Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o
 
Preliminary Proxy Statement

o
 
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý
 
Definitive Proxy Statement

o
 
Definitive Additional Materials

o
 
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Trammell Crow Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
         
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

o
 
No fee required.

o
 
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
    (5)   Total fee paid:

ý
 
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o
 
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 
 
(1)
 
Amount Previously Paid:
         
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
    (3)   Filing Party:
         
    (4)   Date Filed:
         

TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3400
Dallas, Texas 75201

November 15, 2006

Dear Stockholder:

        The board of directors of Trammell Crow Company (the "Company") has approved a transaction providing for the acquisition by merger of the Company by CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. ("CBRE"). Pursuant to a merger agreement, A-2 Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE, will be merged with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE. If the merger is completed, you will receive $49.51 in cash, without interest, for each share of the Company's common stock you own.

        You will be asked, at a special meeting of the Company's stockholders, to approve and adopt the merger agreement. The board of directors has approved and adopted the merger agreement and determined the merger and the merger agreement to be advisable and in the best interest of the Company and the Company's stockholders. The board of directors recommends that the Company's stockholders vote "FOR" the approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

        The special meeting of stockholders of the Company will be held on December 18, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, at The Fairmont Hotel, 1717 North Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75201.

        The proxy statement attached to this letter provides you with information about the proposed merger and the special meeting of the Company's stockholders. We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement carefully. You may also obtain more information about the Company from documents we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares of the Company's common stock you own. Because the approval and adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote thereon as of the record date for the special meeting, a failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the merger. Accordingly, you are requested to submit your proxy by promptly completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning it in the envelope provided or to submit your proxy by telephone or the Internet prior to the special meeting, whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting.

        Submitting your proxy will not prevent you from voting your shares in person if you subsequently choose to attend the special meeting and vote your shares in person.

        If you have any questions regarding the proposed merger, please call Georgeson Inc., our proxy solicitation agent, at (866) 425-7049 if you are an individual stockholder or (212) 440-9800 if you are a bank or broker. You may also contact Barbara Bower in our Investor Relations department at (214) 863-3020.

        Thank you for your cooperation and continued support.

    Very truly yours,

 
 
GRAPHIC

Robert E. Sulentic
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities regulatory agency has approved or disapproved the merger, passed upon the merits or fairness of the merger or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this document. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2006
AND IS FIRST BEING MAILED TO STOCKHOLDERS ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 16, 2006.

TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3400
Dallas, Texas 75201

November 15, 2006

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD DECEMBER 18, 2006

Dear Stockholder:

        A special meeting of stockholders of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation ("Trammell Crow Company" or the "Company"), will be held on December 18, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, at The Fairmont Hotel, 1717 North Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75201 for the following purposes:

        Only stockholders of record on November 10, 2006 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting and at any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. All stockholders of record are cordially invited to attend the special meeting in person.

        The approval and adoption of the merger agreement requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote thereon as of the record date for the special meeting. Even if you plan to attend the special meeting in person, we request that you complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided, or submit your proxy by telephone or the Internet prior to the special meeting, and thus ensure that your shares will be represented at the special meeting if you are unable to attend. If you sign, date and mail your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be voted in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and in favor of the proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies. If you fail to return your proxy card or fail to submit your proxy by telephone or the Internet and do not attend the special meeting in person, the effect will be that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the special meeting and, if a quorum is present, will have the same effect as a vote against the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person.

        Stockholders who do not vote in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement will have the right to seek appraisal of the fair value of their common stock if they deliver a demand for appraisal before a vote is taken on the merger agreement and comply with all requirements of Delaware law, which are summarized in the accompanying proxy statement.


        The Trammell Crow Company board of directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval and adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting and FOR the proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

GRAPHIC


J. Christopher Kirk
Secretary
November 15, 2006


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING AND THE MERGER

SUMMARY
 
The Parties to the Merger
  The Special Meeting
  When the Merger Will be Completed
  Effects of the Merger
  Board Recommendation
  Opinion of Lazard Frères & Co, LLC
  Financing
  Treatment of Stock Options
  Treatment of Restricted Stock
  Treatment of Stock-Based Performance Unit Awards
  Interests of the Company's Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
  Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
  Regulatory Approvals
  Procedure for Receiving Merger Consideration
  No Solicitation of Transactions
  Conditions to Closing
  Termination of the Merger Agreement
  Termination Fees and Expenses
  Market Price of Trammell Crow Company Common Stock
  Appraisal Rights

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

THE PARTIES TO THE MERGER
 
Trammell Crow Company
  CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.
  A-2 Acquisition Corp.

THE SPECIAL MEETING
 
Time, Place and Purpose of the Special Meeting
  Record Date and Quorum
  Required Vote
  Appraisal Rights
  Proxies; Revocation
  Submitting Proxies Via the Internet or by Telephone
  Adjournments and Postponements
  Solicitation of Proxies

THE MERGER
 
Background of the Merger
  Reasons for the Merger
  Recommendation of the Company's Board of Directors
  Certain Financial Projections
  Opinion of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC
  Effects on the Company if the Merger is Not Completed
  Financing
 

i

  Interests of the Company's Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
  Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
  Regulatory Approvals
  Delisting and Deregistration of Common Stock

DISSENTERS' RIGHTS OF APPRAISAL

THE MERGER AGREEMENT
 
Effective Time
  Structure
  Treatment of Stock and Other Securities
  Appraisal Rights
  Exchange and Payment Procedures
  Representations and Warranties
  Conduct of Our Business Pending the Merger
  No Solicitation of Transactions
  Access to Information and Efforts to Close
  Stockholder Meeting
  Employee Matters
  Financing
  CBRE Services Debt Consent Solicitation and Tender Offer or Redemption
  Governmental Approvals
  Conditions to the Merger
  Termination
  Fees and Expenses
  Amendment and Waiver
  Specific Performance
STOCK VOTING AGREEMENTS
MARKET PRICE OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

ANNEX A        Agreement and Plan of Merger
ANNEX B        Opinion of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC
ANNEX C        Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law

ii


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING AND THE MERGER

        The following questions and answers address briefly some questions you may have regarding the special meeting and the proposed merger. These questions and answers may not address all questions that may be important to you as a stockholder of Trammell Crow Company. Please refer to the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy statement and the documents referred to or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement. In this proxy statement, the terms "Trammell Crow Company," "Company," "we," "our," "ours," and "us" refer to Trammell Crow Company and its subsidiaries.

Q:    What is the proposed transaction?

A:
The proposed transaction is the acquisition of the Company by CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. ("CBRE") pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 30, 2006 (the "merger agreement"), by and among the Company, CBRE and A-2 Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE ("Merger Sub"). Once the merger agreement has been approved and adopted by the Company's stockholders and the other closing conditions under the merger agreement have been satisfied or waived, Merger Sub will merge with and into Trammell Crow Company (the "merger"). Trammell Crow Company will be the surviving corporation in the merger (the "surviving corporation") and will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE.

Q:    What will I receive in the merger?

A:
Upon completion of the merger, you will receive $49.51 in cash, without interest and less any required tax withholding, for each share of our common stock that you own. For example, if you own 100 shares of our common stock, you will receive $4,951.00 in cash in exchange for your shares of common stock, less any required tax withholding. You will not own shares in the surviving corporation.

Q:    When and where is the special meeting?

        

A:
The special meeting will take place at The Fairmont Hotel, 1717 North Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75201, on December 18, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time.

Q:    What am I being asked to vote on at the special meeting?

A:
You are being asked to consider and vote on a proposal to approve and adopt the merger agreement that provides for the acquisition of the Company by CBRE and to approve the adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies to establish a quorum, or if there are insufficient votes at the time of the meeting, to approve and adopt the merger agreement.

Q:    Who is eligible to vote?

        

A:
All stockholders of record on the close of business on November 10, 2006 will be eligible to vote.

Q:    What vote of our stockholders is required to approve and adopt the merger agreement?

A:
For us to complete the merger, stockholders holding at least a majority of our common stock outstanding at the close of business on the record date must vote "FOR" the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. Accordingly, a failure to vote, an abstention or a broker non-vote will each have the same effect as a vote against approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

1

Q:    Am I entitled to appraisal or dissenters' rights?

A:
Yes, as a holder of our common stock, you are entitled to appraisal rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law in connection with the merger if you meet certain conditions, which are described in the section of this proxy statement entitled "Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal."

Q:    How does the Company's board of directors recommend that I vote?

A:
Our board of directors recommends that our stockholders vote "FOR" the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and "FOR" the approval or adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies to establish a quorum or if there are insufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve and adopt the merger agreement. You should read "The Merger—Reasons for the Merger" for a discussion of the factors that our board of directors considered in deciding to recommend the approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

Q:    What do I need to do now?

A:
We urge you to read this proxy statement carefully, including its annexes, and to consider how the merger affects you. If you are a stockholder of record, then you can ensure that your shares are voted at the special meeting by submitting your proxy via:

•
telephone, using the toll-free number listed on each proxy card (if you are a registered stockholder, meaning that you hold your stock in your name) or vote instruction card (if your shares are held in "street name," meaning that your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee and your bank, broker or nominee makes telephone voting available);

•
the Internet, at the address provided on each proxy card (if you are a registered stockholder) or vote instruction card (if your shares are held in "street name" and your bank, broker or nominee makes Internet voting available); or

•
mail, by completing, signing, dating and mailing each proxy card or vote instruction card and returning it in the envelope provided.

Q:    If my shares are held in "street name" by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?

A:
Yes, but only if you provide instructions to your broker on how to vote. You should follow the directions provided by your broker regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your shares. Without those instructions, your shares will not be voted, which will have the same effect as voting against the merger.

Q:    Can I change my vote?

A:
Yes, you can change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the special meeting. If you are a registered stockholder, you may revoke your proxy (a) by filing with or transmitting to the

2

Q:    What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card or vote instruction card?

        

A:
If your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account, you will receive more than one card. Please complete and return all of the proxy cards or vote instruction cards you receive (or submit all of your proxies by telephone or the Internet, if available to you) to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Q:    What is a quorum for the special meeting?

A:
A quorum is present if the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote are present at the meeting, either in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not permitted to vote on that item without instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and no instructions are given.

Q:    How are votes counted?

A:
For the proposal relating to the approval and adoption of the merger agreement, you may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. Abstentions and broker non-votes will count for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present, but, because stockholders holding at least a majority of Company common stock outstanding on the record date must vote FOR the approval and adoption of the merger agreement, an abstention or broker non-vote will have the same effect as if you vote AGAINST the approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

Q.    Who will bear the cost of this solicitation?

A:
We will pay the cost of this solicitation, which will be made primarily by mail. Proxies also may be solicited in person, or by telephone, facsimile or similar means, by our directors, officers or employees without additional compensation. In addition, Georgeson Inc. will provide proxy solicitation services to us for a fee of approximately $10,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. We will, on request, reimburse stockholders who are brokers, banks or other nominees for their reasonable expenses in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the shares they hold of record.

Q:    When do you expect the merger to be completed?

A.
We are working toward completing the merger as quickly as possible, and we anticipate that it will be completed during the fourth quarter of 2006 or the first quarter of 2007. In order to complete the merger, we must obtain stockholder approval and each of the other closing conditions under the merger agreement must be satisfied or waived (as permitted by law). Please read "The Merger

3

Q:    Should I send in my stock certificates now?

A:
No. Shortly after the merger is completed, you will receive a letter of transmittal with instructions informing you how to send in your stock certificates and any other required documentation to the exchange agent in order to receive the merger consideration. You should use the letter of transmittal to exchange stock certificates for the merger consideration to which you are entitled as a result of the merger.

Q:    Will the merger be taxable to me?

        

A:
Generally, yes. The exchange of shares of our common stock for the cash merger consideration will be a taxable transaction to our stockholders for United States federal income tax purposes. Please read "The Merger—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences" for more information.

Q:    Who can help answer my other questions?

A:
If you have more questions about the merger, or if you need assistance in submitting your proxy or voting your shares or need additional copies of the proxy statement or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact Georgeson Inc., our proxy solicitation agent, at (866) 425-7049 if you are an individual stockholder or (212) 440-9800 if you are a bank or broker. You may also call Barbara Bower in our Investor Relations department at (214) 863-3020. If your broker holds your shares, you should also call your broker for additional information.

4


SUMMARY

        The following summary highlights selected information from this proxy statement and may not contain all of the information that may be important to you. Accordingly, we encourage you to read carefully this entire proxy statement, its annexes and the documents referred to or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement. Each item in this summary includes a page reference directing you to a more complete description of that item.


The Parties to the Merger (Page 18)

Trammell Crow Company
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3400
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 863-3000

        Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation founded in 1948 by Mr. Trammell Crow, is one of the largest diversified commercial real estate service companies in the world with global headquarters in Dallas, Texas. Trammell Crow Company delivers brokerage, project management and building management services through its global services group and undertakes development and investment activities through its development and investment group. For additional information, you may also visit Trammell Crow Company's website at www.trammellcrow.com.

CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.
100 North Sepulveda Boulevard
Suite 1050
El Segundo, California 90245
(310) 606-4700

        CBRE is a Delaware corporation and the world's largest commercial real estate services firm with leading full-service operations in major metropolitan areas throughout the world and global headquarters in El Segundo, California. CBRE offers a full range of services to occupiers, owners, lenders and investors in office, retail, industrial, multi-family and other commercial real estate assets. For additional information, you may also visit CBRE's website at www.cbre.com.

A-2 Acquisition Corp.
100 North Sepulveda Boulevard
Suite 1050
El Segundo, California 90245
(310) 606-4700

        Merger Sub is a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE. Merger Sub was formed solely for the purpose of entering into the merger agreement and consummating the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. It has not conducted any activities to date other than activities incidental to its formation and in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

The Special Meeting

        The special meeting will be held on December 18, 2006 starting at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, at The Fairmont Hotel, 1717 North Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75201.

5

        You will be asked to consider and vote on the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. The merger agreement provides that Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company, and each outstanding share of the Company's common stock (other than shares held in the treasury of the Company or owned by CBRE, Merger Sub or any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE or the Company and other than shares held by stockholders who have properly demanded statutory appraisal rights, if any) will be converted into the right to receive $49.51 in cash, without interest.

        The special meeting may be adjourned or postponed for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies if necessary to establish a quorum or if there are insufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve and adopt the merger agreement.

        The persons named in the accompanying proxy card will also have discretionary authority to vote on other business, if any, that properly comes before the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting.

        You are entitled to vote at the special meeting if you owned shares of the Company's common stock at the close of business on November 10, 2006, the record date for the special meeting. You will have one vote for each share of the Company's common stock that you owned on the record date. As of the record date, there were 36,465,339 shares of the Company's common stock entitled to be voted.

        A quorum of the holders of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock must be present for the special meeting to be held. A quorum is present if the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock entitled to vote are present at the meeting, either in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not permitted to vote on that item without instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and no instructions are given.

        For us to complete the merger, stockholders holding at least a majority of our common stock outstanding at the close of business on the record date must vote "FOR" the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. All of our stockholders are entitled to one vote per share. A failure to vote your shares of the Company's common stock, an abstention or a broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote against the merger.

        Each of the following individuals has entered into a stock voting agreement, pursuant to which they have agreed to vote the shares that they beneficially own in favor of the approval and adoption of

6


the merger agreement and against any competing transaction proposed to the Company's stockholders, unless the merger agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms:

Name:
   Title:
William F. Concannon   Vice Chairman and Director
James R. Groch   Chief Investment Officer and President, Funds and Investment Management
Matthew S. Khourie   President, Development and Investment—Central Operations
Michael J. Lafitte   President, Global Services
Derek R. McClain   Chief Financial Officer
Diane S. Paddison   Chief Operating Officer, Global Services
T. Christopher Roth   President, Development and Investment—Eastern Operations
John A. Stirek   President, Development and Investment—Western Operations
Robert E. Sulentic   Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President

        As of October 25, 2006, an aggregate of 2,146,987 shares (excluding options), representing approximately 5.9% of our outstanding common stock, would have been subject to these stock voting agreements. The stock voting agreements will terminate upon the earlier of the termination of the merger agreement pursuant to its terms or the effective time of the merger.

        As of October 25, 2006, the directors and current executive officers of Trammell Crow Company beneficially owned in the aggregate 2,829,477 shares (excluding options), representing approximately 7.8% of the shares of the Company's common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting.

        Any Trammell Crow Company stockholder of record entitled to vote may submit a proxy by telephone or the Internet or by returning the enclosed proxy card by mail, or may vote in person by appearing at the special meeting. If your shares are held in "street name" by your broker, you should instruct your broker on how to vote your shares using the instructions provided by your broker. If you do not provide your broker with instructions, your shares will not be voted and that will have the same effect as a vote against the merger.

        Any Trammell Crow Company stockholder of record who executes and returns a proxy card (or submits a proxy via telephone or the Internet) may revoke the proxy at any time before it is voted in any one of the following ways:

7

        Simply attending the special meeting will not constitute revocation of a proxy. If you have instructed your broker to vote your shares, the above-described options for revoking your proxy do not apply and instead you must follow the directions provided by your broker to change these instructions.


When the Merger Will be Completed (Page 63)

        We are working to complete the merger as soon as possible. We anticipate completing the merger during the fourth quarter of 2006 or the first quarter of 2007, subject to the approval and adoption of the merger agreement by the Company's stockholders and the satisfaction or waiver of each of the other closing conditions under the merger agreement.


Effects of the Merger (Page 64)

        If the merger agreement is approved and adopted by the Company's stockholders and the other conditions to closing are satisfied, Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company, with the Company being the surviving corporation. Upon completion of the merger, the Company's outstanding common stock (other than shares owned by the Company, CBRE or any of its subsidiaries and shares held by a stockholder properly exercising statutory dissenters rights) will be converted into the right to receive $49.51 per share, without interest and less any required tax withholding. Following the completion of the merger, we will no longer be a public company and you will cease to have any ownership interest in the Company and will not participate in any future earnings and growth of the Company.


Board Recommendation (Page 34)

        After careful consideration, our board of directors has:

        In reaching its decision, our board of directors continuously consulted with our management team and advisors in considering the proposed merger agreement. In considering the recommendation of the Company's board of directors with respect to the merger, you should be aware that some of the Company's directors and executive officers who participated in meetings of our board of directors have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally. Please read "The Merger—Interests of the Company's Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger." For the factors considered by our board of directors in reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, please read "The Merger—Reasons for the Merger."


Opinion of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC (Page 36 and Annex B)

        In connection with the merger, our board of directors received the opinion of our financial advisor, Lazard Frères & Co. LLC ("Lazard"). On October 30, 2006, Lazard delivered its written opinion to our board of directors to the effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the assumptions, factors and qualifications set forth in the opinion, the $49.51 per share cash merger consideration to be received by the holders of our common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders (other than the Company, CBRE or any subsidiary of CBRE and any shareholder who is entitled to demand and properly demands appraisal rights). The full text of Lazard's written opinion is attached to this proxy statement as Annex B and is incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. We encourage you to read the Lazard opinion

8


carefully in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Lazard in connection with the opinion. Lazard's written opinion is addressed to our board of directors and was one of many factors considered by our board of directors in deciding to approve the merger. Lazard's written opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or whether our stockholders should take any other action relating to the merger.


Financing (Page 41)

        The Company and CBRE estimate that the total amount of funds necessary to complete the merger and related transactions (including payment of the aggregate merger consideration, the repayment or refinancing of some of the Company's currently outstanding debt and all related fees and expenses) will be approximately $2,113,000,000.

        CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE ("CBRE Services"), has received a commitment from Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Credit Suisse with respect to up to $2,800,000,000 of senior secured loan facilities, consisting of (a) two term loan facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to $2,200,000,000 and (b) $600,000,000 of revolving loan facilities (which will be utilized to replace the existing senior secured revolving credit facilities of CBRE Services if the existing facilities are not amended to permit the merger and the financing thereof). The facilities contemplated by the debt financing commitment are conditioned on the merger being completed, as well as other conditions being satisfied, as described in further detail under "The Merger—Financing—Debt Financing."


Treatment of Stock Options (Page 64)

        The merger agreement provides that, at the effective time of the merger, each outstanding Company stock option issued pursuant to the Company's stock option and incentive plans will be converted into the right to receive, upon the vesting and exercise of such option in accordance with its terms, an amount in cash, less applicable tax withholding and without interest, equal to the product of:


Treatment of Restricted Stock (Page 65)

        The merger agreement provides that, at the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share of our restricted stock will be converted into the right to receive $49.51 in cash, without interest and less applicable tax withholding, payable as soon as administratively feasible following the vesting or the lapse of restrictions on such restricted stock. Any payments will remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including vesting) as currently in effect with respect to such restricted stock. Any shares of restricted stock that vest at the effective time of the merger will be treated as shares of our outstanding common stock and will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration at the effective time of the merger, less any applicable tax withholding.


Treatment of Stock-Based Performance Unit Awards (Page 65)

        At the effective time, each of our outstanding stock-based performance unit awards will be converted into the right to receive $49.51 in cash, without interest and less applicable tax withholding. The cash payment applicable to each former performance unit award will be paid by the surviving

9


corporation at such time and in accordance with the provisions set forth in the applicable award agreement between us and the holder of such performance unit award.


Interests of the Company's Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger (Page 42)

        Our directors and executive officers may have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, yours, including the following:

10


 Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences (Page 56)

        If you are a U.S. holder of our common stock, the merger will be a taxable transaction to you. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, your receipt of cash in exchange for your shares of the Company's common stock generally will cause you to recognize a gain or loss measured by the difference, if any, between the cash you receive in the merger and your adjusted tax basis in your shares. If you are a non-U.S. holder of our common stock, the merger generally will not be a taxable transaction to you under U.S. federal income tax laws unless you have certain connections to the United States. You should consult your own tax advisor for a full understanding of how the merger will affect your taxes.


Regulatory Approvals (Page 58)

        Except for (a) the required pre-merger notification filing with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission and the expiration of the prescribed statutory waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, and the rules promulgated thereunder by the Federal Trade Commission (the "HSR Act"), and (b) the filing of certificate of merger in Delaware at or before the effective date of the merger, we are unaware of any material federal, state or foreign regulatory requirements or approvals required for completion of the merger.


Procedure for Receiving Merger Consideration (Page 65)

        As soon as practicable after the effective time of the merger, the exchange agent will mail a letter of transmittal and instructions to you and the other stockholders of the Company. The letter of transmittal and instructions will tell you how to surrender your stock certificates or book-entry shares and any other required materials in exchange for the merger consideration. You should not return your stock certificates with the enclosed proxy card, and you should not forward your stock certificates to the exchange agent without a duly completed and executed letter of transmittal.


No Solicitation of Transactions (Page 74)

        The merger agreement restricts our ability to solicit or engage in discussions or negotiations with third parties regarding specified transactions involving the Company. Notwithstanding these restrictions, under certain limited circumstances if the failure of our board to do so would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties, our board of directors may respond to an unsolicited proposal for an alternative transaction, change its recommendation of the merger and terminate the merger agreement and enter into an agreement with respect to a superior proposal after paying the termination fee specified in the merger agreement.


Conditions to Closing (Page 79)

        Before we can complete the merger, a number of conditions must be satisfied. These include:

11


 Termination of the Merger Agreement (Page 80)

        The Company, CBRE and Merger Sub may agree in writing to terminate the merger agreement at any time without completing the merger, even after the stockholders of the Company have approved and adopted the merger agreement. The merger agreement may also be terminated at any time prior to the effective time of the merger in certain other circumstances, including:

12


 Termination Fees and Expenses (Page 82)

        The Company has agreed to pay CBRE a termination fee of $40,000,000 in cash if CBRE terminates the merger agreement because:

        The Company has also agreed to pay CBRE a termination fee of $40,000,000 in cash if the Company terminates the merger agreement in order to accept a superior proposal.

        In addition, the Company has agreed to pay CBRE a termination fee of $40,000,000 in cash if:

13


        CBRE has agreed to pay the Company a termination fee of $100,000,000 in cash if the merger agreement is terminated by either CBRE or the Company because of the failure of the applicable antitrust regulators to approve the merger or the closing has not occurred by the end date because of the failure of the applicable antitrust regulators to approve the merger by the end date and all other mutual closing conditions under the merger agreement and the closing conditions of CBRE and Merger Sub under the merger agreement have been satisfied (or are reasonably likely to have been satisfied by the end date).

        CBRE has agreed to pay the Company liquidated damages in an amount equal to $200,000,000 in cash if the merger agreement is terminated:


Market Price of Trammell Crow Company Common Stock (Page 88)

        Trammell Crow Company's common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") under the symbol "TCC". On October 30, 2006, which was the last trading day prior to the

14


day we announced the merger, the Company's common stock closed at $39.10 per share. On November 14, 2006, which was the last trading day before the date of this proxy statement, the Company's common stock closed at $49.15 per share.


Appraisal Rights (Page 60)

        Stockholders of the Company are entitled to statutory appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with the merger. This means that you are entitled to have the value of your shares determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment based on that valuation. The ultimate amount you receive as a dissenting stockholder in an appraisal proceeding may be more than, the same as or less than the amount you would have received under the merger agreement. To exercise your appraisal rights, you must submit a written demand for appraisal to the Company before the vote is taken on the merger agreement and you must not vote in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. Please read "The Special Meeting—Appraisal Rights" and "Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal" for more information.

15


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

        This proxy statement, and the documents to which we refer you in this proxy statement, contain forward-looking statements based on estimates and assumptions. Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Company, the expected completion and timing of the merger and other information relating to the merger. There are forward-looking statements throughout this proxy statement, including, among others, under the headings "Summary," "The Merger," "The Merger—Certain Financial Projections," "The Merger—Opinion of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC" and in statements containing the words "believes," "plans," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "estimates" or other similar expressions. You should be aware that forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the actual results or developments we anticipate will be realized, or even if realized, that they will have the expected effects on the business or operations of the Company. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which the statements were made and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements made in this proxy statement or elsewhere as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition to other factors and matters contained or incorporated in this document, we believe the following factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:

16

17


THE PARTIES TO THE MERGER

Trammell Crow Company

        The Company, founded in 1948 by Mr. Trammell Crow, is one of the largest diversified commercial real estate service companies in the world, with approximately 7,400 employees as of September 30, 2006. The Company delivers brokerage, project management and building management services through its global services group (which provides corporate advisory services, project management and facilities management for its foreign and domestic user clients and which provides brokerage, construction management and property management for its foreign and domestic investor clients) and the Company undertakes development and investment activities through its development and investment group.

        The Company is incorporated in the state of Delaware with its principal offices at 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3400, Dallas, Texas 75201 and its telephone number is (214) 863-3000.


CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.

        CBRE is the world's largest commercial real estate services firm, based on 2005 revenue, with leading full-service operations in major metropolitan areas throughout the world. CBRE offers a full range of services to occupiers, owners, lenders and investors in office, retail, industrial, multi-family and other commercial real estate assets. CBRE is a holding company that conducts all of its operations through its indirect subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2006, excluding affiliate and partner offices, CBRE operated in more than 220 offices worldwide with approximately 14,500 employees providing commercial real estate services under the CB Richard Ellis brand name. CBRE's business is focused on several service competencies, including tenant representation, property/agency leasing, property sales, commercial mortgage origination/servicing, integrated capital markets (equity and debt) solutions, commercial property and corporate facility management, valuation, proprietary research and real estate investment management. In 2005, CBRE was the only commercial real estate services company included on the Fortune 1000 list of the largest U.S. publicly-held companies and the Forbes Global 2000 list of the largest companies in the world.

        CBRE is incorporated in the state of Delaware with its principal offices at 100 North Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 1050, El Segundo, California 90245 and its telephone number is (310) 606-4700.


A-2 Acquisition Corp.

        Merger Sub is a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE. Merger Sub's principal executive offices are located at 100 North Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 1050, El Segundo, California 90245 and its telephone number is (310) 606-4700. Merger Sub was organized solely for the purpose of entering into the merger agreement and consummating the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. It has not conducted any activities to date other than activities incidental to its formation and in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company. The Company will survive the merger and Merger Sub will cease to exist.

18


THE SPECIAL MEETING

Time, Place and Purpose of the Special Meeting

        This proxy statement is being furnished to our stockholders as part of the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at the special meeting to be held on December 18, 2006, starting at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, at The Fairmont Hotel, 1717 North Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75201 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof. The purpose of the special meeting is for our stockholders to consider and vote upon the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. If the stockholders fail to approve and adopt the merger agreement, the merger will not occur. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A. This proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy are first being mailed to our stockholders on or about November 16, 2006.


Record Date and Quorum

        The holders of record of the Company's common stock as of the close of business on November 10, 2006, the record date for the special meeting, are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting. On the record date, there were 36,465,339 shares of the Company's common stock outstanding.

        The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock on the record date represented in person or by proxy will constitute a quorum for purposes of the special meeting. A quorum is necessary to hold the special meeting. Any shares of the Company's common stock held in treasury by the Company or by any of our subsidiaries are not considered to be outstanding for purposes of determining a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. Once a share is represented at the special meeting, it will be counted for the purpose of determining a quorum at the special meeting and any postponement or adjournment of the special meeting. However, if a new record date is set for the adjourned special meeting, then a new quorum will have to be established.


Required Vote

        Completion of the merger requires the approval and adoption of the merger agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Company's common stock outstanding on the record date. Each outstanding share of the Company's common stock on the record date entitles the holder to one vote at the special meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of votes against the approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

        As of October 25 2006, the directors and current executive officers of the Company beneficially owned (excluding options), in the aggregate, 2,829,477 shares of the Company's common stock, representing approximately 7.8% of our outstanding common stock on such date.

19


        Each of the following individuals has entered into a stock voting agreement with respect to the shares of our common stock that they beneficially own:

Name:
   Title:
William F. Concannon   Vice Chairman and Director
James R. Groch   Chief Investment Officer and President, Funds and Investment Management
Matthew S. Khourie   President, Development and Investment—Central Operations
Michael J. Lafitte   President, Global Services
Derek R. McClain   Chief Financial Officer
Diane S. Paddison   Chief Operating Officer, Global Services
T. Christopher Roth   President, Development and Investment—Eastern Operations
John A. Stirek   President, Development and Investment—Western Operations
Robert E. Sulentic   Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President

        As of October 25, 2006, an aggregate of 2,146,987 shares (excluding options), representing approximately 5.9% of our outstanding common stock, were subject to these stock voting agreements. These holders have agreed to vote all of these shares in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and against any competing transaction proposed to the Company's stockholders, unless the merger agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, and have delivered an irrevocable proxy to CBRE for the purpose of voting such shares. The stock voting agreements will terminate upon the earlier of (a) the termination of the merger agreement and (b) the effective time of the merger. For further information, please read "Stock Voting Agreements."


Appraisal Rights

        Stockholders are entitled to statutory appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with the merger. This means that you are entitled to have the value of your shares determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment based on that valuation. The ultimate amount you receive as a dissenting stockholder in an appraisal proceeding may be more than, the same as or less than the amount you would have received under the merger agreement.

        To exercise your appraisal rights, you must submit a written demand for appraisal to the Company before the vote is taken on the merger agreement and you must not vote in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. For further information regarding your statutory appraisal rights, please read "Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal."


Proxies; Revocation

        If you are a stockholder of record and submit a proxy by telephone or the Internet or by returning a signed proxy card by mail, your shares will be voted at the special meeting as you indicate on your proxy card or by such other method. If no instructions are indicated on your signed and returned proxy card, your shares of the Company's common stock will be voted "FOR" the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and "FOR" any postponement or adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies to obtain a quorum or to approve and adopt the merger agreement and the merger.

        If your shares are held in "street name" by your broker, you should instruct your broker how to vote your shares using the instructions provided by your broker. If you have not received such voting instructions or require further information regarding such voting instructions, contact your broker and your broker will give you directions on how to vote your shares. Shares of Company common stock held by persons attending the special meeting but not voting, or shares for which the Company has

20


received proxies with respect to which holders have abstained from voting, will be considered abstentions. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote at the special meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, but will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

        You may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken at the special meeting. To revoke your proxy, you must either (a) deliver to our Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company a written revocation of such proxy, (b) submit by telephone, the Internet or mail a proxy dated after the date of the proxy you wish to revoke or (c) attend the special meeting and vote your shares in person. Attendance at the special meeting will not by itself constitute revocation of a proxy.

        Please note that if you have instructed your broker to vote your shares, the options for revoking your proxy described in the paragraph above do not apply and instead you must follow the directions provided by your broker to change these instructions.

        We do not expect that any matters other than the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the adjournment or postponement of the meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies will be brought before the special meeting. If, however, any such other matter is properly presented at the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, the persons appointed as proxies will have discretionary authority to vote the shares represented by duly executed proxies in accordance with their discretion and judgment.


Submitting Proxies Via the Internet or by Telephone

        Stockholders of record and many stockholders who hold their shares through a broker or bank may have the option to submit their proxies or voting instructions via the Internet or by telephone. There are separate arrangements for using the Internet and telephone to submit your proxy depending on whether you are a stockholder of record or your shares are held in "street name" by your broker.

        In addition to submitting the enclosed proxy card by mail, Trammell Crow Company stockholders of record may submit their proxies:

        If your shares are held in "street name," you should check the voting instruction card provided by your broker to see which options are available and the procedures to be followed.


Adjournments and Postponements

        Although it is not currently expected, the special meeting may be adjourned or postponed for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies, if necessary or appropriate, to establish a quorum or to approve and adopt the merger agreement and the merger. Any adjournment may be made without notice by announcement at the special meeting of the new date, time and place of the special meeting; provided, that, if the meeting is adjourned to a date more than 60 days later than the original meeting date, the board must set a new record date for the meeting. Whether or not a quorum exists, holders of a majority of the shares of the Company's common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote thereat may adjourn the special meeting. Any signed proxies received by the Company in which no voting instructions are provided on such matter will be voted in favor of an adjournment in these circumstances. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on a proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting. Any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies will allow the Company's stockholders who have

21


already sent in their proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use at the special meeting as adjourned or postponed.


Solicitation of Proxies

        This solicitation is made by the Company and the Company will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, directors, officers and employees of the Company may solicit proxies personally and by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means of communication. These persons will not receive additional or special compensation for such solicitation services. The Company will, upon request, reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for their reasonable expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. The Company has retained Georgeson Inc. to assist it in the solicitation of proxies for the special meeting and will pay Georgeson Inc. a fee of approximately $10,000 plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.

22


THE MERGER

Background of the Merger

        As part of its ongoing evaluation of the Company's business and strategic direction, our board of directors and members of our senior management have evaluated from time to time the Company's strategic alternatives and prospects for continued operations as an independent company. These evaluations have been conducted and discussed at our board's annual strategy session and have been generally updated throughout the year at regularly-scheduled board meetings. In conducting these evaluations, our board from time to time has sought the advice of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. ("Vinson & Elkins"), the Company's primary outside corporate legal counsel, and Lazard, who has acted for the last several years as our board's primary financial advisor in the context of mergers and acquisitions. These evaluations have driven changes in the Company's long-term growth plan and helped set the objectives established by management and approved by our board for each performance year.

        Our board and senior management are generally of the view that the commercial real estate services business in the United States, while remaining significantly fragmented, has been in recent years characterized by a drive to consolidate, prompted in large measure by the cost economies of scale available to larger entities in the industry, as well as the potential for geographic expansion and the addition of complementary business lines to provide a broader array of high quality services to industry customers. In order to provide our stockholders the potential to benefit from this consolidation trend, our senior management and our board of directors have remained receptive to opportunities to acquire other businesses or to be acquired by another entity.

        Over the years, members of our senior management team have become familiar with other management teams operating in our industry through the day-to-day competition for customers. Over the past several years, certain of our senior executives became acquainted with, among other leaders in the industry, Ray Wirta, the current Vice Chairperson of CBRE's board of directors, and Cal Frese, CBRE's current President—Americas.

        On April 7, 2005, Mr. Frese and Bill Concannon, Vice Chairman of the Company and a member of our board of directors, met in Chicago, at which meeting Mr. Frese expressed to Mr. Concannon CBRE's preliminary interest in pursuing a business combination with the Company.

        At a meeting of our board on May 18, 2005, our board discussed, among other things, the current strategic options available to the Company. The options that were discussed included (a) remaining independent and pursuing the Company's existing growth and business objectives, (b) pursuing a strategic combination with one or more parties or (c) pursuing a sale of the Company. Management and our board concluded that any strategic combination with CBRE would likely involve a sale of the company. After discussions with management, our board was of the general view that the Company should continue to pursue its long-term business objectives and not pursue a sale of the Company at such time, but remain open to discussions with third parties regarding strategic business combinations. Our board and management therefore agreed that the Company would continue existing business combination discussions with a third party and notify CBRE that it was not interested in pursuing a transaction with CBRE at such time. The Company subsequently communicated this course of action to CBRE.

        In early June of 2005, Mr. Frese contacted Jim Groch, our Chief Investment Officer, by telephone and indicated that soon he would be in the New York City area on other business and would like to meet Mr. Groch in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. On June 23, 2005, Mr. Frese and Mr. Groch met in Philadelphia. Mr. Frese discussed with Mr. Groch his belief in the continuing consolidation trends in the commercial real estate services industry and CBRE's interest in a possible strategic business combination. To this end, Mr. Frese expressed to Mr. Groch his belief that a combination of the Company's business with CBRE's business would be the best fit for CBRE among its strategic options. Mr. Frese indicated to Mr. Groch that CBRE was very familiar with the Company's global services

23


business, but needed to better understand the Company's development and investment business (the "development and investment business"). Mr. Frese discussed each of CBRE's business segments, their relative size and financial performance and his own views on the prospects for each. Mr. Groch informed Mr. Frese that Mr. Concannon had previously disclosed to our board CBRE's interest in the Company and that, while our board greatly appreciated CBRE's interest in the Company, our board was very pleased with the Company's business plan and growth prospects and that our board had decided not to pursue a sale of the Company at that time. Mr. Groch also noted the concern of our management and board that there was significant risk to the Company's business—in the form of employee unrest resulting from any rumors of those discussions—from even engaging in strategic discussions with CBRE. Mr. Groch told Mr. Frese that he would again inform our board of CBRE's interest in the Company at the next scheduled board meeting in September of 2005.

        On July 19, 2005, Mr. Frese called Mr. Groch and stated that CBRE was still very interested in pursuing a possible strategic business combination and wished to engage the Company in further discussions. Mr. Frese and Mr. Groch then discussed in general terms the potential cost savings that could occur in such a transaction, including for comparison purposes a discussion of costs savings that CBRE had achieved in previous acquisitions.

        Mr. Groch and Mr. Frese spoke again via telephone on July 22, 2005 and further discussed potential synergies and cost savings that could be achieved in a combination of the businesses. They also discussed a potential organizational structure of CBRE post-closing.

        On July 29, 2005, Mr. Frese called Mr. Groch and indicated that CBRE was having internal discussions regarding potential issues that could arise from the combination of the parties' respective businesses, especially with respect to the investment management business of CB Richard Ellis Investors, L.L.C. ("CBRE Investors"), on the one hand, and the development and investment business and some of the Company's joint ventures, on the other hand. They again discussed potential cost savings in the context of the proposed transaction. Mr. Frese told Mr. Groch that he was going to ask Brett White, CBRE's Chief Executive Officer, to call Robert Sulentic, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, to arrange a meeting. Mr. Groch again reiterated to Mr. Frese that the Company was happy with its current results and prospects but that, while the Company was not actively seeking a sale, it was open to listening to CBRE's ideas.

        Shortly thereafter, Mr. White called Mr. Sulentic suggesting that they meet to consider the topics Mr. Frese and Mr. Groch had discussed. Mr. White noted that he would be in Orlando, Florida on August 5, 2005 and Mr. Sulentic agreed to meet him there. On August 5th, prior to the start of the meeting, Mr. Sulentic learned that a United Kingdom real estate trade journal had published speculation that CBRE was to acquire the Company. Mr. Sulentic called Mr. White to inform him of the rumors and his view that these rumors would create problems for the Company. Mr. Sulentic indicated his belief that the two of them should not meet given the rumors. On this telephone call Messrs. Sulentic and White agreed that any discussions of a business combination between CBRE and the Company would be terminated. Mr. White again expressed CBRE's interest in pursuing a deal and told Mr. Sulentic that CBRE might contact the Company later that year.

        In late September 2005, Mr. White called Mr. Sulentic and expressed an interest in meeting with Mr. Sulentic. Mr. Sulentic informed Mr. White that he was going to be in San Francisco, California on September 29, 2005 and that they could meet at that time. On September 29, 2005, Mr. Sulentic met with Mr. White in San Francisco. At the meeting, Mr. White reiterated CBRE's interest in acquiring the Company and discussed with Mr. Sulentic the process proposed by CBRE to construct an initial valuation of the Company, including a description of the information CBRE would need from the Company.

        On September 30, 2005, Mr. Frese called Mr. Groch to discuss logistics for a meeting with the parties' Chief Financial Officers to review the Company's business in greater detail. On October 6,

24


2005, Mr. Frese, Mr. Groch, Derek McClain, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Kenneth Kay, the Chief Financial Officer of CBRE, met in Chicago, Illinois. The parties discussed the Company's development and investment business and certain of the Company's joint ventures, including financial results, business trends and future prospects. They also discussed the potential treatment by CBRE of such business units after the proposed acquisition.

        On October 10, 2005, Mr. McClain contacted Mr. Kay via email confirming that the Company had received a due diligence request from CBRE and was working to gather responsive information. Mr. McClain also confirmed that another meeting among representatives of the parties was scheduled for October 19 through October 20, 2005 in Dallas, Texas.

        On October 18, 2005, CBRE and the Company entered into a confidentiality agreement containing customary terms and conditions, including a standstill agreement with a term of at least 12 months, having first exchanged draft agreements for the previous seven to ten days.

        Between October 19, 2005 and the middle of December, 2005, the Company provided to CBRE documents in response to CBRE's due diligence requests, and management of the Company engaged in numerous discussions with representatives of CBRE in connection with CBRE's due diligence investigation of the Company.

        During the periods from October 19 through October 20, 2005, from November 2 through November 4, 2005 and on December 14, 2005, representatives of CBRE and the Company met in Dallas, Texas, Short Hills, New Jersey and Dallas, Texas, respectively. Generally, Messrs. Groch and McClain of the Company and Mr. Frese and other representatives from CBRE met and discussed the financial statements and budgets of the Company and engaged in detailed discussions regarding potential synergies, as well as potential revenue losses, from the proposed acquisition. At the December 14, 2005 meeting, the Company delivered to CBRE the Company's then-current five year growth plan that was developed internally by the Company in the ordinary course of its business. The parties also discussed the Company's projected cash and debt positions set forth in the five year growth plan. Between the meeting dates, the parties also exchanged follow-up telephone calls regarding the topics discussed at the meetings and the Company delivered to CBRE additional due diligence documents.

        On November 16, 2005, our board held a regularly scheduled meeting. Mr. Groch updated the meeting participants on discussions the Company had conducted with CBRE regarding a potential strategic combination. Our board then discussed in general the potential synergies that could make strategic combinations or merger and acquisition transactions among the largest of the Company's industry competitors attractive, and also discussed certain other potential partners for strategic combinations. After discussion of these matters and the Company's prospects as laid out in the five year growth plan, our board agreed that the Company's current strategy would be to continue to pursue the Company's long-term business objectives, but be receptive in exploring whether any future discussions with third parties could lead to a transaction that would be in the best interest of the Company's stockholders.

        During the period following the November 16th board meeting and continuing into mid December, 2005, our management held extensive internal discussions regarding a possible transaction with CBRE. After consultation by our management with members of our board, it was concluded that it was not in the Company's interest to pursue a transaction with CBRE at that time due to (a) the Company's belief that its stock price was then undervalued (and that even a significant premium to such stock price would not represent fair value for the Company), (b) concerns over confidentiality issues in any potential transaction, (c) concerns regarding diversion of management's time from other strategic endeavors, (d) CBRE's lack of familiarity with the Company's development and investment business, and (e) the possible adverse effect on the Company of a drawn out due diligence and transaction process.

25


        On December 20, 2005, Mr. Sulentic spoke with Mr. White via telephone and informed him that the Company was ending negotiations regarding a proposed transaction with CBRE due to these reasons.

        In late spring of 2006, Mr. White called Mr. Sulentic and inquired whether they could have another meeting and, on or about April 12, 2006, they met in Dallas, Texas. At this meeting, Mr. White indicated that CBRE would consider acquiring the Company at an unspecified price that would represent a premium (on a percentage basis) to the then-current trading price of the Company's stock ranging from the high single digits to the mid teens, depending on the cash and stock mix of the consideration.

        At a regularly scheduled meeting of our board on May 17, 2006, our board and management discussed the perceived risks of pursuing a transaction with CBRE, noting the potential damage to the Company's business if the transaction were pursued or publicized and CBRE did not go through with the transaction. Our board and management also discussed the fact that the initial indications of pricing from CBRE did not compare favorably to the Company's growth rate imbedded in its long-term plan. This discussion also focused on the importance of the Company continuing to pursue execution of its business plan with as little distraction as possible for most of senior management, while only pursuing strategic opportunities that seemed likely to result in a transaction that would provide greater value to the Company's stockholders as compared to the value likely to result from the Company's continued pursuit of the Company's current growth plan. After further discussion, our board agreed that it was in the best interest of the Company's stockholders to not pursue a sale to CBRE at that time and to continue execution of the Company's business plan while the Company continued to explore potential opportunities with certain acquisition candidates. Soon thereafter, Mr. Sulentic communicated to Mr. White that the Company was not interested in pursuing a transaction with CBRE.

        On June 2, 2006, CBRE sent to the Company via overnight delivery a termination letter under the confidentiality agreement between the parties.

        During the time period from June 2006 through September 2006, our board and management continued to explore its strategic alternatives, including the conduct of discussions regarding one or more potential strategic acquisitions. In particular, we engaged in serious discussions with an industry competitor to explore the possibility of combining our business with that of the competitor by acquiring the competitor.

        In late August 2006, Mr. Frese contacted Mr. Groch via telephone to discuss rumors from sources CBRE found reliable that the Company was considering entering into a significant merger or acquisition transaction with an industry competitor in the very near future. Mr. Frese told Mr. Groch that CBRE still had a high degree of interest in pursuing a transaction with the Company. Mr. Frese noted that CBRE's board was actively reviewing its options regarding a transaction with the Company and suggested that the parties meet to further discuss a potential acquisition by CBRE.

        On August 28, 2006, Laurence Midler, General Counsel of CBRE, contacted J. Christopher Kirk, General Counsel of the Company and Secretary to our board, and proposed that Messrs. Sulentic, Groch, White and Frese meet on September 1, 2006 in Denver, Colorado. Messrs. Midler and Kirk confirmed their mutual understanding that the meeting did not require any board action by either party in order to comply with the standstill provisions contained in the confidentiality agreement.

        On September 1, 2006, Messrs. Sulentic and Groch met with Messrs. White and Frese in Denver, Colorado. Mr. Sulentic opened the meeting by stating that he and Mr. Groch were in close communication with our board and were operating under our board's direction at the meeting. He further indicated that he and Mr. Groch would be reporting back to our board following the meeting. Messrs. White and Frese noted that CBRE had developed a better understanding of the Company's development and investment business, and wanted to make a proposal regarding the acquisition of the

26


entire Company. They discussed the updated information they would need to analyze in order to provide an indication of value to the Company. They also noted that the terms of the existing confidentiality agreement required that CBRE obtain permission from our board before they could make a proposal with regard to the contemplated acquisition. Mr. Sulentic noted that he would consult with our board prior to developing any response.

        On September 6, 2006, Mr. Sulentic spoke with Mr. White via telephone and confirmed to Mr. White that our board had reiterated its instructions that management evaluate all strategic options available to the Company and that the focus of such evaluation would be on maximizing value for the Company's stockholders. He indicated that the Company would respond in a timely manner with more details if our board desired to receive a proposal from CBRE regarding CBRE's potential acquisition of the Company. The parties also acknowledged that a mechanism to provide such a proposal would need to be worked out under the existing confidentiality agreement. Mr. White told Mr. Sulentic that the Acquisition Committee of CBRE's board had met previously that week and there was great support for a transaction with the Company.

        On September 11, 2006, Mr. Midler called Mr. Kirk to request permission for CBRE to submit to our board of directors a preliminary non-binding indication of the terms and conditions on which CBRE would seek to acquire the Company. Later that day, Mr. Kirk sent to Mr. Midler a letter confirming that, although our board had not made any decision to sell the Company or abandon its existing long-term strategic objectives, CBRE was invited by our board to present its preliminary non-binding proposal. Among other things, the letter set forth specific requirements regarding the content of CBRE's proposal, including a discussion of any financing and any material closing conditions.

        From September 11, 2006 through September 15, 2006, Mr. Sulentic and Mr. Groch, on behalf of the Company, and Mr. White and Mr. Frese, on behalf of CBRE, communicated via email and telephone regarding the terms and conditions of a potential acquisition proposal to acquire the Company. Such discussions culminated in a preliminary non-binding acquisition proposal from CBRE that was contained in a letter from Mr. White to Mr. Sulentic, dated September 15, 2006 (the "proposal"). The proposal stated CBRE's offer to acquire all of the outstanding stock of the Company for a per share cash price of $46.50, assuming the successful completion of business, financial, legal and accounting due diligence, the negotiation of a mutually-acceptable merger agreement, the negotiation of employment arrangements with certain key personnel of the Company and other customary closing conditions. The proposal also contained terms relating to the proposed financing and due diligence matters and requested that the Company respond by no later than September 22, 2006.

        The proposal was sent to the Company after the close of business on September 15, 2006. Mr. Sulentic communicated orally to each member of our board that CBRE had sent an acquisition proposal to the Company and the price per share set forth in such proposal. Our board agreed to discuss the CBRE proposal and an acquisition then being considered by the Company at our board retreat scheduled for the immediately following week.

        On September 16, 2006, Mr. Groch asked Mr. Frese to have CBRE clarify specified terms and conditions in the CBRE proposal.

        On September 18, 2006, Mr. White sent to Mr. Sulentic a letter clarifying certain of the terms and conditions of the proposal, including the terms of the proposed financing, the closing conditions to the acquisition and certain due diligence matters. The letter also contained a due diligence request list, a list of personnel of the Company to whom CBRE would need access for due diligence purposes, and a proposed timeline.

        Also on September 18, 2006, Mr. Groch called Mr. Frese to discuss the price set forth in the proposal. On such call, Mr. Groch told Mr. Frese that the price for the Company should be at least

27


$50.00 per share for the CBRE proposal to compare favorably to the alternative acquisition that the Company was then considering.

        On September 18, 2006, Mr. Sulentic and Mr. Groch met with Mr. Frese in Jacksonville, Florida to discuss the pricing under CBRE's proposal. Mr. White participated by telephone. On a private call during this meeting, Mr. Sulentic reiterated to Mr. White that the Company was considering various strategic alternatives, but that if CBRE would raise its offer price to at least $50.50 per share, Mr. Sulentic would advocate to our board that the Company choose the CBRE proposal over the other options our board was then considering and move forward with further discussions. Later that day, Mr. White called Mr. Sulentic to inform him that CBRE was raising the per share purchase price in the proposal to $48.50, and that this was the price CBRE would like our board to measure against the other alternatives our board was considering.

        The increased price was confirmed the next day in a letter from Mr. White to Mr. Sulentic.

        On September 19, 2006, Mr. Midler, Mr. Kirk and outside legal counsel for CBRE and the Company held a telephonic meeting regarding the financing of the acquisition, as well as other matters relating to the development and investment group and the treatment of outstanding options and restricted stock in the acquisition. Over the next few days, there were various telephone calls made between representatives of the Company, CBRE and their respective outside legal counsel clarifying certain terms and conditions in the proposal.

        On September 20 and 21, 2006, our board met to discuss CBRE's proposal, the potential acquisition being considered by the Company and the alternative of continuing to pursue our strategic objectives as an independent company. Mr. Groch made a presentation to our board regarding the competitive and industry landscape, business cycle and cost synergy opportunities available from various strategic transactions in the commercial real estate services industry. Mr. Groch also provided an update on the Company's merger and acquisition activities, including the Company's discussions with CBRE. The presentation to our board contained a discussion of the terms and conditions of CBRE's proposal, as well as a comparison of the relevant risks and rewards of the proposal as compared to a potential acquisition being considered by the Company and an analysis of the financial impacts of both transactions. Our board also discussed with Lazard the preliminary financial and comparative analyses conducted by Lazard based on information provided by the Company. Our board decided that the proposal by CBRE would likely provide the Company's stockholders with a more compelling financial opportunity than the contemplated acquisition, taking into account the relative probability of closing either transaction and the significant post-closing execution risk in the acquisition opportunity. In addition, our board considered the likelihood that any other industry or financial buyer could offer a financial value for our stockholders that would be more compelling than CBRE's proposal if an auction for the Company were conducted. Our board concluded that, given the significant potential disruption to our business of conducting an auction process and the fact that the proposal from CBRE contemplated that our board could consider competing proposals for an acquisition of the Company under certain circumstances, it was not in the interest of our stockholders to conduct an auction for the Company. Our board instructed management to engage in further discussions with CBRE, but to try to achieve a price of $51.00 per share before expending significant time or resources on a proposed acquisition.

        On September 21, 2006, Mr. White and Mr. Sulentic had a telephone conversation regarding certain issues concerning CBRE's proposal, including issues regarding regulatory approvals, financing and the rights of the parties under certain circumstances in which the proposed transaction was announced but failed to close. Mr. Sulentic also conveyed the view of our board that CBRE should offer at least $51.00 per share for the Company.

        On September 23, 2006, various representatives of CBRE and the Company held conference calls to discuss certain financial information and projections that had been delivered to CBRE.

28


        On September 24, 2006, Mr. White sent a letter to Mr. Sulentic stating that CBRE was raising the per share purchase price in the proposal to $50.00 per share, advising Mr. Sulentic that this was CBRE's best and final proposal and requesting that the parties and their advisors meet to resolve the outstanding regulatory, financing and other questions regarding CBRE's proposal.

        On September 25, 2006, Messrs. Midler and Kirk held a telephone conference with their respective outside legal counsel to discuss the issues raised on September 24th. Later that day Mr. Midler emailed Mr. Kirk to inform him that the Acquisition Committee of the board of CBRE was meeting on September 26, 2006 regarding these issues. On September 26, CBRE's outside legal counsel notified Mr. Kirk that such committee had approved the resolution of these issues on the terms previously discussed.

        From September 24th through September 26th, Mr. Sulentic spoke with each of the non-executive directors of the Company and each confirmed their support for a $50.00 per share price if the financing, regulatory and other identified issues could be resolved. Mr. Sulentic then notified Mr. White that the Company would proceed with further discussions and comply with CBRE's due diligence requests.

        On September 27, 2006, Messrs. White and Sulentic met in Phoenix, Arizona and agreed that the parties would continue their discussions on the basis of a price of $50.00 per share. They were subsequently joined by Michael Lafitte, President of the Company's global services business, to discuss organizational matters relating to the combined entity that might result from the acquisition.

        From September 30, 2006 through October 13, 2006, CBRE personnel and their advisors conducted a due diligence investigation of the Company and its businesses and the Company produced due diligence documentation in response thereto. The Company also established an online virtual due diligence data room during such time. CBRE and the Company also held numerous due diligence meetings involving their respective personnel and advisors.

        On October 1, 2006, the leadership team of CBRE Investors and Mr. Wirta of CBRE's board met with Mr. Groch to resolve certain potential issues relating to the charter, franchise, leadership and operating model for the development and investment business.

        On October 2, 2006, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP ("Simpson Thacher"), outside legal counsel for CBRE, delivered to the Company and Vinson & Elkins an initial draft of a proposed merger agreement. Over the next two weeks, Vinson & Elkins and Simpson Thacher negotiated and exchanged drafts of the proposed merger agreement.

        On October 10, 2006, at a meeting initiated by Mr. White, Mr. White met with Curtis Feeny, a member of our board, at Mr. Feeny's offices in Menlo Park, California. Messrs. White and Feeny discussed the attitude of our board regarding the proposed transaction. Mr. White expressed his views on the likelihood that the parties could reach final agreement with respect to the transaction. Mr. White also discussed the process by which CBRE would seek to evaluate members of our board for potential service on CBRE's board if the proposed merger was completed. However, Mr. White did not offer Mr. Feeny a position on CBRE's board upon closing, and Mr. White and Mr. Feeny confirmed the understanding of CBRE and the Company that service on CBRE's board by any of our directors (other than the service of Mr. Sulentic) would not be discussed unless and until the merger agreement was signed.

        On October 13, 2006, Messrs. Sulentic, Kirk, White, and Midler and representatives from Vinson & Elkins and Simpson Thacher met to discuss and attempt to resolve the outstanding issues in the proposed merger agreement. The parties, other than Messrs. White and Sulentic, also held a follow-up meeting on the outstanding merger agreement issues on October 20, 2006.

29


        Throughout much of October, the Company continued to produce documents in response to CBRE's due diligence requests and CBRE continued to refine its analysis of the synergies and integration issues raised in the acquisition.

        During the period from October 25 through October 27, 2006, Messrs. White and Sulentic engaged in various telephonic discussions to continue to negotiate significant deal terms. The discussions centered on Mr. Sulentic'c concerns regarding the timing and certainty of closing. These discussions resulted in enhanced rights for the Company to ensure a more likely, timely and efficient closing process in exchange for a proposed adjustment of the price from $50 to $48.88 per share. Messrs. White and Sulentic agreed that they would recommend these changes to their respective boards of directors.

        On October 27, 2006, our board met to consider the proposed merger, at which meeting senior members of our management and representatives of Lazard, Vinson & Elkins, Prickett, Jones & Elliot, P.A., Delaware counsel to the Company ("Prickett Jones"), and Arnold & Porter LLP, special regulatory counsel to the Company, were also present. Management updated our board on the current financial performance of the Company and, upon the departure from the meeting of Lazard personnel, representatives from Prickett Jones discussed with, and responded to questions from, our board regarding its fiduciary duties under Delaware law in relation to the proposed merger. Lazard then rejoined the meeting and reviewed with our board its financial analysis of the proposed merger. Management and representatives from Vinson & Elkins then summarized for our board the material terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement, voting agreements, amendments to certain of our benefits, bonus and severance plans and the other transaction documents. Management and Vinson & Elkins then responded to questions from our board regarding the documents. Management, our board, Vinson & Elkins, Arnold & Porter and Lazard then discussed the outstanding legal and business issues relating to the proposed merger, and our board discussed reasons for the proposed merger. Our board then approved the terms of the engagement letter with Lazard to serve as financial advisor to the Company in connection with the proposed merger and agreed to consider the transaction at a meeting on October 30, 2006, following further discussions between Messrs. Sulentic and White regarding pricing and other material terms.

        Messrs. White and Sulentic talked by telephone later that night to further discuss the proposed price per share and the outstanding material transaction issues. Mr. White indicated his belief that the CBRE board of directors would support either (a) a price of $49.51 per share if we would accept a $100 million termination fee payable by CBRE upon termination of the merger agreement due to the failure to obtain required regulatory approvals, or (b) the alternative price of $48.88 per share in combination with a $200 million termination fee payable by CBRE upon termination of the merger agreement due to the failure to obtain required regulatory approvals.

        On October 28, 2006, Mr. Sulentic held numerous discussions with all other members of our board to discuss the alternative price scenarios. The outcome of these discussions was a preference for the option with the $49.51 price. During the period from October 27 through October 30, 2006, our management, Vinson & Elkins and Simpson Thacher finalized the terms of the proposed merger agreement and the schedules thereto.

        On October 30, 2006, our board again met to consider the proposed merger, at which meeting management and representatives of Lazard and Vinson & Elkins were also present. Representatives of Lazard reviewed with our board their financial analyses regarding the proposed merger and, following a discussion with our board, Lazard rendered its written opinion to our board that, as of October 30, 2006 and based upon and subject to the assumptions, factors and qualifications set forth in its opinion, the $49.51 per share cash merger consideration to be received by the holders of our common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders (other than the Company, CBRE or any subsidiary of CBRE and any shareholder who is entitled to demand and

30


properly demands appraisal rights). Lazard's opinion is more fully described in "The Merger—Opinion of Lazard Frères."

        Representatives of management and Vinson & Elkins then summarized for our board the terms and conditions of the proposed severance, retention and bonus plans, proposed amendments to certain executive officer employment agreements to be entered into by CBRE simultaneously with the execution of the merger agreement, and any material changes to the transaction documentation, including the proposed merger agreement and the voting agreements, since the October 27, 2006 board meeting. Representatives from Vinson & Elkins and management then responded to questions from our board regarding the proposed transaction documents. Our board also discussed and considered the compensation, accelerated vesting, severance and other payments to be received by executive officers in connection with the merger.

        Mr. Feeny then disclosed to our board the material details of his meeting with Mr. White on October 10, 2006. Mr. Feeny confirmed that neither his meeting with Mr. White, nor the potential for service on CBRE's board of directors after completion of the merger, impacted his conclusions regarding the merger. The other members of our board confirmed that they also were not impacted by the prospect of continued service on CBRE's board after closing.

        Lazard, management and our employee directors then excused themselves from the meeting and our outside directors then met in an executive session with Vinson & Elkins to consider the merger and the related transactions, after which management and our employee directors returned to the meeting.

        Our board then considered the merger from a business, financial and legal perspective and the current conditions in the commercial real estate services industry and also considered the reasons for the merger described in "The Merger—Reasons for the Merger." After careful consideration and deliberation, our board unanimously (a) determined that the merger and the merger agreement were advisable and in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders, (b) approved the merger agreement, the ancillary transaction documents and each of the transactions contemplated thereby, (c) authorized management to execute the definitive transaction documentation and (d) resolved to recommend that the stockholders of the Company vote in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

        Later that evening, the definitive merger agreement and the voting agreements were executed by the parties. Before the open of business on October 31, 2006, each of the Company and CBRE issued separate press releases announcing the merger agreement and the merger.


Reasons for the Merger

        In determining to adopt and approve the merger agreement and the merger, our board of directors considered the following material factors, among others:

31

32

        Our board of directors also considered and balanced against the potential benefits of the merger the following potentially adverse factors concerning the merger:

        After taking into account all of the factors set forth above, as well as others, our board of directors agreed that the benefits of the merger outweigh the risks and that the merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable and in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. Our board of directors has approved and adopted the merger agreement and recommends that the Company's stockholders vote FOR the approval and adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting.

33

        Our board of directors did not assign relative weights to the above factors or the other factors considered by it. In addition, our board of directors did not reach any specific conclusion on each factor considered, but conducted an overall analysis of these factors. Individual members of our board of directors may have given different weights to different factors.


Recommendation of the Company's Board of Directors

        After careful consideration, our board of directors:


Certain Financial Projections

        As part of management's annual strategic discussions with our board of directors, management prepares a five-year projection for the business commonly referred to internally as the "growth model." The growth model contains projections of (a) revenues and pre-tax income for the Company's two reporting segments and for various lines of business within its global services segment and (b) net income and earnings per share for the Company (as a whole). The growth model generally factors in management's assessment of (a) conditions expected to prevail in the various lines of business, (b) the Company's recent experience with the business lines, and (c) initiatives being undertaken by the Company that are designed to drive revenue growth and expense efficiencies.

        The growth model has been a reference point in discussions with CBRE regarding the value of the Company. The growth model was first disclosed to CBRE during the Company's 2005 discussions with CBRE. In April 2006, in connection with the Company's consideration of an acquisition, the growth model was updated on an interim basis (a) to reflect the Company's actual 2005 performance and to reflect the 2006 budget approved by the board, with growth rates then applied to the 2006 budget instead of the 2005 budget, (b) to reflect changes to the Company's projected tax rate and share count, (c) to make minor modifications to growth rates, (d) to upwardly adjust our expectations of Savill's contribution to income in line with their 2005 actual results and (e) to include a calculation of EBITDA for the Company as a whole. CBRE was advised of the resulting changes to the growth model in early September, 2006. These projections were provided by the Company to Lazard in connection with its financial analyses and presentation to our board of directors.

34


        Set forth below is a summary of the updated growth model:

 
   2006
   2007
   2008
   2009
   2010
 
   (in 000,000's except per share amounts)
Global Services                              
  Revenues(1)   $ 985   $ 1,172   $ 1,371   $ 1,608   $ 1,890
  Income before income taxes     86     106     130     160     190

Development and Investment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Revenues(1)     143     171     197     233     275
  Income before income taxes     36     45     49     59     71

Company Consolidated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Revenues(1)     1,128     1,343     1,568     1,841     2,165
  Income before income taxes     122     151     179     219     261
  Net income     75     94     111     136     162
  Earnings per share     2.04     2.53     3.00     3.67     4.39
  EBITDA     145     178     205     246     290
(1)
For purposes of the growth model, the Company considers revenues to include (a) income from unconsolidated subsidiaries and (b) gains on disposition of real estate, including gains reclassified as income from discontinued operations in accordance with FAS 144 (neither of which are GAAP revenues).

        In connection with our board of directors' consideration of the proposed transaction with CBRE and an alternative acquisition on September 20 and 21, 2006, management referred to a set of projections (the "17.5% growth projections") that assumed the Company would post earnings per share of $2.00 for 2006 and that earnings per share would grow at the rate of 17.5% from 2007 through 2010. Prior to management's meeting with CBRE on September 18, 2006, and our conference calls with CBRE on September 23, 2006, referred to in "—Background of the Merger," CBRE was advised that the Company used the 17.5% growth projections for the Company's own analysis of its various strategic alternatives. Except for the assumptions noted above that were disclosed to CBRE, no other information regarding the 17.5% growth projections was provided to CBRE.

        On September 23, 2006, management of the Company provided to CBRE a "topside-adjusted forecast" for 2006, providing an updated projection for the Company's performance for 2006. Set forth below is a summary of the topside-adjusted forecast:

 
   Global
Services
   Development
and
Investment
   Company
Total
 
   (in 000,000's, except per share amounts)
2006 Income before income taxes   $ 79   $ 38   $ 117
2006 Earnings per share               $ 1.94
EBITDA               $ 142

        In discussions surrounding the topside adjusted forecast, Company representatives advised CBRE representatives that recent historical experience (for 2004 and 2005) would indicate that the Company generally tended to underestimate its ultimate full-year earnings per share in its topside adjusted forecasts prepared in the months leading up to year end.

        On October 17, 2006, in connection with the discussion of a business plan for the development and investment business as an independently managed subsidiary of CBRE, management of the Company indicated to CBRE that if management were then revising the growth model, management would shift

35


$7 million of income before income taxes for the development and investment segment from 2007 into 2008.

        The Company makes public only very limited information as to future performance and does not provide specific or detailed information as to earnings or performance over an extended period. The foregoing projections are included in this proxy statement only because this information was provided to CBRE and Merger Sub during negotiations and to Lazard for use in preparation of its financial analyses. The projections were not prepared with a view to public disclosure or compliance with the published guidelines of the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding projections or forecasts. The projections do not purport to present operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), and our independent auditors have not examined or compiled the projections and accordingly assume no responsibility for them. The internal financial forecasts (upon which these projections were based in part) are, in general, prepared solely for internal use and other management decisions and are subjective in many respects and thus susceptible to interpretations and periodic revision based on actual experience and business developments.

        The projections also reflect numerous assumptions made by management including assumptions with respect to general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters including effective tax rates and interest rates and the anticipated amount of borrowings, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Company's control. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the assumptions made in preparing the projections will prove accurate. There will be differences between actual and projected results, and actual results may be materially greater or less than those contained in the projections. The inclusion of the projections in this proxy statement should not be regarded as an indication that the Company or its representatives considered or consider the projections to be a reliable prediction of future events, and the projections should not be relied upon as such.

        The Company's management believes that the projections prepared were prepared in good faith at the time they were made; however, you should not assume that the projections continue to be accurate or reflective of management's current view. The projections were disclosed to CBRE, Merger Sub and their representatives at their request as a matter of due diligence and to Lazard for use in preparation of its financial analyses, and are included in this proxy statement on that account. None of the Company or any of its representatives has made or makes any representation to any person regarding the ultimate performance of the Company compared to the information contained in the projections, and none of them intends to update or otherwise revise the projections to reflect circumstances existing after the date when made or to reflect the occurrence of future events in the event that any or all of the assumptions underlying the projections are shown to be in error.


Opinion of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC

        Under an agreement dated October 27, 2006, we formally retained Lazard to act as our investment banker in connection with the merger. As part of that engagement, we requested that Lazard evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of our common stock of the consideration to be paid to such holders in the merger. Lazard delivered a written opinion to our board of directors, dated October 30, 2006, the date of the merger agreement, that, as of that date and based upon and subject to certain assumptions, factors and qualifications set forth therein, the $49.51 per share cash merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of our common stock (other than the Company, CBRE or any subsidiary of CBRE and any shareholder who is entitled to demand and properly demands appraisal rights).

        The full text of the Lazard opinion is included as Annex B to this proxy statement and is incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. The description of the Lazard opinion set forth in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Lazard opinion set

36


forth in Annex B. You are urged to read the Lazard opinion carefully in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Lazard in connection with the opinion. Lazard's written opinion is directed to our board of directors and only addresses the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of our common stock (other than the Company, CBRE or any subsidiary of CBRE and any shareholder who is entitled to demand and properly demands appraisal rights) of the $49.51 per share in cash merger consideration to be paid to such holders. Lazard's written opinion does not address the merits of the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the merger or any other aspect of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how the stockholder should vote on any matter relating to the merger. Lazard's opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to Lazard as of, October 30, 2006, the date of Lazard's opinion. Lazard assumes no responsibility for updating or revising its opinion based on circumstances or events occurring after the date of the opinion. The following is only a summary of the Lazard opinion. You are encouraged to read the entire opinion carefully.

        In connection with its opinion, Lazard:

        Lazard relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the foregoing information and has not assumed any responsibility for any independent verification of such information or any independent valuation or appraisal of any of our assets or liabilities or concerning our solvency or fair value. With respect to the financial forecasts, Lazard assumed that they had been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of our management as to our future financial performance. Lazard did not assume any responsibility for and expressed no view as to such forecasts or the assumptions on which they were based.

        In rendering its opinion, Lazard assumed, with our consent, that the merger would be completed on the terms described in the merger agreement provided to it, without any waiver or modification of any material terms or conditions by us and that obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for the merger would not have an adverse effect on us or the merger. Lazard did not express any opinion as to any tax or other consequences that might result from the merger, nor does its opinion address any legal, tax, regulatory or accounting matters, as to which Lazard understood that we had obtained such advice we deemed necessary from qualified professionals. Lazard noted in its opinion that due to the limited number of public companies that are comparable to the Company, the limited number of transactions in the Company's industry, the lack of disclosure regarding transactions involving private companies in the Company's industry and the cyclicality in the industry, Lazard was unable to perform a meaningful precedent transactions analysis. In addition, Lazard analyzed, with our consent, the Company's minority interest in Savills plc based on the closing price of Savills ordinary shares on October 27, 2006, after giving effect to estimated taxes payable upon a sale of such shares.

37

        Lazard was not engaged to broadly solicit, and Lazard confirmed that it did not broadly solicit, other parties regarding a potential transaction with us, nor was Lazard requested to consider, and its opinion does not address, the relative merits of the merger as compared to any other transaction in which we might have engaged. Lazard does not express any opinion as to the price at which our common stock might trade subsequent to the announcement of the merger.

        The following is a brief summary of the material financial and comparative analyses that Lazard deemed to be appropriate in connection with rendering its opinion. The following summaries of financial analyses include information included in tabular format. You should read these tables together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the material financial analyses.

        Comparable public companies analysis.    Lazard reviewed and analyzed selected publicly available financial and other data of the following companies having businesses and trading characteristics that it deemed reasonably comparable to us:

        In performing these analyses, Lazard reviewed and analyzed certain financial information, implied multiples and market trading data relating to the selected comparable companies and compared such information to corresponding information for the Company. The estimated financial information for the selected public companies used by Lazard in its analysis was based on the Institutional Brokers' Estimate System's, commonly referred to as "I/B/E/S," consensus estimates or on recent research estimates published by certain Wall Street institutions. The historical financial information used by Lazard in its analysis was based on publicly available historical information. The financial information for the Company was based on information and estimates provided to Lazard by our management.

        For each of the selected public comparable companies, Lazard compared the enterprise value, that is, equity value plus debt and minority interest less cash and cash equivalents, of each company as a multiple of estimated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (commonly referred to as "EBITDA") for fiscal years 2006 and 2007. The results of the analysis were as follows:

 
   Enterprise
Value as a
Multiple
of EBITDA
  
Company
  
  2006
   2007
  
CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.   11.6 x 10.5 x
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated   11.8   12.2  
Savills plc   11.5   10.8  

        For each of the selected public comparable companies, Lazard also compared closing prices per share of common stock for each company as of October 26, 2006 as a multiple of estimated earnings per share (commonly referred to as "EPS") for such company for fiscal years 2006 and 2007. The results of the analysis were as follows:

 
   Closing Share
Price as a
Multiple of EPS
  
Company
  
  2006
   2007
  
CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.   19.5 x 17.1 x
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated   18.4   19.7  
Savills plc   16.8   15.2  

38

        Applying a range of selected multiples derived from the analysis to the corresponding EBITDA and EPS data for the Company and taking into account the implied value of the Company's ownership interest in Savills based on the closing price of Savills ordinary shares on October 27, 2006, after giving effect to estimated taxes payable upon a sale of such shares, Lazard derived an implied per share equity reference range for the Company of $36.00 to $46.00 and $42.00 to $54.00 when taking into account a 20% takeover premium, as compared to the cash merger consideration of $49.51 per share in cash to be paid to the holders of our common stock in the merger.

        Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.    Based on publicly available research analysts' estimates, as well as the estimates of the Company's management, for fiscal years 2006 to 2011 for the Company, Lazard performed an analysis of the present value of the projected free cash flows that the Company could generate from 2006 through 2011. For purposes of this analysis, Lazard also estimated the terminal value of the Company by applying (a) net income exit multiples ranging from 15.0x to 17.0x to the Company's estimated net income for fiscal year 2011 and (b) EBITDA exit multiples ranging from 8.0x to 10.0x to the Company's estimated EBITDA for fiscal year 2011. The cash flows and terminal values were then discounted to present value using discount rates ranging from 12% to 14%. Based on the foregoing and taking into account the implied value of the Company's ownership interest in Savills based on the closing price of Savills ordinary shares on October 27, 2006, after giving effect to estimated taxes payable upon a sale of such shares, Lazard calculated an implied per share equity reference range for the Company of $38.00 to $48.00 based on publicly available research analysts' estimates for the Company and of $42.00 to $54.00 based on the Company's management estimates, as compared to the cash merger consideration of $49.51 per share in cash to be paid to the holders of our common stock in the merger.

        Miscellaneous.    The preparation of financial analyses is a complex process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and, therefore, is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Selecting the portions of the analyses or the summary set forth above without considering the analyses as a whole could create an incomplete or misleading view of the process underlying Lazard's presentation to our board of directors. In formulating its presentation to our board of directors, Lazard considered the results of all of its analyses and did not attribute any particular weight to any factor or analyses considered by it; rather, Lazard formulated its presentation on the basis of its experience and professional judgment after considering the results of its analyses. No company used in the above analyses as a comparison is directly comparable to us or the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or the merger. The analyses were prepared for the purpose of Lazard rendering advice to our board of directors in connection with its consideration of the merger, and those analyses do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold, which may be significantly more or less favorable than set forth in the analyses. You should understand that estimates of values and forecasts of future results contained in the analyses, whether publicly available or provided by our management, were based on numerous assumptions and forecasts with respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of the Company and Lazard and are not necessarily indicative of actual values or actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses.

        In performing its analyses, Lazard made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters. Because those analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond our control or the control of our advisors, neither we, Lazard nor any other person assumes responsibility if future results or actual values are materially different from those forecasts or estimates contained in the analyses.

        In connection with Lazard's services as our board of directors' investment banker, we agreed to pay Lazard a fee of $8,500,000 payable upon the closing of the merger. We have also agreed to

39


reimburse Lazard for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses (including attorneys' fees) and to indemnify Lazard and certain related parties against certain liabilities under certain circumstances that may arise out of the rendering of its advice, including certain liabilities under U.S. federal securities laws.

        Lazard has provided and may currently or in the future provide investment banking services to the Company for which Lazard has received or may receive customary fees. Lazard has previously provided advisory services to us in connection with the exercise of our option to purchase shares in Savills, which closed in April 2005 and for which we paid Lazard a customary fee.

        Lazard, as part of its investment banking business, is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements, leveraged buyouts, and valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes. In addition, in the ordinary course of their respective businesses, affiliates of Lazard and LFCM Holdings LLC (an entity owned in large part by managing directors of Lazard) may actively trade the securities of the Company and/or the securities of CBRE for their own accounts and for the accounts of their customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

        Lazard is an internationally recognized investment banking firm providing a full range of financial advisory and securities services. Lazard was selected to act as investment banker to our board of directors because of its qualifications, expertise and reputation in investment banking and mergers and acquisitions, as well as its familiarity with the Company.

        Lazard prepared these analyses for the purpose of providing an opinion to our board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point view, of the $49.51 per share cash merger consideration to be received by the holders of our common stock. The $49.51 per share in cash consideration to be received by the holders of the Company common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was determined through arm's-length negotiations between the Company and CBRE and was approved by our board of directors. Lazard did not recommend any specific merger consideration to the Company or that any given merger consideration constituted the only appropriate merger consideration for the merger.

        As described above, the opinion of Lazard was one of many factors taken into consideration by our board of directors in making the determination to approve the merger and the merger agreement. Consequently, the analyses described above should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of our board of directors with respect to the merger consideration of $49.51 per share in cash or of whether our board of directors would have been willing to agree to a different merger consideration. Additionally, Lazard's opinion is not intended to confer any rights or remedies upon any employee or creditor of the Company.


Effects on the Company if the Merger is Not Completed

        If the merger agreement is not approved and adopted by the Company's stockholders or if the merger is not completed for any other reason, stockholders will not receive any payment for their shares in connection with the merger. Instead, the Company will remain an independent public company and its common stock will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE for as long as it meets the listing requirements of that exchange. In addition, if the merger is not completed, we expect that management will operate the business in a manner similar to that in which it is being operated today and that the Company's stockholders will continue to be subject to the same risks and opportunities as they currently are, including, among other things, the nature of the commercial real estate industry on which the Company's business largely depends, and general economic and market conditions. Accordingly, if the merger is not completed, we cannot predict the effect of these risks and opportunities on the future value of your shares. From time to time, our board of directors will evaluate and review the business operations, properties, dividend policy and capitalization of the Company (among other things), make such changes as are deemed appropriate and continue to seek to

40


identify strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value including acquisitions of other real estate services companies. If the merger agreement is not approved and adopted by the Company's stockholders or if the merger is not completed for any other reason, we cannot assure you that any other transaction acceptable to the Company will be offered or that the business, prospects or results of operations of the Company will not be adversely impacted.


Financing

        The Company and CBRE estimate that the total amount of funds necessary to complete the merger and the related transactions will be approximately $2.113 billion, which includes approximately:

These payments are expected to be funded by a combination of debt financing and available cash of CBRE and Merger Sub.

        General.    CBRE Services has received a debt commitment letter, dated as of October 30, 2006, from Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Credit Suisse (collectively, "Credit Suisse"), for to up to $2,800,000,000 of senior secured loan facilities, consisting of (a) two term loan facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to $2,200,000,000 and (b) $600,000,000 of revolving loan facilities (which will be utilized to replace the existing senior secured revolving credit facilities of CBRE Services if the existing facilities are not amended to permit the merger and financing thereof) (together, the "facilities"). The facilities contemplated by the debt financing commitment are conditioned on the merger being completed, as well as other conditions being satisfied.

        Conditions.    The availability of the facilities is subject to, among other things:

41

        The debt commitment letter expires at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on May 7, 2007, unless the end date (as defined in the merger agreement) is extended to August 6, 2007, in which case the debt commitment letter will expire on August 6, 2007. The documentation governing the facilities has not been finalized and, accordingly, the actual terms of the facilities may differ from those described in this proxy statement.

        CBRE and Merger Sub have agreed to use reasonable efforts to obtain debt financing on the terms and conditions described in the debt commitment letter. If any portion of the financing contemplated by the debt commitment letter will not be available to CBRE or Merger Sub to complete the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, CBRE or Merger Sub must use their reasonable efforts to arrange alternate financing for the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; provided, that the terms and conditions of such alternate financing in the aggregate are not materially less favorable to CBRE and Merger Sub than those contemplated by the debt commitment letter.

        The Merger Agreement does not condition CBRE's obligation to complete the merger on the receipt by CBRE of the necessary debt financing. However, CBRE is not required to complete the merger until the expiration of the "marketing period," as defined in the merger agreement. Please read "The Merger Agreement—Effective Time."


Interests of the Company's Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

        In considering the recommendation of the Company's board of directors with respect to the merger, you should be aware that some of the Company's directors and executive officers have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally. These interests may present them with actual or potential conflicts of interest, and these interests, to the extent material, are described below. The Company's board of directors was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in approving the merger agreement.

        As of October 25, 2006, there were 1,721,718 shares of our common stock subject to stock options granted under our 1997 Option Plan and our Long-Term Incentive Plan (together, the "Company Stock Plans") to our current executive officers and directors. At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding stock option will automatically be converted into the right to receive, upon the vesting and exercise of such option in accordance with its terms, a cash payment, without interest and less applicable tax withholding, equal to the product of:

42

        All options held by the Company's directors and executive officers have previously vested. The following table summarizes the options held by our executive officers and directors as of October 25, 2006 and the consideration (not taking into account any applicable tax or other withholding) that each of them will receive pursuant to the merger agreement in connection with the exercise of their options:

Directors:
   No. of Shares
Underlying
Options(1)
   Weighted Average
Exercise Price
of Options(1)
   Resulting
Consideration(2)
William F. Concannon(3)   358,727   $ 13.38   $ 12,960,044
James R. Erwin   37,925   $ 13.27   $ 1,374,572
Curtis F. Feeny   30,539   $ 10.80   $ 1,182,019
Jeffrey M. Heller   37,925   $ 13.27   $ 1,374,572
Rowland T. Moriarty   37,925   $ 13.27   $ 1,374,572
Michael A. Moses   0   $ 0   $ 0
Robert E. Sulentic(4)   465,518   $ 13.29   $ 16,859,924
J. McDonald Williams   52,327   $ 14.84   $ 1,814,308

Executive Officers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
E. Stevenson Belcher   30,500   $ 12.22   $ 1,137,205
James R. Groch   160,460   $ 14.24   $ 5,658,951
Matthew S. Khourie   90,412   $ 14.22   $ 3,190,521
Michael J. Lafitte   45,418   $ 14.67   $ 1,582,247
Derek R. McClain   204,797   $ 13.45   $ 7,385,436
Diane S. Paddison   0   $ 0   $ 0
T. Christopher Roth   154,870   $ 13.72   $ 5,542,846
John A. Stirek   14,375   $ 13.90   $ 511,894
(1)
All options held by the Company's executive officers and directors have previously vested.

(2)
The amounts set forth in this "Resulting Consideration" column are calculated based on the actual exercise prices underlying the related options, as opposed to the weighted average exercise price per share for the options.

(3)
Mr. Concannon also serves as the vice-chairman of the Company, which is an executive officer position of the Company.

(4)
Mr. Sulentic also serves as the president and chief executive officer of the Company.

        As of October 25, 2006, there were 814,179 shares of restricted stock outstanding and held by our executive officers and directors under our Long-Term Incentive Plan. Under the terms of the merger agreement, at the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share of our restricted stock will be converted into the right to receive a cash payment of $49.51 per share of restricted stock, without interest and less any applicable tax withholding, payable as soon as administratively feasible following the vesting or the lapse of restrictions on such restricted stock. Any payments will remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including vesting) as currently in effect with respect to such restricted stock. Any shares of restricted stock that vest at the effective time of the merger will be treated as shares of our outstanding common stock and will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration at the effective time of the merger, less any applicable tax withholding. The restricted stock of all of our executive officers, other than E. Stevenson Belcher, fully vests at the effective time of the merger.

        The following table summarizes the restricted stock held by our executive officers and directors as of October 25, 2006 and the consideration (not taking into account any applicable tax or other

43


withholding) that each of them will ultimately receive pursuant to the merger agreement in connection with such shares of restricted stock:

Directors:
   No. of Shares of
Restricted Stock
   Resulting
Consideration
William F. Concannon(1)   83,161   $ 4,117,301
James R. Erwin   0   $ 0
Curtis F. Feeny   0   $ 0
Jeffrey M. Heller   0   $ 0
Rowland T. Moriarty   0   $ 0
Michael A. Moses   0   $ 0
Robert E. Sulentic(2)   159,358   $ 7,889,815
J. McDonald Williams   0   $ 0

Executive Officers:
 
 
 
 
 
E. Stevenson Belcher   59,595   $ 2,950,548
James R. Groch   91,972   $ 4,553,534
Matthew S. Khourie   64,942   $ 3,215,278
Michael J. Lafitte   85,581   $ 4,237,115
Derek R. McClain   66,643   $ 3,299,495
Diane S. Paddison   58,643   $ 2,903,415
T. Christopher Roth   72,142   $ 3,571,750
John A. Stirek   72,142   $ 3,571,750
(1)
Mr. Concannon also serves as the vice-chairman of the Company, which is an executive officer position of the Company.

(2)
Mr. Sulentic also serves as the president and chief executive officer of the Company.

        The Company has amended each agreement that was entered into on August 9, 2006 granting shares of restricted stock to each of the executive officers listed above. The amendment provides that the performance requirements set forth in such restricted stock agreement will be deemed satisfied if the merger occurs. The following table sets forth the number of restricted shares covered by each of the amendments which are included in the aggregate number of restricted shares indicated in the previous table:

Executive Officers:
   No. of Restricted Shares
E. Stevenson Belcher   8,553
William F. Concannon   17,763
James R. Groch   21,053
Matthew S. Khourie   14,474
Michael J. Lafitte   19,079
Derek R. McClain   11,184
Diane S. Paddison   11,184
T. Christopher Roth   14,474
John A. Stirek   14,474
Robert E. Sulentic   29,605

44

        As of October 25, 2006, stock-based performance unit awards representing 34,424 shares of our common stock had been issued and were outstanding and fully vested under our Long-Term Incentive Plan. These stock-based performance units may be settled in cash, stock or a combination of both.

        At the effective time of the merger, each of these outstanding stock-based performance unit awards will be converted into the right to receive $49.51 in cash, without interest and less applicable tax withholding. However, the cash payment applicable to each stock-based performance unit award will be paid by the surviving corporation at such time and in accordance with the provisions set forth in the applicable award agreement between us and the holder of such performance unit award.

        The following table summarizes the stock-based performance unit awards held by our executive officers and directors as of October 25, 2006 and the value that each of them would receive at the completion of the merger if such stock-based performance unit awards were converted into the right to receive the merger consideration of $49.51 in cash:

Directors:
   No. of Shares Represented
by Performance Unit Awards
   Resulting
Consideration
William F. Concannon(1)   0   $ 0
James R. Erwin   10,685   $ 529,014
Curtis F. Feeny   6,763   $ 334,836
Jeffrey M. Heller   10,685   $ 529,014
Rowland T. Moriarty   0   $ 0
Michael A. Moses(2)   5,107   $ 252,848
Robert E. Sulentic(3)   0   $ 0
J. McDonald Williams(2)   1,184   $ 58,620

Executive Officers:
 
 
 
 
 
E. Stevenson Belcher   0   $ 0
James R. Groch   0   $ 0
Matthew S. Khourie   0   $ 0
Michael J. Lafitte   0   $ 0
Derek R. McClain   0   $ 0
Diane S. Paddison   0   $ 0
T. Christopher Roth   0   $ 0
John A. Stirek   0   $ 0
(1)
Mr. Concannon also serves as the vice-chairman of the Company, which is an executive officer position of the Company.

(2)
Mr. Williams has elected to receive cash and Mr. Moses has elected to receive part cash and part stock.

(3)
Mr. Sulentic also serves as the president and chief executive officer of the Company.

        From time to time, we have awarded cash-based performance unit awards (which may only be settled in cash) to our executive officers under our Long-Term Incentive Plan. Each of the executive officers listed below has entered into an amendment to the agreement that was entered into on August 9, 2006 granting cash-based performance unit awards to such executive officer. The amendment provides that the performance requirements set forth in such performance unit awards will be satisfied

45

if the merger occurs. The following table sets forth the "target value" of cash-based performance unit awards covered by each of these amended awards:

Executive Officers:
   Aggregate "Target Value" of Cash
Performance Unit Awards
Subject to Acceleration
E. Stevenson Belcher   $ 420,000
William F. Concannon   $ 577,500
James R. Groch   $ 495,000
Matthew S. Khourie   $ 465,000
Michael J. Lafitte   $ 525,000
Derek R. McClain   $ 465,000
Diane S. Paddison   $ 343,750
T. Christopher Roth   $ 465,000
John A. Stirek   $ 465,000
Robert E. Sulentic   $ 940,000

        The actual amount that will be payable to each of the above-listed executive officers in respect of their cash-based performance unit awards has not yet been determined and will not be determined until after the 2006 performance year is complete and the Company's financial results for the 2006 performance year are available. The amounts payable in connection with these performance unit awards will be bonuses pursuant to the terms of the 2006 Annual Bonus Plan described below and will be based in part on the financial performance of the Company and in part on a subjective assessment of the performance of each executive officer. If the amounts payable in connection with such performance unit awards are determined prior to the effective time of the merger, these determinations will be made by the compensation committee of our board of directors. If the amounts payable in connection with such performance unit awards are determined after the effective time of the merger, these determinations will be made by the members of CBRE's board of directors, if any, who were previously members of our board of directors. While the amounts that will be paid in connection with these performance unit awards cannot be reasonably estimated as of the date of this proxy statement, the annual cash incentive payments made to our executive officers with respect to the 2005 performance year ranged from 118% to 235% of the targeted value of their annual cash incentive compensation.

        Several of our current executive officers have entered into agreements with us that contain change of control termination protection provisions, the payments under which vary in amount and according to whether or not "good reason" or "cause" exists under such employment agreements and the timing of any termination thereunder. The closing of the merger under the merger agreement will be considered a change of control under such employment agreements. The change of control termination provisions in (a) the employment agreements for nine of our executive officers and (b) the change of control agreement for one of our executive officers are summarized below:

        Robert E. Sulentic.    If we experience a change in control and Mr. Sulentic's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause, by Mr. Sulentic for good reason, or upon our election not to renew Mr. Sulentic's employment, Mr. Sulentic is entitled to receive the following compensation in addition to awarded but unpaid bonuses and accrued base salary, benefits and investment plan participation amounts: (a) cash payments in the amounts of three times (i) Mr. Sulentic's highest annual base salary for the preceding 12 months, and (ii) one-half of Mr. Sulentic's mean annual bonus for the preceding three years plus one-half of Mr. Sulentic's current annual bonus target; (b) cash payments in the amounts of (i) the unvested portion of any matching contribution account under our 401(k) plan, and (ii) three times our matching contribution under our

46


401(k) plan for the calendar year prior to the year in which the termination occurs; (c) continuing coverage under our health plan for three years, with the active employee cost to be paid by Mr. Sulentic; (d) a pro rated bonus payment based on the average percentage of annual cash incentive bonuses paid to our other senior executives, payable when such incentive bonuses are paid to other senior executives; (e) expenses for enrollment in an outplacement program for up to 12 months; and (f) continued vesting of all awards granted after a change in control under our Long-Term Incentive Plan for a period of two years. Mr. Sulentic also may terminate his employment no later than the seventh calendar month following a change in control and receive the compensation and benefits described above in this paragraph. Upon a change in control, all awards held by Mr. Sulentic pursuant to our equity incentive plans will automatically vest and become exercisable.

        William F. Concannon.    If we experience a change in control and Mr. Concannon's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause, by Mr. Concannon for good reason or upon our election not to renew Mr. Concannon's employment, then Mr. Concannon is entitled to receive the following compensation in addition to awarded but unpaid bonuses and accrued base salary, benefits and investment plan participation amounts: (a) cash payments in the amounts of two and one-half times (i) Mr. Concannon's highest annual base salary for the preceding 12 months, and (ii) one-half of Mr. Concannon's mean annual bonus for the preceding three years plus one-half of Mr. Concannon's current annual bonus target; (b) cash payments in the amounts of (i) the unvested potion of any matching contribution account under our 401(k) plan, and (ii) two and one-half times our matching contribution under our 401(k) plan for the calendar year prior to the year in which the termination occurs; (c) continuing coverage under our health plan for two and one-half years, with the active employee cost to be paid by Mr. Concannon; (d) a pro rated bonus payment based on the average percentage of annual cash incentive bonuses paid to our other senior executives, payable when such incentive bonuses are paid to other senior executives; (e) expenses for enrollment in an outplacement program for up to 12 months; and (f) continued vesting of all equity awards granted under our Long-Term Incentive Plan for a period of 18 months after termination. Upon a change in control, all awards held by Mr. Concannon pursuant to our equity incentive plans will automatically vest and become exercisable.

        James R. Groch.    If we experience a change in control and Mr. Groch's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause, by Mr. Groch for good reason or upon our election not to renew Mr. Groch's employment, Mr. Groch is entitled to receive the following compensation in addition to awarded but unpaid bonuses and accrued base salary, benefits and investment plan participation amounts: (a) cash payments in the amounts of two and one-half times (i) Mr. Groch's highest annual base salary for the preceding 12 months, and (ii) one-half of Mr. Groch's mean annual bonus for the preceding three years plus one-half of Mr. Groch's current annual bonus target; (b) cash payments in the amounts of (i) the unvested portion of any matching contribution account under our 401(k) plan, and (ii) two and one-half times our matching contribution under our 401(k) plan for the calendar year prior to the year in which the termination occurs; (c) continuing coverage under our health plan for two and one-half years, with the active employee cost to be paid by Mr. Groch; (d) a pro rated bonus payment based on the average percentage of annual cash incentive bonuses paid to our other senior executives, payable when such incentive bonuses are paid to other senior executives; (e) expenses for enrollment in an outplacement program for up to 12 months; and (f) continued vesting of all awards granted after a change in control under our Long-Term Incentive Plan for a period of 18 months. Mr. Groch also may terminate his employment no later than the seventh calendar month following a change in control and receive the compensation and benefits described above in this paragraph. Upon a change in control, all awards held by Mr. Groch pursuant to our equity incentive plans will automatically vest and become exercisable.

        Matthew S. Khourie.    If we experience a change in control and Mr. Khourie's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause, by Mr. Khourie for good reason or

47


upon our election not to renew Mr. Khourie's employment, Mr. Khourie is entitled to receive the following compensation in addition to awarded but unpaid bonuses and accrued base salary, benefits and investment plan participation amounts: (a) cash payments in the amounts of two and one-half times (i) Mr. Khourie's highest annual base salary for the preceding 12 months, and (ii) one-half of Mr. Khourie's mean annual bonus for the preceding three years plus one-half of Mr. Khourie's current annual bonus target; (b) cash payments in the amounts of (i) the unvested portion of any matching contribution account under our 401(k) plan, and (ii) two and one-half times our matching contribution under our 401(k) plan for the calendar year prior to the year in which the termination occurs; (c) continuing coverage under our health plan for two and one-half years, with the active employee cost to be paid by Mr. Khourie; (d) a pro rated bonus payment based on the average percentage of annual cash incentive bonuses paid to our other senior executives, payable when such incentive bonuses are paid to other senior executives; (e) expenses for enrollment in an outplacement program for up to 12 months; and (f) continued vesting of all awards granted after a change in control under our Long-Term Incentive Plan for a period of 18 months. Upon a change in control, all awards held by Mr. Khourie pursuant to our equity incentive plans will automatically vest and become exercisable.

        Michael J. Lafitte.    If we experience a change in control and Mr. Lafitte's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause, by Mr. Lafitte for good reason or upon our election not to renew Mr. Lafitte's employment, Mr. Lafitte would be entitled to substantially the same severance benefits as described for Mr. Concannon above.

        T. Christopher Roth.    If we experience a change in control and Mr. Roth's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause, by Mr. Roth for good reason or upon our election not to renew Mr. Roth's employment, Mr. Roth would be entitled to substantially the same severance benefits as described for Mr. Concannon above.

        John A. Stirek.    If we experience a change in control and Mr. Stirek's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause, by Mr. Stirek for good reason or upon our election not to renew Mr. Stirek's employment, Mr. Stirek would be entitled to substantially the same severance benefits as described for Mr. Concannon above.

        E. Stevenson Belcher.    If we experience a change in control and Mr. Belcher's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause or by Mr. Belcher for good reason, Mr. Belcher is entitled to receive the following compensation in addition to awarded but unpaid bonuses and accrued base salary, benefits, and investment plan participation amounts: (a) cash payments in the amounts of the sum of (i) Mr. Belcher's highest annual base salary for the preceding 12 months, and (ii) one-half of Mr. Belcher's mean annual bonus for the preceding three years plus one-half of Mr. Belcher's current annual bonus target; (b) cash payments in the amounts of (i) the unvested portion of any matching contribution account under our 401(k) plan, and (ii) our matching contribution under our 401(k) plan for the calendar year prior to the year in which the termination occurs; (c) continuing coverage under our health plan for one year, with the active employee cost to be paid by Mr. Belcher; (d) a pro rated bonus payment based on the average percentage of annual cash incentive bonuses paid to our other senior executives, payable when such incentive bonuses are paid to other senior executives; and (e) expenses in an amount not to exceed $15,000 for enrollment in an outplacement program for up to 12 months. Upon a change in control, if Mr. Belcher's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause or by Mr. Belcher for good reason all awards held by Mr. Belcher pursuant to our equity incentive plans will automatically vest and become exercisable.

        Derek R. McClain.    If we experience a change in control and Mr. McClain's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause, by Mr. McClain for good reason or upon our election not to renew Mr. McClain's employment, Mr. McClain would be entitled to substantially the same severance benefits as described for Mr. Groch above.

48


        Diane S. Paddison.    If we experience a change in control and Ms. Paddison's employment is terminated on or within two years thereafter by us without cause, by Ms. Paddison for good reason or upon our election not to renew Ms. Paddison's employment, then Ms. Paddison is entitled to receive the following compensation in addition to awarded but unpaid bonuses and accrued base salary, benefits and investment plan participation amounts: (a) cash payments in the amounts of two times (i) Ms. Paddison's highest annual base salary for the preceding 12 months, and (ii) one-half of Ms. Paddison's mean annual bonus for the preceding three years plus one-half of Ms. Paddison's current annual bonus target; (b) continuing coverage under our health plan for two and one-half years, with the active employee cost to be paid by Ms. Paddison; (c) a pro rated bonus payment based on the average percentage of annual cash incentive bonuses paid to our other senior executives, payable when such incentive bonuses are paid to other senior executives; (d) expenses for enrollment in an outplacement program for up to 12 months; and (e) continued vesting of all equity awards granted under our Long-Term Incentive Plan for a period of 18 months after termination. Upon a change in control, all awards held by Ms. Paddison pursuant to our equity incentive plans will automatically vest and become exercisable.

        Each employment agreement and Mr. Belcher's change of control agreement also contains a tax gross-up provision whereby if the executive officer incurs any excise tax by reason of his or her receipt of any payment that constitutes an "excess parachute payment" as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the executive officer will receive a gross-up payment in an amount that would place the executive officer in the same after-tax position that he or she would have been in if no excise tax had applied.

        The following table shows the amount of total potential cash severance payable to our current executive officers, assuming the merger was completed and the employment of the executive officer was terminated as of October 31, 2006. The table also shows the estimated value of continuing coverage and other benefits under the Company's group health, dental and life insurance plans to each such executive officer and the estimated value of outplacement enrollment benefits and any other benefits. The estimates are subject to change based on the date of termination of the executive officer.

 
   Amount of Total
Potential Cash
Severance Payment(1)
   Estimated
Value of
Benefits
Executive Officers:
            
E. Stevenson Belcher   $ 1,187,500   $ 28,884
William F. Concannon   $ 3,051,042   $ 63,940
James R. Groch   $ 3,083,333   $ 63,280
Matthew S. Khourie   $ 2,519,201   $ 64,870
Michael J. Lafitte   $ 3,170,833   $ 63,940
Derek R. McClain   $ 2,543,750   $ 63,940
Diane S. Paddison   $ 1,870,284   $ 63,940
T. Christopher Roth   $ 2,775,001   $ 64,870
John A. Stirek   $ 2,775,001   $ 63,940
Robert E. Sulentic   $ 4,853,333   $ 72,844
(1)
Excludes the value of acceleration and vesting of equity awards, as reported separately herein, and unpaid base salary as of the date of termination.

        On October 30 2006, we adopted the 2006 Annual Principal Bonus Plan (the "2006 Bonus Plan"), which will reward eligible participants (defined below) for their contributions to our performance

49

during the year 2006. The 2006 Bonus Plan provides that a bonus pool (defined below) will be allocated among eligible participants and paid no later than March 15, 2007. The 2006 Bonus Plan is merely intended to provide that the annual cash incentive plan for certain of our senior executive employees is administered with respect to the 2006 performance year in the same manner as it was with respect to the 2005 performance year.

        The 2006 Bonus Plan covers "participants," which includes individuals who, after December 31, 2005 and before January 1, 2007, were principals, managing directors, senior managing directors, operating committee members or executive committee members. However, if, after the effective time of the merger and prior to the allocation of the bonus pool, no member of our current board of directors is on the board of directors of CBRE, then the term "participant" will exclude brokers, employees who are eligible for the development incentive and employees who work in certain cities.

        Only "eligible participants" will receive an allocation of the bonus pool. An eligible participant is: (a) prior to the effective time of the merger, a participant designated by our compensation committee; and (b) after the effective time of the merger, a participant who (i) is an employee of the surviving corporation, CBRE or any of their respective subsidiaries at the time of payment of the bonus, or (ii) is terminated without cause.

        The bonus pool will be allocated among eligible participants: (a) in accordance with the determination of the compensation committee of our board of directors if such allocation is made prior to the effective time of the merger; (b) in accordance with the determination of the former members of our board of directors then serving on the board of directors of CBRE if such allocation is made after the effective time of the merger; and (c) according to a set formula if such allocation is made after the effective time of the merger and no former member of our board of directors is then serving on the board of directors of CBRE.

        The bonus pool will be an amount equal to 22% of the difference between (a) the sum of (i) our 2006 consolidated net income before income taxes, and (ii) the aggregate amount of accrued non-reimbursed bonuses payable with respect to services provided in 2006, and (b) the aggregate amount of bonuses payable to individuals who work in certain specified cities for services provided in 2006 that were due to the earnings of our global services division.

        If the completion of the merger occurs prior to December 31, 2006, the bonus pool is to be calculated as if the merger did not occur and we continued as a separate entity. Bonuses paid on account of earnings of our global services business to participants working in certain specified cities will be deemed to be paid from the bonus pool.

        Prior to the effective time of the merger, our compensation committee may amend or terminate the 2006 Bonus Plan. Following such time, the 2006 Bonus Plan cannot be amended or terminated unless all former members of our board of directors then serving on the board of directors of CBRE consent, and if no such directors remain, the 2006 Bonus Plan cannot be amended or terminated by the board of directors of CBRE. The 2006 Bonus Plan will terminate automatically upon the termination of the merger agreement or after all eligible participants have received the amounts due to them under the 2006 Bonus Plan.

        Our executive officers may participate in the 2006 Bonus Plan and the target bonus amounts of each of our executive officers are described above under "—Treatment of Cash-Based Performance Unit Awards."

        In connection with the merger, certain of our executive officers have entered into amendments with a subsidiary of CBRE to their existing employment agreements with the Company pursuant to which CBRE agreed to assume their employment agreements at the effective time of the merger and

50

make certain amendments thereto and their employment is contemplated to continue with CBRE after the completion of the merger. The material terms of such amendments are summarized below:

        Robert E. Sulentic.    On October 30, 2006, Mr. Sulentic entered into an amendment to his employment agreement to be effective as of the effective time of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the term of the employment agreement will be extended to October 30, 2008 and Mr. Sulentic's title will be Group President of Asia Pacific Operations, EMEA Operations and D&I Operations of CB Richard Ellis, Inc. ("CBRE Inc."). In addition, at the effective time of the merger, Mr. Sulentic will be appointed to the global executive board of CBRE Inc. and will be appointed to the board of directors of CBRE. The amendment provides that Mr. Sulentic's initial base salary will be $600,000, which will be subject to review in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in no event will the base salary be less than the initial base salary set forth above. Mr. Sulentic will also be eligible to receive annual bonus payments, which will have a bonus target amount of no less than $750,000 annually. Mr. Sulentic will be eligible to receive a one time bonus in an amount of up to $300,000 for his assistance in facilitating the integration of our development and investment business, which bonus amount will be determined in the discretion of Chief Executive Officer of CBRE Inc. Mr. Sulentic will be eligible to receive equity incentive awards and such awards will be structured and awarded in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc. The amendment provides that upon the effective time of the merger, all provisions in the employment agreement, as amended, that are triggered by a change in control will become effective, subject to the terms of the amendment and will remain in effect until the expiration of the employment term. If the merger agreement is terminated before the effective time of the merger, the amendment will automatically terminate and be void and the employment agreement will continue in accordance with its terms.

        William F. Concannon.    On October 30, 2006, Mr. Concannon entered into an amendment to his employment agreement to be effective as of the effective time of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the term of the employment agreement will be extended to December 31, 2009 and Mr. Concannon's title will be Vice Chairman, Global Services of CBRE Inc. In addition, at the effective time of the merger, Mr. Concannon will be appointed to the global executive board of CBRE Inc. The amendment provides that Mr. Concannon's initial base salary will be $500,000, which will be subject to review in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in no event will the base salary be less than the initial base salary set forth above. Mr. Concannon will also be eligible to receive annual bonus payments, which will be no less than $725,000 for the year 2007 and will have a bonus target amount of no less than $500,000 annually for each of the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Upon the effective time of the merger, CBRE will grant to Mr. Concannon restricted shares of CBRE's common stock with an aggregate fair market value of $2.0 million, which will vest in four substantially equal installments beginning on December 30, 2007. Mr. Concannon is also required to purchase an aggregate of $500,000 of CBRE common stock in connection with the grant of restricted shares and may not sell more than 25% of such purchased shares annually, or certain of the granted restricted shares will be forfeited. All other equity incentive awards will be structured and awarded in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in any event, such awards will have an aggregate fair market value of at least $675,000 annually for the years 2008 and 2009. The amendment provides that upon the effective time of the merger, all provisions in the employment agreement, as amended, that are triggered by a change in control will become effective, subject to the terms of the amendment and will remain in effect until the expiration of the employment term. If the merger agreement is terminated before the effective time of the merger, the amendment will automatically terminate and be void and the employment agreement will continue in accordance with its terms.

        James R. Groch.    On October 30, 2006, Mr. Groch entered into an amendment to his employment agreement to be effective as of the effective time of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the

51


amendment, the term of the employment agreement will be extended to December 31, 2009 and Mr. Groch's title will be Chief Investment Officer and President of Funds and Investment Management, Trammell Crow Company. In addition, at the effective time of the merger, Mr. Groch will be appointed to the global executive board of CBRE Inc. The amendment provides that Mr. Groch's initial base salary will be $330,000, which will be subject to review in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in no event will the base salary be less than the initial base salary set forth above. Mr. Groch will also be eligible to receive annual bonus payments, which, subject to the terms of the amendment, will be no less than $950,000 annually for the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Upon the effective time of the merger, CBRE will grant to Mr. Groch restricted shares of CBRE's common stock with an aggregate fair market value of $2.0 million, which will vest in four substantially equal installments beginning on December 30, 2007. Mr. Groch is also required to purchase an aggregate of $500,000 of CBRE common stock in connection with the grant of restricted shares and may not sell more than 25% of such purchased shares annually, or certain of the granted restricted shares will be forfeited. All other equity incentive awards will be structured and awarded in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in any event, such awards will have an aggregate fair market value of at least $800,000 annually for the years 2008 and 2009. The amendment provides that upon the effective time of the merger, all provisions in the employment agreement, as amended, that are triggered by a change in control will become effective, subject to the terms of the amendment and will remain in effect until the expiration of the employment term. If the merger agreement is terminated before the effective time of the merger, the amendment will automatically terminate and be void and the employment agreement will continue in accordance with its terms.

        Matthew S. Khourie.    On October 30, 2006, Mr. Khourie entered into an amendment to his employment agreement to be effective as of the effective time of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the term of the employment agreement will be extended to December 31, 2009 and Mr. Khourie's title will be President—Central United States, Trammell Crow Company. The amendment provides that Mr. Khourie's initial base salary will be $310,000, which will be subject to review in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in no event will the base salary be less than the initial base salary set forth above. Mr. Khourie will also be eligible to receive annual bonus payments, which, subject to the terms of the amendment, will be no less than $800,000 annually for the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Upon the effective time of the merger, CBRE will grant to Mr. Khourie restricted shares of CBRE's common stock with an aggregate fair market value of $2.0 million, which will vest in four substantially equal installments beginning on December 30, 2007. Mr. Khourie is also required to purchase an aggregate of $500,000 of CBRE common stock in connection with the grant of restricted shares and may not sell more than 25% of such purchased shares annually, or certain of the granted restricted shares will be forfeited. All other equity incentive awards will be structured and awarded in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in any event, such awards will have an aggregate fair market value of at least $550,000 annually for the years 2008 and 2009. The amendment provides that upon the effective time of the merger, all provisions in the employment agreement, as amended, that are triggered by a change in control will become effective, subject to the terms of the amendment and will remain in effect until the expiration of the employment term. If the merger agreement is terminated before the effective time of the merger, the amendment will automatically terminate and be void and the employment agreement will continue in accordance with its terms.

        Michael J. Lafitte.    On October 30, 2006, Mr. Lafitte entered into an amendment to his employment agreement to be effective as of the effective time of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the term of the employment agreement will be extended to December 31, 2009 and Mr. Lafitte's title will be President, Global Services of CBRE Inc. In addition, at the effective time of the merger, Mr. Lafitte will be appointed to the global executive board of CBRE Inc. The amendment provides that Mr. Lafitte's initial base salary will be $500,000, which will be subject to review in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in no event will the base salary

52


be less than the initial base salary set forth above. Mr. Lafitte will also be eligible to receive annual bonus payments, which will be no less than $800,000 for the year 2007 and will have a bonus target amount of no less than $500,000 annually for each of the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Upon the effective time of the merger, CBRE will grant to Mr. Lafitte restricted shares of CBRE's common stock with an aggregate fair market value of $2.0 million, which will vest in four substantially equal installments beginning on December 30, 2007. Mr. Lafitte is also required to purchase an aggregate of $500,000 of CBRE common stock in connection with the grant of restricted shares and may not sell more than 25% of such purchased shares annually, or certain of the granted restricted shares will be forfeited. All other equity incentive awards will be structured and awarded in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in any event, such awards will have an aggregate fair market value of at least $725,000 annually for the years 2008 and 2009. The amendment provides that upon the effective time of the merger, all provisions in the employment agreement, as amended, that are triggered by a change in control will become effective, subject to the terms of the amendment and will remain in effect until the expiration of the employment term. If the merger agreement is terminated before the effective time of the merger, the amendment will automatically terminate and be void and the employment agreement will continue in accordance with its terms.

        T. Christopher Roth.    On October 30, 2006, Mr. Roth entered into an amendment to his employment agreement to be effective as of the effective time of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the term of the employment agreement will be extended to December 31, 2009 and Mr. Roth's title will be President—Eastern United States, Trammell Crow Company. The amendment provides that Mr. Roth's initial base salary will be $310,000, which will be subject to review in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in no event will the base salary be less than the initial base salary set forth above. Mr. Roth will also be eligible to receive annual bonus payments, which, subject to terms of the amendment, will be no less than $800,000 annually for the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Upon the effective time of the merger, CBRE will grant to Mr. Roth restricted shares of CBRE's common stock with an aggregate fair market value of $2.0 million, which will vest in four substantially equal installments beginning on December 30, 2007. Mr. Roth is also required to purchase an aggregate of $500,000 of CBRE common stock in connection with the grant of restricted shares and may not sell more than 25% of such purchased shares annually, or certain of the granted restricted shares will be forfeited. All other equity incentive awards will be structured and awarded in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in any event, such awards will have an aggregate fair market value of at least $550,000 annually for the years 2008 and 2009. The amendment provides that upon the effective time of the merger, all provisions in the employment agreement, as amended, that are triggered by a change in control will become effective, subject to the terms of the amendment and will remain in effect until the expiration of the employment term. If the merger agreement is terminated before the effective time of the merger, the amendment will automatically terminate and be void and the employment agreement will continue in accordance with its terms.

        John A. Stirek.    On October 30, 2006, Mr. Stirek entered into an amendment to his employment agreement to be effective as of the effective time of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the term of the employment agreement will be extended to December 31, 2009 and Mr. Stirek's title will be President—Western United States, Trammell Crow Company. The amendment provides that Mr. Stirek's initial base salary will be $310,000, which will be subject to review in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in no event will the base salary be less than the initial base salary set forth above. Mr. Stirek will also be eligible to receive annual bonus payments, which, subject to the terms of the amendment, will be no less than $800,000 annually for the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Upon the effective time of the merger, CBRE will grant to Mr. Stirek restricted shares of CBRE's common stock with an aggregate fair market value of $2.0 million, which will vest in four substantially equal installments beginning on December 30, 2007. Mr. Stirek is also required to purchase an aggregate of $500,000 of CBRE common stock in connection

53


with the grant of restricted shares and may not sell more than 25% of such purchased shares annually, or certain of the granted restricted shares will be forfeited. All other equity incentive awards will be structured and awarded in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in any event, such awards will have an aggregate fair market value of at least $550,000 annually for the years 2008 and 2009. The amendment provides that upon the effective time of the merger, all provisions in the employment agreement, as amended, that are triggered by a change in control will become effective, subject to the terms of the amendment and will remain in effect until the expiration of the employment term. If the merger agreement is terminated before the effective time of the merger, the amendment will automatically terminate and be void and the employment agreement will continue in accordance with its terms.

        Diane S. Paddison.    On November 3, 2006, Ms. Paddison entered into an amendment to her employment agreement to be effective as of the effective time of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the term of the employment agreement will be extended to December 31, 2009 and Ms. Paddison's title will be President, Corporate Services of CBRE Inc. and, at the effective time of the merger, she will also be appointed to the global executive board of CBRE Inc. The amendment provides that Ms. Paddison's initial base salary will be $350,000 for the years 2007, 2008 and 2009, which will be subject to review in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in no event will the base salary be less than the initial base salary set forth above. Ms. Paddison will also be eligible to receive annual bonus payments, which will be no less than $650,000 for the year 2007 and will have a bonus target amount of no less than $350,000 annually for each of the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Upon the effective time of the merger, CBRE will grant to Ms. Paddison restricted shares of CBRE's common stock with an aggregate fair market value of $1.0 million, which will vest in four substantially equal installments beginning on December 30, 2007. Ms. Paddison is also required to purchase an aggregate of $250,000 of CBRE common stock in connection with the grant of restricted shares and may not sell more than 25% of such purchased shares annually, or certain of the granted restricted shares will be forfeited. All other equity incentive awards will be structured and awarded in the same manner as other similarly situated executives of CBRE Inc., but in any event, such awards will have an aggregate fair market value of at least $425,000 annually for the years 2008 and 2009. The amendment provides that upon the effective time of the merger, all provisions in the employment agreement, as amended, that are triggered by a change in control will become effective, subject to the terms of the amendment and will remain in effect until the expiration of the employment term. If the merger agreement is terminated before the effective time of the merger, the amendment will automatically terminate and be void and the employment agreement will continue in accordance with its terms.

        The merger agreement provides that, without limiting any additional rights that any employee may have under any employment agreement, indemnification agreement or otherwise, from and after the effective time of the merger, CBRE and the surviving corporation will, jointly and severally, indemnify and hold harmless each person who is or has been at any time prior to the execution of the merger agreement, or who becomes prior to the effective time of the merger, a director, employee or officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or who acts as a fiduciary under any employee benefit plan of the Company or our subsidiaries (and their respective estates, heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns) against all losses, fines, claims, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys' and other professionals' fees and expenses), liabilities or judgments and settlement amounts incurred in connection with any claim arising out of actions taken by them in their capacity as an officer, director, employee, fiduciary or agent of the Company or any of our subsidiaries or serving as a director, officer, employee, agent, trustee, shareholder, partner or fiduciary of another person, pension or employee benefit plan or enterprise at the request of the Company or any of our subsidiaries, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law. In this regard, CBRE and the surviving corporation will also be

54

required to advance expenses to an indemnified officer, director or employee (and their respective estates, heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns); provided, that the person to whom expenses are advanced provides an undertaking to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined that the person is not entitled to indemnification.

        The merger agreement provides that for a period of six years after the effective time of the merger, the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the surviving corporation will continue to contain provisions with respect to indemnification that are the same as those set forth in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws as of the date of the merger agreement, unless any such modifications are required by applicable law.

        In addition, the merger agreement provides that, prior to the effective time of the merger, we will obtain "tail" insurance policies with a claims period of at least six years from the effective time of the merger from an insurance carrier with the same or better credit rating as our current insurance carrier with respect to directors' and officers' liability insurance in an amount and scope no more favorable than our existing policies with respect to matters existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time of the merger.

        Subject to applicable law, the rules of the NYSE and CBRE's corporate governance guidelines, CBRE has agreed to cause its board of directors to include the following individuals: (a) two members of our board of directors immediately prior to the effective time of the merger who qualify as "independent" (as defined by the NYSE and Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) members of the board of directors of CBRE and who consent to serve as a director of CBRE, which appointment to the board of directors of CBRE will become effective at or promptly after the effective time, and (b) our chief executive officer immediately prior to the effective time, which appointment to the board of directors of CBRE will become effective on the closing date if our chief executive officer consents to serve as a director of CBRE.

55


Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

        The following is a general discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to holders of our common stock. We base this summary on the provisions of the Code, applicable current and proposed U.S. Treasury Regulations, judicial authority, and administrative rulings and practice, all of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis.

        For purposes of this discussion, we use the term "U.S. holder" to mean:

A "non-U.S. holder" is a person (other than an entity treated as a partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that is not a U.S. holder.

        This discussion assumes that a holder holds the shares of our common stock as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income tax that may be relevant to a holder in light of its particular circumstances, or that may apply to a holder that is subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws (including, for example, insurance companies, dealers in securities or foreign currencies, traders in securities who elect the mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities, stockholders subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, mutual funds, partnerships or other pass through entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, certain expatriates, corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, corporations subject to anti-inversion rules, stockholders who hold shares of our common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or conversion transaction, stockholders who acquired their shares of our common stock through the exercise of employee stock options or other compensation arrangements). In addition, this discussion does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to holders of options or other derivative securities to purchase our common stock, or any state, local or foreign tax consequences of the merger, and this summary does not address the tax consequences to holders of our common stock who exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law.

        Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors to determine the particular tax consequences, including the application and effect of any state, local or foreign income and other tax laws, of the receipt of cash in exchange for our common stock pursuant to the merger.

        If a holder of our common stock is an entity treated as a partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the tax treatment of an investor in such entity will generally depend upon the status of such investor and the activities of the partnership or other entity. Partnerships or other pass-through entities holding our common stock, and investors in such partnerships or members in such other entities, should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of the merger.

56


        The receipt of cash in the merger by U.S. holders of our common stock will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder of our common stock will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between:

        If the holding period in our common stock surrendered in the merger is greater than one year as of the date of the merger, the gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss. The deductibility of a capital loss recognized on the exchange is subject to limitations under the Code. If a U.S. holder acquired different blocks of our common stock at different times and different prices, such holder must determine its adjusted tax basis and holding period separately with respect to each block of our common stock. Long-term capital gain of individual taxpayers is generally taxable at a maximum rate of 15%. Capital gain of corporate stockholders is generally taxable at the regular tax rates applicable to corporations.

        Any gain realized on the receipt of cash in the merger by a non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless:


        An individual non-U.S. holder described in the first bullet point immediately above will be subject to tax on the net gain derived from the merger under regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates. If a non-U.S. holder that is a foreign corporation falls under the first bullet point immediately above, it will be subject to tax on its net gain in the same manner as if it were a U.S person as defined under the Code and, in addition, may be subject to the branch profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings and profits or at such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. An individual non-U.S. holder described in the second bullet point immediately above will be subject to a flat 30% tax (or such lower rate as may be prescribed by an applicable United States income tax treaty) on the gain derived from the merger, which may be offset by U.S. source capital losses, even though the individual is not considered a resident of the United States.

        If we are, or have been, a United States real property holding corporation at any time during the five years preceding the merger, a non-U.S. holder will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular graduated federal income tax rates with respect to gain realized pursuant to the merger and income tax withholding at a rate of 10% on the consideration received in the merger unless the non-U.S. holder has not owned more than 5% of our common stock (directly or constructively) at any time during the five years preceding the merger. Such a non-U.S. holder may be entitled to a refund or credit against its United States tax liability, if any, with respect to the amount withheld, provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") on a timely basis. We believe that we

57


are not, have not been, and do not anticipate becoming a United States real property holding corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

        Each non-U.S. holder should consult with its own tax advisors regarding whether it will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a result of the merger and whether any applicable income tax treaty may provide for rules different from those set forth above.

        Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding will apply (currently at a rate of 28%) to payments made in connection with the merger unless a holder (a) in the case of a U.S. holder, furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not subject to backup withholding on the IRS Form W-9 or substitute successor form, (b) in the case of a non-U.S. holder, furnishes an applicable IRS Form W-8 or successor form, or (c) is otherwise exempt from backup withholding. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holder's U.S. federal income tax liability provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.

        THE FOREGOING DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE MERGER AND IS NOT TAX ADVICE. THEREFORE, HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS.


Regulatory Approvals

        The merger cannot be completed until the Company and CBRE file a notification and report form under the HSR Act and the applicable waiting period has expired or been terminated. The Company and CBRE have previously filed such notification and report forms under the HSR Act with the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, but the applicable waiting period has not yet expired or been terminated. At any time before or after completion of the merger, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission could take such action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public interest, including seeking to enjoin the completion of the merger or seeking divestiture of substantial assets of the Company or CBRE. At any time before or after the completion of the merger, any state could take such action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public interest. Such action could include seeking to enjoin the completion of the merger or seeking divestiture of substantial assets of the Company or CBRE. Private parties may also seek to take legal action under the antitrust laws under certain circumstances.

        If a governmental entity asserts any objections with respect to the merger or challenges the merger on antitrust grounds, CBRE and Merger Sub have agreed to use all reasonable efforts to resolve any such objections or challenges, including by agreeing to (a) sell, dispose of or hold separate assets of the Company, (b) terminate existing relationships and contractual rights and obligations of the Company, (c) terminate any relevant venture or other arrangement of the Company, or (d) effectuate any other change or restructuring of the Company. The Company has agreed to use reasonable efforts to assist CBRE and Merger Sub. The Company may not take any of the foregoing actions without the prior written consent of CBRE, and CBRE may not take any of the foregoing actions without the prior written consent of the Company if such actions would bind the Company to take any action irrespective of whether the closing occurs. However, CBRE and Merger Sub will not be obligated to agree (nor will the Company agree without CBRE's prior written consent) to take any action, or accept any conditions, restrictions, obligations or requirements that would be reasonably like to have, individually or in the

58


aggregate, a company material adverse effect (as defined in the merger agreement) or would result in the sale, divestiture, other disposition or loss of 25% or more of the consolidated revenue of any one or more of the Property Management, Facilities Management or Project Management businesses of the Company as determined on a pro forma basis by utilizing the consolidated results of operations of the Company for the year ending 2006 and assuming the disposition occurred on January 1, 2006.

        The parties have also agreed (a) to cooperate and use all reasonable efforts to assist in any defense by any other party of the merger before any governmental entity reviewing the merger and (b) not to take any action that would reasonably be expected to hinder or delay the obtaining of clearance or the expiration of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act or any other applicable antitrust law.

        While we cannot assure you that the merger will not be challenged by a governmental authority or private party on antitrust grounds, the Company, based in part on a review of information provided by CBRE relating to the businesses in which it and its affiliates are engaged, believes that the merger can be effected in compliance with antitrust laws.

        The merger will become effective at the time the certificate of merger are filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware (or such later time as is specified in the articles of merger).


Delisting and Deregistration of Common Stock

        If the merger is completed, our common stock will be delisted from the NYSE and deregistered under the Exchange Act and we will no longer file periodic reports with the SEC on account of our common stock.

59


DISSENTERS' RIGHTS OF APPRAISAL

        Under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL"), you have the right to dissent from the merger and to receive payment in cash for the fair value of your common stock as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, as determined by the Chancery Court, in lieu of the consideration you would otherwise be entitled to pursuant to the merger agreement. These rights are known as appraisal rights. The Company's stockholders electing to exercise appraisal rights must comply with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL in order to perfect their rights. The Company will require strict compliance with the statutory procedures.

        The following is intended as a brief summary of the material provisions of the Delaware statutory procedures required to be followed by a stockholder in order to dissent from the merger and perfect appraisal rights. This summary, however, is not a complete statement of all applicable requirements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Section 262 of the DGCL, the full text of which appears in Annex C to this proxy statement. Failure to precisely follow any of the statutory procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL may result in a termination or waiver of your appraisal rights.

        Section 262 requires that stockholders be notified that appraisal rights will be available not less than 20 days before the stockholders' meeting to vote on the merger. A copy of Section 262 must be included with such notice. This proxy statement constitutes the Company's notice to its stockholders of the availability of appraisal rights in connection with the merger in compliance with the requirements of Section 262. If you wish to consider exercising your appraisal rights, you should carefully review the text of Section 262 contained in Annex C since failure to timely and properly comply with the requirements of Section 262 will result in the loss of your appraisal rights under the DGCL.

        If you elect to demand appraisal of your shares, you must satisfy each of the following conditions:

        All demands for appraisal should be addressed to Trammell Crow Company, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3400, Dallas, Texas 75201, Attention: Secretary, and must be delivered before the vote on the merger agreement is taken at the special meeting, and should be executed by, or on behalf of, the record holder of the shares of common stock. The demand must reasonably inform the Company of the identity of the stockholder and the intention of the stockholder to demand appraisal of his, her or its shares.

        To be effective, a demand for appraisal by a stockholder must be made by, or in the name of, such registered stockholder, fully and correctly, as the stockholder's name appears on his, her or its stock certificate(s). Beneficial owners who do not also hold the shares of record may not directly make appraisal demands to the Company. The beneficial holder must, in such cases, have the registered

60


owner, such as a broker or other nominee, submit the required demand in respect of those shares. If shares are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, execution of a demand for appraisal should be made by or for the fiduciary. If the shares are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the demand should be executed by or for all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an authorized agent for two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for appraisal for a stockholder of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose the fact that, in executing the demand, he or she is acting as agent for the record owner. A record owner, such as a broker, who holds shares as a nominee for others, may exercise his or her right of appraisal with respect to the shares held for one or more beneficial owners, while not exercising this right for other beneficial owners. In that case, the written demand should state the number of shares as to which appraisal is sought. Where no number of shares is expressly mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares held in the name of the record owner.

        If you hold your shares of common stock in a brokerage account or in other nominee form and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your broker or the other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for making a demand for appraisal by the nominee.

        Within 10 days after the effective time of the merger, the surviving corporation must give written notice that the merger has become effective to each Company stockholder who has properly filed a written demand for appraisal and who did not vote to approve and adopt the merger agreement. At any time within 60 days after the effective time of the merger, any stockholder who has demanded an appraisal has the right to withdraw the demand and to accept the cash payment specified by the merger agreement for his, her or its shares of common stock. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger, any stockholder who has complied with Section 262 will, upon written request to the surviving corporation, be entitled to receive a written statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger agreement with respect to which demands for appraisal rights have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement must be mailed to the requesting stockholder within 10 days after such written request is received by the surviving corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal, whichever is later. Within 120 days after the effective time of the merger, either the surviving corporation or any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of Section 262 may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares held by all stockholders entitled to appraisal. Upon the filing of the petition by a stockholder, service of a copy of such petition must be made upon the surviving corporation. The surviving corporation has no obligation to file such a petition in the event there are dissenting stockholders. Accordingly, the failure of a stockholder to file such a petition within the period specified could nullify the stockholder's previously written demand for appraisal.

        If a petition for appraisal is duly filed by a stockholder and a copy of the petition is delivered to the surviving corporation, the surviving corporation will then be obligated, within 20 days after receiving service of a copy of the petition, to provide the Chancery Court with a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded an appraisal of their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving corporation. After notice to dissenting stockholders who demanded appraisal of their shares, the Chancery Court is empowered to conduct a hearing upon the petition, and to determine those stockholders who have complied with Section 262 and who have become entitled to the appraisal rights provided thereby. The Chancery Court may require the stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares to submit their stock certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings. If any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Chancery Court may dismiss the proceedings as to that stockholder.

61


        After determination of the stockholders entitled to appraisal of their shares of the Company's common stock, the Chancery Court will appraise the shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with a fair rate of interest, if any. When the value is determined, the Chancery Court will direct the payment of such value, with interest thereon accrued during the pendency of the proceeding (if the Chancery Court so determines), to the stockholders entitled to receive the same, upon surrender by such stockholders of the certificates representing those shares.

        In determining fair value, the Chancery Court is required to take into account all relevant factors. You should be aware that the fair value of your shares as determined under Section 262 could be more than, the same as, or less than the value that you are entitled to receive under the terms of the merger agreement.

        Costs of the appraisal proceeding may be imposed upon the surviving corporation and the stockholders participating in the appraisal proceeding by the Chancery Court as the Chancery Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon the application of a stockholder, the Chancery Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all shares entitled to appraisal. Any stockholder who had demanded appraisal rights will not, after the effective time of the merger, be entitled to vote shares subject to that demand for any purpose or to receive payments of dividends or any other distribution with respect to those shares, other than with respect to payment as of a record date prior to the effective time; however, if no petition for appraisal is filed within 120 days after the effective time of the merger, or if the stockholder delivers a written withdrawal of his, her or its demand for appraisal and an acceptance of the terms of the merger within 60 days after the effective time of the merger, then the right of that stockholder to appraisal will cease and that stockholder will be entitled to receive the cash payment for shares of his, her or its common stock pursuant to the merger agreement. Any withdrawal of a demand for appraisal made more than 60 days after the effective time of the merger may only be made with the written approval of the surviving corporation and must, to be effective, be made within 120 days after the effective time.

        In view of the complexity of Section 262, the Company's stockholders who may wish to dissent from the merger and pursue appraisal rights should consult their legal advisors.

62


THE MERGER AGREEMENT

        The following summarizes the material provisions of the merger agreement, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A and incorporated by reference into this document. This summary does not purport to be complete and may not contain all of the information about the merger agreement that is important to you. We encourage you to read carefully the merger agreement in its entirety because the rights and obligations of the parties are governed by the express terms of the merger agreement and not by this summary or any other information contained in this proxy statement.

        The representations and warranties in the merger agreement were made only for the purposes of the merger agreement and solely for the benefit of the parties to the merger agreement. Those representations and warranties may be subject to important limitations and qualifications agreed to by the contracting parties and may not be complete as of the date of this proxy statement. Some of those representations and warranties may not be accurate or complete as of any particular date because they are subject to contractual standards of materiality different from that generally applicable to public disclosures to stockholders. Furthermore, these representations and warranties may have been made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties instead of establishing these matters as facts, and they may or may not have been accurate as of any specific date and do not purport to be accurate as of the date of this proxy statement. Accordingly, you should not rely on the descriptions of representations and warranties in the merger agreement that are contained in this proxy statement or on the actual representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement as statements of factual information.


Effective Time

        The effective time of the merger will occur at the time that we file the certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on the closing date of the merger, or on such other date as is agreed upon by the parties to the merger agreement and set forth in the certificate of merger. The closing date will occur on the second business day after all of the conditions to the merger set forth in the merger agreement have been satisfied or waived (or such other date as the parties to the merger agreement have agreed); provided, that CBRE and Merger Sub are not required to effect the closing prior to the later of:

        For purposes of the merger agreement, the "marketing period" means the first period of thirty-seven consecutive calendar days after the initiation date (as defined in the merger agreement); provided, that (a) if the marketing period would otherwise terminate on any day from and including December 21, 2006 through and including January 2, 2007, then the marketing period will end on January 3, 2007, (b) the marketing period will not be deemed to have commenced if, prior to the completion of the marketing period, Ernst & Young LLP, our independent accountants, withdraws its audit opinion with respect to any financial statements contained in the financial information that we are required to deliver pursuant to the merger agreement or indicated that such audit opinion should

63


not be relied upon, and (c) the marketing period shall not terminate any earlier than December 18, 2006.


Structure

        At the effective time of the merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company. The Company will survive the merger and continue to exist after the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE. All of the Company's and Merger Sub's properties, assets, rights, privileges, immunities, powers and franchises, and all of their debts, liabilities and duties, will become those of the surviving corporation. Following completion of the merger, the Company's common stock will no longer be quoted on the NYSE and will be deregistered under the Exchange Act, and will no longer be publicly traded. Also, the Company's current stockholders will cease to have any ownership interest in the Company or rights as Company stockholders. Therefore, such current stockholders of the Company will not participate in any future earnings or growth of the Company and will not benefit from any appreciation in value of the Company.


Treatment of Stock and Other Securities

        At the effective time of the merger, each share of our common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be canceled and will cease to exist and will be converted into the right to receive $49.51 in cash, without interest and less any required tax withholding, other than shares of Company common stock:

        After the effective time of the merger, each of our outstanding stock certificates or book-entry shares representing shares of common stock converted in the merger will represent only the right to receive the merger consideration without any interest and less any applicable tax withholding. The merger consideration paid upon surrender of each certificate or book-entry share will be paid in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the shares of our common stock represented by that certificate or book-entry share.

        At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding option to acquire our common stock will be converted into the right to receive, upon the vesting and exercise of such option in accordance with its terms, an amount in cash, without interest and less applicable tax withholding, equal to the product of:

64

        At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share of our restricted stock will be converted into the right to receive $49.51 in cash, without interest and less applicable tax withholding, payable as soon as administratively feasible following vesting of or the lapse of restrictions on such restricted stock. Any payments will remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including vesting) as currently in effect with respect to such restricted stock. Any shares of restricted stock that vest at the effective time of the merger will be treated as shares of our outstanding common stock and will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration at the effective time of the merger, less any applicable tax withholding.

        At the effective time, each of our outstanding stock-based performance unit awards will be converted into the right to receive $49.51 in cash, without interest and less applicable tax withholding. However, the cash payment applicable to each former stock-based performance unit award will be paid by the surviving corporation at such time and in accordance with the provisions set forth in the applicable award agreement between us and the holder of such stock-based performance unit award.

        We have agreed to take all necessary action under our stock purchase plans to provide that (a) all participants' rights under all current offering periods will terminate at the end of the next payroll date following the date of the merger agreement, but in no event later than December 31, 2006, and all accumulated payroll deductions allocated to each participant's account under the employee stock purchase plans will thereupon be used to purchase from us whole shares of our common stock at a price determined under the terms of our stock purchase plans for the remaining offering period, and (b) as of the close of business immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, our stock purchase plans will terminate. At the effective time of the merger, any shares of our common stock previously acquired under our stock purchase plans will be cashed out along with the other outstanding shares of our common stock that will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration at the effective time of the merger. We also have agreed to take all necessary action so that no new offering is made and no new offering period will commence under our stock purchase plans.


Appraisal Rights

        The merger agreement provides that shares of our common stock held by stockholders who properly demand appraisal pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL will not be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration. Holders of these shares will instead be entitled to payment of the "fair value" of their shares in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL. If a stockholder fails to perfect or otherwise waives, withdraws or loses his, her or its right to appraisal under Section 262 of the DGCL, then the right to appraisal will cease and that stockholder's shares will be deemed to be converted as of the effective time of the merger into, and will become exchangeable solely for, the right to receive the merger consideration. Please read "The Special Meeting—Appraisal Rights" for more information.


Exchange and Payment Procedures

        At or promptly after the effective time of the merger, CBRE will deposit or cause to be deposited, in trust an amount of cash sufficient to pay the aggregate merger consideration to be paid to all holders of our common stock with a bank or trust company (the "exchange agent") reasonably acceptable to us. As soon as practicable after the effective time of the merger (but not later than 10 business days thereafter), the surviving corporation will send to each record holder of our common

65


stock, or cause the exchange agent to send to each record holder of our common stock, a letter of transmittal and instructions. The letter of transmittal and instructions will tell stockholders how to surrender their common stock certificates or shares you may hold represented by book-entry in exchange for the merger consideration.

        You should not return your stock certificates with the enclosed proxy card, and you should not forward your stock certificates to the exchange agent (or the surviving corporation, if applicable) without a duly completed and executed letter of transmittal.

        You will not be entitled to receive the merger consideration until you surrender your stock certificate or certificates (or book-entry shares) to the exchange agent (or the surviving corporation, if applicable), together with a duly completed and executed letter of transmittal and any other documents as may be required by the letter of transmittal. The merger consideration may be paid to a person other than the person in whose name the corresponding certificate or book-entry shares are registered if the certificate or book-entry shares are properly endorsed or are otherwise in the proper form for transfer. In addition, the person who surrenders such certificate or book-entry shares must either pay any transfer or other applicable taxes or establish to the satisfaction of the exchange agent or the surviving corporation that such taxes have been paid or are not applicable. No interest will be paid or will accrue on the cash payable upon surrender of the certificates or book-entry shares. The exchange agent or the surviving corporation will be entitled to deduct and withhold, and pay to the appropriate taxing authorities, any applicable taxes from the merger consideration. Any sum which is withheld and paid to a taxing authority by the exchange agent or the surviving corporation will be deemed to have been paid to the person with regard to whom it is withheld. At the effective time of the merger, our stock transfer books will be closed, and there will be no further registration of transfers of outstanding shares of our common stock. If, after the effective time of the merger, certificates are presented to the surviving corporation for transfer, they will be canceled and exchanged for the merger consideration.

        None of CBRE, Merger Sub, the surviving corporation or the exchange agent will be liable to any person in respect of any shares of our common stock (or dividends or distributions with respect thereto) for any amounts paid to a public official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar law. Any portion of the merger consideration deposited with the exchange agent that remains undistributed to the holders of our common stock for six months after the effective time of the merger will be delivered, upon request, to the surviving corporation. Stockholders who have not received the merger consideration prior to the delivery of such funds to the surviving corporation may only look to CBRE and the surviving corporation for the payment of the merger consideration. If you have lost a certificate, or if it has been stolen or destroyed, then before you will be entitled to receive the merger consideration, you will have to comply with the replacement requirements established by the exchange agent or the surviving corporation, including the making of an affidavit of such fact, and, if required by the surviving corporation, the posting of a bond in a reasonable amount sufficient to protect the surviving corporation against any claim that may be made against it with respect to that certificate.


Representations and Warranties

        We make various representations and warranties in the merger agreement that are subject, in some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications. Our representations and warranties relate to, among other things:

66

        For purposes of the merger agreement, a "company material adverse effect" with respect to us means any material adverse effect on (a) the business, assets, liabilities, financial condition or results of

67


operations of us and our subsidiaries taken as a whole (but with respect to our project entities and company minority investments, only to the extent of such effects on our direct or indirect equity interests therein and/or on the obligations or liabilities of us and our subsidiaries that are not project entities or company minority investments), or (b) our ability to perform our obligations under the merger agreement or the other agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby to which we are a party.

        A "company material adverse effect" will not have occurred, however, as a result of any material adverse effect to the extent arising out of, attributable to or resulting from:

68

        The merger agreement also contains various representations and warranties made by CBRE and Merger Sub that are subject, in some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications. The representations and warranties relate to, among other things:

        The representations and warranties of each of the parties to the merger agreement will expire upon the effective time of the merger.

69



Conduct of Our Business Pending the Merger

        Under the merger agreement, we have agreed that, subject to certain exceptions and unless Merger Sub gives its prior written consent, between October 30, 2006 and the completion of the merger, we and our subsidiaries will conduct our business in the ordinary course, including that we will:

        We have also agreed that, during the same time period, and again subject to certain exceptions or unless Merger Sub gives its prior written consent, we and our subsidiaries will not:

70

71

        Under the merger agreement, we have agreed that, subject to certain exceptions and unless Merger Sub gives its prior written consent, between October 30, 2006 and the completion of the merger, we will cause each of our special purpose vehicles to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course. We have also agreed that, subject to certain exceptions and unless Merger Sub gives its

72


prior written consent, between October 30, 2006 and the completion of the merger, we will cause our subsidiaries engaged in the development and investment activities to, and will cause each of our controlled special purpose vehicles to:

73


No Solicitation of Transactions

        We have agreed that we will not, nor will we permit any of our subsidiaries to, nor will we authorize or knowingly permit any officer, director, employee, investment banker, attorney, accountant, agent or other advisor or representative of us or our subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly:

74

        For purposes of the merger agreement, an "acquisition proposal" means any offer or proposal (whether or not in writing) regarding any of the following:

provided, however, that an acquisition proposal will not include the sale, lease, exchange, transfer or other disposition of one or more development or investment properties (whether through the direct sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of such properties or the direct sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of one or more of our special purpose vehicles that own such properties) in our ordinary course of business of our development and investment group.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing restrictions, prior to approval and adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders, if we receive an unsolicited acquisition proposal from a third party that constitutes a superior proposal or that our board of directors determines in good faith could reasonably be expected to lead to the delivery of a superior proposal from that third party, we may, subject to compliance with the nonsolicitation provisions of the merger agreement, furnish information, including non-public information, to, and engage in discussions and negotiations with, such third party with respect to its acquisition proposal and grant a waiver or release under any standstill or similar agreement if our board of directors concludes in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and legal advisors, that, as a result of such acquisition proposal, the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law.

        For purposes of the merger agreement, a "superior proposal" means any proposal

        We have agreed that neither our board of directors nor any committee thereof will amend, withdraw, modify, change, condition or qualify in any manner adverse to CBRE or Merger Sub its recommendation that our stockholders approve and adopt the merger agreement; provided, however, that, our board of directors is permitted, at any time prior to the approval and adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders, to amend, withdraw, modify, condition or qualify its recommendation

75


that our stockholders approve and adopt the merger agreement in a manner adverse to CBRE or Merger Sub if:

        We have also agreed:

        Before we participate in any negotiations with, or furnish any information to, a third party that has made any inquiry or request that could reasonably be expected to lead to an acquisition proposal, we

76


are required to enter into a confidentiality agreement with such party on terms that are not materially less favorable to the Company than the confidentiality agreement between us and CBRE.


Access to Information and Efforts to Close

        We have agreed, upon reasonable advance notice to among other things:

for the purpose of familiarizing themselves with us and our subsidiaries in anticipation of, or reasonably related to, the completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

        Each of CBRE and Merger Sub has agreed to hold, and to cause its representatives to hold, any nonpublic information obtained in any investigation in confidence in accordance with the existing confidentiality agreement between us and CBRE. Additionally, we are not required to grant access or furnish any information if such information is of a competitively sensitive nature, subject to an attorney-client or attorney work product privilege or if such access or the furnishing of such information is prohibited by law or an existing contract.


Stockholder Meeting

        We have agreed to call, hold and convene a meeting of our stockholders to solicit from our stockholders proxies in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and to take all other reasonable lawful actions to obtain such adoption and approval. In addition, we have agreed that, subject to the right of our board of directors to amend, withdraw, modify, change, condition or qualify its recommendation of the merger pursuant to the terms and conditions outlined in the merger agreement, our board of directors will recommend that our stockholders vote in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. We may adjourn or postpone the stockholder meeting to the extent necessary to ensure that any supplement or amendment to the proxy statement, which is necessary to ensure that the proxy statement does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, is provided to our stockholders in advance of a vote on the merger, or if there are insufficient shares of our common stock represented to constitute a quorum or to approve and adopt the merger agreement.


Employee Matters

        CBRE has agreed that, from the effective time of the merger until one year thereafter, officers and employees of us and our subsidiaries who remain in the employ of the surviving corporation after the effective time of the merger will be provided employee benefits, plans and programs (excluding any equity based benefits or awards and any defined benefit retirement plan benefits) that, in the aggregate, are comparable to those made available by CBRE and its subsidiaries to similarly situated employees of CBRE or its subsidiaries immediately prior to the effective time of the merger.

        CBRE and the surviving corporation have agreed to grant to employees who continue their employment with the surviving corporation eligibility and vesting under the employee benefit plans after the merger to the same extent as such service credit was granted under our employee benefit

77


plans immediately prior to the merger. Following the effective time of the merger, such continuing employees will retain credit for unused vacation and sick days that were accrued with us as of the effective time of the merger. In addition, if the effective time of the merger falls within an annual period of coverage under any group health plan of the surviving corporation or any of its subsidiaries, each continuing employee will be given credit for covered expenses paid by that employee under our previous employee benefit plans during the applicable coverage period through the effective time of the merger toward satisfaction of any annual deductible limitation and out-of-pocket maximum that may apply under that group health plan of the surviving corporation and its subsidiaries. Unless CBRE notifies us otherwise, we have agreed to terminate our existing 401(k) retirement savings plan effective as of the day immediately preceding the effective time of the merger.

        At the effective time of the merger, CBRE has also agreed to adopt and to cause the surviving corporation to adopt (a) the 2006 Bonus Plan (b) the Company's severance pay policy and (c) an employee retention plan (each in the form adopted by our board of directors) with respect to all employees who continue their employment with the surviving corporation until (i) the payments of all amounts due under the employee retention plan and with respect to calendar year 2006 in the case of the 2006 Bonus Plan, and (ii) one year from the closing date with respect to the severance pay policy.


Financing

        CBRE and Merger Sub have agreed to use all reasonable efforts to obtain the debt financing under the debt commitment letter provided to CBRE by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Credit Suisse, including using reasonable efforts to:

        If any portion of the debt financing becomes unavailable on the terms and conditions contemplated in the debt commitment letter, CBRE and Merger Sub must use all reasonable efforts to arrange to obtain alternative financing, including from alternative sources, on terms not materially less favorable to CBRE in the aggregate and in no event less favorable as to pricing and other economic terms (as determined in the good faith reasonable judgment of CBRE) than the debt financing under the debt commitment letter, as promptly as practicable following the occurrence of such event.

        We have agreed, subject to certain exceptions and certain indemnification and expense reimbursement obligations of CBRE and Merger Sub, to cause our representatives to cooperate with all reasonable requests by CBRE in connection with the debt financing including, but not limited to, assisting with the preparation of offering documents and all related documentation, assisting with the preparation of any required financial information and causing our employees and representatives to

78

attend meetings with prospective members of and participants in any syndicate of financial institutions being assembled to provide such debt financing.


CBRE Services Debt Consent Solicitation and Tender Offer or Redemption

        CBRE has agreed, no later than seven days after the execution of the merger agreement, to cause CBRE Services to conduct a tender offer and consent solicitation for all of CBRE Services' outstanding 93/4% senior notes due May 15, 2010 and, upon the receipt of the requested consents, CBRE will cause CBRE Services to enter into a supplemental indenture reflecting the amendments approved in the consent solicitation, which will become effective upon the acceptance of the notes tendered in the tender offer. CBRE will be responsible for all fees and expenses related to the tender offer and consent solicitation, including any premiums payable to noteholders. In the event that the requested consents have not been obtained by CBRE Services on or prior to March 16, 2007, CBRE must cause CBRE Services to deliver notice of, and conduct a redemption of, the notes pursuant to the indenture governing the notes. The closing of the tender offer is not conditioned on the closing of the merger and CBRE and CBRE Services must use all reasonable efforts to close the debt tender offer prior to the merger.


Governmental Approvals

        The completion of the merger is subject to the termination or expiration of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act. Please see "The Merger—Regulatory Approvals" for more information.


Conditions to the Merger

        The obligations of the parties to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following mutual conditions:

        The obligations of CBRE and Merger Sub to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction or written waiver of the following additional conditions:

79

        Our obligations to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction or written waiver of the following additional conditions:


Termination

        The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger abandoned at any time prior to the effective time:

80

81


Fees and Expenses

        We have agreed to pay CBRE a termination fee of $40,000,000 in cash if CBRE terminates the merger agreement because:

        We have also agreed to pay CBRE a termination fee of $40,000,000 in cash if we terminate the merger agreement in order to accept a superior proposal.

        In addition, we have agreed to pay CBRE a termination fee of $40,000,000 in cash if:

82

such termination fee to be paid to CBRE following the earlier of the completion of the transaction contemplated by such other acquisition proposal or our entering into a definitive agreement contemplating such acquisition proposal.

        CBRE has agreed to pay us a termination fee of $100,000,000 in cash if the merger agreement is terminated by CBRE or us because (a) the effective time of the merger has not occurred by the end date, or (b) any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has issued an order, decree or ruling or taken any other action permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the merger on the basis that the merger and the transactions contemplated thereby are violative of any antitrust law and such order decree, ruling or action has become final and nonappealable, and in either case, at the time of such termination:

83

        CBRE and Merger Sub have agreed, jointly and severally, to pay to us liquidated damages in the amount of $200,000,000 in cash if the merger agreement is terminated:

        The maximum aggregate liability of CBRE and Merger Sub in the aggregate for all damages arising out of or resulting from breaches of the merger agreement or any representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained in the merger agreement is $200,000,000, minus the amount of any CBRE liquidated damages or antitrust termination fee that was paid to us by CBRE. We have agreed that we cannot seek damages of any kind against any CBRE affiliate other than CBRE and Merger Sub and that we can only seek damages against CBRE and Merger Sub in an amount equal to this liability cap, plus the amount of our costs and expenses in pursuing our legal remedies to obtain such recovery.

        Except as otherwise specifically provided in the merger agreement, all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby will be paid by the party incurring such expenses, whether or not the merger is completed.

84


Amendment and Waiver

        The merger agreement may be amended or waived in writing by the parties thereto at any time prior to the effective time.

        Until the effective time of the merger, the parties may, to the extent legally allowed:


Specific Performance

        Prior to any termination of the merger agreement, but subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this paragraph, the parties to the merger agreement will be entitled to specific performance of the terms of the merger agreement. We will not be entitled to an injunction to prevent breaches of the merger agreement by CBRE or Merger Sub or to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of the merger agreement if (a) we are in material breach of any our representations, warranties, covenants or obligations in the merger agreement or (b) the merger has not been completed due to a failure of CBRE or Merger Sub to receive the proceeds of the financing contemplated by the debt commitment letter and neither CBRE nor Merger Sub is in material breach of their respective representatives, warranties, covenants or obligations under the merger agreement so as to cause any of the mutual closing conditions to the merger agreement not to be satisfied or to cause any of our closing conditions to the merger agreement not to be satisfied (other than due to a breach consisting of the failure to complete the merger due to the failure to receive the proceeds of the financing under the debt commitment letters). Neither CBRE nor Merger Sub will be entitled to an injunction to prevent breaches of the merger agreement by us or to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of the merger agreement if either CBRE or Merger Sub is in material breach of their respective representatives, warranties, covenants or obligations under the merger agreement so as to cause any of the mutual closing conditions to the merger agreement not to be satisfied or to cause any of our closing conditions to the merger agreement not to be satisfied. In the event that any action is brought in equity to enforce the provisions of the merger agreement, no party to the merger agreement may allege, and each has waived the defense, that there is an available adequate remedy at law.

85


STOCK VOTING AGREEMENTS

        Each of the following individuals have entered into a stock voting agreement in connection with the merger:

Name:
   Title:
William F. Concannon   Vice Chairman and Director
James R. Groch   Chief Investment Officer and President, Funds and Investment Management
Matthew S. Khourie   President, Development and Investment—Central Operations
Michael J. Lafitte   President, Global Services
Derek R. McClain   Chief Financial Officer
Diane S. Paddison   Chief Operating Officer, Global Services
T. Christopher Roth   President, Development and Investment—Eastern Operations
John A. Stirek   President, Development and Investment—Western Operations
Robert E. Sulentic   Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President

        As of October 25, 2006, an aggregate of 2,146,987 shares of Trammell Crow Company common stock and currently exercisable options to purchase an additional 1,494,577 shares of Trammell Crow Company common stock were subject to such stock voting agreements. The shares of these holders subject to the stock voting agreements (not including shares purchasable upon the exercise of currently exercisable stock options held by such holders) represent approximately 5.9% of the Company's outstanding common stock as of the record date.

        Pursuant to the stock voting agreements, each of these stockholders has agreed to vote, and has executed a proxy in favor of CBRE so that their shares may be voted, at the special meeting:

        In addition, under the stock voting agreements, each of these stockholders has agreed:

86

        The stock voting agreements terminate upon the earlier of (a) the effective time of the merger or (b) the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms.

        This summary of the stock voting agreements does not purport to be complete and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. We encourage you to read the form of the stock voting agreements which has previously been filed by the Company on its Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2006, as amended by its Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 14, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.

87


MARKET PRICE OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK

        Our common stock is quoted on the NYSE under the symbol "TCC." The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock on the NYSE for the periods indicated.

 
   Fiscal Quarter
Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2006
  1st
   2nd
   3rd
   4th*
High   $ 34.90   $ 41.45   $ 38.20   $ 49.29
Low   $ 24.57   $ 30.50   $ 31.30   $ 34.80
 
   Fiscal Quarter
Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2005
  1st
   2nd
   3rd
   4th
High   $ 21.19   $ 36.91   $ 27.88   $ 27.16
Low   $ 15.83   $ 20.32   $ 23.32   $ 23.05
 
   Fiscal Quarter
Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2004
  1st
   2nd
   3rd
   4th
High   $ 14.52   $ 14.30   $ 16.20   $ 18.51
Low   $ 13.25   $ 12.25   $ 12.51   $ 14.86
*
Through November 14, 2006.

        The closing sale price of our common stock on the NYSE on October 30, 2006, which was the last trading day before we announced the merger, was $39.10 per share. On November 14, 2006, the last trading day before the date of this proxy statement, the closing price for our common stock on the NYSE was $49.15 per share. You are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for our common stock in connection with voting your shares.

        The Company does not pay regular dividends on shares of its common stock.

        As of November 14, 2006, the last trading day before the date of this proxy statement, there were 2,938 registered holders of the Company's common stock.

88


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table and the notes thereto set forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock as of October 25, 2006, by:

        Unless otherwise indicated, all stockholders set forth below have the same principal business address as the Company. The number of shares beneficially owned by a person includes shares of common stock of the Company that are subject to stock options that are either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after October 25, 2006. These shares are also deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding shares owned by the person. These shares are not deemed outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, to the Company's knowledge, each stockholder has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the securities beneficially owned by that stockholder. On October 25, 2006, there were 36,350,819 shares of common stock of the Company outstanding.

Name
   Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
   Percentage of Shares
Beneficially Owned
  
Third Avenue Management LLC
622 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10017-2023		   6,642,282 (1) 18.3 %
Robert E. Sulentic   932,181 (2) 2.5 %
William F. Concannon   716,761 (3) 2.0 %
J. McDonald Williams   531,090 (4) 1.5 %
James R. Groch   384,008 (5) 1.1 %
Matthew S. Khourie   415,976 (6) 1.1 %
T. Christopher Roth   311,688 (7) *  
John A. Stirek   291,053 (8) *  
Michael J. Lafitte   177,581 (9) *  
Rowland T. Moriarty   118,510 (10) *  
James R. Erwin   57,610 (11) *  
Jeffrey M. Heller   48,610 (12) *  
Curtis F. Feeny   42,052 (13) *  
Michael A. Moses   5,507 (14) *  
Directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)   4,585,619 (15) 12.0 %
*
Less than one percent

(1)
Based on information set forth in Amendment No. 9 to Schedule 13G, filed February 15, 2006 (the "TAM Schedule 13G"), filed with the Commission by Third Avenue Management LLC ("TAM"). The TAM Schedule 13G reflects that TAM has sole voting power with respect to 6,637,882 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 6,642,282 shares of common stock. The TAM Schedule 13G indicates that certain investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and various clients for whom TAM acts as investment advisor have the right to receive dividends from, and the proceeds from the sale of, the securities beneficially owned by TAM.

89

(2)
Includes 23,000 shares owned by Mr. Sulentic's wife and 465,518 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable or will become exercisable within the next 60 days. Includes 159,358 unvested shares of restricted stock which Mr. Sulentic cannot dispose of without the Company's consent until the restrictions on these shares lapse.

(3)
Includes 358,727 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable or will become exercisable within the next 60 days. Includes 83,161 unvested shares of restricted stock which Mr. Concannon cannot dispose of without the Company's consent until the restrictions on these shares lapse.

(4)
Includes 52,327 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable. Also includes 1,184 performance units which may be settled (a) in cash or in common stock, (b) in a single lump sum or in up to five annual installments, and (c) upon Mr. Williams' termination of services, completion of a stated number of years or a date specified by Mr. Williams.

(5)
Includes 14,313 shares held in trust for the benefit of Mr. Groch's family members. Mr. Groch is the trustee of the trust. Also includes 160,460 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable or will become exercisable within the next 60 days. Includes 91,972 unvested shares of restricted stock which Mr. Groch cannot dispose of without the Company's consent until the restrictions on these shares lapse.

(6)
Includes 85,250 shares held in a family limited partnership. Mr. Khourie and his wife are the general partners of the limited partnership. Mr. Khourie's children are the limited partners of the limited partnership. Also, includes 90,412 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable or will become exercisable within the next 60 days. Includes 64,942 unvested shares of restricted stock which Mr. Khourie cannot dispose of without the Company's consent until the restrictions on these shares lapse.

(7)
Includes 154,870 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable or will become exercisable within the next 60 days. Includes 72,162 unvested shares of restricted stock which Mr. Roth cannot dispose of without the Company's consent until the restrictions on these shares lapse.

(8)
Includes 14,375 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable or will become exercisable within the next 60 days. Includes 72,142 unvested shares of restricted stock which Mr. Stirek cannot dispose of without the Company's consent until the restrictions on these shares lapse.

(9)
Includes 45,418 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable or will become exercisable within the next 60 days. Includes 85,581 unvested shares of restricted stock which Mr. Lafitte cannot dispose of without the Company's consent until the restrictions on these shares lapse.

(10)
Includes 37,925 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable, 5,000 shares of common stock held indirectly by a non-issuer retirement trust, and 36,939 shares held in trust for the benefit of Dr. Moriarty's family members. Dr. Moriarty disclaims beneficial ownership of all securities held in trust for the benefit of his family members.

(11)
Includes 37,925 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable. Also includes 10,685 performance units which may be settled (a) in cash or in common stock, (b) in a single lump sum or in up to five annual installments, and (c) upon Mr. Erwin's termination of services, completion of a stated number of years or a date specified by Mr. Erwin.

90

(12)
Includes 37,925 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable. Also includes 10,685 performance units that may be settled (a) in cash or in common stock, (b) in a lump sum or in up to five annual installments, and (c) upon Mr. Heller's termination of services, completion of a stated number of years or a date specified by Mr. Heller.

(13)
Includes 250 shares held in trust for the benefit of Mr. Feeny, his wife and his children, 2,100 shares owned by Mr. Feeny's sons, 2,400 shares owned by Mr. Feeny's daughters and 30,539 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable. Also includes 6,763 performance units which may be settled (a) in cash or in common stock, (b) in a single lump sum or in up to five annual installments, and (c) upon Mr. Feeny's termination of services, completion of a stated number of years or a date specified by Mr. Feeny.

(14)
Includes 5,107 performance units that may be settled (a) in cash or in common stock, (b) in a lump sum or in up to five annual installments, and (c) upon Dr. Moses' termination of services, completion of a stated number of years or a date specified by Dr. Moses.

(15)
Includes (a) 1,721,718 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that currently are exercisable or will become exercisable within the next 60 days, (b) 34,424 performance units that may be settled (i) in cash or in common stock, (ii) in a lump sum or in up to five annual installments, and (iii) upon the individual's termination of services, completion of a stated number of years or a date specified by the individual, and (c) 1,343,199 unvested shares of restricted stock which cannot be disposed of without the Company's consent until the restrictions on these shares lapse.

91


SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

        We will only hold a 2007 annual meeting of our stockholders if the merger is not successfully completed. Pursuant to Rule 14a-4(c)(1) promulgated under the Exchange Act, our management will have discretionary authority to vote on any matter of which we do not receive notice by March 3, 2007, with respect to proxies submitted to our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders. To be included in our board of directors' solicitation of proxies relating to our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, a stockholder proposal must be received by our corporate secretary at Trammell Crow Company, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3400, Dallas, Texas 75201, no later than December 19, 2006. Pursuant to our certificate of incorporation, in order to nominate persons for election to our board of directors at our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, a stockholder must deliver notice, in the form specified in our certificate of incorporation, to our principal executive offices not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the scheduled date to our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, which has not yet been determined.

92


WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

        We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, proxy statements or other information that we file with the SEC at the following location of the SEC:

    Public Reference Room
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

        Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. Our public filings are also available to the public from document retrieval services and the Internet website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.

        Any person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this proxy statement is delivered may request copies of reports, proxy statements or other information concerning us, without charge, by written or telephonic request directed to us at Trammell Crow Company, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3400 Dallas, Texas 75201, (214) 863-3020, Attention: Investor Relations. If you would like to request documents, please do so by promptly in order to receive them before the special meeting.

        The SEC allows us to "incorporate by reference" into this proxy statement documents we file with the SEC. This means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this proxy statement, and later information that we file with the SEC will update and supersede that information. Any statement so modified or superceded will not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this proxy statement. For the avoidance of doubt, information furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 or 7.01 of any Current Report on Form 8-K will not be deemed incorporated herein or otherwise to form a part hereof. We incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any documents filed by us pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of this proxy statement and prior to the date of the special meeting:

Company Filings:
   Periods:

Annual Report on Form 10-K
 
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 15, 2006 with respect to the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended by Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed June 29, 2006 with respect to the year ended December 31, 2005

Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
 
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2006 with respect to the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 and filed May 10, 2006 with respect to the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006

Current Reports on Form 8-K
 
Current Reports on Form 8-K filed November 14, 2006, November 2, 2006, November 1, 2006, August, 25, 2006, August 15, 2006, July 27, 2006, June 30, 2006, June 19, 2006, May 25, 2006, April 27, 2006, February 23, 2006 and January 12, 2006

        No persons have been authorized to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this proxy statement and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by us or any other person. This proxy statement is dated November 15, 2006. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of any date other than that date and the mailing of this proxy statement to stockholders will not create any implication to the contrary.

93

Annex A

        EXECUTION COPY

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

by and among

TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY,

CB RICHARD ELLIS GROUP, INC.

and

A-2 ACQUISITION CORP.

October 30, 2006


Table of Contents

 
    
   Page
ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS   A-1
  1.1.   Definitions.   A-1

ARTICLE 2 THE MERGER
 
A-11
  2.1.   The Merger.   A-11
  2.2.   Organizational Documents.   A-12
  2.3.   Directors and Officers.   A-12

ARTICLE 3 CONVERSION OF SECURITIES AND RELATED MATTERS
 
A-12
  3.1.   Capital Stock of Acquiror.   A-12
  3.2.   Cancellation of Treasury Stock and Acquiror-Owned Shares.   A-12
  3.3.   Conversion of Company Shares.   A-12
  3.4.   Exchange of Certificates.   A-13
  3.5.   Company Stock Options and Other Awards.   A-14
  3.6.   Dissenting Shares.   A-15

ARTICLE 4 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
 
A-16
  4.1.   Corporate Existence and Power.   A-16
  4.2.   Corporate Authorization.   A-16
  4.3.   Governmental Authorization.   A-16
  4.4.   Non-Contravention.   A-17
  4.5.   Capitalization.   A-17
  4.6.   Subsidiaries; Minority Investments.   A-18
  4.7.   Company SEC Documents.   A-19
  4.8.   Financial Statements; No Material Undisclosed Liabilities.   A-20
  4.9.   Absence of Certain Changes.   A-21
  4.10.   Litigation.   A-21
  4.11.   Taxes.   A-22
  4.12.   Employee Benefits.   A-22
  4.13.   Compliance with Laws; Licenses, Permits and Registrations.   A-26
  4.14.   Title to Assets.   A-26
  4.15.   Intellectual Property.   A-26
  4.16.   Transaction Fees; Opinions of Financial Advisor.   A-26
  4.17.   Labor Matters.   A-27
  4.18.   Material Contracts.   A-28
  4.19.   Real Estate.   A-30
  4.20.   Environmental.   A-31
  4.21.   Insurance.   A-31
  4.22.   Affiliate Transactions.   A-31
  4.23.   Required Vote; Board Approval; State Takeover Statutes.   A-32
  4.24.   Information to Be Supplied.   A-32

ARTICLE 5 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND ACQUIROR
 
A-32
  5.1.   Corporate Existence and Power.   A-32
  5.2.   Corporate Authorization.   A-33
  5.3.   Governmental Authorization.   A-33
  5.4.   Non-Contravention.   A-33
  5.5.   Financing.   A-33
  5.6.   Information to Be Supplied.   A-34
         

A-i

  5.7.   Solvency; Surviving Corporation After the Merger.   A-34
  5.8.   Vote/Approval Required.   A-34
  5.9.   Parent SEC Documents.   A-34
  5.10.   Litigation.   A-35
  5.11.   No Business Conduct; Ownership.   A-35

ARTICLE 6 COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY
 
A-35
  6.1.   Company Interim Operations.   A-35
  6.2.   Stockholder Meeting.   A-41
  6.3.   Acquisition Proposals; Board Recommendation.   A-42
  6.4.   Termination of Credit Agreements.   A-44
  6.5.   Resignation of Directors.   A-44
  6.6.   Rule 16b-3.   A-44

ARTICLE 7 COVENANTS OF PARENT AND ACQUIROR
 
A-45
  7.1.   Director and Officer Liability.   A-45
  7.2.   Employee Benefits.   A-47
  7.3.   Transfer Taxes.   A-48
  7.4.   Debt Tender Offer or Redemption.   A-48
  7.5.   Parent Board of Directors.   A-49

ARTICLE 8 COVENANTS OF PARENT ACQUIROR AND THE COMPANY
 
A-49
  8.1.   Efforts.   A-49
  8.2.   Governmental Approvals.   A-49
  8.3.   Proxy Statement.   A-51
  8.4.   Public Announcements.   A-52
  8.5.   Access to Information; Notification of Certain Matters.   A-52
  8.6.   Disposition of Litigation.   A-54
  8.7.   Confidentiality Agreements.   A-54
  8.8.   Financing Arrangements.   A-54
  8.9.   Investigation and Agreement by Parent and Acquiror; No Other Representations or Warranties.   A-56

ARTICLE 9 CONDITIONS TO MERGER
 
A-57
  9.1.   Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party.   A-57
  9.2.   Conditions to the Obligations of the Company.   A-58
  9.3.   Conditions to the Obligations of Parent and Acquiror.   A-58

ARTICLE 10 TERMINATION
 
A-59
  10.1.   Termination.   A-59
  10.2.   Effect of Termination.   A-61
  10.3.   Fees and Expenses.   A-63

ARTICLE 11 MISCELLANEOUS
 
A-64
  11.1.   Notices.   A-64
  11.2.   Survival.   A-65
  11.3.   Amendments; No Waivers.   A-65
  11.4.   Successors and Assigns   A-65
  11.5.   Counterparts; Effectiveness; Third Party Beneficiaries   A-65
  11.6.   Governing Law   A-65
  11.7.   Jurisdiction   A-65
  11.8.   Enforcement   A-66
  11.9.   Entire Agreement   A-66
         

A-ii

  11.10.   Authorship; Representation by Counsel   A-66
  11.11.   Severability   A-66
  11.12.   Waiver of Jury Trial   A-67
  11.13.   Rules of Construction.   A-67
  11.14.   Affiliate Liability   A-68

   

EXHIBIT A   Form of Voting Agreement

SCHEDULE A
 
Individuals Entering into Employment Agreement Amendments

A-iii


AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 30th day of October 2006, by and among Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), and A-2 Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by Parent ("Acquiror").

        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has (i) determined that the Merger (as defined herein) is advisable and in the best interest of the Company Stockholders (as defined below), and (ii) approved the Merger;

        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of each of Parent and Acquiror has (i) determined that the Merger is advisable and in the best interest of its respective stockholders, and (ii) approved the Merger;

        WHEREAS, contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, certain employees of the Company identified on Schedule A hereto have entered into employment agreements with Parent effected as amendments to existing employment agreements with the Company pursuant to which CB Richard Ellis, Inc. shall assume such employment agreements effective as of the Effective Time (as defined below);

        WHEREAS, contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, certain Company Stockholders (as defined below) have entered into voting agreements with Parent, Acquiror and the Company (the "Voting Agreements"), each of which is in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, pursuant to which, among other things, such Company Stockholders have agreed to vote their Company Shares (as defined below) in favor of adopting and approving this Agreement and the Merger; and

        WHEREAS, by resolutions duly adopted, the respective Boards of Directors of the Company, Parent and Acquiror have approved and adopted this Agreement and the transactions and other agreements contemplated hereby.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and promises contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as set forth below.


ARTICLE 1

DEFINITIONS

        1.1.    Definitions.    

        "Acquiror Share" means one share of common stock of Acquiror, $0.01 par value per share.

        "Acquisition Proposal" means, other than the Merger, any offer or proposal (whether or not in writing) regarding any of the following: (a) the acquisition by a Third Party of beneficial ownership (as defined in Rule 13d-3 as promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act) of more than twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding shares of any class of Equity Interests of the Company, whether from the Company or pursuant to a tender offer or exchange offer or otherwise, (b) a merger, consolidation, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization or similar transaction involving the Company or any Significant Subsidiary of the Company, (c) a liquidation or dissolution of the Company or any Significant Subsidiary of the Company, or (d) any sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of assets (including the sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of Equity Interests of one or more Company Subsidiaries) that would result in a Third Party acquiring more than twenty percent (20%) of the fair market value on a consolidated basis of the assets of the Company and Company Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to such transaction; provided, however, that an Acquisition Proposal shall not

A-1


include the sale, lease, exchange, transfer or other disposition of one or more development or investment properties (whether through the direct sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of such properties or the direct sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of one or more Special Purpose Vehicles that own such properties) in the Ordinary Course of Business of the Development and Investment Group.

        "Affiliate" means, with respect to any Person, any other Person, directly or indirectly, controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, such first Person. For purposes of this definition, the term "control" (including the correlative terms "controlling", "controlled by" and "under common control with") means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.

        "Alliance Agreements" means the Company's alliance or affiliation agreements with Savills plc, J.J. Barnicke and Grant Samuels.

        "Antitrust Laws" means the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Clayton Antitrust Act, the HSR Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act and all other federal, state and foreign Laws that are designed or intended to prohibit, restrict or regulate actions having the purpose or effect of monopolization or restriction of trade or business or competition through merger or acquisition, each as amended.

        "Business Day" means any day, other than a Saturday, Sunday or one on which banks are authorized by Law to be closed in Dallas, Texas or Los Angeles, California.

        "Code" means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

        "Company Balance Sheet" means the Company's consolidated balance sheet included in the Company 10-K, as amended, relating to its fiscal year ended on December 31, 2005.

        "Company Charter" means the certificate of incorporation of the Company.

        "Company Damages" means any loss or damage of any nature suffered as a result of the breach by Parent or Acquiror of this Agreement or any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement.

        "Company Entities" means, collectively, the Company Subsidiaries, Special Purpose Vehicles and the Company Minority Investments.

        "Company Material Adverse Effect" means any material adverse effect on (a) the business, assets, liabilities, financial condition or results of operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole (but with respect to Project Entities and Company Minority Investments, only to the extent of such effects on the Company's direct or indirect Equity Interests therein and/or on the obligations or liabilities of the Company and its Subsidiaries that are not Project Entities or Company Minority Investments), or (b) the ability of the Company to perform its obligations under this Agreement or the other agreements and transactions contemplated hereby to which it is a party; provided, however, that, in determining whether there has been a Company Material Adverse Effect or whether a Company Material Adverse Effect would be reasonably likely to occur, this definition shall exclude any material adverse effect to the extent arising out of, attributable to or resulting from:

A-2

A-3

        "Company Minority Investment" means a Minority Investment of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that does not meet the definition of a Special Purpose Vehicle.

        "Company Option" means any option to purchase Company Shares, whether granted pursuant to the Company Options Plans or otherwise, but excluding purchase rights under Purchase Plans.

        "Company Option Plans" means the Company's 1997 Stock Option Plan and the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, each as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified.

        "Company SEC Documents" means (a) the annual reports on Form 10-K of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 (each a "Company 10-K"), (b) the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006, (c) the Company's proxy and information statements relating to meetings of, or actions taken without a meeting by, the Company Stockholders, since December 31, 2002, and (d) all other reports, filings, registration statements and other documents filed by the Company with the SEC since December 31, 2002; in each case as may be amended, including all exhibits, appendices and attachments thereto, whether filed therewith or incorporated by reference therein.

        "Company Share" means one share of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share.

        "Company Stockholders" means the stockholders of the Company.

        "Company Subsidiary" means a Subsidiary of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.

        "Confidentiality Agreement" means the Confidentiality Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2005, between Parent and the Company, as amended and supplemented on October 9, 2006.

        "Contract" means any contract, agreement, arrangement, commitment, letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, license, lease, promise, instrument, or other similar understanding, whether written or oral, in each case that is legally binding as of the date in question.

        "Credit Agreements" means (i) the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2005, among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and issuing bank, and the other lender parties thereto, as amended through the date hereof and (ii) the Letter Agreement, dated June 15, 2006, between Trammell Crow Company (UK) Limited and The Royal Bank of Scotland.

        "Development and Investment Activities" means the real estate development and investment activities conducted by the Company primarily through its Development and Investment Group in the Ordinary Course of Business.

A-4


        "Development and Investment Group" means the Company's Development and Investment group described in the Company 10-K through which the Company conducts Development and Investment Activities.

        "Environmental Laws" shall mean all Laws relating to the protection of the indoor or outdoor environment (including, without limitation, the quality of the ambient air, soil, surface water or groundwater, natural resources or human health or safety).

        "Environmental Permits" shall mean all permits, licenses, registrations, and other authorizations required under applicable Environmental Laws.

        "Equity Interest" means, with respect to any Person, any and all shares, interests, participations, rights in, or other equivalents (however designated and whether voting or non-voting) of, such Person's capital stock or other equity interests (including partnership or membership interests in a partnership or limited liability company or any other interest or participation that confers on a Person the right to receive a share of the profits and losses, or distributions of assets, of the issuing Person), whether outstanding on the date hereof or issued after the date hereof.

        "Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

        "GAAP" means United States generally accepted accounting principles, applied on a consistent basis.

        "Governmental Entity" means any federal, state, local, international or foreign governmental authority, any transgovernmental authority or any court, administrative or regulatory agency or commission or other governmental authority, agency or body.

        "HSR Act" means Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended.

        "Indebtedness" means all indebtedness for borrowed money.

        "Independent Contractor" means brokers, managers or developers who are properly classified as "independent contractors" rather than "employees" for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

        "Initiation Date" means (A) the first date after the date hereof on which Parent shall have received the Required Financial Information with respect to applicable financial periods ending on and prior to September 30, 2006 that the Company is required to provide pursuant to Section 8.8; provided that, anything in the foregoing clause (A) to the contrary notwithstanding, (B) beginning on (and including) February 15, 2007, if the Closing Date does not occur on or prior to February 14, 2007, then in lieu of the date determined pursuant to clause (A) the Initiation Date shall be the later of (i) the first date on which Parent shall have received the Required Financial Information with respect to financial periods ending on and prior to December 31, 2006 that the Company is required to provide pursuant to Section 8.8 or (ii) March 1, 2007 (unless (x) Parent's or Acquiror's material breach of, or failure to perform in any material respect, any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement set forth in this Agreement was the principal cause of the failure of the Closing to occur on or before February 14, 2007 and (y) the conditions set forth in Sections 9.1 and 9.3 (other than the delivery by the Company of the officer's certificate contemplated by Section 9.3(a)) were satisfied on February 14, 2007, in which case this clause (B) will not be applicable); provided that anything in the foregoing clauses (A) and (B) to the contrary notwithstanding, (C) beginning on (and including) May 16, 2007, if the Closing Date does not occur on or prior to May 15, 2007, then in lieu of the date determined pursuant to clause (B) the Initiation Date shall be the later of (1) the first date on which Parent shall have received the Required Financial Information with respect to financial periods ending on and prior to March 31, 2006 that the Company is required to provide pursuant to Section 8.8 or (2) May 10, 2007 (unless (x) Parent's or Acquiror's material breach of, or failure to perform in any material respect, any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement set forth in this Agreement was the principal cause of

A-5


the failure of the Closing to occur on or before May 15, 2007 and (y) the conditions set forth in Sections 9.1 and 9.3 (other than the delivery by the Company of the officer's certificate contemplated by Section 9.3(a)) were satisfied on May 15, 2007, in which case this clause (C) will not be applicable).

        "Knowledge" means, with respect to the matter in question, if any of the employees of the Company listed in Section 1.1 of the Company Disclosure Schedule or of Parent or Acquiror listed in Section 1.1 of the Parent and Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, has actual knowledge, without investigation, of the matter.

        "Krombach Joint Venture" means "Krombach Trammell Crow, L.L.C."

        "Law" means any federal, state, local, international or foreign (including the European Union) law (including common law), rule, regulation, judgment, code, ruling, statute, order, directives, decree, injunction or ordinance or other legal requirement.

        "Lien" means, with respect to any asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest or encumbrance of any kind in respect of an asset.

        "Marketing Period" means the first period of thirty-seven (37) consecutive calendar days after the Initiation Date; provided, that (i) if the Marketing Period would otherwise terminate on any day from and including December 21, 2006 through and including January 2, 2007, then the Marketing Period shall end on January 3, 2007, (ii) the Marketing Period shall not be deemed to have commenced if, prior to the completion of the Marketing Period, Ernst & Young LLP shall have withdrawn its audit opinion with respect to any financial statements contained in the Required Financial Information or indicated that such audit opinion should not be relied upon, and (iii) the Marketing Period shall not terminate any earlier than December 18, 2006.

        "Materials of Environmental Concern" means any substance or waste defined or regulated as hazardous, acutely hazardous, or toxic substance or waste (or any other words of similar import) under Environmental Laws (including the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended, and the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended) and any other material or organism that would be reasonably expected to result in liability under any Environmental Law (including oil, petroleum products, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls and mold).

        "Meghraj Joint Venture" means "Trammell Crow Meghraj".

        "Minority Investments" means, with respect to any Person, any corporation or other entity (including a division or line of business of such corporation or other entity) (A) of which such Person and/or any of its Subsidiaries beneficially owns a portion of the Equity Interests that is insufficient to make such corporation or other entity a Subsidiary of such Person, and (B) over which such Person and/or any of its Subsidiaries does not exercise control.

        "Ordinary Course of Business" means, with respect to a Person, the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice of such Person and its Subsidiaries.

        "Organizational Documents" means, with respect to a Person, the articles of incorporation, certificate of incorporation, charter, bylaws, articles of formation, articles of association, regulations, operating agreement, certificate of limited partnership, partnership agreement, limited liability company agreement and all other similar documents, instruments or certificates executed, adopted, or filed in connection with the creation, formation, or organization of such Person, including any amendments thereto.

        "Parent Material Adverse Effect" means any result, occurrence, condition, fact, change, violation, event or effect of any of the foregoing that, individually or in the aggregate with any such other results, occurrences, conditions, facts, changes, violations, events or effects, prevents or materially impairs the

A-6


ability of Parent or Acquiror to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement in accordance with the terms hereof.

        "Parent SEC Documents" means (a) the annual reports on Form 10-K of Parent for the year ended December 31, 2005, (b) the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of Parent for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006, (c) Parent's proxy and information statements relating to meetings of, or actions taken without a meeting by, the stockholders of Parent, since December 31, 2004, and (d) all other reports, filings, registration statements and other documents filed by Parent with the SEC since December 31, 2004; in each case as may be amended, including all exhibits, appendices and attachments thereto, whether filed therewith or incorporated by reference therein.

        "Permitted Liens" means (a) Liens for utilities and current Taxes not yet due and payable, (b) mechanics', carriers', workers', repairers', materialmen's, warehousemen's and other similar Liens arising or incurred in the Ordinary Course of Business, (c) Liens for Taxes being contested in good faith for which appropriate reserves have been included on the balance sheet of the applicable Person, (d) easements, restrictions, covenants or rights of way currently of record against any of the Owned Real Property which do not interfere with, or increase the cost of operation of, the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries in any material respect or materially affect the value or marketability of such Owned Real Property, (e) minor irregularities of title with respect to any of the Owned Real Property which do not interfere with, or increase the cost of the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries in any material respect or materially affect the value or marketability of such Owned Real Property and (f) Liens under the Credit Agreements.

        "Person" means an individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association, trust or any other entity or organization, including any Governmental Entity.

        "Project Entity" means a Special Purpose Vehicle that owns a Development and Investment Activities project or is the general partner of any such Special Purpose Vehicle and shall include Trammell Crow Investment Fund II, L.P., Trammell Crow Investment Fund III L.P., Trammell Crow Investment Fund IV, L.P., Trammell Crow Investment Fund V, L.P. and TCC-Lion Industrial, LLC.

        "Proxy Statement" means the proxy statement to be mailed to the Company Stockholders in connection with the Company Stockholder Approval, together with any amendments or supplements thereto.

        "SEC" means the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        "Securities Act" means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

        "Significant Subsidiary" means a "significant subsidiary" as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

        "Special Purpose Vehicle" means any Company Subsidiary or Company Minority Investment whose activities with respect to the Company are limited to, and whose assets are used only in connection with, the Company's Development and Investment Activities.

        "SPV Guarantees" means, collectively, (i) completion or performance guarantees guaranteeing the obligations of a Project Entity, (ii) budget guarantees guaranteeing the obligations of a Project Entity, and (iii) other guarantees or similar obligations entered into in the course of Development and Investment Activities with respect to the obligations of Project Entities for environmental claims, fraud, misapplication of cash and failure to comply with bankruptcy remote and special purpose entity requirements.

        "Stockholders" means Company Stockholders.

A-7

        "Subsidiary" means, with respect to any Person, any corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other entity (including joint ventures) of which such Person, directly or indirectly, (a) has the right or ability to elect, designate or appoint a majority of the board of directors or other Persons performing similar functions for such entity, whether as a result of the beneficial ownership of Equity Interests, contractual rights or otherwise or (b) beneficially owns a majority of the voting Equity Interests (including general partner Equity Interests).

        "Superior Proposal" means any Acquisition Proposal (with all of the percentages included in the definition of Acquisition Proposal increased to fifty percent (50%) for purposes of this definition) that the Company's Board of Directors concludes in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, (a) is on terms that are more favorable, from a financial point of view, to the Company Stockholders than the terms of the Merger (including any written proposal by Parent and Acquiror received by the Company to amend the terms of this Agreement) (taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of the proposal, including to the extent financing is required, the terms and conditions of the proposed financing); and (b) is reasonably capable of being consummated.

        "Taxes" means all United States federal, state, local or foreign income, profits, estimated gross receipts, windfall profits, environmental (including taxes under Section 59A of the Code), severance, property, intangible property, occupation, production, sales, use, license, excise, emergency excise, franchise, capital gains, capital stock, employment, withholding, social security (or similar), disability, transfer, registration, stamp, payroll, employer insurance, goods and services, value added, alternative or add-on minimum tax, estimated, or any other tax, custom, duty or governmental fee, or other like assessment or charge of any kind whatsoever, together with any interest, penalties, fines, related liabilities or additions to tax that may become payable in respect therefor imposed by any Governmental Entity, whether disputed or not.

        "Third Party" means a Person (or group of Persons) other than Parent, Acquiror or any of their respective Subsidiaries.

        "WARN" means the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, as amended.

Term
   Section
Trammell Crow Bank   4.16(a)
2006 Budget   6.1(a)(ix)
2006 Plans   7.2(c)
Acquiror   Preamble
Acquiror Share   1.1(a)
Acquisition Proposal   1.1(a)
Affiliate   1.1(a)
Agreement   Preamble
Alliance Agreements   1.1(a)
Alternative Financing   8.8(a)
Antitrust Conditions   8.2(h)
Antitrust Division   8.1(b)
Antitrust Laws   1.1(a)
Business Day   1.1(a)
Book-Entry Shares   3.4(a)
Capital Commitments   6.1(b)
Capital Investments   6.1(b)
Certificate of Merger   2.1(b)
     

A-8

Certificates   3.4(a)
Claim   4.10
Closing   2.1(d)
Closing Date   2.1(d)
Code   1.1(a)
Commitment Letter   5.5
Company   Preamble
Company 10-K   1.1(a)
Company 401(k) Plan   7.2(c)
Company Balance Sheet   1.1(a)
Company Charter   1.1(a)
Company Damages   1.1(a)
Company Employees   4.12(a)
Company Entities   1.1(a)
Company Independent Contractors   4.12(a)
Company Intellectual Property   4.15
Company Minority Investment   1.1(a)
Company Material Adverse Effect   1.1(a)
Company Option   1.1(a)
Company Option Plans   1.1(a)
Company Plans   4.12(a)
Company Preferred Stock   4.5(a)
Company Recommendation   4.23(b)
Company Returns   4.11(a)
Company SEC Documents   1.1(a)
Company Securities   4.5(b)
Company Share   1.1(a)
Company Stockholder Approval   4.23(a)
Company Stockholder Meeting   6.2
Company Stockholders   1.1(a)
Company Subsidiary   1.1(a)
Company Termination Fee   10.2(b)(i)
Confidentiality Agreement   1.1(a)
Consent Solicitation   7.4(a)
Continuing Employees   7.2(a)
Contract   1.1(a)
Controlled Group   4.12(c)(iii)
Credit Agreements   1.1(a)
Debt Tender Offer   7.4(a)
Default   4.18(c)
Development and Investment Activities   1.1(a)
Development and Investment Group   1.1(a)
DGCL   2.1(a)
Dissenting Shares   3.6(a)
Effective Time   2.1(b)
End Date   10.1(b)(i)
Environmental Laws   1.1(a)
Environmental Permits   1.1(a)
Equity Interest   1.1(a)
ERISA   4.12(a)
     

A-9

Exchange Act   1.1(a)
Exchange Agent   3.4(a)
Exchange Fund   3.4(a)
Exclusivity Arrangement   4.18(c)
Financing   5.5
Foreign Benefit Plans   4.12(i)
FTC   8.1(b)
GAAP   1.1(a)
Governmental Entity   1.1(a)
HSR Act   1.1(a)
Indebtedness   1.1(a)
Indemnified Parties   7.1(b)
Indenture   7.4(b)
Independent Contractor   1.1(a)
Initiation Date   1.1(a)
Joint Defense Agreement   8.2(c)
Minority Investment   1.1(a)
Knowledge   1.1(a)
Krombach Joint Venture   1.1(a)
Labor Laws   4.17(a)
Law   1.1(a)
Leased Property   4.19(a)
Leases   4.19(a)
Lender   5.5
Lien   1.1(a)
Marketing Period   1.1(a)
Matching Bid   6.3(b)
Material Contract   4.18(a)
Materials of Environmental Concern   1.1(a)
Meghraj Joint Venture   1.1(a)
Merger   2.1(a)
Merger Consideration   3.3
Minority Investments   1.1(a)
Modified Superior Proposal   6.3(d)
Notes   7.4(a)
Notice of Superior Proposal   6.3(d)
Order   4.10
Ordinary Course of Business   1.1(a)
Organizational Documents   1.1(a)
Owned Real Property   4.19(b)
Parent   Preamble
Parent Antitrust Termination Fee   10.2(c)
Parent Breach Termination Fee   10.2(d)
Parent Liability Cap   10.2(g)
Parent Litigation   5.10
Parent Material Adverse Effect   1.1(a)
Parent Party   10.2(d)
Parent SEC Documents   1.1(a)
Participation Agreements   4.19(g)
Participation Party   4.19(g)
     

A-10

Permits   4.13(b)
Permitted Actions   6.3(a)(iv)
Permitted Liens   1.1(a)
Person   1.1(a)
Project Entities   1.1(a)
Proxy Statement   1.1(a)
Purchase Plans   3.5(b)
Real Property   4.19(b)
Representatives   6.3(a)
Requested Consents   7.4(a)
Required Financial Information   8.8(b)(ii)
Restricted Share   3.5(c)
SEC   1.1(a)
Secretary of State   2.1(b)
Securities Act   1.1(a)
Services   7.4
Significant Subsidiary   1.1(a)
Special Purpose Vehicle   1.1(a)
SPV Guarantees   1.1(a)
Stock Plan Suspension Date   3.5(b)
Stockholders   1.1(a)
Subsidiary   1.1(a)
Superior Proposal   1.1(a)
Surviving Corporation   2.1(a)
Taxes   1.1(a)
Tendered Notes   7.4(a)
Third Party   1.1(a)
Title Insurance Policy   4.19(b)
Transfer Taxes   7.3
Unit   3.5(d)
Voting Agreements   Recitals
WARN   1.1(a)


ARTICLE 2

THE MERGER

        2.1.    The Merger.    

A-11

        2.2.    Organizational Documents.    The Certificate of Merger shall provide that at the Effective Time (a) the Company's certificate of incorporation in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the Surviving Corporation's certificate of incorporation and (b) the Acquiror's by-laws in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the Surviving Corporation's by-laws, in each case until amended in accordance with applicable Law; provided, however, that any such amendment shall not amend the certificate of incorporation or by-laws in a manner prohibited by or inconsistent with Section 7.1.

        2.3.    Directors and Officers.    From and after the Effective Time (until such time as their successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified), (A) Acquiror's directors at the Effective Time shall be the Surviving Corporation's directors and (B) the Company's officers immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the Surviving Corporation's officers.


ARTICLE 3

CONVERSION OF SECURITIES AND RELATED MATTERS

        3.1.    Capital Stock of Acquiror.    As of the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of any Company Share or Acquiror Share, each Acquiror Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into one share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Surviving Corporation.

        3.2.    Cancellation of Treasury Stock and Acquiror-Owned Shares.    As of the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of any Company Share or Acquiror Share, each Company Share held by the Company as treasury stock or owned by Parent or any Subsidiary of Parent immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be canceled and retired, and no payment shall be made or consideration delivered or deliverable in respect thereof.

        3.3.    Conversion of Company Shares.    As of the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of any Company Share or Acquiror Share, each Company Share (excluding any Restricted Shares whose restrictions do not lapse as of the Effective Time) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than (a) shares to be cancelled in accordance with Section 3.2 and (b) Dissenting Shares) shall be converted into the right to receive in cash, without interest, an amount equal to $49.51 (the "Merger Consideration").

A-12

        3.4.    Exchange of Certificates.    

A-13

        3.5.    Company Stock Options and Other Awards.    

A-14

        3.6.    Dissenting Shares.    

A-15


ARTICLE 4

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY

        Except (i) as disclosed in the Company SEC Documents filed with the SEC after January 1, 2006 and prior to the date of this Agreement with respect to information that is reasonably apparent on its face to relate to the representations and warranties contained in this Article 4 (excluding any disclosures set forth in any risk factor section thereof, in any section relating to forward looking statements and any other disclosures included therein to the extent that they are cautionary, predictive or forward looking in nature) or (ii) as disclosed in the Company Disclosure Schedule attached hereto, the Company represents and warrants to Parent and Acquiror as set forth below:

        4.1.    Corporate Existence and Power.    The Company is a corporation, duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of the State of Delaware, and has all corporate powers and authority required to own, lease and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its business as now conducted. The Company is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where the character of the property and assets owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of its activities makes qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. The Company is not in violation of any provision of its Organizational Documents, and the Company has made available to Parent true and correct copies of its Organizational Documents.

        4.2.    Corporate Authorization.    The execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby are within the Company's corporate powers and, except for the Company Stockholder Approval and the filing and recordation of the Certificate of Merger in accordance with the DGCL, have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate action and no other corporate proceedings on the part of the Company are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. Subject to Section 6.3, the Board of Directors of the Company unanimously has approved and declared advisable this Agreement and has resolved to recommend that the Company Stockholders vote their shares in favor of the adoption of this Agreement and approval of the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by the Company, and assuming that this Agreement constitutes the valid and binding obligation of Parent and Acquiror, constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms subject, as to enforceability, to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors' rights and to general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law).

        4.3.    Governmental Authorization.    The execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby will

A-16


not require with respect to the Company or any Company Subsidiary any consent, approval, action, order, authorization, or permit of, or registration, declaration or filing with, any Governmental Entity, other than (a) the filing of the Certificate of Merger in accordance with the DGCL; (b) compliance with any applicable requirements of any Antitrust Laws or any international or foreign Laws; (c) compliance with any applicable requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act; (d) filings with the New York Stock Exchange; (e) such filings and approvals as may be required by any applicable state securities, "blue sky" or takeover laws; and (f) other consents, approvals, actions, orders, authorizations, permits, registrations, declarations and filings which, if not obtained or made, would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. The consummation of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby will not result in the lapse of any Permit of the Company or Company Subsidiaries or the breach of any authorization or right to use any Permit of the Company or Company Subsidiaries or other right that the Company or any Company Subsidiaries has from a Governmental Entity, except where such lapses or breaches would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        4.4.    Non-Contravention.    The execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not (a) contravene or conflict with the Organizational Documents of the Company, (b) contravene or conflict with the Organizational Documents of any Company Subsidiary, (c) assuming compliance with the matters referred to in Section 4.3, contravene or conflict with, or constitute a violation of, any provision of any Law binding upon or applicable to the Company or its Subsidiaries or by which any of their respective properties or assets is bound or affected, (d) constitute a breach of or default under (or an event that with notice or lapse of time or both would be reasonably likely to become a breach or default) or give rise (with or without notice or lapse of time or both) to a right of termination, amendment, cancellation or acceleration under any Contract binding upon the Company (including, in the case of any Contract evidencing Indebtedness or other payment obligation of any Special Purpose Vehicle, any right to claim against the Company or any Company Subsidiaries other than a Special Purpose Vehicle all or any portion of the amount of Indebtedness or other payment obligation underlying such Contract), any Company Subsidiary or any of their respective properties or assets, or (e) result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on any asset of the Company or any Company Subsidiary, other than, in the case of clauses (b), (c), (d) and (e) taken together, any items that would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        4.5.    Capitalization.    

A-17

        4.6.    Subsidiaries; Minority Investments.    

A-18

        4.7.    Company SEC Documents.    

A-19

        4.8.    Financial Statements; No Material Undisclosed Liabilities.    

A-20

        4.9.    Absence of Certain Changes.    

        4.10.    Litigation.    As of the date of this Agreement, there is no litigation, action, suit, claim, investigation, arbitration or proceeding or inquiry, whether civil, criminal or administrative (each, a "Claim"), pending, or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened, against the Company or any Company Subsidiary or any Special Purpose Vehicle any of their respective assets, properties or employees before any arbitrator or Governmental Entity that would be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. Set forth on Section 4.10 of the Company Disclosure Schedule is a list of all Claims pending, or to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened as of the date of this Agreement, against the Company or any Company Subsidiary or any of their respective assets, properties or employees (if such Claim is related to, or arising from, an employee's actions or omissions on behalf of the Company or any Company Subsidiary) before any arbitrator or Governmental Entity in which the amount claimed is in excess of $1,000,000 or in which specific performance or other injunctive relief or punitive damages are sought, or in which a criminal

A-21

violation is alleged. As of the date of this Agreement, neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary nor any of their respective properties, assets or, to the Knowledge of the Company, employees is or are subject to any order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, settlement, determination or award ("Order") having, or which would be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        4.11.    Taxes.    Except as would not be reasonably likely, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, (a) all Tax returns, statements, declarations, reports and forms, including any schedules or attachments thereto, required to be filed with any taxing authority by, or with respect to, the Company and each Company Subsidiary (collectively, the "Company Returns") have been timely filed accordance with all applicable Laws and the Company Returns are true, correct and complete in; (b) the Company and each Company Subsidiary has timely paid all Taxes due and payable whether or not shown as being due on any Company Return (other than Taxes that are being contested in good faith and for which adequate reserves are reflected in the Company Balance Sheet); (c) the charges, accruals and reserves for Taxes with respect to the Company and each consolidated Company Subsidiary that are reflected on the Company Balance Sheet are adequate to cover the Tax liabilities accruing through the date thereof; (d) as of the date of this Agreement, there is no action, suit, proceeding, audit or claim now proposed or pending against the Company or any Company Subsidiary in respect of any Taxes; (e) neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary is party to, bound by or has any obligation under, any tax sharing Contract or any Contract that obligates them to make any payment computed by reference to the Taxes, taxable income or taxable losses of any other Person; (f) there are no Liens with respect to Taxes on any of the assets or properties of the Company or any Company Subsidiary other than with respect to Taxes not due and payable; (g) neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary (1) is, or has been, a member of an affiliated, consolidated, combined or unitary group, other than one of which the Company was the common parent and (2) has any liability for the Taxes of any Person (other than the Company and the Company Subsidiaries) under Treasury Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state, local or foreign Law), or as a transferee or successor, by contract or otherwise; (h) neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has ever entered into a closing agreement pursuant to Section 7121 of the Code that could affect the Company or a Company Subsidiary in a Tax period or portion thereof beginning after the Effective Time; (i) the Company will not be required to include amounts in income, or exclude items of deduction, in a taxable period beginning after the Closing Date as a result of (1) a change in method of accounting occurring prior to the Closing Date, (2) an installment sale or open transaction arising in a taxable period (or portion thereof) ending on or before the Closing Date, (3) a prepaid amount received, or paid, prior to the Closing Date or (4) deferred gains arising prior to the Closing Date; (j) all Taxes required to be withheld, collected or deposited by or with respect to Company and each of the Company Subsidiaries have been timely withheld, collected or deposited as the case may be, and to the extent required, have been paid to the relevant taxing authority; (k) none of Company or any of the Company Subsidiaries has been either a "distributing corporation" or a "controlled corporation" in a distribution occurring during the last five years in which the parties to such distribution treated the distribution as one to which Section 355 of the Code is applicable; and (l) neither the Company nor any of the Company Subsidiaries has engaged in any transaction that would reasonably be expected to give rise to (1) a list maintenance obligation with respect to any Person under Section 6112 of the Code or the regulations thereunder or (2) a disclosure obligation as a "reportable transaction" under Section 6011 of the Code and the regulations thereunder.

        4.12.    Employee Benefits.    

A-22

A-23

A-24

A-25

        4.13.    Compliance with Laws; Licenses, Permits and Registrations.    

        4.14.    Title to Assets.    The Company and each Company Subsidiary (other than a Special Purpose Vehicle) has good title to, or valid leasehold interests in, all their respective assets, except where the absence thereof would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. Other than assets held by a Special Purpose Vehicle and other than assets in which the Company or any Company Subsidiary has leasehold interests, all of these assets are free and clear of all Liens, except for (a) Permitted Liens and (b) Liens that would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. All assets owned by Special Purpose Vehicles are owned free and clear of all Liens, except for (i) Liens incurred in the Ordinary Course of Business by such Special Purpose Vehicles, (ii) Permitted Liens, and (iii) Liens that would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        4.15.    Intellectual Property.    The Company and each Company Subsidiary owns or has a valid license or other right to use, free and clear of all Liens, except for Permitted Liens, each trademark, service mark, trade name, domain name or other source indicator, patent, trade secret, confidential information, or copyright (including any registrations or applications for registration of any of the foregoing, which are set forth in Section 4.15 of the Company Disclosure Schedule) used in or necessary to carry on the business of the Company and each Company Subsidiary, taken as a whole, as currently conducted (collectively, the "Company Intellectual Property"), except where the failure to own or have the right to use such properties would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect. To the Knowledge of the Company, the Company Intellectual Property is not being infringed or misappropriated by any third party. Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has received any notice of infringement of or challenge to, and there are no Claims or Orders pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened with respect to any Company Intellectual Property that would be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        4.16.    Transaction Fees; Opinions of Financial Advisor.    

A-26

        4.17.    Labor Matters.    

A-27

        4.18.    Material Contracts.    

A-28

A-29

        4.19.    Real Estate.    

A-30

        4.20.    Environmental.    Except as would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect: (i) the Company and each Company Subsidiary complies, and at all times has complied, and to the Company's Knowledge each other Company Entity complies and at all times has complied, with all applicable Environmental Laws, and possess and comply with, and at all times possessed and complied with, all applicable Environmental Permits required under such Laws; (ii) there are no Materials of Environmental Concern or other facts, events, conditions or set of circumstances at or relating to any property or other facility (A) currently or previously owned or leased, by the Company or any Company Subsidiary, (B) currently managed or operated by the Company, any Company Subsidiary other than a Special Purpose Vehicle or (C) currently managed or operated by a Special Purpose Vehicle with respect to which an environmental guarantee has been entered into with respect thereto, in each case that would reasonably be expected to result in liability of the Company or any Company Subsidiary under any applicable Environmental Law; and (iii) neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has received or is otherwise aware of any Claim or any written notification alleging that it is liable under any Environmental Law, or any request for information pursuant to Section 104(e) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended, or similar Law concerning any release or threatened release of Materials of Environmental Concern at any location; and (iv) none of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries and to the Company's Knowledge any other Special Purpose Vehicle has contractually assumed any liability under any Environmental Law other than in the conduct of Development and Investment Activities or under services contracts, property management agreements with clients or other contracts entered into in the Ordinary Course of Business.

        4.21.    Insurance.    Section 4.21 of the Company Disclosure Schedule lists all insurance policies involving general errors and omissions, directors and officers coverage or environmental liabilities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in effect on the date hereof and true and correct copies of such insurance policies have been made available to Acquiror. As of the date of this Agreement, there is no material claim by the Company or any Company Subsidiary pending under any such insurance as to which coverage has been questioned, denied or disputed by the underwriters of such insurance. All premiums payable under all such insurance have been paid when due and the Company and each Company Subsidiary is in all material respects in full compliance with the terms of such insurance.

        4.22.    Affiliate Transactions.    Except (i) for any expense reimbursements and advances in the Ordinary Course of Business, (ii) for any employment or consulting agreement identified in the Company Disclosure Schedule and any other employment agreement with officers other than executive officers, (iii) for benefits pursuant to a Company Plan, or (iv) for transactions in the Ordinary Course of Business with any Affiliate of a non-employee member of the Company's Board of Directors, there are no Contracts with more than $250,000 of obligations, commitments or payments remaining as of the date of this Agreement between the Company or any Company Entity, on the one hand, and any (x) executive officer or director of the Company or any Company Subsidiary or any of their immediate family members (including their spouses) or any Person known by the Company to be an Affiliate of such Person, or (y) Person known by the Company to be a beneficial owner of five percent (5%) or more of any class or series of voting securities of the Company.

A-31

        4.23.    Required Vote; Board Approval; State Takeover Statutes.    

        4.24.    Information to Be Supplied.    The Proxy Statement will not, at the time of the mailing thereof and at the time of the Company Stockholder Meeting and in light of the circumstances in which they are made, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein not misleading. The Proxy Statement will comply as to form with the provisions of the Exchange Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company makes no representation or warranty with respect to any statements made or incorporated by reference in the Proxy Statement based on information supplied by Parent or Acquiror in writing specifically for inclusion or incorporation by reference therein.


ARTICLE 5

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND ACQUIROR

        Except as disclosed in the Parent and Acquiror Disclosure Schedule attached hereto, Parent and Acquiror, jointly and severally, represent and warrant to the Company that:

        5.1.    Corporate Existence and Power.    Each of Parent and Acquiror is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation and has all corporate powers and authority required to own, lease and operate its properties and assets and carry on its business as now conducted. Each of Parent and Acquiror is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where the character of the property owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of its activities makes qualification necessary, except where the failure to be qualified has not had and would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect. True and correct copies of the

A-32


certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Acquiror, and all amendments, modifications or supplements thereto, have been provided to the Company.

        5.2.    Corporate Authorization.    The execution, delivery and performance by each of Parent and Acquiror of this Agreement and the consummation by each of Parent and Acquiror of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby are within the corporate powers of each of Parent and Acquiror and have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate action and no other corporate proceedings on the part of Parent or Acquiror are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by each of Parent and Acquiror and assuming that this Agreement constitutes the valid and binding obligation of the Company, this Agreement constitutes a valid and binding agreement of each of Parent and Acquiror, enforceable in accordance with its terms.

        5.3.    Governmental Authorization.    The execution, delivery and performance by each of Parent and Acquiror of this Agreement and the consummation by Parent and Acquiror of the transactions contemplated hereby will not require any consent, approval, action, order, authorization, or permit of, or registration, declaration or filing with, any Governmental Entity by Parent or Acquiror other than (a) those set forth in clauses (a) through (d) of Section 4.3 and (b) other consents, approvals, actions, orders, authorizations, permits, registrations, declarations and filings which, if not obtained or made, would not be reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.

        5.4.    Non-Contravention.    The execution, delivery and performance by Parent and Acquiror of this Agreement and the consummation by Parent and Acquiror of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not (a) contravene or conflict with the Organizational Documents of Parent or Acquiror, (b) assuming compliance with the matters referred to in Section 5.3, contravene or conflict with any provision of Law, binding upon or applicable to Parent or Acquiror or by which any of their respective properties or assets is bound or affected, (c) constitute a breach or default under (or an event that with notice or lapse of time or both could reasonably become a breach or default) or give rise (with or without notice or lapse of time or both) to a right of termination, amendment, cancellation or acceleration under any Contract binding upon, Parent or Acquiror or their respective properties or assets, or (d) result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on any asset of Parent or Acquiror other than, in the case of clauses (b), (c) and (d) taken together, any such items that have not had and would not be reasonably likely to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.

        5.5.    Financing.    As of the date of this Agreement, Acquiror has received an executed commitment letter dated October 30, 2006 (the "Commitment Letter") from Credit Suisse and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC ("Lender"), pursuant to which Lender has committed, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, to provide to Parent the amount of financing set forth in the Commitment Letter (the "Financing"), to complete the transactions contemplated hereby. A true and complete copy of the Commitment Letter has been previously provided to the Company. Acquiror has fully paid any and all commitment fees or other fees required by such Commitment Letter to be paid as of the date hereof. As of the date hereof, the Commitment Letter is valid and in full force and effect, does not contain any material misrepresentation by Parent (other than those resulting from inaccurate information, if any, provided by the Company) and no event has occurred which (with or without notice, lapse of time or both) would constitute a breach thereunder on the part of Parent or Acquiror. There are no conditions precedent or other contingencies related to the funding of the full amount of the Financing, other than as set forth in or contemplated by the Commitment Letter. The aggregate proceeds contemplated by the Commitment Letter, together with available cash of Parent and Acquiror, will be sufficient for Acquiror and the Surviving Corporation to pay the aggregate Merger Consideration, the aggregate consideration to be paid to each holder of a Company Option and other awards pursuant to Section 3.5, any repayment or refinancing of debt contemplated in the Commitment Letter and the fees and expenses incurred in connection with the transactions

A-33


contemplated hereby. The fee letter between Parent and Lender referred to in the Commitment Letter does not contain any conditions precedent or other contingencies related to the funding of the full amount of the Financing or any provisions that could reduce the aggregate amount of the Financing set forth in the Commitment Letter or the aggregate proceeds contemplated by the Commitment Letter. As of the date hereof, none of Parent or Acquiror has any reason to believe that any of the conditions to the Financing will not be satisfied or that the Financing will not be available to Parent and Acquiror on the Closing Date.

        5.6.    Information to Be Supplied.    The information supplied or to be supplied by Parent and Acquiror (if any) in writing specifically for inclusion or incorporation by reference in the Proxy Statement will, at the time of the mailing thereof and at the time of the Company Stockholder Meeting, not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.

        5.7.    Solvency; Surviving Corporation After the Merger.    Neither Parent nor Acquiror is entering into the transactions contemplated by this Agreement with the actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud either present or future creditors. Assuming that the representations and warranties of the Company contained in this Agreement are true and correct in all material respects, and after giving effect to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby, at and immediately after the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation (i) will be solvent (in that both the fair value of its assets will not be less than the sum of its debts and that the present fair saleable value of its assets will not be less than the amount required to pay its probable liability on its recourse debts as they become absolute and matured); (ii) will have adequate capital and liquidity with which to engage in its business; and (iii) will not have incurred and does not plan to incur debts beyond its ability to pay as they become absolute and matured.

        5.8.    Vote/Approval Required.    No vote or consent of the holders of any class or series of capital stock of Parent is necessary to approve this Agreement or the Merger or the transactions contemplated hereby. The vote or consent of Services, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, as the sole stockholder of Acquiror is the only vote or consent of the holders of any class or series of capital stock of Parent or Acquiror necessary to approve this Agreement or the Merger or the transactions contemplated hereby and Parent will cause such vote to be obtained on the date of this Agreement.

        5.9.    Parent SEC Documents.    

A-34

        5.10.    Litigation.    As of the date of this Agreement, there is no Claim pending, or, to the knowledge of Parent or Acquiror, threatened, against or affecting Parent or Acquiror ("Parent Litigation") or against any of their respective assets, properties or employees before any arbitrator or Governmental Entity that would reasonably be expected to materially adversely affect the ability of Parent or Acquiror to consummate the Merger, and neither Parent nor Acquiror nor any of their respective properties or assets or, to the Knowledge of Parent or Acquiror, employees is or are subject to any Order that would reasonably be expected to materially adversely affect the ability of the Company or Acquiror to consummate the Merger.

        5.11.    No Business Conduct; Ownership.    Acquiror was incorporated on October 25, 2006. Since its inception, Acquiror has not engaged in any activity, other than such actions in connection with (i) its organization and (ii) the preparation, negotiation and execution of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby. Acquiror has not had any operations, has not generated any revenues and has no liabilities other than those incurred in connection with the foregoing and in association with the Merger as provided in this Agreement. All of the Equity Interests of Acquiror are wholly-owned (directly or indirectly) by Parent.


ARTICLE 6

COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY

        The Company agrees as set forth below.

        6.1.    Company Interim Operations.    

A-35

A-36

A-37

A-38

A-39

A-40

        6.2.    Stockholder Meeting.    The Company shall cause a meeting of its Stockholders (the "Company Stockholder Meeting") to be duly called and held as promptly as reasonably practicable after receipt of SEC confirmation that the SEC has no further comments to the Proxy Statement for the purpose of obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval. Subject to Section 6.3 hereto (including the right of the Company's Board of Directors to amend, withdraw, modify, change, condition or qualify the Company Recommendation pursuant to Section 6.3(b)), the Company's Board of Directors shall recommend adoption by the Company Stockholders of this Agreement and approval by the Company Stockholders of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger, and the Company shall take all other reasonable lawful action to solicit and secure the Company Stockholder Approval. Subject to Section 6.3 hereto (including the right of the Company's Board of Directors to amend, withdraw, modify, change, condition or qualify the Company Recommendation pursuant to Section 6.3(b)), the Company Recommendation, together with a copy of the opinion referred to in Section 4.16(b), shall be included in the Proxy Statement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the Company may adjourn or postpone the Company Stockholder Meeting to the extent necessary (i) to ensure that any supplement or amendment to the Proxy Statement, which is necessary to ensure that the Proxy Statement does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the

A-41

circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, is provided to its Stockholders in advance of a vote to obtain the Company Stockholder Approval or (ii) if as of the time for which the Company Stockholder Meeting is originally scheduled there is an insufficient number of Company Shares represented (either in person or by proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct the business of the Company Stockholder Meeting.

        6.3.    Acquisition Proposals; Board Recommendation.    

A-42

A-43

        6.4.    Termination of Credit Agreements.    On or prior to the second Business Day prior to the Closing Date, the Company shall use its reasonable efforts to deliver to Parent copies of payoff letters (subject to delivery of funds as arranged by Parent and Acquiror), in reasonable form, from the administration agents under the Credit Agreements and shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to make arrangements for the release of all mortgages, liens and other security over the Company's and the Company Subsidiaries' properties and assets securing such obligations (subject to delivery of funds as arranged by Parent and Acquiror, if necessary).

        6.5.    Resignation of Directors.    Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall deliver to Acquiror evidence satisfactory to Acquiror of the resignation of all directors of the Company effective at the Effective Time.

        6.6.    Rule 16b-3.    Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall take such steps as may be reasonably necessary to cause dispositions of Equity Interests of the Company (including derivative securities) pursuant to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement by each individual who is a

A-44


director or officer of the Company to be exempted under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act in accordance with that certain No-Action Letter dated January 12, 1999 issued by the SEC regarding such matters.


ARTICLE 7

COVENANTS OF PARENT AND ACQUIROR

        Each of Parent and Acquiror agrees as set forth below.

        7.1.    Director and Officer Liability.    

A-45

A-46

        7.2.    Employee Benefits.    

A-47

        7.3.    Transfer Taxes.    The parties shall cooperate in the preparation, execution and filing of all returns, questionnaires, applications or other documents regarding all state, local and foreign real property transfer or gains, sales, use, transfer, value added, stock transfer and stamp taxes, any transfer, recording, registration and other fees or similar Taxes ("Transfer Taxes") which become payable in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement that are required to be filed on or before the Effective Time. All Transfer Taxes (including any interest or penalties with respect thereto) attributable to the Merger shall be timely paid by Parent, Acquiror or the Surviving Corporation and expressly shall not be a liability of the holder of any Company Shares.

        7.4.    Debt Tender Offer or Redemption.    

A-48

        7.5.    Parent Board of Directors.    Subject to applicable Law and the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, Parent shall cause its Board of Directors to include (either pursuant to newly-created directorships and/or vacancies, as determined by Parent in its sole discretion) the following individuals (each such individual in clause (a) to be selected by Parent in its discretion, subject to the consent of such individual to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of Parent and subject as to any individual described in clause (a) or (b) to the satisfaction of Parent's corporate governance guidelines as in effect as of the date of this Agreement): (a) two members of the Board of Directors of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time who will qualify as "independent" (as defined by Section 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual and Section 10A of the Exchange Act (or any successor provisions)) members of the Board of Directors of Parent, which appointment to the Board of Directors of Parent shall become effective at or promptly after the Effective Time, and (b) the chief executive officer of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time, which appointment of the chief executive officer of the Company to the Board of Directors of Parent shall become effective on the Closing Date.


ARTICLE 8

COVENANTS OF PARENT ACQUIROR AND THE COMPANY

        The parties hereto agree as set forth below.

        8.1.    Efforts.    Subject to Section 8.2 and the other terms and conditions of this Agreement, each party will use all reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable Law to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including preparing and filing as promptly as practicable all documentation to effect all necessary filings, notices, petitions, statements, registrations, submissions of information, applications and other documents necessary to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement; provided, however, that in no event shall any Party or its Subsidiaries be required to pay, and without Parent's prior consent the Company and the Company Subsidiaries shall not pay, prior to the Effective Time any fee, penalties or other consideration to any Third Party to obtain any consent or approval required for the consummation of the Merger under any Contract.

        8.2.    Governmental Approvals.    

A-49

A-50

        8.3.    Proxy Statement.    As soon as practicable and in any event no later than ten (10) days after execution of this Agreement, the Company shall prepare the preliminary Proxy Statement and file the preliminary Proxy Statement with the SEC under the Exchange Act. The Company shall use all reasonable efforts to have the preliminary Proxy Statement cleared by the SEC. Parent, Acquiror and the Company shall cooperate with each other in the preparation of the Proxy Statement, and the Company shall notify Acquiror of the receipt of any comments of the SEC with respect to the Proxy Statement and of any requests by the SEC for any amendment or supplement thereto or for additional

A-51

information and shall provide to Parent promptly copies of all correspondence between the Company or any representative of the Company and the SEC. Parent shall promptly provide the Company with such information regarding Parent and its Subsidiaries as may be required to be included in the Proxy Statement or as may be reasonably required to respond to any comment of the SEC. The Company shall give Parent and its counsel a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on the Proxy Statement and any other documents filed with the SEC or mailed to the Company Stockholders prior to their being filed with, or sent to, the SEC or mailed to the Company Stockholders and shall give Parent and its counsel a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on all amendments and supplements to the Proxy Statement and any other documents filed with, or sent to, the SEC or mailed to the Company Stockholders and all responses to requests for additional information and replies to comments prior to their being filed with, or sent to, the SEC or mailed to Company Stockholders. Each of the Company, Parent and Acquiror agrees to use all reasonable efforts, after consultation with the other parties hereto, to respond promptly to all such comments of and requests by the SEC. As promptly as practicable after the Proxy Statement has been cleared by the SEC, the Company shall file the definitive Proxy Statement with the SEC and cause the Proxy Statement to be mailed to the Stockholders of record, as of the record date established by the Board of Directors of the Company. Each of the Company, Parent and Acquiror promptly shall correct any information provided (or omitted) by it and used in the Proxy Statement that shall have become false or misleading in any material respect to ensure that the Proxy Statement does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, and the Company shall take all steps necessary to file with the SEC and have cleared by the SEC any amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement as to correct the same and to cause the Proxy Statement as so corrected to be disseminated to the Company Stockholders, in each case to the extent required by applicable Law.

        8.4.    Public Announcements.    The parties shall cooperate with each other in the development and distribution of, and consult with each other before issuing, any press release or making any public statement or announcement with respect to this Agreement, the Voting Agreements and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby and shall not issue any such press release or make any such public statement or announcement without the prior consent of the other parties (which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), except as may be required by applicable Law or any listing agreement with any national securities exchange.

        8.5.    Access to Information; Notification of Certain Matters.    

A-52

A-53

        8.6.    Disposition of Litigation.    The Company will consult with Parent with respect to any action by any Third Party to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any Voting Agreement and, subject to Section 6.3, will use all reasonable efforts to resist any such effort to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any Voting Agreement. Parent may participate in (but not control) the defense of any stockholder litigation against the Company and its directors relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any Voting Agreement at Parent's sole cost and expense. In addition, subject to Section 6.3, the Company will not voluntarily cooperate with any Third Party which has sought or may hereafter seek to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any Voting Agreement and will reasonably cooperate with Parent to resist any such effort to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any Voting Agreement.

        8.7.    Confidentiality Agreements.    The parties acknowledge that the Company and the Parent entered into the Confidentiality Agreement, which Confidentiality Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms until the earlier of (a) the Effective Time or (b) the expiration of the Confidentiality Agreement according to its terms. Subject to Section 6.3 hereto, without the prior written consent of Parent, neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary will waive or fail to enforce any provision of any confidentiality or similar agreement which the Company or any Company Subsidiary has entered into in connection with any completed or proposed business combination relating to the Company or such Company Subsidiary.

        8.8.    Financing Arrangements.    

A-54

A-55

        8.9.    Investigation and Agreement by Parent and Acquiror; No Other Representations or Warranties.    

A-56


ARTICLE 9

CONDITIONS TO MERGER

        9.1.    Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party.    The obligations of the Company, Parent and Acquiror to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:

A-57

        9.2.    Conditions to the Obligations of the Company.    The obligations of the Company to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver in writing by the Company of the following further conditions:

        9.3.    Conditions to the Obligations of Parent and Acquiror.    The obligations of Parent and Acquiror to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver in writing by Parent of the following further conditions:

A-58


ARTICLE 10

TERMINATION

        10.1.    Termination.    This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time by written notice, whether before or after the Company Stockholder Approval shall have been obtained:

A-59

A-60

        10.2.    Effect of Termination.    

A-61

then Parent shall pay to the Company (by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account designated by the Company) on the next Business Day following such termination a cash amount equal to $100,000,000 (the "Parent Antitrust Termination Fee").

then, in the case of the foregoing clauses (i) through (vi), inclusive, Parent and Acquiror, jointly and severally, agree to pay to the Company (by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account designated by the Company) a cash amount equal to $200,000,000 (the "Parent Breach Termination Fee") on the next Business Day following the date of termination of this Agreement. The parties hereto acknowledge that the agreements contained in this Section 10.2(d) are an integral part of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and that the Parent Breach Termination Fee is not a penalty, but rather is liquidated damages in a reasonable amount that will compensate the Company for the efforts and resources expended and opportunities foregone while negotiating this Agreement and in reliance on this Agreement and on the expectation of the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, and for losses and damages likely to be incurred or suffered as a result of termination in the circumstances described in clauses (i) through (vi) of the preceding sentence, which amount would otherwise be impossible to calculate with precision. Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, if this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 10.1 under circumstances

A-62

where the Parent Breach Termination Fee is payable pursuant to this Section 10.2(d), then subject to the Company's rights pursuant to Section 10.2(e), the Company's right to receipt of payment of the Parent Breach Termination Fee shall be the sole and exclusive remedy against Parent, Acquiror and any of their respective Representatives, Affiliates, directors, officers, employees, partners, managers, members, or stockholders (each, a "Parent Party") for any Company Damages.

        10.3.    Fees and Expenses.    Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, all fees and expenses incurred in connection herewith and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring expenses, whether or not the Merger is consummated.

A-63


ARTICLE 11

MISCELLANEOUS

        11.1.    Notices.    All notices, requests and other communications to any party hereunder shall be in writing (including facsimile or similar writing) and shall be given,

or such other address or facsimile number as a party may hereafter specify for the purpose by notice to the other parties hereto. Each notice, request or other communication shall be effective only (a) if given by facsimile, when the facsimile is transmitted to the facsimile number specified in this Section and the appropriate facsimile confirmation is received or (b) if given by overnight courier or personal delivery, when delivered at the address specified in this Section.

        11.2.    Survival.    None of the representations, warranties and, except as provided in the following sentence, covenants and agreements contained herein or in any instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall survive the Effective Time. Article 3, this Article 11, the agreements of Parent,

A-64


Acquiror and the Company in Sections 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.5, and Section 10.3, Article 11 and those other covenants and agreements contained herein that by their terms apply, or that are to be performed in whole or in part, after the Effective Time shall survive the consummation of the Merger.

        11.3.    Amendments; No Waivers.    

        11.4.    Successors and Assigns.    The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns; provided, however, that all or any of the rights or obligations of Parent or Acquiror may be assigned to any direct or indirect wholly-owned Subsidiary of such party (which assignment shall not relieve such assigning party of its obligations hereunder); provided, further, that other than with respect to the foregoing proviso, no party may assign, delegate or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the consent of the other parties hereto. Any purported assignment in violation hereof shall be null and void.

        11.5.    Counterparts; Effectiveness; Third Party Beneficiaries.    This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original (including any counterpart transmitted by facsimile or other electronic means of transmission), with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. This Agreement shall become effective when each party hereto shall have received counterparts hereof signed by all of the other parties hereto. Except as provided in Sections 7.1, no provision of this Agreement is intended to confer upon any Person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder.

        11.6.    Governing Law.    THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND GOVERNED BY THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS EXECUTED AND FULLY PERFORMED WITHIN THE STATE OF DELAWARE.

        11.7.    Jurisdiction.    EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE THAT ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING SEEKING TO ENFORCE ANY PROVISION OF, OR BASED ON ANY MATTER ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH, THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY SHALL BE BROUGHT IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE (OR, IN THE CASE OF ANY CLAIM AS TO WHICH THE FEDERAL COURTS HAVE EXCLUSIVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) SITTING IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AND EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY CONSENTS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THOSE COURTS (AND OF THE

A-65


APPROPRIATE APPELLATE COURTS THEREFROM) IN ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING AND IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, ANY OBJECTION WHICH IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE LAYING OF THE VENUE OF ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN ANY OF THOSE COURTS OR THAT ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING WHICH IS BROUGHT IN ANY OF THOSE COURTS HAS BEEN BROUGHT IN AN INCONVENIENT FORUM. PROCESS IN ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE SERVED ON ANY PARTY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, WHETHER WITHIN OR WITHOUT THE JURISDICTION OF ANY OF THE NAMED COURTS. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, EACH PARTY AGREES THAT SERVICE OF PROCESS ON IT BY NOTICE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 11.1 SHALL BE DEEMED EFFECTIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS.

        11.8.    Enforcement.    The parties recognize and agree that if for any reason any of the provisions of this Agreement are not performed in accordance with their specific terms or are otherwise breached, immediate and irreparable harm or injury would be caused for which money damages would not be an adequate remedy. Accordingly, each party agrees that, prior to any termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 10.1, but subject to the last sentence of this Section 11.8, the parties shall be entitled to specific performance of the terms hereof. In the event that any action shall be brought in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, no party shall allege, and each hereby waives the defense, that there is an adequate remedy at Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall not be entitled to an injunction to prevent breaches of this Agreement by Parent or Acquiror or to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement if (i) the Company is in material breach of any of its representations, warranties, covenants or obligations under this Agreement or (ii) the Merger has not been consummated due to the reason of a failure of Parent and Acquiror to receive the proceeds of the Financing contemplated by the Commitment Letter and neither Parent nor Acquiror is, nor are they collectively, in material breach of its or their respective representatives, warranties, covenants or obligations under this Agreement so as to cause any of the conditions set forth in Section 9.1 or 9.2 not to be satisfied (other than due to a breach consisting of the failure to consummate the Merger due to the failure to receive the proceeds of the Financing). Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither Parent nor Acquiror shall be entitled to an injunction to prevent breaches of this Agreement by the Company or to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement if either Parent or Acquiror is, or collectively are, in material breach of its or their respective representations, warranties, covenants and obligations under this Agreement so as to cause any of the conditions set forth in Section 9.1 or 9.2 not to be satisfied.

        11.9.    Entire Agreement.    This Agreement (together with the exhibits and schedules hereto), the Voting Agreements and the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, both oral and written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.

        11.10.    Authorship; Representation by Counsel.    The parties agree that the terms and language of this Agreement were the result of negotiations between the parties and, as a result, there shall be no presumption that any ambiguities in this Agreement shall be resolved against any party. Any controversy over construction of this Agreement shall be decided without regard to events of authorship or negotiation. Each of the parties hereto acknowledges that it has been represented by independent counsel of its choice throughout all negotiations that have preceded the execution of this Agreement.

        11.11.    Severability.    If any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of Law or public policy, all other terms and provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner adverse to any party. Upon a determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent

A-66


of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable manner to the end that transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the extent possible.

        11.12.    Waiver of Jury Trial.    EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, ALL RIGHTS TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING, OR COUNTERCLAIM (WHETHER BASED UPON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

        11.13.    Rules of Construction.    

A-67

        11.14.    Affiliate Liability.    Each of the following is herein referred to as a "Company Affiliate" or "Parent Affiliate", as applicable: (i) any direct or indirect holder of equity interests or securities in the Company or Parent, as applicable, (whether limited or general partners, members, stockholders or otherwise), and (ii) any director, officer, employee, representative or agent of (1) the Company or Parent, as applicable, or (2) any Person who controls the Company or Parent, as applicable. Except to the extent that a Company Affiliate is an express party thereto, no Company Affiliate shall have any liability or obligation to Parent or Acquiror of any nature whatsoever in connection with or under this Agreement, the Voting Agreements or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby as a result of such Person's status as a Company Affiliate, and Parent and Acquiror hereby waive and release all claims of any such liability and obligation. Except to the extent that a Parent Affiliate is an express party thereto, no Parent Affiliate shall have any liability or obligation to the Company of any nature whatsoever in connection with or under this Agreement, the Voting Agreements or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby as a result of such Person's status as a Parent Affiliate, and the Company hereby waives and releases all claims of any such liability and obligation.

* * *

A-68

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.

    TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY

 
 
By:
/s/  ROBERT E. SULENTIC    
Name: Robert E. Sulentic
Title: Chairman and CEO

 
 
CB RICHARD ELLIS GROUP, INC.

 
 
By:
/s/  BRETT WHITE    
Name: Brett White
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 
 
A-2 ACQUISITION CORP.

 
 
By:
/s/  BRETT WHITE   
Name: Brett White
Title: President

A-69


Annex B

October 30, 2006              

The Board of Directors
Trammell Crow Company
2001 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75201

Dear Members of the Board:

        We understand that Trammell Crow Company (the "Company"), CB Richard Ellis Inc. ("Parent"), and Trammell Crow Acquisition Corp., a corporation wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by Parent ("Acquiror"), have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 30, 2006 (the "Agreement"), which provides, among other things, for the merger (the "Merger") of the Acquiror with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving corporation. Pursuant to the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company ("Company Shares"), other than Company Shares held by the Company as treasury stock or owned by Parent or any Subsidiary of Parent or any holder who is entitled to demand and properly demands appraisal of such shares, will be converted into the right to receive in cash from the Acquiror, without interest, an amount equal to $49.51 (the "Merger Consideration"). The terms and conditions of the Merger are more fully set out in the Agreement, and capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings as defined in the Agreement.

        You have requested our opinion as of the date hereof as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the Holders of Company Shares (as defined below) of the Merger Consideration to be paid to the Holders of Company Shares pursuant to the Agreement. For purposes of this opinion "Holders of Company Shares" means all holders of Company Shares (including Restricted Shares) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Date, other than the Company, Parent or any Subsidiary of Parent and any holder who is entitled to demand and properly demands appraisal rights.

        In connection with this opinion, we have:


        We have relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the foregoing information and have not assumed any responsibility for any independent verification of such information or any independent

B-1

valuation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities of the Company or concerning the solvency or fair value of the Company. With respect to financial forecasts, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of the Company as to the future financial performance of the Company. We assume no responsibility for and express no view as to such forecasts or the assumptions on which they are based.

        Further, our opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. We assume no responsibility for updating or revising our opinion based on circumstances or events occurring after the date hereof. We do not express any opinion as to the prices at which the Company Shares will trade at any time subsequent to the announcement of the Merger.

        In rendering our opinion, you have advised us, and we have assumed, that the Merger will be consummated on the terms described in the Agreement, without any waiver or modification of any material terms or conditions by the Company. We have also assumed that obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for the Merger will not have an adverse effect on the Company or the Merger. We do not express any opinion as to any tax or other consequences that might result from the Merger, nor does our opinion address any legal, tax, regulatory or accounting matters, as to which we understand that the Company obtained such advice as it deemed necessary from qualified professionals.

        Lazard Frères & Co. LLC is acting as investment banker to the Company in connection with the Merger and will receive a fee for our services which is payable upon the closing of the Merger. We have in the past provided investment banking services to the Company unrelated to the Merger for which we have received customary fees. In addition, in the ordinary course of their respective businesses, affiliates of Lazard and LFCM Holdings LLC (an entity indirectly owned in large part by managing directors of Lazard), may actively trade the securities of the Company and/or the securities of Parent for their own accounts and for the accounts of their customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

        In rendering our opinion, we were not authorized to broadly solicit and we did not so solicit other parties regarding a potential transaction with the Company, nor were we requested to consider, and our opinion does not address, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any other transaction in which the Company might engage. Lazard notes that due to the limited number of public companies that are comparable to the Company, the limited number of transactions in the Company's industry, the lack of disclosure regarding transactions involving private companies in the Company's industry and the cyclicality in the industry, Lazard was unable to perform a meaningful precedent transactions analysis. In addition, with your consent, we have analyzed the Company's minority interest in Savills PLC based on the closing price of Savills ordinary shares on October 27, 2006, after giving effect to estimated taxes payable upon a sale of such shares.

        Our engagement and the opinion expressed herein are for the benefit of the Company's board of directors in connection with its consideration of the Merger and are not on behalf of, and are not intended to confer rights or remedies upon, the Parent, any stockholders of the Company or the Parent or any other person. Our opinion does not address the merits of the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the Merger and is not intended to and does not constitute a recommendation to any Holder of Company Shares as to how such Holder of Company Shares should vote with respect to the Merger or any matter relating thereto.

B-2


        Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration to be paid to the Holders of Company Shares pursuant to the Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Holders of Company Shares.

    Very truly yours,

 
 
LAZARD FRÈRES & CO. LLC

 
 
By:
/s/  DOUGLAS TAYLOR    
Douglas Taylor
Managing Director

B-3

ANNEX C

DELAWARE CORPORATION LAW

        SECTION 262.    Appraisal Rights.    

        (a)   Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the stockholder's shares of stock under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section, the word "stockholder" means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words "stock" and "share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and the words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.

        (b)   Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to § 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to § 251(g) of this title), § 252, § 254, § 257, § 258, § 263 or § 264 of this title:

C-1

        (c)   Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.

        (d)   Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:

C-2

        (e)   Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections (a) and (d) hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholder's written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) hereof, whichever is later.

        (f)    Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1 or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.

        (g)   At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.

        (h)   After determining the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court shall appraise the shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment

C-3


or expectation of the merger or consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate of interest, the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate of interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of the proceeding. Upon application by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, permit discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such stockholder's certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.

        (i)    The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto. Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court may direct. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.

        (j)    The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.

        (k)   From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such stockholder's demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just.

        (l)    The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.

C-4

Trammell Crow Company    
c/o National City Bank    
Shareholder Services Operations
LOC 5352		    
P. O. Box 94509
Cleveland, OH 44101-4509
  
VOTE BY TELEPHONE
    Have your proxy card available when you call Toll-Free 1-888-693-8683 using a touch-tone phone and follow the simple instructions to record your vote.
   
VOTE BY INTERNET
    Have your proxy card available when you access the website www.cesvote.com and follow the simple instructions to record your vote.
   
VOTE BY MAIL
    Please mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided or return it to: National City Bank, P.O. Box 535300, Pittsburgh PA 15253-9837.
Vote by Telephone
Call Toll-Free using a
touch-tone telephone:
 1-888-693-8683
  
Vote by Internet
Access the Website and
cast your vote:
 www.cesvote.com
  
Vote by Mail
Return your proxy
in the postage-paid
envelope provided

Vote 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Your telephone or Internet vote must be received by 6:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time
on December 18, 2006 to be counted in the final tabulation.

If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
   
   
         
         
   
   

Proxy card must be signed and dated below.
Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY   PROXY

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD DECEMBER 18, 2006

The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Robert E. Sulentic, J. Christopher Kirk and Derek R. McClain his or her true and lawful agents and proxies, with full power of substitution in each, to represent the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, and to vote the Common Stock of Trammell Crow Company held of record by the undersigned on the record date at the Special Meeting of Stockholders of Trammell Crow Company to be held at The Fairmont Hotel, 1717 North Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75201, on December 18, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, on all matters coming before said meeting.

Any Proxy, when properly granted, will be voted in the manner directed and will authorize the Proxies to take action in their discretion upon other matters that may properly come before the meeting. If no direction is made, your Proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors. Proxies are authorized to vote upon matters incident to the conduct of the meeting such as approval of one or more adjournments of the meeting for the purpose of obtaining additional stockholder votes.


 
 
Dated: _____________________________, 2006

 
 
Signature

 
 
Signature if held jointly
Note: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Special Meeting of Stockholders, you can be sure your shares are represented at the meeting by promptly returning your proxy in the enclosed envelope.

Proxy card must be signed and dated on the reverse side.
Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing.

TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY   PROXY

You are encouraged to specify your vote by marking the appropriate box BELOW but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendation, which is FOR the proposal to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 30, 2006 (as it may be amended from time to time, the "merger agreement"), by and among Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("CBRE"), and A-2 Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation indirectly wholly-owned by CBRE, and FOR the proposal to approve the adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies to establish a quorum or if there are insufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve and adopt the merger agreement. The Proxy cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this card or grant your proxy by telephone or the Internet in accordance with the instructions provided. Any Proxy may be revoked in writing at any time prior to the voting thereof.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND FOR PROPOSAL 2.

1.
To approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 30, 2006 (as it may be amended from time to time), by and among Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("CBRE"), and A-2 Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation indirectly wholly-owned by CBRE ("Merger Sub"), pursuant to which, upon the merger becoming effective, each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (other than shares held in the treasury of the Company or owned by CBRE, Merger Sub or any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE or the Company and other than shares held by stockholders who have properly demanded statutory appraisal rights, if any) will be converted into the right to receive $49.51 in cash, without interest.

o    FOR                                        o    AGAINST                                        o    ABSTAIN

2.
To approve the adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies to establish a quorum or if there are insufficient votes at the time of the meeting to approve and adopt the merger agreement.

o    FOR                                        o    AGAINST                                        o    ABSTAIN

(Continued, and to be signed, on the reverse side)