UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
(Mark One)
 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from __________ to ___________
 
Commission File Number   001-33426
 
 
NEURO-HITECH, INC.
 
 
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
 
 
 
Delaware
 
20-4121393
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)
 
Identification No.)
 
 
 
 
One Penn Plaza, Suite 1503, New York, NY 10019
 
 
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
 
 
 
 
(212) 594-1215  
 
 
(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year
If Changed Since Last Report)
 
 
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer o 
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer 
Smaller Reporting Company x 
 
(Do Not Check if a smaller reporting company)
 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes  x No

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: May 5, 2008

Common Stock   14,004,853
 

 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Financial Statements
 
Neuro-Hitech, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
   
March 31, 2008
 
 
 
 
   
(Unaudited)
 
December 31, 2007
 
ASSETS:
             
Current Assets:
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
$
4,165,383
 
$
6,137,592
 
Accounts Receivable
   
164,250
   
63,300
 
Inventory
   
25,008
   
33,821
 
Prepaid Expenses
   
103,943
   
11,861
 
Total Current Assets
   
4,458,584
   
6,246,574
 
               
Property and Equipment, net
   
3,501
   
4,248
 
               
Other Assets:
             
Security Deposit
   
13,226
   
13,226
 
               
Total Assets
 
$
4,475,311
 
$
6,264,048
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
             
               
Current Liabilities:
             
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
 
$
738,478
 
$
1,000,399
 
Total Current Liabilities
   
738,478
   
1,000,399
 
               
Stockholders' Equity:
             
Common Stock $.001 Par Value, Authorized: 44,999,900, Issued and Outstanding: 14,004,853
   
14,005
   
14,005
 
Common Stock - Class A $.001 Par Value, Authorized: 100, Issued and Outstanding: 0
   
-
   
-
 
Additional Paid-in Capital
   
39,781,967
   
39,270,951
 
Deferred Compensation
   
(1,158,785
)
 
(1,190,654
)
Accumulated Deficit
   
(34,900,354
)
 
(32,830,653
)
               
Total Stockholders' Equity
   
3,736,833
   
5,263,649
 
               
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
 
$
4,475,311
 
$
6,264,048
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
     

2

 
Neuro-Hitech, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
 
       
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
       
 2008
 
2007
 
       
  
     
                
                
Sales
       
$
190,827
 
$
194,400
 
Cost of Goods Sold
         
99,357
   
100,555
 
Gross Profit
         
91,470
   
93,845
 
                     
Operating Expenses:
                   
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
         
556,411
   
662,322
 
Research and Development Costs
         
1,100,664
   
735,781
 
Share-Based Compensation
   
 
   
511,017
   
188,732
 
Amortization of Deferred Compensation
         
31,869
   
15,935
 
Total Operating Expenses
         
2,199,961
   
1,602,770
 
                 
(Loss) from Operations
         
(2,108,491
)
 
(1,508,925
)
                     
Other Income:
                   
Interest and Dividend Income
         
38,788
   
61,206
 
Total Other Income
         
38,788
   
61,206
 
                     
(Loss) Before Provision for IncomeTaxes
         
(2,069,703
)
 
(1,447,719
)
                     
Provision for Income Taxes
         
-
   
-
 
                     
Net (Loss)
       
$
(2,069,703
)
$
(1,447,719
)
                     
Basic and Diluted (Loss) per Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
       
$
(0.15
)
$
(0.12
)
                     
Weighted Average - Common Shares Outstanding
         
14,004,853
   
12,118,777
 
                     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

3

 
 
Neuro-Hitech, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
 
   
For The Three Months EndedYears Ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2008
 
2007
 
           
Cash flows from operating activities:
             
Net (Loss)
 
$
(2,069,703
)
$
(1,447,719
)
               
Adjustments to Reconcile Net (Loss) to Net Cash (Used In) Operating Activities:
             
Share-Based Compensation Expense
   
511,017
   
188,732
 
Amortization of Deferred Compensation
   
31,869
   
15,935
 
Depreciation Expense
   
747
   
749
 
               
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
             
(Increase) Decrease in Assets:
             
Accounts Receivable
   
(100,951
)
 
(282,674
)
Inventory
   
8,812
   
(9,920
)
Prepaid Expenses
   
(92,081
)
 
(128,904
)
Deferred Charges
   
-
   
11,910
 
Increase (Decrease) in Liabilities:
             
