SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
[X] Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
Commission File No. 0-21931
AMPLIDYNE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 22-3440510
-------- ----------
(State of or other jurisdiction (IRS Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)
59 LaGrange Street
Raritan, New Jersey 08869
------------------- -----
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (908) 253-6870
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share
----------------------------------------
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of the Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]
Issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year were $1,613,732
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant, computed by reference to the closing price of such stock as of
March 31, 2003, was approximately $592,281
Number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock, as of March 31,
2003 was 9,676,500.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: None
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
General
Amplifier Products
Amplidyne, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Amplidyne" or the "Company")
designs, manufactures and sells ultra linear power amplifiers and related
subsystems to the worldwide wireless, local loop and satellite uplink
telecommunications market. These power amplifiers, which are a key component in
cellular base stations, increase the power of radio frequency ("RF") and
microwave signals with low distortion, enabling the user to significantly
increase the quality and quantity of calls processed by new and existing
cellular base stations. The Company's wireless telecommunications products
consist of solid-state, RF and microwave, single and multi-carrier power
amplifiers that support a broad range of analog and digital transmission
protocols including advanced mobile phone services ("AMPS"), code division
multiple access ("CDMA"), time division multiple access ("TDMA"), total access
communication systems ("TACS"), extended total access communication systems
("ETACS"), Nordic mobile telephone ("NMT"), global system for mobile
communications ("GSM"), digital communication service at 1800 MHz ("DCS-1800")
and wideband code division multiple access 3G communications ("W-CDMA"). The
products are marketed to the cellular, wireless local loop and personal
communication systems ("PCS") segments of the wireless telecommunications
industry.
The Company has also refined amplifier products for the 3.5 GHZ digital
data transmission systems that are presently being deployed by some major OEM's
in North America. The Company also refined its amplifier products such as the
MINI amplifier for its high-speed wireless Internet products. The Company has
had its test site in Sparta New Jersey under continuous operation for more than
3 years. The Company has been able to get reliable and successful service under
various and severe weather including rain and snow.
In the year 2002,the Company experienced a considerable downturn in its
overall business due to the general decline in the Telecommunications Industry
as well as slow down in demand for its High Speed Internet products, due to
prevailing economic conditions. Sales in the first three quarters were
particularly down, only the fourth quarter showed a recovery for us. Sales in
the fourth quarter were $550,00 (33% of sales for the year 2002). The first
three quarters generated sales totaling $1,063,732, compared to $1,838,519 for
the same period in 2001, a decrease of 42% from 2001. The Company increased its
sales and marketing and support team for the High Speed Wireless Internet
products, but due to market conditions the sales did not increase significantly
in the first three quarters. Therefore the Company began to aggressively reduce
staff and expenditures in the third and fourth quarters. The Company was unable
to raise any additional funds and as a result the Company has been operating
under severe cash flow conditions since the middle of the third quarter of 2002.
2
Amplidyne has several products covered by a patent issued by the United
States Patent and Trademark Office for Pre-Distortion and Pre-Distortion
Linearization which, the Company believes, is very effective in reducing
distortion, in amplifiers. In addition to Company's product line of single
channel power amplifiers, which are currently utilized by the wireless
communications industry, the Company also develops, designs and manufactures
Multi-carrier Linear Power Amplifiers ("MCLPAs"). MCLPAs combine the performance
capabilities of many single carrier amplifiers into one unit, eliminating the
need for numerous single carrier amplifiers and the corresponding unnecessary
space occupied by the cavity filters encasing the amplifiers. Management
believes that with its (i) proprietary technology (which effectively reduces
distortion), (ii) technological expertise and (iii) established product line
consisting of ultra linear single channel power amplifiers, the Company can
achieve similar performance with its MCLPAs. The Company's linear power
amplifiers and MCLPAs utilizes the Company's patented predistortion and
proprietary feed forward technology, which amplifies many channels with minimal
distortion at the same time with one product.
High Speed Wireless Internet Products
In 1999 the Company made its entry into the emerging wireless Internet
access market with new products in the ISM license exempt operating band (2.4 to
2.4835 GHz). The line of spread spectrum radio products has been expanded to
provide complete solutions, with designs for indoor, outdoor and hybrid
indoor/outdoor network coverage including point-to-point and
point-to-multi-point configurations.
These products include ISP Base Stations, PCMCIA radio cards, modular
customer premise equipment (CPE), micro-cells, client base station, amplifiers,
and other network components to provide a turn-key network solution. These
products are IEEE 802.11 compliant and provide high-speed internet access and
private network access from any point in the network. The Company's capabilities
include engineering design to provide coverage over a wide area. Wireless
network elements therefore provide users access from anywhere in the wireless
network. Management believes that this type of design delivers high performance
and lower operating and maintenance costs, compared to a conventional wired
network. An additional value added to a network utility is full roaming access
for portable devices anywhere in the network. The Company installed its own
wireless network in the fourth quarter of 1999 to provide a customer
demonstration system, which has proven to be successful.
The Company designs outdoor solutions specifically targeted to the ISP
market which consist of point-to-point backbones for the networks and
point-to-multi-point access to wireless clients. ISP's can order complete
turn-key systems for various applications or components for expansion and
concentration of existing networks. During 2002, Amplidyne continued offered its
"ISP in a Box" complete network start-up kit for deployment to ISPs.
3
The Company also expanded its LAN products to include a new access points,
refined gateway and high power PCMCIA radio card to support its indoor market
development and penetration into Multi-Dwelling Units ("MDUs"). The use of
discreet antennas and intelligent amplifiers has proved especially effective in
providing ubiquitous coverage in tall buildings, large atriums, and sprawling
campus applications. The SOHO package was also refined in 2002 to quickly and
easily implement simple home and small office networks without professional
installation or maintenance.
In light of the events of 2002,particularly the downsizing of the Company
and serious cash flow constraints during the year, the Company will need to
re-evaluate its products and future marketing strategy during 2003.
Historical
The Company was incorporated on December 14,1995 pursuant to the laws of
the State of Delaware as the successor to Amplidyne, Inc., a New Jersey
corporation ("Amplidyne-NJ"), which was incorporated in October 1988. The
Company was organized to effectuate a reincorporation of Amplidyne-NJ with and
into the Company on December 22, 1995. The Company maintains its executive
offices at 59 LaGrange Street, Raritan, NJ 08869 and its telephone number is
(908) 253-6870. The Company completed its initial public offering of 1,610,000
Units (each Unit consisting of one (1) share of Common Stock and one (1)
Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant ("Warrants")) in January 1997 pursuant
to firm commitment underwritten offering. The offering price was $5.10 per Unit.
The Warrants were redeemed in May 2000. Prior to redemption, 124,871 Warrants
were exercised. The Common Stock trades on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board under the
symbol AMPD.OB.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain information contained in this Annual Report is forward-looking
statements (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).
Factors set forth that appear with the forward-looking statements, or in the
Company's other Securities and Exchange Commission filings, could affect the
Company's actual results and could cause the Company's actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on
behalf of, the Company in this Annual Report. In addition to statements, that
explicitly describe such risks and uncertainties, readers are urged to consider
statements labeled with the terms "believes," "belief," "expects," "intends,"
"estimate," "project," "may," "will," "should," continue," "anticipates" or
"plans" to be uncertain and forward-looking. The forward-looking statements
contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties
that are described from time to time in the Company's reports and registration
statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
risks described in Part I-Risk Factors. Such potential risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to: the ability to increase revenues and reduce
operating losses; the successful deployment and sale of products; the successful
distribution of our products in the marketplace; the successful expansion of
business with sales made by ISPs; managing expansion; dependence on a limited
number
4
of customers; reductions, delays or cancellations in orders from new or existing
customers; potential deterioration of business and economic conditions in the
Company's customers marketplaces; new product development and product
obsolescence; potential deterioration of the Company's customers credit quality
due to deteriorating economic conditions in the Company's customers
marketplaces; a limited number of potential customers; intensely competitive
industry with increasing price competition; successful development of strategic
partnerships globally; reliance on certain key personnel; variability in gross
margins on new products and resulting impacts on operating results; continued
success in the design of new products and the ability to manufacture in quantity
such new products; continued favorable business conditions and growth in the
wireless communications market; and dependence on certain suppliers for
single-sourced components. In addition, prior financial performance and customer
orders are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the
future and the Company believes that such comparisons cannot be relied upon as
indicators of future performance. Due to the foregoing factors, the Company
believes that period-to-period comparisons of its operating results are not
necessarily meaningful and that such comparisons cannot be relied upon as
indicators of future performance. Additionally, the Company undertakes no
obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these
forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances
occurring after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events.
Wireless Local Loop Amplifier Products
The Company has continued to refine its wireless local loop amplifier
products during 2002. These products operate in the NMT 450 band. The Company
designed a prototype amplifier for the 3.5 GHz band for a major North American
OEM customer during 2000 and refined the products during 2001, and has been
manufacturing products during 2002. The Company expects to obtain future orders
for its NMT450 and 3.5GHz amplifiers during 2003 as systems get deployed.
Cellular Systems
A cellular system consists of a number of cell sites that are networked to
form a cellular system operator's geographic coverage area. Each cell site has a
base station which houses the equipment that transmits and receives telephone
calls between the cellular subscriber within the cell and the switching office
of the local wireline telephone system. Such base station equipment includes an
antenna and a series of transceivers, power amplifiers and cavity filters. Large
cell sites, which generally cover a geographic area of up to five miles in
radius, are commonly referred to as "macrocells."
The ability of cellular system operators to increase system capacity
through the use of microcells is largely dependent on their ability to broadcast
multiple signals with acceptable levels of interference and distortion. In
cellular systems, the amplifier is generally the greatest source of signal
interference and distortion, particularly with multi carrier high power
amplifiers. Consequently, obtaining amplifiers that can transmit and
5
receive multiple signals with low distortion or interference from adjacent
signals ("high spectral purity") is critical to a cellular system operator's
ability to increase system capacity. Substantial resources and technical
expertise are required to design and manufacture multi carrier power amplifiers
with high spectral purity. To achieve high spectral purity, multi carrier
amplifier systems must have high interference cancellation properties.
The Company believes that the potential opportunities for wireless
communication services in countries without reliable or extensive wireline
systems may be even greater than in countries with developed telecommunication
systems. The Company has developed and refined its products for this market such
as the 2.4 GHz and 3.5 GHz wireless local loop amplifiers and the NMT-450
products. As a result of these developments, the Company has continued to obtain
orders for these products from its customers, including major OEMs and expects
to continue to do so in 2003.
The Company's satellite amplifier products are used to amplify the signal,
which is being transmitted from the ground up to the satellite. The
manufacturers of satellite communications equipment operate in commercial
markets such as television broadcast services and commercial military
communications. Amplidyne has also provided amplifiers for terrestrial radio
systems, which are used, for television and audio signal transmission.
Company Strategy
Utilizing its proprietary, patented technology and experience in
interference cancellation, the Company is pursuing a strategy, focused on the
need of cellular, wireless local loop and PCS system operators, to develop
technologically advanced amplifier based products. The Company has recently
developed products which address the technical issues faced by such system
operators as a result of the spots of growth in wireless telephone use
(cellular, NMT-450 and wireless local loop) particularly in developing
countries, while a general downward trend has remained in the Telecommunications
market.
The Company's products have been evaluated and successfully deployed in the
OEM systems. However, due to market conditions, the Company expects the 3.5GHz
products to be given priority in the near future by its OEM customers.
Management believes that with its predistortion technology and the linear
capability of its core amplifier technology, the Company can achieve similar
performance from a multicarrier amplifier which others achieve by using dual
feed forward loops; this results in much higher component count within the
amplifier unit and may result in poor reliability for such products, compared to
predistortion based feed forward amplifiers which use fewer components and
thereby have a high reliability.
The Company's business strategy focuses primarily on the wireless
communication market and consists of the following elements:
6
Wireless Internet Products. The Company's high-speed wireless Internet
products have been successfully deployed since 1999. Our wireless Internet
products are aimed at four market segments: (a) Hospitality and Multi-Dwelling
Units (MDU) including hotels and condominiums, (b) enterprise, corporate and
education campuses (c) Internet Service Provider (ISP) networks, (d) Small
Office/Home Office (SOHO),
Increase Penetration of Wireless Equipment Manufacturers. Since 1991, the
Company has positioned itself as a supplier of amplifier products to large
wireless telecommunications OEMs. Amplidyne seeks to capitalize on its existing
customer relationships and become a more significant source of its customers'
amplifiers by working closely with OEM customers to offer innovative solutions
to technical requirements and problems. Amplidyne has demonstrated its 3.5 GHz
and 450 MHz single and multichannel products to OEM's during 2002. The Company
intends to pursue this market segment during 2003. There can be no assurance
that the Company will be successful since some of the Company's competitors have
vast financial, technical and marketing resources.
Maintain a Technology Edge. In management's belief the Company, with its
innovative products, has been addressing the needs of its customers for products
that solve significant technical problems. The Company believes its interference
cancellation technologies are among the most advanced that are commercially
available in the industry, both in performance and diversity of methodology. The
Company utilizes proprietary and patented pre-distortion technology and
proprietary feed forward interference cancellation technology in its linear
power amplifiers and MCLPAs to enable the user to significantly increase the
quality and quantity of calls processed by new and existing cellular base
stations. The Company intends to continue to maintain resources in research and
development associated with its interference cancellation technologies. The
Company has continued its development on 3.5GHz, NMT-450, 3G (Third Generation)
amplifiers and wireless local loop products during 2002.
Develop Innovative Proprietary Products. To date, the Company has focused
its efforts in the development of amplifier products which are highly
innovative, and which are not the standard "commodity" type product. In
addition, the Company believes that it has compiled an extensive design library
in the solid-state, high power amplifier industry utilizing its proprietary and
patented technology and expertise in interference cancellation. The Company has
developed and intends to continue to develop products, which combine basic
components in unique and high performance configuration to command higher prices
in the wireless communications market. In addition, the Company has adapted this
expertise for new commercial market applications and product requirements and
develops products for the NMT-450, 3G (Third Generation) and wireless local loop
markets.
Provide Support from Product Design through Installation and Operation. The
Company works with its customers throughout the design process to assist them in
7
refining and developing their amplifier specifications. Once the specifications
have been met and the product delivered, Amplidyne continues to provide
technical support to facilitate system integration, start-up and continued
operation. By providing customer support services from the product design phase
through installation and operation, management believes it fosters increased
levels of customer loyalty and satisfaction. In addition, through this process,
the Company believes it will develop new product definitions and implementations
to further enhance the strategic position of the Company in the wireless market.
Maintain Control of the Manufacturing Process. Amplidyne has consistently
analyzed in house automated manufacturing versus the use of subcontracted
manufacturers in order to control its production schedule. The Company installed
automated manufacturing equipment in the first quarter of 2000, to enhance its
manufacturing process for NMT-450 and wireless local loop amplifiers and other
related products. In certain instances, Amplidyne has made the strategic
decisions to select single or limited source suppliers in order to obtain lower
pricing, receive more timely delivery and maintain quality control.
The Amplidyne Advantage
The Company believes that its products have several features, which
differentiate them from those of its competitors, such as:
The Predistortion Solution. Utilizing its proprietary technology the
Company can obtain significant distortion reduction in its core amplifiers. This
enables the pre-distorted amplifier to have feed forward correction (which is
described below, see "Technology") applied to it to achieve distortion
cancellation.
Superior Distortion and Spurious Cancellation Resulting in Ultra Linear
High Power Amplifiers. The Company believes the use of MCLPAs is critical in the
implementation of new cellular systems and upgrade of older analog systems.
Cellular systems need to cover large areas with minimum hardware in order to
minimize cost per subscriber. Reduction of the distortion and spurious signals
from the amplifiers is a key enabling technology. Amplidyne has developed
proprietary interference cancellation technology using multiple methods to
achieve high suppression of spurious output and distortion typically associated
with higher power amplifiers. . The Company's single channel amplifiers have
also been well received in the industry, however, the Company has experienced
more competition in this area. The Company is seeking to position itself to be a
viable source in this area. The Company constantly monitors such situations and
will employ resources to explore such opportunities, as financing permits.
By utilizing its proprietary and patented predistortion technology and its
proprietary feed forward technology, the MCLPAs amplification capacities of the
Company's amplifiers are, in management's belief, among the best in the
industry.
8
Linearity, Low Distortion and High Amplification. Wireless service
providers' ability to manage scarce spectrum resources more effectively and
accommodate large numbers of subscribers is largely dependent on their ability
to broadcast signals with high linearity, which pertains to the ability of a
component to amplify a wave form without altering its characteristics in
undesirable ways. Linear amplifiers allow signals to be amplified without
introducing spurious emissions that might interfere with adjacent channels.
Higher linearity increases the capacity of cellular systems by enabling a more
efficient use of digital transmission technologies, micro-cellular architectures
and adaptive channel allocation. In current cellular systems, the power
amplifier is generally the source of the greatest amount of signal distortion.
Consequently, obtaining power amplifiers with high linearity and low distortion
is critical to wireless service providers' ability to improve spectrum
efficiency.
The Company has several products covered by a patent issued by the United
States Patent and Trademark Office, which we believe, gives us a significant
advantage over our competitors.
Multicarrier Designs. Multicarrier amplification, in which all channels are
amplified together by a MCLPA, rather than each channel using a separate
amplifier, allows for instantaneous electronic channel allocation. Functionally,
it combines many single channel power amplifiers, into a single unit, thereby
eliminating the single channel power amplifiers and the corresponding tunable
cavity filters. MCLPAs require significantly higher linearity compared to single
channel designs.
By virtue of the Company's high linearity products which incorporates
pre-distortion and feed forward technology achieving, in management's belief,
among the lowest distortion in the industry, the MCLPA amplified signal remains
within their prescribed band and spectrum with low interference of adjacent
channels thus providing flexibility to accommodate any frequency plan.
Wireless Internet Products. One of the key components in the wireless
Internet access system is the bi-directional tower top amplifier. We also have
considerable experience in the design, development and deployment of fixed
broadband amplifier products. The amplifier has to operate reliably in an
outdoor application. Our expertise in this area is an advantage over competitors
who are required to purchase their amplifiers from outside sources.
We also have considerable know-how of other related products such as
antennas, filters, power supplies and digital control circuits. We are therefore
able to offer a turnkey solution to ISP's, providing indoor and outdoor
networking support using our existing resources. We have a cost advantage
because we manufacture our own amplifiers, which we can, if necessary, rapidly
refine and change.
We intend to refine our products as needed and in a timely fashion in order
to obtain market share.
9
High Quality, Reliability and Customer Support. The Company believes that
the power amplifier in cell sites historically has been the single most common
point of equipment failure in wireless telecommunications networks. Increasingly
reliable power amplifiers, therefore, will improve the level of service offered
by wireless service providers, while reducing their operating costs. In
addition, MCLPAs eliminate the need for high-maintenance; tunable cavity filters
that should further reduce costs.
The Company works closely with its customers throughout the design process
in refining and developing their amplifier specifications. The Company uses the
latest equipment and computer aided design and modeling, solid-state device
physics, advanced digital signal processing ("DSP") and digital control systems,
in the development of its products in their specialized engineering and research
departments. The integration of the Company's design and production is a factor
in the Company's ability to provide its customers with high reliability, low
distortion and low maintenance amplifiers.
Technology
Wireless Transmit Technology. A typical wireless communications system
comprises a geographic region containing a number of cells, each with a base
station, which are networked to form a service provider's coverage area. Each
base station or cell site houses the equipment that transmits and receives
telephone calls to and from the cellular subscriber within the cell and the
switching office of the local wire line telephone system. Such equipment
includes a series of transceivers, power amplifiers, tunable cavity filters and
an antenna. In a single channel system, each channel requires a separate
transceiver, power amplifier and tunable cavity filter. The power amplifier
within the base station receives a relatively weak signal from the transceiver
and significantly boosts the power of the outgoing wireless signal so that it
can be broadcast throughout the cell. The radio power levels necessary to
transmit the signal over the required range must be achieved without distorting
the modulation characteristics of the signal. The signal must also be amplified
with linearity in order to remain in the assigned channel with low distortion or
interference with adjacent channels.
Because cellular operators are allocated a small RF spectrum and certain
channels, it is necessary to make efficient use of the spectrum to enable
optimum system capacity. By amplifying all channels with minimum distortion at
the same time, rather than inefficient use of single channel amplification, one
obtains better system capacity. A MCLPA combines the performance capabilities of
many single carrier amplifiers into one unit, eliminating the need for numerous
single carrier amplifiers and their corresponding tunable cavity filters. These
MCLPAs require less space than multiple single channel amplifiers and their
corresponding tunable cavity filters, which reduce the size and cost of a base
station.
MCLPAs create distortion products, which can cause adjacent channel
interference. The minimization of these distortion products requires
sophisticated technology. This is accomplished through interference cancellation
techniques such as "predistortion" and "feed forward" accompanied by highly
advanced control and
10
processing technology. The Company has developed certain proprietary technology
and methods to achieve minimal distortion in its amplifiers, technically called
predistortion and feed forward correction. The Company uses three distinct
technologies (A) Linear class A and AB amplifiers, (B) Predistorted class A and
AB amplifiers and (C) Predistortion feed forward amplifiers. The Company's
proprietary leading edge products contain patented predistortion and proprietary
feed forward technology combined in a proprietary automatic correction
technique.
All amplifiers create distortion when they are run at a high power level.
In an ideal case the output of the amplifier would faithfully reproduce the
input signal without any distortion. In real life, however, distortion
characteristics are produced. These distortion products can cause interference
with another caller's channel, which in turn produces poor call quality. By
using a simple, patented technology, Amplidyne recreates the distortion for the
amplifier in such a manner to cancel the interference signals.
Feed forward cancellation involves taking the distortion created by the
amplifier and processing it in such a way that when it is added back into the
amplifier having been pre-distorted and combined with the feed forward
technology, distortion cancellation occurs. The Company believes that its
patented technology has the most unique and potent technology for distortion
cancellation. Furthermore, Amplidyne has selected linear class AB technology for
its base amplifier which it believes also has superior distortion
characteristics compared to other competitors because it is easier to
pre-distort. Thus the three key ingredients (a) Linear class A and AB
amplifiers, (b) Predistortion technology and (c) Feed forward technology enables
Amplidyne to produce MCLPAs for its major OEM customers.
The Company's wireless Internet access products consist of point-to-point
and point to multipoint indoor and outdoor units that can be configured to
provide broad coverage over a city or region or to create coverage in an indoor
space with free roaming access.
At the remote site an indoor or outdoor LAN system can be connected using a
single channel CPE or Access Point, with various antennae combinations.
Amplifiers are used for range extension purposes.
Markets
The market for wireless communications services has grown substantially
during the past decade as cellular wireless local loop, PCS and other new and
emerging applications (such as W-CDMA) have become increasingly accessible and
affordable to growing numbers of consumers. The growth of these markets has
decreased substantially over the last year or so, decreasing the demand for the
Company's products, although the Company cannot predict trends in these markets.
11
Cellular Market. The market for cellular communications still accounts for
a fairly large portion of the wireless services. The general downturn in this
segment decreased demand for amplifier products during 2002.
Wireless Local Loop. Wireless local loop systems are increasingly being
adopted in developing markets to more quickly implement telephone and Data
communication services. In certain developing countries, wireless local loop
systems provide an attractive alternative to copper and fiber optic cable based
systems, with the potential to be implemented more quickly and at lower cost
than wireline telephone systems. The Company designs, manufactures and markets
MCLPAs and single channel amplifiers for infrastructure equipment systems in the
wireless local loop market in the 2 and 3.5 GHz bands.
Wireless Internet Access Market. The Company's products are aimed at four
market segments: (a) Hospitality and Multi-Dwelling Units (MDU) including hotels
and condominiums, (b) enterprise, corporate and education campuses (c) Internet
Service Provider (ISP) networks, (d) Small Office/Home Office (SOHO).
Custom Communications and Other Markets. The custom communications market
consists of small niche segments within the larger communications market:
long-haul radio communications, land mobile communications, surveillance
communications, ground-to-air communications, microwave communications,
broadband communications and telemetry tracking. The Company sells custom
amplifiers and related products to these segments.
Products
The Company designs and sells multi-carrier transmit amplifiers and low
noise receive amplifiers for the cellular communications market, as well as the
PCS and wireless local loop segments of the wireless communications industry.
The Company also provides a large number of catalog and custom amplifiers to
OEMs and to other customers in the communications market in general. In
addition, the Company also sells a complete line of fixed broadband wireless
networking and LAN products for private networks, virtual private networks and
Internet access.
o Multicarrier Linear Power Amplifiers (MCLPAs). When a cellular or PCS user
places a call, the call is processed through a base station, amplified, and
then transmitted on to the person receiving the call. Therefore, all base
stations require amplifiers (MCLPAs) whether they are being used for
cellular, PCS or 3G (Third Generation) local loop applications. Amplidyne
designs and manufactures these amplifiers. The objective is to provide a
quality product at a good price and to have exemplary reliability.
Management believes that Amplidyne's products with its patented
pre-distortion technology; core linear amplifier technology and proprietary
feed forward technology achieve all of the objectives mentioned above.
Amplidyne's MCLPAs are a unique line of ultra linear devices, which utilize
a proprietary pre-distortion and phase locked feed forward architecture.
12
o Wireless Internet Products. The Company's wireless Internet products
operate in the 2.4 GHz ISM band using Direct Sequencing Spread Spectrum
technology.
o High Power Linear Amplifiers. Amplidyne's product line of linear amplifiers
have a high third order intercept point, which translates to better call
quality. These high power amplifiers are supplied as modules or plug in
enclosures. The communication bands available are NMT-450, AMPS, TACS,
ETACS and PCS. The output power ranges from 1 to 200 Watts. These
amplifiers can be used in instances where service providers only need a
single transmit channel.
o 3G (Third Generation) Amplifier Development. The Company held a live
demonstration of its 4channel ultra-linear 3G amplifier at the CTIA expo in
March of 2002.Deployment of this Technology has been delayed; the Company
is maintaining contact with its customers for future opportunities.
o Local Loop and Mini Cell Amplifiers. Local loop and mini cell amplifiers
are designed with a proprietary circuit to achieve a high IMD
specification, which translates to better call quality through the mini
cell. These amplifiers can be ordered as modules or in a rack
configuration.
o Low Noise Amplifier, Cellular, PCN, PCS, GSM. Amplidyne's low noise
amplifiers are manufactured with a mix of silicon and GaAsFET devices.
These amplifiers offer the user the lowest noise and the highest intercept
point, while maintaining good efficiency. Received calls at a base station
are low in level due to the fact that hand held cellular phones typically
operate at half a watt power level. This weak signal has to be amplified
clearly which is done by using Amplidyne's low noise amplifier. All
amplifiers undergo a 72-hour burn-in period to ensure reliable filed
operation.
o Communication Amplifiers. These amplifiers are designed for cellular and
PCN/PCS applications and use GaAs or Silicon Bipolar FET devices. The
transmit amplifiers are optimized for low distortion products. Custom
configurations are available for all communication amplifiers. This line of
products is aimed at the single channel base station users employing the
digital cellular standards (CDMA and TDMA).
The Company's wireless telecommunications amplifiers can be configured as
modules separate plug-in amplifier units or integrated subsystems. The Company's
products are integrated into systems by OEM customers, and therefore must be
engineered to be compatible with industry standards and with certain customer
specifications, such as frequency, power, linearity and built-in test (BIT) for
automatic fault diagnostics.
13
Product Warranty
The Company warrants new products against defects in materials and
workmanship generally for a period of one (1) year from the date of shipment. To
date, the Company has not experienced a material amount of warranty claims.
Backlog/Future Orders
The Company regularly reviews its backlog (which includes projected future
orders from customers) that it expects to ship over the next 12 months. We have
had to change schedules and delay orders depending on customer needs. Customer
schedules or requirements may frequently change and in some cases result in
cancellation of orders, in response to which the Company has to change its
production schedule. Changes and cancellations exist since, among other matters,
the wireless communications industry is characterized by rapid technological
change, new product development, product obsolescence and evolving industry
standards. In addition, the decline in the Telecommunications industry resulted
in low activity in the first three quarters of 2002. Only the fourth quarter
showed somewhat of a recovery for sales of our products. The outlook for 2003
has improved, however some uncertainty remains to the extent of the recovery and
its sustainability. This uncertainty may lead to postponement or cancellation of
future or current orders. In addition, as technology changes, corporations are
frequently requested to update and provide new prototypes in accordance with new
specifications if products become obsolete or inferior. Therefore, the Company
has been focusing on strategic partnerships to provide better quality solutions
to our partners with higher margin sales opportunities.
As of December 31, 2002, the Company had signed purchase orders for
approximately $500,000. The Company expects to ship these products during the
first quarter of 2003. In the present state of the Telecommunications Industry
there is a reluctance of companies to commit to large blanket orders. We expect
to see this trend, of just in time orders, to continue during 2003. The Company
would like to stress, although useful for scheduling production, backlog as of
any particular date may not be a reliable indicator of sales for any future
period. The Company expects sales to improve during the first half of 2003 as
compared to the half of 2002.
The Company expects to continue to ship products to its major OEM customers
during 2003 at the levels or above the levels of 2002.
The acquisition of certain of the Darwin assets in 2001 (which included
access to hotels) and the Company venturing into the "hospitality" market in
2001 was new to the Company and turning this venture into a success depended
largely on the Company being able to dispose of some of the assets rapidly in a
"bulk" sale. The value of some of these assets has decreased with time. These
products are being sold under the Ampwave product line.
14
Customers, Sales & Marketing
Customers. The Company markets its products worldwide generally to wireless
communications manufacturers (OEMs) and communications system operators. The
table below indicates net revenues derived from customers in the Company's
markets in 2001 and 2002.
Net Revenues By Market Categories
(In thousands)
Year Ended
December 31,
---------------
2001 2002
---- ----
Amplifier Markets
Cellular Analog and digital $ 267.5 264.5
Wireless Telephony 1,361.3 711.1
Satellite Communications, Custom and other Products 170.0 57.0
Digital PCS Products 0 0
Ampwave Market
Wireless Internet Products. And Broadband solutions 406.2 581.0
Total $2,205.0 $1,613.6
Wireless Telephony. Sales to the wireless telephone segments of the wireless
communications industry have decreased from approximately 62% of total revenues
for fiscal year end 2001 to approximately 44% of total revenue for the fiscal
year end 2002.
* Wireless Internet and Broadband solutions. The Company shipped
products to its customers in 2002 with total sales for the year of
$581,613, which accounts for approximately 36% of total revenues. The
Company sold some of its Darwin Hotel assets and inventory during
2002.
* International Sales. Sales of wireless products outside the United
States (primarily to Western Europe and Canada represented
approximately 81% and 62% of net sales during fiscal 2001 and fiscal
2002, respectively.
15
* Sales and Marketing. The Company reduced its sales and marketing force
considerably during 2002.The Company's officers and sales and
marketing consultants maintain significant contact with key customers,
ensuring close technical liaison with customer engineers and
purchasing managers. The Company's High Speed Wireless Internet
products generated sales of approximately 36% of total revenues for
2002.
Competition
Amplifier Products
The ability of the Company to compete successfully and operate profitably
depends in part upon the rate of which OEM customers incorporate the Company's
products into their systems. The Company believes that a substantial majority of
the present worldwide production of power amplifiers is captive within the
manufacturing operations of a small number of wireless telecommunications OEMs
and offered for sale as part of their wireless telecommunications systems. The
Company's future success is dependent upon the extent to which these OEMs elect
to purchase from outside sources rather than manufacture their own amplification
products. There can be no assurance that OEM customers will incorporate the
Company's products into their systems or that in general OEM customers will
continue to rely, or expand their reliance, on external sources of supply for
their power amplification products. Since each OEM product involves a separate
proposal by the amplifier supplier, there can be no assurance that the Company's
current OEM customers will not rely upon internal production capabilities or a
non-captive competitor for future amplifier product needs. The Company's OEM
customers continuously evaluate whether to manufacture their own amplification
products or purchase them from outside sources. These OEM customers are large
manufacturers of wireless telecommunications equipment who could elect to enter
the non-captive market and compete directly with the Company. Such increased
competition could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Certain of the Company's competitors have substantially greater technical,
financial, sales and marketing, distribution and other resources than the
Company and have greater name recognition and market acceptance of their
products and technologies. In addition, certain of these competitors are already
established in the wireless amplification market, but the Company believes it
can compete with them effectively. No assurance can be given that the Company's
competitors will not develop new technologies or enhancements to existing
products or introduce new products that will offer superior price or performance
features. To the extent that OEMs increase their reliance on external sources
for their power amplification needs more competitors could be attracted to the
market.
The Company expects its competitors to offer new and existing products at
prices necessary to gain or retain market share. The Company expects to
experience significant
16
price competition, which could have a materially adverse effect on gross
margins. Certain of the Company's competitors have substantial financial
resources, which may enable them to withstand sustained price competition or
downturns in the power amplification market. Currently, the Company competes
primarily with non-captive suppliers of power amplification products. The
Company believes that its competition, and ultimately the success of the
Company, will be based primarily upon service, pricing, reputation and the
ability to meet the delivery schedules of its customers.
High Speed Wireless Internet Products
The Company has targeted its products to segments: (a) Hospitality and
Multi-Dwelling Units (MDU) including hotels and condominiums, (b) enterprise,
corporate and education campuses (c) Internet Service Provider (ISP) networks,
and (d) Small Office/Home Office (SOHO). The Company first derived significant
revenue from these products during 2001, and this market accounted for
approximately 36% of the total sales for the year 2002.
The Company has relied on being able to work strategically with its partners and
consultants, as well as its own engineers to develop and refine its products.
The Company has taken some risks in introducing products to certain sectors by
providing samples and system trials, which in certain cases may not result in
revenues. The vast majority of ISP's are in need of capital to grow their
businesses and in certain cases may not be able to obtain such financing.
Manufacturing
The Company assembles, tests, packages, and ships its products at its
manufacturing facilities located in Raritan, New Jersey. This facility includes
a separate assembly and test facility for various custom products.
The Company's manufacturing process consists of purchasing components,
assembling and testing components and subassemblies, integrating the
subassemblies into a final product and testing the product. The Company's
amplifiers consist of a variety of subassemblies and components designed or
specified by the Company including housings, harnesses, cables, packaged RF
power transistors, integrated circuits and printed circuit boards. Most of these
components are manufactured by others and are shipped to the Company for final
assembly. Each of the Company's products receives extensive in process and final
quality inspections and tests.
The Company's devices, components and other electrical and mechanical
subcomponents are generally purchased from multiple suppliers. The Company does
not have any written agreement with any of its suppliers. The Company has
followed a general policy of multiple sourcing for most of its suppliers in
order to assure a continuous flow of such supplies. However, the Company does
purchase certain transistors produced by a single manufacturer because of the
high quality of its components. The Company believes it is unlikely that such
transistors would become
17
unavailable, however, if that were to occur, there are multiple manufacturers of
generally comparable transistors. The Company would require a period of time to
"return" its products to function properly with the replacement transistors. The
Company believes that the distributors of such transistors maintain adequate
inventory levels, which would mitigate any adverse effect on the Company's
production in the event unavailability or shortage of such transistors. If for
any reason the Company could not obtain comparable replacement transistors or
could not return its products to operate with the replacement transistors, the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations could be
adversely affected.
The Company currently utilizes discrete circuit technology on printed
circuit boards, which are designed by the Company and provided by suppliers to
the Company's specifications. All transistors and other semiconductor devices
are purchased in sealed packages ready for assembly and testing. Other
components such as resistors, capacitors, connectors or mechanical supported
subassemblies are also manufactured by others. Components are ordered from
suppliers under master purchase orders with deliveries timed to meet the
Company's production schedules. As a result, the Company maintains a low
inventory of components, which could result in delay in production in the event
of delays in such deliveries.
