UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from __________ to ___________
Commission
File Number 001-33426
|
NEURO-HITECH,
INC.
|
|
|
(Exact
name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-4121393
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
|
One
Penn Plaza, Suite 1503, New York, NY 10019
|
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212)
594-1215
|
|
|
(Issuer’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Former
Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year
If
Changed Since Last Report)
|
|
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
Smaller Reporting Company x
|
|
(Do Not Check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o
Yes x
No
State
the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity,
as of the latest practicable date: May 5, 2008
Common
Stock 14,004,853
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1.
Financial
Statements
Neuro-Hitech,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,165,383
|
|
$
|
6,137,592
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
|
164,250
|
|
|
63,300
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
25,008
|
|
|
33,821
|
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
|
|
103,943
|
|
|
11,861
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
4,458,584
|
|
|
6,246,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment, net
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
Deposit
|
|
|
13,226
|
|
|
13,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
4,475,311
|
|
$
|
6,264,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
|
$
|
738,478
|
|
$
|
1,000,399
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
738,478
|
|
|
1,000,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock $.001 Par Value, Authorized: 44,999,900, Issued and Outstanding:
14,004,853
|
|
|
14,005
|
|
|
14,005
|
|
Common
Stock - Class A $.001 Par Value, Authorized: 100, Issued and Outstanding:
0
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
39,781,967
|
|
|
39,270,951
|
|
Deferred
Compensation
|
|
|
(1,158,785
|
)
|
|
(1,190,654
|
)
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
(34,900,354
|
)
|
|
(32,830,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
3,736,833
|
|
|
5,263,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
$
|
4,475,311
|
|
$
|
6,264,048
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
|
|
|
|
Neuro-Hitech,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
For
the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
190,827
|
|
$
|
194,400
|
|
Cost
of Goods Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,357
|
|
|
100,555
|
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,470
|
|
|
93,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
556,411
|
|
|
662,322
|
|
Research
and Development Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100,664
|
|
|
735,781
|
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
511,017
|
|
|
188,732
|
|
Amortization
of Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,869
|
|
|
15,935
|
|
Total
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,199,961
|
|
|
1,602,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,108,491
|
)
|
|
(1,508,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and Dividend Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,788
|
|
|
61,206
|
|
Total
Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,788
|
|
|
61,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Before Provision for IncomeTaxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,069,703
|
)
|
|
(1,447,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,069,703
|
)
|
$
|
(1,447,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted (Loss) per Weighted Average Common Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average - Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,004,853
|
|
|
12,118,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
For
The Three Months EndedYears Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,069,703
|
)
|
$
|
(1,447,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
to Reconcile Net (Loss) to Net Cash (Used In) Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-Based
Compensation Expense
|
|
|
511,017
|
|
|
188,732
|
|
Amortization
of Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
31,869
|
|
|
15,935
|
|
Depreciation
Expense
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
Decrease in Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
|
(100,951
|
)
|
|
(282,674
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
8,812
|
|
|
(9,920
|
)
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
|
|
(92,081
|
)
|
|
(128,904
|
)
|
Deferred
Charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
11,910
|
|
Increase
(Decrease) in Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
(261,919
|
)
|
|
(227,339
|
)
|
Net
cash (used in) Operating activities
|
|
|
(1,972,209
|
)
|
|
(1,879,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash (used in) Investing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Proceeds from Private Placement Offering of Common Stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,220,755
|
|
Proceeds
from the Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,276
|
|
Net
cash provided by Financing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,236,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,972,209
|
)
|
|
356,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
6,137,592
|
|
|
4,705,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
4,165,383
|
|
$
|
5,061,996
|
|
|
Cash
Paid For:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing
Activities:
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, options held by the Company's executive
officers and board of directors vested as to 181,342 and 124,791 shares of
the
Company's common stock. The Company recognized an aggregate compensation
cost of
$511,017 and $188,732 for the vesting of the aforementioned options for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
The
Company entered into a service agreement and issued 100,000 warrants measured
at
fair value as of February 14, 2007, the date the service agreement was ratified
by the Company's board of directors. The fair value of these warrants
approximated $255,000 and was recognized as Deferred Compensation in the
Stockholders' Equity section of the Balance Sheet. During the first quarter
of
2008 and 2007, the Company ratably recognized approximately $32,000 and $16,000
of expenses for the amortization of Deferred Compensation in accordance with
the
service term.