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
   
(261,919
)
 
(227,339
)
Net cash (used in) Operating activities
   
(1,972,209
)
 
(1,879,230
)
               
Cash flows from investing activities:
           
Net cash (used in) Investing activities
   
-
   
-
 
               
Cash flows from financing activities:
           
Net Proceeds from Private Placement Offering of Common Stock
   
-
   
2,220,755
 
Proceeds from the Exercise of Stock Options
   
-
   
15,276
 
Net cash provided by Financing activities
   
-
   
2,236,031
 
               
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
   
(1,972,209
)
 
356,801
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
   
6,137,592
   
4,705,195
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
 
$
4,165,383
 
$
5,061,996
 
 
Cash Paid For:
             
Income Taxes
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
Interest
 
$
-
 
$
-
 

 
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, options held by the Company's executive officers and board of directors vested as to 181,342 and 124,791 shares of the Company's common stock. The Company recognized an aggregate compensation cost of $511,017 and $188,732 for the vesting of the aforementioned options for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.

The Company entered into a service agreement and issued 100,000 warrants measured at fair value as of February 14, 2007, the date the service agreement was ratified by the Company's board of directors. The fair value of these warrants approximated $255,000 and was recognized as Deferred Compensation in the Stockholders' Equity section of the Balance Sheet. During the first quarter of 2008 and 2007, the Company ratably recognized approximately $32,000 and $16,000 of expenses for the amortization of Deferred Compensation in accordance with the service term.

In connection with a private placement offering of the Company’s securities that occurred between January through March 15, 2007, the Company entered into a stock subscription agreement for the issuance of 30,000 shares of common stock and share purchase warrants for an additional 15,000 shares. The transaction totaled $144,525 and was fully collected by the Company in April 2007.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

4

 
NEURO-HITECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
[1] Nature of Operations

Neuro-Hitech, Inc. (the “Company” or “Neuro-Hitech”) is an early stage pharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative drugs for the treatment of degenerative neurological diseases. The Company’s most advanced product candidate, Huperzine A, recently completed a Phase II clinical trial in the U.S. which tested Huperzine A for efficacy and safety in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. The Company has also studied the transdermal delivery of Huperzine A. The Company believes that Huperzine A can effectively be delivered transdermally because of its low dosage requirement and low molecular weight.

After receiving the results of the Phase II clinical trial of Huperzine A, the Company conducted a detailed review of those results. Based on its review, the Company believes that there is substantial support within the results that Huperzine A can become a safe and effective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. In order to validate the current information on the compound and review the Company’s analysis of the results, in March 2008 the Company entered into an agreement with Numoda Corporation (“Numoda”) pursuant to which Numoda will review the results and will provide a report to the Company on its findings.

In view of the results of the Phase II clinical trial, the Company is currently reviewing its options for moving forward with its business, including the potential development of collaborative, joint and strategic alliances and licensing arrangements with one or more pharmaceutical companies for the further development of Huperzine A and its pipeline of other compounds. Additionally, the Company is evaluating merger and/or acquisition opportunities.

In addition to Huperzine A, the Company has worked on two pre-clinical development programs: one for second generation anti-amyloid compounds or disease modifying drugs for Alzheimer’s disease and, secondly, development of a series of compounds targeted to treat and prevent epilepsy. The Company’s efforts however, have principally focused on its primary product.

The Company has imported and sold inventories of natural Huperzine to vitamin and supplement suppliers to generate revenues. However, the majority of the Company’s operations to date have been funded through Company’s private placement of equity securities.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary in order to make the interim financials not misleading have been included and all such adjustments are of normal recurring nature. The operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008.

Liquidity

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the continuation of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. For the three months ending March 31, 2008, the Company generated a net loss of approximately $2.1 million. As of March 31, 2008, the Company has funded its working capital requirements primarily through the sale of equity to founders, institutional and individual investors. Management intends to fund future operations through entrance into the commercial marketplace as well as additional equity or debt offerings.

There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining financing at the level needed for long-term operations or on terms acceptable to the Company. In addition, there can be no assurance, assuming the Company is successful in commercializing its product, realizing revenues and obtaining new equity or debt offerings that the Company will achieve profitability or positive operating cash flow. The Company is incurring significant losses, which give rise to questions about its ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
5

 
NEURO-HITECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
[2] Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. Approximately $191,000 and $4,475,000 of consolidated revenue and assets, after eliminations, respectively, are based upon the accounts of the parent and $0 and $0 of consolidated revenue and assets, after eliminations respectively, of the subsidiaries.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid financial instruments with an original maturity of three months or less from the date acquired.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from product sales are recognized when products are shipped to the customer and risk of loss and transfer of title has passed over to the customer.
 
