Edgar Filing: FREDERICK COUNTY BANCORP INC

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2011

OR

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-50407

FREDERICK COUNTY BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		20-0049496
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

9 North Market Street

Frederick, Maryland 21701

(Address of registrant’s principal executive offices)

301.620.1400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date. There were 1,529,314 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 31, 2011.

Table of Contents

FREDERICK COUNTY BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I		FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets, September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

	Consolidated Statements of Income, Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

PART II		OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

Item 1A.	Risk Factors

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities

Item 4.	Removed and Reserved

Item 5.	Other Information

Item 6.	Exhibits

	Signatures

Table of Contents

Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	1,720		$	1,469
Federal funds sold	1,359			1,128
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	24,528			39,468
Cash and cash equivalents	27,607			42,065
Investment securities available-for-sale at fair value	38,322			30,178
Restricted stock	1,508			1,521
Loans	209,693			209,387
Less: Allowance for loan losses	(3,129		)	(3,718		)
Net loans	206,564			205,669
Bank premises and equipment	5,916			4,968
Bank owned life insurance	4,561			—
Other assets	6,712			4,642
Total assets	$	291,190		$	289,043

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	42,208		$	41,244
Interest-bearing deposits	203,981			207,380
Total deposits	246,189			248,624
Short-term borrowings	2,700			300
Long-term borrowings	10,000			10,000
Junior subordinated debentures	6,186			6,186
Accrued interest and other liabilities	1,108			738
Total liabilities	266,183			265,848

Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock, per share par value $0.01; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 1,504,494 and 1,469,364 shares issued and outstanding	15			15
Additional paid-in capital	15,518			15,069
Retained earnings	8,674			8,142
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	800			(31		)
Total shareholders’ equity	25,007			23,195
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	291,190		$	289,043

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	3,095		$	3,392	$	9,274		$	10,059
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
Interest — taxable	191			218		540			491
Interest — tax exempt	149			76		393			235
Dividends	14			12		39			37
Interest on federal funds sold	—			1		1			2
Other interest income	14			18		52			42
Total interest income	3,463			3,717		10,299			10,866
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits	538			825		1,780			2,376
Interest on short-term borrowings	34			4		45			15
Interest on long-term borrowings	81			117		240			346
Interest on junior subordinated debentures	101			101		303			303
Total interest expense	754			1,047		2,368			3,040
Net interest income	2,709			2,670		7,931			7,826
Provision for loan losses	900			410		1,515			1,010
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	1,809			2,260		6,416			6,816
Noninterest income:
Securities gains	383			1		386			85
Loss on sale of foreclosed properties	(18		)	—		(18		)	—
Service fees	72			100		225			284
Other operating income	90			49		213			149
Total noninterest income	527			150		806			518
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	1,241			1,201		3,690			3,540
Occupancy and equipment expenses	312			307		976			934
Other operating expenses	630			531		1,692			1,474
Total noninterest expense	2,183			2,039		6,358			5,948
Income before provision for income taxes	153			371		864			1,386
Provision for income tax (benefits) expense	(3		)	129		184			498
Net income	$	156		$	242	$	680		$	888
Basic earnings per share	$	0.11		$	0.16	$	0.46		$	0.60
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.10		$	0.16	$	0.45		$	0.60
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	1,482,044			1,473,258		1,477,708			1,469,011
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	1,519,305			1,488,820		1,513,849			1,481,562

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

Three Months Ended September 30,

(dollars in thousands)	Shares Outstanding		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders’ Equity

Balance, July 1, 2010	1,474,482		$	15	$	15,015		$	7,633	$	291		$	22,954
Comprehensive income:
Net income								242					242
Changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of income taxes of $112										173			173

Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized, net of no income taxes										(1		)	(1		)
Total Comprehensive income													414
Shares repurchased	(5,118	)			(62		)						(62		)
Compensation expense from stock option transactions					51								51
Excess tax benefit from equity-based awards					9								9
Balance, September 30, 2010	1,469,364		$	15	$	15,013		$	7,875	$	463		$	23,366
Balance, July 1, 2011	1,478,354		$	15	$	15,233		$	8,518	$	495		$	24,261
Comprehensive income:
Net income								156					156
Changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of income taxes of $350										537			537
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized, net of income taxes of $151										(232		)	(232		)
Total Comprehensive income													461
Shares issued under stock option transactions	26,140				261								261
Compensation expense from stock option transactions					20								20
Excess tax benefit from equity-based awards					4								4
Balance, September 30, 2011	1,504,494		$	15	$	15,518		$	8,674	$	800		$	25,007

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30,

(dollars in thousands)	Shares Outstanding		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders’ Equity

Balance, January 1, 2010	1,461,802		$	15	$	14,702		$	6,987		$	46		$	21,750
Comprehensive income:
Net income								888						888
Changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of income taxes of $305											468			468
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized, net of income taxes of $33											(51		)	(51		)
Total Comprehensive income														1,305
Shares repurchased	(5,118	)			(62		)							(62		)
Shares issued under stock option transactions	12,680				127									127
Compensation expense from stock option transactions					204									204
Excess tax benefit from equity-based awards					42									42
Balance, September 30, 2010	1,469,364		$	15	$	15,013		$	7,875		$	463		$	23,366
Balance, January 1, 2011	1,469,364		$	15	$	15,069		$	8,142		$	(31	)	$	23,195
Comprehensive income:
Net income								680						680
Changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of income taxes of $694											1,065			1,065
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized, net of income taxes of $152											(234		)	(234		)
Total Comprehensive income														1,511
Dividends paid on common stock								(148		)				(148		)
Shares repurchased	(7,850	)			(105		)							(105		)
Shares issued under stock option transactions	42,980				430									430
Compensation expense from stock option transactions					90									90
Excess tax benefit from equity-based awards					34									34
Balance, September 30, 2011	1,504,494		$	15	$	15,518		$	8,674		$	800		$	25,007

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	680		$	888
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	213			225
Deferred income taxes (benefits)	305			(168		)
Provision for loan losses	1,515			1,010
Securities gains	(386		)	(85		)
Net premium amortization on investment securities	243			253
Loss on sale of foreclosed properties	18			—
Stock-based compensation expense	90			204
Provision for foreclosed properties	124			—
Excess tax benefit from equity-based awards	(34		)	(42		)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest and other assets	(225		)	131
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest and other liabilities	(151		)	110
Net cash provided by operating activities	2,392			2,526
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of investment securities available for sale	(18,000		)	(26,881		)
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale	7,612			4,195
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls investment securities available for sale	3,760			5,269
Redemption of restricted stock	13			45
Net increase in loans	(5,015		)	(4,268		)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance	(4,500		)	—
Purchases of bank premises and equipment	(1,161		)	(192		)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed properties	265			—
Net cash used in investing activities	(17,026		)	(21,832		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in NOW, money market accounts, savings accounts and noninterest-bearing deposits	(4,672		)	17,123
Net increase in time deposits	2,237			19,947
Net increase in short-term borrowings	2,400			(200		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	430			127
Repurchase of common stock	(105		)	(62		)
Dividends paid on common stock	(148		)	—
Excess tax benefit from equity-based awards	34			42
Net cash provided by financing activities	176			36,977
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(14,458		)	17,671
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period	42,065			12,114
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	27,607		$	29,785
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Interest paid	$	2,372		$	3,051
Income taxes paid	$	522		$	584
Transfer of loans to foreclosed properties	$	2,604		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FREDERICK COUNTY BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. General:

Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. (the “Bancorp”), the parent company for its wholly-owned subsidiary Frederick County Bank (the “Bank” and together with Bancorp, the “Company”), was organized in September 2003. The Bank was incorporated under the laws of the state of Maryland in August 2000 and commenced banking operations in October 2001. The Bank provides its customers with various banking services. The Bank offers various loan and deposit products to its customers. The Bank’s customers include individuals and commercial enterprises within its principal market area consisting of Frederick County, Maryland. Additionally, the Bank maintains correspondent banking relationships and transacts daily federal funds sales on an unsecured basis with regional correspondent banks. Note 4 discusses the types of securities the Bank purchases. Note 5 discusses the types of lending in which the Bank engages. The Bank does not have any significant concentrations to any one industry or customer. The Bank has a direct subsidiary established to hold foreclosed properties known as FCB Hagerstown, LLC. Bancorp also has a subsidiary trust, established to issue trust preferred securities, and one direct subsidiary established to hold foreclosed properties known as FCB Holdings, Inc.. See Note 7 for additional disclosures related to the subsidiary trust, which issued trust preferred securities.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, the instructions for Form 10-Q, Regulation S-X, and general practices within the banking industry. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results shown in this interim report are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other period or for the full year ending December 31, 2011.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and could differ from actual results.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The FASB issued new guidance under ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) to improve disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance requires entities to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the same. It also requires Level 3 reconciliation to be presented on a gross basis disclosing purchases, sales, issuances and settlements separately. The guidance is effective for interim and annual financial periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for gross basis presentation for Level 3 reconciliation, which is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The disclosure requirements effective for interim and annual financial periods beginning after December 15, 2009 have been adopted for the interim period ended March 31, 2010, while the disclosure requirements effective for gross basis presentation for Level 3 reconciliation beginning after December 15, 2010 have been adopted for the interim period ended March 31, 2011.