In
connection with a private placement offering of the Company’s securities that
occurred between January through March 15, 2007, the Company entered into
a
stock subscription agreement for the issuance of 30,000 shares of common
stock
and share purchase warrants for an additional 15,000 shares. The transaction
totaled $144,525 and was fully collected by the Company in April
2007.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
NEURO-HITECH,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
[1]
Nature of Operations
Neuro-Hitech,
Inc. (the “Company” or “Neuro-Hitech”) is an early stage pharmaceutical company
focused on developing innovative drugs for the treatment of degenerative
neurological diseases. The Company’s most advanced product candidate, Huperzine
A, recently completed a Phase II clinical trial in the U.S. which tested
Huperzine A for efficacy and safety in the treatment of mild to moderate
Alzheimer’s disease. The Company has also studied the transdermal delivery of
Huperzine A. The Company believes that Huperzine A can effectively be delivered
transdermally because of its low dosage requirement and low molecular weight.
After
receiving the results of the Phase II clinical trial of Huperzine A, the Company
conducted a detailed review of those results. Based on its review, the Company
believes that there is substantial support within the results that Huperzine
A
can become a safe and effective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. In order to
validate the current information on the compound and review the Company’s
analysis of the results, in March 2008 the Company entered into an
agreement with Numoda Corporation (“Numoda”) pursuant to which Numoda will
review the results and will provide a report to the Company on its findings.
In
view
of the results of the Phase II clinical trial, the Company is currently
reviewing its options for moving forward with its business, including the
potential development of collaborative, joint and strategic alliances and
licensing arrangements with one or more pharmaceutical companies for the further
development of Huperzine A and its pipeline of other compounds. Additionally,
the Company is evaluating merger and/or acquisition opportunities.
In
addition to Huperzine A, the Company has worked on two pre-clinical development
programs: one for second generation anti-amyloid compounds or disease modifying
drugs for Alzheimer’s disease and, secondly, development of a series of
compounds targeted to treat and prevent epilepsy. The Company’s efforts however,
have principally focused on its primary product.
The
Company has imported and sold inventories of natural Huperzine to vitamin and
supplement suppliers to generate revenues. However, the majority of the
Company’s operations to date have been funded through Company’s private
placement of equity securities.
The
accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered necessary in order to make the interim financials not misleading
have
been included and all such adjustments are of normal recurring nature. The
operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ending December
31,
2008.
Liquidity
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a
going-concern basis, which contemplates the continuation of operations,
realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course
of
business. For the three months ending March 31, 2008, the Company generated
a
net loss of approximately $2.1 million. As of March 31, 2008, the Company has
funded its working capital requirements primarily through the sale of equity
to
founders, institutional and individual investors. Management intends to fund
future operations through entrance into the commercial marketplace as well
as
additional equity or debt offerings.
There
can
be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining financing
at
the level needed for long-term operations or on terms acceptable to the Company.
In addition, there can be no assurance, assuming the Company is successful
in
commercializing its product, realizing revenues and obtaining new equity or
debt
offerings that the Company will achieve profitability or positive operating
cash
flow. The Company is incurring significant losses, which give rise to questions
about its ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
of
this uncertainty.
NEURO-HITECH,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
[2]
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All inter-company balances and transactions have
been
eliminated. Approximately $191,000 and $4,475,000 of consolidated revenue and
assets, after eliminations, respectively, are based upon the accounts of the
parent and $0 and $0 of consolidated revenue and assets, after eliminations
respectively, of the subsidiaries.
Cash
and
Cash Equivalents
Cash
and
cash equivalents consist of highly liquid financial instruments with an original
maturity of three months or less from the date acquired.
Revenues
from product sales are recognized when products are shipped to the customer
and
risk of loss and transfer of title has passed over to the customer.
Research
and Development Costs
All
research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include costs paid
to sponsored third parties to perform research and conduct clinical
trials.
Share-Based
Compensation
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires
the Company to record as an expense in its financial statements the fair value
of all stock-based compensation awards. The Company currently utilizes the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options
granted to employees using the “modified prospective” method. Under the
“modified prospective” method, compensation cost is recognized in the financial
statements beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of
SFAS
No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after that date, and based
on
the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all unvested awards granted prior to
the
effective date of SFAS No. 123(R).
The
Company recognized an aggregate share-based compensation cost of $511,017 for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and $188,732 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, in accordance with the vesting of the aforementioned options
granted during such interim periods.
[3]
Common Stock
Between
January 2007 and March 2007, the Company received total gross proceeds of
$2,379,005 from the private placement with accredited investors of an aggregate
of 464,196 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 232,098
shares of the Company’s common stock. The common stock was sold in the offering
at $5.125 per share and the exercise price of the warrants was $7.00 per share.
The warrants expire on November 29, 2011.