Research and Development Costs
 
All research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include costs paid to sponsored third parties to perform research and conduct clinical trials.

Share-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the Company to record as an expense in its financial statements the fair value of all stock-based compensation awards. The Company currently utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees using the “modified prospective” method. Under the “modified prospective” method, compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R).

The Company recognized an aggregate share-based compensation cost of $511,017 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and $188,732 for the three months ended March 31, 2007, in accordance with the vesting of the aforementioned options granted during such interim periods. 
 
[3] Common Stock

Private Placement Offerings

Between January 2007 and March 2007, the Company received total gross proceeds of $2,379,005 from the private placement with accredited investors of an aggregate of 464,196 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 232,098 shares of the Company’s common stock. The common stock was sold in the offering at $5.125 per share and the exercise price of the warrants was $7.00 per share. The warrants expire on November 29, 2011.

Option Exercises

In addition to the aforementioned private placements, the Company received approximately $15,000 from the exercise of stock options to purchase 4,020 shares during the three months ended March 31, 2007.  There were no options exercised during the first quarter of 2008.

6

 
NEURO-HITECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
[4] Research and License Agreements

Georgetown University
 
In December 2003, the Company entered into a clinical research agreement, which was amended in November 2005 and October 2007, with Georgetown pursuant to which Georgetown provided the Company with Phase II research. The costs associated with this agreement totaled $5,336,842 and were partially funded by the National Institutes of Health. The Company’s portion of the total cost is $4,036,842, and paid in installments upon the achievement of certain milestones.

For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the payments made by the Company to Georgetown under the terms of the clinical research agreement were approximately $529,400 and $250,000, respectively, and the total payments made by the Company to Georgetown since inception of the agreement were approximately $3,665,697. These costs are reflected in the Research and Development caption of the Statement of Operations.

The Company expects to make additional payments in 2008 to Georgetown of $371,145 related to an open label extension which extension will expire in June 2008.

Org Syn Laboratory, Inc.

On February 1, 2006, the Company entered into an exclusive development agreement with Org Syn for the development of synthetic Huperzine A. Org Syn received an aggregate of $175,894 upon the execution of the Agreement. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the payments made by the Company to Org Syn were approximately $0 and $176,000, respectively. These payments are reflected in the Research and Development caption of the Statement of Operations.

Xel Herbaceuticals, Inc.

On March 15, 2006, the Company entered into a development agreement with Xel Herbaceuticals, Inc. (“XEL”) for the development of the Huperzine A Transdermal Delivery System (“Delivery Product”). Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid XEL a $250,000 fee upon the execution of the agreement and paid XEL $92,500 per month during the development of the Delivery Product, including the first six months of 2007. The Delivery Product was completed in July 2007. The $250,000 signing fee paid upon the execution of the agreement was amortized ratably over the 16 month term of the agreement.
 
If the Company elects to exercise its right to license the Delivery Product in the U.S. and Canada (“North America”) and to develop the Delivery Product on its own, the Company will pay XEL an initial license fee of $400,000 and up to an aggregate of $2.4 million in additional payments upon the achievement of certain milestones, including completion of a prototype, initial submission to the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), completion of phases of clinical studies and completion of the FDA submission and FDA approval. Similarly, if the Company elects to exercise its option to license the Delivery Product worldwide excluding China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau and Singapore (“Worldwide”), and develop the Delivery Product on its own, the Company will pay XEL an additional initial license fee of $400,000 and up to an aggregate of $2.4 million in additional payments upon the achievement of comparable milestones. If XEL fails to obtain a U.S. or international patent, the corresponding license fee and milestone payments will be reduced by 50% until such time as XEL obtains such patent, at which time the unpaid 50% of all such milestone payments previously not made will be due. If the Company elects to exercise the licensing rights described above, the additional payments that the Company has made to XEL to further develop the Product would be applied toward the additional payments payable to XEL upon the achievement of certain milestones.