The FASB issued new guidance under ASU 2010-20, Receivables - Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (Topic 310). The guidance requires entities to provide disclosures designed to facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of (i) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entity’s portfolio of financing receivables, (ii) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses and (iii) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. Disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment, the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses, and class of financing receivable, which is generally a disaggregation of portfolio segment. The required disclosures include, among other things, a roll forward of the allowance for credit losses as well as information about modified, impaired, non-accrual and past due loans and credit quality indicators. ASU 2010-20 became effective for the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2010, as it relates to disclosures required as of the end of a reporting period. The Company adopted the guidance for disclosures that relate to activity during a reporting period on January 1, 2011 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

The FASB issued new guidance under ASU 2010-28, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) — When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This guidance modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether

Table of Contents

it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2011 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The FASB issued new guidance under ASU 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310) — A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. This guidance clarifies which loan modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings and is intended to assist creditors in determining whether a modification of the terms of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring, both for purposes of recording an impairment loss and for disclosure of troubled debt restructurings. In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, a creditor must separately conclude, under this guidance, that both of the following exist: (a) the restructuring constitutes a concession; and (b) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. ASU 2011-02 became effective for the Company on July 1, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-02 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The FASB issued new guidance under ASU 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) — Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This guidance is to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. This amendment removes from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to the criterion. ASU 2011-03 will be effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. Adoption of ASU 2011-03 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The FASB issued new guidance under ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) — Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. These amendments result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”). Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 will be effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is not permitted. Adoption of ASU 2011-04 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). This guidance requires companies to present comprehensive income in a single statement below net income or in a separate statement of comprehensive income immediately following the income statement. The guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity, which is our current presentation. This guidance does not change which items are reported in other comprehensive income or the requirement to report reclassifications of items from other comprehensive income to net income. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and will require retrospective application for all periods presented.

The FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This guidance is designed to simplify how entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments in this guidance permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2011-08 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Table of Contents

Note 2. Earnings Per Share:

Earnings per share (“EPS”) are disclosed as basic and diluted. Basic EPS is generally computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, whereas diluted EPS essentially reflects the potential dilution in basic EPS that could occur if other contracts to issue common stock were exercised.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income	$	156	$	242	$	680	$	888
Basic earnings per share	$	0.11	$	0.16	$	0.46	$	0.60
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.10	$	0.16	$	0.45	$	0.60
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	1,482,044		1,473,258		1,477,708		1,469,011
Effect of dilutive securities — stock options	37,261		15,562		36,141		12,551
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	1,519,305		1,488,820		1,513,849		1,481,562
Anti-dilutive securities outstanding	—		118,700		—		121,700

Note 3. Stock Based Compensation Plans:

The Company maintains two stock based compensation plans, (i) the 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan (the “2001 Plan”), under which grants of incentive and non-incentive stock options were made through 2010; and the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”), under which grants of incentive and non-incentive options, restricted stock and restricted stock units may be made. Each plan has been presented to and approved by the Company’s shareholders. There were 118,700 stock options granted in April 2010 under the 2001 Plan. No further awards may be made under the 2001 Plan. No awards of stock based compensation were made, under either the 2001 Plan or the 2011 Plan, during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011. The Company recognizes the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity investment based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $20 thousand and $90 thousand, respectively, compared to $51 thousand and $204 thousand, respectively, for the same periods in 2010. As of September 30, 2011, there was $41 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options that will be expensed over the period October 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012.

The weighted-average fair value of options granted in the year ended December 31, 2010 was $3.17, and was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following weighted average assumptions.

	December 31, 2010
Risk free interest rate of return	3.80	%
Expected option life (months)	60
Expected volatility	25	%
Expected dividends	—	%

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The expected lives are based on the “simplified” method allowed by ASC Topic 718 Compensation, whereby the expected term is equal to the midpoint between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term of the award. The expected volatility is based on the Company’s estimated level of volatility. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s expectation of dividend payouts.

The following is a summary of stock option transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

	Options Issued and Outstanding	Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Balance at January 1, 2011	235,430	$	10.69
Exercised	42,980	10.03
Balance at September 30, 2011	192,450	$	10.84
Exercisable at September 30, 2011	143,930	$	10.67

Table of Contents

Note 4. Investment Portfolio:

The following tables set forth certain information regarding the Company’s investment portfolio at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Available-for-sale portfolio

September 30, 2011

(dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Average Yield
State and political subdivisions:
Due after five years through ten years	$	5,002	$	309	$	—	$	5,311	4.51	%
Due after ten years	7,864		439		—		8,303		5.39	%
	12,866		748		—		13,614
Mortgage-backed debt securities	22,944		521		—		23,465		3.14	%
Small business administration	891		52		—		943		3.69	%
Equity securities	300		—		—		300		—	%
	$	37,001	$	1,321	$	—	$	38,322	3.79	%

December 31, 2010

(dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Average Yield
State and political subdivisions:
Due after five years through ten years	$	2,094	$	12	$	21	$	2,085	5.36	%
Due after ten years	7,005		50		123		6,932		5.74	%
	9,099		62		144		9,017
Mortgage-backed debt securities	20,830		158		127		20,861		2.71	%
Equity securities	300		—		—		300		—	%
	$	30,229	$	220	$	271	$	30,178	3.57	%

There were no unrealized losses as of September 30, 2011.

December 31, 2010

	Continuous unrealized losses existing for less than 12 months				Continuous unrealized losses existing for 12 months and greater				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
State and political subdivisions	$	4,253	$	144	—		$	—	$	4,253	$	144
Mortgage-backed debt securities	9,398		127		—		—		9,398		127
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	13,651	$	271	$	—	$	—	$	13,651	$	271

Management systematically evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. This analysis requires management to consider various factors, which include: (1) duration and magnitude of the decline in value; (2) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers; and (3) the structure of the security. An impairment loss is recognized in earnings only when: (1) we intend to sell the debt security; (2) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. In situations where we intend to sell or when it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security, the entire impairment loss must be recognized in earnings. In all other situations, only the portion of the impairment loss representing the credit loss must be recognized in earnings, with the remaining portion being recognized in shareholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes. Credit loss is determined by calculating the present value of future cash flows of the security compared to the amortized cost of the security. Realized gains or losses on the sale of investment and mortgage-backed securities are reported in earnings and determined using the amortized cost of the specific security sold.

Table of Contents

Restricted Stock

The following table shows the amounts of restricted stock as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta	$	894	$	907
Federal Reserve Bank	574		574
Atlantic Central Bankers Bank	40		40
	$	1,508	$	1,521

Note 5. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses:

Loans consist of the following:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011			% of Loans		December 31, 2010			% of Loans
Construction and land development	$	16,931		8	%	$	15,742		8	%
Real estate:
Commercial real estate mortgage	128,415			62	%	128,998			62	%
Residential real estate mortgage	36,677			17	%	37,143			17	%
Total construction and real estate mortgage	165,092			79	%	166,141			79	%
Commercial and industrial	25,916			12	%	25,778			12	%
Consumer	1,754			1	%	1,726			1	%
	209,693			100	%	209,387			100	%
Less allowance for loan losses	(3,129		)			(3,718		)
Net loans	$	206,564				$	205,669

Allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is summarized as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	Construction and Land Development			Commercial Real Estate Mortgage			Residential Real Estate Mortgage		Commercial and Industrial			Consumer		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	273		$	2,546		$	432	$	455		$	12	$	3,718
Charge-offs	(2		)	(1,969		)	—		(161		)	—		(2,132		)
Recoveries	—			6			—		21			1		28
Provisions	26			1,410			56		23			—		1,515
Ending balance	$	297		$	1,993		$	488	$	338		$	13	$	3,129
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	51		$	169		$	20	$	70		$	—	$	310
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	246		$	1,824		$	468	$	268		$	13	$	2,819

Loans:
Ending balance	$	16,931		$	128,415		$	36,677	$	25,916		$	1,754	$	209,693
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,878		$	10,725		$	2,024	$	6,633		$	18	$	22,278
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	14,053		$	117,690		$	34,653	$	19,283		$	1,736	$	187,415

Table of Contents

Credit quality indicators as of September 30, 2011 are as follows:

Internally assigned grade:

Pass — loans in this category have strong asset quality and liquidity along with a multi-year track record of profitability.

Special mention — loans in this category are currently protected but are potentially weak. The credit risk may be relatively minor, yet constitute an increased risk in light of the circumstances surrounding a specific loan.

Substandard — loans in this category show signs of continuing negative financial trends and unprofitability and therefore, is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.

Doubtful — loans in this category contain weaknesses that make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors which may work to the advantage and strengthening of the asset, its classification as loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined.

Loss - loans classified in this category are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable loans is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has no recovery value, but that it is not practical to defer writing it off, even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. Such credits should be recommended for charge-off.

Commercial credit exposure - Credit risk profile by internally assigned grade

(dollars in thousands)	Construction and Land Development		Commercial Real Estate Mortgage		Commercial and Industrial		Total
Pass	$	10,703	$	112,195	$	18,675	$	141,573
Special mention	2,301		6,453		1,003		9,757
Substandard	3,927		9,767		6,238		19,932
Total	$	16,931	$	128,415	$	25,916	$	171,262

Consumer credit exposure - Credit risk profile by internally assigned grade

(dollars in thousands)	Residential Real Estate Mortgage		Consumer		Total
Pass	$	33,657	$	1,673	$	35,330
Special mention	1,036		—		1,036
Substandard	1,984		81		2,065
Total	$	36,677	$	1,754	$	38,431

An age analysis of past due loans as of September 30, 2011 is as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total		Greater than 90 Days and Still Accruing
Construction and land development	$	—	$	989	$	61	$	1,050	$	15,881	$	16,931	$	—
Commercial real estate mortgage	134		2,175		1,012		3,321		125,094		128,415		—
Residential real estate mortgage	458		100		191		749		35,928		36,677		—
Commercial and industrial	—		81		—		81		25,835		25,916		—
Consumer	—		20		—		20		1,734		1,754		—
Total	$	592	$	3,365	$	1,264	$	5,221	$	204,472	$	209,693	$	—

Table of Contents

The Company’s charge-off policy states after all collection efforts have been exhausted and the loan is deemed to be a loss, it will be charged to the Company’s established allowance for loan losses. Consumer loans subject to the Uniform Retail Credit Classification are charged-off as follows: (a) closed end loans are charged-off no later than 120 days after becoming delinquent; (b) consumer loans to borrowers who subsequently declare bankruptcy, where the Company is an unsecured creditor, are charged-off within 60 days of receipt of the notification from the bankruptcy court; (c) fraudulent loans are charged-off within 90 days of discovery; and (d) death of a borrower will cause a charge-off to be incurred at such time an actual loss is determined. All other types of loans are generally evaluated for loss potential at the 90th day past due threshold; and any loss is recognized no later than the 120th day past due threshold; each loss is evaluated on its specific facts regarding the appropriate timing to recognize the loss.

