Edgar Filing: Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

No Exercise

Full Exercise

Form S-11

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2009

Registration No. 333-

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form S-11

FOR REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE COMPANIES

Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its governing instruments)

65 East 55^th Street

New York, New York 10022

(212) 705-0160

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Kevin E. Grant

Chief Executive Officer

65 East 55^th Street

New York, New York 10022

(212) 705-0160

(212) 705-0199 (Facsimile)

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:


Daniel M. LeBey		David J. Goldschmidt
S. Gregory Cope		Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Hunton & Williams LLP		Four Times Square
Riverfront Plaza, East Tower		New York, New York 10036
951 E. Byrd Street		(212) 735-3000
Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074		(212) 735-2000 (Facsimile)
(804) 788-8200
(804) 788-8218 (Facsimile)

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any of the Securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following box: [ ]

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]	Non-accelerated filer [ x ]	Smaller reporting company [ ]
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE



Title of Securities Being Registered	Number of Shares Being Registered	Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share⁽¹⁾	Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price	Amount of Registration Fee⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Common Stock, $0.01 par value	10,350,000	$14.07 per share	$145,624,500	$8,126

⁽¹⁾

The proposed maximum offering price per share with respect to the 10,350,000 shares being registered pursuant to this registration statement is $14.07, estimated solely for the purpose of computing the registration fee, pursuant to Rule 457(a) under the Securities Act, and, in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act, based on the average of the high and low reported sales price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on September 24, 2009.

⁽²⁾

In accordance with Rule 457(p), Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. is carrying over $7,488 of unutilized registration fees relating to $243,899,600 aggregate offering price of unsold securities of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. that were registered under Registration Statement No. 333-142446 filed on April 30, 2007. Pursuant to Rule 457(p) under the Securities Act, such unutilized registration fees may be applied to the registration fees payable pursuant to this registration statement. Accordingly, $638 is due concurrently with the filing of this registration statement.

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission has become effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, nor is it a solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, in any state or other jurisdiction where an offer or sale of the securities is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 29, 2009

PROSPECTUS

9,000,000 Shares

LOGO

Common Stock

Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. is a specialty finance company that invests on a leveraged basis exclusively in whole-pool residential mortgage pass-through securities for which the principal and interest payments are guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency or a U.S. Government-sponsored entity. We are currently managed and advised by Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC, a joint venture between affiliates of The Cypress Group and Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.

We are offering 9,000,000 shares of common stock. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol “CYS.” The last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE on , 2009 was $ per share.

We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes. To assist us in qualifying as a REIT, ownership of our common stock by any person is generally limited to 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of the outstanding shares of our capital stock. In addition, our charter contains various other restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our common stock, see “Description of Securities—Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer.”

Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 22 of this prospectus for a discussion of those risks.


	Per Share	Total
Public offering price	$	$
Underwriting discounts and commissions	$	$
Proceeds to us, before expenses	$	$

We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,350,000 shares of common stock from us on the same terms and conditions as set forth above if the underwriters sell more than 9,000,000 shares of common stock in this offering.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Barclays Capital expects to deliver the shares of common stock to investors on or about , 2009.

Barclays Capital


JMP Securities		Stifel Nicolaus
	Oppenheimer & Co.

Prospectus dated , 2009

You should rely only on information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide you with different information. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale of shares is not permitted. You should assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front of this prospectus only. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
Summary		1
The Offering		16
Summary Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Information		18
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		21
Risk Factors		22
Use of Proceeds		48
Public Market for our Common Stock		49
Distribution Policy		50
Capitalization		51
Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Information		52
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		55
Business		85
Our Manager and the Management Agreement		100
Management		110
Principal Stockholders		118
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		120
Description of Securities		122
Shares Eligible for Future Sale		127
Certain Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and Our Charter and Bylaws		129
Federal Income Tax Consequences of Our Qualification as a REIT		135
Underwriting		156
Legal Matters		162
Experts		162
Where You Can Find More Information		163
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-1

Information contained in our web site does not constitute part of this prospectus.

Our logo and other trademarks mentioned in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.

SUMMARY

This summary highlights the key aspects of this offering. It is not complete and may not contain all of the information that you may want to consider before making an investment in our common stock. You should read carefully the more detailed information set forth elsewhere in this prospectus, including under “Risk Factors” and in our consolidated financial statements and related notes.

Except where the context suggests otherwise, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and its subsidiary; “Manager” refers to Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC; “Cypress” or “The Cypress Group” refers to Cypress Advisors, Inc. and its affiliated entities and “Sharpridge” refers to Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P. and its affiliated entities.

On May 28, 2008, we effected a three-for-one reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock. Unless indicated otherwise, information presented in this prospectus gives effect to this reverse stock split.

Unless indicated otherwise, the information in this prospectus assumes (i) the common stock to be sold in this offering will be sold at $ per share, which was the last reported sale price of our common stock on , 2009, as reported on the NYSE and (ii) no exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to an additional 1,350,000 shares of our common stock.

Our Company

Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. is a specialty finance company that was created with the objective of achieving consistent risk-adjusted investment income. We seek to achieve this objective by investing on a leveraged basis exclusively in whole-pool residential mortgage pass-through securities for which the principal and interest payments are guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac, or the Government National Mortgage Association, or Ginnie Mae, and collateralized by single-family residential mortgage loans. We refer to these securities as Agency RMBS.

We are currently managed and advised by Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC. We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. In 2006, we completed two private equity offerings, one in February and one in December, raising net proceeds of approximately $78.0 million and $105.8 million, respectively. In May 2008, we completed a private equity offering, raising net proceeds of approximately $14.0 million. In June 2009, we completed our initial public offering of common stock, raising net proceeds of approximately $105.8 million. As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of our Agency RMBS was approximately 99.8% of the approximately $1,519.7 million of assets in our portfolio. A small portion of our total assets currently consists of subordinated tranches of collateralized loan obligations, or CLOs, and structured notes. Our current investment guidelines require that we seek to dispose of our CLOs and structured notes at reasonable prices. We are not, however, required to sell these securities. During 2008, we sold one CLO and did not sell any structured notes. We have not sold any CLOs or structured notes during 2009. We continue to monitor the market for selling the remaining portion of our CLOs and structured notes; however, we may not be able to sell these assets for a reasonable price for some time given the currently depressed prices for these assets. As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of our CLOs and structured notes was approximately 0.2%, in the aggregate, of the assets in our portfolio.

Our Investment Strategy

intervals, or fixed rate single-family residential mortgage loans. We rely on our Manager’s expertise in identifying Agency RMBS for investment. Our Manager makes investment decisions based on various factors, including, but not limited to, relative value, expected cash yield, supply and demand, costs of hedging, costs of financing, liquidity, expected future interest rate volatility and the overall shape of the U.S. Treasury and interest rate swap yield curves. We do not attribute any particular quantitative significance to any of these factors, and the weight we give to these factors when we consider these types of investments is likely to vary depending on market conditions and economic trends. We believe that this strategy, combined with our Manager’s experience, will enable us to pay dividends and achieve capital appreciation throughout changing interest rate and credit cycles, and provide attractive long term returns to investors.

Our investment strategy is designed to:

build an investment portfolio consisting exclusively of Agency RMBS that seeks to generate attractive risk-adjusted investment income;

manage financing, interest and prepayment rate risks;

capitalize on discrepancies in the relative valuations in the Agency RMBS market;

manage cash flow so as to provide for regular quarterly distributions to stockholders;

limit credit risk;

cause us to qualify as a REIT; and

cause us to remain exempt from the registration requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the Investment Company Act.

We believe that the current market and interest rate environment offer significant investment opportunities and that our investment strategy is suited to this environment because:

the current relative spread differential between Agency RMBS and U.S. Treasury securities is attractive; and

the overall weakness in the housing industry and the declining trend of many economic indicators has led to a period of low short term interest rates, which generally increases our net interest margin.

Our income is generated primarily from the difference, or net spread, between the interest income we earn on our investment portfolio and the cost of our borrowings and hedging activities. We believe that the best approach to generate a positive net spread is to manage our liabilities to mirror, as often as possible, the interest rate risks of our investments. To seek to achieve this result, we employ short term financing for our Agency RMBS portfolio in combination with interest rate swaps to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with the financing of our portfolio. In the future, we may, subject to maintaining our REIT qualification, also employ other hedging techniques from time to time, including interest rate caps, floors and collars and Eurobond and U.S. Treasury futures, to protect against adverse interest rate movements. We have not, nor do we intend to, lever or borrow against our CLOs or structured notes.

Because our investments vary in interest rate, prepayment speed and maturity, the leverage or borrowings that we employ to fund our asset purchases are not exactly matched to the terms or performance of our assets. Based on our experience, because our assets are not match funded, such assets’ market prices change more slowly than the corresponding liabilities. Consequently, changes in interest rates, particularly short term interest rates, may significantly influence our net income. Decreases in these rates will tend to increase our net income and the market value of our assets, while increases in these rates will tend to decrease our net income and the market value of our assets and could possibly result in operating losses. Our approach to managing our investment portfolio is to take a longer term view of assets and liabilities, such that our net income and mark-to-market valuations at the end of a financial reporting period will not significantly influence our strategy of maximizing cash distributions to stockholders and achieving capital appreciation over the long term.

Financing Strategy

We use leverage on our Agency RMBS portfolio to seek to increase our potential returns and to fund the acquisition of our assets. We have not used, and do not intend to use, leverage on our existing CLOs or structured notes. Our borrowings currently consist of short term borrowings in the repurchase market, but we may utilize other financing techniques in the future such as direct corporate borrowings of secured or unsecured debt, issuances of preferred stock and trust preferred securities, as well as various other techniques. As of September 30, 2009, we had repurchase agreements with 24 different counterparties. We do not have a policy limiting the amount of leverage we may incur. However, we generally expect that the multiple of leverage compared to the amount of net assets in our overall investment portfolio will be between 6 and 10 times. The amount of leverage we incur may vary from time to time depending on market conditions and other factors that our Manager deems relevant. As of June 30, 2009, our portfolio was leveraged (as measured by total liabilities to net assets) approximately 5.9 to 1.

Hedging Strategy

We historically have utilized interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk associated with the financing of our portfolio. In the future, subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, we may utilize various derivative financial instruments to hedge the interest rate risk associated with the financing of our portfolio from time to time, including, among others, interest rate swaps, caps, floors and collars and Eurobond and U.S. Treasury futures. Specifically, we seek to hedge our exposure to potential interest rate mismatches between the interest we earn on our investments and our borrowing costs caused by fluctuations in short term interest rates. In utilizing interest rate hedges, our objective is to lock in, on a long term basis, a spread between the yield on our assets and the cost of our financing.

Risk Management

Our board of directors exercises its oversight of risk management principally through its Risk Management Committee. The Risk Management Committee oversees our senior management’s and our Manager’s risk-related responsibilities, including reviewing risk management policies and performance against these policies and related benchmarks.

As part of our risk management process, our Manager seeks to actively manage the interest rate, liquidity and prepayment risks associated with our Agency RMBS portfolio. Our Manager seeks to mitigate our interest rate risk exposure by entering into various hedging instruments in order to minimize our exposure to potential interest rate mismatches between the interest we earn on our investments and our borrowing costs. See “—Hedging Strategy.”

Our Manager seeks to mitigate our liquidity risks by monitoring our liquidity position on a daily basis and maintaining a prudent level of leverage, which we currently consider to be between 6 and 10 times the amount of net assets in our overall portfolio, based on current market conditions and various other factors, including the health of the financial institutions that lend to us and the presence of special liquidity programs provided by domestic and foreign central banks. As of June 30, 2009, our portfolio was leveraged (as measured by total liabilities to net assets) approximately 5.9 to 1. To date, we have been able to satisfy all margin call requirements of our lenders.

Our Manager seeks to mitigate our prepayment risk by investing in Agency RMBS with (i) a variety of prepayment characteristics, (ii) prepayment prohibitions and penalties and (iii) prepayment protections, as well as by balancing Agency RMBS purchased at a premium with Agency RMBS purchased at a discount.

Our Manager

General. We are currently managed and advised by Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC, which is a joint venture formed in January 2006 between Cypress and Sharpridge. We believe that the combination of Sharpridge’s expertise in the mortgage-backed securities, or MBS, and asset-backed securities, or ABS, markets, and Cypress’ expertise in the private equity and leveraged finance markets enhance our ability to opportunistically acquire assets and effectively manage those assets in a manner designed to generate consistent risk-adjusted investment income. All of our executive officers are employees of Sharpridge. Our Manager is responsible for our operations and the performance of all services and activities relating to the management of our assets and operations pursuant to a management agreement with us. Our Manager has entered into sub-advisory agreements with Sharpridge and Cypress, pursuant to which they provide certain advisory services to our Manager in conjunction with our Manager’s service to us.

Internalization Plans. In order to establish a more efficient management structure that will produce economies of scale for our operating expenses, most effectively meet our management and administrative needs and align the interests of those individuals responsible for executing our strategy with the interests of our stockholders, we intend to change our management structure no later than March 31, 2010. We refer to these management changes as an internalization transaction. As part of our efforts to accomplish our goals, we amended our management agreement so that we no longer pay our Manager any incentive compensation and the management fee percentage is reduced as our net assets increase. Our board of directors, our Manager and its sub-advisors have been analyzing with counsel and other advisors various structures to further accomplish the goals of an internalization transaction. We have not yet determined the most effective method or structure to accomplish the goals of an internalization transaction described above. We continue to analyze various transaction structures that would result in our management and operations being conducted by employees of our Company or a wholly-owned subsidiary. However, based on our analysis since the completion of our initial public offering in June 2009, it is possible that such a structure could result in increased operating expenses and significant business disruption due to various legal, tax and operational considerations. As a result, in order to realize the goals of an internalization transaction we also are reviewing structures pursuant to which we may maintain and amend our relationship with our Manager and its sub-advisors. Ultimately, to complete an internalization transaction that is in the best interests of our stockholders, our independent directors, our Manager and its sub-advisors will have to negotiate and reach mutually acceptable agreements. Finalization of these agreements is subject to the resolution of various regulatory, legal and tax considerations for all of the interested parties. Completing appropriate due diligence and negotiating the applicable agreements is likely to be time consuming and complex. We will not pay a termination fee to our Manager under the management agreement if an internalization transaction is completed, and do not expect that we will pay consideration that exceeds $750,000 if the internalization transaction ultimately provides for any such consideration to be paid by us. We cannot assure you that we will be able to complete an internalization transaction, or when or on what terms it may be completed, including the amount of consideration we may be required to pay to our Manager or its sub-advisors.

Sub-advisors. Sharpridge was founded in January 2005 by Kevin E. Grant, our chief executive officer, president and the chairman of our board of directors. Sharpridge owns an interest in, and serves as the primary sub-advisor to, our Manager, overseeing all of our day-to-day operations and actively managing our investment portfolio. Currently, Sharpridge does not manage the assets of any other entity, individuals or other investors. In the future, Sharpridge may offer fixed income asset management services to institutions and high net worth individuals, generally employing investment styles and structures classified as alternative investments. As of September 30, 2009, Sharpridge had nine employees. As of June 30, 2009, Sharpridge had approximately $1,519.7 million of total portfolio assets under management, all of which consisted of our assets. We currently own a 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in Sharpridge through a taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, which allows us to participate in Sharpridge’s success.

Prior to founding Sharpridge, Mr. Grant was a senior portfolio manager and member of the Aggregate Bond Team at Fidelity Investments, with direct responsibility for over $25 billion of fixed income assets across 19 separate accounts. At Fidelity, Mr. Grant invested in many types of fixed income investments, ranging from government bonds to below investment grade corporate securities. Over the course of his career at Fidelity, Mr. Grant had responsibility for managing fixed income funds including Fidelity’s Mortgage Securities Fund, Investment Grade Bond Fund, Intermediate Bond Fund, Total Bond Fund, and Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund. In addition, Mr. Grant had responsibility for the fixed income component of certain Fidelity balanced funds, including the Strategic Income Fund, Puritan Fund and Fidelity Balanced Fund. Mr. Grant also managed separate accounts for pension plan sponsors, insurance companies and other institutional clients.

Cypress, founded in 1994, owns an interest in, and serves as a sub-advisor to, our Manager. Cypress is a financial sponsor of leveraged buyouts and other private equity transactions for growth-oriented, middle-market companies, including Affinia Group Inc., Catlin Group Limited, Cinemark USA, Inc., Communications & Power Industries, Inc., Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc., Financial Guaranty Insurance Corporation, Illinois Central Corporation, Infinity Broadcasting Corporation, K&F Industries, Inc., Lear Corporation, Loral Corporation, The Meow Mix Company, Montpelier Re Holdings, Ltd., Parisian, Inc., R.P. Scherer Corporation, Scottish Re Group Limited, WESCO International, Inc. and Williams Scotsman, Inc. Cypress invests in a number of industry sectors, focusing on the financial services, healthcare, consumer, general industrial, automotive, aerospace, media and leisure industries. Since 1989, Cypress professionals have invested over $4 billion of equity capital in 32 separate investments with an aggregate transaction value of over $22 billion. As of September 30, 2009, Cypress had 13 employees.

Competitive Strengths

We believe that our competitive strengths include:

Focused Investment Strategy

We believe our investment strategy of acquiring Agency RMBS exclusively, combined with our financing and hedging strategy, will provide our stockholders with attractive risk-adjusted investment income. We further believe this investment strategy allows our Manager to focus on interest rate risk management rather than credit risk management and utilize its expertise in this area. We also believe our investment strategy provides us with opportunities to generate stable investment income without incurring material credit risk even when the spread between long term interest rates and short term interest rates is relatively narrow and mortgage default rates are increasing.

Existing Funding Relationships

As of September 30, 2009, we had repurchase agreements with 24 financial institutions and believe these relationships will enable us to expeditiously invest the net proceeds from this offering in accordance with our investing and financing strategies.

Experienced Manager and Ability to Navigate Through Different Market Environments

the Total Bond Fund, the fixed income portion of the Fidelity Puritan Fund and the Strategic Income Fund. Our Manager’s investment team consists of highly experienced fixed income portfolio managers who average more than 20 years of experience in the fields of MBS, structured finance and corporate finance, providing us with significant experience in key areas of our business. Each member of our management team has a demonstrated track record in his or her relevant area of responsibility.

Investment Committee and Board of Directors with Significant Relevant Experience

We believe that our board of directors and our Manager’s investment committee provide us with a competitive advantage through their experience in fixed income and equity investing, corporate management and financial advisory services. The members of our Manager’s investment committee, which provides oversight to our investing activities, have on average approximately 30 years of investing experience in both the debt and equity markets. In addition, members of our Manager’s investment committee and our board of directors have significant experience in risk management for financial services companies and investment portfolios.

Strong Alignment of Interests

We believe the interests of our Manager and our management team are strongly aligned with our interests. As of September 30, 2009, our directors and executive officers and certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors and other affiliates beneficially owned an aggregate of 750,116 shares of our common stock (including 510,917 shares owned as a result of purchases of our common stock in our February and December 2006 offerings and our initial public offering), including restricted stock, representing approximately % of the shares of our common stock that will be outstanding immediately after completion of this offering.

Affiliation with The Cypress Group

We believe our Manager’s access to the resources and expertise of Cypress is a significant competitive strength. Our Manager has access to Cypress’ team of private equity professionals, which provides us with access to their significant industry experience, network of relationships with industry executives and knowledge of transaction structuring. Cypress also has extensive relationships with major commercial and investment banking firms that we believe provides our Manager with access to information, investment opportunities and capital markets expertise.

Summary Risk Factors

An investment in shares of our common stock involves various risks. You should consider carefully the risks discussed below and under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 22 before purchasing our common stock.

No assurance can be given that the actions taken by the U.S. Government for the purpose of seeking to stabilize the financial and credit markets and stimulate the economy will achieve their intended effect, or will benefit our business, and further government or market developments could adversely impact us.

Increases in interest rates and adverse market conditions may negatively affect the value of our investments and increase the cost of our borrowings, which could result in reduced earnings or losses and reduced cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

We leverage our portfolio investments in Agency RMBS, which may adversely affect our return on our investments and may reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Our lenders may require us to provide additional collateral, especially when the market values for our investments decline, which may restrict us from leveraging our assets as fully as desired, and reduce our liquidity, earnings and cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Hedging against interest rate risk exposure may not completely insulate us from interest rate risk and may adversely affect our earnings, which could adversely affect our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

The federal conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related efforts, along with any changes in laws and regulations affecting the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. Government, may adversely affect our business.

Mortgage loan modification programs and future legislative action may adversely affect the value of, and the returns on, the Agency RMBS in which we invest.

Prepayment rates could negatively affect the value of our Agency RMBS, which could result in reduced earnings or losses and negatively affect the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value based on market quotations from brokers and dealers. The value of our common stock could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of these investments were materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon their disposal.

Until we complete an internalization transaction, we will be dependent on our Manager and may not find a suitable replacement if our Manager terminates the management agreement.

We are dependent on certain key personnel of Sharpridge and Cypress for our future success, and their continued service to us is not guaranteed. In connection with an internalization transaction, we may be unable to retain all of Sharpridge’s employees or maintain a relationship with Cypress.

Because our management agreement was negotiated between related parties and due to our relationship with our Manager, conflicts of interest exist that could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders. Upon the completion of an internalization transaction, conflicts of interests may arise between our executive officers and us that could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders.

Loss of our exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act would adversely affect the value of shares of our common stock and our ability to distribute cash to our stockholders.

Failure to qualify as a REIT would subject us to federal income tax, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of our common stock and would reduce the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Recent Market Impacts and Supplemental Summary Financial Information

As of September 30, 2009, we estimate that our net asset value per share was between $ and $ . The estimated range of our net asset value per share as of September 30, 2009 is based on our preliminary analysis of our accounts and has not been approved by our board of directors or reviewed by our independent registered public accounting firm. As a result, we cannot assure you that our net asset value per share as of September 30, 2009 that we report in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 will be within this range. The estimated range of our net asset value per share as of September 30, 2009 referenced above includes the impact on our net asset value of the $0.35 per share distribution that our board of directors authorized on September 25, 2009 that will be paid on October 21, 2009 to stockholders of record as of October 5, 2009.

The information furnished above does not include all of the information regarding our financial condition and results of operations for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 that may be important to investors. As a result, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information furnished above and should view this information in the context of our full third quarter results when such results are disclosed by us in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

Our Distribution Policy

We generally must distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income annually (subject to certain adjustments) so that we can continue to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code. To satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT and generally not be subject to federal income and excise tax, we intend to pay quarterly distributions of all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income to stockholders out of cash generated from our net investment income. To date, we have funded our distributions out of cash generated from our net investment income. Although we could satisfy the requirement to distribute 90% of our REIT taxable income with taxable distributions of our capital stock or debt, we have no intention of doing so and intend to only distribute cash. We do not intend to pay future distributions from the proceeds from this offering.

Any future distributions we make will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, our earnings and financial condition, maintenance of our REIT qualification, restrictions on making distributions under Maryland law, and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. We cannot assure you that we will make any future distributions to our stockholders, and our past distributions are not intended to be indicative of the amount and timing of future distributions, if any.

$0.96 per share, which included a portion of our estimated REIT taxable income for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, and a portion of our remaining undistributed estimated REIT taxable income for 2006, paid on April 26, 2007;

$0.93 per share for the four-month period ended July 31, 2007, paid on July 31, 2007;

$0.57 per share for the period commencing August 1, 2007 and ending October 18, 2007, paid on November 1, 2007;

$0.54 per share for the period commencing October 19, 2007 and ending December 31, 2007, paid on January 30, 2008;

$0.66 per share, which included a portion of our estimated REIT taxable income for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, and a portion of our remaining undistributed estimated REIT taxable income for 2007, paid on April 30, 2008;

$0.66 per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, paid on July 30, 2008 (after paying this distribution, we had distributed sufficient REIT taxable income to our stockholders to remain qualified as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2008);

$0.60 per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, paid on April 29, 2009; and

$0.60 per share for a portion of the quarter ended June 30, 2009, paid on June 15, 2009.

Our board of directors has authorized a distribution to our stockholders of $0.35 per share that will be paid on October 21, 2009 to stockholders of record as of October 5, 2009. This distribution relates to our financial performance for a portion of the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Purchasers in this offering will not be eligible to receive this distribution.

Our Formation and Structure

We were formed as a Maryland corporation in January 2006. We conduct all of our business through and hold all of our assets in Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. We currently have one TRS, Sharpridge TRS, Inc. Sharpridge TRS, Inc. was formed to make, from time to time, certain investments that would not be REIT qualifying investments if made directly by us and to earn income that would not be REIT qualifying income if earned directly by us. Sharpridge TRS, Inc. holds a 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in Sharpridge but does not conduct any other business. The following chart illustrates our ownership and management structure immediately after completion of this offering:

LOGO

Management Agreement

We are a party to a management agreement with our Manager, pursuant to which our Manager is responsible for managing our assets and day-to-day operations. Our Manager is subject to the supervision and oversight of our board of directors. The initial term of the management agreement expired on December 31, 2008, and it has been automatically renewed for a one-year term that will expire on December 31, 2009. The management agreement is automatically renewable for a one-year term each anniversary date thereafter unless terminated under certain circumstances. We have not received notice of our Manager’s intention not to renew the management agreement. As a result, the agreement will automatically renew until December 31, 2010.

The following table summarizes the fees payable to our Manager.


Fee		Summary Description
Base Management Fee		Payable monthly in arrears in an amount equal to 1/12th of (a) 1.50% of the first $250,000,000 of our net assets, (b) 1.25% of our net assets that are greater than $250,000,000 and less than or equal to $500,000,000, and (c) 1.00% of our net assets that are greater than $500,000,000. For purposes of calculating the base management fee, our net assets means, for any month, the amount determined by subtracting our total liabilities from our total assets, as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. Our base management fee is adjusted to exclude special one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP, as well as certain non-cash charges, after discussion between our Manager and our independent directors and approval by a majority of our independent directors in the case of non-cash charges. During 2007 and 2008, we paid our Manager approximately $2.4 million and approximately $1.6 million, respectively, in base management fees. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we paid our Manager approximately $0.9 million in base management fees.

Reimbursement of Expenses		Certain expenses directly related to our operations incurred by our Manager on our behalf will be reimbursed by us, the most significant of which are office rent and other related overhead expenses, computer software and hardware, including market information and research systems, and the salary of several employees of Sharpridge.

2006 Stock Incentive Plan		Our Manager, its officers and employees, its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to us are eligible to receive stock awards pursuant to our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.

Sub-Advisory Agreements

Our Manager has entered into sub-advisory agreements with Sharpridge and Cypress, pursuant to which Sharpridge or Cypress is responsible for providing certain services to the Manager. These agreements are described below. In connection with internalizing our management, as described in “—Our Manager,” we expect to, among other things, terminate these sub-advisory agreements and hire the employees of Sharpridge.

Sub-Advisory Agreement with Sharpridge

Our Manager has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with Sharpridge whereby Sharpridge has agreed to provide certain services for our benefit, including:

portfolio management;

asset monitoring;

asset hedging;

asset sourcing;

asset purchase and sale negotiation;

tax and regulatory advice; and

certain administrative functions.

This agreement had an initial term that ended on December 31, 2008. This agreement has been automatically renewed until December 31, 2009, and will be automatically renewed, unless Sharpridge provides notice no later than 180 days prior to an anniversary date of its intention not to renew, for a one-year term on each anniversary date thereafter, except under certain circumstances, including termination of the management agreement. Our Manager has not received notice of Sharpridge’s intention not to renew this agreement. As a result, the agreement will automatically renew until December 31, 2010.

Sub-Advisory Agreement with Cypress

Our Manager has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with Cypress whereby Cypress has agreed to provide certain services for our benefit, including:

asset sourcing;

asset purchase and sale negotiation;

tax and regulatory advice; and

certain administrative functions.

This agreement had an initial term that ended on December 31, 2008. This agreement has been automatically renewed until December 31, 2009, and will be automatically renewed, unless Cypress provides notice no later than 180 days prior to an anniversary date of its intention not to renew, for a one-year term on each anniversary date thereafter, except under certain circumstances, including termination of the management agreement. Our Manager has not received notice of Cypress’ intention not to renew this agreement. As a result, the agreement will automatically renew until December 31, 2010.

Conflicts of Interest

We are entirely dependent on our Manager for our day-to-day management and do not have any independent officers. Our executive officers also serve as officers of our Manager and Sharpridge. In addition, certain of our directors and all of the members of our Manager’s investment committee are officers of either Cypress or Sharpridge. As a result, our management agreement with our Manager was negotiated between related parties and its terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it had been negotiated at arm’s length with an unaffiliated third party.

The compensation we pay our Manager consists of a base management fee that is not tied to our performance. The base management fee may not sufficiently incentivize our Manager to generate consistent risk-adjusted investment income for us.

Until we complete the internalization transaction, each of our Manager and Sharpridge could have discretionary investment authority over accounts that have overlapping investment objectives and may compete with us for investment opportunities. Each of our Manager and Sharpridge has an investment allocation policy in place so that we may share equitably with other client accounts of our Manager and Sharpridge in all investment opportunities, particularly those involving a security with limited supply, that may be suitable for our account and such other accounts. This system also includes other controls designed to prevent any client account from receiving favorable treatment over any other client account.

Until we complete the internalization transaction, the ability of our Manager and its officers and employees to engage in other business activities may reduce the time our Manager spends managing us. Upon the completion of an internalization transaction, conflicts of interest may arise between our executive officers and us that could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders.

We have not adopted a policy that expressly prohibits our directors, officers, security holders or affiliates from having a direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any investment to be acquired or disposed of by us or any of our subsidiaries or in any transaction to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or has an interest. Nor do we have a policy that expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account in business activities of the types conducted by us. However, our code of business conduct and ethics contains a conflicts of interest policy that prohibits our directors, officers and employees, as well as employees of our Manager who provide services to us, from engaging in any transaction that involves an actual or apparent conflict of interest with us. In addition, nothing in the management agreement binds or restricts our Manager or any of its affiliates, officers or employees from buying, selling or trading any securities or commodities for their own accounts or for the accounts of others for whom our Manager or any of its affiliates, officers or employees may be acting. We have adopted a written policy for the review and approval of related party transactions that may arise in the future. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transaction,” for a description of this policy.

Although we intend to complete an internalization transaction no later than March 31, 2010, if we instead sought to terminate the management agreement without cause, it would be difficult and costly for us. We may only terminate the management agreement without cause if we determine that (i) our Manager’s performance has been unsatisfactory, which has been materially detrimental to us, or (ii) our Manager’s compensation is unfair, subject to our Manager’s right to accept reduced compensation to avoid such a termination. Termination in either event would require us to (i) obtain the approval of at least two thirds of our independent directors or a majority of our stockholders, and (ii) pay our Manager a termination fee equal to four times the average annual base management fee and incentive compensation earned by our Manager during the eight calendar quarters immediately preceding such termination.

Resolution of Potential Conflicts of Interest and Allocation of Investment Opportunities

To address the risks related to potential conflicts of interest with our Manager prior to the completion of an internalization transaction, we have adopted certain policies that are designed to address potential conflicts of interest related to managing other client accounts of our Manager or Sharpridge. We have also adopted detailed compliance policies to govern our interactions with Cypress, including when Cypress is in receipt of material non-public information.

Our management agreement with our Manager generally restricts our Manager and its affiliates from managing another REIT that invests primarily in domestic MBS, unless our independent directors have previously approved such management by our Manager. Any portfolio company of any private equity fund controlled by Cypress shall not be deemed to be an affiliate or an entity under common control with our Manager.

If our Manager or Sharpridge engages in additional management or investment opportunities that have overlapping objectives with us, our Manager or Sharpridge may face conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities to these other investments. Generally, each of our Manager and Sharpridge has a policy that requires the aggregation of all purchase orders received by separate accounts for the same security in order to facilitate best execution. These policies also provide that in situations where our Manager or Sharpridge aggregates purchase orders and the amount of securities available is insufficient to satisfy each order, each of our Manager and Sharpridge will endeavor to allocate such purchases on a pro-rata basis, based on the size of each account’s order. For certain securities transactions that cannot be allocated on a pro-rata basis, such as in the case of “whole pool” trades, each of our Manager and Sharpridge will endeavor to allocate such purchases over time in a fair and equitable manner.

Tax Structure

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Our qualification as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various complex requirements under the Internal Revenue Code, relating to, among other things, the sources of our gross income, the composition and values of our assets, our distribution levels and the concentration of ownership of our capital stock. We believe that we were organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and that our current and proposed manner of operation will enable us to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the REIT taxable income that we distribute currently to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we will be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates, and we may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable years following the year during which we lost our qualification. Even if we qualify for federal taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income. Our TRS, Sharpridge TRS, Inc., is a regular, domestic taxable corporation that is subject to federal, state and local income tax on its income. Any dividends received by our stockholders from us, with limited exceptions, will not be eligible for taxation at the preferred rates that currently apply to dividends received by taxpayers taxed at individual rates from taxable corporations.

Restrictions on Ownership of Our Capital Stock

Due to limitations on the concentration of ownership of the stock of a REIT imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, our charter generally prohibits any stockholder from beneficially or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of our capital stock. Our charter also prohibits any person from (a) beneficially or constructively owning shares of our capital stock that would result in our being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT and (b) transferring shares of our capital stock if such transfer would result in our capital stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons.

Our charter provides that any ownership or transfer of our capital stock in violation of the foregoing restrictions will result in the shares owned or transferred in such violation being automatically transferred to a charitable trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary, and the purported owner or transferee acquiring no rights in such shares. If the transfer is ineffective for any reason to prevent a violation of the restriction, the transfer that would have resulted in such violation will be void ab initio. Our board of directors has discretion to grant exemptions from the ownership limit subject to terms and conditions as it deems appropriate to conclude that such exemptions will not cause us to lose our status as a REIT.

Investment Company Act Exemption

We operate our business so that Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and its subsidiary are exempt from registration under the Investment Company Act. Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. itself relies on the exemption provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. We monitor our portfolio periodically and prior to each investment to confirm that we continue to qualify for the exemption. To qualify for the exemption, we make investments so that at least 55% of the assets we own on an unconsolidated basis consist of qualifying mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate, which we refer to as qualifying real estate assets, and so that at least 80% of the assets we own on an unconsolidated basis consist of real estate-related assets, including our qualifying real estate assets.

We treat Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae whole-pool residential mortgage pass-through certificates issued with respect to an underlying pool of mortgage loans in which we hold all of the certificates issued by the pool as qualifying real estate assets based on no-action letters issued by the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Our Agency RMBS consist and will consist solely of such Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae whole-pool residential mortgage pass-through certificates. At present, we generally do not expect that our investments in CLOs and structured notes will constitute qualifying real estate assets or real estate-related assets for purposes of the Investment Company Act. Similarly, we do not expect that Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.’s interest in its subsidiary, Sharpridge TRS, Inc., will constitute a qualifying real estate asset or a real estate-related asset for purposes of the Investment Company Act. Sharpridge TRS, Inc. will not register as an investment company in reliance upon Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, which is available to companies that do not make a public offering and that issue securities exclusively to qualified purchasers. Qualification for this exemption limits our ability to make certain investments.

Lock-Up Agreements

We have agreed that for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus, we will not, without the prior written consent of Barclays Capital Inc., (i) issue, offer, sell, agree to issue, offer or sell, solicit offers to purchase, grant any call option, warrant or other right to purchase, purchase any put option or other right to sell, pledge, borrow or otherwise dispose of any shares of our common stock and any security convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, our common stock, which we refer to as the relevant securities, or publicly announce the intention to do any of the foregoing, (ii) establish or increase any “put equivalent position” or liquidate or decrease any “call equivalent position” (in each case within the meaning of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder) with respect to any relevant security, or (iii) otherwise enter into any swap, derivative or other transaction or arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any economic consequence of ownership of a relevant security, whether or not such transaction is to be settled by delivery of relevant securities, other securities, cash or other consideration, subject to certain exceptions. During this 90-day period, we also have agreed not to file a registration statement under the Securities Act in connection with any transaction by us or any person that is prohibited pursuant to the foregoing, without the prior written consent of Barclay’s Capital, Inc., except for any registration statements on Form S-8 or Form S-11 but solely for the registration of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to our 2006 stock incentive plan.

thereunder) with respect to any relevant security, or (iii) otherwise enter into any swap, derivative or other transaction or arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any economic consequence of ownership of a relevant security, whether or not such transaction is to be settled by delivery of relevant securities, other securities, cash or other consideration, subject to certain exceptions. This lock-up period may be extended in certain circumstances as described in “Underwriting—Lock Up Agreements.”

Our Corporate Information

Our offices are located at 65 East 55th Street, New York, New York 10022, and the telephone number of our offices is (212) 705-0160. The offices of Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC and The Cypress Group are at the same location. Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P. is located at 890 Winter Street, Suite 200, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451. Our internet address is www.cysinv.com. Our internet web site and the information contained therein or connected thereto do not constitute a part of this prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto.

THE OFFERING

Common stock offered by us

9,000,000 shares⁽¹⁾

Common stock to be outstanding after this offering

27,212,732 shares⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

Use of proceeds

We estimate that the net proceeds we will receive from this offering will be approximately $ million (or approximately $ million if the underwriters fully exercise their option to purchase additional shares of our common stock), after deducting the underwriting discount and commissions of approximately $ million (or approximately $ million if the underwriters fully exercise their option to purchase additional shares of our common stock) and estimated offering expenses of approximately $ million payable by us.

We intend to invest the net proceeds of this offering in a targeted mix of Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs and fixed rate mortgage loans. Specifically, we intend to invest approximately 35% to 65% of the net proceeds in Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs and the remaining net proceeds in Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgage loans. We then expect to borrow against the Agency RMBS that we purchase with the net proceeds of this offering through repurchase agreements and use the proceeds of the borrowings to acquire additional Agency RMBS in accordance with a similar targeted allocation. We reserve the right to change our targeted allocation depending on prevailing market conditions, including, among others, the pricing and supply of Agency RMBS, the performance of our portfolio and the availability and terms of financing.

New York Stock Exchange Symbol

“CYS”

Ownership and transfer restrictions

To assist us in complying with limitations on the concentration of ownership of a REIT imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, our charter generally prohibits, among other prohibitions, any stockholder from beneficially or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of the outstanding shares of our capital stock. See “Description of Securities—Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer.”

Risk factors

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 22.

⁽¹⁾	Assumes the underwriters’ option to purchase up to an additional 1,350,000 shares of our common stock is not exercised.

⁽²⁾

Does not include (i) 78,190 shares of our common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of the warrants underlying the units sold in our May 2008 private offering, which are currently exercisable and will expire on April 30, 2011; (ii) 131,088 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options granted in connection with our initial capitalization to our chief executive officer; or (iii) 2,930,628 additional shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2006 stock incentive plan.

SUMMARY SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

The following table presents summary selected consolidated financial and other information as of June 30, 2009, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. The consolidated income statement data for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006, has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The consolidated income statement data and consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 has been derived from our interim unaudited financial statements. These interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared on substantially the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to provide a fair statement of our financial position as of June 30, 2009 and the results of our operations and cash flow for the interim periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These results are not necessarily indicative of our results for the full fiscal year. Similarly, because we only operated our business for a portion of the year ended December 31, 2006, we do not believe that a comparison of our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 to the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006 is indicative of the trends in our performance. The “Key Portfolio Statistics” have been derived from our underlying books and records.

Since the information presented below is only a summary and does not provide all of the information contained in our historical consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, you should read it in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our historical consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The shares outstanding and per share amounts reflected in the chart below have been adjusted to reflect the three-for-one reverse stock split effective May 28, 2008.


	Six Months Ended June 30,					Year Ended December 31,
	2009		2008			2008			2007			2006*
Consolidated Income Statement Data:
Investment income—Interest income⁽¹⁾	$	19,048,720	$	32,345,751		$	55,475,822		$	135,585,142		$	48,067,705
Expenses:
Interest expense		2,500,567		14,820,206			23,980,836			112,995,775			38,716,966
Non-Investment expenses		2,976,576		2,499,270			7,747,884			5,246,895			3,637,531

Total expenses		5,477,143		17,319,476			31,728,720			118,242,670			42,354,497

Net investment income		13,571,577		15,026,275			23,747,102			17,342,472			5,713,208
Net realized gain (loss) on investments		1,415,931		(4,217,155	)		(7,982,797	)		(18,290,492	)		(260,054	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		18,006,631		(14,666,251	)		(26,377,797	)		(1,434,857	)		(5,492,367	)
Net gain (loss) on interest rate swap contracts⁽²⁾		596,333		(17,683,757	)		(28,558,957	)		(27,304,395	)		1,005,480

Net income (loss)	$	33,590,472	$	(21,540,888	)	$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267

Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)	$	3.98	$	(3.19	)	$	(5.48	)	$	(4.58	)	$	0.33

Distributions per common share	$	1.20	$	0.66		$	1.32		$	3.00		$	1.98


	As of June 30, 2009
	Actual			As Adjusted**
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	44,644,536		$
Total assets		1,575,080,660
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		699,004,746
Net assets		229,558,429
Net assets per common share	$	12.66		$

Key Portfolio Statistics:***

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Year Ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2008			2007			2006*
Average Agency RMBS⁽³⁾	$	751,231,814		$	1,014,279,040		$	897,714,150		$	2,147,699,675		$	890,543,418
Average securities sold under agreement to repurchase		654,456,996			906,867,859			796,027,700			2,044,976,836			832,746,432
Average net assets		118,650,116			116,717,759			110,261,494			163,990,080			83,355,831
Average yield on Agency RMBS⁽⁴⁾		4.91	%		5.74	%		5.46	%		6.03	%		5.72	%
Average cost of funds & hedge⁽⁵⁾		1.52	%		4.02	%		3.89	%		5.38	%		5.23	%
Interest rate spread net of hedge⁽⁶⁾		3.39	%		1.72	%		1.57	%		0.65	%		0.49	%
Leverage ratio (at period end)⁽⁷⁾		5.9:1			7.5:1			6.1:1			13.3:1			12.8:1
⁽¹⁾ Interest income is made up of the following components:

Interest Income—Agency RMBS	$	18,309,112		$	28,971,867		$	48,997,293		$	129,505,620		$	45,184,854
Interest Income—CLOs, Structured Notes & Cash Equivalents		739,608			3,373,884			6,478,529			6,079,522			2,882,851

⁽²⁾ Net gain (loss) on interest rate swap contracts is made up of the following components:

Net swap interest income (expense)	$	(2,421,244	)	$	(3,322,503	)	$	(6,945,012	)	$	3,001,870		$	75,267
Net realized gain (loss) on termination of swap contracts		(10,804,123	)		(29,927,526	)		(35,118,468	)		(3,432,742	)		64,733
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap contracts		13,821,700			15,566,272			13,504,523			(26,873,523	)		865,480

⁽³⁾	Our average investment in Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by averaging the cost basis of our settled Agency RMBS investments during the period.

⁽⁴⁾	Our average yield on Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by dividing our interest income from Agency RMBS by our average Agency RMBS.

⁽⁵⁾	Our average cost of funds and hedge for the period was calculated by dividing our total interest expense, including our net swap interest income (expense), by our average securities sold under agreement to repurchase.

⁽⁶⁾	Our interest rate spread net of hedge for the period was calculated by subtracting our average cost of funds and hedge from our average yield on Agency RMBS.

⁽⁷⁾	Our leverage ratio was calculated by dividing total liabilities by net assets.

^*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

^**	Assumes shares will be sold in this offering at a public offering price of $ per share for net proceeds of approximately $ million after deducting the estimated underwriting discount of approximately $ million and estimated offering expenses of approximately $ million.

^***	All percentages are annualized.

Core Earnings

Core earnings represents a non-GAAP financial measure and is defined as net income (loss) excluding net realized gain (loss) on investments, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, net realized gain (loss) on termination of swap contracts and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap contracts. In order to evaluate the effective yield of the portfolio, management uses core earnings to reflect the net investment income of our portfolio as adjusted to reflect the net swap interest income (expense). Core earnings allows management to isolate the interest income (expense) associated with our swaps in order to monitor and project our borrowing costs and interest rate spread. In addition, management utilizes core earnings as a key metric in conjunction with other portfolio and market factors to determine the appropriate leverage and hedging ratios, as well as the overall structure of the portfolio.

We adopted SOP 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies, prior to its deferral in February 2008, while most, if not all, other public companies that invest only in Agency RMBS have not adopted SOP 07-1. Under SOP 07-1, we use the financial reporting specified for investment companies, and accordingly, our investments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings. Most other public companies that invest only in Agency RMBS include most changes in the fair value of their investments within shareholders’ equity, not in earnings. As a result, investors are not able to readily compare our results of operations to those of most of our competitors. We believe that the presentation of our core earnings is useful to investors because it provides a means of comparing our core earnings to those of our competitors. In addition, because core earnings isolates the net swap interest income (expense) it provides investors with an additional metric to identify trends in our portfolio as they relate to the interest rate environment.

The primary limitation associated with core earnings as a measure of our financial performance over any period is that it excludes the effects of net realized gain (loss) from investments. In addition, our presentation of core earnings may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures of other companies, who may use different calculations. As a result, core earnings should not be considered as a substitute for our GAAP net income (loss) as a measure of our financial performance or any measure of our liquidity under GAAP.


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Year Ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2008			2007			2006*
Non-GAAP Reconciliation:
Net income (loss)	$	33,590,472		$	(21,540,888	)	$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267
Net realized (gain) loss on investments		(1,415,931	)		4,217,155			7,982,797			18,290,492			260,054
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments		(18,006,631	)		14,666,251			26,377,797			1,434,857			5,492,367
Net realized (gain) loss on termination of swap contracts		10,804,123			29,927,526			35,118,468			3,432,742			(64,733	)
Unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on swap contracts		(13,821,700	)		(15,566,272	)		(13,504,523	)		26,873,523			(865,480	)

Core earnings	$	11,150,333		$	11,703,772		$	16,802,090		$	20,344,342		$	5,788,475

*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We make forward-looking statements in this prospectus that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans and objectives. When we use the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “should,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “will,” or similar expressions, or the negative of these words, we intend to identify forward-looking statements. Statements regarding the following subjects are forward-looking by their nature:

our business and investment strategy;

our expected operating results;

our ability to acquire investments on attractive terms;

the effect of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s and the U.S. Treasury’s recent actions on the liquidity of the capital markets;

the federal conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related efforts, along with any changes in laws and regulations affecting the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. Government;

mortgage loan modification programs and future legislative action;

our ability to access the capital markets;

our ability to obtain future financing arrangements;

our ability to successfully hedge the interest rate risk associated with the financing of our portfolio;

our ability to make distributions to our stockholders in the future;

our understanding of our competition;

market trends;

expected capital expenditures; and

use of the proceeds of this offering.

The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. We are not obligated to update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date of this prospectus, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risks and other cautionary statements set forth in this prospectus, including those contained in “Risk Factors.” Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s views as of the date of this prospectus. The risks and other cautionary statements noted throughout this prospectus could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a number of risks. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with the other information contained in this prospectus. If any of the risks discussed in this prospectus occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, as a result of which the price of our common stock could decline significantly, and you could lose all or a part of your investment.

Risks Related To Our Business

In response to the financial issues affecting the banking system, the financial and housing markets and the economy as a whole, the U.S. Government has implemented a number of initiatives intended to bolster the banking system, the financial and housing markets and the economy as a whole. These actions include: (i) the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or the EESA, which established the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, (ii) the voluntary Capital Purchase Program, or the CPP, which was implemented under authority provided in the EESA and gives the U.S. Treasury the authority to purchase up to $250 billion of senior preferred shares in qualifying U.S. controlled banks, saving associations, and certain bank and savings and loan holding companies engaged only in financial activities, (iii) a program to purchase $200 billion in direct obligations of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks and $1.25 trillion in RMBS issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae, (iv) the creation of a new funding mechanism, the Financial Stability Trust, that will provide financial institutions with bridge financing until such institutions can raise capital in the capital markets, (v) the creation of a Public-Private Investment Fund for private investors to purchase mortgages and mortgage-related assets from financial institutions, (vi) the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility with the goal of increasing securitization activity for various consumer and commercial loans and other financial assets, including student loans, automobile loans and leases, credit card receivables, SBA small business loans and commercial mortgage-backed securities and (vii) the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or the ARRA, which includes a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure, energy, health and education needs. For a more detailed description of certain of these initiatives, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Trends and Recent Market Impacts.”

No assurance can be given that these initiatives will have a beneficial impact on the banking system, financial market or housing market. To the extent the markets do not respond favorably to these initiatives or if these initiatives do not function as intended, the pricing, supply, liquidity and value of our assets and the availability of financing on attractive terms may be materially adversely affected.

We invest indirectly in mortgage loans by purchasing Agency RMBS. Under a normal yield curve, an investment in Agency RMBS will decline in value if long term interest rates increase. In addition, net interest income could decrease under an inverted or flat yield curve. Despite Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae guarantees of the principal and interest payments related to the Agency RMBS we own, those guarantees do not protect us from declines in market value caused by changes in interest rates. Declines in the market value of our investments may ultimately result in losses to us, which may reduce earnings and negatively affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

A significant risk associated with our investment in Agency RMBS is the risk that both long term and short term interest rates will increase significantly. If long term rates were to increase significantly, the market value of

these Agency RMBS would decline and the duration and weighted average life of the investments would increase. We could realize a loss if the securities were sold. At the same time, an increase in short term interest rates would increase the amount of interest owed on our repurchase agreements used to finance the purchase of Agency RMBS, which would decrease cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Market values of our investments may decline without any general increase in interest rates for a number of reasons, such as increases in defaults, increases in voluntary prepayments for those investments that we have that are subject to prepayment risk, and widening of credit spreads. If the market values of our investments were to decline for any reason, the value of your investment could also decline. For example, the significant downturn in the residential mortgage market and the weakness in the credit markets beginning in 2007 caused a decrease in valuations on MBS, including Agency RMBS, and an increase in collateral requirements for repurchase agreement lending. In anticipation of increased margin requirements from lenders due to this decrease in valuations of MBS coupled with increases in collateral requirements for other repurchase agreement financing, we sold a portion of our Agency RMBS portfolio in February and March of 2008 and recognized net realized losses on these sales of approximately $6.2 million.

We leverage our portfolio investments in Agency RMBS, which may adversely affect our return on our investments and may reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

We leverage our portfolio investments in Agency RMBS through borrowings under repurchase agreements. Leverage can enhance our potential returns but can also exacerbate losses. The percentage of leverage will vary depending on our ability to obtain these financing facilities and the lender’s and rating agencies’ estimate of the stability of the portfolio investments’ cash flow. As of June 30, 2009, our portfolio was leveraged (as measured by total liabilities to net assets) approximately 5.9 to 1. Our return on our investments and cash available for distribution to our stockholders may be reduced if market conditions cause the cost of our financing to increase relative to the income that can be derived from the assets acquired, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock. In addition, our debt service payments will reduce cash flow available for distributions to stockholders. We may not be able to meet our debt service obligations. To the extent that we cannot meet our debt service obligations, we risk the loss of some or all of our assets to foreclosure or sale to satisfy our debt obligations.

We currently use repurchase agreements to finance our investments in Agency RMBS. Our repurchase agreements allow the lenders, to varying degrees, to determine a new market value of the collateral to reflect current market conditions. If the market value of the securities pledged or sold by us to a funding source decline in value, we may be required by the lender to provide additional collateral or pay down a portion of the funds advanced on minimal notice, which is known as a margin call. Posting additional collateral will reduce our liquidity and limit our ability to leverage our assets, which could adversely affect our business. Additionally, in order to satisfy a margin call, we may be required to liquidate assets at a disadvantageous time, which could cause us to incur further losses and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and may impair our ability to maintain our current level of distributions to our stockholders. We receive margin calls from our repurchase agreement counterparties from time to time in the ordinary course of business similar to other entities in the specialty finance business. Although the margin calls that we receive in the ordinary course of business from time to time typically are not material to our business, many, if not all, investors in MBS, including Agency RMBS, experienced an unusually high amount of margin calls during early 2008 primarily as a result of the collapse of Bear Stearns and the dislocations in the residential mortgage market at the time. As a result, March 2008 represented one of our most active months in terms of margin calls, and the amount, as a percentage of our net assets, of additional collateral that we were required to post. From March 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008, we received 20 margin calls from our repurchase agreement counterparties requesting that we post an aggregate of

approximately $32.9 million in additional collateral with respect to our repurchase agreements. During less volatile months, we experience margin calls in the ordinary course of business and operations. For example, from June 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009 we received eight margin calls from our repurchase agreement counterparties requesting that we post an aggregate of approximately $11.8 million in additional collateral with respect to our repurchase agreements. As of June 30, 2009, we had approximately $157.3 million in Agency RMBS, cash and cash equivalents available to satisfy future margin calls. In the event we do not have sufficient liquidity to satisfy these margin calls, lending institutions can accelerate our indebtedness, increase our borrowing rates, liquidate our collateral and terminate our ability to borrow. Such a situation would likely result in a rapid deterioration of our financial condition and possibly necessitate a filing for protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

The significant downturn in the residential mortgage market beginning in 2007 caused a decrease in valuations and widening of credit spreads on MBS, including Agency RMBS. These reduced valuations have caused some lenders to require borrowers to post additional collateral through margin calls with respect to repurchase agreements, and borrowers have been forced to liquidate large portions of their Agency RMBS portfolios to satisfy their lenders’ requests when valuations of Agency RMBS have been depressed. In February and March 2008, in anticipation of increased margin requirements from the lenders under our repurchase agreements, we increased our cash position by selling certain of our Agency RMBS, which provided us with greater liquidity to meet lenders’ additional margin calls. Because of forced selling by other investors of Agency RMBS to satisfy margin calls, the valuations of Agency RMBS were artificially depressed during this period. As a result, we recognized net realized losses on these sales of approximately $6.2 million. During 2008, we reduced our leverage by selling certain of our assets. As a result, our leverage ratio was reduced from 13.3 to 1 at December 31, 2007 to 6.1 to 1 at December 31, 2008. A significant increase in margin calls similar to those we experienced in early 2008 could materially adversely harm our liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and cash available for distribution.

Further, lenders may require us to maintain a certain amount of cash that is not invested or to set aside non-levered assets sufficient to maintain a specified liquidity position which would allow us to satisfy our collateral obligations. As a result, we may not be able to leverage our assets as fully as we would choose, which could reduce our return on equity. In the event that we are unable to meet these collateral obligations, then, as described above, our financial condition could deteriorate rapidly.

Hedging against interest rate exposure may not completely insulate us from interest rate risk and may adversely affect our earnings, which could adversely affect cash available for distributions to our stockholders.

Subject to compliance with the requirements to qualify as a REIT, we engage in certain hedging transactions to limit our exposure to changes in interest rates and therefore may expose ourselves to risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors and Eurobond and U.S. Treasury futures to seek to hedge the interest rate risk associated with our portfolio. Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, we may establish other hedging positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.

The success of our hedging transactions depends on our Manager’s ability to correctly predict movements of interest rates and credit spreads. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions, as has been the case during the recent volatile and unprecedented interest rate environment that has caused us to incur losses on our interest rate swaps beginning in the third quarter of 2007 and continuing in 2008. During the second half of 2007 and the year ended

December 31, 2008, we incurred net losses on our interest rate swaps of approximately $36.7 million and $28.6 million, respectively. During the six month period ended June 30, 2009, we generated net gains of approximately $0.6 million on our interest rate swaps. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss.

We currently hedge against interest rate risk. Our hedging activity varies in scope based on the level and volatility of interest rates, the type of portfolio investments held, and other changing market conditions. Interest rate hedging may fail to protect or could adversely affect us because, among other things:

interest rate hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of volatile interest rates such as those experienced in recent months;

available interest rate hedging may not correspond directly with the interest rate risk for which protection is sought;

the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related liability;

the amount of income that a REIT may earn from hedging transactions to offset interest rate losses is limited by federal tax provisions governing REITs;

the credit quality of the hedging counterparty may be downgraded to such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction; and

the counterparty in the hedging transaction may default on its obligation to pay.

Our interest rate hedging activity may adversely affect our earnings, which could adversely affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders and negatively impact our stock price.

The payments we receive on the Agency RMBS in which we invest depend upon a steady stream of payments on the mortgages underlying the securities and are guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Ginnie Mae is part of a U.S. Government agency and its guarantees are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are U.S. Government-sponsored entities, or GSEs, but their guarantees are not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.

Since 2007, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have reported substantial losses and a need for substantial amounts of additional capital. In response to the deteriorating financial condition of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the recent credit market disruption, Congress and the U.S. Treasury undertook a series of actions to stabilize these GSEs and the financial markets, generally. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 was signed into law on July 30, 2008, and established the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA, with enhanced regulatory authority over, among other things, the business activities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the size of their portfolio holdings. On September 7, 2008, in response to the deterioration in the financial condition of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the FHFA placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship, which is a statutory process pursuant to which the FHFA will operate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as conservator in an effort to stabilize the entities, and together with the U.S. Treasury and the U.S. Federal Reserve, has undertaken actions designed to boost investor confidence in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, support the availability of mortgage financing and protect taxpayers. Appointing FHFA as conservator of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac allows the FHFA to control the actions of the two GSEs without forcing them to liquidate, which would be the case under receivership. In addition, the U.S. Treasury has taken steps to capitalize and provide financing to

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and agreed to purchase direct obligations and Agency RMBS issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. For a more detailed description of the actions taken by the U.S. Government with respect to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Trends and Recent Market Impacts.”

Shortly after Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed in federal conservatorship, the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, in announcing the actions, noted that the guarantee structure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac required examination and that changes in the structures of the entities were necessary to reduce risk to the financial system. The future roles of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could be significantly reduced and the nature of their guarantees could be eliminated or considerably limited relative to historical measurements. Any changes to the nature of the guarantees provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could redefine what constitutes Agency RMBS and could have broad adverse market implications as well as negatively impact us.

The problems faced by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac resulting in their being placed into federal conservatorship have stirred debate among some federal policy makers regarding the continued role of the U.S. Government in providing liquidity for the residential mortgage market. Following expiration of the current authorization, each of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could be dissolved and the U.S. Government could decide to stop providing liquidity support of any kind to the mortgage market. If Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac were eliminated, or their structures were to change radically, we would not be able to acquire Agency RMBS from these companies, which would drastically reduce the amount and type of Agency RMBS available for investment, which are our only targeted investments. As of June 30, 2009, 99.8% of our investments consisted of Agency RMBS, the principal and interest of which are guaranteed by either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Our income could be negatively affected in a number of ways depending on the manner in which related events unfold. For example, the current credit support provided by the U.S. Treasury to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and any additional credit support it may provide in the future, could have the effect of lowering the interest rate we receive from Agency RMBS, thereby tightening the spread between the interest we earn on our portfolio of targeted investments and our cost of financing that portfolio. A reduction in the supply of Agency RMBS could also increase the prices of Agency RMBS we seek to acquire by reducing the spread between the interest we earn on our portfolio of targeted assets and our cost of financing that portfolio.

As indicated above, recent legislation has changed the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. Government and requires Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reduce the amount of mortgage loans they own or for which they provide guarantees on Agency RMBS. The effect of the actions taken by the U.S. Government remain uncertain. Furthermore, the scope and nature of the actions that the U.S. Government will ultimately undertake are unknown and will continue to evolve. Future legislation could further change the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. Government, and could also nationalize or eliminate these GSEs entirely. Any law affecting these GSEs may create market uncertainty and have the effect of reducing the actual or perceived credit quality of securities issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. As a result, such laws could increase the risk of loss on investments in Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac Agency RMBS. It is also possible that such laws could adversely impact the market for such securities and spreads at which they trade. All of the foregoing could materially adversely affect the pricing, supply, liquidity and value of our target assets and otherwise materially adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition.

Mortgage loan modification programs and future legislative action may adversely affect the value of, and the returns on, the Agency RMBS in which we invest.

During the second half of 2008, the U.S. Government, through the Federal Housing Authority, or FHA, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, commenced implementation of programs designed to provide homeowners with assistance in avoiding residential mortgage loan foreclosures. One such program is the Hope for Homeowners program, which is effective from October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2011 and will

enable certain distressed borrowers to refinance their mortgages into FHA-insured loans. The programs may involve, among other things, the modification of mortgage loans to reduce the principal amount of the loans or the rate of interest payable on the loans, or to extend the payment terms of the loans.

In addition, in February 2009 the U.S. Treasury announced the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, or HASP, which is a multi-faceted plan intended to prevent residential mortgage foreclosures by, among other things:

allowing certain homeowners whose homes are encumbered by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac conforming mortgages to refinance those mortgages into lower interest rate mortgages with either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac;

creating the Homeowner Stability Initiative, which is intended to utilize various incentives for banks and mortgage servicers to modify residential mortgage loans with the goal of reducing monthly mortgage principal and interest payments for certain qualified homeowners; and

allowing judicial modifications of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conforming residential mortgages loans during bankruptcy proceedings.

It is likely that loan modifications would result in increased prepayments on some Agency RMBS. See”—Prepayment rates could negatively affect the value of our Agency RMBS, which could result in reduced earnings or losses and negatively affect the cash available for distribution to our stockholders,” for information relating to the impact of prepayments on our business.