The Company purchased automated surface mount machinery ("SMT") to enhance
its manufacturing ability for amplifiers as well as wireless internet products,
which was installed during the first quarter of 2000. The equipment has provided
improved efficiency in production and faster turn around for certain products.
The Company has started to manufacture some of the products for its High Speed
Wireless Internet products.
The Company manufacturers some of its High Speed Wireless Internet products
and amplifiers in its New Jersey facility and the rest in offshore facilities,
which are ISO 9001, certified.
Research, Engineering and Development
The Company's research, engineering and development efforts are focused on
the design of amplifiers for new protocols, the improvement of existing product
performance, cost reductions and improvements in the manufacturability of
existing products.
The Company has historically devoted a significant portion of its resources
to research, engineering and development programs The Company's research,
engineering and development expenses in fiscal 2001 and 2002 were approximately
$593,823 and $406,614, respectively, and represented approximately 27% and 25%,
respectively, of net revenues. These efforts were primarily dedicated to the
development of the linear feed forward, high power, low distortion amplifiers,
resulting in the Company's models for 3Gand refinements to its bi-directional
amplifier, Client Base Station, ISP Base Station and Microcell for its wireless
internet
18
systems and other high speed wireless internet products. During the third and
fourth quarters of 2002 the Company significantly reduced its costs by staff and
consulting reductions.
During the first half of 2002, the Company was able to maintain its
research and development costs by being able to develop significant products in
house, thereby, minimizing commitments to outside suppliers and consultants. The
Company did, however, incur consulting fees regarding the development of the
High Speed Wireless Internets Products.
The Company uses the latest equipment and computer aided design and
modeling, solid-state device physics, advanced digital signal processing ("DSP")
and digital control systems, in the development of its products in the
specialized engineering and research departments.
The Company uses a CAD environment employing networked workstations to
model and test new circuits. This design environment, together with the
Company's experience in interference cancellation technology and modular product
architecture, allows the Company to rapidly define, develop and deliver new and
enhanced products and subsystems sought by its customers.
The markets in which the Company and OEM customers compete are
characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and
continuous improvements in products and services.
Patents, Proprietary Technology and Other Intellectual Property
The Company's ability to compete successfully and achieve future revenue
growth will depend, in part, on its ability to protect its proprietary
technology and operate without infringing the rights of others. The Company has
a policy of seeking patents, when appropriate, on inventions resulting from its
ongoing research and development and manufacturing activities.
Presently, the Company has been granted a patent (No. 5,606,286) by the
United States Patent and Trademark Office with respect to its Pre-Distortion and
Pre-Distortion Linearization technology which, the Company believes, is more
effective in reducing distortion then other currently available technology.
There can be no assurance that the Company's patent will not be challenged or
circumvented by competitors.
Notwithstanding the Company's active pursuit of patent protection, the
Company believes that the success of its amplifier business depends more on its
specifications, CAE/CAD design and modeling tools, technical processes and
employee expertise than on patent protection. The Company generally enters into
confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with its employees and limits
access to and distribution of its proprietary technology. The Company may in the
future be notified that it is infringing certain patent and/or other
intellectual property rights of others. Although there are no such pending
lawsuits against the Company or unresolved notices that the Company is
19
infringing intellectual property rights of others, there can be no assurance
that litigation or infringement claims will not occur in the future. The
Company's wireless internet access products are marketed under the trademark
Ampwave(TM)
Governmental Regulations
The Company's customers must obtain regulatory approval to operate their
base stations. The United States Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has
regulations that impose more stringent RF and microwave emissions standards on
the telecommunications industry. There can be no assurance that the Company's
customers will comply with such regulations, which could materially adversely
affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company manufactures its products according to specifications provided by
its customers, which specifications are given to comply with applicable
regulations. The Company does not believe that costs involved with manufacturing
to meet specifications will have a material impact on its operations. There can
be no assurances that the adoption of future regulations would not have a
material adverse affect on the Company's business.
Employees
As of December 31, 2002, the Company had a total of 14 employees, 9 in
operations, 2 in engineering, 3 in administration; the Company employs 2
consultants in sales andmarketing. The employee headcount was reduced
significantly in the third and fourth quarters of 2002, from 33 employees and 3
consultants during the second quarter, to the present levels. The Company
believes its future performance will depend in large part on its ability to
retain highly skilled employees. None of the Company's employees is represented
by a labor union and the Company has not experienced any work stoppages. The
Company considers its employee relations to be good.
Environmental Regulations
The Company is subject to Federal, state and local governmental regulations
relating to the storage, discharge, handling, emissions, generation, manufacture
and disposal of toxic or other hazardous substances used to manufacture the
Company's products. The Company believes that it is currently in compliance in
all material respects with such regulations. Failure to comply with current or
future regulations could result in the imposition of substantial fines on the
Company, suspension of production, alteration of its manufacturing process,
cessation of operations or other actions which could materially and adversely
affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
20
In addition to other information in this Annual Report, the following
important factors should be carefully considered in evaluating the Company and
its business because such factors currently have a significant impact on the
Company's business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below before investing in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones
facing our company. Other risks and uncertainties that we have not predicted or
assessed may also adversely affect our company.
Some of the information in this Annual Report contains forward-looking
statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify
these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect,"
"anticipate," "believe,' "intend," "estimate," and "continue" or other similar
words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully for the
following reasons:
o the statements may discuss our future expectations;
o the statements may contain projections of our future earnings or of
our financial condition; and
o the statements may state other "forward-looking" information.
We believe it is important to communicate our expectations to our
investors. There may be events in the future, however, that we are not
accurately able to predict or over which we have no control. The risk factors
listed below, as well as any cautionary language in or incorporated by reference
into this Annual Report, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events
that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we
describe in our forward-looking statements. Before you invest in our company,
you should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in the
risk factors below, elsewhere in or incorporated by reference into this Annual
Report and other events that we have not predicted or assessed could have a
material adverse effect on our earnings, financial condition or business. In
such case, the trading price of our securities could decline and you may lose
all or part of your investment.
We Have a Recent History of Losses and Expect Losses to Continue. We have
incurred net losses of $2,024,882 and $2,380,027 for the years ended December
31, 2001 and 2002, respectively. These losses were due, in large part, to the
research, engineering and development costs associated with the creation of our
line of multicarrier linear power amplifiers, sales and marketing efforts and
high speed wireless internet products and stock compensation costs for the use
of stock or stock options to obtain services or to obtain financing. We have
made commitments to vendors to purchase hardware for use in our wireless
internet systems. We may need to cancel such orders, and the inability to do so
may result in material losses to the company. We expected to have increased
sales in this area to compensate for the expenses, however
21
we have reduced staff levels, therefore there is no guarantee that this will
happen. The need for high bandwidth products may lead to rapid product
obsolescence. With our reduced staff levels, we may not be able to compete.
Further, we have not generated sufficient sales volume to cover our overhead
costs and generate profits. We have minimized losses by staff reduction; this
could result in loss of market share from which we may not be able to recover.
We expect that our losses will increase and will continue until such time, if
ever, as we are able to successfully manufacture and market our products on a
larger scale and therefore generate higher profit margins. We will need to
generate a substantial increase in revenues to become profitable. Accordingly,
we cannot assure you that we will ever become or remain profitable. In addition,
we had an accumulated deficit$21,949,679 as of December 31,2002.
Other factors may cause us to incur additional losses. We have experienced
a down turn in our amplifier and High Speed Wireless Internet Access business
due to the worldwide recession in the telecommunications market, and general
lack of funding to Wisp's and corporate spending restraints. We may also not be
able to sell-off certain of our Darwin assets or inventory, which will further
contribute to our losses (or lower sales). We need to update our high speed
wireless internet access products and amplifier products, but may not be able to
accomplish this given the losses we have sustained and the capital that is
required. Finally, we may not be able to collect certain Ampwave receivables,
which will further cause us to sustain additional losses. In addition, we lost a
lawsuit in May 2002 (See Risk Factors - We lost a lawsuit which brought a jury
verdict against us and will need to use funds to make the required settlement
payments, which will have an adverse effect on our cash position.
The report from our independent auditors includes an explanatory paragraph
regarding the doubt of the Company to continue as a going concern. The auditors'
report on the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2002 includes an explanatory paragraph stating that our losses, lack of cash and
otherwise limited financial resources raise substantial doubt about our ability
to continue as a going concern. The risk that we may not be able to continue in
existence may limit our ability to access certain types of financing, or may
prevent us from obtaining financing on acceptable terms.
We Will Require Additional Financing. We believe that collections of our current
accounts receivable and sales in 2003, together with loans from an officer, will
be adequate to fund our operations for at least three to four months. However,
we will require additional financing during fiscal 2003. We have considerable
accounts payable and accrued professional fees, which have aged considerably and
need to be paid to avoid further undesirable collection action by vendors or
even litigation. We have issued our common stock, when available to us, in lieu
of cash payment of officer's salaries, commissions and consulting fees, although
we may not be able to continue this practice. If additional financing is needed,
we cannot be sure that such financing will be available to us on acceptable
terms or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we will have to further
reduce our operations, resulting in delays, scale back or elimination of our
research, engineering and development or manufacturing programs, or we may have
22
to cease operation entirely. To raise funds through arrangements with partners
or others may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our technologies,
potential products or other assets. Thus, our inability to obtain the necessary
financing will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and operations.
Terrorist Attacks Or Acts Of War May Seriously Harm Our Business. Terrorist
attacks or acts of war may impact our revenues, expenses and financial
condition. The terrorist attacks that took place in the United States on
September 11, 2001 were unprecedented events that have created many economic and
political uncertainties, some of which may materially and adversely affect our
business, results of operations, and financial condition. The potential for
future terrorist attacks, the national and international responses to terrorist
attacks, and other acts of war or hostility have created many economic and
political uncertainties, which could materially and adversely affect our
business, results of operations, and financial condition in ways that we
currently cannot predict.
We Lost a Lawsuit, Which Brought a Jury Verdict Against Us. In connection with
the complaint brought in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division,
Somerset County, by High Gain Antenna Co. Ltd. of Korea, a trial commenced on
May 7, 2002, and on May 13, 2002, the jury brought in a verdict against us for
$400,000. A settlement was reached, whereby we agreed to pay $200,000 in cash
and to issue 700,000 shares of common stock. $75,000 has been paid to date and
$25,000 is required to be paid quarterly until the balance is paid in full. If
Amplidyne fails to make any payment when the same is due or within the fifteen
(15) day cure period, then High Gain shall have the right to execute on the
outstanding balance due under the $400,000 judgment, after crediting the value
of the shares of stock transferred which shall be valued at $105,000 and
crediting all payments made. High Gain will also be able to levy and execute its
judgment, which will have an adverse effect on the company and may jeopardize
our ability to continue to operate.
Our Success Relies Upon The Growth of Wireless Telecommunications Services.
The demand for our products will depend in large part upon continued and growing
demand within the wireless telecommunications industry for power amplifiers and
our high speed wireless internet access products. During 2002 a major downturn
occurred in the Telecommunications market and recovery may not occur for a year
or two, therefore the demand for our products will remain subject to great
uncertainty from quarter to quarter.
Our Limited Lack of Automated Manufacturing Processes and Our Dependence on
Third Party Manufacturers Could Adversely Affect Our Business. We have
consistently reviewed our automated manufacturing needs in order to control our
production schedule. To date, we have not established a fully automated
manufacturing facility although we have purchased an automated surface mount
machine and reflow process oven. Our wireless internet products are manufactured
at offshore facilities, which are our sole suppliers. Until such time as we are
able to establish such facilities, we expect to be dependent on third party
manufacturers. We cannot be sure
23
that these third party manufacturers will be able to fulfill our production
commitment. Furthermore, we do not have written agreements with these
manufacturers. Our inability to obtain timely deliveries of acceptable
assemblies could delay our ability to deliver products to our customers, and
would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, if these manufacturers increase their
production costs, we may not be able to recover such cost increases under the
fixed price commitments with our customers.
Our Limited Number of Suppliers Could Adversely Affect Our Business. Power
transistors and certain other key components used in our products for our
amplifiers, as well as our wireless internet business are currently available
from only a limited number of suppliers. Certain of our suppliers have limited
operating histories and limited financial and other resources. Our suppliers may
prove to be unreliable sources of certain components. Furthermore, we have no
written agreements with our suppliers. In the past, we have not purchased key
components in large volumes but anticipate that our need for component parts
will increase. If we are unable to obtain sufficient quantities of components,
particularly power transistors, we could experience delays or reductions in
product shipments. Such delays or reductions could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, such delays or reductions may have a material adverse effect on
our relationships with customers and result in the termination of existing
orders and/or a permanent loss in our future sales. Our wireless internet
products are manufactured at offshore facilities. The lack of supply from this
source due to any reason could adversely impact our business.
Our Success Will Rely On Our Ability To Enter Into Strategic Partnerships.
We are currently developing and expect to continue to develop strategic
partnerships and other relationships in order to expand our business. The
failure to successfully develop such relationships could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and result of operations.
Our Success Relies on a Small Number of Customers and Our Sales Orders Have
Had a High Degree of Delays and Cancelled Orders. In 2001, approximately 74% of
our net sales were derived from two customers (62% and 12%). In 2002,
approximately 62% of our net sales were derived from two customers (44% and
18%). In the past few years we have experienced reductions, delays and
cancellations in orders from our new and existing customers, we anticipate that
sales of our products to relatively few customers will account for a majority of
our 2003 revenues. . The reduction, delay or cancellation of orders from one or
more of our significant customers would materially and adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operation. Moreover, we may experience
significant fluctuations in net sales, gross margins and operating results in
the future as a result of the uncertainty of such sales.
24
Our Limited Marketing Experience (Particularly for our High Speed Wireless
Internet Products), May Adversely Affect Our Business. We are not sure whether
our marketing efforts will be successful or that we will be able to maintain
competitive sales and distribution capabilities. In addition, we have limited
experience in the marketing and sales of our wireless internet products, and
cannot be certain that this sector will grow in revenue as expected,
particularly with our reduced staff levels.
Management of our Company Owns a Significant Amount of our Outstanding
Common Stock. Our officers, directors and persons who may be deemed our
affiliates beneficially own, in the aggregate, and have the right to vote
approximately 24% of our issued and outstanding common stock, not including
common stock options they may own. Accordingly, such holders may be in a
position to affect the election of all of our directors and control our company.
We May Not Be Able To Comply In A Timely Manner With All Of The Recently
Enacted Or Proposed Corporate Governance Provisions. Beginning with the
enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in July 2002, a significant number
of new corporate governance requirements have been adopted or proposed. Although
we currently expect to comply with all current and future requirements, we may
not be successful in complying with these requirements at all times in the
future. In addition, certain of these requirements will require us to make
changes to our corporate governance practices. For example, one Nasdaq proposal
(which may become applicable to companies listed on the OTC Bulletin Board, or
its successor, the BBX Exchange) under review by the Securities and Exchange
Commission will require that a majority of our Board of Directors be composed of
independent directors by our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Currently, two
of the members of our Board of Directors are considered to be independent. We
may not be able to attract a sufficient number of directors in the future to
satisfy this requirement, if enacted and if it becomes applicable to our
Company. Additionally, the Commission recently passed a final rule that requires
companies to disclose whether a member of their Audit Committee satisfies
certain criteria as a "financial expert" We currently do not have an Audit
Committee member that satisfies this requirement and, we may not be able to
satisfy this, or other, corporate governance requirements at all times in the
future, and our failure to do so could cause the Commission or Nasdaq to take
disciplinary actions against us, including an action to delist our stock from
the OTC Bulletin Board or any other exchange or electronic trading system where
our shares of common stock trade.
Our Success Depends on Our Ability to Manage the Size of Our Operations. We
downsized some of our operations in order to maintain competitiveness and reduce
our operating losses. We have also explored joint ventures and mergers in order
to achieve these results, but have not consummated any such transaction. If we
do not increase our sales, decrease overhead expenditure or do not adequately
manage the size of our operations, our results of operations will be materially
adversely affected.
25
Declining Average Sales Prices Could Adversely Affect Our Business. If
wireless internet and telecommunications customers come under increasing price
pressure from service providers, we could expect to experience downward pricing
pressure on our products. In addition, competition among non-captive amplifier
suppliers could increase the downward pricing pressure on our amplifier
products. To date, we have not experienced such pressure. As our customers
frequently negotiate supply arrangements with us far in advance of product
delivery dates, we often must commit to price reductions before we can determine
whether cost reductions can be obtained. If we are unable to achieve cost
reductions, our gross margins will decline and our business, financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Rapid Technological Change and Intense Competition Could Adversely Affect
Our Business. The wireless internet and telecommunications equipment industry is
extremely competitive and is characterized by rapid technological change, new
product development, product obsolescence and evolving industry standards. In
addition, price competition in this market is intense and characterized by
significant price erosion over the life of a product. Currently, we compete
primarily with non-captive suppliers of power amplification products. We believe
that our success will be based primarily upon service, pricing, reputation, and
our ability to meet product delivery schedules. Our existing and potential
customers continuously evaluate whether to manufacture their own amplification
products or to purchase such products from outside sources. These customers and
other large manufacturers of wireless telecommunications equipment could elect
to enter the market and compete directly with us. Many of our competitors have
significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, sales and marketing
capabilities and research and development personnel and other resources than us
and have achieved greater name recognition of their existing products and
technologies. In order for us to successfully compete, we must continue to
develop new products, keep pace with advancing technologies and competitive
innovations and successfully market our products. Our inability to successfully
compete against our larger competitors will have a materially adverse affect on
our business, financial condition and operations.
In addition, we are not sure whether new products or alternative technology
will render our current or planned products obsolete or inferior. Rapid
technological development by others may result in our products becoming obsolete
before we recover a significant portion of the research, development and
commercialization expenses we incurred with respect to those products.