Option
Exercises
In
addition to the aforementioned private placements, the Company received
approximately $15,000 from the exercise of stock options to purchase 4,020
shares during the three months ended March 31, 2007. There were no options
exercised during the first quarter of 2008.
NEURO-HITECH,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
[4]
Research and License Agreements
Georgetown
University
In
December 2003, the Company entered into a clinical research agreement, which
was
amended in November 2005 and October 2007, with Georgetown pursuant to which
Georgetown provided the Company with Phase II research. The costs associated
with this agreement totaled $5,336,842 and were partially funded by the National
Institutes of Health. The Company’s portion of the total cost is $4,036,842, and
paid in installments upon the achievement of certain milestones.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the payments made by the Company
to
Georgetown under the terms of the clinical research agreement were approximately
$529,400
and $250,000, respectively, and the total payments made by the Company to
Georgetown since inception of the agreement were approximately $3,665,697.
These
costs are reflected in the Research and Development caption of the Statement
of
Operations.
The
Company expects to make additional payments in 2008 to Georgetown of $371,145
related to an open label extension which extension will expire in June
2008.
Org
Syn
Laboratory, Inc.
On
February 1, 2006, the Company entered into an exclusive development agreement
with Org Syn for the development of synthetic Huperzine A. Org Syn received
an
aggregate of $175,894 upon the execution of the Agreement. For the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the payments made by the Company to Org Syn
were
approximately $0 and $176,000, respectively. These payments are reflected in
the
Research and Development caption of the Statement of Operations.
Xel
Herbaceuticals, Inc.
On
March
15, 2006, the Company entered into a development agreement with Xel
Herbaceuticals, Inc. (“XEL”) for the development of the Huperzine A Transdermal
Delivery System (“Delivery Product”). Under the terms of the agreement, the
Company paid XEL a $250,000 fee upon the execution of the agreement and paid
XEL
$92,500 per month during the development of the Delivery Product, including
the
first six months of 2007. The Delivery Product was completed in July 2007.
The
$250,000 signing fee paid upon the execution of the agreement was amortized
ratably over the 16 month term of the agreement.
If
the
Company elects to exercise its right to license the Delivery Product in the
U.S.
and Canada (“North America”) and to develop the Delivery Product on its own, the
Company will pay XEL an initial license fee of $400,000 and up to an aggregate
of $2.4 million in additional payments upon the achievement of certain
milestones, including completion of a prototype, initial submission to the
Food
and Drug Administration (“FDA”), completion of phases of clinical studies and
completion of the FDA submission and FDA approval. Similarly, if the Company
elects to exercise its option to license the Delivery Product worldwide
excluding China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau and Singapore (“Worldwide”), and
develop the Delivery Product on its own, the Company will pay XEL an additional
initial license fee of $400,000 and up to an aggregate of $2.4 million in
additional payments upon the achievement of comparable milestones. If XEL fails
to obtain a U.S. or international patent, the corresponding license fee and
milestone payments will be reduced by 50% until such time as XEL obtains such
patent, at which time the unpaid 50% of all such milestone payments previously
not made will be due. If the Company elects to exercise the licensing rights
described above, the additional payments that the Company has made to XEL to
further develop the Product would be applied toward the additional payments
payable to XEL upon the achievement of certain milestones.
If
the
Company elects to exercise its right to license the Delivery Product in North
America and to develop the Delivery Product with a third party, the Company
will
pay XEL 50% of any initial signing fees and milestone fees (excluding any
research and development fees) paid by such third party. Similarly, in the
event
that the Company decides to exercise its option to license the Product Worldwide
and to develop the Product with a third party, the Company will pay XEL 50%
of
any initial signing fees and milestone fees (excluding any research and
development fees) paid by such third party. If XEL fails to obtain a U.S. or
international patent, the percentage of the corresponding fees will be reduced
to 25%. The Company will pay XEL 20% of any royalty payments received by the
Company from third-party sublicensees, or if the Product is not protected by
at
least one patent, 10% of any royalty received by the Company from
sublicensees.
NEURO-HITECH,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
If
the
Company elects not to exercise its right to license the Delivery Product and
XEL
elects to further develop the Delivery Product without the Company, XEL will
be
obligated to pay the Company 30% of any net profits realized up to a maximum
of
two times the amount paid by the Company to XEL during development, excluding
the initial $250,000 signing fee. Upon such election, XEL will be entitled
to
full ownership of the intellectual property of the Delivery Product. If the
Company elects to exercise its rights to license the Delivery Product in North
America, but not Worldwide, XEL will have certain rights to obtain intellectual
property protection in any country outside North America upon payment to the
Company for such rights, such fees to be negotiated in good faith by the
parties.