These loan modification programs, as well as future legislative or regulatory actions, including amendments to the bankruptcy laws, that result in the modification of outstanding mortgage loans may adversely affect the value of, and the returns on, the Agency RMBS in which we invest.

Prepayment rates could negatively affect the value of our Agency RMBS, which could result in reduced earnings or losses and negatively affect the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

In the case of residential mortgage loans, there are seldom any restrictions on borrowers’ abilities to prepay their loans. Homeowners tend to prepay mortgage loans faster when applicable mortgage interest rates decline. Consequently, owners of the loans have to reinvest the money received from the prepayments at the lower prevailing interest rates. Conversely, homeowners tend not to prepay mortgage loans when mortgage interest rates remain steady or increase. Consequently, owners of the loans are unable to reinvest money that would have otherwise been received from prepayments at the higher prevailing interest rates. This volatility in prepayment rates may affect our ability to maintain targeted amounts of leverage on our Agency RMBS portfolio and may result in reduced earnings or losses for us and negatively affect the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

The Hope for Homeowners program, which is effective from October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2011, and HASP, which was announced in February 2009, will enable certain distressed borrowers to refinance their mortgages, which could increase prepayments on the mortgages backing our Agency RMBS.

Despite Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae guarantees of principal and interest related to the Agency RMBS we own, those guarantees do not protect investors against prepayment risks.

All of our current portfolio investments, and some of our future portfolio investments, will be in the form of securities that are not publicly traded. The fair value of securities and other investments that are not publicly

traded may not be readily determinable. We currently value and will continue to value these investments monthly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Manager based on market quotations from brokers and dealers. Because such quotations and valuations are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a public market for these securities existed. The value of our common stock could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of these investments were materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon their disposal.

The significant downturn in the residential mortgage markets beginning in 2007, and the weakness in the credit markets, have adversely affected, and could continue to adversely affect, one or more of our lenders, which could result in a contraction of available repurchase agreement financing, increases in our borrowing costs, reductions in our liquidity and reductions in the value of the investments in our portfolio.

The significant downturn in the residential mortgage market beginning in 2007 and, in turn, the RMBS market that we have experienced since August 2007, have led lenders, including the financial institutions that provide financing for our investments, to heighten their credit review standards and reduce the loan amounts available to borrowers, which has adversely affected, and could continue to adversely affect, funding for our Agency RMBS portfolio if our counterparties are unwilling or unable to provide us with additional financing. This could potentially limit our ability to finance our investments and operations, increase our financing costs and reduce our liquidity. Furthermore, if one or more of our counterparties are unwilling or unable to provide us with ongoing financing on terms that are acceptable to us, we may need to sell our investments at a time when prices are depressed, and we may be unable to obtain additional financing. If this were to occur, it could prevent us from complying with the REIT qualification requirements and otherwise materially harm our results of operations and financial outlook.

Dramatic declines in the housing market in the past few years have resulted in significant write downs of asset valuations by several major financial institutions. These write downs have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with other institutions and, in some cases, to fail. Institutions from which we seek to obtain repurchase agreement financing for our investments in Agency RMBS may have owned or financed residential mortgage loans, real estate-related securities and real estate loans which have declined in value and caused losses as a result of the significant downturn in the housing markets. Many lenders and institutional investors have reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions. If these conditions persist, these institutions may become insolvent. As a result of recent market events, it may be more difficult for us to secure financing as there are fewer institutional lenders and those remaining lenders have tightened their lending standards. For example, during the month of March 2008, lenders generally increased haircuts (the difference between the cash we receive from the counterparty when we initially sell the securities to the counterparty and the value of those securities) substantially on Agency RMBS. During March 2008, the haircuts on our repurchase agreements ranged from 3% to 6%. Since March 2008, lenders have generally increased haircuts on Agency RMBS. Since March 2008, the haircuts on our repurchase agreements have ranged from 5% to 10%. A material increase in haircuts on these securities would negatively affect our liquidity and the results of operations.

As was the case after Lehman Brothers Inc. filed for bankruptcy in September 2008, if one or more major market participants fails or withdraws from the market, it could negatively impact the marketability of all fixed income securities, including Agency RMBS, and this could reduce the value of the securities in our portfolio, thus reducing our net asset value.

An increase in our borrowing costs relative to the interest we receive on our assets may impair our profitability and thus our cash available for distributions to our stockholders.

As our repurchase agreements and other short term borrowings mature, we must either enter into new borrowings or liquidate certain of our investments at times when we might not otherwise choose to do so.

Lenders may seek to use a maturity date as an opportune time to demand additional terms or increased collateral requirements that could be adverse to us and harm our operations. An increase in short term interest rates when we seek new borrowings would reduce the spread between our returns on our assets and the cost of our borrowings. This would reduce the returns on our assets which might reduce earnings and in turn cash available for distributions to our stockholders. We generally expect that the interest rates tied to our borrowings will adjust more rapidly than the interest rates tied to the assets in which we invest.

If the lending institution under one or more of our repurchase agreements defaults on its obligation to resell the underlying security back to us at the end of the agreement term, we will lose money on our repurchase transactions.

When we engage in a repurchase transaction, we will initially sell securities to the transaction counterparty under a master repurchase agreement in exchange for cash from the counterparty. The counterparty is obligated to resell the same securities back to us at the end of the term of the repurchase agreement, which typically is 30 to 90 days, but which may be up to one year. If the counterparty in a repurchase transaction defaults on its obligation to resell the securities back to us we will incur a loss on the transaction equal to the amount of the haircut (assuming no change in the value of the securities). Losses incurred on our repurchase transactions would adversely affect our earnings and our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

If we default on our obligations under our repurchase agreements, we may be unable to establish a suitable replacement facility on acceptable terms or at all.

If we default on one of our obligations under a repurchase agreement, the counterparty may terminate the agreement and cease entering into any other repurchase agreements with us. In that case, we would likely need to establish a replacement repurchase facility with another financial institution in order to continue to leverage our investment portfolio and carry out our investment strategy. We may be unable to establish a suitable replacement repurchase facility on acceptable terms or at all.

Our repurchase agreements may give our lenders greater rights in the event that we file for bankruptcy.

Our borrowings under repurchase agreements may qualify for special treatment under the bankruptcy code, giving our lenders the ability to avoid the automatic stay provisions of the bankruptcy code and to take possession of and liquidate our collateral under the repurchase agreements without delay if we file for bankruptcy. Furthermore, the special treatment of repurchase agreements under the bankruptcy code may make it difficult for us to recover our pledged assets under a repurchase agreement in the event that a lender party to such an agreement files for bankruptcy. Thus, the use of repurchase agreements exposes our pledged assets to increased risk in the event we or any of our lenders files for bankruptcy.

Failure to procure adequate funding and capital would adversely affect our results and may, in turn, negatively affect the value of our common stock and our ability to distribute dividends to our stockholders.

We depend upon the availability of adequate funding and capital for our operations. To qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income annually, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain, to our stockholders and therefore are not able to retain our earnings for new investments (excluding earnings generated by our TRS, subject to REIT requirements). We cannot assure you that any, or sufficient, funding or capital will be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable to us. In the event that we cannot obtain sufficient funding and capital on acceptable terms, there may be a negative impact on the value of our common stock and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, and you may lose part or all of your investment.

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.

A number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make. We compete with other REITs, financial companies, public and private funds, commercial and investment banks and commercial

finance companies. Additionally, we may also compete with the U.S. Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury to the extent they purchase Agency RMBS pursuant to their respective Agency RMBS purchase programs. See “—The federal conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related efforts, along with any changes in laws and regulations affecting the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. Government, may adversely affect our business.” Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Several other REITs have recently raised, or are expected to raise, significant amounts of capital, and may have investment objectives that overlap with ours, which may create competition for investment opportunities. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objectives.

Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to manage future growth effectively.

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives will depend on our ability to grow, which will depend, in turn, on our Manager’s ability to identify and invest in securities that meet our investment criteria. Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis largely will be a function of our Manager’s structuring and implementation of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and our access to financing on acceptable terms. The senior management team of our Manager has substantial responsibilities under the management agreement. In order to grow, our Manager, or its sub-advisors, needs to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees successfully. However, we can offer no assurance that any of those employees will contribute to the work of our Manager. Any failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may change our investment strategy and asset allocation without notice or stockholder consent, which may result in riskier investments.

Our board of directors has the authority to change our investment strategy or asset allocation at any time without notice to or consent from our stockholders. In 2008, our board of directors amended our investment guidelines to require that we invest exclusively in Agency RMBS. To the extent that our investment strategy changes in the future, we may make investments that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the investments described in this prospectus. A change in our investment strategy may increase our exposure to interest rate and real estate market fluctuations. Furthermore, a change in our asset allocation could result in our allocating assets in a different manner than as described in this prospectus.

Hedging instruments often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or a clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities and involve risks and costs.

The cost of using hedging instruments increases as the period covered by the instrument increases and during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. We may increase our hedging activity and thus increase our hedging costs during periods when interest rates are volatile or rising and hedging costs have increased.

In addition, hedging instruments involve risk since they often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities. Consequently, there are no requirements with respect to record keeping, financial responsibility or segregation of customer funds and positions. Furthermore, the enforceability of agreements underlying derivative transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory and commodity and other regulatory requirements and,

depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. The business failure of a hedging counterparty with whom we enter into a hedging transaction most likely will result in a default. Default by a party with whom we enter into a hedging transaction may result in the loss of unrealized profits and force us to cover our resale commitments, if any, at the then current market price. In addition, we may not always be able to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty, and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract to cover our risk. We cannot assure you that a liquid secondary market will exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may be required to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in losses.

We may enter into derivative contracts that could expose us to unexpected economic losses in the future.

Swaps and certain options and other custom instruments are subject to the risk of non-performance by the swap or option counterparty, including risks relating to the creditworthiness of the counterparty. In addition, we also are subject to the risk of the failure of any of the exchanges or clearing houses on which we trade. Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, we may enter into swap agreements, including interest rate swaps. Swap agreements can be individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of investments or market factors. Depending on their structure, swap agreements may increase or decrease exposure to long term or short term interest rates (in the United States or abroad), foreign currency values, mortgage securities, corporate borrowing rates, or other factors such as security prices, baskets of equity securities, or inflation rates. Swap agreements can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names. We are not precluded from any particular form of swap or option agreement if our Manager determines it is consistent with our investment objectives and policies.

Swap agreements tend to shift investment exposure from one type of investment to another. Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of our portfolio. The most significant factor in the performance of swap agreements is the change in the specific interest rate, currency, individual equity values or other factors that determine the amounts of payments due to and from us. If a swap agreement calls for payments or collateral transfers by us, we must be prepared to make such payments and transfers when due. Additionally, if a counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of swap agreements with the counterparty can be expected to decline, potentially resulting in losses by us.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and certain commodity exchanges have established limits referred to as speculative position limits or position limits on the maximum net long or net short position that any person or group of persons may hold or control in particular futures and options. Limits on trading in options contracts also have been established by the various options exchanges. It is possible that trading decisions may have to be modified and that positions held may have to be liquidated to avoid exceeding such limits. Such modification or liquidation, if required, could adversely affect our operations and profitability.

Part of our investment strategy involves entering into derivative contracts that could require us to fund cash payments in the future under certain circumstances, such as the early termination of the derivative agreement caused by any event of default or other early termination event, or the decision by a counterparty to request margin securities it is contractually owed under the terms of the derivative contract. The amount due would be equal to the unrealized loss of the open derivative positions with the respective counterparty and could also include other fees and charges. These potential payments will be contingent liabilities and therefore may not appear on our balance sheet. The economic losses will be reflected in our financial results of operations, and our ability to fund these obligations will depend on the liquidity of our assets and access to capital at the time, and the need to fund these obligations could adversely impact our financial condition.

Our investments in subordinated tranches of CLOs may be subject to losses.

We have invested a small portion of our total assets in lower-rated or non-rated deeply subordinated tranches of CLOs collateralized primarily by corporate leveraged loans and to a lesser extent by corporate debt

securities. In general, losses on a loan or other asset included in a securitization will be borne first by equity support, a cash reserve fund or a letter of credit, if any, and then by the subordinated security holders. In the event of nonpayment on the loan or other asset and the exhaustion of any equity support, reserve fund, letter of credit and any classes of securities junior to those in which we invest, we will not be able to recover all of our investment in the securities we purchased. In addition, if the underlying asset portfolio has been overvalued by the originator, or if the values subsequently decline and, as a result, less collateral is available to satisfy payments due on the related CLO, significant losses to us may result. The prices of lower credit quality securities are generally less sensitive to interest rate changes than more highly rated investments, but more sensitive to adverse economic downturns or individual issuer developments. A projection of an economic downturn, for example, could cause a decline in the price of lower credit quality securities because the ability of obligors of loans underlying the CLO to make required payments may be impaired. In such event, existing credit support in the securitization structure may be insufficient to protect us against loss of our principal on these securities.

CLOs in which we have invested may not be adequately managed or may not have a liquid market. If this were the case, we could lose a portion, or potentially all, of our investment in subordinated tranches of CLOs.

Many CLO managers are relatively new to the securitization business and may not have the systems or processes in place to adequately manage such CLOs. Failure to adequately manage a CLO could result in, among other things, mistimed collateral sales and purchases, purchasing underperforming collateral, and inadequate cash flow processing, all of which could negatively affect the performance of the CLO. In addition, the market for these securities is relatively new and has been volatile for several months due to the continued adverse developments in the fixed income and credit markets, and we may have difficulty valuing them, financing them or finding a market should we decide to sell them. As a result, we could lose a portion, or potentially all, of our investment in subordinated tranches of CLOs, which could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and business.

The assets collateralizing the CLOs in which we have invested will subject us to specific risks that could adversely affect our operating results and the value of our assets.

The CLOs in which we have invested are collateralized primarily by corporate leveraged loans. These loans are term loans and revolving loans, pay interest at a fixed or floating rate, are senior or subordinated and secured or unsecured. These loans are illiquid. To the extent that they are non-investment grade, they may also bear risks associated with high-yield bonds.

The CLOs in which we have invested may acquire interests in corporate leveraged loans either directly (by way of sale or assignment) or indirectly (by way of participation). The purchaser of an assignment typically succeeds to all the rights and obligations of the assigning institution and becomes a lender under the credit agreement with respect to the debt obligation; however, its rights can be more restricted than those of the assigning institution. Participation interests in a portion of the debt obligation typically result in a contractual relationship only with the institution participating out the interest, not with the borrower. In purchasing participations, the CLOs in which we have invested generally have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the credit agreement, or any rights of set-off against the borrower, and the CLOs in which we have invested do not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the debt obligation in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, the CLOs in which we invest will assume the credit risk of both the borrower and the institution selling the participation. Default rates on the corporate leveraged loans collateralizing the CLOs in which we have invested increased in 2008 and the respective CLO managers have been unable to seek adequate recourse, which has resulted in a decrease in the value of and income generated by our CLOs. We could experience increased defaults on the loans in our CLOs in the future.

Our investments in CLOs with over-collateralization requirements may have a negative impact on our cash flow.

The terms of CLOs in which we have invested require that the principal amount of assets must exceed the principal balance of the related bonds by a certain amount, commonly referred to as “over-collateralization.” The CLO terms generally provide that, if certain delinquencies and/or losses exceed specified levels, which are established based on the analysis by the rating agencies (or any financial guaranty insurer) of the characteristics of the assets collateralizing the bonds, our ability to receive net income from the assets collateralizing the obligations may be impaired. We cannot assure you that the over-collateralization tests will be satisfied.

We are highly dependent on communications and information systems operated by third parties, and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Our business is highly dependent on communications and information systems that allow us to monitor, value, buy, sell, finance and hedge our investments. These systems are operated by third parties and, as a result, we have limited ability to ensure their continued operation. In the event of systems failure or interruption, we will have limited ability to affect the timing and success of systems restoration. Any failure or interruption of our systems could cause delays or other problems in our securities trading activities, including Agency RMBS trading activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

If we issue debt securities, our operations may be restricted and we will be exposed to additional risk.

If we decide to issue debt securities in the future, it is likely that such securities will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our common stock. We, and indirectly our stockholders, will bear the cost of issuing and servicing such securities. Holders of debt securities may be granted specific rights, including but not limited to, the right to hold a perfected security interest in certain of our assets, the right to accelerate payments due under the indenture, rights to restrict dividend payments, and rights to approve the sale of assets. Such additional restrictive covenants and operating restrictions could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

We are subject to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Our management will be required to deliver a report that assesses the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires our auditors to deliver an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in conjunction with their opinion on our audited financial statements as of each fiscal year end beginning on December 31, 2010. Substantial work on our part is required to implement appropriate processes, document the system of internal control over key processes, assess their design, remediate any deficiencies identified and test their operation. This process is expected to be both costly and challenging. We cannot give any assurances that material weaknesses will not be identified in the future in connection with our compliance with the provisions of Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The existence of any material weakness described above would preclude a conclusion by management and our independent auditors that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. Our management may be required to devote significant time and expense to remediate any material weaknesses that may be discovered and may not be able to remediate any material weaknesses in a timely manner. The existence of any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could also result in errors in our financial statements that could require us to restate our financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, all of which could lead to a decline in the trading price of our common stock.

Terrorist attacks and other outbreaks of violence or war may affect the market for our common stock, the industry in which we conduct our operations and our profitability.

Terrorist attacks against the United States or U.S. businesses may occur and harm our results of operations and your investment. These terrorist attacks or outbreaks of conflict may directly impact the assets or property underlying our Agency RMBS, the securities market in general or the credit markets. Losses resulting from these types of events may be uninsurable.

More generally, any of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. Adverse economic conditions resulting from such events could harm the value of the assets or property underlying our Agency RMBS or other assets, the securities markets in general or the credit markets, which could harm our operating results and revenues and may result in the increased volatility of, or decline in, the value of our common stock.

Risks Related To Our Management and Our Relationship with Our Manager, Cypress and Sharpridge

Until we complete an internalization transaction, we will be dependent on our Manager and may not find a suitable replacement if our Manager terminates the management agreement.

We have no employees. Our officers are employees of Sharpridge. We have no separate facilities and are completely reliant on our Manager, which has significant discretion as to the implementation of our operating policies and strategies. Until we complete an internalization transaction, we will be subject to the risk that our Manager will terminate the management agreement and that no suitable replacement will be found to manage us. We believe that our success depends to a significant extent upon the experience of our Manager’s executive officers, whose continued service is not guaranteed. If our Manager terminates the management agreement prior to an internalization transaction, we may not be able to execute our business plan and may suffer losses, which could materially decrease cash available for distribution to our stockholders. In connection with the potential internalization transaction, we may hire Sharpridge’s employees and maintain a relationship with Cypress. We cannot assure you that we will be able to hire Sharpridge’s employees or maintain a relationship with Cypress after we complete an internalization transaction. If we are not able to do so, our ability to conduct our business may be adversely affected.

The senior management of our Manager evaluates, negotiates, structures, closes and monitors our investments. We depend on the diligence, skill, investment expertise and network of business contacts of the senior management of our Manager and its affiliates. For a description of the senior management team, see “Management.” Kevin E. Grant is the chief executive officer of our Manager and has extensive experience managing investment portfolios maximizing risk adjusted returns. We are reliant on Mr. Grant’s expertise and his ability to select a highly talented team of senior management professionals to evaluate, negotiate, structure, close and monitor our investments. The loss of Mr. Grant’s services or the services of any of the executive officers of our Manager could have a material adverse effect on our performance and our ability to effectively monitor our portfolio of assets, source investment opportunities, make investment decisions, or execute our strategy and achieve our investment objectives. We also depend, to a significant extent, on our Manager’s access to the investment professionals and principals of Sharpridge and Cypress and the information and deal flow generated by the Sharpridge and Cypress investment professionals in the course of their investment and portfolio management activities. We are also subject to the risk that Sharpridge and/or Cypress will terminate their respective sub-advisory agreements with our Manager and that no suitable replacements will be found to advise our Manager. We can offer no assurance that our Manager will remain our Manager or that we will continue to have access to Sharpridge’s or Cypress’ principals and investment professionals or their information and deal flow. In connection with the potential internalization transaction, we may hire Sharpridge’s employees and

maintain a relationship with Cypress. We cannot assure you that we will be able to hire Sharpridge’s employees or maintain a relationship with Cypress after we complete an internalization transaction. If we are not able to do so, our ability to conduct our business may be adversely affected.

Because our management agreement was negotiated between related parties and due to our relationship with our Manager, conflicts of interest exist that could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders. Upon the completion of an internalization transaction, conflicts of interest may arise between our executive officers and us that could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of stockholders.

We are subject to potential conflicts arising out of our relationship with our Manager and its affiliates. We are entirely dependent on our Manager for our day-to-day management and have no independent officers. Our chairman, chief executive officer and president, chief financial officer, chief operating officer and secretary also serve as officers of Sharpridge. In addition, certain of our other directors are affiliated with our Manager. As a result, our management agreement with our Manager was negotiated between related parties and its terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.

Although our Manager and its affiliates are not permitted to raise, advise or sponsor a new REIT that invests in domestic MBS, a portfolio company of any private equity fund controlled by Cypress shall not be deemed to be an affiliate or an entity under common control with our Manager. As a result, any such entity could engage in a business directly in competition with us. If our Manager or its affiliates engages in additional management or investment opportunities that have overlapping objectives with us, our Manager or its affiliates may face conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities to these other managed entities or investments. As a result of our available liquidity, our investment policies, REIT requirements and other legal restrictions applicable to us and other relevant considerations, it is possible that we may not be given the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by existing or future entities affiliated with our Manager. Additionally, the ability of our Manager and its officers and employees to engage in other business activities may reduce the time our Manager spends managing us. In addition, we may compete, directly or indirectly, with other accounts or pools of capital affiliated or managed by Cypress and/or Sharpridge for access to Cypress and Sharpridge’s resources and investment opportunities, which may reduce investment opportunities available to us.

Upon the completion of an internalization transaction, conflicts of interest may arise between our executive officers and us that could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our investment focus is different from those of other entities that are or have been managed by Cypress or Sharpridge investment professionals.

Even though our Manager is an affiliate of Cypress and Sharpridge, our investment focus is different from those of other entities that are or have been managed by Cypress or Sharpridge investment professionals. We can offer no assurance that our Manager will replicate the historical success of the Manager’s investment professionals in their previous endeavors, and we caution you that our investment returns could be substantially lower than the returns achieved by our Manager’s investment professionals’ previous endeavors.

Our board of directors does not approve each investment decision made by our Manager.

Our directors periodically review our investment guidelines and our investment portfolio. However, our board of directors does not review all of our proposed investments. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, the directors may rely primarily on information provided to them by our Manager. Furthermore, transactions entered into or structured for us by our Manager may be difficult or impossible to unwind by the time they are reviewed by the directors.

Our base management fee is payable regardless of our performance.

Our Manager is entitled to receive a base management fee that is based on the amount of our net assets (as defined in the management agreement), regardless of the performance of our portfolio. Our Manager’s entitlement to substantial non-performance based compensation might reduce its incentive to devote its time and effort to seeking profitable opportunities for our portfolio. This in turn could hurt our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and could negatively impact our stock price.

Termination by us of the management agreement with our Manager without cause is difficult and costly.

The initial term of the management agreement expired on December 31, 2008, and it has been automatically renewed for a one-year term that will expire on December 31, 2009. Going forward, the management agreement will be automatically renewed for a one-year term each anniversary date thereafter unless notice of non-renewal is given to us by our Manager. Our independent directors will review our Manager’s performance annually and the management agreement may be terminated upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors, or by a vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock, based upon:

unsatisfactory performance by our Manager that is materially detrimental to us or

a determination that the management fees payable to our Manager are not fair, subject to our Manager’s right to prevent such a termination by accepting a reduction of management fees agreed to by at least two-thirds of our independent directors and our Manager.

We must provide 180 days prior notice of any such termination. Our Manager will be paid a termination fee equal to four times the sum of (a) the average annual base management fee earned by the Manager during the 24-month period prior to such termination and (b) the average annual incentive compensation earned (notwithstanding that the payment of any such incentive compensation may have been waived) by our Manager during the 24-month period immediately prior to such termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination. However, we and our Manager have agreed to terminate the management agreement upon the completion of an internalization transaction without payment of any termination fee to our Manager pursuant to the terms of the management agreement. The current termination fee may make it more difficult for us to terminate the management agreement. These provisions may increase the effective cost to us of terminating the management agreement, thereby adversely affecting our ability to terminate our Manager without cause.

Our Manager’s liability is limited under the management agreement, and we have agreed to indemnify our Manager against certain liabilities.

Risks Related to This Offering

The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile following this offering.

The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at or above the public offering price. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. Some of the factors that could negatively affect our share price or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our common stock include:

actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or distributions;

changes in our earnings estimates or publication of research reports about us or the real estate or specialty finance industry;

decreases in the market valuations of Agency RMBS;

increased difficulty in maintaining or obtaining financing on attractive terms, or at all;

increases in market interest rates that lead purchasers of our shares of common stock to demand a higher yield;

changes in market valuations of similar companies;

adverse market reaction to any increased indebtedness we incur in the future;

additions or departures of key management personnel;

actions by institutional stockholders;

speculation in the press or investment community; and

general market and economic conditions.

Broad market fluctuations could negatively impact the market price of our common stock.

The stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many companies in industries similar or related to ours and that have been unrelated to these companies’ operating performances. These broad market fluctuations could reduce the market price of our common stock. Furthermore, our operating results and prospects may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors or may be lower than those of companies with comparable market capitalizations, which could lead to a material decline in the market price of our common stock.

Future offerings of debt securities, which would rank senior to our common stock upon our liquidation, and future offerings of equity securities, which would dilute our existing stockholders and may be senior to our common stock for the purposes of dividend and liquidating distributions, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by making offerings of debt or additional offerings of equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes and classes of preferred stock or common stock. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Our preferred stock, if issued, could have a preference on liquidating distributions or a preference on dividend payments that could limit our ability to make a dividend distribution to the holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or

estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, holders of our common stock bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their stock holdings in us.

Common stock eligible for future sale may depress the market price of our shares.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of common stock, or the availability of shares for future sales, on the value of the common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for the common stock, if any.

The shares of common stock issued in connection with our initial capitalization, our December 2006 private offering, our May 2008 private offering (including shares issuable upon cashless exercise of warrants issued in that offering) and our initial public offering are, and the shares of common stock sold in this offering will be, freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act except those shares that are subject to lock-up agreements that were entered into in connection with our initial public offering and unless the shares are held by any of our “affiliates,” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. As defined in Rule 144, an “affiliate” of an issuer is a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the issuer. As of the date of this prospectus, we also may issue up to an additional 2,930,628 shares of common stock pursuant to our 2006 stock incentive plan.

We may issue from time to time additional common stock in connection with the acquisition of investments, and we may grant demand or piggyback registration rights in connection with such issuances.

Sales of substantial amounts of common stock or the perception that such sales could occur may adversely affect the prevailing market price for our common stock.

You should not rely on lock-up agreements in connection with this offering to limit the amount of common stock sold into the market.

Our directors and executive officers, our Manager, Cypress, Sharpridge and certain of their executive officers, directors and affiliates have agreed for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus, that such holders will not, without the prior written consent of Barclays Capital Inc., directly or indirectly sell, offer, pledge, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell (including without limitation any short sale), grant any option, right or warrant for the sale of or otherwise transfer or dispose of any of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of our common stock.

Barclays Capital Inc. may, at any time, release all or a portion of the securities subject to lock-up agreements entered into or to be entered into in connection with this offering. See “Underwriting—Lock-Up Agreements.” There are no present agreements between the underwriters and us or any of the persons or entities subject to the lock-up agreements releasing them or us from these lock-up agreements. In addition, we cannot predict the circumstances or timing under which our underwriters may waive these restrictions. If the restrictions under the lock-up agreements with the persons or entities subject to the lock-up agreements are waived or terminated, or upon expiration of the lock-up periods, approximately 750,116 shares, or 4.1% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of September 30, 2009, will be available for sale into the market at that time, subject only to applicable securities rules and regulations. These sales or a perception that these sales may occur could reduce the market price for our common stock.

Your interest in us may be diluted if we issue additional shares.

Existing stockholders and potential investors in this offering do not have preemptive rights to any common stock issued by us in the future. Therefore, investors purchasing shares in this offering may experience dilution of their equity investment if we sell additional common stock in the future, sell securities that are convertible into

common stock or issue shares of common stock or options exercisable for shares of common stock. In addition, we could sell securities at a price less than our then-current net asset value per share. Further, investors purchasing shares in this offering may experience dilution of their equity investment upon the exercise of the currently outstanding options to purchase 131,088 shares of our common stock and the currently outstanding warrants to purchase 78,190 shares of our common stock.

We have not established a minimum distribution payment level, and we cannot assure you of our ability to make distributions in the future.

We expect to make quarterly distributions to our stockholders in amounts such that we distribute all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income in each year, subject to certain adjustments. We have not established a minimum distribution payment level, and our ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by the risk factors described in this prospectus. All distributions will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of our REIT status and other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. We may not be able to make distributions in the future. In addition, some of our distributions may include a return of capital. To the extent that we decide to make distributions in excess of our current and accumulated tax earnings and profits, such distributions would generally be considered a return of capital for federal income tax purposes. A return of capital is not taxable, but it has the effect of reducing the holder’s basis in its investment.

An increase in market interest rates may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

One of the factors that investors may consider in deciding whether to buy or sell shares of our common stock is our distribution rate as a percentage of our share price relative to market interest rates. If the market price of our common stock is based primarily on the earnings and return that we derive from our investments and income with respect to our investments and our related distributions to stockholders, and not from the market value of the investments themselves, then interest rate fluctuations and capital market conditions will likely affect the market price of our common stock. For instance, if market rates rise without an increase in our distribution rate, the market price of our common stock could decrease as potential investors may require a higher distribution yield on our common stock or seek other securities paying higher distributions or interest. In addition, rising interest rates would result in increased interest expense on our variable rate debt, thereby adversely affecting cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness and pay distributions.

We have relationships with certain of our underwriters, or their respective affiliates, and those underwriters or their affiliates may receive benefits in connection with this offering.

We have entered into a master repurchase agreement with Barclays Capital Inc., one of our underwriters. Our repurchase agreement does not specify the maximum amount that may be borrowed by us thereunder. At June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding with Barclays Capital Inc.

We have purchased Agency RMBS and CLOs and likely will purchase in the future Agency RMBS issued or sold by affiliates of certain of the underwriters in this offering or underwritten by certain underwriters in this offering. As of June 30, 2009, an aggregate of approximately $313.5 million in carrying value, or 20.6% of the fair value of our portfolio, had been issued or sold by affiliates of Barclays Capital Inc. and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company Incorporated, of which $39.0 million was purchased from Lehman Brothers Inc.

hypothecate these securities for a period of 180 days following the date of this prospectus. After the expiration of this lock-up period, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated may sell the 40,666 shares of our common stock without restriction and it may sell the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 12,200 shares of our common stock or the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of such warrants pursuant to certain exemptions from registration under the Securities Act.

The relationships described above may result in certain of the underwriters having interests in the completion of this offering beyond the discounts and commissions they will receive for serving as underwriters.

Investing in our common stock may involve an above average degree of risk.

The investments we make in accordance with our investment objectives may result in a higher amount of risk, volatility or loss of principal than alternative investment options. Our investments may be highly speculative and aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our common stock may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.

Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure

Loss of our exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act would negatively affect the value of shares of our common stock and our ability to distribute cash to our stockholders.

We have operated and intend to continue to operate our business so as to be exempt from registration under the Investment Company Act because we are “primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.” Specifically, we invest and intend to continue to invest so that at least 55% of the assets that we own on an unconsolidated basis consist of qualifying mortgages and other liens and interests in real estate, which are collectively referred to as “qualifying real estate assets,” and so that at least 80% of the assets we own on an unconsolidated basis consist of real estate related assets (including our qualifying real estate assets). We treat Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae whole-pool residential mortgage pass-through securities issued with respect to an underlying pool of mortgage loans in which we hold all of the certificates issued by the pool as qualifying real estate assets. Our Agency RMBS consist and will consist solely of such Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae whole-pool residential mortgage pass-through securities.

If we fail to qualify for this exemption, we could be required to restructure our activities in a manner that, or at a time when, we would not otherwise choose to do so, which could negatively affect the value of shares of our common stock and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. For example, if the market value of our investments in CLOs and structured notes, neither of which are qualifying real estate assets or real estate related assets, were to increase by an amount that resulted in less than 80% of our assets being invested in Agency RMBS, we might have to sell CLOs and structured notes in order to maintain our exemption from the Investment Company Act. The sale could occur during adverse market conditions, and we could be forced to accept a price below that which we believe is acceptable.

We may not realize a return on the 19% non-voting limited partnership interest that we hold in Sharpridge.

Concurrent with our initial capitalization, we received a 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in Sharpridge, which is held by our wholly-owned domestic TRS, Sharpridge TRS, Inc. Under the terms of the Sharpridge limited partnership agreement, our 19% non-voting limited partnership interest will be subject to substantial restrictions on transfer to any entity other than an affiliate of ours.

The general partner of Sharpridge has the exclusive authority to manage and control the day-to-day business operations of Sharpridge without the consent of the limited partners. Among other things, the general partner, on behalf of Sharpridge, may enter into term sheets, offer letters, and/or other agreements with Sharpridge employees or partners regarding their rights and obligations in connection with their initial employment with

Sharpridge. These arrangements may provide for allocations, distributions, bonus or other compensation to these individuals, each of which may have an impact on the ultimate return from our 19% non-voting limited partnership interest.

Finally, Sharpridge has a limited operating history and its ability to generate returns to its limited partners is unproven. For each of the foregoing reasons, there is a limited ability for us to realize a return on this investment, and we may not realize such a return.

Our charter and bylaws contain provisions that may inhibit potential acquisition bids that you and other stockholders may consider favorable, and the market price of our common stock may be lower as a result.

Our charter and bylaws contain provisions that may have an anti-takeover effect and inhibit a change in our board of directors. These provisions include the following:

There are ownership limits and restrictions on transferability and ownership in our charter. In order to qualify as a REIT for each taxable year after 2006, not more than 50% of the value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned, directly or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined under the Internal Revenue Code to include natural persons and certain entities) during the second half of any calendar year and our shares must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of twelve months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. To assist us in meeting these requirements, subject to some exceptions, our charter generally prohibits any stockholder from beneficially or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of our outstanding capital stock unless an exemption is granted by our board of directors in its sole discretion. For purposes of this calculation, warrants treated as held by a person will be deemed to have been exercised. However, warrants held by other unrelated persons will not be deemed to have been exercised. Our board of directors has granted a waiver from the 9.8% ownership limit to Talon Sharpridge LLC, Talon Sharpridge QP LLC, Talon Opportunity Partners, LP and Talon Asset Management LLC, or collectively, Talon. The waiver allows Talon to own up to the greater of 15% or 2,509,246 shares of our common stock. See “Description of Securities—Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer.”

This ownership restriction may:

discourage a tender offer or other transactions or a change in the composition of our board of directors or control that might involve a premium price for our shares or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders; or

result in shares issued or transferred in violation of such restriction being automatically transferred to a trust for a charitable beneficiary and thereby resulting in a forfeiture of such shares.

Our charter permits our board of directors to issue common or preferred stock with terms that may discourage a third party from acquiring us. Our charter permits our board of directors to amend our charter, without approval of our stockholders, to increase the total number of authorized shares of stock or the number of shares of any class or series, and to cause the issuance of common or preferred stock, having preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption as determined by our board. Thus, our board could authorize the issuance of common or preferred stock with terms and conditions that could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of some or a majority of our shares might receive a premium for their shares over the then-prevailing market price of our shares.

Our charter and bylaws contain other possible anti-takeover provisions. Our charter and bylaws contain other provisions that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us or the removal of existing directors and, as a result, could prevent our stockholders from being paid a premium for their common stock over the then-prevailing market price. See “Certain Provisions of Maryland General Corporation Law and our Charter and Bylaws.”

Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control.

Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or MGCL, may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or impeding a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could provide our stockholders with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our common stock, including:

“business combination” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter special stockholder voting requirements on these combinations; and

“control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of our company (defined as shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of “control shares”) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.

We have elected to opt out of these provisions of the MGCL, in the case of the business combination provisions of the MGCL, by resolution of our board of directors, and in the case of the control share provisions of the MGCL, pursuant to a provision in our bylaws. However, our board of directors may by resolution elect to repeal the foregoing opt-outs from the business combination provisions of the MGCL, and we may, by amendment to our bylaws, opt in to the control share provisions of the MGCL in the future.

Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited, which could limit your recourse in the event of actions not in your best interests.

Our charter limits the liability of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders for money damages, except for liability resulting from:

actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or

a final judgment based upon a finding of active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was material to the cause of action adjudicated.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers that obligate us to indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. In addition, our charter authorizes our company to obligate itself to indemnify our present and former directors and officers for actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Our bylaws require us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify each present or former director or officer who has been successful in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service to us. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers. See “Certain Provisions of Maryland General Corporation Law and our Charter and Bylaws—Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and Advance of Expenses.”

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory changes that could reduce the market price of our common stock.

At any time, laws or regulations, or the administrative interpretations of those laws or regulations, that impact our business and Maryland corporations may be amended. In addition, the markets for MBS and derivatives, including swaps, have been the subject of intense scrutiny in recent months. We cannot predict when or if any new law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing law, regulation

or administrative interpretation, will be adopted or promulgated or will become effective. Additionally, revisions in these laws, regulations or administrative interpretations could cause us to change our investments. We could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, law, regulation or administrative interpretation, which could reduce the market price of our common stock.

Tax Risks

Your investment has various federal income tax risks.

Although the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relevant to your investment are generally described in “Federal Income Tax Consequences of Our Qualification as a REIT,” we strongly urge you to consult your own tax advisor concerning the effects of federal, state and local income tax law on an investment in our common stock and on your individual tax situation.

We operate in a manner that is intended to cause us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. However, the federal income tax laws governing REITs are complex, and interpretations of the federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT are limited. Qualifying as a REIT requires us to meet various tests regarding the nature of our assets and our income, the ownership of our outstanding stock, and the amount of our distributions on an ongoing basis.

Although we do not intend to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, as to our REIT qualification, Hunton & Williams LLP is rendering an opinion with respect to our qualification as a REIT in connection with this offering of common stock. Investors should be aware, however, that opinions of counsel are not binding on the IRS or any court. The opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP represents only the view of our counsel based on our counsel’s review and analysis of existing law and on certain representations as to factual matters and covenants made by us, including representations as to the values of our assets and the sources of our income. The opinion is expressed as of the date issued and will not cover subsequent periods. Hunton & Williams LLP has no obligations to advise us or the holders of our common stock of any subsequent changes in the matters stated, represented or assumed, or of any subsequent change in applicable law.

Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Our compliance with the REIT income and quarterly asset requirements also depends upon our ability to successfully manage the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Although we intend to operate so that we will qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, no assurance can be given that we will so qualify for any particular year.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any calendar year, we would be required to pay federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, and dividends paid to our stockholders would not be deductible by us in computing our taxable income. Further, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we might need to borrow money or sell assets in order to pay any resulting tax. Our payment of income tax would decrease the amount of our income available for distribution to our stockholders. Furthermore, if we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we no longer would be required to distribute substantially all of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. Unless our failure to qualify as a REIT was subject to relief under federal tax laws, we could not re-elect to qualify as a REIT until the fifth calendar year following the year in which we failed to qualify.

We may lose our REIT qualification or be subject to a penalty tax if the IRS successfully challenges our characterization of income from our investments in subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes issued by foreign corporations.

We likely will be required to include in our income, even without the receipt of actual distributions, earnings from our investment in the subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes issued by foreign corporations. We intend to treat certain of these income inclusions as qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test but not the 75% gross income test. The provisions that set forth what income is qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test provide that gross income derived from dividends, interest and certain other enumerated classes of passive income qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test. Income inclusions from equity investments in foreign corporations are technically neither actual dividends nor any of the other enumerated categories of income specified in the 95% gross income test for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and there is no other clear precedent with respect to the qualification of such income. However, based on advice of counsel, we intend to treat such income inclusions as qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. Nevertheless, because this income does not meet the literal requirements of the REIT provisions, it is possible that the IRS could successfully take the position that such income is not qualifying income. In the event that such income was determined not to qualify for the 95% gross income test, we would be subject to a penalty tax with respect to such income to the extent it and our other non-qualifying income exceeds 5% of our gross income or we could fail to qualify as a REIT. See “Federal Income Tax Consequences of Our Qualification as a REIT—Gross Income Tests—Dividends.” In addition, if such income was determined not to qualify for the 95% gross income test, we would need to invest in sufficient qualifying assets, or sell some of our interests in other foreign corporations, to ensure that the income recognized by us from our investment in the subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes issued by foreign corporations does not exceed 5% of our gross income, or we would cease to qualify as a REIT. We currently intend that income inclusions from our investment in subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes issued by foreign corporations together with any non-qualifying income will not exceed 5% of our gross income; however, no assurance can be given that such intent will not change in the future.

Our ability to invest in and dispose of “to be announced” securities could be limited by our REIT status, and we could lose our REIT status as a result of these investments.

We have purchased, and may purchase in the future, Agency RMBS through “to-be-announced” forward contracts, or TBAs, or dollar roll transactions. In certain instances, rather than take delivery of the Agency RMBS subject to a TBA, we will dispose of the TBA through a dollar roll transaction in which we agree to purchase similar securities in the future at a predetermined price or otherwise, which may result in the recognition of income or gains. We account for dollar roll transactions as purchases and sales. The law is unclear regarding whether TBAs will be qualifying assets for the 75% asset test and whether income and gains from dispositions of TBAs will be qualifying income for the 75% gross income test.

Until we receive a favorable private letter ruling from the IRS or we are advised by counsel that TBAs should be treated as qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test, we will limit our investment in TBAs and any non-qualifying assets to no more than 25% of our assets at the end of any calendar quarter. Further, until we receive a favorable private letter ruling from the IRS or we are advised by counsel that income and gains from the disposition of TBAs should be treated as qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, we will limit our gains from dispositions of TBAs and any non-qualifying income to no more than 25% of our gross income for each calendar year. Accordingly, our ability to purchase Agency RMBS through TBAs and to dispose of TBAs, through dollar roll transactions or otherwise, could be limited.

Moreover, even if we are advised by counsel that TBAs should be treated as qualifying assets or that income and gains from dispositions of TBAs should be treated as qualifying income, it is possible that the IRS could successfully take the position that such assets are not qualifying assets and such income is not qualifying income. In that event, we could be subject to a penalty tax or we could fail to qualify as a REIT if (i) the value of our

TBAs, together with our non-qualifying assets for the 75% asset test, exceeded 25% of our gross assets at the end of any calendar quarter or (ii) our income and gains from the disposition of TBAs, together with our non-qualifying income for the 75% gross income test, exceeded 25% of our gross income for any taxable year.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. In order to meet these tests, we may be required to forego attractive business or investment opportunities. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

Liquidation of assets may jeopardize our REIT qualification.

To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our investments to repay obligations to our lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our qualification as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% tax on any resultant gain if we sell assets that are treated as dealer property or inventory.

Failure to make required distributions would subject us to tax, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

In order to qualify as a REIT, an entity must distribute to its stockholders, each calendar year, at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. To the extent that a REIT satisfies the 90% distribution requirement, but distributes less than 100% of its taxable income, it will be subject to federal corporate income tax on its undistributed income. In addition, a REIT will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which its distributions in any calendar year are less than the sum of:

85% of its REIT ordinary income for that year;

95% of its REIT capital gain net income for that year; and

100% of its undistributed taxable income from prior years.

We intend to continue to make distributions in the future to our stockholders in a manner intended to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement and to avoid both federal corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax. However, there is no requirement that TRSs distribute their after-tax net income to their parent REIT or their stockholders, and our TRS may determine not to make any distributions to us.

Our taxable income may substantially exceed our net income as determined based on GAAP because, for example, realized capital losses will be deducted in determining our GAAP net income, but may not be deductible in computing our taxable income. In addition, we may invest in assets that generate taxable income in excess of economic income or in advance of the corresponding cash flow from the assets, referred to as phantom income. Although some types of phantom income are excluded in determining the 90% distribution requirement, we will incur corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax with respect to any phantom income items if we do not distribute those items on an annual basis. As a result of the foregoing, we may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year. In that event, we may be required to use cash reserves, incur debt, or liquidate non-cash assets at rates or times that we regard as unfavorable in order to satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid federal corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax in that year.

Our ability to utilize TRSs will be limited by our intention to qualify as a REIT.

A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may earn income that would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the parent REIT. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 25% (or 20% for our prior taxable years) of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. A domestic TRS will pay federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates on any income that it earns. In addition, the TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.

Our domestic TRS will pay federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income, and its after-tax net income is available for distribution to us but is not required to be distributed to us. We anticipate that the aggregate value of the TRS stock and securities owned by us will continue to be significantly less than 25% of the value of our total assets (including the TRS stock and securities). Furthermore, we monitor the value of our investments in TRSs for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the rule that no more than 25% (or 20% for our prior taxable years) of the value of our assets may consist of TRS stock and securities (which is applied at the end of each calendar quarter). In addition, we scrutinize all of our transactions with TRSs for the purpose of ensuring that they are entered into on arm’s-length terms in order to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above. No assurance, however, can be given that we will be able to comply with the 25% (or 20% for our prior taxable years) limitation on ownership of TRS stock and securities on an ongoing basis so as to maintain our REIT qualification or avoid application of the 100% excise tax imposed on certain non-arm’s-length transactions.

Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.

The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code substantially limit our ability to hedge Agency RMBS and related borrowings. Under these provisions, our annual gross income from qualifying hedges entered into prior to July 30, 2008, with respect to our borrowings, together with any income from non-qualifying hedges and other income not generated from qualifying real estate assets, is limited to 25% or less of our gross income. In addition, we must limit our aggregate gross income from non-qualifying hedges, fees, and certain other non-qualifying sources to 5% or less of our annual gross income. As a result, we might in the future have to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through our domestic TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities, because our domestic TRS would be subject to tax on gains, or leave us exposed to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear.

The taxation of corporate dividends may adversely affect the value of our stock.

Legislation enacted in 2003 and 2006, among other things, generally reduces to 15% the maximum marginal rate of tax payable by taxpayers taxed at individual rates on dividends received from a regular C corporation until January 1, 2011. This reduced tax rate, however, will not apply to dividends paid by a REIT on its stock, except for certain limited amounts. While the earnings of a REIT that are distributed to its stockholders generally will still be subject to less federal income taxation than earnings of a non-REIT C corporation that are distributed to its stockholders net of corporate-level income tax, this legislation could cause taxpayers taxed at individual rates to view the stock of regular C corporations as more attractive relative to the stock of a REIT than was the case prior to the enactment of the legislation, because the dividends from regular C corporations will generally be taxed at a lower rate while dividends from REITs will generally be taxed at the same rate as the investor’s other ordinary income. We cannot predict what effect, if any, this legislation may have on the value of the stock of REITs in general or on the value of our common stock in particular, either in terms of price or relative to other investments.

The failure of Agency RMBS subject to a repurchase agreement to qualify as real estate assets would adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

We have entered into sale and repurchase agreements under which we nominally sold certain of our Agency RMBS to a counterparty and simultaneously entered into an agreement to repurchase the sold assets. We believe that we are treated for federal income tax purposes as the owner of the Agency RMBS that are the subject of any such agreement notwithstanding that such agreements may transfer record ownership of such assets to the counterparty during the term of the agreement. It is possible, however, that the IRS could successfully assert that we did not own the Agency RMBS during the term of the sale and repurchase agreement, in which case we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

If we make distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, those distributions will be treated as a return of capital, which will reduce the adjusted basis of your stock, and to the extent such distributions exceed your adjusted basis, you may recognize a capital gain.

Unless you are a tax-exempt entity, distributions that we make to you generally will be subject to tax as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined for federal income tax purposes. If the amount we distribute to you exceeds your allocable share of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of your adjusted basis in your stock, which will reduce your basis in your stock but will not be subject to tax. To the extent the amount we distribute to you exceeds both your allocable share of our current and accumulated earnings and profits and your adjusted basis, this excess amount will be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset.

If the CLO and structured note issuers in which we have invested are subject to federal income tax at the entity level, it would greatly reduce the amounts those entities would have available to pay their creditors and to distribute to us.

We have invested in subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes, which are treated as equity for federal income tax purposes. The CLO and structured note issuers in which we have invested will be treated as corporations for federal income tax purposes. The CLO and structured note issuers are organized in foreign countries. There is a specific exemption from federal income tax for non-U.S. corporations that restrict their activities in the United States to trading stock and securities (or any activity closely related thereto) for their own account whether such trading (or such other activity) is conducted by the corporation or its employees or through a resident broker, commission agent, custodian or other agent. We expect that the CLO and structured note issuers in which we have invested will rely on that exemption or otherwise operate in a manner so that they will not be subject to federal income tax on their net income at the entity level. If the IRS were to succeed in challenging that tax treatment, it could greatly reduce the amount that those CLO and structured note issuers would have available to pay to their creditors and to distribute to us.

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could reduce the market price of our common stock.

At any time, the federal income tax laws or regulations governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws or regulations may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted or promulgated or will become effective and any such law, regulation or interpretation may take effect retroactively. We and our stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation. Additionally, revisions in federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could cause us to change our investments and commitments and affect the tax considerations of an investment in us.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds we will receive from the sale of shares of our common stock in this offering by us will be approximately $ million (or approximately $ million if the underwriters fully exercise their option to purchase an additional shares of our common stock), in each case after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately $ million (or approximately $ million if the underwriters fully exercise their option to purchase additional shares of our common stock) and estimated offering expenses of approximately $ million payable by us.

We intend to invest most, if not all, of the net proceeds of this offering prior to December 31, 2009. However, we may need three to six months to fully invest the net proceeds of this offering in Agency RMBS at attractive prices. Pending full deployment of the net proceeds, we will temporarily invest these funds in interest-bearing, short term, marketable investments, including, without limitation, government securities, certificates of deposit, money market accounts or interest bearing bank deposits that are consistent with our intention to qualify as a REIT and to maintain our Investment Company Act exemption. These temporary investments are expected to provide a lower net return than we hope to achieve from our targeted investments in Agency RMBS.

PUBLIC MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK

Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “CYS.” On September , 2009, the last reported sale price of our common stock, as reported on the NYSE, was $ . The following table shows the high and low sales prices for shares of our common stock for the period indicated, as reported on the NYSE.


	High Sales Price		Low Sales Price
June 12, 2009 to June 30, 2009	$	12.01	$	11.00
July 1, 2009 to September , 2009	$		$

As of August 31, 2009, we had 18,212,732 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. Our issued and outstanding shares of common stock were held by approximately 1,369 shareholders, which include 120 holders of record. The holders of record include Cede & Co., which holds shares as nominee for The Depository Trust Company. The Depository Trust Company itself holds shares on behalf of approximately 1,249 beneficial owners of our common stock as of August 31, 2009.

DISTRIBUTION POLICY

We have elected to be treated as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Federal income tax law requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. We will not be required to make distributions with respect to activities through our TRS. For more information, please see “Federal Income Tax Consequences of Our Qualification as a REIT—Distribution Requirements.”

To satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT and generally not be subject to federal income and excise tax, we intend to pay quarterly distributions of all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income to stockholders out of cash generated from our net investment income. To date, we have funded our distributions out of cash generated from our net investment income. Although we could satisfy the requirement to distribute 90% of our REIT taxable income with taxable distributions of our capital stock or debt, we have no intention of doing so and intend to only distribute cash. We do not intend to pay future distributions from the proceeds from this offering.

Any distributions we make will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, our earnings and financial condition, maintenance of our REIT qualification, restrictions on making distributions under Maryland law, and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. We cannot assure you that we will make any future distributions to our stockholders, and our past distributions are not intended to be indicative of the amount and timing of future distributions, if any. For more information regarding risk factors that could materially adversely affect our earnings and financial condition see “Risk Factors” beginning on page 22.

The following is a description of the distributions we have paid since January 1, 2007. The per share amounts that follow have been adjusted to reflect the three-for-one reverse stock split effective May 28, 2008. In April 2007, our board of directors authorized a distribution to our stockholders of $0.96 per share, which included a portion of our estimated REIT taxable income for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, and a portion of our remaining undistributed estimated REIT taxable income for 2006. This distribution was paid on April 26, 2007. In July 2007, our board of directors authorized a distribution to our stockholders of $0.93 per share for the four-month period ended July 31, 2007, which was paid on July 31, 2007 to our stockholders of record on July 23, 2007. In October 2007, our board of directors authorized a distribution to our stockholders of $0.57 per share for the period from August 1, 2007 through October 18, 2007, which was paid on November 1, 2007 to our stockholders of record on October 10, 2007. In December 2007, our board of directors authorized a distribution to our stockholders of $0.54 per share for the period from October 19, 2007 through December 31, 2007, which was paid on January 30, 2008 to our stockholders of record on December 31, 2007. In April 2008, our board of directors authorized a distribution to our stockholders of $0.66 per share, which included a portion of our estimated REIT taxable income for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, and a portion of our remaining undistributed estimated REIT taxable income for 2007. This distribution was paid on April 30, 2008. In July 2008, our board of directors authorized a distribution to our stockholders of $0.66 per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, which was paid on July 30, 2008 to our stockholders of record on July 16, 2008. After paying the distribution for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we had distributed sufficient REIT taxable income to our stockholders to remain qualified as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 2008. In April 2009, our board of directors authorized a distribution to our stockholders of $0.60 per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, which was paid on April 29, 2009 to our stockholders of record as of April 22, 2009. In June 2009, our board of directors authorized a distribution to our stockholders of $0.60 per share for a portion of the quarter ended June 30, 2009, which was paid on June 15, 2009 to our stockholders of record on June 3, 2009.

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth (1) our actual cash and cash equivalents and capitalization at June 30, 2009 and (2) our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as adjusted to reflect (i) the effects of the sale of shares of our common stock by us in this offering at $ per share for net proceeds of approximately $ million, after deducting the underwriting discounts of approximately $ million and estimated offering expenses of approximately $ million, and (ii) the application of the net proceeds as described in “Use of Proceeds.” You should read this table together with “Use of Proceeds,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.


	As of June 30, 2009
	Actual⁽¹⁾			As Adjusted
	(dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	44,644.5		$

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	$	699,004.7		$

Net assets:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 18,133,538 shares outstanding, actual and shares outstanding, as adjusted	$	181.3		$
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding, actual and as adjusted		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		308,206.0
Accumulated net realized loss on investments		(80,697.1	)
Net unrealized depreciation on investments		(13,980.2	)
Undistributed net investment income		15,848.4

Net assets	$	229,558.4		$

⁽¹⁾

Does not include (i) 288,592 shares of our common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of the warrants underlying the units sold in our May 2008 private offering, which are currently exercisable and will expire on April 30, 201l; (ii) 3,376 shares issued to our independent directors on July 1, 2009 or (iii) 2,930,628 additional shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2006 stock incentive plan. Warrants to purchase (A) 148,200 shares have been exercised by the cashless option resulting in the issuance of 13,619 shares and (B) 62,202 shares have been exercised by cash exercise for the period from July 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

The following table presents selected consolidated financial and other information as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. The consolidated income statement data and consolidated balance sheet data presented below as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006, has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The consolidated income statement data and consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 has been derived from our interim unaudited financial statements. These interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared on substantially the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to provide a fair statement of our financial position as of June 30, 2009 and the results of our operations and cash flow for the interim periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These results are not necessarily indicative of our results for the full fiscal year. Similarly, because we only operated our business for a portion of the year ended December 31, 2006, we do not believe that a comparison of our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 to the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006 is indicative of the trends in our performance. The “Key Portfolio Statistics” have been derived from our underlying books and records.

Since the information presented below is only a summary and does not provide all of the information contained in our historical consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, you should read it in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our historical consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The shares outstanding and per share amounts in the chart below have been adjusted to reflect the three-for-one reverse stock split effective May 28, 2008.


	Six Months Ended June 30,					Year Ended December 31,
	2009		2008			2008			2007			2006*
Consolidated Income Statement Data:
Investment income—Interest income⁽¹⁾	$	19,048,720	$	32,345,751		$	55,475,822		$	135,585,142		$	48,067,705
Expenses:
Interest expense		2,500,567		14,820,206			23,980,836			112,995,775			38,716,966
Non-Investment expenses		2,976,576		2,499,270			7,747,884			5,246,895			3,637,531

Total expenses		5,477,143		17,319,476			31,728,720			118,242,670			42,354,497

Net investment income		13,571,577		15,026,275			23,747,102			17,342,472			5,713,208
Net realized gain (loss) on investments		1,415,931		(4,217,155	)		(7,982,797	)		(18,290,492	)		(260,054	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		18,006,631		(14,666,251	)		(26,377,797	)		(1,434,857	)		(5,492,367	)
Net gain (loss) on interest rate swap contracts⁽²⁾		596,333		(17,683,757	)		(28,558,957	)		(27,304,395	)		1,005,480

Net income (loss)	$	33,590,472	$	(21,540,888	)	$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267

Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)	$	3.98	$	(3.19	)	$	(5.48	)	$	(4.58	)	$	0.33

Distributions per common share	$	1.20	$	0.66		$	1.32		$	3.00		$	1.98


	As of June 30, 2009		As of December 31,
	As of June 30, 2009		2008		2007		2006*
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	44,644,536	$	7,156,140	$	122,254	$	984,498
Total assets		1,575,080,660		702,445,559		1,884,409,297		2,491,807,479
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		699,004,746		587,485,241		1,337,613,863		2,306,318,000
Net assets		229,558,429		98,800,849		132,146,036		180,300,933
Net assets per common share	$	12.66	$	12.89	$	19.75	$	26.97

Key Portfolio Statistics:**


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Year Ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2008			2007			2006*
Average Agency RMBS⁽³⁾	$	751,231,814		$	1,014,279,040		$	897,714,150		$	2,147,699,675		$	890,543,418
Average securities sold under agreement to repurchase		654,456,996			906,867,859			796,027,700			2,044,976,836			832,746,432
Average net assets		118,650,116			116,717,759			110,261,494			163,990,080			83,355,831
Average yield on Agency RMBS⁽⁴⁾		4.91	%		5.74	%		5.46	%		6.03	%		5.72	%
Average cost of funds & hedge⁽⁵⁾		1.52	%		4.02	%		3.89	%		5.38	%		5.23	%
Interest rate spread net of hedge⁽⁶⁾		3.39	%		1.72	%		1.57	%		0.65	%		0.49	%
Leverage ratio (at period end)⁽⁷⁾		5.9:1			7.5:1			6.1:1			13.3:1			12.8:1
⁽¹⁾ Interest income is made up of the following components:

Interest Income—Agency RMBS	$	18,309,112		$	28,971,867		$	48,997,293		$	129,505,620		$	45,184,854
Interest Income—CLOs, Structured Notes & Cash Equivalents		739,608			3,373,884			6,478,529			6,079,522			2,882,851

⁽²⁾ Net gain (loss) on interest rate swap contracts is made up of the following components:

Net swap interest income (expense)	$	(2,421,244	)	$	(3,322,503	)	$	(6,945,012	)	$	3,001,870		$	75,267
Net realized gain (loss) on termination of swap contracts		(10,804,123	)		(29,927,526	)		(35,118,468	)		(3,432,742	)		64,733
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap contracts		13,821,700			15,566,272			13,504,523			(26,873,523	)		865,480

⁽³⁾	Our average investment in Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by averaging the cost basis of our settled Agency RMBS investments during the period.

⁽⁴⁾	Our average yield on Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by dividing our interest income from Agency RMBS by our average Agency RMBS.

⁽⁵⁾	Our average cost of funds and hedge for the period was calculated by dividing our total interest expense, including our net swap interest income (expense), by our average securities sold under agreement to repurchase.

⁽⁶⁾	Our interest rate spread net of hedge for the period was calculated by subtracting our average cost of funds and hedge from our average yield on Agency RMBS.

⁽⁷⁾	Our leverage ratio was calculated by dividing total liabilities by net assets.

*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

**	All percentages are annualized.

Core Earnings

Non-GAAP Reconciliation:


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Year Ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2008			2007			2006*
Net income (loss)	$	33,590,472		$	(21,540,888	)	$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267
Net realized (gain) loss on investments		(1,415,931	)		4,217,155			7,982,797			18,290,492			260,054
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments		(18,006,631	)		14,666,251			26,377,797			1,434,857			5,492,367
Net realized (gain) loss on termination of swap contracts		10,804,123			29,927,526			35,118,468			3,432,742			(64,733	)
Unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on swap contracts		(13,821,700	)		(15,566,272	)		(13,504,523	)		26,873,523			(865,480	)

Core earnings	$	11,150,333		$	11,703,772		$	16,802,090		$	20,344,342		$	5,788,475

*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Overview

We are a specialty finance company created with the objective of achieving consistent risk-adjusted investment income. We seek to achieve this objective by investing, on a leveraged basis, exclusively in Agency RMBS. We are currently managed by Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC, a joint venture between affiliates of The Cypress Group and Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.