Our Business Will Be Adversely Affected if We Do Not Keep Up With the
Internet's Rapid Technological Change, Evolving Industry Standards and Changing
User Requirements. To be successful, we must adapt to our rapidly changing
market by continually enhancing the technologies used for Internet access. If we
are unable, for technical, legal, financial or other reasons, to adapt in a
timely manner in response to changing market conditions or user requirements,
our business could be materially adversely affected. Significant issues
concerning the commercial use of Internet technologies, including security,
reliability, cost, ease of use and quality of service, remain unresolved and may
inhibit the growth of businesses relying on the
26
Internet. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to meet these
challenges. Among the most important challenges facing us is the need to:
o effectively use established technologies;
o continue to develop our technical expertise; and
o respond to emerging industry standards and other technical changes.
All of these changes must be met in a timely and cost-effective manner. We
cannot assure you that we will succeed in effectively meeting these challenges
and our failure to do so could materially and adversely affect our business.
Risks Associated with Sales Outside of the United States May Adversely
Affect Our Business. International sales represented approximately 85% and 66%
of our net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002,
respectively. We expect that international sales will continue to account for a
significant portion of our net revenues in the future. To the extent that we do
not achieve and maintain substantial international sales, our business, results
of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely
affected.
Sales of our products outside of the United States are denominated in US
dollars. An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign
currencies would make our products more expensive and, therefore, potentially
less competitive outside the United States. Additional risks inherent in our
sales abroad include:
o the impact of recessionary environments in economies outside the
United States;
o generally longer receivables collection periods;
27
o unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
o tariffs and other trade barriers;
o potentially adverse tax consequences;
o reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;
o the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.
These factors may have an adverse effect on our future international sales
and, consequently, on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our Operating Results May Vary From Quarter to Quarter in Future Periods,
and As A Result, Our Stock Price May Fluctuate or Decline. Our quarterly
operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future due to a variety of
factors that could affect our revenues or our expenses in any particular
quarter. Factors that may affect our quarterly results include:
o our ability to attract and retain customers;
o development of competitive products;
o the short term nature of manufacturing and engineering orders to date;
o unforeseen changes in operating expenses;
o the loss of key employees; and
o unexpected revenue shortfalls.
A substantial portion of our operating expenses is related to personnel
costs and overhead, which we cannot adjust quickly and are therefore relatively
fixed in the short term. Our operating expense levels are based, in significant
part, on our expectations of future revenues on a quarterly basis. If actual
revenues are below our expectations, our results of operations and financial
condition would be materially and adversely affected because a relatively small
amount of our costs and expenses are proportionate with revenues in the short
term.
Due to all of the foregoing factors and the other risks discussed in this
Annual Report, it is possible that in some future periods our results of
operations may be below the expectations of investors and public market analysts
which may cause our stock price to fluctuate or decline.
We Are Dependent Upon Management and Technical Personnel. Our success is
highly dependent upon the continued services of Devendar Bains, our Chief
Executive Officer .The employment agreement terminates April 30, 2005 and
contains certain covenants not to compete against our company following
termination of employment with our company. We have obtained key man insurance
on the life of Mr. Bains in the amount of $1,000,000. We cannot be sure whether
we will be able to replace. Mr. Bains if his services become unavailable or,
whether the proceeds of such insurance would be adequate to compensate us for
the loss of his services.
Due to the specialized nature of our business, we are highly dependent on
the continued service of, and on our ability to attract and retain, qualified
technical and marketing personnel, particularly those involved in the
development of new products and processes and the manufacture and enhancement of
our existing products. In addition, as part of our team-based sales approach, we
dedicate specific design engineers to service the requirements of individual
customers. The loss of any such engineer could adversely affect our ability to
obtain future purchase orders from the customers to which such engineer was
dedicated. We have employment or non-competition agreements with most of our
current design engineers and test technicians. The competition for such
personnel is intense, and the loss of any such persons, as well as the failure
to recruit additional key technical personnel in a timely manner, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We rely on the Ability to Protect Proprietary Technology; Risk of Third
Party Claims of Infringement May Affect Our Business. Our ability to compete
successfully and achieve future revenue growth will depend, in part, on our
ability to protect proprietary technology and operate without infringing upon
the rights of others. Although there are no pending lawsuits regarding our
technology or notices that we are
28
infringing upon intellectual property rights of others, litigation or
infringement claims may occur in the future. Such litigation or claims could
result in substantial costs, and diversion of resources and could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations. We generally enter into confidentiality and non-disclosure
agreements with our employees and limit access to and distribution of
proprietary information. However, we cannot be sure whether such measures will
provide adequate protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary
information, or whether our trade secrets or proprietary technology will
otherwise become known or independently developed by our competitors. Our
failure to protect proprietary technology could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We Do Not Plan To Pay Dividends On Our Common Stock. We have never paid any
dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future. Any earnings that we may realize in the
foreseeable future will be retained to finance our growth.
Governmental Regulations and Environmental Regulations Can Have a Large
Impact on Our Business. Our customers must obtain regulatory approval to operate
their base stations. The United States Federal Communications Commission has
regulations that impose stringent radio frequency and microwave emissions
standards on the telecommunications industry. Our customers are required to
comply with such regulations. The failure of our customers to comply with these
regulations could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations. We manufacture products according to specifications
provided by our customers, which specifications are required to comply with
applicable regulations. We do not believe that costs involved with manufacturing
to meet specifications will have a material impact on our operations. We cannot
be sure whether the adoption of future regulations would have a material adverse
affect on our business.
We are subject to Federal, state and local governmental regulations
relating to the storage, discharge, handling, emissions, generation, manufacture
and disposal of toxic or other hazardous substances used to manufacture our
products. We believe that we are currently in compliance in all material
respects with such regulations. Failure to comply with current or future
regulations could result in the imposition of substantial fines on our company,
suspension of our production, alteration of our manufacturing process, cessation
of our operations or other actions, which could materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Limited Public Market and Trading Market May Cause Volatility in Our
Stock Price. There has only been a public market for our common stock since
January 1997 and we are not sure whether an active trading market in our common
stock will ever be maintained. In the absence of such a market, you may find it
more difficult to sell our common stock. In addition, the stock market in recent
years has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have
particularly affected the market prices of many smaller and technology based
companies. The trading price of our common stock
29
is expected to be subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations
in our quarterly operating results; changes in analysts' earnings estimates
regarding our Company; announcements of technological innovations by us or our
competitors; and general conditions in the wireless communications industry and
other factors. These fluctuations, as well as general economic and market
conditions, may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common
stock.
Penny Stock Regulations May Impose Certain Restrictions on Marketability of
Our Securities. The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define a "penny
stock" to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per
share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions. Since our common stock is listed on The NASD OTC Electronic Bulletin
Board, it is subject to the definition of "penny stock and is subject to the
"penny stock" rules. These rules impose additional sales practice requirements
on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established
customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of
$1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with their
spouse). For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must:
o Make a special suitability determination with respect to each purchaser of
securities;
o Receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the
purchase;
o Deliver, prior to the purchase, a risk disclosure document mandated by the
SEC relating to the penny stock market;
o Disclose the commission payable to both the broker-dealer and the
registered representative;
o Disclose current quotations for such securities;
o Disclose whether the broker-dealer has control over the particular market;
and
o Deliver monthly statements disclosing recent price information for the
securities and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
Consequently, the "penny stock" rules may restrict the ability of
broker-dealers to sell our securities and adversely affect your ability to sell
our securities in the secondary market and the price of our securities in the
secondary market.
There Are Risks Associated With Our Stock Trading On The NASD OTC Bulletin
Board Rather Than A National Exchange. There are significant consequences
associated with our stock trading on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board rather than a
national exchange. The effects of not being able to list our securities on a
national exchange include:
o Limited release of the market prices of our securities;
o Limited news coverage of us;
o Limited interest by investors in our securities;
o Volatility of our stock price due to low trading volume;
30
o Increased difficulty in selling our securities in certain states due to
"blue sky" restrictions;
o Limited ability to issue additional securities or to secure financing.
Anti-Takeover Provisions May Adversely Affect the Value of Our Outstanding
Securities. Pursuant to our Certificate of Incorporation, our Board of Directors
may issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock in the future with such
preferences, limitations and relative rights as they may determine without
stockholder approval. The rights of the holders of our common stock will be
subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any
preferred stock outstanding or that may we may issue in the future. The issuance
of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible
acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change in control of our company without further action by the
stockholders. In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 203 prohibits us
from engaging in a "business combination" with an "interested stockholder" for a
period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the persons
became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in
a prescribed manner. The application of Section 203 also could have the effect
of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company.
31
Additional Authorized Shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock Available
for Issuance May Adversely Affect the Market. We are authorized to issue
25,000,000 shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2002, there were
9,676,500 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, which amount does
not include:
o (1) 20,000 exercisable at $1.00 through May 2010
o (2) 20,000 exercisable at $7.00 through December 2004
o (3) 30,000 exercisable at $6.00 through November 2004
o (4) 50,000 exercisable at $2.00 through December 2004
o (5) 50,000 exercisable at $4.00 through December 2004
o (6) 16,000 exercisable at $1.75 through December 2004
o (7) 41,500 exercisable at $1.80 through July 31, 2004
o (8) 207,500 exercisable at $3.00 through July 31, 2004
o (9) 55,000 exercisable at $1.20 through September 30, 2004
o (10) 300,000 exercisable at $2.00 through December 31, 2005
o (11) 75,000 exercisable at $.96 through March 2007
o (12) 80,000 exercisable at $1.50 through December 2004.
o 2,051,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of options
granted to our employees and Directors at exercise prices ranging between
$0.20 and $4.00 per share.
As of December 31, 2002, after reserving a total of 2,996,000 shares of our
common stock for issuance upon the exercise of all options and warrants
described above, we will have at least 12,327,500 shares of authorized but
unissued common stock available for issuance without further shareholder
approval. Any issuance of additional shares of our common stock may cause our
current shareholders to suffer significant dilution, which may adversely affect
the market for our securities.
In addition, we have 1,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock. While
we have no present plans to issue any additional shares of preferred stock, our
Board of Directors has the authority, without shareholder approval, to create
and issue one or more series of such preferred stock and to determine the
voting, dividend and other rights of holders of such preferred stock. The
issuance of any of our preferred stock could have an adverse effect on the
holders of our common stock.
Shares Eligible for Future Sale May Adversely Affect the Market. As of
December 31, 2002 we had 9,676,500 shares of our common stock issued and
outstanding. Of these 9,676,500 shares of issued and outstanding common stock,
approximately 6,292,143 shares are considered "restricted securities". These
"restricted securities" may be sold pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act
of 1933 as follows:
32
o Approximately 6,283,894 shares of our common stock may currently be sold
pursuant to Rule 144;
o Approximately 8,159 shares of our common stock may be sold pursuant to Rule
144 commencing June 2003
Rule 144 provides, in essence, that a person holding "restricted
securities" for a period of one year may sell only an amount every three months
equal to the greater of:
(a) One percent of the Company's issued and outstanding shares; or
(b) The average weekly volume of sales during the four calendar weeks
preceding the sale.
The amount of "restricted securities" which a person who is not an
affiliate of our company may sell is not so limited. Non-affiliates may sell
without volume limitation their shares held for two years if there is adequate
current public information available concerning our company.
The sale in the public market of our common stock may adversely affect
prevailing market prices of our common stock.
The Exercise of Outstanding Options and Warrants May Adversely Affect the
Market for Our Common Stock. As of December 31, 2002, we had the following
outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock:
(1) 20,000 exercisable at $1.00 through May 2010
(2) 20,000 exercisable at $7.00 through December 2004
(3) 30,000 exercisable at $6.00 through November 2004
(4) 50,000 exercisable at $2.00 through December 2004
(5) 50,000 exercisable at $4.00 through December 2004
(6) 16,000 exercisable at $1.75 through December 2004
(7) 41,500 exercisable at $1.80 through July 31, 2004
(8) 207,500 exercisable at $3.00 through July 31, 2004
(9) 55,000 exercisable at $1.20 through September 30, 2004
(10) 300,000 exercisable at $2.00 through December 31, 2005
(11) 75,000 exercisable at $.96 through March 2007
(12) 80,000 exercisable at $1.50 through December 2004.
In addition, we have reserved 2,051,000 shares of our common stock for
issuance pursuant to outstanding employee stock options. The exercise of our
outstanding options and warrants will dilute the percentage ownership of our
stockholders. Sales in the public market of our common stock underlying such
options or warrants may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common
stock. Moreover, the terms upon which we will be able to obtain additional
equity capital may be adversely affected since the holders of such outstanding
securities can be expected to exercise their respective rights therein at a time
when we would, in all likelihood, be able to obtain any needed capital on terms
more favorable to us those provided in such securities.
33
Limitation on Director Liability May Adversely Affect the Value of our
Common Stock. As permitted by Delaware law, our Certificate of Incorporation
limits the liability of our directors for monetary damages for breach of their
fiduciary duty except for liability in certain instances. As a result of our
charter provision and Delaware law, you may have limited rights to recover
against our directors for breach of their fiduciary duty.
Item 2. PROPERTIES.
The Company leases (from an unaffiliated party) approximately 11,000 square
feet, at 59 LaGrange Street, Raritan, NJ 08869, which serves as the Company's
executive offices and manufacturing facility. The lease term expires on July 13,
2004. The annual rental is $71,250 plus the Company's share of real estate taxes
and other occupancy costs.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Other than as set forth below, the Company is not a party to any material
pending litigation or governmental proceedings that, management believes, would
result in judgments or fines that would have a material adverse effect on the
Company.
The Company is a party to the following matters:
1. HIGH GAIN ANTENNA CO., LTD. OF KOREA
The Company (as well as an officer and director of the Company) was a defendant
in a complaint brought in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division,
Somerset County, by High Gain Antenna Co., Ltd. of Korea in November 2000. The
complaint sought damages for an alleged breach of a contract for the repair of
certain equipment purchased by plaintiff from a distributor of the Company's
products and the Company. A trial commenced on May 7, 2002, and on May 13, 2002,
the jury brought in a verdict against the Company for $400,000. The Company
filed a motion in the Law Division for a new trial, which was denied, and gave a
notice of appeal of the verdict and judgment to the Superior Court of New
Jersey, Appellate Division. 2. A stipulated settlement was signed on January
3,2003.According to the settlement the Company would pay $200,000 in cash, to be
paid in installments. $75,000 has been paid to date; the balance of $125,000 has
to be paid in quarterly payments of $25,000. The Company also issued 700,000
shares of common stock.
34
2. AMPLIDYNE, INC. V. WAYNE FOGEL, DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, INC. AND
INTERNET NETWORK CORPORATION
On May 30, 2002, the Company filed a two-count lawsuit against the above
mentioned defendants in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset
County, seeking, among other things, declaratory relief that the Company is not
obligated to pay a finders fee (in connection with the Company's purchase of the
Darwin Assets), and that the Company is entitled to monetary damages as a result
of defendant's false misrepresentations. On July 10, 2002, the matter was
removed to the United States District Court of New Jersey but later transferred
back to the United States Bankruptcy Court and then transferred to the United
States District Court of New Jersey. On July 29, 2002, defendants filed a
counterclaim seeking $200,000 in damages as a result of a finders fee agreement.
In January 2003, the matter was transferred to the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida. The defendants sought a further transfer to
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, but such
motion was denied. Although the Company is confident in its position, it cannot
predict the outcome of the case and any negative outcome may have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial position or prospects.
3. The Company was served with class action complaints on behalf of all
purchasers of the Company's common stock and warrants between September 9, 1999
and September 14, 1999. By orders of the District Court for the District of New
Jersey, the actions were consolidated and lead plaintiffs were appointed. On or
about March 24, 2000, the Company was served with a consolidated and amended
class action complaint on behalf of purchasers of the Company's common stock and
warrants between September 9, 1999 and September 17, 1999. That complaint
alleged that the Company and other individuals violated the federal securities
laws by, among other things, the issuance of a press release on September 9,
1999. Although the Company believed that the complaint had no merit and
vigorously contested it, the Company and the other parties to the class action
reached a settlement on May 2, 2001, which was approved by the District Court
for the District of New Jersey on August 14, 2001 (which became effective on
September 14, 2001) Pursuant to the settlement agreement, a settlement fund
consisting of $750,000 in cash ($50,000 of which was paid directly by the
Company) was established for the benefit of members of the class. In addition,
the Company issued 324,486 freely tradable shares of its common stock (which was
valued at $500,000 as of May 2, 2001) on behalf of the class members. The
Company had recorded the cost of the litigation, including a credit to
Additional Paid-In Capital for the value of the settlement that has been settled
by the issuance of common stock. In addition the Company is subject to an SEC
formal order of private investigation relating to the subject matter of the
class action. The Company has responded to the SEC requests. In April 2003, the
SEC indicated that it intends to file a civil complaint against the Company and
Devendar S. Bains. The Company and Mr. Bains are negotiating with the SEC in an
attempt to reach a consensual resolution of this matter.
Item 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders
There were no matters submitted to a vote of stockholders in 2002.
35
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The Company's Common Stock and Warrants commenced trading on the Nasdaq
Small Cap Market on January 22, 1997. The Warrants were redeemed in May 2000.
The Common Stock was regularly quoted and traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market
under the symbol AMPD, through January 13, 2003. Since January 14, 2003, the
common stock trades on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol AMPD.OB.
The following table sets forth the range of high and low closing prices for
the Company's Common Stock for fiscal years 2001 and 2002 and for the period of
January 1, 2003 up to March 31, 2003 as reported by the Nasdaq SmallCap Market,
or the NASD OTCBB, as the case may be. The trading volume of the Company's
securities fluctuates and may be limited during certain periods. As a result,
the liquidity of an investment in the Common Stock may be adversely affected.