The
Company will also be obligated to pay XEL royalty payments of between 7% and
10%
of net sales, with such royalty payments subject to reduction upon the
expiration of the patent or the launch of a generic product in the applicable
territory. If a patent has not been issued in either the U.S. or Canada, the
royalty payments will be subject to reduced rates of between 3% and 5% of net
sales. Royalty payments for sales in the Worldwide territory will be subject
to
good faith negotiations between the parties.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the total payments made by the
Company to XEL under this agreement were approximately $92,500 and $277,500,
respectively, and are reflected in the Research and Development caption of
the
Statement of Operations.
Dalhousie
License Agreements (PARTEQ)
As
part
of the acquisition of Q-RNA, the Company assumed exclusive License Agreements
with PARTEQ Research and Development Innovations (“PARTEQ”), the technology
licensing arm of Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
The
Exclusive Patent License Agreement with PARTEQ (the “Alzheimer’s Agreement”)
grants the Company an exclusive worldwide license to all innovations and
developments, including the patent applications and additional filings, related
to specified patents related to research on Alzheimer’s disease. The Company
made a one-time license fee of C$25,000 when it entered into the Alzheimer’s
Agreement in 2005 and will be required to make quarterly royalty payments of
3%
of net sales of the licensed products (as such term is defined in Alzheimer’s
Agreement), with a minimum annual royalty of C$10,000 for 2007, C$20,000 for
2008, C$30,000 for 2009 and C$40,000 for 2010 and each subsequent calendar
year.
The Company is also obligated to make the following milestone payments:
C$100,000 upon completion of a Phase I trial of a licensed product, C$250,000
upon completion of a Phase II trial of a licensed product, and C$1,000,000
upon
the first FDA approval (as such term is defined in the Alzheimer’s Agreement).
The Company also has the right to sub-license with the payment of 20% of all
non-royalty sublicensing consideration.
Under
the
terms of the Alzheimer’s Agreement which was amended in early 2007, the Company
will pay fixed annual fees of C$282,944.
The
Exclusive Patent License Option Agreement with PARTEQ (the “Epilepsy Agreement”)
grants the Company an option to acquire an exclusive worldwide license to all
innovations and developments, including the patent applications and additional
filings, related to specified patents related to research on Epilepsy. The
Company made a non-refundable, non-creditable option payment of $10,000 when
it
entered into the Epilepsy Agreement in 2006. If the Company exercises its
option, the Company will make a non-refundable, non-creditable license payment
of C$17,500 at the time of such exercise. If the Company exercises its option,
it will be required to make quarterly royalty payments of 3% of net sales of
the
licensed products (as such term is defined in Epilepsy Agreement), with a
minimum annual royalty of C$10,000 through the second anniversary of the
license, C$20,000 through the third anniversary of the license, C$30,000 through
the fourth anniversary of the license and C$40,000 through the fifth anniversary
of the license and each subsequent anniversary. If the Company exercises its
option, the Company is also obligated to make the following milestone payments:
C$100,000 upon completion of a Phase I trial of a licensed product, C$250,000
upon completion of a Phase II trial of a licensed product, and C$1,000,000
upon
the first FDA approval (as such term is defined therein). If the Company
exercises its option, the Company also has the right to sub-license with the
payment of 20% of all non-royalty sublicensing consideration.
Under
the
terms of the Epilepsy Agreement which was amended in early 2007, the Company
will pay fixed annual fees of C$150,800.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the payments made by the Company
to
PARTEQ under these agreements have been approximately $121,000 and $135,000,
respectively, and are reflected in the Research and Development caption of
the
Statement of Operations.
NEURO-HITECH,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
On
March
3, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Numoda corporation
(“Numoda”) pursuant to which Numoda will review the results of the Company’s
recently completed Phase II clinical trial of Huperzine A. Under the terms
of
its agreement with Numoda, the Company made an initial payment to Numoda of
$100,000. The Company will pay Numoda an additional $100,000 upon the delivery
of their analysis. Deferred payments of up to $400,000 will be payable to Numoda
(a “Deferred Payment”) if the Company enters into an agreement for the sale or
license of the Company’s products, or an agreement to merge or sell the Company
(each a “Transaction”). If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in
such a Transaction is $1,000,000 or less, the Deferred Payment will be $200,000.
If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction is more
than
$1,000,000 but less than $5,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $250,000.
If
the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction is more than
$5,000,000 but less than $10,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $300,000.