We earn investment income from our investment portfolio, and we use leverage to seek to enhance our returns. Our net investment income is generated primarily from the difference, or net spread, between the interest income we earn on our investment portfolio and the cost of our borrowings and hedging activities. The amount of net investment income we earn on our investments depends in part on our ability to control our financing costs, which comprise a significant portion of our operating expenses. Although we leverage our portfolio investments in Agency RMBS to seek to enhance our potential returns, leverage also may exacerbate losses.

While we use hedging to mitigate some of our interest rate risk, we do not hedge all of our exposure to changes in interest rates, as there are practical limitations on our ability to insulate our portfolio from all potential negative consequences associated with changes in short term interest rates in a manner that will allow us to seek attractive spreads on our portfolio.

In addition to investing in issued pools of Agency RMBS, we occasionally utilize forward-settling purchases of Agency RMBS where the pool is “to-be-announced”, or TBAs. Pursuant to these TBA transactions, we agree to purchase, for future delivery, Agency RMBS with certain principal and interest terms and certain types of underlying collateral, but the particular Agency RMBS to be delivered is not identified until shortly before the TBA settlement date.

In February 2006, we completed our initial capitalization pursuant to which we raised net proceeds of approximately $78.0 million. In December 2006, we completed an additional private offering in which we raised approximately $105.8 million in net proceeds. In May 2008, we completed an additional private offering in which we raised approximately $14.0 million in net proceeds. In June 2009, we completed an initial public offering of 10.5 million shares of our common stock, raising approximately $105.8 million of new capital after offering expenses and the underwriters’ exercise of their option.

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT and have complied, and intend to continue to comply, with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code with respect thereto. Accordingly, we do not expect to be subject to federal income tax on our REIT taxable income that we currently distribute to our stockholders if certain asset, income and ownership tests and recordkeeping requirements are fulfilled. Even if we maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income. For example, Sharpridge TRS, Inc. is taxed as regular subchapter C corporation under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the periods ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, Sharpridge TRS, Inc. owned a 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in one of our sub-advisors, Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P., but had no taxable income.

Factors that Affect our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

A variety of industry and economic factors may impact our results of operations and financial condition. These factors include:

interest rate trends;

prepayment rates on mortgages underlying our Agency RMBS, and credit trends insofar as they affect prepayment rates;

competition for investments in Agency RMBS;

recent actions taken by the U.S. Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury; and

other market developments.

In addition, a variety of factors relating to our business may also impact our results of operation and financial condition. These factors include:

our degree of leverage;

our access to funding and borrowing capacity;

our borrowing costs;

our hedging activities;

changes in the credit ratings of the securities in our portfolio;

the market value of our investments; and

the REIT requirements and the requirements to qualify for a registration exemption under the Investment Company Act.

We anticipate that, for any period during which changes in the interest rates earned on our assets do not coincide with interest rate changes on the corresponding liabilities, such assets will reprice more slowly than the corresponding liabilities. Consequently, changes in interest rates, particularly short term interest rates, may significantly influence our net investment income.

Our net investment income may be affected by a difference between actual prepayment rates and our projections. Prepayments on loans and securities may be influenced by changes in market interest rates and homeowners’ ability and desire to refinance their mortgages. To the extent we have acquired assets at a premium or discount to par value, changes in prepayment rates may impact our anticipated yield.

Trends and Recent Market Impacts

The following trends and recent market impacts may also affect our business:

Interest Rate Environment and Liquidity

Recent actions by the U.S. Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury appear to have stabilized the investing and financing environment for Agency RMBS. The liquidity facilities created by the U.S. Federal Reserve during 2007 and 2008 and its lowering of the Federal Funds Target Rate to 0 – 0.25%, along with the reduction of the 30-day LIBOR to 0.30875% as of June 30, 2009, have lowered our financing costs (which most closely correlates with the 30-day LIBOR) and stabilized the availability of repurchase agreement financing. The following table shows 30-day LIBOR and the U.S. Federal Funds Target Rate at the end of each of the prior six fiscal quarters:


Date	30-Day LIBOR		Federal Funds Target Rate
June 30, 2009	0.309	%	0.25	%
March 31, 2009	0.501	%	0.25	%
December 31, 2008	0.436	%	0.25	%
September 30, 2008	3.926	%	2.00	%
June 30, 2008	2.463	%	2.00	%
March 31, 2008	2.703	%	2.25	%

Source: Bloomberg

Actions taken by the FHFA to place Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under conservatorship and the U.S. Federal Reserve’s purchase of Agency RMBS have likewise stabilized the market for our assets. Despite the fall in short term interest rates, yields on U.S. Treasury securities have risen with the yield on five-year U.S. Treasury notes rising by 90 basis points during the second quarter of 2009 and by 101 basis points during the first half of 2009. Despite this rise in yields on U.S. Treasury securities, the market prices of Agency RMBS have fallen slightly. We believe this is an unusual circumstance and reflective of the stabilization of the Agency RMBS market. The following table is illustrative of this situation by comparing market levels for two benchmark securities, the yield on five-year U.S. Treasury Notes and the market price of 15-year Fannie Mae 4.5% Agency RMBS:


Date	Five-Year US Treasury Note		Market Price of Fannie Mae 4.5% 15-Year Agency RMBS
June 30, 2009	2.56	%	$	102.000
March 31, 2009	1.66	%	$	103.000
December 31, 2008	1.55	%	$	102.375
September 30, 2008	2.98	%	$	97.200
June 30, 2008	3.33	%	$	96.750
March 31, 2008	2.44	%	$	99.750

Source: Bloomberg

Yields on three-year interest rate swaps, our current hedging vehicle, were relatively stable over the second quarter of 2009 rising by 47 basis points. Yields on mortgage securities have also risen during the same period. The yield on a par-priced Fannie Mae Agency RMBS backed by 30-year mortgage loans rose by 69 basis points during the first six months of 2009. Our financing costs have fallen as financing rates have roughly tracked the interest rate cuts adopted by the U.S. Federal Reserve, which has consequently improved the net interest margin on our portfolio.

We believe the difficulties of the past two years in the residential housing and mortgage markets in the United States appear to have been somewhat alleviated in the Agency RMBS markets. However, a variety of difficulties and economic conditions including loan defaults, credit losses and decreased liquidity continue to affect the non-Agency RMBS market.

In response to credit market disruptions in 2008, the U.S. Government took a number of actions to stimulate the credit markets and the economy. For example, on October 3, 2008, the U.S. Congress enacted the EESA. The EESA provides the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury with the authority to establish the TARP to purchase from financial institutions up to $700 billion of residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before March 14, 2008, as well as any other financial instrument that the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, after consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve, determines the purchase of which is necessary to promote financial market stability, upon transmittal of such determination in writing, to the appropriate committees of the U.S. Congress. The EESA also provides for a program that would allow companies to insure their troubled assets.

In addition, in the third quarter of 2008, the U.S. Federal Reserve announced that it initiated a program to purchase $200 billion in direct obligations of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks and $1.25 trillion in Agency RMBS issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae. The U.S. Federal Reserve stated that its actions are intended to reduce the cost and increase the availability of credit for the purchase of houses, which in turn was expected to support housing markets and foster improved conditions in financial markets more generally. The purchases of direct obligations began during the first week of December 2008 and the purchases of Agency RMBS began on January 5, 2009. The size and timing of the U.S. Government’s Agency RMBS purchase program is subject to the discretion of the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, who has indicated that the purchases will be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2010. The impact of

these events on the financial and credit markets remains uncertain; however, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s program to purchase Agency RMBS could cause an increase in the prices of Agency RMBS, which would increase our book value but make purchases of Agency RMBS more expensive in the future.

See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—No assurance can be given that the actions taken by the U.S. Government for the purpose of seeking to stabilize the financial and credit markets and stimulate the economy will achieve the intended effect on, or benefit to, our business, and further government or market developments could adversely affect us,” for a discussion of the risks associated with these programs.

Conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

In response to the credit market disruption and the deteriorating financial conditions of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, Congress and the U.S. Treasury undertook a series of actions. On July 30, 2008, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 established FHFA as the new regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. On September 7, 2008, FHFA, citing concerns about the continuing ability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to operate safely and soundly, placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship, which is a statutory process pursuant to which the FHFA will operate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as conservator, in an effort to stabilize the entities. In connection with the conservatorship, FHFA announced that, after consultation with the U.S. Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, among other things (i) FHFA had assumed the power of the board of directors and management of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, (ii) the chief executive officers of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were being replaced, (iii) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be permitted to continue to guarantee Agency RMBS, and (iv) the U.S. Treasury would establish a financing and investment relationship with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. FHFA also noted that during the conservatorship period, FHFA would work to enact new regulations that would apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in an effort to implement the actions described above, including those relating to minimum capital standards, prudent safety and soundness standards and portfolio limits of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

As announced by the U.S. Treasury on September 7, 2008, the newly established financing and investing relationship between the U.S. Treasury and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac includes:

a program through which the U.S. Treasury purchases Fannie Mae-guaranteed and Freddie Mac-guaranteed Agency RMBS in the open market, including newly-issued Agency RMBS, beginning in September 2008 and ending on December 31, 2009;

(i) preferred stock purchase agreements, which were designed to allow Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to maintain a positive net worth and avoid mandatory triggering of receivership, pursuant to which the U.S. Treasury can invest up to $100 billion in each of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the form of senior preferred stock with a liquidation preference, and (ii) an upfront $1 billion issuance of senior preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury by each of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in exchange for entering into the agreements;

issuance to the U.S. Treasury of warrants to purchase common stock representing 79.9% of the common stock of each of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on a fully-diluted basis at a nominal price;

access to the Government Sponsored Enterprise Credit Facility, or GSECF, which is a secured credit facility to be provided by the U.S. Treasury directly to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (as well as Federal Home Loan Banks) in exchange for eligible collateral from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The GSECF is to be used when other funding sources are unavailable and expires on December 31, 2009; and

beginning March 31, 2010, payment by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the U.S. Treasury on a quarterly basis of a periodic commitment fee for the explicit support provided by the agreement in an amount to be determined by the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, the conservator and the chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve.

The agreement with the U.S. Treasury also imposes covenants on each of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that provide, among other things, that (i) each of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s mortgage and Agency RMBS portfolios will not exceed $850 billion as of December 31, 2009 and must decline by 10% per year thereafter until they reach $250 billion, and (ii) without the prior consent of the U.S. Treasury, neither Fannie Mae nor Freddie Mac may (a) purchase or redeem its capital stock or pay any dividends (other than dividends on the senior preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury), (b) issue any capital stock, (c) terminate the conservatorship, (d) sell or transfer its assets outside the ordinary course of business, other than in connection with the reduction of assets as described in clause (i) above, (e) increase its debt to more than 110% of its debt at June 30, 2008, or (f) acquire or consolidate with, or merge into, another entity.

In February 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced that it intends to increase the (i) amounts available under each preferred stock purchase agreement with the GSEs from $100 billion to $200 billion, and (ii) maximum size of each GSE’s mortgage and Agency RMBS portfolios from $850 billion to $900 billion.

Although the U.S. Government has committed significant resources to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Agency RMBS guaranteed by either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac are not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Moreover, the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, in announcing the actions, noted that the guarantee structure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac required examination and that changes in the structures of the entities were necessary to reduce risk to the financial system. Such changes may involve an explicit U.S. government backing of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Agency RMBS or the express elimination of any implied U.S. government guarantee and, therefore, the creation of credit risk with respect to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Agency RMBS. Accordingly, the effect of the actions taken by the U.S. Treasury and FHFA remains uncertain. In addition, while specific steps within the conservatorships were announced, the scope and nature of the actions that the U.S. Treasury, FHFA or Congress will ultimately undertake are unknown and will continue to evolve. New and recently enacted laws, regulations and programs related to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may adversely affect the pricing, supply, liquidity and value of our target assets and otherwise materially harm our business and operations. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—The federal conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related efforts, along with changes in laws and regulations affecting the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. Government, may adversely affect our business.”

Yield Curve

During the first half of 2009, LIBOR and the U.S. Federal Funds Target Rate fell while yields on longer dated Treasury and other securities rose significantly resulting in a steepening yield curve. During this period, the 30-day LIBOR fell by approximately 13 basis points, while the yield on three-year U.S. Treasury notes increased by approximately 65 basis points and the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury notes increased by approximately 133 basis points. With respect to our Agency RMBS backed by monthly reset ARMs, we believe that the fall in short term interest rates has improved our net interest margin due to lower financing rates. Our Agency RMBS backed by hybrid ARMs pay a fixed interest rate for a set period and then convert to a floating rate payment structure. Our Agency RMBS backed by fixed rate mortgage loans pays a fixed rate for a term of either 15 or 30 years. The market prices of these securities correlate more closely with the longer end of the yield curve. As a result, with the yield curve remaining steep, these securities continue to produce high yields relative to our financing costs. For our Agency RMBS portfolio, an increase in short term interest rates would increase our financing rates and, therefore, reduce our net interest margin.

Prepayment Rates and Loan Modification Programs

Prepayment rates generally increase when interest rates fall and decrease when interest rates rise; however, changes in prepayment rates are difficult to accurately predict. Prepayment rates also may be affected by other factors, including homeowners’ ability and desire to refinance their mortgages (which depends on, among other things, the overall level of home equity available), conditions in the housing and financial markets, conditions in the mortgage origination industry, general economic conditions and the relative interest rates on adjustable-rate

and fixed rate mortgage loans. To the extent that we have acquired assets at a premium or discount to par value, changes in prepayment rates may impact our anticipated yield. Because mortgage interest rates have declined, we expect to see an increase in the prepayment rates on our portfolio; however, we believe that the increase in prepayment rates will have only a limited adverse impact on our portfolio in the near term due to depressed levels of home equity resulting in homeowners’ inability to obtain financing. If mortgage interest rates increase, however, we may experience a reduction in the prepayment rates on our portfolio. Although we currently believe that an increase in prepayment rates will only have a limited adverse impact on our portfolio due to depressed levels of home equity, recent actions by the U.S. Government may cause an increase in prepayment rates despite the current depressed levels of home equity.

During the second half of 2008, the U.S. Government, through the FHA and the FDIC, commenced implementation of programs designed to provide homeowners with assistance in avoiding residential mortgage loan foreclosures. The programs may involve, among other things, the modification of mortgage loans to reduce the principal amount of the loans or the rate of interest payable on the loans, or to extend the payment terms of the loans. One such program is the Hope for Homeowners program, which is effective from October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2011 and will enable certain distressed borrowers to refinance their mortgages into FHA-insured loans. In addition, in February 2009 the U.S. Treasury announced the HASP, which is a multi-faceted plan intended to prevent residential mortgage foreclosures by, among other things:

allowing judicial modifications of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conforming residential mortgages loans during bankruptcy proceedings.

Programs such as the Hope for Homeowners program and HASP may have the effect of increasing prepayment rates and reducing the principal or interest payments on residential mortgage loans held by certain types of borrowers. The effect of such programs for holders of Agency RMBS could be that such holders would experience changes in the anticipated yields of their Agency RMBS due to (i) increased prepayment rates on their Agency RMBS and (ii) lower interest and principal payments on their Agency RMBS.

Credit Spreads

Over the past several years, the credit markets experienced tightening credit spreads (specifically, spreads between U.S. Treasury securities and other securities that are identical in all respects except for ratings) mainly due to the strong demand for lending opportunities. Generally, when credit spreads tighten the value of Agency RMBS increases, which would result in an increase in our book value. As a result of the actions of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Federal Reserve in late 2008 and early 2009, credit spreads have tightened, which has resulted in an increase in our book value. However, if credit spreads were to widen again, we expect the market value of Agency RMBS would decrease, which could reduce our book value but also create an attractive opportunity to reinvest principal and interest from our existing portfolio as well as deploy new capital into higher-yielding Agency RMBS.

Impacts on Us

Our business has been impacted by the recent market trends discussed above. During the second quarter of 2009, we generally experienced an increase in the fair value of the securities in our portfolio, however, when factoring in our new purchases of Agency RMBS during the second quarter of 2009, the average market price of

our Agency RMBS decreased slightly to $102.83 at June 30, 2009 compared to $102.88 at March 31, 2009. Our interest rate spread net of hedge, which we calculate by subtracting our average cost of funds and hedge from our average yield on the Agency RMBS in our portfolio, also increased during the second quarter of 2009. Our interest rate spread net of hedge was 3.88% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 2.94% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 1.57% for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our leverage ratio has been relatively consistent during this period at 5.9 to 1 at June 30, 2009, 7.0 to 1 at March 31, 2009 and 6.1 to 1 at December 31, 2008. In addition, in light of the recent trends in LIBOR rates and the interest rate environment, we decided to unwind an interest rate swap in early April 2009 and replace it with a new interest rate swap at what we believe to be a favorable rate. In addition, we entered into two additional interest rate swaps in June 2009. As a result, although we realized a net loss of approximately $10.8 million upon termination of the interest rate swap during April 2009, we experienced unrealized appreciation on the new interest rate swaps in an aggregate amount of approximately $12.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009.

We believe that the actions taken by the U.S. Government with respect to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as well as actions taken by the U.S. Treasury and the U.S. Federal Reserve to improve liquidity in the financial and mortgage markets will continue to have a positive effect on the supply of Agency RMBS, and we expect to see a healthy supply of new issue Agency RMBS and increased secondary trading of Agency RMBS in the near future. No assurance can be given, however, that these initiatives will have a positive effect on the supply of Agency RMBS. Over the long term, we expect both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reduce their Agency RMBS holdings (commencing in 2010), which should increase supply of Agency RMBS and allow us the opportunity to source attractive assets for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, the current steepness of the yield curve and the current level of short term interest rates has increased our net investment income. However, our ability to purchase Agency RMBS in the future will depend on the availability of repurchase agreement financing, which may be difficult to obtain if current credit conditions deteriorate. Also, government loan modification programs such as the Hope for Homeowners program and HASP may increase mortgage prepayments, which could reduce the anticipated yields on our Agency RMBS.

For a discussion of additional risks relating to our business see “Risk Factors” and “—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared by management in accordance with GAAP. Although we conduct our operations so that we are not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, for financial reporting purposes we are an investment company and follow the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies. Accordingly, investments in securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the statement of operations. Our most critical accounting policies require us to make complex and subjective decisions and assessments that could affect our reported assets and liabilities, as well as our reported interest income and expenses. We believe that all of the decisions and assessments upon which our financial statements are based were reasonable at the time made based upon information available to us at that time. We rely on our Manager’s experience and analysis of historical and current market data in order to arrive at what we believe to be reasonable estimates. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for a complete discussion of our significant accounting policies. We have identified our most critical accounting policies to be the following:

Valuation

Valuation of our investments is determined by our Manager. Investments are valued at their fair value based on market quotations from brokers and dealers. Our Manager normally seeks prices from at least three such brokers or dealers, although the Manager may rely on price quotes from fewer than three brokers or dealers in certain circumstances. Our Manager reviews all prices used to ensure that current market conditions are represented. This review includes comparisons of similar market transactions or comparisons to a pricing model. The resulting unrealized gains and losses are reflected in the statement of operations.

Interest Income Recognition

We account for interest income on our investments using the effective yield method. For investments purchased at par value, the effective yield is the contractual interest rate on the investment. If the investment is purchased at a discount or at a premium to par value, the effective yield is computed based on the contractual interest rate increased for the accretion of a purchase discount or decreased for the amortization of a purchase premium. Amortization of premium and accretion of discount are included in interest income in the statement of operations.

The Manager determines the effective yield on the subordinated tranches of CLOs based upon estimated default rates, recovery rates, prepayment speeds and reinvestment spreads. These securities are reviewed quarterly, and the effective yield may be adjusted if economic conditions or assumptions change. For CDO and CLO securities placed on nonaccrual status or when cash flows cannot be reliably estimated, the cost recovery method is used.

Accounting For Derivative Financial Instruments

Our policies permit us to enter into derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and/or collars and Eurobond and U.S. Treasury futures, as a means of mitigating our interest rate risk. We currently use interest rate derivative instruments to mitigate interest rate risk rather than to enhance returns.

We intend to engage in a variety of interest rate hedging activities that reduce market value differences between our liabilities and our assets. These hedges are intended to reduce the interest rate sensitivity of our liabilities. Additionally, we expect these hedges will reduce differences in the timing and magnitude of our cash flows and better correlate the cash paid on our liabilities with the cash received from our assets.

During the term of an interest rate swap, we make or receive periodic cash payments. Unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a result of “marking-to-market” the swap. When the swap is terminated, we will record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the proceeds from (or cost of) the closing transaction and our basis in the contract, if any. The periodic payments and any realized or unrealized gains or losses are reported as net gain or loss on swap contracts in the statement of operations. Swaps involve a risk that interest rates will move contrary to our expectations, thereby increasing our payment obligation.

We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the swap, limited to any gains recognized. Should interest rates move unexpectedly, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the interest rate swap and may realize a loss. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by any counterparty.

Share Based Payment and Related Party Transactions

We account for share-based compensation issued to members of our board of directors and our Manager using the fair value based methodology. We do not have any employees, although we believe that independent members of our board of directors are deemed to be employees for purposes of interpreting and applying accounting principles relating to share-based compensation. We record as compensation costs the restricted common stock that we have issued to members of our board of directors at fair value as of the grant date. We amortize the cost into expense over the three-year vesting period of restricted common stock issued to independent members of our board of directors prior to January 1, 2007, using the straight-line method. Restricted common stock granted to independent members of our board of directors on or after January 1, 2007 will vest over a one-year period. We record compensation cost for restricted common stock and common stock options that we issued to certain of our executive officers, certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors at fair value as of the grant date, and we remeasure the amount on subsequent reporting dates to the extent that the restricted common stock and our common stock options are unvested. We amortize compensation expense related to the restricted common stock and common stock options that we have granted to certain of our executive officers, certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors using the straight-line method.

Because we remeasure the amount of compensation cost associated with the unvested restricted common stock and unvested common stock options that we issued to certain of our executive officers, certain officers and

employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors as of each reporting period, our share-based compensation expense reported in our statement of operations will change based on the fair value of our common stock, which may result in earnings volatility.

Financial Condition

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Agency RMBS in our portfolio were purchased at a net premium to their par value, with a weighted-average amortized cost of 101.3% and 101.4%, 101.9% and 102.5%, respectively, due to the average interest rates on these investments being higher than prevailing market rates. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we had approximately $19.6 million and $10.0 million, $34.2 million and $61.2 million, respectively, of unamortized premium included in the cost basis of our investments.

Our Agency RMBS portfolio consisted of the following:

June 30, 2009


					Weighted Average
Security Description	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Coupon		Months to Reset⁽¹⁾	Constant Prepayment Rate⁽²⁾
	(in thousands)
Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs	$	717,016	$	739,783	4.8	%	49.2	15.1	%
Agency RMBS collateralized by short-reset hybrid ARMS⁽³⁾		182,910		188,167	4.5		6.7	19.4
Agency RMBS collateralized by monthly reset ARMS		151,750		155,354	3.8		1	2.3
Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgages		423,390		433,543	4.8		N/A	22.8

Total Agency RMBS⁽⁴⁾	$	1,475,066	$	1,516,847

December 31, 2008


					Weighted Average
Security Description	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Coupon		Months to Reset⁽¹⁾	Constant Prepayment Rate⁽²⁾
	(in thousands)
Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs	$	332,468	$	341,132	5.7	%	42.2	10.6	%
Agency RMBS collateralized by short-reset hybrid ARMS⁽³⁾		8,723		8,785	4.6		4.0	18.3
Agency RMBS collateralized by monthly reset ARMS		154,575		153,609	4.7		1	5.5
Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgages		176,566		182,040	5.8		N/A	6.6

Total Agency RMBS	$	672,332	$	685,566

December 31, 2007


					Weighted Average
Security Description	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Coupon		Months to Reset⁽¹⁾	Constant Prepayment Rate⁽²⁾
	(in thousands)
Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs	$	738,367	$	752,741	5.9	%	50.5	26.3	%
Agency RMBS collateralized by monthly reset ARMs		457,979		469,515	7.2		1	29.9
Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgages		600,714		612,898	6.2		N/A	22.0

Total Agency RMBS⁽⁴⁾	$	1,797,060	$	1,835,154

December 31, 2006


					Weighted Average
Security Description	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Coupon		Months to Reset⁽¹⁾	Constant Prepayment Rate⁽²⁾
	(in thousands)
Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs	$	1,097,506	$	1,104,757	5.4	%	45.9	22.6	%
Agency RMBS collateralized by monthly reset ARMs		1,291,138		1,339,903	7.3		1	23.7

Total Agency RMBS	$	2,388,644	$	2,444,660

⁽¹⁾	“Months to Reset” is the number of months remaining before the fixed rate on a hybrid ARM becomes a variable rate. At the end of the fixed period, the variable rate will be determined by the margin and the pre-specified caps of the ARM.

⁽²⁾

“Constant Prepayment Rate” is a method of expressing the prepayment rate for a mortgage pool that assumes that a constant fraction of the remaining principal is prepaid each month or year. Specifically, the constant prepayment rate is an annualized version of the prior three month prepayment rate. Securities with no prepayment history are excluded from this calculation.

⁽³⁾	“Short-reset” is defined as 24 months or less to reset.

⁽⁴⁾	Includes the securities to be purchased pursuant to the forward settling purchase agreements described in “—Liabilities.”

Actual maturities of Agency RMBS are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities (which range up to 30 years), as they are affected by the contractual lives of the underlying mortgages, periodic payments and prepayments of principal. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the average final contractual maturity of the mortgage portfolio is in year 2034 and 2035, 2037 and 2036, respectively.

The average expected life of our Agency RMBS reflects the estimated average period of time the securities in the portfolio will remain outstanding. The average expected lives of our Agency RMBS do not exceed five years, based upon prepayment models obtained through subscription-based financial information service providers. The prepayment model considers current yield, forward yield, steepness of the yield curve, current mortgage rates, the mortgage rate of the outstanding loan, loan age, margin and volatility. The actual lives of the Agency RMBS in our investment portfolio could be longer or shorter than those estimates depending on the actual prepayment rates experienced over the lives of the applicable securities.

Subordinated Tranches of CLOs

We invested a portion of the proceeds from our initial capitalization and December 2006 private offering in subordinated tranches of CLOs, which are securities backed by a pool of variously rated loans or bonds. Underwriters of CLOs package a large and diversified pool of loans or bonds. Multiple tranches of securities backed by this pool are sold to investors. While certain tranches are rated, subordinated tranches of CLOs represent the most subordinated claim on principal and interest payments from the collateral pool. As a result, these subordinated tranches typically have no credit ratings or are rated below investment grade. In 2008, our board of directors amended our current investment guidelines to require that we seek to dispose of our CLOs and structured notes at reasonable prices. We are not, however, required to sell these securities. During 2008, we sold one CLO for approximately $1.1 million and did not sell any structured notes. We have not sold any CLOs or structured notes during 2009. We continue to monitor the market for selling the remaining portion of our CLOs and structured notes; however, we may not be able to sell these assets for a reasonable price for some time given the currently depressed prices for these assets.

Hedging Instruments

We generally intend to hedge as much of the interest rate risk we determine is in the best interests of our stockholders. Our policies do not contain specific requirements as to the percentages or amount of interest rate risk that our Manager is required to hedge. No assurance can be given that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

Interest rate hedging may fail to protect or could adversely affect us because, among other things:

interest rate hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of rising and volatile interest rates;

available interest rate hedging may not correspond directly with the interest rate risk for which protection is sought;

due to prepayments on assets and repayments of debt securing such assets, the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related liability or asset;

the amount of income that a REIT may earn from hedging transactions to offset market losses related to movement in interest rates is limited by federal tax provisions governing REITs;

the credit quality of the hedging counterparty may be downgraded to such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction; and

the hedging counterparty may default on its obligation to pay.

We engage in interest rate swaps as a means of mitigating our interest rate risk on forecasted interest expense associated with repurchase agreements for the term of the swap contract. An interest rate swap is a contractual agreement entered into by two counterparties under which each agrees to make periodic payments to the other for an agreed period of time based upon a notional amount of principal. Under the most common form of interest rate swap, commonly known as a fixed-floating interest rate swap, a series of fixed interest rate payments on a notional amount of principal is exchanged for a series of floating interest rate payments on such notional amount.

We hedge our floating rate debt by entering into fixed-floating interest rate swap agreements whereby, as described above, we swap the floating rate of interest on the liability we are hedging for a fixed rate of interest. At June 30, 2009, we were a party to three interest rate swaps with maturities between April 2012 and July 2012 with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $640.0 million and a fair value of approximately $1.3 million. At December 31, 2008, we were a party to one interest rate swap with a maturity of May 2010 with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $240.0 million and a fair value of approximately $(12.5) million. At December 31, 2007, we were a party to five interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from May 2010 to October 2012 with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $890.0 million and a fair value of approximately ($26.0) million. At December 31, 2006, we were a party to six interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from June 2009 to December 2009 with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $745.0 million and a fair value of approximately $0.9 million.

Under the interest rate swap agreements in place at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we received interest at rates that reset periodically, generally every three months, and paid a rate fixed at the initiation of and for the life of the swap agreements. The current market value of interest rate swaps is heavily dependent on the current market fixed rate, the corresponding term structure of floating rates (known as the yield curve) as well as the expectation of changes in future floating rates. As expectations of future floating rates change, the market value of interest rate swaps changes.

Liabilities

We have entered into repurchase agreements to finance some of our purchases of Agency RMBS. These agreements are secured by our Agency RMBS and bear interest at rates that have historically moved in close relationship to LIBOR. As of June 30, 2009, we had established 19 borrowing relationships with various investment banking firms and other lenders. Interest payable on our repurchase agreements at June 30, 2009 was approximately $0.2 million. As of December 31, 2008, we had established 20 borrowing relationships with various investment banking firms and other lenders. Interest payable on our repurchase agreements at December 31, 2008 was approximately $1.6 million. As of December 31, 2007, we had established 20 borrowing relationships with various investment banking firms and other lenders. Interest payable on our repurchase

agreements at December 31, 2007 was approximately $5.7 million. As of December 31, 2006, we had established 18 borrowing relationships with various investment banking firms and other lenders. Interest payable on our repurchase agreements at December 31, 2006 was approximately $4.5 million.

At June 30, 2009, we had approximately $699.0 million of liabilities pursuant to repurchase agreements with seven counterparties that had weighted-average interest rates of approximately 0.51%, which had maturities of between one and 79 days. We intend to seek to renew these repurchase agreements as they mature under then-applicable borrowing terms of the counterparties to the repurchase agreement. At December 31, 2008, we had approximately $587.5 million of liabilities pursuant to repurchase agreements with six of our 20 borrowing relationships that had weighted-average borrowing rates of approximately 2.44%, which had maturities of between two and 20 days. At December 31, 2007, we had outstanding approximately $1,337.6 million of liabilities pursuant to repurchase agreements with seven of our 20 borrowing relationships that had weighted-average borrowing rates of approximately 5.07%, which had maturities of between three and seven days. At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding approximately $2,306.3 million of liabilities pursuant to repurchase agreements with eight of our 18 borrowing relationships that had weighted-average borrowing rates of approximately 5.3%, which had maturities of between nine and 12 days. At March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the repurchase agreements were secured by Agency RMBS with an estimated fair value of approximately $688.4 million, $638.0 million, $1,387.2 million and $2,357.8 million, respectively. The net amount at risk for securities sold under repurchase agreements with counterparties, defined as fair value of investments in securities, plus accrued interest income, minus liabilities due to securities sold under repurchase agreements, plus accrued interest expense, with all counterparties was $53.2 million, $51.8 million, $51.1 million and $52.0 million at March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had a $644.3 million, $0, $378.2 million and $0, respectively, payable for securities purchased, a portion of which will be financed through repurchase agreements. Because we measure leverage as total liabilities divided by net assets, the payable for securities purchased is included in our leverage ratio. Below is a summary of our payable for securities purchased as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2007:

June 30, 2009


Forward Settling Purchases	Settle Date	Par Value		Payable
FNMA—15 Year 4.5% Fixed	7/16/2009	$	52,429,867	$	53,519,426
FNMA—15 Year 4.5% Fixed	8/18/2009		60,000,000		60,690,025
FNMA—15 Year 4.5% Fixed	9/17/2009		150,000,000		150,737,575
FNMA—5X1 4.084% Hybrid ARM	7/22/2009		25,055,082		25,662,851
FNMA—5X1 3.9% Hybrid ARM	9/23/2009		150,000,000		151,201,250
FNMA—5X1 4.03% Hybrid ARM	9/23/2009		50,000,000		50,662,201
FNMA—5X1 4.1% Hybrid ARM	9/23/2009		100,000,000		101,500,556
FNMA—5X1 4.05% Hybrid ARM	9/24/2009		50,000,000		50,330,572

		$	637,484,949	$	644,304,456

December 31, 2007
FHLMC—30 Year 6.5% Fixed	1/14/2008	$	247,000,000	$	253,792,500
FNMA—30 Year 5.5% Fixed	1/14/2008		125,000,000		124,394,531

		$	372,000,000	$	378,187,031

Results of Operations

The following is a comparison of the consolidated operating results for Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. Because we only operated our business for a portion of the year ended December 31, 2006, we do not believe that a comparison of our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 to the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006 is indicative of the trends in our performance.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Summary. Our net income (loss) is summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Investment income—Interest income
Interest Income—Agency RMBS	$	9,357,129		$	10,199,051
Interest Income—CLOs, Structured Notes & Cash Equivalents		370,246			1,521,441

Total interest income		9,727,375			11,720,492

EXPENSES:
Interest expense		1,111,059			3,891,473
Non-Investment expenses		1,414,338			1,446,621

Total expenses		2,525,397			5,338,094

Net investment income		7,201,978			6,382,398
Net gain (loss) from investments		12,443,441			(2,760,989	)

GAINS AND (LOSSES) FROM SWAP CONTRACTS:
Net swap interest income (expense)		(392,098	)		(1,992,202	)
Net gain (loss) on termination of swap contracts		(10,804,123	)		—
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap contracts		12,127,098			11,275,723

Net gain (loss) from swap contracts		930,877			9,283,521

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	20,576,296		$	12,904,930

Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)	$	2.22		$	1.84
Distributions per common share	$	1.20		$	0.66
Key Portfolio Statistics*
Average Agency RMBS⁽¹⁾	$	789,520,805		$	731,973,024
Average securities sold under agreement to repurchase		693,518,835			635,284,148
Average net assets		129,484,724			110,223,681
Average yield on Agency RMBS⁽²⁾		4.75	%		5.60	%
Average cost of funds & hedge⁽³⁾		0.87	%		3.72	%
Interest rate spread net of hedge⁽⁴⁾		3.88	%		1.88	%
Leverage ratio (at period end)⁽⁵⁾		5.9:1			7.5:1

⁽¹⁾	Our average Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by averaging the cost basis of our settled Agency RMBS during the period.

⁽²⁾	Our average yield on Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by dividing our interest income from Agency RMBS by our average Agency RMBS.

⁽³⁾	Our average cost of funds and hedge for the period was calculated by dividing our total interest expense, including our net swap interest income (expense), by our average securities sold under agreement to repurchase.

⁽⁴⁾	Our interest rate spread net of hedge for the period was calculated by subtracting our average cost of funds and hedge from our average yield on Agency RMBS.

⁽⁵⁾	Our leverage ratio was calculated by dividing total liabilities by net assets.

*	All percentages are annualized.

Net Investment Income. Net investment income increased by $0.8 million to $7.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Net investment income consists of interest income less interest expense and non-investment expenses. The increase was mainly due to the increase in our interest rate spread which is the result of a significant reduction in our borrowing costs. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, our average Agency RMBS portfolio was $789.5 million and $732.0 million, respectively, resulting in an average yield on Agency RMBS of approximately 4.75% and 5.60%, respectively. Our average cost of funds net of hedge was approximately 0.87% and 3.72%, respectively, resulting in interest rate spread of approximately 3.88% and 1.88%, respectively.

Interest Income. Interest income, which consists of interest income on Agency RMBS, subordinated tranches of CLOs and short term investments and other debt securities, decreased by $2.0 million to $9.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $11.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The change in interest income is primarily related to the decrease in the average yield on Agency RMBS as discussed above and the interest accrued on our CLOs and structured notes. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, our interest accrued on CLOs, structured notes and cash equivalents was $0.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

Interest Expense & Net Swap Interest Income (Expense). Interest expense net of swap interest income (expense), decreased by $4.4 million to $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $5.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to the decreased borrowing costs discussed above.

Non-Investment Expenses. Non-investment expenses consist of management fees payable to our Manager in accordance with our management agreement, amortization related to restricted stock and stock options granted to our executive officers, certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to us, as designated by our Manager, and our independent directors, directors’ fees and insurance premium expenses for directors and officers insurance and other general and administrative expenses, including legal and accounting fees. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, non-investment expenses remained flat compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008 at $1.4 million. However as an annualized percentage of net assets our expense ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 4.38% and 5.26%, respectively. The decrease in expense ratio is due to the average net assets increasing during the period to $129.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $110.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

Net Gain (Loss) From Investments. Net gain from investments increased by $15.2 million to $12.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to a loss of $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The change was primarily due to the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments of $12.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $(2.7) million for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

Net Gain (Loss) From Swap Contracts Excluding Net Swap Interest Income (Expense). Net gain from swap contracts excluding net swap interest income (expense) decreased by $10.0 million to $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared $11.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The change was primarily due to the net gain (loss) on termination of swap contracts of $(10.8) million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 three year swap rates increased by 47 basis points and 116 basis points, respectively.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Summary. Our net income (loss) is summarized as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Investment income—Interest income
Interest Income—Agency RMBS	$	18,309,112		$	28,971,867
Interest Income—CLOs, Structured Notes & Cash Equivalents		739,608			3,373,884

Total interest income		19,048,720			32,345,751

EXPENSES:
Interest expense		2,500,567			14,820,206
Non-Investment expenses		2,976,576			2,499,270

Total expenses		5,477,143			17,319,476

Net investment income		13,571,577			15,026,275
Net gain (loss) from investments		19,422,562			(18,883,406	)

GAINS AND (LOSSES) FROM SWAP CONTRACTS:
Net swap interest income (expense)		(2,421,244	)		(3,322,503	)
Net gain (loss) on termination of swap contracts		(10,804,123	)		(29,927,526	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap contracts		13,821,700			15,566,272

Net gain (loss) from swap contracts		596,333			(17,683,757	)

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	33,590,472		$	(21,540,888	)

Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)	$	3.98		$	(3.19	)
Distributions per common share	$	1.20		$	0.66
Key Portfolio Statistics*
Average Agency RMBS⁽¹⁾	$	751,231,814		$	1,014,279,040
Average securities sold under agreement to repurchase		654,456,996			906,867,859
Average net assets		118,650,116			116,717,759
Average yield on Agency RMBS⁽²⁾		4.91	%		5.74	%
Average cost of funds & hedge⁽³⁾		1.52	%		4.02	%
Interest rate spread net of hedge⁽⁴⁾		3.39	%		1.72	%
Leverage ratio (at period end)⁽⁵⁾		5.9:1			7.5:1

⁽¹⁾	Our average Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by averaging the cost basis of our settled Agency RMBS during the period.

⁽²⁾	Our average yield on Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by dividing our interest income from Agency RMBS by our average Agency RMBS.

⁽³⁾	Our average cost of funds and hedge for the period was calculated by dividing our total interest expense, including our net swap interest income (expense), by our average securities sold under agreement to repurchase.

⁽⁴⁾	Our interest rate spread net of hedge for the period was calculated by subtracting our average cost of funds and hedge from our average yield on Agency RMBS.

⁽⁵⁾	Our leverage ratio was calculated by dividing total liabilities by net assets.

*	All percentages are annualized.

Net Investment Income. Net investment income decreased by $1.4 million to $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Net investment income consists of interest income less interest expense and non-investment expenses. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in the interest accrued on our CLOs and structured notes. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, our interest income from CLOs, structured notes and cash equivalents was $0.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively.

Interest Income. Interest income, which consists of interest income on Agency RMBS, subordinated tranches of CLOs and short term investments and other debt securities, decreased by $13.3 million to $19.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $32.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The change in interest income is primarily related to the decreased average yield on Agency RMBS and decrease in our leverage ratio. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, our average yield on Agency RMBS was 4.91% and 5.74%, respectively, and our leverage ratio at period end was 5.9 to 1 and 7.5 to 1, respectively.

Interest Expense & Net Swap Interest Income (Expense). Interest expense net of swap interest income (expense), decreased by $13.2 million to $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $18.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to the decrease in borrowing costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, our average cost of funds and hedge was 1.52% and 4.02%, respectively.

Net Gain (Loss) From Investments. Net gain from investments increased by $38.3 million to $19.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to a loss of $18.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The change was primarily due to the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments of $18.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $(14.7) million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Net Gain (Loss) From Swap Contracts Excluding Net Swap Interest Income (Expense). Net gain from swap contracts excluding net swap interest income (expense) increased by $17.4 million to $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $(14.4) million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The change was primarily due to the net loss on termination of swap contracts of $10.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $29.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 three year swap rates increased by 41 basis points and decreased by 2 basis points, respectively.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006

Summary. Our net income (loss) is summarized as follows:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006*
Investment income—Interest income⁽¹⁾	$	55,475,822		$	135,585,142		$	48,067,705
Expenses:
Interest expense		23,980,836			112,995,775			38,716,966
Non-Investment expenses		7,747,884			5,246,895			3,637,531

Total expenses		31,728,720			118,242,670			42,354,497

Net investment income		23,747,102			17,342,472			5,713,208
Net realized gain (loss) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		(34,360,594	)		(19,725,349	)		(5,752,421	)
Net gain (loss) on interest rate swap contracts⁽²⁾		(28,558,957	)		(27,304,395	)		1,005,480

Net income (loss)	$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267

Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)	$	(5.48	)	$	(4.58	)	$	0.33
Distributions per common share	$	1.32		$	3.00		$	1.98

Key Portfolio Statistics**
Average Agency RMBS⁽³⁾	$	897,714,150		$	2,147,699,675		$	890,543,418
Average securities sold under agreement to repurchase		796,027,700			2,044,976,836			832,746,432
Average net assets		110,261,494			163,990,080			83,355,831
Average yield on Agency RMBS⁽⁴⁾		5.46	%		6.03	%		5.72	%
Average cost of funds & hedge⁽⁵⁾		3.89	%		5.38	%		5.23	%
Interest rate spread net of hedge⁽⁶⁾		1.57	%		0.65	%		0.49	%
Leverage ratio (at period end)⁽⁷⁾		6.1:1			13.3:1			12.8:1

⁽¹⁾ Interest income is made up of the following components:
Interest Income—Agency RMBS	$	48,997,293		$	129,505,620		$	45,184,854
Interest Income—CLOs, Structured Notes & Cash Equivalents		6,478,529			6,079,522			2,882,851

⁽²⁾ Net gain (loss) on interest rate swap contracts is made up of the following components:
Net swap interest income (expense)	$	(6,945,012	)	$	3,001,870		$	75,267
Net realized gain (loss) on termination of swap contracts		(35,118,468	)		(3,432,742	)		64,733
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap contracts		13,504,523			(26,873,523	)		865,480

⁽³⁾	Our average investment in Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by averaging the cost basis of our settled Agency RMBS investments during the period.

⁽⁴⁾	Our average yield on Agency RMBS for the period was calculated by dividing our interest income from Agency RMBS by our average Agency RMBS.

⁽⁵⁾	Our average cost of funds and hedge for the period was calculated by dividing our total interest expense, including our net swap interest income (expense), by our average securities sold under agreement to repurchase.

⁽⁶⁾	Our interest rate spread net of hedge for the period was calculated by subtracting our average cost of funds and hedge from our average yield on Agency RMBS.

⁽⁷⁾	Our leverage ratio was calculated by dividing total liabilities by net assets.

^*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

^**	All percentages are annualized.

Net Investment Income. Net investment income increased by $6.4 million to $23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $17.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Net investment income consists of interest income less interest expense and non-investment expenses. The increase was due to the increase in spread between the interest earned on our portfolio and our borrowing costs. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the average yield on Agency RMBS was approximately 5.46% and 6.03%, respectively, and our average cost of funds and hedge was approximately 3.89% and 5.38%, respectively. As a result, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, our interest rate spread net of hedge was approximately 1.57% and 0.65%, respectively. Net investment income for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006 was $5.7 million. The increase in net investment income of $11.6 million from 2006 to 2007 was primarily related to our higher asset levels in 2007 than in 2006. For the year ended December 31, 2007, our average net assets were $164.0 million compared to $83.4 million for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

Interest Income. Interest income, which consists of interest income on Agency RMBS, subordinated tranches of CLOs and short term investments and other debt securities, decreased by $80.1 million to $55.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Interest income increased by $87.5 million to $135.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $48.1 million for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. The change in interest income is primarily related to the change in asset levels during each period. Our average net assets were $110.3 million, $164.0 million and $83.4 million for the years ended 2008, 2007 and the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

Interest Expense. Interest expense, which consists of interest expense relating to repurchase agreements, decreased by $89.0 million to $24.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to the decreased asset levels and decreased borrowing costs discussed above. Interest expense increased by $74.3 million to $113.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $38.7 million for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. The change in interest expense is primarily related to our higher asset levels in 2007 than in 2006.

Non-Investment Expenses. Non-investment expenses consist of management fees payable to our Manager in accordance with our management agreement, amortization related to restricted stock and stock options granted to our executive officers, certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to us, as designated by our Manager, and our independent directors, directors’ fees and insurance premium expenses for directors and officers insurance and other general and administrative expenses, including legal and accounting fees. For the year ended December 31, 2008, non-investment expenses totaled $7.7 million as compared to $5.2 million and $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006, respectively. The increase of $2.5 million in 2008 compared to 2007 was primarily due to expensing offering costs of $2.3 million. The increase of $1.6 million in 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily related to an increase in our management fee, which is paid as a percentage of our assets, due to our higher asset levels in 2007 than in 2006. For the year ended December 31, 2007, our average net assets were $164.0 million compared to $83.4 million for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

Net Loss from Investments. Net loss from investments increased by $15.9 million to $62.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to a loss of $47.0 and $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006, respectively. The change in 2008 as compared to 2007 was primarily due to the change in net realized losses and unrealized depreciation on investments of $34.4 million in 2008 compared to $19.7 million in 2007. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we had a net loss on interest rate swap contracts of $28.6 million compared to a loss of $27.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase in 2007 compared to 2006 was related to the realized loss of $18.3 million on the sale of investments largely in connection with deleveraging our portfolio in August 2007 to 9.2 to 1 from 12.8 to 1 at December 31, 2006, and a loss on swap contracts of $27.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

As of February 10, 2006, we had entered into a management agreement with our Manager. Pursuant to that agreement, our Manager was entitled to receive a base management fee, incentive compensation and, in certain circumstances, a termination fee and reimbursement of certain expenses as described in the management agreement. Such fees and expenses do not have fixed and determinable payments.

The base management fee under our management agreement is payable monthly in arrears in an amount equal to 1/12th of (a) 1.50% of the first $250,000,000 of our net assets, (b) 1.25% of our net assets that are greater than $250,000,000 and less than or equal to $500,000,000, and (c) 1.00% of our net assets that are greater than $500,000,000. Our Manager uses the proceeds from its management fee in part to pay compensation to its officers and employees who, notwithstanding that certain of them also are our officers, receive no cash compensation directly from us. Our Manager was eligible to receive quarterly incentive compensation in an amount equal to the product of (i) 15% of the dollar amount by which (a) average quarterly net income, before incentive compensation, for the immediately preceding four quarters per share of common stock (based on weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for such four quarters) exceeds (b) an amount equal to (1) the weighted average price per share of the common stock in our February 2006, December 2006 and May 2008 private offerings and the price per share of our common stock in any subsequent offerings by us, in each case at the time of issuance thereof multiplied by (2) the greater of (A) 2.00% and (B) 0.50% plus one-fourth of the Ten Year U.S. Treasury Rate for such quarter, multiplied by (ii) the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during such four quarters. Pursuant to that agreement, our Manager is also entitled to receive, in certain circumstances, a termination fee and reimbursement of certain expenses. These fees and expenses do not have fixed and determinable payments. We will not pay our Manager a termination fee in connection with, and our management agreement with our Manager will terminate upon, the completion of an internalization transaction.

We and our Manager agreed that our Manager no longer will be eligible to receive any incentive compensation upon completion of our initial public offering, which occurred in June 2009. In addition, our Manager agreed to waive the payment of any incentive compensation earned prior to the completion of our initial public offering. The only incentive compensation earned by our Manager to date, which was $0.2 million during 2007, was waived by our Manager.

We enter into repurchase agreements to finance some of our purchases of Agency RMBS. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had outstanding approximately $699.0 million and $587.5 million, respectively, of liabilities pursuant to repurchase agreements that had weighted-average borrowing rates of approximately 0.51% and 2.44%, respectively, and maturities of between one and 79 days and two and 20 days, respectively. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, interest payable on our repurchase agreements was $0.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively. In addition, as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had $644.3 million, $0, $378.2 million and $0, respectively, payable for securities purchased, a portion of which will be financed through repurchase agreements. Because we measure leverage as total liabilities divided by net assets, the payable for securities purchased is included in our leverage ratio. Below is a summary of our payable for securities purchased as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2007:


June 30, 2009

Forward Settling Purchases	Settle Date	Par Value		Payable
FNMA—15 Year 4.5% Fixed	7/16/2009	$	52,429,867	$	53,519,426
FNMA—15 Year 4.5% Fixed	8/18/2009		60,000,000		60,690,025
FNMA—15 Year 4.5% Fixed	9/17/2009		150,000,000		150,737,575
FNMA—5X1 4.084% Hybrid ARM	7/22/2009		25,055,082		25,662,851
FNMA—5X1 3.9% Hybrid ARM	9/23/2009		150,000,000		151,201,250
FNMA—5X1 4.03% Hybrid ARM	9/23/2009		50,000,000		50,662,201
FNMA—5X1 4.1% Hybrid ARM	9/23/2009		100,000,000		101,500,556
FNMA—5X1 4.05% Hybrid ARM	9/24/2009		50,000,000		50,330,572

		$	637,484,949	$	644,304,456

December 31, 2007



Forward Settling Purchases	Settle Date	Par Value		Payable
FHLMC—30 Year 6.5% Fixed	1/14/2008	$	247,000,000	$	253,792,500
FNMA—30 Year 5.5% Fixed	1/14/2008		125,000,000		124,394,531

		$	372,000,000	$	378,187,031

We enter into interest rate swap contracts as a means of mitigating our interest rate risk on forecasted interest expense associated with repurchase agreements for the term of the swap contract. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had the following interest rate swap contracts:

June 30, 2009


Counterparty	Expiration Date	Pay Rate		Receive Rate	Notional Amount		Fair Value
Deutsche Bank Group	April 2012	1.691	%	3-Month LIBOR	$	240,000,000	$	2,059,581
Deutsche Bank Group	June 2012	2.266	%	3-Month LIBOR		200,000,000		(741,401	)
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc	July 2012	2.125	%	3-Month LIBOR		200,000,000		—

					$	640,000,000	$	1,318,180

December 31, 2008


Counterparty	Expiration Date	Pay Rate		Receive Rate	Notional Amount		Fair Value
JPMorgan, Inc.	May 2010	5.164	%	3-Month LIBOR	$	240,000,000	$	(12,503,520	)

We enter into certain contracts that contain a variety of indemnification obligations, principally with our Manager, brokers and counterparties to interest rate swap contracts and repurchase agreements. The maximum potential future payment amount we could be required to pay under these indemnification obligations is unlimited. We have not incurred any costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification obligations. As a result, the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, we recorded no liabilities for these agreements as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 we did not maintain any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, or special purpose or variable interest entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 we had not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities or entered into any commitment or intent to provide funding to any such entities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We held cash and cash equivalents of $44.6 million, $7.2 million, $0.1 million and $1.0 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, our source of funds, excluding our February 2006 private placement, December 2006 and May 2008 private offerings and our June 2009 initial

public offering, consisted of net proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaling $699.0 million, with a weighted-average borrowing rate of 0.51%, which we used to finance the acquisition of mortgage-related assets. We expect to continue to borrow funds in the form of repurchase agreements. As of June 30, 2009, we had established 19 borrowing arrangements with various investment banking firms and other lenders, seven of which were in use. As of December 31, 2008, our source of funds, excluding our February 2006 private placement, and our December 2006 and May 2008 private offerings, consisted of net proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaling $587.5 million, with a weighted-average borrowing rate of 2.44%, which we used to finance the acquisition of mortgage-related assets. As of December 31, 2008, we had established 20 borrowing arrangements with various investment banking firms and other lenders, six of which were in use. As of December 31, 2007, our source of funds, excluding our February and December 2006 private offerings, consisted of net proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaling $1,337.6 million, with a weighted-average borrowing rate of 5.07%, which we used to finance the acquisition of mortgage-related assets. As of December 31, 2007, we had established 20 borrowing arrangements with various investment banking firms and other lenders, seven of which were in use. As of December 31, 2006, our source of funds, excluding our February and December 2006 private placements, consisted of net proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaling $2,306.3 million, with a weighted-average borrowing rate of 5.31%. As of December 31, 2006, we had established 18 borrowing arrangements with various investment banking firms and other lenders, eight of which were in use.

The following tables present certain information regarding our risk exposure on our repurchase agreements as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:

June 30, 2009


Counterparty	Amount at Risk⁽¹⁾		Weighted Average Maturity in Days
Bank of America Corp.	$	12,450,624	13
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.		12,034,409	10
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.		9,722,711	78
MF Global, Ltd.		7,561,719	66
South Street Securities LLC		4,687,457	64
Morgan Keegan & Co.		4,336,633	38
Pershing, LLC		2,434,259	16

Total	$	53,227,812

December 31, 2008


Counterparty	Amount at Risk⁽¹⁾		Weighted Average Maturity in Days
Bank of America Corp.⁽²⁾	$	13,373,003	10
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.		15,064,027	9
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.		12,893,032	6
MF Global, Ltd.		5,693,697	15
Morgan Keegan & Co.		1,271,593	5
Pershing, LLC		3,506,859	12

Total	$	51,802,211

December 31, 2007


Counterparty	Amount at Risk⁽¹⁾		Weighted Average Maturity in Days
Bank of America Corp.⁽²⁾	$	4,926,468	3
Barclays Bank PLC		2,570,922	4
JPMorgan, Inc.⁽³⁾		21,697,567	3
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.		7,536,771	4
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.		3,322,836	7
HSBC Group, Inc.		8,817,282	6
UBS AG		2,250,768	7

Total	$	51,122,614

December 31, 2006


Counterparty	Amount at Risk⁽¹⁾		Weighted Average Maturity in Days
Bank of America Corp.⁽⁴⁾	$	15,262,828	10
Barclays Bank PLC		5,122,093	9
JPMorgan, Inc.⁽³⁾		15,232,990	8
Citigroup, Inc.		1,091,845	11
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.		3,676,435	11
HSBC Group, Inc.		5,912,399	12
Lehman Brothers Inc.		4,094,507	12
Morgan Stanley, Inc.		1,561,321	11

Total	$	51,954,418

⁽¹⁾	Equal to the fair value of securities plus accrued interest income, minus the sum of securities sold under agreement to repurchase liabilities plus accrued interest expense.

⁽²⁾	Formerly Merrill Lynch & Co., acquired by Bank of America Corp., effective January 1, 2009.

⁽³⁾	Formerly Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., acquired by JPMorgan, Inc., effective May 30, 2008.

⁽⁴⁾	Formerly Countrywide Financial Corp., acquired by Bank of America Corp., effective July 1, 2008.

Our repurchase agreements do not include substantive provisions other than those covenants and other customary provisions contained in the standard master repurchase agreement as published by the Bond Market Association (now the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association). The repurchase agreements generally require us to transfer additional securities to the counterparty in the event the value of the securities then held by the counterparty in the margin account falls below specified levels and contain events of default in cases where we breach our obligations under the agreement. We receive margin calls from our repurchase agreement counterparties from time to time in the ordinary course of business similar to other entities in the specialty finance business. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had approximately $157.3 million and $40.7 million, respectively, in Agency RMBS, cash and cash equivalents available to satisfy future margin calls. To date, we have maintained sufficient liquidity to meet margin calls, and we have never been unable to satisfy a margin call, although no assurance can be given that we will be able to satisfy requests from our lenders to post additional collateral in the future.

An event of default or termination event under the standard master repurchase agreement would give our counterparty the option to terminate all repurchase transactions existing with us and make any amount due by us to the counterparty to be payable immediately.

We have made and intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions of all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income to holders of our common stock. In order to qualify as a REIT and to avoid federal corporate income tax on the income that we distribute to our stockholders, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain, on an annual basis. This requirement can impact our liquidity and capital resources.

For our short term (one year or less) and long term liquidity, we also rely on the cash flow from operations, primarily monthly principal and interest payments to be received on our Agency RMBS, as well as any primary securities offerings authorized by our board of directors.

Based on our current portfolio, leverage rate and available borrowing arrangements, we believe that our cash flow from operations and the utilization of borrowings will be sufficient to enable us to meet anticipated short term (one year or less) liquidity requirements such as to fund our investment activities, pay fees under our management agreement, fund our distributions to stockholders and for general corporate expenses. However, an increase in prepayment rates substantially above our expectations could cause a temporary liquidity shortfall due to the timing of the necessary margin calls on the financing arrangements and the actual receipt of the cash related to principal paydowns. If our cash resources are at any time insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may have to issue debt or additional equity securities or sell Agency RMBS in our portfolio. If required, the sale of Agency RMBS at prices lower than their carrying value would result in losses and reduced income. We believe that we have additional capacity through repurchase agreements to leverage our equity further should the need for additional short term (one year or less) liquidity arise.

Our ability to meet our long term (greater than one year) liquidity and capital resource requirements will be subject to obtaining additional debt financing and equity capital. This offering will increase our long term capital resources; however, we currently anticipate needing to obtain additional debt financing and equity capital. We may increase our capital resources by obtaining long term credit facilities or making public or private offerings of equity or debt securities, possibly including classes of preferred stock, common stock, commercial paper, medium-term notes, collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, collateralized mortgage obligations and senior or subordinated notes. Such financing will depend on market conditions for capital raises and for the investment of any proceeds. If we are unable to renew, replace or expand our sources of financing on substantially similar terms, it may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We generally seek to borrow (on a recourse basis) between six and 10 times the amount of our net assets. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, our total liabilities were $1,345.5 million, $603.6 million, $1,752.3 million and $2,311.5 million, respectively, which represented a leverage ratio of approximately 5.9 to 1, 6.1 to 1, 13.3 to 1 and 12.8 to 1, respectively.

Estimated REIT Taxable Income

Estimated REIT taxable income, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, is calculated according to the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, rather than GAAP. The following table reconciles GAAP net income (loss) to estimated REIT taxable income for the six months ended June 30, 2009, the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006:


	Six months ended June 30, 2009			Year ended December 31, 2008			Year ended December 31, 2007			Period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006
Net income (loss)	$	33,590,472		$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267
Net realized and unrealized loss on investments		(20,018,895	)		62,919,551			47,029,744			4,746,941
Related party management compensation		131,458			(135,460	)		(414,689	)		1,262,346
Estimated book to tax differences in CLOs		995,243			(2,107,512	)		889,410			(479,988	)
Net swap interest income (expense) and amortization of swap gain (loss)		(11,951,510	)		(17,408,690	)		2,703,441			75,268
Other		(4,018	)		2,219,331			287,996			(8,036	)

Estimated REIT taxable income before distributions		2,742,750			6,314,771			20,808,630			6,562,798
Current period distributions		(9,202,246	)		(9,474,493	)^†		(20,068,252	)*		(5,780,986	)

Current period estimated undistributed REIT taxable income	$	—		$	(3,159,722	)	$	740,378		$	781,812

Beginning estimated undistributed REIT taxable income		—			1,522,190			781,812			—
Estimated undistributed REIT taxable income 6/30/09, 12/31/08, 12/31/07 and 12/31/06, respectively	$	—		$	—		$	1,522,190		$	781,812

Minimum remaining distribution to satisfy the 90% REIT distribution requirement	$	—		$	—			—			125,532

†	Includes $1,522,190 from prior year.

*	Includes $781,812 from prior year.

The estimated undistributed taxable income at December 31, 2008 decreased by $151,908 from the amount reported in our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. This was the result of the actual amounts received from the issuers of CLOs designated as taxable income differing from the original estimates of taxable income provided by these issuers.

We believe that the presentation of our estimated REIT taxable income is useful to investors because it demonstrates to investors the minimum amount of distributions that we must make to maintain our qualification as a REIT. However, beyond our intent to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income on an annual basis in order to qualify as a REIT, we do not expect that the amount of distributions that we make will necessarily be correlated with our estimated REIT taxable income. Estimated REIT taxable income will not necessarily bear any close relation to cash flow. Accordingly, we do not consider estimated REIT taxable income to be a reliable measure of our liquidity, although the related distribution requirement can impact our liquidity and capital resources. Moreover, there are limitations associated with estimated REIT taxable income as a measure of our financial performance over any period, and our presentation of estimated REIT taxable income may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures of other companies, who may use different calculations. As a result, estimated REIT taxable income should not be considered as a substitute for our GAAP net income as a measure of our financial performance or any measure of our liquidity under GAAP.

Inflation

Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive in nature. As a result, interest rates and other factors influence our performance far more than inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and our distributions are determined by our board of directors based in part on our REIT taxable income as calculated according to the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code; in each case, our activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to fair value without considering inflation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or SFAS No. 161. SFAS No. 161 requires companies with derivative instruments to disclose information that should enable financial-statement users to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative instrument and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. Management adopted SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009 and expanded our disclosures included in our consolidated financial statements.

On October 10, 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3 (“FSP 157-3”), Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, in response to the deterioration of the credit markets. FSP 157-3 provides guidance clarifying how SFAS 157 should be applied when valuing securities in markets that are not active. The guidance provides an illustrative example that applies the objectives and framework of SFAS 157, utilizing management’s internal cash flow and discount rate assumptions when relevant observable data does not exist. It further clarifies how observable market information and market quotes should be considered when measurement date and that fair value analysis is a transactional process and should not be broadly applied to a group of assets. FSP 157-3 is effective upon issuance including prior periods for which financial statement have not been issued. FSP 157-3 does not have a material effect on the fair value of our assets as we intend to continue to hold assets that can be valued via level 1 and level 2 criteria, as defined under SFAS 157.

On April 9, 2009 the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-4 (“FSP 157-4”), Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, to provide additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. FSP 157-4 does not have a material effect on the fair value of our assets as we intend to continue to hold assets that can be valued via level 1 and level 2 criteria, as defined under SFAS 157.

Summary of Quarterly Results of Operations


	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2009		March 31, 2009
Investment Income—Interest Income	$	9,727,375	$	9,321,345
Total expenses		2,525,397		2,951,746

Net investment income		7,201,978		6,369,599
Net gain (loss) from investments		12,443,441		6,979,121
Net gain (loss) from swap contracts		930,877		(334,544	)

Net income (loss)	$	20,576,296	$	13,014,176

Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)	$	2.22	$	1.71



	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2008			September 30, 2008			June 30, 2008			March 31, 2008
Investment Income—Interest Income	$	10,498,512		$	12,631,559		$	11,720,492		$	20,625,259
Total expenses		8,280,557			6,128,687			5,338,094			11,981,382

Net investment income		2,217,955			6,502,872			6,382,398			8,643,877
Net gain (loss) from investments		(2,766,263	)		(12,710,925	)		(2,760,989	)		(16,122,417	)
Net gain (loss) from swap contracts		(8,097,703	)		(2,777,497	)		9,283,521			(26,967,278	)

Net income (loss)	$	(8,646,011	)	$	(8,985,550	)	$	12,904,930		$	(34,445,818	)

Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)	$	(1.15	)	$	(1.19	)	$	1.84		$	(5.26	)

	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2007			September 30, 2007			June 30, 2007			March 31, 2007
Investment Income—Interest Income	$	22,451,724		$	33,122,008		$	41,850,162		$	38,161,248
Total expenses		17,472,441			28,642,186			38,312,491			33,815,552

Net investment income		4,979,283			4,479,822			3,537,671			4,345,696
Net gain (loss) from investments		13,118,530			(21,651,926	)		(13,534,148	)		2,342,195
Net gain (loss) from swap contracts		(20,777,178	)		(15,895,582	)		11,760,536			(2,392,171	)

Net income (loss)	$	(2,679,365	)	$	(33,067,686	)	$	1,764,059		$	4,295,720

Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)	$	(0.41	)	$	(5.10	)	$	0.27		$	0.66

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the primary component of our market risk was interest rate risk, as described below. While we do not seek to avoid risk completely, we do believe that risk can be quantified from historical experience and seek to actively manage risk, to earn sufficient compensation to justify taking risks and to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we undertake.

Interest Rate Risk

We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our investments in Agency RMBS collateralized by ARMs, hybrid ARMs and fixed rate mortgage loans and our related debt obligations, which are generally repurchase agreements of limited duration that are periodically refinanced at current market rates. We seek to mitigate this risk through utilization of derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swap agreements.

Effect on Net Investment Income. We fund our investments in long term Agency RMBS collateralized by ARMs, hybrid ARMs and fixed rate mortgage loans with short term borrowings under repurchase agreements. During periods of rising interest rates, the borrowing costs associated with those Agency RMBS tend to increase while the income earned on such Agency RMBS (during the fixed rate component of such securities) may remain substantially unchanged. This results in a narrowing of the net interest spread between the related assets and borrowings and may even result in losses.

We are a party to the interest rate swap contracts listed below as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and 2007:

As of June 30, 2009


Counterparty	Expiration Date	Pay Rate		Receive Rate	Notional Amount		Fair Value
Deutsche Bank Group	April 2012	1.691	%	3-Month LIBOR	$	240,000,000	$	2,059,581
Deutsche Bank Group	June 2012	2.266	%	3-Month LIBOR		200,000,000		(741,401	)
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc	July 2012	2.125	%	3-Month LIBOR		200,000,000		—

					$	640,000,000	$	1,318,180

As of December 31, 2008


Counterparty	Expiration Date	Pay Rate		Receive Rate	Notional Amount		Fair Value
JPMorgan, Inc.	May 2010	5.164	%	3-Month LIBOR	$	240,000,000	$	(12,503,520	)

As of December 31, 2007


Counterparty	Expiration Date	Pay Rate		Receive Rate	Notional Amount		Fair Value
JPMorgan, Inc.	May 2010	5.164	%	3-Month LIBOR	$	240,000,000	$	(7,120,645	)
JPMorgan, Inc.	June 2010	5.430	%	3-Month LIBOR		160,000,000		(5,899,716	)
JPMorgan, Inc.	October 2010	4.890	%	3-Month LIBOR		225,000,000		(5,847,328	)
JPMorgan, Inc.	October 2010	4.905	%	3-Month LIBOR		140,000,000		(3,693,997	)
JPMorgan, Inc.	October 2012	4.807	%	3-Month LIBOR		125,000,000		(3,446,357	)

					$	890,000,000	$	(26,008,043	)

Hedging techniques are partly based on assumed levels of prepayments of our Agency RMBS. If prepayments are slower or faster than assumed, the life of the Agency RMBS will be longer or shorter, which would reduce the effectiveness of any hedging strategies we may use and may cause losses on such transactions.

We invest in Agency RMBS collateralized by ARMs which are based on mortgages whose coupon rates reset monthly based on the MTA. However, our borrowing costs pursuant to our repurchase agreements are generally based on one month LIBOR, which may change more quickly than the MTA index. Hence, in a rapidly rising interest rate environment, we would expect our net interest margin to decrease, temporarily. In a falling interest rate environment, we would expect our net interest margin to rise. For a discussion of the effects of interest rate changes on our Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs and fixed-rate mortgages, see “—Extension Risk.”

Effect on Fair Value. Another component of interest rate risk is the effect changes in interest rates will have on the fair value of our assets. We face the risk that the fair value of our assets will increase or decrease at different rates than that of our liabilities, including our hedging instruments.

We primarily assess our interest rate risk by estimating the duration of our assets and the duration of our liabilities. Duration essentially measures the market price volatility of financial instruments as interest rates change. We generally calculate duration using various third-party financial models and empirical data. Different models and methodologies can produce different duration numbers for the same securities.

Extension Risk. We invest in Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs, which have interest rates that are fixed for the first few years of the loan (typically three, five, seven or 10 years) and thereafter reset periodically on the same basis as Agency RMBS collateralized by ARMs. We compute the projected weighted-average life of our Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs based on assumptions regarding the rate at which the borrowers will prepay the underlying mortgages. In general, when Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate or hybrid ARMs is acquired with borrowings, we may, but are not required to, enter into an interest rate swap agreement or other hedging instrument that effectively fixes our borrowing costs for a period close to the anticipated weighted-average life of the fixed rate portion of the related Agency RMBS. This strategy is designed to protect us from rising interest rates by fixing our borrowing costs for the duration of the fixed rate period of the collateral underlying the related Agency RMBS.

We have structured our swaps to expire in conjunction with the estimated weighted average life of the fixed period of the mortgages underlying our Agency RMBS portfolio. However, in a rising interest rate environment, the weighted average life of the fixed rate mortgages underlying our Agency RMBS could extend beyond the term of the swap agreement or other hedging instrument. This could have a negative impact on our results from operations, as borrowing costs would no longer be fixed after the term of the hedging instrument while the income earned on the remaining Agency RMBS would remain fixed for a period of time. This situation may also cause the market value of our Agency RMBS to decline, with little or no offsetting gain from the related hedging transactions. In extreme situations, we may be forced to sell assets to maintain adequate liquidity, which could cause us to incur losses.

Interest Rate Cap Risk. Both the ARMs and hybrid ARMs that collateralize our Agency RMBS are typically subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps and floors, which limit the amount by which the security’s interest yield may change during any given period. However, our borrowing costs will not be subject to similar restrictions. Therefore, in a period of increasing interest rates, the interest costs on our borrowings could increase without limitation by caps, while the interest-rate yields on our Agency RMBS would effectively be limited by caps. This problem will be magnified to the extent that we acquire Agency RMBS that are collateralized by hybrid ARMs that are not fully indexed. In addition, the underlying mortgages may be subject to periodic payment caps that result in some portion of the interest being deferred and added to the principal outstanding. This could result in our receipt of less cash income on our Agency RMBS than we need in order to pay the interest cost on our related borrowings. These factors could lower our net investment income or cause a net loss during periods of rising interest rates, which would harm our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Interest Rate Mismatch Risk. We intend to fund a substantial portion of our acquisitions of Agency RMBS with borrowings that, after the effect of hedging, have interest rates based on indices and repricing terms similar to, but of somewhat shorter maturities than, the interest rate indices and repricing terms of the Agency RMBS. Thus, we anticipate that in most cases the interest rate indices and repricing terms of our Agency RMBS and our funding sources will not be identical, thereby creating an interest rate mismatch between assets and liabilities. Therefore, our cost of funds would likely rise or fall more quickly than would our earnings rate on assets. During periods of changing interest rates, such interest rate mismatches could negatively impact our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. To mitigate interest rate mismatches, we may utilize the hedging strategies discussed above.

Our analysis of risks is based on our Manager’s experience, estimates, models and assumptions. These analyses rely on models which utilize estimates of fair value and interest rate sensitivity. Actual economic conditions or implementation of investment decisions by our management may produce results that differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used in our models and the projected results reflected herein.

Prepayment Risk

Prepayments are the full or partial repayment of principal prior to the original contractual maturity of a mortgage loan and typically occur due to refinancing of mortgage loans. Prepayment rates for existing Agency RMBS generally increase when prevailing mortgage interest rates fall. In addition, prepayment rates on Agency RMBS collateralized by ARMs and hybrid ARMs generally increase when the difference between long term and short term interest rates declines or becomes negative. Some ARMs underlying our Agency RMBS may bear initial teaser mortgage interest rates that are lower than their fully-indexed rates, which refers to the applicable index rates plus a margin. In the event that such an ARM is prepaid prior to or soon after the time of adjustment to a fully-indexed rate, the holder of the related Agency RMBS would have held such security while it was less profitable and lost the opportunity to receive interest at the fully-indexed rate over the expected life of the Agency RMBS. We currently do not own any Agency RMBS collateralized by ARMs with teaser mortgage interest rates. Additionally, we currently own Agency RMBS that were purchased at a premium. The prepayment of such Agency RMBS at a rate faster than anticipated would result in a write-off of any remaining capitalized premium amount.

Effect on Market Value and Net Investment Income

Another component of interest rate risk is the effect changes in interest rates will have on the market value of our assets and our net investment income. We face the risk that the market value of our assets and net investment income will increase or decrease at different rates than that of our liabilities, including our hedging instruments.

We primarily assess our interest rate risk by estimating the duration of our assets and the duration of our liabilities. Duration essentially measures the market price volatility of financial instruments as interest rates change. We generally calculate duration using various financial models and empirical data. Different models and methodologies can produce different duration numbers for the same securities.

The following sensitivity analysis table shows the estimated impact on the market value and net investment income of our interest rate-sensitive investments and repurchase agreement liabilities at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and 2007, assuming a static portfolio and that rates instantaneously fall 25, 50 and 75 basis points and rise 25, 50 and 75 basis points.

June 30, 2009


Change in Interest Rates	Projected Change in the Market Value of Our Assets		Projected Change in Our Net Investment Income
- 75 basis points	0.74	%	2.96	%
- 50 basis points	0.58	%	2.12	%
- 25 basis points	0.38	%	1.41	%
No Change	0.00	%	0.00	%
+ 25 basis points	-0.25	%	-3.53	%
+ 50 basis points	-0.65	%	-7.07	%
+ 75 basis points	-1.11	%	-10.60	%

December 31, 2008


Change in Interest Rates	Projected Change in the Market Value of Our Assets		Projected Change in Our Net Investment Income
- 75 basis points	0.45	%	9.15	%
- 50 basis points	0.29	%	6.29	%
- 25 basis points	0.14	%	3.25	%
No Change	0.00	%	0.00	%
+ 25 basis points	-0.25	%	-3.47	%
+ 50 basis points	-0.35	%	-7.19	%
+ 75 basis points	-0.61	%	-11.19	%

December 31, 2007


Change in Interest Rates	Projected Change in the Market Value of Our Assets		Projected Change in Our Net Investment Income
- 75 basis points	0.86	%	12.10	%
- 50 basis points	0.64	%	8.03	%
- 25 basis points	0.37	%	3.95	%
No Change	0.00	%	0.00	%
+ 25 basis points	-0.34	%	-4.20	%
+ 50 basis points	-0.81	%	-8.28	%
+ 75 basis points	-1.34	%	-12.36	%

While the charts above reflect the estimated immediate impact of interest rate increases and decreases on a static portfolio, we rebalance our portfolio from time to time either to take advantage or minimize the impact of changes in interest rates. Additionally, the effects of interest rate changes on our portfolio illustrated in the above chart does not take into account the effect that our hedging instruments, mainly interest rate swaps, would have on the market value of our portfolio, but does take into account the effect that our hedging instruments, mainly interest rate swaps, would have on our net investment income. Generally, our interest rate swaps reset in the quarter following changes in interest rates. It is important to note that the impact of changing interest rates on market value and net investment income can change significantly when interest rates change beyond 75 basis points from current levels. Therefore, the volatility in the market value of our assets could increase significantly when interest rates change beyond 75 basis points. In addition, other factors impact the market value of and net investment income from our interest rate-sensitive investments and hedging instruments, such as the shape of the yield curve, market expectations as to future interest rate changes and other market conditions. Accordingly, in the event of changes in actual interest rates, the change in the market value of our assets and our net investment income would likely differ from that shown above, and such difference might be material and adverse to our stockholders.

Risk Management

Our board of directors exercises its oversight of risk management principally through its Risk Management Committee. The Risk Management Committee oversees our senior management’s and our Manager’s risk-related responsibilities, including reviewing management policies and performance against these policies and related benchmarks.

Our Manager seeks to mitigate our liquidity risks by monitoring our liquidity position on a daily basis and maintaining a prudent level of leverage, which we currently consider to be between 6 and 10 times the amount of net assets in our overall portfolio, based on current market conditions and various other factors, including the health of the financial institutions that lend to us under our repurchase agreements and the presence of special liquidity programs provided by domestic and foreign central banks. As of June 30, 2009, our portfolio was leveraged (as measured by total liabilities to net assets) approximately 5.9 to 1. To date, we have been able to satisfy all margin call requirements of our repurchase agreement counterparties.

BUSINESS

Our Company

We are a specialty finance company created with the objective of achieving consistent risk-adjusted investment income. We are currently managed and advised by Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC. We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We completed our initial private equity offering in February 2006 and two additional private equity offerings in December 2006 and May 2008, raising net proceeds of $78.0 million, $105.8 million and $14.0 million, respectively. In June 2009, we completed our initial public offering of common stock, raising net proceeds of approximately $105.8 million. Our strategy is to invest exclusively in Agency RMBS, which comprised approximately 99.8% of the approximately $1,519.7 million of assets in our portfolio as of June 30, 2009. A small portion of our current total assets consist of subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes, the fair values of which in the aggregate comprised approximately 0.2% of the assets in our portfolio as of June 30, 2009.

We conduct all of our business through and hold all of our assets in Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. We currently have one TRS, Sharpridge TRS, Inc., which holds a 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in Sharpridge but does not conduct any other business.

Our Portfolio

Agency RMBS are whole-pool residential mortgage pass-through securities, the principal and interest of which is guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae. As of June 30, 2009, our mortgage portfolio consisted of $155.3 million of Agency RMBS backed by monthly reset ARMs. The underlying mortgages in these securities have prepayment penalties and coupon rates that reset monthly based on the twelve-month moving average of the one-year constant maturity U.S. Treasury rate. As of June 30, 2009, we also held $928.0 million of Agency RMBS backed by three-, five- and seven-year hybrid ARMs that have a fixed coupon for three, five and seven years, respectively, and then pay an adjustable coupon that resets annually. As of June 30, 2009, we also held $433.6 million of Agency RMBS backed by fixed rate mortgages. We also held $0.3 million of structured notes as of June 30, 2009, where the underlying collateral consisted of non-Agency residential mortgages. Lastly, as of June 30, 2009, we held $2.5 million of CLO equity where the underlying collateral consisted of secured corporate debt. In 2008, our board of directors amended our current investment guidelines to require that we seek to dispose of our CLOs and structured notes at reasonable prices. We are not required, however, to sell these securities. During 2008, we sold one CLO for approximately $1.1 million and did not sell any structured notes. We have not sold any CLOs or structured notes during 2009. We continue to monitor the market for selling the remaining portion of our CLOs and structured notes; however, we may not be able to sell these assets for a reasonable price for some time given the currently depressed prices for these assets. As of August 31, 2009, our cash and other reserves consisted of cash and Agency RMBS.

The following table is our portfolio as of June 30, 2009:

Fixed Income Securities—100.0%^(d)


	Face Amount		Fair Value
Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS—99.8%^(d)
Fannie Mae Pools—88.3%^(d)
3.713%, due 12/1/2038^(b)	$	10,085,815	$	10,228,435
3.73%, due 5/1/2034^(a)^(b)		8,220,228		8,461,697
3.778%, due 4/1/2036^(a)^(b)		42,875,886		43,894,188
3.78%, due 6/1/2036^(a)^(b)		35,834,597		36,685,668
3.783%, due 10/1/2036^(a)(b)		35,789,274		36,639,269
3.784%, due 7/1/2036^(a)(b)		37,250,529		38,135,230
3.9%, due 9/1/2039^(b)		150,000,000		152,062,500
4.03%, due 9/1/2039^(b)		50,000,000		50,797,000
4.05%, due 9/1/2039^(b)		50,000,000		50,812,500
4.084%, due 12/1/2038^(b)		25,055,082		25,626,651
4.092%, due 8/1/2033^(a)(b)		7,618,155		7,843,128
4.1%, due 9/1/2039^(b)		100,000,000		101,750,000
4.421%, due 8/1/2037^(a)(b)		27,069,442		27,813,852
4.5%, due 1/1/2035^(a)(b)		38,148,820		39,245,599
4.5%, due 5/1/2024		17,708,222		18,078,988
4.5%, due 6/1/2024		34,721,645		35,448,629
4.5%, due 6/1/2024		22,763,569		23,240,181
4.5%, due 6/1/2024		28,420,707		29,015,765
4.5%, due 8/1/2024		60,000,000		61,040,625
4.5%, due 9/1/2024		150,000,000		152,039,063
4.56%, due 4/1/2035^(a)(b)		11,180,441		11,557,781
4.634%, due 3/1/2034^(a)(b)		43,674,161		44,957,089
4.759%, due 9/1/2034^(a)(b)		30,215,126		30,979,946
5.272%, due 3/1/2038^(a)(b)		29,936,095		31,329,995
5.5%, due 9/1/2023^(a)		57,078,411		59,718,287
5.587%, due 11/1/2037^(a)(b)		7,916,282		8,318,590
5.874%, due 8/1/2037^(a)(b)		54,143,586		57,066,494
5.945%, due 11/1/2036^(a)(b)		34,478,147		36,259,967
5.976%, due 12/1/2036^(a)(b)		36,890,557		38,875,269
6%, due 4/1/2038^(a)		27,640,794		28,880,311
6%, due 5/1/2037^(a)		16,030,841		16,647,027
6.108%, due 5/1/2037^(a)(b)		26,746,143		28,284,046

Total Fannie Mae Pools				1,341,733,770

Freddie Mac Pools—11.5%^(d)
4.176%, due 4/1/2035^(a)(b)		11,880,289		12,221,847
4.795%, due 12/1/2038^(a)(b)		13,226,638		13,730,904
4.985%, due 5/1/2038^(a)(b)		46,648,957		48,580,516
5.5%, due 9/1/2023^(a)		9,025,369		9,434,331
5.782%, due 11/1/2036^(a)(b)		43,287,185		45,377,144
5.958%, due 1/1/2036^(a)(b)		4,903,416		5,085,762
5.979%, due 10/1/2037^(a)(b)		38,601,910		40,682,794

Total Freddie Mac Pools				175,113,298

Total Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS (cost—$1,494,233,822)				1,516,847,068


	Face Amount		Fair Value
Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities—0.2%^(d)
AMMC CLO V, LTD^(c)(e)	$	2,249,000	$	89,960
AMMC CLO VII, LTD^(c)(e)		3,900,000		39,000
ARES VIR CLO, LTD^(c)(e)		3,775,000		151,000
AVENUE CLO V, LTD^(c)(e)		2,000,000		20,000
BALLYROCK CLO 2006-2, LTD^(c)(e)		4,270,000		21,350
CARLYLE HIGH YIELD PARTNERS VIII, LTD^(c)(e)		3,000,000		30,000
EATON VANCE CDO IX, LTD^(c)(e)		2,500,000		100,000
FLAGSHIP CLO V, LTD^(c)		3,750,000		18,750
PRIMUS CLO I, LTD^(c)(e)		2,500,000		75,000
START III CLO, LTD^(c)		3,000,000		1,965,000
TRIMARAN CLO VII, LTD^(c)		2,000,000		10,000

Total Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities (cost—$28,122,553)				2,520,060

Structured Notes—0.0%^(d)
RESIX 2006-B B9, 6.319%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		1,855,529		74,221
RESIX 2006-B B10, 7.819%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		1,855,529		58,820
RESIX 2006-C B11, 7.569%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		992,934		24,923
RESIX 2007-A B11, 6.819%, due 2/15/2039^(b)(c)		4,427,360		66,410
RESIX 2007-B B11, 8.819%, due 4/15/2039^(b)(c)		3,511,244		115,169

Total Structured Notes (cost—$12,648,687)				339,543

Total Investment in Securities (cost—$1,535,005,062)			$	1,519,706,671


	Notional Amount		Fair Value
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Interest Rate Swap Contracts—0.1%^(d)
April 2012 Expiration, Pay Rate 1.691%, Receive Rate 3-month LIBOR	$	240,000,000	$	2,059,581
June 2012 Expiration, Pay Rate 2.266%, Receive Rate 3-month LIBOR		200,000,000		(741,401	)
July 2012 Expiration, Pay Rate 2.125%, Receive Rate 3-month LIBOR		200,000,000		—

Total Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Interest Rate Swap Contracts (cost—$0)			$	1,318,180

Investment in Affiliate—
Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.^(f)			$	—

LEGEND

^(a)	Securities or a portion of the securities are pledged as collateral for securities sold under agreement to repurchase or interest rate swap contracts.

^(b)	The coupon rate shown on floating or adjustable rate securities represents the rate at June 30, 2009.

^(c)

Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may only be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At June 30, 2009, the value of these securities amounted to $2,859,603 or 0.2% of total investments.

^(d)	Percentage of total investments.

^(e)	Non-income producing security—issuer has missed last payment.

^(f)	19% non-voting limited partnership interest, no value has been ascribed.

Subordinated Tranches of CLOs. A small portion of our total assets are subordinated tranches, which include non-investment grade and unrated tranches, of CLOs that we acquired in the secondary market and selected primary issuances. Currently all of our investments in this asset class are in CLOs collateralized primarily by corporate leveraged loans and to a lesser extent by corporate debt securities, some of which are non-investment grade.

Most of the corporate leveraged loans and corporate debt securities which collateralize the CLOs in which we have invested have an explicit rating from one or more nationally recognized statistical rating agencies. The majority of these leveraged loans and corporate debt securities are considered “non-investment grade” due to their rating of between Ba1 and B3 by Moody’s Investors Services, Inc., or Moody’s, and between BB+ and B- by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service, or Standard & Poor’s. We have not leveraged, nor do we intend to leverage our investments in subordinated tranches of CLOs.

Structured Notes. Structured notes are securities packaged and issued by major financial institutions. The notes have some similar characteristics to a plain debt instrument such as commercial paper, medium-term notes, or certificates of deposit, or CDs. Instead of paying a fixed interest rate over time and repaying par at maturity, structured notes index the coupon, the principal, or both to virtually anything with a trading market. The indexing may be to a designated mortgage pool, interest rate spreads, stock market indices or the price of a security completely unrelated to the transaction. We have not leveraged, nor do we intend to leverage, our investments in structured notes.

TBA Contracts. We have utilized, and may utilize in the future, TBAs in order to invest in Agency RMBS. Pursuant to these TBAs, we agree to purchase, for future delivery, Agency RMBS with certain principal and interest terms and certain types of underlying collateral, but the particular Agency RMBS to be delivered is not identified until shortly before the TBA settlement date.

Our Manager

General. We are currently externally managed and advised by Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC, a joint venture between affiliates of The Cypress Group and Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P., pursuant to a management agreement. Our Manager was formed in Delaware in January 2006. All of our executive officers are employees of Sharpridge. The executive offices of our Manager are located at 65 East 55th Street, New York, NY 10022 and the telephone number of our Manager’s executive offices is (212) 705-0160.

Pursuant to the terms of the management agreement, our Manager provides us with our management team, including a chief executive officer and chief financial officer (each of whom also serves as an officer of our Manager), along with appropriate support personnel. Our Manager is responsible for our operations and performs all services and activities relating to the management of our assets and operations. Our Manager is at all times subject to the supervision and oversight of our board of directors and has only such functions and authority as we delegate to it. Our Manager has access to the employees and other resources of both Sharpridge and Cypress on a non-exclusive basis. Our Manager does not provide management services to any other entities, and it has agreed that it and any entity controlled or under common control by it will refrain from raising, advising or sponsoring any new REIT that invests primarily in domestic MBS without the prior approval of the independent members of our board of directors; provided, however, that a portfolio company of any private equity fund controlled by Cypress shall be deemed not to be an entity under common control with our Manager for this purpose.

We do not have any employees of our own, and we do not pay any of our officers’ cash compensation. Instead, we pay our Manager a base management fee pursuant to the terms of the management agreement and reimburse certain expenses of our Manager and its sub-advisors.

stockholders, we intend to complete an internalization transaction no later than March 31, 2010. As part of our efforts to accomplish our goals, we amended our management agreement so that we no longer pay our Manager any incentive compensation and the management fee percentage is reduced as our net assets increase. Our board of directors, our Manager and its sub-advisors have been analyzing with counsel and other advisors various structures to further accomplish the goals of an internalization transaction. We have not yet determined the most effective method or structure to accomplish the goals of an internalization transaction described above. We continue to analyze various transaction structures that would result in our management and operations being conducted by employees of our Company or a wholly-owned subsidiary. However, based on our analysis since the completion of our initial public offering in June 2009, it is possible that such a structure could result in increased operating expenses and significant business disruption due to various legal, tax and operational considerations. As a result, in order to realize the goals of an internalization transaction we also are reviewing structures pursuant to which we may maintain and amend our relationship with our Manager and its sub-advisors. Ultimately, to complete an internalization transaction that is in the best interests of our stockholders, our independent directors, our Manager and its sub-advisors will have to negotiate and reach mutually acceptable agreements. Finalization of these agreements is subject to the resolution of various regulatory, legal and tax considerations for all of the interested parties. Completing appropriate due diligence and negotiating the applicable agreements is likely to be time consuming and complex. We will not pay a termination fee to our Manager under the management agreement if an internalization transaction is completed, and do not expect that we will pay consideration that exceeds $750,000 if the internalization transaction ultimately provides for any such consideration to be paid by us. We cannot assure you that we will be able to complete an internalization transaction, or when or on what terms it may be completed, including the amount of consideration we may be required to pay to our Manager or its sub-advisors.

Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.

Sharpridge was founded in January 2005 by Kevin E. Grant, our chief executive officer and president and the chairman of the board of directors. Mr. Grant is the sole member of the general partner of Sharpridge. Sharpridge owns an interest in and serves as the primary sub-advisor to our Manager, overseeing all of our day-to-day operations and actively managing our investment portfolio. As of September 30, 2009, Sharpridge had nine employees. As of June 30, 2009, Sharpridge had approximately $1,519.7 million of total portfolio assets under management, all of which consisted of our assets.

Prior to founding Sharpridge, Mr. Grant was a senior portfolio manager and a member of the Aggregate Bond Team at Fidelity Investments, with direct responsibility for over $25 billion of fixed income assets across 19 separate accounts. At Fidelity, Mr. Grant invested in many types of fixed income investments, ranging from government bonds to below investment grade corporate securities. Over the course of his career at Fidelity, Mr. Grant had responsibility for managing fixed income funds including Fidelity’s Mortgage Securities Fund, Investment Grade Bond Fund, Intermediate Bond Fund, Total Bond Fund, and Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund. In addition, Mr. Grant had responsibility for the fixed income component of certain Fidelity balanced funds, including the Strategic Income Fund, Puritan Fund and Fidelity Balanced Fund. Mr. Grant also managed separate accounts for pension plan sponsors, insurance companies and other institutional clients.

Ownership of Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.

Concurrent with our initial capitalization, we acquired a 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in Sharpridge, which is held by our wholly-owned domestic TRS, Sharpridge TRS, Inc. Our 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in Sharpridge entitles us to receive distributions and allocations at the close of each accounting period (as defined in the Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P. limited partnership agreement) based on our percentage interest, excluding amounts attributable to Sharpridge’s invested capital. Under the terms of the Sharpridge limited partnership agreement, our interest in Sharpridge may not be transferred without the prior written consent of the Sharpridge general partner. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure—We may not realize a return on the 19% non-voting limited partnership interest that we hold in Sharpridge.”

The Cypress Group

Cypress, founded in 1994, owns an interest in and serves as a sub-advisor to our Manager. Cypress is a financial sponsor of leveraged buyouts and other private equity transactions for growth-oriented, middle-market companies. Cypress is organized by industry sector, focusing on the financial services, healthcare, consumer, general industrial, automotive, aerospace, media and leisure industries. Since 1989, Cypress professionals have invested over $4 billion of equity capital in 32 separate investments with an aggregate transaction value of over $22 billion. Cypress professionals have led private equity investments in companies including Affinia Group Inc., Catlin Group Limited, Cinemark USA, Inc., Communications & Power Industries, Inc., Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc., Financial Guaranty Insurance Corporation, Illinois Central Corporation, Infinity Broadcasting Corporation, K&F Industries, Inc., Lear Corporation, Loral Corporation, The Meow Mix Company, Montpelier Re Holdings, Ltd., Parisian, Inc., R.P. Scherer Corporation, Scottish Re Group Limited, WESCO International, Inc. and Williams Scotsman, Inc. As of September 30, 2009, Cypress had 13 employees.

Competitive Strengths

We believe that our competitive strengths include:

Focused Investment Strategy

We believe our investment strategy of acquiring Agency RMBS exclusively, combined with our financing strategy, will provide our stockholders with attractive risk-adjusted investment income. We further believe our defined investment strategy allows our Manager to focus on interest rate risk management rather than credit risk management and utilize its expertise in this area. We also believe our investment strategy provides us with opportunities to generate stable investment income without incurring material credit risk even when the spread between long term interest rates and short term interest rates is relatively narrow and mortgage default rates are increasing.

Existing Funding Relationships

Experienced Manager and Ability to Navigate Through Different Market Environments

Our Manager’s investment team has experience managing assets through the various interest rate and credit cycles since the early 1980s, and has the proven ability to generate risk-adjusted investment income in various interest rate and credit environments. We believe that our Manager’s experienced investment team provides us with a competitive advantage relative to companies that have management teams with less experience. Our Chief Executive Officer, Kevin E. Grant, was a senior portfolio manager and member of the Aggregate Bond Team at Fidelity Investments from 1993 to 2005, where he was responsible, both directly and indirectly, for the management of fixed income assets including the Mortgage Securities Fund, the Investment Grade Bond Fund, the Total Bond Fund, the fixed income portion of the Fidelity Puritan Fund and the Strategic Income Fund. Our Manager’s investment team consists of highly experienced fixed income portfolio managers who average more than 20 years of experience in the fields of MBS, structured finance and corporate finance, providing us with significant experience in key areas of our business. Each member of our management team has a demonstrated track record in his or her relevant area of responsibility.

Investment Committee and Board of Directors with Significant Relevant Experience

financial advisory services. The members of our Manager’s investment committee, which provides oversight to our investing activities, have on average approximately 30 years of investing experience in both the debt and equity markets. In addition, members of our Manager’s investment committee and our board of directors have significant experience in risk management for financial services companies and investment portfolios.

Strong Alignment of Interests

Affiliation with The Cypress Group

Our Investment Strategy

We invest exclusively in Agency RMBS collateralized by either adjustable-rate single-family residential mortgage loans, or ARMs, with interest rates that reset monthly, hybrid ARMs that typically have a coupon rate that is fixed for an initial period (typically three, five seven or ten years) and thereafter resets at regular intervals, or fixed rate single-family residential mortgage loans. We rely on our Manager’s expertise in identifying Agency RMBS for investment. Our Manager makes investment decisions based on various factors, including, but not limited to, relative value, expected cash yield and supply and demand, costs of hedging, costs of financing, liquidity, expected future interest rate volatility and the overall shape of the U.S. Treasury and interest rate swap yield curves. We do not attribute any particular quantitative significance to any of these factors, and the weight we give to these factors when we consider these types of investments is likely to vary depending on market conditions and economic trends. We believe that this strategy, combined with our Manager’s experience, will enable us to pay dividends and achieve capital appreciation throughout changing interest rate and credit cycles, and provide attractive long term returns to investors.

Our investment strategy is designed to:

build an investment portfolio consisting exclusively of Agency RMBS that seeks to generate attractive risk-adjusted investment income;

manage financing, interest and prepayment rate risks;

capitalize on discrepancies in the relative valuations in the Agency RMBS market;

manage cash flow so as to provide for regular quarterly distributions to stockholders;

limit credit risk;

minimize the impact that changing interest rates have on our net investment income;

cause us to qualify as a REIT; and

cause us to remain exempt from the registration requirements of the Investment Company Act.

We believe that the current market and interest rate environment offer significant investment opportunities and that our investment strategy is suited to this environment because:

the current relative spread differential between Agency RMBS and U.S. Treasury securities is attractive; and

Because our investments vary in interest rate, prepayment speed and maturity, the leverage or borrowings that we employ to fund our asset purchases are not exactly matched to the terms or performance of our assets. Based on our experience, because our assets are not match funded, such assets’ market prices change more slowly than the corresponding liabilities. Consequently, changes in interest rates, particularly short term interest rates, may significantly influence our net income. Decreases in these rates will tend to increase our net income and the market value of our assets. Increases in these rates will tend to decrease our net income and the market value of our assets and could possibly result in operating losses. Our approach to managing our investment portfolio is to take a longer term view of assets and liabilities, such that our net income and mark-to-market valuations at the end of a financial reporting period will not significantly influence our strategy of maximizing cash distributions to stockholders and achieving capital appreciation over the long term.

Investment Sourcing

Our Manager sources the majority of our investments through its relationships with a large and diverse group of financial intermediaries, ranging from major commercial and investment banks to specialty investment dealers and brokerage firms.

Investment Process

Our Manager evaluates each one of our investment opportunities based on its expected risk-adjusted investment income relative to the investment income available from other, comparable investments. In addition, we evaluate new opportunities based on their relative expected returns compared to our comparable securities held in our portfolio. The terms of any leverage available to us for use in funding an investment purchase are also taken into consideration, as are any risks posed by illiquidity or correlations with other securities in the portfolio.

The key steps of our investment process are summarized below:

allocation of our capital to the attractive types of Agency RMBS;

review of asset allocation plan for overall risk management and diversification;

research and selection of individual securities and financing (leverage) strategies;

active portfolio monitoring within asset classes, together with ongoing risk management (hedging) and periodic rebalancing, to maximize total returns; and

consideration of the impact on maintaining our REIT qualification and our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act.

Financing Strategy

We use leverage in order to finance certain of our Agency RMBS assets and to seek to increase potential returns to our stockholders. Our use of leverage may, however, also have the effect of increasing losses when securities in our portfolio decline in value. Our target leverage is in the range of approximately 6 to 10 times the amount of our equity. The amount of leverage we incur may vary from time to time depending on market conditions and other factors that our Manager deems relevant. Our investment policies require no minimum or maximum leverage and our Manager and its investment committee have the discretion, without the need for further approval by our board of directors, to increase or decrease the amount of leverage employed. As of June 30, 2009, our portfolio was leveraged (as measured by total liabilities to net assets) approximately 5.9 to 1.

We currently and intend to continue to finance our Agency RMBS investments on a non-term financing basis using a diversified approach involving repurchase agreements with multiple commercial and investment banks. Using repurchase agreements, we are able to borrow against the value of our assets. Under these agreements, we sell our assets to a counterparty and agree to repurchase the same assets from the counterparty at a price equal to the original sales price plus an interest factor. If the market value of the securities sold by us to a counterparty declines in value, we may be required by the counterparty to provide additional collateral, which is commonly referred to as a margin call. These repurchase agreements are accounted for as debt for purposes of GAAP and secured by the underlying assets. During the period of a repurchase agreement, we earn the principal and interest on the related assets.

Our repurchase agreement counterparties are commercial and investment banks with whom we have or expect to have agreements in place that cover the terms of our transactions. We maintain formal relationships with multiple counterparties for the purpose of obtaining financing on favorable terms. As of June 30, 2009, we had repurchase agreements in place with 19 different counterparties with aggregate indebtedness outstanding of approximately $699.0 million, or approximately 46% of the fair value of our portfolio, and a weighted average borrowing rate of 0.51%. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Trends and Recent Market Impacts.” Currently, the haircuts are 5% to 10% on Agency RMBS for the repurchase agreements under which we are currently borrowing. As a borrower, we are subject to margin calls from counterparties if the value of the collateral that we have posted has declined below the haircut level, which may occur due to prepayments of the mortgages causing the face value of the mortgage pool provided as collateral to the counterparty to decline or when the value of the mortgage pool provided as collateral declines as a result of interest rate movements or spread widening.

Our leverage consists solely of short term borrowings in the repurchase market, but we may utilize other financing techniques in the future such as direct corporate borrowings of secured or unsecured debt, issuances of preferred stock and trust preferred securities, as well as various other techniques.

We do not currently and we do not intend to finance our subordinated tranches of CLOs. We believe investments of this type are intrinsically leveraged on a term basis primarily through the issuance of match-funded non-recourse debt specific to each individual transaction.

Hedging Strategy

Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, we utilize derivative financial instruments to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk associated with the financing of our portfolio. Our most common method of financing Agency RMBS is through term repurchase agreements, which generally have maturities up to 30 days. The weighted average life of the Agency RMBS we own is generally much longer. The difference in maturities, in addition to prepayments, adjustable-rate features of ARMs, and other potential changes in timing and/or amount of cash flows, creates potential interest rate risk. We engage in interest rate hedging activities intended to mitigate changes in interest rates that we expect would impair our ability to continue to finance assets we own at favorable rates. Our interest rate hedging methods have historically consisted of interest rate swaps (a contract exchanging a variable rate for a fixed rate, or vice versa) and in the future may include:

interest rate swaps;

interest rate caps (a contract protecting against a rise in interest rates above a fixed level);

interest rate floors (a contract protecting against a decline in interest rates below a fixed level);

interest rate collars (a combination of caps and floors);

cancelable interest rate swaps (swaps that may be canceled at one party’s option before expiry);

Eurobond and U.S. Treasury futures; and

other interest rate and non-interest rate derivative instruments or contracts.

Because the term of our repurchase agreement financing almost always is shorter than the expected average maturity of our mortgage portfolio, we attempt to mitigate risks arising from our refinancing needs using some or all of the techniques listed above. These techniques may also be used in an attempt to protect us against declines in the market value of our assets that result from general trends in debt markets.

Historically, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to offset the potential adverse effects of rising interest rates on certain short term repurchase agreements. Our repurchase agreements generally have maturities of approximately 30 days and carry interest rates that correspond to LIBOR rates for those same periods. Historically, we have sought to enter into interest rate swap agreements structured such that we receive payments based on a variable interest rate and make payments based on a fixed interest rate. The variable interest rate on which payments are received is calculated based on various reset mechanisms for LIBOR. The swap agreements effectively fix our borrowing cost and are not held for speculative or trading purposes. As of June 30, 2009, of the approximately $699.0 million of our portfolio that has been financed under repurchase agreements, we had established interest rate swap agreements covering $640.0 million, or approximately 92% of the fair value of our portfolio that has been financed under repurchase agreements. We only enter into interest rate swap agreements related to financing for Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs and fixed rate mortgage loans. We do not hedge Agency RMBS collateralized by monthly reset ARMs because their interest rates reset monthly and closely in time with the interest rates under the corresponding repurchase agreements.

For a description of the consequences of our hedging transactions on our qualification and taxation as a REIT, see “Federal Income Tax Consequences of Our Qualification as a REIT—Gross Income Tests—Hedging Transactions.”

Investment Guidelines

Our board of directors has adopted a set of investment guidelines that set out the investment focus and other criteria used to evaluate the merits of specific investments as well as the overall portfolio composition. Our Manager’s investment committee reviews our compliance with the investment guidelines periodically and our board of directors receives an investment report at each quarter-end in conjunction with its review of our quarterly results. Our board also reviews our investment portfolio and related compliance with our investment policies and procedures and investment guidelines at each regularly scheduled board of directors meeting.

Our board of directors and our Manager’s investment committee have adopted the following guidelines for our investments and borrowings:

we will invest exclusively in Agency RMBS;

no investment shall be made that would cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes; and

no investment shall be made that would cause us to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

In addition, our board of directors has authorized us to dispose of our CLOs and structured notes at reasonable prices. We are not required to sell these securities. During 2008, we sold one CLO for approximately $1.1 million, and did not sell any structured notes. We have not sold any CLOs or structured notes in 2009. We continue to monitor the market for selling the remaining portion of our CLOs and structured notes; however, we may not be able to sell these assets for a reasonable price for some time given the recent depressed prices for these assets. These investment guidelines may be changed by a majority of our board of directors without the approval of our stockholders.

Our board of directors has also adopted a separate set of investment guidelines and procedures to govern our relationships with Cypress and Sharpridge. We have also adopted detailed compliance policies to govern our interaction with Cypress, including when Cypress is in receipt of material non-public information.

Conflicts of Interest

Pursuant to the management agreement, our Manager will not assume any responsibility other than to render the services called for thereunder and will not be responsible for any action of our board of directors in following or declining to follow its advice or recommendations. Our Manager, its sub-advisors, its officers, managers and employees will not be liable to us, any subsidiary of ours, our directors, our stockholders or any subsidiary’s stockholders or partners for acts or omissions performed in accordance with and pursuant to the management agreement, except by reason of acts constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of their duties under the management agreement. We have agreed to indemnify our Manager and its sub-advisors, officers, managers and employees with respect to all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims arising from acts of our Manager not constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of duties, performed in good faith in accordance with and pursuant to the management agreement. Our Manager has agreed to indemnify us, our directors, officers and employees with respect to all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims arising from acts of our Manager constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its duties under the management agreement and performed in good faith in accordance with and pursuant to the management agreement or any claims by our Manager’s employees relating to the terms and conditions of their employment with our Manager.

Resolution of Potential Conflicts of Interest and Allocation of Investment Opportunities

Related Person Transaction Policies

Our board of directors has adopted a policy regarding the approval of any “related person transaction,” which is any transaction or series of transactions in which we or any of our subsidiaries is or are to be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a “related person” (as defined under SEC rules) has a direct or indirect material interest. Under the policy, a related person would need to promptly disclose to our corporate secretary any related person transaction and (i) all material facts about the transaction, (ii) the benefits to us of the related party transaction, (iii) if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable products and services and (iv) an assessment of whether the proposed transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally. Our corporate secretary would then assess whether the proposed transaction is a “related person transaction” and, if so, promptly communicate that information to the audit committee of our board of directors. Based on its consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, this committee will decide whether or not to approve such transaction. If we become aware of an existing related person transaction that has not been pre-approved under this policy, the transaction will be referred to this committee, which will evaluate all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of such transaction. Our policy requires any audit committee member who may be interested in a related person transaction to recuse himself or herself from any consideration of such related person transaction.

Policies with Respect to Certain Other Activities

If our board of directors determines that additional funding is required, we may raise such funds through additional offerings of equity or debt securities, the retention of cash flow (subject to provisions in the Internal Revenue Code concerning distribution requirements and the taxability of undistributed REIT taxable income), other funds from debt financing, including repurchase agreements, or a combination of these methods. In the event that our board of directors determines to raise additional equity capital, it has the authority, without stockholder approval, to issue additional common stock or preferred stock in any manner and on such terms and for such consideration as it deems appropriate, at any time.

We have not in the past but may in the future offer equity or debt securities in exchange for assets and to repurchase or otherwise reacquire our shares and may engage in such activities in the future.

We have not invested in the past, and will not in the future invest, in the securities of other issuers for the purpose of exercising control over such entities.

We engage in the purchase and sale of investments. We have not in the past and will not in the future make loans to third parties. We will not underwrite the securities of other issuers.

We have furnished and intend to continue to furnish our stockholders with annual reports containing consolidated financial statements audited by our independent certified public accountants and with quarterly reports containing unaudited consolidated financial statements for each of the first three quarters of each fiscal year.

Our board of directors may change any of these policies without prior notice to you or a vote of our stockholders.

Tax Structure

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Our qualification and taxation as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various complex requirements under the Internal Revenue Code relating to, among other things, the sources of our gross income, the composition and values of our assets, our distribution levels and the concentration of ownership of our capital stock. We believe that we were organized and have operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and that our current and proposed manner of operation will enable us to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the REIT taxable income that we distribute currently to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we will be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates, and we may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable years following the year during which we lost our qualification. Even if we qualify for federal taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income. Our TRS, Sharpridge TRS, Inc., is a regular, domestic taxable corporation that is subject to federal, state and local income tax on its income. Any dividends received from us, with limited exceptions, will not be eligible for taxation at the preferred rates that currently apply to dividends received by taxpayers taxed at individual rates from taxable corporations.

Investment Company Act Exemption

We operate our business so that Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and its subsidiary are exempt from registration under the Investment Company Act. Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. itself relies on the exemption provided by Section 3(c)(5)(c) of the Investment Company Act. We monitor our portfolio periodically and prior to each investment to confirm that we continue to qualify for the exemption. To qualify for the exemption, we make investments so that at least 55% of the assets we own consist of qualifying mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate, which we refer to as qualifying real estate assets, and so that at least 80% of the assets we own consist of real estate-related assets (including our qualifying estate assets).

We treat Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae whole-pool residential mortgage pass-through certificates issued with respect to an underlying pool of mortgage loans in which we hold all of the certificates issued by the pool as qualifying real estate assets based on no-action letters issued by the SEC. Our Agency RMBS consist and will consist solely of such Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae whole-pool residential mortgage pass-through certificates. At present, we do not generally expect that our investments in CLOs and structured notes will constitute qualifying real estate assets or real estate-related assets for purposes of the Investment Company Act. Similarly, we do not expect that Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.’s interest in its subsidiary, Sharpridge TRS, Inc., will constitute a qualifying real estate asset or a real estate-related asset for purposes of the Investment Company Act. Sharpridge TRS, Inc. will not register as an investment company in reliance upon Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, which is available to companies that do not make a public offering and that issue securities exclusively to qualified purchasers. Qualification for this exemption limits our ability to make certain investments.

Competition

In acquiring Agency RMBS, we compete with mortgage REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, other lenders, governmental bodies and other entities. In addition, there are numerous mortgage REITs with similar asset acquisition objectives, and others may be organized in the future. The effect of the existence of additional REITs may be to increase competition for the available supply of mortgage assets suitable for purchase.

Additionally, we may also compete with the U.S. Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury to the extent they purchase Agency RMBS pursuant to the respective Agency RMBS purchase programs. See “Risk Factors—The federal conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related efforts, along with any changes in laws and regulations affecting the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. Government, may adversely affect our business.”

Our Manager has access to Cypress’ investment professionals and their industry expertise, which we believe provides it with a competitive advantage and helps it assess investment risks and determine appropriate pricing and structuring for certain potential investments. In addition, the relationships of the senior managers of our Manager and of the principals of Cypress enable our Manager to learn about, and compete more effectively for, financing opportunities with attractive companies in the industries in which we seek to invest.

Professional Staff and Employees

We do not have any employees. We are managed by Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC pursuant to the management agreement between our Manager and us. All of our executive officers are employees of Sharpridge. As of September 30, 2009, affiliates of our Manager had 22 employees involved in our Manager’s operations.

Properties

We do not own any properties. Our offices are located in leased space at 65 East 55th Street, New York, New York 10022 and the telephone number of our offices is (212) 705-0160. The offices of our Manager and The Cypress Group are at the same location. Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P. is located at 890 Winter Street, Suite 200, Waltham, Massachusetts, 02451.

Legal Proceedings

Neither we, nor our Manager are currently subject to any material legal proceedings.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

None.

OUR MANAGER AND THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

General

We are currently externally managed and advised by our Manager. Our Manager was formed on January 3, 2006. All of our executive officers are employees of Sharpridge. The executive offices of our Manager are located at 65 East 55th Street, New York, New York 10022 and the telephone number of our Manager’s executive offices is (212) 705-0160.

Internalization Plans

In order to establish a more efficient management structure that will produce economies of scale for our operating expenses, most effectively meet our management and administrative needs and align the interests of those individuals responsible for executing our strategy with the interests of our stockholders, we intend to complete an internalization transaction no later than March 31, 2010. As part of our efforts to accomplish our goals, we amended our management agreement so that we no longer pay our Manager any incentive compensation and the management fee percentage is reduced as our net assets increase. Our board of directors, our Manager and its sub-advisors have been analyzing with counsel and other advisors various structures to further accomplish the goals of an internalization transaction. We have not yet determined the most effective method or structure to accomplish the goals of an internalization transaction described above. We continue to analyze various transaction structures that would result in our management and operations being conducted by employees of our Company or a wholly-owned subsidiary. However, based on our analysis since the completion of our initial public offering in June 2009, it is possible that such a structure could result in increased operating expenses and significant business disruption due to various legal, tax and operational considerations. As a result, in order to realize the goals of an internalization transaction we also are reviewing structures pursuant to which we may maintain and amend our relationship with our Manager and its sub-advisors. Ultimately, to complete an internalization transaction that is in the best interests of our stockholders, our independent directors, our Manager and its sub-advisors will have to negotiate and reach mutually acceptable agreements. Finalization of these agreements is subject to the resolution of various regulatory, legal and tax considerations for all of the interested parties. Completing appropriate due diligence and negotiating the applicable agreements is likely to be time consuming and complex. We will not pay a termination fee to our Manager under the management agreement if an internalization transaction is completed, and do not expect that we will pay consideration that exceeds $750,000 if the internalization transaction ultimately provides for any such consideration to be paid by us. We cannot assure you that we will be able to complete an internalization transaction, or when or on what terms it may be completed, including the amount of consideration we may be required to pay to our Manager or its sub-advisors.

Investment Committee

The role of our Manager’s investment committee is to review and approve our investment policies and procedures and investment guidelines, and review and approve our investment portfolio holdings and oversee the compliance with our investment policies and procedures and our investment guidelines. The investment committee meets as frequently as necessary in order for us to achieve our investment objectives. Our investment committee reviews and approves our investment portfolio holdings with the exception of portfolio holdings acquired in the ordinary course of business and pursuant to our investment guidelines. Our Manager’s investment committee consists of Kevin Grant, Jeffrey Hughes, Raymond Redlingshafer, William Shean, James Stern and David Tyson. Biographical information for these committee members is set forth below.

100

Officers of Our Manager

The following sets forth certain information with respect to the officers of our Manager as of September 30, 2009. Their biographical information follows.


Name	Age	Title
Kevin E. Grant	49	Chief Executive Officer, President
Frances Spark	51	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Richard E. Cleary	46	Chief Operating Officer and Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey P. Hughes	69	Secretary
Thomas A. Rosenbloom	46	Assistant Secretary

Biographical Information

Kevin E. Grant. Mr. Grant has served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of our Manager and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President and the chairman of our board of directors since January 2006. He also serves on our Manager’s investment committee. Prior to joining our Manager and us in January 2006, Mr. Grant formed Sharpridge in January 2005. Prior to forming Sharpridge, Mr. Grant was Vice President and Portfolio Manager at Fidelity Investments, or Fidelity. As a Portfolio Manager of Fidelity, Mr. Grant had direct or indirect responsibility for management of fixed income assets in mutual funds and institutional separate accounts. Over the course of his career at Fidelity, Mr. Grant’s mutual fund responsibilities included the Mortgage Securities Fund, Investment Grade Bond Fund, Total Bond Fund, the fixed income portion of Fidelity Puritan Fund and Strategic Income Fund. In addition, Mr. Grant managed many separate accounts for Fidelity’s institutional clients. Prior to joining Fidelity in 1993, Mr. Grant was head of Mortgage Strategy for Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated. He began his investing career at Aetna Bond Investors in 1985.

Jeffrey P. Hughes. Mr. Hughes is Vice Chairman of The Cypress Group. At Cypress, Mr. Hughes is the principal operating officer and advises and assists industry groups, primarily the financial services investment team. Mr. Hughes is currently a director of Financial Guaranty Insurance Company, Communications & Power Industries, Inc., Scottish Re Group Limited and Medicus Insurance Holdings, Inc. Prior to founding Cypress in 1994, Mr. Hughes was a senior investment banker with Lehman Brothers Inc. and its predecessors, which he joined in 1968 and was elected partner in 1976. Over the course of his career at Lehman, Mr. Hughes established the firm’s private financing department, served as a senior investment banker for industrial, energy and consumer products companies, and was head of its financial institutions group. Mr. Hughes began his career as an attorney with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.

Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr. Mr. Redlingshafer is a Managing Director for the Pentalpha Capital Group, or Pentalpha. Pentalpha is an independent financial services firm that provides advisory and consulting services related to the capital markets and operating issues affecting the global credit markets. Prior to working as an independent consultant for and subsequently joining Pentalpha, Mr. Redlingshafer was a Managing Director of KC Partners, a private equity firm, from October 2006 to October 2007. Mr. Redlingshafer was President and Chief Investment Officer of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. (NYSE: NYMT), from March 2003 to July 2005. New York Mortgage Trust is a REIT focused on owning and managing a leveraged portfolio of residential mortgage securities and a mortgage origination business. Prior to joining New York Mortgage Trust, from January 2000 to April 2001, Mr. Redlingshafer was a Managing Director of Pedestal Capital Markets, Inc., an institutional mortgage-backed security trading platform. As a Vice President of Mortgage Capital Markets at Salomon Brothers from 1998 to 2000, Mr. Redlingshafer had roles in sales, trading, and finance, working with origination as well as buy-side accounts. Prior to Salomon Brothers, he was National Director of Securities Marketing for Freddie Mac, where he managed a sales team which marketed Freddie Mac securities to institutional fixed income investors. Prior to becoming the National Director of Securities Marketing for Freddie Mac, Mr. Redlingshafer held a number of positions at the firm, including starting the Adjustable Rate Mortgage trading desk. Mr. Redlingshafer began his career with Goldman Sachs & Co. as a whole loan mortgage trader and was one of the original members of the firm’s mortgage department.

101

William G. Shean. Mr. Shean has served as the Managing Director of Sharpridge since February 2006. Prior to joining Sharpridge in 2006, Mr. Shean was Senior Vice President and Portfolio Manager at Citizens Bank from 2002 to 2006, where he had investment management responsibility for portfolios of mortgage-backed, government agency and U.S. Treasury securities. Prior to joining Citizens Bank in 2002, Mr. Shean was Senior Vice President and Portfolio Manager at State Street Research & Management, or State Street, a division of MetLife. Over the course of his career at State Street, Mr. Shean managed investments in intermediate duration, core, core plus, structured liability, long liability, and mortgage-only portfolios across 10 separate accounts. Mr. Shean began his investment career at Shawmut Bank in 1984, and also worked at Fidelity Investments in MBS from 1990 to 1992.

James A. Stern. Mr. Stern is the Chairman and CEO of The Cypress Group. At Cypress, Mr. Stern manages the firm’s investing activities and serves as a director of portfolio companies including Affinia Holdings, Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc. and MedPointe Inc. and is also a director of Lear Corporation. Prior to founding Cypress in 1994, Mr. Stern was head of Lehman’s Merchant Banking Group. Over the course of his career at Lehman, Mr. Stern was a member of the firm’s management committee and co-head of investment banking. In addition to his business activities, Mr. Stern has been a member of Tufts University’s Board of Trustees since 1982, and currently serves as its Chairman.

David A. Tyson, PhD., CFA. Dr. Tyson is Chief Executive Officer of RiversEdge Portfolio Advisors LLC, or RiversEdge, an investment risk management consultancy based in Connecticut. Dr. Tyson also founded RiversEdge Convertible Portfolio Advisors in 2007 to manage convertible portfolios for institutional accounts. Prior to founding RiversEdge, Dr. Tyson held several financial roles at Travelers Life & Annuity, or Travelers, and Citigroup’s other proprietary insurance companies. Dr. Tyson was Vice Chairman of Citigroup Investments from 2000 until 2003 and Chief Investment Officer of Traveler’s and Citigroup’s other proprietary insurance companies from 2000 until 2004. From 1994 until 2000, Dr. Tyson held the position of President and Chief Operating Officer of Travelers Asset Management International Corporation and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2000 to 2004. Over the course of his 19-year career at Travelers, Dr. Tyson was responsible for global fixed income asset class management and asset-liability matching for Citigroup’s insurance companies. In addition, he managed third party hedge fund investments, internal hedge fund groups, specialty fixed income groups, and a registered investment advisor which had oversight responsibility for strategies including collateralized debt obligations, syndicated bank loans, core and specialty fixed income variable annuity funds, and many third party insurance accounts. As Chief Investment Officer, Dr. Tyson was actively involved in all of Travelers’ alternative and special investments, and served on numerous insurance and fiduciary investment management committees including the Global Asset Liability Committee for all of Citigroup. Prior to joining Travelers in 1985, Dr. Tyson was with Equitable Investment Management Company from 1979 to 1985.

Frances Spark, ACA. Ms. Spark has served as the Chief Financial Officer of our Manager and has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2009. Ms. Spark served as a member of our board of directors from our initial capitalization to September 2009. She served as the chair of our Audit Committee from March 2007 to September 2009. Recently, Ms. Spark has been providing financial management, strategic advisory and business consulting services to public and private companies through Spark Consulting, a consulting firm she founded in 1999. Ms. Spark held the position of Chief Financial Officer for MVC Capital, Inc. (NYSE: MVC), a business development company, from January 2004 to September 2005 and also acted as an investment professional for MVC. Ms. Spark has also worked as a turnaround consultant and been involved in restructuring of public and private companies. Prior to Spark Consulting, Ms. Spark was the Controller at The Beacon Group (“Beacon”), a private investment firm now part of CCMP Capital from 1997 to 1998, and from 1993 to 1996, Ms. Spark was the Chief Financial Officer of Hyperion Capital Management, a New York investment management firm specializing in mortgage backed securities. From 1987 to 1992, Ms. Spark held a number of financial roles at Prudential Securities in both the United States and the United Kingdom. Ms. Spark is a Chartered Accountant and worked with KPMG in the United Kingdom from 1981 until 1987.

102

Richard E. Cleary. Mr. Cleary has served as the Chief Operating Officer and Assistant Secretary of our Manager and has served as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2006 and Assistant Secretary since June 2007. Prior to joining our Manager and us in January 2006, Mr. Cleary was a Partner at Merathon Advisory, a strategic consulting firm focused on private equity and information services from 2004 to 2006. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Cleary was the Director of Corporate and Business Development of OneSource Information Services, or OneSource. Prior to OneSource, Mr. Cleary’s work experience includes building Thomson Financial’s First Call research and quantitative services businesses in Asia, and with Schooner Capital, a private equity firm. At Schooner Capital, Mr. Cleary led investments in digital assets management, including portfolio company Iron Mountain’s digital archive business. Mr. Cleary’s other prior work experience was at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities and Xerox Corporation.

Thomas A. Rosenbloom. Mr. Rosenbloom has served as the General Counsel of Sharpridge, one of our Manager’s sub-advisors, since May 2007, and our Secretary and the Assistant Secretary of our Manager since June 2007. Prior to joining Sharpridge in May 2007, from February 2005 through May 2007, Mr. Rosenbloom was a partner with Foley & Lardner, LLP, and a member of the firm’s Private Equity & Venture Capital and Transactional & Securities Practices. Mr. Rosenbloom was also a member of the firm’s Emerging Technologies, Life Sciences, and Nanotechnology Industry Teams. From 1996 through January 2005, Mr. Rosenbloom was a partner with Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C. During Mr. Rosenbloom’s tenure at Foley & Lardner and Epstein, Becker & Green, both national law firms, he represented middle-market public companies, entrepreneurs, founders, emerging businesses, start-up corporations, and partnerships in diverse industries. Mr. Rosenbloom managed and negotiated mergers and acquisitions, private equity and venture capital financings, and private placements. While in private practice, Mr. Rosenbloom was responsible for developing and managing all aspects of client relationships, including analyzing and evaluating financing, acquisition, and divestiture opportunities, writing, and developing business plans, and providing other planning and financial advice, including with respect to intellectual property protection, labor and employment, immigration and real estate matters. Mr. Rosenbloom currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors for one of his former clients, and has served as a member of the Board of Advisors for several of his former clients.

Management, Investment and Operations Teams

Certain members of Sharpridge’s staff perform key functions on our behalf. Key functions performed by Sharpridge staff on our behalf include trading and settlement of Agency RMBS investments; accounting, compliance and financial reporting; and others. Sharpridge believes that it is well-positioned to attract and retain highly experienced investment and operations professionals due to the reputation of Mr. Grant and an abundance of qualified individuals resident in the Boston area. As of September 30, 2009, Sharpridge had nine professionals on staff.

The Management Agreement

We are a party to a management agreement with Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC, our Manager. The management agreement requires our Manager to manage our business affairs in conformity with the policies and the investment guidelines that are approved by a majority of our independent directors and monitored by our board of directors. Our Manager is subject to the supervision and oversight of our board of directors. Our Manager is also responsible for (i) the selection, purchase and sale of our portfolio investments, (ii) our financing and risk management activities, and (iii) providing us with investment advisory services. In addition, our Manager is responsible for our day-to-day operations and performs (or causes to be performed) such services and activities relating to our assets and operations as may be appropriate, including, without limitation, the following:

(i) serving as our consultant with respect to the periodic review of the investment criteria and parameters for our investments, borrowings and operations, any modifications to which must be approved by a majority of our independent directors, and other policies for the approval subject to our board of directors;

(ii) investigating, analyzing and selecting possible investment opportunities;

103

(iii) with respect to prospective purchases and sales of investments, conducting negotiations with sellers and purchasers and their agents, representatives and investment bankers;

(iv) engaging and supervising, on our behalf and at our expense, independent contractors that provide investment banking, mortgage brokerage, securities brokerage and other financial services and such other services as may be required relating to our investments;

(v) negotiating on our behalf for the sale, exchange or other disposition of our investments;

(vi) coordinating and managing the operations of and our investments in any joint ventures and co-investment interests held by us and conducting all matters with any joint venture or co-investment partners;

(vii) providing executive and administrative personnel, office space and office services;

(viii) supervising the performance of such administrative functions necessary to our management as may be agreed upon by our Manager and the board of directors, including the collection of revenues and the payment of our debts and obligations and maintenance of appropriate technology infrastructure to perform such administrative functions;

(ix) communicating on our behalf with our security holders as required to satisfy the reporting and other requirements of any governmental bodies or agencies or trading markets and to maintain effective relations with such holders;

(x) counseling us in connection with policy decisions to be made by our board of directors;

(xi) evaluating and recommending to our board of directors hedging strategies and engaging in hedging activities on our behalf in a manner consistent with such strategies, our REIT status and our investment guidelines;

(xii) counseling us on the maintenance of our qualification as a REIT and monitoring compliance with the various REIT qualification tests and other rules set out in the Internal Revenue Code and U.S. Treasury Regulations thereunder;

(xiii) counseling us on the maintenance of our exemption from the Investment Company Act and monitoring compliance with the requirements for maintaining an exemption from that Act;

(xiv) assisting us in developing criteria for asset purchase commitments that are specifically tailored to our investment objectives and making available to us its knowledge and experience with respect to mortgage loans, real estate, real estate related securities, other real estate-related assets and non-real estate related assets, including corporate debt obligations;

(xv) representing and making recommendations to us in connection with the purchase and finance of, and commitment to purchase and finance, mortgage loans (including on a portfolio basis), real estate, real estate-related securities, other real estate-related assets and non-real estate-related assets, including corporate debt obligations, and the sale and commitment to sell such assets;

(xvi) monitoring the operating performance of our investments and providing periodic reports with respect thereto to our board of directors, including comparative information with respect to such operating performance and budgeted or projected operating results;

(xvii) investing or reinvesting any money and securities of ours (including investing in short term investments pending investment in long term asset investments, payment of fees, costs and expenses, or payments of dividends or distributions to our stockholders and partners), and advising us as to our capital structure and capital raising;

(xviii) causing us to retain qualified accountants and legal counsel, as applicable, to assist in developing appropriate accounting procedures, compliance procedures and testing systems with respect to financial reporting obligations and compliance with the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and to conduct quarterly compliance reviews with respect thereto;

104

(xix) causing us to qualify to do business in all applicable jurisdictions and to obtain and maintain all appropriate licenses;

(xx) assisting us in complying with all regulatory requirements applicable to us in respect of our business activities, including preparing or causing to be prepared all financial statements required under applicable regulations and contractual undertakings and all reports and documents, if any, required under the Exchange Act;

(xxi) taking all necessary actions to enable us to make required tax filings and reports, including soliciting stockholders for required information to the extent provided by the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;

(xxii) handling and resolving all claims, disputes or controversies (including all litigation, arbitration, settlement or other proceedings or negotiations) in which we may be involved or to which we may be subject arising out of our day-to-day operations, subject to such limitations or parameters as may be imposed from time to time by our board of directors;

(xxiii) using commercially reasonable efforts to cause expenses incurred by or on our behalf to be commercially reasonable or commercially customary and within any budgeted parameters or expense guidelines set by our board of directors from time to time;

(xxiv) performing such other services as may be required from time to time for management and other activities relating to our assets as our board of directors shall reasonably request or our Manager shall deem appropriate under the particular circumstances; and

(xxv) using commercially reasonable efforts to cause us to comply with all applicable laws.

Pursuant to the management agreement, our Manager does not assume any responsibility other than to render the services called for thereunder and is not responsible for any action of our board of directors in following or declining to follow its advice or recommendations. Our Manager, its members, any person controlling or controlled by its members and any person providing sub-advisory services to our Manager and the managers, officers, directors and employees of our Manager, its members and any such person are not liable to us, any subsidiary of ours, our directors, our stockholders or any subsidiary’s stockholders for acts performed in accordance with and pursuant to the management agreement, except by reason of acts constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of their duties under the management agreement. We have agreed to indemnify our Manager, its members and any person controlling or controlled by the members and any person providing sub-advisory services to our Manager and the managers, officers, directors and employees of our Manager, its members and any such person with respect to all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims arising from acts of such indemnified party not constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of duties, performed in good faith in accordance with and pursuant to the management agreement. Our Manager has agreed to indemnify us, our stockholders, directors, officers, employees and each other person, if any, controlling us with respect to all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims arising from acts of our Manager constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its duties under the management agreement. As required by the management agreement, our Manager carries errors and omissions insurance.

Pursuant to the terms of the management agreement, our Manager is required to provide us with our management team, including a chief executive officer and chief financial officer, along with appropriate support personnel, to provide the management services to be provided by our Manager to us, the members of which team shall devote such of their time to the management of us as our board of directors reasonably deems necessary and appropriate, commensurate with our level of activity from time to time. Our Manager has entered into separate sub-advisory agreements with each of Cypress and Sharpridge, on terms and conditions substantially identical to the terms of the management agreement between us and our Manager. In the event either of Cypress or Sharpridge elects to terminate its relationship with our Manager, our independent directors must approve any replacement sub-advisor proposed by our Manager. In the event our Manager does not propose an acceptable replacement within 180 days of such event, we may terminate the management agreement without payment of a termination fee.

105

To supplement the expertise of Cypress and Sharpridge, our Manager may also propose additional sub-advisors to provide specific expertise or other capabilities we believe to be important to our investment operations. Such additional sub-advisors, if any, shall (i) be engaged on terms and conditions substantially identical to the terms and conditions of the management agreement, (ii) not result in an increased management fee or expenses to us, and (iii) be approved by our independent directors.

The initial term of the management agreement expired on December 31, 2008, and has been automatically renewed for a one-year term that will expire on December 31, 2009. Going forward, the management agreement will be automatically renewed for a one-year term each anniversary date thereafter except as described below. Our independent directors will review our Manager’s performance annually and, following the initial term, the management agreement may be terminated upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors or by a vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock, based upon (1) unsatisfactory performance that is materially detrimental to us or (2) a determination that the management fees payable to our Manager are not fair, subject to our Manager’s right to prevent such a termination due to unfair fees by accepting a reduction of management fees agreed to by at least two-thirds of our independent directors and our Manager. We must provide 180 days’ prior notice of any such termination and our Manager will be paid a termination fee equal to four times the sum of (a) the average annual base management fee earned by the Manager during the 24-month period prior to such termination and (b) the average annual incentive compensation earned (notwithstanding that the payment of any such incentive compensation may have been waived) by our Manager during the 24-month period immediately preceding such termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination.

We may also terminate the management agreement with 30 days’ prior written notice for cause, which is defined as (i) our Manager’s continued material breach of any provision of the management agreement following a period of 30 days after written notice thereof, (ii) our Manager’s fraud, misappropriation of funds, or embezzlement against us, (iii) our Manager’s gross negligence of duties under the management agreement, (iv) the commencement of any proceeding relating to our Manager’s bankruptcy or insolvency, (v) the dissolution of our Manager, (vi) a change of control of our Manager, and (vii) failure of our Manager to propose an acceptable replacement sub-advisor within 180 days of the termination of the sub-advisory agreement with either Cypress or Sharpridge, without payment of any termination fee. The management agreement shall terminate at the option of our Manager, without payment of any termination fee, in the event we become regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Such termination shall be deemed to occur immediately prior to such event. Our Manager may also decline to renew the management agreement by providing us with 180 days written notice. Our Manager may also terminate the management agreement upon 60 days written notice if we default in the performance of any material term of the agreement and the default continues for a period of 30 days after written notice to us, in which case we would be required to pay our Manager the termination fee described above.

We have not received notice of our Manager’s intention not to renew the management agreement. As a result, the agreement will automatically renew until December 31, 2010.

The management agreement will terminate without payment of any termination fee to our Manager in connection with or pursuant to the consummation of an internalization event pursuant to the terms of the management agreement. Internalization event is defined in the management agreement to be a transaction or series of transactions the result of which is that (i) the management agreement is terminated, (ii) our management is no longer subject to or reliant upon an external manager or sub-advisors and (iii) we employ a management team.

106

Management Fees and Incentive Compensation

We do not employ personnel and therefore rely on the resources of our Manager to conduct our operations. Expense reimbursements to our Manager are made on the first business day of each calendar month. The base management fee and incentive compensation called for in the management agreement between us and our Manager are as follows:

Base Management Fee

Currently, we pay our Manager a base management fee monthly in arrears in an amount equal to 1/12th of (a) 1.50% of the first $250,000,000 of our net assets, (b) 1.25% of our net assets that are greater than $250,000,000 and less than or equal to $500,000,000, and (c) 1.00% of our net assets that are greater than $500,000,000. Our Manager uses the proceeds from its management fee in part to pay compensation to its officers and employees who, notwithstanding that certain of them also are our officers, receive no cash compensation directly from us. For purposes of calculating the base management fee, our net assets means, for any month, the amount determined by subtracting our total liabilities from our total assets, as determined in accordance with GAAP. The foregoing calculation of the base management fee is adjusted to exclude special one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP, as well as certain non-cash charges, after discussion between our Manager and our independent directors and approval by a majority of our independent directors in the case of non-cash charges. Our Manager’s base management fee shall be calculated by our Manager within fifteen business days after the end of each month and such calculation shall be promptly delivered to us. We are obligated to pay the base management fee within twenty business days after the end of each month. During 2007 and 2008, we paid our Manager approximately $2.4 million and approximately $1.6 million in base management fees, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we paid our Manager approximately $0.9 million in base management fees.

Incentive Compensation

Our Manager is no longer eligible to receive any incentive compensation under the management agreement or otherwise.

Reimbursement of Expenses Because our Manager and employees of Sharpridge perform certain legal, accounting, due diligence tasks and other services that outside professionals or outside consultants otherwise would perform, our Manager or sub-advisors, as the case may be, is paid or reimbursed for the documented cost of performing such tasks, provided that such costs and reimbursements are no greater than those which would be paid to outside professionals or consultants on an arm’s-length basis. We also pay all operating expenses of our Manager or sub-advisors as they relate to the performance of their duties under the Management Agreement or Sub-Advisory Agreements, as the case may be. We currently do not reimburse our Manager or its sub-advisors for any compensation or health benefits, except that we reimburse the salary of several employees of Sharpridge. The expenses required to be paid by us include, but are not limited to, issuance and transaction costs incident to the acquisition, disposition and financing of our investments, legal, tax, accounting, consulting and auditing fees and expenses, the compensation and expenses of our directors, the cost of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, the costs associated with the establishment and maintenance of any credit facilities and other indebtedness of ours (including commitment fees, accounting fees, legal fees, closing costs and similar items), expenses associated with other securities offerings of ours, expenses relating to making distributions to our stockholders, the costs of printing and mailing proxies and reports to our stockholders, costs associated with any computer software or hardware, electronic equipment, or purchased information technology services from third party vendors that is used solely for us, costs incurred by our Manager or employees of Sharpridge for travel on our behalf, the costs and expenses incurred with respect to market information systems and publications, research publications and materials, and settlement, clearing, and custodial fees and expenses, expenses of our transfer agent, the costs of maintaining compliance with all federal, state and local rules and regulations or any other regulatory agency, all taxes and license fees and all insurance costs incurred by us or on our behalf. In addition, we are required to pay our pro-rata portion of rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery

107

and other office, internal and overhead expenses of our Manager and its affiliates required for our operations. Our Manager may, at its option, elect not to seek reimbursement for certain expenses during a given quarterly period, which determination will not be deemed to construe a waiver of reimbursement for similar expenses in future periods. During 2007, we did not reimburse any expenses to our Manager because our Manager waived its right to seek such reimbursement. Commencing January 1, 2008, we began reimbursing our Manager for the expenses described above, which amounted to approximately $0.9 and approximately $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. We did not grant any stock awards to our Manager in 2007, 2008 or the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Sub-Advisory Agreements

Our Manager has entered into sub-advisory agreements with Sharpridge and Cypress, pursuant to which they are responsible for providing certain services to the Manager. These agreements are described below. In connection with internalizing our management, we expect to, among other things, terminate these sub-advisory agreements and hire the employees of Sharpridge.

Sub-Advisory Agreement with Sharpridge Our Manager has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with Sharpridge whereby Sharpridge has agreed to provide certain services for our benefit, including:

portfolio management;

asset monitoring;

asset hedging;

asset sourcing;

asset purchase and sale negotiation;

tax and regulatory advice; and

certain administrative functions.

This agreement had an initial term that ended on December 31, 2008. This agreement has been automatically renewed until December 31, 2009, and will be automatically renewed for a one-year term on each anniversary date thereafter, unless (i) the Management Agreement between us and our Manager is terminated, or (ii) Sharpridge delivers notice to us no later than 180 days prior to an anniversary date of its intention not to renew indicating that it does not wish to renew the agreement. Our Manager has not received notice of Sharpridge’s intention not to renew this agreement. As a result, the agreement will automatically renew until December 31, 2010. Additionally, our Manager may terminate the agreement for cause, which includes (i) a material breach by Sharpridge of the agreement (subject to a right to cure such breach), (ii) Sharpridge committing an act of fraud, misappropriation of funds or embezzlement against our Manager or us, (iii) Sharpridge committing gross negligence in the execution of its duties under the agreement, (iv) the initiation of bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings against Sharpridge or (v) the dissolution of Sharpridge.

Sub-Advisory Agreement with Cypress Our Manager has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with Cypress whereby Cypress has agreed to provide certain services for our benefit, including:

asset sourcing;

asset purchase and sale negotiation;

tax and regulatory advice; and

certain administrative functions.

108

anniversary date thereafter, unless (i) the Management Agreement between us and our Manager is terminated, or (ii) Cypress delivers notice to us no later than 180 days prior to an anniversary date of its intention not to renew indicating that it does not wish to renew the agreement. Our Manager has not received notice of Cypress’ intention not to renew this agreement. As a result, the agreement will automatically renew until December 31, 2010. Additionally, our Manager may terminate the agreement for cause, which includes (i) a material breach by Cypress of the agreement (subject to a right to cure such breach), (ii) Cypress committing and act of fraud, misappropriation of funds or embezzlement against our Manager or us, (iii) Cypress committing gross negligence in the execution of its duties under the agreement, (iv) the initiation of bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings against Cypress or (v) the dissolution of Cypress.

Conflicts of Interest with our Manager, Sharpridge and Cypress

See “Business—Conflicts of Interest,” and “Business—Resolution of Potential Conflicts of Interest and Allocation of Investment Opportunities” for a discussion of the potential conflicts of interest with our Manager, Sharpridge and Cypress.

License Agreements

In connection with our initial capitalization, we entered into license agreements with each of Cypress and Sharpridge pursuant to which each of Cypress and Sharpridge granted us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the names and trademarks “Cypress” and “Sharpridge.” Under these agreements, we have a right to use these names and trademarks, for so long as each firm or one of its affiliates remains affiliated with our Manager. Other than with respect to these limited licenses, we have no legal right to either the “Cypress” or “Sharpridge” names. Each license agreement will remain in effect so long as the management agreement with our Manager and the respective sub-advisory agreement is in effect. As a result, in the event the management agreement or the respective sub-advisory agreement is terminated or expires, we would be required to change our name to eliminate the use of “Cypress” or “Sharpridge,” as the case may be; provided, however, that we may negotiate with Cypress and Sharpridge to continue using their respective name after internalizing our management. We cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into such an agreement.

109

MANAGEMENT

Our Directors and Executive Officers

Our board of directors consists of Kevin E. Grant, Douglas Crocker, II, Jeffrey P. Hughes, Stephen P. Jonas, Raymond A. Redlingshafer, James A. Stern and Dr. David Tyson. Our board of directors has determined that four of these directors satisfy the listing standards for independence of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE. Upon the expiration of their terms at the annual meeting of the stockholders in 2010, directors will be elected to serve a term of one year or until their successors are duly elected and qualify. Our bylaws provide that a majority of the entire board of directors may at any time increase or decrease the number of directors. However, unless our bylaws are amended, the number of directors may never be less than five nor more than eleven.

The following sets forth certain information with respect to our directors and executive officers as of September 30, 2009:


Name	Age	Title
Kevin E. Grant	49	Chief Executive Officer; President; Director; Chairman of the Board
Frances Spark	51	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Richard E. Cleary	46	Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Assistant Secretary
Thomas A. Rosenbloom	46	Secretary
Douglas Crocker, II	69	Director*
Jeffrey P. Hughes	69	Director
Stephen P. Jonas	56	Director*
Raymond A. Redlingshafer	53	Director*
James A. Stern	58	Director
David A. Tyson, PhD	52	Director*

*	Independent director

Biographical Information

Executive Officers

For biographical information on Messrs. Grant, Cleary and Rosenbloom and Ms. Spark, see “Our Manager and the Management Agreement—Biographical Information.”

Directors For biographical information on Messrs. Grant, Hughes, Redlingshafer, Stern and Tyson, see “Our Manager and the Management Agreement—Biographical Information.”

Douglas Crocker, II. Mr. Crocker has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2006. Mr. Crocker is currently a director of Ventas, Inc. (NYSE: VTR) a health care REIT. Mr. Crocker also serves as a director of the following companies: Post Properties (NYSE: PPS), a multifamily REIT, and REIS, Inc. (NASDAQ: REIS), a real estate merchant banking firm. Mr. Crocker serves as a Trustee for Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE: AKR), a REIT which owns and operates shopping centers. From March 1993 through December 2002, Mr. Crocker was Chief Executive Officer, President and a Trustee of Equity Residential (NYSE: EQR), an apartment REIT, and served as the company’s Vice Chairman from January 2003 through May 2003. Mr. Crocker also serves as a trustee of DePaul University. Mr. Crocker is a former Chairman of the Multifamily Council of the Urban Land Institute and former member of the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. Mr. Crocker is a past chairman of the National Multi Housing Council.

Stephen P. Jonas. Mr. Jonas has served on our board of directors since September 2009. Mr. Jonas retired in 2007 as Executive Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company, the investment management

110

organization of Fidelity Investments, the largest mutual fund company in the United States. Mr. Jonas was a member of Fidelity’s Management Committee and served on Fidelity’s Board of Directors as well as the Board of Trustees of the Fidelity Funds. Mr. Jonas joined Fidelity in 1987 as Vice President of Finance for the retail customer phone operations. He then held a series of senior operational and financial positions, which included Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity Management & Research Company, Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity Brokerage Group and Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity Personal Investments and Brokerage Group. Mr. Jonas served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity Investments from 1998 to 2002, and Chief Administrative Officer until 2004, when he was named President of Enterprise Operations and Risk Services. He was appointed to his last position in 2005 and retired in 2007, when he was responsible for the investment management of $1.2 trillion of mutual fund assets. Prior to joining Fidelity, Mr. Jonas was with Wang Laboratories in Lowell, Massachusetts from 1978 to 1987, where he held a series of senior financial and operational positions in the Customer Services Division. Previously, he was Chief Financial Officer for Graphic Systems, Inc. in Hudson, New Hampshire from 1975 to 1978. Mr. Jonas serves on the Board of Trustees for Simmons College in Massachusetts, where he is currently Chairman of its Investment Committee.

Promoter

We consider Mr. Grant, our chief executive officer and president and the chairman of our board of directors, as our promoter, which means that he has taken initiative in funding and organizing our business.

Corporate Governance—Board of Directors and Committees

Our business is managed by our Manager, subject to the supervision and oversight of our board of directors, which has established investment guidelines for our Manager to follow in its day to day management of our business. A majority of our board of directors is “independent,” as determined by the requirements of the NYSE and the regulations of the SEC. Our directors keep informed about our business at meetings of our board and its committees and through supplemental reports and communications. Our independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions without the presence of our corporate officers.

Audit Committee

Our board of directors has established an audit committee, which is composed of three of our independent directors, Messrs. Jonas, Redlingshafer and Tyson. Mr. Jonas chairs our audit committee and serves as our audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined by the SEC. The committee assists the board in overseeing:

our accounting and financial reporting processes;

the integrity and audits of our consolidated financial statements;

our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; and

the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and any internal auditors.

The committee is also responsible for engaging our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.

Compensation Committee

Our board of directors has established a compensation committee, which is composed of Mr. Crocker, Mr. Redlingshafer and Mr. Tyson. Mr. Crocker chairs the committee, whose principal functions are to:

evaluate the performance of our officers;

111

review the compensation payable to our officers;

evaluate the performance of our Manager;

review the compensation and fees payable to our Manager under our management agreement; and

administer the issuance of any stock issued to our employees or the employees of our Manager who provide services to us.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our board of directors has established a nominating and corporate governance committee, which is composed of Mr. Crocker, Mr. Redlingshafer and Mr. Tyson. Mr. Redlingshafer chairs the committee, which is responsible for seeking, considering and recommending to the full board of directors qualified candidates for election as directors and recommending a slate of nominees for election as directors at the annual meeting of stockholders. It also periodically prepares and submits to the board for adoption the committee’s selection criteria for director nominees. It reviews and makes recommendations on matters involving general operation of the board and our corporate governance, and annually recommends to the board nominees for each committee of the board. In addition, the committee annually facilitates the assessment of the board of directors’ performance as a whole and of the individual directors and reports thereon to the board.

Risk Management Committee

Our board of directors has established a risk management committee, which is composed of Mr. Crocker, Mr. Redlingshafer, Ms. Spark and Mr. Tyson. Mr. Tyson chairs the committee. The committee’s principal functions are to:

oversee senior management’s responsibilities to identify, assess and manage our risk exposures, including but not limited to credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, counterparty risk, investment risk, liquidity risk, operational risk and compliance risk; and

report to and assist the board of directors with respect to the assessment of our risk management compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our compensation committee is or has been employed by us. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past three years has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of another entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has established a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our officers, directors and employees and to our Manager’s officers, directors and employees when such individuals are acting for or on our behalf. Among other matters, our code of business conduct and ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our SEC reports and other public communications;

compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to appropriate persons identified in the code; and

accountability for adherence to the code.

112

Any waiver of the code of business conduct and ethics for our executive officers or directors may be made only by our board of directors or one of our board committees and will be promptly disclosed as required by law or stock exchange regulations.

Compensation of Directors

Members of our board of directors who are also employees of us, our Manager, Cypress or Sharpridge, (the “excluded directors”) do not receive additional compensation for serving on our board of directors. In the future, to the extent our chairman is a non-excluded director, the chairman may be entitled to receive an annual retainer fee, a fee for each full board meeting attended in person or telephonically and/or a fee for each committee meeting attended in person or telephonically and that occurs on a date different from a full board meeting date at the discretion of the compensation committee of our board of directors. Each non-excluded director receives $10,000 per quarter, payable in shares of our restricted common stock. Beginning January 1, 2007, shares of restricted stock that we grant to our non-excluded directors are subject to forfeiture restrictions that lapse on the first anniversary of the date of each grant. These shares are issued pursuant to our 2006 stock incentive plan and are in addition to awards to our Manager. Furthermore, each of our independent directors who serves on our audit committee, compensation committee or nominating and corporate governance committee receives an annual cash retainer fee of $10,000, the chairperson of our audit committee receives an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000 and each member of our audit committee receives a cash fee of $2,000 per audit committee meeting. We also reimburse our directors for their travel expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at full board and committee meetings.

Compensation of Our Directors in 2008

The table below describes the compensation earned by our independent directors in 2008. We compensated only those directors who are independent under the NYSE listing standards.


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Stock Awards⁽¹⁾		All Other Compensation	Total Compensation
Frances Spark⁽²⁾	$	24,000	$	53,386	—	$	77,386
David A. Tyson, PhD⁽³⁾		14,000		50,047	—		64,047
Douglas Crocker, II⁽⁴⁾		10,000		43,367	—		53,367
Raymond A. Redlingshafer⁽⁵⁾		14,000		43,367	—		57,367

⁽¹⁾	All stock awards were granted pursuant to our 2006 stock incentive plan.

⁽²⁾

Ms. Spark was a member of our board of directors until September 21, 2009. Ms. Spark received 2,538 shares of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $39,978. These shares of restricted stock were granted as follows: 506 in January 2008, 684 in April 2008, 633 in July 2008 and 715 in October 2008. These restricted stock awards are subject to forfeiture restrictions that will lapse on the first anniversary of the date of grant. As of December 31, 2008, Ms. Spark had outstanding an aggregate of 5,205 shares of restricted stock. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a discussion of the assumptions used to value our stock awards to directors.

⁽³⁾

Mr. Tyson received 2,538 shares of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $39,978. These shares of restricted stock were granted as follows: 506 in January 2008, 684 in April 2008, 633 in July 2008 and 715 in October 2008. These restricted stock awards are subject to forfeiture restrictions that will lapse on the first anniversary of the date of grant. As of December 31, 2008, Mr. Tyson had outstanding an aggregate of 4,871 shares of restricted stock. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a discussion of the assumptions used to value our stock awards to directors.

⁽⁴⁾

Mr. Crocker received 2,538 shares of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $39,978. These shares of restricted stock were granted as follows: 506 in January 2008, 684 in April 2008, 633 in July 2008 and 715 in October 2008. These restricted stock awards are subject to forfeiture restrictions that will lapse on the first anniversary of the date of grant. As of December 31, 2008, Mr. Crocker had outstanding an aggregate of 4,204 shares of restricted stock. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a discussion of the assumptions used to value our stock awards to directors.

⁽⁵⁾

Mr. Redlingshafer received 2,538 shares of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $39,978. These shares of restricted stock were granted as follows: 506 in January 2008, 684 in April 2008, 633 in July 2008 and 715 in October 2008. These restricted stock awards are subject to forfeiture restrictions that will lapse on the first anniversary of the date of grant. As of December 31, 2008, Mr. Redlingshafer had outstanding an aggregate of 4,204 shares of restricted stock. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a discussion of the assumptions used to value our stock awards to directors.

113

Executive Compensation

Because our management agreement provides that our Manager is responsible for managing our affairs, our executive officers, who are employees of Sharpridge, do not receive cash compensation directly from us for serving as our executive officers. However, in their capacities as officers or employees of our Manager, or its affiliates, they devote a portion of their time to our affairs as is required for the performance of the duties of our Manager under the Management Agreement.

Our Manager compensates each of our executive officers. We pay our Manager a management fee, and our Manager uses the proceeds from the management fee in part to pay compensation to its or its sub-advisors’ officers and employees. Our Manager has informed us that, because the services performed by these officers or employees in their capacities as such are performed primarily, but not exclusively, for us, it cannot segregate and identify that portion of the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our executive officers by our Manager that relates solely to their services to us. From time to time, we have granted, and in the future we may grant, shares of restricted stock or options to purchase our common stock to our executive officers and certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to us, as designated by our Manager. For a description of grants made as of the date of this prospectus, see “—Options and Restricted Stock Awards.”

2006 Stock Incentive Plan

We have adopted the 2006 stock incentive plan to provide incentives to our independent directors, our Manager and certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to us to stimulate their efforts toward our continued success, long term growth and profitability and to attract, reward and retain personnel. The incentive plan is administered by, and the issuance of restricted stock awards or granting of options is subject to the approval of, the compensation committee of our board of directors. Unless terminated earlier, our stock incentive plan will terminate in 2016, but will continue to govern unexpired awards. The total number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan is 3,333,333. As of September 30, 2009, of the 3,333,333 shares authorized for issuance under the plan, 402,705 have been awarded as restricted stock or stock options and 2,930,628 shares remain available for future issuance under the 2006 stock incentive plan. Furthermore, the number of shares that may be issued during the plan’s life may increase from time to time to provide for awards of restricted stock to our non-excluded directors, which are in addition to awards to our Manager and other service providers.

Our stock incentive plan permits the granting of options to purchase shares of common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code, and stock options that do not qualify as incentive stock options. The exercise price of each stock option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our shares of common stock on the date of grant. The committee will determine the terms of each option, including when each option may be exercised and the period of time, if any, after retirement, death, disability or termination of employment during which options may be exercised. Options become vested and exercisable in installments and the exercisability of options may be accelerated by the committee.

Our stock incentive plan also permits the grant of shares of our common stock in the form of awards. A stock award is an award of shares of common stock that may be subject to forfeiture (vesting), restrictions on transferability and such other restrictions, if any, as the committee may impose at the date of grant. The shares may vest and the restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, including, without limitation, a specified period of employment or the satisfaction of pre-established criteria, in such installments or otherwise, as our compensation committee may determine. During such time as shares awarded under our stock incentive plan are under restriction, any dividends paid on our common stock shall be paid directly to holders of restricted stock as if such shares were unrestricted.

Unrestricted shares of common stock, which are shares of common stock awarded at no cost to the participant or for a purchase price determined by the compensation committee, may also be issued under our

114

stock incentive plan. The compensation committee may also grant shares of our common stock, stock appreciation rights, performance awards and other stock and non-stock-based awards under the incentive plan. These awards may be subject to such conditions and restrictions as the committee may determine, including, but not limited to, the achievement of certain performance goals or continued employment with us through a specific period. Each award under the plan may not be exercisable more than 10 years after the date of grant.

Our board of directors may at any time amend, alter or discontinue the incentive plan, but cannot, without a participant’s consent, take any action that would impair the rights of such participant under any award granted under the plan. To the extent required by law, the board of directors will obtain approval of the stockholders for any amendment that would, other than through adjustment as provided in the incentive plan:

increase the total number of shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under the incentive plan;

change the class of eligible participants under the incentive plans; or

otherwise require such approval.

If we experience a change of control, our stock incentive plan provides that the compensation committee of our board of directors has the discretion to provide that (i) all or any outstanding options and stock appreciation rights will become fully exercisable, (ii) all or any outstanding stock awards will become vested and transferable and (iii) all or any outstanding performance shares and incentive awards will be earned, all or any outstanding awards may be cancelled in exchange for a payment of cash and/or all or any outstanding awards may be substituted for awards that will substantially preserve the otherwise applicable terms of any affected awards previously granted under the stock incentive plan.

Under our stock incentive plan, a change in control is defined as the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the acquisition of more than 50% of our voting shares by any person; (ii) the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets; (iii) a merger, consolidation or statutory share exchange where our stockholders immediately prior to such event hold less than 50% of the voting power of the surviving or resulting entity; (iv) our directors, including subsequent directors recommended or approved by our directors, cease to constitute a majority of our board of directors; (v) stockholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution; or (vi) the adoption by our board of directors of a resolution to the effect that, in its judgment, as a consequence of any transaction or event, a change in control has effectively occurred, except, in the case of clauses (i) through (vi), if the change of control results from a transaction between us and our Manager or an affiliate of our Manager or from a termination of the management agreement for cause.

Options and Restricted Stock Awards

In connection with our initial capitalization in February 2006, we awarded to our chief executive officer, as designated by our Manager, options to purchase shares of common stock currently equal to 131,088 shares. These options currently have an exercise price of $30.00 per share and are fully vested.

In connection with our initial capitalization, we awarded shares of restricted stock currently equal to 131,088 shares to our executive officers and certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors and other affiliates, as designated by our Manager. These shares of restricted stock are fully vested. Shares of restricted stock currently equal to 1,666 shares were forfeited in 2006.

In addition, in connection with our December 2006 private offering, we granted shares of restricted stock currently equal to 114,497 shares to our executive officers and certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to us, as designated by our Manager. These shares of restricted stock are subject to forfeiture restrictions that will lapse in equal one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the closing date of the December 2006 private offering. Pursuant to the terms of the 2006 stock incentive plan and other legal requirements, these shares of restricted stock were issued to Sharpridge’s officers and employees and other individuals who provide services to us, as designated by our Manager.

115

From February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to May 28, 2008 (effective date of stock split), we granted an aggregate of shares of restricted stock currently equal to 13,095 shares to our independent directors as part of their director compensation. From May 28, 2008 to September 30, 2009, we granted an aggregate of 14,600 shares of restricted stock to our independent directors as part of their director compensation. The shares of restricted stock granted in 2006 are subject to forfeiture restrictions that lapse in equal one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of each grant. Beginning on January 1, 2007, the shares of restricted stock granted to our independent directors are subject to forfeiture restrictions that lapse on the first anniversary of the date of each grant.

To the extent that we elect to grant shares of restricted stock to our Manager in the future, we expect that our Manager will generally elect to assign its right to receive these shares to its sub-advisors’ officers and employees and other individuals who provide services to us and will instruct us to issue these shares directly to these individuals.

Indemnification and Limitation on Liability; Insurance

Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages, except for liability resulting from:

actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or

active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action.

Our charter contains such a provision that eliminates directors’ and officers’ liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.

Our charter also authorizes our company, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to obligate our company to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while a director or officer of our company and at the request of our company, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee, from and against any claim or liability to which that individual may become subject or which that individual may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse his or her reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding.

Our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or any individual who, while a director or officer of our company and at the request of our company, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee and who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity and to pay or reimburse his or her reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. Our charter and bylaws also permit our company to indemnify and advance expenses to any individual who served a predecessor of our company in any of the capacities described above and any employee or agent of our company or a predecessor of our company. Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service in such capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or are threatened to be made, a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that:

the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (i) was committed in bad faith or (ii) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; or

116

the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or

in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.

A court may order indemnification if it determines that the director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification, even though the director or officer did not meet the prescribed standard of conduct or was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the corporation’s receipt of:

a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the corporation; and

a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.

We have obtained a policy of insurance under which our directors and officers are insured, subject to the limits of the policy, against certain losses arising from claims made against such directors and officers by reason of any acts or omissions covered under such policy in their respective capacities as directors or officers, including certain liabilities under the Securities Act. We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers.

117

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2009, certain ownership information with respect to our common stock for those persons known to us who directly or indirectly own, control or hold with the power to vote, 5% or more of our outstanding common stock and all of our executive officers and directors, individually and as a group. Knowledge of the beneficial ownership of our common stock is drawn from statements filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act. In accordance with SEC rules, each listed person’s beneficial ownership includes:

all shares the investor actually owns beneficially or of record;

all shares over which the investor has or shares voting or dispositive control (such as in the capacity as a general partner of an investment fund); and

all shares the investor has the right to acquire within 60 days (such as upon exercise of options that are currently vested or which are scheduled to vest within 60 days).


	Shares Beneficially Owned
Name and Address	Number⁽¹⁾	Percent⁽¹⁾
5% Stockholders:
Talon⁽²⁾	1,936,871	10.63	%
Fidelity Investments⁽³⁾	1,809,906	9.94	%
Wellington⁽⁴⁾	1,793,131	9.85	%
Robeco Investment Management, Inc.⁽⁵⁾	1,050,944	5.77	%
Directors and Executive Officers:
Kevin E. Grant⁽⁶⁾⁽⁷⁾	271,520	1.48	%
Jeffrey P. Hughes⁽⁶⁾⁽⁸⁾	100,062	0.55	%
James A. Stern⁽⁶⁾⁽⁹⁾	82,141	0.45	%
Richard E. Cleary⁽⁶⁾⁽¹⁰⁾	25,599	0.14	%
Frances Spark^(6)(11)	9,505	0.05	%
Thomas A. Rosenbloom⁽⁶⁾	500	0.00	%
David A. Tyson^(6)(11)	13,837	0.08	%
Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr.^(6)(11)	12,237	0.07	%
Douglas Crocker, II^(5)(12)	23,149	0.13	%
Stephen P. Jonas⁽⁶⁾	—	—
All Officers and Directors as a Group (10 persons)	538,550	2.96	%

⁽¹⁾

For each 5% stockholder and named person, assumes that all unvested shares of restricted stock have vested and the named person exercised all warrants and options to acquire shares of common stock held by such person which are currently exercisable or which become exercisable on or before 60 days after September 30, 2009 (without regard to whether the warrants and options were or are in-the-money). The total number of shares of common stock used in calculating the percent owned by each 5% stockholder or named person assumes that none of the warrants and options held by other stockholders are exercised.

⁽²⁾	The address for Talon is One N. Franklin St., Suite 900, Chicago, Illinois 60606. Talon Asset Management, LLC manages each of these entities.

⁽³⁾	The address for Fidelity Investments is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

⁽⁴⁾	The address for Wellington is 75 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

⁽⁵⁾	The address for Robeco Investment Management, Inc. is 909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, New York 10022.

⁽⁶⁾	The address for Messrs. Grant, Hughes, Stern, Crocker, Redlingshafer, Cleary, Rosenbloom, Tyson and Jonas and Ms. Spark is 65 East 55th Street, New York, New York 10022.

⁽⁷⁾	Includes (i) 8,304 unvested shares of restricted stock and (ii) options to acquire 131,088 shares of common stock.

⁽⁸⁾	Includes (i) 16,666 shares of common stock held in trusts for which Mr. Hughes is a trustee and (ii) 5,410 unvested shares of restricted stock.

⁽⁹⁾	Includes (i) 16,667 shares of common stock held in a trust for which Mr. Stern is a trustee and (ii) 5,159 unvested shares of restricted stock.

118

⁽¹⁰⁾	Includes 1,111 unvested shares of restricted stock.

⁽¹¹⁾	Includes 3,129 unvested shares of restricted stock.

⁽¹²⁾

Includes 16,644 shares of common stock, which were acquired by Talon Sharpridge QP, LLC. Talon Asset Management LLC is the managing member of Talon Sharpridge QP, LLC. Mr. Crocker holds a minority ownership interest in Talon Sharpridge QP, LLC. These amounts reflect Mr. Crocker’s economic interest in the shares of common stock held by Talon Sharpridge QP, LLC. Also includes 3,129 unvested shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Crocker.

119

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Management Agreement

Our management agreement with Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC, our Manager, provides for the day-to-day management of our operations. The management agreement requires our Manager to manage our business affairs in conformity with the policies and the investment guidelines that are approved and monitored by our board of directors. See “Management—Management Agreement.” Our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief operating officer and secretary also serve as officers of our Manager. As a result, the management agreement between us and our Manager was negotiated between related parties, and the terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party. See “Business—Conflicts of Interest,” “Business—Resolution of Potential Conflicts of Interest and Allocation of Investment Opportunities” and “Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Organization and Structure—There are conflicts of interest in our relationship with our Manager.”

During 2007, 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2009, we paid our Manager approximately $2.4 million, approximately $1.6 million and approximately $0.9 million in base management fees, respectively. The only incentive compensation earned by our Manager to date, which was approximately $0.2 million during 2007, was waived by our Manager. During 2007, we did not reimburse any expenses to our Manager because our Manager waived its right to seek such reimbursement. Commencing January 1, 2008, we began reimbursing our Manager for the expenses described above which amounted to approximately $0.9 million and approximately $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. We and our Manager have agreed that our Manager no longer will be eligible to receive any incentive compensation under our management agreement or otherwise upon the completion of this offering.

License Agreement

In connection with our initial capitalization, we entered into license agreements with each of Cypress and Sharpridge pursuant to which each of Cypress and Sharpridge granted us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the names and trademarks “Cypress” and “Sharpridge.” Under these agreements, we have a right to use these names and trademarks, for so long as each firm or one of its affiliates remain affiliated with our Manager. Other than with respect to these limited licenses, we have no legal right to either the “Cypress” or “Sharpridge” names. Each license agreement will remain in effect so long as the management agreement with our Manager and the respective sub-advisory agreement is in effect. As a result, in the event the management agreement or the respective sub-advisory agreement is terminated or expires, we would be required to change our name to eliminate the use of “Cypress” or “Sharpridge,” as the case may be.

Options and Restricted Stock Awards

In connection with our February 2006 and December 2006 private offerings and our compensation of our independent directors, we have granted shares of restricted stock to our independent directors and shares of restricted stock and options to purchase shares of our common stock to our executive officers and certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to us, as designated by our Manager. See “Management—Options and Restricted Stock Awards” for additional information relating to these grants.

Interest in Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.

Our chief executive officer, Kevin E. Grant, founded Sharpridge in January 2005. Mr. Grant is the sole member of the general partner of Sharpridge. Concurrent with our initial capitalization, we received a 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in Sharpridge, which interest is held by Sharpridge TRS, Inc. Our 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in Sharpridge entitles us to receive distributions and allocations at the

120

close of each accounting period (as defined in the Sharpridge limited partnership agreement) based on our percentage interest, excluding amounts attributable to Sharpridge’s invested capital. Under the terms of the Sharpridge limited partnership agreement, our interest in Sharpridge may not be transferred without the prior written consent of the general partner.

Purchases of Common Stock by Executive Officers, Directors and Affiliates

Our executive officers and directors, and certain officers and employees of our Manager and its sub-advisors and other affiliates own 510,917 shares of our common stock as a result of purchases of our common stock in our February 2006 and December 2006 private offerings and our initial public offering. All of these securities were purchased at the same price paid by other third party investors.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. The indemnification agreements require, among other things, that we indemnify our directors and certain officers to the fullest extent permitted by law and advance to our directors and certain officers all related expenses, subject to reimbursement if it is subsequently determined that indemnification is not permitted.

Related Person Transaction Policies

121

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

The following summary description of our capital stock does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the MGCL and our charter and our bylaws, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”

General

Our charter provides that we may issue up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, both having par value $0.01 per share. As of September 30, 2009, we had issued and outstanding 18,212,732 shares of our common stock, including 50,679 shares of unvested restricted stock, and warrants and options to purchase an additional 78,190 and 131,088 shares of our common stock, respectively. As of that date, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding. On May 23, 2008, our stockholders approved a three-for-one reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock at our annual meeting of stockholders. Our charter permits our board of directors, without any action by our stockholders, to increase the total number of authorized shares of stock or the number of shares of any class or series of our stock. Under Maryland law, our stockholders are generally not liable for any of our debts and obligations.

Common Stock

All shares of our common stock have equal rights as to earnings, assets, dividends and voting and, when they are issued, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. Distributions may be paid to the holders of our common stock if, as and when authorized by our board of directors and declared by us out of funds legally available therefor. Shares of our common stock have no preemptive, appraisal, preference, exchange, conversion or redemption rights and are freely transferable, except where their transfer is restricted by federal and state securities laws, by contract or by the restrictions in our charter. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each share of our common stock would be entitled to share ratably in all of our assets that are legally available for distribution after we pay all known debts and other liabilities and subject to our charter restriction on the transfer and ownership of our stock and any preferential rights of holders of our preferred stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such time. Subject to our charter restrictions on the transfer and ownership of our stock and except as may otherwise be specified in the terms of any class or series of common stock, each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as provided with respect to any other class or series of stock, the holders of our common stock possess exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock can elect all of our directors, and holders of less than a majority of such shares are unable to elect any director. Generally, all matters to be voted on by stockholders must be approved by a majority (or in the case of elections of directors, by a plurality) of the votes entitled to be cast by all holders of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy, voting together as a single class.

Classification and Designation of Stock

Our charter authorizes our board of directors to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock, including preferred stock. Prior to issuance of shares of each class or series, the board of directors is required by Maryland law and by our charter to set, subject to our charter restrictions on the transfer and ownership of our stock, the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each such class or series. Thus, the board of directors could authorize the issuance of shares of common or preferred stock with terms and conditions which could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or otherwise be in their best interest. No shares of our preferred stock are presently outstanding and we have no present plans to issue any preferred stock.

122

Power to Increase the Number of, and to Issue, Additional Shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock

We believe that the power of our board of directors to increase the total number of authorized shares of our stock or of any class or series of our stock, to issue additional authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock and to classify or reclassify unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock and thereafter to cause us to issue such classified or reclassified shares of stock will provide us with increased flexibility in structuring possible future financings and acquisitions and in meeting other needs which might arise. The additional classes or series, as well as our common stock, will be available for issuance without further action by our stockholders, unless stockholder action is required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our securities may be listed or traded. Although our board of directors has no intention at the present time of doing so, it could authorize us to issue a class or series that could, depending upon the terms of such class or series, delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control of us that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or otherwise be in their best interest.

Warrants Issued in Our May 2008 Private Offering

The 2,885,923 warrants underlying the units sold in our May 2008 private offering were issued pursuant to a warrant agreement that we entered into with National City Bank, as warrant agent on May 22, 2008. Each warrant currently entitles the holder to purchase one-tenth of one share of common stock for an exercise price of $1.56 (or $15.60 per share), subject to adjustment as described below. Because the offering price per share in our initial public offering was less than $15.60, the exercise price of these warrants was adjusted to equal the offering price per share in that offering ($11.00 per share). The following is a brief summary of certain provisions of the warrant agreement and does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the warrant agreement.

Exercise of the Warrants

Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one-tenth of one share of our common stock for $1.56 (or $15.60 per share), subject to adjustment as set forth below under “—Anti-Dilution Adjustments.” Because the offering price per share in our initial public offering was less than $15.60, the exercise price of these warrants was adjusted to equal the offering price per share in that offering ($11.00 per share). The warrants became exercisable on May 28, 2008 and will expire at the close of business on April 30, 2011. The warrants have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act and the warrants may not be exercised unless an exemption from such registration is available.

Upon receipt of payment of the exercise price and the warrant certificate, together with a form of election attached thereto, properly completed and duly executed at the office of the warrant agent, we will, as soon as practicable, forward the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. Payment may be made (i) in cash or by certified or official bank check or by wire transfer of funds to an account designated by us for such purpose or (ii) without the payment of cash, by reducing the number of shares of common stock obtainable upon the exercise of a warrant and payment of the exercise price in cash so as to yield a number of shares of common stock upon the exercise of such warrant equal to the product of (a) the number of shares of common stock issuable as of the date the warrant is exercised (if payment of the exercise price were being made in cash) and (b) the cashless exercise ratio. For purposes of the foregoing, the “cashless exercise ratio” is a fraction, the numerator of which is the excess of the current market value per share of common stock on the exercise date over the exercise price per share as of the exercise date and the denominator of which is the current market value per share of common stock on the exercise date. We shall at all times during the term of the warrants keep in reserve sufficient authorized but unissued shares of common stock for issuances in the event of the exercise of the warrants. In lieu of issuing fractional shares upon the exercise of any warrants, we will pay a cash amount equal to the current market value per share (as determined pursuant to the warrant agreement on the day immediately preceding the date the warrant is exercised), multiplied by such fraction, computed to the nearest whole cent.

123

Anti-Dilution Adjustments

The warrants are subject to customary anti-dilution provisions, including adjustments to the exercise price and the shares of common stock deliverable upon exercise of the warrants upon the following events: (i) stock dividends, subdivisions, combinations and reclassifications, and (ii) other distributions and other similar dilutive events (other than ordinary cash dividends). However, no adjustment of the exercise price or the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants will be made unless the adjustment, either by itself or with other adjustments not previously made, increases or decreases by at least 1% the exercise price or the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants immediately prior to the making of the adjustment.

Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer

In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code for each taxable year after 2006, our shares of capital stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of twelve months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Also, no more than 50% of the value of our outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned, directly or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities) during the second half of any calendar year. Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, contains restrictions on the number of shares of our capital stock that a person may own. Our charter provides that (subject to certain exceptions described below) no person may own beneficially or constructively, or be deemed to own by virtue of the attribution provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of our capital stock. For purposes of this calculation with respect to a stockholder, warrants treated as held by such stockholder will be deemed to have been exercised. However, warrants held by other unrelated persons will not be deemed to have been exercised.

Our charter also prohibits any person from (i) beneficially or constructively owning shares of our capital stock that would result in our being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT and (ii) transferring shares of our capital stock if such transfer would result in our capital stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons. Any person who acquires or attempts or intends to acquire beneficial or constructive ownership of shares of our capital stock that will or may violate any of the foregoing restrictions on transferability and ownership, or who is the intended transferee of shares of our stock which are transferred to the trust (as described below), will be required to give notice immediately to us and provide us with such other information as we may request in order to determine the effect of such transfer on our status as a REIT. The foregoing restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a REIT.

Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt a person from the foregoing restrictions. The person seeking an exemption must provide to our board of directors such representations, covenants and undertakings as our board of directors may deem appropriate in order to conclude that granting the exemption will not cause us to lose our status as a REIT. Our board of directors may also require a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of counsel in order to determine or ensure our status as a REIT. Our board of directors has granted a waiver from the 9.8% ownership limit to Talon that allows Talon to own up to the greater of 15% or 2,509,246 shares of our common stock.

Any attempted transfer of our stock which, if effective, would result in a violation of the foregoing restrictions will cause the number of shares causing the violation (rounded to the nearest whole share) to be automatically transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more charitable beneficiaries, and the proposed transferee will not acquire any rights in such shares. The automatic transfer will be deemed to be effective as of the close of business on the business day (as defined in our charter) prior to the date of the transfer. Shares of our stock held in the trust will be issued and outstanding shares. The proposed transferee will

124

not benefit economically from ownership of any shares of stock held in the trust and will have no rights to dividends, rights to vote or other rights attributable to the shares of stock held in the trust. The trustee of the trust will have all voting rights and rights to dividends or other distributions with respect to shares held in the trust. These rights will be exercised for the exclusive benefit of the charitable beneficiary. Any dividend or other distribution paid to the proposed transferee prior to our discovery that shares of stock have been transferred to the trust will be paid by the proposed transferee on demand to the trustee. Any dividend or distribution authorized but unpaid will be paid to the trustee when due. Any dividend or other distribution paid to the trustee will be held in trust for the charitable beneficiary. If the automatic transfer to the trust is ineffective for any reason to prevent a violation of the restriction, the transfer that would have resulted in such violation will be void ab initio.

Subject to Maryland law, the trustee will have the authority (i) to rescind as void any vote cast by the proposed transferee prior to our discovery that the shares have been transferred to the trust and (ii) to recast the vote in accordance with the desires of the trustee acting for the benefit of the charitable beneficiary. If we have already taken irreversible corporate action, however, then the trustee will not have the authority to rescind and recast the vote.

Within 20 days of receiving notice from us that shares of our stock have been transferred to the trust, the trustee will sell the shares to a person designated by the trustee, whose ownership of the shares will not violate the above ownership limitations. Upon such sale, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee will distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the proposed transferee and to the charitable beneficiary as follows: The proposed transferee will receive the lesser of (i) the price paid by the proposed transferee for the shares or, if the proposed transferee did not give value for the shares in connection with the event causing the shares to be held in the trust (e.g., a gift, devise or other similar transaction), the market price (as defined in our charter) of the shares on the day of the event causing the shares to be held in the trust and (ii) the price received by the trustee from the sale or other disposition of the shares. The trustee may reduce the price, however, by the amount of any dividends or distributions paid to the proposed transferee on the shares and owed by the proposed transferee to the trustee. Any net sale proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the proposed transferee will be paid immediately to the charitable beneficiary. If, prior to our discovery that shares of our stock have been transferred to the trustee, the shares are sold by the proposed transferee, then (i) the shares shall be deemed to have been sold on behalf of the trust and (ii) to the extent that the proposed transferee received an amount for the shares that exceeds the amount the proposed transferee was entitled to receive, the excess shall be paid to the trustee upon demand.

In addition, shares of our stock held in the trust will be deemed to have been offered for sale to us, or our designee, at a price per share equal to the lesser of (i) the price per share in the transaction that resulted in the transfer to the trust (or, in the case of a devise or gift, the market price at the time of the devise or gift) and (ii) the market price on the date we, or our designee, accept the offer. We may reduce the price, however, by the amount of any dividends or distributions paid to the proposed transferee on the shares and owed by the proposed transferee to the trustee. We will have the right to accept the offer until the trustee has sold the shares. Upon a sale to us, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee will distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the proposed transferee.

All certificates representing outstanding shares of our capital stock will either bear legends referring to the restrictions described above or will state that we will furnish a full statement about certain transfer restrictions to a stockholder upon request and without charge.

Every owner of more than 5% (or such lower percentage as required by the Internal Revenue Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder) in value of all classes or series of our outstanding shares of stock, including shares of common stock, within 30 days after the end of each taxable year, will be required to give written notice to us stating the name and address of such owner, the number of shares of our stock which the owner beneficially owns and a description of the manner in which the shares are held. Each owner shall provide to us such

125

additional information as we may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of the beneficial ownership on our status as a REIT and to ensure compliance with the ownership limitations. In addition, each such owner shall upon demand be required to provide to us such information as we may request, in good faith, in order to determine our status as a REIT and to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority or governmental authority or to determine such compliance.

These ownership limitations could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for the common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for our shares of common stock is Computershare Limited.

126

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

We cannot predict the effect, if any, that sales of shares or the availability of shares for sale will have on the market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock.

Prior to this offering, we had 18,212,732 shares of our common stock outstanding. Upon completion of this offering, we will have outstanding an aggregate of approximately shares of our common stock. In addition, we have 2,930,628 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2006 stock incentive plan. As of the date of this prospectus, 78,190 shares of common stock are issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued in our May 2008 private offering.

The 17,865,297 shares of common stock issued in connection with our initial capitalization, our December 2006 private offering, our May 2008 private offering and our initial public offering are, and the shares of common stock sold in this offering will be, freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act unless the shares are held by any of our “affiliates,” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. As defined in Rule 144, an “affiliate” of an issuer is a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the issuer. Of the 288,592 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued in our May 2008 private offering, only such shares that are issued using the cash exercise feature of the warrants will be restricted securities. As of the date of this prospectus, 13,619 shares of common stock have been issued upon exercise of the warrants using the cashless exercise feature and 62,199 shares of common stock have been issued upon exercise of the warrants using the cash exercise feature. Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if registered under the securities laws or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rule 144, as described below.

Rule 144

In general, under Rule 144, a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who is not an affiliate of ours and has not been one of our affiliates at any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned the restricted securities proposed to be sold for at least one year, including the holding period of any prior owner other than an affiliate, is entitled to sell his or her securities without registration and without complying with the manner of sale, current public information, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144. In addition, under Rule 144, once we have been subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for at least 90 days, a person (or persons whose securities are aggregated) who is not an affiliate of ours and has not been one of our affiliates at any time during the three months preceding a sale, may sell his or her securities without registration after only a six-month holding period, subject only to the continued availability of current public information about us. Any sales by affiliates under Rule 144, even after the applicable holding periods described above, are subject to requirements and or limitations with respect to volume, manner of sale, notice and the availability of current public information about us.

Lock-Up Periods

We have agreed with the underwriters not to issue, offer to sell, contract to sell, or otherwise dispose of, loan, pledge or grant any rights with respect to any shares of our common stock, any options or warrants to purchase any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable for any of our common stock, or announce our intention to do any of the foregoing, for a period of 90 days following the date of this prospectus, subject to certain extensions and exceptions described in “Underwriting—No Sale of Similar Securities.”

127

outstanding shares of common stock, or 750,116 shares. Each of these individuals and entities has agreed that for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus they will not, without the prior written consent of Barclays Capital Inc., (i) directly or indirectly, offer, sell, agree to offer or sell, solicit offers to purchase, grant any call option or purchase any put option with respect to, pledge, borrow or otherwise dispose of any relevant securities or (ii) establish or increase any “put equivalent position” or liquidate or decrease any “call equivalent position” (in each case within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder) with respect to any relevant security, or otherwise enter into any swap, derivative or other transaction or arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any economic consequence of ownership of a relevant security, whether or not such transaction is to be settled by delivery of relevant securities, other securities, cash or other consideration, subject to certain exceptions. This lock-up period may be extended in the circumstances as described in “Underwriting—Lock Up Agreements.”

128

CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE MARYLAND GENERAL CORPORATION

LAW AND OUR CHARTER AND BYLAWS

The following summary of certain provisions of Maryland law and of our charter and bylaws contains the material terms of our charter and bylaws and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, reference to Maryland law and to our charter and bylaws.

General

The MGCL and our charter and bylaws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a potential acquiror to acquire us by means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are expected to discourage certain coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to negotiate first with our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of these provisions outweigh the potential disadvantages of discouraging any such acquisition proposals because, among other things, the negotiation of such proposals may improve their terms.

Number of Directors; Vacancies; Removal

Our charter provides that the number of directors will be set only by the board of directors in accordance with our bylaws. Our bylaws provide that a majority of our entire board of directors may at any time increase or decrease the number of directors. However, unless our bylaws are amended, the number of directors may never be less than five nor more than eleven. We have elected to be subject to the provision of Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the MGCL regarding the filling of vacancies on the board of directors. Accordingly, except as may be provided by the board of directors in setting the terms of any class or series of stock, any and all vacancies on the board of directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is duly elected and qualifies. Subject to the rights of the holders of preferred stock, if any, our charter provides that a director may be removed only for cause, as defined in our charter, and then only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors.

Action by Stockholders

Under the MGCL, stockholder action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of stockholders or by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting (unless the charter provides for a lesser percentage, which our charter does not). These provisions, combined with the requirements of our bylaws regarding the calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting of stockholders discussed below, may have the effect of delaying consideration of a stockholder proposal until the next annual meeting.

Advance Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and Stockholder Proposals

Our bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to the board of directors and the proposal of business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (i) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (ii) by or at the direction of the board of directors or (iii) by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record both at the time of giving of notice by such stockholder as provided for in our bylaws and at the time of the annual meeting and who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice procedures of the bylaws. With respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the meeting.

Nominations of individuals for election to the board of directors at a special meeting may be made only (i) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (ii) by or at the direction of the board of directors or (iii) provided that the board of directors has determined that directors will be elected at the meeting, by a stockholder who was a

129

stockholder of record both at the time of giving of notice by such stockholder as provided for in our bylaws and at the time of the annual meeting and who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of the bylaws.

The purpose of requiring stockholders to give us advance notice of nominations and other business is to afford our board of directors a meaningful opportunity to consider the qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of any other proposed business and, to the extent deemed necessary or desirable by our board of directors, to inform stockholders and make recommendations about such qualifications or business, as well as to provide a more orderly procedure for conducting meetings of stockholders. Although our bylaws do not give our board of directors any power to disapprove stockholder nominations for the election of directors or proposals recommending certain action, they may have the effect of precluding a contest for the election of directors or the consideration of stockholder proposals if proper procedures are not followed and of discouraging or deterring a third party from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of directors or to approve its own proposal without regard to whether consideration of such nominees or proposals might be harmful or beneficial to us and our stockholders.

Calling of Special Meetings of Stockholders

Our bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called by our board of directors and certain of our officers. Additionally, our bylaws provide that, subject to the satisfaction of certain procedural and informational requirements by the stockholders requesting the meeting, a special meeting of stockholders shall be called by the secretary of the corporation upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at such meeting.

Approval of Extraordinary Corporate Action; Amendment of Charter and Bylaws

Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business, unless approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Our charter, with certain exceptions, generally provides for approval of charter amendments and extraordinary transactions that have been declared advisable by our board of directors by the stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Our bylaws provide that the board of directors will have the exclusive power to adopt, alter or repeal any provision of our bylaws and to make new bylaws.

No Appraisal Rights

As permitted by the MGCL, our charter provides that stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal rights (unless our board of directors, upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the board, determines that appraisal rights apply, with respect to all or any classes or series of stock, to one or more transactions occurring after the date of the board’s determination in connection with which holders of the shares would otherwise be entitled to exercise appraisal rights).

Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act

The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act provides that “control shares” of a Maryland corporation acquired in a “control share acquisition” have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding shares owned by the acquiror, by officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation. “Control shares” are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquiror or in respect of which the acquiror is able to exercise or

130

direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:

one-tenth or more but less than one-third;

one-third or more but less than a majority; or

a majority or more of all voting power.

Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.

A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition, upon satisfaction of certain conditions (including an undertaking to pay expenses), may compel our board of directors to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the shares. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any stockholders meeting.

If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement as required by the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, then, subject to certain conditions and limitations, we may redeem for fair value any or all of the control shares, except those for which voting rights have previously been approved. Fair value is determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting rights of the shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders’ meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. This means that a stockholder would be able to force us to redeem such stockholder’s shares for fair value. Under Maryland law, the fair value of the shares as determined for purposes of such appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid by the acquiror in the control share acquisition.

The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if we are a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions approved or exempted by our charter or bylaws.

Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares of stock. We cannot assure you that such provision will not be amended or repealed, in whole or in part, at any time in the future. We will, however, amend our bylaws to be subject to the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act only if the board of directors determines that it would be in our best interests.

Maryland Business Combination Act

The Maryland Business Combination Act prohibits certain “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and “interested stockholders” or an affiliate of an interested stockholder. Among other things, the law prohibits, for a period of five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, a corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder. These business combinations include mergers, consolidations, share exchanges or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities or certain other transactions. An interested stockholder is defined as:

any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s shares; or

an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of the corporation.

131

A person is not an interested stockholder under the Maryland Business Combination Act if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which the person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the board.

After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:

80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and

two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder.

These supermajority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares.

The Maryland Business Combination Act permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the board of directors before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Our board of directors has adopted a resolution that provides that any business combination between us and any other person is exempted from the provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act, provided that the business combination is first approved by the board of directors. However, this resolution may be altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time by our board of directors. If this resolution is repealed, or the board of directors does not otherwise approve a business combination, the statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.

Subtitle 8

Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the MGCL permits a Maryland corporation with a class of equity securities registered under the Exchange Act and at least three independent directors to elect to be subject, by provision in its charter or bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors and notwithstanding any contrary provision in the charter or bylaws, to any or all of five provisions:

a classified board;

a two-thirds vote requirement for removing a director;

a requirement that the number of directors be fixed only by vote of the directors;

a requirement that a vacancy on the board be filled only by the remaining directors and for the remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which the vacancy occurred; and

a majority requirement for the calling of a special stockholder-requested meeting of stockholders.

Our charter provides that, at such time as we have at least three independent directors and a class of our stock is registered under the Exchange Act, we elect to be subject to the provisions regarding the filling of board vacancies. Through provisions in our charter and bylaws unrelated to Subtitle 8, we already (a) require a two-thirds vote for the removal of any director from the board, (b) vest in the board the exclusive power to fix the number of directorships and (c) require, unless called by our chairman of the board, our president, our chief executive officer or the board, the request of holders of a majority of outstanding shares to compel the calling of a special meeting of stockholders.

132

Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and Advance of Expenses

actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or

active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action.

Our charter contains such a provision that eliminates directors’ and officers’ liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.

Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service in such capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or are threatened to be made, a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that:

the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or

in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.

However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was

133

improperly received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the corporation’s receipt of:

a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the corporation; and

a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.

134

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF OUR QUALIFICATION AS A REIT

This section summarizes the material federal income tax considerations that you, as a holder of shares of common stock, may consider relevant. Hunton & Williams LLP has acted as our tax counsel, has reviewed this summary, and is of the opinion that the discussion contained herein fairly summarizes the federal income tax consequences that are likely to be material to a holder of our shares of common stock. Because this section is a summary, it does not address all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to particular holders in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances, or to certain types of holders that are subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws, such as insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations (except to the extent discussed in “—Taxation of U.S. Holders—Taxation of Tax-Exempt Stockholders” below), partnerships, financial institutions or broker-dealers, and non-U.S. individuals and foreign corporations (except to the extent discussed in “—Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders” below) and other persons subject to special tax rules. This summary assumes that holders hold shares of common stock as capital assets for federal income tax purposes, which generally means property held for investment.

The statements in this section and the opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP are based on the current federal income tax laws. We cannot assure you that new laws, interpretations of law, or court decisions, any of which may take effect retroactively, will not cause any statement in this section to be inaccurate. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences described below. We have not sought and will not seek an advance ruling from the IRS regarding any matter in this prospectus.

This summary is for general information only and is not tax advice. We urge you to consult your tax advisor regarding the specific tax consequences to you of the purchase, ownership and sale of our common stock and of our election to be taxed as a REIT. Specifically, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the federal, state, local, foreign, and other tax consequences of such purchase, ownership, sale and election, and regarding potential changes in applicable tax laws.

Taxation of Our Company

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ended on December 31, 2006. We believe that we were organized and have operated and will continue to operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the federal income tax laws, but no assurances can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. This section discusses the laws governing the federal income tax treatment of a REIT and its stockholders. These laws are highly technical and complex.

In connection with this offering, Hunton & Williams LLP is rendering an opinion that we qualified to be taxed as a REIT for our taxable years ended on December 31, 2006, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008, and our organization and current and proposed method of operation will enable us to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for our taxable year ending December 31, 2009 and subsequent taxable years. Investors should be aware that Hunton & Williams LLP’s opinion is based upon customary assumptions, is conditioned upon certain representations made by us as to factual matters, including representations regarding the nature of our assets and the conduct of our business, and is not binding upon the IRS or any court. In addition, Hunton & Williams LLP’s opinion is based on existing federal income tax law governing qualification as a REIT, which is subject to change either prospectively or retroactively. Moreover, our qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet on a continuing basis, through actual annual operating results, certain qualification tests set forth in the federal tax laws. Those qualification tests involve the percentage of income that we earn from specified sources, the percentage of our assets that falls within specified categories, the diversity of our stock ownership, and the percentage of our earnings that we distribute. Hunton & Williams LLP will not review our compliance with those tests on a continuing basis. Accordingly, no assurance

135

can be given that our actual results of operations for any particular taxable year will satisfy such requirements. For a discussion of the tax consequences of our failure to qualify as a REIT, see “—Failure to Qualify.”

If we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on our net taxable income that we currently distribute to our stockholders, but taxable income generated by our domestic TRSs will be subject to regular corporate income tax. However, we will be subject to federal tax in the following circumstances:

We will pay federal income tax on our net taxable income, including net capital gain, that we do not distribute to stockholders during, or within a specified time period after, the calendar year in which the income is earned.

We may be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” on any items of tax preference, including any deductions of net operating losses, that we do not distribute or allocate to stockholders.

We will pay income tax at the highest corporate rate on:

net income from the sale or other disposition of property acquired through foreclosure, or foreclosure property, that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, and

other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property.

We will pay a 100% tax on net income earned from sales or other dispositions of property other than foreclosure property, that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.

If we fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test, as described below under “—Gross Income Tests,” but nonetheless continue to qualify as a REIT because we meet other requirements, we will be subject to a 100% tax on:

the greater of the amount by which we fail the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test, multiplied, in either case, by

a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.

If we fail to satisfy the asset tests (other than a de minimis failure of the 5% asset test or the 10% vote or value test, as described below under “—Asset Tests,”) as long as the failure was due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, we dispose of the assets or otherwise comply with such asset tests within six months after the last day of the quarter in which we identify such failure and we file a schedule with the IRS describing the assets that caused such failure, we will pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or 35% of the net income from the nonqualifying assets during the period in which we failed to satisfy such asset tests.

If we fail to satisfy one or more requirements for REIT qualification, other than the gross income tests and the asset tests, and the failure was due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, we will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure.

We may be required to pay monetary penalties to the IRS in certain circumstances, including if we fail to meet recordkeeping requirements intended to monitor our compliance with rules relating to the composition of a REIT’s stockholders, as described below in “—Requirements for Qualification.”

If we fail to distribute during a calendar year at least the sum of: (i) 85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year, (ii) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for the year and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from earlier periods, we will pay a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the amount we actually distributed, plus any retained amounts on which income tax has been paid at the corporate level.

We may elect to retain and pay income tax on our net long term capital gain. In that case, a U.S. stockholder would be taxed on its proportionate share of our undistributed long term capital gain (to the extent that we make a timely designation of such gain to the stockholder) and would receive a credit or refund for its proportionate share of the tax we paid.

136

We will be subject to a 100% excise tax on transactions between us and a TRS that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.

If we acquire any asset from a C corporation, or a corporation that generally is subject to full corporate-level tax, in a merger or other transaction in which we acquire a basis in the asset that is determined by reference either to the C corporation’s basis in the asset or to another asset, we will pay tax at the highest regular corporate rate applicable if we recognize gain on the sale or disposition of the asset during the 10-year period after we acquire the asset. The amount of gain on which we will pay tax is the lesser of:

the amount of gain that we recognize at the time of the sale or disposition, and

the amount of gain that we would have recognized if we had sold the asset at the time we acquired it, assuming that the C corporation will not elect in lieu of this treatment to an immediate tax when the asset is acquired.

In addition, notwithstanding our qualification as a REIT, we may also have to pay certain state and local income taxes, because not all states and localities treat REITs in the same manner that they are treated for federal income tax purposes. Moreover, as further described below, any domestic TRS in which we own an interest will be subject to federal, state and local corporate income tax on its taxable income. We could also be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not presently contemplated.

Requirements for Qualification

A REIT is a corporation, trust, or association that meets each of the following requirements:

It is managed by one or more trustees or directors.

Its beneficial ownership is evidenced by transferable shares or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest.

It would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for the REIT provisions of the federal income tax laws.

It is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to special provisions of the federal income tax laws.

At least 100 persons are beneficial owners of its shares or ownership certificates.

Not more than 50% in value of its outstanding shares or ownership certificates is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals, which the federal income tax laws define to include certain entities, during the last half of any taxable year.

It elects to be taxed as a REIT, or has made such election for a previous taxable year, and satisfies all relevant filing and other administrative requirements that must be met to elect and maintain REIT qualification.

It meets certain other qualification tests, described below, regarding the nature of its income and assets.

We must meet requirements 1 through 4 during our entire taxable year and must meet requirement 5 during at least 335 days of a taxable year of twelve months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than twelve months. Requirements 5 and 6 applied to us beginning with our 2007 taxable year. If we comply with all the requirements for ascertaining the ownership of our outstanding stock in a taxable year and have no reason to know that we violated requirement 6, we will be deemed to have satisfied requirement 6 for that taxable year. For purposes of determining share ownership under requirement 6, an “individual” generally includes a supplemental unemployment compensation benefits plan, a private foundation, or a portion of a trust permanently set aside or used exclusively for charitable purposes. An “individual,” generally does not include a trust that is a qualified employee pension or profit sharing trust under the federal income tax laws, however, and beneficiaries of such a trust will be treated as holding our stock in proportion to their actuarial interests in the trust for purposes of requirement 6.

137

We believe that we have issued common stock with sufficient diversity of ownership to satisfy requirements 5 and 6. In addition, our charter restricts the ownership and transfer of our stock so that we should continue to satisfy these requirements. The provisions of our charter restricting the ownership and transfer of the common stock are described in “Description of Securities—Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer.”

To monitor compliance with the share ownership requirements, we generally are required to maintain records regarding the actual ownership of our shares. To do so, we must demand written statements each year from the record holders of significant percentages of our stock pursuant to which the record holders must disclose the actual owners of the shares (i.e., the persons required to include our dividends in their gross income). We must maintain a list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand as part of our records. We could be subject to monetary penalties if we fail to comply with these record-keeping requirements. If you fail or refuse to comply with the demands, you will be required by U.S. Treasury regulations to submit a statement with your tax return disclosing your actual ownership of our shares and other information. In addition, we must satisfy all relevant filing and other administrative requirements that must be met to elect and maintain REIT qualification and use a calendar year for federal income tax purposes. We intend to continue to comply with these requirements.

Qualified REIT Subsidiaries

A corporation that is a “qualified REIT subsidiary” is not treated as a corporation separate from its parent REIT. All assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of a qualified REIT subsidiary are treated as assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of the REIT. A qualified REIT subsidiary is a corporation, other than a TRS, all of the capital stock of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the REIT. Thus, in applying the requirements described herein, any qualified REIT subsidiary that we own will be ignored, and all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of such subsidiary will be treated as our assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit.

Other Disregarded Entities and Partnerships

An unincorporated domestic entity, such as a partnership or limited liability company, that has a single owner generally is not treated as an entity separate from its parent for federal income tax purposes. An unincorporated domestic entity with two or more owners generally is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership that has other partners, the REIT is treated as owning its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership and as earning its allocable share of the gross income of the partnership for purposes of the applicable REIT qualification tests. For purposes of the 10% value test (see “—Asset Tests”), our proportionate share is based on our proportionate interest in the equity interests and certain debt securities issued by the partnership. For all of the other asset and income tests, our proportionate share is based on our proportionate interest in the capital interests in the partnership. Our proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, and items of income of any partnership, joint venture, or limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes in which we acquire an interest, directly or indirectly, will be treated as our assets and gross income for purposes of applying the various REIT qualification requirements.

In the event that a disregarded subsidiary of ours ceases to be wholly-owned—for example, if any equity interest in the subsidiary is acquired by a person other than us or another disregarded subsidiary of ours—the subsidiary’s separate existence would no longer be disregarded for federal income tax purposes. Instead, the subsidiary would have multiple owners and would be treated as either a partnership or a taxable corporation. Such an event could, depending on the circumstances, adversely affect our ability to satisfy the various asset and gross income requirements applicable to REITs, including the requirement that REITs generally may not own, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the securities of another corporation. See “—Asset Tests” and “—Gross Income Tests.”

138

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries

A REIT is permitted to own up to 100% of the stock of one or more “taxable REIT subsidiaries.” A TRS is a fully taxable corporation that may earn income that would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the parent REIT. The subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation with respect to which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. However, an entity will not qualify as a TRS if it directly or indirectly operates or manages a lodging or health care facility or, generally, provides to another person, under a franchise, license or otherwise, rights to any brand name under which any lodging facility or health care facility is operated. We generally may not own more than 10%, as measured by voting power or value, of the securities of a corporation that is not a qualified REIT subsidiary unless we and such corporation elect to treat such corporation as a TRS. Overall, no more than 25% (or 20% for our prior taxable years) of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs.

The separate existence of a TRS or other taxable corporation, unlike a disregarded subsidiary as discussed above, is not ignored for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, a domestic TRS would generally be subject to corporate income tax on its earnings, which may reduce the cash flow generated by us and our subsidiaries in the aggregate and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

A REIT is not treated as holding the assets of a TRS or other taxable subsidiary corporation or as receiving any income that the subsidiary earns. Rather, the stock issued by the subsidiary is an asset in the hands of the REIT, and the REIT generally recognizes as income the dividends, if any, that it receives from the subsidiary. This treatment can affect the gross income and asset test calculations that apply to the REIT, as described below. Because a parent REIT does not include the assets and income of such subsidiary corporations in determining the parent’s compliance with the REIT requirements, such entities may be used by the parent REIT to undertake indirectly activities that the REIT rules might otherwise preclude it from doing directly or through pass-through subsidiaries or render commercially unfeasible (for example, activities that give rise to certain categories of income such as nonqualifying hedging income or inventory sales).

Certain restrictions imposed on TRSs are intended to ensure that such entities will be subject to appropriate levels of federal income taxation. First, a TRS may not deduct interest payments made in any year to an affiliated REIT to the extent that such payments exceed, generally, 50% of the TRS’s adjusted taxable income for that year (although the TRS may carry forward to, and deduct in, a succeeding year the disallowed interest amount if the 50% test is satisfied in that year). In addition, if amounts are paid to a REIT or deducted by a TRS due to transactions between a REIT, its tenants and/or a TRS, that exceed the amount that would be paid to or deducted by a party in an arm’s-length transaction, the REIT generally will be subject to an excise tax equal to 100% of such excess. We believe that all of our transactions with our TRSs have been, and will be, conducted on an arm’s-length basis.

We have elected to treat Sharpridge TRS, Inc. as a TRS for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We may form additional domestic TRSs in the future and may form or invest in foreign TRSs. To the extent that any TRSs pay any taxes, they will have less cash available for distribution to us. If dividends are paid by domestic TRSs to us, then the dividends we designate and pay to our stockholders who are taxed at individual rates, up to the amount of dividends that we receive from such entities, generally will be eligible to be taxed at the reduced 15% maximum federal rate applicable to qualified dividend income. See “—Taxation of U.S. Holders—Taxation of U.S. Holders on Distributions on Common Stock.”

CLOs and Structured Notes

Pursuant to our then existing investment strategy, we invested in subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes. The CLO entities in which we have invested are treated as corporations for federal income tax purposes and the structured notes are treated for federal income tax purposes as equity of a corporation. The CLO

139

and structured notes issuers are organized in foreign countries. There is a specific exemption from federal income tax for non-U.S. corporations that restrict their activities in the United States to trading in stock and securities (or any activity closely related thereto) for their own account whether such trading (or such other activity) is conducted by the corporation or its employees or through a resident broker, commission agent, custodian or other agent. Notwithstanding these rules, any gain recognized by a foreign corporation with respect to United States real property is subject to United States tax as if the foreign corporation were a United States taxpayer. It is not anticipated that the CLO and structured note issuers in which we have invested will hold United States real property other than by foreclosure. Nevertheless, gain (if any) realized on foreclosed United States real property would be subject to United States tax.

We expect that the CLO and structured note issuers in which we have invested will either rely on the exemption described above or otherwise operate in a manner so that they will not be subject to federal income tax on their net income at the entity level. Therefore, despite their status as corporations for federal income tax purposes, they generally will not be subject to corporate income tax on their earnings. Certain U.S. shareholders of such a non-U.S. corporation are required, however, to include in their income currently their proportionate share of the earnings of such a corporation, whether or not such earnings are distributed. We will likely be required to include in income, on a current basis, our proportionate share of the earnings of the CLO and structured note issuers in which we have invested. Although we anticipate that the CLO and structured note issuers in which we have invested will not be subject to corporate income tax, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge this treatment. If the IRS were to succeed in such a challenge, then it could greatly reduce the amounts that the CLO and structured note issuers in which we have invested would have available to pay to their creditors and to distribute to us.

Gross Income Tests

We must satisfy two gross income tests annually to maintain our qualification as a REIT. First, at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year must consist of defined types of income that we derive, directly or indirectly, from investments relating to real property or mortgage loans on real property or qualified temporary investment income. Qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test generally includes:

rents from real property;

interest on debt secured by a mortgage on real property or on interests in real property;

dividends or other distributions on, and gain from the sale of, shares in other REITs;

gain from the sale of real estate assets;

income and gain derived from foreclosure property (as described below);

income derived from a REMIC in proportion to the real estate assets held by the REMIC, unless at least 95% of the REMIC’s assets are real estate assets, in which case all of the income derived from the REMIC; and

income derived from the temporary investment of new capital that is attributable to the issuance of our stock or a public offering of our debt with a maturity date of at least five years and that we receive during the one-year period beginning on the date on which we received such new capital.

Second, in general, at least 95% of our gross income for each taxable year must consist of income that is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, other types of interest and dividends, gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities or any combination of these. Gross income from our sale of property that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is excluded from both the numerator and the denominator in both income tests. In addition, income and gain from “hedging transactions,” as defined in “—Hedging Transactions,” that we enter into to hedge indebtedness incurred or to be incurred to acquire or carry real estate assets and that are clearly and timely identified as such will be excluded from both the numerator

140

and the denominator for purposes of the 95% gross income test (but will be nonqualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test). Income and gain from hedging transactions entered into after July 30, 2008 will be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator for purposes of both the 75% and 95% gross income tests. In addition, certain foreign currency gains recognized after July 30, 2008 will be excluded from gross income for purposes of one or both of the gross income tests. See “—Foreign Currency Gain.” The following paragraphs discuss the specific application of the gross income tests to us.

Dividends

Our share of any dividends received from any corporation (including dividends from a TRS, but excluding any REIT) in which we own an equity interest will qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test but not for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Our share of any dividends received from any other REIT in which we own an equity interest, if any, will be qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests. We likely will be required to include in our income, even without the receipt of actual distributions, earnings from our investment in the subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes issued by foreign corporations. We intend to treat certain of these income inclusions as qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test but not the 75% gross income test. The provisions that set forth what income is qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test provide that gross income derived from dividends, interest and certain other enumerated classes of passive income qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test. Income inclusions from equity investments in foreign corporations are technically neither actual dividends nor any of the other enumerated categories of income specified in the 95% gross income test for federal income tax purposes, and there is no other clear precedent with respect to the qualification of such income. However, based on advice of counsel, we intend to treat such income inclusions as qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. Nevertheless, because this income does not meet the literal requirements of the REIT provisions, it is possible that the IRS could successfully take the position that such income is not qualifying income. In the event that such income was determined not to qualify for the 95% gross income test, we would be subject to a penalty tax with respect to such income to the extent it and our other nonqualifying income exceeds 5% of our gross income or we could fail to qualify as a REIT. See “—Failure to Satisfy Gross Income Tests” and “—Failure to Qualify.”

Interest

The term “interest,” as defined for purposes of both gross income tests, generally excludes any amount that is based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, interest generally includes the following:

an amount that is based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales; and

an amount that is based on the income or profits of a debtor, as long as the debtor derives substantially all of its income from the real property securing the debt from leasing substantially all of its interest in the property, and only to the extent that the amounts received by the debtor would be qualifying “rents from real property” if received directly by a REIT.

Interest on debt secured by a mortgage on real property or on interests in real property, including, for this purpose, discount points, prepayment penalties, loan assumption fees, and late payment charges that are not compensation for services, generally is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. However, if the highest principal amount of a loan outstanding during a taxable year exceeds the fair market value of the real property securing the loan as of the date the REIT agreed to originate or acquire the loan, a portion of the interest income from such loan will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, but will be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. The portion of the interest income that will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test will be equal to the portion of the principal amount of the loan that is not secured by real property—that is, the amount by which the loan exceeds the value of the real estate that is security for the loan.

141

We intend to continue to invest in Agency RMBS that are pass-through certificates. We expect that all of the income on our Agency RMBS will be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. We expect that the Agency RMBS will be treated as interests in a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes. Consequently, we would be treated as owning an undivided beneficial ownership interest in the mortgage loans held by the grantor trust. The interest on such mortgage loans would be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test to the extent that the obligation is secured by real property, as discussed above. Although the IRS has ruled generally that the interest income from Agency RMBS is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, it is not clear how this guidance would apply to secondary market purchases of Agency RMBS at a time when the loan-to-value ratio of one or more of the mortgage loans backing the Agency RMBS is greater than 100%. We expect that substantially all of our income from Agency RMBS will be qualifying income for the 75% gross income test.

We have purchased, and may purchase in the future, Agency RMBS through TBAs and may recognize income or gains on the disposition of TBAs, through dollar roll transactions or otherwise. The law is unclear with respect to the qualification of gains from dispositions of TBAs as gains from the sale of real property (including interests in real property and interests in mortgages on real property) or other qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Until we receive a favorable private letter ruling from the IRS or we receive an opinion of counsel to the effect that income and gain from the disposition of TBAs should be treated as qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, we will limit our gains from dispositions of TBAs and any non-qualifying income to no more than 25% of our gross income for each calendar year. Accordingly, our ability to dispose of TBAs, through dollar roll transactions or otherwise, could be limited. Moreover, even if we are advised by counsel that income and gains from dispositions of TBAs should be treated as qualifying income, it is possible that the IRS could successfully take the position that such income is not qualifying income. In the event that such income were determined not to be qualifying for the 75% gross income test, we could be subject to a penalty tax or we could fail to qualify as a REIT if such income and any non-qualifying income exceeds 25% of our gross income. See “—Failure to Qualify.”

Hedging Transactions

From time to time, we may enter into hedging transactions with respect to one or more of our assets or liabilities. Our hedging activities may include entering into interest rate swaps, caps, and floors, options to purchase these items, and futures and forward contracts. Income and gain from “hedging transactions” entered into prior to July 31, 2008 will be excluded from gross income for purposes of the 95% gross income test, but will be treated as nonqualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Income and gain from hedging transactions entered into after July 30, 2008 will be excluded from gross income for purposes of both the 75% and 95% gross income tests. A “hedging transaction” includes any transaction entered into in the normal course of our trade or business primarily to manage the risk of interest rate, price changes, or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or carry real estate assets. A “hedging transaction” also includes any transaction entered into after July 30, 2008 primarily to manage risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income test (or any property which generates such income or gain). We are required to clearly identify any such hedging transaction before the close of the day on which it was acquired, originated, or entered into and satisfy other identification requirements. To the extent that we hedge for other purposes, or to the extent that a portion of our Agency RMBS is not secured by “real estate assets” (as described below under “—Asset Tests”) or in other situations, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as nonqualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests. We intend to structure any hedging transactions in a manner that does not jeopardize our qualification as a REIT. We may conduct some or all of our hedging activities (including hedging activities relating to currency risk) through a TRS or other corporate entity, the income from which may be subject to federal income tax, rather than by participating in the arrangements directly or through pass-through subsidiaries.

142

Fee Income

Fee income generally will be qualifying income for purposes of both the 75% and 95% gross income tests if it is received in consideration for entering into an agreement to make a loan secured by real property and the fees are not determined by income and profits. Other fees generally are not qualifying income for purposes of either gross income test. Any fees earned by a TRS, such as the fees allocated to Sharpridge TRS, Inc. as a result of its equity interest in Sharpridge, will not be included for purposes of the gross income tests.

Foreign Currency Gain

Certain foreign currency gains recognized after July 30, 2008 will be excluded from gross income for purposes of one or both of the gross income tests. “Real estate foreign exchange gain” will be excluded from gross income for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Real estate foreign exchange gain generally includes foreign currency gain attributable to any item of income or gain that is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, foreign currency gain attributable to the acquisition or ownership of (or becoming or being the obligor under) obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interest in real property and certain foreign currency gain attributable to certain “qualified business units” of a REIT. “Passive foreign exchange gain” will be excluded from gross income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. Passive foreign exchange gain generally includes real estate foreign exchange gain as described above, and also includes foreign currency gain attributable to any item of income or gain that is qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test and foreign currency gain attributable to the acquisition or ownership of (or becoming or being the obligor under) obligations. These exclusions for real estate foreign exchange gain and passive foreign exchange gain do not apply to foreign currency gain derived from dealing, or engaging in substantial and regular trading, in securities. Such gain is treated as nonqualifying income for purposes of both the 75% and 95% gross income tests.

Rents from Real Property

We do not currently own and do not intend to acquire any real property, but we may acquire real property or an interest therein in the future. To the extent that we acquire real property or an interest therein, rents we receive will qualify as “rents from real property” in satisfying the gross income requirements for a REIT described above only if the following conditions are met:

First, the amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. An amount received or accrued generally will not be excluded, however, from rents from real property solely by reason of being based on fixed percentages of receipts or sales.

Second, rents we receive from a “related party tenant” will not qualify as rents from real property in satisfying the gross income tests unless the tenant is a TRS, at least 90% of the property is leased to unrelated tenants, the rent paid by the TRS is substantially comparable to the rent paid by the unrelated tenants for comparable space and the rent is not attributable to an increase in rent due to a modification of a lease with a “controlled TRS” (i.e., a TRS in which we own directly or indirectly more than 50% of the voting power or value of the stock). A tenant is a related party tenant if the REIT, or an actual or constructive owner of 10% or more of the REIT, actually or constructively owns 10% or more of the tenant.

Third, if rent attributable to personal property, leased in connection with a lease of real property, is greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of rent attributable to the personal property will not qualify as rents from real property.

Fourth, we generally must not operate or manage our real property or furnish or render services to our tenants, other than through an “independent contractor” who is adequately compensated and from whom we do not derive revenue. We may, however, provide services directly to tenants if the services are “usually or customarily rendered” in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only and are not considered to be provided for the tenants’ convenience. In addition, we may provide a minimal

143

amount of “non-customary” services to the tenants of a property, other than through an independent contractor, as long as our income from the services does not exceed 1% of our income from the related property. Furthermore, we may own up to 100% of the stock of a TRS, which may provide customary and non-customary services to tenants without tainting our rental income from the related properties.

Prohibited Transactions

A REIT will incur a 100% tax on the net income (including foreign currency gain recognized after July 30, 2008) derived from any sale or other disposition of property, other than foreclosure property, that the REIT holds primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Any such income will be excluded from the application of the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Whether a REIT holds an asset “primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business” depends on the facts and circumstances in effect from time to time, including those related to a particular asset. We believe that none of our assets will be held primarily for sale to customers and that a sale of any of our assets will not be in the ordinary course of our business. No assurance, however, can be given that the IRS will not successfully assert a contrary position, in which case we would be subject to the prohibited transaction tax on the sale of those assets.

Foreclosure Property

We will be subject to tax at the maximum corporate rate on any income (including foreign currency gain recognized after July 30, 2008) from foreclosure property, other than income that otherwise would be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, less expenses directly connected with the production of that income. Gross income from foreclosure property will qualify, however, under the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Foreclosure property is any real property, including interests in real property, and any personal property incident to such real property:

that is acquired by a REIT as the result of the REIT having bid on such property at foreclosure, or having otherwise reduced such property to ownership or possession by agreement or process of law, after there was a default or default was imminent on a lease of such property or on indebtedness that such property secured;

for which the related loan or lease was acquired by the REIT at a time when the default was not imminent or anticipated; and

for which the REIT makes a proper election to treat the property as foreclosure property.

A REIT will not be considered, however, to have foreclosed on a property where the REIT takes control of the property as a mortgagee-in possession and cannot receive any profit or sustain any loss except as a creditor of the mortgagor. Property generally ceases to be foreclosure property at the end of the third taxable year following the taxable year in which the REIT acquired the property, or longer if an extension is granted by the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury. This grace period terminates and foreclosure property ceases to be foreclosure property on the first day:

on which a lease is entered into for the property that, by its terms, will give rise to income that does not qualify for purposes of the 75% gross income test, or any amount is received or accrued, directly or

to a lease entered into on or after such day that will give rise to income that does not qualify for purposes of the 75% gross income test;

on which any construction takes place on the property, other than completion of a building or any other improvement, where more than 10% of the construction was completed before default became imminent; or

which is more than 90 days after the day on which the REIT acquired the property and the property is used in a trade or business that is conducted by the REIT, other than through an independent contractor from whom the REIT itself does not derive or receive any income.

144

Failure to Satisfy Gross Income Tests

If we fail to satisfy one or both of the gross income tests for any taxable year, we nevertheless may qualify as a REIT for that year if we are entitled to qualify for relief under certain provisions of the federal income tax laws. Those relief provisions generally will be available if:

our failure to meet those tests is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect; and

following such failure for any taxable year, a schedule of the sources of our income is filed with the IRS in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury.

We cannot with certainty predict whether any failure to meet these tests will qualify for the relief provisions. If the IRS were to determine that we failed the 95% gross income test because income inclusions with respect to our investment in the subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes issued by foreign corporations are not qualifying income, it is possible that the IRS would not consider our position taken with respect to such income, and accordingly our failure to satisfy the 95% gross income test, to be due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. If the IRS were to determine that we failed the 75% gross income test because income and gains from dispositions of TBAs are not qualifying income, it is possible that the IRS would not consider our position taken with respect to such income, and accordingly our failure to satisfy the 75% gross income test, to be due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. If the IRS were to successfully assert this position, we would fail to qualify as a REIT. See “—Failure to Qualify.” Accordingly, it is not possible to state whether we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions with regard to this issue or in any other circumstances. If these relief provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances involving us, we will not qualify as a REIT. As discussed above in “—Taxation of Our Company,” even if the relief provisions apply, we would incur a 100% tax on the gross income attributable to the greater of (1) the amount by which we fail the 75% gross income test, or (2) the excess of 95% of our gross income over the amount of gross income attributable to sources that qualify under the 95% gross income test, multiplied, in either case, by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.

Asset Tests

To qualify as a REIT, we also must satisfy the following asset tests at the end of each quarter of each taxable year.

First, at least 75% of the value of our total assets must consist of:

cash or cash items, including certain receivables;

government securities;

interests in real property, including leaseholds and options to acquire real property and leaseholds;

interests in mortgage loans secured by real property;

stock in other REITs;

investments in stock or debt instruments during the one-year period following our receipt of new capital that we raise through equity offerings or public offerings of debt with at least a five-year term; and

regular or residual interests in a REMIC. However, if less than 95% of the assets of a REMIC consist of assets that are qualifying real estate-related assets under the federal income tax laws, determined as if we held such assets, we will be treated as holding directly our proportionate share of the assets of such REMIC.

Second, of our investments not included in the 75% asset class, the value of our interest in any one issuer’s securities may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets (the “5% asset test”).

145

Third, of our investments not included in the 75% asset class, we may not own more than 10% of the voting power or value of any one issuer’s outstanding securities (the “10% vote or value test”).

Fourth, no more than 25% (or 20% for our prior taxable years) of the value of our total assets may consist of the securities of one or more TRSs.

Fifth, no more than 25% of the value of our total assets may consist of the securities of TRSs and other non-TRS taxable subsidiaries and other assets that are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test (the “25% securities test”).

For purposes of the 5% asset test or the 10% vote or value test, the term “securities” does not include stock in another REIT, equity or debt securities of a qualified REIT subsidiary or TRS, mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities that constitute real estate assets, or equity interests in a partnership. For purposes of the 10% value test, the term “securities” does not include:

“Straight debt” securities, which is defined as a written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified date a sum certain in money if (i) the debt is not convertible, directly or indirectly, into stock, and (ii) the interest rate and interest payment dates are not contingent on profits, the borrower’s discretion, or similar factors. “Straight debt” securities do not include any securities issued by a partnership or a corporation in which we or any “controlled TRS” hold non-”straight” debt securities that have an aggregate value of more than 1% of the issuer’s outstanding securities. However, “straight debt” securities include debt subject to the following contingencies:

a contingency relating to the time of payment of interest or principal, as long as either (i) there is no change to the effective yield of the debt obligation, other than a change to the annual yield that does not exceed the greater of 0.25% or 5% of the annual yield, or (ii) neither the aggregate issue price nor the aggregate face amount of the issuer’s debt obligations held by us exceeds $1 million and no more than twelve months of unaccrued interest on the debt obligations can be required to be prepaid; and

•

a contingency relating to the time or amount of payment upon a default or prepayment of a debt obligation, as long as the contingency is consistent with customary commercial practice.

Any loan to an individual or an estate.

Any “section 467 rental agreement,” other than an agreement with a related party tenant.

Any obligation to pay “rents from real property.”

Certain securities issued by governmental entities that are not dependent in whole or in part on the profits of (or payments made by) a non-governmental entity.

Any security (including debt securities) issued by another REIT.

Any debt instrument of an entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes in which we are a partner to the extent of our proportionate interest in the equity and certain debt securities issued by that partnership.

Any debt instrument of an entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes not described in the preceding bullet points if at least 75% of the partnership’s gross income, excluding income from prohibited transactions, is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test described above in “—Gross Income Tests.”

We believe that our investments in Agency RMBS will be qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test. Our investments in subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test.

146

We have entered into sale and repurchase agreements under which we nominally sold certain of our Agency RMBS to a counterparty and simultaneously entered into an agreement to repurchase the sold assets in exchange for a purchase price that reflects a financing charge. Based on positions the IRS has taken in analogous situations, we believe that we are treated for REIT asset and income test purposes as the owner of the Agency RMBS that are the subject of such agreements notwithstanding that such agreements may transfer record ownership of the assets to the counterparty during the term of the agreement. It is possible, however, that the IRS could assert that we did not own the Agency RMBS during the term of the sale and repurchase agreement, in which case we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

We have purchased, and may purchase in the future, Agency RMBS through TBAs. The law is unclear with respect to the qualification of TBAs as real estate assets or Government securities for purposes of the 75% asset test. Until we receive a favorable private letter ruling from the IRS or we receive an opinion from counsel to the effect that TBAs should be treated as qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test, we will limit our investment in TBAs and any non-qualifying assets to no more than 25% of our assets at the end of any calendar quarter. Accordingly, our ability to purchase Agency RMBS through TBAs could be limited. Moreover, even if we are advised by counsel that TBAs should be treated as qualifying assets, it is possible that the IRS could successfully take the position that such assets are not qualifying assets. In the event that such assets were determined not to be qualifying for the 75% asset test, we could be subject to a penalty tax or we could fail to qualify as a REIT if the value of our TBAs and any non-qualifying assets exceeds 25% of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter. See “—Failure to Qualify.”

We monitor the status of our assets for purposes of the various asset tests and seek to manage our portfolio to comply at all times with such tests. No assurance, however, can be given that we will continue to be successful in this effort. In this regard, to determine our compliance with these requirements, we will have to value our investment in our assets to ensure compliance with the asset tests. Although we seek to be prudent in making these estimates, no assurances can be given that the IRS might not disagree with these determinations and assert that a different value is applicable, in which case we might not satisfy the 75% asset test and the other asset tests and, thus, would fail to qualify as a REIT.

If we fail to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a calendar quarter, we will not lose our REIT qualification if:

we satisfied the asset tests at the end of the preceding calendar quarter; and

the discrepancy between the value of our assets and the asset test requirements arose from changes in the market values of our assets and was not wholly or partly caused by the acquisition of one or more non-qualifying assets.

If we did not satisfy the condition described in the second item, above, we still could avoid disqualification by eliminating any discrepancy within 30 days after the close of the calendar quarter in which it arose.

In the event that we violate the 5% asset test or the 10% vote or value test described above at the end of any calendar quarter, we will not lose our REIT qualification if (i) the failure is de minimis (up to the lesser of 1% of our assets or $10 million) and (ii) we dispose of assets or otherwise comply with the asset tests within six months after the last day of the quarter in which we identified such failure. In the event of a more than de minimis failure of any of the asset tests, as long as the failure was due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, we will not lose our REIT qualification if we (i) dispose of assets or otherwise comply with the asset tests within six months after the last day of the quarter in which we identified such failure, (ii) file a schedule with the IRS describing the assets that caused such failure in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury and (iii) pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or 35% of the net income from the nonqualifying assets during the period in which we failed to satisfy the asset tests. If the IRS were to determine that we failed the 75% asset test because TBAs are not qualifying assets, it is possible that the IRS would not consider our position taken with respect to such assets, and accordingly our failure to satisfy the 75% asset test, to be due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. If the IRS were to successfully assert these positions, we would fail to qualify as a

147

REIT. See “—Failure to Qualify.” Accordingly, it is not possible to state whether we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions with regard to this issue or in any other circumstances. If these relief provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances involving us, we will not qualify as a REIT.

We believe that the Agency RMBS and other assets that we will hold will satisfy the foregoing asset test requirements. We will monitor the status of our assets and our future acquisition of assets to ensure that we continue to comply with those requirements, but we cannot assure you that we will be successful in this effort. No independent appraisals have been or will be obtained to support our estimates of and conclusions as to the value of our assets and securities, or in many cases, the real estate collateral for the mortgage loans that support our Agency RMBS. Moreover, the values of some assets may not be susceptible to a precise determination. As a result, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not contend that our ownership of securities and other assets violates one or more of the asset tests applicable to REITs.

Distribution Requirements

Each taxable year, we must distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends and deemed distributions of retained capital gain, to our stockholders in an aggregate amount at least equal to:

the sum of

90% of our “REIT taxable income,” computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain, and

90% of our after-tax net income, if any, from foreclosure property, minus

the sum of certain items of non-cash income.

We must make such distributions in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if either (i) we declare the distribution before we timely file our federal income tax return for the year and pay the distribution on or before the first regular dividend payment date after such declaration or (ii) we declare the distribution in October, November or December of the taxable year, payable to stockholders of record on a specified day in any such month, and we actually pay the dividend before the end of January of the following year. The distributions under clause (i) are taxable to the stockholders in the year in which paid, and the distributions in clause (ii) are treated as paid on December 31 of the prior taxable year. In both instances, these distributions relate to our prior taxable year for purposes of the 90% distribution requirement.

In order for distributions to be counted as satisfying the annual distribution requirements for REITs, and to provide us with a REIT-level tax deduction, the distributions must not be “preferential dividends.” A dividend is not a preferential dividend if the distribution is (1) pro-rata among all outstanding shares of stock within a particular class, and (2) in accordance with the preferences among different classes of stock as set forth in our organizational documents.

We will pay federal income tax on taxable income, including net capital gain, that we do not distribute to stockholders. Furthermore, if we fail to distribute during a calendar year, or by the end of January following the calendar year in the case of distributions with declaration and record dates falling in the last three months of the calendar year, at least the sum of:

85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year,

95% of our REIT capital gain income for such year, and

any undistributed taxable income from prior periods,

we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the amounts we actually distribute.

148

We may elect to retain and pay income tax on the net long term capital gain we recognize in a taxable year. If we so elect, we will be treated as having distributed any such retained amount for purposes of the REIT distribution requirements and the 4% nondeductible excise tax described above. We intend to continue to make timely distributions in the future sufficient to satisfy the annual distribution requirements and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax.

It is possible that, from time to time, we may experience timing differences between the actual receipt of cash, including distributions from our subsidiaries, and actual payment of deductible expenses and the inclusion of that income and deduction of such expenses in arriving at our REIT taxable income. Possible examples of those timing differences include the following:

Because we may deduct capital losses only to the extent of our capital gains, we may have taxable income that exceeds our economic income.

We will recognize taxable income in advance of the related cash flow if any of our Agency RMBS are deemed to have original issue discount. We generally must accrue original issue discount based on a constant yield method that takes into account projected prepayments but that defers taking into account credit losses until they are actually incurred.

We may acquire investments that will be treated as having “market discount” for federal income tax purposes, because the investments will be debt instruments that we acquire for an amount less than their principal amount. Under the federal income tax rules applicable to market discount and our elections under those rules, we are required to recognize market discount as ordinary income as it accrues on a constant yield basis. The recognition of market discount results in an acceleration of the recognition of taxable income to periods prior to the receipt of the related economic income. Further, to the extent that such an investment does not fully amortize according to its terms, we may never receive the economic income attributable to previously recognized market discount.

We may recognize phantom taxable income from our investments in the subordinated tranches of CLOs and structured notes.

Although several types of non-cash income are excluded in determining the annual distribution requirement, we will incur corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax with respect to those non-cash income items if we do not distribute those items on a current basis. As a result of the foregoing, we may have less cash than is necessary to distribute all of our taxable income and thereby avoid corporate income tax and the excise tax imposed on certain undistributed income. In such a situation, we may need to borrow funds or issue additional common or preferred stock.

Under certain circumstances, we may be able to correct a failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to our stockholders in a later year. We may include such deficiency dividends in our deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Although we may be able to avoid income tax on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends, we will be required to pay interest and a penalty to the IRS based upon the amount of any deduction we take for deficiency dividends.

Recordkeeping Requirements

We must maintain certain records in order to qualify as a REIT. In addition, to avoid a monetary penalty, we must request on an annual basis information from our stockholders designed to disclose the actual ownership of our outstanding stock. We intend to continue to comply with these requirements.

Failure to Qualify

If we fail to satisfy one or more requirements for REIT qualification, other than the gross income tests and the asset tests, we could avoid disqualification if our failure is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect and we pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure. In addition, there are relief provisions for a failure of the gross income tests and asset tests, as described in “—Gross Income Tests” and “—Asset Tests.”

149

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and no relief provision applies, we would be subject to federal income tax and any applicable alternative minimum tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. In calculating our taxable income in a year in which we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would not be able to deduct amounts paid out to stockholders. In fact, we would not be required to distribute any amounts to stockholders in that year. In such event, to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, all distributions to stockholders would be taxable as ordinary income. Subject to certain limitations of the federal income tax laws, corporate stockholders might be eligible for the dividends received deduction and stockholders taxed at individual rates might be eligible for the reduced federal income tax rate of 15% on such dividends (through 2010). In addition, subject to the limitations of the Internal Revenue Code, corporate distributions may be eligible for the dividends received deduction. Unless we qualified for relief under specific statutory provisions, we also would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we ceased to qualify as a REIT. We cannot predict whether in all circumstances we would qualify for such statutory relief.

Taxation of U.S. Holders

The term “U.S. holder” means a holder of our common stock that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is:

a citizen or resident of the United States;

a corporation (including an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United States, any of its States or the District of Columbia;

an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

any trust if (i) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) it has a valid election in place to be treated as a U.S. person.

If a partnership, entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes holds our common stock, the federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding our common stock, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock by the partnership.

Taxation of U.S. Holders on Distributions on Common Stock

As long as we qualify as a REIT, a taxable U.S. holder must generally take into account as ordinary income distributions made out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits that we do not designate as capital gain dividends or retained long term capital gain. A U.S. holder will not qualify for the dividends received deduction generally available to corporations. In addition, dividends paid to a U.S. holder generally will not qualify for the 15% tax rate for “qualified dividend income.”

Legislation enacted in 2003 and 2006 reduced the maximum tax rate for qualified dividend income received by taxpayers taxed at individual rates to 15% for tax years 2003 through 2010. Without future Congressional action, the maximum tax rate for such taxpayers on qualified dividend income will move to 39.6% in 2011. Qualified dividend income generally includes dividends paid to U.S. holders taxed at individual rates by domestic C corporations and certain qualified foreign corporations. Because we are not generally subject to federal income tax on the portion of our REIT taxable income distributed to our stockholders (see “—Taxation of Our Company” above), our dividends generally will not be eligible for the 15% rate on qualified dividend income. As a result, our ordinary REIT dividends will be taxed at the higher tax rate applicable to ordinary income. Currently, the highest marginal individual income tax rate on ordinary income is 35%. However, the 15% tax rate for qualified dividend income will apply to our ordinary REIT dividends (i) attributable to dividends received by us from certain non-REIT corporations (e.g., dividends from domestic TRSs), (ii) to the

150

extent attributable to income upon which we have paid corporate income tax (e.g., to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our taxable income), and (iii) attributable to income in the prior taxable year from the sales of “built-in gain” property acquired by the REIT from C corporations in carryover basis transactions (less the amount of corporate tax on such income). In general, to qualify for the reduced tax rate on qualified dividend income, a stockholder must hold our common stock for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning on the date that is 60 days before the date on which our common stock becomes ex-dividend.

A U.S. holder generally will take into account distributions that we designate as capital gain dividends as long term capital gain without regard to the period for which the U.S. stockholder has held our common stock. A corporate U.S. holder may, however, be required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain dividends as ordinary income.

A U.S. holder will not incur tax on a distribution in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits if the distribution does not exceed the adjusted basis of the U.S. holder’s common stock. Instead, the distribution will reduce the adjusted basis of such common stock. A U.S. holder will recognize a distribution in excess of both our current and accumulated earnings and profits and the U.S. holder’s adjusted basis in his or her common stock as long term capital gain, or short term capital gain if the shares of common stock have been held for one year or less, assuming the shares of common stock are a capital asset in the hands of the U.S. holder. In addition, if we declare a distribution in October, November, or December of any year that is payable to a U.S. holder of record on a specified date in any such month, such distribution shall be treated as both paid by us and received by the U.S. holder on December 31 of such year, provided that we actually pay the distribution during January of the following calendar year, as described in “—Distribution Requirements.”

Stockholders may not include in their individual income tax returns any of our net operating losses or capital losses. Instead, these losses are generally carried over by us for potential offset against our future income.

Taxable distributions from us and gain from the disposition of our common stock will not be treated as passive activity income and, therefore, stockholders generally will not be able to apply any “passive activity losses,” such as losses from certain types of limited partnerships in which the stockholder is a limited partner, against such income. In addition, taxable distributions from us and gain from the disposition of our common stock generally will be treated as investment income for purposes of the investment interest limitations. We will notify stockholders after the close of our taxable year as to the portions of the distributions attributable to that year that constitute ordinary income, return of capital and capital gain.

We may recognize taxable income in excess of our economic income, known as phantom income, in the first years that we hold certain investments, and experience an offsetting excess of economic income over our taxable income in later years. As a result, stockholders at times may be required to pay federal income tax on distributions that economically represent a return of capital rather than a dividend. These distributions would be offset in later years by distributions representing economic income that would be treated as returns of capital for federal income tax purposes. Taking into account the time value of money, this acceleration of federal income tax liabilities may reduce a stockholder’s after-tax return on his or her investment to an amount less than the after-tax return on an investment with an identical before-tax rate of return that did not generate phantom income. For example, if an investor with a 30% tax rate purchases a taxable bond with an annual interest rate of 10% on its face value, the investor’s before-tax return on the investment would be 10% and the investor’s after-tax return would be 7%. However, if the same investor purchased our common stock at a time when the before-tax rate of return was 10%, the investor’s after-tax rate of return on such stock might be somewhat less than 7% as a result of our phantom income. In general, as the ratio of our phantom income to our total income increases, the after-tax rate of return received by a taxable stockholder will decrease. We will consider the potential effects of phantom income on our taxable stockholders in managing our investments.

Taxation of U.S. Holders on the Disposition of Common Stock

In general, a U.S. holder who is not a dealer in securities must treat any gain or loss realized upon a taxable disposition of our common stock as long term capital gain or loss if the U.S. holder has held such common stock

151

for more than one year and otherwise as short term capital gain or loss. In general, a U.S. holder will realize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the sum of the fair market value of any property and the amount of cash received in such disposition and the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis. A holder’s adjusted tax basis generally will equal the U.S. holder’s acquisition cost, increased by the excess of net capital gains deemed distributed to the U.S. holder less tax deemed paid by it and reduced by any returns of capital. However, a U.S. holder must treat any loss upon a sale or exchange of common stock held by such holder for six months or less as a long term capital loss to the extent of capital gain dividends and any other actual or deemed distributions from us that such U.S. holder treats as long term capital gain. All or a portion of any loss that a U.S. holder realizes upon a taxable disposition of the common stock may be disallowed if the U.S. holder purchases other common stock within 30 days before or after the disposition.

Capital Gains and Losses

A taxpayer generally must hold a capital asset for more than one year for gain or loss derived from its sale or exchange to be treated as long term capital gain or loss. The highest marginal individual income tax rate currently is 35% (which rate will apply for the period through December 31, 2010). The maximum tax rate on long term capital gain applicable to U.S. holders taxed at individual rates is 15% for sales and exchanges of assets held for more than one year occurring through December 31, 2010. The maximum tax rate on long term capital gain from the sale or exchange of “section 1250 property,” or depreciable real property, is 25% to the extent that such gain would have been treated as ordinary income if the property were “section 1245 property.” With respect to distributions that we designate as capital gain dividends and any retained capital gain that we are deemed to distribute, we will designate whether such a distribution is taxable to U.S. holders taxed at individual rates at a 15% or 25% rate. Thus, the tax rate differential between capital gain and ordinary income for those taxpayers may be significant. In addition, the characterization of income as capital gain or ordinary income may affect the deductibility of capital losses. A non-corporate taxpayer may deduct capital losses not offset by capital gains against its ordinary income only up to a maximum annual amount of $3,000. A non-corporate taxpayer may carry forward unused capital losses indefinitely. A corporate taxpayer must pay tax on its net capital gain at ordinary corporate rates. A corporate taxpayer may deduct capital losses only to the extent of capital gains, with unused losses being carried back three years and forward five years.

Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding

We will report to U.S. holders and to the IRS the amount of distributions we pay during each calendar year, and the amount of tax we withhold, if any. Under the backup withholding rules, a U.S. holder may be subject to backup withholding at a rate of 28% with respect to distributions unless such holder:

is a corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates this fact; or

provides a taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding, and otherwise complies with the applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules.

A U.S. holder who does not provide us with its correct taxpayer identification number also may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Any amount paid as backup withholding will be creditable against the U.S. holder’s income tax liability. In addition, we may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain distributions to any U.S. holders who fail to certify their non-foreign status to us.

Taxation of Tax-Exempt Stockholders

Tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts, generally are exempt from federal income taxation. They are subject, however, to taxation on their unrelated business taxable income, or UBTI. While many investments in real estate generate UBTI, the IRS has issued a ruling that dividend distributions from a REIT to an exempt employee pension trust do not

152

constitute UBTI so long as the exempt employee pension trust does not otherwise use the shares of the REIT in an unrelated trade or business of the pension trust. Based on that ruling, amounts that we distribute to tax-exempt stockholders generally should not constitute UBTI so long as our stock is not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business. However, if a tax-exempt stockholder were to finance its acquisition of common stock with debt, a portion of the income that it receives from us would constitute UBTI pursuant to the “debt-financed property” rules. Moreover, social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans that are exempt from taxation under special provisions of the federal income tax laws are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally will require them to characterize distributions that they receive from us as UBTI. Finally, in certain circumstances, a qualified employee pension or profit sharing trust that owns more than 10% of our stock must treat a percentage of the dividends that it receives from us as UBTI. Such percentage is equal to the gross income we derive from an unrelated trade or business, determined as if we were a pension trust, divided by our total gross income for the year in which we pay the dividends. That rule applies to a pension trust holding more than 10% of our stock only if:

the percentage of our dividends that the tax-exempt trust must treat as UBTI is at least 5%;

we qualify as a REIT by reason of the modification of the rule requiring that no more than 50% of our stock be owned by five or fewer individuals that allows the beneficiaries of the pension trust to be treated as holding our stock in proportion to their actuarial interests in the pension trust; and

either:

•

one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of our stock; or

•

a group of pension trusts individually holding more than 10% of the value of our stock collectively owns more than 50% of the value of our stock.

Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders

The term “non-U.S. holder” means a holder of our common stock that is not a U.S. holder or a partnership (or entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes). The rules governing U.S. federal income taxation of nonresident alien individuals, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships, and other foreign holders are complex. This section is only a summary of such rules. We urge non-U.S. holders to consult their tax advisors to determine the impact of federal, state, and local income tax laws on ownership of our common stock, including any reporting requirements.

A non-U.S. holder that receives a distribution that is not attributable to gain from our sale or exchange of “United States real property interests,” as defined below, and that we do not designate as a capital gain dividend or retained capital gain will recognize ordinary income to the extent that we pay the distribution out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. A withholding tax equal to 30% of the gross amount of the distribution ordinarily will apply unless an applicable tax treaty reduces or eliminates the tax. However, if a distribution is treated as effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the non-U.S. holder generally will be subject to federal income tax on the distribution at graduated rates, in the same manner as U.S. holders are taxed on distributions and also may be subject to the 30% branch profits tax in the case of a corporate non-U.S. holder. In general, non-U.S. holders will not be considered to be engaged in a U.S. trade or business solely as a result of their ownership of our stock. We plan to withhold U.S. income tax at the rate of 30% on the gross amount of any distribution that we do not designate as a capital gain distribution or retained capital gain and is paid to a non-U.S. holder unless either:

a lower treaty rate applies and the non-U.S. holder files an IRS Form W-8BEN evidencing eligibility for that reduced rate with us, or

the non-U.S. holder files an IRS Form W-8ECI with us claiming that the distribution is effectively connected income.

A non-U.S. holder will not incur tax on a distribution on the common stock in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits if the excess portion of the distribution does not exceed the adjusted basis of its

153

common stock. Instead, the excess portion of the distribution will reduce the adjusted basis of that common stock. A non-U.S. holder will be subject to tax on a distribution that exceeds both our current and accumulated earnings and profits and the adjusted basis of the common stock, if the non-U.S. holder otherwise would be subject to tax on gain from the sale or disposition of its common stock, as described below. Because we generally cannot determine at the time we make a distribution whether the distribution will exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, we normally will withhold tax on the entire amount of any distribution at the same rate as we would withhold on a dividend. However, a non-U.S. holder may obtain a refund of amounts that we withhold if we later determine that a distribution in fact exceeded our current and accumulated earnings and profits.

For any year in which we qualify as a REIT, a non-U.S. holder may incur tax on distributions that are attributable to gain from our sale or exchange of “United States real property interests” under special provisions of the federal income tax laws known as “FIRPTA.” The term “United States real property interests” includes interests in real property and shares in corporations at least 50% of whose assets consist of interests in real property. The term “United States real property interests” generally does not include mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities such as Agency RMBS. As a result, we do not anticipate that we will generate material amounts of gain that would be subject to FIRPTA. Under the FIRPTA rules, a non-U.S. holder is taxed on distributions attributable to gain from sales of United States real property interests as if the gain were effectively connected with a U.S. business of the non-U.S. holder. A non-U.S. holder thus would be taxed on such a distribution at the normal capital gain rates applicable to U.S. holders, subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of a nonresident alien individual. A non-U.S. corporate holder not entitled to treaty relief or exemption also may be subject to the 30% branch profits tax on such a distribution. Unless a non-U.S. holder qualifies for the exception described in the next paragraph, we must withhold 35% of any such distribution that we could designate as a capital gain dividend. A non-U.S. holder may receive a credit against such holder’s tax liability for the amount we withhold.

Capital gain distributions on our common stock that are attributable to our sale of real property will be treated as ordinary dividends rather than as gain from the sale of a United States real property interest, as long as (i) our common stock continues to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market in the United States and (ii) the non-U.S. holder does not own more than 5% of our common stock during the one-year period preceding the distribution date. As a result, non-U.S. holders generally would be subject to withholding tax on such capital gain distributions in the same manner as they are subject to withholding tax on ordinary dividends. If our common stock ceases to be regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States or the non-U.S. holder owned more than 5% of our common stock any time during the one-year period prior to the distribution, capital gain distributions that are attributable to our sale of real property would be subject to tax under FIRPTA. Moreover, if a non-U.S. shareholder disposes of our common stock during the 30-day period preceding a dividend payment, and such non-U.S. holder (or a person related to such non-U.S. holder) acquires or enters into a contract or option to acquire our common stock within 61 days of the 1st day of the 30 day period described above, and any portion of such dividend payment would, but for the disposition, be treated as a United States real property interest capital gain to such non-U.S. shareholder, then such non-U.S. shareholder shall be treated as having United States real property interest capital gain in an amount that, but for the disposition, would have been treated as United States real property interest capital gain.

In the unlikely event that at least 50% of the assets we hold were determined to be United States real property interests, gains from the sale of our common stock by a non-U.S. holder could be subject to a FIRPTA tax. However, even if that event were to occur, a non-U.S. holder generally would not incur tax under FIRPTA on gain from the sale of our common stock if we were a “domestically controlled qualified investment entity.” A domestically controlled qualified investment entity includes a REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its shares are held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. holders. We believe that we are, and we expect to continue to be, a domestically controlled qualified investment entity, and that a sale of our common stock should not be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. No assurance can be given, however, that we will remain a domestically controlled qualified investment entity.

154

So long as our common stock continues to be regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States, an additional exception to the tax under FIRPTA will be available, even if we do not qualify as a domestically controlled qualified investment entity at the time the non-U.S. holder sells our common stock. Under that exception, the gain from such a sale by such a non-U.S. holder will not be subject to tax under FIRPTA if:

our common stock is considered regularly traded under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations on an established securities market, such as the New York Stock Exchange; and

the non-U.S. holder owned, actually or constructively, 5% or less of our common stock at all times during a specified testing period.

As noted above, we believe that our common stock will be treated as being regularly traded on an established securities market.

If the gain on the sale of the common stock were taxed under FIRPTA, a non-U.S. holder would be taxed on that gain in the same manner as U.S. holders, subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals. Furthermore, a non-U.S. holder generally will incur tax on gain not subject to FIRPTA if:

the gain is effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s U.S. trade or business, in which case the non-U.S. holder will be subject to the same treatment as U.S. holders with respect to such gain, or the

non-U.S. holder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the U.S. for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States, in which case the non-U.S. holder will incur a 30% tax on his or her capital gains.

Sunset of Reduced Tax Rate Provisions

Several of the tax considerations described herein are subject to a sunset provision. The sunset provisions generally provide that for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010, certain provisions that are currently in the Internal Revenue Code will revert back to a prior version of those provisions. These provisions include provisions related to the reduced maximum income tax rate for long term capital gains of 15% (rather than 20%) for taxpayers taxed at individual rates, the application of the 15% tax rate to qualified dividend income, and certain other tax rate provisions described herein. The impact of this reversion is not discussed herein. Consequently, prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of sunset provisions on an investment in our common stock.

State, Local and Foreign Taxes

We and/or our stockholders may be subject to taxation by various states, localities or foreign jurisdictions, including those in which we or a stockholder transacts business, owns property or resides. We may own properties located in numerous jurisdictions and may be required to file tax returns in some or all of those jurisdictions. The state, local and foreign tax treatment may differ from the federal income tax treatment described above. Consequently, stockholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of state, local and foreign income and other tax laws upon an investment in the common stock.

155

UNDERWRITING

We are offering the shares of common stock described in this prospectus through a number of underwriters. Barclays Capital Inc. is acting as the representative of the underwriters and the sole book-running manager of this offering. Under the terms of an underwriting agreement, which will be filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each of the underwriters named below has severally agreed to purchase from us the respective number of shares of common stock shown opposite its name below:


Underwriters		Number of Shares
Barclays Capital Inc.
JMP Securities LLC
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.

Total		9,000,000

The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters’ obligation to purchase shares of common stock depends on the satisfaction of the conditions contained in the underwriting agreement including:

the obligation to purchase all of the shares of common stock offered hereby (other than those shares of common stock covered by their option to purchase additional shares as described below), if any of the shares are purchased;

the representations and warranties made by us to the underwriters are true;

there is no material change in our business or the financial markets; and

we deliver customary closing documents to the underwriters.

Commissions and Expenses. The following table summarizes the underwriting discounts and commissions we will pay to the underwriters. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares. The underwriting fee is the difference between the initial price to the public and the amount the underwriters pay to us for the shares.

The representative of the underwriters has advised us that the underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock directly to the public at the public offering price on the cover of this prospectus and to selected dealers, which may include the underwriters, at such offering price less a selling concession not in excess of $ per share. After the offering, the representative may change the offering price and other selling terms. Sales of shares made outside of the United States may be made by affiliates of the underwriters.

The expenses of the offering that are payable by us are estimated to be $ (excluding underwriting discounts and commissions).

Option to Purchase Additional Shares. We have granted the underwriters an option exercisable for 30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase from time to time, in whole or in part, up to an aggregate of 1,350,000 shares at the public offering price less underwriting discounts and commissions. This option may be exercised if the underwriters sell more than 9,000,000 shares in connection with this offering. To the extent that this option is exercised, each underwriter will be obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase its pro rata portion of these additional shares based on the underwriter’s portion of underwriting commitment in the offering as indicated in the table at the beginning of this Underwriting section.

156

New York Stock Exchange. Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “CYS.”

Lock-Up Agreements. We have agreed that for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus, we will not, without the prior written consent of Barclays Capital Inc. (i) directly or indirectly, issue, offer, sell, agree to issue, offer or sell, solicit offers to purchase, grant any call option, warrant or other right to purchase, purchase any put option or other right to sell, pledge, borrow or otherwise dispose of any relevant securities, or publicly announce the intention to do any of the foregoing, (ii) establish or increase any “put equivalent position” or liquidate or decrease any “call equivalent position” (in each case within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder) with respect to any relevant security, or (iii) otherwise enter into any swap, derivative or other transaction or arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any economic consequence of ownership of a relevant security, whether or not such transaction is to be settled by delivery of relevant securities, other securities, cash or other consideration; provided, however, that we may (a) issue the shares of common stock in this offering, (b) issue shares of our common stock upon the exercise of currently outstanding options or warrants to purchase our common stock; and (c) grant shares of our common stock, or options to purchase our common stock, pursuant to our 2006 stock incentive plan. During this 90-day period, we have also agreed not to file a registration statement under the Securities Act in connection with any transaction by us or any person that is prohibited pursuant to the foregoing, without the prior written consent of Barclays Capital Inc., except for any registration statements on Form S-8 or Form S-11, but solely for the registration of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to our 2006 stock incentive plan.

As of September 30, 2009, our directors and executive officers, our Manager, Cypress, Sharpridge and certain of their executive officers, directors and affiliates collectively held approximately 4.1% of our currently outstanding shares of common stock, or 750,116 shares. Each of these individuals and entities has agreed that for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus they will not, without the prior written consent of Barclays Capital Inc., (i) directly or indirectly, offer, sell, agree to offer or sell, solicit offers to purchase, grant any call option or purchase any put option with respect to, pledge, borrow or otherwise dispose of any relevant securities, or (ii) establish or increase any “put equivalent position” or liquidate or decrease any “call equivalent position” (in each case within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder) with respect to any relevant security, or otherwise enter into any swap, derivative or other transaction or arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any economic consequence of ownership of a relevant security, whether or not such transaction is to be settled by delivery of relevant securities, other securities, cash or other consideration, subject to certain exceptions described below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each of our executive officers and directors, our Manager, Cypress, Sharpridge and certain of their executive officers, directors and affiliates may (i) exercise currently outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock during this 90-day period without the prior written consent of Barclays Capital Inc. and (ii) sell or transfer shares of our common stock during this 90-day period, without the prior written consent of Barclays Capital Inc.:

as a bona fide gift or gifts;

to any trust for the direct or indirect benefit of such party or his or her immediate family; or

by will or intestate succession;

provided, however, it is a condition to any such transfer that the transferee (or trustee, if applicable) execute a similar lock-up agreement stating that such transferee (or trustee, if applicable) is receiving and holding shares of our common stock subject to the provisions of the agreement pursuant to which these persons agree not to sell or transfer shares of our common stock for the remainder of the 90-day period described above; provided, further, that no filing by any party under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act is required in connection with such transfer (other than a filing on Form 5 in connection with such transfer, if applicable). For this purpose, “immediate family” shall mean any relationship by blood, marriage or adoption, not more remote than first cousin.

The periods described in the preceding paragraphs will be automatically extended if: (i) during the last 17 days of the 90-day period we issue an earnings release or announce material news or a material event relating to us; or (ii) prior to the expiration of the 90-day period, we announce that we will release earnings results during

157

the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the 90-day period, then the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the announcement of the material news or material event.

Indemnification. We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and to contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to make for these liabilities.

Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids. The representative may engage in stabilizing transactions, short sales and purchases to cover positions created by short sales, and penalty bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing or maintaining the price of the common stock, in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act:

Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum.

A short position involves a sale by the underwriters of shares in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to purchase in the offering, which creates the syndicate short position. This short position may be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of shares involved in the sales made by the underwriters in excess of the number of shares they are obligated to purchase is not greater than the number of shares that they may purchase by exercising their option to purchase additional shares. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is greater than the number of shares in their option to purchase additional shares. The underwriters may close out any short position by either exercising their option to purchase additional shares and/or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out the short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through their option to purchase additional shares. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering.

Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions.

Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the common stock originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short positions.

These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result, the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may be effected on the NYSE or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of our common stock. In addition, neither we nor any of the underwriters make representation that the representative will engage in these stabilizing transactions or that any transaction, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.

Electronic Distribution. A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the Internet sites or through other online services maintained by one or more of the underwriters and/or selling group members participating in this offering, or by their affiliates. In those cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and, depending upon the particular underwriter or selling group member, prospective investors may be allowed to place orders online. The underwriters may agree with us to allocate a specific number of shares for sale to online brokerage account holders. Any such allocation for online distributions will be made by the representative on the same basis as other allocations.

158

Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information on any underwriter’s or selling group member’s web site and any information contained in any other web site maintained by an underwriter or selling group member is not part of the prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or any underwriter or selling group member in its capacity as underwriter or selling group member and should not be relied upon by investors.

Stamp Taxes. If you purchase shares of our common stock offered in this prospectus, you may be required to pay stamp taxes and other charges under the laws and practices of the country of purchase, in addition to the offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus.

Selling Restrictions. Each underwriter intends to comply with all applicable laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which it acquires, offers, sells or delivers shares or has in its possession or distributes this document.

European Economic Area. In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a “Relevant Member State”), with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the “Relevant Implementation Date”) an offer of the shares to the public may not be made in that Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the shares which has been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that an offer to the public in that Relevant Member State of any shares may be made at any time under the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive if they have been implemented in the Relevant Member State:

(a) if the offer of shares is addressed solely to persons who are “qualified investors” within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive (“Qualified Investors”). Qualified Investors include:

(i) to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities; and

(ii) to any legal entity which meets two or more of the following criteria: (1) an average of at least 250 employees during the last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than €43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more than €50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts; or

(b) in any other circumstances falling within Article 3 (2) of the Prospectus Directive;

provided that no such offer of shares shall result in a requirement for the publication by the company or any underwriter of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.

For the purposes of this provision, the expression an “offer of shares to the public” in relation to any shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State and the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State.

Australia. No prospectus or other disclosure document (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001(6th) of Australia (“Corporations Act”)) in relation to the shares has been or will be lodged with the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (“ASIC”). This document has not been lodged with ASIC and is only directed to certain categories of exempt persons. Accordingly, if you receive this document in Australia:

(a) you confirm and warrant that you are either:

(i) a “sophisticated investor” under section 708(8)(a) or (b) of the Corporations Act;

159

(ii) a “sophisticated investor” under section 708(8)(c) or (d) of the Corporations Act and that you have provided us with a certificate from a qualified accountant (as defined in the Corporations Act), which complies with the requirements of section 708(8)(c)(i) or (ii) of the Corporations Act and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (6th) before the offer has been made;

(iii) a person associated with us under section 708(12) of the Corporations Act; or

(iv) a “professional investor” within the meaning of section 708(11)(a) or (b) of the Corporations Act,

and to the extent that you are unable to confirm or warrant that you are an exempt sophisticated investor, associated person or professional investor under the Corporations Act any offer made to you under this document is void and incapable of acceptance; and

(b) you warrant, undertake and agree that you will not offer for resale in Australia within 12 months any of those shares being issued to you unless any such resale offer by you is exempt from the requirement to issue a disclosure document under section 708 of the Corporations Act.

The Emirate of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. This prospectus is strictly private and confidential and is being distributed to a limited number of investors and must not be provided to any person other than the original recipient, and may not be reproduced or used for any other purpose. By receiving this prospectus, the person or entity to whom it has been issued understands, acknowledges and agrees that this prospectus has not been approved by the UAE Central Bank, the Emirates Securities or Commodities Authority (“ESCA”) or any other authorities in the UAE, nor has the placement agent, if any, received authorization or licensing from the UAE Central Bank, ESCA or any other authorities in the United Arab Emirates to market or sell securities or other investments within the United Arab Emirates. No marketing of any financial products or services has been or will be made from within the United Arab Emirates and no subscription to any securities or other investments may or will be consummated within the United Arab Emirates. It should not be assumed that the placement agent, if any, is a licensed broker, dealer or investment advisor under the laws applicable in the United Arab Emirates, or that it advises individuals resident in the United Arab Emirates as to the appropriateness of investing in or purchasing or selling securities or other financial products. The shares may not be offered or sold directly or indirectly to the public in the United Arab Emirates. This does not constitute a public offer of securities in the United Arab Emirates in accordance with the Commercial Companies Law, Federal Law No. 8 of 1984 (as amended) or otherwise. By receiving this prospectus, the person or entity to whom it has been issued understands, acknowledges and agrees that the shares have not been and will not be offered, sold or publicly promoted or advertised in the Dubai International Financial Centre other than in compliance with laws applicable in the Dubai International Financial Centre, governing the issue, offering or sale of securities. The Dubai Financial Services Authority has not approved this prospectus nor taken steps to verify the information set out in it, and has no responsibility for it.

Hong Kong. The shares may not be offered or sold in Hong Kong, by means of any document, other than (a) to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made under that Ordinance or (b) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a “prospectus” as defined in the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32, Laws of Hong Kong) or which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of that Ordinance. No advertisement, invitation or document relating to the shares may be issued or may be in the possession of any person for the purpose of the issue, whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere, which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to the shares which are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong) or any rules made under that Ordinance.

India. This prospectus has not been and will not be registered as a prospectus with the Registrar of Companies in India or with the Securities and Exchange Board of India. This prospectus or any other material

160

relating to these securities is for information purposes only and may not be circulated or distributed, directly or indirectly, to the public or any members of the public in India and in any event to not more than 50 persons in India. Further, persons into whose possession this prospectus comes are required to inform themselves about and to observe any such restrictions. Each prospective investor is advised to consult its advisors about the particular consequences to it of an investment in these securities. Each prospective investor is also advised that any investment in these securities by it is subject to the regulations prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India and the Foreign Exchange Management Act and any regulations framed thereunder.

Japan. No registration has been made under Article 4, Paragraph 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (Law No. 25 of 1948, as amended) (“FIEL”) in relation to our common stock. The shares are being offered in a private placement to: (i) “qualified institutional investors” (tekikaku-kikan-toshika) under Article 10 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance concerning Definitions provided in Article 2 of the FIEL (the Ministry of Finance Ordinance No. 14, as amended) (“QIIs”), under Article 2, Paragraph 3, Item 2 i of the FIEL; and (ii) up to 49 investors under Article 2, Paragraph 3, Item 2 iii of the FIEL. Any QII acquiring shares in this offering may not transfer or resell those shares except to other QIIs.

Korea. The shares may not be offered, sold and delivered directly or indirectly, or offered or sold to any person for reoffering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Korea or to any resident of Korea except pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations of Korea, including the Korea Securities and Exchange Act and the Foreign Exchange Transaction Law and the decrees and regulations thereunder. The shares have not been registered with the Financial Services Commission of Korea for public offering in Korea. Furthermore, the shares may not be resold to Korean residents unless the purchaser of the shares complies with all applicable regulatory requirements (including but not limited to government approval requirements under the Foreign Exchange Transaction Law and its subordinate decrees and regulations) in connection with the purchase of the shares.

Singapore. This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the shares be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the Securities and Future Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the “SFA”), (ii) to a “relevant person” as defined in Section 275(2) of the SFA, or any person pursuant to Section 275 (1A), and in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA. Where the shares are subscribed and purchased under Section 275 of the SFA by a relevant person which is: (a) a corporation (which is not an accredited investor (as defined in Section 4A of the SFA)) the sole business of which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or (b) a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited investor (as defined in Section 4A of the SFA)) whose sole whole purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary is an accredited investor, shares, debentures and units of shares and debentures of that corporation or the beneficiaries’ rights and interest (howsoever described) in that trust shall not be transferable within six months after that corporation or that trust has acquired the shares under Section 275 of the SFA except: (i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the SFA or to a relevant person (as defined in Section 275(2) of the SFA) and in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA; (ii) (in the case of a corporation) where the transfer arises from an offer referred to in Section 275(1A) of the SFA, or (in the case of a trust) where the transfer arises from an offer that is made on terms that such rights or interests are acquired at a consideration of not less than S$200,000 (or its equivalent in a foreign currency) for each transaction, whether such amount is to be paid for in cash or by exchange of securities or other assets; (iii) where no consideration is or will be given for the transfer; or (iv) where the transfer is by operation of law. By accepting this prospectus, the recipient hereof represents and warrants that he is entitled to receive it in accordance with the restrictions set forth above and agrees to be bound by limitations contained herein. Any failure to comply with these limitations may constitute a violation of law.

161

Taiwan. The shares have not been and will not be registered with the Financial Supervisory Commission of Taiwan, the Republic of China pursuant to relevant securities laws and regulations and may not be offered or sold in Taiwan, the Republic of China through a public offering or in circumstances which constitute an offer within the meaning of the Securities and Exchange Act of Taiwan, the Republic of China that requires a registration or approval of the Financial Supervisory Commission of Taiwan, the Republic of China. No person or entity in Taiwan, the Republic of China has been authorized to offer or sell the shares in Taiwan, the Republic of China.

Conflicts/Affiliates. Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates have engaged, and the underwriters and their affiliates may from time to time engage, in transactions with us in the ordinary course of their respective businesses. In addition, certain of the underwriters and their affiliates have performed, and the underwriters and their affiliates may, from time to time, perform, services for us in the ordinary course of their respective businesses. The underwriters and their affiliates have received, and expect to receive, customary compensation and expense reimbursement for these transactions and services.

We have purchased Agency RMBS and CLOs and likely will purchase in the future Agency RMBS issued or sold by affiliates of certain of the underwriters or underwritten by certain underwriters. As of June 30, 2009, an aggregate of approximately $313.5 million in carrying value, or 20.6% of the fair value of our portfolio, had been issued or sold by affiliates of certain of the underwriters or underwritten by certain of the underwriters, including Barclays Capital Inc. and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (of which $39.0 million was purchased from Lehman Brothers Inc.).

We have entered into a master repurchase agreement with Barclays Capital Inc. At June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding with Barclays Capital Inc.

Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated served as the initial purchaser and placement agent of our May 2008 private offering for which they received customary fees. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated also owns (i) 40,666 shares of our common stock and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 12,200 shares of our common stock as a result of purchases in that offering. Pursuant to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Rule 5110(h), Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated has agreed that they will not sell, transfer, assign, pledge or hypothecate these securities for a period of 180 days following the date of this prospectus. After the expiration of this lock-up period, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated may sell the 40,666 shares of our common stock without restriction and it may sell the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 12,200 shares of our common stock or the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of such warrants pursuant to certain exemptions from registration under the Securities Act.

LEGAL MATTERS

Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed on for us by Hunton & Williams LLP. Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New York.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006 included in this prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein. Such consolidated financial statements are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

162

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-11, including exhibits and schedules filed with the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock to be sold in this offering. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. For further information with respect to our company and the shares of common stock to be sold in this offering, reference is made to the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Copies of the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement, may be examined without charge at the public reference room of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. Information about the operation of the public reference room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of all or a portion of the registration statement may be obtained from the public reference room of the SEC upon payment of prescribed fees. Our SEC filings, including our registration statement, are also available to you on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

We are subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and file periodic reports, proxy statements and make available to our stockholders annual reports containing audited financial information for each year and quarterly reports for the first three quarters of each fiscal year containing unaudited interim financial information.

163

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


		Page
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008, AND FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008 (UNAUDITED)

Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities		F-2

Consolidated Schedules of Investments		F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-7

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets		F-8

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-9

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-10

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007, AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 10, 2006 (COMMENCEMENT OF OPERATIONS) TO DECEMBER 31, 2006:

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		F-26

Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities		F-27

Consolidated Schedules of Investments		F-28

Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-32

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets		F-33

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-34

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-35

F-1

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES


	June 30, 2009 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2008*
ASSETS:
Investments in securities, at fair value (cost, $1,535,005,062 and $723,814,995, respectively)	$	1,519,706,671		$	690,509,973
Interest rate swap contracts, at fair value		2,059,581			—
Cash and cash equivalents		44,644,536			7,156,140
Receivable for securities sold		2,346,742			885,009
Interest receivable		5,695,555			3,828,586
Prepaid insurance		627,575			65,851

Total assets		1,575,080,660			702,445,559

LIABILITIES:
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		699,004,746			587,485,241
Interest rate swap contracts, at fair value		741,401			12,503,520
Payable for securities purchased		644,304,456			—
Accrued interest payable (including accrued interest on securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $207,438 and $1,598,881, respectively)		547,365			2,327,208
Related party management fee payable		310,184			220,045
Accrued offering costs		332,687			510,569
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		281,392			598,127

Total liabilities		1,345,522,231			603,644,710

Contingencies (note 10)
NET ASSETS	$	229,558,429		$	98,800,849

Net Assets consist of:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized (18,133,538 and 7,662,706 shares issued and outstanding, respectively)	$	181,335		$	76,627
Additional paid in capital		308,206,053			201,941,407
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments		(80,697,130	)		(68,887,694	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		(13,980,211	)		(45,808,542	)
Undistributed net investment income		15,848,382			11,479,051

NET ASSETS	$	229,558,429		$	98,800,849

NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE	$	12.66		$	12.89

*	Derived from audited financial statements

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS

JUNE 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED)

INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES—UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Fixed Income Securities—662.0%^(d)
	Face Amount		Fair Value
Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS—660.8%^(d)
Fannie Mae Pools—584.5%^(d)
3.713%, due 12/1/2038^(b)	$	10,085,815	$	10,228,435
3.73%, due 5/1/2034^(a)(b)		8,220,228		8,461,697
3.778%, due 4/1/2036^(a)(b)		42,875,886		43,894,188
3.78%, due 6/1/2036^(a)(b)		35,834,597		36,685,668
3.783%, due 10/1/2036^(a)(b)		35,789,274		36,639,269
3.784%, due 7/1/2036^(a)(b)		37,250,529		38,135,230
3.9%, due 9/1/2039^(b)		150,000,000		152,062,500
4.03%, due 9/1/2039^(b)		50,000,000		50,797,000
4.05%, due 9/1/2039^(b)		50,000,000		50,812,500
4.084%, due 12/1/2038^(b)		25,055,082		25,626,651
4.092%, due 8/1/2033^(a)(b)		7,618,155		7,843,128
4.1%, due 9/1/2039^(b)		100,000,000		101,750,000
4.421%, due 8/1/2037^(a)(b)		27,069,442		27,813,852
4.5%, due 1/1/2035^(a)(b)		38,148,820		39,245,599
4.5%, due 5/1/2024		17,708,222		18,078,988
4.5%, due 6/1/2024		34,721,645		35,448,629
4.5%, due 6/1/2024		22,763,569		23,240,181
4.5%, due 6/1/2024		28,420,707		29,015,765
4.5%, due 8/1/2024		60,000,000		61,040,625
4.5%, due 9/1/2024		150,000,000		152,039,063
4.567%, due 4/1/2035^(a)(b)		11,180,441		11,557,781
4.634%, due 3/1/2034^(a)(b)		43,674,161		44,957,089
4.759%, due 9/1/2034^(a)(b)		30,215,126		30,979,946
5.272%, due 3/1/2038^(a)(b)		29,936,095		31,329,995
5.5%, due 9/1/2023^(a)		57,078,411		59,718,287
5.587%, due 11/1/2037^(a)(b)		7,916,282		8,318,590
5.874%, due 8/1/2037^(a)(b)		54,143,586		57,066,494
5.945%, due 11/1/2036^(a)(b)		34,478,147		36,259,967
5.976%, due 12/1/2036^(a)(b)		36,890,557		38,875,269
6%, due 4/1/2038^(a)		27,640,794		28,880,311
6%, due 5/1/2037^(a)		16,030,841		16,647,027
6.108%, due 5/1/2037^(a)(b)		26,746,143		28,284,046

Total Fannie Mae Pools				1,341,733,770

Freddie Mac Pools—76.3%^(d)
4.176%, due 4/1/2035^(a)(b)		11,880,289		12,221,847
4.795%, due 12/1/2038^(a)(b)		13,226,638		13,730,904
4.985%, due 5/1/2038^(a)(b)		46,648,957		48,580,516
5.5%, due 9/1/2023^(a)		9,025,369		9,434,331
5.782%, due 11/1/2036^(a)(b)		43,287,185		45,377,144
5.958%, due 1/1/2036^(a)(b)		4,903,416		5,085,762
5.979%, due 10/1/2037^(a)(b)		38,601,910		40,682,794

Total Freddie Mac Pools				175,113,298

Total Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS (cost—$1,494,233,822)				1,516,847,068

F-3

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

JUNE 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED)


	Face Amount		Fair Value
Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities—1.1%^(d)
AMMC CLO V, LTD^(c)(e)	$	2,249,000	$	89,960
AMMC CLO VII, LTD^(c)(e)		3,900,000		39,000
ARES VIR CLO, LTD^(c)(e)		3,775,000		151,000
AVENUE CLO V, LTD^(c)(e)		2,000,000		20,000
BALLYROCK CLO 2006-2, LTD^(c)(e)		4,270,000		21,350
CARLYLE HIGH YIELD PARTNERS VIII, LTD^(c)(e)		3,000,000		30,000
EATON VANCE CDO IX, LTD^(c)(e)		2,500,000		100,000
FLAGSHIP CLO V, LTD^(c)		3,750,000		18,750
PRIMUS CLO I, LTD^(c)(e)		2,500,000		75,000
START III CLO, LTD^(c)		3,000,000		1,965,000
TRIMARAN CLO VII, LTD^(c)		2,000,000		10,000

Total Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities (cost—$28,122,553)				2,520,060

Structured Notes—0.1%^(d)
RESIX 2006-B B9, 6.319%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		1,855,529		74,221
RESIX 2006-B B10, 7.819%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		1,855,529		58,820
RESIX 2006-C B11, 7.569%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		992,934		24,923
RESIX 2007-A B11, 6.819%, due 2/15/2039^(b)(c)		4,427,360		66,410
RESIX 2007-B B11, 8.819%, due 4/15/2039^(b)(c)		3,511,244		115,169

Total Structured Notes (cost—$12,648,687)				339,543

Total Investment in Securities (cost—$1,535,005,062)			$	1,519,706,671

Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Interest Rate Swap Contracts—0.6%^(d)
	Notional Amount		Fair Value
April 2012 Expiration, Pay Rate 1.691%, Receive Rate 3-Month LIBOR	$	240,000,000	$	2,059,581
June 2012 Expiration, Pay Rate 2.226%, Receive Rate 3-Month LIBOR		200,000,000		(741,401	)
July 2012 Expiration, Pay Rate 2.125%, Receive Rate 3-Month LIBOR		200,000,000		—

Total Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Interest Rate Swap Contracts (cost—$0)			$	1,318,180

Investment in Affiliate—
Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.^(f)			$	—

LEGEND

^(a)	Securities or a portion of the securities are pledged as collateral for securities sold under agreement to repurchase or interest rate swap contracts.

^(b)	The coupon rate shown on floating or adjustable rate securities represents the rate at June 30, 2009.

^(c)	Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may only be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At June 30, 2009, the value of these securities amounted to $2,859,603 or 1.2% of net assets.

^(d)	Percentage of net assets.

^(e)	Non-income producing security—issuer has missed last payment.

^(f)	19% non-voting limited partnership interest, no value has been ascribed.

F-4

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2008*

INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES—UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Fixed Income Securities—698.9%^(d)
	Face Amount		Fair Value
Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS—693.9%^(d)
Fannie Mae Pools—514.8%^(d)
4.642%, due 5/1/2034^(a)(b)	$	8,722,591	$	8,785,283
4.728%, due 4/1/2036^(a)(b)		45,224,901		44,942,245
4.728%, due 6/1/2036^(a)(b)		36,267,916		36,041,241
4.73%, due 10/1/2036^(a)(b)		35,820,101		35,596,225
4.741%, due 7/1/2036^(a)(b)		37,262,609		37,029,718
5.5%, due 9/1/2023^(a)		67,676,224		69,960,297
5.586%, due 11/1/2037^(a)(b)		8,189,893		8,394,640
5.89%, due 8/1/2037^(a)(b)		58,501,897		60,220,391
5.951%, due 11/1/2036^(a)(b)		35,303,033		36,340,060
5.965%, due 12/1/2036^(a)(b)		38,847,702		39,982,783
6%, due 4/1/2038^(a)		29,693,115		30,658,142
6%, due 5/1/2037^(a)		17,140,171		17,335,676
6%, due 6/1/2038^(a)		17,097,584		17,653,256
6%, due 6/1/2038^(a)		17,487,049		18,055,378
6%, due 8/1/2038^(a)		17,435,317		18,001,965
6.129%, due 5/1/2037^(a)(b)		28,729,391		29,663,097

Total Fannie Mae Pools				508,660,397

Freddie Mac Pools—179.1%^(d)
4.987%, due 5/1/2038^(a)(b)		49,063,191		49,845,136
5.786%, due 11/1/2036^(a)(b)		49,962,585		51,211,650
5.949%, due 1/1/2036^(a)(b)		5,895,792		6,035,818
5.972%, due 10/1/2037^(a)(b)		43,520,267		44,825,875
4.853%, due 12/1/2038^(a)(b)		14,454,086		14,612,178
5.5%, due 9/1/2023		10,036,130		10,374,850

Total Freddie Mac Pools				176,905,507

Total Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS (cost—$681,783,215)				685,565,904

Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities—4.4%^(d)
AMMC CLO V, LTD^(c)(f)		2,249,000		112,450
AMMC CLO VII, LTD^(c)		3,900,000		234,000
ARES VIR CLO, LTD^(c)		3,775,000		264,250
AVENUE CLO V, LTD^(c)		2,000,000		160,000
BALLYROCK CLO 2006-2, LTD^(c)		4,270,000		213,500
CARLYLE HIGH YIELD PARTNERS VIII, LTD^(c)		3,000,000		150,000
EATON VANCE CDO IX, LTD^(c)		2,500,000		150,000
FLAGSHIP CLO V, LTD^(c)		3,750,000		525,000
PRIMUS CLO I, LTD^(c)		2,500,000		187,500
START III CLO, LTD^(c)		3,000,000		1,980,000
TRIMARAN CLO VII, LTD^(c)		2,000,000		340,000

Total Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities (cost—$29,239,555)				4,316,700

F-5

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2008*


	Face Amount		Fair Value
Structured Notes—0.6%^(d)
RESIX 2006-B B10, 8.69%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)	$	1,910,762	$	114,646
RESIX 2006-B B9, 7.195%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		1,910,762		133,753
RESIX 2006-C B11, 8.445%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		994,486		39,779
RESIX 2007-A B11, 7.695%, due 2/15/2039^(b)(c)		4,444,139		177,766
RESIX 2007-B B11, 9.695%, due 4/15/2039^(b)(c)		3,524,554		161,425

Total Structured Notes (cost—$12,792,225)				627,369

Total Investments in Securities (cost—$723,814,995)			$	690,509,973

Unrealized Depreciation on Interest Rate Swap Contract—(12.7%)^(d) (Notional $240,000,000) May 2010 Expiration, Pay Rate 5.164%, Receive Rate 3-Month LIBOR (cost, $0))			$	(12,503,520	)

Investment in Affiliate—
Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.^(e)			$	—

LEGEND

*	Derived from audited financial statements.

^(a)	Securities or a portion of the securities are pledged as collateral for securities sold under agreement to repurchase or interest rate swap contracts.

^(b)	The coupon rate shown on floating or adjustable rate securities represents the rate at December 31, 2008.

^(c)

Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may only be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At December 31, 2008, the value of these securities amounted to $4,944,069, or 5.0% of net assets.

^(d)	Percentage of net assets.

^(e)	19% non-voting limited partnership interest, no value has been ascribed.

^(f)	Non-income producing security—issuer has missed last payment.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
INVESTMENT INCOME—Interest income	$	9,727,375		$	11,720,492		$	19,048,720		$	32,345,751

EXPENSES:
Interest		1,111,059			3,891,473			2,500,567			14,820,206
Management fees		786,999			593,826			1,498,768			1,183,691
Related party management compensation		102,923			493,175			533,218			593,952
General, administrative and other		524,416			359,620			944,590			721,627

Total expenses		2,525,397			5,338,094			5,477,143			17,319,476

Net investment income		7,201,978			6,382,398			13,571,577			15,026,275

GAINS AND (LOSSES) FROM INVESTMENTS:
Net realized gain (loss) on investments		(25,945	)		(11,539	)		1,415,931			(4,217,155	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		12,469,386			(2,749,450	)		18,006,631			(14,666,251	)

Net gain (loss) from investments		12,443,441			(2,760,989	)		19,422,562			(18,883,406	)

GAINS AND (LOSSES) FROM SWAP CONTRACTS:
Net swap interest income (expense)		(392,098	)		(1,992,202	)		(2,421,244	)		(3,322,503	)
Net gain (loss) on termination of swap contracts		(10,804,123	)		—			(10,804,123	)		(29,927,526	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap contracts		12,127,098			11,275,723			13,821,700			15,566,272

Net gain (loss) from swap contracts		930,877			9,283,521			596,333			(17,683,757	)

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	20,576,296		$	12,904,930		$	33,590,472		$	(21,540,888	)

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic	$	2.23		$	1.85		$	3.99		$	(3.19	)

Diluted	$	2.22		$	1.84		$	3.98		$	(3.19	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic		9,228,703			6,983,954			8,417,133			6,762,966

Diluted		9,252,934			6,996,869			8,442,266			6,762,966

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-7

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009			Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Net income:
Net investment income	$	7,201,978		$	13,571,577
Net realized gain (loss) on investment securities		(25,945	)		1,415,931
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		12,469,386			18,006,631
Net gain (loss) on swap contracts		930,877			596,333

Net income		20,576,296			33,590,472

Distributions to shareholders		(9,202,246	)		(9,202,246	)

Capital transactions:
Net proceeds from issuance of common shares		105,836,136			105,836,136
Amortization of related party compensation		102,923			533,218

Increase in net assets from capital transactions		105,939,059			106,369,354

Total increase in net assets		117,313,109			130,757,580
Net assets:
Beginning of period		112,245,320			98,800,849

End of period	$	229,558,429		$	229,558,429

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-8

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) :	$	20,576,296		$	12,904,930		$	33,590,472		$	(21,540,888	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Purchase of investment securities		(702,950,687	)		(852,024,440	)		(920,194,528	)		(1,898,091,620	)
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities		—			767,133,067			50,657,636			2,671,641,677
Proceeds from paydowns of investment securities		33,261,812			20,917,255			58,878,828			68,991,018
Amortization of related party compensation		102,923			493,175			533,218			593,952
Amortization of premiums on investment securities		159,273			162,585			292,612			377,818
Accretion of discounts on investment securities		—			(16,998	)		—			(39,250	)
Net realized (gain) loss on investment securities		25,945			11,539			(1,415,931	)		4,217,155
Net realized (gain) loss on paydowns		368,578			417,016			591,316			1,450,768
Net (gain) loss on interest rate swap contracts		(12,127,098	)		(11,275,723	)		(13,821,700	)		(15,566,272	)
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments		(12,469,386	)		2,749,450			(18,006,631	)		14,666,251
Change in assets and liabilities:
Receivable for securities sold		52,610,837			419,718			(1,461,733	)		(470,018	)
Interest receivable		(1,546,645	)		1,332,184			(1,866,969	)		6,937,266
Prepaid insurance		269,009			160,833			(561,724	)		(468,548	)
Payable for securities purchased		514,047,319			(55,170,937	)		644,304,456			(191,891,406	)
Related party management fee payable		69,923			(10,359	)		90,139			45,210
Accrued interest payable		(3,983,706	)		(3,949,061	)		(1,779,843	)		(3,811,275	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		88,045			55,163			(316,735	)		(13,693	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(111,497,562	)		(115,690,603	)		(170,487,117	)		637,028,145

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		1,808,883,065			3,145,778,772			4,003,424,467			10,566,896,512
Repayments of securities sold under agreement to repurchase		(1,752,743,470	)		(3,033,260,627	)		(3,891,904,962	)		(11,203,001,410	)
Proceeds from issuance of common shares		107,056,921			14,443,328			107,056,921			14,443,328
Return of capital^(a)		—			(1,545	)		—			(1,545	)
Offering costs paid		(928,723	)		(944,590	)		(1,398,667	)		(1,408,341	)
Distributions paid		(9,202,246	)		(4,418,995	)		(9,202,246	)		(8,031,964	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		153,065,547			121,596,343			207,975,513			(631,103,420	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		41,567,985			5,905,740			37,488,396			5,924,725
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period		3,076,551			141,239			7,156,140			122,254

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period	$	44,644,536		$	6,046,979		$	44,644,536		$	6,046,979

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	5,486,863		$	9,832,737		$	8,007,886		$	31,004,788

Accrued offering costs	$	1,155,973		$	267,784		$	1,220,785		$	484,014

^(a)	Represents cash-in-lieu of fractional shares relating to the May 28, 2008 reverse stock split.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-9

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. ORGANIZATION

Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed as a Maryland corporation on January 3, 2006, and commenced operations on February 10, 2006. The Company is externally managed and advised by Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC (the “Manager”), a Delaware limited liability company, pursuant to a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”). The Manager is a joint venture between Cypress CSI Advisors LLC, a sponsor of private equity funds and leveraged buyouts of U.S. companies in the industrial, consumer, media and financial sectors, and Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P., a fixed income asset management company. Certain individuals associated with Cypress CSI Advisors LLC and Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P. serve on the Company’s board of directors and the Manager’s investment committee.

The Company has elected to be taxed and intends to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and is required to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), with respect thereto.

In February 2006, the Company completed the initial private placement of units at $10.00 per unit ($30.00 on a post-split basis) that generated net proceeds of approximately $78.0 million. In December 2006, the Company completed a private offering of shares of its common stock at $10.00 per share ($30.00 on a post-split basis) that generated net proceeds of approximately $105.8 million. In May 2008, the Company completed a private offering of units at $5.20 per unit ($15.60 on a post-split basis) that generated net proceeds of approximately $14.0 million. On June 17, 2009, the Company completed its initial public offering of its common stock at $11.00 per share that generated net proceeds of approximately $105.8 million. The Company’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CYS”.

On May 1, 2008, the board of directors of the Company approved a three-for-one reverse stock split of issued and outstanding common stock, which was then approved by stockholders at the May 23, 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. The reverse stock split was effective May 28, 2008, and the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to give effect to the reverse stock split for all periods presented.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for investment companies (“GAAP”) and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10, Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The interim unaudited financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its taxable REIT subsidiary, Sharpridge TRS, Inc. The term “Company” refers to these entities collectively, unless otherwise noted. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The interim unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated by reference in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on April 19, 2007, as amended. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those management estimates.

F-10

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash held in banks and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents is recorded in interest income.

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

The Company utilizes interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk associated with the financing of its portfolio. Specifically, the Company seeks to hedge the exposure to potential interest rate mismatches between the interest earned on investments and the borrowing costs caused by fluctuations in short term interest rates. In a simple interest rate swap, one investor pays a floating rate of interest on a notional principal amount and receives a fixed rate of interest on the same notional principal amount for a specified period of time. Alternatively, an investor may pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate. Interest rate swaps are asset/liability management tools.

During the term of the interest rate swap, the Company makes or receives periodic payments and unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a result of marking the swap to its fair value. When the swap is terminated, the Company will record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the proceeds from (or cost of) the closing transaction and the Company’s basis in the contract, if any. The periodic payments and any realized or unrealized gains or losses are reported under gains and losses from swap contracts in the statement of operations. Swaps involve a risk that interest rates will move contrary to the Company’s expectations, thereby increasing its payment obligation.

The Company adopted SOP 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies, prior to its deferral in February 2008. Under SOP 07-1, the Company uses financial reporting for investment companies, and accordingly, its investments and interest rate swap contracts are carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings. Consequently, there is no impact to designating interest rate swaps as cash flow or fair value hedges under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the swap, limited to any gains recognized. However, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by any counterparty. Should interest rates move unexpectedly, the Company may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the interest rate swap and may realize a loss.

Investment Valuation

Valuation of the Company’s investments is determined by the Manager. Investments are valued at their fair value based on quotations from brokers and dealers. The Manager normally seeks prices from at least three such brokers or dealers, although the Manager may rely on price quotes from fewer than three brokers or dealers in certain circumstances. The Manager reviews all prices used to ensure that current market conditions are represented. This review includes comparisons of similar market transactions or comparisons to a pricing model. The resulting unrealized gains and losses are reflected in the statement of operations.

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities which qualify as financial instruments under SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, approximates the carrying amounts presented in the statement of assets and liabilities.

F-11

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

Investment Transactions and Income

The Company records its transactions in securities on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on securities transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis. Interest income and expense are recorded on the accrual basis. Interest income on residential mortgage-backed securities that are issued and guaranteed by a federally chartered corporation, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), or an agency of the U.S. government such as the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) (“Agency RMBS”), and structured notes is accrued based on outstanding principal amount of the securities and their contractual terms. Interest on collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) and collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) securities is accrued at a rate determined based on estimated future cash flows and adjusted prospectively as future cash flow amounts are recast. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, as amended by Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-20-1, for CDO and CLO securities placed on nonaccrual status or when the Company cannot reliably estimate cash flows, the cost recovery method is used. Amortization of premium and accretion of discount are recorded using the yield to maturity method, and are included in interest income in the statement of operations.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation issued to its independent directors and executive officers and certain officers and employees of its Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company, as designated by its Manager (“Manager Designees”), using the fair value based methodology prescribed by SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). Compensation cost related to restricted common stock and common stock options issued to the Manager Designees is initially measured at estimated fair value at the grant date, and is remeasured on subsequent dates to the extent the awards are unvested. Compensation cost related to independent directors is measured at its estimated fair value at the grant date and amortized and expensed over the vesting period. The Company has elected to use the straight line method pursuant to SFAS 123(R) to amortize compensation expense for the restricted common stock and common stock options granted to the Manager Designees.

Income Taxes

The Company has elected to treat Sharpridge TRS, Inc. (the “TRS”) as a taxable REIT subsidiary. In general, the TRS may hold assets that the Company cannot hold directly and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business. The TRS is subject to corporate-level federal income tax as a regular C corporation and, accordingly, would record income tax benefit or expense.

Earnings Per Share

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, the Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per common share (“EPS”) in its consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto. Basic earnings per common share (“Basic EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss allocable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares, including vested restricted common shares, outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share (“Diluted EPS”) reflect the potential additional dilution of common stock options, unvested restricted common stock and warrants, if they are not anti-dilutive. See note 3 for earnings per share computations.

F-12

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

Subsequent Events

Effective the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company implemented SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. This standard establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred from June 30, 2009 to August 5, 2009, the date the Company issued these financial statements. During this period the Company did not have any material recognizable or non recognizable subsequent events other than what is disclosed in note 13.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 requires companies with derivative instruments to disclose information that should enable financial-statement users to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The Company adopted SFAS 161 on January 1, 2009 and expanded the disclosures relating to derivative instruments included in its consolidated financial statements.

On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3 (“FSP 157-3”), Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, in response to the deterioration of the credit markets. FSP 157-3 provides guidance clarifying how SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”) should be applied when valuing securities in markets that are not active. The guidance provides an illustrative example that applies the objectives and framework of SFAS 157, utilizing management’s internal cash flow and discount rate assumptions when relevant observable data does not exist. It further clarifies how observable market information and market quotes should be considered when measuring fair value in an inactive market. It reaffirms the notion of fair value as an exit price as of the measurement date and that fair value analysis is a transactional process and should not be broadly applied to a group of assets. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. FSP 157-3 does not have a material effect on the fair value of the Company’s assets as it intends to continue to hold assets that can be valued using level 1 and level 2 criteria, as defined under SFAS 157.

On April 9, 2009 the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-4 (“FSP 157-4”), Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, to provide additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. FSP 157-4 does not have a material effect on the fair value of the Company’s assets as it intends to continue to hold assets that can be valued using level 1 and level 2 criteria, as defined under SFAS 157.

F-13

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

3. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company calculates basic net income (loss) per common share by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted-average shares of its common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share takes into account the effect of dilutive instruments, such as common stock options, unvested restricted common stock and warrants, but uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of incremental shares that are to be added to the weighted-average shares of its common stock outstanding. The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Basic:
Net income (loss)	$	20,576,296	$	12,904,930	$	33,590,472	$	(21,540,888	)

Weighted-average shares outstanding		9,228,703		6,983,954		8,417,133		6,762,966

Basic net income (loss) per share	$	2.23	$	1.85	$	3.99	$	(3.19	)

Diluted:
Net income (loss)	$	20,576,296	$	12,904,930	$	33,590,472	$	(21,540,888	)

Weighted-Average shares outstanding		9,228,703		6,983,954		8,417,133		6,762,966
Plus: Incremental shares from assumed conversion of dilutive instruments		24,231		12,915		25,133		—

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding		9,252,934		6,996,869		8,442,266		6,762,966

Diluted net income (loss) per share	$	2.22	$	1.84	$	3.98	$	(3.19	)

4. INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES AND INTEREST RATE SWAP CONTRACTS

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157” or the “Standard”). The Standard defines fair value, provides a consistent framework for measuring fair value under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and expands fair value financial statement disclosure requirements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. It only applies to accounting pronouncements that already require or permit fair value measures, except for standards that relate to share-based payments.

SFAS 157’s valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. SFAS 157 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 Inputs—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 Inputs—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 Inputs—Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

F-14

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no effect on the manner in which the Company measures fair value, but it does require certain additional disclosures about the fair value of securities and derivatives, based on the level of inputs, summarized below:

June 30, 2009


	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets
Agency RMBS	$	—	$	1,516,847	$	—	$	1,516,847
CLOs and Structured Notes		—		2,860		—		2,860
Interest rate swap contracts		—		2,060		—		2,060

Total	$	—	$	1,521,767	$	—	$	1,521,767

Liabilities
Interest rate swap contracts	$	—	$	741	$	—	$	741

Total	$	—	$	741	$	—	$	741


December 31, 2008
	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets
Agency RMBS	$	—	$	685,566	$	—	$	685,566
CLOs and Structured Notes		—		4,944		—		4,944

Total	$	—	$	690,510	$	—	$	690,510

Liabilities
Interest rate swap contracts	$	—	$	12,504	$	—	$	12,504

Total	$	—	$	12,504	$	—	$	12,504

F-15

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

The Agency RMBS portfolio consisted of Agency RMBS as follows:

June 30, 2009


	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Weighted Average
Security Description	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Coupon		Months to Reset⁽¹⁾	Constant Prepayment Rate⁽²⁾
	(in thousands)
Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs	$	717,016	$	739,783	4.8	%	49.2	15.1	%
Agency RMBS collateralized by short-reset hybrid ARMs⁽³⁾		182,910		188,167	4.5		6.7	19.4
Agency RMBS collateralized by monthly reset ARMs		151,750		155,354	3.8		1	2.3
Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgages		423,390		433,543	4.8		N/A	22.8

Total Agency RMBS	$	1,475,066	$	1,516,847


December 31, 2008
	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Weighted Average
Security Description	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Coupon		Months to Reset⁽¹⁾	Constant Prepayment Rate⁽²⁾
	(in thousands)
Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs	$	332,468	$	341,132	5.7	%	42.2	10.6	%
Agency RMBS collateralized by short-reset hybrid ARMs⁽³⁾		8,723		8,785	4.6		4.0	18.3
Agency RMBS collateralized by monthly reset ARMs		154,575		153,609	4.7		1	5.5
Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgages		176,566		182,040	5.8		N/A	6.6

Total Agency RMBS	$	672,332	$	685,566

⁽¹⁾	“Months to Reset” is the number of months remaining before the fixed rate on a hybrid ARM becomes a variable rate. At the end of the fixed period, the variable rate will be determined by the margin and the pre-specified caps of the ARM.

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾	“Short-reset” is defined as 24 months or less to reset.

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company’s Agency RMBS were purchased at a net premium to their par value, with a weighted-average amortized cost of $101.3 and $101.4, respectively, due to the average interest rates on these investments being higher than prevailing market rates. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, approximately $19.6 million and $10.0 million, respectively, of unamortized premium was included in the cost basis of the investments.

F-16

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

the Company’s Agency RMBS portfolio is in year 2034 and 2035, respectively. Based on current estimates, the Agency RMBS will have an average expected life of less than five years. Interest income on Agency RMBS for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $9,357,129, $10,199,051, $18,309,112 and $28,971,867, respectively.

In order to mitigate its interest rate exposure, the Company enters into interest rate swap contracts. On April 1, 2009, the Company closed an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $240.0 million. On April 1, 2009, June 24, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the Company opened interest rate swaps with notional amounts of $240.0 million, $200.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively. On March 12, 2008, March 20, 2008 and March 31, 2008, the Company closed interest rate swaps with notional amounts of $160.0 million, $225.0 million and $140.0 million, respectively, as collateral on interest rate swap contracts. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had pledged Agency RMBS with a fair value of $7.1 million and $14.1 million, respectively. Below is a summary of our interest rate swap contracts:

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under FAS 133 ^(a)

As of June 30, 2009

Pay Rates

Receive
Rate

Notional
Amount

Fair Value

Statement of assets and Liabilities Location

Expiration Date

April 2012

1.691

3-Month
LIBOR

^(b)

240,000,000

2,059,581

Interest rate swap contracts, at fair value

June 2012

2.266

3-Month
LIBOR

^(b)

200,000,000

(741,401

)

Interest rate swap contracts, at fair value

July 2012

2.125

3-Month
LIBOR

^(b)

200,000,000

—

Interest rate swap contracts, at fair value

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under FAS 133^(a)

As of December 31, 2008

Pay Rates

Receive
Rate

Notional
Amount

Fair Value

Statement of assets and Liabilities Location

Expiration Date

May 2010

5.164

3-Month
LIBOR

^(b)

240,000,000

(12,503,520

)

Interest rate swap contracts, at fair value


		Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
Derivatives not designated as hedging Instruments under FAS 133^(a)	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	Three Months Ended
		June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008
Interest rate swap contracts	Net gain (loss) from interest rate swap contracts	$	930,877	$	9,283,521

		Six Months Ended

		June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008
Interest rate swap contracts	Net gain (loss) from interest rate swap contracts	$	596,333	$	(17,683,757	)

^(a)	See note 2 for additional information on the Company’s purpose for entering into interest rate swaps not designated as hedging instruments.

^(b)	London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).

Credit Risk

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company limited its exposure to credit losses on its mortgage assets by purchasing Agency RMBS. The payment of principal and interest on the Agency RMBS are guaranteed

F-17

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. In September 2008, both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were placed in the conservatorship of the United States government. While it is hoped that the conservatorship will help stabilize Freddie Mac’s and Fannie Mae’s losses and overall financial position, there can be no assurance that it will succeed or that, if necessary, Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae will be able to satisfy their guarantees of Agency RMBS.

The Company’s CLOs and structured notes do not have the backing of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Payment of principal and interest is dependent on the performance of the underlying loans, which are subject to borrower default and possible losses.

5. BORROWINGS

The Company leverages its Agency RMBS portfolio through the use of securities sold under agreement to repurchase. Each of the borrowing vehicles used by the Company bears interest at floating rates based on a spread above or below the LIBOR.

Certain information with respect to the Company’s borrowings is summarized in the following tables. Each of the borrowings listed is contractually due in one year or less (dollars in thousands).


June 30, 2009
Outstanding borrowings	$	699,005
Interest accrued thereon	$	207
Weighted average borrowing rate		0.51	%
Weighted average remaining maturity (in days)		44.90
Fair value of the collateral⁽¹⁾	$	749,444

December 31, 2008
Outstanding borrowings	$	587,485
Interest accrued thereon	$	1,599
Weighted average borrowing rate		2.44	%
Weighted average remaining maturity (in days)		10.03
Fair value of the collateral⁽¹⁾	$	638,026

⁽¹⁾	Collateral for borrowings consists of Agency RMBS.

At June 30, 2009, the Company did not have any securities sold under agreement to repurchase where the amount at risk exceeded 10% of net assets. At December 31, 2008, the Company had securities sold under agreement to repurchase where the amount at risk exceeded 10% of net assets with the following counterparties:

December 31, 2008


Counterparty	Amount at Risk⁽¹⁾		Weighted Average Maturity in Days
Bank of America Corp.⁽²⁾	$	13,373,003	10
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.		15,064,027	9
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.		12,893,032	6

⁽¹⁾	Equal to the fair value of securities plus accrued interest income, minus the sum of securities sold under agreement to repurchase liabilities plus accrued interest expense.

⁽²⁾	Formerly Merrill Lynch & Co., acquired by Bank of America Corp., effective January 1, 2009.

F-18

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

Market Risk

The current situation in the mortgage sector and the current weakness in the broader mortgage market could adversely affect one or more of the Company’s lenders and could cause one or more of the Company’s lenders to be unwilling or unable to provide additional financing. This could potentially increase the Company’s financing costs and reduce liquidity. If one or more major market participants fail, it could negatively impact the marketability of all fixed income securities, including Agency RMBS. This could negatively impact the value of the securities in the Company’s portfolio, thus reducing its net asset value. Furthermore, if many of the Company’s lenders are unwilling or unable to provide additional financing, the Company could be forced to sell its Agency RMBS at an inopportune time when prices are depressed. Even with the current situation in the mortgage sector, the Company does not anticipate having difficulty converting its assets to cash or extending financing terms due to the fact that its Agency RMBS have an actual or implied “AAA” rating and principal and interest payments are guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.

6. SHARE CAPITAL

The Company authorized 500,000,000 shares of common stock having par value of $0.01 per share. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had issued and outstanding 18,133,538 and 7,662,706 shares of common stock, respectively, and warrants to purchase an additional 288,592 shares of common stock. Below is a description of the warrants outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

June 30, 2009


Expiration	Additional shares of common stock	Exercise Price
April 30, 2011	288,592	$	11.00	^(a)

December 31, 2008


Expiration	Additional shares of common stock	Exercise Price
April 30, 2011	288,592	$	15.60	^(a)

^(a)

These warrants were originally issued with an exercise price of $15.60 per share. If additional shares of common stock were sold at a price less than $15.60 per share, the related warrant agreement required a one-time adjustment to the exercise price to equal the price per share of the additional shares sold. Pursuant to the Company’s June 2009 initial public offering, the exercise price of these warrants was reduced to $11.00 per share, which equaled the price per common share sold in such offering.

The Company is also authorized to issue shares of preferred stock. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, no such shares were issued or outstanding.

7. STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK

The Company has adopted a stock incentive plan (the “2006 Stock Incentive Plan”) that provides for the grant of non-qualified common stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted common stock and other share-based awards. The compensation committee of the board of directors administers the plan. Awards under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan may be granted to the Company’s independent directors and executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals providing services to the Company, as designated by the Manager.

F-19

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

The exercise price for any stock option granted under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan may not be less than 100% of the fair value of the shares of common stock at the time the common stock option is granted. Each common stock option must terminate no later than ten years from the date it is granted. The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes a total of 3,333,333 shares that may be used to satisfy awards under the plan. New shares will be issued on the exercise of any option. The Company made its initial grants under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan on February 10, 2006, December 8, 2006 and December 28, 2006, upon completing a private offering of common stock on each of these dates. Each grant vests over a three-year period. Restricted common stock granted to independent directors on or after January 1, 2007 will vest over a one-year period. The following table summarizes restricted common stock transactions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:


Three and six months ended June 30, 2009	Officers and Employees⁽¹⁾		Independent Directors		Total
Unvested Shares as of December 31, 2008	81,307		11,155		92,462
Issued	—		3,100		3,100
Vested	(43,140	)	(2,581	)	(45,721	)

Unvested Shares as of March 31, 2009	38,167		11,674		49,841
Issued	—		2,732		2,732
Vested	—		(2,738	)	(2,738	)

Unvested Shares as of June 30, 2009	38,167		11,668		49,835


Three and six months ended June 30, 2008	Officers and Employees⁽¹⁾		Independent Directors		Total
Unvested Shares as of December 31, 2007	162,618		7,334		169,952
Issued	—		2,025		2,025
Vested	(43,140	)	(1,889	)	(45,029	)

Unvested Shares as of March 31, 2008	119,478		7,470		126,948
Issued	—		2,737		2,737
Vested	—		(1,333	)	(1,333	)

Unvested Shares as of June 30, 2008	119,478		8,874		128,352

⁽¹⁾	Includes grants to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company.

The shares of restricted common stock granted to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company and independent directors were valued using the fair value at the time of grant, which was $12.89 and $19.75 for shares granted on January 1, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $14.64 and $14.61 for shares granted on April 1, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Pursuant to SFAS 123(R), the Company is required to value any unvested shares of restricted common stock granted to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company at the fair value at each reporting period. The Company valued the unvested restricted common stock at $11.90 and $12.89 per share at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted common stock granted as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $316,126 and $713,774, respectively.

There were no common stock option transactions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were 131,088 options outstanding with a weighted

F-20

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

average exercise price of $30.00. Of the 131,088 options outstanding at June 30, 2009, all have vested and therefore were exercisable. Of the 131,088 options outstanding at December 31, 2008, 87,392 had vested and were exercisable. The common stock options are valued using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions:


	As of June 30, 2009		As of December 31, 2008
Expected life	6.6 years		7.1 years
Discount rate	3.314	%	2.329	%
Volatility	68.06	%	84.62	%
Dividend yield	18.00	%	32.44	%

The estimated fair value of the common stock options was $2.42 and $2.14 per share at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The components of share based compensation expense for each period were as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
Options granted to CEO	$	—	$	(14,565	)
Restricted shares granted to officers and employees⁽¹⁾		59,739		460,522
Restricted shares granted to certain directors		43,184		47,218

Total shared based compensation expense	$	102,923	$	493,175


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
Options granted to CEO	$	57,278	$	(24,268	)
Restricted shares granted to officers and employees⁽¹⁾		388,222		523,753
Restricted shares granted to certain directors		87,718		94,467

Total shared based compensation expense	$	533,218	$	593,952

⁽¹⁾	Includes grants to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company.

8. MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Manager manages the Company’s day-to-day operations, subject to the direction and oversight of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Management Agreement was executed on February 10, 2006. The initial term of the Management Agreement expired on December 31, 2008, and it was automatically renewed for a one-year term and will continue to be automatically renewed for one-year term on each anniversary date thereafter. The Management Agreement may be terminated upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the Company’s independent directors, or by a vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. In the event the Management Agreement is terminated as described above, the Company shall pay to the Manager a termination fee in accordance with the provisions of the Management Agreement.

F-21

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

and on behalf of the Company. The base management fee, which is paid monthly, was equal to 1/12 of (A) 1.50% of the first $250,000,000 of Net Assets (as defined in the Management Agreement), (B) 1.25% of such Net Assets that are greater than $250,000,000 and less than or equal to $500,000,000, and (C) 1.00% of such Net Assets that are greater than $500,000,000.

For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 the Company incurred $508,193, $415,145, $917,973, $842,997 in base management fees, respectively. The Company is required to reimburse the Manager for its pro-rata portion of rent, utilities, legal and investment services, market information systems and research publications and materials which amounted to $278,806, $178,681, $580,795 and $340,694 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to common stock options and restricted common stock granted to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company which is included in related party management compensation on the consolidated statement of operations and described in note 7.

Sharpridge TRS, Inc. has a 19% non-voting limited partnership interest in the Company’s sub-advisor, Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P., which is accounted for at fair value. No value was ascribed to this investment at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.

9. INCOME TAXES

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Section 856 of the Code and intends to continue to comply with the provisions of the Code. As a REIT, the Company generally is not subject to federal or state income tax. To maintain its qualification as a REIT, the Company must distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders each year and meet certain other tests relating to assets and income. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. The Company may also be subject to certain state and local taxes. Under certain circumstances, even though the Company qualifies as a REIT, federal income and excise taxes may be due on its undistributed taxable income. No provision for income taxes has been provided in the accompanying financial statements related to the REIT, because the Company has paid or will pay dividends in amounts approximating its taxable income. The Company has elected to treat the TRS as a taxable REIT subsidiary. A taxable REIT subsidiary is a corporation that is permitted to engage in non-qualifying REIT activities. Taxable income of a taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to federal, state, and local income taxes.

Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization of realized losses on swaps, offering costs, related party management compensation expense, CLO income accruals and swap income and expenses.

The tax character of the $1.32 of distributions declared to shareholders during 2008 was $1.11 as ordinary income and $0.21 as return of capital.

F-22

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

The current estimate of the federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings is as follows:


As of December 31, 2008
Cost of investments	$	722,212,574

Gross appreciation	$	10,683,375
Gross depreciation		(42,385,976	)

Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)	$	(31,702,601	)

Undistributed ordinary income		—

Capital loss carryforwards	$	(26,882,588	)

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had estimated capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:


December 31, 2011	$	(195,321)
December 31, 2012		(18,941,370	)
December 31, 2013		(7,745,897	)

	$	(26,882,588	)

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company’s undistributed taxable income was approximately $0.0 million. No income tax provision was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

10. CONTINGENCIES

The Company enters into certain contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications, principally with the Manager and brokers. The maximum potential amount of future payment the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited. The Company has not incurred any costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK OR CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

In the normal course of its business, the Company trades various financial instruments and enters into various investment activities with off-balance sheet risk, including interest rate swap contracts. These financial instruments contain varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk whereby changes in the fair values of the securities underlying the financial instruments or the Company’s satisfaction of the obligations may ultimately exceed the amount recognized in the statement of assets and liabilities.

The contract amounts of the swap contracts do not represent the Company’s risk of loss due to counterparty nonperformance. The Company’s exposure to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance on swap contracts is limited to the unrealized gains, if any, inherent in such contracts which are recognized in the statement of assets and liabilities. Any counterparty nonperformance of these transactions is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition.

F-23

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

The Company’s investments are primarily concentrated in securities that pass through collections of principal and interest from underlying mortgages, and there is a risk that some borrowers on the underlying mortgages will default. Therefore, mortgage-backed securities may bear some exposure to credit losses. However, the Company mitigates credit risk by primarily holding securities that are either guaranteed by government (or government-sponsored) agencies.

The Company bears certain other risks typical in investing in a portfolio of mortgage-backed securities. The principal risks potentially affecting the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows include the risks that: (a) interest rate changes can negatively affect the fair value of the Company’s mortgage-backed securities, (b) interest rate changes can influence borrowers’ decisions to prepay the mortgages underlying the securities, which can negatively affect both cash flows from, and the fair value of, the securities, and (c) adverse changes in the fair value of the Company’s mortgage-backed securities and/or the inability of the Company to renew short term borrowings under repurchase agreements can result in the need to sell securities at inopportune times and incur realized losses.

The Company enters into derivative transactions with counterparties as hedges of interest rate exposure and in the course of investing. In the event of nonperformance by a counterparty, the Company is potentially exposed to losses, although the counterparties to these agreements are primarily major financial institutions with investment grade ratings.

The Company is subject to interest rate risk. Generally, the value of fixed income securities will change inversely with changes in interest rates. As interest rates rise, the market value of fixed income securities tends to decrease. Conversely, as interest rates fall, the market value of fixed income securities tends to increase.

The Company’s principal trading activities are primarily with brokers and other financial institutions located in North America. All securities transactions of the Company are cleared by multiple major securities firms pursuant to customer agreements. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, substantially all the investments in securities, and receivable for securities sold are positions with and amounts due from these brokers. The Company had substantially all of its individual counterparty concentrations with these brokers and their affiliates.

F-24

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)—(Continued)

12. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

In accordance with financial reporting requirements applicable to investment companies, the Company has included below certain financial highlight information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.


	Per Share
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Net asset value, beginning of period	$	14.64		$	14.61		$	12.89		$	19.75
Net income:
Net investment income		0.81	^(a)		0.89	^(a)		1.62	^(a)		2.16	^(a)
Net gain (loss) from investments and swap contracts		1.50	^(a)		0.91	^(a)		2.39	^(a)		(5.25	)^(a)

Net income (loss)		2.31			1.80			4.01			(3.09	)
Capital transactions:
Distributions to shareholders		(1.20	)		(0.66	)		(1.20	)		(0.66	)
Issuance of common shares and amortization of restricted shares		(3.09	)^(a)		0.03	^(a)		(3.04	)^(a)		(0.22	)^(a)

Net decrease in net asset value from capital transactions		(4.29	)		(0.63	)		(4.24	)		(0.88	)

Net asset value, end of period	$	12.66		$	15.78		$	12.66		$	15.78

Total return (%)		(5.33	)%^(b)		12.53	%^(b)		7.53	%^(b)		(16.76	)%^(b)
Ratios to Average Net Assets
Expenses before interest expense		4.38	%^(c)		5.26	%^(c)		5.06	%^(c)		4.29	%^(c)
Expenses		7.82	%^(c)		19.43	%^(c)		9.31	%^(c)		29.76	%^(c)
Net investment income		22.31	%^(c)		23.23	%^(c)		23.07	%^(c)		25.82	%^(c)

Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (000)	$	229,558		$	120,809		$	229,558		$	120,809
Market price per share, end of period	$	11.90			N/A	^(d)	$	11.90			N/A	^(d)
Portfolio turnover rate (%)		4	%		81	%		13	%		141	%

⁽^a)	Calculated based on average shares outstanding during the period. Average shares outstanding include vested and unvested restricted shares and differs from weighted average shares outstanding used in calculating earnings per share (see note 3).

^(b)	Not computed on an annualized basis.

^(c)	Computed on an annualized basis.

^(d)	Prior to the Company’s initial public offering which closed on June 17, 2009, there was no publicly traded market for the Company’s stock.

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 1, 2009, an aggregate of 3,376 shares of restricted common stock were granted to the independent directors.

For the period from July 1, 2009 through August 5, 2009, warrants to purchase 147,659 shares of common stock were exercised by form of a cashless payment option, resulting in the issuance of 13,543 shares. As of August 5, 2009, the Company had warrants to purchase an additional 140,933 shares of common stock outstanding.

F-25

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedules of investments, of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the period February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the period February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

February 24, 2009

Boston, Massachusetts

F-26

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES


	As of December 31,
	2008			2007
ASSETS:
Investments in securities, at fair value (cost, $723,814,995 and $1,877,370,442, respectively)	$	690,509,973		$	1,870,443,217
Cash and cash equivalents		7,156,140			122,254
Receivable for securities sold		885,009			2,531,032
Interest receivable		3,828,586			10,325,509
Prepaid insurance		65,851			29,166
Prepaid and deferred offering costs		—			958,119

Total assets		702,445,559			1,884,409,297

LIABILITIES:
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		587,485,241			1,337,613,863
Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts		12,503,520			26,008,043
Distribution payable		—			3,612,969
Payable for securities purchased		—			378,187,031
Accrued interest payable (including accrued interest on securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $1,598,881 and $5,687,850, respectively)		2,327,208			5,692,163
Related party management fee payable		220,045			165,388
Accrued offering costs		510,569			463,751
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		598,127			520,053

Total liabilities		603,644,710			1,752,263,261

Contingencies (note 10)
NET ASSETS	$	98,800,849		$	132,146,036

Net assets consist of:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized (7,662,706 and 6,690,684 shares issued and outstanding, respectively)	$	76,627		$	66,907
Additional paid in capital		201,941,407			186,649,372
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments		(68,887,694	)		(18,841,417	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		(45,808,542	)		(32,935,268	)
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income		11,479,051			(2,793,558	)

NET ASSETS	$	98,800,849		$	132,146,036

NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE	$	12.89		$	19.75

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-27

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2008

INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES—UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Fixed Income Securities—698.9%^(d)
	Face Amount		Fair Value
Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS—693.9%^(d)
Fannie Mae Pools—514.8%^(d)
4.642%, due 5/1/2034^(a)(b)	$	8,722,591	$	8,785,283
4.728%, due 4/1/2036^(a)(b)		45,224,901		44,942,245
4.728%, due 6/1/2036^(a)(b)		36,267,916		36,041,241
4.73%, due 10/1/2036^(a)(b)		35,820,101		35,596,225
4.741%, due 7/1/2036^(a)(b)		37,262,609		37,029,718
5.5%, due 9/1/2023^(a)		67,676,224		69,960,297
5.586%, due 11/1/2037^(a)(b)		8,189,893		8,394,640
5.89%, due 8/1/2037^(a)(b)		58,501,897		60,220,391
5.951%, due 11/1/2036^(a)(b)		35,303,033		36,340,060
5.965%, due 12/1/2036^(a)(b)		38,847,702		39,982,783
6%, due 4/1/2038^(a)		29,693,115		30,658,142
6%, due 5/1/2037^(a)		17,140,171		17,335,676
6%, due 6/1/2038^(a)		17,097,584		17,653,256
6%, due 6/1/2038^(a)		17,487,049		18,055,378
6%, due 8/1/2038^(a)		17,435,317		18,001,965
6.129%, due 5/1/2037^(a)(b)		28,729,391		29,663,097

Total Fannie Mae Pools				508,660,397

Freddie Mac Pools—179.1%^(d)
4.987%, due 5/1/2038^(a)(b)		49,063,191		49,845,136
5.786%, due 11/1/2036^(a)(b)		49,962,585		51,211,650
5.949%, due 1/1/2036^(a)(b)		5,895,792		6,035,818
5.972%, due 10/1/2037^(a)(b)		43,520,267		44,825,875
4.853%, due 12/1/2038^(a)(b)		14,454,086		14,612,178
5.5%, due 9/1/2023		10,036,130		10,374,850

Total Freddie Mac Pools				176,905,507

Total Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS (cost—$681,783,215)				685,565,904

Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities—4.4%^(d)
AMMC CLO V, LTD^(c)(f)		2,249,000		112,450
AMMC CLO VII, LTD^(c)		3,900,000		234,000
ARES VIR CLO, LTD^(c)		3,775,000		264,250
AVENUE CLO V, LTD^(c)		2,000,000		160,000
BALLYROCK CLO 2006-2, LTD^(c)		4,270,000		213,500
CARLYLE HIGH YIELD PARTNERS VIII, LTD^(c)		3,000,000		150,000
EATON VANCE CDO IX, LTD^(c)		2,500,000		150,000
FLAGSHIP CLO V, LTD^(c)		3,750,000		525,000
PRIMUS CLO I, LTD^(c)		2,500,000		187,500
START III CLO, LTD^(c)		3,000,000		1,980,000
TRIMARAN CLO VII, LTD^(c)		2,000,000		340,000

Total Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities (cost—$29,239,555)				4,316,700

F-28

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2008


	Face Amount		Fair Value
Structured Notes—0.6%^(d)
RESIX 2006-B B10, 8.69%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)	$	1,910,762	$	114,646
RESIX 2006-B B9, 7.195%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		1,910,762		133,753
RESIX 2006-C B11, 8.445%, due 7/15/2038^(b)(c)		994,486		39,779
RESIX 2007-A B11, 7.695%, due 2/15/2039^(b)(c)		4,444,139		177,766
RESIX 2007-B B11, 9.695%, due 4/15/2039^(b)(c)		3,524,554		161,425

Total Structured Notes (cost—$12,792,225)				627,369

Total Investments in Securities (cost—$723,814,995)			$	690,509,973

Unrealized Depreciation on Interest Rate Swap Contracts—(12.7%)^(d)(Notional $240,000,000 (cost, $0))			$	(12,503,520	)

Investment in Affiliate—
Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.^(e)			$	—

LEGEND

^(a)	Securities or a portion of the securities are pledged as collateral for securities sold under agreement to repurchase or interest rate swap contracts.

^(b)	The coupon rate shown on floating or adjustable rate securities represents the rate at December 31, 2008.

^(c)

Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may only be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At December 31, 2008, the value of these securities amounted to $4,944,069, or 5.0% of net assets.

^(d)	Percentage of net assets.

^(e)	19% non-voting limited partnership interest, no value has been ascribed.

^(f)	Non-income producing security—issuer has missed last payment.

F-29

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2007

INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES—UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Fixed Income Securities—1415.4%^(d)
	Face Amount		Fair Value
Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS—1388.7%^(d)
Fannie Mae Pools—945.0%^(d)
5.5%, due 12/1/2038	$	125,000,000	$	124,824,219
5.712%, due 4/1/2037^(a,b⁾		96,979,901		98,660,844
5.745%, due 6/1/2037^(a,b)		47,983,114		48,882,797
5.813%, due 4/1/2037^(a,b)		43,118,282		44,027,808
5.897%, due 8/1/2037^(a,b)		62,015,137		63,245,491
5.945%, due 11/1/2036^(a,b)		38,551,505		39,334,583
5.981%, due 12/1/2036^(a,b)		45,102,918		46,033,165
6%, due 11/1/2036^(a)		55,702,337		56,581,389
6%, due 5/1/2037^(a)		17,730,488		17,877,296
6.116%, due 10/1/2036^(a,b)		30,125,357		30,798,470
6.149%, due 5/1/2037^(a,b)		32,037,836		32,756,685
6.193%, due 6/1/2036^(a,b)		16,299,292		16,678,760
6.5%, due 8/1/2037^(a)		54,912,332		56,456,741
6.5%, due 10/1/2037^(a)		69,535,082		71,490,756
6.5%, due 10/1/2037^(a)		30,834,194		31,701,406
6.787%, due 3/1/2036^(a,b)		22,047,017		22,434,536
7.15%, due 9/1/2036^(a,b)		41,318,867		42,198,463
7.231%, due 12/1/2036^(a,b)		43,688,329		44,671,316
7.242%, due 10/1/2036^(a,b)		38,322,071		39,322,037
7.247%, due 4/1/2036^(a,b)		49,929,688		51,209,136
7.25%, due 6/1/2036^(a,b)		40,946,775		42,021,628
7.266%, due 7/1/2036^(a,b)		41,114,685		42,206,794
7.275%, due 3/1/2036^(a,b)		53,609,649		54,983,397
7.277%, due 12/1/2036^(a,b)		39,627,196		40,692,177
7.312%, due 9/1/2036^(a,b)		26,812,629		27,591,871
7.343%, due 12/1/2036^(a,b)		22,982,246		23,535,256
7.367%, due 11/1/2036^(a,b)		37,579,422		38,648,087

Total Fannie Mae Pools				1,248,865,108

Freddie Mac Pools—443.7%^(d)
5.806%, due 11/1/2036^(a,b)	$	59,421,173	$	60,417,703
5.94%, due 12/1/2036^(a,b)		86,989,302		88,602,691
5.965%, due 10/1/2037^(a,b)		49,630,585		50,597,240
6.005%, due 1/1/2036^(b)		6,756,455		6,872,747
6.042%, due 7/1/2036^(a,b)		48,074,138		48,994,835
6.069%, due 10/1/2037^(a,b)		75,281,831		76,837,799
6.5%, due 12/1/2038		247,000,000		253,966,173

Total Freddie Mac Pools				586,289,188

Total Mortgage Pass-Through Agency RMBS (cost—$1,830,636,500)				1,835,154,296

F-30

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2007


	Face Amount		Fair Value
Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities—19.4%^(d)
AMMC CLO V, LTD^(c)	$	2,249,000	$	1,383,135
AMMC CLO VII, LTD^(c)		3,900,000		2,535,000
ARES VIR CLO, LTD^(c)		3,775,000		2,529,250
AVENUE CLO V, LTD^(c)		2,000,000		1,561,232
BALLYROCK CLO 2006-2 V, LTD^(c)		4,270,000		3,458,700
CARLYLE HIGH YIELD PARTNERS VIII, LTD^(c)		3,000,000		2,010,000
EATON VANCE CDO IX, LTD^(c)		2,500,000		1,837,500
FLAGSHIP CLO V, LTD^(c)		3,750,000		2,587,500
NAVIGARE CLO, LTD^(c)		2,600,000		1,534,000
PRIMUS CLO I, LTD^(c)		2,500,000		1,700,000
START III CLO, LTD^(c)		3,000,000		2,820,000
TRIMARAN CLO VII, LTD^(c)		2,000,000		1,740,000

Total Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities (cost—$33,735,864)				25,696,317

Structured Notes—7.3%^(d)
RESIX 2006-B B9, 11.028%, due 7/15/2038^(b,c)		1,980,496		1,624,006
RESIX 2006-B B10, 12.528%, due 7/15/2038^(b,c)		1,980,496		1,554,689
RESIX 2006-C B11, 12.278%, due 7/15/2038^(b,c)		997,337		708,110
RESIX 2007-A B11, 11.528%, due 2/15/2039^(b,c)		4,475,432		3,043,294
RESIX 2007-B B11, 13.528%, due 4/15/2039^(b,c)		3,550,007		2,662,505

Total Structured Notes (cost—$12,998,078)				9,592,604

Total Investments in Securities (cost—$1,877,370,442)			$	1,870,443,217

Unrealized depreciation on Interest Rate Swap Contracts—(19.7%)^(d)(Notional $890,000,000 (cost, $0))			$	(26,008,043	)

Investment in Affiliate—
Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P.^(e)			$	—

LEGEND

^(a)	Securities or a portion of the securities are pledged as collateral for securities sold under agreement to repurchase or interest rate swap contracts.

^(b)	The coupon rate shown on floating or adjustable rate securities represents the rate at December 31, 2007.

^(c)

Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may only be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At December 31, 2007, the value of these securities amounted to $35,288,921, or 26.7% of net assets.

^(d)	Percentage of net assets.

^(e)	19% non-voting limited partnership interest, no value has been ascribed.

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-31

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006*
INVESTMENT INCOME—Interest income	$	55,475,822		$	135,585,142		$	48,067,705

EXPENSES:
Interest		23,980,836			112,995,775			38,716,966
Management fees		2,554,539			2,439,667			1,272,291
Related party management compensation		1,280,277			1,600,627			1,262,346
Insurance expense		753,529			320,833			490,250
Administration expense		183,939			242,258			180,000
Professional fees		374,901			414,577			255,000
Offering expenses		2,274,362			—			—
General, administrative and other		326,337			228,933			177,644

Total expenses		31,728,720			118,242,670			42,354,497

NET INVESTMENT INCOME		23,747,102			17,342,472			5,713,208

GAINS AND (LOSSES) FROM INVESTMENTS:
Net realized gain (loss) on investments		(7,982,797	)		(18,290,492	)		(260,054	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		(26,377,797	)		(1,434,857	)		(5,492,367	)
Net gain (loss) on swap contracts		(28,558,957	)		(27,304,395	)		1,005,480

Net gain (loss) from investments		(62,919,551	)		(47,029,744	)		(4,746,941	)

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic	$	(5.48	)	$	(4.58	)	$	0.34

Diluted	$	(5.48	)	$	(4.58	)	$	0.33

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic		7,151,331			6,478,752			2,884,122

Diluted		7,151,331			6,478,752			2,904,717

*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-32

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS


	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006*
Net income (loss):
Net investment income	$	23,747,102		$	17,342,472		$	5,713,208
Net realized gain (loss) on investments		(7,982,797	)		(18,290,492	)		(260,054	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		(26,377,797	)		(1,434,857	)		(5,492,367	)
Net gain (loss) on swap contracts		(28,558,957	)		(27,304,395	)		1,005,480

Net income (loss)		(39,172,449	)		(29,687,272	)		966,267
Distributions to shareholders		(9,474,493	)		(20,068,252	)		(5,780,986	)

Capital Transactions:
Net proceeds from issuance of common shares		14,023,148			—			183,853,306
Return of capital		(1,670	)^(a)		—			—
Amortization of related party compensation		1,280,277			1,600,627			1,262,346

Increase in net assets from capital transactions		15,301,755			1,600,627			185,115,652

Total increase (decrease) in net assets		(33,345,187	)		(48,154,897	)		180,300,933
Net assets:
Beginning of period		132,146,036			180,300,933			—

End of period	$	98,800,849		$	132,146,036		$	180,300,933

*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

^(a)	Represents cash-in-lieu of fractional shares relating to the May 28, 2008 reverse stock split.

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-33

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006*
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Purchase of investment securities		(1,942,505,453	)		(3,851,458,315	)		(2,658,082,514	)
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities		2,972,601,715			3,979,100,370			97,734,940
Proceeds from paydowns of investment securities		112,561,371			443,267,398			77,455,528
Amortization of related party compensation		1,280,277			1,600,627			1,262,346
Amortization of premiums on investment securities		695,686			1,222,389			634,182
Accretion of discounts on investment securities		(77,099	)		(88,302	)		(197,006	)
Offering expenses		2,274,362			—			—
Net realized (gain) loss on investment securities		7,982,797			18,290,492			260,054
Net realized (gain) loss on paydowns		2,296,430			12,126,010			2,364,334
Net (gain) loss on swap contracts		(13,504,523	)		26,873,523			(865,480	)
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments		26,377,797			1,434,857			5,492,367
Change in assets and liabilities:
Receivable for securities sold		1,646,023			(1,093,844	)		(1,437,188	)
Interest receivable		6,496,923			3,856,689			(14,182,198	)
Prepaid insurance		(36,685	)		(29,166	)		—
Payable for securities purchased		(378,187,031	)		378,187,031			—
Related party management fee payable		54,657			(23,232	)		188,620
Accrued interest payable		(3,364,955	)		1,228,939			4,463,224
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		78,074			(16,649	)		536,702

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		757,497,917			984,791,545			(2,483,405,822	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		14,152,289,497			34,519,636,093			13,444,815,382
Repayments of securities sold under agreement to repurchase		(14,902,418,119	)		(35,488,340,231	)		(11,138,497,382	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common shares		14,023,148			—			183,853,306
Return of capital^(a)		(1,670	)		—			—
Offering costs paid		(1,269,425	)		(494,368	)		—
Distributions paid		(13,087,462	)		(16,455,283	)		(5,780,986	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(750,464,031	)		(985,653,789	)		2,484,390,320

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		7,033,886			(862,244	)		984,498
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period		122,254			984,498			—

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period	$	7,156,140		$	122,254		$	984,498

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	45,820,914		$	130,403,123		$	37,070,640

Distributions declared, not yet paid	$	—		$	3,612,969		$	—

Accrued offering costs	$	46,818		$	463,751		$	—

*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

^(a)	Represents cash-in-lieu of fractional shares relating to the May 28, 2008 reverse stock split.

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-34

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed as a Maryland corporation on January 3, 2006, and commenced operations on February 10, 2006. The Company is externally managed and advised by Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC (the “Manager”), a Delaware limited liability company, pursuant to a management agreement (“Management Agreement”). The Manager is a joint venture of Cypress CSI Advisors LLC, a sponsor of private equity funds and leveraged buyouts of U.S. companies in the industrial, consumer, media and financial sectors, and Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P., a fixed income asset management company. Certain individuals associated with Cypress CSI Advisors LLC and Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P. serve on the Company’s board of directors and the Manager’s investment committee.

The Company is a specialty finance company that was created with the objective of achieving consistent risk-adjusted investment income by investing across multiple asset classes, while complying with the requirements to maintain its qualification as a REIT. The Company’s strategy had been to invest a majority of its capital in agency residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), and subordinated tranches of asset-backed securities, including collateralized debt or loan obligations (“CLO”). In March 2008, the board of directors amended the investment guidelines, pursuant to which the Company will invest exclusively in Agency RMBS.

In February 2006, the Company completed the initial private placement of shares of its common stock at $10.00 per share ($30.00 on a post-split basis) that generated net proceeds of approximately $78.0 million. In December 2006, the Company completed a private offering of shares of its common stock at $10.00 per share ($30.00 on a post-split basis) that generated net proceeds of approximately $105.8 million. In May 2008, the Company completed a private offering of shares of its common stock at $5.20 per share ($15.60 on a post-split basis) that generated net proceeds of approximately $14.0 million.

On May 1, 2008, the board of directors approved a three-for-one reverse stock split of issued and outstanding common stock, which was then approved by stockholders at the May 23, 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. The reverse stock split was effective May 28, 2008, and the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to give effect to the reverse stock split for all periods presented.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for investment companies (“GAAP”). Accordingly, investments in securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the statement of operations. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its taxable REIT subsidiary, Sharpridge TRS, Inc. The term “Company” refers to these entities collectively, unless otherwise noted. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

F-35

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Investment Valuation

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities which qualify as financial instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, approximates the carrying amounts presented in the statement of assets and liabilities.

Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities

The Company’s investments in agency mortgage-backed securities consist of whole-pool pass-through certificates backed by fixed rate, adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate residential mortgage (“ARM”) loans guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Hybrid ARMs have interest rates that have an initial fixed period (typically three, five, seven or ten years) and thereafter reset at regular intervals in a manner similar to adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities and loans. A majority of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) in which the Company invests consists of agency-backed ARMs and three, five and seven year hybrid ARMs.

Collateralized Debt or Loan Obligations

The Company invests in securities backed by a pool of variously rated loans or bonds. Underwriters of CLOs package a large and diversified pool of loans or bonds, including high risk, high yield bonds, which is then separated into “tiers.” Typically, the top tier represents the higher quality collateral and pays the lower interest rate; a middle tier is backed by riskier loans or bonds and pays a higher rate; the bottom tier represents the lowest credit quality and, instead of receiving a fixed interest rate, may receive the residual interest payments from the pool.

Structured Notes

Structured notes are securities packaged and issued by major financial institutions. The notes have some similar characteristics to a plain debt instrument such as commercial paper, medium-term notes, or certificates of deposit. Instead of paying a fixed interest rate over time and repaying par at maturity, structured notes index the coupon, the principal, or both to virtually anything with a trading market. The indexing may be to a designated mortgage pool, interest rate spreads, stock market indices or the price of a security completely unrelated to the transaction.

F-36

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Mortgage Dollar Rolls

The Company has entered into mortgage dollar roll transactions, in which the Company sells mortgage-backed securities to a dealer and agrees to purchase similar securities in the future at a predetermined price. The Company accounts for mortgage dollar roll transactions as purchases and sales; as such, these transactions may increase the Company’s portfolio turnover rate and leverage ratio. Amounts to be received or paid in connection with open mortgage dollar rolls are included in receivable for securities sold or payable for securities purchased in the statement of assets and liabilities. The primary risk associated with mortgage dollar rolls is that a counterparty will default on its obligations to deliver purchased securities. However, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by any counterparty.

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

The Company invests in interest rate swap contracts. In a simple interest rate swap, one investor pays a floating rate of interest on a notional principal amount and receives a fixed rate of interest on the same notional principal amount for a specified period of time. Alternatively, an investor may pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate. Interest rate swaps are asset/liability management tools.

During the term of the interest rate swap, the Company makes or receives periodic payments and unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a result of marking the swap to its fair value. When the swap is terminated, the Company will record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the proceeds from (or cost of) the closing transaction and the Company’s basis in the contract, if any. The periodic payments and any realized or unrealized gains or losses are reported as net gain or loss on swap contracts in the statement of operations. Swaps involve a risk that interest rates will move contrary to the Company’s expectations, thereby increasing its payment obligation.

The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the swap, limited to any gains recognized. Should interest rates move unexpectedly, the Company may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the interest rate swap and may realize a loss. However, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by any counterparty.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase generally are collateralized by investments in fixed income securities and are carried at their contractual amounts, including accrued interest. Counterparties are large institutional dealers in fixed income securities. Collateral is valued daily and counterparties may require additional collateral when appropriate. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, fixed income securities owned with a fair value of approximately $638,025,755 and $1,387,195,878, respectively, have been pledged as collateral for which the counterparty has the right to sell or repledge the securities.

Delayed Delivery Transactions and When-Issued Securities

The Company may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. The price of the underlying securities and the date when the securities will be delivered and paid for are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. With respect to purchase commitments, the Company identifies securities as segregated in its records with a value at least equal to the amount of the commitment. Losses may arise due to changes in the value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract’s terms, or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic, or other factors.

F-37

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Investment Transactions and Income

The Company records its transactions in securities on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on securities transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis. Interest income and expense are recorded on the accrual basis. Interest income on Agency RMBS and structured notes is accrued based on outstanding principal amount of the securities and their contractual terms. Interest on CDO and CLO securities is accrued at a rate determined based on estimated future cash flows and adjusted prospectively as future cash flow amounts are recast. Amortization of premium and accretion of discount are recorded using the yield to maturity method, and are included in interest income in the statement of operations.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation issued to its independent directors and executive officers and certain officers and employees of its Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company, as designated by its Manager (“Manager Designees”), using the fair value based methodology prescribed by SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). Compensation cost related to restricted common stock and common stock options issued to the Manager Designees is initially measured at estimated fair value at the grant date, and is remeasured on subsequent dates to the extent the awards are unvested. Compensation cost related to independent directors is measured at its estimated fair value at the grant date and amortized and expensed over the vesting period. The Company has elected to use the straight line method pursuant to SFAS 123(R) to amortize compensation expense for the restricted common shares and common stock options granted to the Manager Designees.

Income Taxes

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT and intends to continue to comply with provisions of the Code with respect thereto. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal or state income tax. To maintain its qualification as a REIT, the Company must distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and meet certain other tests relating to assets and income. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and does not qualify for certain statutory savings provisions, the Company will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to some amount of federal, state and local taxes. Under certain circumstances, even though the Company qualifies as a REIT, federal income and excise taxes may be due on its undistributed taxable income. No provision for income taxes has been provided in the accompanying financial statements related to the REIT, because the Company has paid or will pay dividends in amounts approximating its REIT taxable income.

Dividends are generally declared and paid quarterly. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.

The Company accounts for income taxes in conformity with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach for accounting and reporting of income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future income tax consequences (temporary differences) attributable to the difference between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases.

F-38

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted income tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred income tax assets where realization is not considered “more likely than not.” The Company recognizes the effect of change in income tax laws or rates on deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the period that includes the enactment date.

Effective January 1, 2007 the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”) and determined there was no material impact on the Company’s financial statements. FIN 48 provides guidelines for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. It is the Company’s policy to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax benefits in income taxes. Tax years that remain open to examination by major tax jurisdictions include 2006, 2007 and 2008.

Segment Reporting

The Company operates as a single segment reporting to the Chief Executive Officer, who manages the investment portfolio in the aggregate.

Earnings Per Share

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, the Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per common share (“EPS”) in its consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto. Basic earnings per common share (“Basic EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss allocable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares, including vested restricted common shares, outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share (“Diluted EPS”) reflect the potential additional dilution of common stock options, unvested restricted common stock and warrants, if they are not anti-dilutive. See Note 3 for earnings per share computations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 was effective for the Company commencing January 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any additional financial instruments.

In April 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 39-1 (“FSP FIN 39-1”) which modifies FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts relating to Certain Contracts (“FIN 39”). FSP FIN 39-1 addresses whether a reporting entity that is party to a master netting arrangement can offset fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments that have been offset under the same master netting arrangement in accordance with FIN 39. Upon adoption of this guidance, a reporting entity is permitted to change its accounting policy to offset or not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements. This guidance was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The implementation did not have an effect on the financial statements of the Company.

F-39

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP No. 140-3”) relating to FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions, to address situations where assets purchased from a particular counterparty and financed through a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty can be considered and accounted for as separate transactions. Management has evaluated such assets based on the criteria set forth in FSP No. 140-3 and has determined the transactions should not be considered linked and therefore the Company should continue to record such assets and the related financing on a gross basis in the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, and the corresponding interest income and interest expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires companies with derivative instruments to disclose information that should enable financial-statement users to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS No. 161 will have on the disclosures included in its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 requires companies to disclose the fair value of their financial instruments according to a fair value hierarchy (i.e., levels 1, 2, and 3, as defined). Additionally, companies are required to provide enhanced disclosure regarding instruments in the level 3 category (the valuation of which require significant management judgment), including a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances separately for each major category of assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2008. SFAS 157 did not have an impact on the manner in which the Company estimates fair value, but it requires additional disclosure, which is included in Note 4.

On October 10, 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (“FSP 157-3”), in response to the deterioration of the credit markets. FSP 157-3 provides guidance clarifying how SFAS 157 should be applied when valuing securities in markets that are not active. The guidance provides an illustrative example that applies the objectives and framework of SFAS 157, utilizing management’s internal cash flow and discount rate assumptions when relevant observable data does not exist. It further clarifies how observable market information and market quotes should be considered when measuring fair value in an inactive market. It reaffirms the notion of fair value as an exit price as of the measurement date and that fair value analysis is a transactional process and should not be broadly applied to a group of assets. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. FSP 157-3 does not have a material effect on the fair value of its assets as the Company intends to continue to hold assets that can be valued via level 1 and level 2 criteria, as defined under SFAS 157.

3. EARNINGS PER SHARE

F-40

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

of incremental shares that are to be added to the weighted-average shares of its common stock outstanding. The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.


	Year Ended December 31
	2008			2007			2006*
Basic:
Net income (loss)	$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267

Weighted-average shares outstanding		7,151,331			6,478,752			2,884,122

Basic net income (loss) per share	$	(5.48	)	$	(4.58	)	$	0.34

Diluted:
Net income (loss)	$	(39,172,449	)	$	(29,687,272	)	$	966,267

Weighted-average shares outstanding		7,151,331			6,478,752			2,884,122
Plus: Incremental shares from assumed conversion of dilutive instruments		—			—			20,595

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding		7,151,331			6,478,752			2,904,717

Diluted net income (loss) per share	$	(5.48	)	$	(4.58	)	$	0.33

*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

4. INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157” or the “Standard”). The Standard defines fair value, provides a consistent framework for measuring fair value under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and expands fair value financial statement disclosure requirements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. It only applies to accounting pronouncements that already require or permit fair value measures, except for standards that relate to share-based payments.

Level 1 Inputs—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 3 Inputs—Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no effect on the manner in which the Company measures fair value, but it does require certain additional disclosures, set forth below.

F-41

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The fair value of securities and derivatives, based on the level of inputs, are summarized below:

December 31, 2008


	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets
Agency RMBS	$	—	$	685,566	$	—	$	685,566
CLOs and Structured Notes		—		4,944		—		4,944

Total	$	—	$	690,510	$	—	$	690,510

Liabilities
Interest rate swap contracts	$	—	$	12,504	$	—	$	12,504

Total	$	—	$	12,504	$	—	$	12,504

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Agency RMBS portfolio consisted of Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgages, ARMs and hybrid ARMs as follows:

December 31, 2008


					Weighted Average
Security Description	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Coupon		Months to Reset⁽¹⁾	Constant Prepayment Rate⁽²⁾
	(in thousands)
Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs	$	341,190	$	349,917	5.7	%	41.2	38.8	%
Agency RMBS collateralized by monthly reset ARMs		154,576		153,609	4.7		1	21.2
Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgages		176,566		182,040	5.8		N/A	29.9

Total Agency RMBS	$	672,332	$	685,566

December 31, 2007


					Weighted Average
Security Description	Par Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Coupon		Months to Reset⁽¹⁾	Constant Prepayment Rate⁽²⁾
	(in thousands)
Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid ARMs	$	738,367	$	752,741	5.9	%	50.5	26.3	%
Agency RMBS collateralized by monthly reset ARMs		457,979		469,515	7.2		1	29.9
Agency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgages		600,714		612,898	6.2		N/A	22.0

Total Agency RMBS	$	1,797,060	$	1,835,154

⁽¹⁾	“Months to Reset” is the number of months remaining before the fixed rate on a hybrid ARM becomes a variable rate. At the end of the fixed period, the variable rate will be determined by the margin and the pre-specified caps of the ARM.

⁽²⁾	“Constant Prepayment Rate” is a method of expressing the prepayment rate for a mortgage pool that assumes that a constant fraction of the remaining principal is prepaid each month or year. Specifically, the constant prepayment rate is an annualized version of the single monthly mortality rate.

F-42

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Agency RMBS were purchased at a net premium to their par value, with a weighted-average amortized cost of 101.4% and 101.9% of par value, respectively, due to the average interest rates on these investments being higher than prevailing market rates. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, approximately $10.0 million and $34.2 million, respectively, of unamortized premium was included in the cost basis of the investments.

Actual maturities of Agency RMBS are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities (which range up to 30 years), as they are affected by the contractual lives of the underlying mortgages, periodic payments and prepayments of principal. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the average final contractual maturity of the mortgage portfolio is in year 2035 and 2037, respectively. Based on current estimates, the Agency RMBS will have an average expected life of less than five years.

In order to mitigate its interest rate exposure, the Company had entered into one swap contract as of December 31, 2008, and five swap contracts as of December 31, 2007. The following table summarizes the expiration dates, notional amounts and fair values of these contracts:


As of December 31, 2008
Expiration Date	Notional Amount		Fair Value
May 2010	$	240,000,000	$	(12,503,520	)

As of December 31, 2007
Expiration Date	Notional Amount		Fair Value
May 2010	$	240,000,000	$	(7,120,645	)
June 2010		160,000,000		(5,899,716	)
October 2010		365,000,000		(9,541,325	)
October 2012		125,000,000		(3,446,357	)

	$	890,000,000	$	(26,008,043	)

Credit Risk

At December 31, 2008, the Company limited its exposure to credit losses on our mortgage assets by purchasing securities primarily through Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The payment of principal and interest on the Agency RMBS are guaranteed by those respective enterprises. In September 2008, both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were placed in the conservatorship of the United States government. While it is hoped that the conservatorship will help stabilize Freddie Mac’s and Fannie Mae’s losses and overall financial position, there can be no assurance that it will succeed or that, if necessary, Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae will be able to satisfy their guarantees of Agency RMBS.

The Company’s Agency RMBS backed by adjustable-rate mortgage loans are subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps. Periodic caps can limit the amount an interest rate can increase during any given period.

F-43

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

5. BORROWINGS

The Company leverages its portfolio of securities through the use of securities sold under agreement to repurchase. Each of the borrowing vehicles used by the Company bears interest at floating rates based on a spread above or below the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).

Certain information with respect to the Company’s borrowings as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 is summarized in the following tables. Each of the borrowings listed is contractually due in one year or less (dollars in thousands).


December 31, 2008
Outstanding borrowings	$	587,485
Interest accrued thereon	$	1,599
Weighted average borrowing rate		2.44	%
Weighted average remaining maturity (in days)		10.03
Fair value of the collateral⁽¹⁾	$	638,026

December 31, 2007
Outstanding borrowings	$	1,337,614
Interest accrued thereon	$	5,688
Weighted average borrowing rate		5.07	%
Weighted average remaining maturity (in days)		4.38
Fair value of the collateral⁽¹⁾	$	1,387,196

⁽¹⁾	Collateral for borrowings consists of fixed income securities.

At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had securities sold under agreement to repurchase where the amount at risk exceeded 10% of net assets with the following counterparties:


December 31, 2008

Counterparty	Amount at Risk⁽¹⁾		Weighted Average Maturity in Days
Bank of America Corp.⁽²⁾.	$	13,373,003	10
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.		15,064,027	9
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc		12,893,032	6


December 31, 2007

Counterparty	Amount at Risk⁽¹⁾		Weighted Average Maturity in Days
JPMorgan, Inc.⁽³⁾	$	21,697,567	3

⁽¹⁾	Equal to the fair value of securities plus accrued interest income, minus the sum of securities sold under agreement to repurchase liabilities plus accrued interest expense.

⁽²⁾	Formerly Merrill Lynch & Co., acquired by Bank of America Corp., effective January 1, 2009.

⁽³⁾	Formerly Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., acquired by JPMorgan, Inc., effective May 30, 2008.

F-44

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Market Risk

The current situation in the mortgage sector and the current weakness in the broader mortgage market could adversely affect one or more of the Company’s lenders and could cause one or more of the Company’s lenders to be unwilling or unable to provide additional financing. This could potentially increase the Company’s financing costs and reduce liquidity. If one or more major market participants fail, it could negatively impact the marketability of all fixed income securities, including Agency RMBS. This could negatively impact the value of the securities in the Company’s portfolio, thus reducing its net book value. Furthermore, if many of the Company’s lenders are unwilling or unable to provide additional financing, the Company could be forced to sell its Agency RMBS at an inopportune time when prices are depressed. Even with the current situation in the mortgage sector, the Company does not anticipate having difficulty converting its assets to cash or extending financing terms due to the fact that its Agency RMBS have an actual or implied “AAA” rating and principal and interest payments are guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.

6. SHARE CAPITAL

The Company authorized 500,000,000 shares of common stock having par value of $0.01 per share. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had issued and outstanding 7,662,706 and 6,690,684, respectively, shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 288,592 and 1,310,881 shares of common stock, respectively. Below is a description of the warrants outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007:


December 31, 2008

Expiration	Additional shares of common stock	Exercise Price
April 30, 2011	288,592	$	15.60	^(a)

December 31, 2007

Expiration	Additional shares of common stock	Exercise Price
December 31, 2008	1,310,881	$	30.00

^(a)	If additional shares of common stock are sold at a price less than $15.60 per share, there will be a one-time adjustment to the exercise price of the warrants to equal the price per share of the additional shares sold.

The Company is also authorized to issue shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, no such shares were issued or outstanding.

In October of 2008 the Company decided not to update its registration statement on Form S-11 with September 30, 2008 financial statements. Based on the decision not to update the registration statement and the uncertainties regarding the public offering in October of 2008, the Company expensed all of the offering costs incurred through such date, totaling $2,274,362. Offering costs paid and accrued offering costs have and will be treated as cash flows from financing activities.

7. STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK

F-45

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan may be granted to the Company’s independent directors and executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals providing services to the Company, as designated by the Manager.

The exercise price for any stock option granted under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan may not be less than 100% of the fair value of the shares of common stock at the time the common stock option is granted. Each common stock option must terminate no more than ten years from the date it is granted. The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes a total of 3,333,333 shares that may be used to satisfy awards under the plan. New shares will be issued on the exercise of any option. The Company made its initial grants under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan on February 10, 2006, December 8, 2006 and December 28, 2006, upon completing the private offering of common stock on these dates. Each grant vests over a three-year period. Restricted common stock granted to independent directors on or after January 1, 2007 will vest over a one-year period.

The following table summarizes restricted common stock transactions for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the period February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006:


Period and years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008	Officers and Employees⁽¹⁾		Independent Directors		Total
Issued	245,588		3,000		248,588
Forfeited	(1,667	)	—		(1,667	)

Unvested Shares as of December 31, 2006	243,921		3,000		246,921

Issued	—		5,333		5,333
Vested	(81,304	)	(999	)	(82,303	)

Unvested Shares as of December 31, 2007	162,617		7,334		169,951

Issued	—		10,154		10,154
Vested	(81,310	)	(6,333	)	(87,643	)

Unvested Shares as of December 31, 2008	81,307		11,155		92,462

⁽¹⁾	Includes grants to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company.

The shares of restricted common stock granted to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company and independent directors were valued using the fair value at the time of grant, which was $13.98, $15.78, $14.61 and $19.75 for shares granted on October 1, 2008, July 1, 2008, April 1, 2008 and January 1, 2008, respectively, and $30.00 for shares granted in 2007 and 2006. Pursuant to SFAS 123(R), the Company is required to value any unvested shares of restricted common stock granted to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company at the fair value at each reporting period. The Company valued the unvested restricted common stock at $12.89 and $19.75 per share at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted common stock granted as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $673,791 and $2,700,720, respectively.

F-46

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

There were no common stock option transactions for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. For the period February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006, there were 131,088 options granted to the Chief Executive Officer. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were 131,088 options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $30.00. Of the 131,088 options outstanding at December 31, 2008, 87,392 have vested and therefore were exercisable. Of the 131,088 options outstanding at December 31, 2007, 43,696 have vested and therefore were exercisable. The common stock options are valued using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions:


	As of December 31, 2008		As of December 31, 2007
Expected life	7.1 years		8.1 years
Discount rate	2.329	%	3.815	%
Volatility	84.62	%	34.50	%
Dividend yield	32.44	%	9.52	%

The estimated fair value of the common stock options was $2.14, $1.29 and $0.69 per share at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The components of share-based compensation expense for each period were as follows:


	Year ended December 31,
	2008		2007		2006*
Options granted to CEO	$	72,637	$	63,161	$	26,671
Restricted shares granted to officers and employees⁽¹⁾		1,017,473		1,407,268		1,219,724
Restricted shares granted to certain directors		190,167		130,198		15,951

Total shared based compensation expense	$	1,280,277	$	1,600,627	$	1,262,346

*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

⁽¹⁾	Includes grants to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company.

8. MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Manager manages the Company’s day-to-day operations, subject to the direction and oversight of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Management Agreement was executed on February 10, 2006. The initial term expired on December 31, 2008, was automatically renewed for a one-year term and will continue to be automatically renewed for one-year term on each anniversary date thereafter. The Management Agreement may be terminated upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the Company’s independent directors, or by a vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. In the event the Management Agreement is terminated, the Company shall pay to the Manager a termination fee in accordance with the provisions of the Management Agreement.

The Management Agreement provides, among other things, that the Company pays to the Manager, in exchange for managing the day-to-day operations of the Company, certain fees and reimbursements, consisting of a base management fee and reimbursement for out-of-pocket and certain other costs incurred by the Manager and on behalf of the Company. The base management fee, which is paid monthly, was initially equal to 1/12 of 1.50% of equity (as defined in the Management Agreement). Effective January 1, 2008, the management fee was equal to 1/12 of (A) 1.50% of the first $250,000,000 of Net Assets (as defined in the Management Agreement), (B) 1.25% of such Net Assets that are greater than $250,000,000 and less than or equal to $500,000,000, and (C) 1.00% of such

F-47

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Net Assets that are greater than $500,000,000. In addition to the base management fees, the Manager receives quarterly incentive compensation in an amount generally equal to the product of: (i) 25% of the dollar amount by which (A) Net Income (as defined in the Management Agreement), before Incentive Compensation (as defined in the Management Agreement), for such quarter per Common Share (based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for such quarter) exceeds (B) an amount equal to (1) the weighted average of the price per share of the common stock in the initial offering and the prices per share of the common stock in any subsequent offerings by the Company multiplied by (2) the greater of (a) 2.00% or (b) 0.50% plus one-fourth of the Ten Year U.S. Treasury Rate (as defined in the Management Agreement) for such quarter multiplied by (ii) the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during such quarter. Effective January 1, 2008, the incentive compensation generally equals the product of (i) 15% of the dollar amount by which (A) the Company’s average quarterly Net Income, before Incentive Compensation, for the immediately preceding four quarters per Common Share (based on weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding for such four quarters) exceeds (B) an amount equal to (1) the weighted average price per share of the Common Shares in the initial offering by the Company and the prices per share of the Common Shares in any subsequent offerings by the Company, in each case at the time of issuance thereof multiplied by (2) the greater of (a) 2.00% and (b) 0.50% plus one-fourth of the Ten Year U.S. Treasury Rate for such quarter, multiplied by (ii) the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during such four quarters. In addition, effective January 1, 2008 the Company and the Manager agreed to waive the incentive fee until the manager presents a plan to internalize the Company’s management to the independent directors.

For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006, the Company incurred $1,609,990, $2,439,667 and $1,272,291 in base management fees, respectively. The Company is required to pay its pro-rata portion of rent, utilities, market information systems and research publications and materials. The Manager agreed to waive its option to seek reimbursement for these expenses through December 31, 2007. Effective January 1, 2008, the waiver expired and the Company started paying its pro-rata portion of these expenses which amounted to $944,549 for the year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to common stock options and restricted common stock granted to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company which is included in related party management compensation on the consolidated statement of operations and described in note 7.

No incentive compensation was earned or paid to the Manager during the year ended December 31, 2008 or nine months ended December 31, 2007. Incentive compensation of $229,625 was earned for the three months ended March 31, 2007, however no fee was paid because the Manager agreed to waive any incentive fee for which it would be eligible until April 30, 2007, when the Company filed a resale shelf registration statement registering all of the shares of common stock sold in the Company’s initial capitalization and the Company’s December 2006 private offering and shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding warrants. No incentive compensation was earned or paid to the Manager during the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) through December 31, 2006.

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s executive officers and directors, and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company beneficially own an aggregate of 719,213 and 709,589 shares of common stock, respectively, representing approximately 9.4% and 10.6%, respectively, of the shares of common stock outstanding.

F-48

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

9. INCOME TAXES

Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization of realized losses on swaps, offering costs, related party management compensation expense, CLO income accruals and swap income and expenses.

The estimated tax character of all distributions declared to shareholders during 2008 was ordinary income.

The estimated federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:


As of December 31, 2008
Cost of investments	$	724,392,651

Gross appreciation	$	10,683,375
Gross depreciation		(44,566,053	)

Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)	$	(33,882,678	)

Undistributed ordinary income	$	151,908

Capital loss carryforwards	$	(26,895,142	)

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had estimated capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:


December 31, 2011	$	(195,321	)
December 31, 2012		(18,941,370	)
December 31, 2013		(7,758,451	)

	$	(26,895,142	)

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s undistributed taxable income was approximately $0.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. No income tax provision was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 or the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

10. CONTINGENCIES

F-49

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.

11.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK OR CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

The contract amounts of the swap contracts do not represent the Company’s risk of loss due to counterparty nonperformance. The Company’s exposure to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance on swap contracts is limited to the unrealized gains inherent in such contracts which are recognized in the statement of assets and liabilities. Any counterparty nonperformance of these transactions is not expected to have a material effect upon the Company’s consolidated financial condition.

The Company enters into derivative transactions as hedges of interest rate exposure and in the course of investing with counterparties. In the event of nonperformance by a counterparty, the Company is potentially exposed to losses although the counterparties to these agreements are primarily major financial institutions with investment grade ratings.

The Company’s principal trading activities are primarily with brokers and other financial institutions located in North America. All securities transactions of the Company are cleared by multiple major securities firms pursuant to customer agreements. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, substantially all the investments in securities, and receivable for securities sold are positions with and amounts due from these brokers. The Company had substantially all of its individual counterparty concentrations with these brokers and their affiliates.

F-50

CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

12. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

In accordance with financial reporting requirements applicable to investment companies, the Company has included below certain financial highlight information for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.


	Per Share
	Year ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006*
Net asset value, beginning of period	$	19.75		$	26.97		$	30.00
Net gain (loss):
Net investment income		3.26	^(a)		2.58	^(a)		1.89	^(a)
Net gain (loss) from investments		(8.63	)^(a)		(7.04	)^(a)		(1.65	)^(a)

Net gain (loss)		(5.37	)		(4.46	)		0.24
Capital transactions:
Distributions to shareholders		(1.30	)^(a)		(3.00	)^(a)		(1.92	)^(a)
Issuance of common shares and amortization of restricted shares		(0.19	)^(a)		0.24	^(a)		(1.35	)^(a)

Net decrease in net assets from capital transactions		(1.49	)		(2.76	)		(3.27	)

Net asset value, end of period	$	12.89		$	19.75		$	26.97

Total return (%)		(28.15	)%		(15.65	)%		(3.70	)%^(b)
Ratios to Average Net Assets
Expenses before interest expense		7.03	%^(d)		3.20	%		4.90	%^(c)
Expenses		28.78	%^(d)		72.10	%		57.07	%^(c)
Net investment income		21.54	%		10.58	%		7.70	%^(c)

Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (000)	$	98,801		$	132,146		$	180,301
Portfolio turnover rate (%)		177	%		162	%		8	%

*	For the period from February 10, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006.

^(a)	Calculated based on average shares outstanding during the period. Average shares outstanding include vested and unvested restricted shares and differs from weighted average shares outstanding used in calculating earnings per share (footnote 3).

^(b)	Not computed on an annualized basis.

^(c)	Computed on an annualized basis.

^(d)	Includes expensing offering costs, a non-recurring expense, described in note 2, which amounted to $2,274,362, or 2.06% of average net assets.

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 1, 2009, an aggregate of 3,100 shares of restricted common stock were granted to the independent directors.

Effective January 1, 2009, the terms of the Management Agreement were amended such that until such time as the Company withdraws its Registration Statement on Form S-11, Registration No. 333-142236, from the SEC, the payment of the incentive fee is waived and shall not accrue, and that upon completion of an initial public offering, no incentive fee will be due or payable.

F-51

9,000,000 Shares

LOGO

Common Stock

Prospectus

, 2009

Barclays Capital

JMP Securities

Stifel Nicolaus

Oppenheimer & Co.

PART II. INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 31. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

The following table sets forth the costs and expenses of the sale and distribution of the securities being registered, all of which are being borne by the Registrant.


Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee	$	8,126
FINRA filing fee	$	15,063
NYSE listing fee		*
Printing and engraving fees		*
Legal fees and expenses		*
Accounting fees and expenses		*
Blue sky fees and expenses		*
Transfer Agent and Registrar fees		*
Miscellaneous		*

Total	$	*

*	To be provided by amendment.

All expenses, except the Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee, the NYSE listing fee and the NASD filing fee, are estimated.

Item 32. Sales to Special Parties.

See the response to Item 33 below.

Item 33. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

The information in this Item 33 states the actual number of shares of common stock issued prior to May 28, 2008 and does not reflect the three-for-one reverse stock split of the common stock effective May 28, 2008.

On December 8, 2006, the Company sold 6,995,150 shares of its Common Stock to Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc., as initial purchaser (the “2006 Initial Purchaser”). The Company issued these shares of Common Stock to the 2006 Initial Purchaser in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The 2006 Initial Purchaser paid the Company a purchase price of $9.30 per share for these shares of Common Stock, for net gross proceeds to the Company of $65,054,895. The 2006 Initial Purchaser resold all of these shares of Common Stock to (i) Qualified Institutional Buyers (as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act) in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A under the Securities Act and (ii) investors outside the United States in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Regulation S under the Securities Act. The offering price per share of Common Stock to Qualified Institutional Buyers under Rule 144A and non-United States persons under Regulation S was $10.00 per share for gross proceeds of $69,951,500 and the aggregate initial purchaser’s discount was $4,896,605.

On December 8, 2006, the Company sold 2,943,850 shares of its Common Stock in a concurrent private placement to “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501 under the Securities Act) in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act, with the 2006 Initial Purchaser and Lombard Partners acting as placement agents. All of these shares were sold for a purchase price of $10.00 per share for gross proceeds of $29,438,500. The placement agents received a commission of $0.70 per share with respect to 2,767,100 of these shares of Common Stock. No commission was paid with respect to 176,750 of these shares. The net proceeds to the Company from the private placement of these shares was $27,501,530 and total commissions paid to the placement agents was $1,936,970.

II-1

On December 8, 2006, the Company granted a total of 343,500 restricted shares of Common Stock to the Company’s executive officers and certain officers and employees of the Manager and its sub-advisors and other individuals who provide services to the Company, as designated by the Manager, and 1,000 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 1,000 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 1,000 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 1,000 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director, in each case pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On December 15, 2006, the Company sold 61,000 shares of its Common Stock in a concurrent private placement to “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501 under the Securities Act) in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act, with the 2006 Initial Purchaser acting as placement agent. All of these shares were sold for a purchase price of $10.00 per share for gross proceeds of $610,000. No commission was paid with respect to these shares. The net proceeds to the Company from the private placement of these shares was $610,000.

On December 28, 2006, the Company sold 1,350,000 shares of its Common Stock to the 2006 Initial Purchaser. The Company issued these shares of Common Stock to the 2006 Initial Purchaser in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The 2006 Initial Purchaser paid the Company a purchase price of $9.30 per share for these shares of Common Stock, for total gross proceeds to the Company of $12,555,000. The 2006 Initial Purchaser resold all of these shares of Common Stock to (i) Qualified Institutional Buyers (as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act) in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A under the Securities Act and (ii) investors outside the United States in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Regulation S under the Securities Act. The offering price per share of Common Stock to Qualified Institutional Buyers under Rule 144A and non-United States persons under Regulation S was $10.00 per share for gross proceeds of $13,500,000 and the aggregate initial purchasers’ discount was $945,000.

On December 28, 2006, the Company sold 100,000 shares of its Common Stock in a concurrent private placement to “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501 under the Securities Act) in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act, with the 2006 Initial Purchaser acting as placement agent. All of these shares were sold for a purchase price of $10.00 per share for gross proceeds of $1,000,000. The placement agent received a commission of $0.70 per share with respect to all of these shares of Common Stock. The net proceeds to the Company from the private placement of these shares was $930,000 and total commissions paid to the placement agent was $70,000.

On January 1, 2007, the Company granted 1,000 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 1,000 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 1,000 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 1,000 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On April 1, 2007, the Company granted 1,000 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 1,000 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 1,000 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 1,000 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On July 1, 2007, the Company granted 1,000 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 1,000 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 1,000 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 1,000 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

II-2

On October 1, 2007, the Company granted 1,000 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 1,000 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 1,000 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 1,000 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On January 1, 2008, the Company granted 1,519 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 1,519 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 1,519 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 1,519 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On April 1, 2008, the Company granted 2,053 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 2,053 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 2,053 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 2,053 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On May 22, 2008, the Company sold 2,500,923 units, with each unit consisting of one share of Common Stock and one warrant to purchase three-tenths of one share of Common Stock (the “Units”), to Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, as the initial purchaser (the “2008 Initial Purchaser”). The Company issued these Units to the 2008 Initial Purchaser in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The 2008 Initial Purchaser paid the Company a purchase price of $4.992 per Unit, except that the 2008 Initial Purchaser’s purchase price per Unit with respect to any Units that it initially resold to certain Qualified Institutional Buyers under Rule 144A previously designated by the Company was $5.096 per Unit, for total net proceeds, before deducting expenses, to the Company of $12,530,368. The 2008 Initial Purchaser resold all of these Units to 33 Qualified Institutional Buyers (as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act) in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A under the Securities Act. The offering price per Unit to Qualified Institutional Buyers under Rule 144A was $5.20 for gross proceeds of $13,004,800, and the aggregate initial purchaser’s discount was $474,432.

On May 22, 2008, the Company sold 385,000 Units in a concurrent private placement to an institutional “accredited investor” (as defined in Rule 501(a)(3) under the Securities Act) in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) under the Securities Act, with the 2008 Initial Purchaser acting as the sole placement agent. All of these Units were sold for a purchase price of $5.20 per Unit for gross proceeds of $2,002,000. The Company paid the 2008 Initial Purchaser placement fees with respect to these Units of $40,040. The net proceeds to the Company from the private placement of these Units, before deducting expenses, was $1,961,960.

On July 1, 2008, the Company granted 633 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 633 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 633 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 633 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On October 1, 2008, the Company granted 715 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 715 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 715 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 715 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On January 1, 2009, the Company granted 775 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 775 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 775 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 775 restricted shares to Raymond A.

II-3

Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On April 1, 2009, the Company granted 683 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 683 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 683 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 683 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

On July 1, 2009, the Company granted 844 restricted shares to Frances Spark, 844 restricted shares to David A. Tyson, PhD, 844 restricted shares to Douglas Crocker, II and 844 restricted shares to Raymond A. Redlingshafer as compensation for serving as a director pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Such grants were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act.

Item 34. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active or deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. Our charter contains a provision which limits the liability of our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.

Our charter permits us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify and to pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to (a) any present or former director or officer or (b) any individual who, while a director and at our request, serves or has served another real estate investment trust, corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or any other enterprise as a director, trustee, officer or partner of such real estate investment trust, corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise from and against any claim or liability to which such person may become subject or which such person may incur by reason of his status as a present or former director or officer of our company. Our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify and to pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to (a) any present or former director or officer who is made a party to the proceeding by reason of his service in that capacity or (b) any individual who, while a director or officer of our company and at our request, serves or has served another real estate investment trust, corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise and who is made a party to the proceeding by reason of his service in that capacity, against any claim or liability to which he may become subject by reason of such status. Our charter and bylaws also permit us to indemnify and advance expenses to any person who served a predecessor of our company in any of the capacities described above and to any employee or agent of our company or a predecessor of our company. Maryland law requires us to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his service in that capacity.

The MGCL permits a Maryland corporation to indemnify and advance expenses to its directors, officers, employees and agents. The MGCL permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or omission if the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (i) was committed in bad faith or (ii) was a result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment

II-4

in a suit by or in the right if the corporation or if the director or officer was adjudged to be liable for an improper personal benefit. In accordance with the MGCL and our bylaws, our bylaws require us, as a condition to advancing expenses, we must obtain (a) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his good faith belief that he has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification and (b) a written statement by or on his behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by us if it shall ultimately be determined that the standard of conduct was not met.

Item 35. Treatment of Proceeds from Stock Being Registered.

None of the proceeds will be credited to an account other than the appropriate capital share account.

Item 36. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(a) Financial Statements. See page F-1 for an index of the financial statements included in the Registration Statement.

(b) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Registration Statement on Form S-11:


Exhibit		Description of Document
1.1**		Form of Underwriting Agreement among Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and the underwriters named therein

3.1*		Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

3.2*		Bylaws of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

3.3*		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

4.1*		Form of Certificate for Common Stock for Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

4.2*		Warrant Agreement, by and between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and National City Bank, dated as of May 22, 2008

4.3*		First Amendment to Warrant Agreement, by and between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and National City Bank, dated as of June 11, 2008

5.1**		Opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP as to legality of the securities being issued

8.1**		Opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP as to certain U.S. federal income tax matters

10.1*		License Agreement, between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and The Cypress Group L.L.C., dated as of February 10, 2006

10.2*		License Agreement, between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P., dated as of February 10, 2006

10.3*†		2006 Stock Incentive Plan

10.4*†		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement

10.5*†		Form of Stock Option Agreement

10.6*		Second Amended and Restated Management Agreement, by and between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC, effective as of January 1, 2009

10.7*		Form of Indemnification Agreement

II-5


Exhibit		Description of Document

10.8**		Separation Agreement and General Release, between Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P., Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and Cypress Sharpridge Advisors, LLC and former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, dated as of September 11, 2009.

21.1		List of Subsidiaries of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

23.1**		Consent of Hunton & Williams LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)

23.2		Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

24.1		Power of Attorney (included on Signature Page)

*	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (File No. 333-142236).

**	To be filed by amendment.

†	Compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 37. Undertakings.

(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, may be permitted to directors, officers or controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance under Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4), or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

II-6

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-11 and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in New York, New York, on the 29^th day of September, 2009.


CYPRESS SHARPRIDGE INVESTMENTS, INC.

By:		/S/ KEVIN E. GRANT
Name:		Kevin E. Grant
Title:		Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Kevin E. Grant and Jeffrey P. Hughes and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Registration Statement, and any additional related registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (including post-effective amendments to the registration statement and any such related registration statements), and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and any other documents in connection therewith, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signature	Title	Date

/S/ KEVIN E. GRANT Kevin E. Grant	Chief Executive Officer, President; Director; Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)	September 29, 2009

/S/ FRANCES SPARK Frances Spark	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)	September 29, 2009

/S/ RICHARD E. CLEARY Richard E. Cleary	Vice President and Chief Operating Officer	September 29, 2009

/S/ DOUGLAS CROCKER, II Douglas Crocker, II	Director	September 29, 2009

/S/ JEFFREY P. HUGHES Jeffrey P. Hughes	Director	September 29, 2009

/S/ STEPHEN P. JONAS Stephen P. Jonas	Director	September 29, 2009

II-7


Signature	Title	Date

/S/ RAYMOND A. REDLINGSHAFER Raymond A. Redlingshafer	Director	September 29, 2009

/S/ JAMES A. STERN James A. Stern	Director	September 29, 2009

/S/ DAVID A. TYSON, PhD David A. Tyson, PhD	Director	September 29, 2009

II-8

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit		Description of Document

1.1**		Form of Underwriting Agreement among Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and the underwriters named therein

3.1*		Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

3.2*		Bylaws of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

3.3*		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

4.1*		Form of Certificate for Common Stock for Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

4.2*		Warrant Agreement, by and between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and National City Bank, dated as of May 22, 2008

4.3*		First Amendment to Warrant Agreement, by and between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and National City Bank, dated as of June 11, 2008

5.1**		Opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP as to legality of the securities being issued

8.1**		Opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP as to certain U.S. federal income tax matters

10.1*		License Agreement, between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and The Cypress Group L.L.C., dated as of February 10, 2006

10.2*		License Agreement, between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P., dated as of February 10, 2006

10.3*†		2006 Stock Incentive Plan

10.4*†		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement

10.5*†		Form of Stock Option Agreement

10.6*		Second Amended and Restated Management Agreement, by and between Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and Cypress Sharpridge Advisors LLC, effective as of January 1, 2009

10.7*		Form of Indemnification Agreement

10.8**		Separation Agreement and General Release, between Sharpridge Capital Management, L.P., Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. and Cypress Sharpridge Advisors, LLC and former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, dated as of September 11, 2009.

21.1		List of Subsidiaries of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc.

23.1**		Consent of Hunton & Williams LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)

23.2		Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

24.1		Power of Attorney (included on Signature Page)

*	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (File No. 333-142236).

**	To be filed by amendment.

†	Compensatory plan or arrangement.