Common Stock
2001 Calendar Year
------------------
High Low
January 1-March 31 2.78 1.250
April 1-June 30 1.95 1.13
July 1-September 30 1.57 .79
October 1-December 31 1.25 .69
2002 Calendar Year
------------------
January 1 - March 31 1.37 .86
April 1-June 30 1.07 .58
July1-September 30 .57 .10
October 1-December 31 .28 .08
2003 Calendar Year
------------------
January 1-March 31 .15 .05
On March 31, 2003, the closing price of the Common Stock as reported on the NASD
OTCBB was $.08. On March 31, 2003 there were 9,676,500 shares of Common Stock
outstanding, held of record by approximately 80 record holders (with over 2,300
beneficial owners).
36
Item 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
Results of Operations - Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2002 compared to
Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2001.
Revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 decreased by $591,696
from $2,205,428 to $1,613,732, or 27% compared to the fiscal year ended December
31, 2001. The primary reason for the decrease was the general decline in
purchasing of equipment by the telecommunications industry. The decline is
largely represented by the decrease in sales to European customers, which went
down to $711,861 in 2002 from $1,361,316 in 2001, a decrease of $649,455 or 48%.
Sales substantially declined in the first three quarters of 2002. Fourth quarter
sales represented approximately 33% of the total sales for the year ($531,200).
Coupled with the staff reductions and other aggressive cost cuts, the fourth
quarter losses were significantly reduced.
The majority of the amplifier sales for the year ended December 31, 2002
were obtained from the Wireless Local Loop amplifier products to a major
European customer. The Company has also supplied 3.5GHz linear amplifiers to its
major North American customer.
The Company has continued to develop its IMT 2000 amplifiers for the
worldwide 3G market, however, deployment of this technology has been delayed.
The Company has focused its sales and marketing efforts in the more stable
United States, European and Canadian markets.
Cost of sales was $1,520,237 or 94% of sales (including an inventory
write-down of $233,995) during the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to 58%
during the same period for 2001. Our fixed overhead costs are relatively high
for our current sales volume. Excluding the inventory write-down, the cost of
sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $1,286,242 or 80% of sales. The
decline in gross margin was principally attributable to pricing pressures caused
by business conditions in the telecommunications industry and a write-down of
obsolete inventory in the 3rd quarter of 2002 of $233,995. Gross margin
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2001 because of lower amplifier sales
resulting in higher fixed direct costs and lower margins for the high-speed
wireless Internet products. The Company is continuing to assess cost reduction
of its products and sales volume increases to improve gross margins in 2003.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding stock based
compensation) increased in 2002 by $183,943 to $2,088,433 from $1,904,490, in
2001. Expressed as a percentage of sales, the selling, general and
administrative expenses (excluding stock based compensation) were 129% in 2002
and 86% in 2001. The principal factors contributing to the increase in selling,
general and administrative expenses were related to increases in bad debts and
salaries, offset by labor cutbacks and general cost cutting in the 3rd and 4th
quarters.
37
Research, engineering and development expenses were 25% of net sales in
2002 compared to 27% in 2001. In 2002 and 2001, the principal activity of the
business related to the design and production of product for OEM manufacturers,
particularly for the IMT 2000 and 3.5 GHz single channel products and
refinements to the High Speed Internet products. The research, engineering and
development expenses consist principally of salary cost for engineers and the
expenses of equipment purchases specifically for the design and testing of the
prototype products. The Company's research and development efforts are
influenced by available funds and the level of effort required by the
engineering staff on customer specific projects.
The Company had interest income and other income in 2001 of $50,915 due to
influx of new capital during 2000 and 2001 from our private placements and
exercise of warrants and options. Interest income went down to $3,170 in 2002
because our cash balances which we have historically temporarily invested in
interest bearing accounts declined by $709,879 and interest rates went down.
This is a decline of approximately 102%. Interest income declined by $47,745 or
approximately 94% , which is consistent with the steady decline in cash balances
and interest rates in 2002. The Company also sold New Jersey Net operating loss
carryforwards pursuant to the New Jersey Technology Certificate Transfer
Program, receiving $163,687 in 2002 and $189,744 in 2001.
Interest expense was $932 in 2002 compared to $864 in 2001 and principally
related to balances due on capitalized leases for testing equipment.
Actual and estimated litigation settlement costs (see financial statement
Note I - Litigation) have been provided in both 2002 and 2001, to reflect our
known exposure in litigation against the Company, as well as the actual cost of
the settlement of the following matters:
o Class action lawsuit in 2001 with a cash cost of $50,000 to the
Company plus the issuance of free-trading common shares valued at
$500,000.
o Settlement of the High Gain Antenna matter for $200,000 plus 700,000
shares of restricted common stock of the Company (total charge
$229.400).
o Because of the remoteness of any further assertions in another matter,
we determined that the charge of $85,000 from 2001 should be reversed
in 2002.
Stock compensation and financing expenses of $140,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2001 is due to the financing cost associated with warrants extended
and shares issued. There was no stock compensation cost for 2002.
As a result of the foregoing, the Company incurred net losses of $2,380,027
or $0.25 per share for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared with net losses
of $2,024,882 or $0.26 per share for the same period in 2001.
38
Results of Operations - Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2001 compared to
Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2000
Revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 decreased from
$2,595,090 to $2,205,429, or 15% compared to the fiscal year ended December 31,
2000. The primary reason for the decrease was the general decline in purchasing
of equipment by the telecommunications industry. The decline is largely
represented by the decrease in sales to Canadian customers, which went down to
$264,488 in 2001 from $666,069 in 2000, a decrease of $401,581 or 60%.
The majority of the sales for the year 2001 were obtained from the Wireless
Local Loop amplifier products to a major European customer. The Company has also
supplied 900 MHz cellular multi carrier linear amplifiers to its major North
American customer, as well as 3.5GHz amplifiers for the wireless local loop
products.
The Company has continued to develop its IMT 2000 amplifiers for the
worldwide 3G market, however, deployment of this technology has been delayed.
The Company has focused its sales and marketing efforts in the more stable
United States, European and Canadian markets. It is maintaining a more cautious
approach towards the South Korean market due to the significant currency
fluctuations and purchase order cancellations during the past few years in South
Korea.
Cost of sales as a percentage of sales was 58% during the year ended
December 31, 2001, compared to 95% during the same period for 2000. This
decrease can be attributed to the decrease in the costs of certain components of
our products with selling prices to customers remaining relatively stable and to
the maturation of our manufacturing processes resulting in substantial
reductions in production costs. The stability of our selling prices, combined
with the decline of component costs, improved manufacturing efficiencies through
automation and the reduction in subcontracted work resulted in our higher gross
profits. Our fixed overhead costs are relatively high for our current sales
volume. The increase in inventory held at year-end was in part due to component
purchases in anticipation of orders from our major amplifier customers. Lead
times for imported finished products and components required advance stocking
for certain essential items. The Company is continuing to assess cost reduction
of its products and sales volume increases to improve gross margins in 2002.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding stock based
compensation) decreased in 2001 by $81,680 to $1,904,490 from $1,986,170, in
2000. Expressed as a percentage of sales, the selling, general and
administrative expenses were 86% in 2001 and 77% in 2000. The principal factors
contributing to the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses
were related to decreases in advertising, depreciation and professional fees.
Research, engineering and development expenses were 27% of net sales in
2001 compared to 23% in 2000. In 2001 and 2000, the principal activity of the
business related
39
to the design and production of product for OEM manufacturers, particularly for
the IMT 2000 and 3.5 GHz single channel products. The research, engineering and
development expenses consist principally of salary cost for engineers and the
expenses of equipment purchases specifically for the design and testing of the
prototype products. Research, engineering and development expenses remained
relatively unchanged from 2000 to 2001. The Company's research and development
efforts are influenced by available funds and the level of effort required by
the engineering staff on customer specific projects.
The Company had interest income and other income in 2001 of $50,915 due to
influx of new capital during 2000 and 2001 from our private placements and
exercise of warrants and options. Interest income went down because our cash
balances which we have historically temporarily invested in interest bearing
accounts declined by $1,268,000. This is a decline of approximately 65%.
Interest income declined by approximately 56%, which is consistent with the
steady decline in cash balances and interest rates in 2001, compared to
increases balances in 2000. The Company also sold New Jersey Net operating loss
carryforwards pursuant to the New Jersey Technology Certificate Transfer
Program, in both 2001 and 2000.
Interest expense decreased in 2001 because of the decrease in balances due
on capitalized leases on test equipment.
Estimated and actual litigation settlement costs have been provided in both
2001 and 2000, to reflect our estimated or known exposure in litigation against
the Company, as well as the actual cost of the settlement of a class action
lawsuit in 2001 with a cash cost of $50,000 to the Company plus the issuance of
free-trading common shares valued at $500,000. See financial statement Note I -
Litigation.
Stock compensation and financing expenses of $140,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2001 compared to $114,546 for the comparable 2000 period is due to
the financing cost associated with warrants extended and shares issued.
As a result of the foregoing, the Company incurred net losses of $2,024,882
or $.26 per share for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared with net losses
of $2,440,045 or $.34 per share for the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to
meet our needs. We have been generating the cash necessary to fund our
operations from continual loans from the President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, Devendar Bains. We have incurred a loss in each year since
inception.. It is possible that we will incur further losses, that the losses
may fluctuate, and that such fluctuations may be substantial. As of December 31,
2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $21,949,679. Potential immediate sources
of liquidity are loans from Mr. Bains. Another potential source of liquidity is
the sale of restricted shares of our common stock, but there are no immediate
plans for such sale.
40
As of December 31, 2002, our current liabilities exceeded our cash and
receivables by $533,254. Our current ratio was 1.43 to 1.00, but our ratio of
accounts receivable to current liabilities was only 0.45 to 1.00. This indicates
that we will have difficulty meeting our obligations as they come due. We are
carrying $926,713 in inventory, of which $489,542 represents component parts.
Based on last years usage, we are carrying 186 days worth of parts inventory.
Because of the lead times in our manufacturing process, we will likely need to
replenish many items before we use everything we now have in stock. Accordingly,
we will need more cash to replenish our component parts inventory before we are
able realize cash from all of our existing inventories.
As of December 31, 2002, we had an overdraft of $11,939 compared to cash
and cash equivalents of $697,940 at December 31, 2001. Overall our cash and cash
equivalents went down $709,879 during 2002. Our cash used for operating actives
was $1,587,122, which was funded by loans and salary deferrals by
officer/stockholders of $155,200 and proceeds from private placements of
$724,201 (including collection of subscriptions receivable at December 31, 2001)
as well as using up all of the cash we started the year with of $697,940.
The allowance for doubtful accounts on trade receivables increased form
$131,104 (23% of accounts receivable of $580,294) in 2001 to $143,000 (25%of
accounts receivable of $583,506) in 2002. Because of our relatively small number
of customers and low sales volume, accounts receivable balances and allowances
for doubtful accounts do not reflect a consistent relationship to sales. We
determine our allowance for doubtful accounts based on a specific
customer-by-customer review of collectiblity. In 2001, we had several large
outstanding balances that we had doubt we would collect. In 2002, we concluded
that several of those doubtful accounts were in fact not collectible and they
were charged off against the previously established reserve. Because of the
general decline in business in the telecommunications sector, we had to write
off even more accounts in 2002. Bad debts expense increased from $67,592 in 2001
to $291,471 in 2002, even though the reserve increased only slightly by $11,896,
because of the direct write-offs during the year.
Our inventories decreased by $254,969 to $926,713 in 2002 compared to
$1,181,682 in 2001, a decrease of 22% We believe that the reasons for the
decreased inventories were primarily due to the write-down in the 3rd quarter of
2002 of $233,995.
During 2002 we raised $540,000 from the privately placed sale of securities
and collected $180,000 from subscriptions receivable for our preferred stock
offering at December 31, 2001 for a total of $720,000. During 2001, the Company
raised $1,054,750 ($180,000 of which was collected in 2002) from the privately
placed sale of securities and from the exercise of warrants and options, which
were used for working capital purposes. The Company has several lease
obligations for its premises and certain equipment and an automobile requiring
minimum monthly payments of approximately $5,900 through
41
2004. Although the Company did not convert salaries to officers through the
issuance of Common Stock in 2002 or 2001, it may to do so in 2003. To help
alleviate the cash flow difficulties, the Chief Executive Officer agreed to
defer an aggregate of $54,000 of salaries. Additionally, the Secretary agreed to
defer $9,000 and the Vice President of Operations also agreed to defer $20,000
of salaries.
The Company continues to explore strategic relationships with ISP's,
customers and others, which could involve jointly developed products,
revenue-sharing models, investments in or by the Company, or other arrangements.
There can be no assurance that a strategic relationship can be consummated.
In 2001, the Company settled a class action lawsuit and another litigation
matter. The class action resulted in a cost to the Company of $550,000, $50,000
of which was cash and $500,000 in the Company's common stock. The other matter
was settled for cash payments aggregating $200,000, with a down payment of
$75,000 in March 2003 and $25,000 quarter from June 2003 through May 2004
In the past, the officers of the Company have deferred a portion of their
salaries or provided loans to the Company to meet short-term liquidity
requirements. Where possible, the Company has issued stock or granted warrants
to certain vendors in lieu of cash payments, and may do so in the future. There
can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available to the
Company on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, the
Company may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate its research,
engineering and development or manufacturing programs or obtain funds through
arrangements with partners or others that may require the Company to relinquish
rights to certain of its technologies or potential products or other assets.
Accordingly, the inability to obtain such financing could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations.
With no remaining cash and no near term prospects of private placements,
options or warrant exercises and reduced revenues, we believe that we will have
great difficulty meeting our working capital and litigation settlement
obligations over the next 12 months. We are presently dependent on cash flows
generated from sales and loans from officers to meet our obligations. Our
failure to consummate a merger. or substantially improve our revenues will have
serious adverse consequences and, accordingly, there is substantial doubt in our
ability to remain in business over the next 12 months. There can be no assurance
that any financing will be available to the Company on acceptable terms, or at
all. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to delay,
scale back or eliminate its research, engineering and development or
manufacturing programs or obtain funds through arrangements with partners or
others that may require the Company to relinquish rights to certain of its
technologies or potential products or other assets. Accordingly, the inability
to obtain such financing could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations.
42
Item 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
See financial statements following Item 13 of this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB.
Item 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENT WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE.
On February 15, 2002, Grant Thornton LLP ("Grant Thornton") was dismissed
as the independent accountants for the Company. The reports of Grant Thornton on
the Company's financial statements within the two most recent fiscal years or
any subsequent interim period, contain no adverse opinion or disclaimer of
opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or
accounting principles.
The Company's Board of Directors and Audit Committee approved the dismissal
of Grant Thornton. During the two most recent fiscal years and any subsequent
interim period preceding Grant Thornton's dismissal, there were no
disagreement(s) with Grant Thornton on any matter of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of Grant Thornton, would
have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in
connection with its report.
No "reportable events" (as defined in Item 304 (a) (1) (iv) of Regulation
S-B) occurred during the Company's two most recent fiscal years and any
subsequent interim period, preceding the accounting firm of Grant Thornton's
dismissal.
43
PART III
Item 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE
WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF THE REGISTRANT
The names and ages of the directors and executive officers of the Company
as of the date of this filing are set forth below:
Name Age Position(s) with the Company
---- --- ----------------------------
Devendar S. Bains* 52 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and
Director
Tarlochan Bains 53 Vice President-Operations and Director
Nirmal Bains 45 Secretary
Charles J. Ritchie* 59 Director
Manish V. Detroja* 35 Director
* Member of the Compensation Committee and Audit Committee.
Background of Executive Officers and Directors
Devendar S. Bains has been Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
Treasurer and a director of the Company since its inception in 1988. He was also
President of the Company from inception through September 2001. From 1983 to
1988 Mr. Bains was Group Project Leader of Amplifier division of Microwave
Semiconductor Corporation. Previously, Mr. Bains was employed at G.E.C. in
Coventry, England. Mr. Bains received a Bachelors Degree in Electronic
Engineering from Sheffield University, England, and a Masters Degree in
Microwave Communications from the University of Leeds and Sheffield, England.
Mr. Bains is the brother of Tarlochan Bains and the husband of Nirmal Bains.
Tarlochan Bains has been Vice President of Operations since March 2000 and a
director since 1991. From 1991 through March 2000, he was the Company's Vice
President of Sales and Marketing. Previously, Mr. Bains was Technical Manager at
Land Rover in Solihull, England. He has a Higher National Diploma in Mechanical
Engineering from Hatfield Polytechnic, England and a Masters Degree in
Automotive Engineering from Cranfield Institute of Technology, England. Mr.
Bains is the brother of Devendar S. Bains and the brother-in-law of Nirmal
Bains.
44
Nirmal Bains has been Secretary of the Company since 1989. She has a degree in
Computer Programming from Cittone Institute in New Jersey. Mrs. Bains is the
wife of Devendar S. Bains and the sister-in-law of Tarlochan Bains.
Charles J. Ritchie was elected to the Board of Directors of the Company in
February 1998. Mr. Ritchie has had a 32 year career with Lucent Technologies,
formerly AT&T, with assignments that included Product Management, Account
Management, AT&T Divestiture Planning, National Cellular Sales Manager for
non-Wireline Companies, International Wireless Product Support, and many others.
Since 1992, Mr. Ritchie has been an International Business Development director
for Europe, Middle East and Africa for the Network Wireless Division at Lucent
Technologies. Marketing, sales and business development education and experience
were accrued over his business career. Mr. Ritchie received a Bachelors Degree
in Electrical Engineering at Youngstown University and continued with graduate
work in Electrical Engineering at Ohio State University.
Manish V. Detroja was elected to the Board of Directors of the Company in
February 1998. Mr. Detroja has been with Current Circuits Inc. ("CCI"), a
private company engaged in the manufacturing of printed circuit boards for the
electronics industry, since its inception in May of 1989. From 1989-1993 Mr.
Detroja was the production manager for CCI and from 1993-1996 he was its sales
manager for the entire United States. He is currently the president and chief
executive officer of CCI. Mr. Detroja is a graduate of Temple University and has
a B.S. in Electrical Engineering Technology.