If
the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in the Transaction is more
than
$10,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $400,000. Additionally, the Company
will be obligated to pay Numoda a fee equal to 3.5% of the aggregate
consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction, provided that the
Transaction is completed at any time during the term of the agreement, or prior
to March 3, 2011, and Numoda has either introduced such party to the Company
or
materially assisted the Company in facilitating such a Transaction.
After
completing its review and delivering a report of its findings to the Company,
the Company will consider its options for moving forward and Numoda will assist
the Company in interpreting and presenting the results to potential licensing
partners, purchasers and/or acquisition or merger candidates.
The
following chart estimates the fixed annual research and development costs of
the
Company, excluding any exercise of the option under the Epilepsy Agreement
and
any milestone payments to Numoda or XEL.
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
861,295
|
|
2010
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
951,295
|
|
[5]
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
March
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement
No.
161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The new
standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments
and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors
to
better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued
for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early
application encouraged. The company is currently evaluating the impact of
adopting SFAS. No. 161 on its financial statements.
In
May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles." The new standard is intended to improve
financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for
selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements
that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) for non-governmental entities. We are currently evaluating
the
effects, if any, that SFAS No. 162 may have on our financial
reporting.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements (as defined
in
Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act). To
the
extent that any statements made in this Report contains information that is
not
historical, these statements are essentially forward-looking. Forward-looking
statements can be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “plans”
“will,” “may,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “should,” “intends,” “estimates,”
“projects” and other words of similar meaning. These statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified and consequently,
actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include those outlined
in “Risk Factors” found within our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and include,
without limitation, the Company’s limited cash and ability to raise capital to
finance the growth of the Company’s operations, the ability of the Company to
develop its products and obtain necessary governmental approvals, the Company’s
ability to protect its proprietary information, the Company’s ability to attract
or retain qualified personnel, including scientific and technical personnel,
and
other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the SEC, or
otherwise.
All
references to the “Company” refer to Neuro-Hitech, Inc. and its
subsidiaries.
THE
FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE READ TOGETHER WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED
IN
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q .
History
The
Company is an early stage pharmaceutical company focused on developing
innovative drugs for the treatment of degenerative neurological diseases. The
Company’s most advanced product candidate, Huperzine A, recently completed a
Phase II clinical trial in the U.S. which tested Huperzine A for efficacy and
safety in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease.
The
Phase
II clinical trial compared the safety, tolerability and efficacy of either
200
or 400 micrograms of Huperzine A on cognitive function, activities of daily
living and behavior. Results showed that there was no statistical difference
in
the mean change AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) scores, the primary
endpoint, after 16 weeks treatment with Huperzine A 200 micrograms bid compared
to placebo (p=0.81). However, data demonstrated that the higher dose tested,
400
micrograms bid, showed cognitive enhancement on the ADAS-Cog versus placebo.
The
maximum cognitive improvement was observed at week 11 of treatment (p=0.001).
Over 16 weeks Huperzine A (400 micrograms bid) improved cognition compared
to
placebo (p=0.03) and there was a trend to cognitive improvement over placebo
at
week 16 (p=0.069). In this clinical trial, there was an unexpected improvement
in cognition in the placebo group at week 16 versus baseline. On other secondary
endpoints, including clinical global impression of change (ADCS-CGIC) and the
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) there was no statistical difference between
placebo and either 200 or 400 micrograms bid after four months treatment.
However, there was a trend to improvement on activities of daily living
(ADCS-ADL) with 400 micrograms bid (p=0.077). Huperzine A was safe and well
tolerated. Overall the incidence of adverse events during the study was similar
between both doses of Huperzine A and placebo. Following completion of the
double-blind part of this clinical trial, subjects were invited to receive
Huperzine A treatment in an open-label fashion for up to one year: 82% of
subjects accepted this invitation.
After
receiving the results of the Phase II clinical trial of Huperzine A, the Company
conducted a detailed review of those results. Based on its review, the Company
believes that there is substantial support within the results that Huperzine
A
can become a safe and effective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. In order to
validate the current information on the compound and review the Company’s
analysis of the results, in March 2008 the Company entered into an
agreement with Numoda Corporation (“Numoda”) pursuant to which Numoda will
review the results and will provide a report to the Company on its findings.
The
Company also expects that Numoda will assist the Company in interpreting and
presenting the results of the Phase II clinical trial to potential partners,
licensees and merger or acquisition candidates. In view of the results of the
Phase II clinical trial, the Company is currently reviewing its options for
moving forward with its business, including the potential development of
collaborative, joint and strategic alliances and licensing arrangements with
one
or more pharmaceutical companies for the further development of Huperzine A
and
its pipeline of other compounds. Additionally, the Company is evaluating merger
and/or acquisition opportunities.