The Company has recorded $842 thousand in partial charge-offs related to three (3) commercial real estate loan relationships that are still in the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011.

Information on impaired loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized

With no allowance recorded:
Construction and land development	$	1,833	$	1,833	$	—	$	1,936	$	213
Commercial real estate mortgage	8,695		9,537		—		8,535		293
Residential real estate mortgage	1,507		1,507		—		936		65
Commercial and industrial	6,336		6,336		—		5,258		296
Consumer	18		18		—		9		4
Total with no allowance	$	18,389	$	19,321	$	—	$	16,674	$	871
With an allowance recorded:
Construction and land development	$	1,045	$	1,045	$	51	$	705	$	57
Commercial real estate mortgage	2,030		2,030		169		3,384		94
Residential real estate mortgage	517		517		20		517		37
Commercial and industrial	297		297		70		356		2
Total with an allowance	$	3,889	$	3,889	$	310	$	4,962	$	190
Grand total:
Construction and land development	$	2,878	$	2,878	$	51	$	2,641	$	270
Commercial real estate mortgage	10,725		11,567		169		11,919		387
Residential real estate mortgage	2,024		2,024		20		1,453		102
Commercial and industrial	6,633		6,633		70		5,614		298
Consumer	18		18		—		9		4
Grand total	$	22,278	$	23,120	$	310	$	21,636	$	1,061

Table of Contents

Information on performing and nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Impaired performing loans:
Construction and land development	$	2,817	$	2,292
Commercial real estate mortgage	6,111		3,892
Residential real estate mortgage	885		335
Commercial and industrial	6,245		2,795
Consumer	—		—
Troubled debt restructurings:
Construction and land development	—		—
Commercial real estate mortgage	3,514		7,306
Residential real estate mortgage	948		546
Commercial and industrial	307		1,620
Consumer	18		—
Total impaired performing loans	20,845		18,786
Impaired nonperforming loans (nonaccrual):
Construction and land development	—		48
Commercial real estate mortgage	191		390
Residential real estate mortgage	191		—
Commercial and industrial	81		—
Consumer	—		—
Troubled debt restructurings:
Construction and land development	61		63
Commercial real estate mortgage	909		1,523
Residential real estate mortgage	—		—
Commercial and industrial	—		178
Consumer	—		—
Total impaired nonperforming loans (nonaccrual):	1,433		2,202
Total impaired loans	$	22,278	$	20,988

Information on troubled debt restructurings for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 is as follows:

	Three months ended September 30, 2011					Nine months ended September 30, 2011
	Number of contracts	Pre- modification outstanding recorded investment		Post- modification outstanding recorded investment		Number of contracts	Pre- modification outstanding recorded investment		Post- modification outstanding recorded investment
Troubled debt restructurings:
Construction and land development	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate mortgage	—	$	—	$	—	2	$	441	$	441
Residential real estate mortgage	—	$	—	$	—	2	$	1,045	$	1,045
Commercial and industrial	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—	$	—
Troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted:
Construction and land development	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate mortgage	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—	$	—
Residential real estate mortgage	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial and industrial	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—	$	—

Table of Contents

Note 6. Deposits:

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s deposit base at the dates indicated.

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	42,208	$	41,244
Interest-bearing demand deposits:
NOW accounts	14,177		15,049
Money market accounts	66,144		71,317
Savings accounts	5,229		4,820
Certificates of deposit:
$100,000 or more	45,018		47,566
Less than $100,000	73,413		68,628
Total deposits	$	246,189	$	248,624

Note 7. Trust preferred securities/junior subordinated debentures and other long-term borrowings:

In December 2006, Bancorp completed the private placement of an aggregate of $6.00 million of trust preferred securities through FCBI Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”), a newly formed trust subsidiary organized under Connecticut law, of which Bancorp owns all of the common securities of $186 thousand. The principal asset of the Trust is a similar amount of Bancorp’s junior subordinated debentures. The interest rate on the trust preferred securities and underlying subordinated debentures will adjust from a fixed rate of 6.5375% to a floating rate, adjusted quarterly, of 163 basis points over three month Libor, which would have been approximately 2.05% as of October 31, 2011, effective for the interest payment period beginning December 16, 2011. The junior subordinated debentures mature on December 15, 2036, and may be redeemed at par, at Bancorp’s option, on any interest payment date commencing December 15, 2011. The securities are redeemable prior to December 15, 2011, at a premium ranging up to 103.525% of the principal amount thereof, upon the occurrence of certain regulatory or legal events. The obligations of Bancorp with respect to the Trust’s preferred securities constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Bancorp of Trust’s obligations with respect to the trust preferred securities to the extent set forth in the related guarantee. Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, Bancorp may elect from time to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debentures, resulting in a deferral of distribution payments on the related trust preferred securities. If the Company defers interest payments on the junior subordinated debentures, or otherwise is in default of the obligations, the Company would be prohibited from making dividend payments to its shareholders.

The trust preferred securities may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy purposes up to 25% of Tier 1 capital, net of goodwill after its inclusion. The portion of the trust preferred securities not qualifying as Tier 1 capital may be included as part of total qualifying capital in Tier 2 capital, subject to limitation.

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had a total of $10.00 million in borrowings under its credit facility from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”). This amount consists of two (2) $5.00 million borrowings with fixed interest rates of 3.29% and 3.05%, with a maturity of November 19, 2015. Outstanding advances are secured by collateral consisting of a blanket lien on qualifying loans in the Bank’s residential mortgage loan portfolio and certain commercial real estate loans.

Table of Contents

Note 8. Noninterest Expense:

Noninterest expense consists of the following:

(dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Salaries	$	1,061		$	1,027		$	3,123		$	3,005
Bonus	—			—			—			5
Deferred Personnel Costs	(24		)	(11		)	(81		)	(45		)
Payroll Taxes	69			65			229			210
Employee Insurance	76			69			240			207
Other Employee Benefits	59			51			179			158
Depreciation	70			74			213			226
Rent	97			100			314			300
Utilities	25			22			79			76
Repairs and Maintenance	51			52			165			160
ATM Expense	30			21			75			66
Other Occupancy and Equipment Expenses	39			38			130			106
Postage and Supplies	17			16			56			47
Data Processing	100			90			299			276
Advertising and Promotion	59			46			188			188
Provision for foreclosed properties	124			—			124			—
FDIC insurance	57			100			246			274
Legal	5			24			37			46
Insurance	14			16			44			44
Consulting	10			8			27			17
Courier	4			4			12			13
Audit Fees	48			48			144			144
Other	192			179			515			425
	$	2,183		$	2,039		$	6,358		$	5,948

Note 9. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan:

The Company has a Section 401(k) profit sharing plan covering employees meeting certain eligibility requirements as to minimum age and years of service. Employees may make voluntary contributions to the Plan through payroll deductions on a pre-tax basis. The Company has the discretion to make matching contributions of 100% of the employee’s contributions up to 4% of the employee’s salary. A participant’s account under the Plan, together with investment earnings thereon, is normally distributable, following retirement, death, disability or other termination of employment, in a single lump-sum payment.

The Company made matching contributions of $48 thousand and $144 thousand for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $42 thousand and $126 thousand for the same periods in 2010.

Note 10. Shareholders’ Equity:

Capital:

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company, once it exceeds $500 million in assets, and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject as of September 30, 2011.

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2011, the most recent notification from the regulatory agency categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification which management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are presented in the following tables.

September 30, 2011

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				Minimum To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Tier 1 Capital
To Risk-Weighted Assets
Company	$	30,207	12.70	%	$	9,514	4.00	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	$	29,478	12.56	%	$	9,384	4.00	%	$	14,077	6.00	%

Total Capital
To Risk-Weighted Assets
Company	$	33,182	13.95	%	$	19,027	8.00	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	$	32,413	13.82	%	$	18,769	8.00	%	$	23,461	10.00	%

Tier 1 Capital
To Average Assets
Company	$	30,207	10.17	%	$	11,884	4.00	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	$	29,478	10.02	%	$	11,764	4.00	%	$	14,705	5.00	%

December 31, 2010

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				Minimum To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Tier 1 Capital
To Risk-Weighted Assets
Company	$	29,226	12.86	%	$	9,094	4.00	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	$	28,430	12.56	%	$	9,055	4.00	%	$	13,582	6.00	%

Total Capital
To Risk-Weighted Assets
Company	$	32,079	14.11	%	$	18,188	8.00	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	$	31,271	13.81	%	$	18,110	8.00	%	$	22,637	10.00	%

Tier 1 Capital
To Average Assets
Company	$	29,226	10.03	%	$	11,652	4.00	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	$	28,430	9.78	%	$	11,625	4.00	%	$	14,531	5.00	%

On June 26, 2007, the Company authorized the repurchase of up to 146,000 shares of its common stock, for an aggregate expenditure of not more than $4.5 million, through September 30, 2012, or earlier termination of the program by the Board of Directors. Repurchases, if any, by the Company pursuant to this authorization are expected to enable the Company to repurchase its shares at an attractive price, and to provide a source of liquidity for the Company’s shares. As of September 30, 2011, there have been 12,968 shares repurchased by the Company at an average price of $12.88.

Note 11. Fair Value Measurements:

The Company follows the guidance issued by the FASB under ASC Topic 825 Financial Instruments regarding fair value measurements and disclosures topic. This guidance permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at

Table of Contents

fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The election to use the fair value option is available when an entity first recognizes a financial asset or financial liability or upon entering into a Company commitment. Subsequent changes must be recorded in earnings. The Company has yet to apply the fair value option to any assets or liabilities. This guidance clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Under this guidance, fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. This guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under this guidance are described below.