The Company has established an audit committee and a compensation
committee.
The audit committee reviews, among other matters, the professional services
provided by the Company's independent auditors, the independence of such
auditors from management of the Company, the annual financial statements of the
Company and the Company's system of internal accounting controls. The audit
committee also reviews such other matters with respect to the accounting,
auditing and financial reporting practices and procedures of the Company as it
may find appropriate or as may be brought to its attention. The audit committee
adopted an audit committee charter in 2002 and intends to adopt a new charter
which conforms to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The audit committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial
statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002 with management. The audit committee has discussed
with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61, as
may be modified or supplemented. The audit committee has received the written
disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by
Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as may be modified or supplemented,
and has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors' independence.
Based on the review and discussions noted above, the audit committee recommended
to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in
the Company 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.
45
The audit committee consists of three members, two of whom (Messrs. Ritchie
and Detroja) are "independent". Mr. Devendar Bains is the third member of the
committee. The audit committee met four times during fiscal year 2002. The Board
intends to take appropriate action that may be required under the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and revised listing standards of the applicable stock markets to
assure that all members of the Audit Committee are independent under those
rules.
For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company incurred professional
fees to its auditors in the amount of $42,280, all of which related to auditing
and quarterly review services. No non-audit services have been provided to the
Company by its current auditor.
The compensation committee reviews executive salaries, administers any
bonus, incentive compensation and stock option plans of the Company, and
approves the salaries and other benefits of the executive officers of the
Company. In addition, the compensation committee consults with the Company's
management regarding pension and other benefit plans, and compensation policies
and practices of the Company. The compensation committee consists of Devendar S.
Bains, Charles J. Ritchie and Manish V. Detroja. The compensation committee met
four times during fiscal year 2002.
Each non-employee director of the Company is entitled to receive reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of Directors
of the Company. Directors who are employees of the Company are not paid any fees
or other remuneration for service on the Board or any of the committees. Each
non-employee director may receive options to purchase Common Stock or other
remuneration. The members of the Board of Directors intend to meet at least
quarterly during the Company's fiscal year, and at such other times duly called.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")
requires the Company's directors and executive officers, and persons who own
more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of the Company's equity
securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")
initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock
and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than
ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company
with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To the Company's knowledge, based solely upon its review of the copies of
such reports furnished to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2001,
all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and
greater than ten percent beneficial owners were satisfied.
46
Item 10. Executive Compensation
Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation paid by the
Company for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 for its Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President, respectively. Each non-employee director
of the Company is entitled to receive reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in attending meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company.
Long Term Compensation
-----------------------------------------
Annual Compensation
Awards Payouts
----------------------------- --------------------
Restricted Securities
Name of Individual Other Annual Stock Underlying LTIP All Other
and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation Awards Options/SARS (#) Payouts Comp.
------ ----------- --------- --------------- ----------- -------------------- --------- ----------
Devendar S. Bains, 2002 $162,000 $20,000(1)
Chairman, (2)
Chief Executive Officer,
And Treasurer
2001 $162,000 $20,000(1)
2000 $162,000 $20,000(1)
Tarlochan Bains, 2002 $100,000(3)
Vice President 2001 $125,000
And Director 2000 $105,000
(1) Represents payment for health insurance and automobile insurance lease
payments on behalf of such individual but does not include deferred
compensation.
(2) Includes $54,000 accrued but unpaid at December 31, 2002
(3) Includes $20,000 accrued but unpaid at December 31, 2002
Employment Agreements
The Company entered into employment agreements with each of Devendar Bains
(Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer), Tarlochan Bains (Vice
President - Operations), and Nirmal Bains (Secretary), which, as extended, now
expire on April 30, 2005. The employment agreements provide for annual base
salaries of $162,000, $100,000 and $50,000 with respect to Devendar Bains,
Tarlochan Bains and Nirmal
47
Bains, respectively. The employment agreements provide for discretionary bonuses
to be determined in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors and contain
covenants not to compete with the Company following termination of employment.
In June 1998, the Company issued 40,000 shares of Common Stock to Devendar
S. Bains, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, in consideration
of the forgiveness by Mr. Bains of $50,000 of accrued salary owed to him.
On December 31, 1998, accrued and unpaid salary in the aggregate amount of
$195,000 owed as of September 30, 1998 to Devendar S. Bains ($117,000),
Tarlochan Bains ($54,600) and Nirmal Bains ($23,400), were forgiven. In
consideration of such forgiveness of accrued salary, the Company issued 104,000,
48,533 and 20,800 shares, respectively, to such persons (based upon the closing
sales price of the Common Stock as of September 30, 1998).
On March 31, 1999, accrued and unpaid salary in the aggregate amount of
$20,717 owed as of December 31, 1998 to Devendar S. Bains ($10,566), Tarlochan
Bains ($6,629) and Nirmal Bains ($3,522) were forgiven. In consideration of such
forgiveness of accrued salary, the Company issued 4,025, 2,526 and 1,342 shares,
respectively, to such persons (based upon the closing sales price of the Common
Stock as of March 31, 1999).
On March 31, 1999, accrued and unpaid salary in the aggregate amount of
$41,920 owed as of March 31, 1999 to Devendar S. Bains ($14,346), Tarlochan
Bains ($25,474) and Nirmal Bains ($2,100) were forgiven. In consideration of
such forgiveness of accrued salary, the Company issued 5,465, 9,704 and 800
shares, respectively, to such persons (based upon the closing sales price of the
Common Stock as of March 31, 1999).
On June 30, 1999, accrued and unpaid salary in the aggregate amount of
$57,546 owed as of June 30, 1999 to Devendar S. Bains ($27,424), Tarlochan Bains
($22,822) and Nirmal Bains ($7,300) were forgiven. In consideration of such
forgiveness of accrued salary, the Company issued 15,398, 12,815 and 4,099
shares, respectively, to such persons (based upon the closing sales price of the
Common Stock as of June 30, 1999).
On September 30, 1999, accrued and unpaid salary in the aggregate amount of
$38,541 owed as of September 30, 1999 to Devendar S. Bains ($20,885), Tarlochan
Bains ($12,986) and Nirmal Bains ($4,700), were forgiven. In consideration of
such forgiveness of accrued salary, the Company issued 3,358, 2,088 and 756
shares, respectively, to such persons (based upon the closing sales price of the
Common Stock on September 29, 1999).
On December 31, 1999, accrued and unpaid salary in the aggregate amount of
$22,369 owed as of December 31, 1999 to Devendar S. Bains ($14,346), Tarlochan
Bains ($5,923) and Nirmal Bains ($2,100), were forgiven. In consideration of
such forgiveness of accrued salary, the Company issued 3,566, 1,060 and 376
shares, respectively, to such
48
persons (based upon the closing sales price of the Common Stock on December 31,
1999).
There were no conversion of unpaid salary into equity from 2000 to 2002.
Stock Option Plans and Agreements
Option Plan - In May 1996, the Directors of the Company adopted and the
stockholders of the Company approved the adoption of the Company's 1996 Stock
Option Plan (as amended, the "Option Plan"). The purpose of the Option Plan is
to enable the Company to encourage key employees and Directors to contribute to
the success of the Company by granting such employees and Directors incentive
stock options ("ISOs") or non-qualified stock options ("NQOs").
The Option Plan will be administered by the Board of Directors or a
committee appointed by the Board of Directors (the "Committee") which will
determine, in its discretion, among other things, the recipients of grants,
whether a grant will consist of ISOs, NQOs or a combination thereof, and the
number of shares to be subject to such options.
The Option Plan provides for the granting of ISOs or NQOs to purchase
Common Stock at an exercise price to be determined by the Board of Directors or
the Committee not less than the fair market value of the Common Stock on the
date the option is granted.
The total number of shares with respect to which options may be granted
under the Option Plan is currently 2,225,000. Options may not be granted to an
individual to the extent that in the calendar year in which such options first
become exercisable the shares subject to such options have a fair market value
on the date of grant in excess of $100,000. No option may be granted under the
Option Plan after May 2006 and no option may be outstanding for more than ten
years after its grant. Additionally, no option can be granted for more than five
(5) years to a stockholder owning 10% or more of the Company's outstanding
Common Stock and such options must have an exercise price of not less than 110%
of the fair market value on the date of grant.
Upon the exercise of an option, the holder must make payment of the full
exercise price. Such payment may be made in cash or in shares of Common Stock,
or in a combination of both. The Company may lend to the holder of an option
funds sufficient to pay the exercise price, subject to certain limitations.
The Option Plan may be terminated or amended at any time by the Board of
Directors, except that, without stockholder approval, the Option Plan may not be
amended to increase the number of shares subject to the Option Plan, change the
class of persons eligible to receive options under the Option Plan or materially
increase the benefits of participants.
49
As of December 31, 2002, 1,656,000 options to purchase Common Stock under
the Option Plan were granted and/or reserved to certain employees, including
Devendar Bains (1,000,000 options), Tarlochan Bains (100,000 options), and
Nirmal Bains (50,000 options), the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Vice
President-Operations and Secretary, respectively. The options are exercisable at
$4.00 and expire on May 31, 2004. 30,000 options to purchase Common Stock were
granted to each of Messrs. Detroja and Ritchie, Directors of the Company. These
options are exercisable at $1.25, are fully vested and expire on May 31, 2004
The balance of these options are exercisable between $1.04 and $4.00 per share.
No determinations have been made regarding the persons to whom options will be
granted in the future, the number of shares which will be subject to such
options or the exercise prices to be fixed with respect to any option.
Other Options
As of December 31, 2002, each of Messrs. Detroja and Ritchie also own
70,000 options to purchase Common Stock. 45,000 of these options are exercisable
at $1.25 per share, are fully vested and expire on May 31, 2004. The balance of
these options are exercisable at $0.20 per share, are fully vested and expire
March 31, 2006. In addition, pursuant to the terms a former employee's
employment agreement employment agreement, the Company issued 300,000 options to
purchase Common Stock exercisable at $1.50 per share. The options are fully
vested and expire December 31, 2005.
50
Item 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information, as of March 31, 2003
with respect to the beneficial ownership of the outstanding Common Stock by (i)
any holder of more than five percent (5%); (ii) each of the Company's officers
and directors; and (iii) the directors and officers of the company as a group:
Name of Beneficial Number of Shares Percentage (%) of
Owner* of Common Stock(1) Ownership
------ ------------------ ---------
Devendar S. Bains(2) 3,272,985 30.51
Tarlochan Bains(3) 178,456 1.83
Nirmal Bains(2) 3,272,985 30.51
Charles J. Ritchie(4) 100,000 1.02
Manish V. Detroja(5) 100,000 1.02
Joseph Giamanco (6) 584,674 6.03
Jerome Belson (7) 808,402 8.31
All Officers and Directors
As a group (5 persons)(8) 3,651,441 32.82
* Unless otherwise indicated, the address of all persons listed in this
section is c/o Amplidyne, Inc., 59 LaGrange Street, Raritan, NJ 08869.
(1) Beneficial ownership as reported in the table above has been determined in
accordance with Instruction (4) to Item 403 of Regulation S-B of the
Exchange Act.
(2) Mr. Devendar Bains is the husband of Mrs. Nirmal Bains and the brother of
Mr. Tarlochan Bains. Mr. Devendar Bains is the record holder of 2,194,812
of such shares and Mrs. Nirmal Bains is the record holder of 28,173 of such
shares. Includes 1,000,000 stock options, which were granted to Mr.
Devendar Bains. Includes 50,000 stock options, which were granted to Ms.
Nirmal Bains. See "Executive Compensation-Stock Option Plans and
Agreements."
(3) Mr. Tarlochan Bains is the brother of Mr. Devendar Bains. Mr. Tarlochan
Bains is the record holder of 78,456 of such shares. Includes 100,000 stock
options. See "Executive Compensation - Stock Option Plans and Agreements."
(4) The address for such person is 92 Parker Road, Long Valley, NJ 07853.
Includes 100,000 stock options. See "Executive Compensation - Stock Option
Plans and Agreements."
(5) The address for such person is 2001 Buckingham Dr., Jamison, PA, 18929.
Includes 100,000 stock options. See "Executive Compensation - Stock Option
Plans and Agreements."
(6) Based upon a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 2, 2001 and other
information provided to the Company by such stockholder. The address for
this stockholder is c/o G.H.M., Inc., 74 Trinity Place, New York, NY 10006.
Includes 25,000 shares of Common Stock that are issuable upon exercise of
warrants owned by such stockholder that are exercisable at $3.00 per share
and expire on July 31, 2004.
51
(7) Based upon a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on August 27, 2001 and other
information provided to the Company by such stockholder. The address for
this stockholder is c/o Jerome Belson Associates, Inc., 495 Broadway, New
York, NY 10012. Includes 670,402 shares owned by Mr. Belson and 88,000
shares owned by the Jerome Belson Foundation, a charitable corporation of
which Mr. Belson is the President and, as a result, may be deemed to have
voting and investment power over such shares. Also includes 50,000 shares
that are issuable upon exercise of warrants owned by Mr. Belson that are
exercisable at $3.00 per share and expire on July 31, 2004. Does not
include an additional 135,400 shares of Common Stock held by certain
members of Mr. Belson's family. All of such persons may be deemed to be
members of a group within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act
that owns 9.71% of the Company's outstanding Common Stock.
(8) Includes 1,000,000 options held by Devendar Bains, 50,000 options held by
Nirmal Bains, 100,000 options held by Tarlochan Bains, 100,000 options held
by Mr. Detroja, and 100,000 options held by Mr. Ritchie (See Notes 2, 3, 4,
5 and 6).
Item 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
$55,892 was owed to the Company by the Chief Executive Officer and
principal shareholder as of December 31, 2001. In 2002, this officer repaid this
loan and advanced to the Company additional sums aggregating $206,308 of which
$136,000 was repaid in 2002 and $57,200 was repaid in 2003. Additionally, he
agreed to defer $54,000 of salaries to help the Company with its cash flow. The
Vice President of Operations and the Secretary each also agreed to defer $20,000
and $9,000 of salaries, respectively. In March 2003, the Chief Executive Officer
and principal shareholder loaned the Company an additional $23,000. As of
December 31, 2002, the Company owed $70,308 to the Chief Executive Officer for
loans and accrued salaries and owed other officers an aggregate of $29,000 for
accrued salaries. The total due to all officers combined at December 31, 2002
was $99,308. As of March 26, 2003 the Company owed $86,108 to the Chief
Executive Officer for loans and accrued salaries.
Mr. Detroja, a director of the Company, is the president and chief
executive officer of one of the Company's vendors. During fiscal year 2001 and
2002, the Company made purchases of approximately $79,000 and $24,000
respectively, from such vendor.
Between January 1994 and December 1996, Devendar S. Bains, the Company's
President and Chief Executive Officer, loaned the Company an aggregate of
$442,745 without interest, payable on demand. $339,694 was repaid during 1997
and an additional $98,000 was repaid during 1998. In connection with the
Company's settlement of a litigation, Devendar S. Bains, the Company's President
and Chief Executive Officer, loaned the Company $41,000 (in October 1997)
without interest, payable on demand. Through December 31, 1999, substantially
all amounts were settled either by payment or issuance of stock.
52
See "Management - Employment Agreement" for issuances to officers and
directors.
The Company intends to indemnify its officers and directors to the full
extent permitted by Delaware law. Under Delaware law, a corporation may
indemnify its agents for expenses and amounts paid in third party actions and,
upon court approval in derivative actions, if the agents acted in good faith and
with reasonable care. A majority vote of the Board of Directors, approval of the
stockholder or court approval is required to effectuate indemnification.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, may be permitted to officers, directors or persons
controlling the Company, the Company has been advised that, in the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in such Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the
payment by the Company of expenses incurred or paid by an officer, director or
controlling person of the Company in the successful defense of any action, suit
or proceeding) is asserted by such officer, director or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the Company will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent,
submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in such Act and will
be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
Transactions between the Company and its officers, directors, employees and
affiliates will be on terms no less favorable to the Company than can be
obtained from unaffiliated parties. Any such transactions will be subject to the
approval of a majority of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors.
53
PART IV
Item 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a)(1) Financial Statements.
The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 7:
Index to Financial Statements F-1
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants F-2 - F-3
Balance Sheets F-4 - F-5
Statement of Operations F- 6
Statement of Stockholders' Equity F- 7
Statement of Cash Flows F- 8
Notes to Financial Statements F- 9 - F- 24
(a) (2) Exhibits
1.1* Form of Underwriting Agreement
1.2* Form of Selected Dealer Agreement
1.3* Form of Agreement Among Underwriters
3.1* Certificate of Incorporation of the Company
3.2* Certificate of Merger (Delaware)
3.3* Certificate of Merger (New Jersey)
3.4* Agreement and Plan of Merger
3.5* By-Laws of the Company
3.6** Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock
4.1* Specimen Certificate for shares of Common Stock
4.2* Specimen Certificate for Warrants
4.3* Form of Underwriter's Purchase Option
4.4* Form of Warrant Agreement
10.1* 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan
10.2* Employment Agreement between the Company and Devendar S. Bains
10.3* Employment Agreement between the Company and Tarlochan Bains
10.4* Employment Agreement between the Company and Nirmal Bains
10.5 Intentionally Omitted
10.6 Intentionally Omitted
10.7* Agreement between the Company and Electronic Marketing Associates, Inc.
10.8* Agreement between the Company and Link Microtek Limited.
10.9* Agreement between the Company and ENS Engineering.
54
23.1 Consent of Kahn Boyd Levychin, LLP, Independent Certified Public
Accountants.
* Incorporated by Reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
SB-2, No. 333-11015.
** Incorporated by Reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 3,
1999.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2002.
Item 14: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, Amplidyne, Inc.
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation
of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive and
Principal Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the chief Executive
and Principal Accounting Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting him to material
information required to be included in the Company's periodic SEC filings
relating to the Company.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls.
There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect these internal controls
subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation.