The
Company has also studied the transdermal delivery of Huperzine A. The Company
believes that Huperzine A can effectively be delivered transdermally because
of
its low dosage requirement and low molecular weight. The Company believes that
a
transdermal patch could be a better way to deliver Huperzine A because the
patch
may provide the drug for transdermal delivery for up to between three and five
days while avoiding the gastrointestinal tract. Although the Company initially
expected to begin Phase I clinical trials in the first quarter of 2008, the
Company has elected to postpone any decision or expenditures related to such
a
trial until after Numoda has delivered its report and the Company has considered
its options.
Worldwide
research thus far suggests that, in addition to Alzheimer’s Disease, Huperzine A
may be effective in treating other dementias and myasthenia gravis. Also,
research suggests that it has potential neuroprotective properties that may
render it useful as a protection against neurotoxins, and it has an anti-oxidant
effect.
In
addition to Huperzine A, the Company has worked on two pre-clinical development
programs: one for second generation anti-amyloid compounds or disease modifying
drugs for Alzheimer’s disease and, secondly, development of a series of
compounds targeted to treat and prevent epilepsy. The Company’s efforts however,
have principally focused on its primary product.
The
Company has imported and sold inventories of natural Huperzine to vitamin and
supplement suppliers to generate revenues. However, the majority of the
Company’s operations to date have been funded through Company’s private
placement of equity securities.
In
view
of the results of the Phase II clinical trial, the Company is currently
reviewing its options for moving forward with its business, including the
potential development of collaborative, joint and strategic alliances and
licensing arrangements with one or more pharmaceutical companies for the further
development of Huperzine A and its pipeline of other compounds. Additionally,
the Company is evaluating merger and/or acquisition opportunities.
The
following discussion provides comparisons of the Company’s results of operations
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 with the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
The
Company had revenues from operations of $190,827 for the quarter ended March
31,
2008, a 1.8% decrease from the $194,400 in revenue achieved for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007. The decrease in revenue was the result of a decrease
in
product sales to the Company’s sole customer.
Cost
of
goods sold as a percentage of the Company’s revenue was 52.0% for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008, compared with 51.7% for the quarter ended March 31,
2007.
The
Company’s total selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 were $556,411, a 16.0% decrease from $662,322 for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007. This decrease was the result of the implementation
of certain reductions following the Company’s receipt of the Phase II clinical
trial for Huperzine A.
The
Company’s research and development costs for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
was $1,100,664, an increase of 49.6% from $735,781 for the quarter ended March
31, 2007. The increase in research and development expenses is attributable
to
an increase in the payments made to Georgetown related to the expansion in
the
size of the Phase II clinical trial and an expansion of the Company’s clinical
development portfolio for Huperzine A and preclinical research in compounds
acquired from Q-RNA.
The
Company’s share based compensation costs increased to $511,017 for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 from $188,732 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, an
increase of 170.8%. The increase in share based compensation expenses is
attributable to stock options and warrants granted to employees, directors,
and
advisors during the second half of 2007.
In
December 2003, the Company entered into a clinical research agreement, which
was
amended in November 2005 and October 2007, with Georgetown pursuant to which
Georgetown will provide the Company with Phase II research on Huperzine A.
The
costs associated with this agreement originally totaled $3,146,667 and was
partially funded by the National Institutes of Health. The Company’s portion of
the total cost was $1,846,667, payable in installments upon the achievement
of
certain milestones. On December 8, 2006, the Company announced the expansion
in
the size of the Phase II clinical trial by 60 participants, an increase of
40%.
The Company’s portion of the total cost increased by an additional $2,190,175
and is payable in installments. For the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
the Company made payments to Georgetown of $529,400 and $250,000, respectively.
These costs are reflected in the Research and Development caption of the
Statement of Operations.
On
February 1, 2006, the Company entered into an exclusive development agreement
with Org Syn for the development by Org Syn of synthetic Huperzine A, in
accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Org Syn received an aggregate of
$175,894 upon the execution of the Agreement. For the quarters ended March
31,
2008 and 2007, the Company made payments to Org Syn of $0 and $175,894,
respectively. These payments are reflected in the Research and Development
caption of the Statement of Operations.
For
the
quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company made payments to XEL of
$92,500 and $277,500, respectively. These payments are reflected in the Research
and Development caption of the Statement of Operations. The decrease is
attributable to the Company’s implementation of certain cost reductions
following the receipt of the results of the Phase II clinical trial of Huperzine
A, including the delay of certain expenditures relating to the study of the
transdermal delivery system of Huperzine A.