If the Company elects to exercise its right to license the Delivery Product in North America and to develop the Delivery Product with a third party, the Company will pay XEL 50% of any initial signing fees and milestone fees (excluding any research and development fees) paid by such third party. Similarly, in the event that the Company decides to exercise its option to license the Product Worldwide and to develop the Product with a third party, the Company will pay XEL 50% of any initial signing fees and milestone fees (excluding any research and development fees) paid by such third party. If XEL fails to obtain a U.S. or international patent, the percentage of the corresponding fees will be reduced to 25%. The Company will pay XEL 20% of any royalty payments received by the Company from third-party sublicensees, or if the Product is not protected by at least one patent, 10% of any royalty received by the Company from sublicensees.

7

 
NEURO-HITECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
If the Company elects not to exercise its right to license the Delivery Product and XEL elects to further develop the Delivery Product without the Company, XEL will be obligated to pay the Company 30% of any net profits realized up to a maximum of two times the amount paid by the Company to XEL during development, excluding the initial $250,000 signing fee. Upon such election, XEL will be entitled to full ownership of the intellectual property of the Delivery Product. If the Company elects to exercise its rights to license the Delivery Product in North America, but not Worldwide, XEL will have certain rights to obtain intellectual property protection in any country outside North America upon payment to the Company for such rights, such fees to be negotiated in good faith by the parties.

The Company will also be obligated to pay XEL royalty payments of between 7% and 10% of net sales, with such royalty payments subject to reduction upon the expiration of the patent or the launch of a generic product in the applicable territory. If a patent has not been issued in either the U.S. or Canada, the royalty payments will be subject to reduced rates of between 3% and 5% of net sales. Royalty payments for sales in the Worldwide territory will be subject to good faith negotiations between the parties. 

For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the total payments made by the Company to XEL under this agreement were approximately $92,500 and $277,500, respectively, and are reflected in the Research and Development caption of the Statement of Operations.

Dalhousie License Agreements (PARTEQ)

As part of the acquisition of Q-RNA, the Company assumed exclusive License Agreements with PARTEQ Research and Development Innovations (“PARTEQ”), the technology licensing arm of Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

The Exclusive Patent License Agreement with PARTEQ (the “Alzheimer’s Agreement”) grants the Company an exclusive worldwide license to all innovations and developments, including the patent applications and additional filings, related to specified patents related to research on Alzheimer’s disease. The Company made a one-time license fee of C$25,000 when it entered into the Alzheimer’s Agreement in 2005 and will be required to make quarterly royalty payments of 3% of net sales of the licensed products (as such term is defined in Alzheimer’s Agreement), with a minimum annual royalty of C$10,000 for 2007, C$20,000 for 2008, C$30,000 for 2009 and C$40,000 for 2010 and each subsequent calendar year. The Company is also obligated to make the following milestone payments: C$100,000 upon completion of a Phase I trial of a licensed product, C$250,000 upon completion of a Phase II trial of a licensed product, and C$1,000,000 upon the first FDA approval (as such term is defined in the Alzheimer’s Agreement). The Company also has the right to sub-license with the payment of 20% of all non-royalty sublicensing consideration.
 
Under the terms of the Alzheimer’s Agreement which was amended in early 2007, the Company will pay fixed annual fees of C$282,944.  

The Exclusive Patent License Option Agreement with PARTEQ (the “Epilepsy Agreement”) grants the Company an option to acquire an exclusive worldwide license to all innovations and developments, including the patent applications and additional filings, related to specified patents related to research on Epilepsy. The Company made a non-refundable, non-creditable option payment of $10,000 when it entered into the Epilepsy Agreement in 2006. If the Company exercises its option, the Company will make a non-refundable, non-creditable license payment of C$17,500 at the time of such exercise. If the Company exercises its option, it will be required to make quarterly royalty payments of 3% of net sales of the licensed products (as such term is defined in Epilepsy Agreement), with a minimum annual royalty of C$10,000 through the second anniversary of the license, C$20,000 through the third anniversary of the license, C$30,000 through the fourth anniversary of the license and C$40,000 through the fifth anniversary of the license and each subsequent anniversary. If the Company exercises its option, the Company is also obligated to make the following milestone payments: C$100,000 upon completion of a Phase I trial of a licensed product, C$250,000 upon completion of a Phase II trial of a licensed product, and C$1,000,000 upon the first FDA approval (as such term is defined therein). If the Company exercises its option, the Company also has the right to sub-license with the payment of 20% of all non-royalty sublicensing consideration.  

Under the terms of the Epilepsy Agreement which was amended in early 2007, the Company will pay fixed annual fees of C$150,800.

For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the payments made by the Company to PARTEQ under these agreements have been approximately $121,000 and $135,000, respectively, and are reflected in the Research and Development caption of the Statement of Operations.

8

 
NEURO-HITECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
Numoda Corporation

On March 3, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Numoda corporation (“Numoda”) pursuant to which Numoda will review the results of the Company’s recently completed Phase II clinical trial of Huperzine A. Under the terms of its agreement with Numoda, the Company made an initial payment to Numoda of $100,000. The Company will pay Numoda an additional $100,000 upon the delivery of their analysis. Deferred payments of up to $400,000 will be payable to Numoda (a “Deferred Payment”) if the Company enters into an agreement for the sale or license of the Company’s products, or an agreement to merge or sell the Company (each a “Transaction”). If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in such a Transaction is $1,000,000 or less, the Deferred Payment will be $200,000. If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction is more than $1,000,000 but less than $5,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $250,000. If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction is more than $5,000,000 but less than $10,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $300,000. If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in the Transaction is more than $10,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $400,000. Additionally, the Company will be obligated to pay Numoda a fee equal to 3.5% of the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction, provided that the Transaction is completed at any time during the term of the agreement, or prior to March 3, 2011, and Numoda has either introduced such party to the Company or materially assisted the Company in facilitating such a Transaction.

After completing its review and delivering a report of its findings to the Company, the Company will consider its options for moving forward and Numoda will assist the Company in interpreting and presenting the results to potential licensing partners, purchasers and/or acquisition or merger candidates.

The following chart estimates the fixed annual research and development costs of the Company, excluding any exercise of the option under the Epilepsy Agreement and any milestone payments to Numoda or XEL.


Year
 
Amount
 
2009
 
$
861,295
 
2010
   
20,000
 
2011
   
30,000
 
2012
   
40,000
 
Total
 
$
951,295
 
 
[5] Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS. No. 161 on its financial statements.

In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for non-governmental entities. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that SFAS No. 162 may have on our financial reporting.

9

 
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements (as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act). To the extent that any statements made in this Report contains information that is not historical, these statements are essentially forward-looking. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “plans” “will,” “may,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “should,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects” and other words of similar meaning. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified and consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include those outlined in “Risk Factors” found within our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and include, without limitation, the Company’s limited cash and ability to raise capital to finance the growth of the Company’s operations, the ability of the Company to develop its products and obtain necessary governmental approvals, the Company’s ability to protect its proprietary information, the Company’s ability to attract or retain qualified personnel, including scientific and technical personnel, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the SEC, or otherwise.

All references to the “Company” refer to Neuro-Hitech, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
 
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE READ TOGETHER WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q .
 
History
 
The Company is an early stage pharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative drugs for the treatment of degenerative neurological diseases. The Company’s most advanced product candidate, Huperzine A, recently completed a Phase II clinical trial in the U.S. which tested Huperzine A for efficacy and safety in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease.

The Phase II clinical trial compared the safety, tolerability and efficacy of either 200 or 400 micrograms of Huperzine A on cognitive function, activities of daily living and behavior. Results showed that there was no statistical difference in the mean change AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) scores, the primary endpoint, after 16 weeks treatment with Huperzine A 200 micrograms bid compared to placebo (p=0.81). However, data demonstrated that the higher dose tested, 400 micrograms bid, showed cognitive enhancement on the ADAS-Cog versus placebo. The maximum cognitive improvement was observed at week 11 of treatment (p=0.001). Over 16 weeks Huperzine A (400 micrograms bid) improved cognition compared to placebo (p=0.03) and there was a trend to cognitive improvement over placebo at week 16 (p=0.069). In this clinical trial, there was an unexpected improvement in cognition in the placebo group at week 16 versus baseline. On other secondary endpoints, including clinical global impression of change (ADCS-CGIC) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) there was no statistical difference between placebo and either 200 or 400 micrograms bid after four months treatment. However, there was a trend to improvement on activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL) with 400 micrograms bid (p=0.077). Huperzine A was safe and well tolerated. Overall the incidence of adverse events during the study was similar between both doses of Huperzine A and placebo. Following completion of the double-blind part of this clinical trial, subjects were invited to receive Huperzine A treatment in an open-label fashion for up to one year: 82% of subjects accepted this invitation.