55
Amplidyne, Inc.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants F-2
Financial Statements
Balance Sheets F-3 - F-4
Statements of Operations F-5
Statement of Stockholders' Equity F-6
Statements of Cash Flows F-7
Notes to Financial Statements F-8 - F-22
-F1-
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Board of Directors and Stockholders
AMPLIDYNE, INC.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Amplidyne, Inc. as of December
31, 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Amplidyne, Inc., as of December
31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note A to the
financial statements, the Company suffered losses from operations, has no cash
and otherwise limited financial resources, raising substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these
matters are also described in Note A. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset
carrying amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might
result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
KAHN BOYD LEVYCHIN, LLP
New York, New York
March 26, 2003
-2-
Amplidyne, Inc.
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
ASSETS
2002 2001
----------- -----------
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $ -- $ 697,940
----------- -----------
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$143,000 and $131,104 in 2002 and 2001, respectively 440,506 449,190
Inventories 926,713 1,181,682
Loan receivable - officer -- 55,892
Prepaid expenses and other 24,616 23,464
Total current assets 1,391,835 2,408,168
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - AT COST
Machinery and equipment 725,629 723,663
Furniture and fixtures 43,750 43,750
Autos and trucks 66,183 66,183
Leasehold improvements 8,141 8,141
----------- -----------
843,703 841,737
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (760,633) (687,260)
83,070 154,477
----------- -----------
SECURITY DEPOSITS AND OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS 45,068 52,106
----------- -----------
$ 1,519,973 $ 2,614,751
=========== ===========
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE STATEMENTS
-3-
Amplidyne, Inc.
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
2002 2001
------------ ------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Overdraft $ 11,939 $ --
Current maturities of lease obligations 2,041 9,271
Accounts payable 410,445 121,533
Accrued expenses 155,027 131,308
Accrued settlement of litigation 295,000 180,000
Loans payable - officers 99,308 --
------------ ------------
973,760 442,112
COMMITMENTS AND OTHER COMMENTS - NOTE G
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS - NOTE H
LITIGATION - NOTE I
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS - NOTE J
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Convertible Preferred stock - authorized 100,000 shares of
$.0001 par value; 55,000 shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2001 (liquidation preference of
$550,000 at December 31, 2001) -- 6
Common stock - authorized, 25,000,000 shares of $.0001 par
value; shares 9,676,500 and 7,892,661 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2002 and 2001, 968 790
respectively
Additional paid-in capital 22,494,924 21,921,495
Subscriptions receivable - preferred stock -- (180,000)
Accumulated deficit (21,949,679) (19,569,652)
------------ ------------
546,213 2,172,639
------------ ------------
$ 1,519,973 $ 2,614,751
============ ============
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE STATEMENTS
-4-
Amplidyne, Inc.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year ended December 31,
2002 2001
----------- -----------
Net sales $ 1,613,732 $ 2,205,429
Cost of goods sold (net of inventory
write-down of $233,995 in 2002) 1,520,237 1,281,009
----------- -----------
Gross profit 93,495 924,420
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative, including stock
compensation costs of $140,000 in 2001 2,088,433 2,044,490
Research, engineering and development 406,614 593,823
----------- -----------
Operating loss (2,401,552) (1,713,893)
Nonoperating income (expenses)
Interest income and other income 3,170 50,915
Interest expense (932) (864)
Litigation settlement costs (144,400) (550,000)
Sale of New Jersey tax benefits 163,687 189,744
----------- -----------
Loss before income taxes (2,380,027) (2,024,098)
Provision for income taxes -- 784
NET LOSS $(2,380,027) $(2,024,882)
=========== ===========
Net loss per share - basic and diluted $ (0.25) $ (0.26)
=========== ===========
Weighted average number of shares outstanding 9,386,790 7,706,971
=========== ===========
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE STATEMENTS
-5-
Amplidyne, Inc.
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001
Preferred Stock Common Stock
---------------------------- ----------------------------
Shares Par Value Shares Par Value
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2000 -- $ -- 7,463,841 $ 747
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001
Cost of litigation to be settled by the issuance of common stock
Financing cost associated with warrants extended and shares issued 1,820
Issuance of common stock, net of costs 415,000 42
Issuance of preferred stock, net of costs 55,000 6
Issuance of common stock for services rendered by third party 12,000 1
------- --------- --------- ---------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2001 55,000 6 7,892,661 790
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002
Cost of litigation to be settled by the issuance of common stock
Collection of subscription receivable
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock (55,000) (6) 701,194 70
Issuance of common stock in settlement of class action 324,486 32
Issuance of restricted common stock in lieu of expenses 8,159 1
Issuance of common stock, net of cost 750,000 75
------- --------- --------- ---------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 -- $ -- 9,676,500 $ 968
======= ========= ========= =========
Additional
Paid-In Accumulated Subscriptions
Capital Deficit Receivable Total
------- ------- ---------- -----
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2000 $ 20,212,154 $(17,544,770) $ -- $ 2,668,131
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001 (2,024,882) (2,024,882)
Cost of litigation to be settled by the issuance of common stock 500,000 500,000
Financing cost associated with warrants extended and shares issued 140,000 140,000
Issuance of common stock, net of costs 559,708 559,750
Issuance of preferred stock, net of costs 494,994 (180,000) 315,000
Issuance of common stock for services rendered by third party $ 14,639 $ -- $ -- $ 14,640
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2001 21,921,495 (19,569,652) (180,000) 2,172,639
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 (2,380,027) (2,380,027)
Cost of litigation to be settled by the issuance of common stock 29,400 29,400
Collection of subscription receivable 180,000 180,000
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock (64) --
Issuance of common stock in settlement of class action (32) --
Issuance of restricted common stock in lieu of expenses 4,200 4,201
Issuance of common stock, net of costs 539,925 540,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 $ 22,494,924 $(21,949,679) $ -- $ 546,213
============ ============ ============ ============
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE STATEMENTS
-6-
Amplidyne, Inc.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended December 31,
2002 2001
----------- -----------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net Loss $(2,380,027) $(2,024,882)
----------- -----------
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization 73,373 98,415
Bad debt expense 291,471 67,592
Litigation loss 144,400 530,000
Provision for inventory write-down 233,995 20,000
Stock compensation charge -- 154,640
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable (282,787) (204,876)
Inventories 20,974 (603,728)
Prepaid expenses and other assets (1,152) 105,179
Accounts payable and accrued expense 312,631 (248,842)
----------- -----------
Total adjustments 792,905 (81,620)
----------- -----------
Net cash used for operating activities (1,587,122) (2,106,502)
----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Officer loans and salary deferrals 155,200 (22,225)
Change in security deposits 7,038 --
Purchase of property and equipment (1,966) (2,845)
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities 160,272 (25,070)
----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of lease obligations (7,230) (11,380)
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock, net of costs -- 495,000
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of costs 544,201 559,750
Subscriptions receivable preferred stock - net 180,000 (180,000)
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by financing activities 716,971 863,370
----------- -----------
NET (DECREASE) IN CASH (709,879) (1,268,202)
Cash at and cash equivalents beginning of period 697,940 1,966,142
----------- -----------
Cash (overdraft) and cash equivalents at end of period $ (11,939) $ 697,940
=========== ===========
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for: Interest $ 932 $ 864
Income taxes $ -- $ 784
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE STATEMENTS
-7-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
NOTE A - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND LIQUIDITY
Amplidyne, Inc. (the Company) has historically operated in one segment, which is
the design, manufacture and selling of ultra linear power amplifiers and related
subsystems to the worldwide wireless, local loop and satellite uplink
telecommunications market. The Company has introduced products which offer
high-speed wireless internet connectivity to residential and business clients of
internet service providers in the third quarter of 1999. These products are sold
under the AmpWave(TM) name.
The Company's financial statements have been presented on a going concern basis,
which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities
in the normal course of business. The liquidity of the Company has been
adversely affected in recent years by significant losses from operations. The
Company has incurred losses of $2,380,027 and $2,024,882 in 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
With no remaining cash and no near term prospects of private placements, options
or warrant exercises and reduced revenues, management believes that the Company
will have great difficulty meeting its working capital and litigation settlement
obligations over the next 12 months. The Company is presently dependent on cash
flows generated from sales and loans from officers to meet our obligations. Our
failure to consummate a merger with an appropriate partner or to substantially
improve our revenues will have serious adverse consequences and, accordingly,
there is substantial doubt in our ability to remain in business over the next 12
months. There can be no assurance that any financing will be available to the
Company on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, the
Company may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate its research,
engineering and development or manufacturing programs or obtain funds through
arrangements with partners or others that may require the Company to relinquish
rights to certain of its technologies or potential products or other assets.
Accordingly, the inability to obtain such financing could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The Company funded operations during the year ended December 31, 2002 primarily
from the proceeds of privately placed common and preferred stock. The Company
has also funded certain operating expenses through borrowings (in the form of
deferring salaries and cash advances) from officers and principal shareholders.
The Company has in the past issued its stock in lieu of cash payments for
compensation, sales commissions and consulting fees, wherever possible.
Management's plans for dealing with the foregoing matters include:
o Increasing sales of its high speed internet connectivity products
through both individual customers, strategic alliances and mergers.
o Decreasing the dependency on certain major customers by aggressively
seeking other customers in the amplifier markets;
o Partnering with significant companies to jointly develop innovative
products, which has yielded orders with multinational companies to
date, and which are expected to further expand such relationships;
-8-
o Reducing costs through a more streamlined operation by using automated
machinery to produce components for our products;
o Deferral of payments of officers' salaries, as needed;
o Selling remaining net operating losses applicable to the State of New
Jersey, pursuant to a special government high-technology incentive
program in order to provide working capital, if possible;
o Reducing overhead costs and general expenditures.
o Merging with another company to provide adequate working capital and
jointly develop innovative products.
NOTE B - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the
preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows.
1. REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue is recognized upon shipment of products to customers because our
shipping terms are F.O.B. shipping point.
2. INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market; cost is determined using
the first-in, first-out method. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, inventories
consisted of the following:
2002 2001
-------------- --------------
Component parts $ 489,542 $ 724,797
Work-in-progress 209,822 231,150
Finished Goods 227,349 225,735
-------------- --------------
$ 926,713 $ 1,181,682
============== ==============
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Depreciation and amortization are provided for in amounts sufficient to relate
the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives,
which range from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over
the lives of the respective leases, or the service lives of the improvements,
whichever is shorter. The straight-line method of depreciation is followed for
substantially all assets for financial reporting purposes, but accelerated
methods are used for tax purposes.
-9-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
4. VALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company reviews long-lived assets held and used for possible impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. The Company has not recorded any provision for
the impairment of long-lived assets at December 31, 2002.
5. INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This
statement requires, among other things, an asset and liability approach for
financial accounting and reporting of deferred income taxes. In addition, the
deferred tax liabilities and assets are required to be adjusted for the effect
of any future changes in the tax law or rates. Deferred income taxes arise from
temporary differences resulting in the basis of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting and income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is provided
if the Company is uncertain as to the realization of deferred tax assets.
6. RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND CERTAIN CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC
DEPENDENCY
The Company's future results of operations involve a number of significant risks
and uncertainties. Factors that could affect the Company's future operating
results and cause actual results to vary materially from expectations include,
but are not limited to, dependence on key personnel, dependence on a limited
number of customers, ability to design new products and product obsolescence,
ability to generate consistent sales, ability to finance research and
development, government regulation, technological innovations and acceptance,
competition, reliance on certain vendors, credit and other risks.
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations
of credit risk, consist principally of cash and accounts receivable.
The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit and money market
accounts in one bank, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits or
not be insured. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and
does not believe it is exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash
equivalents.
During 2002, two customers accounted for 60% of net sales (44% and 16%) and 71%
of accounts receivable at December 31, 2002. Export sales in 2002 accounted for
approximately 67% of net sales and were primarily to Europe (46%), Canada (18%),
and other foreign countries.
During 2001, two customers accounted for 74% of net sales (62% and 12%) and 49%
of accounts receivable at December 31, 2001. Export sales in 2001 accounted for
approximately 85% of net sales and were primarily to Europe (62%), Canada (12%),
and other foreign countries.
In addition, the Company is dependent on a limited number of suppliers for key
components used in the Company's products (primarily power transistors) and
subcontracted manufacturing processes. Management believes that other suppliers
could provide similar components and processes on comparable terms. A change in
suppliers, however, could disrupt manufacturing.
-10-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
The carrying values of financial instruments potentially subject to valuation
risk, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and
officer's loan receivable, approximate fair value, principally because of the
short maturity of these items.
7. USE OF ESTIMATES
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
8. STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Stock-based employee compensation is accounted for under the intrinsic value
based method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations as
clarified by Financial Interpretation No. 44 (FIN 44), Accounting for Certain
Transactions Involving Stock Compensation. Included in these notes to the
financial statements are the pro forma disclosures required by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS No. 123), Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation.
9. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
10. ADVERTISING EXPENSES
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses were
$68,878 and $99,261 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
11. RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications were made to the 2001 amounts to conform to the
current presentation.
12. LOSS PER SHARE
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.128 (SFAS No. 128), Earnings per
Share, specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for
earnings per share for entities with publicly held common stock or potential
common stock.
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted is determined by dividing the net
loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Net
loss per common share - diluted does not
-11-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
include potential common shares derived from stock options and warrants because
they are antidilutive. The number of antidilutive securities excluded from the
dilutable loss per share calculation for the years ended December 31, 2002 and
2001 were 945,000 and 2,373,500 shares, respectively.
13. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company commenced its wireless Internet connectivity business in the summer
of 2000. The Company does not measure its operating results, assets or
liabilities by segment. However, the following limited segment information is
available:
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31,
2002 2001
------------------- -------------------
Sales - external
Amplifier 992,361 $ 1,901,702
Internet business 621,371 303,727
------------------- -------------------
$ 1,613,732 $ 2,205,429
=================== ===================
Sales - external, by geographic area
United States $ 572,083 $ 330,834
Europe 711,861 1,361,316
Canada 273,350 264,488
All other foreign countries 56,438 248,791
------------------- -------------------
$ 1,613,732 $ 2,205,429
=================== ===================
Inventory
Amplifier $ 441,654 $ 802,964
Internet business 485,059 378,718
------------------- -------------------
$ 926,713 $ 1,181,682
=================== ===================
-12-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
NOTE C - PUBLIC OFFERING AND PRIVATE PLACEMENTS
PUBLIC OFFERING
A registration statement covering an underwritten public offering of 1,610,000
units at a price of $5.10 per unit, prior to underwriters' commissions, was
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21,
1997. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock, par value $.0001 per
share and one redeemable common stock purchase warrant. In 1997, the Company
received net proceeds from the public offering of approximately $6,782,000,
which included the over allotment of 210,000 units. The proceeds are net of
legal fees, underwriters' fees and other expenses of the offering totaling
approximately $1,429,000. Each warrant originally entitled the holder to
purchase one share for $6.00 during the four-year period ending January 21,
2001. The Company provided notice in April 2000 to redeem the warrants on May
17, 2000 unless the warrants were previously exercised.
On May 1, 2000, the Company reduced the exercise price of the warrants to $5.00
per share. Through May 16, 2000, 124,871 warrants were exercised, yielding
proceeds of $650,454. The remaining unexercised warrants of 1,485,129 were
redeemed at $0.01 per warrant on May 17, 2000, resulting in an aggregate
expenditure of $14,851.
The underwriter received an option to purchase up to 140,000 shares of common
stock and 140,000 warrants under the same terms. All the options remained
outstanding at December 31, 2000 and the warrants were redeemed in May 2000.
In January 2001, the Company extended the expiration date of 212,500 warrants
resulting in a charge to earnings of $140,000.
In 2001 the Company entered into the following private placements:
o During the second quarter ended June 30, 2001, the Company issued
390,000 shares of common stock at $1.50 per share, to accredited
investors, resulting in gross proceeds of $585,000. The Company paid
cash commissions of $58,500 in connection with such private placement.
o In July 2001, the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock at
$1.50 per share, to accredited investors, resulting in gross proceeds
of $37,000. The Company paid cash commissions of $3,750 in connection
with such private placement.
o In the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2001, the Company issued 55,000 shares
of Series B Preferred Stock to accredited investors pursuant to Rule
506 of Regulation D of the Act. The Company sold such shares at $10.00
per share, received gross proceeds of $550,000 and paid brokerage
commissions of $55,000 (resulting in net proceeds of $495,000,
$180,000 [net] of which was received in the first quarter of 2002).
The Preferred Stock: (i) are entitled to dividends at the annual rate
of 10%, payable semi-annually, in cash or in shares of Common Stock;
(ii) has a liquidation preference of $10.00 per share, (iii) is
convertible into shares of Common Stock at the lesser of (A) 100% of
the average closing sales price of the Common Stock on the five
trading days prior to issuance or (B) 85% of the average closing sale
price of the Common Stock for the five trading days prior to
conversion, in each case not less than $.75 per share; (iv) is
non-voting, (v) is subject
-13-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
to redemption (at the option of the Company) at a rate of 110% of the
original issuance price and (vi) shall automatically convert into
Common Stock on September 30, 2004 (if not previously converted). The
Company shall also have the right, at its option, to convert the
Preferred Stock (at a conversion rate of $1.00 per share) if the
average closing sales price per share of Common Stock, for a
consecutive 20 trading day period, is $3.00 or greater. All shares
outstanding at December 31, 2001 converted to common in the first
quarter of 2002.
At December 31, 2002, the following 945,000 warrants, remained outstanding:
(1) 20,000 exercisable at $1.00 through May 2010
(2) 20,000 exercisable at $7.00 through December 2004
(3) 30,000 exercisable at $6.00 through November 2004
(4) 50,000 exercisable at $2.00 through December 2004
(5) 50,000 exercisable at $4.00 through December 2004
(6) 16,000 exercisable at $1.75 through December 2004
(7) 41,500 exercisable at $1.80 through July 31, 2004
(8) 207,500 exercisable at $3.00 through July 31, 2004
(9) 55,000 exercisable at $1.20 through September 30, 2004
(10) 300,000 exercisable at $2.00 through December 31, 2005
(11) 75,000 exercisable at $.96 through March 2007
(12) 80,000 exercisable at $1.50 through December 2004.