Level 1		Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2		Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities which use observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in active markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3		Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include most U.S. government and agency securities, liquid mortgage products, active listed equities and most money market securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. As required by fair value measurement and disclosures guidance, the Company does not adjust the quoted price for such instruments.

The types of instruments valued based on quoted prices in markets that are not active, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency include most investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds, less liquid mortgage products, less liquid equities, state, municipal and provincial obligations. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Level 3 is for positions that are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used.

Impaired loans are evaluated and valued at the time the loan is identified as impaired, at the lower of cost or market value. Market value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing these loans and is classified at a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory and/or accounts receivable. The value of real estate collateral is determined based on appraisal by qualified licensed appraisers hired by the Company. The value of business equipment, inventory and accounts receivable collateral is based on the net book value on the business’ financial statements and, if necessary, discounted based on management’s review and analysis. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, and/or management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business. Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly, based on the same factors identified above.

Table of Contents

The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

					Significant
	Carrying				Other		Significant
	Value		Quoted		Observable		Unobservable
September 30, 2011	(Fair		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
(dollars in thousands)	Value)		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed debt	$	23,465	$	—	$	23,465	$	—
State and political subdivisions	13,614		—		13,614		—
Small business administration	943		—		943		—
Equity securities	300		—		300		—
Total	$	38,322	$	—	$	38,322	$	—

					Significant
	Carrying				Other		Significant
	Value		Quoted		Observable		Unobservable
December 31, 2010	(Fair		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
(dollars in thousands)	Value)		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed debt	$	20,861	$	—	$	20,861	$	—
State and political subdivisions	9,017		—		9,017		—
Equity securities	300		—		300		—
Total	$	30,178	$	—	$	30,178	$	—

The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

					Significant
	Carrying				Other		Significant
	Value		Quoted		Observable		Unobservable
September 30, 2011	(Fair		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
(dollars in thousands)	Value)		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans:
Construction and land development	$	2,827	$	—	$	—	$	2,827
Commercial real estate mortgage	10,556		—		—		10,556
Residential real estate mortgage	2,004		—		—		2,004
Commercial and industrial	6,563		—		—		6,563
Consumer	18		—		—		18
Total impaired loans	$	21,968	$	—	$	—	$	21,968
Foreclosed properties:
Commercial real estate mortgage	$	2,228	$	—	$	—	$	2,228
Residential real estate mortgage	731		$	—	$	—	731
Total foreclosed properties	$	2,959	$	—	$	—	$	2,959

Table of Contents

					Significant
	Carrying				Other		Significant
	Value		Quoted		Observable		Unobservable
December 31, 2010	(Fair		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
(dollars in thousands)	Value)		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans:
Construction and land development	$	2,248	$	—	$	—	$	2,248
Commercial real estate mortgage	12,143		—		—		12,143
Residential real estate mortgage	870		—		—		870
Commercial and industrial	4,483		—		—		4,483
Consumer	—		—		—		—
Total impaired loans	$	19,744	$	—	$	—	$	19,744
Foreclosed properties:
Commercial real estate mortgage	$	231	$	—	$	—	$	231
Residential real estate mortgage	495		$	—	$	—	495
Total foreclosed properties	$	726	$	—	$	—	$	726

The following tables provide a reconciliation of all assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

	Foreclosed			Impaired
(dollars in thousands)	Properties			Loans
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	726		$	19,744
Total net gains (losses) for the period included in:
Gains (losses) on sale of foreclosed properties	(18		)	—
Provision for foreclosed properties	(124		)	—
Purchases	—			—
Sales	(229		)	—
Transfers in	2,604			7,908
Transfers out	—			(5,684		)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	2,959		$	21,968

	Foreclosed		Impaired
(dollars in thousands)	Properties		Loans
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	495	$	12,350
Total net gains (losses) for the period included in:
Gain on sale of foreclosed properties	—		—
Other comprehensive gain (loss)	—		—
Purchases	—		—
Sales	—		—
Transfers in	—		7,387
Transfers out	—		(1,176		)
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	495	$	18,661

Table of Contents

Note 12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
(dollars in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
FINANCIAL ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	27,607	$	27,607	$	42,065	$	42,065
Investment securities available for sale	38,322		38,322		30,178		30,178
Restricted stock	1,508		1,508		1,521		1,521
Net loans	206,564		206,413		205,669		205,878
Accrued interest receivable	848		848		850		850

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Deposits	$	246,18	$	256,162	$	248,624	$	257,805
Short-term borrowings	2,700		2,700		300		300
Long-term borrowings	10,000		10,824		10,000		10,438
Junior subordinated debentures	6,186		6,134		6,186		6,058
Accrued interest payable	136		136		140		140

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value disclosures for financial instruments as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Cash and cash equivalents:

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents is estimated to approximate the carrying amounts.

Investment securities and restricted stock:

Fair values are based on quoted market prices for Level 1 and 2, except for certain restricted stocks where fair value equals par value because of certain redemption restrictions.

Loans:

Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Each portfolio is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms by performing and non-performing categories.

The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting estimated cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The estimated cash flows do not anticipate prepayments.

Management has made estimates of fair value discount rates that it believes to be reasonable. However, because there is no market for many of these financial instruments, management has no basis to determine whether the fair value presented for loans would be indicative of the value negotiated in an actual sale.

Deposits:

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW accounts and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The fair value estimates do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.

Short-term borrowings:

The fair value of short-term borrowings is determined using rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Long-term borrowings:

The fair value of the long-term borrowings is determined using rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms

Table of Contents

and remaining maturities.

Junior subordinated debentures:

The junior subordinated debentures are unsecured obligations of the Company and are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all present and future senior indebtedness of the Company. The Company has entered into a guarantee, which together with its obligations under the junior subordinated debentures and the declaration of trust governing the Trust provides a full and unconditional guarantee of the Trust’s preferred securities. The fair value of junior subordinated debentures is determined using rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. See Note 7 for additional disclosures.

Accrued Interest:

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements relating to Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.’s (“Bancorp”) and Frederick County Bank’s (the “Bank” and together with Bancorp, the “Company”) beliefs, expectations, anticipations and plans regarding, among other things, general economic trends, interest rates, product expansions and other matters. Such forward-looking statements are identified by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “believe”, “expect”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “likely”, “unlikely”, “continue”, or similar terms and are subject to numerous uncertainties, such as federal monetary policy, inflation, employment, profitability and consumer confidence levels, both nationally and in the Company’s market area, the health of the real estate and construction market in the Company’s market area, the Company’s ability to develop and market new products and to enter new markets, competitive challenges in the Company’s market, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in accounting principles or the application thereof and other factors, and as such, there can be no assurance that future events will develop in accordance with the forward-looking statements contained herein. Readers are cautioned against placing undue reliance on any such forward-looking statement. In addition, the Company’s past results of operations do not necessarily indicate its future results.

General

The following paragraphs provide an overview of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This discussion is intended to assist the readers in their analysis of the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto.

Bancorp, the parent company for the Bank, its wholly-owned subsidiary, was organized in September 2003. The Bank was incorporated under the laws of the state of Maryland in August 2000 and commenced banking operations in October 2001. The Bank provides its customers with various banking services, from three banking offices in the City of Frederick and one in Walkersville, Maryland. The Bank currently has its fifth banking office under construction, which will be located in the City of Frederick and is expected to open by the end of 2011. The Bank offers various loan and deposit products to its customers. The Bank’s customers include individuals and commercial enterprises within its principal market area consisting of Frederick County, Maryland. Additionally, the Bank maintains correspondent banking relationships and transacts daily federal funds sales on an unsecured basis with regional correspondent banks. Note 4 discusses the types of securities the Bank purchases. Note 5 discusses the types of lending in which the Bank engages. The Bank does not have any significant concentrations to any one industry or customer. Bancorp also has a subsidiary trust, established to issue trust preferred securities, and two subsidiaries established to hold foreclosed properties. The two subsidiaries established to hold foreclosed properties are known as FCB Holdings, Inc. (a direct subsidiary of Bancorp) and FCB Hagerstown, LLC (an indirect subsidiary of Bancorp). See Note 7 for additional disclosures related to the subsidiary trust, which issued trust preferred securities.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair

Table of Contents

value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when available. The estimates used in management’s assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses require that management make assumptions about matters that are uncertain at the time of estimation. Differences in these assumptions and differences between the estimated and actual losses could have a material effect. For discussions related to the critical accounting policies of the Company, refer to the sections in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis entitled “Income Taxes,” “Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Investment Portfolio.”

Loans

Loans increased by $306 thousand, or 0.15%, from December 31, 2010, to a balance of $209.69 million as of September 30, 2011, but decreased by $8.91 million, or 4.08% from September 30, 2010. Management continues to be cautious about the economy and therefore has maintained the lower growth loan strategy.

Assets

In May 2011, the Company made a $4.50 million purchase of bank owned life insurance. This product produces tax-exempt income that will assist in improving the tax effectiveness of the Company.

Deposits

Deposits decreased by $2.44 million, or 0.98%, from December 31, 2010 to a balance of $246.19 million as of September 30, 2011, and by $10.19 million, or 3.98% from September 30, 2010. The balance of certificates of deposit increased to $118.43 million as of September 30, 2011 from $116.19 million as of December 31, 2010; while noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased slightly by $956 thousand from $41.24 million, NOW and savings accounts decreased slightly to $19.41 million from $19.87 million, and money market accounts decreased to $66.14 million from $71.32 million, all for the same periods. As a result of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd Frank”), since July 21, 2011 banks are no longer prohibited from paying interest on demand deposit accounts, including those from businesses. At this time, there has been little impact from the elimination of this prohibition on the Bank’s interest expense, allocation of deposits, deposit pricing, loan pricing, net interest margin, ability to compete, ability to establish and maintain customer relationships, or profitability.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Net income was $156 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $242 thousand of net income for the same period in 2010. The decrease in earnings for this quarter in 2011 is primarily related to an increase in the provision for loan losses of $490 thousand, which has been offset slightly by the $383 thousand in securities gains recognized. Net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 increased (on a tax-equivalent basis) to $2.82 million from $2.74 million for the same period in 2010. Basic earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $0.10 and $0.16, respectively, and were based on weighted-average number of shares outstanding of 1,482,044 and 1,473,258, respectively. Diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $0.10 and $0.16, respectively, and were based on weighted-average number of shares outstanding of 1,519,305 and 1,488,820, respectively.

The Company experienced an annualized return on average assets of 0.21% and 0.32% for the three-months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Additionally, the Company experienced an annualized return on average shareholders’ equity of 2.54% and 4.14% for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Net income was $680 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $888 thousand of net income for the same period in 2010. The decrease in earnings for this period in 2011 is primarily related to an increase in the provision for loan losses of $505 thousand, an increase in noninterest expenses of $410 thousand primarily reflecting higher foreclosure expenses, along with $386 thousand of securities gains in 2011 compared to only $85 thousand in 2010. Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased (on a tax-equivalent basis) to $8.23 million from $8.05 million for the same period in 2010. Basic earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $0.46 and $0.60, respectively, and were based on weighted-average number of shares outstanding of 1,477,708 and 1,468,011, respectively. Diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $0.45 and $0.60, respectively, and were based on weighted-average number of shares outstanding of 1,513,849 and 1,481,562, respectively.

The Company experienced an annualized return on average assets of 0.31% and 0.42% for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Additionally, the Company experienced an annualized return on average shareholders’ equity of 3.76% and 5.20% for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Table of Contents

Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity; Interest Rates and Interest Differential

The following tables show average balances of asset and liability categories, interest income and interest expense, and average yields and rates for the periods indicated.

	2011						2010
Three Months Ended September 30, (dollars in thousands)	Average daily balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ rate		Average daily balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold	$	1,460	$	—	—	%	$	1,355	$	1	0.29	%
Interest bearing deposits in other banks	24,299		14		0.23		29,661		18		0.24
Investment securities (1):
Taxable	29,028		205		2.80		33,355		230		2.74
Tax-exempt (2)	16,355		226		5.48		7,458		115		6.12
Loans (3)	210,646		3,126		5.89		218,681		3,426		6.22
Total interest-earning assets	281,788		3,571		5.03		290,510		3,790		5.18
Noninterest-earning assets	15,316						7,657
Total assets	$	297,104					$	298,167

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	$	14,833	$	8	0.21	%	$	14,634	$	10	0.27	%
Savings accounts	5,328		2		0.15		5,281		2		0.15
Money market accounts	68,324		91		0.53		67,275		185		1.09
Certificates of deposit $100,000 or more	46,588		186		1.58		53,464		271		2.01
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000	74,953		251		1.34		75,495		357		1.88
Short-term borrowings	3,584		34		3.76		424		4		3.74
Long-term borrowings	10,000		81		3.21		10,000		117		4.64
Junior subordinated debentures	6,186		101		6.48		6,186		101		6.48
Total interest-bearing liabilities	229799		754		1.30		232,759		1,047		1.78
Noninterest-bearing deposits	41,790						40,938
Noninterest-bearing liabilities	904						1,061
Total liabilities	272,493						274,758
Total shareholders’ equity	24,611						23,409
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	297,104					$	298,167
Net interest income			$	2,817					$	2,743
Net interest spread					3.73	%					3.40	%
Net interest margin					3.97	%					3.75	%

(1) Yields on securities available-for-sale have been calculated on the basis of historical cost and do not give effect to changes in the fair value of those securities, which is reflected as a component of shareholders’ equity.

(2) Presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 34%. Taxable-equivalent adjustments of $77 thousand in 2011 and $39 thousand in 2010 are included in the calculation of the tax-exempt investment interest income.

(3) Presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 34%. Taxable-equivalent adjustments of $31 thousand in 2011 and $34 thousand in 2010 are included in the calculation of the loan interest income. Net loan origination income in interest income totaled $9 thousand in 2011 and $10 thousand in 2010.

Table of Contents

	2011						2010
Nine Months Ended September 30, (dollars in thousands)	Average daily balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ rate		Average daily balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield/ rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold	$	1,288	$	1	0.10	%	$	1,208	$	2	0.22	%
Interest bearing deposits in other banks	29,556		52		0.24		24,739		42		0.23
Investment securities (1):
Taxable	27,344		579		2.83		25,762		528		2.74
Tax-exempt (2)	13,850		595		5.74		7,702		356		6.18
Loans (3)	208,951		9,370		6.00		216,775		10,159		6.27
Total interest-earning assets	280,989		10,597		5.04		276,186		11,087		5.37
Noninterest-earning assets	11,306						7,569
Total assets	$	292,295					$	283,755

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	$	14,753	$	30	0.27	%	$	13,549	$	21	0.21	%
Savings accounts	5,078		4		0.11		5,088		4		0.11
Money market accounts	71,480		379		0.71		62,904		535		1.14
Certificates of deposit $100,000 or more	47,095		580		1.65		49,569		763		2.06
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000	69,886		787		1.50		72,479		1,053		1.94
Short-term borrowings	1,580		45		3.81		474		15		4.23
Long-term borrowings	10,000		240		3.21		10,000		346		4.63
Junior subordinated debentures	6,186		303		6.55		6,186		303		6.55
Total interest-bearing liabilities	226,058		2,368		1.40		220,249		3,040		1.85
Noninterest-bearing deposits	41,371						39,906
Noninterest-bearing liabilities	781						835
Total liabilities	268,210						260,990
Total shareholders’ equity	24,085						22,765
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	292,295					$	283,755
Net interest income			$	8,229					$	8,047
Net interest spread					3.64	%					3.52	%
Net interest margin					3.92	%					3.90	%

(2) Presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 34%. Taxable-equivalent adjustments of $202 thousand in 2011 and $121 thousand in 2010 are included in the calculation of the tax-exempt investment interest income.

(3) Presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 34%. Taxable-equivalent adjustments of $96 thousand in 2011 and $100 thousand in 2010 are included in the calculation of the loan interest income. Net loan origination income in interest income totaled $25 thousand in 2011 and $46 thousand in 2010.

Table of Contents

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table indicates the changes in interest income and interest expense that are attributable to changes in average volume and average rates, in comparison with the same period in the preceding year on a fully taxable equivalent basis. The change in interest due to the combined rate-volume variance has been allocated entirely to the change in rate.

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 compared to 2010									Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 compared to 2010
	Increase (decrease) Due to						Net increase			Increase (decrease) Due to						Net increase
(dollars in thousands)	Volume			Rate			(decrease)			Volume			Rate			(decrease)
Interest income
Interest-earning assets:
Interest on federal funds sold	$	—		$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	—		$	(1	)	$	(1	)
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	(3		)	(1		)	(4		)	15			(5		)	10
Investment securities:
Taxable	(30		)	5			(25		)	58			(7		)	(51		)
Tax-exempt	136			(25		)	111			507			(268		)	239
Loans	(125		)	(175		)	(300		)	(654		)	(135		)	(789		)
Total interest income	(22		)	(197		)	(219		)	(74		)	(416		)	(49		)

Interest expense
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	—			(2		)	(2		)	—			9			9
Money market accounts	3			(97		)	(94		)	130			(286		)	(156		)
Certificates of deposit $100,000 or more	(35		)	(50		)	(85		)	(68		)	(115		)	(183		)
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000	(3		)	(103		)	(106		)	(67		)	(199		)	(266		)
Short-term borrowings	30			—			30			62			(32		)	30
Long-term borrowings	—			(36		)	(36		)	—			(106		)	(106		)
Total interest expense	(5		)	(288		)	(293		)	57			(729		)	(672		)
Net interest income	$	(17	)	$	91		$	74		$	(131	)	$	313		$	182

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is generated from the Company’s lending and investment activities, and is the most significant component of the Company’s earnings. Net interest income is the difference between interest and rate-related fee income on earning assets (primarily loans and investment securities) and the interest paid on the funds (primarily deposits) supporting them. The Company primarily utilizes deposits to fund loans and investments, with a small amount of additional funding from junior subordinated debentures and minimal short-term and long-term borrowings. In future periods, the Company may utilize a higher level of short-term and long-term borrowings, including borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, federal funds lines with correspondent banks and repurchase agreements, to fund operations, depending on economic conditions, deposit availability and pricing, interest rates and other factors.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Net interest income (on a taxable-equivalent basis) was $2.82 million in 2011 and $2.74 million in 2010. The change in net interest income was primarily driven by lower rates paid on certificates of deposit, money market accounts and long-term borrowings, and an improvement in the volume of investment securities, which was partially offset by a lower volume of loans at lower rates. Average earning assets decreased by $8.72 million, or 3.00%, since September 30, 2010. The yield on earning assets in 2011 decreased by 15 basis points to 5.03% from 5.18% in 2010. The decrease of 48 basis points in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities primarily is the result of the lower rates paid on certificates of deposit and money market accounts. The Company’s net interest margin was 3.97% and 3.75%, and the net interest spread was 3.73% and 3.39%, for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Interest expense decreased 27.98% from $1.05 million in 2010 to $754 thousand in 2011 due to the reduced rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, which decreased to 1.30% in 2011 from 1.78% in 2010 primarily as a result in declines in rates on certificates of deposit and money market accounts. The net interest margin is not expected to improve substantially through the re-pricing of the certificates of deposit portfolio since the majority are priced at current market interest rates.

Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Net interest income (on a taxable-equivalent basis) was $8.23 million in 2011 and $8.05 million in 2010. The change in net interest income was primarily driven by lower rates paid on certificates of deposit, money market accounts and long-term borrowings, and an improvement in the volume of investment securities, which was partially offset by a lower volume of loans at lower rates. Average earning assets increased by $4.80 million, or 1.74%, since September 30, 2010. The yield on earning assets in 2011 decreased by 33 basis points to 5.04% from 5.37% in 2010. The decrease of 45 basis points in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities primarily is the result of the lower rates paid certificates of deposit and money market accounts. The Company’s net interest margin was 3.92% and 3.90%, and the net interest spread was 3.64% and 3.52%, for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Interest expense decreased 22.11% from $3.04 million in 2010 to $2.37 million in 2011 due to the reduced rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, which decreased to 1.40% in 2011 from 1.85% in 2010 primarily as a result in declines in rates on certificates of deposit and money market accounts. The net interest margin is not expected to improve substantially through the re-pricing of the certificates of deposit portfolio since the majority are priced at current market interest rates.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income was $527 thousand and $806 thousand for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and was $150 thousand and $518 thousand for the same periods in 2010. There were $383 thousand in gains on sale of securities for the three months ended September 30, 2011, while there were only $1 thousand for the same period in 2010. Gains on sale of securities for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $386 thousand and $85 thousand, respectively. In addition, the NSF fees have decreased by $27 thousand and $64 thousand for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively compared to the same periods in 2010. Due to the Company’s purchase of the bank owned life insurance in May 2011, this has generated $41 thousand and $61 thousand of income for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense amounted to $2.18 million and $2.04 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Noninterest expense for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $6.36 million and $5.95 million, respectively. The primary increase in noninterest expense for the three-month periods in 2011 compared to 2010 relates to an increase in foreclosure expenses of $192 thousand, which was partially offset by reduced FDIC insurance costs of $43 thousand. The primary increase in noninterest expense for the nine-month periods in 2011 compared to 2010 relates to an increase in foreclosure expenses of $242 thousand and an increase in salaries of $118 thousand.

Income Taxes

During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company realized an income tax benefit of $3 thousand compared to an income tax expense of $129 thousand during the same period in 2010. The effective tax rates for the three-month periods in 2011 and 2010 were (1.96)% and 34.77%, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense in 2011 is due to the lower level of pre-tax income and the larger proportion of tax-exempt income, which includes income from municipal securities and bank owned life insurance, to taxable income. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized income tax expense of $184 thousand compared to $498 thousand during the same period in 2010. The effective tax rates for the nine-month periods in 2011 and 2010 were 21.30% and 35.93%, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense in 2011 is due to the lower level of pre-tax income and the larger proportion of tax-exempt income to taxable income.

Market Risk, Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity

Asset/liability management involves the funding and investment strategies necessary to maintain an appropriate balance between interest sensitive assets and liabilities. It also involves providing adequate liquidity while sustaining stable growth in net interest income. Regular review and analysis of deposit and loan trends, cash flows in various categories of loans, and monitoring of interest spread relationships are vital to this process.

The conduct of our banking business requires that we maintain adequate liquidity to meet changes in the composition and volume of assets and liabilities due to seasonal, cyclical or other reasons. Liquidity describes the ability of the Company to meet financial obligations that arise during the normal course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of the customers of the Company, as well as for meeting current and future planned expenditures. This

Table of Contents

liquidity is typically provided by the funds received through customer deposits, investment maturities, loan repayments, borrowings, and income. Management considers the current liquidity position to be adequate to meet the needs of the Company and its customers.

The Company seeks to limit the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations by managing the balance between interest sensitive assets and liabilities. Managing to mitigate interest rate risk is, however, not an exact science. Not only does the interval until repricing of interest rates on assets and liabilities change from day to day as the assets and liabilities change, but for some assets and liabilities, contractual maturity and the actual maturity experienced are not the same. Similarly, NOW and money market accounts, by contract, may be withdrawn in their entirety upon demand and savings deposits may be withdrawn on seven days notice. While these contracts are extremely short, it is the Company’s belief that these accounts turn over at the rate of five percent (5%) per year. The Company therefore treats them as having maturities staggered over all periods. If all of the Company’s NOW, money market, and savings accounts were treated as repricing in one year or less, the cumulative gap at one year or less would be $(56.94) million.

Interest rate sensitivity is an important factor in the management of the composition and maturity configurations of the Company’s earning assets and funding sources. An Asset/Liability Committee manages the interest rate sensitivity position in order to maintain an appropriate balance between the maturity and repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities that is consistent with the Company’s liquidity analysis, growth, and capital adequacy goals. It is the objective of the Asset/Liability Committee to maximize net interest margins during periods of both volatile and stable interest rates, to attain earnings growth, and to maintain sufficient liquidity to satisfy depositors’ requirements and meet credit needs of customers.

The table below, “Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap Analysis,” summarizes, as of September 30, 2011, the anticipated maturities or repricing of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the Company’s interest rate sensitivity gap (interest-earning assets less interest-bearing liabilities), the Company’s cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap, and the Company’s cumulative interest sensitivity gap ratio (cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap divided by total assets). A negative gap for any time period means that more interest-bearing liabilities will reprice or mature during that time period than interest-earning assets. During periods of rising interest rates, a negative gap position would generally decrease earnings, and during periods of declining interest rates, a negative gap position would generally increase earnings. The converse would be true for a positive gap position. Therefore, a positive gap for any time period means that more interest-earning assets will reprice or mature during that time period than interest-bearing liabilities. During periods of rising interest rates, a positive gap position would generally increase earnings, and during periods of declining interest rates, a positive gap position would generally decrease earnings.

It is important to note that the following table represents the static gap position for interest sensitive assets and liabilities at September 30, 2011. The table does not give effect to prepayments or extensions of loans as a result of changes in general market interest rates. Moreover, while the table does indicate the opportunities to reprice assets and liabilities within certain time frames, it does not account for timing differences that occur during periods of repricing. For example, changes to deposit rates tend to lag in a rising rate environment and lead in a falling rate environment, although this will not always be the case. Nor does it account for the effects of competition on pricing of deposits and loans. For example, under current market conditions, market rates paid on deposits may not be able to adjust by the full amount of downward adjustments in the federal funds target rate, while rates on loans will tend to adjust by the full amount, subject to certain limitations. In response to the weak economic climate, the Company has maintained a higher level of liquidity over the past year, mostly in interest-bearing deposits in other banks with the majority being held at the Federal Reserve.

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap Analysis

September 30, 2011

	Expected Repricing or Maturity Date
(dollars in thousands)	Within One Year			One to Three Years			Three to Five Years			After Five Years			Total
Assets
Federal funds sold	$	1,359		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,359
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	24,528			—			—			—			24,528
Investment securities(1)	81			6,069			17,342			14,530			38,022
Loans	86,287			64,057			46,074			13,275			209,693
Total interest-earning assets	112,255			70,126			63,416			27,805			273,602

Liabilities
Savings and NOW accounts	970			1,941			1,941			14,554			19,406
Money Market accounts	3,307			6,614			6,614			49,609			66,144
Certificates of deposit	64,754			21,841			21,836			—			108,431
Short-term borrowings	2,700			—			—			—			2,700
Long-term borrowings	—			—			10,000			—			10,000
Junior subordinated debentures	6,186			—			—			—			6,186
Total interest-bearing liabilities	87,917			30,396			40,391			64,163			222,864
Interest rate sensitivity gap	$	24,338		$	39,730		$	23,025		$	(36,358	)	$	50,735
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap	$	24,338		$	64,068		$	87,093		$	50,735
Cumulative gap ratio as a percentage of total assets	8.36		%	22.00		%	29.91		%	17.42		%

(1) Excludes equity securities.

In addition to the Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap Analysis, the Company also uses an earnings simulation model on a quarterly basis to closely monitor interest sensitivity and to expose its balance sheet and income statement to different scenarios. The model is based on current Company data and adjusted by assumptions as to growth patterns, noninterest income and noninterest expense and interest rate sensitivity, based on historical data, for both assets and liabilities projected for a one-year period. The model is then subjected to a “shock test” assuming a sudden prime interest rate increase of 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points or a decrease for the same amounts, but not below zero. The results show that with a rise in the prime interest rate the Company’s net interest income would increase by 0.64% for 100 basis points, but decrease by 0.46%, 1.98% and 2.93%2 for 200, 300 and 400 basis points, respectively. A decrease in the prime interest rate of 300 basis points was not considered to be feasible since this would infer that the federal funds interest rate would fall below zero.

Certain shortcomings are inherent in this method of analysis. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or repricing periods, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the loan. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels could deviate significantly from those assumed. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a significant interest rate increase.

Critical Accounting Policy:

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company makes provisions for loan losses in amounts deemed necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level. The Company’s provision for loan losses for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 was $900 thousand and $1.52 million, respectively, compared to $410 thousand and $1.01 million for the same periods in 2010. The provision for loan losses is determined based upon Management’s estimate of the amount required to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses reflective of the risks in the Company’s loan portfolio. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses was $3.13 million and $3.72 million, respectively. The change in the allowance from December 31, 2010 reflects the provision of $1.52 million less net charge-offs of $2.10 million, consisting of $2.13 million in charge-offs and $28 thousand in recoveries, as compared to a provision of $1.01 million less net charge-offs of $609 thousand, consisting of $695 thousand in charge-offs and $86 thousand in recoveries in the same period of 2010. The $2.13 million of charge-offs in 2011 is a result of eight (8) commercial real

Table of Contents

estate relationships, three (3) commercial and industrial loan relationships and one (1) consumer relationship, as compared to the $695 thousand of charge-offs in 2010, which consisted of one (1) construction and land development relationship, one (1) commercial real estate relationship, one (1) residential real estate relationship and one (1) commercial and industrial loan relationship.

The Company prepares a quarterly analysis of the allowance for loan losses, with the objective of quantifying portfolio risk into a dollar amount of inherent losses. The determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on eight qualitative factors and one quantitative factor for each category and type of loan along with any specific allowance for adversely classified loans within each category. Each factor is assigned a percentage weight and that total weight is applied to each loan category. Factors are different for each category. Qualitative factors include: levels and trends in delinquencies and nonaccrual loans; trends in volumes and terms of loans; effects of any changes in lending policies, the experience, ability and depth of management; national and local economic trends and conditions; concentrations of credit; quality of the Company’s loan review system; and regulatory requirements. The total allowance required thus changes as the percentage weight assigned to each factor increased or decreased due to the particular circumstances, as the various types and categories of loans change as a percentage of total loans and as specific allowances are required due to increases in adversely classified loans.

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (i) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Contingencies Topic, which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable; and (ii) ASC Receivables Topic, which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the loan balance and either the value of collateral, or the present value of future cash flows, or the loan’s value as observable in the secondary market. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are any loans that have been classified by internal measurements as substandard or worse. Factors considered by Management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the projected potential cash flow of the borrower. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and borrower, including the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. The provision for loan losses included in the statements of operations serves to maintain the allowance at a level Management considers adequate.

The Company’s allowance for loan losses has three basic components: the specific allowance, the formula allowance and the pooled allowance. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates that can and do change when the actual events occur. As a result of the uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, Management’s estimate of loan losses and the related allowance could change in the near term.

The specific allowance component is used to individually establish an allowance for loans identified as impaired. When impairment is identified, a specific reserve may be established based on the Company’s calculation of the estimated loss embedded in the individual loan. Impaired loans are any loans that have been classified by internal measurements as substandard or worse. Impairment testing includes consideration of the borrower’s overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support available from financial guarantors and the fair market value of collateral. These factors are combined to estimate the probability and severity of inherent losses. Large groups of smaller balance, homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential mortgage loans for impairment.

The formula allowance component is used for estimating the loss on internally risk rated loans meeting the Company’s internal criteria for classification as special mention are segregated from performing loans within the portfolio. These internally classified loans are then grouped by loan type (commercial, commercial real estate, commercial construction, residential real estate, residential construction or installment). Each loan type is assigned an allowance factor based on Management’s estimate of the associated risk, complexity and size of the individual loans within the particular loan category. Classified loans are assigned a higher allowance factor than non-classified loans due to Management’s concerns regarding collectability or Management’s knowledge of particular elements surrounding the borrower. Allowance factors increase with the worsening of the internal risk rating.

The pooled formula component is used to estimate the losses inherent in the pools of non-classified loans. These loans are then also segregated by loan type and allowance factors are assigned by Management based on delinquencies, loss history, trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in lending policy, the experience and depth of Management, national and local economic trends, concentrations of credit, quality of loan review system and the effect of external factors (i.e. competition and regulatory requirements). The allowance factors assigned differ by loan type.

Allowance factors and overall size of the allowance may change from period to period based on Management’s assessment of the above-described factors and the relative weights given to each factor. In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the allowance for loan losses. These agencies may require the Bank to make additions to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments of collectibility based on information available to them at the time of their examination.

Table of Contents

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at September 30, 2011. There can be no assurance, however, that additional provisions for loan losses will not be required in the future, including as a result of changes in the economic assumptions underlying Management’s estimates and judgments, adverse developments in the economy, on a national basis or in the Company’s market area, or changes in the circumstances of particular borrowers.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the real estate loan portfolio constituted 87% of the total loan portfolio. While this exceeds the 10% threshold for determining a concentration of credit risk within an industry, we do not consider this to be a concentration with adverse risk characteristics given the diversity of borrowers within the real estate portfolio and other sources of repayment. An industry for this purpose is defined as a group of counterparties that are engaged in similar activities and have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. Additionally, the loan portfolio does not include concentrations of credit risk in residential loan products that permit the deferral of principal payments that are smaller than normal interest accruals (negative amortization); loans with high loan-to-value ratios; or loans, such as option adjustable-rate mortgages, that may expose the borrower to future increases in repayments that are in excess of increases that would result solely from increases in market interest rates. However, the Company does have interest only home equity lines of credit with outstanding balances of $8.94 million of at September 30, 2011.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Average total loans outstanding during period	$	210,646		$	218,681		$	208,951		$	216,775
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,615		$	3,139		$	3,718		$	3,127
Recoveries – construction and land development	6			—			6			3
Recoveries – commercial and industrial	—			82			21			82
Recoveries – consumer	—			—			1			1
Total recoveries	6			82			28			86
Charge-offs – construction and land development	—			(103		)	(2		)	(103		)
Charge-offs – commercial real estate mortgage	(1,379		)	—			(1,969		)	(500		)
Charge-offs – residential real estate mortgage	—			—			—			(92		)
Charge-offs – commercial and industrial	(13		)	—			(161		)	—
Total charge-offs	(1,392		)	(103		)	(2,132		)	(695		)
Net recoveries (charge-offs)	(1,386		)	(21		)	(2,104		)	(609		)
Provision charged to operating expenses	900			410			1,515			1,010
Balance at end of period	$	3,129		$	3,528		$	3,129		$	3,528
Ratios of net charge-offs to average loans	0.66		%	0.01		%	1.01		%	0.28		%

The allocation of the allowance, presented in the following table, is based primarily on the factors discussed above in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance as a whole. Since all of those factors are subject to change, the allocation is not necessarily indicative of the category of recognized loan losses, and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in any category.

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses

	September 30,				December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2011		% of Loans		2010		% of Loans
Construction and land development	$	297	8	%	$	273	8	%
Real estate - mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate mortgage	1,993		62	%	2,546		61	%
Residential real estate mortgage	488		17	%	432		18	%
Total mortgage loans	2,481		79	%	2,978		79	%
Commercial and industrial	338		12	%	455		12	%
Consumer	13		1	%	12		1	%
	$	3,129	100	%	$	3,718	100	%

Table of Contents

	September 30,			December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2011			2010
Nonaccrual loans:
Construction and land development	$	61		$	111
Commercial real estate mortgage	1,100			1,913
Residential real estate mortgage	191			—
Commercial and industrial	81			178
Total nonaccrual loans	1,433			2,202
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing	—			—
Total nonperforming loans	1,433			2,202
Foreclosure properties	2,959			726
Total nonperforming assets	$	4,392		$	2,928
Nonperforming assets to total assets	1.51		%	1.01		%

There were no other interest-bearing assets at September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010 classified as past due 90 days or more and still accruing, problem assets, and no non-impaired loans which were currently performing in accordance with their terms, but as to which information known to Management caused it to have serious doubts about the ability of the borrower to comply with the loan as currently written.

Information concerning the Company’s recorded investment in impaired loans is as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2011		2010
Impaired loans with no allowance:
Construction and land development	$	1,833	$	2,038
Commercial real estate mortgage	8,695		8,374
Residential real estate mortgage	1,507		364
Commercial and industrial	6,336		4,179
Consumer	18		—
Total impaired loans with no allowance	$	18,389	$	14,955

Impaired loans with allowance:
Construction and land development	$	1,045	$	365
Commercial real estate mortgage	2,030		4,737
Residential real estate mortgage	517		517
Commercial and industrial	297		414
Total impaired loans with allowance	$	3,889	$	6,033
Specific allocation of allowance	$	310	$	1,244

	September 30,		December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2011		2010
Impaired performing loans:
Construction and land development	$	2,817	$	2,403
Commercial real estate mortgage	9,625		11,296
Residential real estate mortgage	1,833		881
Commercial and industrial	6,552		4,206
Consumer	18		—
Total impaired performing loans	$	20,845	$	18,786

Impaired nonperforming loans (nonaccrual):
Construction and land development	$	61	$	111
Commercial real estate mortgage	1,100		1,913
Residential real estate mortgage	191		—
Commercial and industrial	81		178
Total impaired nonperforming loans	$	1,433	$	2,202
Total impaired loans	$	22,278	$	20,988

Table of Contents

At September 30, 2011, there were $18.39 million of impaired loans with no specific reserves that consisted of two (2) construction loans in the aggregate amount to $1.83 million, twelve (12) commercial real estate loans in the aggregate amount of $8.70 million, three (3) residential real estate loans in the amount of $1.52 million and twelve (12) commercial and industrial loans totaling $6.34 million. By comparison at December 31, 2010 there were $14.96 million of impaired loans which required no specific reserves consisting of two (2) construction loans in the aggregate amount of $2.04 million, fourteen (14) commercial real estate loans in the aggregate amount of $8.36 million, one (1) residential mortgage loan for $364 thousand and ten (10) commercial and industrial loans totaling $4.18 million. In addition at September 30, 2011, there were $3.89 million of impaired loans, which required specific reserves totaling $310 thousand, that consisted of one (1) construction loan for $1.05 million thousand, eight (8) commercial real estate loans in the aggregate amount of $2.03 million, one (1) residential mortgage loan for $517 thousand and three (3) commercial and industrial loans totaling $297 thousand, compared to $6.03 million of impaired loans, which required specific reserves totaling $1.24 million, that consisted of one (1) construction loan for $365 thousand, eleven (11) commercial real estate loans in the aggregate amount of $4.73 million, one (1) residential mortgage loan for $517 thousand and three (3) commercial and industrial loans totaling $414 thousand at December 31, 2010. All of the impaired loan relationships discussed are in different types of businesses.

There are no loans that had a specific allowance as of December 31, 2010 that are still in the Company’s loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011 where the specific allowance has been reduced or eliminated.

Loans are placed into a nonaccruing status and classified as nonperforming when the principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the obligation is well secured and in the process of collection. A debt is “well secured” if it is secured by (i) pledges of real or personal property, including securities, that have a realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt, (including accrued interest), in full, or (ii) the guarantee of a financially responsible party. A debt is “in the process of collection” if collection on the debt is proceeding in due course either through legal action, including judgment enforcement procedure, or, in appropriate circumstances, through collection efforts not involving legal action which are reasonably expected to result in repayment of the debt or in its restoration to a current status.

Loans classified as substandard or worse are considered for impairment testing. A substandard loan shows signs of continuing negative financial trends and unprofitability and therefore, is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. The borrower on such loans typically exhibit one or more of the following characteristics: financial ratios and profitability margins are well below industry average; a negative cash flow position exists; debt service capacity is insufficient to the service debt and an improvement in the cash flow position is unlikely within the next twelve months; secondary and tertiary means of debt repayment are weak. Loans classified as substandard are characterized by the probability that the Bank will not collect amounts due according to the contractual terms or sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Loss potential, while existing with respect to the aggregate amount of substandard (or worse) loans, does not have to exist in any individual assets classified as substandard. Such credits are also evaluated for nonaccrual status.

Impaired loans include loans that have been classified as substandard or worse. However, certain of such loans have been paying as agreed and have remained current, with some financial issues related to cash flow that has caused some concern as to the ability of the borrower to perform in accordance with the current loan terms, but it has not been extreme enough to require the loan be put into a nonaccruing status.

The Company does not have a formal modification program such as the Making Home Affordable Program, but instead uses a system whereby loans are modified on a case-by-case basis, based upon an analysis of the individual borrower’s situation and the causes of the weakness in the individual loan. To date, loan modifications have primarily involved commercial real estate mortgages and commercial and industrial loans and have included reducing the interest rate on the loan to a level that is in line with current market rates for similar type loans, converting to an interest only period, usually six to twelve months, or re-amortizing the loan. For the first nine months of 2011, the Company has made concessions on only a few residential mortgage loans which included reducing the interest rate on one (1) residential mortgage loan in the amount $576 thousand and an interest only period of six to twelve months for a $473 thousand residential loan.

Troubled debt restructured loans, which are included in the total of impaired loans, amounted to $4.85 million as of September 30, 2011. These included loans converted to interest only periods for six to twelve months in the amount of $2.49 million, reduced interest rates on loans in the amount of $618 thousand, and loans that have been re-amortized in the amount of $1.74 million. These loans have specific reserves of $107 thousand based on the collateral value.

As noted above the Company does not have a formal modification program and it does not have any loans as of September 30, 2011 that had been modified and then subsequently re-defaulted in 2011.

Loans classified as non-performing are nonaccrual loans and loans 90 days or more past due. The Company does not have any loans 90 days or more past due that are still in an accruing status. If a loan has been modified and it is current as to principal and interest for a period

Table of Contents

of at least six months then it is classified as a performing loan, otherwise it is considered to be a non-performing loan.

The Company’s charge-off policy states after all collection efforts have been exhausted and the loan is deemed to be a loss, it will be charged to the Company’s established allowance for loan losses. Consumer loans subject to the Uniform Retail Credit Classification are charged-off as follows (a) closed end loans are charged-off no later than 120 days after becoming delinquent, (b) consumer loans to borrowers who subsequently declare bankruptcy, where the Company is an unsecured creditor, are charged-off within 60 days of receipt of the notification from the bankruptcy court, (c) fraudulent loans are charged-off within 90 days of discovery and (d) death of a borrower will cause a charge-off to be incurred at such time an actual loss is determined. All other types of loans are generally evaluated for loss potential at the 90th day past due threshold, and any loss is recognized no later than the 120th day past due threshold; each loss is evaluated on its specific facts regarding the appropriate timing to recognize the loss.

The Company has recorded $842 thousand in partial charge-offs related to three (3) commercial real estate loan relationships that are still in the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, including unused portions of lines of credit, and standby letters of credit. The Company has also entered into long-term lease obligations for some of its premises and equipment, the terms of which generally include options to renew. The above instruments and obligations involve, to varying degrees, elements of off-balance sheet risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition. With the exception of these instruments and the Company’s obligations relating to its trust preferred securities, the Company does not have any off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit were as follows:

	September 30,
	2011
(dollars in thousands)	Contractual Amount
Financial instruments whose notional or contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$	29,732
Standby letters of credit	1,736
Total	$	31,468

See Note 9 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for additional information regarding the Company’s long-term lease obligations.

Capital Resources

The ability of the Company to grow is dependent on the availability of capital with which to meet regulatory capital requirements, discussed below. To the extent the Company is successful it may need to acquire additional capital through the sale of additional common stock, preferred stock (which the Company does not currently have authorized), or subordinated debt. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to the Company on a timely basis or on attractive terms. On December 15, 2006, the Company issued $6.00 million of trust preferred securities that can be recognized as capital for regulatory purposes. Under Dodd-Frank, the capital treatment of the Company’s trust preferred securities is grandfathered, but we will be able to issue additional trust preferred securities which count as capital at the holding company only as long as we remain under $500 million in assets. The interest rate on the trust preferred securities and underlying subordinated debentures will adjust from a fixed rate of 6.5375% to a floating rate, adjusted quarterly, of 163 basis points over three month Libor, which would have been approximately 2.05% as of October 31, 2011, effective for the interest payment period beginning December 16, 2011. The Company has an unsecured revolving line of credit borrowing arrangement with an unaffiliated financial institution in the amount of $4.00 million with no outstanding balance as of September 30, 2011 and $300 thousand as of December 31, 2010. This facility matures on July 22, 2012, has a floating interest rate equal to the Wall Street Journal prime rate, subject to a minimum rate of 3.75%, and requires monthly interest payments only. The purpose of this facility is to provide capital to the Bank, as needed. The Bank expects to have this credit facility renewed, but there can be no assurance. The Company also has an unsecured borrowing arrangement with an unaffiliated third party in the amount of $2.7 million as of September 30, 2011. This facility was initiated on July 12, 2011 and matures on July 12, 2012, at a fixed rate of 3.00%, and requires quarterly interest payments only.

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. The Company will be

Table of Contents

subject to such requirements when its assets exceed $500 million, it has publicly issued debt or it engages in certain highly leveraged activities. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Significant further growth of the Company may be limited because the current level of capital will not support rapid short term growth while meeting regulatory capital expectations. Loan portfolio growth will need to be funded primarily by increases in deposits as the Company has limited amounts of on-balance sheets assets deployable into loans. Growth will depend upon Company earnings and/or the raising of additional capital.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes that the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject as of September 30, 2011 and that the Company would meet such requirements if applicable. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for a table depicting compliance with regulatory capital requirements.

As of September 30, 2011, the most recent notification from the regulatory agency categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table in Note 10. There are no conditions or events since that notification which management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

Inflation

The effect of changing prices on financial institutions is typically different than on non-banking companies since virtually all of a Company’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. In particular, interest rates are significantly affected by inflation, but neither the timing nor magnitude of the changes are directly related to price level indices; therefore, the Company can best counter inflation over the long term by managing net interest income and controlling net increases in noninterest income and expenses.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

See “Market Risk, Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity” at Page 28.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of the last day of the period covered by this report, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Act of 1934) during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings. On July 15, 2010, the Bank was sued in a case titled Piontek v. Frederick County Bank that was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The complaint alleged non-compliance with the ATM notice requirements of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act. The case was filed as a putative class action. Without admitting any liability and subject to the approval of the court, the Bank entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiff which provided for the Bank to make certain payments for the benefit of the plaintiff, plaintiff’s counsel and a proposed settlement class. Those payments, which did not change materially from the amount established last year, were made and are reflected in the Company’s September 30, 2011 financial statements and did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The settlement received final approval of the court on August 31, 2011 and a final judgment was entered releasing the Bank of any further liability in connection with the lawsuit.

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors. Not Applicable.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Sales of Unregistered Securities. None

(b) Use of Proceeds. Not Applicable.

The following table provides information on the Company’s purchases of its common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)	Maximum Number of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1-31, 2011	0	N/A	0	0
August 1-31, 2011	0	N/A	0	0
September 1-30, 2011	0	N/A	0	133,032	(2)

(1) On June 26, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program that authorizes the repurchase of up to 146,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, subject to a maximum expenditure of $4.5 million. Repurchases under the program may be made on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions from time to time until September 30, 2012, or earlier termination of the program by the Board.

(2) Subject to a maximum expenditure of $4.5 million. Number of shares indicated is the remaining number of shares authorized for repurchase as of the end of the indicated period.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities. None

Item 4. Removed and Reserved

Item 5. Other Information None

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibits

3(a)		Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended(1)
3(b)		Bylaws of the Company(2)
4(a)		Indenture, dated as of December 15, 2006 between Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee(3)
4(b)		Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as December 15, 2006 between Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, and Martin S. Lapera and William R. Talley, Jr. as Administrators(3)
4(c)		Guarantee Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006 between Frederick County Bancorp, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Guarantee Trustee(3)
10(a)		2001 Stock Option Plan(4)
10(b)		Employment Agreement between the Bank and Martin S. Lapera(5)
10(c)		Employment Agreement between the Bank and William R. Talley, Jr. (6)
10(f)		2002 Executive and Director Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended(7)
10(g)		Amendment No. 1 to the 2002 Executive and Director Deferred Compensation Plan(7)
10(h)		Promissory Note with Atlantic Central Bankers Bank (8)
10(i)		Amendment to Loan Documents, filed herein
10(j)		2011 Stock Incentive Plan(10)
11		Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Income – Please refer to Note 2 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein

Table of Contents

21		Subsidiaries of the Registrant
31(a)		Certification of Martin S. Lapera, President and Chief Executive Officer
31(b)		Certification of William R. Talley, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
32(a)		Certification of Martin S. Lapera, President and Chief Executive Officer
32(b)		Certification of William R. Talley, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
101		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the nine and three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and (iv) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(1)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(3)	Not filed in accordance with the provision of Item 601(b)(4)(v) of Regulation SK. The Company agrees to provide a copy of these documents to the Commission upon request.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111761).
(5)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009.
(6)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009.
(7)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(8)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(9)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(10)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	FREDERICK COUNTY BANCORP, INC.


Date: November 10, 2011	By:	/s/ Martin S. Lapera
		Martin S. Lapera
		President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 10, 2011	By:	/s/ William R. Talley, Jr.
		William R. Talley, Jr.
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer