualty insurance segment, we evaluate performance both including and excluding catastrophe losses. Portions of our catastrophe losses may be recoverable under our catastrophe reinsurance agreements. We include a discussion of the impact of catastrophes because we believe it is meaningful for investors to understand the variability in periodic earnings.

		Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)		2009				2008
ISO catastrophes (1)		$	2,069			$	3,016
Non-ISO catastrophes			908				4
Total catastrophes		$	2,977			$	3,020

Combined ratio is a commonly used financial measure of underwriting performance. A combined ratio below 100 percent generally indicates a profitable book of business. The combined ratio is the sum of two separately calculated ratios, the loss and loss settlement expense ratio (referred to as the “loss ratio”) and the underwriting expense ratio (the “expense ratio”). When prepared in accordance with GAAP, the loss ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of losses and loss settlement expenses by net premium earned. The expense ratio is calculated by dividing nondeferred underwriting expenses and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs by net premiums earned. When prepared in accordance with statutory accounting principles, the loss ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of losses and loss settlement expenses by net premium earned; the expense ratio is calculated by dividing underwriting expenses by net premiums written.

Underwriting income (loss) is the gain or loss by an insurance company from the business of insurance. Underwriting income is equal to net premiums earned less incurred losses, loss settlement expenses, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, and other underwriting expenses. We use this financial measure in evaluating the results of our operations and to analyze the profitability of our property and casualty segment separately from our investment results.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We have exposure to market risk arising from potential losses due to adverse changes in interest rates and market prices. However, we have the ability to hold fixed maturity investments to maturity. Our investment guidelines define the overall framework for managing our market and other investment risks, including accountability and controls. In addition, each of our subsidiaries has specific investment policies that delineate the investment limits and strategies that are appropriate given each entity’s liquidity, surplus, product, and regulatory requirements. We respond to market risk by rebalancing our existing asset portfolio and by managing the character of future investment purchases.

We do not utilize financial instrument hedges or derivative financial instruments to manage risks, nor do we enter into any swap, forward or option contracts, but attempt to mitigate our exposure through active portfolio management. In addition, we place the majority of our investments in high-quality, liquid securities and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. At March 31, 2009, we did not have sub-prime mortgages, derivative securities or other credit-enhancement exposures.

While our primary market risk exposure is changes in interest rates, we do have exposure to changes in equity prices and limited exposure to foreign currency exchange rates.

There have been no material changes in our market risk or market risk factors from that reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were designed and functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, no such change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a detailed discussion of legal proceedings of the Company, refer to Note 1—Contingent Liabilities in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business is subject to a number of risks, including those identified in Part I, Item 1A of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 2, 2009, that could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and/or liquidity and that could cause our operating results to vary significantly from period to period. The risks described in the above mentioned document are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial could also have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Under our share repurchase program, announced in August 2007, we may purchase common stock from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The amount and timing of any purchases will be at our discretion and will depend upon a number of factors, including the price, economic and general market conditions, and corporate and regulatory requirements. The share repurchase program will be in effect for two years, but may be modified or discontinued at any time. As of March 31, 2009, we had authorization from the Board of Directors to repurchase 575,575 shares of our common stock. Our share repurchase program will expire in August 2009 unless the Board of Directors decides to extend the program.

										Total Number of Shares				Maximum Number of
		Total								Purchased as a Part of				Shares that may be
		Number of				Average Price				Publicly Announced				Purchased Under the
Period		Shares Purchased				Paid per Share				Plans or Programs				Plans or Programs
1/1/09-1/31/09			—			$	—				—				608,875
2/1/09-2/28/09			4,200				17.38				4,200				604,675
3/1/09-3/31/09			29,100				15.96				29,100				575,575

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Incorporated by reference

Exhibit

Filed

Period

Filing

number

Exhibit description

herewith

Form

ending

Exhibit

date

11

Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings. All information required by Exhibit 11 is presented within Note 6 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128

X

31.1

Certification of Randy A. Ramlo pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002

X

31.2

Certification of Dianne M. Lyons pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002

X

32.1

Certification of Randy A. Ramlo pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002

X

32.2

Certification of Dianne M. Lyons pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002

X

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
(Registrant)
/s/ Randy A. Ramlo				/s/ Dianne M. Lyons
Randy A. Ramlo				Dianne M. Lyons
President, Chief Executive Officer				Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
				Principal Accounting Officer
May 4, 2009				May 4, 2009
(Date)				(Date)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Incorporated by reference

Exhibit

Filed

Period

Filing

number

Exhibit description

herewith

Form

ending

Exhibit

date

11

Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings. All information required by Exhibit 11 is presented within Note 6 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128

X

31.1

Certification of Randy A. Ramlo pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002

X

31.2

Certification of Dianne M. Lyons pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002

X

32.1

Certification of Randy A. Ramlo pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002

X

32.2

Certification of Dianne M. Lyons pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002

X