After receiving the results of the Phase II clinical trial of Huperzine A, the Company conducted a detailed review of those results. Based on its review, the Company believes that there is substantial support within the results that Huperzine A can become a safe and effective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. In order to validate the current information on the compound and review the Company’s analysis of the results, in March 2008 the Company entered into an agreement with Numoda Corporation (“Numoda”) pursuant to which Numoda will review the results and will provide a report to the Company on its findings. The Company also expects that Numoda will assist the Company in interpreting and presenting the results of the Phase II clinical trial to potential partners, licensees and merger or acquisition candidates. In view of the results of the Phase II clinical trial, the Company is currently reviewing its options for moving forward with its business, including the potential development of collaborative, joint and strategic alliances and licensing arrangements with one or more pharmaceutical companies for the further development of Huperzine A and its pipeline of other compounds. Additionally, the Company is evaluating merger and/or acquisition opportunities.

The Company has also studied the transdermal delivery of Huperzine A. The Company believes that Huperzine A can effectively be delivered transdermally because of its low dosage requirement and low molecular weight. The Company believes that a transdermal patch could be a better way to deliver Huperzine A because the patch may provide the drug for transdermal delivery for up to between three and five days while avoiding the gastrointestinal tract. Although the Company initially expected to begin Phase I clinical trials in the first quarter of 2008, the Company has elected to postpone any decision or expenditures related to such a trial until after Numoda has delivered its report and the Company has considered its options.
 
10

 
Worldwide research thus far suggests that, in addition to Alzheimer’s Disease, Huperzine A may be effective in treating other dementias and myasthenia gravis. Also, research suggests that it has potential neuroprotective properties that may render it useful as a protection against neurotoxins, and it has an anti-oxidant effect.

In addition to Huperzine A, the Company has worked on two pre-clinical development programs: one for second generation anti-amyloid compounds or disease modifying drugs for Alzheimer’s disease and, secondly, development of a series of compounds targeted to treat and prevent epilepsy. The Company’s efforts however, have principally focused on its primary product.

The Company has imported and sold inventories of natural Huperzine to vitamin and supplement suppliers to generate revenues. However, the majority of the Company’s operations to date have been funded through Company’s private placement of equity securities.
 
Results of Operations

In view of the results of the Phase II clinical trial, the Company is currently reviewing its options for moving forward with its business, including the potential development of collaborative, joint and strategic alliances and licensing arrangements with one or more pharmaceutical companies for the further development of Huperzine A and its pipeline of other compounds. Additionally, the Company is evaluating merger and/or acquisition opportunities. 

The following discussion provides comparisons of the Company’s results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 with the quarter ended March 31, 2007.

The Company had revenues from operations of $190,827 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, a 1.8% decrease from the $194,400 in revenue achieved for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The decrease in revenue was the result of a decrease in product sales to the Company’s sole customer.

Cost of goods sold as a percentage of the Company’s revenue was 52.0% for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, compared with 51.7% for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.

The Company’s total selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 were $556,411, a 16.0% decrease from $662,322 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. This decrease was the result of the implementation of certain reductions following the Company’s receipt of the Phase II clinical trial for Huperzine A.

The Company’s research and development costs for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 was $1,100,664, an increase of 49.6% from $735,781 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The increase in research and development expenses is attributable to an increase in the payments made to Georgetown related to the expansion in the size of the Phase II clinical trial and an expansion of the Company’s clinical development portfolio for Huperzine A and preclinical research in compounds acquired from Q-RNA.

The Company’s share based compensation costs increased to $511,017 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 from $188,732 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, an increase of 170.8%. The increase in share based compensation expenses is attributable to stock options and warrants granted to employees, directors, and advisors during the second half of 2007.

In December 2003, the Company entered into a clinical research agreement, which was amended in November 2005 and October 2007, with Georgetown pursuant to which Georgetown will provide the Company with Phase II research on Huperzine A. The costs associated with this agreement originally totaled $3,146,667 and was partially funded by the National Institutes of Health. The Company’s portion of the total cost was $1,846,667, payable in installments upon the achievement of certain milestones. On December 8, 2006, the Company announced the expansion in the size of the Phase II clinical trial by 60 participants, an increase of 40%. The Company’s portion of the total cost increased by an additional $2,190,175 and is payable in installments. For the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company made payments to Georgetown of $529,400 and $250,000, respectively. These costs are reflected in the Research and Development caption of the Statement of Operations.

On February 1, 2006, the Company entered into an exclusive development agreement with Org Syn for the development by Org Syn of synthetic Huperzine A, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Org Syn received an aggregate of $175,894 upon the execution of the Agreement. For the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company made payments to Org Syn of $0 and $175,894, respectively. These payments are reflected in the Research and Development caption of the Statement of Operations.
 
11

 
For the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company made payments to XEL of $92,500 and $277,500, respectively. These payments are reflected in the Research and Development caption of the Statement of Operations. The decrease is attributable to the Company’s implementation of certain cost reductions following the receipt of the results of the Phase II clinical trial of Huperzine A, including the delay of certain expenditures relating to the study of the transdermal delivery system of Huperzine A.

As part of the acquisition of Q-RNA, the Company assumed exclusive license agreements with PARTEQ. Under the terms of the exclusive PARTEQ Licensing Agreement the Company made an initial one-time license fee of C$25,000 and since January 1, 2008 has been obligated to pay fixed annual fees of C$283,000 for the Alzheimer’s research in equal quarterly installments. The Company may also be required to make quarterly royalty payments of 3% of net sales of the licensed products, with a minimum annual royalty of C$10,000 for 2007, C$20,000 for 2008, C$30,000 for 2009 and C$40,000 for 2010 and each subsequent calendar year. Until such time as the Company has a licensed product, the Company will not have to make any quarterly payments. The Company is also obligated to make the following milestone payments: C$100,000 upon completion of a Phase I trial of a licensed product, C$250,000 upon completion of a Phase II trial of a licensed product, and C$1,000,000 upon the first FDA approval (as such term is defined in the PARTEQ Licensing Agreement). The Company does not currently anticipate having a licensed product in the near term. The Company also has the right to sub-license with the payment of 20% of all non-royalty sublicensing consideration.

Under the terms of the Exclusive Patent License Option Agreement with PARTEQ (the “Epilepsy Agreement”) grants the Company a three-year option to acquire an exclusive worldwide license to all innovations and developments, including the patent applications and additional filings, related to specified patents for research on Epilepsy. The Company made a non-refundable, non-creditable option payment of $10,000 when it entered into the Epilepsy Agreement in 2006. The Company made an additional payment of $45,000 to PARTEQ in the year ended December 31, 2007 for expenses that should have been paid by Q-RNA in the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company also began to pay fixed annual fees of C$150,800 in quarterly installments of C$37,700 beginning on March 1, 2008. If the Company exercises its option, the Company will make a non-refundable, non-creditable license payment of C$17,500 at the time of such exercise. If the Company exercises its option, it will be required to make quarterly royalty payments of 3% of net sales of the licensed products (as such term is defined in Epilepsy Agreement), with a minimum annual royalty of C$10,000 through the second anniversary of the license, C$20,000 through the third anniversary of the license, C$30,000 through the fourth anniversary of the license and C$40,000 through the fifth anniversary of the license and each subsequent anniversary. If the Company exercises its option, it is also obligated to make the following milestone payments: C$100,000 upon completion of a Phase I trial of a licensed product, C$250,000 upon completion of a Phase II trial of a licensed product, and C$1,000,000 upon the first FDA approval (as such term is defined therein). If the Company exercises its option, the Company also has the right to sub-license with the payment of 20% of all non-royalty sublicensing consideration.

For the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the payments made by the Company to PARTEQ under these agreements have been approximately $121,000 and $135,000, respectively.
 
The Company invests any cash and cash equivalents not used for working capital in short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade securities or accounts. In the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company generated $38,788 from interest and dividend income, compared to $61,206 generated in the three months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease is attributable partly to a decrease in the balance of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents during the current three month period and a decrease in the rate of interest paid on the Company’s cash and cash equivalents.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
The Company has generated limited revenue from operations to date, and expects to continue generating limited operating revenue from the sale of natural Huperzine. Substantially all of the Company’s operations to date have been funded through the sale of its securities, and the Company expects this to continue in the foreseeable future.

Historically, the principal uses of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents have been concluding the Phase II clinical trials, developing alternative delivery technologies, improving on the synthetic processes, and continuing to fund pre-clinical compounds associated with the agreements with PARTEQ. Although the Company has developed plans related to its operations, management continues to retain significant flexibility for the uses of Company funds. In addition to meeting its working capital needs, the Company may also use its cash and cash equivalents to acquire additional products or technologies. Currently, the principal uses of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are investigating the results of the Phase II clinical trials.
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company experienced an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increases were largely attributable to increases in salaries and employee benefit expenses and the employment of a new Chief Executive Officer. To improve its liquidity and ensure that it has sufficient cash and cash equivalents for the next 12 months, the Company implemented certain cost reductions in the first quarter of 2008 and delayed the implementation of certain research programs, including the previously planned Phase I trial for the transdermal patch.
 
12

 
The Company expects to make additional payments by June 30, 2008 to Georgetown of $396,775 related to an open label extension which extension will expire in June 2008. The Company also expects to continue making payments to PARTEQ of C$108,000 each quarter as a result of the renewal of the Alzheimer’s Agreement and Epilepsy Agreement with PARTEQ. The Company may also incur additional expenses if it pursues certain contractual rights or activities that are at its discretion, including exercising its option to license the Product in North America from XEL, pursuant to which it would pay XEL an initial license fee of $400,000 and up to an aggregate of $2.8 million in additional payments upon the achievement of certain milestones.

The Company may also incur additional expenses in connection with its agreement with Numoda Corporation (“Numoda”). Following Numoda’s delivery of its analysis of the Phase II clinical trials, the Company will pay Numoda $100,000. The Company may be obligated to pay Numoda up to $400,000 of additional payments (a “Deferred Payment”) if the Company enters into an agreement for the sale or license of the Company’s products, or an agreement to merge or sell the Company (each a “Transaction”). If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in such a Transaction is $1,000,000 or less, the Deferred Payment will be $200,000. If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction is more than $1,000,000 but less than $5,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $250,000. If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction is more than $5,000,001 but less than $10,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $300,000. If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in the Transaction is more than $10,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $400,000. Additionally, the Company will be obligated to pay Numoda a fee equal to 3.5% of the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction, provided that the Transaction is completed at any time during the term of the agreement, or prior to March 3, 2011, and Numoda has either introduced such party to the Company or materially assisted the Company in facilitating such a Transaction.

To fund the implementation of its business plan, the Company has historically engaged in equity financing through existing investors and potential new investors. If the Company does not enter into a Transaction that provides it substantial liquidity, it may engage in additional financing efforts. Additional funds may not be available or not available on acceptable terms, if at all. Given the anticipated cash expenditures, the potential cash requirements and the lack of sufficient cash to fully fund those expenses, the Company is continually analyzing alternative ways in which it can preserve its cash and cash equivalents, including the potential delay, reduction in scope of or elimination of some of its research or development programs. If the Company is unable to raise additional financing and is forced to take such measures, they may materially harm the Company’s prospects, financial condition and future operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates, and the recognition of revenues and expenses for the reporting periods. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of its accounting policies.

Research and Development Costs
 
All research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include costs paid to sponsored third parties to perform research and conduct clinical trials.

Share-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the Company to record as an expense in its financial statements the fair value of all stock-based compensation awards. The Company currently utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees using the “modified prospective” method. Under the “modified prospective” method, compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R).

Deferred Compensation

In accordance with EITF Abstract No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” the Company initially measures the fair value of any equity granted to consultants on the date of grant and subsequently remeasures such grants in accordance with promulgated accounting principles using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Amounts are initially recorded as Deferred Compensation in the Stockholders’ Equity section of the balance sheet and are subsequently charged to the appropriate expense over the period to which the service relates.
 
13

 
New Authoritative Pronouncements

In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS. No. 161 on its financial statements.

In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for non-governmental entities. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that SFAS No. 162 may have on our financial reporting.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

Based on management’s evaluation (with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be reported and disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls 

Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of control effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
 
14

 
PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 6.  Exhibits.
 
10.1
 
BAU Analysis and Partnering Letter of Intent dated March 3, 2008
31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
 
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
 
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2008.
 
15

 
SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
Neuro-Hitech, Inc.
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
Date: May 14, 2008
By:  
/s/ Gary T. Shearman
 
Gary T. Shearman
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
Date: May 15, 2008
By:  
/s/ David J. Barrett
 
David J. Barrett
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
16