As
part
of the acquisition of Q-RNA, the Company assumed exclusive license agreements
with PARTEQ. Under the terms of the exclusive PARTEQ Licensing Agreement the
Company made an initial one-time license fee of C$25,000 and since January
1,
2008 has been obligated to pay fixed annual fees of C$283,000 for the
Alzheimer’s research in equal quarterly installments. The Company may also be
required to make quarterly royalty payments of 3% of net sales of the licensed
products, with a minimum annual royalty of C$10,000 for 2007, C$20,000 for
2008,
C$30,000 for 2009 and C$40,000 for 2010 and each subsequent calendar year.
Until
such time as the Company has a licensed product, the Company will not have
to
make any quarterly payments. The Company is also obligated to make the following
milestone payments: C$100,000 upon completion of a Phase I trial of a licensed
product, C$250,000 upon completion of a Phase II trial of a licensed product,
and C$1,000,000 upon the first FDA approval (as such term is defined in the
PARTEQ Licensing Agreement). The Company does not currently anticipate having
a
licensed product in the near term. The Company also has the right to sub-license
with the payment of 20% of all non-royalty sublicensing
consideration.
Under
the
terms of the Exclusive Patent License Option Agreement with PARTEQ (the
“Epilepsy Agreement”) grants the Company a three-year option to acquire an
exclusive worldwide license to all innovations and developments, including
the
patent applications and additional filings, related to specified patents for
research on Epilepsy. The Company made a non-refundable, non-creditable option
payment of $10,000 when it entered into the Epilepsy Agreement in 2006. The
Company made an additional payment of $45,000 to PARTEQ in the year ended
December 31, 2007 for expenses that should have been paid by Q-RNA in the year
ended December 31, 2005. The Company also began to pay fixed annual fees of
C$150,800 in quarterly installments of C$37,700 beginning on March 1, 2008.
If
the Company exercises its option, the Company will make a non-refundable,
non-creditable license payment of C$17,500 at the time of such exercise. If
the
Company exercises its option, it will be required to make quarterly royalty
payments of 3% of net sales of the licensed products (as such term is defined
in
Epilepsy Agreement), with a minimum annual royalty of C$10,000 through the
second anniversary of the license, C$20,000 through the third anniversary of
the
license, C$30,000 through the fourth anniversary of the license and C$40,000
through the fifth anniversary of the license and each subsequent anniversary.
If
the Company exercises its option, it is also obligated to make the following
milestone payments: C$100,000 upon completion of a Phase I trial of a licensed
product, C$250,000 upon completion of a Phase II trial of a licensed product,
and C$1,000,000 upon the first FDA approval (as such term is defined therein).
If the Company exercises its option, the Company also has the right to
sub-license with the payment of 20% of all non-royalty sublicensing
consideration.
For
the
quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the payments made by the Company to
PARTEQ under these agreements have been approximately $121,000 and $135,000,
respectively.
The
Company invests any cash and cash equivalents not used for working capital
in
short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade securities or accounts. In the
three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company generated $38,788 from interest
and dividend income, compared to $61,206 generated in the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The decrease is attributable partly to a decrease in the balance
of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents during the current three month period
and a decrease in the rate of interest paid on the Company’s cash and cash
equivalents.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company has generated limited revenue from operations to date, and expects
to
continue generating limited operating revenue from the sale of natural
Huperzine. Substantially all of the Company’s operations to date have been
funded through the sale of its securities, and the Company expects this to
continue in the foreseeable future.
Historically,
the principal uses of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents have been
concluding the Phase II clinical trials, developing alternative delivery
technologies, improving on the synthetic processes, and continuing to fund
pre-clinical compounds associated with the agreements with PARTEQ. Although
the
Company has developed plans related to its operations, management continues
to
retain significant flexibility for the uses of Company funds. In addition to
meeting its working capital needs, the Company may also use its cash and cash
equivalents to acquire additional products or technologies. Currently, the
principal uses of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are investigating the
results of the Phase II clinical trials.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company experienced an increase
in
selling, general and administrative expenses compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The increases were largely attributable to increases in salaries
and employee benefit expenses and the employment of a new Chief Executive
Officer. To improve its liquidity and ensure that it has sufficient cash and
cash equivalents for the next 12 months, the Company implemented certain cost
reductions in the first quarter of 2008 and delayed the implementation of
certain research programs, including the previously planned Phase I trial for
the transdermal patch.
The
Company expects to make additional payments by June 30, 2008 to Georgetown
of
$396,775 related to an open label extension which extension will expire in
June
2008. The Company also expects to continue making payments to PARTEQ of
C$108,000 each quarter as a result of the renewal of the Alzheimer’s Agreement
and Epilepsy Agreement with PARTEQ. The Company may also incur additional
expenses if it pursues certain contractual rights or activities that are at
its
discretion, including exercising its option to license the Product in North
America from XEL, pursuant to which it would pay XEL an initial license fee
of
$400,000 and up to an aggregate of $2.8 million in additional payments upon
the
achievement of certain milestones.
The
Company may also incur additional expenses in connection with its agreement
with
Numoda Corporation (“Numoda”). Following Numoda’s delivery of its analysis of
the Phase II clinical trials, the Company will pay Numoda $100,000. The Company
may be obligated to pay Numoda up to $400,000 of additional payments (a
“Deferred Payment”) if the Company enters into an agreement for the sale or
license of the Company’s products, or an agreement to merge or sell the Company
(each a “Transaction”). If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in
such a Transaction is $1,000,000 or less, the Deferred Payment will be $200,000.
If the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction is more
than
$1,000,000 but less than $5,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $250,000.
If
the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction is more than
$5,000,001 but less than $10,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $300,000.
If
the aggregate consideration paid to the Company in the Transaction is more
than
$10,000,000, the Deferred Payment will be $400,000. Additionally, the Company
will be obligated to pay Numoda a fee equal to 3.5% of the aggregate
consideration paid to the Company in a Transaction, provided that the
Transaction is completed at any time during the term of the agreement, or prior
to March 3, 2011, and Numoda has either introduced such party to the Company
or
materially assisted the Company in facilitating such a Transaction.
To
fund
the implementation of its business plan, the Company has historically engaged
in
equity financing through existing investors and potential new investors. If
the
Company does not enter into a Transaction that provides it substantial
liquidity, it may engage in additional financing efforts. Additional funds
may
not be available or not available on acceptable terms, if at all. Given the
anticipated cash expenditures, the potential cash requirements and the lack
of
sufficient cash to fully fund those expenses, the Company is continually
analyzing alternative ways in which it can preserve its cash and cash
equivalents, including the potential delay, reduction in scope of or elimination
of some of its research or development programs. If the Company is unable to
raise additional financing and is forced to take such measures, they may
materially harm the Company’s prospects, financial condition and future
operations.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the balance sheet dates, and the recognition of revenues and
expenses for the reporting periods. These estimates and assumptions are affected
by management’s application of its accounting policies.
Research
and Development Costs
All
research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include costs paid
to sponsored third parties to perform research and conduct clinical
trials.
Share-Based
Compensation
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires
the Company to record as an expense in its financial statements the fair value
of all stock-based compensation awards. The Company currently utilizes the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options
granted to employees using the “modified prospective” method. Under the
“modified prospective” method, compensation cost is recognized in the financial
statements beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of
SFAS
No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after that date, and based
on
the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all unvested awards granted prior to
the
effective date of SFAS No. 123(R).
Deferred
Compensation
In
accordance with EITF Abstract No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That
Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with
Selling, Goods or Services,” the Company initially measures the fair value of
any equity granted to consultants on the date of grant and subsequently
remeasures such grants in accordance with promulgated accounting principles
using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Amounts are initially recorded as
Deferred Compensation in the Stockholders’ Equity section of the balance sheet
and are subsequently charged to the appropriate expense over the period to
which
the service relates.
New
Authoritative Pronouncements
In
March
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement
No.
161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The new
standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments
and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors
to
better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued
for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early
application encouraged. The company is currently evaluating the impact of
adopting SFAS. No. 161 on its financial statements.
In
May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles." The new standard is intended to improve
financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for
selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements
that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) for non-governmental entities. We are currently evaluating
the
effects, if any, that SFAS No. 162 may have on our financial
reporting.
Item
3.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not
applicable.
Item
4.
Controls
and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based
on
management’s evaluation (with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)), as of the end of the period
covered by this report, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), are
effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
reported and disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated
to
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during
the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our
management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure
controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect
all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control
system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must
be
considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations
in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance
that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls.
The
design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design
will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions. Projections of any evaluation of control effectiveness to future
periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures.
PART
II.
OTHER
INFORMATION
10.1
|
|
BAU
Analysis and Partnering Letter of Intent dated March 3, 2008†
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
of 2002.
|
†
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 7, 2008.
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
Neuro-Hitech,
Inc.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 14, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Gary T. Shearman
|
|
Gary
T. Shearman
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 15, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
David J. Barrett
|
|
David
J. Barrett
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|