At December 31, 2002, the Company had employee stock options outstanding to
acquire 2,051,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices of $.20 to $4.00.
During the first quarter ended March 31, 2002, the Company issued 750,000 shares
of Common Stock, at $.80 per share (resulting in gross proceeds of $600,000), to
accredited investors. In connection with such private offering, the Company paid
commissions to NASD broker-dealers in the amount of $60,000 and issued to such
persons 75,000 warrants, which are exercisable at $.96 per share and expire
March 31, 2007.
During the first quarter ended March 31, 2002, the Company issued 701,194 shares
of Common Stock in connection with the conversion of all of the Company's Series
B Preferred Stock (which included shares of Common Stock issued in lieu of
accrued dividends thereon).
During the first quarter ended March 31, 2002, the Company issued 324,486 shares
of Common Stock to the members of the class action compliant, which was settled
in September 2001.
During the second quarter ended June 30, 2002, the Company issued 8,159 shares
of common stock to a customer in lieu of cash.
For the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company recorded a charge to
operations of $140,000 reflecting the costs recognized for warrants issued to
consultants of the Company, and employee stock options granted with a strike
price below quoted market value (see Note D).
-14-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
Under the accounting guidance of FIN 44, a reduction of a warrant's exercise
price or an extension of the exercise date is treated as a variable option, and
therefore requires that a portion of the difference between the market values at
the date of the modification be charged to operations. The extension of the
exercise date of the warrants mentioned above did not result in a charge to
operations because the extension occurred prior to the effective date of FIN 44
and because the exercise price exceeded the market value of the underlying
common stock at the date of the extension.
NOTE D - STOCK OPTION PLANS
An option and stock appreciation rights (SARs) plan was authorized prior to the
public offering whereby options could be granted to purchase no more than
1,500,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices no less than fair market
value as of date of grant. At the 2001 Annual Shareholders' Meeting, the maximum
number of shares set aside for this plan was increased to 2,225,000. Under the
plan, employees and directors may be granted options to purchase shares of
common stock at the fair market value at the time of grant. Options generally
vest in three years and expire in four years from the date of grant. 1,656,000
options remained outstanding at December 31, 2002. The extension of the exercise
date of the warrants mentioned above did not result in a charge to operations
because the extension occurred prior to the effective date of FIN 44 and because
the exercise price exceeded the market value of the underlying common stock at
the date of the extension.
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No.
25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations in
accounting for its stock options. Under APB No. 25, if the exercise price of the
Company's employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock
on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, requires presentation of pro forma net
loss and loss per share as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock
options granted under the fair value method of that statement. For purposes of
pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to
expense over the vesting period. Under the fair value method, the Company's net
loss and loss per share would have been as follows:
2002 2001
Net loss $ (2,416,794) $ (2,061,649)
Loss per share $ (0.26) $ (0.27)
-15-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
Stock option activity during 2002 and 2001, is summarized below:
Shares of common Weighted average
stock attributable exercise price of
to options options
---------- -------
Unexercised at December 31, 2000 1,491,000 $ 3.850
Issuance to employees and directors 690,000 2.430
---------
Unexercised at December 31, 2001 2,181,000 3.400
Expired at December 31, 2002 (180,000) 1.460
Issued during 2002 50,000 0.200
---------
Unexercised at December 31, 2002 2,051,000 3.233
=========
The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and
exercisable options, including warrants issued to officers, at December 31,
2002:
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
------------------- -------------------
Weighted average
remaining Weighted average Weighted
Number contractual life exercise price Number average
Exercise Prices outstanding at exercisable at exercise price
period end period end
---------------- ------------- ---------------------------------- ------------- --------------
$ 3.250 30,000 0.8 years $ 3.250 30,000 $ 3.250
4.000 1,346,000 2.4 years (1) 4.000 1,346,000 4.000
1.250 150,000 1.4 years 1.250 150,000 1.250
3.125 100,000 1.25 years 3.125 100,000 3.250
1.040 10,000 3 years 1.040 10,000 1.040
1.120 10,000 3 years 1.120 10,000 1.120
3.250 55,000 2 years 3.250 55,000 3.250
1.500 300,000 3 years 1.500 300,000 1.500
0.200 50,000 3.25 years 0.200 50,000 0.200
--------- ---------
2,051,000 2,051,000
(1) Expiration date extended from May 1, 2000 to May 31, 2004
-16-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
NOTE E - INCOME TAXES
Temporary differences and carryforwards give rise to deferred tax assets and
liabilities. The principal components of the deferred tax assets relate to net
operating loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2002, the Federal net operating
loss carryforwards are approximately $14,000,000. The net operating loss
carryforwards expire at various dates through 2022, and because of the
uncertainty in the Company's ability to utilize the net operating loss
carryforwards, a full valuation allowance of approximately $5,126,000 and
$4,426,000 has been provided on the deferred tax asset at December 31, 2002 and
2001, respectively.
The Company participated in the New Jersey Technology Tax Certificate Transfer
Program, whereby net operating loss carryforwards generated in New Jersey can be
sold to other qualified companies. During 2002 and 2001, the Company received
$163,687 and $189,744, respectively, from the sale of such net operating losses.
The Company expects to sell additional New Jersey net operating losses in 2003,
although there can be no assurance a suitable transaction will be consummated.
The New Jersey net operating loss carryforwards are approximately $2,000,000 at
December 31, 2002.
Internal Revenue Code Section 382 places a limitation on the utilization of
Federal net operating loss and other credit carryforwards when an ownership
change, as defined by the tax law, occurs. Generally, this occurs when a greater
than 50 percentage point change in ownership occurs. Accordingly, the actual
utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax
assets for tax purposes may be limited annually under Code Section 382 to a
percentage (about 5%) of the fair market value of the Company at the time of any
such ownership change.
The Company's tax provision for 2002 and 2001 is principally due to the impact
of state income and minimum taxes.
NOTE F - CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
The Company has capital leases (at interest rates ranging from 8.5% to 14.2%)
for certain equipment for use in its manufacturing and research, engineering and
development activities. Future minimum lease payments on these leases are
$2,041.
The cost of assets under capital leases was approximately $24,000 at December
31, 2002 and 2001, and is included in property and equipment. Accumulated
depreciation at December 31, 2002 and 2001 was approximately $24,000.
-17-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
NOTE G - COMMITMENTS AND OTHER COMMENTS
1. OPERATING LEASES
During July 2000, the Company entered into a lease agreement for approximately
11,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space, for a five-year period
ending July 13, 2004. The annual rental is $71,000 plus the Company's share of
real estate taxes, utilities and other occupancy costs.
Future minimum lease payments on non-cancelable operating leases aggregate
$109,000 as follows: $71,000 for 2003 and $38,000 for 2004.
Rent expense, including the Company's share of real estate taxes, utilities and
other occupancy costs, was $79,725 and $87,109 for the years ended December 31,
2002 and 2001, respectively.
2. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Commencing May 1, 1996, the Company entered into three five-year employment
agreements with its Chairman, its Vice President of Sales and Marketing and its
Secretary (the Officers). These agreements were extended to expire April 30,
2005. The agreements call for aggregate annual base salaries of $312,000, plus
certain employee benefits.
In September 2001, the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement
with its former President. On July 12, 2002, the then President resigned,
receiving a severance package of $40,000, $20,000 of which remains unpaid at
December 31, 2002. The Chief Executive Officer, has been appointed President to
fill the vacancy.
The Officers deferred a portion of their compensation from 1997 through 1999. In
1999 the Officers converted an aggregate of $181,131 of such deferrals,
principally arising in 1999, into 66,378 shares of common stock of the Company,
representing the estimated fair value of the common stock of the Company at that
time. During 2001, no shares were issued in lieu of officers' deferred
compensation and no compensation was deferred. During 2002, the Chief Executive
Officer deferred salaries of $54,000 and the Vice President of Operations and
the Secretary each also deferred salaries of $20,000 and $9,000, respectively.
No shares were issued in lieu of officers' deferred compensation.
3. 401(K) PLAN
During 1996, the Company established a defined contribution plan, the Amplidyne,
Inc. 401(k) Plan. The Company makes no contributions. All employees with greater
than six months' service with the Company are eligible to join the plan. The
plan is administered by a third party.
4. DARWIN ASSETS
In January 2002, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire certain assets
of Darwin Networks, Inc. ("Darwin") for $175,000 plus additional contingent
payments not to exceed $340,000. Darwin was in
-18-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
the business of installing and maintaining high-speed Internet structures for
hotels and residential properties. The assets acquired included equipment not
yet installed as well as completed installations in a specified number of hotel
properties. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has the sole and exclusive
right to contact and negotiate with each property paid for under the contract to
either activate or remove the equipment. After a specified number of locations
were successfully negotiated (which are covered in the initial purchase price)
the Company had the right (now expired) to continue to contact additional
properties and must pay a specified sum for each successful negotiation up to
the $340,000 maximum. As of March 26, 2003, the Company had successfully
negotiated 11 properties and has incurred no liability to pay any additional
sums under the contract.
NOTE H - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
1. OFFICER / STOCKHOLDER LOANS
$55,892 was owed to the Company by the Chief Executive Officer and principal
shareholder as of December 31, 2001. In 2002, this officer repaid this loan and
advanced to the Company additional sums aggregating $206,308 of which $136,000
was repaid in 2002 and $57,200 was repaid in 2003. Additionally, he agreed to
defer $54,000 of salaries to help the Company with its cash flow. The Vice
President of Operations and the Secretary each also agreed to defer $20,000 and
$9,000 of salaries, respectively. In March 2003, the Chief Executive Officer and
principal shareholder loaned the Company an additional $23,000. As of December
31, 2002, the Company owed $70,308 to the Chief Executive Officer for loans and
accrued salaries and owed other officers an aggregate of $29,000 for accrued
salaries. The total due to all officers combined at December 31, 2002 was
$99,308. As of March 26, 2003 the Company owed $86,108 to the Chief Executive
Officer for loans and accrued salaries.
2. PURCHASES FROM RELATED PARTY
A member of the Company's Board of Directors is President and CEO of one of the
Company's vendors. During 2002 and 2001, the Company made purchases of
approximately $24,000 and $79,000, respectively, from this vendor.
-19-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
NOTE I - LITIGATION
From time to time, the Company is party to what it believes are routine
litigation and proceedings that may be considered as part of the ordinary course
of its business. Except for the proceedings noted below, the Company is not
aware of any pending litigation or proceedings that could have a material effect
on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
1. AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION VS. AMPLIDYNE, INC.
AirNet filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial
District of the State of Florida on January 23, 1997 alleging breach of
contract. During 2000, the Company settled with AirNet at a cost of $175,000;
$25,000 is to be paid quarterly over two years. $95,000 remained unpaid at
December 31, 2002.
2. ENS ENGINEERING VS. AMPLIDYNE, INC.
The Company was also a defendant in a complaint filed in the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey on May 13, 1998. The complaint
alleges breach of contract of a representative agreement between the Company and
ENS Engineering of South Korea. The Company reached oral settlement terms and,
based upon such oral settlement, the court dismissed the case in the first
quarter of 2000. The terms of the oral settlement called for the Company to pay
$85,000 in twelve equal monthly installments, none of which has been paid to
date. The Company has not received any required documents and releases from ENS.
There is no liability reflected for this settlement as of December 31, 2002.
3. The Company was served with class action complaints on behalf of all
purchasers of the Company's common stock and warrants between September 9, 1999
and September 14, 1999. By orders of the District Court for the District of New
Jersey, the actions were consolidated and lead plaintiffs were appointed. On or
about March 24, 2000, the Company was served with a consolidated and amended
class action complaint on behalf of purchasers of the Company's common stock and
warrants between September 9, 1999 and September 17, 1999. That complaint
alleged that the Company and other individuals violated the federal securities
laws by, among other things, the issuance of a press release on September 9,
1999. Although the Company believed that the complaint had no merit and
vigorously contested it, the Company and the other parties to the class action
reached a settlement on May 2, 2001, which was approved by the District Court
for the District of New Jersey on August 14, 2001 (which became effective on
September 14, 2001) Pursuant to the settlement agreement, a settlement fund
consisting of $750,000 in cash ($50,000 of which was paid directly by the
Company) was established for the benefit of members of the class. In addition,
the Company issued 324,486 freely tradable shares of its common stock (which was
valued at $500,000 as of May 2, 2001) on behalf of the class members. The
Company had recorded the cost of the litigation, including a credit to
Additional Paid-In Capital for the value of the settlement that has been settled
by the issuance of common stock. In addition the Company is subject to an SEC
formal order of private investigation relating to the subject matter of the
class action. The Company has responded to the SEC requests. In April 2003, the
SEC indicated that it intends to file a civil complaint against the Company and
Devendar S. Bains. The Company and Mr. Bains are negotiating with the SEC in an
attempt to reach a consensual resolution of the matter.
-20-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
4. HIGH GAIN ANTENNA CO., LTD. OF KOREA
The Company (as well as an officer and director of the Company) was a defendant
in a complaint brought in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division,
Somerset County, by High Gain Antenna Co., Ltd. of Korea in November 2000. The
complaint sought damages for an alleged breach of a contract for the repair of
certain equipment purchased by plaintiff from a distributor of the Company's
products and the Company. A trial commenced on May 7, 2002, and on May 13, 2002,
the jury brought in a verdict against the Company for $400,000. The Company had
filed a motion in the Law Division for a new trial, which was denied and gave
notice of appeal to file an appeal of the verdict and judgment to the Superior
Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Management latter determined that
pursuing the appeal would not be in the best interest of the Company and its
shareholders.
In January 2003, the Company entered into a Stipulation of Settlement and
Release before the Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County. The settlement
stipulates that the Company pay a total of $200,000 plus 700,000 shares of
restricted common stock of the Company valued by the agreement at $105,000
(management has determined that the discounted value of the 700,000 restricted
shares was $29,400 as of February 4, 2003 based on quoted market price of $0.07
per share discounted for lack of marketability). The stipulation calls for an
initial payment of $75,000 (paid in March 2003) with the remaining balance
payable in $25,000 increments on the following dates: June 2, 2003, August 31,
2003, November 29, 2003, February 27, 2004 and May 28, 2004. The record
judgement of $400,000 shall remain until the payment obligations are made in
full. In the event of default, the plaintiff shall have the right to execute the
judgement after crediting $105,000 for the agreed value of the shares issued
plus any payments made pursuant to the settlement. Accordingly, failure by the
Company to timely meet the settlement terms will have a material adverse effect
on the Company's financial position and prospects.
5. AMPLIDYNE, INC. V. WAYNE FOGEL, DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, INC. AND
INTERNET NETWORK CORPORATION
On May 30, 2002, the Company filed a two-count lawsuit against the above
mentioned defendants in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset
County, seeking, among other things, declaratory relief that the Company is not
obligated to pay a finders fee (in connection with the Company's purchase of the
Darwin Assets), and that the Company is entitled to monetary damages as a result
of defendant's false misrepresentations. On July 10, 2002, the matter was
removed to the United States District Court of New Jersey but later transferred
back to the United States Bankruptcy Court and then transferred to the United
States District Court of New Jersey. On July 29, 2002, defendants filed a
counterclaim seeking $200,000 in damages as a result of a finders fee agreement.
In January 2003, the matter was transferred to the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida. The defendants sought a further transfer to
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, but such
motion was denied. Although the Company is confident in its position, it cannot
predict the outcome of the case and any negative outcome may have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial position or prospects.
-21-
Amplidyne, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002 and 2001
NOTE J - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
1. SETTLEMENT OF HIGH GAIN ANTENNA CO., LTD. OF KOREA MATTER
In January 2003, a settlement was reached with High Gain Antenna Co., Ltd. of
Korea (see Note I .4.) for $200,000 plus 700,000 shares of the Company's
restricted common stock. In March 2003, the Company made the first installment
of $75,000 in connection with the settlement.
2. LOANS FROM AND REPAYMENTS TO OFFICER / STOCKHOLDER
From January through March 2003, this officer loaned the Company an additional
$73,000 and was repaid $57,200. As of March 26, 2003 the Company owed $86,108 to
this officer for loans and accrued salaries. (See note H-1).
3. INVESTOR LOANS
In March 2003, investor loaned the Company $20,000. The terms of this loan have
not as yet been determined.
4. ADVANCE FROM CUSTOMER
In March 2003, the Company received $100,000 as an advance against future orders
from a customer with whom it is considering entering into a potential purchase
or merger agreement.
-22-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMPLIDYNE, INC.
By: /s/ Devendar S. Bains
----------------------------------
Name: Devendar S. Bains
Title: Chief Executive Officer,
Treasurer, Principal Accounting
Officer and Director
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ Devendar S. Bains Chief Executive Officer, April 15, 2003
Devendar S. Bains Treasurer, Principal Accounting
Officer and Director
/s/ Tarlochan Bains Vice President and Director April 15, 2003
--------------------------
Tarlochan Bains
/s/ Nirmal Bains Secretary April 15, 2003
--------------------------
Nirmal Bains
/s/Charles J. Ritchie Director April 15, 2003
--------------------------
Charles J. Ritchie
/s/Manish V. Detroja Director April 15, 2003
--------------------------
Manish V. Detroja
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED, AND
THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Devendar S. Bains, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of Amplidyne, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify that:
1 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;
2 Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstance
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report; and
3 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flow of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this
annual report.
4 I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the Company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, is made known to me
by others within the Company, particularly during in which this
annual report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
(c) Presented in this annual report my conclusion about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
my evaluation as of the date of the Evaluation Date;
5 I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have been identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weakness in internal controls; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have significant role in the Company's
internal controls; and
6 I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weakness.
/s/ Devendar S. Bains April 15, 2003
-----------------------------------
Devendar S. Bains
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer